easons? I'm not aware of that.

And of those votes coming in that were just the overseas ones that are non-military, how many of them do you think voted for Biden in Fulton County and Maricopa? Those are the ones that we have the most questions about. Well according to Amuse the Fulton County numbers, the votes for Biden that came in from this suspicious overseas unverified bunch of voters, that 100 percent of them went for Biden. 100 percent. Now you know that's not possible, right? That is proof of rigging. That's not a suspicion. That would be proof. That would be proof.

How about Maricopa? 74 percent for Biden. Do you think there's anybody from you know you could take any group of Maricopa people and get 74 percent for Biden? No. Now these numbers if they're true, remember data is always suspicious but if it's true then we know exactly one of the big sources of cheating. So if you're wondering hey was there cheating in 2020? Yeah there it is. There it is. If the data is true. If the data is true I would call that citizen level proof. Meaning that I don't know what a court would say because a court would probably need you to track down every vote and check the ID and stuff like this. But on a citizen level like what do you and I decide is evidence versus proof. To me this is proof if the data is true, right? I'll still put an if on it. You always have to wonder if the data sources are good. But if the data is true yeah this is proof that the election was rigged and that they plan to do it again.

There's an FBI whistleblower according to the Gateway Pundit that says the FBI is planning to have their own agents undercover, I think undercover I'm not sure they said undercover, but they would be monitoring the Maricopa County polling stations to monitor the Trump voters. You thought I was going to say the FBI was going to monitor the election to make sure the election was fair, right? No they're going to monitor the monitors. They're going to monitor the Republicans.

Now let's game this out. Let's say you are an attorney and an election monitor. You've been trained by the Lara Trump, Whatley group and you're trained to be a good observer. And suddenly you see something that looks suspicious and you go to everybody and say hey hey I'm an observer this is suspicious. You know we need to keep an eye on this or whatever we need to do. What happens then? Well the Democrats of course push back and they push and they push but it's kind of a fair fight. You've got some attorneys that are trained to do this so that's pretty powerful. But the Democrats are going to push back hard and they're pretty powerful. So at least you got a fair fight. Okay so that's the situation without the FBI there.

Now imagine the same situation but the FBI there are to make sure the observers don't get out of hand. So the observers say hey hey we just saw something in that batch. You got to stop everything till we look at it. Democrats say no no no. And then the FBI walks in says what are you talking about? And the Republicans say this batch looks bad. Can you help us? You know we'll make sure this one's guarded. And then the FBI says nah I think it looks fine. The Democrats say it looks fine. And then what does the lawyer do? The trained lawyer observer do? Well the trained lawyer observer is outranked now because you're not going to not do what the FBI tells you if you're a lawyer. I mean most lawyers. So to me it looks like they're just adding muscle so that the Democrats can hide anything they want and the observers won't have enough clout to make sure that they can check it when it needs to get checked.

So to me it looks like now you could say but Scott this is not proven in any court. No I'm as a citizen I'm using my own standards for what I would consider proven versus alleged or hypothetical. To me if you put the FBI in there to watch only the Trump observers that would be a rigged election in at least in that way it would be rigged.

Now keep in mind this comes from a whistleblower. I don't know if the whistleblower was anonymous. If it's an anonymous whistleblower we'll give it the same treatment as the Trump hoax which is anonymous doesn't count. Anonymous is not evidence. But if he gave his name and we know who he is or he's at least given his name to law enforcement or something maybe. So keep an eye on that one.

Mark Andreessen, famous investor in Silicon Valley, one of the big names there, he teaches us something called the iron law of oligarchy. I've never heard this bef