Back to episode — Episode 2710 CWSA 01/04/25
Context —
e for persuasion, the most important starting rule for persuasion: you have to make people focus on your thing more than they were. That's it. That's your rule number one. So Massie is turning this concept of debt into a physical device that your eyes are looking at. It makes you think about it more than you were thinking about it. That is really good persuasion. So you know it looks like it's a c…
← Previous segment →the truth. Yeah, yeah, I get that, but you don't have to be boring. So I feel like there's a conversation that's going to happen where Trump is going to take his reality TV experience, which is phenomenal, and see if he can apply it to this situation. We'll see how it goes. I think I'd be happy either way, honestly, but it'd be fun to see it as a show just to pay them back.
Well, meanwhile the Biden administration has determined that the chemical formaldehyde, which it turns out is in all kinds of products and in your environment all over the place, is an unreasonable risk to human health and should be regulated. So you're basically surrounded by this thing that the administration just told you is deadly and it's everywhere and you're not going to get rid of it, huh?
But I wonder if there is a counterargument. Yes, turns out the American Chemistry Council — and they're of course a lobbying group for the chemical industry — stressed the importance of formaldehyde and said that the determination that it was unreasonably risky was based on, quote, a flawed assessment.
So here's your choice. I want to see which way you think the credibility is. So on one hand you've got the government, the Biden administration. So they've got a scientific take. On the other hand you've got the scientists who are really lobbyists for the industry. Which one of those do you trust? Your government to get the science right? And when was the last time they did that? Versus a lobbying group whose job really is to lie to you for all practical purposes. That's how it works out.
So if I told you, hey, trust the science, do you have any access to the science? No, you don't. You would have to trust either your government or a lobbyist group. That's all you have. So they're telling us that you're going to die if you get too close to this stuff, but you have only an uncredible source telling you and that it's being imposed by another non-credible source. And that's what we call science.
And when the idiots who tell me you should trust the science and believe the science and don't be a science denier — these are people who are seriously inexperienced. I feel like everybody who has real world experience and has paid attention, they don't trust the science so quickly. You know what I mean? By the way, well I can't tell you yet, but there's some science that is really bad that I've had a preview to. I don't know if I could ever go public with it, but oh my god.
So Biden is going to award the Presidential Medal of Freedom, one of the country's greatest honors, to a number of people, but it includes George Soros and Hillary Clinton. And you might be saying, wait what? I probably heard that wrong. It couldn't possibly be true that Bid
Context —
en's giving our highest medal of freedom to Soros, who has done the most to destroy the country and is the most closely associated with evil incarnate. He's getting an award, the highest award. Meanwhile Hillary Clinton is also getting the award. Huh. What do Hillary Clinton and George Soros have in common? Commonality? Oh, Huma Abedin. So she was longtime confidant and assistant to Hillary Clint…
Next segment → →