en's giving our highest medal of freedom to Soros, who has done the most to destroy the country and is the most closely associated with evil incarnate. He's getting an award, the highest award. Meanwhile Hillary Clinton is also getting the award. Huh.

What do Hillary Clinton and George Soros have in common? Commonality? Oh, Huma Abedin. So she was longtime confidant and assistant to Hillary Clinton and now is married to George Soros's son Alex, who's taking over the business. Huh. Seems to me that wherever Huma Abedin is is the real power, doesn't it? She seems like a moth to the flame. So where she goes tells you where the real power is.

What do you make of the fact that Biden is doing something that's so remarkably obscene in giving these two characters the highest award in the country? Here's what I think is happening. This is a flex. This is how George Soros and Alex Soros tell you that they're still in control. Because if you can make Biden do this, you are always in control. This is basically telling the Democrats, hey, these are the ones who are in control. That's what I see.

I'm surprised they didn't throw Obama in there, but I do wonder what's the dynamic between the Clinton power island versus the Obama power island. Because I don't think the Democrats have one leader who's pulling all the strings. I think they probably have a Game of Thrones kind of few power sources vying for dominance. But it seems to me that Obama has been taken completely off the field because he just did such a bad job promoting Biden and he's the one who picked Biden and seems to have been behind the Russia collusion hoax. And he didn't have a good year. Obama didn't. So I suspect that the Soros thing probably came from Soros and/or Hillary, and that his real purpose is to establish them as legitimate rulers of the party, albeit behind the scenes. So that's a very artificial persuasion play. This is to tell you that these are not the biggest criminals in the world but rather should be respected.

Meanwhile, Greenland throws us a curve. You know, Trump wanted to maybe take control or buy Greenland, and the Danes who own it — Denmark controls Greenland — and the Danes said no way, no way are we going to sell you Greenland. It's valuable and we're going to keep it. And now Greenland itself says, you know what, we don't like being owned by this colonizing Denmark. We should be an independent country.

Now here are some things you need to know about Greenland. So first of all you probably know that it's strategically vital in a way that it didn't used to be because as the ice melts in the Arctic it's going to be a fight for dominance among the superpowers. And Greenland is sort of right there in the mix. So whoever controls the land mass of Greenland is going to be in a much more dominant position to control what's north of the northern hemisphere. I guess that's still the Northern Hemisphere, but what happens when you get to the top of the planet? That's nobody's hemisphere.

All right, so there are 56,000 residents of Greenland approximately. The whole country, the entire country, 56,000. For context, the small town that I live in has 75,000 people. 75,000 people, but that's my town and I don't live in a city. I mean it's maybe a small city but it's more like a town. There's one little Main Street, the whole town. And we're much bigger than all of Greenland.

Greenland has a GDP that's apparently hard to measure for some reason but probably between three and four billion dollars a year. So it's not a big place. And my question would be how in the world could Greenland as an independent country protect itself? And a bigger question would be how could Denmark ever protect Greenland? Of course they couldn't. Not even close. The only country that could protect Greenland properly would be the United States. But they're not asking for that. You know they would of course if they were independent they would make their own treaties and stuff. Maybe they could work out some kind of deal.

But here's what I think. It seems to me that if I were in the CIA and my job was to secure America using every little clever trick I could, the first thing I would do is convince Greenland that they really need to be independent. So first you got to get them away from Denmark. Why? Because I'm guessing — this is just speculation — but I'm guessing that the CIA would not want to use dirty tricks against a European ally. You know, it's not something we would do to Great Britain. It's not something we would do to France. It's not something we do to Denmark, I