Back to episode — Episode 2679 CWSA 12/04/24
Context —
tising groups and entities of the world, when they coordinate to, let's say, put X out of business because they don't like the politics or the messaging, that he's thinking maybe that should be illegal. What part of illegal would that be? I guess it would be for being a cartel and suppressing competition and free speech. So I don't know exactly what count you would get them on, but yes, this is ex…
← Previous segment →that nobody could select what advertising is associated with their content. Wouldn't it be better? Because once you got used to it and you knew, oh, here's that terrible advertisement but it's associated with this content I want to see, but you would know that the person who made the content had nothing to do with the advertising. It was just an unrelated coincidence. I feel like we'd be better off if you couldn't control that. But you know, you'd have to get rid of the Nazi stuff, I suppose. But if it's just normal advertising, it seems like it should be blind. I'm seeing a lot of people disagree with that, and so you shall. Apparently we can agree to disagree.
All right
Context —
, I've got something you're really going to disagree with later. Wait for that. According to Newsmax, Ray Lewis says 21 Soros-linked DAs have been replaced by tough-on-crime prosecutors since 2022. And my first question was, if 21 Soros-linked DAs — Soros-linked means he probably was a big part of their funding for their campaign, may have even selected them — how many are left? You know I always…
Next segment → →