the only explanation for this? Me. Here's my explanation. I said George senior didn't know what was happening. That he didn't know what was happening. He didn't know where his money was going. Do I win? Am I the winner? I said that George senior didn't know where the money was going. What we know is he has too many people and too much bureaucracy which does what? It obscures to the owner what's happening. Because even the owner can't penetrate the bureaucracy. And even the younger Soros has apparently been funding things that are very much the opposite of one of his core beliefs. How do you think he funds things that are the opposite of his core beliefs? I say neither of them were active managers. So my hypothesis was that neither of them knew what it was doing. That somehow it had taken on its own bureaucratic life and that the bureaucracy was making the decisions based on DEI and equity things. And that if you had put either of the Soroses in charge it would have looked different.

So he just bought 200 more radio stations. Yeah so I'm going to double down in my hypothesis that the Soroses are not aware what the organization is doing. And I think that's just true because it never really made sense anything we saw unless it was accidental or somebody else was in charge.

Scott why repeat lies? Well why don't you tell me what the lie is? Could you give me any hint what do you think was the lie? I told you what other people said. Is that what you're calling repeating the lies? I call it the news and the context that's important. So you tell me what lie. What lie did I just repeat right now? That was a dumbass comment. If you want to tell me what the content is that you think I'm wrong about something tell me. Oh that Soros is so dumb not to know his business. He just proved it. That's literally the story he just reported on his own that he didn't know what his business was doing because the bureaucracy. Yeah do better. Do better in your comments anyway.

There's a study in something called The Conversation. Michael Pasek who says that learning your political opponents don't actually hate you can reduce toxic polarization and anti-democratic attitudes. Here's my problem. Here's what I have no patience for. I have no patience for a personal accusation in the context of factual statements. I have every interest in being fact checked. That part I like. So if I say something wrong then it's wrong. But to immediately assume that there's some kind of character flaw because you've got some idea about reality that I don't, fix yourself. Just fix yourself. Think about how to not be that person anymore.

Anyway back to this. So you've heard the stories of people who met MAGA supporters and were surprised to find out that they're awesome. And you've heard this anecdote a whole bunch of times right? So how many times have you heard oh I had MAGA neighbors but then they kept shoveling my driveway for me for free and I realized I was wrong about them. You've heard that a million times. Have you ever heard it the other way? Have you ever heard somebody who said you know I thought these Antifa people were all robbing but then I met some they were pretty nice. I never hear that. It doesn't work both ways. There's one side that was demonized by mental illness, TDS and propaganda. And the other side just wants to be left alone. They just want to be left alone. That if you put me in a room with a normal Democrat do you think I have any problem with them? Do you think that I have a negative opinion about just an ordinary Democrat? Never. It's never even occurred to me. It doesn't even seem like a thing that you should think about. Now there are certainly the extremists who are causing the ordinary Democrats to not be exactly the way you'd want them to be. But I don't even hate the extremists. I just would want to stay away from them because they'd hate me. The only thing that would keep