een on the same page, meaning it was more their fault than his. And this is why I think all the January 6ers need to be pardoned without regard to how bad their crimes were. Because if you don't know that the government was behind instigating the trouble, and this clearly indicates that there were two people who could have increased the security to the point where nobody got hurt or fewer people got hurt and decided not to for whatever reason — don't know yet — presumably to make it look worse for Trump, but we don't know that. So assuming it's true that the January 6 committee intentionally essentially altered his testimony by removing big parts of it, that feels jailable, doesn't it? I don't know exactly what law that would be violating, but if somebody testifies under oath in an official proceeding and then you decide to hide some of the good stuff, the stuff that would be opposite of your narrative, there must be some law against that, isn't there?

So that's the sort of thing where I don't necessarily want to put the names of the people on a hit list, but you certainly start with the January 6 committee if you're going to be asking some questions as the new head of the FBI.

All right. According to Project Veritas, as I told you, Biden is trying to Trump-proof the administration. But there's som