Back to episode — Episode 2685 CWSA 12/10/24
Context —
sed it on mice and they had 100% survival rate. 100%. Now that's just mice and only 5% of the time do animal studies work out for humans. But this one might be a little different because the chemical that they're putting in the mouse or in the human is something that they already know works in humans. The only problem is it wasn't good at locating the exact cancer place. But they already knew it…
← Previous segment →erpret a white guy doing something he thought was protecting people on the subway and in the process the black guy died? So how do Republicans see that? They see it as a story about a tragic event. That's it. It's a tragic event. It was tragic for the person who died, tragic for the family, tragic a little bit for the people even who were saved by Penny because they had to sort of endure the situation, and bad for Penny. So it's just a tragic situation. So that's how Republicans see it.
How do Democrats see it? Well, if you believe the Democrat media, it's a case of, oh it's race. There's no race in this. There's not a single element of race that came into any of this. The jury was diverse and they had 100% agreement. Diverse jury, 100% agreement. There was no race here at all. The people being saved by Penny, some of them were black. The people who helped Penny hold the guy down, some of them were black. There's no racial anything here. This is the least racial situation you'll ever see. It just happened to have people of more than one race.
So watching the Democrats who figured out, or they haven't figured out I guess, that identity politics and making everything about race is why they lost everything. Because I think this is another one of those common sense stories. Now I'm not saying that the justice system is color blind. I'm not saying that. I'm just saying that this particular case had nothing to do with race. Just this one. So you know I'm not talking in a general way. But for the Democrat, let's say the leading news entities and leading opinion people, to try as hard as they can to turn this into a racial case, it just makes the Democrats look so out of touch. It makes them look almost like they're in the wrong decade or something. It seems so tone deaf, out of time. There's just nothing right about it. It's just pure incompetence, evil, not understanding the moment, not understanding the country, not trying to be helpful, not trying to make the country a better place. So I don't know who is worse, Joy Reid or CNN. They were both pretty bad on this one.
So according to Joy Reid, the reason he got off is because he was white. No, that's opposite. The reason he got charged is because he was white. It's not the reason he got off. It's the reason he got charged. Because he wouldn't have been charged if he had been black. There's not a single person who thinks that. I don't think you could find even one person who thinks that a black Penny would have been accused from the very moment they tried to turn it into a racial thing, which it never was.
Then CNN has a new one of their new hosts, Audie Cornish, and I'm paraphrasing but she basically introduced the topic by saying that Penny decided basically decided who lived and died that day. Nothing like that happened. Penny didn't make any decisions about who lives and dies. He very clearly was not doing anything to try to kill the guy. That's what the jury decided and they looked at all the facts. And again it was a diverse jury so I trust them.
And then you know I've been complimenting CNN lately because they let Scott Jennings do his thing. So he's usually supporting the Republican side of things and I've complimented CNN not only for having him on the show as a regular but allowing him to speak without cutting him off or yelling him down or anything like that. Let him have his full say. And I've really appreciated that. I think that just makes CNN better. But they've got a new host who decided that talking over Scott Jennings the entire time he talked, at least on one topic, was the way to go. And I thought, well there they go. They just took a step backwards. It's like they couldn't stay in that unbiased zone. It had to be that Scott Jennings is not allowed to talk because if he talks only bad things will happen. So they're right back to being terrible. They were halfway away from terrible but they're back to terrible.
Black Lives Matter of course decided to get involved. How many of you saw the video of Black Lives Matter local leader, not national, Hawk Newsome, where he was saying that maybe black people need to get some vigilantes to go after white people? Did you see that? Now if you saw it, could you tell he was super drunk? Now I've talked to Hawk personally at length several years ago and I know what he sounds like when he's not drunk and it's not that. He was super drunk. Now how come we never talk about that in the
Context —
news? Like I can say it because I'm just this guy with a live stream but CNN, Fox News, there's nobody who's willing to say that man is obviously super drunk and not just a little bit. He was super drunk. Because even the things he said I don't think he would say if he hadn't been drunk. So I'm not excusing him. It's no excuse. In fact it's twice as bad if you're being a bad role model and you're…
Next segment → →