s to fail, how could they possibly recover? And they can't tell the media that the media is the problem because then the media won't invite them to be on anymore. It's an unsolvable problem. Yeah, I can't see any system or tweak or anything. The only way you could solve this problem is replacing all of the people at the same time, and of course there isn't any way to do that.

All right. Colin Rugg had a little video and a post on X about Washington Post's Jennifer Rubin. She was mocking Trump's because his nominations were too white. And she said when they looked at the page of the nominations there were a thousand shades of white. Ha. She said I have to comment. When he put up all those faces, it was a thousand shades of white. Have you noticed that?

Well, I'd like to do a call out to one of my followers, Mike Bert. Mike Bert, what are you going to say about that? That's sort of an inside joke, right? We have within Locals, I've authorized one person to be inappropriate as much as he wants, you know, not too bad. But so we have one court jester who's allowed to say the things you really shouldn't be saying, but we've allowed one person to do it because it's actually fascinating. If you cut yourself off from the opinions that differ from you, you're not going to understand the nuance. But this was funny for reasons that you won't totally understand.

But I would note that they're not entirely white. I think there are some Asian Americans, there are some other flavors, and there's some Hispanic Americans. I think there's at least one. Some Middle Eastern American type. And Scott Turner was selected for head of HUD. So HUD has a black guy who was part of the executive team over there I guess, and he's got a good resume. Now what do you think? Do you think that the HUD appointment was a DEI appointment just so he could just so Trump could say well they're not 100% white? Well I don't know. I don't know. I also don't know if HUD needs to exist. Can anybody tell me why HUD exists? Is there anything that HUD does that couldn't be replaced by something far more efficient? I think they have tens of billions of dollars of funding that they kind of allocate, but couldn't that be allocated more locally?

So here's my take on what's wrong with every urban development problem. So somebody says if only there were a big bunch of money. And then somebody says all right, here's your big bunch of money from the government. And then it's allocated to people who apparently just steal most of it. How do you stop that? So if you have a system that's good at producing money and delivering it, but then once it gets delivered it's stolen somewhat reliably or it's given to the wrong vendors who can't get the job done, you're never really going to fix it.

So it seems like that what we need is to fix the funding oversight. I feel like the decision of how to spend money locally should be not in the hands of the elected representatives. And I know that sounds