s doubled down and says that there are drones coming out of an Iranian ship. He believes his sources. I believe that Van Drew is probably getting cracked, meaning somebody is feeding him some lies so that he disgraces himself in public and becomes less electable because of it. So it feels like somebody's playing a dirty trick on him, but I can't be sure. It's just what it looks like.

So here's what's funny. I think it's funny that the American public—I saw some people asking this question. I wondered if it was influenced by me, but I saw some people asking the question—government, I have a question. If you say you know that the drones are not from a foreign adversary and you also know that they're not dangerous, how could you know they're not dangerous and also know that they're not from a foreign adversary unless you know what they are? Is that not the right question? Unless you do know what they are, you can't tell us they're not coming from a foreign adversary, because that means you either know what they are or you don't. If you don't know what they are, then you also don't know how dangerous they are. Is that not common sense?

Now, if they had said to us, well, we do have a way of knowing they're not dangerous—for example, if they said, yeah, we can tell they're made of balsa wood and it looks like a hobbyist—I'd say, oh, okay, and that's a good reason to say it doesn't sound like an adversary or dangerous. But they're not saying that. They're not giving you any indication that they have even a clue what these are, but they know they're not dangerous. And also the air is not full of military assets trying to bring them down and/or figure out what they are. Do you need any more evidence that these are US military tests?

Now, the US military might not own the drones. It might be the vendors still own them and they're just demonstrating. Or they could be from another, you know, maybe it's a product of another country's military that's allied with us. Could be a NATO country that has drones and they're testing them out and seeing if we want to get in on them and, you know, maybe recommend them for NATO or something. But it's definitely us. Do you all agree the drones is us? It's got to be American drones. It's got to be military, because otherwise the military would be up there shooting them down.

So here's the other thing that I've heard that's just crazy: that they're invisible to people in helicopters. Come on. Come on, really? They're invisible only to people in helicopters? You mean the easiest way that you could go up and check what's going on, a helicopter, they're invisible? You can see them clearly from the ground for miles. They have lights on them. They have running lights, you know, like a regular commercial drone. And you're telling me that the helicopters can't see them? So apparently America is trying out our helicopter-only invisibility cloak. Oh yeah, you can see them from the ground, but boy, you get in a helicopter, nothing. The ridiculousness that we're being set up with here is crazy. It's crazy that we're being asked to believe this.

Now, here's the other thing that's making me laugh. When the drones come out, it's between 4:00 and 11:00 p.m. nightly. Between 4:00 and 11:00 p.m. is exactly the time that a human being would want to test something at night. After 11 o'clock everybody wants to go home, right, because they have families and stuff. So you don't want to go past 11, and you want to wait till it's dark. You start around 4 or 5. It's so obviously Americans testing these. If it were one person or an attack, do you think it would stick to evening hours between 4 and 11? You don't think they'd do a little attacking after midnight if it was some kind of clever plot. Or if it were hobbyists, you think all the hobbyists go home at 11 o'clock? No. It's obviously a group of people because they've agre