Coffee With Scott Adams — Knowledge Archive May 24, 2026
Scott Adams Philosophy Archive
Search ideas
Episodes Episode #2679

Episode 2679 CWSA 12/04/24

Episode #2679 Dec 4, 2024 1:24:16 33,276 views

Nomination drama, WW3, NJ drone mystery, lots more ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ If you would like to enjoy this same content plus bonus content from Scott Adams, including micro-lessons on lots of useful topics to build your talent stack, please see scottadams.locals.com for full access to that secret treasure.

Opening The Golden Age

Well, stocks are a little bit flat, a little bit up. Not bad. We'll take it. It's the Golden Age. Let's see, we've got nine people on YouTube and 223 on Rumble. That's a way to rumble. All right, let me get my comments up here and then we've got a show to do. Comments coming. Perfecto. Good morning…

View segment →
SimultaneousSip Energy & Mood Management

nd welcome to the highlight of human civilization. But if you'd like to take this experience, which is already wildly amazing, up to levels that nobody can even understand with tiny shiny human brains, all you need for that is a cup or a mug or a glass, a tankard, a chalice or stein, a canteen, jug…

View segment →
NewsReaction Politics as Persuasion

re when I was doing that. You can keep doing distracting memes when I do the sip, but some of them were extra distracting today. What's happening with Hawk Newsome? He's leading the murderer chants against Perry. Of course he is. A piece of shit. Of course he is. Woke knew him. I once thought he ha…

View segment →
MainContent Health & Biohacking

itive force in the world, but apparently not. Well, let's start with the Golden Age. You want to hear the good news? You probably already heard this, but drinking coffee is good for your liver according to a new study. I don't know if these are different stories or the same story dressed up, but I…

View segment →
NewsReaction Media & Fake News

just could have asked me probably, they found that high blood sugar in healthy adults is linked to lower brain activity. In other words, sugar makes you dumb even if you don't have diabetes. So if your sugar is high, just higher than it should be but not diabetes, it's going to take a few points off…

View segment →
NewsReaction Politics as Persuasion

tising groups and entities of the world, when they coordinate to, let's say, put X out of business because they don't like the politics or the messaging, that he's thinking maybe that should be illegal. What part of illegal would that be? I guess it would be for being a cartel and suppressing compet…

View segment →
NewsReaction The Golden Age

that nobody could select what advertising is associated with their content. Wouldn't it be better? Because once you got used to it and you knew, oh, here's that terrible advertisement but it's associated with this content I want to see, but you would know that the person who made the content had not…

View segment →
NewsReaction AI & Technology

, I've got something you're really going to disagree with later. Wait for that. According to Newsmax, Ray Lewis says 21 Soros-linked DAs have been replaced by tough-on-crime prosecutors since 2022. And my first question was, if 21 Soros-linked DAs — Soros-linked means he probably was a big part of…

View segment →
NewsReaction Politics as Persuasion

anything. So this is where I don't actually know anything. Is 21 most of them, or is 21 just the start? So this is either really, really good news or it's almost nothing. Does anybody know what it is? I think it's a lot of them. Yeah, I think it might be the majority of them. And some were replaced…

View segment →
NewsReaction General Commentary

a big one that's for your whole network to provide electricity to buildings, then you might not want lithium. And so some of these other storage technologies might be the way to go. So maybe there'll be a proton battery in your network coming up. So I guess Biden is doing all this Trump-proofing of…

View segment →
MainContent General Commentary

st president, it just feels like an understatement. He doesn't seem like he's even on our side, does he? He opened the borders. That's not my team. He bankrupted the country with his spending. That's not my team. And now he's not going to let the DOGE effort fire people who probably need to get fire…

View segment →
Tangent General Commentary

w, I've used Steam. I've downloaded games from it, and I do understand that it's a commercial process. So anybody in the world understands that if it's still there in 24 hours, it would be pretty surprising. So you, for assuming that I don't know something as obvious as that and then making a commen…

View segment →
NewsReaction AI & Technology

e a little less toxic. It might be good for you. There are now mysterious car-sized drones over New Jersey for multiple days. I guess several weeks. Drone swarms, not just single drones but swarms, they say, over the skies of New Jersey. Can I show you a picture of it? Would you like to see a pictu…

View segment →
NewsReaction AI & Technology

nd I believe the murderer was apparently waiting for him, so it was a planned attack. It was an assassination, not a random thing. And he apparently did die. He was shot multiple times, and the attacker escaped on a bicycle. Yeah. So all right, maybe we need a little less of this in the comments. Go…

View segment →
NewsReaction Politics as Persuasion

d you're sitting there trying to decide whether this guy goes to prison, and you can't decide, the 12 of you can't decide on the same definition of the word that is the most important word to the trial? I feel like that's somebody who's trying to hang the jury. In other words, I feel like somebody's…

View segment →
MainContent Politics as Persuasion

er somebody did a crime. I don't think you're going to find flexibility on whether to be a racist or not. The people who are racists are going to be racist, and that's going to be their vote. They're going to vote against him because he's white. And those in the trial who recognize it as a racial pr…

View segment →
NewsReaction Politics as Persuasion

rnia. This is the current situation and has been for decades. Do we really need a bill? Now, maybe it's a pushback against the anti-DEI stuff because Trump might do away with that stuff. So if that's what it is, then it makes a little more sense. But I think it should be noted that this is the curr…

View segment →
NewsReaction Media & Fake News

ams. Now he didn't use the word really, but he uses the same technique. The technique is this: when somebody makes a claim that is preposterous, rather than going through all the work of explaining why it's preposterous, you simply restate it and you go, really? So that's what you think? So you thin…

View segment →
MainContent Persuasion

s caused a lot of people to be talking about World War III and how close we are to a nuclear confrontation because Russia's doing things that look like they're teasing a nuclear preparation, and we're doing things back that look like, you know, if you nuke us we'll nuke you. And I remind you again,…

View segment →
NewsReaction Economics & Finance

n't have any personal experience. But I would say if given the names and the reputations of the people who backed him, I think I'm going to go with them. Now I can't know everything, so I don't know what's true. But if I had to choose in terms of credibility, the Fox News people who went on the reco…

View segment →
MainContent The Golden Age

iced that? When he was running for president, I remember thinking, well, I prefer Trump, but you know, clearly DeSantis is qualified. When we talk about being a senator or something, of course. Of course if we talk about him to be the Secretary of Defense, yeah. We talk about him if he had been nomi…

View segment →
NewsReaction Politics as Persuasion

pollone, James Clapper, Hillary Clinton, James Comey. I'm skipping some names that may be less familiar to you. Mark Esper, Alyssa Farah, Merrick Garland, Stephanie Grisham, Kamala Harris, Gina Haspel, former CIA, Eric Holder, Cassidy Hutchinson, Nina Jankowicz, Loretta Lynch. There's some General K…

View segment →
MainContent Talent Stack

e the names and have the right names and that he necessarily agrees with all the names. So I'm undecided on Kash Patel. No, it doesn't matter because they're not going to make the decision based on what I think. But I think all of you guys need to have the same standard. I think the standard needs t…

View segment →
NewsReaction Media & Fake News

g so well. Well, so their current president declared martial law. But I guess the parliament tried to get in the building to vote it down or vote out the military, tried to stop them from getting in, but they climbed over the fence and got in and quickly voted on it. And now the president is obligat…

View segment →
MainContent Politics as Persuasion

ut the superdelegates decided they just give it to Hillary Clinton instead. That's the actual real thing that happened while we were all watching. Now the rules allow that because they have these things called superdelegates that can just overrule the regular people. But if you have superdelegates,…

View segment →
NewsReaction General Commentary

rainians killed, maybe the same number of Russians killed. And that the people involved are pretending that this is about something else, National Defense and NATO and all that. But really it's about who gets to produce the oil and the gas and collect the checks. And Burisma apparently was key, cent…

View segment →
NewsReaction Politics as Persuasion

een on the same page, meaning it was more their fault than his. And this is why I think all the January 6ers need to be pardoned without regard to how bad their crimes were. Because if you don't know that the government was behind instigating the trouble, and this clearly indicates that there were t…

View segment →
MainContent Politics as Persuasion

e guy who works for the EPA, and Project Veritas caught him on hidden camera. And he's saying that they've got an insurance policy against Trump and that they're funneling billions to climate organizations. And he said, quote, we're throwing gold bars off the Titanic to get the money out as fast as…

View segment →
NewsReaction AI & Technology

The only place you can find it, the place to order, is on Dilbert.com. You won't find it online anywhere else. Go to Dilbert.com and right at the top just click on the calendar. It'll take you to the sales page. And I remind you it's twice as many comics and made in America now for the first time. M…

View segment →
Closing General Commentary

e comics on the back of each page. In the front and on the back is all the spicy ones that have never been published outside of subscription services. So they're going like crazy. So I would make sure that you get your order in so you can make sure you get it by Christmas. You still have time. All…

View segment →

Well, stocks are a little bit flat, a little bit up. Not bad. We'll take it. It's the Golden Age. Let's see, we've got nine people on YouTube and 223 on Rumble. That's a way to rumble. All right, let me get my comments up here and then we've got a show to do. Comments coming. Perfecto.

Good morning, everybody, and welcome to the highlight of human civilization. But if you'd like to take this experience, which is already wildly amazing, up to levels that nobody can even understand with tiny shiny human brains, all you need for that is a cup or a mug or a glass, a tankard, a chalice or stein, a canteen, jug or flask, a vessel of any kind. Fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee. And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure, the dopamine hit of the day, the thing that makes everything better. It's called the simultaneous sip, and it happens now.

Whoa. Well, I can't begin to tell you how distracting the memes were when I was doing that. You can keep doing distracting memes when I do the sip, but some of them were extra distracting today.

What's happening with Hawk Newsome? He's leading the murderer chants against Perry. Of course he is. A piece of shit. Of course he is. Woke knew him. I once thought he had potential to be a positive force in the world, but apparently not.

Well, let's start with the Golden Age. You want to hear the good news? You probably already heard this, but drinking coffee is good for your liver according to a new study. I don't know if these are different stories or the same story dressed up, but I feel like that's the third time I've told you that coffee is good for your liver, which is why I soak my liver in coffee overnight.

Also, caffeine seems to block some kind of dopamine effect when you drink alcohol, meaning that if you were to drink a cup of coffee and then have some alcohol, the alcohol would be less fun. Isn't that weird? Back when I used to drink on weekends, I was sort of a party drinker. I would notice that sometimes I would drink and I didn't feel anything much, and other times I'd have one sip and I'd be like, wow. And I always wondered what was behind that. Like, is it because it wasn't always because I hadn't eaten? It wasn't food, and I always drank exactly the same thing. It was never different. So I wonder now if it's how recently I'd had coffee. Maybe if I'd had an afternoon coffee and then I had an early evening drink, that maybe one canceled out the other. Or dehydration. Somebody says dehydration. Maybe.

Well, anyway, coffee seems to decrease the dopamine hit you get from alcohol. In another study where they just could have asked me probably, they found that high blood sugar in healthy adults is linked to lower brain activity. In other words, sugar makes you dumb even if you don't have diabetes. So if your sugar is high, just higher than it should be but not diabetes, it's going to take a few points off your IQ.

Now, did all of you know that? Because I feel like I've known that for a long time, that sugar, even if you're not diabetic, extra sugar makes you extra zombie. Didn't you all know that? I kind of thought that was common knowledge, but there's a study if you believe studies.

Well, there's the FTC commissioner, according to Reclaim the Net. FTC Commissioner Andrew Ferguson, he's warned against what he calls pro-censorship advertising cartels. In other words, when the advertising groups and entities of the world, when they coordinate to, let's say, put X out of business because they don't like the politics or the messaging, that he's thinking maybe that should be illegal. What part of illegal would that be? I guess it would be for being a cartel and suppressing competition and free speech. So I don't know exactly what count you would get them on, but yes, this is exactly what we need. We need our FTC to say that you can't put somebody out of business with their advertising model just because you don't like their editorial thing.

Now, I always thought it would be a big advantage to the advertising companies if all the advertising was blind, meaning that nobody could select what advertising is associated with their content. Wouldn't it be better? Because once you got used to it and you knew, oh, here's that terrible advertisement but it's associated with this content I want to see, but you would know that the person who made the content had nothing to do with the advertising. It was just an unrelated coincidence. I feel like we'd be better off if you couldn't control that. But you know, you'd have to get rid of the Nazi stuff, I suppose. But if it's just normal advertising, it seems like it should be blind. I'm seeing a lot of people disagree with that, and so you shall. Apparently we can agree to disagree.

All right, I've got something you're really going to disagree with later. Wait for that.

According to Newsmax, Ray Lewis says 21 Soros-linked DAs have been replaced by tough-on-crime prosecutors since 2022. And my first question was, if 21 Soros-linked DAs — Soros-linked means he probably was a big part of their funding for their campaign, may have even selected them — how many are left? You know I always tell you, if you know the number without the percentage or the percentage without the number, you don't actually know anything. So this is where I don't actually know anything. Is 21 most of them, or is 21 just the start? So this is either really, really good news or it's almost nothing. Does anybody know what it is? I think it's a lot of them. Yeah, I think it might be the majority of them. And some were replaced by soft-on-crime, just other non-Soros people, but they might be equally soft on crime. So I don't have a good picture of this. But I know that the Soros-linked DA in my area got replaced. Pam Price, I think was her name. So I'm happy about that. All right, that seems like a move in the right direction.

According to a Hoodline article by Sandra Hernandez, there's some kind of a genetic booster gene that has been found that might make your plants grow way faster, like double, twice as fast or twice as big. And it's not fully realized yet, but they've got a pretty good idea that they can make your plants twice as good. And the question that this asks for me is, well, of course people reject anything that looks like it's unnatural, so you've got that problem. But at what point could you make indoor farming economical if you could make a plant grow really fast and really thick and have lots of food in it and taste good and all that? Does that make indoor farming — like if you doubled the amount of food you could produce in the same pot — I feel like that gets pretty close to making indoor farming work economically. So maybe that's the big story. Who knows?

Meanwhile, in battery technology, there's something called a proton battery. So according to the University of New South Wales, I guess they're working on this. And I don't know how you store a proton and turn it into electricity, but the idea is that lithium is not the ideal battery type for the big industrial network kind of batteries. Might work great in your car and in your drone, the lithium batteries. But if you want to have a big one that's for your whole network to provide electricity to buildings, then you might not want lithium. And so some of these other storage technologies might be the way to go. So maybe there'll be a proton battery in your network coming up.

So I guess Biden is doing all this Trump-proofing of government, trying to spend all their money and tie Trump up in ways that he can't reverse it when he gets in there. And one of the things is he granted protection and secured permanent tenure for 42,000 Social Security bureaucrats until after Trump leaves office. Now, what would be the possible reason for even doing that? I mean, the ridiculousness of trying to stop the people who just want to get rid of the unnecessary fat in the process. How is that even a Republican or a Democrat issue? You can't let people even look to get rid of the unnecessary people. I mean, Biden, to say that he's the worst president, it just feels like an understatement. He doesn't seem like he's even on our side, does he? He opened the borders. That's not my team. He bankrupted the country with his spending. That's not my team. And now he's not going to let the DOGE effort fire people who probably need to get fired. That's not on my team. Started a war with Ukraine for what reasons? Is that on my team? Like, I'm not even seeing Biden doing things that appear to be in America's best interest. It's just weird how amazingly bad he is.

However, my guess is that there will still be ways to get rid of those 42,000 people. One way would be to turn off their connection to the network. Do you think they can do that? Just turn off their connection to the network and then fire them for not doing their work. So they can't fire them for not coming into the office, but they can certainly fire them for not doing their job, right? And I mean, did Biden say no matter what you do you can't get fired? Well, he didn't say that, did he? So all you have to do is turn off their access to the internal systems, just block their things unless they come into work, and none of them could do their work, and then you fire them. So I feel like there's a workaround there.

Just when you think human beings are as bad as they can possibly be, the Steam network — that's where video games are put on that network to be downloaded and played — Steam. Now there's a video game on there where you can reenact the October 7th massacre, and apparently you can be on the side of the massacre people. So you can play Hamas and massacre innocent people. That's a video game that was made in the real world. This is an actual real thing. Yikes.

Now, on one hand I say the same thing that most of you are saying, which is yikes, how in the world is that legal, and who would want to do that, and blah blah blah. But it raises a bigger question. Can you make imagination illegal? Because playing the game is sort of an imaginary process. Suppose you had virtual reality that allowed you to do things that would be illegal as a regular person, but it would be fantasy within the virtual reality, such as murdering citizens. You could argue that the Hamas thing was in the context of a larger war or something. But suppose you had a video game that allowed you just to murder innocent people. Should that be illegal? How about if it were something that allowed you to engage in what looked like virtual sex crimes, but nobody's involved except you and your imagination? Should that be legal?

Well, there's certainly a commercial element to it, which is are people going to boycott Steam because it's on there and all that. But I don't know if you should ever make anything that's in your imagination, even if the imagination is aided by some virtual process, as long as it's private. I think I'm in favor of making sure that nobody can mess with your imagination. I don't know that imagining these things makes you more likely to do them. It might. If you're already have a propensity to violence, I could see if you played video games with violence every day, it might push you over the edge. The average person isn't going to become violent from a video game. We know that for sure because too many people have played video games.

So here's another that I need to get rid of. All right, so here's what you should never say. "Matt Scott has no idea about Steam. If the game is still there in 24 hours, I'll be amazed." Now, I've used Steam. I've downloaded games from it, and I do understand that it's a commercial process. So anybody in the world understands that if it's still there in 24 hours, it would be pretty surprising. So you, for assuming that I don't know something as obvious as that and then making a comment in public about it. So how about less reading of minds and less insulting me and maybe have an opinion that's worth a shit? So how about that?

All right, this is probably the same troll that I got rid of yesterday. I've noticed that there are some people who would not consider themselves trolls who can nonetheless find the most toxic thing to say on every topic. And I don't even know if they're doing it intentionally. I think they are. But yeah, you be a little less toxic. It might be good for you.

There are now mysterious car-sized drones over New Jersey for multiple days. I guess several weeks. Drone swarms, not just single drones but swarms, they say, over the skies of New Jersey. Can I show you a picture of it? Would you like to see a picture of it? Okay, here you go. There you go. See that picture? You got it. Very clear. You can clearly see the drones, and you can tell the drones because you can so clearly see inside them, and you can see that there's no pilot, and you can tell the size of them very easily. No, you can't see anything. The pictures are dots. They're dots against the night sky.

So I think it's kind of obvious what they are. They're not drones. Duh. They're winged Bigfoots, I think. Because you know the Bigfoots are hard to photograph, and if they've been there for weeks and nobody's got a good photograph of them, I'm thinking Bigfoot. But they're flying, so I'm going to go with the obvious: a winged sort of a tribe of winged Bigfoots. Possibly. No, I'm going to make a better guess. Here's my better guess. Why are we saying that they're unpiloted so we can't get a picture of them, but we know there's not a human being in each one of them? Can you explain that? I can. It's because we talk about drones so much that if you see something in the sky that you don't recognize, it's either a UFO or a drone.

Wouldn't it make more sense if it were, let's say, a car-sized helicopter? Wouldn't it make more sense if they were testing a one-person military flying device, which would be pretty awesome, and wouldn't know about it if it was military? And it seems to be only in the proximity of a military base. Do you think that our US military would allow something that they didn't control to be flying over their base every night for weeks, and that there would be no explody things happening like shooting them down or at least telling us what's going on? I think the fact that it's near something that looks like a military base and it's a car-sized thing kind of suggests — I mean, it might be drones, but I imagine there's people in them, and I think they're probably just experimental crafts. Just guessing. It's also possible that the whole they're the size of a car is probably just not true because nobody got a good picture of it. You can't really judge the size of it, and everything's misleading in space. Or it's winged Bigfoots.

According to Unusual Whales, the account on X, Google has now been ordered to sell its Chrome browser and share data and search results with competitors and make a range of other measures to end its monopoly on searching the internet. Isn't it weird that Google lost its monopoly on search at the same time its search feature became kind of worthless? Is that a coincidence? Like at the same time I decided there's so many sponsored and fake news and the news is just so obviously propagandized that I just stop using it. I just use Perplexity or an AI if I think it's not going to hallucinate. But Perplexity doesn't do nearly the things that Google does. So kind of a weird coincidence that just when it wasn't really a product, that's the first time it became illegal. Weird.

Well, tragically, the CEO of United Healthcare was gunned down in Midtown today, just maybe an hour ago, and was murdered. Gunned down outside the Hilton Hotel. And I believe the murderer was apparently waiting for him, so it was a planned attack. It was an assassination, not a random thing. And he apparently did die. He was shot multiple times, and the attacker escaped on a bicycle. Yeah. So all right, maybe we need a little less of this in the comments. Go ahead. Maybe a little less of that. Okay, you know what I'm talking about. Just a little less of that.

All right. Well, the Daniel Penny trial is still on. I guess there's no verdict yet, right? Has any verdict been announced in the Daniel Penny thing? Because it's going on right now. The verdict, they're still in deliberations. Okay, well, here's the only hint we have. Apparently one of the jurors asked for — let's just say the jurors asked for — they wanted a little more information. They wanted a second read-through of what is considered justifiable. So they need a better definition of what is justifiable.

Now, if you knew that a jury of 12 people were asking for a better definition of the most important part of the trial — was it justifiable? — doesn't that tell you that there's a reasonable doubt? How in the world could you go through the entire trial and you're sitting there trying to decide whether this guy goes to prison, and you can't decide, the 12 of you can't decide on the same definition of the word that is the most important word to the trial? I feel like that's somebody who's trying to hang the jury. In other words, I feel like somebody's stalling. It feels like a play by a patriot, as in somebody's going to make sure that there's something they can hold on to to claim reasonable doubt. I'm going to say hung jury. What do you say?

Because I think the people who want to convict him are never going to change their mind because they'd just be racists, and the people who think that the jury itself is racist are not going to change their mind because it's obviously a racist case. So I think that nobody's — you might find people who are willing to be flexible on the argument of whether somebody did a crime. I don't think you're going to find flexibility on whether to be a racist or not. The people who are racists are going to be racist, and that's going to be their vote. They're going to vote against him because he's white. And those in the trial who recognize it as a racial prosecution are going to say, I don't even care if he did that. I don't even care if he did murder him if it's a racist prosecution. Nope, that's what I would do. I wouldn't even care about the details of the case if I knew it was only a case because of the race of the alleged. Not good enough.

Yeah, I wouldn't participate in that in any way. So I can't say it's — I don't have a prediction yet, but I would say the fact that they asked for this specific thing suggests a hung jury to come. So that's, I guess, that is my prediction. Hung jury means that they could do it again, so it might not be over. We'll see.

Meanwhile, Democrat New York City Mayor Eric Adams, according to the Daily Wire, is totally on Daniel Penny's side. Okay, thank you, Eric Adams. He said, quote, "You have someone on that subway who is responding, doing what we should have done." Perfect way to put it. Doing what we should have done. Strongly defended him. You know, I don't know if Eric Adams is angling for some kind of a federal pardon, but he's definitely on my good side. So he agrees with Hochul about helping to remove dangerous migrants, and he agrees that we should be able to protect ourselves in his city. Now he's got some allegations against him that look pretty serious to me, look pretty serious. But God, I'd hate to lose him. I mean, he's the only Democrat who seems to be willing to say what is obvious and makes sense as opposed to just team play. But the allegations are pretty serious sounding, so we'll see what happens with that. But I definitely appreciate it, Mayor Adams. No relation.

Meanwhile, Southwest Airlines has said it's going to end its DEI employment practices. Another one checked off. So good work, all you activists. I don't know if that was just Robby Starbuck or Christopher Rufo or everybody. I'm not sure how many people were in on that case, but another one falls.

California lawmaker introduced the most ridiculous bill I think I've heard in a long time. He wants to give admission priority to — it's in the form of reparations — he wants to give admission priority to the descendants of slaves at the University of California and California State University. So he wants to make a change to give admission priority to descendants of slaves in California. Can I weigh in here on a minute? I have just a slight context to note that has been the current situation for every year I've lived in California, my entire adult life. There has never been a single second when a California college did not overtly prefer Black candidates. They always have, whether you're descended from a slave or not. What are they talking about? Have I been hallucinating the last 30 years of my life that a Black candidate who qualifies, has the right qualifications, is largely guaranteed to get into any college in California? Let me say that again. A Black candidate who has good credentials, did well on tests, etc., can get into every college in California. This is the current situation and has been for decades.

Do we really need a bill? Now, maybe it's a pushback against the anti-DEI stuff because Trump might do away with that stuff. So if that's what it is, then it makes a little more sense. But I think it should be noted that this is the current situation and has been for decades.

Well, meanwhile, District Attorney Fani Willis — some call her Fannie — has to release all of her communications with special counsel Jack Smith and the January 6 committee. Alex is talking about this on the X platform. And the thinking is if we find out that Fani Willis has been coordinating with them, it would look more like a RICO coordinated lawfare situation than if she were just doing her own job and unconnected to anybody at a federal level. What do you think we're going to find? Do you think that Fani was dumb enough to do something that would be coordinated with the feds that she would have to know could be discoverable at some point for some reason? Do you think any of that would be in writing? I feel like the only thing that might be in writing would be something like, hey, can we have lunch, or can you do you have a minute to talk, or something like that. I feel like they would be too smart to put anything, especially a lawyer. If you're an attorney, if you're a district attorney, don't you know not to put any illegal stuff in your messages? That's just sort of district attorney 101 stuff. So I don't know that we'll find anything, but I'm glad they're looking.

I love the fact that MSNBC has now completely transformed from being what we thought was a news network that you know we just made us mad because it didn't agree with us all the time to nothing but comedy. So every single day now I go in and I look at the clips where somebody on MSNBC is acting stupid, and it's always funny. So today's stupidity, there's a compilation by Grabin. I always see their compilations and I just want to give them a shout out. So somebody, Grabin. I wish I could give them a better plug because they do good work. Some of the best compilation clips that are funny come with this label on it. But in 2019, MSNBC, the compilation is they're talking about whistleblowers, and it sounds like this. I'm making this up. It's like, whistleblowers are the heroes of the country. Oh, those whistleblowers. Thank goodness for the brave, brave whistleblowers who are taking a risk to help the country. It's part of democracy. That was 2019. That's when the whistleblowers are saying things they want them to say. What do they call the whistleblowers when the whistleblowers are opposite their interests and whistleblowing on things that are on their team? Well, I've told you that MSNBC is not just humorous, it's theater. And I swear they all act like they're professional actors or actresses in the play. You know how a play is always overacted? Like a movie could be sometimes subtle because the camera can get right in there. But if you're in a play, sometimes you go big and it's just a little bit more theatrical. That's what MSNBC did with the whistleblowers. So as soon as the whistleblowers were not positive for their narrative, they all did the same thing. The way they talk about it: and then they've got the so-called whistleblowers, the what they're calling whistleblowers, or some people that some people are saying are whistleblowers. The whistleblowers, so-called.

All right, apparently I don't do a good imitation, so you have to watch it. MSNBC as a humor source is pretty rich. It looks like clown college.

And then of course Scott Jennings continues to embarrass his CNN co-workers by simply being a voice of reason and being good at what he does. So Jennings, he's their rare right-leaning Republican type of voice. Now I give them credit. So again, I'll go CNN credit. They give a very capable person who very much disagrees with theirists full time. They don't cut him off. They let him do his thing, and I very much appreciate it because then it turns CNN into also a comedy show because you have to watch the reactions of the panel when Scott Jennings is laying down the truth and look at all their faces. And they all do this kind of where their mouth is kind of pinched because they're hearing things that just make them look like idiots, but they don't want to break in yet. They're like.

So today I saw a clip where Scott used the really technique. Now this is one I teach you on my live streams. Now he didn't use the word really, but he uses the same technique. The technique is this: when somebody makes a claim that is preposterous, rather than going through all the work of explaining why it's preposterous, you simply restate it and you go, really? So that's what you think? So you think that the president of the United States with full forethought stood in front of the American people on video with millions of witnesses and called neo-Nazis fine people? Really? Really, you think that actually happened? So that's how really works. You don't have to even make your argument. You just have to say really, because it's embarrassing that anybody would have that thought.

So Scott used that about a different technique. He didn't use the word really, but he simply described what they believed and made them agree to it, which was devastating. He simply described their own opinion and then asked them if they're committing to it, and it was just marvelous to watch. Excellent technique.

So he was talking to somebody who was talking about the idea of Trump wanting to use the military in the United States. So somebody named Moran said, I don't want to be bringing back waterboarding. What was somebody talking about? That was that on the table? Was somebody talking about bringing back waterboarding? I don't want to be a country that tortures people, especially for the kind of country that's going to be using the military against our own citizens. And then Jones says — somebody named Jones says — we're talking about the American people. We're talking about taking up arms against them with the military that's supposed to be protecting them. This is not right.

And so you have to watch this clip just to see Scott Jennings' face where they do the split screen. You can just see him looking at them when he's saying that they're going to use the military against our own citizens. And he's like, you know that the illegal migrants are not our own citizens, right? It's wonderful. It's wonderful. Good comedy.

Meanwhile, Biden is in Angola and he promised to give them a billion dollars in aid for African victims of natural disasters. Now here's what he says about, you know, that's the right thing for the wealthiest nation in the world to do, blah blah blah. Mr. Biden, I don't know how to explain this to you. Angola has a much higher net worth than the United States, like a lot. Like it's not even close. The United States is 35, 36 trillion dollars in debt. Angola probably also has some debt, a few billion in debt. So which country is worth more? The one that owes a few billion more than it has, or the one that owns 36 trillion more than it has? Angola is richer than the United States, and that's not a joke. They're far richer. They just, you know, it's in a different form. But no, we don't have money to give them. We literally have no money. All we did is move forward by a few minutes the time that we're completely bankrupt. We didn't give them money. We gave them some debt or something, or we created some debt to replace some of their debt, I guess.

Meanwhile, Tucker Carlson's over in Russia. Doesn't look like he's going to talk to Putin, but maybe he's still trying. But he did interview Lavrov. If you don't know who Lavrov is, he's the English-speaking one that you see whenever something about Russia is going on. So he's the mouthpiece for Russia, sort of Putin's guy. So we haven't seen that yet, but it has been recorded.

Again, this caused a lot of people to be talking about World War III and how close we are to a nuclear confrontation because Russia's doing things that look like they're teasing a nuclear preparation, and we're doing things back that look like, you know, if you nuke us we'll nuke you. And I remind you again, you've never been safer. You're in the safest moment of all of American history because waiting for Trump, nobody's going to mess around. Nobody's going to mess around while we've got a few weeks before Trump gets there and just sorts things out. Now even if you say, but Scott, Trump is not a Superman. He can't make everything go away in a week. Maybe. But at the moment, most people think he can. Most reasonable people think he actually can make most of our problems go away in a week. I mean, he can make DEI go away in a week, right? He could probably get our hostages released. I don't know if he'll do that, but it's within reason that it could happen within a week. And he could definitely at least get something like a ceasefire and some talks going with Ukraine in a week. So if Putin is not insane, then he just waits a little while and gets most of or everything he wants. Why would he nuke us? And why would we nuke them when if we just wait a few weeks, we'll probably wrap it up and get at least some of what we want?

So I remind you, it always looks the darkest before the dawn, as they say. And I get all the things you're seeing, all the scary saber rattling, but that's just what happens before you do the serious peace talks. So we have never ever been safer from an intentional nuclear war. An accidental one, I don't know. You maybe there's something that makes that a little more likely. But yeah, no, we're nowhere near any kind of nuclear war. You can stop worrying about that. You have like a million things that are a bigger problem than that. That's not the one you need to worry about. I promise you that you will not be nuked between now and January 20th. I don't know about after that, but you're good for now.

Well, let's talk about the nominees. So Pete Hegseth, of course, said 10 anonymous people say that they think he drinks too much and has some bad behaviors. But they were all anonymous, huh? But then I've never seen any one person have more supporters weigh in with their name. Pretty much, I don't know if it's all of them, but a whole bunch of people who worked with him every day, like actually sat on the couch next to him in his segments, worked just the two of them for years sometimes. Everyone who weighed in with their name said these stories are complete bullshit. He's totally professional. He has never smelled of alcohol, never looked like he's had alcohol during the job. Everybody agrees he's had some drinks at night. He's had some fun, maybe more fun than he wanted to have. But not a single one of his co-workers who know him really, really well for years, not one of them who gives their name says that any of this is real.

And so let me give you a strong opinion on this. Yesterday I was saying, hmm, how do you weigh 10 or so anonymous accusations? If there were only one anonymous accusation, I'd rule it out completely. If there are 10, you have to at least treat it a little bit seriously. But once you have 10 people who are in exactly the right place to observe this behavior, and they say clearly and unambiguously and strongly, absolute 100%, I think I'm going to go with the Fox News co-workers. So you know, I don't know him, so I don't have any personal experience. But I would say if given the names and the reputations of the people who backed him, I think I'm going to go with them. Now I can't know everything, so I don't know what's true. But if I had to choose in terms of credibility, the Fox News people who went on the record strongly, including Ben Domenech, ex-Fox News person, I feel like I trust them. So I'm going to say that that should not be the reason that he might not get it.

However, there are several senators who have not committed: Senator Susan Collins, Lisa Murkowski, John Curtis, Lindsey Graham, Mitch McConnell, and John Thune. Does that group of people worry you at all? Is there anything about that group of people that they have in common? Because Lindsey Graham, Mitch McConnell, I don't know. I feel like maybe they're trying to protect the defense people more than they're looking to reform things. So I don't trust those senators. And I don't trust anonymous sources. But I do trust the people from Fox News and the people who worked with him, including a producer who had tons of exposure, and are putting their names, they're putting their own reputations on the line for another person. That's a pretty gutsy thing to do. So I'm going to go with the guts. I'm going to go with the brave people of Fox News who said, I'm going to put my reputation on the line and I'm going to back this guy because he's been solid the whole time I've known him. So can't know for sure. That's where I think it's going.

However, of course there's some worry within the campaign, not campaign, but within the future Trump administration. And according to Just the News and also CNN, people are saying that Ron DeSantis's name has been raised as maybe a safer, easier nominee for Secretary of Defense. And other names are floating: Bill Hagerty, senator, and somebody else. Maybe somebody else. Here's my take. Ron DeSantis, have you noticed that he seems capable for almost every job? Have you noticed that? When he was running for president, I remember thinking, well, I prefer Trump, but you know, clearly DeSantis is qualified. When we talk about being a senator or something, of course. Of course if we talk about him to be the Secretary of Defense, yeah. We talk about him if he had been nominated for attorney general, yeah. How about if he had been nominated to be the head of the FBI? Yeah. I mean, I think I have to give a shout out to DeSantis for his talent stack because he's got the military, he's got the legal, and now he has the management of being a governor and succeeded on all fronts. He basically succeeded in everything he touched, and they were the exact right things to touch. So he's got a hell of a good package there.

So I don't know if he became the nominee. I don't think we'd be moving backwards. Maybe Florida would, but I don't think the nominee would be worse. But I also think Pete Hegseth, I like his dedication to getting rid of DEI, and I think that's really important. But I think DeSantis would do it too.

Meanwhile, it looks like California is finally settled all its voting stuff. And four weeks after the election, there's another result which, oh, guess what? It was too close to call, but they counted until all five of the ones who were too close to call went Democrat. Now the last one just went Democrat. Huh. Five out of five. Now what are the odds that there would be five races when the entire House of Representatives is so close, so close, and all five races, the ones that took a long time, all five went in the same direction? Huh. I'm going to call it rigged.

So let me explain this again. Do I know for sure that that was rigged? No. Is there a court case that suggests that anything here was rigged? No. Is it likely that there will be a court case that proves anything was rigged? No, I mean because the court case probably won't happen. Here's why I say it's rigged. If you act exactly like it's rigged, I get to say it's rigged. Those are the rules. I'm sorry, those are the rules. If you do everything to make it look rigged, I get to say, well, that looks rigged to me, and I'm going to treat it that way. So that looks rigged to me, so I'm going to treat it this way. If you can't count the votes in a month, don't expect me to believe the result when it goes coincidentally, coincidentally like the whistleblowers, coincidentally all in one direction. No, rigged. Rigged. And I'm sorry that that has to be a firm and undeniable opinion. The truth of it? Don't know. But I know if you act like you're rigging it and you're acting exactly like you're rigging it and everything you do looks like it's rigging it, I get to call it rigged. There's not going to be a debate on that because I get to call it what I get to call it, and you gave me every reason to call it rigged. So I call it rigged. That's my take. Do I know? No. Don't need to. It's as bad as if it had been rigged even if it wasn't, because we can't live like this. We can't have races that we don't know who won.

All right, here's the part where you're not going to like me. I know that almost all of you like Kash Patel as a nominee for FBI. Part of why you like him is that he's tough and he's experienced and he's loyal to Trump, and you know he's going to go after the worst of the bad guys. I like all of that. He's definitely smart enough, and he has all the right, his brain is in the right direction and everything. But did you know Mediaite, which is not a reputable entity, but they've got 60 people that apparently are on Kash Patel's enemies list. And I think some of them are listed in the appendix of one of his books. Now I'll just read you some of the names. So these are the ones that Kash Patel thinks need to be investigated because there's enough evidence that they've done some bad stuff.

All right, some of these you don't know, but Lloyd Austin, James Baker, Bill Barr, John Bolton, Joe Biden, John Brennan, Eric Ciaramella, Pat Cipollone, James Clapper, Hillary Clinton, James Comey. I'm skipping some names that may be less familiar to you. Mark Esper, Alyssa Farah, Merrick Garland, Stephanie Grisham, Kamala Harris, Gina Haspel, former CIA, Eric Holder, Cassidy Hutchinson, Nina Jankowicz, Loretta Lynch. There's some General Kenneth McKenzie, Andrew McCabe. Man, it's a long list. I'm skipping a lot. All right, Ryan McCarthy, General Milley, Robert Mueller, Bruce Ohr, Lisa Page. You remember these names from Russia collusion. John Podesta, Susan Rice, Rod Rosenstein, Peter Strzok, Jake Sullivan, Andrew Weissmann, Alexander Vindman, Christopher Wray, Sally Yates, Adam Schiff.

Now I think every person whose name I read feels like a little bit shifty to me. But I told you that I'm not going to tolerate lawfare. I mean, what can I do about it? It's not like I have anything to do about it, but I don't have to be in favor of it. I'm not comfortable with the head of the FBI having an enemy list. Nope. Now if he'd kept this to himself and shared it with the president and said, you know, if you nominate me, I've got a long list here of going after them, that'd be fine. I'd actually be fine with that. But they better find real crimes. I am not fine with somebody who has an enemies list that doesn't come paired with what they did wrong. If this is a real list, and by the way the first thing you need to know is that this is from Mediaite, it's not from him, but they say it comes from sources from Kash. So I'll take a fact check on that. If I got any of the facts wrong, let me know.

But do you want somebody to come in to be the head of the FBI who has a list of people that he's going after? You okay with that? I'm going to say no. I'm going to say no on that. And by the way, I do think that most of the people that I read have a lot to explain. But you're going to have to come up with a lot more of a crime before I'm okay putting their names out there and saying that the FBI is going to go after them. Do I believe that he's done his homework and he has reason to believe that each of them have something to explain? Yes, probably. I think he probably did his homework. But this is not the way to present it to the public. The public can't see a list of people first because that looks like Stalin. Show me the list of people. Oh, it's all your enemies. Is that a coincidence? I'll bet we can find a crime that all of my enemies did. Nope, not cool.

So I'm going to keep my opinion open for a while. Open meaning I'm not closing down the idea of supporting Kash for that job. I'm not closing it down. I'm saying that I need to know more about this. If in his book these are the same names in the book, I don't know if this is true, but if the book has say a paragraph on each one and a specific list of crimes that are somewhat publicly obviously true, well then okay. Then it's not really like an enemies list. It's a description of the situation. So I'll wait for that because I don't trust Mediaite to just show me the names and have the right names and that he necessarily agrees with all the names. So I'm undecided on Kash Patel. No, it doesn't matter because they're not going to make the decision based on what I think. But I think all of you guys need to have the same standard. I think the standard needs to be that you need to know what the crime is first and then give me the name. But if you give me the name first and I haven't seen the crime yet, I've got questions for you before I have questions for the person you're naming, because you're doing something that bothers me. And I know you're doing something that I don't like. I don't know about that person you're talking about. I'll listen to it. I'm open to the argument. And I want to say again there are people on that list that he's targeted that I really think do need to get targeted, some of them. But I don't know the whole story beyond most of them. So no lawfare please. That would be my take.

You heard that there was a little disruption in South Korea. Here's what's funny about South Korea. I always feel like South Korea is held up as an example of a highly functioning democracy and with a really real good free market, and their economy is amazing. And so therefore their government must be pretty good, otherwise they couldn't be functioning so well. Well, so their current president declared martial law. But I guess the parliament tried to get in the building to vote it down or vote out the military, tried to stop them from getting in, but they climbed over the fence and got in and quickly voted on it. And now the president is obligated to remove it because they voted on it. And the military has decided to say, all right, we're out. We're out. You voted on it. You said it's the end. So the military apparently gets some credit for not only keeping some kind of stability, but when there was a democratic process, even though they tried to stop it, it looks like they're just obeying orders at this point and trying to do the right thing.

But here's what I didn't know, and I saw this list from a few different accounts. In Direction Barbie had it, some others. Here are some of the past presidents of South Korea. Now I won't mention all their names because you've never heard of them. So there are 13 of them, and all I'm going to tell you is what happened to them. All right, so the first one, Syngman Rhee, he was overthrown. The next one was overthrown. Then the next one was assassinated. And I'll just go down the list: removed by military coup, sentenced to death after his presidency, sentenced to 22 years in prison after his presidency, imprisoned during the term of president number three, convictions blah blah blah, imprisoned under President number three and sentenced to death under President number five, later pardoned and winning a Nobel Prize, impeached, later overturned, investigated for corruption, committed suicide, arrested for corruption, sentenced to 50 years, impeached and arrested for corruption, sentenced to 24 years. Recent president, no. Oh, not bad. So Moon Jae-in, recent president, no imprisonment. Well, good for you. And then Yoon Suk-yeol must be the new one, the current one. Impeachment likely.

Now look at the state of their government, which looks like a hot mess and always has been. And somehow they're rocking the best economy short of what Japan or something. I mean, the stability of their society and their lifestyle and everything, how in the world does any of that work with when their government is such a hot mess? Maybe it tells us the government is not part of the solution anyway.

I saw a clip on this. You know, we all know that Bernie got cheated by Hillary Clinton when he was running for 2016. But did you know that Bernie won every county in West Virginia, and then West Virginia went to Hillary? Did you know that? Let me say that again. It's a fact that nobody disputes. So there's no dispute that West Virginia, 100% of the counties voted for Bernie. But the superdelegates decided they just give it to Hillary Clinton instead. That's the actual real thing that happened while we were all watching. Now the rules allow that because they have these things called superdelegates that can just overrule the regular people. But if you have superdelegates, then the actual primary is just for show because the superdelegates will decide who the candidate is. So I wouldn't call the Democrat Party a democratic party. The Democrats are more like a, I don't know, some kind of a face for some large entities that need the government to do what they want them to do. Certainly not democratic in nature.

Well, if you haven't seen the entire Mike Benz appearance on Joe Rogan, I can't even recommend it high enough because a lot of the bad things that are happening that you don't understand is because they're hidden in complexity. The complexity of all the different funded organizations and how they're related and who's on what and who told who to do what and what they want out of it and all that. It's amazingly complicated. But Benz has that exact kind of brain where he can dig into it and explain it to you. And when he does, your head will just explode. And by the way, I don't think there's anything that Mike Benz presents that isn't documented. In other words, he'll show you the official government document. He'll show you their budget. He'll show you their mission statement. He'll show you a video of them talking. It's all none of it is made up.

But the basic idea is that the US always has been — well, at least in modern history we have apparently learned that since we have the most money, we don't have to conquer other countries with our military because that's the expensive way to do it. If you have enough money, you can just buy enough support to control any country if it's smaller than you. So it doesn't work with Russia, so that's why you end up with big Ukraine war. But with anybody smaller, we can just bribe them, blackmail them, just do all the CIA stuff that they do, murder somebody, that sort of thing. We can fund the rebels, make sure they have better weapons.

So I didn't realize that there's a group called USAID, which is cleverly named so you think it's something about helping other countries, but the aid has nothing to do with other countries. It's literally an enormous $50 billion budget situation for influencing other countries. And when I say influencing, I mean controlling, right? Not I'm not talking about nudging. We're talking about just outright controlling them. And the entire intelligence community only has 72 billion, and some people say the 50 billion is understated because there might be other things that contribute to what they're doing. So we have this enormous, enormous expense, this sort of this black box of bad behavior, this basically a CIA asset to control other countries. And I think a lot of these tools got turned back internally because they had to stop anything that was a populist movement.

And when you hear Benz describe how the idea of democracy changed from being what you would expect — a populist would be, you think Trump is the ultimate democracy person because he's backed by the most people and it's what the people want as opposed to the big moneyed interests and the elites. That's about as democratic as you can get. People vote for you and you do stuff for people. The Democrats apparently have redefined democracy as supporting democratic institutions. Meaning if you complain about the COVID shot, you're complaining against the healthcare institutions and that's anti-democratic. So anything you complain about that's a function or a department or any part of our democratic process makes you anti-democratic. So when Trump wants to come in and DOGE the government and get rid of stuff, he's getting rid of departments. But to Democrats, that's the same as getting rid of democracy because to the Democrats, the democracy is the big organizations. That's what's keeping things together.

So I'd never heard that framing of it, but it's pretty interesting. And once you learn that the entire Ukraine situation is nothing at all like the news has told you, but rather it was the entire operation was a way to steal energy. Essentially the economy of Russia depends on energy, and a lot of it runs through Ukraine. So the idea was this — according to Benz — the idea was that Ukraine also has its own large stores of energy. It's like third biggest or something, but it's unexploited. So if we could, the West and the US could control Ukraine. They already have the pipelines. But if you could get them also to produce the energy, then you don't need Russia. So Russia needed the access and the pipelines in Ukraine, and the US thought, wouldn't it be good if we had the access in the pipelines so Europe could get all of its supplies? But wouldn't it be great if the country that we control like Ukraine was the one with all the energy? So you can see why Putin's not going to give up. And you can see why we didn't give up because it's a trillion dollar thing, and a lot of the people involved have their beak in it. So people are getting a taste. So anytime you can move a trillion dollars around, you can have all these people who are figuring out how to carve out their billion from the trillion, and they're not going to want to stop it.

So you should see Ukraine as nothing but an energy deal for a bunch of rich people that might get you killed and got 600,000 Ukrainians killed, maybe the same number of Russians killed. And that the people involved are pretending that this is about something else, National Defense and NATO and all that. But really it's about who gets to produce the oil and the gas and collect the checks. And Burisma apparently was key, central to the whole plan of the US controlling Ukraine. And they would boost Burisma to be the main energy company that we would control. And that was why Hunter was part of it. So Hunter then, under this telling, would be an important part of the CIA's mission. And probably there was never any chance he could have gone to jail, whether Biden had pardoned him or not. If he was working for the CIA, I'm pretty sure they would have found some way that he wasn't going to go to jail because it does look like he was genuinely working for the CIA. Now he was also trying to line his own pockets, and the CIA probably knew that the Biden crime family was a perfect fit for their plans. But yeah, I don't think there was any chance he was ever going to go to jail. So you have to just listen to those. It's the most mind-blowing thing you'll hear.

According to the Amuse account on X, Trump made a big mistake by agreeing to let the FBI vet his appointees. Now vetting means checking their background, and that does give the FBI the ability to say or not say things that they find, which gives the FBI a lot of control over whether the nominees go forward. Do you think that that feels comfortable to you? The FBI, the very entity that will be most targeted by his nominees, are going to be the ones who tell you who the nominee can be. What? I don't know how that possibly works. So I'll keep an eye on that. But I agree with the Amuse account that that doesn't look good.

Let's see. According to, speaking of Kash Patel, he noted on a recent video I saw that the January 6 committee, when they took his deposition, he put five government reports into his testimony. And then when he saw what they had later, they had eliminated them. Two of the documents were exonerating, would have exonerated Trump because they involved Mayor Bowser and Pelosi and what they were saying about the National Guard. And basically you can see that Trump always wanted the National Guard. Trump always wanted peace. No indication that he wanted trouble. In fact, he wanted the opposite. He wanted peace and he wanted to make sure there was enough security. And that Bowser and Pelosi may have not been on the same page, meaning it was more their fault than his. And this is why I think all the January 6ers need to be pardoned without regard to how bad their crimes were. Because if you don't know that the government was behind instigating the trouble, and this clearly indicates that there were two people who could have increased the security to the point where nobody got hurt or fewer people got hurt and decided not to for whatever reason — don't know yet — presumably to make it look worse for Trump, but we don't know that. So assuming it's true that the January 6 committee intentionally essentially altered his testimony by removing big parts of it, that feels jailable, doesn't it? I don't know exactly what law that would be violating, but if somebody testifies under oath in an official proceeding and then you decide to hide some of the good stuff, the stuff that would be opposite of your narrative, there must be some law against that, isn't there?

So that's the sort of thing where I don't necessarily want to put the names of the people on a hit list, but you certainly start with the January 6 committee if you're going to be asking some questions as the new head of the FBI.

All right. According to Project Veritas, as I told you, Biden is trying to Trump-proof the administration. But there's some guy who works for the EPA, and Project Veritas caught him on hidden camera. And he's saying that they've got an insurance policy against Trump and that they're funneling billions to climate organizations. And he said, quote, we're throwing gold bars off the Titanic to get the money out as fast as possible.

Now, do you think that the reason they're trying to get this money out as fast as possible, especially for the green initiatives, is because they want to save the planet and they know they have to hurry and if Trump gets in there they won't be able to save the planet? I don't think so. There may be some people thinking that way, but no. My guess is that when you have lots of money to throw around, that there are a bunch of Democrats waiting to get their beak wet and get their cut. And if you don't allocate the money, they won't get their cut. So this is everything about getting the cut and nothing about the economy. So it's theft. Basically it's just theft. It might not be illegal, but I don't see it as anything but theft.

And that, ladies and gentlemen, is what I wanted to tell you today. Besides, have you purchased your Dilbert calendar? There's still time to get it before Christmas if you order it now. The only place you can find it, the place to order, is on Dilbert.com. You won't find it online anywhere else. Go to Dilbert.com and right at the top just click on the calendar. It'll take you to the sales page. And I remind you it's twice as many comics and made in America now for the first time. Made in America. And there are comics on the back of each page. In the front and on the back is all the spicy ones that have never been published outside of subscription services. So they're going like crazy. So I would make sure that you get your order in so you can make sure you get it by Christmas. You still have time.

All right, I'm going to say hi to the locals subscribers. All five, how many of you? 847 of you. Thanks for joining, everybody. And I'll see you again tomorrow, same time, same place. All right, locals, I'm coming at you privately.

well stocks are a little bit uh little bit flat a little bit up not bad we'll take it it's the Golden Age let's see we've got nine people on You.

Tube and 223 on Rumble that's a way to rumble all right let me get my comments up here and then we got a show to do comments coming Perfecto good morning everybody and welcome to the highlight of human civilization but if you'd like to take this experience which is already wildly amazing up to levels that nobody can even understand with tiny shiny human brains all you need for that is a cup or a mug or a glass a tanker CH or sign a canteen jug or flask a vessel of any kind fill it with your favorite liquid I like coffee and join me now for the unparallel pleasure the dopamine here of the day the thing that makes everything better it's called the simultaneous Sip and it happens now go well I can't begin to tell you how d distracting the memes were when I was doing that you you can keep doing distracting memes when I do the the Sip but some of the some of them were extra distracting today what's happening with Hawk Nome he's leading the murderer chance against Perry of course he is a piece of of course he is walk new him I once thought he was he had potential to be a positive force in the world but apparently not well let's start with the golden age you want to hear the good news you probably already heard this but drinking coffee is good for your liver according to noridge I don't know if these are different stories or the same story dressed up but I feel like that's the third time I've told you that coffee is good for your liver which is why I soak my liver in coffee overnight um also caffeine seems to block some kind of doping dopamine effect when you drink alcohol meaning that if you were to drink a cup of coffee and then have some alcohol the alcohol would be less fun isn't that weird back when I when I used to drink on weekends I was sort of a party Drinker um I would notice that sometimes I would drink and I didn't feel anything much and other times I'd have one step and I'd be like wow and I always wondered what was behind that like is it because it it wasn't always because I hadn't eaten it wasn't food and I always drank exactly the same thing you know it was never different so I wonder now I wonder if it's how how recently I'd had coffee coffee as you say it maybe if I'd had a afternoon coffee and then I had an early evening drink that maybe one canceled out the other or dehydrated somebody says dehydration maybe well anyway coffee seems to decrease the dopamine hit you get from alcohol in another study where they just could have asked me probably they found that high blood sugar in healthy adults is linked to lower brain activity in other words sugar makes you dumb even if you don't have diabetes so if your sugar is high just higher than it should be but not diabetes it's going to take a few points off your IQ now did all of you know that because I feel like I've known that for a long time that Sugar even if you're not diabetic extra sugar makes you extra zombie didn't you all know that I kind of thought that was common knowledge but there's a study if you believe studies well there's uh the there's an FTC commissioner according to reclaim the net FTC commissioner Andrew Ferguson um he's warned against what he calls Pro censorship advertising cartels in other words when the advertising um groups and entities of the World when they coordinate to let's say put X out of business because they don't like the politics or the messaging that he's thinking maybe that should be uh illegal um what part of illegal would that be I guess it would be for being a cartel and and suppressing competition and free speech so I don't know exactly what count you would get them on but yes this is exactly what we need we need our FTC to say that you can't put somebody on a business with their advertising model just because you don't like their editorial thing now I always thought it would be a big advantage to the advertising companies if all the advertising was blind meaning that nobody could nobody could select what advertising is associated with their uh content wouldn't it be better because once you got used to it and you knew uh oh here's that terrible advertisement but it's associated with this content I want to see but you would know that the person who made the content had nothing to do with the advertising it was just unreal Rel ated coincidence I I feel like we'd be better off if you couldn't control that but you know you'd have to get rid the the Nazi stuff I suppose but you know if it's just normal advertising it seems like you should be blind I'm seeing a lot of people disagree with that and so you shall apparently we can agree to disagree all right I got something you're really going to disagree with later wait for that um according to news Ray Lewis says 21 Soros linked Das have been replaced by tough on crime prosecutor since 2022 and my first question was if 21 Soros linked Das Soros linked means he probably was a big part of their funding for their campaign may have even selected them um how many are left you know I always tell you if you know the number without the percentage or the percentage without the number you don't actually know anything so this is where I don't actually know anything is 21 most of them or is 21 just the start so this is either really really good news or it's almost nothing does anybody know what it is I I think it's a lot of them yeah I I think it might be the majority of them and some were replaced by Soft un crime just other uh non Soros people but they might be equally soft on crime so I don't have a good picture of this but I know that our the the Soros linked da in my area got replaced Pam price I think was her name so I'm happy about that all right that seems like a move in the right direction according to hoodline article by Sandra herandez there's some kind of a genetic booster Gene that has been found that might make your plants grow way faster like double twice as fast or twice as big and uh it's not it's not fully realized yet but they've got a pretty good idea that they can make your plants twice as good and the question that this asks for me is well of course people re reject anything that looks like it's unnatural so you got that problem but at what point could you make indoor farming economical if you could make a plant grow really fast and really thick and have you know lots of food in it and taste good and all that does that make indoor farming like if you doubled if you doubled the amount of food you could produce in the same pot I feel like that gets pretty close to making indoor farming work economically so maybe that's the big story who knows meanwhile in Battery Technology there's something called a proton battery so according to the University of New South Wales I guess they're working on this and uh I don't know how you how you store a proton and turn it into electricity but uh the idea is that lithium is not the ideal battery type for the big industrial Network kind of batteries might work great in your car and in your drone the lithium batteries but if you want to have a big one that's for your whole network to provide electricity to buildings then you uh might not want lithium and so some of these other storage uh Technologies might be the way to go so maybe there'll be a protein battery in your network coming up um so I guess Biden is doing all this uh Trump proofing of government trying to spend all their money and and tie Trump up in ways that he can't reverse it when he gets in there and one of the things is um he granted protection and secured permanent Tor for 42,000 Social Security bureaucrats uh until after Trump leaves office now what would be the possible reason for even doing that I mean the the Ridiculousness of trying to stop the people who just want want to get rid of the unnecessary fat in the process how is that even a Republican or a Democrat issue you you can't let people even look to get rid of the unnecessary people I mean Biden to say that he's the worst president it just feels like an understatement he doesn't seem like he's even on our side does he he opened the borders that's not my team he bankrupted the country with his spending that's not my team and now he's going to let he's not going to let uh the Doge effort fire people who probably need to get fired that's not on my team started a war with Ukraine for what reasons is that on my team like I'm not even seeing Biden doing things that appear to be in America's best interest it's just weird how how amazingly bad he is however my guess is that there will still be ways to get rid of those 42,000 people one way would be to turn off their connection to the network do you think they can do that ju just turn off their connection to the network and then fire them for not doing their work so they can't fire them for not coming into the office but they can certainly fire them for not doing their job right and I mean did Biden say no matter what you do you can't get fired well he didn't say that did he so all you have to do is turn off their access to the uh internal systems just block their things unless they come into work and none of them could do their work and then you fire them so so I feel like there's a work around there just when you think human beings are as bad as they can possibly be uh the steam Network that's where video games are put on that Network to be downloaded and played steam uh now there's a video game on there where you can reenact October 7th Massacre and apparently you can be on the side of the massacre people so you can play Hamas and Massacre innocent people that's a video game that was made in the real world this is actual real thing yikes now on one hand I say the same thing that most of you are saying which is yikes how in the world is that legal and who would want to do that and blah blah blah but it it raises a bigger question can you make imagination illegal because playing the game is sort of an imaginary process um suppose you had virtual reality that allowed you to do things that would be illegal um as a regular person but it would be fantasy within the virtual reality such as uh murdering citizens You could argue that the Hamas thing was in the context of a you know a larger war or something but suppose you had a video game that allowed you just to murder innocent people should that be illegal H um How about if it were something that allowed you to engage in what looked like virtual sex crimes but nobody's involved except you and your imagination should that be legal well there's certainly a commercial element to it which is are people get to boycott steam because it's on there and all that but I don't know if you should ever make anything that's in your imagination even if the imagination is aided by some you know virtual process as long as is private I I think I'm in favor of making sure that nobody can mess with your imagination I don't know that imagining these things make you more likely to do them it might you know if you're if you're uh let's say already have a propensity to violence I could see if you played video games with violence every day it might push you over the edge the average person isn't going to become violent from a video game we know that for for sure CU you know too many people have played video games um so here here's another that I need to get rid of all right so here here's what you should never say Matt Scott has no idea about steam if the game is still there in 20 hour 24 hours I'll be amazed now I've used steam I've downloaded games from it and I do understand that it's a commercial process so anybody in the world understands that if it's still there in 24 hours it would be pretty surprising so you for assuming that I don't know something as obvious as that and then making a comment in public about it so how about less reading of minds and less insulting me and maybe have an opinion that's worth a so how about that all right this probably it's probably the same same troll that I got rid of yesterday I've noticed that there are some people who would not consider themselves trolls who can nonetheless find the most toxic thing to say on every topic and I don't even know if they're doing it intentionally I think they are but yeah you be a little less toxic it might be good for you there are now mysterious car-sized drones over New Jersey for multiple days I guess several weeks drone swarms not just single drones but swarms they say over the Skies of New Jersey um can I show you a picture of it would you like to see a uh a picture of it okay here you go there you go see that picture you got it very clear you can clearly see the drones and you can tell the drones because you can so clearly see inside them and you can see that there's no pilot and you can tell the size of them very easily no you can't see anything the pictures are dots they're dots against the night sky so I think it's kind of obvious what they are they're not drones duh they're winged uh um bigfoots I think because you know the bigfoots are hard to photograph and if they've been there for weeks and nobody's got a good photograph of them I'm thinking Bigfoot but they're flying so I'm going to go with the obvious a winged uh sort of a tribe of winged bigfoots possibly uh no I'm going to make a better guess here's my better guess why are we saying that they're they're pilot they're unpiloted so we can't get a picture of them but we know there's not a human being in each one of them can you explain that I can it's because we talk about drones so much that if you see something in the sky that you don't recognize it's either a UFO or a drone wouldn't it make more sense if it were let's say a car sized uh helicopter wouldn't it make more sense if they were testing a oneperson military flying device which would be pretty awesome and wouldn't know about it if it was military and it seems to be only in the proximity of a military base do you think that our US military would allow something that they didn't control to be flying over their base every night for weeks and that there would be no explody things happening like shooting them down or or at least telling us what's going on I think the fact that is near something that looks like a military base and it's a car siiz thing kind of suggests I mean it might be drones but I imagine there's people in them and I think they're probably just experimental crafts just guessing it's also possible that the whole they're the size of a car is probably just not true because nobody got a good picture of it you can't really judge the size of it and everything's misleading in space or it's winged bigfoots according to unusual whales the account on X uh Google has now been ordered to uh sell its Chrome browser and uh share data and search results with competitors and make a range of other measures to end its Monopoly on searching the Internet isn't it weird that Google lost its Monopoly on search at the same time its search feature became kind of worthless is that a coincidence like at the same time I decided there's so many sponsored and fake news and and the news is just so obviously you know propagandized that I just stop using it I I just use perplexity or or an AI if I think it's not going to hallucinate but perplexity doesn't do nearly the things that Google does so kind kind of a weird coincidence that just when it wasn't really a product that's the first time it became illegal weird well tragically the CEO of United Healthcare uh walked downside in uh Midtown today just maybe an hour ago and was murdered downside of the Hilton Hotel and I believe the murderer was apparently waiting for him so it was a planned attack it was an assassination not a random thing and he apparently did die he was shot multiple M times and the attacker escaped on a bicycle yeah so uh all right maybe we need a little less of this in the comments to Goot maybe a little less of that okay you know what I'm talking about just a little less of that all right well the Daniel peny um trial is still on I I guess the uh there's no verdict yet right has any ver verdict been announced in the Daniel peny thing because it's going on right now the ver the verdict veric izing the uh deliberations okay well here's the only hint we have um apparently the one of the jurors asked for let's just say the juros asked for um they wanted a little more information they wanted a second read through of what is considered justifiable so they need a better definition of what is justifiable now if you knew that a jury of 12 people were asking for a better definition of the most important part of the trial was it justifiable doesn't that tell tell you that there's a reasonable doubt how in the world could you go through the entire trial and you're sitting there trying to decide whether this guy goes to prison and you can't decide the 12 of you can't decide on the same definition of the word that is the most important word to the trial I feel like that's somebody who's who's trying to hang the jury in other words I feel like somebody's stalling it feels like a play by a patriot as in somebody's going to make sure that there's something they can hold on to to claim reasonable doubt I'm going to say hung jury what do you say because I think the people who want to con convict him are never going to change their mind because they' just be racists and the people who think that the jury itself is racist are not going to change their mind because it's obviously a racist case so I think that nobody's you might you might find people who are willing to be flexible on the argument of whether somebody did a crime I don't think you're going to be find uh I don't think you're going to find flexibility on whether to be a racist or not the people who are racists are going to be racist and that's going to be their vote they're going to vote against him because he's white and those of you who those in the trial who recognize it as a racial prosecution are going to say I don't even care if he did that I don't even care if he did murder him if it's a racist prosecution nope that's what I would do I wouldn't even care about the details of the case if I knew it was only only being only a case because of the race of the uh alleged not good enough yeah yeah I I wouldn't participate that in any way so I can't say it's I don't I don't have a prediction yet but I would say the fact that they asked for this specific thing suggests a hung hung jury to come so that's I guess that is my prediction hung jury means that they could do it again so it might not be over we'll see uh meanwhile Democrat New York city mayor Eric Adams according to the Daily wire um is totally on Daniel Penny's side okay thank you Eric Adams he said quote you have someone on that Subway who is responding doing what we should have done perfect way to put it doing what we should have done strongly defended him you know I don't know if Eric Adams is angling for some kind of a federal pardon but he's definitely on my good side so he agrees with uh homman about helping to remove you know the dangerous uh migrants and he agrees that we should be able to protect ourselves in his City now he's got some he's got some allegations against them that look pretty serious to me look pretty serious but God I'd hate to lose him I mean he's the only Democrat who seems to be willing to say what is obvious and makes sense as opposed is just you know team play but the allegations pretty serious sounding so we'll see what happens with that but I I definitely appreciate it mayor Adams no relation meanwhile Southwest Airlines has said it's going to end its Dei Employment Practices another one checked off so good work all activists um I don't know if that was just Robbie Starbuck or Christopher rufo or everybody I'm not sure how many people were in on that case but uh another one Falls um California lawmaker uh introduced the most ridiculous bill I think I've heard in a long time he wants to give admission priority to it's in the form of reparations he wants to give admission priority to the descendants of slaves at the University of California and California state University so he wants to make a change to give admission priority to descendants of slaves in California uh um can I weigh in here on minute uh I have a just a slight context to note uh that has been the current situation for every year I've lived in California my entire adult life there has never been a single second when a California college did not overtly prefer black candidates they always have whe whether you're descended from a slave or or not what what are they talking about have I been hallucinating the last 30 years of my life that a black candidate who qualifies has the right qualifications is largely guaranteed to get into any College in California let me say that again a black candidate who has you know good credentials did well on tests Etc can get into every College in California this is the current situation and has been for decades do we really need a bill now maybe maybe it's a push back against the anti- Dei stuff because the you know Trump might do away with that stuff so if it's if that's what it is then it makes a little more sense but I think you should be noted that this is the current situation and has been for decades well meanwhile uh district attorney fonnie Willis some call her Fanny um has to release all of her Communications with special counsel Jack Smith and the January 6 committee Alx is talking about this on on the xplatform and and uh the thinking is if we find out that Fanny fonnie Willis has been coordinating with them it would look more like a RICO you know coordinated lawfare situation than if she were just doing her own job and uh unconnected to anybody at a federal level what do you think we're going to find do you think that funny was dumb enough to do something that would be coordinated with the Feds that she would have to know could be discoverable at some point for some reason do you think any of that would be in writing I feel like the only thing that might be in writing would be something like hey can we have lunch or can do you have a minute to talk or something like that I feel like they would be too smart to put anything especially a lawyer if you're an attorney if you're a district attorney don't you know not to put any illegal stuff in your messages that's just sort of you know district attorney 101 stuff so I don't know that we'll find anything but I'm glad they're looking um I I love the fact that MSNBC has now completely transformed from being what we thought was a News Network that you know we just made us mad because it didn't agree with us all the time uh to nothing but comedy so every single day now I go into and I look at the clips where somebody on MSNBC is acting stupid and it's always funny so today's stupidity uh there's a compilation by graban g r a b i n I always see their compilations and I just want to give them a shout out so somebody graian or graban um so I wish I could give them a better plug because they do good work uh some of the best compilation clips that are funny come with this label on it um but in 2019 MSNBC there's a the the compilation is they're talking about whistleblowers and and it sounds like this I'm making this up it's like whistleblowers are the heroes of the country oh those whistleblowers thank goodness for the brave brave whistleblowers who are taking a risk to help the country it's part of democracy that was 2019 that's when the whistleblowers are saying things they want them to say what do they call the whistleblowers when the whistleblowers are opposite their interests and whistleblowing on things that are on their team well I've told you that MSNBC is not just humorous it's theater and the I swear they all act like they're they're professional actors or actresses in the play you know how a play is always always overacted like a movie could be sometimes subtle because the camera can get right in there but what if you're in a play sometimes you you go big and it's just a little bit more theatrical that that's what MSNBC did with the whistleblowers so as soon as the whistleblowers were not positive for their narrative they all did the same thing the the way they talk about it B and then they've got the socalled whistleblowers the the what they're calling whistleblowers or some people that some people are saying are whistleblowers the whistleblowers so-called all right apparently I don't do a good imitation so you have to watch it MSNBC as a a humor source is pretty rich it looks like clown college and then of course Scott Jennings continues to uh to embarrass his CNN uh co-workers by simply being a voice of reason and being you know good at what he does so Jennings does the uh he's their rare uh right leaning Republican type of voice now I give them credit so again I'll go see an then credit they give a very capable person who very much disagrees with their ists fulltime they don't cut him off they let him do his thing and I very much appreciate it because then it turns CNN into also a comedy show because you have to watch the reactions of the panel when Scott Jennings is laying down the truth and look at all their faces and they all they all do this kind of where where where their mouth is kind of pinched cuz they're hearing things that just make them look like idiots but they don't want to they don't want to break in yet they're like so so to uh today I saw a clip where Scott used the really technique now this is one I teach you on my live streams now he didn't use the word really but but he uses the same technique the the technique is this when somebody makes a claim that is preposterous rather than going through all the work of explaining why it's Preposterous you simply restate it and you go really so so that's what you think so you think that the president of the United States with full forethought stood in front of the American people on video with millions of witnesses and called neo-nazis Fine people really really you think that actually happened so that that's how really works you don't have to even make your argument you just have to say really because it's embarrassing that anybody would have that thought so Scott used that about uh a different technique he didn't use the word really but he simply described what they believed and made them agree to it which was devastating he simply described their own opinion and then asked them if they're committing to it and it was it was just marvelous to watch excellent technique um so he was talking to uh somebody who was talking about the uh the idea of trump wanting to use the military in the United States so somebody named mwan said I I don't want to be bringing back water boarding what was somebody talking about that was that on the table was somebody talking about bringing back water boarding I uh I don't don't want to be a country that tortures people especially for the kind of country that's going to be using the military against our own citizens and then Jones says somebody named Jones says we're talking about the American people we're talking about taking up arms against them with the military that's supposed to be protecting them this is not right and so you have to watch this clip just to see Scott Jenning face where where they do the the split screen you can just see him looking at them when he's saying that they're going to use the military against our own citizens and he's like you know that the illegal migrants are not our own citizens right it's wonderful it's wonderful good comedy meanwhile Biden is in Angola and he he promised to give them a billion dollars in aid for African victims of natural disasters now here's what he says about you know that's the right thing for the wealthy EST nation in the world to do blah blah blah um Mr.

Biden I don't know how to explain this to you Angola has a much higher net worth than the United States like a lot like it's not even close the United States is 35 36 trillion doll in debt Angola probably also has some debt if few billion few billion in debt so which country is worth more the one that owes a few billion more than it has or the one that owns 36 trillion more than it has Angola is richer than the United States and that's not a joke they're far richer they just you know it's in a different form but no we don't have money to give them we literally have no money all we did is is uh move forward by a few minutes the time that we're completely bankrupt we didn't give them many money we gave them some debt or something or we created some debt to to replace some of their debt I guess meanwhile terer Carlson's over in Russia uh doesn't look like he's going to talk to Putin but maybe he's still trying but he did interview lavro if you don't know who lavro is he's the English-speaking one that you see whenever something about Russia is going on so he he's the uh the mouthpiece for Russia sort of Putin's guy so we haven't seen that yet but it has been recorded um again this caused a lot of people to be talking about World War III and how close we are to a nuclear confrontation because Russia's doing things that look like they're teasing a nuclear preparation and we're doing things back that look like you know if you nuke us we'll nuke you and I remind you again you've never been safer you're in the safest moment of all of American History because waiting for Trump nobody's going to mess around nobody's going to mess around while we got a few weeks before Trump gets there and just sorts things out now even if you say B Scot Trump is not a Superman he can't make everything go away in a week maybe but at the moment most people think he can most reasonable people think he actually can make most most of our problems go away in a week I mean he can make Dei go away in a week right he could probably get our uh hostage is released I don't know if he'll do that but it's within reason that it could happen within a week and he could definitely get it least something like a ceasefire and some talks going with Ukraine in a week so if pu if Putin is not insane then he just Waits a little while and gets most of or everything he wants why would he nuke us and why would we nuke them when if we just wait a few weeks we'll probably wrap it up and get at least some of what we want so I remind you it always looks the darkest before the dawn as they say and I get I get all the things you're seeing all the all the scary very saber rattling but that's just what happens before you do the serious peace talks so we have never ever been safer from an intentional nuclear war an accidental one I don't know you maybe there's something that makes that a little more likely but yeah no we're we're nowhere near any kind of nuclear war you can stop worrying about that you you have like a million things that are a bigger problem than that that's not the one you need to worry about I promise you that you will not be nuked between now and January 20th I don't know about after that but you're good for now well let's talk about the nominees so Pete heg Seth of course said uh 10 Anonymous people say that they think he drinks too much and has some bad behaviors but they were all Anonymous huh but then I've never seen any one person have more supporters weigh in with their name pretty much I don't know if it's all of them but a whole bunch of people who worked with him every day like actually sat on the couch next to him in in his segments you know worked just the two of them for you know years sometimes uh everyone who weighed in with their name said these stories are complet complete he's totally professional he has never smelled of alcohol never looked like he's had alcohol during the job uh everybody agrees he's had some he's had some uh some drinks at night he he he's had some fun maybe more fun than he wanted to have but not a single one of his co-workers who know him really really well for years not one of them uh who who gives her name says that any of this is real and there are so let let me uh let me give you a strong opinion on this yesterday I was saying hm how do you weigh you know uh 10 or so Anonymous accusations if there were only one Anonymous accusation I'd rule it down completely if there are 10 you have to at least treat it a little bit seriously but once you have 10 people who are in exactly the right place to observe this behavior and they say clearly and unambiguously and strongly absolute 100% I think I I think I'm going to go with the Fox News co-workers so you know I don't know him so I don't have any personal experience but I would say if given given the names and the reputations of the people who backed them I think I'm going to go with them now I don't I can't know everything so I don't know what's true but if I had to choose in terms of credibility the the Fox News people who went on the record strongly you know including banino you know ex Fox News person um I feel like I trust them so I'm going to say that uh that that should not be the reason that that he might not get it however there are several Senators who have not committed Senator Susan Collins Lisa marowski John Curtis Lindsey Graham Mitch Mc.

Connell and John th does that group of people worry you at all is there anything about that group of people that that they have in common because Lindsey Graham Mitch Mc.

Connell onun I don't know I feel like maybe they're trying to protect the defense people more than they're looking to reform things so I don't trust those Senators um and I don't trust uh Anonymous sources but I do trust the people who from Fox News and the people who worked with them including a producer who had tons of exposure and are putting their names they're putting their own rep reputations on the line for another person that's a it's pretty gutsy thing to do so I'm going to go with the guts I'm going to go with the brave people of Fox News who said I'm going to put M I'm going to put my reputation in the line and I'm GNA back this guy because he's been solid the whole time I've known him so can't know for sure that's where I think it's going however of course there's some worry within the campaign not campaign but within the future Trump Administration and uh according to just the news and also CNN people are saying that uh Ronda Sis's name has been raised as maybe a safer easier nominee for Secretary of Defense um and other names are floating are Bill Hagerty Senator and somebody else um maybe somebody else here's my take um Ronda santis have you notice that he is he seems uh he seems capable for almost every job have you noticed that with when he was running for president I remember thinking well I prefer Trump but you know clearly De.

Santis is qualified uh when we talk about you know being a a senator or something of course of course if we talk about him to be the Secretary of Defense yeah we talk about him if if he had been nominated for attorney general yeah yeah how about uh if he had been nominated to be the head of the FBI yeah yeah I I mean I I think I have to give a shout out to De.

Santis for his talent stack because he's got the military he's got the legal and now he has the the management of being a governor and succeeded on all fronts he basically succeeded in everything he touched and they were the exact right things to touch so he's got a hell of a good package there so I don't know if if he became the nominee um I don't think we'd be moving backwards maybe Florida would but I don't think I don't think the nominee would be worse but also think uh P Heth uh I like his dedication to getting rid of Dei and I think that's really important but I think Dan santis would do it too meanwhile uh it looks like California is finally settled all its uh voting stuff and uh four weeks after the election there's another result which oh oh guess what it was too close to call but they counted until all five of the ones who were too close to call went Democrat now the last one just went Democrat huh five out of five now what are the odds that there would be five races when when the entire House of Representatives is so close so close and all five races the ones that took a long time all five went in the same direction huh um I'm going to call it rigged so let me explain this again uh do I do I know for sure that that was rigged no is there a court case that suggests that anything here was rigged no is it likely that there will be a court case that proves anything was rigged no I mean because the court case probably won't happen um here's why I say it's rigged if you act exactly like it's rigged I get to say it's rigged those are the rules I'm sorry those are the rules if you do everything to make it look rigged I get to say well that looks rigged to me and I'm going to treat it that way so that looks rigged to me so I'm going to treat it this way if you can't count the votes in a month don't expect me to believe the result when it goes coincidentally coincidentally like the whistleblowers coincidentally All in One Direction no rigged rigged and I'm sorry that that has to be a firm and um undeniable opinion the truth of it don't know but I know if you act like you're rigging it and you're acting exactly like you're rigging it and everything you do looks like it's rigging it I get to call it rigged there's there's not going to be a debate on that because I get to call it what I get to call it and you gave me every reason to call it rigged so I call it rigged that's my that's my take do I know no don't need to it's as bad as if it had been rigged even if it wasn't because we can't live like this we can't have races that we don't know who won um all right here's the part where you're not going to like me um I know that almost all of you like cash Patel as a nominee for FBI part of why you like him is that he's tough and he's experienced and you and he's loyal to Trump and you know he's going to go after the worst of the bad guys I like all of that he's definitely smart enough uh and he has all the right you know his brain is in the right direction and everything but did you know mediate Med mediaite which is not a reput entity but they've got uh 60 people that apparently are on cash Patel's enemies list and I think some of them are some or most of them are listed in the appendix of one of his books now I'll just read you some of the names so these are the ones that cash Patel thinks needs to be investigated because there's enough evidence that they've done some bad stuff all right uh some these you don't know but Lloyd Austin James Baker Bill bar John Bolton Joe Biden John Brennan um Eric charmella Pat seone James Clapper Hillary Clinton James Comey I'm skipping some names that may be less familiar to you uh Mark esper Alyssa Farah um Merrick Garland Stephanie Grisham K Harris Gina haspel former CIA um Eric Holder Cassidy Hutchins Nina jankowitz Loretta Lynch uh there's some general General Kenneth Mc.

Kenzie Andrew Mc.

Cabe man it's a long list I'm skipping a lot all right uh Ryan Mc.

Carthy uh General Millie Robert Muller Bruce or nellor Lisa Page you remember these names from um from Russia collusion um John podesta Susan Rice Rod Rosenstein Peter stro Jake suvan uh Andrew Weissman Alexander vinman Christopher Ray Sally Yates Adam Schiff now I think every person whose name I read feels like a little bit Shifty to me but I told you that I'm not going to tolerate lawfare I mean what can I do about it it's not it's not like I have anything to do about it but I don't have to be in favor of it um I'm not comfortable I'm not comfortable with the head of the FBI having an enemy list nope now if he'd kept this to himself and shared it with the president and said you know if you nominate me I get a long list here and going after them that that'd be fine I'd actually be fine with that but they better find real crimes I am not fine with somebody who has an enemies list that doesn't come paired with what they did wrong if if this is a real list and and by the way the first thing you need to know is that this is from mediaite it's not from him but they say it comes from sources from cash so I'll take a I'll take a fact check on that if if I got any of the fact facts wrong let me know but do you want somebody to come in to be the head of the FBI who has a list of people that he's going after you okay with that I'm going to say no I'm going to say no on that and by the way I do think that most of the people that I read have a lot to explain but you're going to have to come up with a lot more of a a lot more of a crime before I'm okay putting their names out there and saying that you know they had the FBI is going to go after them do I believe that he's done his homework and he has reason to believe that each of them have something to explain yes probably I think he probably did his homework but this is not the way to present it to the public the public can't see a list of people first because that looks like Stalin show me the list of people oh it's all your enemies is that Quin incidence I'll bet we can find a crime that all of my enemies did nope not cool so I I'm going to I'm going to keep my opinion open for a while open meaning I'm not I'm not closing down the idea of supporting cash for that job I'm not not closing it down I'm saying that I need to know more about this if in his book these are the same names in the book I don't know if this is true but if the book has say a paragraph on each one and a specific list of crimes that you know are somewhat publicly obviously true well then okay then it's then it's not really like an enemies list it's it's a description of the situation so I'll wait for that because I don't trust mediaite to just show me the names and have the right names and that he necessarily agrees with all the names so I'm uh I'm undecided on cash Patel no it doesn't matter because they're not going to make the decision based on what I think but I think all of you guys need to have the same standard I think the standard needs to be that you need to know what the crime is first and then give me the name but if you give me the name first and I haven't seen the crime yet I got questions for you before I have questions for the person you're naming cuz you're doing something that bothers me and I know you're doing something that I don't like I don't know about that person you're talking about I'll listen to it I'm open to the argument and and and I want to say again there are people on that list that he's targeted that I really think do need to get targeted some of them but I don't know the whole story Beyond most of them so no lawfare please that would be my take uh you heard that there was a a little disruption in South Korea here's what's funny about South Korea I always feel like South Korea is held up as an example of a highly functioning democracy and with a really real good free market and their economy is amazing and so therefore their government must be pretty good otherwise they they couldn't be up functioning so well well so their current president declared martial law um but the I guess the parliament tried to get in the building to vote it down of voted out the military tried to stop them from getting in but they climbed over the fence and got in and quickly voted on it and now the president is obligated to remove it because they voted on it and the the military has decided to say all right we're out we're out you voted on it you said you said it's the end so the military apparently uh get some credit for not only keeping some kind of stability but when there was a a democratic process even though they tried to stop it um it looks like they're just obeying orders at this point and trying to do the right thing but here's what I didn't know and I saw this list from a few different accounts in Direction Barbie had it some others here are some of the past presidents of South Korea now I won't mention all their names because you've never heard of them so there are 13 of them and all I'm going to tell you is what happened to them all right so the first one singman re he was overthrown the next one was overthrown then the next one was assassinated and I'll just go down the list removed by military coup senten death after his presidency sentenced to 22 years 22 years in prison after his presidency imprisoned during the term of president number three um convictions blah blah blah imprisoned under President number three and sentenced to death under President number five later pardoned and winning a Nobel Prize impeached later overturned investigated for corruption committed suicide arrested for corruption sentenced to 50 years impeached and arrested for corruption sentenced to 24 years recent president no oh not bad so Moon Jen recent president no imprisonment well good for you and then uh yunu Yol must be the new one the current one impeachment likely now look at look at the state of their government which looks like a hot mess and always has been and somehow they're rocking the best economy short of what Japan or something I mean the the stability of their society and uh their lifestyle and everything how in the world does that any of that work with when their government is such a hot mess maybe it tells us the government is not part of the solution anyway um I saw a clip on this you know we all know that Bernie got cheated by Hill Hillary Clinton when he was he was running for 2016 but did you know that uh Bernie won every County in West Virginia and the and he won every County and then West Virginia went to Hillary did you know that let me say that again it's a fact that nobody disputes so that there's no dispute that West Virginia 100% of the counties voted for Bernie um but the super delegates decided they just give it to Hillary Clinton instead that that's the actual real thing that happened while we were all watching now the rules allow that because they have these things called super delegates that can just overrule the regular people but if you have super delegates then the actual primary is just for show because the super delegates will decide who the the candidate is so I wouldn't call the Democrat Party a Democratic party the Democrats are more like a I don't know some kind of a uh I'd call them sort of a face for some large entities that need the government to do what they want them to do certainly not Democratic in nature well if you haven't seen the entire Mike Ben's appearance on Joe Rogan I I can't I can't even recommend it high enough because a lot of the bad things that are happening that you don't understand is it because they're HED in complexity the complexity of all the different funded organizations and how they're related and who's on what and who told who to do what and what they want out of it and all that it's amazingly complicated but Ben has that exact kind of brain where he can dig into it and explain it to you and when he does your head will just explode and by the way I don't think there's anything that Mike Ben presents that isn't documented in other words he'll he'll show you the official government document he'll show you their budget you'll show you their mission statement he'll show you a video of them talking it's all none of is made up but the the basic idea is that the US always has been um well at least in modern history we we have apparently learned that since we have the most money we don't have to conquer other countries with our military because that's the the expensive way to do it if you have enough money you can just buy enough support to control any country if it's smaller than you so it doesn't work with Russia so that's why you end up with you know big Ukraine war but with anybody smaller we can just bribe them you know blackmail them just do all the CIA stuff that they do murder somebody you know that that sort of thing we can fund the uh the rebels make sure they have better weapons um so I didn't realize that there's a group called us Aid which is cleverly named so you think it's something about helping other countries but the aid has nothing to do with other countries it's literally an enormous uh $50 billion budget situation for influencing other countries and when I say influencing I mean controlling right not I'm not talking about nudging we're talking about just outright controlling them and the entire intelligence communi only has 72 billion and some people say the 50 billion is understated because there might be other things that contribute to what they're doing so we have this enormous enormous expense the sort of this black box of bad behavior this basically a CIA asset to control other countries and uh I think a lot of this these tools got turned back internally because they had to stop anything that was a populist movement and when you hear Ben's described how the idea of democracy uh changed from being what you wouldd expect a populist would be you think Trump is the ultimate democracy person because he's backed by the most people and it's what the people want as opposed to the big moneyed interests and the elites that's about as Democratic as you can get people vote for you and you do stuff for people the Democrats apparently have redefined democracy as supporting Democratic institutions meaning if you if you complain about uh the the covid shot you know you're complaining against the healthc care institutions and that's anti-democratic so anything you complain about that's a a function or a department or any part of our Democratic process makes you anti-democratic so when Trump wants to come in and you know Doge the government and get rid of stuff he's getting rid of departments but to Democrats that's the same as getting rid of democracy because to the Democrats the democracy is the big organizations that's what's keeping things together so I'd never heard that um framing of it but it's pretty interesting and uh once you learn that the entire Ukraine situation is nothing at all like the news has told you but rather it was the entire operation was a way to steal energy um the essentially the economy of Russia depends on energy and a lot of it runs through Ukraine so the idea was this is according to Ben the idea was that uh Ukraine also has its own large stores of energy it's like third biggest or something but it's unexploited so if we could the west and the us could control Ukraine they already have the pipelines but if you could get them also to produce the energy then you don't need Russia so Russia needed the you know the access and the pipelines in Ukraine and the US thought H wouldn't it be good if we had the access in the pipelines so Europe could get all of its supplies but wouldn't it be great if the country that we control like Ukraine was the one with all the energy so you can see why Putin's not going to give up but uh and you can you can see why we didn't give up because it's a you know trillion dooll thing and a lot of the people involved have their beak in it so people are getting a taste so anytime you can move a trillion dollars around you can have all these people who are figuring I had to carve out their billion from the trillion and they're not going to want to stop it so you should see Ukraine as nothing but a uh an energy deal for a bunch of rich people that might get you killed and got 600,000 um ukrainians killed maybe the same number of Russians killed and that the people involved are pretending that this is about something else you know National Defense and NATO and all that but really it's about who gets to produce the oil and the gas and collect the checks and barisma apparently was key Central to the whole plan of the US controlling Ukraine and we would and they would boost barisma to be the main you know main Energy company that we would control and that that was why Hunter was part of it so Hunter then under this telling would be a an important part of the cia's mission and probably there was never any chance he could have gone to jail whether Biden had pardoned him or not if if he was working for the CIA I'm pretty sure they would have found some way that he wasn't going to go to jail because it does look like he was genuinely working for the CIA now he was also trying to line his own pockets and and the CIA probably knew that the uh the Biden crime family was a perfect fit for their plans but um yeah I don't think there was any chance he was ever going to go to jail so you have to you just have to listen to those it's the most mind-blowing thing you'll hear um according to the amuse account on X uh Trump made a big mistake by agreeing to let the FBI vet his appointees now vetting means checking their background and that does give the FBI the ability to say or not say things that they find which gives the FBI a lot of control over whether the nominees go forward do you think that that feels comfortable to you the FBI the very entity that will be most targeted by his nominees are going to be the ones who tell you who the nominee can be what I don't know how that possibly works so I'll keep an eye on that but uh I agree with the amuse account that that doesn't look good um let's see according to speaking of cash Patel um he noted on a recent video I saw that the January 6 committee when they took his deposition he put uh five government reports into his testimony and then when he saw what they had later they had they had eliminated them two of the two of the documents were exonerating would have EX erated Trump because they involved mayor Bowser and Pelosi and what they were saying about the National Guard and basically you can see that Trump always wanted the National Guard Trump always wanted peace no indication that he wanted trouble he in fact he wanted the opposite he wanted peace and he wanted the to make sure there was enough security and that Bowser and Pelosi may have not been on the same page meaning it was more their fault than his and this is why I think all the January Sixers need to be pardoned without regard to how bad their crimes were because if you don't know that the government was behind instigating the trouble and this clearly indicates that there were two people who could have could have increased the security to the point where nobody got hurt or fewer people got hurt and decided not to for whatever reason don't know yet uh presumably to make it look worse for Trump but we don't know that so assuming is true that uh the January 6 committee intentionally um essentially altered his testimony by removing big parts of it that feels jailable doesn't it I don't know exactly what law that would be violating but if somebody testifies under oath in an official proceeding and then you decide to hide some of the good stuff the stuff that would be opposite of your narrative there must be some law against that isn't there so that's that's the sort of thing where I don't necessarily want to put the names of the people on a on a hit list but you certainly start with the January 6 committee if you're going to be asking some questions as the new head of the FBI all right um according to uh project Veritas as I told you you know Biden is trying to Trump proof the administration but uh there's some guy who works for for the EPA and uh project Veritas caught him on hidden camera and he's saying that they've got an insurance policy against Trump and that they're funneling billions to climate organizations and he said quote we're throwing gold gold bars off the Titanic to get the money out as fast as possible now do you think that the reason they're trying to get this money out as fast as possible especially for the green initiatives is because they want to save the planet and they know they have to hurry and if Trump gets in there they won't be able to save the planet I don't think so there may be some people thinking that way but no my guess is that when you have lots of money to throw around that there are a bunch of Democrats waiting to get their beak wet and get their cut and if you don't allocate the money they won't get their cut so this is everything about getting the cut and nothing about the economy so it's theft Bas not basically it's just theft it might not be illegal but I don't see it as anything both theft and that ladies and gentlemen is what I wanted to tell you today besides have you purchased your um dilber calendar there's still time to get it before Christmas if you order it now the only place you can find the plac order is on dilbert.com you won't find it online anywhere else go to dilbert.com and right at the top just click on the calendar it'll take you to the sales page and I remind you it's twice as many comics and made in America now for the first time made in America and there are comics on the back of each page in the front and on the back is all the spicy ones that have never been published outside of subscription services so they're going like crazy so uh I would make sure that you get your order in so you can make sure you get it by Christmas you still have time all right I'm going to say hi to the uh locals subscribers all five how many of you 847 of you thanks for joining everybody and I'll see you again tomorrow same time same place all right locals I'm coming at you privately e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e for

well stocks are a little bit uh little

bit flat a little bit up not bad we'll

take

it it's the Golden

Age let's see we've got nine people on

YouTube and 223 on

Rumble that's a way to

rumble all right let me get my comments

up here and then we got a show to

do comments

coming

Perfecto good morning everybody and

welcome to the highlight of human

civilization but if you'd like to take

this experience which is already wildly

amazing up to levels that nobody can

even understand with tiny shiny human

brains all you need for that is a cup or

a mug or a glass a tanker CH or sign a

canteen jug or flask a vessel of any

kind fill it with your favorite liquid I

like coffee and join me now for the

unparallel pleasure the dopamine here of

the day the thing that makes everything

better it's called the simultaneous Sip

and it happens now

go well I can't begin to tell you how d

distracting the memes were when I was

doing

that you you can keep doing distracting

memes when I do the the Sip but some of

the some of them were extra distracting

today what's happening with Hawk Nome

he's leading the murderer chance against

Perry of course he is a piece of of

course he

is walk new him I once thought he was he

had potential to be a positive force in

the world but apparently not well let's

start with the golden age you want to

hear the good news you probably already

heard this but drinking coffee is good

for your liver according to noridge I

don't know if these are different

stories or the same story dressed up but

I feel like that's the third time I've

told you that coffee is good for your

liver which is why I soak my liver in

coffee

overnight um also caffeine seems to

block some kind of doping dopamine

effect when you drink alcohol meaning

that if you were to drink a cup of

coffee and then have some alcohol the

alcohol would be less

fun isn't that weird back when I when I

used to drink on

weekends I was sort of a party

Drinker um I would notice that sometimes

I would drink and I didn't feel anything

much and other times I'd have one step

and I'd be like wow and I always

wondered what was behind that like is it

because it it wasn't always because I

hadn't eaten it wasn't food and I always

drank exactly the same thing you know it

was never different so I wonder now I

wonder if it's how how recently I'd had

coffee coffee as you say it maybe if I'd

had a afternoon coffee and then I had an

early evening drink that maybe one

canceled out the other or dehydrated

somebody says dehydration maybe well

anyway coffee seems to decrease the

dopamine hit you get from

alcohol in another study where they just

could have asked me probably they found

that high blood sugar in healthy adults

is linked to lower brain activity in

other words sugar makes you dumb even if

you don't have diabetes so if your sugar

is high just higher than it should be

but not diabetes it's going to take a

few points off your IQ now did all of

you know

that because I feel like I've known that

for a long time that Sugar even if

you're not diabetic extra sugar makes

you extra

zombie didn't you all know that I kind

of thought that was common knowledge but

there's a study if you believe

studies well there's uh the there's an

FTC commissioner according to reclaim

the net FTC commissioner Andrew

Ferguson um he's warned against what he

calls Pro censorship advertising cartels

in other words when the

advertising um groups and entities of

the World when they coordinate to let's

say put X out of business because they

don't like the politics or the messaging

that he's thinking maybe that should be

uh illegal

um what part of illegal would that be I

guess it would be for being a cartel and

and suppressing competition and free

speech so I don't know exactly what

count you would get them on but yes this

is exactly what we

need we need our

FTC to say that you can't put somebody

on a

business with their advertising model

just because you don't like their

editorial thing now I always thought it

would be a big advantage to the

advertising companies if all the

advertising was blind meaning that

nobody could nobody could select what

advertising is associated with their uh

content wouldn't it be better because

once you got used to it and you knew uh

oh here's that terrible

advertisement but it's associated with

this content I want to see but you would

know that the person who made the

content had nothing to do with the

advertising it was just unreal Rel ated

coincidence I I feel like we'd be better

off if you couldn't control

that but you know you'd have to get rid

the the Nazi stuff I suppose but you

know if it's just normal advertising it

seems like you should be blind I'm

seeing a lot of people disagree with

that and so you shall apparently we can

agree to

disagree all right I got something

you're really going to disagree with

later wait for that um according to news

Ray Lewis says 21 Soros linked

Das have been

replaced by tough on crime prosecutor

since 2022 and my first question was if

21 Soros linked Das Soros linked means

he probably was a big part of their

funding for their campaign may have even

selected them um how many are

left you know I always tell you if you

know the number without the percentage

or the percentage without the number you

don't actually know anything

so this is where I don't actually know

anything is

21 most of

them or is 21 just the start so this is

either really really good

news or it's almost

nothing does anybody know what it

is I I think it's a lot of

them yeah I I think it might be the

majority of them and some were replaced

by Soft un crime just other

uh non Soros people but they might be

equally soft on crime so I don't have a

good picture of this but I know that our

the the Soros linked da in my area got

replaced Pam price I think was her name

so I'm happy about that all right that

seems like a move in the right direction

according to

hoodline article by Sandra herandez

there's some kind of a genetic booster

Gene that has been found that might make

your plants grow way faster like double

twice as fast or twice as big and uh

it's not it's not fully realized yet but

they've got a pretty good idea that they

can make your plants twice as good and

the question that this asks for me is

well of course people re reject anything

that looks like it's unnatural so you

got that problem but at what point could

you make indoor farming economical

if you could make a plant grow really

fast and really thick and have you know

lots of food in it and taste good and

all that does that make indoor farming

like if you doubled if you doubled the

amount of food you could produce in the

same

pot I feel like that gets pretty close

to making indoor farming work

economically so maybe that's the big

story who knows meanwhile in Battery

Technology there's something called a

proton

battery so according to the University

of New South Wales I guess they're

working on this and uh I don't know how

you how you store a proton and turn it

into electricity but uh the idea is that

lithium is not the ideal battery type

for the big industrial Network kind of

batteries might work great in your car

and in your drone the lithium batteries

but if you want to have a big one that's

for your whole network to provide

electricity to

buildings then you uh might not want

lithium and so some of these other

storage uh Technologies might be the way

to go so maybe there'll be a protein

battery in your network coming

up um so I guess Biden is doing all this

uh Trump proofing of government trying

to spend all their money and and tie

Trump up in ways that he can't reverse

it when he gets in there and one of the

things is um he granted protection and

secured permanent Tor for 42,000 Social

Security

bureaucrats uh until after Trump leaves

office now what would be the possible

reason for even doing

that I mean the the

Ridiculousness of trying to stop the

people who just want want to get rid of

the unnecessary fat in the

process how is that even a Republican or

a Democrat

issue you you can't let people even look

to get rid of the unnecessary people I

mean

Biden to say that he's the worst

president it just feels like an

understatement he doesn't seem like he's

even on our

side does he he opened the borders

that's not my team he bankrupted the

country with his spending that's not my

team and now he's going to let he's not

going to let uh the Doge effort fire

people who probably need to get fired

that's not on my team started a war with

Ukraine for what reasons is that on my

team like I'm not even seeing Biden

doing things that appear to be in

America's best interest it's just weird

how how amazingly bad he is however

my guess is that there will still be

ways to get rid of those 42,000

people one way would be to turn off

their connection to the

network do you think they can do that ju

just turn off their connection to the

network and then fire them for not doing

their

work so they can't fire them for not

coming into the office but they can

certainly fire them for not doing their

job

right and I mean did Biden say no matter

what you do you can't get

fired well he didn't say that did he so

all you have to do is turn off their

access to the uh internal systems just

block their things unless they come into

work and none of them could do their

work and then you fire them so so I feel

like there's a work around

there just when you think human beings

are as bad as they can possibly

be uh the steam Network that's where

video games are put on that Network to

be downloaded and played

steam uh now there's a video game on

there where you can reenact October 7th

Massacre and apparently you can be on

the side of the massacre people so you

can play Hamas and Massacre innocent

people that's a video game that was made

in the real

world this is actual real thing

yikes now on one hand I say the same

thing that most of you are saying which

is yikes how in the world is that legal

and who would want to do that and blah

blah blah but it it raises a bigger

question can you make imagination

illegal because playing the game is sort

of an imaginary

process um suppose you had virtual

reality that allowed you to do things

that would be

illegal um as a regular person but it

would be fantasy within the virtual

reality such as uh murdering citizens

You could argue that the Hamas thing was

in the context of a you know a larger

war or something but suppose you had a

video game that allowed you just to

murder innocent

people should that be

illegal H um How about if it were

something that allowed you to engage in

what looked like virtual sex

crimes but nobody's involved except you

and your imagination should that be

legal well there's certainly a

commercial element to it which is are

people get to boycott steam because it's

on there and all that but I don't know

if you should ever make anything that's

in your

imagination even if the imagination is

aided by some you know virtual process

as long as is

private I I think I'm in favor of making

sure that nobody can mess with your

imagination I don't know that imagining

these things make you more likely to do

them it might you know if you're if

you're uh let's say already have a

propensity to violence I could see if

you played video games with violence

every

day it might push you over the edge the

average person isn't going to become

violent from a video game we know that

for for sure CU you know too many people

have played video

games um so here here's another

that I need to get rid of all right so

here here's what you should never say

Matt Scott has no idea about steam if

the game is still there in 20 hour 24

hours I'll be amazed now I've used steam

I've downloaded games from it and I do

understand that it's a commercial

process so anybody in the world

understands that if it's still there in

24 hours it would be pretty surprising

so you for assuming that I don't

know something as obvious as that and

then making a comment in public about it

so how about less reading of minds and

less insulting me and maybe have an

opinion that's worth a

so how about

that all

right this probably it's probably the

same same troll that I got rid of

yesterday I've noticed that there are

some people who would not consider

themselves trolls who can nonetheless

find the most toxic thing to say on

every topic and I don't even know if

they're doing it

intentionally I think they are but yeah

you be a little less toxic it might be

good for

you there are now mysterious car-sized

drones over New Jersey for multiple days

I guess several weeks drone swarms not

just single drones but swarms they say

over the Skies of New Jersey um can I

show you a picture of it would you like

to see a uh a picture of it okay here

you go there you go see that picture you

got it very clear you can clearly see

the drones and you can tell the drones

because you can so clearly see inside

them and you can see that there's no

pilot and you can tell the size of them

very easily no you can't see anything

the pictures are dots they're dots

against the night

sky so I think it's kind of obvious what

they

are they're not

drones duh they're winged uh um bigfoots

I think because you know the bigfoots

are hard to

photograph and if they've been there for

weeks and nobody's got a good photograph

of

them I'm thinking Bigfoot but they're

flying so I'm going to go with the

obvious a winged uh sort of a tribe of

winged

bigfoots

possibly uh no I'm going to make a

better guess here's my better guess why

are we saying that they're they're pilot

they're unpiloted

so we can't get a picture of them but we

know there's not a human being in each

one of

them can you explain that I can it's

because we talk about drones so much

that if you see something in the sky

that you don't recognize it's either a

UFO or a

drone wouldn't it make more sense if it

were let's say a car sized uh

helicopter wouldn't it make more sense

if they were testing a oneperson

military flying

device which would be pretty awesome and

wouldn't know about it if it was

military and it seems to be only in the

proximity of a military

base do you think that our US military

would allow something that they didn't

control to be flying over their base

every night for weeks and that there

would be no explody things happening

like shooting them down or or at least

telling us what's going on I think the

fact that is near something that looks

like a military base and it's a car siiz

thing kind of

suggests I mean it might be drones but I

imagine there's people in them and I

think they're probably just experimental

crafts just guessing it's also possible

that the whole they're the size of a car

is probably just not true because nobody

got a good picture of it you can't

really judge the size of it and

everything's misleading in

space or it's winged

bigfoots according to unusual whales the

account on X uh Google has now been

ordered to uh sell its Chrome

browser and uh share data and search

results with competitors and make a

range of other measures to end its

Monopoly on searching the

Internet isn't it weird that Google lost

its Monopoly on search at the same time

its search feature became kind of

worthless is that a coincidence like at

the same time I decided there's so many

sponsored and fake news and and the news

is just so

obviously you know

propagandized that I just stop using it

I I just use

perplexity or or an AI if I think it's

not going to hallucinate but perplexity

doesn't

do nearly the things that Google

does

so kind kind of a weird coincidence that

just when it wasn't really a

product that's the first time it became

illegal

weird well tragically the CEO of United

Healthcare uh walked downside in uh

Midtown today just maybe an hour ago and

was murdered downside of the Hilton

Hotel and I believe the murderer was

apparently waiting for him so it was a

planned attack it was an assassination

not a random thing and he apparently did

die he was shot multiple M times and the

attacker escaped on a

bicycle yeah so

uh all

right maybe we need a little less of

this in the comments to

Goot maybe a little less of that

okay you know what I'm talking

about just a little less of

that all right well the Daniel peny um

trial is still on I I guess the uh

there's no verdict yet right has any ver

verdict been announced in the Daniel

peny thing because it's going on right

now the ver the verdict veric izing the

uh

deliberations okay well here's the only

hint we have um apparently the one of

the jurors asked for let's just say the

juros asked for

um they wanted a little more information

they wanted a second read through of

what is considered

justifiable so they need a better

definition of what is

justifiable now if you knew that a jury

of 12 people were

asking for a better definition of the

most important part of the trial was it

justifiable doesn't that tell tell

you that there's a reasonable

doubt how in the world could you go

through the entire trial and you're

sitting there trying to decide whether

this guy goes to prison and you can't

decide the 12 of you can't decide on the

same definition of the word that is the

most important word to the

trial I feel like that's somebody who's

who's trying to hang the

jury in other words I feel like

somebody's stalling

it feels like a play by a

patriot as in somebody's going to make

sure that there's something they can

hold on to to claim reasonable doubt I'm

going to say hung

jury what do you say because I think the

people who want to con convict him are

never going to change their mind because

they' just be racists and the people who

think that the jury itself is racist are

not going to change their mind because

it's obviously a racist case

so I think that nobody's you might you

might find people who are willing to be

flexible on the argument of whether

somebody did a crime I don't think

you're going to be find uh I don't think

you're going to find flexibility on

whether to be a racist or

not the people who are racists are going

to be racist and that's going to be

their vote they're going to vote against

him because he's white and those of you

who those in the trial who recognize it

as a racial prosecution are going to say

I don't even care if he did that I don't

even care if he did murder him if it's a

racist prosecution nope that's what I

would do I wouldn't even care about the

details of the case if I knew it was

only only being only a case because of

the race of the uh

alleged not good enough yeah yeah I I

wouldn't participate that in any

way so I can't say it's I don't I don't

have a prediction yet but I would say

the fact that they asked for this

specific thing suggests a hung hung jury

to come so that's I guess that is my

prediction hung jury means that they

could do it again so it might not be

over we'll

see uh meanwhile Democrat New York city

mayor Eric Adams according to the Daily

wire um is totally on Daniel Penny's

side okay

thank you Eric Adams he said quote you

have someone on that Subway who is

responding doing what we should have

done perfect way to put it doing what we

should have

done strongly defended

him you know I don't know if Eric Adams

is angling for some kind of a federal

pardon but he's definitely on my good

side so he agrees with uh homman

about helping to remove you know the

dangerous uh migrants and he agrees that

we should be able to protect ourselves

in his

City now he's got some he's got some

allegations against them that look

pretty serious to me look pretty serious

but God I'd hate to lose him I mean he's

the only Democrat who seems to be

willing to say what is obvious and makes

sense as opposed is just you know team

play but the allegations pretty serious

sounding so we'll see what happens with

that but I I definitely appreciate it

mayor Adams no

relation meanwhile Southwest Airlines

has said it's going to end its Dei

Employment

Practices another one checked off so

good work all

activists um I don't know if that was

just Robbie Starbuck or Christopher rufo

or everybody I'm not sure how many

people were in on that case but uh

another one

Falls um California

lawmaker uh introduced the most

ridiculous bill I think I've heard in a

long time he wants to give admission

priority to it's in the form of

reparations he wants to give admission

priority to the descendants of slaves at

the University of California and

California state

University so he wants to make a

change to give admission priority to

descendants of slaves in

California

uh um can I weigh in here on minute uh I

have a just a slight context to

note uh that has been the current

situation for every year I've lived in

California my entire adult life

there has never been a single second

when a California college did not

overtly

prefer black

candidates they always have whe whether

you're descended from a slave or or

not what what are they talking about

have I been hallucinating the last 30

years of my life that a black candidate

who qualifies has the right

qualifications is largely guaranteed to

get into any College in California let

me say that again a black candidate who

has you know good credentials did well

on tests Etc can get into every College

in California this is the current

situation and has been for decades do we

really need a

bill now maybe maybe it's a push back

against the anti- Dei stuff because the

you know Trump might do away with that

stuff so if it's

if that's what it is then it makes a

little more sense but I think you should

be noted that this is the current

situation and has been for

decades well meanwhile uh district

attorney fonnie Willis some call her

Fanny um has to release all of her

Communications with special counsel Jack

Smith and the January 6 committee Alx is

talking about this on on the

xplatform and and uh the thinking is if

we find out that Fanny fonnie Willis has

been coordinating with them it would

look more like a

RICO you know coordinated lawfare

situation than if she were just doing

her own job and uh unconnected to

anybody at a federal level what do you

think we're going to find do you think

that funny was dumb

enough to do something that would be

coordinated with the Feds that she would

have to know could be discoverable at

some point for some reason do you think

any of that would be in

writing I feel like the only thing that

might be in writing would be something

like hey can we have lunch or can do you

have a minute to talk or something like

that I feel like they would be too smart

to put

anything especially a

lawyer if you're an attorney if you're a

district

attorney don't you know not to put any

illegal stuff in your messages

that's just sort of you know district

attorney 101 stuff so I don't know that

we'll find anything but I'm glad they're

looking

um I I love the fact that

MSNBC has now completely transformed

from being what we thought was a News

Network that you know we just made us

mad because it didn't agree with us all

the time uh to nothing but comedy so

every single day now I go into and I

look at the clips where somebody on

MSNBC is acting

stupid and it's always funny so today's

stupidity uh there's a compilation by

graban g r a b i n I always see their

compilations and I just want to give

them a shout out so somebody graian or

graban um so I wish I could give them a

better plug because they do good work uh

some of the best compilation clips that

are funny come with this label on it um

but in

2019 MSNBC there's a the the compilation

is they're talking about

whistleblowers and and it sounds like

this I'm making this up it's like

whistleblowers are the heroes of the

country oh those whistleblowers thank

goodness for the brave brave

whistleblowers who are taking a risk to

help the country it's part of

democracy that was 2019 that's when the

whistleblowers are saying things they

want them to

say what do they call the

whistleblowers when the whistleblowers

are opposite their interests and

whistleblowing on things that are on

their

team well I've told you that MSNBC is

not just humorous it's theater and the I

swear they all act like they're they're

professional actors or actresses in the

play you know how a play is always

always

overacted like a movie could be

sometimes subtle because the camera can

get right in there but what if you're in

a

play sometimes you you go big and it's

just a little bit more

theatrical that that's what MSNBC did

with the whistleblowers so as soon as

the whistleblowers were not positive for

their narrative they all did the same

thing the the way they talk about it B

and then they've got the

socalled

whistleblowers the the what they're

calling whistleblowers or some people

that some people are saying are

whistleblowers the whistleblowers

so-called all right apparently I don't

do a good imitation so you have to watch

it MSNBC as a a humor source is pretty

rich it looks like clown

college and then of course Scott

Jennings continues to

uh to embarrass his CNN uh co-workers by

simply being a voice of reason and being

you know good at what he does so

Jennings does the uh he's their rare uh

right leaning Republican type of voice

now I give them credit so again I'll go

see an then credit they give a very

capable person who very much disagrees

with their

ists fulltime they don't cut him off

they let him do his thing and I very

much appreciate it because then it turns

CNN into also a comedy show because you

have to watch the reactions of the panel

when Scott Jennings is laying down the

truth and look at all their faces and

they all they all do this kind

of where where where their mouth is kind

of

pinched cuz they're hearing things that

just make them look like idiots but they

don't want to they don't want to break

in yet they're

like

so so to uh today I saw a clip where

Scott used the really

technique now this is one I teach you on

my live streams now he didn't use the

word really but but he uses the same

technique the the technique is this when

somebody makes a claim that is

preposterous rather than going through

all the work of explaining why it's

Preposterous you simply restate it and

you go

really so so that's what you think so

you think that the president of the

United

States with full forethought stood in

front of the American people on video

with millions of witnesses and called

neo-nazis Fine people really really you

think that actually happened

so that that's how really works you

don't have to even make your argument

you just have to say really because it's

embarrassing that anybody would have

that

thought so Scott used that about uh a

different technique he didn't use the

word really but he simply described what

they

believed and made them agree to

it which was devastating he simply

described their own opinion and then

asked them if they're committing to it

and it was it was just marvelous to

watch excellent

technique um so he was talking to

uh somebody who was talking about the uh

the idea of trump wanting to use the

military in the United States so

somebody named mwan said I I don't want

to be bringing back water

boarding what was somebody talking about

that was that on the table was somebody

talking about bringing back water

boarding I uh I don't don't want to be a

country that tortures people especially

for the kind of country that's going to

be using the military against our own

citizens and then Jones says somebody

named Jones says we're talking about the

American people we're talking about

taking up arms against them with the

military that's supposed to be

protecting them this is not

right and so you have to watch this clip

just to see Scott Jenning face where

where they do the the split screen you

can just see him looking at them when

he's saying that they're going to use

the military against our own citizens

and he's like you know that the illegal

migrants are not our own citizens

right it's wonderful it's wonderful good

comedy meanwhile Biden is in

Angola and he he promised to give them a

billion dollars in aid for African

victims of natural

disasters now here's what he says about

you know that's the right thing for the

wealthy EST nation in the world to do

blah blah blah um Mr

Biden I don't know how to explain this

to

you Angola has a much higher net worth

than the United

States like a lot like it's not even

close the United States is 35 36

trillion doll in

debt Angola probably also has some debt

if few billion few billion in debt so

which country is worth more the one that

owes a few billion more than it has or

the one that owns 36 trillion more than

it has Angola is richer than the United

States and that's not a joke they're far

richer they just you know it's in a

different form but no we don't have

money to give them we literally have no

money all we did is is uh move forward

by a few minutes the time that we're

completely bankrupt we didn't give them

many money we gave them some debt or

something or we created some debt

to to replace some of their debt I

guess meanwhile terer Carlson's over in

Russia uh doesn't look like he's going

to talk to Putin but maybe he's still

trying but he did interview lavro if you

don't know who lavro is he's the

English-speaking one that you see

whenever something about Russia is going

on so he he's the uh the mouthpiece for

Russia sort of Putin's guy so we haven't

seen that yet but it has been

recorded um again this caused a lot of

people to be talking about World War III

and how close we are to a nuclear

confrontation because Russia's doing

things that look like they're teasing a

nuclear preparation and we're doing

things back that look like you know if

you nuke us we'll nuke you and I remind

you again you've never been

safer you're in the safest moment of all

of American History because waiting for

Trump nobody's going to mess

around nobody's going to mess around

while we got a few weeks before Trump

gets there and just sorts things out now

even if you say B Scot Trump is not a

Superman he can't make everything go

away in a week maybe but at the moment

most people think he

can most reasonable people think he

actually can make most most of our

problems go away in a week I mean he can

make Dei go away in a week right he

could probably get our uh hostage is

released I don't know if he'll do that

but it's within reason that it could

happen within a week and he could

definitely get it least something like a

ceasefire and some talks going with

Ukraine in a week so

if pu if Putin is not

insane then he just Waits a little while

and gets most of or everything he

wants why would he nuke us and why would

we nuke them when if we just wait a few

weeks we'll probably wrap it up and get

at least some of what we

want so I remind you it always looks the

darkest before the dawn as they say and

I get I get all the things you're seeing

all the all the scary very saber

rattling but that's just what happens

before you do the serious peace talks so

we have never ever been safer from an

intentional nuclear war an accidental

one I don't know you maybe there's

something that makes that a little more

likely but yeah no we're we're nowhere

near any kind of nuclear war you can

stop worrying about that you you have

like a million things that are a bigger

problem than that that's not the one you

need to worry about I promise

you that you will not be nuked between

now and January

20th I don't know about after that but

you're good for

now well let's talk about the nominees

so Pete heg Seth of course said uh 10

Anonymous people say that they think he

drinks too much and has some bad

behaviors but they were all Anonymous

huh

but then I've never seen any one person

have more

supporters weigh in with their

name pretty

much I don't know if it's all of them

but a whole bunch of people who worked

with him every day like actually sat on

the couch next to him in in his segments

you know worked just the two of them for

you know years sometimes uh everyone who

weighed in with their name said these

stories are complet complete

he's totally professional he has never

smelled of alcohol never looked like

he's had alcohol during the job uh

everybody agrees he's had some he's had

some uh some drinks at

night he he he's had some fun maybe more

fun than he wanted to have but not a

single one of his co-workers who know

him really really well for years not one

of

them uh who who gives her name says that

any of this is

real and there

are so let let me uh let me give you a

strong opinion on

this yesterday I was saying hm how do

you weigh you know uh 10 or so

Anonymous accusations if there were only

one Anonymous accusation I'd rule it

down completely

if there are 10 you have to at least

treat it a little bit

seriously but once you have 10 people

who are in exactly the right place to

observe this behavior and they say

clearly and unambiguously and strongly

absolute 100%

I think I I think I'm going to

go with the Fox News

co-workers so you know I don't know him

so I don't have any personal experience

but I would say if given given the names

and the reputations of the people who

backed them I think I'm going to go with

them now I don't I can't know everything

so I don't know what's true but if I had

to choose in terms of credibility the

the Fox News people who went on the

record strongly you know including

banino you know ex Fox News person um I

feel like I trust

them so I'm going to say that uh that

that should not be the reason that that

he might not get

it however there are several Senators

who have not committed Senator Susan

Collins Lisa marowski John Curtis

Lindsey Graham Mitch McConnell and John

th does that group of people worry you

at all is there anything about that

group of people that that they have in

common because Lindsey Graham Mitch

McConnell

onun I don't know I feel like maybe

they're trying to protect the defense

people more than they're looking to

reform

things so I don't trust those

Senators um and I don't

trust uh Anonymous

sources but I do trust the people who

from Fox News and the people who worked

with them including a producer who had

tons of exposure and are putting their

names they're putting their own rep

reputations on the line for another

person that's a it's pretty gutsy thing

to do so I'm going to go with the

guts I'm going to go with the brave

people of Fox News who said I'm going to

put M I'm going to put my reputation in

the line and I'm GNA back this guy

because he's been solid the whole time

I've known

him so can't know for sure that's where

I think it's going however of course

there's some worry within the campaign

not campaign but within the future Trump

Administration and uh according to just

the news and also

CNN people are saying that uh Ronda

Sis's name has been raised as maybe a

safer easier nominee for Secretary of

Defense um and other names are floating

are Bill Hagerty

Senator and somebody

else um maybe somebody

else here's my

take um Ronda

santis have you notice that he is he

seems uh he seems capable for almost

every

job have you noticed that with when he

was running for president I remember

thinking well I prefer Trump but you

know clearly DeSantis is

qualified uh when we talk about you know

being a a senator or something of course

of course if we talk about him to be the

Secretary of

Defense yeah we talk about him if if he

had been nominated for attorney

general yeah yeah how about uh if he had

been nominated to be the head of the

FBI yeah yeah I I mean I I think I have

to give a shout out to

DeSantis for his talent stack because

he's got the military he's got the legal

and now he has the the management of

being a governor and succeeded on all

fronts he basically succeeded in

everything he touched and they were the

exact right things to touch so he's got

a hell of a good package there so I

don't know if if he became the

nominee um I don't think we'd be moving

backwards maybe Florida would but I

don't think I don't think the nominee

would be

worse but also think uh P Heth uh I like

his dedication to getting rid of Dei and

I think that's really important but I

think Dan santis would do it

too meanwhile uh it looks like

California is finally

settled all its uh voting stuff and uh

four weeks after the election there's

another result which oh oh guess what it

was too close to call but they counted

until all five of the ones who were too

close to call went Democrat now the last

one just went Democrat huh five out of

five now what are the odds that there

would be five

races when when the entire House of

Representatives is so close so close and

all five races the ones that took a long

time all five went in the same

direction

huh um I'm going to call it rigged

so let me explain this again uh do I do

I know for sure that that was rigged no

is there a court case that suggests that

anything here was rigged no is it likely

that there will be a court case that

proves anything was rigged no I mean

because the court case probably won't

happen um here's why I say it's

rigged if you act exactly like it's

rigged I get to say it's rigged those

are the rules I'm sorry those are the

rules if you do everything to make it

look rigged I get to say well that looks

rigged to me and I'm going to treat it

that way so that looks rigged to me so

I'm going to treat it this way if you

can't count the votes in a month

don't expect me to believe the result

when it goes coincidentally

coincidentally like the whistleblowers

coincidentally All in One Direction no

rigged rigged and I'm

sorry that that has to be a firm and um

undeniable opinion the truth of it don't

know but I know if you act like you're

rigging it and you're acting exactly

like you're rigging it and everything

you do looks like it's rigging it I get

to call it

rigged there's there's not going to be a

debate on that because I get to call it

what I get to call it and you gave me

every reason to call it rigged so I call

it

rigged that's my that's my take do I

know no don't need to it's as bad as if

it had been rigged even if it

wasn't because we can't live like this

we can't have races that we don't know

who

won

um all right here's the part where

you're not going to like me um I know

that almost all of you like cash Patel

as a nominee for FBI part of why you

like him is that he's tough and he's

experienced and you and he's loyal to

Trump and you know he's going to go

after the worst of the bad guys I like

all of that he's definitely smart enough

uh and he has all the right you know his

brain is in the right direction and

everything but did you know mediate Med

mediaite which is not a reput

entity but they've got uh 60 people that

apparently are on cash Patel's enemies

list and I think some of them are some

or most of them are listed in the

appendix of one of his

books

now I'll just read you some of the names

so these are the ones that cash Patel

thinks needs to be investigated because

there's enough evidence that they've

done some bad stuff all right uh some

these you don't know but Lloyd Austin

James Baker Bill bar John Bolton Joe

Biden John Brennan um

Eric

charmella Pat seone James

Clapper Hillary Clinton James Comey I'm

skipping some names that may be less

familiar to you uh Mark esper Alyssa

Farah um Merrick

Garland Stephanie Grisham K Harris Gina

haspel former

CIA um Eric

Holder Cassidy Hutchins Nina

jankowitz Loretta

Lynch uh there's some general General

Kenneth McKenzie Andrew

McCabe man it's a long list I'm skipping

a lot all right uh Ryan

McCarthy uh General Millie Robert

Muller Bruce or nellor Lisa Page you

remember these names from um

from Russia

collusion um John

podesta Susan Rice Rod Rosenstein Peter

stro Jake

suvan uh Andrew

Weissman Alexander vinman Christopher

Ray Sally Yates Adam Schiff

now I think every person whose name I

read feels like a little bit Shifty to

me

but I told you that I'm not going to

tolerate

lawfare I mean what can I do about it

it's not it's not like I have anything

to do about it but I don't have to be in

favor of it um I'm not

comfortable I'm not comfortable with the

head of the FBI having an enemy

list nope now if he'd kept this to

himself and shared it with the president

and said you know if you nominate me I

get a long list here and going after

them that that'd be fine I'd actually be

fine with that but they better find real

crimes I am not fine with somebody who

has an enemies list that doesn't come

paired with what they did

wrong if if this is a real list and and

by the way the first thing you need to

know is that this is from mediaite it's

not from him but they say it comes from

sources from cash so I'll take a I'll

take a fact check on that if if I got

any of the fact facts wrong let me know

but do you want somebody to come in to

be the head of the FBI who has a list of

people that he's going

after you okay with that I'm going to

say no I'm going to say no on that and

by the way I do think that most of the

people that I read have a lot to

explain but you're going to have to come

up with a lot more of a a lot more of a

crime before I'm okay

putting their names out there and saying

that you know they had the FBI is going

to go after

them do I believe that he's done his

homework and he has reason to believe

that each of them have something to

explain yes probably I think he probably

did his homework but this is not the way

to present it to the public the public

can't see a list of people first because

that looks like Stalin show me the list

of people oh it's all your enemies is

that Quin incidence I'll bet we can find

a crime that all of my enemies did nope

not

cool so I I'm going to I'm going to keep

my opinion open for a while open meaning

I'm not I'm not closing

down the idea of supporting cash for

that job I'm not not closing it down I'm

saying that I need to know more about

this if in his book these are the same

names in the book I don't know if this

is true but if the book has say a

paragraph on each one and a specific

list of crimes that you know are

somewhat publicly obviously

true well then okay then it's then it's

not really like an enemies list

it's it's a description of the

situation so I'll wait for that because

I don't trust

mediaite to just show me the names and

have the right names and that he

necessarily agrees with all the names

so I'm uh I'm undecided on cash Patel no

it doesn't matter because they're not

going to make the decision based on what

I think

but I think all of you guys need to have

the same

standard I think the standard needs to

be that you need to know what the crime

is first and then give me the name but

if you give me the name first and I

haven't seen the crime yet I got

questions for

you before I have questions for the

person you're naming cuz you're doing

something that bothers me and I know

you're doing something that I don't like

I don't know about that person you're

talking about I'll listen to it I'm open

to the argument and and and I want to

say again there are people on that list

that he's targeted that I really think

do need to get

targeted some of them but I don't know

the whole story Beyond most of them so

no lawfare please that would be my

take uh you heard that there was a a

little disruption in South

Korea here's what's funny about South

Korea I always feel like South Korea is

held up as an example of a highly

functioning democracy and with a really

real good free market and their economy

is

amazing and so therefore their

government must be pretty good otherwise

they they couldn't be up functioning so

well

well so their current president declared

martial

law um but

the I guess the parliament tried to get

in the building to vote it down of voted

out the military tried to stop them from

getting in but they climbed over the

fence and got in and quickly voted on it

and now the president is obligated to

remove it because they voted on it and

the the military has decided to say all

right we're

out we're out you voted on it you said

you said it's the end so the military

apparently uh get some credit for not

only keeping some kind of stability but

when there was a a democratic process

even though they tried to stop it um it

looks like they're just obeying orders

at this point and trying to do the right

thing but here's what I didn't know and

I saw this list from a few different

accounts in Direction Barbie had it some

others here are some of the past

presidents of South Korea now I won't

mention all their names because you've

never heard of them so there are 13 of

them and all I'm going to tell you is

what happened to them all right so the

first one singman re he was

overthrown the next one was overthrown

then the next one was assassinated and

I'll just go down the list removed by

military coup senten death after his

presidency sentenced to 22 years 22

years in prison after his presidency

imprisoned during the term of president

number three um convictions blah blah

blah imprisoned under President number

three and sentenced to death under

President number five later pardoned and

winning a Nobel

Prize impeached later overturned

investigated for corruption committed

suicide arrested for corruption

sentenced to 50 years impeached and

arrested for corruption sentenced to 24

years recent president no oh not bad so

Moon Jen recent president no

imprisonment well good for you and then

uh yunu Yol must be the new one the

current one impeachment

likely now look at look at the state of

their government which looks like a hot

mess and always has been and somehow

they're rocking the best economy short

of what Japan or something I mean the

the stability of

their society and uh their lifestyle and

everything how in the world does that

any of that work with when their

government is such a hot mess maybe it

tells us the government is not part of

the

solution anyway um I saw a clip on this

you know we all know that Bernie got

cheated by Hill Hillary Clinton when he

was he was running for

2016 but did you know that uh Bernie won

every County in West Virginia and the

and he won every

County and then West Virginia went to

Hillary did you know that let me say

that again it's a fact that nobody

disputes so that there's no

dispute that West

Virginia 100% of the counties voted for

Bernie

um but the super delegates decided they

just give it to Hillary Clinton

instead that that's the actual real

thing that happened while we were all

watching now the rules allow that

because they have these things called

super delegates that can just overrule

the regular people but if you have super

delegates then the actual primary is

just for show because the super

delegates will decide who the the

candidate is so I wouldn't call the

Democrat Party a Democratic party the

Democrats are more like

a I don't know some kind of

a uh I'd call them sort of a face for

some large entities that need the

government to do what they want them to

do certainly not Democratic in

nature well if you haven't seen the

entire Mike Ben's appearance on Joe

Rogan I I can't I can't even recommend

it high

enough because a lot of the bad things

that are happening that you don't

understand is it because they're HED in

complexity the complexity of all the

different funded organizations and how

they're related and who's on what and

who told who to do what and what they

want out of it and all that it's

amazingly

complicated but Ben has that exact kind

of brain where he can dig into it and

explain it to you and when he does your

head will just

explode and by the way I don't think

there's anything that Mike Ben presents

that isn't documented in other words

he'll he'll show you the official

government document he'll show you their

budget you'll show you their mission

statement he'll show you a video of them

talking it's all none of is made up but

the the basic idea is that the US always

has been

um well at least in modern

history we we have apparently learned

that since we have the most money we

don't have to conquer other countries

with our military because that's the the

expensive way to do it if you have

enough money you can just

buy enough support to control any

country if it's smaller than you so it

doesn't work with Russia so that's why

you end up with you know big Ukraine war

but with anybody smaller we can just

bribe them you know blackmail them just

do all the CIA stuff that they do murder

somebody you know that that sort of

thing we can fund the uh the rebels make

sure they have better

weapons um

so I didn't realize that there's a group

called us Aid which is cleverly named so

you think it's something about helping

other countries but the aid has nothing

to do with other countries it's

literally an

enormous uh $50 billion budget situation

for influencing other countries and when

I say influencing I mean

controlling right not I'm not talking

about nudging we're talking about just

outright controlling them

and the entire intelligence communi only

has 72 billion and some people say the

50 billion is understated because there

might be other things that contribute to

what they're doing

so we have this enormous enormous

expense the sort of this black box of

bad behavior this basically a CIA asset

to control other countries and uh I

think a lot of this these tools got

turned back internally because they had

to stop anything that was a populist

movement and when you hear Ben's

described how the idea of

democracy uh changed from being what you

wouldd expect a populist would be you

think Trump is the ultimate democracy

person because he's backed by the most

people and it's what the people want as

opposed to the big moneyed interests and

the elites that's about as Democratic as

you can get people vote for you and you

do stuff for people the Democrats

apparently have redefined democracy as

supporting Democratic

institutions meaning if you if you

complain about uh the the covid shot you

know you're complaining against the

healthc care institutions and that's

anti-democratic so anything you complain

about that's a a function or a

department or any part of our Democratic

process makes you

anti-democratic so when Trump wants to

come in and you know Doge the government

and get rid of stuff he's getting rid of

departments but to Democrats that's the

same as getting rid of democracy because

to the Democrats the democracy is the

big organizations that's what's keeping

things together so I'd never heard

that um framing of it but it's pretty

interesting and uh once you learn that

the entire Ukraine situation is nothing

at all like the news has told you but

rather it was the entire operation was a

way to steal energy um the essentially

the economy of Russia depends on energy

and a lot of it runs through Ukraine so

the idea was this is according to Ben

the idea was that uh Ukraine also has

its own large stores of energy it's like

third biggest or something but it's

unexploited so if we could the west and

the us could control

Ukraine they already have the pipelines

but if you could get them also to

produce the energy then you don't need

Russia so Russia needed the you know the

access and the pipelines in Ukraine and

the US thought H wouldn't it be good if

we had the access in the pipelines so

Europe could get all of its

supplies but wouldn't it be great if the

country that we control like Ukraine was

the one with all the energy so you can

see why Putin's not going to give

up but uh and you can you can see why we

didn't give up because it's a you know

trillion dooll thing and a lot of the

people involved have their beak in it so

people are getting a taste so anytime

you can move a trillion dollars around

you can have all these people who are

figuring I had to carve out their

billion from the trillion and they're

not going to want to stop

it so you should see Ukraine as nothing

but a uh an energy deal for a bunch of

rich people that might get you killed

and got

600,000 um ukrainians killed maybe the

same number of Russians killed and that

the people involved are pretending that

this is about something else you know

National Defense and NATO and all that

but really it's about who gets to

produce the oil and the gas and collect

the

checks and barisma apparently was

key Central to the whole plan of the US

controlling Ukraine and we would and

they would boost barisma to be the main

you know main Energy company that we

would control and that that was why

Hunter was part of it so Hunter then

under this telling would be a an

important part of the cia's

mission and probably there was never any

chance he could have gone to

jail whether Biden had pardoned him or

not if if he was working for the CIA I'm

pretty sure they would have found some

way that he wasn't going to go to jail

because it does look like he was

genuinely working for the CIA now he was

also trying to line his own pockets and

and the CIA probably knew that the uh

the Biden crime family was a perfect fit

for their plans but um yeah I don't

think there was any chance he was ever

going to go to

jail so you have to you just have to

listen to those it's the most

mind-blowing thing you'll

hear um according to the amuse

account on X uh Trump made a big mistake

by agreeing to let the FBI vet his

appointees now vetting means checking

their

background and that does give the FBI

the

ability to say or not say things that

they find which gives the

FBI a lot of control over whether the

nominees go

forward do you think that that feels

comfortable to you the FBI the very

entity that will be most targeted by his

nominees are going to be the ones who

tell you who the nominee can

be

what I don't know how that possibly

works

so I'll keep an eye on that but uh I

agree with the amuse account that that

doesn't look good

um let's

see according to speaking of cash Patel

um he noted on a recent video I saw that

the January 6 committee when they took

his

deposition he put uh five government

reports into his testimony and then when

he saw what they had later they had they

had eliminated them two of the two of

the documents were exonerating would

have EX erated Trump because they

involved mayor Bowser and Pelosi and

what they were saying about the National

Guard and basically you can see that

Trump always wanted the National Guard

Trump always wanted

peace no indication that he wanted

trouble he in fact he wanted the

opposite he wanted peace and he wanted

the to make sure there was enough

security and that Bowser and Pelosi may

have not been on the same

page meaning it was more their fault

than his

and

this is why I think all the January

Sixers need to be pardoned without

regard to how bad their crimes were

because if you don't know that the

government was behind instigating the

trouble and this clearly indicates that

there were two people who could have

could have increased the security to the

point where nobody got hurt or fewer

people got hurt and decided not to for

whatever reason don't know yet uh

presumably to make it look worse for

Trump but we don't know

that

so assuming is true that uh the January

6 committee

intentionally um essentially altered his

testimony by removing big parts of it

that feels jailable doesn't

it I don't know exactly what law that

would be violating

but if somebody testifies under oath in

an official proceeding and then you

decide to hide some of the good stuff

the stuff that would be opposite of your

narrative there must be some law against

that isn't

there so that's that's the sort of thing

where I don't necessarily want to put

the names of the people on a on a hit

list but you certainly start with the

January 6 committee if you're going to

be asking some questions as the new head

of the

FBI all

right um according to uh project Veritas

as I told you you know Biden is trying

to Trump proof the administration but uh

there's some guy who works for for the

EPA and uh project Veritas caught him on

hidden camera and he's saying that

they've got an insurance policy against

Trump and that they're funneling

billions to climate organizations and he

said quote we're throwing gold gold bars

off the

Titanic to get the money out as fast as

possible now do you think that the

reason they're trying to get this money

out as fast as possible especially for

the green initiatives is because they

want to save the planet and they know

they have to hurry and if Trump gets in

there they won't be able to save the

planet I don't think so

there may be some people thinking that

way but no my guess is that when you

have lots of money to throw around that

there are a bunch of Democrats waiting

to get their beak wet and get their cut

and if you don't allocate the money they

won't get their cut so this is

everything about getting the cut and

nothing about the economy so it's

theft Bas not basically it's just theft

it might not be

illegal but I don't see it as anything

both

theft and that ladies and

gentlemen is what I wanted to tell you

today besides have you purchased your um

dilber calendar there's still time to

get it before Christmas if you order it

now the only place you can find the plac

order is on dilbert.com you won't find

it online anywhere else go to

dilbert.com and right at the top just

click on the calendar it'll take you to

the sales page and I remind you it's

twice as many comics and made in America

now for the first time made in America

and there are comics on the back of each

page in the front and on the back is all

the spicy ones that have never been

published outside of subscription

services so they're going like crazy so

uh I would make sure that you get your

order in so you can make sure you get it

by Christmas you still have time all

right I'm going to say hi to the uh

locals subscribers all five how many of

you 847 of you thanks for joining

everybody and I'll see you again

tomorrow same time same place all right

locals I'm coming at

you

privately

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e for