hen it's jammed.

If you built a drone today and it was easily jammed by current technology it would be like no drone at all. There's no point in building that one. So we already know that drones have the capability of using their cameras and infrared and figuring out where they are so they can complete a mission even if their GPS location gets jammed.

So if you are going to test can my drone find its way to a target, would you test it in a desert where there's not much to see if you look down and it'd be kind of easier to know where you are? Or would you test it in a crowded residential place where you can at least find out can this drone find a specific house? You're not with any weapons because it's just a test. But can the drone find an address, hover over it and then return home in a very complicated residential area where the houses look alike from the top?

So number one, guaranteed there is a major procurement effort in the military. You agree with that part right there? There's no way that's not true. It's 100% true that the military of every major country is massively trying to procure the most drones with the best capabilities that they can. That requires demonstrations.

Now here's the next part. Why would you demonstrate them at night? Why would you demonstrate your drone at night? Here's why. Because the public can't see the drones because all they see is the light. The light makes the drone invisible. All you can see is the light so you can't tell anything else about the drone. You can't tell who makes it, what capabilities it might have, exactly what they're testing, is there more than one, is there a lot of companies involved. So there's a lot of information that you don't want to be in the public domain and you can make it all go away by having a bright light shining that makes it impossible to see what the drone is.

Now here's the next reason. If your drone company is showing you that it can coordinate swarms, which again it's guaranteed that they are testing things that would operate in a coordinated swarm like way, how hard would it be to see if your drones are operating in a coordinated way if they did it in the daytime? The drones aren't going to be that close. Like they're way up in the sky. If you were the general trying to make the decision about procurement you'd be looking at them. You'd like okay I see some, wait I see five, oh there's another one. You wouldn't even be able to tell if they were doing what they were supposed to be doing. They'd just be dots.

Because if they operate properly they're high up enough that you can't see them all from the ground. But if you do it at night and if you add the lights you've accomplished two things. Number one if you're doing it at night there's much much less natural small aircraft traffic because small aircraft don't always have instrument ratings so you have the most open airspace for testing. That's good. But number two you can see the lights at night so you can see the patterns. So you would naturally test them at night not only because you want to test them at night but because you can see them better and the lights would obscure what it is that's being tested.

The FBI might help the military by lying about it. Say oh yeah well we're looking into it. Maybe the military told the FBI hey just be cool say you don't know anything and the FBI is yeah we'll just do that. We'll just say we don't know anything. We're looking into it.

So to finish off my thought I think that some of the reports are probably fake. Some of them might be AI generated fake videos. Some of them might be videos from long ago and they're just old drones or balloons or something. So some of the ones from other countries for example might be just a hobbyist. Some hobbyists who have some drones. Might be something like that. But because we're seeing it as part of a pattern we imagine it's all part of one phenomenon. It might be a little fake news, a little confusion with other things.

But in the United States I'm 100% confident there's a major procurement effort and that they have to demonstrate it live. So what do you think? Did I convince you that what you're seeing is just a normal military procurement exercise that's working exactly the way you'd want it to? Exactly the way you'd want it to. You'd want it to be big. You'd want them to be really active in their space. You'd want them to keep a secret but you'd want them to test it and you'd want them to test it over something that looked like a real ground.

All right maybe we'll find out.

So Trump picked a new Surgeon General, Dr. Nesheiwat, who's getting a lot of pushback. I guess she had some views during the pandemic that a lot of Republicans would say that was totally wrong. So it's kind of a weird choice for Surgeon General, somebody who Republicans think was seriously wrong about some pandemic stuff.

But the more interesting thing is that according to the Daily Mail she killed her own father accidentally when she was 13. What? So apparently she was looking for some scissors in a closet and accidentally knocked over a box that had a loaded gun in it that presumably belonged to her father and the gun discharged and shot him in the head and killed him when she was 13.

And she's talked about losing her father and seeing him dying and stuff but she didn't add the detail that it was an accident, that she was part of it, it was accidental of course. Now I'm not sure that should make a difference. Like it shouldn't make a difference about whether or not she's, there's no approval process for the Surgeon General right? Surgeon General doesn't need any congressional approval. Is that true? I'm assuming. Doesn't seem like it's that important of a job anyway.

I don't know. There's not much to that story except it's kind of fascinating.

Let's talk about the healthcare CEO. We're hearing now that law enforcement has his name but they don't want to release it because then it would give him knowledge that he's caught. Correct me if I'm wrong but if you do say publicly that you know the killer's name isn't he going to act exactly like he knows his name is out? What's the difference? If we know his name or if you tell the public you know his name but maybe you don't, he's going to act exactly the same. You know, maximum effort to remain hidden.

So I'm not sure they have a real name but they say that apparently he had multiple jackets. I think he had a jacket in a backpack and he had a different jacket in a cab. How many winter jackets does this one guy have who was staying in a hostel and only had maybe one backpack and he had three big winter jackets? So it could be that maybe he had a place where he stored an extra winter jacket just so he'd have one that doesn't look like the one he did the murdering. So maybe had an extra jacket ploy. Could be.

But because humans are terrible in New York City there was an event, an organized event where people did like the shooter, the shooter had a winter jacket and a mask on so people did a CEO shooter lookalike competition in Washington Square Park in New York City which is terrible taste. And apparently there's some playlist on Spotify which is for people who want to celebrate the CEO shooter because it's got some songs that the title of the song somehow seem to indicate they're related to the story but they're not.

And then we hear that the backpack that they found in the park might have one protein bar or something that they think he bought. He bought two of them but one was in there. But there was Monopoly money and a jacket in there. Why was there Monopoly money in his, why was there Monopoly money in there? Can anybody come up with any hypothesis for Monopoly money?

All right let me take it to the next level. So the speculation is that somebody who may be mad about how a client of this healthcare insurance company was treated, maybe a loved one or something, or maybe hired by somebody who was mad about it. And so that's one possibility.