Episode 2669 CWSA 11/24/24
Democrats still confused why they lost, Republicans surging ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ If you would like to enjoy this same content plus bonus content from Scott Adams, including micro-lessons on lots of useful topics to build your talent stack, please see scottadams.locals.com for full access to that secret treasure.
Showing you once again that some live streamers don't take days off. No, sometimes you just have to power through it. And just make sure my comments are working here. Yes they are. And that means an incredible show is ahead of y
View segment →ou. Good morning everybody, and welcome to the highlight of human civilization, probably the best day you'll ever have in your life. But if you'd like to take this experience up to levels that nobody can even understand with their tiny shiny human brains, all you need for that is a cup or mug or gl…
View segment →he day, the thing that makes everything better. It's called the simultaneous sip, and it happens now. Oh, perfect. Yeah, it's just perfect. Well, good news. Researchers from China and Brazil have finally given us the invention we need. It's a robot dog that can search for fire ants. So if you have…
View segment →could have my own little mini garden with a little mini gardener, and every day I'd just go in there and there'd be a basket of whatever the latest harvest was. And then I give it to my robot chef, and my robot chef would cook it up for me, and I would just have the best food from robots. That's the…
View segment →hing. I don't know if that's ever going to happen, but if this silk can cancel noise, it sure seems like you could make some earplugs out of it, and that would change everything. Do you know one of the biggest secrets in America, and I'm guessing it's the same in other countries, is the number of m…
View segment →iness school scandal that just keeps getting bigger. And the scandal is professors at the business school writing academic papers that are fraudulent. Let's see, what terrible business school has that? I mean, I'd sure hate to have a degree. Can you imagine having a degree from one of these crappy b…
View segment →got caught. According to the New York Post, gun ownership has soared among Republican women but it's declined among Democrat men. So there are fewer Democrat men with guns, and there are more Republican women with guns than there were recently. I'm surprised by that. I actually thought everybody wou…
View segment →ent. I think everybody would agree with that. But if you're distracted, and maybe I'm just speaking for myself, it's because there's something you're looking for that you need that you don't have. Now that's my take. This is not agreeing with any scientists or anything. I have no idea what the scien…
View segment →me oxytocin, that feel-good "I've got everything I need" chemistry? And that's all it was. So that's my hypothesis, is that it wasn't the physical manipulation or the relaxing, although that should have helped because it pretty much helps with everything. So if it didn't help, I'd be surprised. But…
View segment →nd their fans. But you can't create a sketchy financial product and associate it with my name and my brand and then push me to boost it. Do you understand that you put me at great financial and other risk? Because if other people see the Dilbert name on it, they're going to say, well, that's probabl…
View segment →will accept "I didn't know that was going to be a problem." That would be perfectly acceptable. I just can't have it exist, so you need to get rid of it. Got that? All right, so I didn't even want to talk about it, but stay away from that thing. All right. Here's a study from Gilmore Health News.…
View segment →what you should be doing, even if it doesn't look like this specific date is working out. You're chasing meaning. That's still good. If you're chasing meaning 80% of the time and then 20% of the time you're chasing pleasure, you're going to be fine. If you chased pleasure 80% of the time, you're goi…
View segment →others couldn't. But here's one possibility: that the aliens from Mars or somewhere else who were very advanced got stranded on Earth. So they didn't have the technology to get off of Earth and get home, but they thought that someday they'd like to be found. So they used the technology they had to b…
View segment →crime? Is there some kind of crime you can help somebody do and you're not in trouble? Does operating from another soil make you safe if you're doing it from another country? Is that enough to not be illegal? And if it's legal, why is our CIA not having them assassinated? Because isn't that what we…
View segment →open to what it is that I don't know, and I think you've watched the show enough to watch me change on the fly when a comment comes in and says, oh, you forgot this or you're not looking at this. So do some of that and I'll actually be happy for it. But this, you're making yourself look ignorant. I…
View segment →Moyn, a lawyer. He said it wasn't bad luck. They did not put Trump in jail. Well, I'm paraphrasing that part. He said, quote, the more uncomfortable truth is that our search for political salvation primarily through the law has backfired. Let me read that again. The more uncomfortable truth is that…
View segment →real person with a real vote. So they've been doing that for 18 days, and it looks like they might flip two seats in Congress from red to blue because of 18 days of curing the votes. You're going to feel comfortable with that? 18 days of curing the votes? Yeah, I see there's some kind of a fight go…
View segment →never answered me. And I think I tried a few times. Like, but you know that these couldn't possibly be true stories, right? You know that. I read comic books. You've seen it. You see me reading comic books. What would be the evidence that Spider-Man exists that would be different from the evidence,…
View segment →p the Russian asset. I think Hillary's calling card is she always tries to get a twofer. So Hillary hates Russia and Putin, and often she'll hate somebody else. So if she hates somebody else, she'll just say that they're a Putin puppet so that you can take out the person that you hate but also keep…
View segment →ght there in your job description. It's not even immoral or unethical. It's their job. It's their job to lie to anybody they need to lie to to get the job done. So yes, it does look like CNN's got a little influence there from the quote intelligence sources. I don't believe any non-name sources. I'…
View segment →that everything that you knew about the Republicans was wrong, and that as long as you follow the rules that they follow, they love you. They love you. You just have to follow the same rules. That's it. It's easy. But the progressives are over there trying to decide, huh, should we be progressives?…
View segment →professional male black athletes, putting on the hat and saying you know what, I've listened to both arguments, going Trump. You watch the UFC fighter types, every different race and religion, and you see how much they love Trump. And you say to yourself, huh, that's a lot of people who like Trump,…
View segment →s to fail, how could they possibly recover? And they can't tell the media that the media is the problem because then the media won't invite them to be on anymore. It's an unsolvable problem. Yeah, I can't see any system or tweak or anything. The only way you could solve this problem is replacing all…
View segment →opposite of what makes sense, but if a small city can elect a mayor who then can make sure that the contracts go to their brother-in-law and anybody else who's going to give them a kickback, we don't have a workable system. See that's a system problem again. So what I'd like to see is Vivek and Elo…
View segment →ds around my teenage kid, and maybe those friends will influence them. Now that would be a real solution. But sending money? No. I mean if Trump decided that HUD didn't really have a future, I wouldn't be surprised anyway. I saw Chamath talking about on the All-In Pod. Chamath, I think I say his na…
View segment →Showing you once again that some live streamers don't take days off. No, sometimes you just have to power through it. And just make sure my comments are working here. Yes they are. And that means an incredible show is ahead of you.
Good morning everybody, and welcome to the highlight of human civilization, probably the best day you'll ever have in your life. But if you'd like to take this experience up to levels that nobody can even understand with their tiny shiny human brains, all you need for that is a cup or mug or glass, a tanker, a stein, a canteen, jug or flask, a vessel of any kind. Fill it with your favorite liquid, like coffee, and join me now for the unparalleled pleasure, the dopamine hit of the day, the thing that makes everything better. It's called the simultaneous sip, and it happens now.
Oh, perfect. Yeah, it's just perfect.
Well, good news. Researchers from China and Brazil have finally given us the invention we need. It's a robot dog that can search for fire ants. So if you have a big problem with fire ants, you've got a robot dog solution that's coming that can recognize fire ants and do what with them? I don't know. Just spot them, I guess, so you can go kill them.
Now what I want is a robo dog that can pick weeds and also pick vegetables and stuff from a garden. So what I want to have is, on the side of my house, I want to have a little hothouse, you know, greenhouse kind of thing. And I want to have two or three little robots that have access to everything, that can climb up and pick stuff and get rid of weeds and water things and check for problems. And it'd be smarter than I am, right? If I looked at the leaf and it was dying, I wouldn't know why, but AI would know why and then it could go fix it.
So in theory I could have my own little mini garden with a little mini gardener, and every day I'd just go in there and there'd be a basket of whatever the latest harvest was. And then I give it to my robot chef, and my robot chef would cook it up for me, and I would just have the best food from robots. That's the future.
Well, meanwhile at MIT, according to a report, MIT has developed some noise cancelling silk. So it's a sort of a fabric material that has two different elements to it. At least two. There are two different aspects to it. Both of them will reduce sound. And I'm thinking to myself, if you could make a piece of silk that people could stick in their ears and not hear their partner snoring, now you've got something. I don't know if that's ever going to happen, but if this silk can cancel noise, it sure seems like you could make some earplugs out of it, and that would change everything.
Do you know one of the biggest secrets in America, and I'm guessing it's the same in other countries, is the number of married people who can't sleep in the same room? It just isn't possible because one of them snores. You really can't sleep with a snorer. I learned that the hard way by being the snorer. Yeah, nobody wants to sleep with a snorer.
Anyway, here's a funny story. According to the Atlantic, Daniel Engber is writing that there's this business school scandal that just keeps getting bigger. And the scandal is professors at the business school writing academic papers that are fraudulent. Let's see, what terrible business school has that? I mean, I'd sure hate to have a degree. Can you imagine having a degree from one of these crappy business schools that you find out the professors are all a bunch of, see what business school was it? It was the UC Berkeley Haas School of Business. Okay, that's where I have my MBA, but the joke's on them because also I disown them for being racist already, so I don't have to disown them for also having professors who are big liars. I already disavowed them for being racist. Oh, poor Haas School of Business.
Anyway, there was one professor in particular who's just racking up the fake studies and got caught. According to the New York Post, gun ownership has soared among Republican women but it's declined among Democrat men. So there are fewer Democrat men with guns, and there are more Republican women with guns than there were recently. I'm surprised by that. I actually thought everybody would have more guns, but apparently the men have decided they don't need them, but the Republican women are strapped.
Since 2019, 33% of GOP ladies have been packing heat. Is that true? Is that true that one third of Republican women are gun owners? That's way more than I thought. I would guess 10%. It's pretty impressive. That's up from 22% a few years earlier than that. Pretty impressive.
Meanwhile, here's the creepiest of all scientific studies. Are you ready for the creepiest of all scientific studies? I almost wasn't even going to talk about it, but I think I can do it without going to jail. So there was a study. Eric Dolan is writing about this in PsyPost. So a study published in Complementary Therapies and Clinical Practice, which of course you all read that, children who have ADHD can be benefited by massage. So they made sure they had very professional, this is key, professional massage therapists. And it didn't say so in the study, but I'm going to like to think that they were closely monitored by observers, because I hate to think that they were putting a bunch of children behind a closed door with a massage therapist. I hope that didn't happen.
But assuming that they were properly supervised and there was nothing iffy about the experiment itself, what they believe they found is that the kids who got regular massage therapy slept better and concentrated and did better in school.
Now, do you know who would have guessed that without a study? I would. Do you know why I think this worked? Because here's just a speculation. I feel like there's something about ADHD that we don't fully understand. Well, I guess that's an understatement. I think everybody would agree with that. But if you're distracted, and maybe I'm just speaking for myself, it's because there's something you're looking for that you need that you don't have. Now that's my take. This is not agreeing with any scientists or anything. I have no idea what the scientists say. But my take, whenever I'm distracted, is not so much that there's just too much in my head. It's that I'm aware that there's something I need that I don't have, and I'm looking for it, but I don't know what it is. So I don't know if I have it yet, so I'm just sort of looking all the time.
But what I've discovered is, and I told you this before, that if I get a good exercise and it fulfills my, I don't know, my body's chemical needs, then my brain is fine. Then my brain calms down. So are you surprised that a massage, which would have similar benefits to getting some good exercise, would also calm the brain? It should. But I would also add this second thing. In my own experience, that when I've got a good dose of oxytocin, which you can only get from physical contact with other humans, that I don't need much else. So if you give me oxytocin, I'm not immediately thinking about working harder or exercising or solving a problem. I actually have everything I want. I just sit there thinking, oh, it's a good day. I've got everything I want. Glass of water. It's all I need.
So what I'm wondering is, did the massage therapy give the youngsters some oxytocin, that feel-good "I've got everything I need" chemistry? And that's all it was. So that's my hypothesis, is that it wasn't the physical manipulation or the relaxing, although that should have helped because it pretty much helps with everything. So if it didn't help, I'd be surprised. But maybe the bigger thing is that people don't have enough oxytocin.
So here's what I would study to find out. I take a bunch of kids who have ADHD, and then I would ask them questions like, when was the last time you got hugged? Because I'll bet you'll find that the kids with ADHD probably get hugged less, and they had less oxytocin. Just a guess. It's speculation. Pure speculation.
All right, I see a weird meme going by with Dilbert and a Tesla. Okay, anyway, there's a topic I don't know if I want to talk about, but I might. Yeah, I'm going to. I'm just going to go for it. So I wasn't going to talk about this, but I will. So somebody that I don't know who it is says they are fans of Dilbert and fans of mine have created a crypto that I guess is called a Dilbert, and they've asked me to promote it. I'm not doing that. I'm asking them to take it down and dismantle it if there's any way to do that. I don't know if you can reverse it.
Here's why. Well, on one hand I take it as a great compliment that somebody wanted to boost Dilbert somehow and boost me and their fans. But you can't create a sketchy financial product and associate it with my name and my brand and then push me to boost it. Do you understand that you put me at great financial and other risk? Because if other people see the Dilbert name on it, they're going to say, well, that's probably endorsed by Scott, and therefore it's probably safe. He probably looked into it. I did not look into it, and I have no idea that it is safe, and I'm not even sure who's behind it.
So no, I do not endorse it, and I need it to be taken down and dismantled immediately, because I don't want to be in a position where my reputation and my brand is riding on the good work and honesty of people I've never met in the sketchiest of all realms, the shitcoin crypto area. So if you would please stop spamming all of my comments on X and on my live streams trying to get people to buy this token, I will advise everybody who's listening: do not buy this token. And if you did, I'm sorry, but I had nothing to do with it, and it would be a huge mistake to be involved with it in any way.
Now, if it turned out that it's completely legit and somebody was just doing me a favor, it doesn't change my response, because you don't get to decide what I'm associated with, right? It's not your decision that I'm associated with this financial product. My decision is I'm going to sue the out of you if you don't take it down, because I can't abide with that being up. So you need to dismantle it. And if you're just fans, then no hard feelings if you didn't know. I will accept "I didn't know that was going to be a problem." That would be perfectly acceptable. I just can't have it exist, so you need to get rid of it. Got that?
All right, so I didn't even want to talk about it, but stay away from that thing.
All right. Here's a study from Gilmore Health News. Pursuing happiness as a goal often fails to make people happier. Here's why I think that makes sense. The reason you can't pursue happiness is it's not a thing. You can't pursue happiness. You could pursue a wild animal. You could pursue a ball that's rolling down a hill. You could pursue a car. You could pursue a dog, because those are all real. But happiness, you can't pursue. You could end up happy, but you can't pursue happiness.
There are two things you can pursue that'll get you there. You can pursue meaning. Meaning, so you're doing something that's helpful to other people. Usually it's being useful. You're either having children and you're doing a good job of being a parent, or you're doing a job that's important to the world, or you're inventing something, or you're doing what Elon Musk is doing, trying to save the world from debt and or at least the country. And those could give you meaning. But if the only thing you did were hard work, it wouldn't make you very happy either, because you'd just be burned out and there wouldn't be much left of you.
So here's the Scott formula for happiness. You can't chase it. Don't chase it. But you can let it happen by doing other things that are right. So I would say you want to spend about 80% of your time chasing meaning. Now that could include the time it takes you to tie your shoes and put your clothes on and shave in the morning or put your hair together, because that's all important to getting anything done. But the 80% should be making sure that it's directed at some kind of useful something.
Now if you're young, you don't have as many opportunities. So I would say if you're on a dating app and you're trying to date and your ambition is to someday have a family, that's great. Then dating is exactly what you should be doing, even if it doesn't look like this specific date is working out. You're chasing meaning. That's still good. If you're chasing meaning 80% of the time and then 20% of the time you're chasing pleasure, you're going to be fine. If you chased pleasure 80% of the time, you're going to be Dan Bilzerian and eventually say, you know what, turns out that sleeping with five women a day made me a lot of pleasure but not a lot of happiness. So he's trying to figure out the happiness part now.
So 80/20 is your best target. 80% trying to either be part of creating more people, you know, which is good for the world, or doing something useful, and 20% pure pleasure. Now if you don't get your 20% pure pleasure, you just will fall apart. We just require some pleasure every day. If you get too much, you won't be happy. If you get too little, you won't be happy. Happy 80/20 is a good mix. Adjust accordingly.
Well, apparently according to a report, there are ancient hot springs on Mars that reveal that the planet might have been once habitable. Wouldn't it be cool to find out that there was a whole civilization on Mars and that they built the pyramids? Here's my hypothesis on the pyramids. You ready for this? Everything about the pyramids is just recreational belief. I don't know what happened. I don't know why it seemed like all these ancient civilizations could build these giant structures and others couldn't. But here's one possibility: that the aliens from Mars or somewhere else who were very advanced got stranded on Earth. So they didn't have the technology to get off of Earth and get home, but they thought that someday they'd like to be found. So they used the technology they had to build the pyramids, because the pyramids are the proof that high intelligence existed on Earth a long time ago, and you could see them from a very long distance.
So if they wanted to say, well, if somebody can find me someday, I will arrange these pyramids in the shape of the star system I came from. And then if somebody looks and goes, say hey, wait, there's three artificial things. Oh, hold on, they're in the shape of the star system from us. There's no way. These must be our people. Let's go get them. So it could be that the pyramids are a help signal, you know, just something that can be seen from a very far distance from a very advanced civilization to say, whoa, we better go pick those guys up. Of course they're long dead, so it's too late. Just speculation.
All right. Here's something I liked hearing from Vivek Ramaswamy. He's saying that health care is a critical frontier for DOGE, the Department of Government Efficiency. And he met with some of the other incoming appointees from the Trump administration. He says they're serious about reducing cost. And here's the important part. He said they understand innovation is a key part of the solution. Innovation is a key part of the solution. That's what I want to hear. Because if you tell me you're just going to cut my costs, I don't want to hear that, because you probably can't do it. If you tell me you can restructure it, re-engineer it, rethink it in a way that you could almost make your assumptions from scratch and build it up, and that you could do it at a far lower cost, I think you could. I'll bet you could.
You know, I spend a lot of time, just way too much time, thinking about ways you could lower health care costs. And it turns out that the hard part is that 90% of the health care costs come in your last year of life. And if you don't fix that, you can't really fix health care costs. And I don't know if anybody has any great idea for that except for, you know, doctor assisted suicide, and I don't think we're going to go big for that. So I don't have any ideas, but I hope somebody does.
Here's a question in the publication in Red State. Ward Clark is writing about how there are these Soros-backed charities that are really working hard to help illegal immigrants get into the United States. And here's my question. How could it be that there are public entities that are backed by Soros that are not hiding, you know, there's no secret about it, that are aiding and abetting illegal acts in the United States, specifically illegal entry as a non-citizen?
Now my first question is, is there not some normal mechanism by which this could be shut down? How is it not illegal to aid and abet a crime? Is there some kind of crime you can help somebody do and you're not in trouble? Does operating from another soil make you safe if you're doing it from another country? Is that enough to not be illegal? And if it's legal, why is our CIA not having them assassinated? Because isn't that what we pay them to do? If there was some entity that was not in the United States, or even if they were, and they were trying to do something that was terribly damaging to the United States and we couldn't do anything legally, wouldn't we be sending our worst people off to kill those people? Because that's how you protect the United States.
I mean, if you look at all the horrible things the United States has done under the umbrella of self-defense, this would be the smallest thing we've ever done to stop people from sending criminals into our country. Criminals in the sense that they're not going through the legal system. I'm not trying to say anything bad about the immigrants. The immigrants, I completely understand. And I'll say this, I guess I'll say this as plainly as I can. If I were in their position, I would try to get into the United States illegally. So in that same position, I would break the law. I wouldn't feel any guilt about it, because I'm just trying to make things better for myself and my family. So yeah, but it's still illegal. Doesn't mean we can be for it.
Scott, this just makes you sound uninformed. Well, you could use some of those letters to say what it was I was missing, or you could just be one of those dicks who just say you sound uninformed, which helps nobody. So while you're being useless and rude and disruptive, great job there. So you know that 80% of the time where you're trying, working toward meaning, you're not in the 80%. You're not being useful. So how about we stop ever saying "oh, there's something you need to be educated about. If only you were as smart as me, different words would be coming out of your mouth." No. How about you shut the up unless you have something useful to say? Is that okay?
Now I'm completely open to what it is that I don't know, and I think you've watched the show enough to watch me change on the fly when a comment comes in and says, oh, you forgot this or you're not looking at this. So do some of that and I'll actually be happy for it. But this, you're making yourself look ignorant. I just figure you're an idiot. That's the only impression I get when I see that comment. It doesn't matter who it's coming from. From anybody. Somebody here is saying that this is because I didn't get enough sleep last night. You're so right. You're so right. I was telling the locals people I didn't get enough sleep last night. That's mostly what this is about. But it's still bad form. Just don't do it.
Anyway, so I think there should be some way to stop the illegal thing. Now if what you're going to say is, Scott, Scott, you don't understand that the CIA and the government wants them to come in. Was that what you were waiting for? Did you think I didn't know that the government wants them to come in? Oh, you're probably just waiting for the second issue to drop. No, I know that. There's way more than this. Of course I know that. It must be your first day here.
Anyway, have you seen the video? I don't know how old it is. I feel like it maybe has been around a while. But one of the hosts of The View, Sunny Hostin, was on that show where you find out who your relatives were. Your DNA gets checked and then they check your background. And she found out that she was completely wrong about her own background. She thought she was Puerto Rican or half Puerto Rican, but turns out that might have been a Spanish part of the family from Spain, and there were slave owners. That's right. Sunny Hostin of The View comes from a family of slave owners. And watching her learn that she's from a family of slave owners was something I had to watch 20 times in a row. I just kept playing it and replaying it, because there was a part where she tried to laugh about it, but the smile and the laugh was so fake that it was just hilariously uncomfortable. You have to see it. It's in my X feed if you're looking for it. So that was fun.
But even more fun than that, apparently there now have been three separate times in the last week, I'll take a fact check on this, three separate times in the last week when The View had to read a legal disclaimer. So apparently they had to do it four times in Friday's episode. Is that true? Did she have to stop four times and read a legal clarification? I think she did. It's telling me that the lawyers for The View just hate the hosts, because the lawyers are probably trying to figure out how can we stop them saying things that are clearly going to get us in trouble. And the hosts can't stop lying because their entire show is built around lying about what people did. Basically it's a show about lying about Republicans. Basically. So if they can't lie about Republicans, they don't have content, because that's all they have. So the lawyers are like, you can't just lie about their legal situation. You maybe could lie about reading their minds, but you can't lie about whether they were convicted of a crime. You can't lie about that.
So it looks like the legal staff is trying to put The View on a short leash, like actually literally it looks like they're trying to force some amount of honesty, which might be what's happening.
The New York Times has an article by Samuel Moyn, who's a lawyer. Now what's interesting is that this article is in the New York Times, and as others have pointed out, it seems like they're admitting that the lawfare against Trump was not based on the law but was lawfare. So here's a sentence in the New York Times by Samuel Moyn, a lawyer. He said it wasn't bad luck. They did not put Trump in jail. Well, I'm paraphrasing that part. He said, quote, the more uncomfortable truth is that our search for political salvation primarily through the law has backfired. Let me read that again. The more uncomfortable truth is that our search for political salvation primarily through the law has backfired. Is that admitting that they were using lawfare because they didn't have another way to stop Trump? That's how I read it, and others are reading it the same way. And so I appreciate that. I appreciate the complete sincerity of that.
Now Mike Davis, you might know him as a Republican with some legal background, he says even the liberal New York Times is admitting the Democrats ran lawfare and election interference against President Trump, because I guess it would be election interference, wouldn't it? And he says now the Trump Justice Department should open a criminal probe under, and he gives the law, and apparently there's some law that would be a conspiracy against rights. A conspiracy against rights. That sounds exactly like the right law, doesn't it? Does it seem like there was a conspiracy of various elements in the government to prevent Trump from having the right to, first of all, be a free citizen and second of all to run for office?
I mean, without being a lawyer, if you tell me that there is a law that says you can't have a conspiracy to deny somebody their rights guaranteed under the Constitution, the first thing I'd say is, okay, that seems like that should be a law, shouldn't it? I mean it should be a law. So if it is a law, how could you possibly imagine it doesn't apply here? It would clearly apply. And here's a Democrat lawyer who's saying, well, looks like the lawfare didn't work. I feel like what happens after that has to be criminal indictments, because if everybody can see it as plainly as we can, you got to at least dig around there and see if there's a case. I think there might be. But again, I don't want to see any lawfare and revenge. It better be a good case, because we don't want to lawfare the lawfarers. I know some of you want to, but I don't think that's a good place to go.
Apparently there's a study that says 86% of US asylum seekers are not legitimate. So I guess the federal government did a review of that. Now does that surprise you? I thought it was higher, actually. I would have guessed 90 to 95%. But it's interesting that we know about it and we just still keep this program open the way it is. I mean, I think this gets back to that earlier comment that it's super obvious that the government wants to just let in as many people as they can. Like to imagine that this is a mistake, that would be imagining a lot. It's not a mistake. They're using a technical loophole to open the border. That's all that is.
Did you know that California is still counting the votes for 18 days? We're still counting the votes. And believe it or not, Nancy Pelosi's daughter is involved in that, and it's called curing ballots. Now I think that what that means is if you have a ballot that looks like it's filled out wrong or something's missing, you have the option of calling the person and saying, you know, did you mean this? Is this a real vote? Etc. And then you can count it if you can confirm it's a real person with a real vote. So they've been doing that for 18 days, and it looks like they might flip two seats in Congress from red to blue because of 18 days of curing the votes. You're going to feel comfortable with that? 18 days of curing the votes?
Yeah, I see there's some kind of a fight going on on the comments here. Let's see what that's all about. I just want to take a look at what all the fighting's about. All right, I can't see. Never mind.
Well, Elon Musk is having a great time on X. He seems quite addicted to it, which he's admitted today. And he asked this question. He said, how old were you when you realized others couldn't see the Matrix? So I'll ask that question to you. How old were you when you realized others couldn't see the Matrix? Now the way I interpret that is that others, how old were you when you realized that basically everything's a lie? I went with 11.
Have I ever told you my story at age 11? I've written this in my book, so some of you have seen it. You've heard this. Now I will start by saying that I'm pro-religion. Now I think you've heard me say that before. I'm very pro-religion. I think Christianity, and not to pick a favorite but just to pick one as an example, Christianity and others, Judaism, etc., they have a lot of benefits for the people who practice it. Islam, if it's not related to any terrorists or anything, if you're just practicing it happily and minding your own business, probably great. So I'm very pro-religion. I just don't have one, because I don't think you can make yourself a believer. I just don't have an ability to enter that space.
So when I was 11 years old and my parents would send us to Sunday school, it was called. It was a Methodist church. And we would go there and we'd learn all our little Sunday lessons. And one day when I was about 11, the lesson was about Jonah being swallowed by a whale or a giant fish, I guess. And he lived in the whale's stomach for a while, but he prayed and God saved him and the whale spit him up and he was none the worse for being in the whale or the big fish's stomach.
And I remember I called a meeting with my mother, because that's when I realized I was in the Matrix. And I said, Mom, now I'm paraphrasing because obviously I don't remember my exact words at 11, but it was something like, today I learned that a giant fish ate a guy, and apparently the stomach acids of the fish weren't operating, and this particular guy got out because he prayed to God. And then I said, Mom, are you aware that this is all made up? And she never answered me. And I think I tried a few times. Like, but you know that these couldn't possibly be true stories, right? You know that. I read comic books. You've seen it. You see me reading comic books. What would be the evidence that Spider-Man exists that would be different from the evidence, you know? So that's sort of the direction I went.
To her credit, and then I said, I'm resigning from religion. And at 11 I told my mother I wouldn't be participating anymore. And to her credit, to her everlasting credit, one of the greatest things she ever did, she said okay. And we never spoke about it again. Because I tried it. If I never tried it, then we would have had a longer conversation. But the rule was you don't get to be a quitter. No, don't get to be a quitter. If we put you in baseball, you know, if we put you in Little League and you don't like it the first two weeks, you don't get to quit. If you play for three years and decide you don't want to play a fourth year, yeah, then you've tried it.
So the fact that I'd already gone to Sunday school for now what, five years or something, and that I'd worked it through and I had an argument and I had a position and I called the meeting and I stated my position, and she said okay, never talked about it again. And by the way, I never even learned what my parents' religious beliefs were. Still don't. They never talked about it. I mean they attended a little bit of the church activities, but they weren't regulars or anything.
Anyway, so I call that the Matrix. Now of course it was a very long trip to find out that all of the news is fake and most of the science is fake too and that everything we learn about history is made up. Now that took longer. But once I realized there was something kind of basic that could be just a story that people tell. Now if you prefer and say but Scott you're wrong because the Christian religion is all correct, you would certainly agree that all the other religions are wrong. So it ends up being kind of the same point. You just might think you got the right one.
Anyway, here's a Matrix example. In the Matrix, do you remember why Tulsi Gabbard was being called a Russian asset and still is by some of the Democrats? That came from Hillary Clinton. Hillary Clinton also of course tried to make Trump the Russian asset. I think Hillary's calling card is she always tries to get a twofer. So Hillary hates Russia and Putin, and often she'll hate somebody else. So if she hates somebody else, she'll just say that they're a Putin puppet so that you can take out the person that you hate but also keep the pressure on Putin.
So apparently she did that trick, the same trick that she did on Trump. She tried it on Tulsi Gabbard. And that's part of the Matrix. So if you're a Democrat and you think that the news is real and somebody like Hillary Clinton says honest things, then you think, oh, I guess I know what's going on now. Look at all these Russian puppets. But if you know you're in the Matrix and you know that nothing that public figures say should be taken as true, then you go, oh, that's just Hillary Clinton doing what Hillary Clinton always does. Oh, Hillary Clinton always says somebody's a Putin puppet. So no, I wouldn't worry about Tulsi Gabbard.
I saw a conversation on X in which people were saying, were disagreeing with somebody who said we should vet people and make sure that we're letting in immigrants who are not criminals and can add something. It turns out there are a number of people who in the comments said very clearly that all immigration is bad. And the reason is that they're coming in from other countries and other races and cultures, and they're going to outnumber the people who are here eventually and then put pressure on the people who are here, who will become, I think it's mostly white people who are worried about being minorities.
And I was saying that economists should decide who comes in and what kind of people come in and what numbers. And I still believe that. But a number of people disagreed with me and said that all of the immigration is bad. And then somebody said, oh look at how much I'm being dunked on in the comments. So I looked at the comments and I thought, how would anybody dunk on that? To the best of my knowledge, 100% of economists from both sides are on the same page, which is that there is some number of immigrants that's good for the country and there's some number that would be too much. Am I wrong about that? That 100% of economists would agree. They might disagree on the number and even the type, but they would all agree with the concept that there's something that would be called too few, especially since we're not reproducing at the rate of replacement, and there is something that would be too much. I don't think that's even controversial.
But other people were saying no, it's basically just race. They just don't want to be outnumbered by high qualified people or low qualified people. And there was a disagreement because I said everybody's better off if the economy is good because we brought in people who could do good things. Now I'm going to double down on my comment. If we didn't have immigration, you wouldn't have Elon Musk. You wouldn't have, I mean I think maybe his parents. You wouldn't have most of Silicon Valley. Do you know how many unicorns were made by people who were not born in the United States? Maybe it's more obvious when you live where I live because I'm sort of Silicon Valley adjacent, so I'm mired in that population. But immigration is really, really important to America keeping its economic lead.
And if you think that you could take a hit on the economy and you'd still be okay, I don't think you're thinking this through. There's a reason that every economist thinks that some amount of immigration is good. Everyone. So I think some people think that they specifically would have some negative outcome. But again, that has to do with the rate. If you suddenly said let's bring in 100 million people from India without checking them out, that would be too much. Too much. If you said can we skim the smartest, brightest people from their best institutions who want to work in America? Yes please. Let's see if we can get as many of those as we can. Let's see if we can get as many German scientists after World War II as we can. We really do need the best. We need that pretty badly.
So I'll agree with you that there's some amount of anything that's too much. But no, you can't not have immigration and expect the country to remain prosperous.
Well, Elon Musk also making news because he said that even mayors will be arrested for stopping mass deportations. Because he said that anybody who's trying to aid and abet the illegal immigrants is going to have some questions to answer. And he says that even mayors could be arrested. And I think the mayor of Denver who almost immediately said well I probably wouldn't try to stop it. I didn't see that story too closely, but there's some mayor who did a little backtracking. But I agree with this. I agree that mayors should be put in jail if they try to stop the federal government from doing what is legally authorized and I would argue is mandated by the election. So yes, I think a mayor should go to jail if they get in the way. Now I don't know if they should stay in jail, but you know, maybe you need to put them in there overnight while you do your deportations or something. But I'm not in favor of lawfare. No lawfare. But we have to get the job done anyway.
Patrick Bet-David was having a good time mocking CNN and MSNBC. Apparently the Hallmark Channel beat them both in viewership recently. And Patrick Bet-David says, quote, imagine you wake up one day and your producer comes to you and says, guys, Hallmark just beat us. To which I say, well, being the third best at fiction isn't that bad, is it? See, because Hallmark is fiction and CNN and MSNBC are fake news. So they really are direct competition. What would happen if they had real news and then Hallmark continued doing fiction? Although Hallmark does some real stories sometimes, don't they? Well, I think it's pretty funny.
Now I do think that their viewership will rise again when Trump takes power, because they'll have something to attack and people who want to hear it. At the moment I think everybody's weepy because they found out they were on the losing side and their team all lied to them. But they'll get over it, and I think they'll get back at least half of what they lost in audience in the last few months. It'll be after the holidays. Maybe everything's slower over the holidays anyway.
So Glenn Greenwald is always good at reminding us which networks are associated with the CIA. And he says how corporate media like CNN is nothing but a blind mouthpiece for the CIA. And he gives this example that CNN's Kaitlan Collins, she was going after Tulsi Gabbard because Tulsi had once supported limits on NSA domestic spying and about something about Edward Snowden. And then Greenwald points out that Kaitlan Collins repeatedly slips in, quote, intelligence sources tell us, to maintain the facade of neutrality. If you hear intelligence sources tell us, what should you do with that story? Not believe it. Intelligence sources are the professional liars. If you're an intelligence source, you're allowed to lie. It's actually right there in your job description. It's not even immoral or unethical. It's their job. It's their job to lie to anybody they need to lie to to get the job done. So yes, it does look like CNN's got a little influence there from the quote intelligence sources. I don't believe any non-name sources.
I'm seeing an article saying progressives need a new leader. How in the world are they going to do that? So this is one spokesperson in the Democrat Party. They think that at least one thinks that the progressive left is better without a dominant figurehead. So the Democrats don't have an obvious leader now. It seems like Obama will still emerge at some point, but at the moment he's quiet because he's on the losing team. And then there's another view that instead of having no dominant leader, which by the way is a losing proposition. If you're ever involved in an organization who says well I don't think we need a dominant figurehead, we probably need to just share the power, you should quit immediately. Because literally nothing works if you don't have a powerful leader. Now the powerful leader should certainly be taking lots of clues from the people being led. That's what Trump does. But you still need the powerful figurehead to get anything done. You can't share power. That's never going to work.
And then somebody else saying, this is my favorite one, the Democrats need an opposite and equal force in terms of celebrity. Somebody named Turner said so. Imagine them saying, okay, we figured out what we did wrong. Trump was such a good candidate, such a powerful, strong, almost like a cult leader persuasion capabilities, that if they could come up with their own celebrity, powerful, charismatic person, that they could win elections too. So two other theories are we should not have anybody like that, and then the other theory is we need somebody just like that.
So when I say that the Democrats are lost, oh wow are they lost. They are so lost that it's almost like the people who know how anything works already became Republicans. So there's nobody left who can figure out easy stuff, you know, just basic easy strategy stuff. And anyway, I'm starting to think that there are no Democrats who have the skill to fix this. And if they're trying to figure out why does it work for the Republicans but not us, do you think I should tell them? Do you know why the Republicans got a bigger tent and they gained in every single category? Does anybody know why?
I'm going to give away the secret. Because Republicans focused on the Constitution, the law, the religion in many cases, and an emphasis on family. If you know those things, which category of human beings don't like it? None. Every category of human beings likes that. Oh, you've got a very clear set of rules that were made by people. They lasted hundreds of years. Oh, let's just follow these rules and then everybody will be good.
So the Republicans have created, probably by accident as much as anything, well obviously the Constitution is intentional, but even when the Constitution was written it wasn't exactly an egalitarian document, but it became one over time. And it seems to me that the Republicans have created a big tent vacuum cleaner, meaning that if you get anywhere near the big tent, you hear this noise, you know, a vacuum cleaner coming on, and you just get sucked in. And then when you're on the inside, all those people you thought were horrible racists, they're offering, hey, how can I help you? Can I remove the snow from your driveway? I got a few minutes. And you learned that everything that you knew about the Republicans was wrong, and that as long as you follow the rules that they follow, they love you. They love you. You just have to follow the same rules. That's it. It's easy.
But the progressives are over there trying to decide, huh, should we be progressives? Should we be more DEI and really identity politics? Or should we be more like Bernie? Or what? Those are all, they're not even the right questions. If they're talking about personnel, Republicans are talking about process. One is system. One is goal. The system is going to beat the goal every time. So if the Democrats don't figure out how to create a system, which they don't have, they can't beat the system.
So here's what I mean. Democrats have a goal of having power and everybody gets this equity stuff. Yeah, everybody does. Well that's a goal. It's a pretty good goal, right? Of course they want power. They think they're the good guys. They want everybody to do well. Good goals. Then you look at the Republicans. They have systems. Hey, we've got to make sure we're following this Constitution, and that's why we've got to make sure that the Supreme Court is filled with what we call the originalists, the people who are going to follow the Constitution the way it was written, not make up stuff. That's the system. That system, among other things, caused the abortion question to be sent to the states. How'd that work out? Well, it worked out really well for Republicans because it kind of took it off the table for the federal election, which was a better system. And at the same time, the local people in the states have majority female voters in almost every state, so they can kind of get what they want over time. That's a system.
The goal was for them to get all the abortion rights they wanted right away. They will get all the abortion rights they want in each state eventually. The system will work through it and they'll get exactly what they want. But the system of just making sure you're picking meritocracy, you're following the law, you're following the Constitution, and that you're actually doing a primary, that's another system. Mistake, right? So the Republicans said we're going to have a competitive primary, and they did. The Democrats said we'll just push this dying guy through. No, we'll replace him. No. You know, there's no system.
So the system people are going to just absolutely dominate the goal people, I think forever. I mean unless one of them changes completely. This is a permanent dominant situation. And the fun part is that the Democrats can't figure it out because they're locked in an identity world. You know, they're locked in their own form of the Matrix. In their Matrix there's identity and that matters, and then there's bad Republicans. If that's how they frame the world, they can't ever get a solution. So I would expect it to be kind of a bad time to be a Democrat for a few years.
Former Obama speechwriter David Rothkopf, according to the Washington Examiner, says that the celebrity endorsements are good for Democrats. But is careful to say, and here's where I respect this opinion because at first I thought that's dumb, but then when I read the nuance, the nuance is that nobody really changes their opinion because of the celebrities, but you might get people more interested in showing up to vote if it improves your enthusiasm. Okay, maybe. But nobody changed their vote because Beyonce. So I agree with the Democrat speechwriter. Okay, yeah, the celebrities are not changing votes, but maybe they give you some energy.
However, I would note that both sides use celebrities, right? So they both used every celebrity they could get. Trump did it too. But what was different about the way Trump did it? Trump used celebrities too, but what was different? Here's what I think was different. Trump's celebrities were often people that look like Democrats. So when you see Joe Rogan, who's got a long history of progressive Democrat-looking opinions, say you know what, I'm going Trump. You've got professional athletes, especially professional male black athletes, putting on the hat and saying you know what, I've listened to both arguments, going Trump. You watch the UFC fighter types, every different race and religion, and you see how much they love Trump. And you say to yourself, huh, that's a lot of people who like Trump, all different kinds.
Here's how Trump did it. When I look at Trump's celebrity endorsements, here's what I say. Big tent. Big tent. Hey, it's a big tent and you're welcome. Everybody's welcome. When the Democrats put a celebrity on, they're going to tell you that the Republicans are and you should try to crush them, stay away from, and basically that you're the good people and the other people are. And people are like, well I'm not so sure, because my neighbor is a Republican and he just mowed my lawn for free. But you're telling me he's bad? Like how's that work?
So I think that Trump quietly, just quietly doing what makes sense, common sense, attracted people from every domain who appreciate common sense, such as having border control. So you get some Joe Rogan, you get your RFK Juniors, you get your Tulsi, and suddenly it's hard not to notice that everybody who likes common sense solutions seems to be moving toward Trump. And it doesn't matter what their color or race or religion is. And I think that Trump did it the right way. So he used the celebrity endorsements as evidence that it's safe. His biggest problem was making it safe to say that you're on his team. And that's what the celebrity endorsements did.
And by the way, that wasn't Trump making it happen. I've said this before. I think the public dragged Trump across the winning line, the finish line. I don't think he pushed himself over. I mean he did a great job, so not taking nothing away from Trump's performance. It was amazing, one of the best you've ever seen. But still it took people taking big risks in their personal and professional lives to say, you know what, I'm putting this hat on. And Musk was the biggest one, the biggest risk, maybe will be the biggest winner. But when you watch other people take a big risk like that, it's very inspiring. So I think Trump used it the right way by kind of ignoring it and letting it happen on its own, and then it formed on its own and then it helped drag him across the winning finish line anyway.
So the DNC vice chair, according to The Hill, Ken Martin, he criticized the party for losing. And he said, quote, we don't know how or why we lost. Now that's the most honest person. Like he's the one I'd listen to, because he goes on, I think he was on, might have been NewsNation, no he was on CNN with Jake Tapper, and he said this directly. This is a direct quote. We don't know how or why we lost. Now that is exactly right, because I'm observing that everybody's speculating like maybe we should have done this, maybe we should have done that. But when you put all that speculation together, the summary is we don't know how or why. And I don't think that they can find it, because think of the irony of this.
So this is the DNC vice chair and he's appearing on CNN and he's talking to Jake Tapper and he's saying we don't know how or why we lost. He's on CNN. He's talking to Jake Tapper. People get the news from CNN and Jake Tapper. CNN decided what people saw and MSNBC decided what people saw. So it almost didn't matter what the Democrats were doing if there's somebody else who decides what people see. So I don't think that he was quite realizing the irony that he was talking to the problem, Jake Tapper. Now not specifically Jake Tapper, but CNN. So if you appear on CNN, you say I don't know why we lost, and CNN is one of the primary formers of your message, I think maybe you should turn a little bit of that scrutiny on the media and say maybe it's the person I'm talking to. Maybe if you had not pushed the fine people hoax, which Jake Tapper did, maybe people wouldn't be leaving for that reason.
Some of the most important people who left the party say directly it was, and they say it out loud, is because when I found out the fine people hoax was a hoax, that's when the whole Matrix opened up and I could see that the Democrats were just lying. So Jake Tapper was a big part of pushing that and other hoaxes. If you can't recognize that the media is the ones causing the Democrats to fail, how could they possibly recover? And they can't tell the media that the media is the problem because then the media won't invite them to be on anymore. It's an unsolvable problem. Yeah, I can't see any system or tweak or anything. The only way you could solve this problem is replacing all of the people at the same time, and of course there isn't any way to do that.
All right. Colin Rugg had a little video and a post on X about Washington Post's Jennifer Rubin. She was mocking Trump's because his nominations were too white. And she said when they looked at the page of the nominations there were a thousand shades of white. Ha. She said I have to comment. When he put up all those faces, it was a thousand shades of white. Have you noticed that?
Well, I'd like to do a call out to one of my followers, Mike Bert. Mike Bert, what are you going to say about that? That's sort of an inside joke, right? We have within Locals, I've authorized one person to be inappropriate as much as he wants, you know, not too bad. But so we have one court jester who's allowed to say the things you really shouldn't be saying, but we've allowed one person to do it because it's actually fascinating. If you cut yourself off from the opinions that differ from you, you're not going to understand the nuance. But this was funny for reasons that you won't totally understand.
But I would note that they're not entirely white. I think there are some Asian Americans, there are some other flavors, and there's some Hispanic Americans. I think there's at least one. Some Middle Eastern American type. And Scott Turner was selected for head of HUD. So HUD has a black guy who was part of the executive team over there I guess, and he's got a good resume. Now what do you think? Do you think that the HUD appointment was a DEI appointment just so he could just so Trump could say well they're not 100% white? Well I don't know. I don't know. I also don't know if HUD needs to exist. Can anybody tell me why HUD exists? Is there anything that HUD does that couldn't be replaced by something far more efficient? I think they have tens of billions of dollars of funding that they kind of allocate, but couldn't that be allocated more locally?
So here's my take on what's wrong with every urban development problem. So somebody says if only there were a big bunch of money. And then somebody says all right, here's your big bunch of money from the government. And then it's allocated to people who apparently just steal most of it. How do you stop that? So if you have a system that's good at producing money and delivering it, but then once it gets delivered it's stolen somewhat reliably or it's given to the wrong vendors who can't get the job done, you're never really going to fix it.
So it seems like that what we need is to fix the funding oversight. I feel like the decision of how to spend money locally should be not in the hands of the elected representatives. And I know that sounds opposite of what makes sense, but if a small city can elect a mayor who then can make sure that the contracts go to their brother-in-law and anybody else who's going to give them a kickback, we don't have a workable system. See that's a system problem again.
So what I'd like to see is Vivek and Elon coming up with maybe some ideas collectively for how we can make sure that if money is sent to an urban place for urban development, that it just doesn't get stolen. Because if you don't fix that, there's no point in giving anybody any money for anything. And I also worry that Republicans maybe have written off the inner cities because they're not getting many votes there. And I don't think you can fix it. It doesn't look fixable to me. See the trouble is if you put too many people who have too many problems in one place, I don't know that you can ever fix it. You would have to move the people, which would be illegal. And if they don't want to move, then how's that going to work?
I mean I think you could take, if you took let's say a teenager who's in this bad environment, there's gangs and there's crime and the schools are bad and everything. If you took that one teenager and said all right, let's see what happens if we put this one teenager in a safe place with a good school and no gangs, probably you'd get a pretty good outcome. But if everybody is in this one place and they all have the similar problems, they're not going to feel like they have to escape because they're just sort of living the same life as everybody around them. And I don't know that that's fixable. I mean you almost have to distribute the people who are in the same bad situation so they don't reinforce each other's bad habits.
Yeah, you've heard the thing, you are the average of your five closest friends, right? What happens if you live where your five closest friends are gang members? Do you really have a chance? Not really. So how much money could you send into that situation to fix it? There's no amount. There's no amount that fixes that. In fact the more money, the worse it would get. So you gotta fix the five friends problem first. And I don't know how. The only thing I could think of would be a massive improvement in mobility. And the mobility would have to include, can you go somewhere? Can you afford to move? Can you get a job if you go there? And do you have enough school choice that you can move at least the school? So if you could move the options for any one person to say you know what, I need to get where I can get five good friends around my teenage kid, and maybe those friends will influence them. Now that would be a real solution. But sending money? No. I mean if Trump decided that HUD didn't really have a future, I wouldn't be surprised anyway.
I saw Chamath talking about on the All-In Pod. Chamath, I think I say his name wrong. It's Chamath, right? And then I never try to say his last name because I'll just embarrass myself. But it's like Palihapitiya. Jason, are you watching? If Jason is watching, you're laughing at me right now. There's some names that I really try hard. Like every time I read his name, Chamath's last name, I read it and I sound it out and then I try to memorize the order of the letters and stuff. Never works. It doesn't last a day anyway.
But Chamath said, can you imagine if these guys, you're talking about the people working on DOGE, can you imagine if these guys basically use DOGE as a mechanism to shrink the tax code, create a flat tax potentially, the idea of just cutting this all the way down and finding through that process what they actually need. And he says I think America could get 100 to 200 basis points of GDP growth. It could be an economic renaissance. I agree.
Now I don't think flat tax will ever work in America. There's just no way, because it's good for rich people, it's bad for poor people. No way. You're never going to get a flat tax. So just forget about it, right? I mean it's great to talk about, but you're never going to get a flat tax. However, if you could reduce your taxes and make sure the taxes have the right incentives and you get it down to a minimum and you cut the cost of the government so you don't need as much taxes, could you get 100 to 200 basis points, meaning that instead of growing by 3.5 you would grow at 5.5, which would be incredible? Yes. Yes, I think you could do that. Is it hard? Oh my God, it's hard. Is it possible? I think it is. And so I have the same intuition as Chamath, less faith than a flat tax could ever even be within a mile of being viable. And I just think that's because of the way our brains work. We wouldn't, we just couldn't handle it. Flat tax would just make everybody complain too much. Good for rich people.
So now we know much more about January 6 and that the National Guard was delayed three hours and 19 minutes when everybody knew that there was going to be a problem. And it looks like we got a real problem. So Chief Steven Sund, who was in charge of the Capitol Police, and he's noting that we now know that there was this three-hour delay, and if they had sent the reinforcements, it would have looked completely different. Does it look to you like the delay was intentional to make the optics as bad as possible? Maybe. You know, you can't rule out incompetence, but it certainly has the look of an op, and you can't ignore that.
So certainly the January 6 committee are at the top of my list of people we need to be looked at to see if there was a crime there. Now I don't believe in lawfare. It has to be a real crime. But if they were hiding evidence and lying under oath or any of that stuff, these are really bad consequences. I mean what happened to the country? People in jail for it. If there's nobody on the January 6 committee that ends up in jail, I feel like I'd be disappointed. But if they didn't break a law, that's the way it's got to be.
Anyway, California is making it harder to produce gas in California, so we're all dead. Forget about that.
So the story about Biden doing this last-ditch effort to send all the money they have to Ukraine. Was it Antony Blinken said President Biden has committed to make sure that every dollar we have at our disposal will be pushed out the door between now and January 20th. So that really doesn't sound like somebody who's taking care of America, does it? We're going to make sure that we push every one of your dollars out the door before the government changes. That doesn't sound like they're on our side. It really doesn't. So I mean there's a tone problem there. But the way it's being framed is that these moves are designed to make sure that Ukraine is in the strongest possible negotiating position when Trump takes over. Really? Really? Is that why they're pushing all that money through right now? It's to help Trump get a good outcome? Is that why? I don't think so. I don't think so. No.
I think that there's a massive money laundering operation and they're pushing as much money through it so they can suck as much out of it as they can and basically robbing Ukraine and robbing the United States while they leave office. That's what it looks like. That's what it feels like. I don't have any proof, but it sure looks and feels like it's a money laundering, money stealing operation. But nonetheless, it could be true that it would keep Ukraine strong enough to negotiate well as well. So that's good.
All right, that's all I got for you for my prepared remarks today. I'm going to go talk to the people on Locals who haven't yet banned me, and I will see the rest of you on Rumble and YouTube and X tomorrow, same time, same place, and we'll have fun again. Thanks for joining. And Locals coming at you privately in 30 seconds.
showing you once again that some live streamers don't take days off no sometimes you just have to power through it and just make sure my comments are working here yes they are and that means an incredible show is ahead of you good morning everybody and welcome to the highlight of human civilization probably the best day you'll ever have in your life but if you'd like to take this experience up to levels that nobody can even understand with their tiny shiny human brains all you need for that is a cuper muger glass a tanker CH Stein a canteen Jugger flask a vessel of any kind fill it with your favorite liquid ey like coffee and join me now for the unparallel pleasure the dopamine end of the day the thing makes everything better it's called the simultaneous Sip and it happens now oh perfect yeah it's just perfect well good news researchers from China and Brazil have finally given us the invention we need it's a robot dog that can search for fire ants so if you have a big problem with fire ants you've got a robot dog Solution that's coming that can recognize fire ants and do what with them I don't know just spot them I guess so you can go kill them now what I want is a robo dog that can pick weeds and also pick vegetables and stuff from a garden so what I want to have is uh on the side of my house want to have a little uh little hot house you know Greenhouse kind of thing and I want to have two or three little robots that have access to everything that can climb up and pick stuff and get rid of weeds and water things and check for problems and it'd be smarter than I am right if I looked at the leaf and it was dying I wouldn't know why but AI would know why and then it could go fix it so in theory I could have my own little mini garden with a little mini Gardener and every day I'd just go in there and there'd be a basket of whatever the latest Harvest was and then I give it to my robot chef and my robot Chef would cook it up for me and I would just have the best food from robots that's the future well meanwhile uh at the MIT according to Adam zi he has an article on that that MIT has developed some noise cancelling silk so it's a sort of a fabric material that has two different elements to it at least two there are two different aspects to it both of them will reduce sound and I'm thinking to myself if you could make a piece of silk that people could stick in their ears and not hear their partner snoring now you've got something I don't know if that's ever going to happen but if this silk can cancel noise um it sure seems like you could make some mirror plugs out of it and that would change everything do you know the one of the biggest secrets in America and I'm guessing it's the same in other countries is the number of married people who can't sleep in the same room it just isn't possible because one of them snores you really can't sleep with a snorer I learned that the hard way by being the snorer yeah nobody wants to sleep with a snore anyway here's a funny story according to uh the Atlantic Daniel engber is writing that um there's this business school scandal that just keeps getting bigger and the Scandal is professors at the business school uh writing academic papers that are fraudulent let's see uh what what terrible business school has that I mean I'd sure hate to have a degree can you imagine can you imagine having a degree for one of these gray business schools that you find out the professors are all a bunch of uh see what business school was it it was uh it was oh was the UC B uh oh the UC Berkeley H School of Business okay that's where I have my MBA but the jokes on them because also I disown them um for being racist already so I don't have to disown them for also being having professors who are who are big Liars I I I already disavowed them for being racist oh poor hos business school anyway there was one professor in particular who's uh just racking up the fake the fake studies and got caught uh according to the New York Post um G gun ownership has soared among Republican women uh but it's declined among Democrat men so so there are fewer Democrat men with guns and there are more Republican women with guns than there were recently I by surprised by that I I actually thought everybody would have more guns but apparently the the men have decided they don't need them but the Republican women are strapped so since 2019 33% of GOP ladies have been packing heat is that true is that true that onethird of Republican women uh are gun owners that's way more than I thought I would guess 10% it's pretty impressive that's up from 22% uh you know a few years earlier than that pretty impressive meanwhile in cost the creepiest of all scientific studies are you ready for the creepiest of all scientific studies I I almost wasn't even going to talk about it but I I I think I can do it without going to jail uh so there was a study Eric Dolan is writing about this in cost so as a study published in complimentary therapies and clinical practices which of course you all read that uh children who have ADHD uh can be benefited by massage so they made sure they had very professional this is key professional massage therapists and it didn't say so in the study but I'm going to like to think that they were closely monitored by observers because I hate to think that they were putting a bunch of children behind a closed door with a massage therapist I hope that didn't happen but assuming that they were properly supervised and there was nothing Inky about the experiment itself what they believe they found is that the kids who got regular massage therapy slept better and concentrated and did better in school now do you know who would have guessed that without a study I would do you know why I think this worked because here here's just a speculation I feel like there's something about ADHD that we don't fully understand well I guess that's an understatement I think everybody would agree with that but if you're distracted and maybe I'm just speaking for myself it's because there's something you're looking for that you need that you don't have now that's my take that's this is not agreeing with any scientists or anything I I have no idea what the scientists say but my take whenever I'm distracted is not so much that there's just too much in my head it's that I'm aware that there's something I need that I don't have and I'm looking for it but I don't know what it is so I don't know if I have it yet so I'm just sort of looking all the time but what I've discovered is and I told you this before that if I get like a good exercise and it it fulfills my I don't know my body's chemical needs then my brain is fine then my brain calms down so are you surprised that a massage which would have similar benefits to getting some good exercise would also calm the brain it should but I would also add this second thing in my own experience that when I've got a good dose of oxytocin which you can only get from physical contact with other humans that I don't need much else so if you give me oxytocin I'm not immediately thinking about working harder or exercising or solving a problem I actually have everything I want I just sit there thinking oh it's a good day I've got everything I want glass of water it's all I need so what I'm wondering is did the massage therapy give the youngsters some oxytocin that feel good I've got everything I need chem chemistry and that's all it was so that's my hypothesis is that it wasn't the physical manipulation uh or the relaxing although that should have helped because it pretty much helps with with everything so if it didn't help I'd be surprised but maybe the bigger thing is that people don't have enough oxytocin so here's what I would study to find out I take a bunch of kids who have ADHD and then I would ask them questions like when was the last time you got hugged huh cuz I'll bet you'll find that the kids with ADHD probably get hugged less and they they had less oxytocin just a gas it's speculation pure speculation all right I see a weird meme going by with oh Dilbert and a Tesla okay anyway um uh there's a topic I don't know if I want to talk about but I might yeah I'm going to just going to go for it so I wasn't going to talk about this but I will so somebody that I don't know who is uh says they fans of Dill bird and fans of mine have created a crypto uh that I guess is called a Dilbert and they've asked me to promote it I'm not doing that I'm asking them to take it down and dismantle it if there's any way to do that I don't know if you can reverse it here's why well on one hand I take it as a great compliment that somebody wanted to you know boost dilbur somehow and boost me and their fans you can't create a sketchy Financial product and Associate it with my name and my brand and then push me to to boost it do you understand that you put me at great financial and other risk because if other people see the Dilbert name on it they're going to say well that's probably endorsed by Scott and therefore it's probably safe he probably looked into it I did not look into it and I have no idea that it is safe and I'm not even sure who's behind it so uh so no I do not endorse it and I need it to be taken down and dismantled immediately because I don't want to be in a position where my reputation in my brand is writing on the good work and honesty of people I've never met in in the in the sketchiest of all Realms the you know the shitcoin crypto area so if you would please stop spamming my uh all of my comments on X and on my live streams trying to get people to buy this token I I will advise everybody who's listening do not buy this token and if you did I'm sorry but I had nothing to do with it and it would be a huge mistake to be involved with it in any way now if it turned out that it's completely unthe legit and somebody was just just doing me a favor it doesn't change my response because you don't get to decide what I'm associated with right it's not your decision that I'm associated with this financial product my decision is I'm going to sue the out of you if you don't take it down because I I can't I can't abide with that being up right so you need to dismantle it and if if you're just fans then no hard feelings if you didn't know I will I will accept I will accept a I didn't know that was going to be a problem that would be perfectly acceptable I just can't have it exist so you need to get rid of it got that all right so I didn't even want to talk about it but um stay away from that thing all right um pursue here's a study from Gilmore Health news pursuing happiness as a goal often fails to make people happier here's why I think that makes sense the reason you can't pursue happiness is it's not a thing you can't pursue happiness you could pursue a wild animal you could pursue a ball that's rolling down a hill you could pursue a car you could pursue a dog because those are all real but happiness you can't pursue you could end up happy but you can't pursue happiness there are two things you can pursue that'll get there you can pursue meaning meaning so you're doing something that's helpful to other people usually it's usually being useful you're either having children and you're doing a good job of being a parent or you're doing a job that's important to the world or you inventing something or you doing what Elon Musk is doing trying to save the world from debt and or at least the country and those could give you meaning but if the only thing you did were hard work it wouldn't make you very happy either because you'd just be burned out and wouldn't be much left of you so here's the Scott formula for happiness you can't chase it don't chase it but you can let it happen by doing other things that are right so I would say you want to spend about 80% of your time chasing meaning now that could include the time it takes you to tie your shoes and put your clothes on and shave in the morning or put your hair together because that's all important to getting anything done but the 80% should be making sure that it's directed at some kind of useful something now if you're young um you don't have as many opportunities so I would say if you're if you're on a dating app and you're trying to date and you know your your ambition is to someday have a family that's great then dating dating is exactly what you should be doing even if it doesn't look like this specific data is working out you're chasing meaning that's still good if you're chasing meaning 80% of the time and then 20% of the time you're chasing pleasure you're going to be fine if you chased pleasure 80% of the time you're going to be Dan B Bilzerian and eventually say you know what turns out that sleeping with five women A Day Made Me a lot of pleasure but not a lot of Happiness so he's trying to figure out the happiness part now so 8020 is your is your best Target 80% trying to either be part of creating more people you know which is good for the world or doing something something useful and 20% Pure Pleasure now if you don't get your 20% pure pleasure you won't you just will fall apart we just require some pleasure every day if you get too much you won't be happy if you get too little you won't be happy happy 8020 is a good mix adjust accordingly well apparently according Mario n is reporting on this there's a some according to Science Daily there are ancient hot springs on Mars that reveal that the planet might have been once habitable wouldn't it be cool to find out that there was a whole civilization on Mars and that they built the pyramids here's my here's my hypothesis on the pyramids you ready for this um everything about the pyramids is just recreational belief I don't know what happened I don't know why it seemed like all these ancient civilizations could build these giant structures and others couldn't but here's one possibility that the aliens from Mars or somewhere else who were very Advanced um got stranded on Earth so they didn't have the technology to get off of Earth and get home but they thought that someday they'd like to be found so they used the technology they had to build the pyramids because the pyramids are the uh the proof that high intelligence existed on earth a long time ago and you could see are from a very long distance so if they wanted to say well if somebody can find me someday I will arrange these pyramids in the shape of the star system I came from and then if somebody looks and go say hey wait there's three artificial things oh hold on they're in the shape of the star system from us there's no way these must be our people let's go get them so it could be that this that the pyramids are a uh a help signal you know just just something that can be seen from a very far distance from a very Advanced civilization to say whoa we better go pick those guys up of course they're long dead so it's too late just speculation all right uh here's something I liked hearing from VI ramaswami um he's saying that healthc care is a critical Frontier for Doge the department of government efficiency and he met with some of the other incoming appointees from in the Trump Administration he says they're serious about reducing cost and here's the important part he said they understand Innovation is a key part of the solution Innovation is a key part of the solution that's what I want to hear because if you tell me you're just going to cut my costs I don't want to hear that because you probably can't do it if you tell me you can restructure it re-engineer it you know rethink it in a way that you could almost you know make your assumptions from from scratch and build it up and that you could do it at a far lower cost I think you could I'll bet you could you know I spend a lot of time just way too much time thinking about ways you could lower health care costs and it turns out that the hard part is that 90% of the healthare costs come in your your last year of life and if you don't fix that you can't really fix health care costs and I don't know if anybody has any great idea for that except for you know doctor assistant suicide and I don't think we're going to go big for that so I don't have any ideas but I hope somebody does um here's a question question in the publication in Red State Ward Clark is writing about how there are these Soros back Charities that are really working hard to help illegal immigrants get into the United States and here's my question how could it be that there are public entities that are backed by Soros that are not hiding you know there's no secret about it that are aiding and beding illegal acts in the United States specifically illegal entry um as a non-citizen now my first question is is there not some normal mechanism by which this could be shut down how is it not illegal to Aid in the bed in a crime is there some kind of crime you can help somebody do and you're not in trouble does does operating from another soil make you safe if you're doing it from another country is that enough to not be illegal and and if it's legal why why is our CIA not having them assassinated because isn't that what we pay them to do if there was some entity that was not in the United States or even if they were and they were trying to do something that was terribly damaging to the United States and we couldn't do anything legally wouldn't we be sell sending our worst people off to kill those people because that's how you protect the United States I mean if you look at all the horrible things the United States has done under the umbrella of self-defense this would be the smallest thing we've ever done to stop people from sending criminals into our country criminals in the sense that you know they're not going through the legal system I'm not I'm not trying to say anything bad about the immigrants the immigrants I completely understand uh and I'll say this I guess I'll say this as plainly as I can if I were in their position I would try to get into the United States illegally so in that same position I would break the law I wouldn't feel I wouldn't feel any I wouldn't feel any guilt about it because I'm just trying to make things better for myself and my family so yeah but it's still legal doesn't mean we can be for it Scott this just makes you sound uninformed well you you could use some of those letters to say what it was I was missing or you could just be one of those dicks who just say you sound uninformed which helps nobody so while you're being useless and rude and disruptive great job there so you know that 80% of the time where you're trying working toward meaning you're not in the 80% you're not being useful so how about we stop ever saying oh there's something you need to be educated about if only you were as smart as me different words would be coming out of your mouth no how about you shut the up unless you have something useful to say is that okay now I'm completely open to what it is that I don't know and I think you've watched the show enough to watch me change on the fly when a comment comes in and says oh you forgot this or you you're not looking at this so do some of that and I'll I'll actually be happy for it but this you're so you're making yourself look ignorant I just figure you're a idiot that's the only that's the only impression I get when I see that comment it doesn't matter who it's coming from from anybody somebody here is saying that this is because I didn't get enough sleep last night you're so right you're so right I was telling the locals people I didn't get enough sleep last night that's mostly what this is about but it's still it's still bad form just just don't do it anyway so I think there should be some way to stop the uh illegal thing now if what you're going to say is Scott Scott you don't understand that the CIA and the government wants them to come in was that what you were waiting for did you think I didn't know that the government wants them to come in you oh you're probably just waiting for the second issue to drop no I know that there's way more than this of course I know that it must be your first day here anyway um have you seen the video I don't know how old it is I feel like it maybe has been around a while but um one of the hosts of The View Sunny H um was on that show where you find out who your relatives were your DNA gets checked and then they check your background and she found out that she was completely wrong about her own background she thought she was Puerto Rican or half Puerto Rican but turns out that might have been a Spanish part of the family from Spain and there were slave owners that's right Sunny Hosten of the view comes from a family of slave owners and watching her learn that she's from a family of slave owners was something I had to watch 20 times in a row I just kept playing it and replaying it because there was a part where she tried to laugh about it but but the smile and the laugh was so fake that it was just the hilariously uncomfortable you have to see it it's in my X feed if you're looking for it um so that was fun but uh even more fun than that uh apparently so they're now that I think there now have been three separate times in the last week I'll take a fact check on this three separate times in the last week when um when the view had to read a legal a legal disclaimer so apparently they had to do it four times in in yet in Friday's episode is that true Did did she have to stop four times and read uh a legal clarification I think she did it it's telling me that the lawyers for the uh the view just hate the hosts because the lawyers are probably trying to figure out how can we stop them saying things that are clearly going to get us in trouble and the host can't stop lying because their entire show is built around lying about what people did basically it's a show about lying about Republicans basically so if they can't lie about Republicans they don't have content because that's all they have so the lawyers like you can't just lie about their legal situation you maybe you could lie about reading their minds but you can't lie about whether they were convicted Ed of a crime you can't lie about that so uh so it looks like the the legal the legal staff is trying to put the view on a business like actually literally it looks like they're trying to force some am of business which might be what's happening um The New York Times has a article by Samuel Moon who's a lawyer now what's interesting is that this article is in the New York Times And as others have pointed out it seems like they're admitting that the lawfare against Trump was not based on the law but was lawfare so here's a sentence in the New York Times by Samuel Moon a lawyer he said it wasn't bad luck they did not put Trump in jail well I'm paraphrasing that part he said quote the more uncomfortable truth is that our search for political salvation primarily through the law has backfired let me read that again the more uncomfortable truth is that our search for political salvation primarily through the law has backfired is that admitting that they were using laware because they didn't have another way to stop Trump that's how I read it and others are reading it the same way and so I I appreciate that I I appreciate the the complete sincerity of that H now Mike Davis um you might know him as a republican with some legal background um he says even the liberal New York Times is admitting the Democrats rant lawfare and election interference against President Trump because I guess it would be election interference wouldn't it and he says uh now the uh Trump justice department should open a criminal probe under and he gives the the law and apparently there's some law that would be a conspiracy against rights a conspiracy against rights that sounds exactly like the right law doesn't it does it seem like there was a conspiracy of various elements in the government to prevent Trump from having the right to certain first of all be a free free Citizen and second of all to run for office I mean without being a lawyer if you tell me that there is a law that says you can't have a conspiracy to deny somebody their rights guaranteed under the Constitution the first thing I'd say is okay that seems like that should be a law shouldn't it I mean it should be a law so if it is a law how could you possibly imagine it doesn't apply here it would clearly apply and here's here's a Democrat lawyer who's saying well looks like the lawfare didn't work I feel like what happens after that has to be criminal indictments because if everybody can see it as plainly as we can you you got to at least dig around there and see if there's a case I think there might be but again I don't want to see any law fair and revenge it better be a better be a good case because we don't want to lawfare the law farers I know some of you want to but I don't think that's a good place to go um apparently uh there's a study that says 86% of us Asylum Seekers are not legitimate so I guess the federal government did a review of that now does that surprise you I thought it was higher actually I would have guessed 90 to 95% but um it's interesting that that we know about it and we just still keep this program Open The Way It Is it's I mean I think this gets back to that that earlier comment that it's super obvious that the government wants to just let in as many people as they can like to imagine that this is a mistake that would be imagining a lot it's not a mistake they're using a technical Le loophole to open the Border that's all that is um did you know that uh California is still counting the votes for 18 days we're still counting the votes and believe it or not uh Nancy Pelosi's daughter is involved in that and it's called curing ballots now I think that what what that means is if you have a ballot that looks like it filled out wrong or something's missing you have the option of calling the person and saying you know did you mean this is this a real vote Etc and then you can count it if you can confirm it's a real person with a real vote so they've been doing that for 18 days and it looks like they might flip two seats in Congress from red to blue because of 18 days of curing the votes you're going to feel comfortable with that 18 days of curing the votes yeah I see there's some kind of a fight going on on the comments here let's see what that that's all about I just want to take a look at what the what all the fightings about all right I can't see never mind well um Elon Musk is having a great time on X he seems quite addicted to it which he's admitted today and he asked this question he said how how old were you when you realized others couldn't see the Matrix so I'll ask that question to you how old were you when you realize others couldn't see the Matrix now the way the way I interpret that is that others how old were you when you realize that basically everything's a lie uh I went with 11 have I ever told you my story at age 11 I've written this in my book so some of you have seen you've heard this now I will start I'll start by saying that I'm pro- religion now I think you've heard me say that before I'm very Pro religion I think Christianity and not not to pick a favorite but just to pick one as an example um Christianity and others Judaism Etc they they have a a lot of um benefits for the people who practice it Islam if it's the you know if it's not if it's not related to any terrorists or anything if you just practicing it happily and minding your own business probably great so I'm very pro- religion I just don't have one because I don't think you can make yourself a Believer I I just don't have an ability to enter that space so when I was 11 years old and um my parents would send us to uh Sunday school it was called it was a Methodist church and we would go there and we'd learn all our little Sunday lessons and one day when I was about 11 the lesson was about um uh Jonah being uh swallowed by a whale or a giant fish I guess and he lived in the whale's stomach for a while but he prayed and and God saved him and the whale spit him up and he was none the worse for being in the whale or the big fish's stomach and uh I remember I called a with my mother cuz that's when I realized I was in The Matrix and I said um Mom now I'm paraphrasing because obviously I don't remember my exact words at 11 but it was something like um today I learned that a giant fish ate a guy and uh apparently the stomach acids of the fish weren't operating and this particular guy got out cuz he prayed to God and um and then I said Mom are you aware that this is all made up and she never answered me and I think I tried a few few times like but you know you know that these couldn't possibly be true stories right you you know that I read comic books you've seen it you you see me watching reading comic books what would be the evidence that Spider-Man exists that would be different from the EV you know so that's sort of the direction I went to her credit and then and then I said um I'm resigning from religion and at 11: I told my mother I wouldn't be participating anymore and to her credit to her Everlasting credit one of the greatest things she ever did she said okay and we never spoke about it again because I tried it if I never tried it then we would have had a longer conversation but the rule was you don't get to be a quitter no don't get to be a quitter if we put you in baseball you know if put you in little league and you don't like it the first two weeks you don't get to quit if you play for three years and decide you don't want to play a fourth year yeah yeah then you've tried it so the fact that I'd already gone to Sunday school for now what I five years or something and that i' had worked it through and I had an argument and I had a position and I called the meeting and I st down my position and she said okay never talked about it again and by the way I never even learned what my parents religious beliefs were still don't they never talked about it I mean they attended a little bit of the church activities but they weren't regulars or anything anyway anyway so so I call that the Matrix now of course it was a very long trip to find out that all of the news is fake and most of the science is fake too and that everything we learn about history is made up now that took a longer but once I realize there something kind of basic could be just a story that people tell now if you prefer and say but Scott you're wrong because the Christian religion is all correct you would certainly agree that all the other religions are wrong so it ends up being kind of the same point if you you know you just might think you got the right one anyway here's a matrix example um in The Matrix uh do you remember why Tulsi gabard is was being called a Russian asset and still is by some of the Democrats that came from Hillary Clinton Hillary Clinton also of course tried to make make uh Trump the Russian asset I I think Hillary's calling card is she always tries to get a twofer so Hillary hates Russia and Putin and often she'll hate somebody else so if she hates somebody else she'll just say that they're a Putin puppet so that you can take out the person that you hate but also keep the pressure on Putin so apparently she did that trick the same trick that she did on Trump she tried on Tulsi gabard and that's part of the Matrix so if if you're a Democrat and you think that the news is real and somebody like Hillary Clinton says honest things then you think oh I guess I know what's going on now look at all these Russian puppets but if you know you're in The Matrix and you know that nothing that public figures say should be taken as true then you go oh that's just Hillary Clinton doing what Hillary Clinton always does oh Hillary Clinton always says somebody's a a Putin puppet so no I wouldn't worry about telsy gabard um I saw a conversation on X in which people were saying uh were disagreeing with somebody who said we should vet people and make sure that we're letting in immigrants who are you know not criminals and can add something it turns out there are a number of people who in the comments said very clearly that all immigration is bad and the reason is that they're coming in from other countries and other races and cultures and they're going to you know outnumber the people who are here eventually and then put pressure on the people are here who will become I think it's mostly white people who are worried about being minorities and I was saying that uh economists should decide who comes in and what kind of people come in and what numbers and I I still believe that but a number of people disagreed with me and said that all that all of the uh immigration is bad and then somebody said oh look at how much I'm being dunked on in the comments so I looked at the comments and I thought how would anybody dunk on that to the best of my knowledge 100% of economists from both sides are on the same page which is that there is some number of immigrants that's good for the country and there's some number that would be too much am I wrong about that that 100% of economists would agree they might they might disagree on the number and even the type but they would all agree with the concept that there's something as something that would be called too few especially since we're not reproducing at the rate of replacement and there is something that would be too much I don't think that's even controversial but other people were saying no it's basically just race they just don't want to be outnumbered by High qualified people or low-qualified people and there was a disagreement because I said everybody's better off if the economy is good because we brought in people who could do good things now I'm going to double down on my comment if we didn't have immigration you wouldn't have Elon Musk you wouldn't have aake I mean I I think maybe his parents um right you you wouldn't have most of Silicon Valley do you know how many how many uh unicorns were made by uh people who were not born in the United States maybe it's more obvious when you live where I live because I'm you know sort of Silicon Valley adjacent so I'm mired in that population but immigration is really really important to America keeping its economic lead and if you think that you could take a hit on the economy and you'd still be okay I don't think you're thinking this through there's a reason that every Economist thinks that some amount of immigration is good every everyone so uh I think some people think that they specifically would have some negative outcome but again that has to do with the rate if you suddenly said let's bring in uh uh a 100 million people for from India without checking him out that would be too much too much if you said can we skim the smartest brightest people from their you know their best institutions who want to work in America yes please let's let's let's see if we can get as many of those as we can you know let's see if we can get as many German scientists after World War II as we can we really do need the best we need that pretty badly so I'll agree with you that there's some amount of anything that's too much but no you can't you can't not have immigration and expect the country to remain prosperous uh well Elon Musk also making news because he said that even Mayors will be arrested for stopping Mass deportations because he said that anybody who's trying to you know Aid and ab bet the illegal immigrants is going to have some some questions to answer and he says that even Mayors could be arrested and I think the was it the mayor of Denver who almost immediately said well I probably wouldn't try to stop it I didn't see that story too closely but there's some mayor who did a little backtracking but I agree with this I agree that mayor should be put in jail if they try to stop the federal government from doing what is legally authorized and I would argue is mandated by the election so yes I think a mayor should go to jail if they get in the way now I don't know if they should stay in jail but you know maybe you need to put them in there overnight while you do your deportations or something but you know I I I'm not I'm not in favor of law fair no lawfare but we have to get the job done anyway um Patrick Bet David was having a good time uh mocking CNN and MSNBC um apparently the Hallmark Channel beat them both in in uh in viewership recently and uh Patrick B David says quote imagine you wake up one day and your producer comes to you says guys Hallmark just beat us to which I say well being the third best of fiction isn't that bad is it see because Hallmark is fiction and CNN and MSNBC or fake news so they really are direct comp competition what would happen if they had real news and then Hallmark continueed doing fiction although Hallmark does some real stories sometimes don't they well I think it's pretty funny now I do think that their viewership will rise again when Trump takes power because they'll have something to attack and people who want to hear it at the moment I think everybody's weepy because they found out they were on the losing side and their team all lied to them but they'll get over it and uh I think they'll get back at least half of what they lost in audience in the last few months it'll be after the holidays maybe everything's slower over the holidays anyway um so Glennon Greenwald is always good at reminding us which networks are associated with the CIA and he he says uh how Cor corporate media like CNN is nothing but a blind mouthpiece for the CIA and he gives this example that CNN's Katie bis she was going after Tulsi gabard because Tulsi had once supported limits on NSA domestic spying and uh about something about Edward Snowden so and then uh Greenwald points out that uh Katy boellis Bolis uh repeat ly slips in quote intelligent sources tell us to maintain the facade of neutrality if you hear the if you hear intelligent sources tell us what should you do with that story not believe it intelligent sources are they're the professional Liars if you're an intelligent Source you're allowed to lie it's actually right there in your job description it's not even you know it's not even immoral or unethical it's their job it's their job to lie to anybody they need to lie to to get the job done so yes it does look like CNN's got a little little influence there from the quote intelligent sources I don't believe any any non-name sources um I'm seeing it was an article saying progressives need a new leader how in the world are they going to do that um so this is one one spokesperson in the uh Democrat Party um they think that the was at least one thinks that the uh Progressive left is better without a dominant figurehead so the so the Democrats don't have an obvious leader now it seems like Obama will still emerge at some point but at the moment he's quiet because he he's on the losing team um and then there's another view that instead of having no dominant leader which by the way is a losing proposition if you're ever if you're ever involved in a organization who says well I don't think we need a dominant figurehead we probably need to you know just share the power you should quit immediately because literally nothing works if you don't have a you know a powerful leader now the powerful leader should certainly be taking you know lots of Clues from the people being led that's what Trump does but you still need the powerful figure ad to get anything done you can't share power that's never going to work um and then somebody else saying that uh this is my favorite one um the Democrats need an opposite and equal force in terms of celebrity somebody named Turner said so imagine them saying okay we figured out what we did wrong Trump was such a good candidate such a powerful strong you know almost like a cult leader persuasion capabilities that if they could come up with their own celebrity powerful charismatic person that they could win elections too so two other theories are we should not have anybody like that and then the other theory is w we need somebody just like that so when I say that the Democrats are lost oh wow are they lost they are so lost that it's almost like the people who know how anything Works already became Republicans so there's nobody left who can figure out easy stuff you know just basic easy strategy stuff and anyway I'm starting to think that there are no Democrats who have the skill to fix this and if they're trying to figure out why does it work for the Republicans but not us do you think I should tell them do do you know why the Republicans got a bigger tent and they gained in every single category does anybody know why uh I'm going to give away the secret because Republicans focused on the Constitution the law the religion in many cases and an emphasis on family if you know those things which category of uh human beings don't like it none every category of human beings likes that oh you've got a very clear set of rules that were made by people they lasted hundreds of years oh let's just follow these rules and then everybody will be good so the Republicans have created probably by accident as much as anything well obviously the Constitution is intentional but even when the Constitution was written it wasn't wasn't exactly an egalitarian document uh but it became one over time and it seems to me that the Republicans have created a a big tent vacuum cleaner meaning that if you get anywhere near the big tent you hear this noise you know a vacuum cleaner coming on and you just you get sucked in and then when you're on the inside all those people you thought were horrible racists they're offering hey how can I help you you know can I can I uh remove the snow from your driveway I got a few minutes and you learned that everything that you knew about the Republicans was wrong and that as long as you follow the rul rules that they follow they love you they love you you just have to follow the same rules that's it it's easy but the progressives are over there trying to decide huh should we be progressives should we be more Dei and and really identity politics or should we be more like Bernie or or what those are all they're not even the right questions if if they're they're talking about personnel Republicans are talking about process one is system one is goal the system is going to beat the goal every time so if the if the Democrats don't figure out how to create a system which they don't have they can't beat the system so here's what I mean um republ so Democrats have a goal of having power and everybody gets this Equity stuff yeah everybody does well that's a goal it's a pretty good goal right of course they want Power they think they're the good guys they want everybody to do well good goals then you look at the Republicans they have systems hey we got to make sure we're following this Constitution and that's why we got to make sure that the Supreme Court is filled with what we call the originalists the people who are going to follow the Constitution The Way It Was Written not make up stuff that's the system that system among other things caused uh the the abortion question to be sent to the states how' that work out well it worked out really well for Republicans because it kind of took it off the table for the federal election which was a better system and at the same time the local people in the states have you know majority female voters in almost every state so they can kind of get what they want over time that's a system the goal was for them to get all the abortion rights they wanted right away they will get all the abortion rights they want in each state eventually the system will work through it and they'll get exactly what they want but um the system of just making sure you're picking meritocracy you're following the law you're following the Constitution um and that you're actually doing a primary that's another system mistake right so the Republicans said we're going to have a competitive primary and they did the Democrats said um we'll just push this dying guy through uh no we'll replace him uh no you know there's no system so the system people are going to just absolutely dominate the goal people I think forever I mean unless one of them changes completely this is a this is a permanent dominant situation and the fun part is that the Democrats can't figure it out because they're locked in an identity world you know they're they're locked in their own form of the Matrix in their Matrix there's identity and that matters and then there's bad Republicans if that's how they frame the world they can't ever get a solution so I would expect it to be kind of a bad time to be a Democrat for a few few years um former Obama speech writer Roso Keefe according to Washington examiner uh says that the celebrity endorsements are good for Democrats and but is careful to say and here's where I respect this opinion because at first I thought that's dumb but then when I read that Nuance the Nuance is that nobody really changes their opinion because of the celebrities but you might get people more interested in showing up to vote you if if it if it improves Your Enthusiasm okay maybe but nobody changed their vote because Beyonce so I agree with the Democrat um speech writer okay yeah the the celebrities are not changing votes but maybe they give you some energy however I would note that both sides use celebrities right so they both used every celebrity they could get um Trump did it too but what was different about the way what was different about the way that Trump did it Trump used celebrities too but what was different here's what I think was different Trump's celebrities were often people that look like Democrats so when you see Joe Rogan who's got a long history of progressive Democrat looking opinions sayou know what I'm going Trump you've got uh professional athletes especially professional male black athletes putting on the hat and saying you know what I I've listened to both arguments going Trump uh you watch the um you know all the UFC fighter types uh every different race and religion and you see how much they love Trump and you say to yourself huh that's a lot of people who like Trump all different kinds here's how Trump did it when I look at Trump's celebrity endorsements here's what I say big tent Big Tent hey it's a big tent and uh you're welcome everybody's welcome when the when the democ rats put a celebrity on they're going to tell you that the uh Republicans are and you should try to crush them stay away from and basically that you're the good people and the other people are and and people are like well I'm not so sure because my neighbor is a Republican and he just mowed my lawn for free like but you telling me he's bad like how's that work so I think that Trump quietly just quietly doing what makes sense Common Sense uh attracted people from every domain who appreciate Common Sense such as having border control so so you get some Joe Rogan you get your RFK Juniors you get you know you get your uh your Tulsi and suddenly it's hard not to notice that everybody who likes Common Sense Solutions seems to be moving toward Trump and it doesn't matter what their color or race or religion is and I think that Trump did it the right way so he used the celebrity endorsements as evidence that it's safe his biggest problem was making it safe to say that you're on his team and that's what the celebrity endorsements did and by the way that wasn't that wasn't Trump making it happen that I I've said this before that I think the I think the public dragged Trump across the winning line the Finish Line I don't think he pushed himself over I mean he did a great job so not taking nothing away from Trump's performance it was amazing one of the best you've ever seen but still it took people taking big risks in their personal and professional lives to say you know what I'm putting this hat on and you know musk was the biggest one the biggest risk maybe will'll be the biggest winner but uh when you watch other people take a big risk like that it's it's very inspiring so I think Trump used it the right way by kind of ignoring it and letting it happen on its own and then it formed on its own and then it helped drag him across the the winning Finish Line anyway um so um the DNC Vice chair according to the hill uh Ken Martin he criticized the party for losing and he said quote we don't know how or why we lost now that's the most honest person like he's he's the one I'd listen to because he goes on I think he was on uh might have been news Nation no he was on CNN with Jake Tapper and he said this directly this is a direct quote we don't know how or why we lost now that is exactly right because I'm observing that everybody's speculating like maybe we should have done this maybe we should have done that but when you put all that speculation together the summary is we don't know how or why and I don't think that they can find it because think of the irony of this so this is the DNC Vice chair and he's appearing on CNN and he's talking to Jake Tapper and he's saying we don't know how or why we lost he's on CNN he's talking to Jake Tapper people get the news from CNN and Jake Tapper the CNN decided what people saw and MSNBC decided what people saw so it almost didn't matter what the Democrats were doing if there's somebody else who decides what people see so I don't think that he was quite realizing the irony that he was talking to the problem Jake Tapper now not specifically Jake Tapper but CNN so if you appear on CNN you say I don't know why we lost and CNN is you know one of the primary formers of your message I think maybe you should turn a little bit of that scrutiny on the media and say maybe it's the person I'm talking to maybe if you had not pushed the um fine people hoax which Jake Tapper did maybe people wouldn't be leaving for that reason some of the most important people who left the party say directly it was and they say it out loud is because when I found out the fine people hoax was a hoax that's when the whole Matrix opened up and you know I could see that the Democrats were just lying so Jake Tapper was part of a big part of pushing that and other hoaxes if you can't recognize that the media is the ones causing them the Democrats to fail how could they possibly recover and they can't tell the media that the media is the problem because then the media won't invite them to be on anymore it's an unsolvable problem yeah I I can't see any system or tweak or or anything the the only way you could solve this problem is replacing all of the people at the same time and of course there isn't any way to do that all right um Colin rug had a little uh video and a post on X about uh Washington Post is Jennifer Rubin she was mocking trumps because his nominations were too white and she said when they looked at the the page of the nominations there were a thousand shades of white haa um she said I have I have to comment when he put up all those faces it was a thousand shades of white have you noticed that well um I'd like to do a call out to one of my followers Mike Bert Mike Bert what are you going to say about that that's sort of an inside joke right we we have a uh uh within locals I've authorized uh one person to be inappropriate as much as he wants you know not too bad but so we we have one Court Jester who's allowed to say the things you really shouldn't be saying but we've allowed one person to do it because it's actually fascinating if you cut yourself off from the opinions that differ from you you're not going to understand the Nuance but um this was funny for reasons that you won't totally understand but um I would note that uh they're not entirely white uh I think there are some asian-americans there are some other flavors and there's some Hispanic Americans I think there's at least one um some Middle Eastern American type um and Scott Turner was selected for head of Hud so HUD has a a black guy who was U part of the executive team over there I guess and he's got a good resume now what do you think do do you think that the HUD appointment was a Dei appointment just so he could just so Trump could say Well they're not 100% white well I don't know I don't know I also don't know if HUD needs to exist can anybody tell me why HUD exists is there anything the HUD does that couldn't be replaced by something far more efficient I think they have tens of billions of dollars of funding that they um that they kind of allocate but couldn't that be allocated more locally so here here's my take on what's wrong with um every Urban Development problem so somebody says if only there were a big bunch of money and then somebody says all right here's your here's your big bunch of money from the government and then it's allocated to people who apparently just steal most of it how do you stop that so if you have a system that's good at producing money and delivering it but then once it gets delivered it's stolen somewhat reliably or it's given to the wrong vendors who can't can't get the job done you're never really going to fix it so it seems like that what we need is to fix the funding oversight uh I feel like the decision of how to spend money locally should be not in the hands of the elected representatives and I know that sounds opposite of what makes sense but if if a small City can elect a mayor who then can you know make sure that the contracts go to their brother-in-law and anybody else who's going to give them a kickback we don't have a workable system see that's system problem again so what I like to see is V and Elon coming up with maybe some ideas collectively for how we can make sure that if money is sent to an urban place for urban development that it just doesn't get stolen because if you don't fix that there's no point in giving anybody any money for anything and I also worry that um Republicans maybe have written off the inner cities because they're not getting many votes there and I don't think you can fix it it doesn't look fixable to me see the trouble is if you put too many people who have too many problems in one place I don't know that you can ever fix it you would have to move the people which would be illegal and if they don't want to move then how's that going to work mean I I think you could take if you took let's say a teenager who's in this bad environment there's gangs and there's crime and there's you know the schools are bad and everything if you took that one teenager and say all right let's see let's see what happens if we put this one teenager in a safe place with a good school and no gangs probably you'd get a good pretty good outcome but if they're if but if everybody is in this one place and they all have the similar problems they're not going to feel like they have to escape because they're just sort of living the same life as everybody around them and I don't know that that's flexible I mean you almost have to distribute the people who are in the same bad situation so they don't reinforce each other's bad habits yeah you you've heard you've heard the thing you are the average of your five closest friends right what happens if you live where your five closest friends are gang members do you really have a do you have a chance not really so how much money could you send into that situation to fix it there's no amount there there's no amount that fixes that in fact the more money the worse it would get so you going have to fix the five friends problem first and I don't know how the only thing I could think of would be a massive Improvement in mobility and the mobility would have to include can you go some somewhere can you afford to move can you get a job if you go there and can you and do you have enough school choice that you can you move at least the school so if you could move the options for any one person to say you know what I need to get where I can get five good friends around my teenage kid and maybe those friends will influence them now that would be a real solution but sending money no I mean I if if Trump decided that HUD didn't really have a future I wouldn't be surprised anyway um I saw chamoth talking about uh on the all-in Pod chth I think I say his name wrong it's chth right and then I never try to say his last name because I'll just embarrass myself but it's like pelipa Jason are you watching if Jason is watching you're laughing at me right now there's some names that I really try hard like every time I read his name jamaat's last name I read it and I sound it out and then I try to memorize the order of the letters and stuff never works it doesn't last a day anyway but chamal said can you imagine if these guys you talking about the people working on Doge can you imagine if these guys basically use Doge as a mechanism to shrink the the tax code create a flat tax potentially uh the idea of just cutting this all the way down and finding through that the process of what they actually need and he says I think America could uh could get 100 to 200 basis points of GDP growth it could be an economic Renaissance I agree um now I don't think flat tax school ever work in America there's just no way because it's good for rich people it's bad for poor people no way you're never going to get a flat tax so just forget about it right I mean it's great to talk about but you're never going to get a fla tax um however if you could reduce your taxes and you know make make sure the taxes have the right incentive and you get it down to a minimum and you cut the cost of the government so you don't need as much taxes could you get 100 to 200 basis points meaning that instead of growing by 3.5 you would grow at 5.5 which would be incredible yes yes I think you could do that is it hard oh my God it's hard is it possible I think it is and so I have the same intuition as jth uh less uh less Faith than a flat tax could ever even be you know within a mile of being uh viable and I just think that's because our the way our brains work we wouldn't we just couldn't handle it flat tax would just make everybody complain too much good for rich people um so now we know much more about the January 6 and that the National Guard was delayed 3 hours and 19 minutes when everybody knew that there was going to be a problem and uh it looks like we got real problem so Chief Steven Sun um who who was at I guess who was in Char of the capital police and uh he's noting that we now know that there was this three over three-hour delay and if they had sent the reinforcements it would have looked completely different does it look to you like the delay was intentional to make the Optics as bad as possible maybe you know you can't rule out incompetence but it certainly has the look of an OP and you can't ignore that so certainly the January 6 committee are the uh at the top of my list of people we need to be looked at to see if there was a crime there now I don't believe in law fair has to be a real crime but if they were hiding evidence and lying under oath or any of that stuff these are really bad consequences I mean what happened to the country people in jail for it um if there's nobody on the January 6 committee that ends up in jail I feel like I'd be disappointed but if they didn't create if they didn't break a law that's the way it's got to be uh anyway California is making it harder to produce gas in California so we're we're all dead forget about that um so the story about Biden doing this last ditch effort to send all the money they have to Ukraine was it Anthony blinkin said President Biden has committed to make sure that every dollar we have at our disposal will be pushed out the door between now and January 20th so that really doesn't sound like somebody who's taking care of America does it we're going to make sure that we push every one of your dollars out the door before the government changes that doesn't sound like they're on our side it really doesn't so I mean there's a tone problem there but the way it's Being Framed is that these moves are designed to make sure that Ukraine is in the strongest possible negotiating position when Trump takes over really really is that why they're pushing all that money through right now it's to it's to help Trump get a get a good outcome is that why I don't think so I don't think so no I think that there's a massive money laundering operation and they're put pushing as much money through it so they can suck as much out of it as they can and basically robbing Ukraine and robbing the United States while they leave office that's what it looks like that's what it feels like I don't have any proof but sure looks and feels like it's a money laundering money stealing operation but nonetheless it could be true that it would keep Ukraine strong enough to negotiate well as well so that's good all right that's all I got for you for my prepared remarks today I'm going to go talk to the to the people on locals who haven't yet banned me and uh I will see the rest of you on U on Rumble and You.
Tube and X tomorrow same time same place and we'll have fun again thanks for joining and locals coming at you privately in 30 seconds e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e for
showing you once again that some live
streamers don't take days off
no
sometimes you just have to power through
it and just make sure my comments are
working
here yes they
are and that means an incredible show is
ahead of you
[Music]
good morning everybody and welcome to
the highlight of human
civilization probably the best day
you'll ever have in your life but if
you'd like to take this experience up to
levels that nobody can even understand
with their tiny shiny human brains all
you need for that is a cuper muger glass
a tanker CH Stein a canteen Jugger flask
a vessel of any kind fill it with your
favorite liquid ey like coffee and join
me now for the unparallel pleasure the
dopamine end of the day the thing makes
everything better it's called the
simultaneous Sip and it happens
now oh
perfect yeah it's just
perfect well good news researchers from
China and Brazil have finally given us
the invention we need it's a robot dog
that can search for fire
ants so if you have a big problem with
fire
ants you've got a robot dog Solution
that's coming that can recognize fire
ants and do what with them I don't know
just spot them I guess so you can go
kill them now what I want is a robo dog
that can pick
weeds and also pick vegetables and stuff
from a
garden so what I want to have is uh on
the side of my house want to have a
little uh little hot house you know
Greenhouse kind of thing and I want to
have two or three little robots that
have access to everything that can climb
up and pick stuff and get rid of weeds
and water things and check for problems
and it'd be smarter than I am right if I
looked at the leaf and it was dying I
wouldn't know why but AI would know why
and then it could go fix it so in theory
I could have my own little mini garden
with a little mini Gardener and every
day I'd just go in there and there'd be
a basket of whatever the latest Harvest
was and then I give it to my robot chef
and my robot Chef would cook it up for
me and I would just have the best food
from
robots that's the future well meanwhile
uh at the
MIT according to Adam zi he has an
article on that that MIT has developed
some noise cancelling
silk so it's a sort of a fabric material
that has two different elements to it at
least two there are two different
aspects to it both of them will reduce
sound and I'm thinking to myself if you
could make a piece of silk that people
could stick in their ears and not hear
their partner
snoring now you've got something I don't
know if that's ever going to happen but
if this silk
can cancel
noise um it sure seems like you could
make some mirror plugs out of it and
that would change
everything do you know the one of the
biggest secrets in America and I'm
guessing it's the same in other
countries is the number of married
people who can't sleep in the same room
it just isn't possible because one of
them snores you really can't sleep with
a
snorer I learned that the hard way by
being the snorer yeah nobody wants to
sleep with a
snore anyway here's a funny story
according to uh the Atlantic Daniel
engber is writing that um there's this
business school scandal that just keeps
getting bigger and the Scandal is
professors at the business school uh
writing academic papers that are
fraudulent let's see uh what what
terrible business school has that I mean
I'd sure hate to have a degree can you
imagine can you imagine having a degree
for one of these gray business schools
that you find out the professors are all
a bunch of
uh see what business school was it it
was uh it was oh was the UC B uh oh the
UC Berkeley H School of
Business okay that's where I have my MBA
but the jokes on them because also I
disown them um for being racist already
so I don't have to disown them for also
being having professors who
are who are big
Liars I I I already disavowed them for
being
racist oh poor hos business
school anyway there was one professor in
particular who's uh just racking up the
fake the fake studies and got
caught uh according to the New York
Post um G gun ownership has soared among
Republican
women uh but it's declined among
Democrat
men so so there are fewer Democrat men
with guns and there are more Republican
women with guns than there were
recently I by surprised by that I I
actually thought everybody would have
more guns but apparently the the men
have decided they don't need them but
the Republican women are
strapped so since 2019 33% of GOP ladies
have been packing heat is that
true is that true that onethird of
Republican women uh are gun
owners that's way more than I thought I
would guess
10% it's pretty impressive that's up
from
22% uh you know a few years earlier than
that pretty
impressive meanwhile in cost the
creepiest of all scientific
studies are you ready for the creepiest
of all scientific studies I I almost
wasn't even going to talk about it but I
I I think I can do it without going to
jail
uh so there was a
study Eric Dolan is writing about this
in cost so as a study published in
complimentary therapies and clinical
practices which of course you all read
that uh children who have
ADHD uh can be benefited by
massage so they made sure they had very
professional this is key professional
massage therapists and it didn't say so
in the study but I'm going to like to
think that they were closely monitored
by
observers because I hate to think that
they were putting a bunch of children
behind a closed door with a massage
therapist I hope that didn't happen but
assuming that they were properly
supervised and there was nothing Inky
about the experiment itself what they
believe they found is that the kids who
got regular massage therapy slept better
and concentrated and did better in
school now do you know who would have
guessed that without a
study I would do you know why I think
this
worked
because here here's just a
speculation I feel like there's
something about ADHD that we don't fully
understand well I guess that's an
understatement I think everybody would
agree with that but
if you're
distracted and maybe I'm just speaking
for
myself it's because there's something
you're looking for that you need that
you don't
have now that's my take that's this is
not agreeing with any scientists or
anything I I have no idea what the
scientists say but my take whenever I'm
distracted is not so much that there's
just too much in my head it's that I'm
aware that there's something I need that
I don't have and I'm looking for it but
I don't know what it is so I don't know
if I have it yet so I'm just sort of
looking all the time but what I've
discovered is and I told you this before
that if I get like a good exercise and
it it fulfills my I don't know my body's
chemical needs then my brain is fine
then my brain calms down so are you
surprised that a massage which would
have similar benefits to getting some
good exercise would also calm the brain
it should
but I would also add this second thing
in my own
experience that when I've got a good
dose of oxytocin which you can only get
from physical contact with other humans
that I don't need much
else so if you give me oxytocin I'm not
immediately thinking about working
harder or exercising or solving a
problem I actually have everything I
want I just sit there thinking oh it's a
good day I've got everything I want
glass of water it's all I need so what
I'm wondering is did the massage therapy
give the youngsters some oxytocin that
feel good I've got everything I need
chem chemistry and that's all it was so
that's my hypothesis is that it wasn't
the physical
manipulation uh or the relaxing although
that should have helped because it
pretty much helps with with everything
so if it didn't help I'd be surprised
but maybe the bigger thing is that
people don't have enough
oxytocin so here's what I would study to
find out I take a bunch of kids who have
ADHD and then I would ask them questions
like when was the last time you got
hugged huh cuz I'll bet you'll find that
the kids with ADHD probably get hugged
less and they they had less oxytocin
just a gas it's speculation pure
speculation all right I see a weird meme
going by with oh Dilbert and a Tesla
okay anyway
um uh there's a topic I don't know if I
want to talk
about but I might
yeah I'm going to just going to go for
it so I wasn't going to talk about this
but I will so somebody that I don't know
who is uh says they fans of Dill bird
and fans of mine have created a
crypto uh that I guess is called a
Dilbert and they've asked me to promote
it I'm not doing that I'm asking them to
take it down and dismantle it if there's
any way to do that I don't know if you
can reverse it here's why well on one
hand I take it as a great compliment
that somebody wanted to you know boost
dilbur somehow and boost me and their
fans you can't create a sketchy
Financial product and Associate it with
my name and my brand and then push me to
to boost
it do you understand that you put me at
great financial and other risk because
if other people see the Dilbert name on
it they're going to say well that's
probably endorsed by Scott and therefore
it's probably safe he probably looked
into it I did not look into it and I
have no idea that it is safe and I'm not
even sure who's behind it so uh so no I
do not endorse it and I need it to be
taken down and dismantled immediately
because I don't want to be in a position
where my reputation in my brand is
writing on the good work and honesty of
people I've never met in in the in the
sketchiest of all Realms the you know
the shitcoin crypto area so if you would
please stop spamming my uh all of my
comments on X and on my live streams
trying to get people to buy this token I
I will advise everybody who's listening
do not buy this token and if you did I'm
sorry but I had nothing to do with it
and it would be a huge mistake to be
involved with it in any way now if it
turned out that it's completely unthe
legit and somebody was just just doing
me a favor it doesn't change my
response because you don't get to decide
what I'm associated with right it's not
your decision that I'm associated with
this financial product my decision is
I'm going to sue the out of you if
you don't take it down because I I can't
I can't abide with that being up right
so you need to dismantle it and if if
you're just fans then no hard feelings
if you didn't know I will I will accept
I will accept a I didn't know that was
going to be a problem that would be
perfectly acceptable I just can't have
it exist so you need to get rid of it
got
that all right so I didn't even want to
talk about it but um stay away from that
thing all right
um pursue here's a study from Gilmore
Health
news pursuing happiness as a goal often
fails to make people happier here's why
I think that makes
sense the reason you can't pursue
happiness
is it's not a thing you can't pursue
happiness you could pursue a wild animal
you could pursue a ball that's rolling
down a hill you could pursue a car you
could pursue a dog because those are all
real but happiness you can't pursue you
could end up
happy but you can't pursue
happiness there are two things you can
pursue that'll get there you can pursue
meaning meaning so you're doing
something that's helpful to other people
usually it's usually being useful you're
either having children and you're doing
a good job of being a parent or you're
doing a job that's important to the
world or you inventing something or you
doing what Elon Musk is doing trying to
save the world from debt and or at least
the country and those could give you
meaning but if the only thing you did
were hard work
it wouldn't make you very happy either
because you'd just be burned out and
wouldn't be much left of you
so here's the Scott formula for
happiness you can't chase it don't chase
it but you can let it happen by doing
other things that are right so I would
say you want to spend about 80% of your
time chasing meaning now that could
include the time it takes you to tie
your shoes and put your clothes on and
shave in the morning or put your hair
together because that's all important to
getting anything done but the 80% should
be making sure that it's directed at
some kind of useful something now if
you're
young um you don't have as many
opportunities so I would say if you're
if you're on a dating app and you're
trying to date and you know your your
ambition is to someday have a family
that's great then dating dating is
exactly what you should be doing even if
it doesn't look like this specific data
is working out you're chasing meaning
that's still
good if you're chasing meaning 80% of
the time and then 20% of the time you're
chasing
pleasure you're going to be
fine if you chased pleasure 80% of the
time you're going to be Dan B Bilzerian
and eventually say you know what turns
out that sleeping with five women A Day
Made Me a lot of pleasure but not a lot
of Happiness so he's trying to figure
out the happiness part now so 8020 is
your is your best Target
80% trying to either be part of creating
more people you know which is good for
the world or doing something something
useful and 20% Pure Pleasure now if you
don't get your 20% pure pleasure you
won't you just will fall apart we just
require some pleasure every day if you
get too much you won't be happy if you
get too little you won't be happy happy
8020 is a good mix adjust
accordingly well apparently according
Mario n is reporting on this there's a
some according to Science Daily there
are ancient hot springs on Mars that
reveal that the planet might have been
once
habitable wouldn't it be cool to find
out that there was a whole civilization
on
Mars and that they built the
pyramids here's my here's my hypothesis
on the pyramids you ready for
this um everything about the pyramids is
just recreational belief I don't know
what happened I don't know why it seemed
like all these ancient civilizations
could build these giant structures and
others couldn't but here's one
possibility that the aliens from Mars or
somewhere else who were very Advanced um
got stranded on Earth so they didn't
have the technology to get off of Earth
and get home but they thought that
someday they'd like to be found so they
used the technology they had to build
the pyramids because the pyramids are
the uh the proof that high intelligence
existed on earth a long time ago and you
could see are from a very long distance
so if they wanted to say well if
somebody can find me someday I will
arrange these pyramids in the shape of
the star system I came from and then if
somebody looks and go say hey wait
there's three artificial things oh hold
on they're in the shape of the star
system from us there's no way these must
be our people let's go get them so it
could be that this that the pyramids are
a uh a help
signal you know just just something that
can be seen from a very far distance
from a very Advanced civilization to say
whoa we better go pick those guys up of
course they're long dead so it's too
late just speculation
all right uh here's something I liked
hearing from VI
ramaswami um he's saying that healthc
care is a critical Frontier for Doge the
department of government efficiency and
he met with some of the other incoming
appointees from in the Trump
Administration he says they're serious
about reducing cost and here's the
important part he said they understand
Innovation is a key part of the
solution Innovation is a key part of the
solution
that's what I want to hear because if
you tell me you're just going to cut my
costs I don't want to hear that because
you probably can't do it if you tell me
you can restructure it re-engineer it
you know rethink it in a way that you
could almost you know make your
assumptions from from scratch and build
it up and that you could do it at a far
lower cost I think you
could I'll bet you could you know I
spend a lot of time just way too much
time thinking about ways you could lower
health care
costs and it turns out that the hard
part is that 90% of the healthare costs
come in your your last year of
life
and if you don't fix that you can't
really fix health care costs and I don't
know if anybody has any great idea for
that except for you know doctor
assistant suicide and I don't think
we're going to go big for that so I
don't have any ideas but I hope somebody
does um here's a question question in
the publication in Red State Ward Clark
is writing about how there are these
Soros back
Charities that are really working hard
to help illegal immigrants get into the
United
States and here's my
question how could it be that there are
public
entities that are backed by Soros that
are not hiding you know there's no
secret about it that are aiding and
beding illegal acts in the United States
specifically illegal entry um as a
non-citizen
now my first question is is there not
some
normal mechanism by which this could be
shut down how is it not illegal to Aid
in the bed in a
crime is there some kind of crime you
can help somebody do and you're not in
trouble does does operating from another
soil make you safe if you're doing it
from another country is that enough to
not be illegal and and if it's
legal why why is our CIA not having them
assassinated because isn't that what we
pay them to
do if there was some entity that was not
in the United States or even if they
were and they were trying to do
something that was terribly damaging to
the United States and we couldn't do
anything
legally wouldn't we be sell sending our
worst people off to kill those people
because that's how you protect the
United States I mean if you look at all
the horrible things the United States
has done under the umbrella of
self-defense this would be the smallest
thing we've ever done to stop people
from sending criminals into our country
criminals in the sense that you know
they're not going through the legal
system I'm not I'm not trying to say
anything bad about the immigrants the
immigrants I completely understand uh
and I'll say this I guess I'll say this
as plainly as I can if I were in their
position I would try to get into the
United States
illegally so in that same position I
would break the law I wouldn't feel I
wouldn't feel
any I wouldn't feel any guilt about it
because I'm just trying to make things
better for myself and my family so yeah
but it's still legal doesn't mean we can
be for
it Scott this just makes you sound
uninformed well you you
could use some of those letters to say
what it was I was missing or you could
just be one of those dicks who just say
you sound uninformed which helps
nobody so while you're being useless and
rude
and
disruptive great job there so you know
that 80% of the time where you're trying
working toward meaning you're not in the
80% you're not being useful so how about
we stop ever saying oh there's something
you need to be educated about if only
you were as smart as me different words
would be coming out of your
mouth no how about you shut the up
unless you have something useful to
say is that okay now I'm completely open
to what it is that I don't know and I
think you've watched the show enough to
watch me change on the fly when a
comment comes in and says oh you forgot
this or you you're not looking at this
so do some of that and I'll I'll
actually be happy for it but this you're
so you're making yourself look ignorant
I just figure you're a idiot
that's the only that's the only
impression I get when I see that comment
it doesn't matter who it's coming from
from
anybody somebody here is saying that
this is because I didn't get enough
sleep last night you're so
right you're so right I was telling the
locals people I didn't get enough sleep
last
night that's mostly what this is
about but it's still it's still bad
form just just don't do
it anyway so I think there should be
some way to stop the uh illegal thing
now if what you're going to say is Scott
Scott you don't understand that the CIA
and the government wants them to come in
was that what you were waiting for did
you think I didn't know that the
government wants them to come in you oh
you're probably just waiting for the
second issue to drop no I know that
there's way more than this of course I
know that it must be your first day
here anyway um have you seen the video I
don't know how old it is I feel like it
maybe has been around a while but um one
of the hosts of The View Sunny
H um was on that show where you find out
who your relatives were your DNA gets
checked and then they check your
background and she found out that she
was completely wrong about her own
background she thought she was Puerto
Rican or half Puerto Rican but turns out
that might have been a Spanish part of
the family from Spain and there were
slave
owners that's right Sunny Hosten of the
view comes from a family of slave
owners and watching her learn that she's
from a family of slave
owners was something I had to watch 20
times in a row I just kept playing it
and replaying it because there was a
part where she tried to laugh about
it but but the smile and the laugh was
so fake that it was just the hilariously
uncomfortable you have to see it
it's in my X feed if you're looking for
it
um so that was
fun but uh even more fun than that uh
apparently so they're now that I think
there now have been three separate times
in the last week I'll take a fact check
on this three separate times in the last
week when um when the view had to read a
legal a legal disclaimer
so apparently they had to do
it four times in in yet in Friday's
episode is that true Did did she have to
stop four times and
read uh a legal
clarification I think she did it it's
telling me that the lawyers for the uh
the view just hate the hosts because the
lawyers are probably trying to figure
out how can we stop them saying things
that are clearly going to get us in
trouble
and the host can't stop
lying because their entire show is built
around lying about what people did
basically it's a show about lying about
Republicans basically so if they can't
lie about Republicans they don't have
content because that's all they have so
the lawyers like you can't just lie
about their legal
situation you maybe you could lie about
reading their minds but you can't lie
about whether they were convicted Ed of
a
crime you can't lie about that
so uh so it looks like the the legal the
legal staff is trying to put the view on
a business like actually literally it
looks like they're trying to force some
am of business which might be what's
happening
um The New York Times has a article by
Samuel Moon who's a lawyer now what's
interesting is that this article is in
the New York Times And as others have
pointed out it seems like they're
admitting that the lawfare against Trump
was not based on the law but was lawfare
so here's a sentence in the New York
Times by Samuel Moon a lawyer he said it
wasn't bad luck they did not put Trump
in jail well I'm paraphrasing that part
he said quote the more uncomfortable
truth is that our search for political
salvation primarily through the law has
backfired
let me read that again the more
uncomfortable truth is that our search
for political salvation primarily
through the law has
backfired is that admitting that they
were using laware because they didn't
have another way to stop Trump that's
how I read it and others are reading it
the same way and so I I appreciate that
I I appreciate
the the complete sincerity of that H now
Mike Davis um you might know him as a
republican with some legal background um
he says even the liberal New York Times
is admitting the Democrats rant lawfare
and election interference against
President Trump because I guess it would
be election interference wouldn't it and
he says uh now the uh Trump justice
department should open a criminal probe
under and he gives the the law and
apparently there's some law that would
be a conspiracy against
rights a conspiracy against
rights that sounds exactly like the
right law doesn't it does it seem like
there was a
conspiracy of various elements in the
government to prevent Trump from having
the right to certain first of all be a
free free Citizen and second of all to
run for
office I mean without being a lawyer if
you tell me that there is a law that
says you can't have a conspiracy to deny
somebody their rights guaranteed under
the Constitution the first thing I'd say
is okay that seems like that should be a
law shouldn't
it I mean it should be a law so if it is
a
law how could you possibly imagine it
doesn't apply
here it would clearly apply and here's
here's a Democrat lawyer who's saying
well looks like the lawfare didn't work
I feel like what happens after that has
to be criminal
indictments because if everybody can see
it as plainly as we can you you got to
at least dig around there and see if
there's a case I think there might
be but
again I don't want to see any law fair
and revenge it better be a better be a
good case because we don't want to
lawfare the law farers I know some of
you want to but I don't think that's a
good place to
go
um apparently uh there's a study that
says 86% of us Asylum Seekers are not
legitimate so I guess the federal
government did a review of that now does
that surprise you I thought it was
higher actually I would have guessed 90
to
95% but um it's interesting that that we
know about it and we just still keep
this program Open The Way It Is
it's I mean I think this gets back to
that that earlier
comment that it's super obvious that the
government wants to just let in as many
people as they can like to imagine that
this is a
mistake that would be imagining a lot
it's not a mistake they're using a
technical Le loophole to open the Border
that's all that
is um did you know that uh California is
still counting the
votes for 18 days we're still counting
the votes and believe it or not uh Nancy
Pelosi's daughter is involved in that
and it's called curing ballots now I
think that what what that means is if
you have a ballot that looks like it
filled out wrong or something's missing
you have the option of calling the
person and saying you know did you mean
this is this a real vote Etc and then
you can count it if you can confirm it's
a real person with a real vote so
they've been doing that for 18 days and
it looks like they might flip two seats
in Congress from red to blue because of
18 days of curing the
votes you're going to feel comfortable
with
that 18 days of curing the
votes
yeah I see there's some kind of a fight
going on on the comments here let's see
what that that's all
about I just want to take a look at what
the what all the fightings
about all right I can't
see never
mind well um Elon Musk is having a great
time on X he seems quite addicted to it
which he's admitted today and he asked
this question he said how how old were
you when you realized others couldn't
see the
Matrix so I'll ask that question to you
how old were you when you realize others
couldn't see the
Matrix now the way the way I interpret
that is that others how old were you
when you realize that basically
everything's a
lie uh I went with
11 have I ever told you my story at age
11 I've written this in my book so some
of you have seen you've heard this now I
will start I'll start by saying that I'm
pro-
religion now I think you've heard me say
that before I'm very Pro religion I
think
Christianity and not not to pick a
favorite but just to pick one as an
example um Christianity and others
Judaism Etc they they have a a lot of um
benefits for the people who practice it
Islam if it's the you know if it's not
if it's not related to any terrorists or
anything if you just practicing it
happily and minding your own business
probably great so I'm very pro- religion
I just don't have one because I don't
think you can make yourself a
Believer I I just don't have an ability
to enter that space so when I was 11
years old and um my parents would send
us to uh Sunday school it was called it
was a Methodist church and we would go
there and we'd learn all our little
Sunday lessons and one day when I was
about 11 the lesson was about um uh
Jonah being uh swallowed by a whale or a
giant fish I guess and he lived in the
whale's stomach for a while but he
prayed and and God saved him and the
whale spit him up and he was none the
worse for being in the whale or the big
fish's stomach and uh I remember I
called a with my
mother cuz that's when I realized I was
in The
Matrix and I said um
Mom now I'm paraphrasing because
obviously I don't remember my exact
words at 11 but it was something like um
today I learned that a giant fish ate a
guy and uh apparently the stomach acids
of the
fish weren't operating and this
particular guy got out cuz he prayed to
God and um and then I said
Mom are you aware that this is all made
up and she never answered
me and I think I tried a few few times
like but you know you know that these
couldn't possibly be true stories right
you you know that I read comic books
you've seen it you you see me watching
reading comic books what would be the
evidence that Spider-Man exists that
would be different from the EV you know
so that's sort of the direction I went
to her credit and then and then I said
um I'm resigning from
religion and at 11: I told my mother I
wouldn't be participating
anymore and to her credit to her
Everlasting credit one of the greatest
things she ever did she said
okay and we never spoke about it again
because I tried it if I never tried it
then we would have had a longer
conversation but the rule was you don't
get to be a quitter no don't get to be a
quitter if we put you in baseball you
know if put you in little league and you
don't like it the first two weeks you
don't get to quit if you play for three
years and decide you don't want to play
a fourth year yeah yeah then you've
tried it so the fact that I'd already
gone to Sunday school for now what I
five years or something and that i' had
worked it through and I had an argument
and I had a position and I called the
meeting and I st down my position and
she said okay never talked about it
again and by the way I never even
learned what my parents religious
beliefs were still don't they never
talked about it I mean they attended a
little bit of the church activities but
they weren't regulars or
anything anyway anyway
so so I call that the Matrix now of
course it was a very long trip to find
out that all of the news is fake and
most of the science is fake too and that
everything we learn about history is
made up now that took a longer but once
I realize there something kind of
basic could be just a story that people
tell now if you prefer and say but Scott
you're wrong because the Christian
religion is all correct
you would certainly agree that all the
other religions are wrong so it ends up
being kind of the same point if you you
know you just might think you got the
right
one anyway here's a matrix
example um in The Matrix uh do you
remember why Tulsi gabard is was being
called a Russian asset and still is by
some of the Democrats that came from
Hillary
Clinton Hillary
Clinton also of course tried to make
make uh Trump the Russian asset I I
think Hillary's calling card is she
always tries to get a twofer so Hillary
hates Russia and
Putin and often she'll hate somebody
else so if she hates somebody else
she'll just say that they're a Putin
puppet so that you can take out the
person that you hate but also keep the
pressure on Putin so apparently she did
that trick the same trick that she did
on Trump she tried on Tulsi gabard and
that's part of the
Matrix so if if you're a Democrat and
you think that the news is real and
somebody like Hillary Clinton says
honest things then you think oh I guess
I know what's going on now look at all
these Russian puppets but if you know
you're in The Matrix and you know that
nothing that public figures say should
be taken as true then you go oh that's
just Hillary Clinton doing what Hillary
Clinton always does oh Hillary Clinton
always says
somebody's a a Putin
puppet so no I wouldn't worry about
telsy
gabard um I saw a conversation on X in
which people were saying uh were
disagreeing with somebody who said we
should vet people and make sure that
we're letting in immigrants who are you
know not criminals and can add something
it turns out there are a number of
people who in the comments said very
clearly that all immigration is
bad and the reason is that they're
coming in from other countries and other
races and cultures and they're going to
you know outnumber the people who are
here eventually and then put pressure on
the people are here who will become I
think it's mostly white people who are
worried about being
minorities and I was saying that uh
economists should
decide who comes in and what kind of
people come in and what numbers and I I
still believe that but a number of
people disagreed with me and said that
all that all of the uh immigration is
bad and then somebody said oh look at
how much I'm being dunked on in the
comments so I looked at the comments and
I thought how would anybody dunk on
that to the best of my knowledge 100% of
economists from both sides are on the
same page which is that there is some
number of immigrants that's good for the
country and there's some number that
would be too much am I wrong about that
that 100% of economists would agree they
might they might disagree on the number
and even the type but they would all
agree with the concept that there's
something as something that would be
called too few especially since we're
not reproducing at the rate of
replacement and there is something that
would be too much I don't think that's
even
controversial but other people were
saying no it's basically just race they
just don't want to be outnumbered by
High qualified people or low-qualified
people and there was a disagreement
because I said everybody's better off if
the economy is good because we brought
in people who could do good things now
I'm going to double down on my
comment if we didn't have immigration
you wouldn't have Elon
Musk you wouldn't have
aake I mean I I think maybe his parents
um right you you wouldn't have most of
Silicon
Valley do you know how many how many uh
unicorns were made by uh people who were
not born in the United
States maybe it's more obvious when you
live where I live because I'm you know
sort of Silicon Valley adjacent so I'm
mired in that population
but immigration
is really really important to America
keeping its economic lead and if you
think that you could take a hit on the
economy and you'd still be okay I don't
think you're thinking this through
there's a reason that every Economist
thinks that some amount of immigration
is good every
everyone so uh I think some people think
that they specifically would have some
negative outcome but again that has to
do with the
rate if you suddenly said let's bring in
uh uh a 100 million people for from
India without checking him out that
would be too
much too much if you said can we skim
the smartest brightest people from their
you know their best institutions who
want to work in America yes please let's
let's let's see if we can get as many of
those as we can you know let's see if we
can get as many German scientists after
World War II as we can we really do need
the best we need that pretty badly so
I'll agree with you that there's some
amount of anything that's too much but
no you can't you can't not have
immigration and expect the country to
remain
prosperous uh well Elon Musk also making
news because he said that even Mayors
will be arrested for stopping Mass
deportations because he said that
anybody who's trying to you know Aid and
ab bet the illegal immigrants is going
to have some some questions to answer
and he says that even Mayors could be
arrested and I think the was it the
mayor of Denver who almost immediately
said well I probably wouldn't try to
stop
it I didn't see that story too closely
but there's some mayor who did a little
backtracking but I agree with
this I agree that mayor should be put in
jail if they try to stop the federal
government from doing what is legally
authorized and I would argue is mandated
by the election so yes I think a mayor
should go to jail if they get in the way
now I don't know if they should stay in
jail but you know maybe you need to put
them in there overnight while you do
your deportations or something but you
know I I I'm not I'm not in favor of law
fair no lawfare but we have to get the
job
done anyway um Patrick Bet David was
having a good time uh mocking CNN and
MSNBC um apparently the Hallmark Channel
beat them both in in uh in viewership
recently and uh Patrick B David says
quote imagine you wake up one day and
your producer comes to you says guys
Hallmark just beat
us to which I
say well being the third best of fiction
isn't that bad is
it see because Hallmark is
fiction and CNN and MSNBC or fake news
so they really are direct comp
competition what would happen if they
had real
news and then Hallmark continueed doing
fiction although Hallmark does some real
stories sometimes don't they well I
think it's pretty funny now I do think
that their viewership will rise again
when Trump takes
power because they'll have something to
attack and people who want to hear it at
the moment I think everybody's weepy
because they found out they were on the
losing side and their team all lied to
them but they'll get over it and uh I
think they'll get back at least half of
what they lost in audience in the last
few months it'll be after the holidays
maybe everything's slower over the
holidays
anyway um so Glennon Greenwald is always
good at reminding us which networks are
associated with the CIA and he he says
uh how Cor corporate media like CNN is
nothing but a blind mouthpiece for the
CIA and he gives this example that CNN's
Katie
bis she was going after Tulsi gabard
because Tulsi had once supported limits
on NSA domestic spying and uh about
something about Edward
Snowden so and then uh Greenwald points
out that uh Katy
boellis Bolis uh repeat ly slips in
quote intelligent sources tell us to
maintain the facade of
neutrality if you hear the if you hear
intelligent sources tell us what should
you do with that
story not believe
it intelligent sources are they're the
professional
Liars if you're an intelligent Source
you're allowed to lie it's actually
right there in your job description
it's not even you know it's not even
immoral or unethical it's their job it's
their job to lie to anybody they need to
lie to to get the job done
so yes it does look like CNN's got a
little little influence there from the
quote intelligent
sources I don't believe any any non-name
sources um I'm seeing it was an article
saying progressives need a new
leader how in the world are they going
to do
that
um so this is one one spokesperson in
the uh Democrat Party um they think that
the was at least one thinks that the uh
Progressive left is better without a
dominant
figurehead so the so the Democrats don't
have an obvious leader now it seems like
Obama will still emerge at some point
but at the moment he's quiet because he
he's on the losing
team um and then there's another view
that instead of having no dominant
leader which by the way is a losing
proposition if you're ever if you're
ever involved in a organization who says
well I don't think we need a dominant
figurehead we probably need to you know
just share the power you should quit
immediately because literally nothing
works if you don't have a you know a
powerful leader now the powerful leader
should certainly be taking you know lots
of Clues from the people being led
that's what Trump
does but you still need the powerful
figure ad to get anything done you can't
share power that's never going to work
um and then somebody else saying that uh
this is my favorite one um the Democrats
need an opposite and equal force in
terms of
celebrity somebody named Turner said so
imagine them saying okay we figured out
what we did wrong Trump was such a good
candidate such a powerful strong you
know almost like a cult leader
persuasion capabilities that if they
could come up with their own celebrity
powerful charismatic person that they
could win elections too so two other
theories are we should not have anybody
like that and then the other theory is w
we need somebody just like
that so when I say that the Democrats
are lost oh wow are they
lost they are so
lost that it's almost like the people
who know how anything Works already
became Republicans so there's nobody
left who can figure out easy stuff you
know just basic easy strategy
stuff and anyway I'm starting to think
that there are no Democrats who have the
skill to fix
this and if they're trying to figure out
why does it work for the
Republicans but not
us do you think I should tell
them do do you know why the Republicans
got a bigger tent and they gained in
every single
category does anybody know
why uh I'm going to give away the secret
because Republicans focused on the
Constitution the
law the religion in many cases and an
emphasis on
family if you know those things which
category of uh human
beings don't like it none every category
of human beings likes that oh you've got
a very clear set of rules that were made
by people they lasted hundreds of years
oh let's just follow these rules and
then everybody will be good so the
Republicans have created probably by
accident as much as anything well
obviously the Constitution is
intentional but even when the
Constitution was written it wasn't
wasn't exactly an egalitarian document
uh but it became one over
time and it seems to me that the
Republicans have created a a big tent
vacuum cleaner
meaning that if you get anywhere near
the big tent you hear this
noise you know a vacuum cleaner coming
on and you just you get sucked in and
then when you're on the
inside all those people you thought were
horrible racists they're offering hey
how can I help
you you know can I can I uh remove the
snow from your driveway I got a few
minutes and you learned that everything
that you knew about the Republicans was
wrong and that as long as you follow the
rul rules that they follow they love you
they love you you just have to follow
the same rules that's it it's easy but
the progressives are over there trying
to decide huh should we be
progressives should we be more Dei and
and really identity politics or should
we be more like
Bernie or or what those are all they're
not even the right
questions if if they're they're talking
about
personnel Republicans are talking about
process one is system one is goal the
system is going to beat the goal every
time so if the if the Democrats don't
figure out how to create a system which
they don't have they can't beat the
system so here's what I mean um republ
so Democrats have a goal of having power
and everybody gets this Equity stuff
yeah everybody does well that's a goal
it's a pretty good goal right of course
they want Power they think they're the
good guys they want everybody to do well
good
goals then you look at the
Republicans they have systems hey we got
to make sure we're following this
Constitution and that's why we got to
make sure that the Supreme Court is
filled with what we call the
originalists the people who are going to
follow the Constitution The Way It Was
Written not make up stuff that's the
system that system among other things
caused uh the the abortion question to
be sent to the
states how' that work out well it worked
out really well for Republicans because
it kind of took it off the table for the
federal election which was a better
system and at the same time the local
people in the states have you know
majority female voters in almost every
state so they can kind of get what they
want over time that's a system
the goal was for them to get all the
abortion rights they wanted right away
they will get all the abortion rights
they want in each
state eventually the system will work
through it and they'll get exactly what
they want but um the system of just
making sure you're picking meritocracy
you're following the law you're
following the
Constitution um and that you're actually
doing a
primary that's another system mistake
right so the Republicans said we're
going to have a competitive primary and
they did the Democrats said um we'll
just push this dying guy through uh no
we'll replace him uh no you know there's
no
system so the system people are going to
just absolutely dominate the goal
people I think forever I mean unless one
of them changes completely this is a
this is a permanent dominant situation
and the fun part is that the Democrats
can't figure it out because they're
locked in an identity world you know
they're they're locked in their own form
of the Matrix in their Matrix there's
identity and that matters and then
there's bad
Republicans if that's how they frame the
world they can't ever get a
solution so I would expect it to be kind
of a bad time to be a Democrat for a few
few
years
um former Obama speech writer Roso Keefe
according to Washington examiner uh says
that the celebrity endorsements are good
for
Democrats and but is careful to say and
here's where I respect this opinion
because at first I thought that's dumb
but then when I read that Nuance the
Nuance is that nobody really changes
their opinion because of the celebrities
but you might get people more interested
in showing up to vote you if if it if it
improves Your
Enthusiasm okay maybe but nobody changed
their vote because Beyonce so I agree
with the Democrat um speech writer okay
yeah the the celebrities are not
changing votes but maybe they give you
some energy however I would
note that both sides use celebrities
right so they both used every celebrity
they could get um Trump did it too but
what was different about the
way what was different about the way
that Trump did
it Trump used celebrities too but what
was
different here's what I think was
different Trump's celebrities were often
people that look like Democrats
so when you see Joe Rogan who's got a
long history of progressive Democrat
looking opinions sayou know what I'm
going Trump you've got uh professional
athletes especially professional male
black athletes putting on the hat and
saying you know what I I've listened to
both arguments going
Trump uh you watch the um you know all
the UFC fighter types uh every different
race and religion and you see how much
they love Trump and you say to yourself
huh that's a lot of people who like
Trump all different kinds here's how
Trump did
it when I look at Trump's celebrity
endorsements here's what I
say big
tent Big Tent hey it's a big tent and uh
you're welcome everybody's
welcome when
the when the democ rats put a celebrity
on they're going to tell you that the uh
Republicans are and you should try
to crush them stay away from and
basically that you're the good people
and the other people are
and and people are like well I'm
not so sure because my neighbor is a
Republican and he just mowed my lawn for
free like but you telling me he's bad
like how's that work so I think that
Trump quietly
just quietly doing what makes sense
Common Sense uh attracted people from
every domain who appreciate Common Sense
such as having border control so so you
get some Joe Rogan you get your RFK
Juniors you get you know you get your uh
your
Tulsi and suddenly it's hard not to
notice that everybody who likes Common
Sense Solutions seems to be moving
toward Trump and it doesn't matter what
their color or race or religion is and I
think that Trump did it the right way so
he used the celebrity endorsements as
evidence that it's
safe his biggest problem was making it
safe to say that you're on his team and
that's what the celebrity endorsements
did and by the way that wasn't that
wasn't Trump making it happen that I
I've said this before that I think the I
think the public dragged Trump across
the winning line the Finish Line I don't
think he pushed himself over I mean he
did a great job so not taking nothing
away from Trump's performance it was
amazing one of the best you've ever seen
but still it took people taking big
risks in their personal and professional
lives to say you know what I'm putting
this hat on and you know musk was the
biggest one the biggest risk maybe
will'll be the biggest winner
but uh when you watch other people take
a big risk like that it's it's very
inspiring so I think Trump used it the
right way by kind of ignoring it and
letting it happen on its own and then it
formed on its own and then it helped
drag him across the the winning Finish
Line
anyway
um
so um the DNC Vice chair according to
the
hill uh Ken Martin he criticized the
party for losing and he said quote we
don't know how or why we
lost now that's the most honest person
like he's he's the one I'd listen to
because he goes on I think he was on uh
might have been news Nation no he was on
CNN with Jake Tapper and he said this
directly this is a direct quote we don't
know how or why
we
lost now that is exactly right because
I'm observing that everybody's
speculating like maybe we should have
done this maybe we should have done that
but when you put all that speculation
together the summary is we don't know
how or
why and I don't think that they can find
it
because think of the irony of this so
this is the DNC Vice chair and he's
appearing on CNN and he's talking to
Jake Tapper and he's saying we don't
know how or why we
lost he's on CNN he's talking to Jake
Tapper people get the news from CNN and
Jake
Tapper the CNN decided what people saw
and MSNBC decided what people saw so it
almost didn't matter what the Democrats
were doing if there's somebody else who
decides what people
see so I don't think that he was quite
realizing the irony that he was talking
to the
problem Jake
Tapper now not specifically Jake Tapper
but CNN so if you appear on CNN you say
I don't know why we lost and CNN is you
know one of the primary formers of your
message I think maybe you should turn a
little bit of that scrutiny on the media
and say maybe it's the person I'm
talking to maybe if you had not pushed
the um fine people hoax which Jake
Tapper did maybe people wouldn't be
leaving for that reason some of the most
important people who left the
party say directly it was and they say
it out loud is because when I found out
the fine people hoax was a hoax that's
when the whole Matrix opened up and you
know I could see that the Democrats were
just
lying so Jake Tapper was part of a big
part of pushing that and other hoaxes if
you can't recognize that the media is
the ones causing them the Democrats to
fail how could they possibly
recover and they can't tell the media
that the media is the problem because
then the media won't invite them to be
on anymore it's an unsolvable
problem yeah I I can't see any system or
tweak or or anything the the only way
you could solve this problem is
replacing all of the people at the same
time and of course there isn't any way
to do
that all right
um Colin rug had a little uh video and a
post on X about uh Washington Post is
Jennifer Rubin she was mocking trumps
because his nominations were too white
and she said when they looked at the the
page of the nominations there were a
thousand shades of white
haa um she said I have I have to comment
when he put up all those faces it was a
thousand shades of white have you
noticed
that
well um I'd like to do a call out to one
of my followers Mike Bert Mike Bert what
are you going to say about
that that's sort of an inside joke right
we we have a uh uh within locals I've
authorized uh one person to be
inappropriate as much as he wants you
know not too bad but so we we have one
Court
Jester who's allowed to say the things
you really shouldn't be saying but we've
allowed one person to do it because it's
actually fascinating if you cut yourself
off from the opinions that differ from
you you're not going to understand the
Nuance but um this was funny for reasons
that you won't totally understand but um
I would note that uh they're not
entirely white uh I think there are some
asian-americans there are some other
flavors and there's some Hispanic
Americans I think there's at least one
um some Middle Eastern American type um
and Scott Turner was selected for head
of Hud so HUD has a a black guy who was
U part of the executive team over there
I guess and he's got a good
resume
now what do you
think do do you think that the HUD
appointment was a Dei appointment just
so he could just so Trump could say Well
they're not 100%
white well I don't know I don't know I
also don't know if HUD needs to exist
can anybody tell me why HUD exists is
there anything the HUD does that
couldn't be replaced by something far
more efficient I think they have tens of
billions of dollars of funding that
they um that they kind of allocate but
couldn't that be allocated more
locally so here here's my take on what's
wrong with um every Urban Development
problem so somebody says if only there
were a big bunch of money and then
somebody says all right here's your
here's your big bunch of money from the
government and then it's allocated to
people who apparently just steal most of
it how do you stop that so if you have a
system that's good at producing money
and delivering it but then once it gets
delivered it's stolen somewhat reliably
or it's given to the wrong vendors who
can't can't get the job done you're
never really going to fix
it so it seems like that what we need is
to fix the funding
oversight uh I feel like the decision of
how to spend money locally should be not
in the hands of the elected
representatives and I know that sounds
opposite of what makes sense but if if a
small City can elect a mayor who then
can you know make sure that the
contracts go to their brother-in-law and
anybody else who's going to give them a
kickback we don't have a workable system
see that's system problem again so what
I like to see is V and Elon coming up
with maybe some ideas collectively for
how we can make sure that if money is
sent to an urban place for urban
development that it just doesn't get
stolen because if you don't fix that
there's no point in giving anybody any
money for
anything and I also
worry that um Republicans maybe have
written off the inner cities
because they're not getting many votes
there and I don't think you can fix
it it doesn't look fixable to me see the
trouble is if you put too many people
who have too many problems in one place
I don't know that you can ever fix it
you would have to move the people which
would be illegal and if they don't want
to move then how's that going to work
mean I I think you could take if you
took let's say a teenager who's in this
bad environment there's gangs and
there's crime and there's you know the
schools are bad and everything if you
took that one teenager and say all right
let's see let's see what happens if we
put this one teenager in a safe place
with a good school and no gangs probably
you'd get a good pretty good
outcome but if they're if but if
everybody is in this one place and they
all have the similar problems they're
not going to feel like they have to
escape because they're just sort of
living the same life as everybody around
them and I don't know that that's
flexible I mean you almost have to
distribute the people who are in the
same bad situation so they don't
reinforce each other's bad habits yeah
you you've heard you've heard the thing
you are the average of your five closest
friends right what happens if you live
where your five closest friends are gang
members do you really have a do you have
a chance not really so how much money
could you send into that situation to
fix it there's no amount there there's
no amount that fixes that in fact the
more money the worse it would get so you
going have to fix the five friends
problem
first and I don't know how the only
thing I could think of would be a
massive Improvement in
mobility and the mobility would have to
include can you go some somewhere can
you afford to move can you get a job if
you go there and can you and do you have
enough school choice that you can you
move at least the school so if you could
move the options for any one person to
say you know what I need to get where I
can get five good friends around my
teenage kid and maybe those friends will
influence them now that would be a real
solution but sending money no I mean I
if if Trump decided that HUD didn't
really have a
future I wouldn't be
surprised anyway
um I saw chamoth talking about uh on the
all-in Pod chth I think I say his name
wrong it's chth right and then I never
try to say his last name because I'll
just embarrass myself but it's
like
pelipa Jason are you watching
if Jason is watching you're laughing at
me right
now there's some names that I really try
hard like every time I read his name
jamaat's last name I read it and I sound
it out and then I try to memorize the
order of the letters and stuff never
works it doesn't last a day anyway but
chamal said can you imagine if these
guys you talking about the people
working on Doge can you imagine if these
guys basically use Doge as a mechanism
to shrink the the tax code create a flat
tax
potentially uh the idea of just cutting
this all the way down and finding
through that the process of what they
actually need and he says I think
America could uh could get 100 to 200
basis points of GDP growth it could be
an economic
Renaissance I
agree um now I don't think flat tax
school ever work in
America there's just no way because it's
good for rich people it's bad for poor
people no way you're never going to get
a flat tax so just forget about it right
I mean it's great to talk about but
you're never going to get a fla tax um
however if you could reduce your taxes
and you know make make sure the taxes
have the right incentive and you get it
down to a minimum and you cut the cost
of the government so you don't need as
much taxes could you get 100 to 200
basis points meaning that instead of
growing by 3.5 you would grow at 5.5
which would be
incredible yes yes I think you could do
that is it hard oh my God it's hard is
it possible I think it is and so I have
the same intuition as jth uh
less uh less Faith than a flat tax could
ever even be you know within a mile of
being uh viable and I just think that's
because our the way our brains work we
wouldn't we just couldn't handle it flat
tax would just make everybody complain
too
much good for rich
people um so now we know much more about
the January 6 and that the National
Guard was delayed 3 hours and 19 minutes
when everybody knew that there was going
to be a problem and uh it looks
like we got real problem so Chief Steven
Sun um who who was at I guess who was in
Char of the capital police and uh he's
noting that we now know that there was
this three over three-hour
delay and if they had sent the
reinforcements it would have looked
completely
different does it look to
you like the delay was intentional to
make the Optics as bad as
possible
maybe you know you can't rule out
incompetence but it certainly has the
look of an OP
and you can't ignore that so certainly
the January 6 committee are the uh at
the top of my list of people we need to
be looked at to see if there was a crime
there now I don't believe in law fair
has to be a real crime but if they were
hiding evidence and lying under oath or
any of that stuff these are really bad
consequences I mean what happened to the
country people in jail for it um if
there's nobody on the January 6
committee that ends up in jail
I feel like I'd be
disappointed but if they didn't create
if they didn't break a law that's the
way it's got to
be uh anyway California is making it
harder to produce gas in California so
we're we're all dead forget about that
um so the story about Biden doing this
last ditch effort to send all the money
they have to Ukraine was it Anthony
blinkin said President Biden has
committed to make sure that every dollar
we have at our disposal will be pushed
out the door between now and January
20th so that really doesn't sound like
somebody who's taking care of America
does it we're going to make sure that we
push every one of your dollars out the
door before the government changes that
doesn't sound like they're on our side
it really doesn't so I mean there's a
tone problem
there but the way it's Being Framed is
that these moves are designed to make
sure that Ukraine is in the strongest
possible negotiating position when Trump
takes
over
really really is that why they're
pushing all that money through right now
it's to it's to help Trump get a get a
good
outcome is that
why I don't think
so I don't think so no I think that
there's a massive money laundering
operation and they're put pushing as
much money through it so they can suck
as much out of it as they can and
basically robbing Ukraine and robbing
the United States while they leave
office that's what it looks like that's
what it feels like I don't have any
proof but sure looks and feels like it's
a money laundering money stealing
operation but nonetheless it could be
true that it would keep Ukraine strong
enough to negotiate well as well so
that's good
all right that's all I got for you for
my prepared remarks today I'm going to
go talk to the to the people on locals
who haven't yet banned me and uh I will
see the rest of you on U on Rumble and
YouTube and X tomorrow same time same
place and we'll have fun again thanks
for joining and locals coming at you
privately in 30
seconds
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e for