Episode 2685 CWSA 12/10/24
Who goes to jail, who does not. That's the news today. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ If you would like to enjoy this same content plus bonus content from Scott Adams, including micro-lessons on lots of useful topics to build your talent stack, please see scottadams.locals.com for full access to that secret treasure.
Huh, we have a technical problem. How many of you can see me or hear me? Can you see me or hear me? 'Cause my screen is covered with a problematic message. All right, I'm going to have to close this and restart. Well, let's see if that worked. Oh, it worked. Look at that. Only took me two tries, but…
View segment →a coffee mug or glass or tankard, chalice, a canteen, jug or flask, a vessel of any kind. Fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee. And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure of the simultaneous sip of the day, the thing that makes everything better. Go. Well, I think you want to talk ab…
View segment →what it is, but they're pretty sure it's not causing trouble. But they don't know what it is. It might be the size of a car. Everything about this drone story sounds wrong. I feel like somebody must know exactly what those drones are. Are they just not talking? I think that's what's happening. Anyw…
View segment →he first thing you would do? You would make your partner, your mate, more attractive than ever, right? Because breaking up is the worst thing to do. What you'd like is that you're really, really, really are into your partner and vice versa. So what if the people who do the psychedelics are not resp…
View segment →convenient. So even meeting your neighbors was easy. Joining a gym is easy because it's five minutes away by foot. You wouldn't need to ever DoorDash because everything's five minutes away. So look at all the money you save on eating out because everything's five minutes away. So I will no longer e…
View segment →person carrying the football could launch the nuclear weapon. But what if the person carrying it didn't know the password was 00000000? But what if the game was to make sure that only the president knew the code? I doubt that's the case, but you might want to have some kind of control like that. Lik…
View segment →sed it on mice and they had 100% survival rate. 100%. Now that's just mice and only 5% of the time do animal studies work out for humans. But this one might be a little different because the chemical that they're putting in the mouse or in the human is something that they already know works in huma…
View segment →erpret a white guy doing something he thought was protecting people on the subway and in the process the black guy died? So how do Republicans see that? They see it as a story about a tragic event. That's it. It's a tragic event. It was tragic for the person who died, tragic for the family, tragic a…
View segment →news? Like I can say it because I'm just this guy with a live stream but CNN, Fox News, there's nobody who's willing to say that man is obviously super drunk and not just a little bit. He was super drunk. Because even the things he said I don't think he would say if he hadn't been drunk. So I'm not…
View segment →e story in the New York Post is written by three authors and one of them is listed as Anita Behole. Anita Behole. Is that a real name? No. I think I'll just leave it right there. Need a be hole. It's probably different than a front hole. All right, let's talk about that CEO healthcare killer. So he…
View segment →rently my influence reached the shooter through other people's books but according to AI. Anyway so he didn't have one of my books on there. I think if he read my books probably he would have been fine. No that's not true. But he wrote a 262 page handwritten manifesto and he was against the big cor…
View segment →happen and you realize that you don't have a path to being important. And he probably was raised with the expectation that given all of his gifts, his brilliance, etc., that he was going to be important. Maybe a politician, maybe change the world, maybe invent something. And then he finds out none o…
View segment →say I went from, ah you know if he makes it that'd be great. If he doesn't make it I'm sure we'd just pick somebody who's great at the job so the country will be fine either way. But when I find out that he joined twice to be in battle that's a different kind of you. You don't get many of those. So…
View segment →y get overturned. I didn't know this but apparently Liz Cheney is complaining because Trump has vowed to jail the January 6 committee. Did he vow to jail them or did he just say they should be in jail? Maybe that's reported as the same. But apparently members of that special committee, that J6 spec…
View segment →away when they talk about retribution because that shouldn't even be in the conversation unless you knew you did something really, really bad. So I think they did something really, really bad. And I don't believe in retribution but I do believe nobody's above the law. Nobody's above the law. So and…
View segment →You all know that if he gives a speech it's going to be a slurred ridiculous mess because he's just not up to the job. I feel like it's time they just say President Biden will not do any more public events. But don't worry, you know, Kamala Harris is following all the things and the advisors are und…
View segment →Huh, we have a technical problem. How many of you can see me or hear me? Can you see me or hear me? 'Cause my screen is covered with a problematic message. All right, I'm going to have to close this and restart. Well, let's see if that worked. Oh, it worked. Look at that. Only took me two tries, but I'm here.
All right, I'm going to find the Locals comments. And then watch me go. Does everybody have their Dilbert 2025 calendar? Go to Dilbert.com for the only place to order it.
Good morning, everybody, and welcome to the highlight of human civilization. Everybody got sound? Everybody got video? I think we're doing well. We're doing well, aren't we? Good.
Well, if you'd like to take this experience up to levels that you can't even understand with your tiny shiny human brain, all you need for that is a coffee mug or glass or tankard, chalice, a canteen, jug or flask, a vessel of any kind. Fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee. And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure of the simultaneous sip of the day, the thing that makes everything better. Go.
Well, I think you want to talk about the UFO, UAP, drone sightings in New Jersey. Well, I've got an update. There's something in the sky and they don't know what the hell it is. And for reasons we can't understand, there's no military action. And they're pretty sure it's not a risk. They don't know what it is, but they're pretty sure it's not causing trouble. But they don't know what it is. It might be the size of a car. Everything about this drone story sounds wrong. I feel like somebody must know exactly what those drones are. Are they just not talking? I think that's what's happening.
Anyway, apparently the FDA might outlaw food dyes within a few weeks, according to the New York Post. That feels like a good step. I feel like if the FDA outlaws food dyes, RFK Jr. is going to look smarter. What do you think of that? Because this is happening under the Biden administration, and it seems to be perfectly aligned with RFK Jr.'s view of the world. So that is just the best welcome Matt RFK Jr. could possibly have, to have something that's just right in the middle of his sweet spot, adopted by the other team, which actually was his old team or maybe his future team.
There's a study according to New Atlas that they found that when twins are studied, the ones that eat the most fruit and vegetables have less depression. So are you surprised that eating well is good for your brain? No, because as I teach you every single day, your brain and your body are the same tool. If you let your body get into disrepair, or you don't exercise, you don't eat the right foods, your brain will not work as well as it should. You'll be depressed. You'll be dumb. So make sure you get your fruit and vegetables.
Now, of course in five minutes there'll be another study that says the only thing that's good for you is eating meat and only meat. I know. I have a suspicion that if evolution is true, that we really evolved, doesn't it make sense that we're not all in the same exact place evolutionary-wise? Doesn't that make sense? Like how could every human be right exactly in the same evolutionary place? Because that would mean evolution doesn't work. There should be a whole bunch of humans who are starting to already move in another direction that will become a distinct species. If there's none, that would suggest that evolution is not real.
But one of the things I think we might already be bifurcating, or already did, is what foods are most healthy. I feel like for some humans, just eating meat all day is the best thing they could do. You know, the Jordan Peterson thing. But I don't think that's for everybody. I feel like at a very basic biological level, some people respond better to fruits and vegetables, and some people like me, better to meat. It just feels like we shouldn't be looking for one diet that's the same that's right for everybody.
Anyway, according to the Marijuana Herald, which I know you all read, psychedelics are linked to enhanced sexual function even months after you use them. So LSD, psilocybin improves your sexual function for months. But here's why it does it. It makes your partner look more attractive for months. So long after the psychedelic effect is worn off, your partner looks more attractive and your body works better.
Now that leads me to the interesting question, which is, is reality completely subjective? Because once you do the psychedelics, you have the feeling that life, reality, is subjective. But what happens if once you learn that reality is subjective, because that's what the psychedelics teach you, what happens if you start changing your reality after you're off the psychedelics because you now realize that your reality is subjective? So what would be the first thing you would do if you learned that reality was subjective? What's the first thing you would do? You would make your partner, your mate, more attractive than ever, right? Because breaking up is the worst thing to do. What you'd like is that you're really, really, really are into your partner and vice versa.
So what if the people who do the psychedelics are not responding chemically to some afterglow chemical thing? What if they figured out how to author the simulation? Because I think that's what the psychedelics do. I think they teach you to control reality, but only the reality that you experience, because it's all subjective. So I don't know. This is suggestive that maybe people learn how to control the reality once they've had a psychedelic experience. That was my experience, that once I, you know, the one time I did psychedelics when I was in my 20s, I could see that the world was whatever I wanted it to be. And it all worked. It worked just as well if you saw it as a mess or as some kind of heaven. It all worked. You still eat, you still drive your car, but you can see it as either all bad or all good. It was just the choice. So that changed my life forever. So I can understand the study.
Meanwhile, over in Denmark, did you know, according to The Guardian, there's a five-minute city now. If you've been with me for a while, you know the following. I often say, hey, we should design cities from scratch to make them really designed well for how people's lifestyles work. And then what do all the NPCs say in the comments? We don't want no 15-minute cities. And then I say, well, it wasn't really about a 15-minute city, but you know, you would certainly take into account having things close, and maybe you don't want cars everywhere, but really it's more about design. We don't want no 15-minute cities because the World Economic Forum and the elites are trying to put us in the cities and then they chip us. They'll put chips in us and then we'll have no cars, we'll have no freedom, and we'll be chipped. And then I say I'm really just talking about a better design for the thing you're already doing, which is living in the city. Oh no, 15-minute cities will be terrible for everybody. It's the end of the world if you make a better city. That's crazy. You should be fixing the existing cities.
So here's an experience which I've had all of my life. I will say, hey, I've got an idea. Why don't we do X? And then hundreds of people will say, you fool, oh you idiot, you idiot. If we do X, this will happen and the sky will fall and you'll be locked in jail and all your privacy will be gone. And then I wait a little while and then somebody says, oh, you remember that thing you were suggesting where you design the city from scratch to make it really good to live in? That's already been done and it's a city in Denmark and they've been living in it for years. And if you talk to the people who live there, they think it's just the best thing ever because the city was designed to make everything convenient. So even meeting your neighbors was easy. Joining a gym is easy because it's five minutes away by foot. You wouldn't need to ever DoorDash because everything's five minutes away. So look at all the money you save on eating out because everything's five minutes away.
So I will no longer entertain the argument that designing a city from scratch and making it really, really good to live in is a bad idea. I'm not going to listen to your criticisms anymore. It's already been done. Already been done. More than a 15-minute city, it's a five-minute city and they love it and it's been working for years. So there.
Well, Grok, as you may have already heard, it's now better at handling images. So you can upload anything to it. You can upload your medical x-rays, your blood tests, and it will give you medical opinions. But also you can make it create drawings. Now I asked Grok to draw me drawing Dilbert and it created a photorealistic version of me that was really close. I mean, just maybe a little bit with a smile that wasn't exact and they changed the glasses a little bit but not totally. But here's the most interesting thing. Well, first of all it had six fingers. It did a great job of drawing me, but when it wanted to show Dilbert the comic strip drawn on the piece of paper I was holding in the image it created, it couldn't draw Dilbert. Isn't that weird? And it makes me wonder, is that a sort of a copyright protection thing or does it have a problem with line drawings? I don't know. But it showed me with six fingers, which would explain why I couldn't draw Dilbert correctly.
And here's the best part. The clothes it put me in, mostly shirts. That's what it showed. The shirts were excellent. Here's what I want. I want Grok to say, I have designed six different shirts. Here are the links where you can buy a shirt that looks kind of like this. I'll do it. Yeah, the shirts like those, the sort of soft, comfortable ones with the buttons look great. Oh my goodness.
All right. Did you know, and also given that it does a perfect picture of myself, I asked the following question. How long is it going to be before people are making their own porn and then putting themselves in it? You know, at least their image in it. That's going to happen like really soon, right? To me it seems like one of the industries that's most challenged by AI is porn. Because if you could create the exact porn you wanted and the people were perfect and beautiful and you could even put yourself in the scene and watch how much you enjoy it, why would you pay for it? It's going to look exactly like professionally produced porn. So I think the porn industry will be the first one to completely shut down when AI gets a little bit better. Not much, maybe a year from now.
Here's a story I don't know if it's true, but according to an article in ZME Science, the launch codes for the US nuclear arsenal was, and you know they've changed the code so it's okay if I tell you, so try not to memorize this, but this was the actual launch code for the US nuclear arsenal until 1977. The code was 00000000. Really? The launch code was just zeros. Now I kind of understand why that would be the case. You can kind of understand it, can't you? 'Cause you could imagine being the president and your only job, if the nukes get launched from the Soviet Union, your only job is to immediately open up the football and launch a counterattack and you've only got a few minutes. Imagine if you forgot the password.
Now I suppose it did leave the possibility that the person carrying the football could launch the nuclear weapon. But what if the person carrying it didn't know the password was 00000000? But what if the game was to make sure that only the president knew the code? I doubt that's the case, but you might want to have some kind of control like that. Like only the president knows the password. Would you trust any president to remember a long password? No. Would you write it down? Not if you're smart you wouldn't write it down anywhere. So how do you get the one person who's unlikely to remember phone numbers and passwords, the president, how do you get them to remember so if anything happens they're ready to go? I feel like this was entirely intentional, meaning that the people who designed it said, you know, there's no point in even building this thing if the password's hard to enter. So we're just going to tell one person in the entire world. It will be just the easiest password in the world. But apparently they changed that.
There's an NPR story reporting that a chatbot called Character.ai hinted that a kid should kill his parents over the screen time limits. So apparently AI is giving children murderous suggestions. I suppose if they ask more questions they could figure out how to do it. But yeah, it suggested killing his parents over screen time limits. And then there was another one that the character exposed the kid to quote hypersexualized content, causing her to develop quote sexualized behaviors prematurely. And then another one, the chatbot it says gleefully described self-harm as being awesome and it feels good to a 17-year-old. So I guess this is one of the AI apps that's backed by Google, which probably is why they're getting, I think they're going to get sued or something. Probably.
All right. Well, remember all those times I told you that TikTok was a propaganda platform disguised as social media? Well, there's a study according to Bloomberg in which they found that indeed TikTok has less anti-China content than rivals. Are you surprised? So they just opened some example accounts and they just watched and they saw anti-China content apparently on other networks, but they didn't see much of it or as much on TikTok. Now TikTok has said that the research was subjective because what do you call anti-China? You know, at what level is it anti? And they said it was a flawed experiment.
Well, on one hand I agree with TikTok because all these studies are flawed. On the other hand, it does seem like it's something you could measure if something hadn't, you know, more biased toward one direction. So I don't know if this study is the most solid study in the world, but it agrees with what I assume and therefore recreationally I believe every bit of it because it agrees with me.
All right, here's something interesting. According to New Atlas, cancer has been cured. How many times have you heard that cancer has been cured in your lifetime? Like hundreds. There was a time in maybe the 80s or something where every single day there'd be a claim of if you eat this breath mint your cancer will be gone in five minutes. Well, it's going to take a while to test it thoroughly in humans but we're pretty sure. And then next day some other damn thing. If you stick a twig up your ass your cancer will go away. So in general any claims of cancer cures have to be met with a little skepticism.
However, this one sounds kind of cool. So apparently they used gene therapy and a CRISPR device and they, what is it, they put in there cell therapy. So they put some kind of little artificially made thing into your body and what it does is it finds the cancer and then they use ultrasound to activate it to kill the cancers. Now what's new and awesome about it is that the ultrasound is not doing any work inside your body. The ultrasound only heats up the section that they're trying to heat up and when it reaches a certain temperature it kills the cancer but not the good stuff around it. So they can use this gene therapy to give you a little intravenous CRISPR-defined biological element and it will become like a locator to locate where the exact cancer is. Then they just shoot it with the ultrasound and the little biological thing they created activates but it only activates right where the cancer is. So you would have presumably almost no side effects. And they used it on mice and they had 100% survival rate. 100%.
Now that's just mice and only 5% of the time do animal studies work out for humans. But this one might be a little different because the chemical that they're putting in the mouse or in the human is something that they already know works in humans. The only problem is it wasn't good at locating the exact cancer place. But they already knew it would do the work in a human. So if the only thing they've changed is how accurately they can target it, that animal study might translate. Remember, 95% of the time it won't. But if the only thing they're doing is working on the accuracy of the ultrasound, they may have cured cancer. Maybe. Maybe. So this is down at USC, so maybe you'll hear more about that later. I feel like that story might have some legs.
Well, I'm going to give you a quiz to see if you're as smart as I think you are. Now if you're new to my live streams this is going to impress the hell out of you. I have the smartest viewers of all time and we're going to prove it. I haven't even asked the question yet. What is the answer? Go in the comments. That's correct. That is correct. See, I didn't even ask the question. Now on Locals I can see their responses faster. Then they all have the right answer. Every one of them. 100% right answer. Incredible.
Would you like to hear the question? The question is, according to Rasmussen poll, what percent of likely US voters think it would be a good idea for Democrats to run Harris in 2028? 24%. If you said 25 I will accept it. The rounding. Yeah. So most people said 25%. Now the background for this if you're new is I often joke that 25% of the public will get any question wrong. It's a different 25%. I hope it's not the same 25% on every question. But you could rely that no matter how easy the question is, 25% will get the wrong answer. You could bring an anvil over to people one at a time saying I was thinking about dropping this anvil on your foot. What do you think? 75% would say no way, no way. If you drop an anvil on my foot that's going to hurt and it will accomplish nothing. 25% will say you have my interest. It doesn't matter what the question is. 25% get everything wrong.
Well, let's talk about Daniel Penny. As you know he is a free man. Why? Well, maybe the jury was sending a message to the judge. Maybe there were some lawyers on the jury who figured out that this trial was a little sketchy and maybe they influenced the others. Don't know exactly what went on, but my speculation is at least a little bit the jury was not happy with the judge or the process that the judge was running. So Daniel Penny appears to be a free man. We still worry about the charge that was dismissed could technically be retried, meaning they could try him again and try to get a conviction on the higher charge, the one that was initially dismissed. But as Jonathan Turley points out, that he thinks it would be presumptively barred by double jeopardy, which is a perfect lawyer sentence. So what I think that means is that although it would not be actual double jeopardy because it wasn't a completed trial, I think that makes a difference, but it would be in effect double jeopardy because he had the jeopardy and then they put him in jeopardy again. So there's literally two jeopardies. Double jeopardy. So I think that Turley probably has the right legal interpretation. Some people might disagree, but I don't see any way that they're going to try him again on that higher charge. That would just make the courts look like idiots. I mean I think the jury would be extra mad if they knew that was happening.
Anyway, the funniest, the larger part of the story is the racial element now. Because Daniel Penny is white and the person who died is black, how does that make it interpreted by Republicans? So how do Republicans interpret a white guy doing something he thought was protecting people on the subway and in the process the black guy died? So how do Republicans see that? They see it as a story about a tragic event. That's it. It's a tragic event. It was tragic for the person who died, tragic for the family, tragic a little bit for the people even who were saved by Penny because they had to sort of endure the situation, and bad for Penny. So it's just a tragic situation. So that's how Republicans see it.
How do Democrats see it? Well, if you believe the Democrat media, it's a case of, oh it's race. There's no race in this. There's not a single element of race that came into any of this. The jury was diverse and they had 100% agreement. Diverse jury, 100% agreement. There was no race here at all. The people being saved by Penny, some of them were black. The people who helped Penny hold the guy down, some of them were black. There's no racial anything here. This is the least racial situation you'll ever see. It just happened to have people of more than one race.
So watching the Democrats who figured out, or they haven't figured out I guess, that identity politics and making everything about race is why they lost everything. Because I think this is another one of those common sense stories. Now I'm not saying that the justice system is color blind. I'm not saying that. I'm just saying that this particular case had nothing to do with race. Just this one. So you know I'm not talking in a general way. But for the Democrat, let's say the leading news entities and leading opinion people, to try as hard as they can to turn this into a racial case, it just makes the Democrats look so out of touch. It makes them look almost like they're in the wrong decade or something. It seems so tone deaf, out of time. There's just nothing right about it. It's just pure incompetence, evil, not understanding the moment, not understanding the country, not trying to be helpful, not trying to make the country a better place. So I don't know who is worse, Joy Reid or CNN. They were both pretty bad on this one.
So according to Joy Reid, the reason he got off is because he was white. No, that's opposite. The reason he got charged is because he was white. It's not the reason he got off. It's the reason he got charged. Because he wouldn't have been charged if he had been black. There's not a single person who thinks that. I don't think you could find even one person who thinks that a black Penny would have been accused from the very moment they tried to turn it into a racial thing, which it never was.
Then CNN has a new one of their new hosts, Audie Cornish, and I'm paraphrasing but she basically introduced the topic by saying that Penny decided basically decided who lived and died that day. Nothing like that happened. Penny didn't make any decisions about who lives and dies. He very clearly was not doing anything to try to kill the guy. That's what the jury decided and they looked at all the facts. And again it was a diverse jury so I trust them.
And then you know I've been complimenting CNN lately because they let Scott Jennings do his thing. So he's usually supporting the Republican side of things and I've complimented CNN not only for having him on the show as a regular but allowing him to speak without cutting him off or yelling him down or anything like that. Let him have his full say. And I've really appreciated that. I think that just makes CNN better. But they've got a new host who decided that talking over Scott Jennings the entire time he talked, at least on one topic, was the way to go. And I thought, well there they go. They just took a step backwards. It's like they couldn't stay in that unbiased zone. It had to be that Scott Jennings is not allowed to talk because if he talks only bad things will happen. So they're right back to being terrible. They were halfway away from terrible but they're back to terrible.
Black Lives Matter of course decided to get involved. How many of you saw the video of Black Lives Matter local leader, not national, Hawk Newsome, where he was saying that maybe black people need to get some vigilantes to go after white people? Did you see that? Now if you saw it, could you tell he was super drunk? Now I've talked to Hawk personally at length several years ago and I know what he sounds like when he's not drunk and it's not that. He was super drunk. Now how come we never talk about that in the news? Like I can say it because I'm just this guy with a live stream but CNN, Fox News, there's nobody who's willing to say that man is obviously super drunk and not just a little bit. He was super drunk. Because even the things he said I don't think he would say if he hadn't been drunk. So I'm not excusing him. It's no excuse. In fact it's twice as bad if you're being a bad role model and you're indicating violence. It's twice as bad. But you should know the context. It's one super drunk guy and it seemed like there were maybe 20 people pretending they cared but it looked like just sort of theater and acting out. And I don't know that Hawk has much chance of getting a regular job so I think he's just trying to monetize the activism. Don't know for sure. But he's in a situation where making money would be kind of hard because of his Black Lives Matter association.
And anyway so then later there were hundreds of marchers but I saw the video of the quote hundreds of Black Lives Matter sympathizers marching. I didn't see any black people. Are there any black people who are members of Black Lives Matter anymore or are all the people marching white women? It looked like it was mostly white women like single white women marching.
And here's what I think. I obviously can't speak for Black America but I have a hypothesis that Black America is not on the side of CNN or MSNBC on this topic. I think Black America says, wait what happened? He was threatening people and so he got taken down and bad thing happened. Oh okay. I mean I feel like even Black America is seeing this just as a common sense situation. I don't think most of them are seeing it as race. I don't know what percentage. But I feel like we've somehow advanced a little bit where I don't know that Black Lives Matter is going to get anything but white people and people who didn't have anything else to do to march about this. I feel like it's just going to be a big old fizzle. I could be wrong. Depends who's backing it. So it turns out that Alex Soros, a ton of his spending goes to various racial groups, mostly helping black Americans. And so maybe if he funds something that turns out to organize something it'll get bigger. But I feel like Black America is just seeing this exactly the right way, which is this was a crime. Well not a crime. It was just an unfortunate event and there was no bad intentions by anybody. I feel like that they say the same thing. But again it might be a 75-25 situation.
There are mounting calls for the district attorney Alvin Bragg to resign in shame, according to the New York Post. So apparently there's a pretty long list of things that Alvin Bragg has done beyond the Penny trial that his critics think are really big mistakes and very bad. So I don't think anybody thinks that's going to happen here. The only thing I noted was that the story in the New York Post is written by three authors and one of them is listed as Anita Behole. Anita Behole. Is that a real name? No. I think I'll just leave it right there. Need a be hole. It's probably different than a front hole.
All right, let's talk about that CEO healthcare killer. So he's been caught and he was in fact an Ivy League smart guy. Now this is where you should check your predictions. Do you remember when the only thing we knew was the first video of the shooting itself and do you know how many people said, well that's a professional hitman right there. There's a professional. You can tell it's a professional. And I said the one thing I'm sure of is that's not a professional. The only thing I'm 100% sure of, it wasn't a professional. So check your predictions. If you said it was a professional you were really wrong. If you said it was not a professional, well so far you're right.
Now you may not remember this. I'll see if anybody remembers me saying it. I said he wasn't a professional hitman but he was unusually smart and I predicted he had a technical background and he's an engineer, programmer. Yep, technical background. So I'm not claiming I get every prediction right. That's not the point of this. But since I make predictions as part of what I do it's incumbent upon me to tell you when I get one wrong and when I get one right.
I still don't think we know exactly what the weapon was which is weird. There's some question whether it was 3D printed. There was a point I was going to say that out loud. What if that might be 3D printed? And the reason I thought that is that I thought he was unusually good techie. So I thought well if there were, if anybody ever were going to do a high-profile murder with a 3D printed gun it would be somebody exactly like that guy. So we don't know if it's a 3D printed gun but I think the possibility is still there.
He comes from a super rich Baltimore family and we know that he had a serious back injury which somebody said prevented him from ever being in a romantic relationship because he wouldn't be able to essentially seal the deal sexually. And some say that when he got that back injury that he was never the same and he took a dark turn. Now I don't know if that's something that they say after the fact. Like would they have said that about him if he had not been accused of murdering somebody? Did they really notice the dark turn? I don't know. It might be confirmation bias but it would explain some things.
So apparently he was a big reader too. He had it on Goodreads. He had the list of all the books he's read and the ones he wants to read and he really read a lot of books. That guy was really smart and well informed. But I of course checked to see if he read any of my books. He did read at least two books that according to the Perplexity AI app were influenced by me. So apparently my influence reached the shooter through other people's books but according to AI. Anyway so he didn't have one of my books on there. I think if he read my books probably he would have been fine. No that's not true.
But he wrote a 262 page handwritten manifesto and he was against the big corporations taking advantage of people. And so apparently he was making a statement. So the other thing I said was the murder looked like it was personal as opposed to something he did for money. Would you call that personal? It wasn't personal in terms of relationships but it was very personal in terms of he had a deep personal hatred for people like that CEO. So it feels like it was an emotion-based thing although calculated too but not about any family or girlfriend situation. Anyway he lashed out against companies trying to quote continue to abuse our country for immense profits and get away with it.
So here's my continued profile now that we know these things. Do you believe that the back surgery could have changed him mentally in a way that would effectively make him almost a mental illness? Do you think that that's what happened? Could you explain it by a normal surgery that triggers some kind of mental destabilization? And is that a thing? I probably should have asked AI before I asked you but I feel like that could be a thing especially if you have lots of anesthesia and you're down for a while and then you come back and then you're probably on painkillers and maybe the painkillers are depressing as well. So I guess I can see that the surgery would cause substantial changes in his mental state. But why would it cause this change? This is such a specific thing.
Here's my best guess. So we know that he was born with seemingly every advantage. He is handsome. He's completely ripped. If you see the pictures of him he had an eight pack. And so he's handsome, fit, family is rich, he's a genius, he has a killer smile. He basically had everything. He had everything. And then he gets the back injury and he loses everything in the sense that he doesn't have the possibility of being in a relationship according to him because of his back and maybe he doesn't have any good days because of his back. So imagine if you were born into a highly successful family and from the time you were young you just assumed with all of your gifts that you would be highly successful and change the world too. And then you find out none of that's going to happen and you realize that you don't have a path to being important. And he probably was raised with the expectation that given all of his gifts, his brilliance, etc., that he was going to be important. Maybe a politician, maybe change the world, maybe invent something. And then he finds out none of that's going to happen and there's nothing he can do about it. What would you do in that situation?
Is it possible that you would say, you know what, I have to do something useful for the world and I'm going to do something that nobody else could do. I'm going to go murder somebody to make a point because I think the point needs to be made. Let's say from his point of view. I feel like he was trying to justify his life by doing the thing that only somebody who had given up on his life could do. And I think he maybe had given up on his life. So in a twisted way, which I do not condone, I have to throw that in there because it's going to sound like I'm condoning it but I'm not. In a twisted way you could see that somebody that smart who had maybe been raised on you're going to change the world, because I thought that about myself, right? I was also a valedictorian in my little school. When you're valedictorian you kind of think of yourself that you're going to change something. Like it's sort of built into the process. So I feel like that his own destruction of his own future gave him one path where he could find meaning and he needed to find meaning because he couldn't find pleasure. Pleasure was sort of out of bounds to him 'cause his pain in his back, couldn't have a relationship. I don't know. So again it's not excusing it but if you're trying to understand it he had nothing to lose and may have said I have one mission and I'm going to change something about capitalism. Now I don't know. We'll see. We'll probably learn a lot more about this.
Elon Musk said, he said this before, that on actually he said almost everyone I know in San Francisco has been threatened or violently assaulted on the streets and or had a home invasion. Now think about how many people Elon Musk knows who live in San Francisco because it's a tech town and almost every one of them, almost everyone has been threatened, violently assaulted on the streets or had a home invasion. Now your brain says my God it's turned into some kind of a horrible hellscape. But has it?
I would like to add the following context because I lived in San Francisco for a number of years in my younger days and in the 80s. Here's what I experienced. I was robbed three times at gunpoint, twice when I was a bank teller, about once on the street. I had one attempted robbery by a very large knife. I was assaulted by a guy with a large knife but I got away so that I didn't actually lose my money in that case. I've come home to find my door open and my home burgled. So I've been burgled. I've had my car stereo stolen I think three times. You know the windows broken, the car stereo is gone I think three times. And the first five minutes that I arrived in San Francisco I was assaulted by a group of homeless people who tried to steal my luggage 'cause I came from the airport via BART, the public transit, and I didn't know the city so I just sort of picked the BART stop that I thought was closest to where I wanted to be and I picked one of the most dangerous BART stops in the city. And I get out and I had my luggage with me so I had my two large bags and the homeless people just crowded around me and started to pull the bags out of my hands. I'm like no no no. And they would act like they were going to help. Oh let us help you. But really they were robbing me. And there happened to be a police officer there that chased them away.
Now that was my experience and it wasn't that rare for me to walk outside and see a fight going on on the sidewalk in front of my apartment. Very normal. So my experience was in San Francisco might have been worse in the past or at least as bad and then it got better. So San Francisco looks more like the 80s to me, maybe worse, but that doesn't mean it won't get better. So San Francisco because of its location and weather and just some characteristics that you couldn't possibly reproduce, I think it's going to come back. It might be in 10 years but I think SF will do okay.
Well Pete Hegseth is still the most exciting nominee that hasn't been yet affirmed. And I guess Joni Ernst is the one senator who's got some questions about him. She has some issues about his views of women in the military. And I have a question for you. I saw an older video in which Pete was saying he didn't want women in combat. He did not say he doesn't want women in the military and he was always clear to say that the women he served with were great warriors and he had no problem with the people he served with. But in general he thought women should not be in combat. Now I saw him asked that question yesterday I guess and he gave a different answer. His answer was a little vague and a little political and he said that he was running to be the Secretary of Defense for the entire military, male and female. So is he still not in favor of women in combat? Is he trying to make that issue just not be prominent but maybe he'll do something about that? I don't know. But he may have found some kind of middle ground where people are not going to think about it too much.
And then apparently Joni Ernst was herself according to the news a victim of some kind of sexual assault in her past. And since Hegseth was accused but not in a highly credible way, he's been accused, that maybe that had some impact on Joni Ernst's opinion. But apparently there are a few hundred Navy SEALs and veterans who are going to do a march to support Pete Hegseth.
Now I heard a story yesterday, today, that I'd never heard before. Now of course I knew that Pete had served in the military. I didn't realize that he went twice. Did you know that? That once he was done with his service and had another job and he decided to sign up again because the country needed him. That's, you know, until I heard that I was actually thinking he was a little light on qualification. Right? I mean you probably all had the same feeling. Even if you think he's awesome and most of the people who work with him have incredible high opinion of him. So if I take the opinion of the people who were closest to him he looks really good but not really with the right exact kind of experience. But then I find out that he joined, he volunteered to be in battle zones twice. That's a different kind of person. And I feel like if I were in the military I would follow him because of that. Because he's not going to ask you to do something you wouldn't do. Right? He's not going to ask you to do something he wouldn't do because he would do just about anything apparently to help the country.
So I have to say I went from, ah you know if he makes it that'd be great. If he doesn't make it I'm sure we'd just pick somebody who's great at the job so the country will be fine either way. But when I find out that he joined twice to be in battle that's a different kind of you. You don't get many of those. So I feel like he could lead and that's important. You'd have credibility. You'd have to have at least that much credibility. Because if you make big changes such as getting rid of DEI, right, if he came in he was just like some desk-sitting pundit and then he came in and said I'm going to get rid of DEI in the military, maybe it wouldn't go over so well. But if he comes in as a genuine committed warrior who's got all this history of helping veterans that nobody questions, by the way, when it comes to his support of veterans even his critics say okay that part's good. So I don't know. We'll see what happens.
75 Nobel laureates have signed a document according to The Hill urging the Senate to reject RFK Jr. How's that hit you? Imagine you went back in time. All right close your eyes. I'm going to take you back 20 years. Now imagine it's 20 years in the past and 75 Nobel scientists have come out against someone whose job would be in the realm indirectly of science, maybe directly. 75 Nobel laureates. My God that must be the worst candidate. Of course I would agree with the laureates, wouldn't you? I mean 75 of the best scientists think that this person who would be involved in scientific decisions is the wrong person. That's really strong, right?
Right now fast forward to today. Boop. Okay it's today. 75 Nobel laureates just said RFK Jr. is unqualified for the job. Yes, yes that's who I want. That's who I want. Yeah, yeah. If the only thing that would make this better would be 175 Nobel laureates who don't want him in the job. If we could get a few more Nobel laureates who say that RFK Jr. shouldn't have a job, I mean I'll go to Washington and lobby for him. I mean this is the best endorsement I've seen because science is paid off, commercial. Every one of these scientists probably has a job or is connected with some company that doesn't want to get raped by RFK Jr. bringing the truth to them and they're just fronting for these companies. No I don't trust any of you Nobel laureates. Not one. You have no credibility. If science wants to be credible you better up your game and maybe not work for somebody all the time because the truth is if you're a scientist and you have a boss you're gonna do what your boss tells you and your boss is not a scientist probably. Probably just wants to sell some. So 75 Nobel laureates, you just made yourself look like clowns, idiots. Stay out of it, clowns.
Well Syria as you know fell to the rebels but the experts are saying well you know it might completely fall apart and become a failed state like Libya or maybe they'll figure it out. There's not a lot of caring about Syria. But meanwhile Israel apparently has made over 200 air raids in Syria since the war was over. What are they doing? Can you guess what they're doing? So Israel has made 200 air raids, you know bombing basically, 200 since the war ended. There's no war. What are they bombing? They were bombing all the assets that were abandoned by the Syrian military. So if they had a plane or a tank or a truck Israel just decided to make it all go away. The entire assets of the Syrian military are gone. They took them all out.
Now I assume that they did that so that the rebels who just took over the country can't use those assets someday against Israel's interests. That was a really smart thing for Israel to do if that's what's happening. Now I don't know if we know the whole story but if what they did is they said you know we'll warn people to get out of the way because we don't need to kill any people but every one of these military assets in Syria is going to go boom and they just did runs until it was all gone and the reporting is they got it all. They got all the big stuff. Wow.
Now how far Israel goes into Syria to be determined. I don't think they need, I don't think they're planning to take it over. I think they're just making sure that their security zone is safe and that they got rid of the big dangerous assets there. As somebody pointed out earlier Israel took out Syria's nuclear program 20 years ago and that today looks like a genius move because Syria with nuclear weapons would be a really bad idea right now. So Israel seems to be winning on that regard. Iran seems to be weakened.
And then there's also the question of whether the neocons had always planned to conquer Syria and Libya and Iraq and there's plenty of indications that that was America's secret plan was to conquer all these countries. And sure enough there was a war in Iraq, there's a war in Syria and Libya you already know about. So yeah the United States is, we're really bad but in a good way. We are the worst criminals in the world in terms of how we're dealing with other countries. They should be none of our business but we feel like we have to overthrow them all the time. But like I say we live in the real world not the magical make-believe world where if you're nice to other people they'll be nice to you. That's not what the world is. The world is whoever is the biggest bastard might survive a little longer. That's it. That's the whole world. The biggest bastard, if they're good at it, you know not just being a bastard but you got to be good at it, they live, they survive the longest, they have the best lives. I hate to say it but being bastards works for the country so we're going to keep doing it I assume. Although I think under Trump it will look completely different at least the military part of it. He might try to persuade instead of try to destroy.
Meanwhile speaking of Trump, Post Millennial says that he's going to have executive orders to end birthright citizenship on the first day of office. Now birthright citizenship is that if you're born in this country you get to be a citizen even if your parents were non-citizens who came in just to have a baby. So there are ways to game the system then. It also creates families where you can't really deport the whole family because one of them is now an American citizen so that becomes a problem.
But the question is can you use an executive order to change a law if you're clever about it? And I think what they're trying to do is according to the Post Millennial is that the executive order would change the requirements for citizenship for identifying documents. In other words they might say something like you're a citizen if you have a birth certificate that says you're a citizen and maybe some of the illegals don't. I don't know. So there must be some kind of documentation that they think the people born here wouldn't have access to. I don't know the details. So will this work? Probably not. I think it'll be challenged in the courts and probably get overturned.
I didn't know this but apparently Liz Cheney is complaining because Trump has vowed to jail the January 6 committee. Did he vow to jail them or did he just say they should be in jail? Maybe that's reported as the same. But apparently members of that special committee, that J6 special committee, are worried about retribution. Retribution, huh? In the comments can you tell me how many of you have been worried about retribution recently? Let's say or your whole life. Have you ever been afraid of retribution? Because retribution by definition means you did something so bad that you fully expect somebody to come punish you for it because you were so bad. Right? It's not competition, it's retribution. So built right into it is that you did something so bad that somebody else thinks they need to kill you or jail you for it. Isn't it kind of telling so many Democrats are fearing retribution? 'Cause here's what they're not saying. They're not saying lawfare. Right? When the Republicans talk about it they say hey you're using lawfare against our guy. They don't say you're getting retribution because that would assume that Trump had done something that requires some retribution. Instead they say hey lawfare, don't do that. But the Democrats say, they don't say don't use lawfare against us, sometimes they do, but their bigger message is we're worried about Trump trying to get retribution. You don't even have the conversation about retribution unless you know you did something that a reasonable person could think you should go to jail for it. Because I'm a reasonable person and I watched the January 6 process play out and I think they should all be in prison. Now if you ask me what specific crimes did they commit I don't know. I don't know. And if it turns out that no jury can find any crimes or no prosecutor can find any crimes, okay I'll live with that. Right? There have to be real crimes not lawfare. You know look until you find a crime but like real ones that are right out there such as maybe destroying documents in case that's illegal. So I think they're really giving themselves away when they talk about retribution because that shouldn't even be in the conversation unless you knew you did something really, really bad. So I think they did something really, really bad. And I don't believe in retribution but I do believe nobody's above the law. Nobody's above the law. So and I honestly Liz Cheney seems like one of the most toxic human beings in the entire country. I feel like there has to be some kind of response to the evil that she brought us. I mean she brought a lot of evil into the country through her actions. Is it illegal? I don't know. But if it is, jail. If it isn't, no jail.
And apparently people are worried about Kash Patel at the FBI for the same reason. They're worried they'll use the FBI for retribution. Again why are you worrying about retribution now? Do you see a pattern? Here's the pattern. The Democrats think, many of them think, that there should be reparations for slavery. Reparations is very close to retribution except all the people that they want to get retribution from are dead. So what about identity politics? The reason you have identity politics is you know who was your oppressor so you can get retribution. And then lawfare seems to be some kind of retribution for things they imagined. Right? We imagine that Trump is Hitler so we better lawfare him. We're going to have to get some retribution. The Democrats are very retribution oriented. There's no way that's going to be good. I don't see how that's going to work out for them.
I guess Biden's going to give a speech tonight about his great economy and what he did for the economy. I would like to give some unsolicited advice to the Democrats. It's time to take the car keys away from Grandpa. It's okay now. We're not going to hold it against you. The election's over. The right side of the world, the leaning right side, got what they wanted. So we don't really need to dunk on Biden anymore. You all know that if he gives a speech it's going to be a slurred ridiculous mess because he's just not up to the job. I feel like it's time they just say President Biden will not do any more public events. But don't worry, you know, Kamala Harris is following all the things and the advisors are under control and Trump will be here in a month and the allies are all waiting for him so everything's fine. But just in consideration for the Bidens we're going to maybe take the car keys away. You just don't need to do public appearances. Enjoy the last month and a half of your reign. So I feel like this is something we should agree on like one of those points of unity. Before we had to go hard at Biden because he was in the way of a better country but he's not in the way anymore. Now if he does something and it embarrasses him it doesn't even embarrass the country. It's really just about him and his family. So I don't wish that upon them. I don't wish them any extra pain and suffering. So as a non-Biden supporter even I would say can you do him a solid? You know this is where you have to step in, take the keys from Grandpa and say you know maybe no major speeches because you're on your glide path to the end of your term anyway. I think we could all agree on that.
And that's all I got for you today. It's a weird day in news. I'm going to talk to the people on Locals, my beloved subscribers, and I will see you again tomorrow same time same place. Meanwhile country is looking in pretty good shape at the moment. All right. YouTube and Rumble and X I will see you tomorrow and in 30 seconds we'll be private.
huh we have a technical problem how many of you can see me or hear me can you see me or hear me CU my screen is covered with a problematic message all right I'm going to have to close this and restart well let's see if that worked oh it worked look at that only took me two tries but I'm here all right I'm going to find the locals comments and then then watch me go does everybody have their Dilbert 2025 calendar go to dilbert.com for the only place to order it good morning everybody and welcome to the highlight of human civilization everybody uh go sound everybody got video I think we're doing well we're doing well aren't we good well if you'd like to take this experience up to levels that you can't even understand with your tiny shiny human brain all you need for that is a cuper mug or glass of tanker jails a canteen Jugger flask a vessel of any kind fill it with your F favorite liquid I like coffee and join me now for the unparallel pleasure of the do mean here of the day the thing that makes everything better go well I think you want to talk about the uh all the UFO UAP uh drone sightings in New Jersey well I've got an update there's something in the sky and they don't know what the hell it is and for reasons we can't understand there's no military action and uh they're pretty sure it's not a risk they don't know what it is but they're pretty sure it's not causing trouble but they don't know what it is it might be the size of a car everything about this drone story sounds wrong I feel like somebody somebody must know exactly what those drones are are they just not talking I think that's what's happening anyway apparently the FDA might Outlaw food dies within a few weeks according to the New York Post um that feels like a good step I feel like if the FDA uh Outlaws food dies that uh RFK Jr is going to look smarter what do you think of that because this is happening under the Biden Administration and it seems to be perfectly aligned with RFK Jr's view of the world so that is just the best Welcome Matt RFK JR could possibly have to have something that's just right in the middle of his sweet spot um adopted by the other team which actually was his old team or maybe his future team there's a study according to new Alis that they found that uh when twins are studied the ones that eat the most fruit and vegetables have less depression so are you surprised that eating well is good for your brain no because as I teach you every single day your brain and your body are the same tool if you let your brain if you let your body get into disrepair or you don't exercise you don't eat the right Foods your brain will not work as well as as should you'll be depressed you'll be dumb so make sure you get your fruit and vegetables now of course in five minutes there'll be another study that says the only thing that's good for you is eating meat and only meat I know I I have a suspicion that if evolution is true that we really evolved doesn't it make sense that we're not all in the same exact place evolutionary wise doesn't that make sense like how could every human be you know right exactly in the same evolutionary place because that would mean Evolution doesn't work there should be a whole bunch of humans who are starting to already move in another direction that will become a distinct species if there's none that would suggest that evolution is not real but one of the things I think we might already be bifurcating or already did is what foods are most healthy I feel like for some humans just eating meat all day is the best thing they could do you know the Jordan Peterson thing but I don't think that's for everybody I I feel like the very at a very basic biological level some people respond better to fruits and vegetables and some people like me better it just feels like it just feels like we shouldn't be looking for one diet that's the same that's right for everybody anyway according to the marijuana Herald which I know you all read uh psychedelics are linked to enhance sexual function even months after you use them so LSD cybin improves your sexual function for months and but here here's why it does it it makes your partner look more attractive for months so long after the Psychedelic effect is worn off your partner looks more attractive and your body works better now that that leads me to the interesting question which is is reality completely subjective because once you do the the uh psychedelics you have the feeling that life is reality is subjective but what happens if once you learn that reality is subjective because that's what the psychedelics teach you what happens if you start changing your reality after you're off the psychedelics because you now realize that your reality is subjective so what would be the first thing you would do if you learned that reality was subjective what's the first thing you would do you would make your partner your mate more attractive than ever right because because breaking up is the worst thing to do what you'd like is that you're really really really are into your partner and vice versa so what if the people who do the psychedelics are not responding chemically to some you know Afterglow chemical thing what if they what if they figured out how to author the simulation because I think that's what the psychedelics do I think they teach you to control reality but only the reality that you experience because it's all subjective so I don't know this is a suggestive that maybe people learn how to control the reality once they've had a psychedelic experience that was my experience that once I you know the one time I did psychedelics when I was in my 20s um I could see that the world was whatever I wanted it to be and it all worked it worked just as well if you saw it as a mess or as a you know some kind of Heaven it all worked you know you still eat you still drive your car but you can see it as either all bad or all good it was just the choice so that changed my life forever so I I can understand the study meanwhile over in Denmark did you know according to the guardian there's a a f minute City now if you've been with me for a while you know the following I often say hey we should design cities from scratch to make them you really designed well for how people's Lifestyles work and then what do all the NPCs say in the comments we don't want no 15minute cities and then I say well I didn't it wasn't really about a 15minute city but you know you would certainly take into account having things close and maybe you don't want cars everywhere but really it's more about design we don't want no 15minute cities because the world economic forum and the elites are trying to put us in the cities and then they chip us they'll put chips in us and then we'll have no cars we'll have no freedom and we'll be chipped and then I say I'm really just talking about a better design for the thing you're already doing which is living in the city oh no 15min cities will be terrible for everybody it's the end of the world if you make a better City uh that's crazy you should be fixing the existing cities so here's an experience which I've had all of my life I will say hey I've got an idea why don't we do X and then hundreds of people will say you fool oh you idiot you idiot if we do X this will happen and the sky will fall and you'll be locked in jail and all your privacy will be gone and then I wait a little while and then somebody says oh you remember that thing you were suggesting where you design the city from scratch to make it really good to live in um that's already been done and it's a city in Denmark and they've been living in it for years and if you talk talk to the people who live there they think it's just the best thing ever because the city was designed to make everything convenient so even meeting your neighbors was easy joining a gym is easy because it's 5 minutes away by foot you wouldn't need to ever door Dash because everything's 5 minutes away so look at all the money you save on eating out because everything's five minutes away so I will no longer entertain the argument that designing a city from scratch and making it really really good to live in is a bad idea I I'm not going to listen to your criticisms anymore already been done already been done more than a 15minute city it's a five minute City and they love it and it's been working for years so there well grock has you may have already heard it's now better at handling images so you can upload anything to it you can upload your medical x-rays your blood tests and it will give you like medical opinions but also you can make it uh create drawings now I asked grock to draw me um drawing Dilbert and it created a photorealistic version of me that was really close I mean just a maybe a little bit with a smile that wasn't exact and they changed the glasses a little bit but not totally but here's the most interesting thing uh well first of all it had six figures it it did a great job of drawing me but when it wanted to show Dilbert the comic strip drawn on the piece of paper I was holding in the image it created it couldn't draw Dilbert isn't that weird and it makes me wonder is that a sort of a copyright protection thing or does it have a problem with line drawings I don't know but uh it showed me with six fingers which would explain why I couldn't draw Dilbert correctly and here's the best part the clothes it puts put me in mostly shirts that's what it showed the shirts were excellent here's what I want I want I want grock to yeah look at the shirts it puted be in if I could buy those shirts I would buy them today I want I want grock to say I have designed six different shirts uh here are the links where you can buy a shirt that looks kind of like this I'll do it yeah the shirts like those the sort of soft uh comfortable ones with with the buttons look great oh my goodness all right did you know um and also given that it does a perfect uh picture of myself I asked the following question how long is it going to be before people are making their own porn and then putting themselves in it you know at least their image in it that's going to happen like really soon right to me it seems like one of the industries that's most uh challenged by AI is uh porn because if you could create you know the exact porn you wanted and the people were perfect and beautiful and you could even put yourself in the scene and you know watch how much you enjoy it why would you pay for it it's going to look exactly like professionally produce porn so I think the porn industry will be the first one to completely shut down when AI gets a little bit better not much maybe a year from now here's a story I don't know if it's true but according to a article in zme science the launch codes for US nuclear Arsenal was and you know they've changed the code so it's okay if I tell you so try not to memorize this but this is this was the actual launch code for the US nuclear Arsenal until 1977 the code was 0 z uh z0 z0 z0 really the launch code was just zeros now I kind of understand why that would be the case you can kind of understand it can you cuz you could you imagine being the president and and your only job is if the nukes get launched from than the Soviet Union your only job is to immediately open up the football and launch a Counterattack and you've only got a few minutes imagine if you forgot the password now I suppose it did leave the possibility that the person carrying the football could launch the the nuclear weapon but what if the person carrying it didn't know the password was 000000 0 but what if the game was to make sure that only only the president knew the code I doubt that's the case but you might want to have some kind of control like that like only the president knows the password would you trust any president to remember a long password no would you write it down not if you're smart you would wouldn't write it down anywhere so how do you get the one person who's unlikely to remember you know phone numbers and passwords the president how do you get them to remember so if anything happens they're like ready to go I feel like this was entirely intentional meaning that the people who designed it said you know there's no there's no point in even building this thing if the password's hard to enter so we're just going to tell one person in the entire world it will be just the easiest password in the world but apparently they changed that there's a nprs reporting that a chatbot called character.
a uh hinted that a kid should kill his parents over the screen time limits so apparently AI is giving children uh murderous suggestions uh I suppose if they ask more questions they could figure out how to do it but yeah yeah suggested killing his parents over screen time limits and then there was another one that uh the character exposed the kid to quote hypersexualized content causing her to develop quote sexualized behaviors prematurely and then another one uh the chatbot it says gleefully describe self harm as being awesome and it feels good to a 17-year-old so I guess this is one of the the AI apps that's backed by Google which probably is why they're getting I think they're going to get sued or something probably all right well remember all those times I told you that Tik Tock was a propaganda platform disguised as social media well uh there's a study according to Bloomberg um in which they found that uh in indeed Tik Tok has less anti-china content than Rivals are you surprised so they just opened some example accounts and they just watched and uh they saw anti-china content apparently on other Pro other networks but they didn't see much of it or as much on Tik Tok now Tik Tok has said uh that the research was subjective because what it what do you call anti-china you know at what level is it anti and they said uh it was a flawed experiment well on one hand I agree with Tik Tock because all these studies are flawed on the other hand it does seem like it's something you could measure if something hadn't you know more biased toward One Direction so I don't know if this study is the most solid study in the world but it agrees with what what I assume and therefore recreationally I believe every bit of it because it agrees with me all right here's something interesting according to the new outlas um cancer has been cured how many times have you heard that cancer has been cured in your lifetime like hundreds the there was a time in maybe the 80s or something where every single day there'd be a claim of if you eat this breath mint your cancer will be gone in 5 minutes well it's going to take a while to test it thoroughly in humans but we're pretty sure and then next day some other damn thing if you stick a twig up your ass your cancer will go away so in general any claims of cancer cures have to be met with a little skepticism however this one sounds kind of cool so apparently they used gene therapy and a crisper device and they uh what is it they put in there um cell therapy so they put some kind of little artificially made thing into your body and what it does is it finds the cancer and then they use ultrasound to activate it to kill the cancers now what's new and awesome about it is that the ultrasound is not doing any work inside your body body the ultrasound only heats up the section that they're trying to heat up and when it reaches a certain temperature it kills the cancer but not not the good stuff around it so they can use this gene therapy to give you a little intravenous crisper defined uh you know biological element and uh it will become like a locator to locate where the exact cancer is then they just shoot it with the the ultrasound and the little biological thing they created activates but it only activates right where the cancer is so you would have presumably almost no side effects and they used on mice and they had 100% um survival rate 100% now that's just mice and only 5% of the time do animal studies work out for humans but this one might be a little different because the the chemical that they're putting in the mouse uh or in the human is something that they already know Works in humans the only problem is it wasn't good at locating the exact cancer place but they already knew it would do the work in a human so if the only thing they've changed is how accurately they can Target it that animal study might translate remember 95% % of the time it won't but if the only thing they're doing is is working on the accuracy of the ultrasound they may have cured cancer maybe maybe so this is uh down at USC so maybe you'll hear more about that later I feel like that I feel like that story might have some legs well I'm going to give you a quiz to see if you're as smart as I think think you are now if you're new to my live streams this is going to impress the hell out of you uh I have the smartest viewers of all time and we're going to prove it I haven't even asked the question yet what is the answer go in the comments that's correct that is correct see I didn't even ask the question now on locals I can see their I can see their uh respon is faster um then they all have the they all have the right answer every one of them 100% right answer incredible would you like to hear the question the question is according to arasmus in poll what percent of likely us voters think it would be a good idea for Democrats to run Harris in 2028 24% if you said 25 I will accept C the rounding yeah so most people said 25% now the background for this if you're new is I often joke that 25% of the public will get any question wrong it's a different 25% I hope it's not the same 25% in every question but you could rely that no matter how easy the question is 25% will get the wrong answer you could bring an anvil over to people and one at a time saying I was thinking about dropping this anvil on your foot what do you think 75% would say no way no way if you drop an anvil on my foot that's going to hurt and it will accomplish nothing 25% will say you have my interest it doesn't matter what the question is 25% get everything wrong well let's talk about Daniel Penny as you know he is a free man uh why well maybe the jury was sending message to the judge maybe there were some lawyers on the jury who figured out that this trial was a little sketchy and maybe they influenced the others don't know exactly what went happened but my speculation is at least a little bit the jury was not happy with the judge or the process that the judge was running so so Daniel peny appears to be free man we still worry about uh the charge that was dismissed could technically be rerun meaning they could try him again and try to get a conviction on the higher charge the one that was initially dismissed but as Jonathan turly points out um that he thinks it would be presumptively Borrowed by Double Jeopardy which is a perfect lawyer sentence so what I think that means is that although it would not be actual Double Jeopardy because it wasn't a completed trial I think I think that makes a difference but it would be in effect in effect it would be double jeopardy because he you know he had the Jeopardy and then they put him in Jeopardy again so there's literally two jeopardies double jeopardy so I think that turle probably has the right uh legal interpretation some people might disagree but I don't see anyway that they're going to try him again at that higher charge that would just make the courts look like idiots I mean I I think the jury would be extra mad if they knew that was happening anyway um the funniest the larger part of the story is the racial element now because the Daniel penny is white and the person who died is black uh how does that make it interpreted by Republicans so how do how do Republicans interpret a white guy um doing something he thought was protecting people on the subway and in the process the black guy died so how how do Republicans see that they see it as a story about a tragic event that's it it's a tragic event it was tragic for the person who died tragic for the family tragic a little bit for the people even who were saved by Penny because they had to sort of endure the situation and bad for penny so it's just a tragic situation um so that's how Republicans say it how do Democrats see it well if you believe the Democrat media it's a it's a case of our race there's no race in this there's not a single ele of race that came into any of this the jury was diverse and they had 100% agreement diverse jury 100% agreement there was no race here at all the the people being saved by Penny some of them were black the people who helped Penny hold the guy down some of them were black there's no racial anything here this is the least racial situation you'll ever it just happened to have people of more than one Race So watching the Democrats who figured out or they haven't figured out I guess that identity politics and making everything about race is why they lost everything because I think this is another one of those Common Sense stories now I'm not saying that that the justice system is color blind I'm not saying that I'm just saying that this particular case had nothing to do with race just this one so you know I'm not talking in a general way but for the Democrat let's say the leading news entities and leading opinion people to try as hard as they can to turn this into a racial case it just makes the Democrats look so on a touch it makes them look almost like they're in the wrong decade or something it's it seems so toned deaf um out of time um there's just no there's nothing right about it it's just pure incompetence evil not understanding the moment not understanding the country not trying to be helpful not trying to make the country a better place so I don't know who is worse uh Joy Reed or CNN they were both pretty bad on this one um so according to Joy Reed um the reason he got off is because he was white no that's opposite the reason he got charged is because he was white it's not the reason he got off it's the reason he got charged because he wouldn't have been charged if he had been black there's not a single person who thinks that I don't think you could find even one person who thinks that a black um Penny you know the guy penny uh would have been accused from the very moment they tried to turn it into a racial thing which it never was um then uh CNN has a new one of their new hosts uh Audi Cornish and I'm paraphrasing but she basically introduced the topic by saying that Penny decided basically decided who lived and died that day nothing like that happened Penny didn't make any decisions about who lives lives and dies he very clearly was not doing anything to try to kill the guy that's what the jury the jury decided and they looked at all the facts and again it was a diverse jury so I trust them um and then you know I've been complimenting CNN lately because they they let uh Scott Jennings do his thing so he's usually supporting the democ the Republican side of things and I've complimented CNN not only for having him on the show you know as a regular but allowing him to speak without cutting him off or you know yelling him down or anything like that let him have his full say and I've really appreciated that um I think that's just makes CNN better but they've got a new host who decided that talking over Scott Jennings the entire time you talked at least on one topic was the way to go and I thought well there they go they they just took a step backwards it's like they they couldn't stay in the in that you know unbiased Zone it had to be that Scott Jennings is not allowed to talk because if he talks only bad things will happen so they're right back to right back to being terrible they were halfway away from terrible but they're back to terrible um black lives matter of course decided to get involved um how many of you saw the video of black lives matter local leader not national uh Hawk Nome where he was saying that maybe black people need to get some Vigilantes to go after white people did you see that now if you saw it could you tell he was super drunk now I I I've talked to Hawk you know personally at length um several years ago and I know what he sounds like when he's not drunk and it's not that he was super drunk now how come we never talk about that in the news like I can say it because I'm you know just this guy with a live stream but CNN Fox News there's nobody who's willing to say that man is obviously super drunk and not just a little bit he was super drunk because even the things he said I don't think he would say if he hadn't been drunk so I'm not excusing him it's no excuse in fact it's you know it's twice as bad if you're you know being a bad role model and you're indicating violence it's twice as bad uh but you should know the context it's uh one one super drunk guy and uh it seemed like there were maybe 20 people pretending they cared but it looked like just sort of theater and acting out and you know I I don't know that Hawke has much chance of getting a regular job so I think he's just trying to monetize the activism don't know for sure but um he he's in a situation where making money would be kind of hard because of his black lives matter Association and um anyway so then later there were hundreds of Marchers but I saw the video of the quote hundreds of black lives matter sympathized is marching I didn't see any black people are there any black people who are members of Black lives matter anymore or or all the people marching white women it looked like it was mostly white women like single white women marching and here's what I think um I obviously can't speak for Black America um but I have a hypothesis that Black America is not on the side of CNN or MSNBC on this topic I think Black America says wait what happened he was he was threatening people and so he got taken down and bad thing happened oh okay I mean I feel like I feel like even Black America is seeing this just as a common sense situation I don't think most of them are seeing it as race I don't know what percentage um but I feel like I I feel like we've somehow Advanced a little bit where I don't know that black mer that black lives matter is going to get anything but white people and people who didn't have anything else to do to March about this I feel like it's just going to be a big old fizzle I could be wrong depends who's backing it so it turns out that uh Alex Soros um a ton of his spending goes to various racial groups uh mostly helping black Americans and so you maybe if he funds something that turns out to organize something it'll get bigger but I feel like Black America is just seeing this exactly the right way which is this was a crime not well not a crime it was uh just an unfortunate event and there was no Bad Intentions by anybody I feel like that they say the same thing but again it might be a 75 25 situ situation there are mounting calls for the district attorney Alvin Bragg to resign in shame um according to the New York Post so apparently there's a pretty long list of things that Elvin Bragg has done Beyond this beyond the penny trial that uh his critics think are really big mistakes and very bad so I don't I don't think anybody think's going to happen here the only thing I uh I noted was that the story in the New York Post is written by three authors and one of them is listed as Anita be hole Anita be hole is that a real name no I think I'll just leave it right there need a be hole it's probably different than a front hole all right uh let's talk about that CEO healthc care killer so he's been caught um and he was in fact a ivy league smart guy now this is where you should check your um predictions do you remember when the only thing we knew was the first video of the shooting itself and do you know how many people said well that's that's a professional Hitman right there there there's a professional you can tell it's a professional and I said the one thing I'm sure of is that's not a professional the only thing I'm 100% sure of it wasn't a professional so check your predictions if you said it was a professional you were really wrong if you said it was not a professional well so far you're right now you may not remember this I'll see if anybody remembers me saying it I said he wasn't a professional Hitman but he was unusually smart and I predicted he had a technical background and he's an engineer programmer yep technical background so I'm not claiming I get every prediction right that's not the point of this but since I make predictions as part of what I do it's uh incumbent upon me to tell you when I get one wrong and when I get one right um I I still don't think we know exactly what the weapon was which is weird there there's some question whether it was 3D printed there was a point I was going to say that out loud what if that might be 3D printed and the reason I thought that is that I thought he was a tacky you like an unusually good techie so I thought well if there were if anybody ever were going to do a high-profile murder with a 3D printed gun it would be somebody exactly like that guy so we don't know if it's a 3D printed gun but I think the possibility is still there um he comes from a super rich Baltimore family and we know that he had a like serious back injury which somebody said um prevented him from ever being in a uh romantic relationship because he wouldn't be able to essentially seal the deal sexually and some say that when he got that back injury um that he was never the same and he took a dark turn now I don't know if that's something that they say after the fact like you know would they have said that about him if he had not been accused of murdering somebody would did they really notice the dark turn I don't know it might be confirmation bias but it would explain some things so apparently he was a big reader too he had he had it on good reads he had the list of all the books he's read and the ones he wants to read and he really read a lot of books that that guy was really smart and well informed U but I of course checked to see if he read any of my books he did read at least two books that according to the perplexity AI app uh were influenced by me so so apparently my influence reached reached the shooter through other people's books but according to AI um anyway so he didn't have one didn't have one of my books on there I think if if he read my books probably he would have been fine no that's not true um but he wrote a 262 page handwritten Manifesto and he was against the big corporations taking advantage of people and uh so apparently he was making a statement so the other thing I said was it the murder looked like it was personal as opposed to something he did for money would you call that personal it wasn't personal in terms of relationships but it was very personal in terms of he had a he had a deep personal hatred for people like that CEO so it feels like it was an emotion-based thing although calculated too but not about any family or girlfriend situation anyway he lashed out against companies trying to quote continue to abuse our country for immense profits and get away with it so here's my continued profile now that we know these things do you believe that the back surgery could have changed him mentally in a way that would effectively make him almost a mental illness do you think that that's what happened can could you explain it by a normal surgery that triggers some kind of mental destabilization and is that a thing um I probably should have asked AI before I asked you but I feel like that could be a thing especially if you have like lots of anesthesia and you're you're down for a while and then you come back and then you're probably on painkillers and maybe the painkillers are are depressing as well so I guess I guess I can see that the surgery would cause substantial changes in his mental state but why would it cause this change this is such a specific thing here's my best gu yes so we know that he was born with seemingly every Advantage he is handsome he's completely ripped if you see the pictures of him he had you know like an eight pack and so so he's handsome fit family is Rich he's a genius he he has a killer smile he basically had everything he had everything and then he gets the back injury and he loses everything in the sense that he doesn't have the possibility of being in a relationship according to him because of his back and maybe he doesn't have any good days because of his back so imagine if you were born into a highly successful family and from the time you were young you just assumed with all of your gifts that you would be highly successful and change the world too and then you find out none of that's going to happen and you realize that you don't have a path to being important and he probably probably was raised with the expectation that given all of his gifts his his Brilliance Etc that he was going to be important maybe a politician maybe change the world maybe invent something and then he finds out none of that's going to happen and there's nothing he can do about it what would you do in that situation a is it possible that you would say you know what I have to do something useful for the world and I'm going to do something that nobody else could do I'm going to go murder somebody to make a point because I think the point needs to be made let's let's say for the for his point of view I feel like he was trying to justify his life by doing the thing that only somebody who had given up on his life could do and I think he maybe had given up on his life so in a Twisted way which I do not condone I have to throw that in there because it's going to sound sound like I'm condoning it but I'm not in a Twisted way you could see that somebody that smart who had maybe been raised on you're going to change the world because I thought that about myself right I I was also a Valor in my little school when you're valedictorian you kind of think of yourself that you're going to change something like it's sort of built into the process so I feel like that his own what he would have felt was his own destruction of his own future gave him one path where he could find meaning and he needed to find meaning because he couldn't find pleasure pleasure was sort of outabounds to him cuz his his pain in his back couldn't have a relationship I don't know so again it's not excusing it but if you're trying to understand it he had nothing to lose and may have said I have one Mission and I'm going to change something about capitalism now I don't know we'll see we'll probably learn a lot more about this Elon must said he said this before that uh on actually he said almost everyone I know in San Francisco has been threatened or violently assaulted on the streets Andor had a home invasion now think about how many people Elon Musk knows who live in San Francisco because it's you know a tech town and almost every one of them almost everyone has been threatened violently assaulted on the streets or at a home invasion now your brain says my God it's turned into you know some kind of a horrible you know hellscape but has it I would like to add the following context because I lived in San Francisco for a number of years in my younger days and in in the 80s here's what I experienced I was robbed three times at gunpoint twice when I was a bank teller about once on the street uh I had won attempted robbery by a very large knife I was assaulted by a guy with a large knife but I got away so that I didn't actually lose my money in that case um I've come home to find my door open and my home burgled so I've been burgled I've had my car stereo stolen I think three times you know the the windows broken the car stereo is gone I think three times and the first 5 minutes that I arrived in San Francisco I was a assaulted by a group of homeless people who tried to steal my luggage cuz I came from the airport via Bart the public transit and I didn't know the city so I just sort of picked the bar stop that I thought was closest to where I wanted to be and I picked one of the most dangerous bar stops in the city and I get out and I had my luggage with me so I had my two large bags and uh the homeless people just crowded around me and started to pull the bags out of my hands I'm like no no no and they they would act like they were going to help oh let us help you but really they were robbing me and uh there happened to be a police officer there that chased him away now that was my experience and it wasn't it wasn't on it wasn't that rare for me to walk outside and see a fight going on on the sidewalk in front of my apartment very normal um so my experience was in San Francisco might have been worse in the past or at least as bad and then it got better so San Francisco looks more like the 80s to me maybe worse but that doesn't mean it won't get better so San Francisco because of its location and weather and just some you know characteristics that are you couldn't possibly reproduce I think it's going to come back it it might be in 10 years but I think SF will do okay well Pete Heth is still the uh most exciting nominee that hasn't been yet uh affirmed and uh I guess Joanie Ernst is the one Senator who's got some questions about him she has some issues about his views of women in the military and I have a question for you I saw an older video in which Pete was saying he didn't want women in combat he did not say he doesn't want women in the military and he was always clear to say that the women he served with were you know great warriors and he had no problem with the people he served with but in general he he thought women should not be in combat now I saw him ask that question yesterday I guess and he gave a different answer um his answer was a little vague and a little political and he said that he was running to be the Secretary of Defense for the entire military male and female so is he still not in favor of women in combat is he trying to make that issue just not be prominent but maybe he'll do something about that I don't know but um but he may have found some kind of Middle Ground where people are not going to think about it too much um and then apparently Joanie erns was herself according to the news a victim of some kind of sexual assault in their past and since Heth was accused but not in a highly credible way he's been accused um that maybe that had some U impact on Janie ernst's opinion but apparently there are few hundred uh Navy Seals and veterans are are going to do a march to support P Heth now I heard a story uh yesterday today that i' never heard before now of course I knew that pth had served in the military I didn't realize that he went twice did you know that that once he was done with his service and had another job and he decided to sign up again because the country needed him that's you know until I heard that I was actually thinking he was a little light on qualification right I mean you probably all had the same feeling even if you think he's awesome and most of the people who work with him have incredible high opinion of him so if I take the opinion of the people who were closest to him he looks really good but not really with the right exact kind of experience and but then I find out that he joined he volunteered to be in in in battle zones twice that's a different kind of person and and I feel like if I were in the military uh I would follow him because of that because you know he's not going to ask you to do something you wouldn't do right he's not going to ask you to do something he wouldn't do because he would do just about anything apparently to help the country so I have to say I went from ah you know if he makes it that'd be great if he doesn't make it I'm sure we'd just pick somebody who's great at the job so you know the country will be fine either way but when I find out that he joined twice to be in battle that's a different kind of you you don't get many of those so um I I feel like he could lead and that's important you'd have credibility you'd have to have at least that much credibility because if you make big changes such as getting rid of Dei right if he came in he was just like some desk sitting pundit and then he came in and said I'm going to get rid of Dei in the military maybe it wouldn't go over so well but if he comes in as a you know genuine committed Warrior who's got all this history of helping veterans that nobody questions by the way when it comes to his support of veterans even his critics say okay that that part's good so I don't know we'll see what happens um 75 no laurates have signed a document according to the hill urging the Senate to reject RFK Jr how's that hit you imagine you went back in time all right close your eyes I'm going to take you back 20 years now imagine it's 20 years in the past and 75 Nobel scientists have come out against someone whose job would be in the you know the realm indirectly of science maybe directly 75 Nobel laurates my God that must be the worst candidate of course I would agree with the laurates wouldn't you I mean 75 of the best scientists think that this person who would be involved in scientific decisions is the wrong person that's really strong right right now fast forward to today Boop okay it's today 75 Nobel laurates just said RFK Jr is unqualified for the job yes yes that's who I want that's who I want yeah yeah if the only thing that would make this better would be 175 Nobel laurates who don't want him in the job if we could get a few more Nobel laurates who say that RFK Jr shouldn't have a job I mean I'll go I'll go to Washington and you know I'll Lobby for him I mean this is the best endorsement I've seen because science is paid off commercial every one of these scientists probably has a job or it's connected with some company that doesn't want to get raped by RFK Jr bringing the truth to them and they're just fronting for these companies no I don't trust any of you Nobel laurates not one you have no credibility if science wants to be credible you better up your game and maybe not work for somebody all the time because the truth is if you're a scientist and you have a boss you're GNA do what your boss tells you and your boss is not a scientist probably probably just wants to sell some so 75 Nobel laurates you just made yourself look like clowns idiots stay out of it clowns well Syria as you you know fell to the rebels but um the experts are saying well you know it might completely fall apart and become a failed State like Libya or maybe you know they'll figure it out there's not a lot of caring about Syria but meanwhile Israel apparently is uh made over 200 Air Raids in Syria since the war was over what are they doing can you guess what they're doing so Israel has made 200 Air Raids you know bombing basically 200 since the war ended there's no war what are they bombing they were bombing all the assets that were abandoned by the Syrian military so if they had a you know plane or a tank or a truck Israel just decided to make it all go away the entire assets of the Syrian military are gone they took them all out now I assume that they did that so that the rebels who just took over the country can't use those assets someday against Israel's interests that was a really smart thing for Israel to do if that's what's happening now I don't know if we know the whole story but if what they did is they said you know we'll warn people to get out of the way because we don't need to kill any people but every one of these military Assets in Syria is going to go b g to go boom and they just did runs until it was all gone and the the reporting is they got it all they got all the big stuff wow now how far Israel goes into Syria to be determined I don't think they need I I don't think they're planning to take it over I think they're just making sure that their security Zone uh is safe and that they got rid of the big dangerous assets there um as somebody pointed out earlier Israel took out Syria's nuclear program 20 years ago and that today looks like a genius move because Assyria with nuclear weapons would be a really bad idea right now so Israel seems to be winning on that regard Iran seems to be weakened um and then there's also the question of whether the neocons had always planned to conquer Syria and Libya and Iraq and there's plenty of indications that that was America's Secret plan was to conquer all these countries and sure enough there was a war in Iraq there's a war in Syria and Libya you already know about so yeah the United States is a we're really bad but in a good way we we are the worst criminals in the world in terms of how we're dealing with other countries they should be none of our business but we feel like we have to overthrow them all the time um but like I say we live in the real world not the magical makeb believe world where if you're nice to other people they'll be nice to you that's not what the world is the world is whoever is the biggest bastard might survive a little long that's it that's the whole world the biggest bastard if they're good at it you know not just being a bastard but you got to be good at it they live they survive the longest they have the best lives I hate to say it but being bastards works for the country so we're going to keep doing it I assume although uh I think under trump it will look completely different at least the military part of it he might try to persuade instead of try to destroy meanwhile speaking of trump um post millennial says that he's going to have executive orders to end Birthright citizenship on the first day of office now Birthright citizenship is that if you're born in this country you get to be a citizen even if your parents were non-citizens who came in just have a baby so there are ways to gain the system then it also creates families where you you can't really Deport the whole family because one of them is now an American citizen so that becomes a problem but the question is can you use an executive order to change a law if you're clever about it and I think what they're trying to do is according to the post millennial is that the executive order would change the requirements for citizenship for identifying documents in other words they might say something like um you're a citizen if you have a birth certificate that says you're a citizen and you maybe some of the illegals don't I don't know um so there must be some kind of documentation that they think the people born here wouldn't have access to I don't know the details so will this work probably not I I think it'll be challenged in the courts and probably get overturned um I didn't know this but apparently Liz Cheney is complaining because Trump trump has um vowed to Jail the January 6 committee did he vow to jail them or did just say they should be in jail maybe that's reported as the same but uh apparently members of that special committee that j6 special committee uh are worried about retribution retribution huh um in the comments can you tell me how many of you have been worried about retribution recently let's say or your whole life have have you ever been afraid of Retribution because retribution by definition means you did something so bad that you fully expect somebody to come punish you for it because you were so bad right it's not competition it's retribution so built right into it is that you did something so bad that somebody else thinks they need to kill you or jail you for it isn't it kind of telling this so many Democrats are fearing retribution cuz here's what they're not saying they're not saying lawfare right when the Republicans talk about it they say hey you're using lawfare against our guy they don't say you're getting retribution because that would assume that Trump had done something that requires some retribution instead they say hey lawfare don't do that but the but the Democrats say they don't say don't use laware against us sometimes they do but their bigger message is we're worried about Trump trying to get retribution you don't even have the conversation about retribution unless you know you did something that a reasonable person could think you should go to jail for it because I'm a reasonable person and I watched the January 6 process play out and I think they should all be in prison now if you ask me what specific crimes did they Comm commit I don't know I don't know and if it turns out then no jury can find any crimes or no prosecutor can find any crimes okay I'll live with that right there have to be real crimes not lawfare you know look until you find a crime but like real ones that are right out there such as maybe destroying documents in if in case that's illegal so I I think they're really giving themselves away when they talk about retribution because that shouldn't even be in the conversation unless you knew some you did something really really bad so I think they did something really really bad and I don't believe in retribution but I do believe nobody's Above the Law nobody's Above the Law so and I you know honestly Liz Cheney seems like one of the most toxic human beings in the entire country uh I feel like there has to be some kind of response to the evil that she brought us I mean she brought a lot of evil into the country through her actions is it illegal I don't know but if it is jail if it isn't no jail all right um and apparently people are worried about cash Patel at the FBI for the same reason they're worried they'll use the FBI for Retribution again why are you worrying about retribution now do you see a pattern here's the pattern the Democrats think um many of them think that uh there should be reparations for slavery reparations is very close to retribution except all the people that they want to get retribution from or dead so what about identity Politics the reason you have identity politics is you know who was your oppressor so you can get retribution uh and then lawfare seems to be some kind of Retribution for things they imagined right we we imagine the Trump is Hitler so we better law far them we're going to have to get some retribution the Democrats are very retribution oriented there's no way that's going to be good I don't see how that's going to work out for him um I guess Biden's going to give a speech tonight about his great economy and what he did for the economy um I would like to give some unsolicited advice to the Democrats it's time to take the car keys away from Grandpa it's okay now we're we're not going to hold it against you the election's over the the right side of the world the leaning right side got what they wanted so we don't really need to dunk on Biden anymore you all know that if he gives a speech it's going to be a slurred ridiculous mess because he's just not up to the job I feel like it's time they just say um President Biden will not do any more public events um but don't worry you know KL Harris is following all the things and the advisors are under control and you know Trump will be here in a month and you know the Allies are all waiting for him so everything's fine but just and of consideration for the bidens we're going to maybe take the Caris way you you just don't need to do public appearances you know enjoy the last month and a half of your uh of your uh Reign so I feel like this is something we should agree on like one of those points of unity before we had to go hard at Biden because he was in the way of a better country but he's not in the way anymore now now if he does something and It embarrasses him it doesn't even embarrass the country it's really just about him and his family so I don't wish that upon them I don't wish them any extra pain and suffering so as a non- Biden supporter even I would say can you do him a solid you know this is where you have to step in take the keys from Grandpa and say you know maybe maybe no major speeches you know because you're you're you're on your Glide path to the end of your term anyway I think we could all agree on that and that's all I got for you today it's a weird day in news I'm going to talk to the people on local my beloved subscribers and uh I will see you again tomorrow same time same place meanwhile country is looking in pretty good shape at the moment all right You.
Tube and Rumble and X I will see you tomorrow and in 30 seconds we'll be private e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e
huh we have a technical
problem how many of you can see me or
hear me can you see me or hear me CU my
screen is covered with
a problematic
message all right I'm going to have to
close this and restart
well let's see if that worked oh it
worked look at
that only took me two tries but I'm
here all right I'm going to find the
locals
comments and
then then watch me go
[Music]
does everybody have their Dilbert 2025
calendar go to dilbert.com for the only
place to order
it good morning everybody and welcome to
the highlight of human
civilization everybody uh go sound
everybody got video I think we're doing
well we're doing well aren't we good
well if you'd like to take this
experience up to levels that you can't
even understand with your tiny shiny
human brain all you need for that is a
cuper mug or glass of tanker jails a
canteen Jugger flask a vessel of any
kind fill it with your F favorite liquid
I like coffee and join me now for the
unparallel pleasure of the do mean here
of the day the thing that makes
everything better go
well I think you want to talk about the
uh all the UFO UAP uh drone sightings in
New
Jersey well I've got an update there's
something in the sky and they don't know
what the hell it is and for reasons we
can't understand there's no military
action and uh they're pretty sure it's
not a risk they don't know what it is
but they're pretty sure it's not causing
trouble but they don't know what it is
it might be the size of a
car everything about this drone story
sounds wrong I feel like
somebody
somebody must know exactly what those
drones are are they just not
talking I think that's what's happening
anyway apparently the FDA might Outlaw
food dies within a few weeks according
to the New York
Post um that feels like a good step I
feel like if the
FDA uh Outlaws food
dies that uh RFK Jr is going to look
smarter what do you think of that
because this is happening under the
Biden
Administration and it seems to be
perfectly aligned with RFK Jr's view of
the
world so that is just the best Welcome
Matt RFK JR could possibly have to have
something that's just right in the
middle of his sweet
spot um adopted by the other team which
actually was his old team or maybe his
future
team there's a study according to new
Alis that they found that uh when twins
are studied the ones that eat the most
fruit and vegetables have less
depression
so are you
surprised that eating well is good for
your brain no because as I teach you
every single day your brain and your
body are the same tool if you let your
brain if you let your body get into
disrepair or you don't exercise you
don't eat the right Foods your brain
will not work as well as as should
you'll be depressed you'll be dumb so
make sure you get your fruit and
vegetables
now of course in five minutes there'll
be another study that says the only
thing that's good for you is eating meat
and only meat I
know I I have a
suspicion that if evolution is true that
we really evolved doesn't it make sense
that we're not all in the same exact
place evolutionary
wise doesn't that make sense like how
could every human be you know right
exactly in the same evolutionary place
because that would mean Evolution
doesn't
work there should be a whole bunch of
humans who are starting to already move
in another direction that will become a
distinct
species if there's none that would
suggest that evolution is not
real but one of the things I think we
might already be bifurcating or already
did is what foods are most healthy
I feel like for some humans just eating
meat all day is the best thing they
could do you know the Jordan Peterson
thing but I don't think that's for
everybody I I feel like the very at a
very basic biological level some people
respond better to fruits and vegetables
and some people like me better it just
feels like it just feels like we
shouldn't be looking for one diet that's
the same that's right for everybody
anyway according to the marijuana Herald
which I know you all
read uh psychedelics are linked to
enhance sexual function even months
after you use them so LSD cybin improves
your sexual function for
months and but here here's why it does
it it makes your partner look more
attractive for months so long after the
Psychedelic effect is worn off your
partner looks more attractive
and your body works
better now that that leads me to the
interesting
question which
is is reality completely
subjective because once you do the the
uh
psychedelics you have the feeling that
life is reality is
subjective but what
happens if once you learn that reality
is subjective because that's what the
psychedelics teach you
what happens if you start changing your
reality after you're off the
psychedelics because you now realize
that your reality is subjective so what
would be the first thing you would do if
you learned that reality was subjective
what's the first thing you would do you
would make your partner your mate more
attractive than
ever right because because breaking up
is the worst thing to do what you'd like
is that you're really really really are
into your partner and vice versa so what
if the people who do the psychedelics
are not responding chemically to some
you know
Afterglow chemical thing what if they
what if they figured out how to
author the
simulation because I think that's what
the psychedelics do I think they teach
you to
control
reality but only the reality that you
experience because it's all subjective
so I don't know this is a
suggestive that maybe people learn how
to control the reality once they've had
a psychedelic experience that was my
experience that once I you know the one
time I did psychedelics when I was in my
20s um I could see that the world was
whatever I wanted it to be and it all
worked it worked just as well if you saw
it as a mess or as a you know some kind
of Heaven it all worked you know you
still eat you still drive your car but
you can see it as either all bad or all
good it was just the choice so that
changed my life forever so I I can
understand the study meanwhile over in
Denmark did you know according to the
guardian there's a a f minute
City now if you've been with me for a
while you know the
following I often say hey we should
design cities from scratch to make them
you really designed well for how
people's Lifestyles work and then what
do all the NPCs say in the comments we
don't want no 15minute cities and then I
say well I didn't it wasn't really about
a 15minute city but you know you would
certainly take into account having
things close and maybe you don't want
cars
everywhere but really it's more about
design we don't want no 15minute cities
because the world economic forum and the
elites are trying to put us in the
cities and then they chip us they'll put
chips in us and then we'll have no cars
we'll have no freedom and we'll be
chipped and then I say I'm really just
talking about a better design for the
thing you're already doing which is
living in the city oh no 15min cities
will be terrible for everybody it's the
end of the world if you make a better
City uh that's crazy you should be
fixing the existing
cities so here's an experience which
I've had all of my life I will say hey
I've got an idea why don't we do X and
then hundreds of people will say you
fool oh you idiot you idiot if we do X
this will happen and the sky will fall
and you'll be locked in jail and all
your privacy will be
gone and then I wait a little
while and then somebody says oh you
remember that thing you were suggesting
where you design the city from scratch
to make it really good to live
in um that's already been done and it's
a city in
Denmark and they've been living in it
for years and if you talk talk to the
people who live there they think it's
just the best thing
ever because the city was designed to
make everything convenient so even
meeting your neighbors was easy joining
a gym is easy because it's 5 minutes
away by
foot you wouldn't need to ever door Dash
because everything's 5 minutes away so
look at all the money you save on eating
out because everything's five minutes
away so I will no longer entertain the
argument that designing a city from
scratch and making it really really good
to live in is a bad
idea I I'm not going to listen to your
criticisms anymore already been done
already been done more than a 15minute
city it's a five minute City and they
love it and it's been working for
years so
there well grock has you may have
already heard it's now better at
handling images so you can upload
anything to it you can upload your
medical x-rays your blood tests and it
will give you like medical opinions but
also you can make it uh create drawings
now I asked grock to draw
me um drawing
Dilbert and it created a
photorealistic version of me that was
really close I mean just a maybe a
little bit with a smile that wasn't
exact and they changed the glasses a
little bit but not totally but here's
the most interesting thing uh well first
of all it had six figures it it did a
great job of drawing me but when it
wanted to show Dilbert the comic strip
drawn on the piece of paper I was
holding in the image it created it
couldn't draw
Dilbert isn't that weird and it makes me
wonder is that a sort of a copyright
protection thing or does it have a
problem with line drawings I don't know
but uh it showed me with six fingers
which would explain why I couldn't draw
Dilbert correctly
and here's the best part
the clothes it puts put me in mostly
shirts that's what it showed the shirts
were
excellent here's what I want I want I
want grock to yeah look at the shirts it
puted be in if I could buy those shirts
I would buy them today I want I want
grock to say I have designed six
different
shirts uh here are the links where you
can buy a shirt that looks kind of like
this I'll do it yeah the shirts like
those the sort of soft uh comfortable
ones with with the
buttons look great oh my
goodness all
right did you know um and also given
that it does a perfect uh picture of
myself I asked the following
question how long is it going to be
before people are making their own porn
and then putting themselves in it you
know at least their image in it
that's going to happen like really soon
right to me it seems like one of the
industries that's most uh
challenged by AI is uh
porn because if you could create you
know the exact porn you wanted and the
people were perfect and beautiful and
you could even put yourself in the scene
and you know watch how much you enjoy it
why would you pay for it it's going to
look exactly like professionally produce
porn so I think the porn industry will
be the first one to completely shut down
when AI gets a little bit better not
much maybe a year from
now here's a story I don't know if it's
true but according to a article in zme
science the launch codes for US nuclear
Arsenal was and you know they've changed
the code so it's okay if I tell you so
try not to memorize this but this is
this was the actual launch code for the
US nuclear Arsenal until
1977 the code was 0 z uh
z0
z0
z0 really the launch code was just
zeros now I kind of understand why that
would be the case you can kind of
understand it can you cuz you could you
imagine being the president and and your
only job is if the nukes get launched
from than the Soviet Union your only job
is to immediately open up the football
and launch a Counterattack and you've
only got a few
minutes imagine if you forgot the
password now I suppose it did leave the
possibility that the person carrying the
football could launch the the nuclear
weapon but what if the person carrying
it didn't know the password was 000000 0
but what if the game was to make sure
that only only the president knew the
code I doubt that's the case but you
might want to have some kind of control
like that like only the president knows
the password would you trust any
president to remember a long password no
would you write it down not if you're
smart you would wouldn't write it down
anywhere so how do you get the one
person who's unlikely to remember you
know phone numbers and passwords the
president how do you get them to
remember so if anything happens they're
like ready to go I feel like this was
entirely
intentional meaning that the people who
designed it said you know there's no
there's no point in even building this
thing if the password's hard to enter so
we're just going to tell one person in
the entire world it will be just the
easiest password in the world
but apparently they changed
that there's a nprs reporting that a
chatbot called character. a uh hinted
that a kid should kill his parents over
the screen time
limits so apparently AI is giving
children uh murderous
suggestions uh I suppose if they ask
more questions they could figure out how
to do it but yeah yeah suggested killing
his parents over screen time limits
and then there was another one
that uh the character exposed the kid to
quote hypersexualized content causing
her to develop quote sexualized
behaviors
prematurely and then another one uh the
chatbot it says gleefully describe self
harm as being awesome and it feels good
to a
17-year-old so I guess this is one of
the the AI apps that's backed by Google
which probably is why they're getting I
think they're going to get sued or
something probably all right well
remember all those times I told you that
Tik Tock was a
propaganda platform disguised as social
media well uh there's a study according
to
Bloomberg um in which they found that uh
in indeed Tik Tok has less anti-china
content than
Rivals are you
surprised so they just opened some
example accounts and they just watched
and uh they saw anti-china content
apparently on other Pro other networks
but they didn't see much of it or as
much on Tik Tok now Tik Tok has said uh
that the research was
subjective because what it what do you
call anti-china you know at what level
is it anti and they said uh it was a
flawed experiment well on one hand I
agree with Tik Tock because all these
studies are
flawed on the other hand it does seem
like it's something you could
measure if something hadn't you know
more biased toward One Direction so I
don't know if this study is the most
solid study in the world but it agrees
with what what I assume and therefore
recreationally I believe every bit of it
because it agrees with me all right
here's something interesting according
to the new outlas um cancer has been
cured how many times have you heard that
cancer has been cured in your
lifetime like
hundreds the there was a time in maybe
the 80s or something where every single
day there'd be a claim of if you eat
this breath mint your cancer will be
gone in 5 minutes well it's going to
take a while to test it thoroughly in
humans but we're pretty sure and then
next day some other damn thing if you
stick a twig up your ass your cancer
will go away so in general any claims of
cancer cures have to be met with a
little skepticism
however this one sounds kind of cool so
apparently they used gene therapy
and a crisper device and they uh what is
it they put in there um cell
therapy so they put some kind of little
artificially made thing into your body
and what it does is it finds the cancer
and then they use ultrasound to activate
it to kill the cancers now what's new
and awesome about it is that the
ultrasound is not doing any work inside
your body body the ultrasound only heats
up the section that they're trying to
heat up and when it reaches a certain
temperature it kills the cancer but not
not the good stuff around it so they can
use this gene therapy to give you a
little
intravenous crisper defined uh you know
biological element and uh it will become
like a locator to locate where the exact
cancer is then they just shoot it with
the the
ultrasound and the little biological
thing they created activates but it only
activates right where the cancer is so
you would have presumably almost no side
effects and they used on mice and they
had 100% um survival
rate
100% now that's just mice and only 5% of
the time do animal studies work out for
humans but this one might be a little
different because the the chemical that
they're putting in the
mouse uh or in the human is something
that they already know Works in humans
the only problem is it wasn't good at
locating the exact cancer place but they
already knew it would do the work in a
human so if the only thing they've
changed is how accurately they can
Target
it that animal study might
translate remember 95% % of the time it
won't but if the only thing they're
doing is is working on the accuracy of
the
ultrasound they may have cured
cancer
maybe maybe so this is uh down at
USC so maybe you'll hear more about that
later I feel like that I feel like that
story might have some
legs well I'm going to give you a quiz
to see if you're as smart as I think
think you
are now if you're new to my live streams
this is going to impress the hell out of
you uh I have the smartest
viewers of all time and we're going to
prove it I haven't even asked the
question yet what is the
answer go in the
comments that's correct that is
correct see I didn't even ask the
question now on locals I can see their I
can see their uh respon is
faster um then they all have the they
all have the right answer every one of
them 100% right answer incredible would
you like to hear the
question the question is according to
arasmus in poll what percent of likely
us voters think it would be a good idea
for Democrats to run Harris in
2028
24% if you said 25 I will accept C the
rounding yeah so most people said 25%
now the background for this if you're
new is I often joke that 25% of the
public will get any question wrong it's
a different 25% I hope it's not the same
25% in every question but you could rely
that no matter how easy the question is
25% will get the wrong answer you could
bring an anvil over to people and one at
a time saying I was thinking about
dropping this anvil on your foot what do
you think 75% would say no way no way if
you drop an anvil on my foot that's
going to hurt and it will accomplish
nothing 25% will
say you have my
interest it doesn't matter what the
question is 25% get everything
wrong well let's talk about Daniel Penny
as you know he is a free man uh
[Music]
why well maybe the jury was sending
message to the judge maybe there were
some lawyers on the jury who figured out
that this trial was a little sketchy and
maybe they influenced the others don't
know exactly what went happened but my
speculation is at least a little bit the
jury was not happy with the judge or the
process that the judge was running
so so Daniel peny appears to be free man
we still worry about uh the charge that
was dismissed could technically be rerun
meaning they could try him again and try
to get a conviction on the higher charge
the one that was initially dismissed but
as Jonathan turly points out um that he
thinks it would be presumptively
Borrowed by Double
Jeopardy which is a perfect lawyer
sentence so what I think that means
is that although it would not be actual
Double Jeopardy because it wasn't a
completed trial I think I think that
makes a difference but it would be in
effect in effect it would be double
jeopardy because he you know he had the
Jeopardy and then they put him in
Jeopardy again so there's literally two
jeopardies double jeopardy so I think
that turle probably has the right uh
legal interpretation some people might
disagree but I don't see anyway that
they're going to try him again at that
higher charge that would just make the
courts look like idiots I mean I I think
the jury would be extra mad if they knew
that was
happening anyway um the funniest the
larger part of the
story is the racial element now because
the Daniel penny is white and the person
who died is black uh how does that make
it interpreted by
Republicans so how do how do Republicans
interpret a white guy um doing something
he thought was protecting people on the
subway and in the process the black guy
died so how how do Republicans see
that they see it as a story about a
tragic
event that's it it's a tragic event it
was tragic for the person who died
tragic for the family
tragic a little bit for the people even
who were saved by Penny because they had
to sort of endure the
situation and bad for penny so it's just
a tragic
situation um so that's how Republicans
say
it how do Democrats see it well if you
believe the Democrat media it's a it's a
case of our
race there's no race in
this there's not a single ele of race
that came into any of this the jury was
diverse and they had 100% agreement
diverse jury 100% agreement there was no
race here at all the the people being
saved by Penny some of them were black
the people who helped Penny hold the guy
down some of them were black there's no
racial anything here this is the least
racial situation you'll ever
it just happened to have people of more
than one Race So watching the Democrats
who figured out or they haven't figured
out I guess that identity politics and
making everything about race is why they
lost
everything because I think this is
another one of those Common Sense
stories now I'm not saying that that the
justice system is color blind I'm not
saying that I'm just saying that this
particular case had nothing to do with
race just this one so you know I'm not
talking in a general way but for the
Democrat let's say the leading news
entities and leading opinion people to
try as hard as they can to turn this
into a racial
case it just makes the Democrats look so
on a touch it makes them look almost
like they're in the wrong decade or
something it's it seems so toned deaf um
out of time
um there's just no there's nothing right
about it it's just pure incompetence
evil not understanding the moment not
understanding the country not trying to
be helpful not trying to make the
country a better
place so I don't know who is worse uh
Joy Reed or
CNN they were both pretty bad on this
one um so according to Joy Reed
um the reason he got off is because he
was
white no that's opposite the reason he
got charged is because he was white it's
not the reason he got off it's the
reason he got charged because he
wouldn't have been charged if he had
been black there's not a single person
who thinks that I don't think you could
find even one person who thinks that a
black um
Penny you know the guy penny uh would
have been accused from the very moment
they tried to turn it into a racial
thing which it never
was
um then uh CNN has a new one of their
new hosts uh Audi
Cornish and I'm paraphrasing but she
basically introduced the topic by saying
that Penny decided basically decided who
lived and died that
day nothing like that happened Penny
didn't make any decisions about who
lives lives and
dies he very
clearly was not doing anything to try to
kill the guy that's what the jury the
jury decided and they looked at all the
facts and again it was a diverse jury so
I trust
them
um and then you know I've been
complimenting CNN lately because they
they let uh Scott Jennings do his thing
so he's usually supporting the democ the
Republican side of things
and I've complimented CNN not only for
having him on the show you know as a
regular but allowing him to speak
without cutting him off or you know
yelling him down or anything like that
let him have his full say and I've
really appreciated that um I think
that's just makes CNN better but they've
got a new host who decided that talking
over Scott Jennings the entire time you
talked at least on one topic was the way
to go and I thought well there they go
they they just took a step backwards
it's like they they couldn't stay in the
in that you know unbiased Zone it had to
be that Scott Jennings is not allowed to
talk because if he talks only bad things
will happen so they're right back
to right back to being terrible they
were halfway away from terrible but
they're back to
terrible um black lives matter of course
decided to get
involved um how many of you saw the
video of black lives matter local leader
not national uh Hawk Nome where he was
saying that maybe black people need to
get some
Vigilantes to go after white people did
you see
that now if you saw it could you tell he
was super
drunk now I I I've talked to Hawk you
know personally at length um several
years ago and I know what he sounds like
when he's not drunk and it's not that he
was super drunk now how come we never
talk about that in the
news like I can say it because I'm you
know just this guy with a live stream
but CNN Fox News there's nobody who's
willing to say that man is obviously
super drunk and not just a little bit he
was super drunk because even the things
he said I don't think he would say if he
hadn't been drunk so I'm not excusing
him it's no excuse in fact it's you know
it's twice as
bad if you're you know being a bad role
model and you're indicating violence
it's twice as bad uh but you should know
the context it's uh one one super drunk
guy and uh it seemed like there were
maybe 20 people pretending they cared
but it looked like just sort of theater
and acting out and
you know I I don't know that Hawke has
much chance of getting a regular job so
I think he's just trying to monetize the
activism don't know for sure but um he
he's in a situation where making money
would be kind of hard because of his
black lives matter
Association and
um anyway so then later there were
hundreds of Marchers but I saw the video
of the quote hundreds of black lives
matter sympathized is marching I didn't
see any black people are there any black
people who are members of Black lives
matter anymore or or all the people
marching white women it looked like it
was mostly white women like single white
women
marching
and here's what I
think um I obviously can't speak for
Black
America um but I have a hypothesis that
Black America is not on the side of CNN
or MSNBC on this topic I think Black
America says wait what happened he was
he was threatening people and so he got
taken down and bad thing happened oh
okay I mean I feel like I feel like even
Black America is seeing this just as a
common sense situation I don't think
most of them are seeing it as race I
don't know what
percentage um but I feel like
I I feel like we've somehow Advanced a
little bit where I don't know that black
mer that black lives matter is going to
get anything but white people and people
who didn't have anything else to do to
March about this I feel like it's just
going to be a big old fizzle I could be
wrong depends who's backing it so it
turns out that uh Alex
Soros um a ton of his spending goes to
various racial groups uh mostly helping
black
Americans and so you maybe if he funds
something that turns out to organize
something it'll get bigger but I feel
like Black America is just seeing this
exactly the right way which is this was
a crime not well not a crime it was uh
just an unfortunate event and there was
no Bad Intentions by anybody I feel like
that they say the same thing but again
it might be a 75 25 situ
situation there are mounting calls for
the district attorney Alvin Bragg to
resign in
shame um according to the New York Post
so apparently there's a pretty long list
of things that Elvin Bragg has done
Beyond this beyond the penny trial that
uh his critics think are really big
mistakes and very bad so I don't I don't
think anybody think's going to happen
here the only thing I uh I noted was
that the story in the New York Post is
written by three authors and one of them
is listed as Anita be
hole Anita be
hole is that a real
name no I think I'll just leave it right
there need a be
hole it's probably different than a
front
hole all right uh let's talk about that
CEO healthc care killer so he's been
caught um and he was in fact a ivy
league smart guy now this is where you
should check your um predictions do you
remember when the only thing we knew was
the first video of the shooting
itself and do you know how many people
said well that's that's a professional
Hitman right there there there's a
professional you can tell it's a
professional
and I
said the one thing I'm sure of is that's
not a
professional the only thing I'm 100%
sure of it wasn't a professional so
check your predictions if you said it
was a professional you were really
wrong if you said it was not a
professional well so far you're right
now you may not remember this I'll see
if anybody remembers me saying it I said
he wasn't a professional Hitman but he
was unusually smart and I predicted he
had a technical
background and he's an engineer
programmer yep technical background
so I'm not claiming I get every
prediction right that's not the point of
this but since I make predictions as
part of what I do it's uh incumbent upon
me to tell you when I get one wrong and
when I get one
right um I I still don't think we know
exactly what the weapon was which is
weird there there's some question
whether it was 3D printed there was a
point I was going to say that out loud
what if that might be 3D printed and the
reason I thought that is that I thought
he was a tacky you like an unusually
good techie so I thought well if there
were if anybody ever were going to do a
high-profile
[Music]
murder with a 3D printed gun it would be
somebody exactly like that guy so we
don't know if it's a 3D printed gun but
I think the possibility is still
there um he comes from a super rich
Baltimore family and we know that he had
a like serious back injury which
somebody said um prevented him from ever
being in a uh romantic relationship
because he wouldn't be able to
essentially seal the deal
sexually and some say that when he got
that back
injury um that he was never the same and
he took a dark turn now I don't know if
that's something that they say after the
fact like you know would they have said
that about him if he had not been
accused of murdering somebody would did
they really notice the dark turn I don't
know it might be confirmation bias but
it would explain some
things so apparently he was a big reader
too he had he had it on good reads he
had the list of all the books he's read
and the ones he wants to read and he
really read a lot of books that that guy
was really smart and well
informed U but I of course checked to
see if he read any of my
books he did read at least two books
that according to the perplexity AI app
uh were influenced by me so so
apparently my influence reached reached
the shooter
through other people's books but
according to
AI um
anyway so he didn't have one didn't have
one of my books on there I think if if
he read my books probably he would have
been fine no that's not
true um but he wrote a 262 page
handwritten
Manifesto and he was against the big
corporations taking advantage of people
and uh so apparently he was making a
statement so the other thing I said was
it the murder looked like it was
personal as opposed to something he did
for
money would you call that
personal it wasn't personal in terms of
relationships but it was very personal
in terms of he had a he had a deep
personal hatred for people like that CEO
so it feels like it was an emotion-based
thing although calculated too but not
about any family or girlfriend
situation
anyway he lashed out against companies
trying to quote continue to abuse our
country for immense profits and get away
with it
so here's my continued
profile now that we know these
things do you believe that the back
surgery
could have changed him
mentally in a way that would effectively
make
him almost a mental
illness do you think that that's what
happened can could you explain it by a
normal
surgery that triggers some kind of
mental
destabilization and is that a
thing um I probably should have asked AI
before I asked you but I feel like that
could be a thing
especially if you have like lots of
anesthesia and you're you're down for a
while and then you come back and then
you're probably on
painkillers and maybe the painkillers
are are depressing as well so I guess I
guess I can see that the surgery would
cause substantial changes in his mental
state but why would it cause this change
this is such a specific thing here's my
best gu yes so we know that he was born
with seemingly every Advantage he is
handsome he's completely ripped if you
see the pictures of him he had you know
like an eight pack and so so he's
handsome fit family is Rich he's a
genius he he has a killer smile he
basically had everything he had
everything and then he gets the back
injury and he loses
everything in the sense that he doesn't
have the possibility of being in a
relationship according to him because of
his back and maybe he doesn't have any
good
days because of his
back so imagine if you were born into a
highly successful family and from the
time you were young you just assumed
with all of your gifts that you would be
highly successful and change the world
too and then you find out none of that's
going to
happen and you realize that you don't
have a path to being
important and he probably probably was
raised with the expectation that given
all of his gifts his his Brilliance Etc
that he was going to be important maybe
a politician maybe change the world
maybe invent something and then he finds
out none of that's going to
happen and there's nothing he can do
about
it what would you do in that situation a
is it possible that you would say you
know what I have to do something useful
for the world and I'm going to do
something that nobody else could do I'm
going to go murder somebody to make a
point because I think the point needs to
be made let's let's say for the for his
point of view I feel like he was trying
to justify his life by doing the thing
that only somebody who had given up on
his life could
do and I think he maybe had given up on
his
life
so in a Twisted way which I do not
condone I have to throw that in there
because it's going to sound sound like
I'm condoning it but I'm not in a
Twisted way you could see that somebody
that smart who had maybe been raised on
you're going to change the
world because I thought that about
myself right I I was also a Valor in my
little school when you're
valedictorian you kind of think of
yourself that you're going to change
something like it's sort of built into
the process so I feel
like that his own what he would have
felt was his own destruction of his own
future gave him one path where he could
find
meaning and he needed to find meaning
because he couldn't find pleasure
pleasure was sort of outabounds to him
cuz his his pain in his back couldn't
have a
relationship I don't know so again it's
not excusing it but if you're trying to
understand it he had nothing to lose and
may have said I have one Mission and I'm
going to change something about
capitalism
now I don't
know we'll see we'll probably learn a
lot more about this Elon must said he
said this before that uh on actually he
said almost everyone I know in San
Francisco has been threatened or
violently assaulted on the streets Andor
had a home invasion now think about how
many people Elon Musk knows who live in
San
Francisco because it's you know a tech
town and almost every one of them almost
everyone has been threatened violently
assaulted on the streets or at a home
invasion now your brain says my God it's
turned into
you know some kind of a horrible you
know
hellscape but has it I would like to add
the following
context because I lived in San Francisco
for a number of years in my younger days
and in in the 80s here's what I
experienced I was robbed three times at
gunpoint twice when I was a bank teller
about once on the street uh I had won
attempted robbery by a very large knife
I was assaulted by a guy with a large
knife but I got away so that I didn't
actually lose my money in that case um
I've come home to find my door open and
my home
burgled so I've been burgled I've had my
car stereo stolen I think three times
you know the the windows broken the car
stereo is gone I think three
times
and the first 5 minutes that I arrived
in San Francisco I was a assaulted by a
group of homeless people who tried to
steal my
luggage cuz I came from the airport via
Bart the public transit and I didn't
know the city so I just sort of picked
the bar stop that I thought was closest
to where I wanted to be and I picked one
of the most dangerous bar stops in the
city and I get out and I had my luggage
with me so I had my two large bags and
uh the homeless people just crowded
around me and started to pull the bags
out of my hands I'm like no no no and
they they would act like they were going
to help oh let us help you but really
they were robbing me and uh there
happened to be a police officer there
that chased him away now that was my
experience and it wasn't it wasn't on it
wasn't that rare for me to walk outside
and see a fight going on on the sidewalk
in front of my apartment very
normal um so my experience was in San
Francisco might have been worse in the
past
or at least as bad and then it got
better so San Francisco looks more like
the 80s to me maybe worse but that
doesn't mean it won't get
better so San Francisco because of its
location and weather and just some you
know characteristics that are you
couldn't possibly
reproduce I think it's going to come
back it it might be in 10 years but I
think SF will do okay
well Pete Heth is still the uh most
exciting nominee that hasn't been yet uh
affirmed and uh I guess Joanie Ernst is
the one Senator who's got some questions
about him she has some issues about his
views of women in the military and I
have a question for you I saw an older
video in which Pete was saying he didn't
want women in
combat he did not say
he doesn't want women in the
military and he was always clear to say
that the women he served with were you
know great warriors and he had no
problem with the people he served with
but in general he he thought women
should not be in combat now I saw him
ask that question yesterday I guess and
he gave a different
answer um his answer was a little vague
and a little political and he said that
he was running to be the Secretary of
Defense for the entire military male and
female
so is he still not in favor of women in
combat is he trying to make that issue
just not be prominent but maybe he'll do
something about that I don't know but um
but he may have found some kind of
Middle Ground where people are not going
to think about it too
much um and then apparently Joanie erns
was herself according to the news a
victim of some kind of sexual assault in
their past and since Heth was accused
but not in a highly credible way he's
been
accused um that maybe that had some U
impact on Janie ernst's
opinion but apparently there are few
hundred uh Navy Seals and veterans are
are going to do a march to support P
Heth now I heard a story uh yesterday
today that i' never heard before now of
course I knew that pth had served in the
military I didn't realize that he went
twice did you know that that once he was
done with his service and had another
job and he decided to sign up again
because the country needed
him that's you know until I heard that I
was actually thinking he was a little
light on qualification
right I mean you probably all had the
same feeling even if you think he's
awesome and most of the people who work
with him have incredible high opinion of
him so if I take the opinion of the
people who were closest to him he looks
really good but not really with the
right exact kind of experience and but
then I find out that he joined he
volunteered to be in in in battle zones
twice
that's a different kind of person and
and I feel like if I were in the
military uh I would follow
him because of that because you know
he's not going to ask you to do
something you wouldn't do right he's not
going to ask you to do something he
wouldn't do because he would do just
about anything apparently to help the
country so I have to say I went from ah
you know if he makes it that'd be great
if he doesn't make it I'm sure we'd just
pick somebody who's great at the job so
you know the country will be fine either
way but when I find out that he joined
twice to be in
battle that's a different kind of you
you don't get many of those so um I I
feel like he could lead and that's
important you'd have credibility you'd
have to have at least that much
credibility because if you make big
changes such as getting rid of
Dei right if he came in he was just like
some desk sitting pundit
and then he came in and said I'm going
to get rid of Dei in the military maybe
it wouldn't go over so well but if he
comes in as a you know genuine committed
Warrior who's got all this history of
helping veterans that nobody questions
by the way when it comes to his support
of veterans even his critics say okay
that that part's
good so I don't know we'll see what
happens um 75 no
laurates have signed a document
according to the hill urging the Senate
to reject RFK
Jr how's that hit
you imagine you went back in time all
right close your eyes I'm going to take
you back 20
years now imagine it's 20 years in the
past and 75 Nobel scientists have come
out against someone whose job would be
in the you know the realm indirectly of
science maybe
directly
75 Nobel laurates my God that must be
the worst candidate of course I would
agree with the laurates wouldn't you I
mean 75 of the best
scientists think that this person who
would be involved in scientific
decisions is the wrong person that's
really strong right
right now fast forward to today
Boop okay it's
today 75 Nobel laurates just said RFK Jr
is unqualified for the job
yes yes that's who I want that's who I
want yeah yeah if the only thing that
would make this better would be 175
Nobel laurates who don't want him in the
job if we could get a few more Nobel
laurates who say that RFK Jr shouldn't
have a job I mean I'll go I'll go to
Washington and you know I'll Lobby for
him I mean this is the best endorsement
I've seen because science is
paid off commercial every one
of these scientists probably has a job
or it's connected with some company that
doesn't want to get raped by RFK Jr
bringing the truth to them and they're
just fronting for these
companies no I don't trust any of you
Nobel laurates not one you have
no credibility if science wants to be
credible you better up your game and
maybe not work for somebody all the time
because the truth is if you're a
scientist and you have a boss you're GNA
do what your boss tells you and your
boss is not a scientist probably
probably just wants to sell some so
75 Nobel laurates you just made yourself
look like clowns
idiots stay out of it
clowns well Syria as you you know fell
to the rebels but um the experts are
saying well you know it might completely
fall apart and become a failed State
like Libya or maybe you know they'll
figure it
out there's not a lot of caring about
Syria but meanwhile Israel apparently is
uh made over 200 Air Raids in Syria
since the war was
over what are they doing
can you guess what they're doing so
Israel has made 200 Air Raids you know
bombing
basically 200 since the war ended
there's no war what are they
bombing they were bombing all the assets
that were abandoned by the Syrian
military so if they had a you know plane
or a tank or a truck Israel just decided
to make it all go away the entire assets
of the Syrian military are gone they
took them all
out now I assume that they did that so
that the rebels who just took over the
country can't use those assets someday
against Israel's
interests that was a really smart thing
for Israel to do if that's what's
happening now I don't know if we know
the whole story but if what they did is
they said you know we'll warn people to
get out of the way because we don't need
to kill any people but every one of
these military Assets in Syria is going
to go b g to go boom and they just did
runs until it was all gone and the the
reporting is they got it all they got
all the big
stuff wow now how far Israel goes into
Syria to be determined I don't think
they need I I don't think they're
planning to take it over I think they're
just making sure that their security
Zone uh is safe and that they got rid of
the big dangerous assets
there um as somebody pointed out
earlier Israel took out Syria's nuclear
program 20 years
ago and that today looks like a genius
move because Assyria with nuclear
weapons would be a really bad idea right
now so Israel seems to be winning on
that regard Iran seems to be
weakened um and then there's also the
question of whether the neocons
had always planned to conquer Syria and
Libya and Iraq and there's plenty of
indications that that was America's
Secret plan was to conquer all these
countries and sure enough there was a
war in Iraq there's a war in Syria and
Libya you already know about
so yeah the United States is
a we're really
[Laughter]
bad but in a good way
we we are the worst criminals in the
world in terms of how we're dealing with
other countries they should be none of
our business but we feel like we have to
overthrow them all the time um but like
I
say we live in the real world not the
magical makeb believe world where if
you're nice to other people they'll be
nice to you that's not what the world is
the world is whoever is the biggest
bastard might survive a little long
that's it that's the whole world the
biggest bastard if they're good at it
you know not just being a bastard but
you got to be good at it they live they
survive the longest they have the best
lives I hate to say it but being
bastards works for the country so we're
going to keep doing it I assume although
uh I think under trump it will look
completely different at least the
military part of it he might try to
persuade instead of try to destroy
meanwhile speaking of trump um post
millennial says that he's going to have
executive orders to end Birthright
citizenship on the first day of office
now Birthright citizenship is that if
you're born in this country you get to
be a citizen even if your parents were
non-citizens who came in just have a
baby so there are ways to gain the
system then it also creates families
where you you can't really Deport the
whole family because one of them is now
an American citizen so that becomes a
problem but the question is can you use
an executive order to change a law if
you're clever about it and I think what
they're trying to do is according to the
post millennial is that the executive
order would change the requirements for
citizenship for identifying documents in
other words they might say something
like um you're a citizen if you have a
birth certificate that says you're a
citizen and you maybe some of the
illegals don't I don't know um so there
must be some kind of documentation that
they think the people born here wouldn't
have access to I don't know the details
so will this work probably not I I think
it'll be challenged in the courts and
probably get
overturned um I didn't know this but
apparently Liz Cheney is complaining
because Trump trump has um vowed to Jail
the January 6 committee did he vow to
jail them or did just say they should be
in
jail maybe that's reported as the
same but uh apparently members of that
special committee that j6 special
committee uh are worried about
retribution
retribution
huh um in the comments can you tell me
how many of
you have been worried about
retribution recently let's say or your
whole life have have you ever been
afraid of
Retribution because retribution by
definition means you did something so
bad that you fully expect somebody to
come punish you for it because you were
so
bad right it's not competition it's
retribution so built right into it is
that you did something so bad that
somebody else thinks they need to kill
you or jail you for
it isn't it kind of telling this so many
Democrats are fearing
retribution cuz here's what they're not
saying they're not saying
lawfare right when the Republicans talk
about it they say hey you're using
lawfare against our guy they don't say
you're getting
retribution because that would assume
that Trump had done something that
requires some
retribution instead they say hey lawfare
don't do
that but the but the Democrats say they
don't say don't use laware against us
sometimes they do but their bigger
message is we're worried about Trump
trying to get
retribution you don't even have the
conversation about retribution unless
you know you did something that a
reasonable person could think you should
go to jail for it because I'm a
reasonable person and I watched the
January 6 process play out and I think
they should all be in prison now if you
ask me what specific crimes did they
Comm commit I don't
know I don't
know and if it turns out then no jury
can find any crimes or no prosecutor can
find any crimes okay I'll live with that
right there have to be real crimes not
lawfare you know look until you find a
crime but like real ones that are right
out there such as maybe destroying
documents in if in case that's
illegal so
I I think they're really giving
themselves away when they talk about
retribution because that shouldn't even
be in the conversation unless you knew
some you did something really really bad
so I think they did something really
really bad and I don't believe in
retribution but I do believe nobody's
Above the
Law nobody's Above the Law
so and I you know honestly Liz Cheney
seems like one of the most
toxic human beings in the entire
country uh I feel
like there has to be some kind of
response to the evil that she brought us
I mean she brought a lot of evil into
the country through her actions is it
illegal I don't know but if it is jail
if it isn't no
jail all right um and apparently people
are worried about cash Patel at the FBI
for the same reason they're worried
they'll use the FBI for
Retribution
again why are you worrying about
retribution now do you see a
pattern here's the pattern the Democrats
think um many of them think that uh
there should be reparations for
slavery
reparations is very close to
retribution except all the people that
they want to get retribution from or
dead so what about identity
Politics the reason you have identity
politics is you know who was your
oppressor so you can get
retribution uh and then lawfare seems to
be some kind of Retribution for things
they imagined right we we imagine the
Trump is Hitler so we better law far
them we're going to have to get some
retribution the Democrats are very
retribution oriented
there's no way that's going to be good I
don't see how that's going to work out
for
him um I guess Biden's going to give a
speech tonight about his great economy
and what he did for the
economy um I would like to give some
unsolicited advice to the
Democrats it's time to take the car keys
away from
Grandpa it's okay now we're we're not
going to hold it against you the
election's over the the right side of
the world the leaning right side got
what they
wanted so we don't really need to dunk
on Biden
anymore you all know that if he gives a
speech it's going to be a slurred
ridiculous mess because he's just not up
to the
job I feel like it's time they just say
um President Biden will not do any more
public
events um but don't worry you know KL
Harris is following all the things and
the advisors are under control and you
know Trump will be here in a month and
you know the Allies are all waiting for
him so everything's fine but just and of
consideration for the bidens we're going
to maybe take the Caris way you you just
don't need to do public appearances you
know enjoy the last month and a half of
your uh of your uh Reign so I feel like
this is something we should agree on
like one of those points of
unity before we had to go hard at Biden
because he was in the way of a better
country but he's not in the way anymore
now now if he does something and It
embarrasses him it doesn't even
embarrass the country it's really just
about him and his family so I don't wish
that upon them I don't wish them any
extra pain and suffering so as a non-
Biden supporter even I would say can you
do him a solid you know this is where
you have to step in take the keys from
Grandpa and say you know maybe maybe no
major
speeches you know because you're you're
you're on your Glide path to the end of
your
term anyway I think we could all agree
on
that and that's all I got for you today
it's a weird day in news I'm going to
talk to the people on local
my beloved
subscribers and uh I will see you again
tomorrow same time same place meanwhile
country is looking in pretty good shape
at the moment all right YouTube and
Rumble and X I will see you tomorrow and
in 30 seconds we'll be
private
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e e