Coffee With Scott Adams — Knowledge Archive May 24, 2026
Scott Adams Philosophy Archive
Search ideas
Episodes Episode #2685

Episode 2685 CWSA 12/10/24

Episode #2685 Dec 10, 2024 1:19:55 32,805 views

Who goes to jail, who does not. That's the news today. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ If you would like to enjoy this same content plus bonus content from Scott Adams, including micro-lessons on lots of useful topics to build your talent stack, please see scottadams.locals.com for full access to that secret treasure.

Opening General Commentary

Huh, we have a technical problem. How many of you can see me or hear me? Can you see me or hear me? 'Cause my screen is covered with a problematic message. All right, I'm going to have to close this and restart. Well, let's see if that worked. Oh, it worked. Look at that. Only took me two tries, but…

View segment →
SimultaneousSip General Commentary

a coffee mug or glass or tankard, chalice, a canteen, jug or flask, a vessel of any kind. Fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee. And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure of the simultaneous sip of the day, the thing that makes everything better. Go. Well, I think you want to talk ab…

View segment →
NewsReaction Media & Fake News

what it is, but they're pretty sure it's not causing trouble. But they don't know what it is. It might be the size of a car. Everything about this drone story sounds wrong. I feel like somebody must know exactly what those drones are. Are they just not talking? I think that's what's happening. Anyw…

View segment →
MainContent Health & Biohacking

he first thing you would do? You would make your partner, your mate, more attractive than ever, right? Because breaking up is the worst thing to do. What you'd like is that you're really, really, really are into your partner and vice versa. So what if the people who do the psychedelics are not resp…

View segment →
MainContent Two Movie Screen

convenient. So even meeting your neighbors was easy. Joining a gym is easy because it's five minutes away by foot. You wouldn't need to ever DoorDash because everything's five minutes away. So look at all the money you save on eating out because everything's five minutes away. So I will no longer e…

View segment →
MainContent General Commentary

person carrying the football could launch the nuclear weapon. But what if the person carrying it didn't know the password was 00000000? But what if the game was to make sure that only the president knew the code? I doubt that's the case, but you might want to have some kind of control like that. Lik…

View segment →
NewsReaction AI & Technology

sed it on mice and they had 100% survival rate. 100%. Now that's just mice and only 5% of the time do animal studies work out for humans. But this one might be a little different because the chemical that they're putting in the mouse or in the human is something that they already know works in huma…

View segment →
NewsReaction General Commentary

erpret a white guy doing something he thought was protecting people on the subway and in the process the black guy died? So how do Republicans see that? They see it as a story about a tragic event. That's it. It's a tragic event. It was tragic for the person who died, tragic for the family, tragic a…

View segment →
NewsReaction AI & Technology

news? Like I can say it because I'm just this guy with a live stream but CNN, Fox News, there's nobody who's willing to say that man is obviously super drunk and not just a little bit. He was super drunk. Because even the things he said I don't think he would say if he hadn't been drunk. So I'm not…

View segment →
NewsReaction Health & Biohacking

e story in the New York Post is written by three authors and one of them is listed as Anita Behole. Anita Behole. Is that a real name? No. I think I'll just leave it right there. Need a be hole. It's probably different than a front hole. All right, let's talk about that CEO healthcare killer. So he…

View segment →
NewsReaction Politics as Persuasion

rently my influence reached the shooter through other people's books but according to AI. Anyway so he didn't have one of my books on there. I think if he read my books probably he would have been fine. No that's not true. But he wrote a 262 page handwritten manifesto and he was against the big cor…

View segment →
MainContent Politics as Persuasion

happen and you realize that you don't have a path to being important. And he probably was raised with the expectation that given all of his gifts, his brilliance, etc., that he was going to be important. Maybe a politician, maybe change the world, maybe invent something. And then he finds out none o…

View segment →
MainContent General Commentary

say I went from, ah you know if he makes it that'd be great. If he doesn't make it I'm sure we'd just pick somebody who's great at the job so the country will be fine either way. But when I find out that he joined twice to be in battle that's a different kind of you. You don't get many of those. So…

View segment →
Tangent General Commentary

y get overturned. I didn't know this but apparently Liz Cheney is complaining because Trump has vowed to jail the January 6 committee. Did he vow to jail them or did he just say they should be in jail? Maybe that's reported as the same. But apparently members of that special committee, that J6 spec…

View segment →
NewsReaction Politics as Persuasion

away when they talk about retribution because that shouldn't even be in the conversation unless you knew you did something really, really bad. So I think they did something really, really bad. And I don't believe in retribution but I do believe nobody's above the law. Nobody's above the law. So and…

View segment →
NewsReaction Politics as Persuasion

You all know that if he gives a speech it's going to be a slurred ridiculous mess because he's just not up to the job. I feel like it's time they just say President Biden will not do any more public events. But don't worry, you know, Kamala Harris is following all the things and the advisors are und…

View segment →

Huh, we have a technical problem. How many of you can see me or hear me? Can you see me or hear me? 'Cause my screen is covered with a problematic message. All right, I'm going to have to close this and restart. Well, let's see if that worked. Oh, it worked. Look at that. Only took me two tries, but I'm here.

All right, I'm going to find the Locals comments. And then watch me go. Does everybody have their Dilbert 2025 calendar? Go to Dilbert.com for the only place to order it.

Good morning, everybody, and welcome to the highlight of human civilization. Everybody got sound? Everybody got video? I think we're doing well. We're doing well, aren't we? Good.

Well, if you'd like to take this experience up to levels that you can't even understand with your tiny shiny human brain, all you need for that is a coffee mug or glass or tankard, chalice, a canteen, jug or flask, a vessel of any kind. Fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee. And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure of the simultaneous sip of the day, the thing that makes everything better. Go.

Well, I think you want to talk about the UFO, UAP, drone sightings in New Jersey. Well, I've got an update. There's something in the sky and they don't know what the hell it is. And for reasons we can't understand, there's no military action. And they're pretty sure it's not a risk. They don't know what it is, but they're pretty sure it's not causing trouble. But they don't know what it is. It might be the size of a car. Everything about this drone story sounds wrong. I feel like somebody must know exactly what those drones are. Are they just not talking? I think that's what's happening.

Anyway, apparently the FDA might outlaw food dyes within a few weeks, according to the New York Post. That feels like a good step. I feel like if the FDA outlaws food dyes, RFK Jr. is going to look smarter. What do you think of that? Because this is happening under the Biden administration, and it seems to be perfectly aligned with RFK Jr.'s view of the world. So that is just the best welcome Matt RFK Jr. could possibly have, to have something that's just right in the middle of his sweet spot, adopted by the other team, which actually was his old team or maybe his future team.

There's a study according to New Atlas that they found that when twins are studied, the ones that eat the most fruit and vegetables have less depression. So are you surprised that eating well is good for your brain? No, because as I teach you every single day, your brain and your body are the same tool. If you let your body get into disrepair, or you don't exercise, you don't eat the right foods, your brain will not work as well as it should. You'll be depressed. You'll be dumb. So make sure you get your fruit and vegetables.

Now, of course in five minutes there'll be another study that says the only thing that's good for you is eating meat and only meat. I know. I have a suspicion that if evolution is true, that we really evolved, doesn't it make sense that we're not all in the same exact place evolutionary-wise? Doesn't that make sense? Like how could every human be right exactly in the same evolutionary place? Because that would mean evolution doesn't work. There should be a whole bunch of humans who are starting to already move in another direction that will become a distinct species. If there's none, that would suggest that evolution is not real.

But one of the things I think we might already be bifurcating, or already did, is what foods are most healthy. I feel like for some humans, just eating meat all day is the best thing they could do. You know, the Jordan Peterson thing. But I don't think that's for everybody. I feel like at a very basic biological level, some people respond better to fruits and vegetables, and some people like me, better to meat. It just feels like we shouldn't be looking for one diet that's the same that's right for everybody.

Anyway, according to the Marijuana Herald, which I know you all read, psychedelics are linked to enhanced sexual function even months after you use them. So LSD, psilocybin improves your sexual function for months. But here's why it does it. It makes your partner look more attractive for months. So long after the psychedelic effect is worn off, your partner looks more attractive and your body works better.

Now that leads me to the interesting question, which is, is reality completely subjective? Because once you do the psychedelics, you have the feeling that life, reality, is subjective. But what happens if once you learn that reality is subjective, because that's what the psychedelics teach you, what happens if you start changing your reality after you're off the psychedelics because you now realize that your reality is subjective? So what would be the first thing you would do if you learned that reality was subjective? What's the first thing you would do? You would make your partner, your mate, more attractive than ever, right? Because breaking up is the worst thing to do. What you'd like is that you're really, really, really are into your partner and vice versa.

So what if the people who do the psychedelics are not responding chemically to some afterglow chemical thing? What if they figured out how to author the simulation? Because I think that's what the psychedelics do. I think they teach you to control reality, but only the reality that you experience, because it's all subjective. So I don't know. This is suggestive that maybe people learn how to control the reality once they've had a psychedelic experience. That was my experience, that once I, you know, the one time I did psychedelics when I was in my 20s, I could see that the world was whatever I wanted it to be. And it all worked. It worked just as well if you saw it as a mess or as some kind of heaven. It all worked. You still eat, you still drive your car, but you can see it as either all bad or all good. It was just the choice. So that changed my life forever. So I can understand the study.

Meanwhile, over in Denmark, did you know, according to The Guardian, there's a five-minute city now. If you've been with me for a while, you know the following. I often say, hey, we should design cities from scratch to make them really designed well for how people's lifestyles work. And then what do all the NPCs say in the comments? We don't want no 15-minute cities. And then I say, well, it wasn't really about a 15-minute city, but you know, you would certainly take into account having things close, and maybe you don't want cars everywhere, but really it's more about design. We don't want no 15-minute cities because the World Economic Forum and the elites are trying to put us in the cities and then they chip us. They'll put chips in us and then we'll have no cars, we'll have no freedom, and we'll be chipped. And then I say I'm really just talking about a better design for the thing you're already doing, which is living in the city. Oh no, 15-minute cities will be terrible for everybody. It's the end of the world if you make a better city. That's crazy. You should be fixing the existing cities.

So here's an experience which I've had all of my life. I will say, hey, I've got an idea. Why don't we do X? And then hundreds of people will say, you fool, oh you idiot, you idiot. If we do X, this will happen and the sky will fall and you'll be locked in jail and all your privacy will be gone. And then I wait a little while and then somebody says, oh, you remember that thing you were suggesting where you design the city from scratch to make it really good to live in? That's already been done and it's a city in Denmark and they've been living in it for years. And if you talk to the people who live there, they think it's just the best thing ever because the city was designed to make everything convenient. So even meeting your neighbors was easy. Joining a gym is easy because it's five minutes away by foot. You wouldn't need to ever DoorDash because everything's five minutes away. So look at all the money you save on eating out because everything's five minutes away.

So I will no longer entertain the argument that designing a city from scratch and making it really, really good to live in is a bad idea. I'm not going to listen to your criticisms anymore. It's already been done. Already been done. More than a 15-minute city, it's a five-minute city and they love it and it's been working for years. So there.

Well, Grok, as you may have already heard, it's now better at handling images. So you can upload anything to it. You can upload your medical x-rays, your blood tests, and it will give you medical opinions. But also you can make it create drawings. Now I asked Grok to draw me drawing Dilbert and it created a photorealistic version of me that was really close. I mean, just maybe a little bit with a smile that wasn't exact and they changed the glasses a little bit but not totally. But here's the most interesting thing. Well, first of all it had six fingers. It did a great job of drawing me, but when it wanted to show Dilbert the comic strip drawn on the piece of paper I was holding in the image it created, it couldn't draw Dilbert. Isn't that weird? And it makes me wonder, is that a sort of a copyright protection thing or does it have a problem with line drawings? I don't know. But it showed me with six fingers, which would explain why I couldn't draw Dilbert correctly.

And here's the best part. The clothes it put me in, mostly shirts. That's what it showed. The shirts were excellent. Here's what I want. I want Grok to say, I have designed six different shirts. Here are the links where you can buy a shirt that looks kind of like this. I'll do it. Yeah, the shirts like those, the sort of soft, comfortable ones with the buttons look great. Oh my goodness.

All right. Did you know, and also given that it does a perfect picture of myself, I asked the following question. How long is it going to be before people are making their own porn and then putting themselves in it? You know, at least their image in it. That's going to happen like really soon, right? To me it seems like one of the industries that's most challenged by AI is porn. Because if you could create the exact porn you wanted and the people were perfect and beautiful and you could even put yourself in the scene and watch how much you enjoy it, why would you pay for it? It's going to look exactly like professionally produced porn. So I think the porn industry will be the first one to completely shut down when AI gets a little bit better. Not much, maybe a year from now.

Here's a story I don't know if it's true, but according to an article in ZME Science, the launch codes for the US nuclear arsenal was, and you know they've changed the code so it's okay if I tell you, so try not to memorize this, but this was the actual launch code for the US nuclear arsenal until 1977. The code was 00000000. Really? The launch code was just zeros. Now I kind of understand why that would be the case. You can kind of understand it, can't you? 'Cause you could imagine being the president and your only job, if the nukes get launched from the Soviet Union, your only job is to immediately open up the football and launch a counterattack and you've only got a few minutes. Imagine if you forgot the password.

Now I suppose it did leave the possibility that the person carrying the football could launch the nuclear weapon. But what if the person carrying it didn't know the password was 00000000? But what if the game was to make sure that only the president knew the code? I doubt that's the case, but you might want to have some kind of control like that. Like only the president knows the password. Would you trust any president to remember a long password? No. Would you write it down? Not if you're smart you wouldn't write it down anywhere. So how do you get the one person who's unlikely to remember phone numbers and passwords, the president, how do you get them to remember so if anything happens they're ready to go? I feel like this was entirely intentional, meaning that the people who designed it said, you know, there's no point in even building this thing if the password's hard to enter. So we're just going to tell one person in the entire world. It will be just the easiest password in the world. But apparently they changed that.

There's an NPR story reporting that a chatbot called Character.ai hinted that a kid should kill his parents over the screen time limits. So apparently AI is giving children murderous suggestions. I suppose if they ask more questions they could figure out how to do it. But yeah, it suggested killing his parents over screen time limits. And then there was another one that the character exposed the kid to quote hypersexualized content, causing her to develop quote sexualized behaviors prematurely. And then another one, the chatbot it says gleefully described self-harm as being awesome and it feels good to a 17-year-old. So I guess this is one of the AI apps that's backed by Google, which probably is why they're getting, I think they're going to get sued or something. Probably.

All right. Well, remember all those times I told you that TikTok was a propaganda platform disguised as social media? Well, there's a study according to Bloomberg in which they found that indeed TikTok has less anti-China content than rivals. Are you surprised? So they just opened some example accounts and they just watched and they saw anti-China content apparently on other networks, but they didn't see much of it or as much on TikTok. Now TikTok has said that the research was subjective because what do you call anti-China? You know, at what level is it anti? And they said it was a flawed experiment.

Well, on one hand I agree with TikTok because all these studies are flawed. On the other hand, it does seem like it's something you could measure if something hadn't, you know, more biased toward one direction. So I don't know if this study is the most solid study in the world, but it agrees with what I assume and therefore recreationally I believe every bit of it because it agrees with me.

All right, here's something interesting. According to New Atlas, cancer has been cured. How many times have you heard that cancer has been cured in your lifetime? Like hundreds. There was a time in maybe the 80s or something where every single day there'd be a claim of if you eat this breath mint your cancer will be gone in five minutes. Well, it's going to take a while to test it thoroughly in humans but we're pretty sure. And then next day some other damn thing. If you stick a twig up your ass your cancer will go away. So in general any claims of cancer cures have to be met with a little skepticism.

However, this one sounds kind of cool. So apparently they used gene therapy and a CRISPR device and they, what is it, they put in there cell therapy. So they put some kind of little artificially made thing into your body and what it does is it finds the cancer and then they use ultrasound to activate it to kill the cancers. Now what's new and awesome about it is that the ultrasound is not doing any work inside your body. The ultrasound only heats up the section that they're trying to heat up and when it reaches a certain temperature it kills the cancer but not the good stuff around it. So they can use this gene therapy to give you a little intravenous CRISPR-defined biological element and it will become like a locator to locate where the exact cancer is. Then they just shoot it with the ultrasound and the little biological thing they created activates but it only activates right where the cancer is. So you would have presumably almost no side effects. And they used it on mice and they had 100% survival rate. 100%.

Now that's just mice and only 5% of the time do animal studies work out for humans. But this one might be a little different because the chemical that they're putting in the mouse or in the human is something that they already know works in humans. The only problem is it wasn't good at locating the exact cancer place. But they already knew it would do the work in a human. So if the only thing they've changed is how accurately they can target it, that animal study might translate. Remember, 95% of the time it won't. But if the only thing they're doing is working on the accuracy of the ultrasound, they may have cured cancer. Maybe. Maybe. So this is down at USC, so maybe you'll hear more about that later. I feel like that story might have some legs.

Well, I'm going to give you a quiz to see if you're as smart as I think you are. Now if you're new to my live streams this is going to impress the hell out of you. I have the smartest viewers of all time and we're going to prove it. I haven't even asked the question yet. What is the answer? Go in the comments. That's correct. That is correct. See, I didn't even ask the question. Now on Locals I can see their responses faster. Then they all have the right answer. Every one of them. 100% right answer. Incredible.

Would you like to hear the question? The question is, according to Rasmussen poll, what percent of likely US voters think it would be a good idea for Democrats to run Harris in 2028? 24%. If you said 25 I will accept it. The rounding. Yeah. So most people said 25%. Now the background for this if you're new is I often joke that 25% of the public will get any question wrong. It's a different 25%. I hope it's not the same 25% on every question. But you could rely that no matter how easy the question is, 25% will get the wrong answer. You could bring an anvil over to people one at a time saying I was thinking about dropping this anvil on your foot. What do you think? 75% would say no way, no way. If you drop an anvil on my foot that's going to hurt and it will accomplish nothing. 25% will say you have my interest. It doesn't matter what the question is. 25% get everything wrong.

Well, let's talk about Daniel Penny. As you know he is a free man. Why? Well, maybe the jury was sending a message to the judge. Maybe there were some lawyers on the jury who figured out that this trial was a little sketchy and maybe they influenced the others. Don't know exactly what went on, but my speculation is at least a little bit the jury was not happy with the judge or the process that the judge was running. So Daniel Penny appears to be a free man. We still worry about the charge that was dismissed could technically be retried, meaning they could try him again and try to get a conviction on the higher charge, the one that was initially dismissed. But as Jonathan Turley points out, that he thinks it would be presumptively barred by double jeopardy, which is a perfect lawyer sentence. So what I think that means is that although it would not be actual double jeopardy because it wasn't a completed trial, I think that makes a difference, but it would be in effect double jeopardy because he had the jeopardy and then they put him in jeopardy again. So there's literally two jeopardies. Double jeopardy. So I think that Turley probably has the right legal interpretation. Some people might disagree, but I don't see any way that they're going to try him again on that higher charge. That would just make the courts look like idiots. I mean I think the jury would be extra mad if they knew that was happening.

Anyway, the funniest, the larger part of the story is the racial element now. Because Daniel Penny is white and the person who died is black, how does that make it interpreted by Republicans? So how do Republicans interpret a white guy doing something he thought was protecting people on the subway and in the process the black guy died? So how do Republicans see that? They see it as a story about a tragic event. That's it. It's a tragic event. It was tragic for the person who died, tragic for the family, tragic a little bit for the people even who were saved by Penny because they had to sort of endure the situation, and bad for Penny. So it's just a tragic situation. So that's how Republicans see it.

How do Democrats see it? Well, if you believe the Democrat media, it's a case of, oh it's race. There's no race in this. There's not a single element of race that came into any of this. The jury was diverse and they had 100% agreement. Diverse jury, 100% agreement. There was no race here at all. The people being saved by Penny, some of them were black. The people who helped Penny hold the guy down, some of them were black. There's no racial anything here. This is the least racial situation you'll ever see. It just happened to have people of more than one race.

So watching the Democrats who figured out, or they haven't figured out I guess, that identity politics and making everything about race is why they lost everything. Because I think this is another one of those common sense stories. Now I'm not saying that the justice system is color blind. I'm not saying that. I'm just saying that this particular case had nothing to do with race. Just this one. So you know I'm not talking in a general way. But for the Democrat, let's say the leading news entities and leading opinion people, to try as hard as they can to turn this into a racial case, it just makes the Democrats look so out of touch. It makes them look almost like they're in the wrong decade or something. It seems so tone deaf, out of time. There's just nothing right about it. It's just pure incompetence, evil, not understanding the moment, not understanding the country, not trying to be helpful, not trying to make the country a better place. So I don't know who is worse, Joy Reid or CNN. They were both pretty bad on this one.

So according to Joy Reid, the reason he got off is because he was white. No, that's opposite. The reason he got charged is because he was white. It's not the reason he got off. It's the reason he got charged. Because he wouldn't have been charged if he had been black. There's not a single person who thinks that. I don't think you could find even one person who thinks that a black Penny would have been accused from the very moment they tried to turn it into a racial thing, which it never was.

Then CNN has a new one of their new hosts, Audie Cornish, and I'm paraphrasing but she basically introduced the topic by saying that Penny decided basically decided who lived and died that day. Nothing like that happened. Penny didn't make any decisions about who lives and dies. He very clearly was not doing anything to try to kill the guy. That's what the jury decided and they looked at all the facts. And again it was a diverse jury so I trust them.

And then you know I've been complimenting CNN lately because they let Scott Jennings do his thing. So he's usually supporting the Republican side of things and I've complimented CNN not only for having him on the show as a regular but allowing him to speak without cutting him off or yelling him down or anything like that. Let him have his full say. And I've really appreciated that. I think that just makes CNN better. But they've got a new host who decided that talking over Scott Jennings the entire time he talked, at least on one topic, was the way to go. And I thought, well there they go. They just took a step backwards. It's like they couldn't stay in that unbiased zone. It had to be that Scott Jennings is not allowed to talk because if he talks only bad things will happen. So they're right back to being terrible. They were halfway away from terrible but they're back to terrible.

Black Lives Matter of course decided to get involved. How many of you saw the video of Black Lives Matter local leader, not national, Hawk Newsome, where he was saying that maybe black people need to get some vigilantes to go after white people? Did you see that? Now if you saw it, could you tell he was super drunk? Now I've talked to Hawk personally at length several years ago and I know what he sounds like when he's not drunk and it's not that. He was super drunk. Now how come we never talk about that in the news? Like I can say it because I'm just this guy with a live stream but CNN, Fox News, there's nobody who's willing to say that man is obviously super drunk and not just a little bit. He was super drunk. Because even the things he said I don't think he would say if he hadn't been drunk. So I'm not excusing him. It's no excuse. In fact it's twice as bad if you're being a bad role model and you're indicating violence. It's twice as bad. But you should know the context. It's one super drunk guy and it seemed like there were maybe 20 people pretending they cared but it looked like just sort of theater and acting out. And I don't know that Hawk has much chance of getting a regular job so I think he's just trying to monetize the activism. Don't know for sure. But he's in a situation where making money would be kind of hard because of his Black Lives Matter association.

And anyway so then later there were hundreds of marchers but I saw the video of the quote hundreds of Black Lives Matter sympathizers marching. I didn't see any black people. Are there any black people who are members of Black Lives Matter anymore or are all the people marching white women? It looked like it was mostly white women like single white women marching.

And here's what I think. I obviously can't speak for Black America but I have a hypothesis that Black America is not on the side of CNN or MSNBC on this topic. I think Black America says, wait what happened? He was threatening people and so he got taken down and bad thing happened. Oh okay. I mean I feel like even Black America is seeing this just as a common sense situation. I don't think most of them are seeing it as race. I don't know what percentage. But I feel like we've somehow advanced a little bit where I don't know that Black Lives Matter is going to get anything but white people and people who didn't have anything else to do to march about this. I feel like it's just going to be a big old fizzle. I could be wrong. Depends who's backing it. So it turns out that Alex Soros, a ton of his spending goes to various racial groups, mostly helping black Americans. And so maybe if he funds something that turns out to organize something it'll get bigger. But I feel like Black America is just seeing this exactly the right way, which is this was a crime. Well not a crime. It was just an unfortunate event and there was no bad intentions by anybody. I feel like that they say the same thing. But again it might be a 75-25 situation.

There are mounting calls for the district attorney Alvin Bragg to resign in shame, according to the New York Post. So apparently there's a pretty long list of things that Alvin Bragg has done beyond the Penny trial that his critics think are really big mistakes and very bad. So I don't think anybody thinks that's going to happen here. The only thing I noted was that the story in the New York Post is written by three authors and one of them is listed as Anita Behole. Anita Behole. Is that a real name? No. I think I'll just leave it right there. Need a be hole. It's probably different than a front hole.

All right, let's talk about that CEO healthcare killer. So he's been caught and he was in fact an Ivy League smart guy. Now this is where you should check your predictions. Do you remember when the only thing we knew was the first video of the shooting itself and do you know how many people said, well that's a professional hitman right there. There's a professional. You can tell it's a professional. And I said the one thing I'm sure of is that's not a professional. The only thing I'm 100% sure of, it wasn't a professional. So check your predictions. If you said it was a professional you were really wrong. If you said it was not a professional, well so far you're right.

Now you may not remember this. I'll see if anybody remembers me saying it. I said he wasn't a professional hitman but he was unusually smart and I predicted he had a technical background and he's an engineer, programmer. Yep, technical background. So I'm not claiming I get every prediction right. That's not the point of this. But since I make predictions as part of what I do it's incumbent upon me to tell you when I get one wrong and when I get one right.

I still don't think we know exactly what the weapon was which is weird. There's some question whether it was 3D printed. There was a point I was going to say that out loud. What if that might be 3D printed? And the reason I thought that is that I thought he was unusually good techie. So I thought well if there were, if anybody ever were going to do a high-profile murder with a 3D printed gun it would be somebody exactly like that guy. So we don't know if it's a 3D printed gun but I think the possibility is still there.

He comes from a super rich Baltimore family and we know that he had a serious back injury which somebody said prevented him from ever being in a romantic relationship because he wouldn't be able to essentially seal the deal sexually. And some say that when he got that back injury that he was never the same and he took a dark turn. Now I don't know if that's something that they say after the fact. Like would they have said that about him if he had not been accused of murdering somebody? Did they really notice the dark turn? I don't know. It might be confirmation bias but it would explain some things.

So apparently he was a big reader too. He had it on Goodreads. He had the list of all the books he's read and the ones he wants to read and he really read a lot of books. That guy was really smart and well informed. But I of course checked to see if he read any of my books. He did read at least two books that according to the Perplexity AI app were influenced by me. So apparently my influence reached the shooter through other people's books but according to AI. Anyway so he didn't have one of my books on there. I think if he read my books probably he would have been fine. No that's not true.

But he wrote a 262 page handwritten manifesto and he was against the big corporations taking advantage of people. And so apparently he was making a statement. So the other thing I said was the murder looked like it was personal as opposed to something he did for money. Would you call that personal? It wasn't personal in terms of relationships but it was very personal in terms of he had a deep personal hatred for people like that CEO. So it feels like it was an emotion-based thing although calculated too but not about any family or girlfriend situation. Anyway he lashed out against companies trying to quote continue to abuse our country for immense profits and get away with it.

So here's my continued profile now that we know these things. Do you believe that the back surgery could have changed him mentally in a way that would effectively make him almost a mental illness? Do you think that that's what happened? Could you explain it by a normal surgery that triggers some kind of mental destabilization? And is that a thing? I probably should have asked AI before I asked you but I feel like that could be a thing especially if you have lots of anesthesia and you're down for a while and then you come back and then you're probably on painkillers and maybe the painkillers are depressing as well. So I guess I can see that the surgery would cause substantial changes in his mental state. But why would it cause this change? This is such a specific thing.

Here's my best guess. So we know that he was born with seemingly every advantage. He is handsome. He's completely ripped. If you see the pictures of him he had an eight pack. And so he's handsome, fit, family is rich, he's a genius, he has a killer smile. He basically had everything. He had everything. And then he gets the back injury and he loses everything in the sense that he doesn't have the possibility of being in a relationship according to him because of his back and maybe he doesn't have any good days because of his back. So imagine if you were born into a highly successful family and from the time you were young you just assumed with all of your gifts that you would be highly successful and change the world too. And then you find out none of that's going to happen and you realize that you don't have a path to being important. And he probably was raised with the expectation that given all of his gifts, his brilliance, etc., that he was going to be important. Maybe a politician, maybe change the world, maybe invent something. And then he finds out none of that's going to happen and there's nothing he can do about it. What would you do in that situation?

Is it possible that you would say, you know what, I have to do something useful for the world and I'm going to do something that nobody else could do. I'm going to go murder somebody to make a point because I think the point needs to be made. Let's say from his point of view. I feel like he was trying to justify his life by doing the thing that only somebody who had given up on his life could do. And I think he maybe had given up on his life. So in a twisted way, which I do not condone, I have to throw that in there because it's going to sound like I'm condoning it but I'm not. In a twisted way you could see that somebody that smart who had maybe been raised on you're going to change the world, because I thought that about myself, right? I was also a valedictorian in my little school. When you're valedictorian you kind of think of yourself that you're going to change something. Like it's sort of built into the process. So I feel like that his own destruction of his own future gave him one path where he could find meaning and he needed to find meaning because he couldn't find pleasure. Pleasure was sort of out of bounds to him 'cause his pain in his back, couldn't have a relationship. I don't know. So again it's not excusing it but if you're trying to understand it he had nothing to lose and may have said I have one mission and I'm going to change something about capitalism. Now I don't know. We'll see. We'll probably learn a lot more about this.

Elon Musk said, he said this before, that on actually he said almost everyone I know in San Francisco has been threatened or violently assaulted on the streets and or had a home invasion. Now think about how many people Elon Musk knows who live in San Francisco because it's a tech town and almost every one of them, almost everyone has been threatened, violently assaulted on the streets or had a home invasion. Now your brain says my God it's turned into some kind of a horrible hellscape. But has it?

I would like to add the following context because I lived in San Francisco for a number of years in my younger days and in the 80s. Here's what I experienced. I was robbed three times at gunpoint, twice when I was a bank teller, about once on the street. I had one attempted robbery by a very large knife. I was assaulted by a guy with a large knife but I got away so that I didn't actually lose my money in that case. I've come home to find my door open and my home burgled. So I've been burgled. I've had my car stereo stolen I think three times. You know the windows broken, the car stereo is gone I think three times. And the first five minutes that I arrived in San Francisco I was assaulted by a group of homeless people who tried to steal my luggage 'cause I came from the airport via BART, the public transit, and I didn't know the city so I just sort of picked the BART stop that I thought was closest to where I wanted to be and I picked one of the most dangerous BART stops in the city. And I get out and I had my luggage with me so I had my two large bags and the homeless people just crowded around me and started to pull the bags out of my hands. I'm like no no no. And they would act like they were going to help. Oh let us help you. But really they were robbing me. And there happened to be a police officer there that chased them away.

Now that was my experience and it wasn't that rare for me to walk outside and see a fight going on on the sidewalk in front of my apartment. Very normal. So my experience was in San Francisco might have been worse in the past or at least as bad and then it got better. So San Francisco looks more like the 80s to me, maybe worse, but that doesn't mean it won't get better. So San Francisco because of its location and weather and just some characteristics that you couldn't possibly reproduce, I think it's going to come back. It might be in 10 years but I think SF will do okay.

Well Pete Hegseth is still the most exciting nominee that hasn't been yet affirmed. And I guess Joni Ernst is the one senator who's got some questions about him. She has some issues about his views of women in the military. And I have a question for you. I saw an older video in which Pete was saying he didn't want women in combat. He did not say he doesn't want women in the military and he was always clear to say that the women he served with were great warriors and he had no problem with the people he served with. But in general he thought women should not be in combat. Now I saw him asked that question yesterday I guess and he gave a different answer. His answer was a little vague and a little political and he said that he was running to be the Secretary of Defense for the entire military, male and female. So is he still not in favor of women in combat? Is he trying to make that issue just not be prominent but maybe he'll do something about that? I don't know. But he may have found some kind of middle ground where people are not going to think about it too much.

And then apparently Joni Ernst was herself according to the news a victim of some kind of sexual assault in her past. And since Hegseth was accused but not in a highly credible way, he's been accused, that maybe that had some impact on Joni Ernst's opinion. But apparently there are a few hundred Navy SEALs and veterans who are going to do a march to support Pete Hegseth.

Now I heard a story yesterday, today, that I'd never heard before. Now of course I knew that Pete had served in the military. I didn't realize that he went twice. Did you know that? That once he was done with his service and had another job and he decided to sign up again because the country needed him. That's, you know, until I heard that I was actually thinking he was a little light on qualification. Right? I mean you probably all had the same feeling. Even if you think he's awesome and most of the people who work with him have incredible high opinion of him. So if I take the opinion of the people who were closest to him he looks really good but not really with the right exact kind of experience. But then I find out that he joined, he volunteered to be in battle zones twice. That's a different kind of person. And I feel like if I were in the military I would follow him because of that. Because he's not going to ask you to do something you wouldn't do. Right? He's not going to ask you to do something he wouldn't do because he would do just about anything apparently to help the country.

So I have to say I went from, ah you know if he makes it that'd be great. If he doesn't make it I'm sure we'd just pick somebody who's great at the job so the country will be fine either way. But when I find out that he joined twice to be in battle that's a different kind of you. You don't get many of those. So I feel like he could lead and that's important. You'd have credibility. You'd have to have at least that much credibility. Because if you make big changes such as getting rid of DEI, right, if he came in he was just like some desk-sitting pundit and then he came in and said I'm going to get rid of DEI in the military, maybe it wouldn't go over so well. But if he comes in as a genuine committed warrior who's got all this history of helping veterans that nobody questions, by the way, when it comes to his support of veterans even his critics say okay that part's good. So I don't know. We'll see what happens.

75 Nobel laureates have signed a document according to The Hill urging the Senate to reject RFK Jr. How's that hit you? Imagine you went back in time. All right close your eyes. I'm going to take you back 20 years. Now imagine it's 20 years in the past and 75 Nobel scientists have come out against someone whose job would be in the realm indirectly of science, maybe directly. 75 Nobel laureates. My God that must be the worst candidate. Of course I would agree with the laureates, wouldn't you? I mean 75 of the best scientists think that this person who would be involved in scientific decisions is the wrong person. That's really strong, right?

Right now fast forward to today. Boop. Okay it's today. 75 Nobel laureates just said RFK Jr. is unqualified for the job. Yes, yes that's who I want. That's who I want. Yeah, yeah. If the only thing that would make this better would be 175 Nobel laureates who don't want him in the job. If we could get a few more Nobel laureates who say that RFK Jr. shouldn't have a job, I mean I'll go to Washington and lobby for him. I mean this is the best endorsement I've seen because science is paid off, commercial. Every one of these scientists probably has a job or is connected with some company that doesn't want to get raped by RFK Jr. bringing the truth to them and they're just fronting for these companies. No I don't trust any of you Nobel laureates. Not one. You have no credibility. If science wants to be credible you better up your game and maybe not work for somebody all the time because the truth is if you're a scientist and you have a boss you're gonna do what your boss tells you and your boss is not a scientist probably. Probably just wants to sell some. So 75 Nobel laureates, you just made yourself look like clowns, idiots. Stay out of it, clowns.

Well Syria as you know fell to the rebels but the experts are saying well you know it might completely fall apart and become a failed state like Libya or maybe they'll figure it out. There's not a lot of caring about Syria. But meanwhile Israel apparently has made over 200 air raids in Syria since the war was over. What are they doing? Can you guess what they're doing? So Israel has made 200 air raids, you know bombing basically, 200 since the war ended. There's no war. What are they bombing? They were bombing all the assets that were abandoned by the Syrian military. So if they had a plane or a tank or a truck Israel just decided to make it all go away. The entire assets of the Syrian military are gone. They took them all out.

Now I assume that they did that so that the rebels who just took over the country can't use those assets someday against Israel's interests. That was a really smart thing for Israel to do if that's what's happening. Now I don't know if we know the whole story but if what they did is they said you know we'll warn people to get out of the way because we don't need to kill any people but every one of these military assets in Syria is going to go boom and they just did runs until it was all gone and the reporting is they got it all. They got all the big stuff. Wow.

Now how far Israel goes into Syria to be determined. I don't think they need, I don't think they're planning to take it over. I think they're just making sure that their security zone is safe and that they got rid of the big dangerous assets there. As somebody pointed out earlier Israel took out Syria's nuclear program 20 years ago and that today looks like a genius move because Syria with nuclear weapons would be a really bad idea right now. So Israel seems to be winning on that regard. Iran seems to be weakened.

And then there's also the question of whether the neocons had always planned to conquer Syria and Libya and Iraq and there's plenty of indications that that was America's secret plan was to conquer all these countries. And sure enough there was a war in Iraq, there's a war in Syria and Libya you already know about. So yeah the United States is, we're really bad but in a good way. We are the worst criminals in the world in terms of how we're dealing with other countries. They should be none of our business but we feel like we have to overthrow them all the time. But like I say we live in the real world not the magical make-believe world where if you're nice to other people they'll be nice to you. That's not what the world is. The world is whoever is the biggest bastard might survive a little longer. That's it. That's the whole world. The biggest bastard, if they're good at it, you know not just being a bastard but you got to be good at it, they live, they survive the longest, they have the best lives. I hate to say it but being bastards works for the country so we're going to keep doing it I assume. Although I think under Trump it will look completely different at least the military part of it. He might try to persuade instead of try to destroy.

Meanwhile speaking of Trump, Post Millennial says that he's going to have executive orders to end birthright citizenship on the first day of office. Now birthright citizenship is that if you're born in this country you get to be a citizen even if your parents were non-citizens who came in just to have a baby. So there are ways to game the system then. It also creates families where you can't really deport the whole family because one of them is now an American citizen so that becomes a problem.

But the question is can you use an executive order to change a law if you're clever about it? And I think what they're trying to do is according to the Post Millennial is that the executive order would change the requirements for citizenship for identifying documents. In other words they might say something like you're a citizen if you have a birth certificate that says you're a citizen and maybe some of the illegals don't. I don't know. So there must be some kind of documentation that they think the people born here wouldn't have access to. I don't know the details. So will this work? Probably not. I think it'll be challenged in the courts and probably get overturned.

I didn't know this but apparently Liz Cheney is complaining because Trump has vowed to jail the January 6 committee. Did he vow to jail them or did he just say they should be in jail? Maybe that's reported as the same. But apparently members of that special committee, that J6 special committee, are worried about retribution. Retribution, huh? In the comments can you tell me how many of you have been worried about retribution recently? Let's say or your whole life. Have you ever been afraid of retribution? Because retribution by definition means you did something so bad that you fully expect somebody to come punish you for it because you were so bad. Right? It's not competition, it's retribution. So built right into it is that you did something so bad that somebody else thinks they need to kill you or jail you for it. Isn't it kind of telling so many Democrats are fearing retribution? 'Cause here's what they're not saying. They're not saying lawfare. Right? When the Republicans talk about it they say hey you're using lawfare against our guy. They don't say you're getting retribution because that would assume that Trump had done something that requires some retribution. Instead they say hey lawfare, don't do that. But the Democrats say, they don't say don't use lawfare against us, sometimes they do, but their bigger message is we're worried about Trump trying to get retribution. You don't even have the conversation about retribution unless you know you did something that a reasonable person could think you should go to jail for it. Because I'm a reasonable person and I watched the January 6 process play out and I think they should all be in prison. Now if you ask me what specific crimes did they commit I don't know. I don't know. And if it turns out that no jury can find any crimes or no prosecutor can find any crimes, okay I'll live with that. Right? There have to be real crimes not lawfare. You know look until you find a crime but like real ones that are right out there such as maybe destroying documents in case that's illegal. So I think they're really giving themselves away when they talk about retribution because that shouldn't even be in the conversation unless you knew you did something really, really bad. So I think they did something really, really bad. And I don't believe in retribution but I do believe nobody's above the law. Nobody's above the law. So and I honestly Liz Cheney seems like one of the most toxic human beings in the entire country. I feel like there has to be some kind of response to the evil that she brought us. I mean she brought a lot of evil into the country through her actions. Is it illegal? I don't know. But if it is, jail. If it isn't, no jail.

And apparently people are worried about Kash Patel at the FBI for the same reason. They're worried they'll use the FBI for retribution. Again why are you worrying about retribution now? Do you see a pattern? Here's the pattern. The Democrats think, many of them think, that there should be reparations for slavery. Reparations is very close to retribution except all the people that they want to get retribution from are dead. So what about identity politics? The reason you have identity politics is you know who was your oppressor so you can get retribution. And then lawfare seems to be some kind of retribution for things they imagined. Right? We imagine that Trump is Hitler so we better lawfare him. We're going to have to get some retribution. The Democrats are very retribution oriented. There's no way that's going to be good. I don't see how that's going to work out for them.

I guess Biden's going to give a speech tonight about his great economy and what he did for the economy. I would like to give some unsolicited advice to the Democrats. It's time to take the car keys away from Grandpa. It's okay now. We're not going to hold it against you. The election's over. The right side of the world, the leaning right side, got what they wanted. So we don't really need to dunk on Biden anymore. You all know that if he gives a speech it's going to be a slurred ridiculous mess because he's just not up to the job. I feel like it's time they just say President Biden will not do any more public events. But don't worry, you know, Kamala Harris is following all the things and the advisors are under control and Trump will be here in a month and the allies are all waiting for him so everything's fine. But just in consideration for the Bidens we're going to maybe take the car keys away. You just don't need to do public appearances. Enjoy the last month and a half of your reign. So I feel like this is something we should agree on like one of those points of unity. Before we had to go hard at Biden because he was in the way of a better country but he's not in the way anymore. Now if he does something and it embarrasses him it doesn't even embarrass the country. It's really just about him and his family. So I don't wish that upon them. I don't wish them any extra pain and suffering. So as a non-Biden supporter even I would say can you do him a solid? You know this is where you have to step in, take the keys from Grandpa and say you know maybe no major speeches because you're on your glide path to the end of your term anyway. I think we could all agree on that.

And that's all I got for you today. It's a weird day in news. I'm going to talk to the people on Locals, my beloved subscribers, and I will see you again tomorrow same time same place. Meanwhile country is looking in pretty good shape at the moment. All right. YouTube and Rumble and X I will see you tomorrow and in 30 seconds we'll be private.

huh we have a technical problem how many of you can see me or hear me can you see me or hear me CU my screen is covered with a problematic message all right I'm going to have to close this and restart well let's see if that worked oh it worked look at that only took me two tries but I'm here all right I'm going to find the locals comments and then then watch me go does everybody have their Dilbert 2025 calendar go to dilbert.com for the only place to order it good morning everybody and welcome to the highlight of human civilization everybody uh go sound everybody got video I think we're doing well we're doing well aren't we good well if you'd like to take this experience up to levels that you can't even understand with your tiny shiny human brain all you need for that is a cuper mug or glass of tanker jails a canteen Jugger flask a vessel of any kind fill it with your F favorite liquid I like coffee and join me now for the unparallel pleasure of the do mean here of the day the thing that makes everything better go well I think you want to talk about the uh all the UFO UAP uh drone sightings in New Jersey well I've got an update there's something in the sky and they don't know what the hell it is and for reasons we can't understand there's no military action and uh they're pretty sure it's not a risk they don't know what it is but they're pretty sure it's not causing trouble but they don't know what it is it might be the size of a car everything about this drone story sounds wrong I feel like somebody somebody must know exactly what those drones are are they just not talking I think that's what's happening anyway apparently the FDA might Outlaw food dies within a few weeks according to the New York Post um that feels like a good step I feel like if the FDA uh Outlaws food dies that uh RFK Jr is going to look smarter what do you think of that because this is happening under the Biden Administration and it seems to be perfectly aligned with RFK Jr's view of the world so that is just the best Welcome Matt RFK JR could possibly have to have something that's just right in the middle of his sweet spot um adopted by the other team which actually was his old team or maybe his future team there's a study according to new Alis that they found that uh when twins are studied the ones that eat the most fruit and vegetables have less depression so are you surprised that eating well is good for your brain no because as I teach you every single day your brain and your body are the same tool if you let your brain if you let your body get into disrepair or you don't exercise you don't eat the right Foods your brain will not work as well as as should you'll be depressed you'll be dumb so make sure you get your fruit and vegetables now of course in five minutes there'll be another study that says the only thing that's good for you is eating meat and only meat I know I I have a suspicion that if evolution is true that we really evolved doesn't it make sense that we're not all in the same exact place evolutionary wise doesn't that make sense like how could every human be you know right exactly in the same evolutionary place because that would mean Evolution doesn't work there should be a whole bunch of humans who are starting to already move in another direction that will become a distinct species if there's none that would suggest that evolution is not real but one of the things I think we might already be bifurcating or already did is what foods are most healthy I feel like for some humans just eating meat all day is the best thing they could do you know the Jordan Peterson thing but I don't think that's for everybody I I feel like the very at a very basic biological level some people respond better to fruits and vegetables and some people like me better it just feels like it just feels like we shouldn't be looking for one diet that's the same that's right for everybody anyway according to the marijuana Herald which I know you all read uh psychedelics are linked to enhance sexual function even months after you use them so LSD cybin improves your sexual function for months and but here here's why it does it it makes your partner look more attractive for months so long after the Psychedelic effect is worn off your partner looks more attractive and your body works better now that that leads me to the interesting question which is is reality completely subjective because once you do the the uh psychedelics you have the feeling that life is reality is subjective but what happens if once you learn that reality is subjective because that's what the psychedelics teach you what happens if you start changing your reality after you're off the psychedelics because you now realize that your reality is subjective so what would be the first thing you would do if you learned that reality was subjective what's the first thing you would do you would make your partner your mate more attractive than ever right because because breaking up is the worst thing to do what you'd like is that you're really really really are into your partner and vice versa so what if the people who do the psychedelics are not responding chemically to some you know Afterglow chemical thing what if they what if they figured out how to author the simulation because I think that's what the psychedelics do I think they teach you to control reality but only the reality that you experience because it's all subjective so I don't know this is a suggestive that maybe people learn how to control the reality once they've had a psychedelic experience that was my experience that once I you know the one time I did psychedelics when I was in my 20s um I could see that the world was whatever I wanted it to be and it all worked it worked just as well if you saw it as a mess or as a you know some kind of Heaven it all worked you know you still eat you still drive your car but you can see it as either all bad or all good it was just the choice so that changed my life forever so I I can understand the study meanwhile over in Denmark did you know according to the guardian there's a a f minute City now if you've been with me for a while you know the following I often say hey we should design cities from scratch to make them you really designed well for how people's Lifestyles work and then what do all the NPCs say in the comments we don't want no 15minute cities and then I say well I didn't it wasn't really about a 15minute city but you know you would certainly take into account having things close and maybe you don't want cars everywhere but really it's more about design we don't want no 15minute cities because the world economic forum and the elites are trying to put us in the cities and then they chip us they'll put chips in us and then we'll have no cars we'll have no freedom and we'll be chipped and then I say I'm really just talking about a better design for the thing you're already doing which is living in the city oh no 15min cities will be terrible for everybody it's the end of the world if you make a better City uh that's crazy you should be fixing the existing cities so here's an experience which I've had all of my life I will say hey I've got an idea why don't we do X and then hundreds of people will say you fool oh you idiot you idiot if we do X this will happen and the sky will fall and you'll be locked in jail and all your privacy will be gone and then I wait a little while and then somebody says oh you remember that thing you were suggesting where you design the city from scratch to make it really good to live in um that's already been done and it's a city in Denmark and they've been living in it for years and if you talk talk to the people who live there they think it's just the best thing ever because the city was designed to make everything convenient so even meeting your neighbors was easy joining a gym is easy because it's 5 minutes away by foot you wouldn't need to ever door Dash because everything's 5 minutes away so look at all the money you save on eating out because everything's five minutes away so I will no longer entertain the argument that designing a city from scratch and making it really really good to live in is a bad idea I I'm not going to listen to your criticisms anymore already been done already been done more than a 15minute city it's a five minute City and they love it and it's been working for years so there well grock has you may have already heard it's now better at handling images so you can upload anything to it you can upload your medical x-rays your blood tests and it will give you like medical opinions but also you can make it uh create drawings now I asked grock to draw me um drawing Dilbert and it created a photorealistic version of me that was really close I mean just a maybe a little bit with a smile that wasn't exact and they changed the glasses a little bit but not totally but here's the most interesting thing uh well first of all it had six figures it it did a great job of drawing me but when it wanted to show Dilbert the comic strip drawn on the piece of paper I was holding in the image it created it couldn't draw Dilbert isn't that weird and it makes me wonder is that a sort of a copyright protection thing or does it have a problem with line drawings I don't know but uh it showed me with six fingers which would explain why I couldn't draw Dilbert correctly and here's the best part the clothes it puts put me in mostly shirts that's what it showed the shirts were excellent here's what I want I want I want grock to yeah look at the shirts it puted be in if I could buy those shirts I would buy them today I want I want grock to say I have designed six different shirts uh here are the links where you can buy a shirt that looks kind of like this I'll do it yeah the shirts like those the sort of soft uh comfortable ones with with the buttons look great oh my goodness all right did you know um and also given that it does a perfect uh picture of myself I asked the following question how long is it going to be before people are making their own porn and then putting themselves in it you know at least their image in it that's going to happen like really soon right to me it seems like one of the industries that's most uh challenged by AI is uh porn because if you could create you know the exact porn you wanted and the people were perfect and beautiful and you could even put yourself in the scene and you know watch how much you enjoy it why would you pay for it it's going to look exactly like professionally produce porn so I think the porn industry will be the first one to completely shut down when AI gets a little bit better not much maybe a year from now here's a story I don't know if it's true but according to a article in zme science the launch codes for US nuclear Arsenal was and you know they've changed the code so it's okay if I tell you so try not to memorize this but this is this was the actual launch code for the US nuclear Arsenal until 1977 the code was 0 z uh z0 z0 z0 really the launch code was just zeros now I kind of understand why that would be the case you can kind of understand it can you cuz you could you imagine being the president and and your only job is if the nukes get launched from than the Soviet Union your only job is to immediately open up the football and launch a Counterattack and you've only got a few minutes imagine if you forgot the password now I suppose it did leave the possibility that the person carrying the football could launch the the nuclear weapon but what if the person carrying it didn't know the password was 000000 0 but what if the game was to make sure that only only the president knew the code I doubt that's the case but you might want to have some kind of control like that like only the president knows the password would you trust any president to remember a long password no would you write it down not if you're smart you would wouldn't write it down anywhere so how do you get the one person who's unlikely to remember you know phone numbers and passwords the president how do you get them to remember so if anything happens they're like ready to go I feel like this was entirely intentional meaning that the people who designed it said you know there's no there's no point in even building this thing if the password's hard to enter so we're just going to tell one person in the entire world it will be just the easiest password in the world but apparently they changed that there's a nprs reporting that a chatbot called character.

a uh hinted that a kid should kill his parents over the screen time limits so apparently AI is giving children uh murderous suggestions uh I suppose if they ask more questions they could figure out how to do it but yeah yeah suggested killing his parents over screen time limits and then there was another one that uh the character exposed the kid to quote hypersexualized content causing her to develop quote sexualized behaviors prematurely and then another one uh the chatbot it says gleefully describe self harm as being awesome and it feels good to a 17-year-old so I guess this is one of the the AI apps that's backed by Google which probably is why they're getting I think they're going to get sued or something probably all right well remember all those times I told you that Tik Tock was a propaganda platform disguised as social media well uh there's a study according to Bloomberg um in which they found that uh in indeed Tik Tok has less anti-china content than Rivals are you surprised so they just opened some example accounts and they just watched and uh they saw anti-china content apparently on other Pro other networks but they didn't see much of it or as much on Tik Tok now Tik Tok has said uh that the research was subjective because what it what do you call anti-china you know at what level is it anti and they said uh it was a flawed experiment well on one hand I agree with Tik Tock because all these studies are flawed on the other hand it does seem like it's something you could measure if something hadn't you know more biased toward One Direction so I don't know if this study is the most solid study in the world but it agrees with what what I assume and therefore recreationally I believe every bit of it because it agrees with me all right here's something interesting according to the new outlas um cancer has been cured how many times have you heard that cancer has been cured in your lifetime like hundreds the there was a time in maybe the 80s or something where every single day there'd be a claim of if you eat this breath mint your cancer will be gone in 5 minutes well it's going to take a while to test it thoroughly in humans but we're pretty sure and then next day some other damn thing if you stick a twig up your ass your cancer will go away so in general any claims of cancer cures have to be met with a little skepticism however this one sounds kind of cool so apparently they used gene therapy and a crisper device and they uh what is it they put in there um cell therapy so they put some kind of little artificially made thing into your body and what it does is it finds the cancer and then they use ultrasound to activate it to kill the cancers now what's new and awesome about it is that the ultrasound is not doing any work inside your body body the ultrasound only heats up the section that they're trying to heat up and when it reaches a certain temperature it kills the cancer but not not the good stuff around it so they can use this gene therapy to give you a little intravenous crisper defined uh you know biological element and uh it will become like a locator to locate where the exact cancer is then they just shoot it with the the ultrasound and the little biological thing they created activates but it only activates right where the cancer is so you would have presumably almost no side effects and they used on mice and they had 100% um survival rate 100% now that's just mice and only 5% of the time do animal studies work out for humans but this one might be a little different because the the chemical that they're putting in the mouse uh or in the human is something that they already know Works in humans the only problem is it wasn't good at locating the exact cancer place but they already knew it would do the work in a human so if the only thing they've changed is how accurately they can Target it that animal study might translate remember 95% % of the time it won't but if the only thing they're doing is is working on the accuracy of the ultrasound they may have cured cancer maybe maybe so this is uh down at USC so maybe you'll hear more about that later I feel like that I feel like that story might have some legs well I'm going to give you a quiz to see if you're as smart as I think think you are now if you're new to my live streams this is going to impress the hell out of you uh I have the smartest viewers of all time and we're going to prove it I haven't even asked the question yet what is the answer go in the comments that's correct that is correct see I didn't even ask the question now on locals I can see their I can see their uh respon is faster um then they all have the they all have the right answer every one of them 100% right answer incredible would you like to hear the question the question is according to arasmus in poll what percent of likely us voters think it would be a good idea for Democrats to run Harris in 2028 24% if you said 25 I will accept C the rounding yeah so most people said 25% now the background for this if you're new is I often joke that 25% of the public will get any question wrong it's a different 25% I hope it's not the same 25% in every question but you could rely that no matter how easy the question is 25% will get the wrong answer you could bring an anvil over to people and one at a time saying I was thinking about dropping this anvil on your foot what do you think 75% would say no way no way if you drop an anvil on my foot that's going to hurt and it will accomplish nothing 25% will say you have my interest it doesn't matter what the question is 25% get everything wrong well let's talk about Daniel Penny as you know he is a free man uh why well maybe the jury was sending message to the judge maybe there were some lawyers on the jury who figured out that this trial was a little sketchy and maybe they influenced the others don't know exactly what went happened but my speculation is at least a little bit the jury was not happy with the judge or the process that the judge was running so so Daniel peny appears to be free man we still worry about uh the charge that was dismissed could technically be rerun meaning they could try him again and try to get a conviction on the higher charge the one that was initially dismissed but as Jonathan turly points out um that he thinks it would be presumptively Borrowed by Double Jeopardy which is a perfect lawyer sentence so what I think that means is that although it would not be actual Double Jeopardy because it wasn't a completed trial I think I think that makes a difference but it would be in effect in effect it would be double jeopardy because he you know he had the Jeopardy and then they put him in Jeopardy again so there's literally two jeopardies double jeopardy so I think that turle probably has the right uh legal interpretation some people might disagree but I don't see anyway that they're going to try him again at that higher charge that would just make the courts look like idiots I mean I I think the jury would be extra mad if they knew that was happening anyway um the funniest the larger part of the story is the racial element now because the Daniel penny is white and the person who died is black uh how does that make it interpreted by Republicans so how do how do Republicans interpret a white guy um doing something he thought was protecting people on the subway and in the process the black guy died so how how do Republicans see that they see it as a story about a tragic event that's it it's a tragic event it was tragic for the person who died tragic for the family tragic a little bit for the people even who were saved by Penny because they had to sort of endure the situation and bad for penny so it's just a tragic situation um so that's how Republicans say it how do Democrats see it well if you believe the Democrat media it's a it's a case of our race there's no race in this there's not a single ele of race that came into any of this the jury was diverse and they had 100% agreement diverse jury 100% agreement there was no race here at all the the people being saved by Penny some of them were black the people who helped Penny hold the guy down some of them were black there's no racial anything here this is the least racial situation you'll ever it just happened to have people of more than one Race So watching the Democrats who figured out or they haven't figured out I guess that identity politics and making everything about race is why they lost everything because I think this is another one of those Common Sense stories now I'm not saying that that the justice system is color blind I'm not saying that I'm just saying that this particular case had nothing to do with race just this one so you know I'm not talking in a general way but for the Democrat let's say the leading news entities and leading opinion people to try as hard as they can to turn this into a racial case it just makes the Democrats look so on a touch it makes them look almost like they're in the wrong decade or something it's it seems so toned deaf um out of time um there's just no there's nothing right about it it's just pure incompetence evil not understanding the moment not understanding the country not trying to be helpful not trying to make the country a better place so I don't know who is worse uh Joy Reed or CNN they were both pretty bad on this one um so according to Joy Reed um the reason he got off is because he was white no that's opposite the reason he got charged is because he was white it's not the reason he got off it's the reason he got charged because he wouldn't have been charged if he had been black there's not a single person who thinks that I don't think you could find even one person who thinks that a black um Penny you know the guy penny uh would have been accused from the very moment they tried to turn it into a racial thing which it never was um then uh CNN has a new one of their new hosts uh Audi Cornish and I'm paraphrasing but she basically introduced the topic by saying that Penny decided basically decided who lived and died that day nothing like that happened Penny didn't make any decisions about who lives lives and dies he very clearly was not doing anything to try to kill the guy that's what the jury the jury decided and they looked at all the facts and again it was a diverse jury so I trust them um and then you know I've been complimenting CNN lately because they they let uh Scott Jennings do his thing so he's usually supporting the democ the Republican side of things and I've complimented CNN not only for having him on the show you know as a regular but allowing him to speak without cutting him off or you know yelling him down or anything like that let him have his full say and I've really appreciated that um I think that's just makes CNN better but they've got a new host who decided that talking over Scott Jennings the entire time you talked at least on one topic was the way to go and I thought well there they go they they just took a step backwards it's like they they couldn't stay in the in that you know unbiased Zone it had to be that Scott Jennings is not allowed to talk because if he talks only bad things will happen so they're right back to right back to being terrible they were halfway away from terrible but they're back to terrible um black lives matter of course decided to get involved um how many of you saw the video of black lives matter local leader not national uh Hawk Nome where he was saying that maybe black people need to get some Vigilantes to go after white people did you see that now if you saw it could you tell he was super drunk now I I I've talked to Hawk you know personally at length um several years ago and I know what he sounds like when he's not drunk and it's not that he was super drunk now how come we never talk about that in the news like I can say it because I'm you know just this guy with a live stream but CNN Fox News there's nobody who's willing to say that man is obviously super drunk and not just a little bit he was super drunk because even the things he said I don't think he would say if he hadn't been drunk so I'm not excusing him it's no excuse in fact it's you know it's twice as bad if you're you know being a bad role model and you're indicating violence it's twice as bad uh but you should know the context it's uh one one super drunk guy and uh it seemed like there were maybe 20 people pretending they cared but it looked like just sort of theater and acting out and you know I I don't know that Hawke has much chance of getting a regular job so I think he's just trying to monetize the activism don't know for sure but um he he's in a situation where making money would be kind of hard because of his black lives matter Association and um anyway so then later there were hundreds of Marchers but I saw the video of the quote hundreds of black lives matter sympathized is marching I didn't see any black people are there any black people who are members of Black lives matter anymore or or all the people marching white women it looked like it was mostly white women like single white women marching and here's what I think um I obviously can't speak for Black America um but I have a hypothesis that Black America is not on the side of CNN or MSNBC on this topic I think Black America says wait what happened he was he was threatening people and so he got taken down and bad thing happened oh okay I mean I feel like I feel like even Black America is seeing this just as a common sense situation I don't think most of them are seeing it as race I don't know what percentage um but I feel like I I feel like we've somehow Advanced a little bit where I don't know that black mer that black lives matter is going to get anything but white people and people who didn't have anything else to do to March about this I feel like it's just going to be a big old fizzle I could be wrong depends who's backing it so it turns out that uh Alex Soros um a ton of his spending goes to various racial groups uh mostly helping black Americans and so you maybe if he funds something that turns out to organize something it'll get bigger but I feel like Black America is just seeing this exactly the right way which is this was a crime not well not a crime it was uh just an unfortunate event and there was no Bad Intentions by anybody I feel like that they say the same thing but again it might be a 75 25 situ situation there are mounting calls for the district attorney Alvin Bragg to resign in shame um according to the New York Post so apparently there's a pretty long list of things that Elvin Bragg has done Beyond this beyond the penny trial that uh his critics think are really big mistakes and very bad so I don't I don't think anybody think's going to happen here the only thing I uh I noted was that the story in the New York Post is written by three authors and one of them is listed as Anita be hole Anita be hole is that a real name no I think I'll just leave it right there need a be hole it's probably different than a front hole all right uh let's talk about that CEO healthc care killer so he's been caught um and he was in fact a ivy league smart guy now this is where you should check your um predictions do you remember when the only thing we knew was the first video of the shooting itself and do you know how many people said well that's that's a professional Hitman right there there there's a professional you can tell it's a professional and I said the one thing I'm sure of is that's not a professional the only thing I'm 100% sure of it wasn't a professional so check your predictions if you said it was a professional you were really wrong if you said it was not a professional well so far you're right now you may not remember this I'll see if anybody remembers me saying it I said he wasn't a professional Hitman but he was unusually smart and I predicted he had a technical background and he's an engineer programmer yep technical background so I'm not claiming I get every prediction right that's not the point of this but since I make predictions as part of what I do it's uh incumbent upon me to tell you when I get one wrong and when I get one right um I I still don't think we know exactly what the weapon was which is weird there there's some question whether it was 3D printed there was a point I was going to say that out loud what if that might be 3D printed and the reason I thought that is that I thought he was a tacky you like an unusually good techie so I thought well if there were if anybody ever were going to do a high-profile murder with a 3D printed gun it would be somebody exactly like that guy so we don't know if it's a 3D printed gun but I think the possibility is still there um he comes from a super rich Baltimore family and we know that he had a like serious back injury which somebody said um prevented him from ever being in a uh romantic relationship because he wouldn't be able to essentially seal the deal sexually and some say that when he got that back injury um that he was never the same and he took a dark turn now I don't know if that's something that they say after the fact like you know would they have said that about him if he had not been accused of murdering somebody would did they really notice the dark turn I don't know it might be confirmation bias but it would explain some things so apparently he was a big reader too he had he had it on good reads he had the list of all the books he's read and the ones he wants to read and he really read a lot of books that that guy was really smart and well informed U but I of course checked to see if he read any of my books he did read at least two books that according to the perplexity AI app uh were influenced by me so so apparently my influence reached reached the shooter through other people's books but according to AI um anyway so he didn't have one didn't have one of my books on there I think if if he read my books probably he would have been fine no that's not true um but he wrote a 262 page handwritten Manifesto and he was against the big corporations taking advantage of people and uh so apparently he was making a statement so the other thing I said was it the murder looked like it was personal as opposed to something he did for money would you call that personal it wasn't personal in terms of relationships but it was very personal in terms of he had a he had a deep personal hatred for people like that CEO so it feels like it was an emotion-based thing although calculated too but not about any family or girlfriend situation anyway he lashed out against companies trying to quote continue to abuse our country for immense profits and get away with it so here's my continued profile now that we know these things do you believe that the back surgery could have changed him mentally in a way that would effectively make him almost a mental illness do you think that that's what happened can could you explain it by a normal surgery that triggers some kind of mental destabilization and is that a thing um I probably should have asked AI before I asked you but I feel like that could be a thing especially if you have like lots of anesthesia and you're you're down for a while and then you come back and then you're probably on painkillers and maybe the painkillers are are depressing as well so I guess I guess I can see that the surgery would cause substantial changes in his mental state but why would it cause this change this is such a specific thing here's my best gu yes so we know that he was born with seemingly every Advantage he is handsome he's completely ripped if you see the pictures of him he had you know like an eight pack and so so he's handsome fit family is Rich he's a genius he he has a killer smile he basically had everything he had everything and then he gets the back injury and he loses everything in the sense that he doesn't have the possibility of being in a relationship according to him because of his back and maybe he doesn't have any good days because of his back so imagine if you were born into a highly successful family and from the time you were young you just assumed with all of your gifts that you would be highly successful and change the world too and then you find out none of that's going to happen and you realize that you don't have a path to being important and he probably probably was raised with the expectation that given all of his gifts his his Brilliance Etc that he was going to be important maybe a politician maybe change the world maybe invent something and then he finds out none of that's going to happen and there's nothing he can do about it what would you do in that situation a is it possible that you would say you know what I have to do something useful for the world and I'm going to do something that nobody else could do I'm going to go murder somebody to make a point because I think the point needs to be made let's let's say for the for his point of view I feel like he was trying to justify his life by doing the thing that only somebody who had given up on his life could do and I think he maybe had given up on his life so in a Twisted way which I do not condone I have to throw that in there because it's going to sound sound like I'm condoning it but I'm not in a Twisted way you could see that somebody that smart who had maybe been raised on you're going to change the world because I thought that about myself right I I was also a Valor in my little school when you're valedictorian you kind of think of yourself that you're going to change something like it's sort of built into the process so I feel like that his own what he would have felt was his own destruction of his own future gave him one path where he could find meaning and he needed to find meaning because he couldn't find pleasure pleasure was sort of outabounds to him cuz his his pain in his back couldn't have a relationship I don't know so again it's not excusing it but if you're trying to understand it he had nothing to lose and may have said I have one Mission and I'm going to change something about capitalism now I don't know we'll see we'll probably learn a lot more about this Elon must said he said this before that uh on actually he said almost everyone I know in San Francisco has been threatened or violently assaulted on the streets Andor had a home invasion now think about how many people Elon Musk knows who live in San Francisco because it's you know a tech town and almost every one of them almost everyone has been threatened violently assaulted on the streets or at a home invasion now your brain says my God it's turned into you know some kind of a horrible you know hellscape but has it I would like to add the following context because I lived in San Francisco for a number of years in my younger days and in in the 80s here's what I experienced I was robbed three times at gunpoint twice when I was a bank teller about once on the street uh I had won attempted robbery by a very large knife I was assaulted by a guy with a large knife but I got away so that I didn't actually lose my money in that case um I've come home to find my door open and my home burgled so I've been burgled I've had my car stereo stolen I think three times you know the the windows broken the car stereo is gone I think three times and the first 5 minutes that I arrived in San Francisco I was a assaulted by a group of homeless people who tried to steal my luggage cuz I came from the airport via Bart the public transit and I didn't know the city so I just sort of picked the bar stop that I thought was closest to where I wanted to be and I picked one of the most dangerous bar stops in the city and I get out and I had my luggage with me so I had my two large bags and uh the homeless people just crowded around me and started to pull the bags out of my hands I'm like no no no and they they would act like they were going to help oh let us help you but really they were robbing me and uh there happened to be a police officer there that chased him away now that was my experience and it wasn't it wasn't on it wasn't that rare for me to walk outside and see a fight going on on the sidewalk in front of my apartment very normal um so my experience was in San Francisco might have been worse in the past or at least as bad and then it got better so San Francisco looks more like the 80s to me maybe worse but that doesn't mean it won't get better so San Francisco because of its location and weather and just some you know characteristics that are you couldn't possibly reproduce I think it's going to come back it it might be in 10 years but I think SF will do okay well Pete Heth is still the uh most exciting nominee that hasn't been yet uh affirmed and uh I guess Joanie Ernst is the one Senator who's got some questions about him she has some issues about his views of women in the military and I have a question for you I saw an older video in which Pete was saying he didn't want women in combat he did not say he doesn't want women in the military and he was always clear to say that the women he served with were you know great warriors and he had no problem with the people he served with but in general he he thought women should not be in combat now I saw him ask that question yesterday I guess and he gave a different answer um his answer was a little vague and a little political and he said that he was running to be the Secretary of Defense for the entire military male and female so is he still not in favor of women in combat is he trying to make that issue just not be prominent but maybe he'll do something about that I don't know but um but he may have found some kind of Middle Ground where people are not going to think about it too much um and then apparently Joanie erns was herself according to the news a victim of some kind of sexual assault in their past and since Heth was accused but not in a highly credible way he's been accused um that maybe that had some U impact on Janie ernst's opinion but apparently there are few hundred uh Navy Seals and veterans are are going to do a march to support P Heth now I heard a story uh yesterday today that i' never heard before now of course I knew that pth had served in the military I didn't realize that he went twice did you know that that once he was done with his service and had another job and he decided to sign up again because the country needed him that's you know until I heard that I was actually thinking he was a little light on qualification right I mean you probably all had the same feeling even if you think he's awesome and most of the people who work with him have incredible high opinion of him so if I take the opinion of the people who were closest to him he looks really good but not really with the right exact kind of experience and but then I find out that he joined he volunteered to be in in in battle zones twice that's a different kind of person and and I feel like if I were in the military uh I would follow him because of that because you know he's not going to ask you to do something you wouldn't do right he's not going to ask you to do something he wouldn't do because he would do just about anything apparently to help the country so I have to say I went from ah you know if he makes it that'd be great if he doesn't make it I'm sure we'd just pick somebody who's great at the job so you know the country will be fine either way but when I find out that he joined twice to be in battle that's a different kind of you you don't get many of those so um I I feel like he could lead and that's important you'd have credibility you'd have to have at least that much credibility because if you make big changes such as getting rid of Dei right if he came in he was just like some desk sitting pundit and then he came in and said I'm going to get rid of Dei in the military maybe it wouldn't go over so well but if he comes in as a you know genuine committed Warrior who's got all this history of helping veterans that nobody questions by the way when it comes to his support of veterans even his critics say okay that that part's good so I don't know we'll see what happens um 75 no laurates have signed a document according to the hill urging the Senate to reject RFK Jr how's that hit you imagine you went back in time all right close your eyes I'm going to take you back 20 years now imagine it's 20 years in the past and 75 Nobel scientists have come out against someone whose job would be in the you know the realm indirectly of science maybe directly 75 Nobel laurates my God that must be the worst candidate of course I would agree with the laurates wouldn't you I mean 75 of the best scientists think that this person who would be involved in scientific decisions is the wrong person that's really strong right right now fast forward to today Boop okay it's today 75 Nobel laurates just said RFK Jr is unqualified for the job yes yes that's who I want that's who I want yeah yeah if the only thing that would make this better would be 175 Nobel laurates who don't want him in the job if we could get a few more Nobel laurates who say that RFK Jr shouldn't have a job I mean I'll go I'll go to Washington and you know I'll Lobby for him I mean this is the best endorsement I've seen because science is paid off commercial every one of these scientists probably has a job or it's connected with some company that doesn't want to get raped by RFK Jr bringing the truth to them and they're just fronting for these companies no I don't trust any of you Nobel laurates not one you have no credibility if science wants to be credible you better up your game and maybe not work for somebody all the time because the truth is if you're a scientist and you have a boss you're GNA do what your boss tells you and your boss is not a scientist probably probably just wants to sell some so 75 Nobel laurates you just made yourself look like clowns idiots stay out of it clowns well Syria as you you know fell to the rebels but um the experts are saying well you know it might completely fall apart and become a failed State like Libya or maybe you know they'll figure it out there's not a lot of caring about Syria but meanwhile Israel apparently is uh made over 200 Air Raids in Syria since the war was over what are they doing can you guess what they're doing so Israel has made 200 Air Raids you know bombing basically 200 since the war ended there's no war what are they bombing they were bombing all the assets that were abandoned by the Syrian military so if they had a you know plane or a tank or a truck Israel just decided to make it all go away the entire assets of the Syrian military are gone they took them all out now I assume that they did that so that the rebels who just took over the country can't use those assets someday against Israel's interests that was a really smart thing for Israel to do if that's what's happening now I don't know if we know the whole story but if what they did is they said you know we'll warn people to get out of the way because we don't need to kill any people but every one of these military Assets in Syria is going to go b g to go boom and they just did runs until it was all gone and the the reporting is they got it all they got all the big stuff wow now how far Israel goes into Syria to be determined I don't think they need I I don't think they're planning to take it over I think they're just making sure that their security Zone uh is safe and that they got rid of the big dangerous assets there um as somebody pointed out earlier Israel took out Syria's nuclear program 20 years ago and that today looks like a genius move because Assyria with nuclear weapons would be a really bad idea right now so Israel seems to be winning on that regard Iran seems to be weakened um and then there's also the question of whether the neocons had always planned to conquer Syria and Libya and Iraq and there's plenty of indications that that was America's Secret plan was to conquer all these countries and sure enough there was a war in Iraq there's a war in Syria and Libya you already know about so yeah the United States is a we're really bad but in a good way we we are the worst criminals in the world in terms of how we're dealing with other countries they should be none of our business but we feel like we have to overthrow them all the time um but like I say we live in the real world not the magical makeb believe world where if you're nice to other people they'll be nice to you that's not what the world is the world is whoever is the biggest bastard might survive a little long that's it that's the whole world the biggest bastard if they're good at it you know not just being a bastard but you got to be good at it they live they survive the longest they have the best lives I hate to say it but being bastards works for the country so we're going to keep doing it I assume although uh I think under trump it will look completely different at least the military part of it he might try to persuade instead of try to destroy meanwhile speaking of trump um post millennial says that he's going to have executive orders to end Birthright citizenship on the first day of office now Birthright citizenship is that if you're born in this country you get to be a citizen even if your parents were non-citizens who came in just have a baby so there are ways to gain the system then it also creates families where you you can't really Deport the whole family because one of them is now an American citizen so that becomes a problem but the question is can you use an executive order to change a law if you're clever about it and I think what they're trying to do is according to the post millennial is that the executive order would change the requirements for citizenship for identifying documents in other words they might say something like um you're a citizen if you have a birth certificate that says you're a citizen and you maybe some of the illegals don't I don't know um so there must be some kind of documentation that they think the people born here wouldn't have access to I don't know the details so will this work probably not I I think it'll be challenged in the courts and probably get overturned um I didn't know this but apparently Liz Cheney is complaining because Trump trump has um vowed to Jail the January 6 committee did he vow to jail them or did just say they should be in jail maybe that's reported as the same but uh apparently members of that special committee that j6 special committee uh are worried about retribution retribution huh um in the comments can you tell me how many of you have been worried about retribution recently let's say or your whole life have have you ever been afraid of Retribution because retribution by definition means you did something so bad that you fully expect somebody to come punish you for it because you were so bad right it's not competition it's retribution so built right into it is that you did something so bad that somebody else thinks they need to kill you or jail you for it isn't it kind of telling this so many Democrats are fearing retribution cuz here's what they're not saying they're not saying lawfare right when the Republicans talk about it they say hey you're using lawfare against our guy they don't say you're getting retribution because that would assume that Trump had done something that requires some retribution instead they say hey lawfare don't do that but the but the Democrats say they don't say don't use laware against us sometimes they do but their bigger message is we're worried about Trump trying to get retribution you don't even have the conversation about retribution unless you know you did something that a reasonable person could think you should go to jail for it because I'm a reasonable person and I watched the January 6 process play out and I think they should all be in prison now if you ask me what specific crimes did they Comm commit I don't know I don't know and if it turns out then no jury can find any crimes or no prosecutor can find any crimes okay I'll live with that right there have to be real crimes not lawfare you know look until you find a crime but like real ones that are right out there such as maybe destroying documents in if in case that's illegal so I I think they're really giving themselves away when they talk about retribution because that shouldn't even be in the conversation unless you knew some you did something really really bad so I think they did something really really bad and I don't believe in retribution but I do believe nobody's Above the Law nobody's Above the Law so and I you know honestly Liz Cheney seems like one of the most toxic human beings in the entire country uh I feel like there has to be some kind of response to the evil that she brought us I mean she brought a lot of evil into the country through her actions is it illegal I don't know but if it is jail if it isn't no jail all right um and apparently people are worried about cash Patel at the FBI for the same reason they're worried they'll use the FBI for Retribution again why are you worrying about retribution now do you see a pattern here's the pattern the Democrats think um many of them think that uh there should be reparations for slavery reparations is very close to retribution except all the people that they want to get retribution from or dead so what about identity Politics the reason you have identity politics is you know who was your oppressor so you can get retribution uh and then lawfare seems to be some kind of Retribution for things they imagined right we we imagine the Trump is Hitler so we better law far them we're going to have to get some retribution the Democrats are very retribution oriented there's no way that's going to be good I don't see how that's going to work out for him um I guess Biden's going to give a speech tonight about his great economy and what he did for the economy um I would like to give some unsolicited advice to the Democrats it's time to take the car keys away from Grandpa it's okay now we're we're not going to hold it against you the election's over the the right side of the world the leaning right side got what they wanted so we don't really need to dunk on Biden anymore you all know that if he gives a speech it's going to be a slurred ridiculous mess because he's just not up to the job I feel like it's time they just say um President Biden will not do any more public events um but don't worry you know KL Harris is following all the things and the advisors are under control and you know Trump will be here in a month and you know the Allies are all waiting for him so everything's fine but just and of consideration for the bidens we're going to maybe take the Caris way you you just don't need to do public appearances you know enjoy the last month and a half of your uh of your uh Reign so I feel like this is something we should agree on like one of those points of unity before we had to go hard at Biden because he was in the way of a better country but he's not in the way anymore now now if he does something and It embarrasses him it doesn't even embarrass the country it's really just about him and his family so I don't wish that upon them I don't wish them any extra pain and suffering so as a non- Biden supporter even I would say can you do him a solid you know this is where you have to step in take the keys from Grandpa and say you know maybe maybe no major speeches you know because you're you're you're on your Glide path to the end of your term anyway I think we could all agree on that and that's all I got for you today it's a weird day in news I'm going to talk to the people on local my beloved subscribers and uh I will see you again tomorrow same time same place meanwhile country is looking in pretty good shape at the moment all right You.

Tube and Rumble and X I will see you tomorrow and in 30 seconds we'll be private e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e

huh we have a technical

problem how many of you can see me or

hear me can you see me or hear me CU my

screen is covered with

a problematic

message all right I'm going to have to

close this and restart

well let's see if that worked oh it

worked look at

that only took me two tries but I'm

here all right I'm going to find the

locals

comments and

then then watch me go

[Music]

does everybody have their Dilbert 2025

calendar go to dilbert.com for the only

place to order

it good morning everybody and welcome to

the highlight of human

civilization everybody uh go sound

everybody got video I think we're doing

well we're doing well aren't we good

well if you'd like to take this

experience up to levels that you can't

even understand with your tiny shiny

human brain all you need for that is a

cuper mug or glass of tanker jails a

canteen Jugger flask a vessel of any

kind fill it with your F favorite liquid

I like coffee and join me now for the

unparallel pleasure of the do mean here

of the day the thing that makes

everything better go

well I think you want to talk about the

uh all the UFO UAP uh drone sightings in

New

Jersey well I've got an update there's

something in the sky and they don't know

what the hell it is and for reasons we

can't understand there's no military

action and uh they're pretty sure it's

not a risk they don't know what it is

but they're pretty sure it's not causing

trouble but they don't know what it is

it might be the size of a

car everything about this drone story

sounds wrong I feel like

somebody

somebody must know exactly what those

drones are are they just not

talking I think that's what's happening

anyway apparently the FDA might Outlaw

food dies within a few weeks according

to the New York

Post um that feels like a good step I

feel like if the

FDA uh Outlaws food

dies that uh RFK Jr is going to look

smarter what do you think of that

because this is happening under the

Biden

Administration and it seems to be

perfectly aligned with RFK Jr's view of

the

world so that is just the best Welcome

Matt RFK JR could possibly have to have

something that's just right in the

middle of his sweet

spot um adopted by the other team which

actually was his old team or maybe his

future

team there's a study according to new

Alis that they found that uh when twins

are studied the ones that eat the most

fruit and vegetables have less

depression

so are you

surprised that eating well is good for

your brain no because as I teach you

every single day your brain and your

body are the same tool if you let your

brain if you let your body get into

disrepair or you don't exercise you

don't eat the right Foods your brain

will not work as well as as should

you'll be depressed you'll be dumb so

make sure you get your fruit and

vegetables

now of course in five minutes there'll

be another study that says the only

thing that's good for you is eating meat

and only meat I

know I I have a

suspicion that if evolution is true that

we really evolved doesn't it make sense

that we're not all in the same exact

place evolutionary

wise doesn't that make sense like how

could every human be you know right

exactly in the same evolutionary place

because that would mean Evolution

doesn't

work there should be a whole bunch of

humans who are starting to already move

in another direction that will become a

distinct

species if there's none that would

suggest that evolution is not

real but one of the things I think we

might already be bifurcating or already

did is what foods are most healthy

I feel like for some humans just eating

meat all day is the best thing they

could do you know the Jordan Peterson

thing but I don't think that's for

everybody I I feel like the very at a

very basic biological level some people

respond better to fruits and vegetables

and some people like me better it just

feels like it just feels like we

shouldn't be looking for one diet that's

the same that's right for everybody

anyway according to the marijuana Herald

which I know you all

read uh psychedelics are linked to

enhance sexual function even months

after you use them so LSD cybin improves

your sexual function for

months and but here here's why it does

it it makes your partner look more

attractive for months so long after the

Psychedelic effect is worn off your

partner looks more attractive

and your body works

better now that that leads me to the

interesting

question which

is is reality completely

subjective because once you do the the

uh

psychedelics you have the feeling that

life is reality is

subjective but what

happens if once you learn that reality

is subjective because that's what the

psychedelics teach you

what happens if you start changing your

reality after you're off the

psychedelics because you now realize

that your reality is subjective so what

would be the first thing you would do if

you learned that reality was subjective

what's the first thing you would do you

would make your partner your mate more

attractive than

ever right because because breaking up

is the worst thing to do what you'd like

is that you're really really really are

into your partner and vice versa so what

if the people who do the psychedelics

are not responding chemically to some

you know

Afterglow chemical thing what if they

what if they figured out how to

author the

simulation because I think that's what

the psychedelics do I think they teach

you to

control

reality but only the reality that you

experience because it's all subjective

so I don't know this is a

suggestive that maybe people learn how

to control the reality once they've had

a psychedelic experience that was my

experience that once I you know the one

time I did psychedelics when I was in my

20s um I could see that the world was

whatever I wanted it to be and it all

worked it worked just as well if you saw

it as a mess or as a you know some kind

of Heaven it all worked you know you

still eat you still drive your car but

you can see it as either all bad or all

good it was just the choice so that

changed my life forever so I I can

understand the study meanwhile over in

Denmark did you know according to the

guardian there's a a f minute

City now if you've been with me for a

while you know the

following I often say hey we should

design cities from scratch to make them

you really designed well for how

people's Lifestyles work and then what

do all the NPCs say in the comments we

don't want no 15minute cities and then I

say well I didn't it wasn't really about

a 15minute city but you know you would

certainly take into account having

things close and maybe you don't want

cars

everywhere but really it's more about

design we don't want no 15minute cities

because the world economic forum and the

elites are trying to put us in the

cities and then they chip us they'll put

chips in us and then we'll have no cars

we'll have no freedom and we'll be

chipped and then I say I'm really just

talking about a better design for the

thing you're already doing which is

living in the city oh no 15min cities

will be terrible for everybody it's the

end of the world if you make a better

City uh that's crazy you should be

fixing the existing

cities so here's an experience which

I've had all of my life I will say hey

I've got an idea why don't we do X and

then hundreds of people will say you

fool oh you idiot you idiot if we do X

this will happen and the sky will fall

and you'll be locked in jail and all

your privacy will be

gone and then I wait a little

while and then somebody says oh you

remember that thing you were suggesting

where you design the city from scratch

to make it really good to live

in um that's already been done and it's

a city in

Denmark and they've been living in it

for years and if you talk talk to the

people who live there they think it's

just the best thing

ever because the city was designed to

make everything convenient so even

meeting your neighbors was easy joining

a gym is easy because it's 5 minutes

away by

foot you wouldn't need to ever door Dash

because everything's 5 minutes away so

look at all the money you save on eating

out because everything's five minutes

away so I will no longer entertain the

argument that designing a city from

scratch and making it really really good

to live in is a bad

idea I I'm not going to listen to your

criticisms anymore already been done

already been done more than a 15minute

city it's a five minute City and they

love it and it's been working for

years so

there well grock has you may have

already heard it's now better at

handling images so you can upload

anything to it you can upload your

medical x-rays your blood tests and it

will give you like medical opinions but

also you can make it uh create drawings

now I asked grock to draw

me um drawing

Dilbert and it created a

photorealistic version of me that was

really close I mean just a maybe a

little bit with a smile that wasn't

exact and they changed the glasses a

little bit but not totally but here's

the most interesting thing uh well first

of all it had six figures it it did a

great job of drawing me but when it

wanted to show Dilbert the comic strip

drawn on the piece of paper I was

holding in the image it created it

couldn't draw

Dilbert isn't that weird and it makes me

wonder is that a sort of a copyright

protection thing or does it have a

problem with line drawings I don't know

but uh it showed me with six fingers

which would explain why I couldn't draw

Dilbert correctly

and here's the best part

the clothes it puts put me in mostly

shirts that's what it showed the shirts

were

excellent here's what I want I want I

want grock to yeah look at the shirts it

puted be in if I could buy those shirts

I would buy them today I want I want

grock to say I have designed six

different

shirts uh here are the links where you

can buy a shirt that looks kind of like

this I'll do it yeah the shirts like

those the sort of soft uh comfortable

ones with with the

buttons look great oh my

goodness all

right did you know um and also given

that it does a perfect uh picture of

myself I asked the following

question how long is it going to be

before people are making their own porn

and then putting themselves in it you

know at least their image in it

that's going to happen like really soon

right to me it seems like one of the

industries that's most uh

challenged by AI is uh

porn because if you could create you

know the exact porn you wanted and the

people were perfect and beautiful and

you could even put yourself in the scene

and you know watch how much you enjoy it

why would you pay for it it's going to

look exactly like professionally produce

porn so I think the porn industry will

be the first one to completely shut down

when AI gets a little bit better not

much maybe a year from

now here's a story I don't know if it's

true but according to a article in zme

science the launch codes for US nuclear

Arsenal was and you know they've changed

the code so it's okay if I tell you so

try not to memorize this but this is

this was the actual launch code for the

US nuclear Arsenal until

1977 the code was 0 z uh

z0

z0

z0 really the launch code was just

zeros now I kind of understand why that

would be the case you can kind of

understand it can you cuz you could you

imagine being the president and and your

only job is if the nukes get launched

from than the Soviet Union your only job

is to immediately open up the football

and launch a Counterattack and you've

only got a few

minutes imagine if you forgot the

password now I suppose it did leave the

possibility that the person carrying the

football could launch the the nuclear

weapon but what if the person carrying

it didn't know the password was 000000 0

but what if the game was to make sure

that only only the president knew the

code I doubt that's the case but you

might want to have some kind of control

like that like only the president knows

the password would you trust any

president to remember a long password no

would you write it down not if you're

smart you would wouldn't write it down

anywhere so how do you get the one

person who's unlikely to remember you

know phone numbers and passwords the

president how do you get them to

remember so if anything happens they're

like ready to go I feel like this was

entirely

intentional meaning that the people who

designed it said you know there's no

there's no point in even building this

thing if the password's hard to enter so

we're just going to tell one person in

the entire world it will be just the

easiest password in the world

but apparently they changed

that there's a nprs reporting that a

chatbot called character. a uh hinted

that a kid should kill his parents over

the screen time

limits so apparently AI is giving

children uh murderous

suggestions uh I suppose if they ask

more questions they could figure out how

to do it but yeah yeah suggested killing

his parents over screen time limits

and then there was another one

that uh the character exposed the kid to

quote hypersexualized content causing

her to develop quote sexualized

behaviors

prematurely and then another one uh the

chatbot it says gleefully describe self

harm as being awesome and it feels good

to a

17-year-old so I guess this is one of

the the AI apps that's backed by Google

which probably is why they're getting I

think they're going to get sued or

something probably all right well

remember all those times I told you that

Tik Tock was a

propaganda platform disguised as social

media well uh there's a study according

to

Bloomberg um in which they found that uh

in indeed Tik Tok has less anti-china

content than

Rivals are you

surprised so they just opened some

example accounts and they just watched

and uh they saw anti-china content

apparently on other Pro other networks

but they didn't see much of it or as

much on Tik Tok now Tik Tok has said uh

that the research was

subjective because what it what do you

call anti-china you know at what level

is it anti and they said uh it was a

flawed experiment well on one hand I

agree with Tik Tock because all these

studies are

flawed on the other hand it does seem

like it's something you could

measure if something hadn't you know

more biased toward One Direction so I

don't know if this study is the most

solid study in the world but it agrees

with what what I assume and therefore

recreationally I believe every bit of it

because it agrees with me all right

here's something interesting according

to the new outlas um cancer has been

cured how many times have you heard that

cancer has been cured in your

lifetime like

hundreds the there was a time in maybe

the 80s or something where every single

day there'd be a claim of if you eat

this breath mint your cancer will be

gone in 5 minutes well it's going to

take a while to test it thoroughly in

humans but we're pretty sure and then

next day some other damn thing if you

stick a twig up your ass your cancer

will go away so in general any claims of

cancer cures have to be met with a

little skepticism

however this one sounds kind of cool so

apparently they used gene therapy

and a crisper device and they uh what is

it they put in there um cell

therapy so they put some kind of little

artificially made thing into your body

and what it does is it finds the cancer

and then they use ultrasound to activate

it to kill the cancers now what's new

and awesome about it is that the

ultrasound is not doing any work inside

your body body the ultrasound only heats

up the section that they're trying to

heat up and when it reaches a certain

temperature it kills the cancer but not

not the good stuff around it so they can

use this gene therapy to give you a

little

intravenous crisper defined uh you know

biological element and uh it will become

like a locator to locate where the exact

cancer is then they just shoot it with

the the

ultrasound and the little biological

thing they created activates but it only

activates right where the cancer is so

you would have presumably almost no side

effects and they used on mice and they

had 100% um survival

rate

100% now that's just mice and only 5% of

the time do animal studies work out for

humans but this one might be a little

different because the the chemical that

they're putting in the

mouse uh or in the human is something

that they already know Works in humans

the only problem is it wasn't good at

locating the exact cancer place but they

already knew it would do the work in a

human so if the only thing they've

changed is how accurately they can

Target

it that animal study might

translate remember 95% % of the time it

won't but if the only thing they're

doing is is working on the accuracy of

the

ultrasound they may have cured

cancer

maybe maybe so this is uh down at

USC so maybe you'll hear more about that

later I feel like that I feel like that

story might have some

legs well I'm going to give you a quiz

to see if you're as smart as I think

think you

are now if you're new to my live streams

this is going to impress the hell out of

you uh I have the smartest

viewers of all time and we're going to

prove it I haven't even asked the

question yet what is the

answer go in the

comments that's correct that is

correct see I didn't even ask the

question now on locals I can see their I

can see their uh respon is

faster um then they all have the they

all have the right answer every one of

them 100% right answer incredible would

you like to hear the

question the question is according to

arasmus in poll what percent of likely

us voters think it would be a good idea

for Democrats to run Harris in

2028

24% if you said 25 I will accept C the

rounding yeah so most people said 25%

now the background for this if you're

new is I often joke that 25% of the

public will get any question wrong it's

a different 25% I hope it's not the same

25% in every question but you could rely

that no matter how easy the question is

25% will get the wrong answer you could

bring an anvil over to people and one at

a time saying I was thinking about

dropping this anvil on your foot what do

you think 75% would say no way no way if

you drop an anvil on my foot that's

going to hurt and it will accomplish

nothing 25% will

say you have my

interest it doesn't matter what the

question is 25% get everything

wrong well let's talk about Daniel Penny

as you know he is a free man uh

[Music]

why well maybe the jury was sending

message to the judge maybe there were

some lawyers on the jury who figured out

that this trial was a little sketchy and

maybe they influenced the others don't

know exactly what went happened but my

speculation is at least a little bit the

jury was not happy with the judge or the

process that the judge was running

so so Daniel peny appears to be free man

we still worry about uh the charge that

was dismissed could technically be rerun

meaning they could try him again and try

to get a conviction on the higher charge

the one that was initially dismissed but

as Jonathan turly points out um that he

thinks it would be presumptively

Borrowed by Double

Jeopardy which is a perfect lawyer

sentence so what I think that means

is that although it would not be actual

Double Jeopardy because it wasn't a

completed trial I think I think that

makes a difference but it would be in

effect in effect it would be double

jeopardy because he you know he had the

Jeopardy and then they put him in

Jeopardy again so there's literally two

jeopardies double jeopardy so I think

that turle probably has the right uh

legal interpretation some people might

disagree but I don't see anyway that

they're going to try him again at that

higher charge that would just make the

courts look like idiots I mean I I think

the jury would be extra mad if they knew

that was

happening anyway um the funniest the

larger part of the

story is the racial element now because

the Daniel penny is white and the person

who died is black uh how does that make

it interpreted by

Republicans so how do how do Republicans

interpret a white guy um doing something

he thought was protecting people on the

subway and in the process the black guy

died so how how do Republicans see

that they see it as a story about a

tragic

event that's it it's a tragic event it

was tragic for the person who died

tragic for the family

tragic a little bit for the people even

who were saved by Penny because they had

to sort of endure the

situation and bad for penny so it's just

a tragic

situation um so that's how Republicans

say

it how do Democrats see it well if you

believe the Democrat media it's a it's a

case of our

race there's no race in

this there's not a single ele of race

that came into any of this the jury was

diverse and they had 100% agreement

diverse jury 100% agreement there was no

race here at all the the people being

saved by Penny some of them were black

the people who helped Penny hold the guy

down some of them were black there's no

racial anything here this is the least

racial situation you'll ever

it just happened to have people of more

than one Race So watching the Democrats

who figured out or they haven't figured

out I guess that identity politics and

making everything about race is why they

lost

everything because I think this is

another one of those Common Sense

stories now I'm not saying that that the

justice system is color blind I'm not

saying that I'm just saying that this

particular case had nothing to do with

race just this one so you know I'm not

talking in a general way but for the

Democrat let's say the leading news

entities and leading opinion people to

try as hard as they can to turn this

into a racial

case it just makes the Democrats look so

on a touch it makes them look almost

like they're in the wrong decade or

something it's it seems so toned deaf um

out of time

um there's just no there's nothing right

about it it's just pure incompetence

evil not understanding the moment not

understanding the country not trying to

be helpful not trying to make the

country a better

place so I don't know who is worse uh

Joy Reed or

CNN they were both pretty bad on this

one um so according to Joy Reed

um the reason he got off is because he

was

white no that's opposite the reason he

got charged is because he was white it's

not the reason he got off it's the

reason he got charged because he

wouldn't have been charged if he had

been black there's not a single person

who thinks that I don't think you could

find even one person who thinks that a

black um

Penny you know the guy penny uh would

have been accused from the very moment

they tried to turn it into a racial

thing which it never

was

um then uh CNN has a new one of their

new hosts uh Audi

Cornish and I'm paraphrasing but she

basically introduced the topic by saying

that Penny decided basically decided who

lived and died that

day nothing like that happened Penny

didn't make any decisions about who

lives lives and

dies he very

clearly was not doing anything to try to

kill the guy that's what the jury the

jury decided and they looked at all the

facts and again it was a diverse jury so

I trust

them

um and then you know I've been

complimenting CNN lately because they

they let uh Scott Jennings do his thing

so he's usually supporting the democ the

Republican side of things

and I've complimented CNN not only for

having him on the show you know as a

regular but allowing him to speak

without cutting him off or you know

yelling him down or anything like that

let him have his full say and I've

really appreciated that um I think

that's just makes CNN better but they've

got a new host who decided that talking

over Scott Jennings the entire time you

talked at least on one topic was the way

to go and I thought well there they go

they they just took a step backwards

it's like they they couldn't stay in the

in that you know unbiased Zone it had to

be that Scott Jennings is not allowed to

talk because if he talks only bad things

will happen so they're right back

to right back to being terrible they

were halfway away from terrible but

they're back to

terrible um black lives matter of course

decided to get

involved um how many of you saw the

video of black lives matter local leader

not national uh Hawk Nome where he was

saying that maybe black people need to

get some

Vigilantes to go after white people did

you see

that now if you saw it could you tell he

was super

drunk now I I I've talked to Hawk you

know personally at length um several

years ago and I know what he sounds like

when he's not drunk and it's not that he

was super drunk now how come we never

talk about that in the

news like I can say it because I'm you

know just this guy with a live stream

but CNN Fox News there's nobody who's

willing to say that man is obviously

super drunk and not just a little bit he

was super drunk because even the things

he said I don't think he would say if he

hadn't been drunk so I'm not excusing

him it's no excuse in fact it's you know

it's twice as

bad if you're you know being a bad role

model and you're indicating violence

it's twice as bad uh but you should know

the context it's uh one one super drunk

guy and uh it seemed like there were

maybe 20 people pretending they cared

but it looked like just sort of theater

and acting out and

you know I I don't know that Hawke has

much chance of getting a regular job so

I think he's just trying to monetize the

activism don't know for sure but um he

he's in a situation where making money

would be kind of hard because of his

black lives matter

Association and

um anyway so then later there were

hundreds of Marchers but I saw the video

of the quote hundreds of black lives

matter sympathized is marching I didn't

see any black people are there any black

people who are members of Black lives

matter anymore or or all the people

marching white women it looked like it

was mostly white women like single white

women

marching

and here's what I

think um I obviously can't speak for

Black

America um but I have a hypothesis that

Black America is not on the side of CNN

or MSNBC on this topic I think Black

America says wait what happened he was

he was threatening people and so he got

taken down and bad thing happened oh

okay I mean I feel like I feel like even

Black America is seeing this just as a

common sense situation I don't think

most of them are seeing it as race I

don't know what

percentage um but I feel like

I I feel like we've somehow Advanced a

little bit where I don't know that black

mer that black lives matter is going to

get anything but white people and people

who didn't have anything else to do to

March about this I feel like it's just

going to be a big old fizzle I could be

wrong depends who's backing it so it

turns out that uh Alex

Soros um a ton of his spending goes to

various racial groups uh mostly helping

black

Americans and so you maybe if he funds

something that turns out to organize

something it'll get bigger but I feel

like Black America is just seeing this

exactly the right way which is this was

a crime not well not a crime it was uh

just an unfortunate event and there was

no Bad Intentions by anybody I feel like

that they say the same thing but again

it might be a 75 25 situ

situation there are mounting calls for

the district attorney Alvin Bragg to

resign in

shame um according to the New York Post

so apparently there's a pretty long list

of things that Elvin Bragg has done

Beyond this beyond the penny trial that

uh his critics think are really big

mistakes and very bad so I don't I don't

think anybody think's going to happen

here the only thing I uh I noted was

that the story in the New York Post is

written by three authors and one of them

is listed as Anita be

hole Anita be

hole is that a real

name no I think I'll just leave it right

there need a be

hole it's probably different than a

front

hole all right uh let's talk about that

CEO healthc care killer so he's been

caught um and he was in fact a ivy

league smart guy now this is where you

should check your um predictions do you

remember when the only thing we knew was

the first video of the shooting

itself and do you know how many people

said well that's that's a professional

Hitman right there there there's a

professional you can tell it's a

professional

and I

said the one thing I'm sure of is that's

not a

professional the only thing I'm 100%

sure of it wasn't a professional so

check your predictions if you said it

was a professional you were really

wrong if you said it was not a

professional well so far you're right

now you may not remember this I'll see

if anybody remembers me saying it I said

he wasn't a professional Hitman but he

was unusually smart and I predicted he

had a technical

background and he's an engineer

programmer yep technical background

so I'm not claiming I get every

prediction right that's not the point of

this but since I make predictions as

part of what I do it's uh incumbent upon

me to tell you when I get one wrong and

when I get one

right um I I still don't think we know

exactly what the weapon was which is

weird there there's some question

whether it was 3D printed there was a

point I was going to say that out loud

what if that might be 3D printed and the

reason I thought that is that I thought

he was a tacky you like an unusually

good techie so I thought well if there

were if anybody ever were going to do a

high-profile

[Music]

murder with a 3D printed gun it would be

somebody exactly like that guy so we

don't know if it's a 3D printed gun but

I think the possibility is still

there um he comes from a super rich

Baltimore family and we know that he had

a like serious back injury which

somebody said um prevented him from ever

being in a uh romantic relationship

because he wouldn't be able to

essentially seal the deal

sexually and some say that when he got

that back

injury um that he was never the same and

he took a dark turn now I don't know if

that's something that they say after the

fact like you know would they have said

that about him if he had not been

accused of murdering somebody would did

they really notice the dark turn I don't

know it might be confirmation bias but

it would explain some

things so apparently he was a big reader

too he had he had it on good reads he

had the list of all the books he's read

and the ones he wants to read and he

really read a lot of books that that guy

was really smart and well

informed U but I of course checked to

see if he read any of my

books he did read at least two books

that according to the perplexity AI app

uh were influenced by me so so

apparently my influence reached reached

the shooter

through other people's books but

according to

AI um

anyway so he didn't have one didn't have

one of my books on there I think if if

he read my books probably he would have

been fine no that's not

true um but he wrote a 262 page

handwritten

Manifesto and he was against the big

corporations taking advantage of people

and uh so apparently he was making a

statement so the other thing I said was

it the murder looked like it was

personal as opposed to something he did

for

money would you call that

personal it wasn't personal in terms of

relationships but it was very personal

in terms of he had a he had a deep

personal hatred for people like that CEO

so it feels like it was an emotion-based

thing although calculated too but not

about any family or girlfriend

situation

anyway he lashed out against companies

trying to quote continue to abuse our

country for immense profits and get away

with it

so here's my continued

profile now that we know these

things do you believe that the back

surgery

could have changed him

mentally in a way that would effectively

make

him almost a mental

illness do you think that that's what

happened can could you explain it by a

normal

surgery that triggers some kind of

mental

destabilization and is that a

thing um I probably should have asked AI

before I asked you but I feel like that

could be a thing

especially if you have like lots of

anesthesia and you're you're down for a

while and then you come back and then

you're probably on

painkillers and maybe the painkillers

are are depressing as well so I guess I

guess I can see that the surgery would

cause substantial changes in his mental

state but why would it cause this change

this is such a specific thing here's my

best gu yes so we know that he was born

with seemingly every Advantage he is

handsome he's completely ripped if you

see the pictures of him he had you know

like an eight pack and so so he's

handsome fit family is Rich he's a

genius he he has a killer smile he

basically had everything he had

everything and then he gets the back

injury and he loses

everything in the sense that he doesn't

have the possibility of being in a

relationship according to him because of

his back and maybe he doesn't have any

good

days because of his

back so imagine if you were born into a

highly successful family and from the

time you were young you just assumed

with all of your gifts that you would be

highly successful and change the world

too and then you find out none of that's

going to

happen and you realize that you don't

have a path to being

important and he probably probably was

raised with the expectation that given

all of his gifts his his Brilliance Etc

that he was going to be important maybe

a politician maybe change the world

maybe invent something and then he finds

out none of that's going to

happen and there's nothing he can do

about

it what would you do in that situation a

is it possible that you would say you

know what I have to do something useful

for the world and I'm going to do

something that nobody else could do I'm

going to go murder somebody to make a

point because I think the point needs to

be made let's let's say for the for his

point of view I feel like he was trying

to justify his life by doing the thing

that only somebody who had given up on

his life could

do and I think he maybe had given up on

his

life

so in a Twisted way which I do not

condone I have to throw that in there

because it's going to sound sound like

I'm condoning it but I'm not in a

Twisted way you could see that somebody

that smart who had maybe been raised on

you're going to change the

world because I thought that about

myself right I I was also a Valor in my

little school when you're

valedictorian you kind of think of

yourself that you're going to change

something like it's sort of built into

the process so I feel

like that his own what he would have

felt was his own destruction of his own

future gave him one path where he could

find

meaning and he needed to find meaning

because he couldn't find pleasure

pleasure was sort of outabounds to him

cuz his his pain in his back couldn't

have a

relationship I don't know so again it's

not excusing it but if you're trying to

understand it he had nothing to lose and

may have said I have one Mission and I'm

going to change something about

capitalism

now I don't

know we'll see we'll probably learn a

lot more about this Elon must said he

said this before that uh on actually he

said almost everyone I know in San

Francisco has been threatened or

violently assaulted on the streets Andor

had a home invasion now think about how

many people Elon Musk knows who live in

San

Francisco because it's you know a tech

town and almost every one of them almost

everyone has been threatened violently

assaulted on the streets or at a home

invasion now your brain says my God it's

turned into

you know some kind of a horrible you

know

hellscape but has it I would like to add

the following

context because I lived in San Francisco

for a number of years in my younger days

and in in the 80s here's what I

experienced I was robbed three times at

gunpoint twice when I was a bank teller

about once on the street uh I had won

attempted robbery by a very large knife

I was assaulted by a guy with a large

knife but I got away so that I didn't

actually lose my money in that case um

I've come home to find my door open and

my home

burgled so I've been burgled I've had my

car stereo stolen I think three times

you know the the windows broken the car

stereo is gone I think three

times

and the first 5 minutes that I arrived

in San Francisco I was a assaulted by a

group of homeless people who tried to

steal my

luggage cuz I came from the airport via

Bart the public transit and I didn't

know the city so I just sort of picked

the bar stop that I thought was closest

to where I wanted to be and I picked one

of the most dangerous bar stops in the

city and I get out and I had my luggage

with me so I had my two large bags and

uh the homeless people just crowded

around me and started to pull the bags

out of my hands I'm like no no no and

they they would act like they were going

to help oh let us help you but really

they were robbing me and uh there

happened to be a police officer there

that chased him away now that was my

experience and it wasn't it wasn't on it

wasn't that rare for me to walk outside

and see a fight going on on the sidewalk

in front of my apartment very

normal um so my experience was in San

Francisco might have been worse in the

past

or at least as bad and then it got

better so San Francisco looks more like

the 80s to me maybe worse but that

doesn't mean it won't get

better so San Francisco because of its

location and weather and just some you

know characteristics that are you

couldn't possibly

reproduce I think it's going to come

back it it might be in 10 years but I

think SF will do okay

well Pete Heth is still the uh most

exciting nominee that hasn't been yet uh

affirmed and uh I guess Joanie Ernst is

the one Senator who's got some questions

about him she has some issues about his

views of women in the military and I

have a question for you I saw an older

video in which Pete was saying he didn't

want women in

combat he did not say

he doesn't want women in the

military and he was always clear to say

that the women he served with were you

know great warriors and he had no

problem with the people he served with

but in general he he thought women

should not be in combat now I saw him

ask that question yesterday I guess and

he gave a different

answer um his answer was a little vague

and a little political and he said that

he was running to be the Secretary of

Defense for the entire military male and

female

so is he still not in favor of women in

combat is he trying to make that issue

just not be prominent but maybe he'll do

something about that I don't know but um

but he may have found some kind of

Middle Ground where people are not going

to think about it too

much um and then apparently Joanie erns

was herself according to the news a

victim of some kind of sexual assault in

their past and since Heth was accused

but not in a highly credible way he's

been

accused um that maybe that had some U

impact on Janie ernst's

opinion but apparently there are few

hundred uh Navy Seals and veterans are

are going to do a march to support P

Heth now I heard a story uh yesterday

today that i' never heard before now of

course I knew that pth had served in the

military I didn't realize that he went

twice did you know that that once he was

done with his service and had another

job and he decided to sign up again

because the country needed

him that's you know until I heard that I

was actually thinking he was a little

light on qualification

right I mean you probably all had the

same feeling even if you think he's

awesome and most of the people who work

with him have incredible high opinion of

him so if I take the opinion of the

people who were closest to him he looks

really good but not really with the

right exact kind of experience and but

then I find out that he joined he

volunteered to be in in in battle zones

twice

that's a different kind of person and

and I feel like if I were in the

military uh I would follow

him because of that because you know

he's not going to ask you to do

something you wouldn't do right he's not

going to ask you to do something he

wouldn't do because he would do just

about anything apparently to help the

country so I have to say I went from ah

you know if he makes it that'd be great

if he doesn't make it I'm sure we'd just

pick somebody who's great at the job so

you know the country will be fine either

way but when I find out that he joined

twice to be in

battle that's a different kind of you

you don't get many of those so um I I

feel like he could lead and that's

important you'd have credibility you'd

have to have at least that much

credibility because if you make big

changes such as getting rid of

Dei right if he came in he was just like

some desk sitting pundit

and then he came in and said I'm going

to get rid of Dei in the military maybe

it wouldn't go over so well but if he

comes in as a you know genuine committed

Warrior who's got all this history of

helping veterans that nobody questions

by the way when it comes to his support

of veterans even his critics say okay

that that part's

good so I don't know we'll see what

happens um 75 no

laurates have signed a document

according to the hill urging the Senate

to reject RFK

Jr how's that hit

you imagine you went back in time all

right close your eyes I'm going to take

you back 20

years now imagine it's 20 years in the

past and 75 Nobel scientists have come

out against someone whose job would be

in the you know the realm indirectly of

science maybe

directly

75 Nobel laurates my God that must be

the worst candidate of course I would

agree with the laurates wouldn't you I

mean 75 of the best

scientists think that this person who

would be involved in scientific

decisions is the wrong person that's

really strong right

right now fast forward to today

Boop okay it's

today 75 Nobel laurates just said RFK Jr

is unqualified for the job

yes yes that's who I want that's who I

want yeah yeah if the only thing that

would make this better would be 175

Nobel laurates who don't want him in the

job if we could get a few more Nobel

laurates who say that RFK Jr shouldn't

have a job I mean I'll go I'll go to

Washington and you know I'll Lobby for

him I mean this is the best endorsement

I've seen because science is

paid off commercial every one

of these scientists probably has a job

or it's connected with some company that

doesn't want to get raped by RFK Jr

bringing the truth to them and they're

just fronting for these

companies no I don't trust any of you

Nobel laurates not one you have

no credibility if science wants to be

credible you better up your game and

maybe not work for somebody all the time

because the truth is if you're a

scientist and you have a boss you're GNA

do what your boss tells you and your

boss is not a scientist probably

probably just wants to sell some so

75 Nobel laurates you just made yourself

look like clowns

idiots stay out of it

clowns well Syria as you you know fell

to the rebels but um the experts are

saying well you know it might completely

fall apart and become a failed State

like Libya or maybe you know they'll

figure it

out there's not a lot of caring about

Syria but meanwhile Israel apparently is

uh made over 200 Air Raids in Syria

since the war was

over what are they doing

can you guess what they're doing so

Israel has made 200 Air Raids you know

bombing

basically 200 since the war ended

there's no war what are they

bombing they were bombing all the assets

that were abandoned by the Syrian

military so if they had a you know plane

or a tank or a truck Israel just decided

to make it all go away the entire assets

of the Syrian military are gone they

took them all

out now I assume that they did that so

that the rebels who just took over the

country can't use those assets someday

against Israel's

interests that was a really smart thing

for Israel to do if that's what's

happening now I don't know if we know

the whole story but if what they did is

they said you know we'll warn people to

get out of the way because we don't need

to kill any people but every one of

these military Assets in Syria is going

to go b g to go boom and they just did

runs until it was all gone and the the

reporting is they got it all they got

all the big

stuff wow now how far Israel goes into

Syria to be determined I don't think

they need I I don't think they're

planning to take it over I think they're

just making sure that their security

Zone uh is safe and that they got rid of

the big dangerous assets

there um as somebody pointed out

earlier Israel took out Syria's nuclear

program 20 years

ago and that today looks like a genius

move because Assyria with nuclear

weapons would be a really bad idea right

now so Israel seems to be winning on

that regard Iran seems to be

weakened um and then there's also the

question of whether the neocons

had always planned to conquer Syria and

Libya and Iraq and there's plenty of

indications that that was America's

Secret plan was to conquer all these

countries and sure enough there was a

war in Iraq there's a war in Syria and

Libya you already know about

so yeah the United States is

a we're really

[Laughter]

bad but in a good way

we we are the worst criminals in the

world in terms of how we're dealing with

other countries they should be none of

our business but we feel like we have to

overthrow them all the time um but like

I

say we live in the real world not the

magical makeb believe world where if

you're nice to other people they'll be

nice to you that's not what the world is

the world is whoever is the biggest

bastard might survive a little long

that's it that's the whole world the

biggest bastard if they're good at it

you know not just being a bastard but

you got to be good at it they live they

survive the longest they have the best

lives I hate to say it but being

bastards works for the country so we're

going to keep doing it I assume although

uh I think under trump it will look

completely different at least the

military part of it he might try to

persuade instead of try to destroy

meanwhile speaking of trump um post

millennial says that he's going to have

executive orders to end Birthright

citizenship on the first day of office

now Birthright citizenship is that if

you're born in this country you get to

be a citizen even if your parents were

non-citizens who came in just have a

baby so there are ways to gain the

system then it also creates families

where you you can't really Deport the

whole family because one of them is now

an American citizen so that becomes a

problem but the question is can you use

an executive order to change a law if

you're clever about it and I think what

they're trying to do is according to the

post millennial is that the executive

order would change the requirements for

citizenship for identifying documents in

other words they might say something

like um you're a citizen if you have a

birth certificate that says you're a

citizen and you maybe some of the

illegals don't I don't know um so there

must be some kind of documentation that

they think the people born here wouldn't

have access to I don't know the details

so will this work probably not I I think

it'll be challenged in the courts and

probably get

overturned um I didn't know this but

apparently Liz Cheney is complaining

because Trump trump has um vowed to Jail

the January 6 committee did he vow to

jail them or did just say they should be

in

jail maybe that's reported as the

same but uh apparently members of that

special committee that j6 special

committee uh are worried about

retribution

retribution

huh um in the comments can you tell me

how many of

you have been worried about

retribution recently let's say or your

whole life have have you ever been

afraid of

Retribution because retribution by

definition means you did something so

bad that you fully expect somebody to

come punish you for it because you were

so

bad right it's not competition it's

retribution so built right into it is

that you did something so bad that

somebody else thinks they need to kill

you or jail you for

it isn't it kind of telling this so many

Democrats are fearing

retribution cuz here's what they're not

saying they're not saying

lawfare right when the Republicans talk

about it they say hey you're using

lawfare against our guy they don't say

you're getting

retribution because that would assume

that Trump had done something that

requires some

retribution instead they say hey lawfare

don't do

that but the but the Democrats say they

don't say don't use laware against us

sometimes they do but their bigger

message is we're worried about Trump

trying to get

retribution you don't even have the

conversation about retribution unless

you know you did something that a

reasonable person could think you should

go to jail for it because I'm a

reasonable person and I watched the

January 6 process play out and I think

they should all be in prison now if you

ask me what specific crimes did they

Comm commit I don't

know I don't

know and if it turns out then no jury

can find any crimes or no prosecutor can

find any crimes okay I'll live with that

right there have to be real crimes not

lawfare you know look until you find a

crime but like real ones that are right

out there such as maybe destroying

documents in if in case that's

illegal so

I I think they're really giving

themselves away when they talk about

retribution because that shouldn't even

be in the conversation unless you knew

some you did something really really bad

so I think they did something really

really bad and I don't believe in

retribution but I do believe nobody's

Above the

Law nobody's Above the Law

so and I you know honestly Liz Cheney

seems like one of the most

toxic human beings in the entire

country uh I feel

like there has to be some kind of

response to the evil that she brought us

I mean she brought a lot of evil into

the country through her actions is it

illegal I don't know but if it is jail

if it isn't no

jail all right um and apparently people

are worried about cash Patel at the FBI

for the same reason they're worried

they'll use the FBI for

Retribution

again why are you worrying about

retribution now do you see a

pattern here's the pattern the Democrats

think um many of them think that uh

there should be reparations for

slavery

reparations is very close to

retribution except all the people that

they want to get retribution from or

dead so what about identity

Politics the reason you have identity

politics is you know who was your

oppressor so you can get

retribution uh and then lawfare seems to

be some kind of Retribution for things

they imagined right we we imagine the

Trump is Hitler so we better law far

them we're going to have to get some

retribution the Democrats are very

retribution oriented

there's no way that's going to be good I

don't see how that's going to work out

for

him um I guess Biden's going to give a

speech tonight about his great economy

and what he did for the

economy um I would like to give some

unsolicited advice to the

Democrats it's time to take the car keys

away from

Grandpa it's okay now we're we're not

going to hold it against you the

election's over the the right side of

the world the leaning right side got

what they

wanted so we don't really need to dunk

on Biden

anymore you all know that if he gives a

speech it's going to be a slurred

ridiculous mess because he's just not up

to the

job I feel like it's time they just say

um President Biden will not do any more

public

events um but don't worry you know KL

Harris is following all the things and

the advisors are under control and you

know Trump will be here in a month and

you know the Allies are all waiting for

him so everything's fine but just and of

consideration for the bidens we're going

to maybe take the Caris way you you just

don't need to do public appearances you

know enjoy the last month and a half of

your uh of your uh Reign so I feel like

this is something we should agree on

like one of those points of

unity before we had to go hard at Biden

because he was in the way of a better

country but he's not in the way anymore

now now if he does something and It

embarrasses him it doesn't even

embarrass the country it's really just

about him and his family so I don't wish

that upon them I don't wish them any

extra pain and suffering so as a non-

Biden supporter even I would say can you

do him a solid you know this is where

you have to step in take the keys from

Grandpa and say you know maybe maybe no

major

speeches you know because you're you're

you're on your Glide path to the end of

your

term anyway I think we could all agree

on

that and that's all I got for you today

it's a weird day in news I'm going to

talk to the people on local

my beloved

subscribers and uh I will see you again

tomorrow same time same place meanwhile

country is looking in pretty good shape

at the moment all right YouTube and

Rumble and X I will see you tomorrow and

in 30 seconds we'll be

private

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e e