can't trust any of it. So that's the difference between being experienced and not experienced.

So you can sell climate change to young people because they do not yet know that all the important data is fake. They don't know that. But once you know that everything that matters to policy and to money is fake or at least you shouldn't trust it then everything looks different suddenly.

All right so there are three different arguments at least why it's fake. So one of them is that the raw number might be realish but the people who got the jobs are coming in from other countries and the people who got the jobs are mostly government hiring. So there was massive government hiring. Oh that's a big coincidence right before the election. And there was a lot of people took part-time jobs. So basically the jobs numbers even if the data was correct the way you would interpret it could be opposite of the number. So the interpretation would be hey jobs are way up. Good news everybody. Great job Democrats. Or let's look at the details of these numbers. Wait a minute all the jobs went to people who were not even citizens who just came in the country this year. Oh that's the worst thing in the world. Well it's not the worst thing in the world but it's bad. So you can't even tell if the job report is good or bad for somebody who's a citizen. That's how bad our data is. You can't even tell.

Well CNN's Harry Enten is talking about the poll results on CNN and he says quote so there's no historical precedent for the White House party winning another term in the White House when just 28 percent of the country think we're on the right track. And said simply put it would be historically unprecedented.

Huh. So under the current conditions if Kamala Harris was judged the winner on Election Day Harry Enten of CNN has told us that we shouldn't believe it was real. Am I misinterpreting this? Harry Enten is saying that it would be unprecedented and there would be no history of this ever happening in the United States for somebody with such a low rating for being on the right track would ever get reelected. So doesn't that automatically mean that if Harris does get judged the winner on Election Day that a reasonable citizen would say there must be fraud because this is so far under the historical norm that we can't certify this, right? Am I wrong?

Now one of the reasons that people didn't believe the 2020 election is that there, I believe you have to give me a fact check on this but I think there were some bellwether situations, you know places where the vote always goes a certain way and you can rely on it, where it didn't. And only in the kind of critical places where it made a difference. To me that's pretty good evidence of fraud. It's not proof. It's not proof. But I would say if Harry Enten has told us a few weeks before the election then nobody can get elected with these numbers and then they do, how am I supposed to interpret that? How am I supposed to interpret that somebody gets elected with numbers that you can't get elected with? Do we say well I guess history certainly surprised us this time? I might but it's far more likely I'm going to suspect something was wrong with the election.

Well I would say the rigging has already begun and maybe is already done and has determined that Harris will win.

So the Amuse account which is really high value account on X, if you're not following the account on X called Amuse, just one word Amuse, you're missing some of the best independent reporting. I mean it's a level above anything you're going to see on TV news. And I don't even know who's behind it exactly because it's sort of anonymous. But I get some of my best stuff just from that one account on X. Amuse. The other one that's similarly good is George. Follow those two. George is great. I don't know who's backing George but wow he's got quite an operation going.

So here's what we know. So we know we've got the potential election weakness because if you're voting overseas you don't need to show that you're a citizen. You don't need to show your address or even your ID. And here's what the Amuse account tells us. That between 2016 and 2020 that there was a big increase in non-military overseas ballots. So I guess we can tell fairly easily how many military people are overseas and that number stayed about the same but the non-military people skyrocketed in numbers of people who voted in 2020. Why would that be? Did a lot of people move overseas between 2016 and 2020 for non-military r