ore but it matches what I've believed. And it says that so there's something called the iron law of oligarchy and what it says is that all forms of organizations no matter how democratic will turn into oligarchies. Thus democracy is practically and theoretically impossible.

Yes that is correct. If you have a democracy in a free market it's inevitable and unavoidable that some people will succeed more than others. So far you all agree that's just what a free market is. And then once those people get rich they will of course look at ways to stay rich and they will look at ways to increase their advantage. And they'll look around at other rich people and say you know if you and I agreed we'd be way more powerful than if it were just one of us. And they don't even need to say the words because they all know what's good for them and it's probably good for you too fat cat. And then suddenly the oligarchies have so much money and power that they start running the show and that democracy becomes just a window covering or something that makes the citizens feel they're participating but really not.

Does that sound like America? Yes yeah that's America. I don't believe there's any such thing as an actual functioning democracy. And if there is it's a temporary thing because yeah to me this is an iron law. I don't believe it's possible to have a long-term democracy republic situation. I think it just devolves into really the fat cats are in charge and the citizens are diverted into thinking the voting makes a difference.

So this is closely related to my observation that no government can survive free speech and that's why we don't have it and never will. Now you thought you had free speech for most of your life but really you only had the free speech to say things that the mainstream would agree with. Otherwise you were in trouble. It didn't have to be the government. So we watched the government using social media platforms and foreign entities to censor things in the United States and it seems to pass the test of not violating the First Amendment. But we don't have free speech. I mean be real. We don't have anything like free speech. Ask Nicole Shanahan. She had free speech, went from being a Democrat to an independent and suddenly the pressure from other citizens because they've been brainwashed by whom, what? Why is it that Nicole Shanahan gets so much bad treatment from Democrats when she leaves the Democrat field? Is it because those Democrats have free will and they thought it out and they thought that was a good way to act? Nope. They have been literally brainwashed to not tolerate certain kinds of speech and so they acted out that way thinking it was their own opinions. It was not their own opinions. They were brainwashed and those opinions were assigned to them.

So as long as your government can control the media it can assign opinions to people. And part of its assignment is that you know here's one of the opinions I'm going to assign to you. Even though we have this thing called free speech you can't say that stuff. So you can't say stuff that's true if it disagrees with what we're trying to push on people like the pandemic situation. And you can't say something that would be bad for somebody because they even made up a thing that the Constitution has something about hate speech. It doesn't. So hate speech is completely legal under First Amendment. But there was a poll that showed that women and especially young women think that the Constitution already makes it illegal to do hate speech. Which makes it really easy for Democrats to blame people for hate speech and then get rid of their speech because they've already convinced two-thirds of women that that's a legal and valid constitutional thing. It's not. It's the opposite. It's not legal or valid to monitor or stop some of your speech if you're the government. If you're the government it's not appropriate.

So here's a reframe that I hadn't heard until this morning that's really breaking my brain. So this is a Mike Benz again. Mike Benz is, I'm gonna say this as clearly as I can, if you're not following Mike Benz you really don't know what's going on because the stuff he does is not in the news and it's so well sourced and so well communicated you end up listening to it and going oh wow I didn't know that.

All right here's one of those. So you know that all these dangerous looking people are coming across the border and you're seeing all these military age looking people from different countries. It's not even one country. It's not Mexico. It's from all over the world. All these military age people. And then we heard that there's a whole bunch of people that are allegedly on the national security list. You know there's something about them that automatically makes them look like a national security risk probably where they came from. And you're saying to yourself how in the world is our government letting this happen?

Well here's a spin. If you haven't heard this this is going to blow your freaking mind. First of all you do know that the United States has for decades and decades tried to control as many other countries as possible to have influence over their government, to do coups, to have protests. So basically America has tried with every mechanism they can from military to financial to covert to control every country we can because the more we control them the more business we can do. So the oligarchy needs control over other countries to get raw materials and also to have markets. So really our CIA is sort of an extension of our commercial enterprises. It just makes sure that they're softening up these markets and the sources of raw materials so that it's good for the free market basically good for America specifically.

So as part of that process there's a lot of training of rebels who might want to take over their own country with American support. So we got 1.7 million migrants who could pose some national security risk according to the GOP Judiciary Committee. And Mike Benz says this and my mind is completely blown by this by the way. You have to listen to this carefully. Mike Benz if you follow my streams you know why. So you know why that all these dangerous men are coming into the country. Yes sometimes it's recklessness and negligence. So a lot of it could just be we have bad borders. But most of the time DHS, the Department of Homeland Security, is importing CIA and Department of Defense backed paramilitary gangs and their families because they're quote our guys in regime change ops in their countries of origin. Haiti, Venezuela, Somalia etc.

Democrats support the military intelligence op on political grounds because they think it's changing the voter demographics while Republicans support the military intelligence op on commercial grounds because this is how you get your cheap labor in other countries and cheap resources.

So here's what I hate about this point of view. It explains everything. It explains everything that I don't know how completely accurate it is. I'm willing to bet based on Mike Benz's credibility that there's some of that in the mix. The question I don't know and he's not giving us an estimate because he wouldn't know either is what percentage of it is our guys. Meaning people that were trying to influence maybe to send them back or maybe because they already did something for us and we're protecting them. But apparently there's some big secret part of why so many men are coming into the country.

Now I would love to think that our CIA and Department of Defense are so capable that the dangerous looking people that are coming in a