Episode 2729 CWSA 01/23/25
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ If you would like to enjoy this same content plus bonus content from Scott Adams, including micro-lessons on lots of useful topics to build your talent stack, please see scottadams.locals.com for full access to that secret treasure.
That's a terrible tattoo, man. Did you just disappear when I tapped my papers? Did the picture just disappear? Because it threw me out of the app. How could everything go wrong? How is that even possible? All I did was this. I won't do it again, and it turned off the app. This is so beyond possible.…
View segment →absolutely everything's going to go wrong. Simultaneous sip to that. Sometimes it goes that way. Ah, and then he is slap happy. It's up 172% since I told you about it anyway. All right, let's talk about some of the news. You ready for this? And let's try for the fourth time in a row t
View segment →o push one freaking button. Okay, I'm going to use my finger, which I know is a human finger. I'm positive I'm still alive. And I'm going to push the button, which I've pushed now five times. Once it worked. All right, careful, careful. Push the icon. Yes, yes, I pushed the button and it did what it…
View segment →they? Doesn't it seem like just watching a movie doesn't feel like a thing I do anymore? There isn't a single movie on the list I have even a little bit of interest in. I tried to watch a miniseries on Prime Video called The Agency about the CIA. Now it's fiction and characters were good and I kind…
View segment →eeting so again I'll use the same standard. If this story were about Trump I would warn you it's probably not true because there's no source, right? It's just somebody was at a meeting. Were they at that meeting? We don't know. So recreationally, just for fun, I'm going to treat it like it's true. A…
View segment →billions of dollars personally at stake in keeping OpenAI a functioning successful company. So now if somebody has billions of dollars at stake for having the right opinion they're going to be on that opinion. So there's nothing about his current opinion that tells us anything about what he's thinki…
View segment →erm it should lower prices. Short term the companies will just take an extra profit. He wants to eliminate rent seeking practices. Now that's not a phrase that most people know what it means. Rent seeking. That's sort of a political insult that I even I forget what it means. I always see it and I g…
View segment →think it's true. So it's a wonderful story. Again if you don't think one person can change the world well there's a big example. Now the other context is that Teddy Roosevelt knew that for America to be the dominant maritime power that we needed to connect our two oceans. Because if you can't get a…
View segment →h the warmonger and then he's not as bad as the warmonger he's going to look like the good cop. So for negotiating purposes it's kind of perfect to have one warmonger in the room. You just so you're not that warmonger yourself. So that's exactly what Trump said. And I think everybody who understands…
View segment →the only explanation for this? Me. Here's my explanation. I said George senior didn't know what was happening. That he didn't know what was happening. He didn't know where his money was going. Do I win? Am I the winner? I said that George senior didn't know where the money was going. What we know is…
View segment →me out of the room with the leftest lefty progressive of all time is what they think of me. It wouldn't keep me out of the room because of what I think of them. Because what I think is people are all individuals. No two are alike. I'm not going to judge them because everybody's individual. You know…
View segment →That's a terrible tattoo, man. Did you just disappear when I tapped my papers? Did the picture just disappear? Because it threw me out of the app. How could everything go wrong? How is that even possible? All I did was this. I won't do it again, and it turned off the app. This is so beyond possible. I mean, we're into some statistically impossible situation here. It can't be that all the apps died at the same time. They couldn't all be broken at once, could they? I know there's a massive incompetence problem, but that's pretty impressive.
Anyway, if you'd like to take your experience today up to levels that nobody can even understand with their tiny, shiny human brain, none of it makes sense today, does it? Like, the preamble doesn't make any sense because the starting assumption is that things went right, so the preamble doesn't make sense. Let's just surrender, shall we? Let's surrender to the fact that everything's just going to go wrong today. Just absolutely everything's going to go wrong. Simultaneous sip to that. Sometimes it goes that way.
Ah, and then he is slap happy. It's up 172% since I told you about it anyway. All right, let's talk about some of the news. You ready for this? And let's try for the fourth time in a row to push one freaking button. Okay, I'm going to use my finger, which I know is a human finger. I'm positive I'm still alive. And I'm going to push the button, which I've pushed now five times. Once it worked. All right, careful, careful. Push the icon. Yes, yes, I pushed the button and it did what it was supposed to. First time today. All right.
Did you know there's a breakthrough in fusion? Nobody cares. General Atomics figured out how to get 20% higher than the Greenwald limit. The Greenwald limit, which you all know about, of course. It's some kind of limit that the fusion people needed to get past, and they got past it. It was considered difficult or impossible, but they did. And they've also figured out how to stabilize the plasma. Now, the thing with fusion is it might be another 20 years of breakthroughs without actually anything breaking through. But once it gets serious, it's all going to happen at once.
Now, isn't it weird that fusion is coming, which would lower the cost of energy to zero over time, at exactly the time we need cheap energy and relief from inflation? Have you noticed that we have a number of timing things happening that are weird? Meaning that all right, we're heading toward doom with our debt and our expenses and nobody can live. But at the same time, if fusion were a little bit faster, it would save us. But it might just be late by 20 years. I mean, over the history of humankind, missing it by 20 years, that would be the slightest, slightest miss.
But we have other timing too. So you know the AI people at OpenAI think that we're on the verge of being able to solve all of our cancers and diseases because AI will figure out some pattern recognition and figure out how to do it. What about the people who have terminal cancer this year? They might miss the cure for all cancers by a month. Now, it's bad enough if you have to die from cancer at all, but think how dumb you would feel if you died a month before all cancer is cured. That's going to happen. It's like somebody's family member is going to die a month before all cancer is cured. I don't know if that's a year from now, but that's what the AI people say. Could be a year from now.
Meanwhile, NASA is testing a nuclear propulsion to go to Mars in 45 days. So currently it's six months, I think. That would lower it from six months to 45 days. That would be a pretty big deal.
And Naval Ravikant, he was on the Tim Ferriss podcast, and he said that people who don't homeschool their kids' lives suck. And then he described why. Totally right. If anybody has had kids in the last 20 years, you know that the life of the parents is essentially destroyed by school. Because the school loads them up with homework so you can't have any quality time at night. But you got to get up and you've got this stress of getting them there, the traffic, and everything's tense. Tense getting the kids to school, if you drive them especially. It's tense and it's just brutal. But if you homeschool, you kind of make your own schedule and everything's fine. And they perform better and they don't get damaged by the school. Yeah, if you're just a regular parent with children in school, you've got a tough life. And there's no reason for it. There's no reason for it at all, because you can homeschool and you can solve all those problems.
Well, Mr. Beast, the gigantic YouTube star, says he wants to get some billionaires together and buy TikTok. He's already talked to his billionaires and he's pretty serious about it. He says we mean business. You know, having Mr. Beast and his advisors or his investors having them own TikTok, that would be pretty good, as long as we can solve the privacy and the influence part of it. So that's interesting.
President Trump has his Diet Coke button back in the Oval Office. Have you seen it? It's like this nice block of wood with one button on it to order a Diet Coke. Except I feel like he needs more buttons, don't you? Like I'd like to see a trap door button where he could invite in the top DEI director for every government organization. So what's your job? I'm the DEI director. Next. What's your job? Well, I'm the director of DEI. And the Diet Coke, please. Beep. And then you get it mixed up and you want a Diet Coke and next thing you know, Rubo going through the trap door. Oh sorry, I meant to hit the Diet Coke but my bad.
All right. Well, according to Christopher Rufo, who you know was working very hard on getting rid of DEI ridiculousness in the corporate world and elsewhere, he says that the tech executives are telling him that in the Silicon Valley companies they respect Trump's ban on DEI. They respect it. And many feel relieved that they don't have to enforce it anymore. They don't have to pretend. So Rufo says resistance to DEI is basically dead now. Does that surprise you? Are you surprised that DEI could die that easily? I'm not, because I was well aware that the main promoters of DEI tended to be rich white guys who were just protecting themselves. So as soon as somebody said I will hurt you more if you do it, then you don't do it. Then all the people who were only doing it to avoid getting hurt would say, wait, well hold on, what did you say? Oh, it's going to hurt me more to keep doing it? Oh, then I won't do it. There was never any intellectual agreement. It was purely just a bunch of rich white guys covering their ass, pretending like they cared. They didn't care. They were just waiting for some good reason not to do it. Trump gave it to them.
Meanwhile, this is funny. The Daily Mail is reporting, and I don't know if you could trust this story. If this story were about Trump, I would tell you there's no way this is true. But since it's about Jim Acosta, I'm going to recreationally pretend it's true. Now I think I've explained before that a recreational belief is one that doesn't really have a lot of credibility but it would be fun if it were true. Certainly would be fun. Yeah, this is one of those.
So as you know, Jim Acosta's time slot is going to get moved from 10:00 a.m. to midnight, which is widely interpreted as he's being minimized and CNN wants to maybe encourage him to leave on his own. You know what I mean? But the story from Daily Mail is that Jim Acosta is reportedly considering leaving the network because of the shift to the bad time slot. But the move comes as CNN is slashing 200 jobs.
Now let me give some advice to Jim Acosta if he's telling people that he's considering leaving the network. That would be sort of a negotiating, wouldn't you say? He's sort of negotiating with management. Oh, if you move my time slot I might quit. Well let me give you some negotiating advice, Jim Acosta, and this is free. There's no charge for this. If your company is trying desperately to cut costs and they've already decided that you need to move to midnight, that's not really the time to start threatening them that you might quit. Because that's exactly what they want. Obviously they want him to quit. He must be one of the more highly paid people. He's not helping the network at all, and you know they showed it by moving him to midnight. No, I wouldn't negotiate under those circumstances.
The good news is sucking at your job finally matters again. So there's that. But don't worry about Jim Acosta. He can always follow the path of Tucker Carlson, who left Fox News and just got bigger. Or he could follow the model of Don Lemon, who left his prime time show and now he's doing nothing. I don't know. I don't think Don Lemon worked it out well.
The Oscar nominations are out. And the only thing the Oscar nominations for the best movie tell me is movies don't seem like a thing anymore, do they? Doesn't it seem like just watching a movie doesn't feel like a thing I do anymore? There isn't a single movie on the list I have even a little bit of interest in. I tried to watch a miniseries on Prime Video called The Agency about the CIA. Now it's fiction and characters were good and I kind of like the tone of it and the writing seemed good. And I got through the first episode yesterday while I was working. Second episode comes on and man tied to a chair. And that's the last I'll ever watch of it. I'm serious about this. If you tie somebody to a chair, I'm not going to watch. That's the end of my viewing for that. You got to come up with something better than tying somebody to a chair. All right, it's 2025. You can do better.
Meanwhile, Oprah discovered that free will is not a thing. She didn't say it that way. What she said was that when she got on Ozempic she understood thin people now. I'm not saying she's thin and she's not saying she's thin, but it gave her an insight. Because once she got on Ozempic, apparently it changed her thoughts about food. Because when your body is less craving, I guess your mind is relaxed as well. So she realized that thin people don't obsess about food all the time like she did. You realize that's realizing that there's no free will, right? So she realized that her brain was just different and her chemistry was different. And whatever her brain and chemistry were designed to do, well what they were doing was obsessing about food. And that made it difficult not to eat too much. And then when she took Ozempic she stopped obsessing about it and then suddenly it was easy not to eat too much.
Well this is what I've been telling people forever. I discovered this with the kids having sleepovers in the house and having all their friends over. And if I got pizza I put the pizza down and the kids, no matter how many of them there were, would appear to actually get a piece of pizza. Because they were always busy doing something. But they would arrive at the food in the exact order of their current weight. And the first time I saw it I thought that looks like a coincidence. That these skinniest people don't even walk toward the pizza. They just keep doing what they're doing like they're not even hungry. And then the people who are a little heavier right at the pizza. Now there's no way that the way they're thinking about food is the same. Because it can't be a coincidence that the person who's got a few extra pounds is always the first one to the pizza. But you can see it really obviously with kids. So I can tell with certainty that some brains are different. And it's not about anybody choosing to be overweight. That's not what happens. So there is no free will.
If you're an NPC and you'd like to argue this, let me tell you how you could argue in favor of free will existing. You just replace words with your own personal definition. So if you want to argue, here's what you'd say to maintain your illusion of free will. You'd say something like, but I choose what I do. That's free will. No, that's just putting a different word for another word. That's not anything. Or somebody said to me in the comments, we have discipline when it is hard. No, again that's just a word. You have discipline. You mean you just replaced free will with discipline. No, that's not anything. That's just changing a word. Or somebody else said that Scott can believe what he wishes because he has free will. So I can do what I wish which means I have free will. Because you just changed the definition of free will to believing what I wish. Yeah, we're not going to get into this.
Well today apparently Trump will be addressing the World Economic Forum by Zoom or something. And the thing about the Trump era, the golden age, is that I would literally buy a ticket for that. If you told me, Scott, you have to pay $10 to watch a 10-minute video of Trump addressing the World Economic Forum. We don't even know what he's going to say. No idea what he's going to say. Would you pay $10 to watch 10 minutes of Trump talking to the World Economic Forum? Yes, yes I would. Would you pay $10 to watch one of the movies that recently was nominated for an Academy Award? No. I'll pay for the part before somebody's tied to a chair.
Oh, you know what would be fun? If there's somebody who by some weird chance if you've watched all of the movies that are nominated for Academy Award, can you tell me what percentage of them have somebody tied to a chair? It could be the answer is none. I bet it's not. But if the answer is none, maybe that's how you win an Academy Award. It's like okay I'm writing it and then he's tied to a chair. Wait a minute, what if he's not tied to a chair? And next thing you know you're nominated for the Academy Award. Hey, he wasn't even tied to a chair.
Anyway, CNN is devolving into a podcast. So reportedly their CEO Mark Thompson, he plans to do mass layoffs as you know. But apparently, reportedly, I wasn't at the meeting so again I'll use the same standard. If this story were about Trump I would warn you it's probably not true because there's no source, right? It's just somebody was at a meeting. Were they at that meeting? We don't know. So recreationally, just for fun, I'm going to treat it like it's true. And the story is that there was a meeting in which the CEO of CNN told Jake Tapper and Anderson Cooper that they ought to avoid prejudging Trump and stop talking about the past and all the lawfare stuff and calling him a felon and all that stuff. And just talk about what the future looks like and what he's doing at the moment.
What do you think about that? Well it does look like there is some change. It does look like the hosts of CNN are intentionally, and I give them credit for this, most of them seem to be finding some kind of middle ground. However they're still doing the thing where they invite idiots on the show. If they're inviting idiots on the show and they give them lots of time, it's the same CNN. So at the same time I'm reading this about they're not going to be full of it, I see a clip of Scott Jennings have to shut down a salute truther. So they have one of these guests on who starts with saying that well you know Elon did that. He was raising his hand. You see I, oh my God I almost, that was close. I don't know if you noticed but inadvertently I had allowed one of my hands to be higher than my waist and you can't do that when Trump's in office. Yeah you know as soon as it gets up here they're like is that a Hitler? No I was just reaching for something. I was over here. No I was just reaching for something. I just wanted to turn on my lamp. The lamp is a little. No no. So you get a little jumpy.
But they had some guests I hadn't seen before. I don't know her name, who talked about Musk was overshadowing Trump and he was doing that arm salute. Now what do you think the CEO of CNN was thinking when the guest came on and started talking about the fake news of the arm salute and the fake news that Musk is going to overshadow Trump and trying to drive a wedge? That feels like exactly what the CEO said stop doing. So if the host stopped doing it but then they introduce somebody who does it and they do that every day, which is exactly what's happening. Nothing really changed. Seems like it's all the same. So anyway Scott Jennings calls it the salute truthers, which is pretty good.
Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel came to Elon Musk's defense about that fake salute thing. And he said Musk is being falsely smeared and Elon is a great friend of Israel. And all true, all true. And I'm trying to figure out how can I get Netanyahu to do this for me. Can Netanyahu do this for me? It would be great. I'd like him to say that the ADL is not right when they smeared me. That'd be great. So BB, and that's the reason that I don't support Israel because they don't support me. But they do support Elon so I can see why he would support them. Otherwise I just observe. I'll just be an observer. But I can't be a supporter because they don't support me. Got to have reciprocity. Without reciprocity nothing works, right? So a little reciprocity and then we're in good shape.
The Sam Altman story is just getting more and more interesting. So I was unaware until Mike Cernovich found Altman's old posts and started putting them on X. I didn't realize that Sam was not just anti-Trump but he was really involved in being anti-Trump in 2016 and 2020 apparently. So some of his posts, which I never seen then. You know he was less prominent then so there's no reason I would have noticed. So this is actually a Sam Altman post on Twitter back in December 2021. So in 2021, this is after Trump lost the reelection. Sam Altman said, "Very few people realized just how much Reid Hoffman did and spent to stop Trump from getting reelected. It seems likely to me that Trump would still be in office without his efforts. Thank you Reid." And then Paul Graham had said in 2016, so this was just a month or so before the 2016 election in October, he said few have done more than Sam Altman to defeat Trump.
So according to the people who know the most and are the insiders, Sam Altman was one of the primary people for defeating Trump in 2020 and one of the primary ones with Reid Hoffman to try to keep him out of office in 2016. Did you know that? That's kind of interesting. And Altman himself said on one of these, I think responding to Paul Graham, he said I've spent all of my free time and done less work than I should have on various projects and a lot of money. The various projects in the context of stopping Trump. How many various projects was he involved in and how many of them were totally legitimate? I don't know.
But now more recently, especially because he's sort of trying to work with Trump which is necessary for all the tech leaders are going to have to work with him, now he said, I don't have his exact words but Altman basically said that now he's had a chance to see Trump more objectively and he doesn't have his old views. And he explained why he was so wrong before by calling himself an NPC. A non-player character. Somebody who doesn't think before they act, just goes along with the crowd.
Do you think that explains it? Do you think that one of the smartest most capable people in the entire country was an NPC and spent all of his time and all of his money without realizing that he'd been hypnotized by the television? Now your first instinct is there's no way, right? Common sense says you can't be that smart and have acted that seemingly NPC-like for eight years or whatever it was and then suddenly you wake up and now you see the error of your ways. That doesn't seem real, does it? Right? So all of your common sense says that doesn't seem like a real change. You must be pretending now because it's less likely you were pretending then because you put years of work, years of work and massive amounts of money before. So that looked real. And then suddenly you do one post where you're like oh sorry I was an NPC, didn't mean it. And then we're supposed to believe it.
Here's the hard part. That's normal. That's completely normal. If you think there's no way that could be true because you could be that smart and that dumb at the same time. Yeah you can. Totally normal. If you were to look at the IQs of all the people suffering from TDS and you compared to the IQs the people not suffering from it, the sufferers are probably higher because they're more likely to have gone to college where they got hypnotized. So IQ is actually not opposite of being fooled. High IQ and high likelihood of being fooled try to travel together. And we have seen genuine cases where people who had that much TDS or at least were in the TDS world were in fact deprogrammed. I know because I deprogrammed some of them. At least I was part of the process. And the fine people hoax did in fact, no doubt about it, reprogram people who were brilliant. And they didn't know they were acting like NPCs.
So the first filter I'm going to put on this is that this is entirely possible. Now I can almost hear Mike Cernovich yelling at me you idiot he's just pretending for money. I agree with that. I agree with that. My current best take is that he might see that he wasn't entirely right before but he's seemingly transactional. He's got a fiduciary responsibility to the company. If he didn't at least pretend to have become pro-Trump, if he hadn't at least pretended, well he wouldn't be doing his job. He has billions of dollars personally at stake in keeping OpenAI a functioning successful company. So now if somebody has billions of dollars at stake for having the right opinion they're going to be on that opinion. So there's nothing about his current opinion that tells us anything about what he's thinking. Can't tell what he's thinking. But if you want to say to yourself I think the old Sam was the real one, I think that's reasonable. But don't rule out that no matter how brilliant you are and how committed you are you could realize later that you were hypnotized. Because a lot of people did.
You know if we didn't have a whole bunch of people who said honestly, you know and they don't say this about themselves but they could, but I'm really really smart and I was totally fooled by that. But lots of people are essentially saying that. So if lots of people who are as smart as Sam Altman are saying I got totally fooled and we believe them, I believe Bill Ackman for example. I believe he was genuinely fooled but he's also genuinely brilliant. How do you explain that? Because it's normal. It's completely normal. Being able to be free from persuasion is a specific skill. It's not a general intelligence thing at all. In fact general intelligence works against you. You're easier to fool. Dumb people are harder to fool sometimes because they'll say hey you smarty pants looks like you're trying to pull something on me. Well why do you say that? I don't know I just don't trust you. But what do you see that's tipping you off? Don't need to see anything. I just don't trust you. And you're going to be right. So the low IQ person who says I just don't trust you ends up being right. And the smart person says let's look at all the facts and the details by reading the New York Times but I'll cross check it with CNN to make sure that one and they both got it right. Oh it looks like they agree. I guess that's true. So now I'll act like Trump is Hitler because CNN and being smart isn't helping you. It just is a different skill than understanding persuasion.
So you can see the mechanism. You have to be able to see the machine. If you can't see the mechanisms of the machine the machine owns you. But once you learn enough about how it's done, such as learning how a ruse is done, learning how incentives work etc., once you realize how the machine works then it just sort of materializes in front of you. And when a new hoax comes out you go oh that just came out of that hoax machine. And then you're immune. But you got to see it all. Common sense doesn't get you anywhere on that topic.
So I didn't know that Reid Hoffman and Sam were so close and worked together on this. But I don't know what's going on with Reid Hoffman. Someday we'll find out I think.
The New York Times had an opinion piece today. I think it was an opinion piece. Hard to tell these days. The title was "How Labeling Cartels Terrorists Could Hurt the US Economy." All right, how many of you knew that the biggest shareholder in the New York Times is also the richest man in Mexico? And what they're talking about here is that the cartels are embedded in all of the industries of Mexico. It's not just the drug industry but they're embedded with agriculture and everything else. So it could take down the whole economy of Mexico, not just the drug selling part of the economy.
Now to be fair, being the largest shareholder is only 17%, and he doesn't have a controlling interest. That still belongs with the family. So the family is making all the decisions. But I simply point out that wouldn't it have been nice to know that the biggest shareholder for the people who wrote this article is the richest guy in Mexico who I'm guessing has business interests that sort of have some cartel embedded with them. So you never know. You just have to be aware of who's who.
Apparently ICE is going to call the nonresident aliens from now on. Remember how that became like a dirty word? Don't call them aliens. They're just undocumented. I've never been too worked up about what name we use for them. And I have to agree that alien sounds more like something you want to get rid of than undocumented does. And the names matter. So I don't love that aliens has been reintroduced. But I wouldn't mind if all the words are reintroduced. Meaning that it just doesn't matter what you use. That seems healthy. You shouldn't get mad if somebody calls them aliens. You shouldn't be happy if they call them undocumented. Well if we're talking about the same thing it's just words.
Well my prediction on the JFK files, which as you know Mike Pompeo had talked Trump out of revealing all of them last time. According to Mike Pompeo there's nothing in there interesting anyway but there are some secrets. So nothing that we would learn that's big and shocking but still a few secrets even 60 years old. Because he points out that if somebody was in their 20s then they could still be alive in their 80s. But he was just using that as an example. He didn't say that's the reason some of it is secret. He thinks 99% of it already available and that what little there is left in the JFK file isn't really going to change anybody's mind about anything.
Here's what I think. Given that we widely assume the government itself was involved in killing JFK, the question I would ask is do you think the government that killed JFK, and then if it was let's say CIA related or Dulles related, do you think they would have left the memo on that? Do you think there would have been a memo that you could find in the files as in here's a memo, go kill JFK and make sure you keep this memo secret? No, there's not going to be something in the file if our own government killed them. If our own government killed JFK, which is exactly what it looks like happened, they're not going to keep the memo. I mean even in the wildest imagination that somebody ever wrote a memo and put that in writing, if they ever put it in writing which is ridiculously unlikely, they certainly would have lost it by now if you know what I mean. Lost it. Lost in a fire. Misplaced. So no there isn't really any chance there's something in the JFK file unless the JFK file says that the space aliens did it. What are you going to learn? There couldn't possibly be any secrets in there at least secrets about who did it. There can't possibly be anyway. So I won't hold my breath for that stuff.
As you know the Trump administration is doing a lot of firing. And the funniest part is the DEI professionals are trying to avoid being fired because all the DEI people are going to get fired by changing the name of their job. So we're seeing some examples of the director of DEI quickly changing their names on the website to executive, you know just generic executive. But I watched one young black man who worked for the government, I forget which agency, he was sort of proudly crowing that he was moving from his job as a professional in charge of DEI to something that sounded exactly like DEI but used different words. And he announced it in public at about the same time that the Trump administration was putting in a clarifying order that says if all you do is change your name we're going to fire you. And so they asked people to turn people in who were just changing the names and still doing DEI. And like 10 minutes later he updated his post on X from hey everybody I got this new job to I've been laid off. That's right. He bragged about his new job which was just different letters for his old job at the same time that the word went out fire anybody who changes jobs and keeps doing DEI but changes the name of the job. So got him.
Anyway so there's lots happening. I guess the ICE raids are happening now. We're not seeing gigantic video and stuff so one of the things the ICE people are apparently doing right, and obviously they would do this, is they're not announcing where they're going to attack so they don't have cameras. So we're not seeing a lot of video of them picking up the people that were on the list of the bad people. And that's good.
All new hires in the government got their offers rescinded. Interesting. Apparently Trump has already sent 1,500 military troops down to the border. I don't know if all 1,500 are there yet. They started with 500 but it's targeting 1,500. And they're reinforcing the wall and building outposts to help them monitor any illegal entries. I thought I saw in a separate report that they had orders to shoot. Basically orders that they could use deadly force whenever it made sense. Now those are my words but is that confirmed that they have the permission to fire at the border if they need to? You know we're talking defensively. Yeah well that's very Trumpian and probably a good idea.
And meanwhile according to Just the News Trump is announcing emergency price relief for cost of living crisis. Now that doesn't mean if this were a Democrat thing it would mean that they put price controls on things but that's not what Republicans do because it's dumb and it doesn't work. Haven't done that since Nixon. That didn't work out so they learned a lesson. But here's what he is doing. So you decide if these actions will cause prices to come down. He's ordering all federal agencies to untangle the American economy from Biden constraints. Now what are those constraints? Well he's going to eliminate climate policies that generally are going to increase the cost of everything, that make food and fuel costs go up. So in the short run if companies get rid of their climate expenses I think they would just bank it and just keep it as profit. I don't think they would immediately lower the prices but they might. So long term it should lower prices. Short term the companies will just take an extra profit.
He wants to eliminate rent seeking practices. Now that's not a phrase that most people know what it means. Rent seeking. That's sort of a political insult that I even I forget what it means. I always see it and I go can you use like real regular ordinary words? Like there's something to rent seeking that has its own meaning so that's useless communication. So my advice to the people communicating on the Trump team, don't use rent seeking. 99% of the public has no idea what you're talking about. They think it means rent. It has nothing to do with the rent. And he wants to get rid of administrative expenses that are driving up health care costs, lower housing costs and increase the housing supply, create employment opportunities for American workers. Well that rent seeking, that phrase rent seeking is doing a lot of work. I think it means just people getting a job in some grifty kind of thing that didn't need to happen in the first place. So rent seeking meaning trying to get paid as opposed to trying to make anything better. Is that a good definition? Rent seeking would be just somebody says well if I become the head of DEI I'll get a big paycheck as opposed to somebody saying do we need a head of DEI? Like why are we even doing that? I think it's close to that anyway.
So Trump is halting gain of function research. The kind that got us in trouble. Gain of function on the viruses. He wants to halt that. But I wonder about why do we call it gain of function? Isn't it weaponization? Or are we pretending that we're only seeking to understand how someone else could weaponize it so we can treat it?
Oh here's the definition of rent seeking. Rent seeking: when an entity seeks to gain added wealth without any reciprocal contribution of productivity. Okay so my definition was not exactly right. Not really.
So I've got something on the screen that I can't make go away which means I can't see you. I don't know if you can see me. Really? Come on there should be somewhere on this screen a little X or something to tell me how to turn this off. Really? Can you even see me? I can't see your comments. I've got a black screen with one image that I clicked on and no indication of any kind of a way to turn it off so I can see you. No it wasn't that. Clicking anywhere doesn't do it. Oh my God I'm going to have to get out of this to get back in just because I clicked on an image. Holy hell. Can't make it go. Oh okay it turns out that dragging it worked. Another interface fail. Well I'm glad you could see me anyway.
So gain of function sounds like weaponization to me. Marco Rubio is off to Panama. Getting started fast but not just Panama. He's going to El Salvador, Guatemala, Costa Rica, Dominican Republic, etc. So he's going to talk to Panama. I'm sure that won't go well in the first conversation. But there there is a story about how the Panama Canal got started that I told in the man cave but I'll tell now. The story is, and this is wild. There's a YouTube video on it. You could just go to YouTube and look for Panama Canal and French engineer.
So before the United States got involved in the Panama Canal, I'll try to tell the story quickly. The French were trying to build in the same place but the French found out that every time they dug something it rained and then the mud just fell back in the trench. So they just gave up. So the French left. But there was one engineer who was a French engineer who decided to stay to see if he could get something going. So one engineer, just one, decides to convince Panama, which at the time was not its own country. It was an extension of Colombia. So Colombia kind of extended along the little peninsula there. And so he talks to the Panamanians who are more like an area than a country. He said hey the Colombians that own you are ignoring you and you're not getting your value for being part of the country. You should be independent. And the Panamanians are like yeah yeah we should be independent. How about that? And then he says if you make me your ambassador, now keep in mind he's not Panamanian he's a French citizen, and he convinced the Panamanians if you make me your ambassador I'll get you independence. And they probably didn't think it was serious anyway so like sure yeah you're our ambassador go get us some independence.
So he goes to Colombia and says hey Panama wants independence. How about that? And Colombia said get out of here because of course that's ridiculous. So he goes back and then he goes to the United States. And this is during Teddy Roosevelt's time. Now Teddy liked to take over some stuff so he was kind of expanding the empire. So he was already mentally on the same page. If we can grab something we'll grab it as he had already done. And somehow the French engineer convinces them that he's speaking for Panama and that they're going to go independent and it'd be really helpful if the American Navy was parked outside nearby and acted like they were in favor of this independence. Now Teddy thinking maybe we could get some kind of very low cost conquer some territory here. So the American Navy sits out there waiting. Colombia knows about it. And then the ambassador, the ambassador of Panama declares independence. And the Colombians are like hey you can't. Oh maybe you can. Well we don't care about you that much. Okay you're independent. So they gain their independence with no fighting because a French guy wanted to build a canal and he wanted America to be the builder of it with his help.
So then he says all right we got a deal. So then the ambassador who is the French engineer he comes up with a treaty or a deal with the United States that the United States could have control of the Panama Canal in return for building it. You know they'd have to build it but they'd have control of it. So the Americans say hey that's great. They come they sign the deal and then they pull up to take control of the canal and the Panamanians say what are you doing here? And the Americans say well you know because of the deal we signed a deal so Panama gave us this. And the Panamanian said what deal? The only person who even knew about it was the ambassador. The ambassador who was not even Panamanian. So not only did the French engineer create a new country out of nothing but then he made a deal with the United States, the biggest thing that ever happened in Panama, on his own without telling Panama. So the United States comes, realizes they don't really have any standing but they have this big military so they just took the canal because they knew that Panama couldn't stand up to the American military. They knew that they had some cover story of this ridiculous deal with the Panama guy so they just, it was just Teddy Roosevelt situation. He's like oh I guess it's ours now. And sure enough it was.
And then the Panamanian engineer had some ideas how to build it that the French didn't like. So his ideas how to build it were adopted by the Americans because it looked like a good idea and it worked and they built the Panama Canal. Now have you ever heard that story? I think it's true. I mean it was an extensive documentary on YouTube but I think it's true. So it's a wonderful story. Again if you don't think one person can change the world well there's a big example.
Now the other context is that Teddy Roosevelt knew that for America to be the dominant maritime power that we needed to connect our two oceans. Because if you can't get assets from one side of the country to the other without going around South America you're not really the naval power that you need to be. So the Panama Canal had a lot to do with projecting American power and that's why Teddy Roosevelt was okay to play a little fast and loose with that.
Anyway I'm going to make an observation I've made before but I'm going to give you some more details. Have you noticed that Democrats have what I call a rate problem? Let me explain. The general statement is that if something is good at a small scale Democrats will say it must be good at a big scale. And that never makes sense. I mean it might make sense for making money or something but that's about it. So they say for example if a low amount of immigration is good for the country why wouldn't a high rate be good for the country? And then the Republicans say that's batshit crazy. Those are completely different situations. A low rate of immigration is sort of no problem and maybe it's more plus than minus. But a high rate you're literally giving away your country and dying. Those are not just doing more of a good thing. So it's a rate problem.
The Democrats for whatever reason refuse to acknowledge that doing a good thing too much has any kind of negative. Here's another one. You don't want your police to be over-policing do you? Yeah you don't want the police to harm somebody. Maybe be a little too tough on the citizens. Nobody wants that. So it's good if the police are maybe a little softer and more gentle in some situations. But if that's good why not get rid of police entirely? Wouldn't that be even better? It's a rate problem. You don't just take some little good thing and then take it to the extreme and say it must be good.
Nobody really cares if an adult wants to transition. Well if it's good for adults why wouldn't it be good for toddlers say the Democrats. Again good for an adult to have enough freedom to make that kind of a choice in today's world. I like it. I could argue maybe they shouldn't or maybe they won't be happy but it's not up to me. I'm happy that they have the choice as adult citizens in a free country. Yes absolutely. You do what you need to do. I'll do what I need to do. It's the best we can do. But the rate. Can we keep it with just the adults? We're pretty sure. Does it have to extend to children and dogs?
How about it's good to help the unfortunate. Most people would agree it's nice if you get to help somebody needs a little hand up. Yeah that's good. So why don't we give all of our money to everybody else? Oh wait a minute that's a rate problem. It's only good if you keep it within bounds. If you open your doors and let everybody come in and take what they want nothing works. It's a rate problem.
About if diversity is good and I would agree that having a company workforce kind of looks like the public that seems like a plus. Everybody be a little happier. They'd feel a little safer. They'd have a little more visibility about what the customers in general are looking for because you got people who touch every community. Yeah you can see how that would be a plus. But if a little bit of diversity is good why not just get rid of white men entirely which is what it turned into. It turned into let's just get rid of white men because if you do it a little bit it's good wouldn't it be good if we got rid of all of them? It's a rate problem. A little bit's fine. A lot of it is the end of the country.
How about if criticizing a politician such as Trump, one that you might not agree with, if criticizing him pretty severely is good because we got a competitive system so both sides will get criticized and we like it because that's how we settle things. We argue a little bit. So if a little bit of criticism of Trump is good why not organize a coup against him? Again it's a rate problem. A little bit of criticism of Trump is good. I would even argue that he's such a change agent that I would even agree with you that a lot of criticism is good. But can we keep it there? Does it have to be if criticism is good a coup is good? It's a rate problem.
Yeah so here's another one. If a store allows a little bit of shoplifting and the alternative is somebody in desperate need can't get the food or the diaper or something we kind of think oh we don't like, we definitely don't like shoplifting right? Nobody likes it. But a little bit of it you could argue the person who stole it got to stay alive, got to put a diaper on a baby. But if it's good if a little bit of it happens why don't we just open the door and make it legal to steal everything? It's a rate problem again. It's a rate problem. It's the thing that they get wrong every time.
Anyway so John Bolton as you know lost his Secret Service protection under Trump but he was awakened at 12:00 a.m. to be told about it. That part just seems like they were messing with him. Like I suppose they needed to tell him as soon as they knew so I mean there's justification for it to give him the most amount of time to adjust to it but it just feels like they're messing with him. But during the press conference Trump said some bad things about him. He said he tried to blow up the Middle East. And then here's what Trump said. I thought he was a very dumb person but I used him well because every time people saw me coming into a meeting with Bolton standing behind me they thought that he would attack them because he was a warmonger.
Now how many of you remember that when Bolton was first added to Trump's team in the first term? Do you remember what I said? Because of course I didn't want a warmonger on his team. But if you remember what I said, oh this is perfect because when Trump walks into a room with the warmonger and then he's not as bad as the warmonger he's going to look like the good cop. So for negotiating purposes it's kind of perfect to have one warmonger in the room. You just so you're not that warmonger yourself. So that's exactly what Trump said. And I think everybody who understands negotiations, I think everybody understood it. But now he says it directly. And I do believe that this is not just an excuse. If this were a normal politician if Trump were normal I would have said oh you made a big mistake with him and now you're trying to explain your big mistake. I don't think so. I think he knew that Bolton was a negotiating asset and he was going to use him like that right from the start. And only Trump would do that. There's nobody else who would even have had that idea.
But here's my take. I love the fact that Trump is rebranding Bolton as the dumbest guy in America at least on foreign policy. Because if you're Iran just think about this. If you're Iran and you were mad at him because you thought he was going to push America to bomb your country and now he's been branded by the actual commander in chief as the dumbest guy in the country, would your adversary want to kill the dumbest guy on your side? No no that would be the last thing. You want to kill the smart ones. I mean if you're going to kill anybody at all you pick out their smartest guy. Remember when Trump put the hit on Soleimani? It's because Soleimani was their best guy. Killing their best guy makes complete sense if you're an adversary. Killing their dumbest guy doesn't buy you a thing. You'd rather they keep their dumbest guy no matter how dumb it is. So it's kind of funny that Trump both removed his Secret Service at the same time he made it completely unnecessary to kill him. It's kind of perfect. Only Trump.
All right here's I'm going to take another victory lap on this next story as one does. So apparently Alex Soros gave an interview to the Financial Times. Now the first thing that should be noted is wait a minute Alex Soros gave an interview. I've never seen him do that. Because if he got interviewed how would he explain what he's doing? Like it's not really possible to explain what they're doing in any way that sounds non-evil. So I always thought he just avoided interviews because he couldn't possibly explain what they were doing. But he does one and then I immediately looked up who owns the Financial Times and turns out the Financial Times is owned by a Japanese holding company. Japanese holding company. So who would be the least confrontational media if you're going to pick of all the world who would be the least dangerous media? I got to think something owned by a Japanese holding company is not going to ask you the hard questions. I feel like you're going to get the easy questions. Am I wrong? I mean maybe I'm making some kind of stereotype that's unfair but are the Japanese news people world famous for being extra aggressive? Because I know the British are aggressive. French press pretty aggressive. American press very aggressive. And none of them seem to be able to talk to Soros but the one owned by a Japanese holding company, well so I don't think they asked him any tough questions. But still it made news.
So the first question is is Alex Soros intentionally avoiding any serious news interviews? I think the answer is yes obviously. Remember when Elon Musk said he wanted to talk to him and Soros said yes but I'll bet they can't schedule it. Elon can probably make it any time but I bet Alex just he's busy. Maybe we could do that later. It's never going to happen. I don't think ever Elon Musk and Alex Soros will sit in the same room alone. I don't think it'll ever happen because he wouldn't put himself in that position.
But anyway here's the interesting part. This is being reported by the Washington Free Beacon. So according to Alex his father George is angry that the money is going to, well that his own organization has too many employees. Rent seekers you might say. And so apparently George Soros said quote I didn't want to create an employment agency. Now that's what his son says the dad said. Meaning that he didn't want the nonprofit Open Society to just be hiring people like crazy but apparently they did. He said that George was very upset by the massive number of employees and quote amount of bureaucracy at his liberal nonprofit the Open Society Foundations. And furthermore he says his only regret, this is what Alex the younger one says, he says his only regret since taking over is that he didn't slash the nonprofit's workforce sooner.
Now it gets more interesting. Part of the interview Alex considers himself a Zionist meaning that he's very pro-Israel and Israel's existence as you know a Jewish state. Now at the same time his society the Open Society has been funding millions of dollars to self-declared anti-Zionist organizations. How do you square that? He's massively funding anti-Israel organizations who are, and it's not just an interpretation these are organizations who say it directly, but that's the opposite of his view. And this is not a random view because he's Jewish right? So if you're actually Jewish and you say in an interview you know I'm a Zionist or words to that effect but you're funding the exact opposite the exact opposite how do you explain it?
Do you remember who had the only explanation for this? Me. Here's my explanation. I said George senior didn't know what was happening. That he didn't know what was happening. He didn't know where his money was going. Do I win? Am I the winner? I said that George senior didn't know where the money was going. What we know is he has too many people and too much bureaucracy which does what? It obscures to the owner what's happening. Because even the owner can't penetrate the bureaucracy. And even the younger Soros has apparently been funding things that are very much the opposite of one of his core beliefs. How do you think he funds things that are the opposite of his core beliefs? I say neither of them were active managers. So my hypothesis was that neither of them knew what it was doing. That somehow it had taken on its own bureaucratic life and that the bureaucracy was making the decisions based on DEI and equity things. And that if you had put either of the Soroses in charge it would have looked different.
So he just bought 200 more radio stations. Yeah so I'm going to double down in my hypothesis that the Soroses are not aware what the organization is doing. And I think that's just true because it never really made sense anything we saw unless it was accidental or somebody else was in charge.
Scott why repeat lies? Well why don't you tell me what the lie is? Could you give me any hint what do you think was the lie? I told you what other people said. Is that what you're calling repeating the lies? I call it the news and the context that's important. So you tell me what lie. What lie did I just repeat right now? That was a dumbass comment. If you want to tell me what the content is that you think I'm wrong about something tell me. Oh that Soros is so dumb not to know his business. He just proved it. That's literally the story he just reported on his own that he didn't know what his business was doing because the bureaucracy. Yeah do better. Do better in your comments anyway.
There's a study in something called The Conversation. Michael Pasek who says that learning your political opponents don't actually hate you can reduce toxic polarization and anti-democratic attitudes. Here's my problem. Here's what I have no patience for. I have no patience for a personal accusation in the context of factual statements. I have every interest in being fact checked. That part I like. So if I say something wrong then it's wrong. But to immediately assume that there's some kind of character flaw because you've got some idea about reality that I don't, fix yourself. Just fix yourself. Think about how to not be that person anymore.
Anyway back to this. So you've heard the stories of people who met MAGA supporters and were surprised to find out that they're awesome. And you've heard this anecdote a whole bunch of times right? So how many times have you heard oh I had MAGA neighbors but then they kept shoveling my driveway for me for free and I realized I was wrong about them. You've heard that a million times. Have you ever heard it the other way? Have you ever heard somebody who said you know I thought these Antifa people were all robbing but then I met some they were pretty nice. I never hear that. It doesn't work both ways. There's one side that was demonized by mental illness, TDS and propaganda. And the other side just wants to be left alone. They just want to be left alone. That if you put me in a room with a normal Democrat do you think I have any problem with them? Do you think that I have a negative opinion about just an ordinary Democrat? Never. It's never even occurred to me. It doesn't even seem like a thing that you should think about. Now there are certainly the extremists who are causing the ordinary Democrats to not be exactly the way you'd want them to be. But I don't even hate the extremists. I just would want to stay away from them because they'd hate me. The only thing that would keep me out of the room with the leftest lefty progressive of all time is what they think of me. It wouldn't keep me out of the room because of what I think of them. Because what I think is people are all individuals. No two are alike. I'm not going to judge them because everybody's individual. You know if I said hey you're not like the other person. Well what kind of a standard is that? Every person's different. You can't be like other people. So no I don't judge them.
Thomas Massie says seed oil lobbyist will be chief of staff at USDA. Somebody at the oil seed processor association. Really? So that whole seed oil thing. I've never followed it closely. So as you know some number of people say the seed oils are among the worst things we're putting in our bodies and other people say no it isn't. I don't actually know which is true but I guess we'll find out. Looks like it's going to come to a head.
From wokeness to faith in God. Okay all right. These are the end of my prepared remarks and I went too long because it took a while to get going. So I think this will be a reasonable time to end. I'll talk to the Locals people privately later and we got 1,200 people to watch and we'll upload the show to the other platforms later. It just takes a while. All right thanks for joining everybody. Bye for now.
that's a terrible tattoo mama did you just disappear when I tap my when I tap my papers did the picture just disappear cuz it it threw me out of the app how could everything go wrong how's that even possible that all I did was this I I won't do it again and it turned off the app this is so beyond this is so beyond possible I mean we're into some statistical impossible situation here it can't be that all the apps died at the same time they couldn't all be broken at once could they I know there's a massive incompetence problem but that's pretty impressive anyway if you'd like to take your experience today up to levels that nobody can even understand with their tiny shiny human brain none of it makes sense today does it like the the Preamble doesn't make any sense be because the uh the starting assumption is that things went right so the Preamble doesn't make sense let's just do the let's just do this side Let's Just Surrender shall we surrender to the fact that everything's just going to go wrong today just absolutely everything's going to go wrong sip to that sometimes it goes that way ah and then he is slap happy it's up 172% since I told you about it anyway all right let's talk about some of the news you ready for this and let's try for the fourth time in a row to push one freaking button okay I'm going to use my finger which I know is a human finger I'm positive I'm still alive and I'm going to push the button which I've pushed now five times once it worked all right careful careful push the icon yes yes I pushed the button and it did what it was supposed to first time today all right did you know there's a breakthrough in Fusion nobody cares uh General atomics they they figured out how to get 20% higher than the green wall limit the Greenwald limit which you all know about of course it's uh some kind of limit that the fusion people needed to get past and they got past it it was considered difficult or impossible but they did and they've also figured out to stabilize the plasma now the thing with the fusion is it's it might be another 20 years of there's another breakthrough without actually anything breaking through but uh once it gets serious it's all going to happen at once now isn't it weird that that Fusion is coming which would lower the cost of energy to zero over time um at exactly the time we need cheap energy and relief from inflation have you noticed that we have a number of timing things happening that are weird meaning that all right we're heading toward Doom with our debt and our expenses and nobody can live but at the same time if Fusion were a little bit faster it would save us but it might it might just be late by 20 years I mean over the if you look at the history of humankind missing it by 20 years that would be the slightest slightest Miss but we have other timing too too um so you know the AI people at open AI think that we're on the verge of being able to solve all of our cancers and diseases because AI will figure out some pattern recognition and figure out how to do it what about the people who have terminal cancer this year they might miss the cure for all cancers by a month now it's bad enough if you you have to die from cancer at all but think how dumb you would feel if you died a month before all cancer is cured that's going to happen it's like somebody's family member is going to die a month before all cancer is cured I don't know if that's a year from now but that's what the AI people say could be a year from now meanwhile NASA is testing a nuclear propulsion to go to Mars in 45 days so currently it's 6 months I think that would lower from 6 months to 45 days that would be a pretty big deal and they've um what else they got oh I saw a quote from nval Rob he was on Tim Ferris podcast and he said that people who don't homeschool their lives suck and then they described why totally right if anybody has had kids in the last say last 20 years you know that the life of the parents is essentially destroyed by school because the school you know loads them up with homework so you can't have any quality time at night but you got to get up and you've got this stress of getting them there the traffic and the you know everything's tense tense getting the kids to school if you drive them especially it's tense and it's just brutal but if you homeschool you kind of make your own schedule and everything's fine and they perform better and they don't get damaged by the school yeah I if you just if you're just a regular parent with children in school you've got a tough life and there's no reason for it there's no reason for it at all because you can homeschool and you can solve all those problems well Mr.
Beast Mr.
Beast the uh gigantic You.
Tube Star says he want he wants to get some billionaires together and by Tik Tock he's already talked to his billionaires and he's pretty serious about it he says we mean business you know having Mr.
Beast and his advisors or or his investors having them own Tik Tok that would be pretty good as long as we can solve the you know the privacy and the the influence part of it so that's interesting um president Trump has his diet coke button back in the Oval Office have you seen it it's like this you know nice block of wood with one button on it to order a Diet Coke except I feel like he needs more buttons don't you like I'd like to see a trap door button where he could inviting the top Dei director for every government organization so what's your job I'm the DI director next what's your job well I'm the director of De and the Diet Coke please beep and then you get it mixed up and you want to Diet Coke and you know next thing you know next thing you know next thing you know rubo going through the trapo oh sorry I I meant to hit the The Diet Coke but my bad all right well according to Christopher rufo who you know was working very hard on getting rid of Dei Ridiculousness in the corporate world and elsewhere and uh he says that the tech executives are telling him that in the Silicon Valley companies uh they respect Trump's ban on Dei they respect it and uh many feel relieved that they don't they don't have to enforce it anymore they don't have to protect and so rufo says resistance um to Dei is basically dead now does that surprise you are you surprised that Dei could die that easily I'm not because I was well aware that the main promoters of Dei tended to be rich white guys who were just protecting themselves so as soon as somebody said I will hurt you more if you do it then you don't do it then all the people who were only doing it to avoid getting hurt would say wait well hold on what did you say oh oh it's going to hurt me more to keep doing it oh then I won't do it there there was never any intellectual agreement it was purely just a bunch of rich white guys covering their ass pretending like they cared they didn't care they were just waiting for some good reason not to do it Trump gave it to them meanwhile uh this is funny The Daily Mail is reporting and and I don't know if you could trust this story if this story were about Trump I would tell you there's no way this is true but since this it's about uh Jim aasta uh I'm going to recreationally pretend it's true now I think I've explained before that a recreational belief is one that doesn't really have a lot of credibility but it would be fun if it were true certainly would be fun yeah this is one of those so as you know Jim aasta his time slot is going to get moved from 10:00 a.m.
to midnight which is widely interpreted as you know he's being minimized and CNN wants to you know maybe encourage him to leave on his own you know what I mean uh but the story from Daily Mail is that uh uh Jim aosta is reportedly considering leaving the network you know because of the shift of the bad time slot and but the move comes as CNN is slashing 200 jobs um now let me give some advice to Jim Masta if he's telling people that he's considering leaving the network that would be sort of a negotiating wouldn't you say he's sort of negotiating with management oh if you move my time slot I might I might quit well let me give you some negotiating advice Jim aosta and this is free this is free there's there's no charged for this um if your company is trying desperately to cut costs and they've already decided that you need to move to midnight that's not really the time to start threatening them that you might quit because that's exactly what they want obviously they want him to quit he must be one of the more High highly paid people he's not helping the network at all and you know they showed it by moving him to midnight no I wouldn't negotiate under those circumstances uh the good news is is sucking at your job finally matters again so there's that um but don't worry about Jim AA he can always follow the path of uh Tucker Carlson who left Fox News and just got bigger got bigger or he could follow the model of Don Lemon who left his prime time show and uh now he's uh doing nothing I don't know I don't think Don Lemon worked it out well the Oscar nominations are out um and the only thing the Oscar nominations for the the best movie The only thing it tells me is movies don't seem like a thing anymore do they doesn't it seem like just watching a movie doesn't feel like a thing I do anymore there isn't a single movie on the list I have even a little bit of interest in i i Tred to watch uh you know you know my story I turn off any movie as soon as somebody's tied to a chair if your plot of your movie just absolutely requires somebody to be tied to a chair you're just signaling you don't know how to write it can't be true that everybody always has to be tied to a chair no matter what the movie is about it just can't be true that your plot requires it there there's no way you can't tie them to a bed once you can't tie them to a well sometimes they'll tie them to a pole I guess so if they want to get creative but now as soon as somebody's tied to a chair I'm out so I tried to watch a a minseries on Prime Prime video called the agency about the CIA now it's fiction and characters were good and you I kind of like the tone of it and the writing seemed good and I got through the first episode yesterday while I was working second episode comes on and man tied to a chair and that's the last I'll ever watch of it uh I'm serious about this if you tie somebody to a chair I'm not going to watch that's the that's the end of my viewing for that you have to you got to come up with something better than tying somebody to a chair all right it's 2025 you can do better meanwhile Oprah discovered that Free Will is not a thing she didn't say it that way what she said was that when she got an OIC um she understood thin people now I'm not saying she's thin and she's not saying she's thin but it gave her an Insight because once she got an O epic um apparently it it changed her her thoughts about food because when your body is less craving I guess your mind is relaxed as well so she realized that thin people don't obsess about food all the time like she did you realize that's realizing that there's no free will right so she realized that her brain was just different and her chemistry was different and whatever her brain and chemistry were designed to do well what they were doing was obsessing about food and that made it difficult for not to eat too much now uh and then when she took abmic she stopped obsessing about it and then suddenly it was easy not to eat too much well this is what I've been telling people forever um I discovered this with the kids having sleepovers in the house and having all their friends over and if I got pizza I put the pizza down and the kids no matter how many of them there were would appear to actually get a piece of pizza because you know they they were always busy doing something but they would arrive at the food in the exact order of their current weight and the first time I saw it I thought that looks like a coincidence that that these skinniest people don't even walk toward the pizza they just keep doing what they're doing like they're not even hungry and then the people people who are a little heavier right at the pizza now there's no way that the way they're thinking about food is the same because it can't be a coincidence that the person who's got a few extra pounds is always the first one to the pizza but you can see it really obviously with with kids so I can tell with certainty that some brains are different and it's not about anybody choosing to be overweight that that's not what happens um so there is no free will uh if you're an NPC and you'd like to argue this let me tell you how the way you could argue in favor of Free Will existing is you just replace words with your own personal definition so if you want to argue here's what you'd say um to to maintain your illusion of Free Will you'd say something like but I choose what I do that's free will no that's just putting a different word for another word that's not anything or somebody said to me in the comments we have discipline when it is hard no again that's just a word you have discipline you mean you just replaced Free Will with discipline no that's not anything that's just changing a word or somebody else said um that Scott can believe what he wishes because he has free will so I can do what I wish which means I have free will because you just changed the definition of free will to believing what I wish yeah we we're not going to get into this well today apparently Trump will be addressing the world economic Forum by Zoom or something and uh the thing about the Trump era the golden age is that I would literally buy a ticket for that if you told me uh Scott you have to pay $10 to watch a 10-minute video of trump addressing the world economic Forum uh we don't even know what he's going to say no idea what he's going to say would you pay $10 to watch 10 minutes of trump talking to the world economic Forum yes yes I would would you pay $10 to watch one of the movies um that recently was nominated for an Academy Award no what uh I'll pay for the part before somebody's tied to a chair oh you know what would be fun if there's somebody who by some weird by some weird chance if some of if if you've watched all of the movies that are nominated for Academy Award can you tell me what percentage of them have somebody tied to a chair it could be it could be the answer is none I bet it's not but if the answer is none maybe that's how you win an eomm award it's like okay I'm writing it and and then he's tied to a chair wait a minute what if he's not tied to a chair and next next you know you're nominated for the Academy Award hey what he wasn't even tied to a chair Academy a anyway CNN is devolving into a podcast so uh reportedly their CEO mark thas he uh he plans to do Mass layoffs as you know um but apparently reportedly I wasn't at the meeting so again I'll use the same standard if this story were about Trump I would warn you it's probably not true because there's no Source right it's just somebody was at a meeting were they were they at that meeting we don't know so recreationally just for fun I'm going to treat it like it's true and the story is that uh there was a meeting in which the CEO CNN told Jake Tapper and Anderson Cooper that they ought to avoid prejudging Trump and uh stop talking about the past and all the laware stuff and you know calling him a felon and all that stuff and just talk about what the future looks like and what he's doing at the moment um what do you think about that well it does look like there is some change it does look like the hosts of CNN are intentionally and uh I give them credit for this most of them seem to be finding some kind of Middle Ground however they're still doing the thing where they invite idiots on the show if they're inviting idiots on the show and they give them lots of time it's the same CNN so you know at the same time I'm reading this about they're not going to be you know full of TVs uh I see a clip of Scott Jennings have to shut down a salute truther so they have one of these guests on who starts with saying that well you know Elon did that igu was raising his hand you see I oh my God I almost that was close I don't know if you noticed but inadvertently uh I had allowed one of my hands to be higher than my waist and you can't do that when Trump's in office yeah you know as soon as it gets up up here they're like is that a Hiller no oh I was just reaching for something I was over Hill no oh I was just reaching for something I just wanted to turn on my lap the lap is a little no no so you get get a little jumpy but they had some guests I hadn't seen before I don't know her name who talked about uh musk was overshadowing Trump and he was doing that that arm salute now what do you think the CEO of CNN was thinking when the guest came on and started talking about the fake news of the arm salute and the fake news that musk is going to overshadow Trump and trying to drive a wedge that feels like exactly what the CEO said stop doing so if the host stopped doing it but then they introduce somebody who does it and they do that every day which is exactly what's happening nothing really helped seems like it's all the same so anyway Scott Jennings calls it the salute truthers which is pretty good um Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel came to Elan musk defense about that fake salute thing and he said musu is being falsely smeared and Elon is a great friend of Israel and um all true all true and I'm trying to figure out how can I get Netanyahu to do this for me can Netanyahu do this for me it would be great I'd like him to say that the uh ADL uh is not right when they smeared me that'd be great so uh BB um and that's the reason that I don't support Israel because they don't support me but they do support Elon so I can see why he would support them um otherwise I just observe I'll just be an observer but I can't be a supporter because they don't support me got to have rest got to have reciprocity without reciprocity nothing works right so a little reciprocity and then we're in good shape um there's the Sam mman story is just getting more and more interesting so I was unaware until Mike cernovich found alman's old posts and started putting them on acts I didn't realize that Sam was not just anti-trump but he was really involved in being anti-trump in 2016 and 2020 apparently so some of his posts which I never seen then you know he was less prominent then so there's no reason I would have noticed um so he this is actually a Sam Alman post on it on back when it was Twitter on um December 21st or I'm sorry December in 2021 so in 2021 uh so this is after Trump lost the reelection uh Sam Alman said uh anx very few people realized just how much Reed Hoffman did and spent to stop Trump from getting reelected it seems likely to me that Trump would still be in office without his efforts thank you read and then Paul Graham had said in 2016 so this was just a month or so before the 2016 election in October he said few have done more than Sam Alman to defeat Trump so according to the people who know the most and are the Insiders Sam mman was one of the primary people for defeating Trump in 2020 and one of the primary ones with Reed hofen tried to keep him out of office in 2016 did you know that that's uh that's kind of interesting and Alman himself said on one of these uh I think responding to Paul Graham he said I've spent all of my free time and done less work than I should have on various projects and a lot of money the various projects in the context of stopping Trump how many various projects was he involved in and how many of them were totally legitimate I don't know but uh but now more recently especially because he's sort of uh trying to work with Trump which is necessary for all the tech leaders are going to have to work with him um now he said I don't have his exact words but Alman Alman basically said that uh now he's had a chance to see Trump more objectively and he doesn't have his old views and he he explained why he was so wrong before by calling himself an NPC so a non-player character somebody who doesn't think before they act just goes along with the crowd do you think that explains it do you think that one of the smartest most capable people in the entire country was an NPC and spent all of his time and all of his money without realizing that he' been hypnotized by the television now your your first instinct is there's no way right Common Sense common sense says you can't be that smart and have acted that seemingly NPC like for 8 years or whatever it was and then suddenly you wake up and now you see the error of your ways that doesn't seem real does it right so all of your common sense says that doesn't seem like a real change you you must be pretending now because it's it's less likely you were pretending then because you put years of work years of work and massive amounts of money before so that looked real and then suddenly you do you know one post where you're like oh sorry I was an NPC didn't mean it and then we're supposed to believe it here's the hard part that's normal that's completely normal if if you think there's no way that could be true because you could be that smart and that dumb at the same time yeah you can totally normal if you were to if you were to look at the IQs of all the people suffering from TDS and you compared to the IQs the people not suffering from it the sufferers are probably higher because they're more likely to have gone to college where they got hynotized so IQ is actually not opposite of being fooled high IQ and high likelihood of being fooled try to travel together and we have seen genuine cases where people who had that much TDS or at least were in the TDS world were in fact deprogrammed I know because I deprogrammed some of them the you know at least I I was part of the process um and the fine people hoax did in fact did in fact no doubt about it reprogram people who were brilliant and they didn't know they were acting like NP sees so the first the first filter I'm going to put on this is that this is entirely possible now I can almost hear Mike covich yelling at me you idiot he's just pretending for money I agree with that I agree with that my my current best take is that um he might see he might see that he wasn't entirely right before but he's seemingly transactional he's got a fiduciary responsibility to the company if he didn't at least pretend to have pretend to have become Pro Trump if he hadn't at least pretended well he wouldn't be doing his job he he has billions of dollars personally a stake in keeping open AI you know a functioning successful company so now if somebody has billions of dollars at stake for having the right opinion they're going to be on that opinion so there's nothing about his current opinion that tells us anything about what he's thinking can't tell what he's thinking but if you want to say to yourself I think the old Sam was the real one I think that's reasonable but don't rule out that no matter how brilliant you are and how committed you are you could realize later that you were hypnotized because a lot of people did you know if we didn't have a whole bunch of people who said honestly you know and they don't say this about themselves but they could they could say but don't I'm really really smart and I was totally fooled by that but lots of people are essentially saying that so if lots of people who are as smart as Sam Alman are saying I got totally fooled and we believe them I believe u bill aan for example I believe he was genuinely fooled but he's also genuinely brilliant how do you explain that because it's normal it's completely normal be being able to be free from persuasion is a specific skill it's not a general intelligence thing at all in fact general intelligence works against you you're easier to fool dumb people are harder to fool sometimes because they'll say Hey you smarty pants looks like you're trying to pull something on me well why do you say that I don't know I just don't trust you but what do you see that's tipping you off don't need to see anything I just don't trust you and you're going to be right so so the low IQ person who says I just I just don't trust you ends up being right and the smart person says H let's look at all the facts and the details by reading the New York Times but I'll cross check it with a CNN to make sure that one and the they both got it right oh it looks like they agree I guess that's true so now I'll act like Trump is Hitler because the CNN and you know being smart isn't helping you it just is a different skill than understanding persuasion so you can you see the mechanism you have to you have to be able to see the machine if you can't see the mechanisms of the machine the machine owns you but once you learn enough about how it's done such as learning how a rupar is done learning how incentives work etc once you realize how the Machine Works then it just sort of materializes in front of you and when a new hoax comes out you go oh that just came out of that hoax machine and and then you're immune but you got to see it all common sense doesn't get you anywhere on that topic so um and I didn't know that Reed Hoffman and Sam were so close and worked together on this but I don't know what's going on with read Hoffman someday we'll find out I think um New York Times had a opinion piece today I think it was an opinion piece hard to tell these days the title was how labeling cartels terrorists could hurt the US economy all right how many of you knew that the biggest shareholder in the New York Times is also the richest man in Mexico and what they're talking about here is is that the cartels are embedded in all of the industries of Mexico it's not just the drug industry but they're embedded with the you know Agriculture and everything else so it it could take down the whole economy of Mexico not just the drug selling part of the economy um now to be fair being the largest shareholder is only 177% and he doesn't have a controlling interest that still belongs with the family so the family is making the all the decisions but I simply point out that wouldn't it have been nice to know that the biggest shareholder for the people who wrote this article is the richest guy in Mexico who I'm guessing has business interests that are sort of have some cartel embedded with them so so you never know you just have to be aware of the aware of Who's Who uh um apparently the Ice uh ice is going to call the uh nonresidents aliens from now on remember how that became like a dirty word don't call them aliens they're just undocumented I I've never been too worked up about what name we use for him and I don't you know I have to agree that alien sounds more like something you want to get rid of than undocumented does and and the names matter so um I don't love the aliens has been reintroduced but I wouldn't mind if all the words are reintroduced meaning that it just doesn't matter what you use that seems healthy uh you shouldn't get mad if somebody's calls says aliens you shouldn't be happy if they call them nondocumented well if we're talking about the same thing it's just words well my prediction on the JFK files which as you know Mike Pompeo had talked Trump out of revealing all of them last time according to Mike Pompeo there's nothing in there interesting anyway but there are some secrets so nothing that we would learn that's you know big and shocking but still a few Secrets even 60 years old because he points out that if somebody was in their 20s then they could still be alive in their 80s but he was just using that as an example he didn't say that's the reason some of is secret he thinks 99% of it already available and that what little there is left in the JFK file isn't really going to change anybody's mind about anything um here's what I think given that we widely assume the government itself was involved in killing JFK the question I would ask is do you think the government that killed JFK and then you know if it was let's say CIA related or dullas related um do you think they would have left the memo on that do you think there would have been a memo that you could find in the files as in uh here's a memo go kill JFK and make sure you you keep this keep this memo secret no there's not going to be something in the file if our own government killed them if our own government killed JFK which which is exactly what it looks like happened they're not going to they're not going to keep the memo I mean even in the wildest imagination that somebody ever wrote a memo and put that in writing if they ever put it in writing which is ridiculously unlikely they certainly would have lost it by now if you know what I mean lost it lost in a fire misplaced so no there isn't really any chance there's something in the in the JFK file unless the JFK file says that that the space aliens did it what are you going to learn there couldn't possibly be any secrets in there at least secrets about who did it there can't possibly be anyway so I won't hold my breath for that stuff um as you know TR the Trump Administration is doing a lot of firing and the funniest part is the uh Dei uh professionals are trying to avoid being fired because all the Dei people are going to get fired uh by changing the name of their job so we're seeing some examples of the director of Dei quickly changing their names on the website to Executive you know just generic executive uh but I I I watched uh one young black man who worked for the government I forget which agency uh he was he was sort of proudly crowing that he was moving from his job as a you know professional in charge of Dei to something that sounded exactly like Dei but used different words and he announced it in public at about the same time that the Trump Administration was putting in a clarifying order that says uh if all you do is change your name we're going to fire you and so they asked people to turn people in who were just changing the names and still doing Dei and and like 10 minutes later he updated his post on X from hey everybody I got this new job to uh I've been laid off that's right he bragged about his new job which was just different letters for his old job at the same time that the word went out fire anybody who who changes jobs and keeps doing Dei but changes the name of the job so got him anyway so there's lots lots of happening I guess the ice raid are happening now um we're not seeing gigantic video and stuff so one of the things the ice people are apparently doing right and obviously they would do this is they're not announcing where they're going to attack so they don't have cameras so we're not we're not seeing a lot of video of their you know picking up the people that were on the list of the bad people um and that's good um oh all new hires in the government got their offers rescinded interesting all right um apparently Trump has already sent 1500 uh military troops down to the Border I don't know if all 1500 are there yet they started with 500 but it's targeting 1,500 and they're reinforcing the wall and building Outpost to help them monitor any illegal entries uh I thought I saw in a separate report that um they had orders to shoot basically orders that they could use deadly force whenever it made sense now those are my words but is that confirmed that that they have the uh permission to fire at the border you know if they need to you know we're talking defensively yeah well that's very trumpian and uh probably a good idea and meanwhile according to just the news uh Trump is announcing emergency price relief for cost of living crisis now that doesn't mean if this were a Democrat thing it would mean that they put price gs on things but that's not what Republicans do because it's dumb and it doesn't work haven't done that since uh Nixon that didn't work out so they learned a lesson um but here's what he is doing so you decide if these actions will cause prices to come down all right um he's ordering all federal agencies to untangle the American economy from Biden constraints now what are those constraints well he's going to eliminate climate policies that generally are going to increase the cost of everything uh that make food and fuel costs go up so in the short run if companies get rid of their climate expenses I think they would just Bank it and just keep it as profit I don't think they would immediately lower the prices but they might so long-term ISS should lower prices short term uh the companies will just take an extra profit uh he wants to eliminate rent seeking practices now that's not a phrase that most people know what it means rent seeking that's sort of a political insult that I even I forget what it means I I always see it and I go can you use like real regular ordinary words like there there's something to rent seeking that has you know its own meaning so that that's useless communication so my advice to the people communicating on the Trump team don't use Ren seeking 99% of the public has no idea what you're talking about they think it means rent it has nothing to do with the rent um and he wants to uh let's say uh get rid of administration administrative expenses and driving up healthc care costs um lower housing costs and increase the housing Supply create employment opportunities for American workers well that rent seeking that phrase rent seeking is doing a lot of work I think it means just people getting a job and some grifty kind of thing that didn't need to happen in the first place so rent seeking meaning trying to get paid as opposed to trying to make anything better is that a good definition rent rent seeking would be just somebody says well if I become the head of Dei I'll get a big paycheck as opposed to somebody saying do we need a head of Dei like why why are we even doing that I think it's close to that anyway um so Trump is halting gain of function research the kind that got us in trouble gain of function on the viruses he wants to Halt that but I wonder about why we why do we call it gain of function isn't it weaponization or are we pretending that we're only seeking to understand how someone else could weaponize it so we can treat it uh oh here's the definition of rent seeking uh rent seeking when an entity seeks to gain added wealth without any reciprocal contribution of productivity okay so uh my definition was not exactly right not really so I've got something on the screen that I can't make a go away which means I can't see you I don't know if you can see me really come on there should be somewhere on this screen a little X or something to tell me how to turn this off really can you even see me I I can't see your comments I've got a black screen with one image that I clicked on and no indication of any kind of a way to turn it off so I can see you no it wasn't that wasn't that clicking anywhere doesn't do it oh my God I'm going to have to get out of this to get back in just because I clicked on an image holy hell can't make it go oh okay it turns out that dragging it worked another interface fail well I'm glad you could see me anyway so gain of function sounds like weaponization to me uh Marco Rubio is off to Panama uh getting started fast but not just Panama he's going to El Salvador Guatemala Costa Rica Dominican Republican Republic Etc um so he's going to talk to Panama I'm sure that won't go well in the first conversation but there there is a story about how the Panama Canal got started that I told in the man cave but I I'll tell now the the story is and this is wild um there's a You.
Tube video on it you could just go to You.
Tube and look for Panama Canal uh and French engineer so before before the United States got involved in the Panama Canal I'll try to tell the story quickly um the French were trying to build in the same place but the French uh found out that every time they dug something it rained and then the mud just fell back in the in the trench so they just gave up so the French left but there was one engineer who was a French engineer who decided to stay to see if he could get something going so one engineer just one decides to um he he decides to convince Panama which at the time was not its own country it was an extension of Colombia so Colombia kind of extended you know along the little peninsula there uh or along whatever that is and so he talks to the Panama panamanians who are more like an area than a company than a country he said hey the Colombians that own you are like ignoring you and you're not getting your value for being part of the country you should be in you should be independent and the panamanians are like yeah yeah we should be independent how about that and then he says if you make me your Ambassador now keep in mind he's not Panamanian he's a French Citizen and he convinced the panamanians if you make me your Ambassador I'll get you Independence and they probably didn't think it was serious anyway so like sure yeah you're you're our ambassador go get us some Independence so he goes to Columbia and says hey Panama wants Independence how about that and Columbia said get out of here because of course that's ridiculous so he goes back and then he goes to the United States and this is during a Teddy Roosevelt's time now Teddy liked to take over some stuff so he was he was kind of expanding the Empire so he was already you know mentally on the same page if if we can grab something we'll grab it as he had already done and somehow the French engineer convinces them that he's speaking for Panama and that they're going to go independent and it' be really helpful if the American Navy was parked outside you know nearby and acted like they were in favor of this Independence now Teddy thinking maybe we could get some kind of very lowcost conquer some territory here so the American Navy sits sits out there waiting Colombia knows about it and then the Ambassador the ambassador of Panama declares independence and the Colombians are like hey you can't oh maybe you can well we don't care about you that much okay you're independent so they gain their independence with no fighting because a french guy wanted to build a canal and he wanted America to be the you know the Builder of it with his help so so then then he says all right we got a deal so then the Ambassador who is the French engineer he comes up with a uh I guess it would be a treaty or a deal with the United States that the United States could have control of the Panama Canal uh in return for building it you know they'd have to build it but they'd have control of it so the Americans say hey that's great they come they sign sign the deal and then they pull up to you know take control of the the canal and the panamanians say what are you doing here and the Americans say well you know because of the deal we signed a deal so Panama gave us this and the Panamanian said what deal the the only person who even knew about it was the Ambassador the Ambassador who was not even Panamanian so so not only did the French engineer create a new country out of nothing but then he made a then he made a deal with the United States the biggest thing that ever happened in Panama on his own without telling Panama so the United States comes realizes they don't really have any standing but they have this big military so they just took the canal because they knew that Panama couldn't stand up to the American Military they knew that they had some cover story of this ridiculous deal with the panan guy so they just it was just Teddy Roosevelt situation he's like oh I guess it's ours now and sure enough it was so and and then the Panamanian engineer uh had some ideas how to build it that the French didn't like so his ideas how to build it were adopted by the Americans because it looked like a good idea and it worked and they built the Panama Canal now have you ever heard that story I think it's true I mean I it was an extensive documentary on You.
Tube but I think it's true so it's a wonderful story again if you don't think one person can change the world well there's a big example now uh the other context is that Teddy Roosevelt knew that for America to be the dominant um Maritime power that we needed to connect our two oceans because if you can't get assets from one side of the country to the other without going around you know uh South America you're not really the naval power that you need to be so the panal canal had a lot to do with projecting American power and that's why Teddy Roosevelt was okay to play little fast and loose with that anyway I'm going to make an observation I've made before but I'm give you going to give you some more details have you noticed that Democrats have what I call a rape problem a rate problem let me explain the the general statement is that if something is good at a small scale Democrats will say it must be good at a big scale and that never makes sense I mean it might make sense for making money or something but that's about it so they say for example if a low amount of immigration is good for the country why wouldn't a high rate of be good for the country and then the Republic Republicans say uh that's badshit crazy those are completely different situations a low rate of immigration is sort of no problem and maybe it's more plus than minus but a high rate you're literally giving away your country and dying those are not just doing more of a good thing so it's a rate problem the Democrats for whatever reason refuse to acknowledge that doing a good thing too much has any kind of negative here's another one you don't want your police to be over policing do you yeah yeah you don't want the police to harm somebody you know maybe be a little too tough on the citizens nobody wants that so it's good if the police are maybe a little softer and more gentle in some situations but if that's good why not get rid of police entirely wouldn't that be even better it's a rate problem you you you don't just take some little good thing and then take it to the extreme and say it must be good um it's nobody really cares if an adult wants to transition well if it's good for adults why wouldn't it be good for toddlers say the Democrats again good for an adult to have enough freedom to make that kind of a choice in today's world I like it I I could argue maybe they shouldn't or maybe they won't be happy but it's not up to me I'm happy that they have the choice as adult citizens in a free country yes absolutely you do what you need to do I'll do what I need to do it's the best we can do but the rate can we keep it with just the adults we're pretty sure does it have to extend to children and dogs um how about uh it's good to help the unfortunate most people would agree it's nice if you get to help somebody needs a little hand up yeah that's good so why don't we give all of our money to everybody else oh wait a minute that's a rate problem it's only good if you keep it within bounds if you open your doors and let everybody come in and take what they want nothing works it's a rate problem about uh if diversity is good and I would agree that having having a company who worked Force kind of looks like the public that seems like a plus everybody be a little happier they'd feel a little safer uh they'd have a little more visibility about what the customers in general are looking for because you got people who touch every Community yeah you can see how that would be a plus but if a little bit of diversity is good why not just get rid of white men entirely which is what it turned into it turned into let's just get rid of white man because if you do it a little bit it's good wouldn't it be good if he got rid of all of them it's a rate problem a little bit's fine a lot of it is the end of the country um how about uh if criticizing a politician such as Trump one one that you might not agree with if criticizing him pretty severely is good because we got a competitive set we have a competitive system so both sides will get you know criticized and we like it because that that's how we settle things we argue a little bit so if a little bit of criticism of trump is good why not organize a coup against him again it's a rate problem it's a rate problem a little bit of criticism of trump is good I would even argue that he's such a change agent that I would even agree with you that a lot of criticism is good but can we keep it there does it have to be if if if criticism is good a coup is good it's a rate problem um yeah so here here's another one uh if a store allows a little bit of shoplifting and the alternative is somebody in in desperate need can't get the food or the diaper or something we kind of think oh we don't like we definitely don't like shoplifting right nobody likes it but a little bit of it you could argue the person who stole it you know got to stay alive got to put a diaper on a baby but if it's good if a little bit of it happens why don't we just open the door and make it legal to steal everything it's a rate problem again it's a rate problem it it's the thing that they get wrong every time anyway so John Bolton as you know lost his uh Secret Service protection under Trump but he was awakened at 12:00 a.m.
to be told about it that that part just seems like they were messing with him like I I suppose they needed to tell him as soon as they knew so I mean there's justification for it to give him the most amount of time to adjust to it but it it just feels like they're messing with them um but during the press conference uh Trump uh said some bad things vam he said he tried to blow up the Middle East um and then here's what Trump said I thought he was a very dumb person but but I used him well because every time people saw me coming into a meeting with Bolton standing behind me they thought that he'd attack them because he was a warmonger now how many of you remember that when Bolton was uh first added to Trump's team in the first first term do you remember what I said because of course I didn't want a war bonger on his team but if you remember what I said oh this is perfect because when Trump walks into a room with the warmonger and then he's not as bad as the warmonger he's going to look like the good cop so for NE negotiating purposes is Kind of Perfect to have one warmonger in the room you just so you're not that warmonger yourself so that's exactly what Trump said and I I think everybody who understands negotiations I think everybody understood it but now he says it directly and I do I do believe that this is not just an excuse If This Were a normal politician if Trump were normal I would have said oh you made a big mistake with him and now you're trying now you're trying to explain your big mistake I don't think so I I think he I think he knew that Bolton was a negotiating asset and he was going to use him like that right from the start uh and only Trump would do that there's nobody else who have even had that idea but uh here's my take um I love the fact that Trump is rebranding Bolton as the uh the dumbest guy in America at least on foreign policy because if you're a ran just think about this if you're a ran and you were mad at him because you thought he was going to push America to bomb your country and now he's been branded by the actual commander-in Chief as the dumbest guy of the country would your adversary want to kill the dumbest guy on your side no no that would be the last thing you want to kill the Smart Ones I mean if you're going to kill anybody if you're going to kill anybody at all you pick out their smartest guy remember when Trump uh put the hit on Solomon it's because Solomon was their best guy killing their best guy makes complete sense if you're an adversary killing their dumbest guy doesn't buy you a thing you'd rather they keep their dumbest guy no matter how dumb it is so it's kind of funny that Trump B both removed his security secret service at the same time he made it completely unnecessary to kill him It's Kind of Perfect only Trump all right here's I'm going to take another Victory lap on this next story as one does so apparently Alex Soros uh gave an interview to the financial times now the first thing that should be noted is wait a minute Alex Soros gave a interview I've never seen him do that because if he got interviewed how would he explain what he's doing like it's not really possible to explain what he's doing in any way that sounds non-evil so I always thought he just avoided interviews because he couldn't possibly explain what they were doing but he does one and then I immediately looked up who owns who owns the financial times and turns out the financial times is owned by a Japanese holding company Japanese holding company so who would be the least confrontational media if if you're going to pick of all the world who would be the least con uh the least the least dangerous media I got to think something owned by a Japanese holding company is not going to ask you the hard questions I feel like you're going to get the easy questions am I wrong I mean maybe I'm making some kind of a stereotype that's unfair but are the Japanese news people uh are they are they world famous for being extra aggressive because I know the British are aggressive French Press pretty aggressive American Press very aggressive and none of them seem to be able to talk to Soros but the one owned by a Japanese holding company well so I don't think they asked him any tough questions but still it made news uh so the first question is is Alex Soros intentionally avoiding any serious News interviews I think the answer is yes obviously remember when Elon Musk said he wanted to talk to him and and Soros said yes but I'll bet I'll bet they can't schedule it Elon can probably make it any any time but I bet how bet Alex just he's busy maybe we could do that later it's never going to happen I don't think ever Elon Musk and Alex Soros will sit in the same room alone I don't think it'll ever happen because he wouldn't put himself in that position but anyway here's the interesting part uh this is being reported by the Washington Free Beacon so according to Alex his father George uh is is angry that the money is going to well that his own organization has too many employees rent Seekers you might say and so apparently George Soros said quote I didn't want to create an employment agency now that's what his son says the dad said meaning that he didn't want the nonprofit open Society to just be hiring people like crazy but apparently they did um he said that George was very upset by the massive number of employees and quote amount of bureaucracy at his liberal nonprofit the open Society foundations and um furthermore he says his uh only regret this is what Alex the the younger one says he says his only regret since taking over is that he didn't slash the nonprofits Workforce sooner now it gets more interesting um part of the interview uh Alex s considers himself a Zionist meaning uh that he's very pro-israel and Israel's existence as you know a Jewish State now at the same time his Society the open the open Society uh has been funding millions of dollars to self-declared anti-zionist organizations how do you square that he's massively funding anti-israel organizations who are and it's not just an interpretation these are organizations who say it directly but that's the opposite of his View and this is not a random view because he's Jewish right so if you're actually Jewish and you say in an interview you know I'm a Zionist or words that effect but you're funding the exact opposite the exact opposite how do you explain it do you remember who had the only explanation for this me here's my explanation I said George senior didn't know what was happening that he didn't know what was happening he didn't know where his money was going do I win am I the winner I said that George senior didn't know where the money was going what we know is he has too many people and too much bureaucracy which does what it obscures to the owner what's happening because even the owner can't penetrate the bureaucracy and even the younger Soros has apparently been funding things that are very much the opposite of one of his core beliefs how do you think he funds things that are the opposite of his core beliefs I say neither of them were active managers so my high hypothesis was that neither of them knew what it was doing that that somehow it it had taken on its own bureaucratic life and that the bureaucracy was making the decisions based on you know Dei and Equity things and that if you had put uh either of the soros's in charge it would have looked different so uh he just bought 200 more radio stations yeah so I'm going to I'm going to double down in my hypothesis that the sorosis are not aware what the organization is doing uh and I think that's just true because it never really made sense anything we saw unless it was accidental or was somebody else was in Charge Scott why repeat lies um well why don't you tell me what the LIE is could you give me any hint what what do you think was the lie I told you what other people said is that what you're calling repeating the lies I call it the news and the context that's important so you tell me what lie what lie did I just repeat right now that was a dumbass comment if you want to tell me what the content is that you think I'm wrong about something tell me oh that Soros is so dumb not to not know his business he just proved it that's literally the story he just reported on his own that he didn't know what his business was doing because the bureaucracy yeah do better do better in your comments anyway um there's a study u in something called the conversation Michael pek who says that learning your polit political opponents don't actually hate you can reduce toxic polarization and anti-democratic attitudes um here's my problem here's what I have no patience for I have no patience for a personal accus in the context of factual statements I have every every uh you know every interest in being fact jacked that part I like so if I say something wrong then it's wrong but to immediately assume that there's some kind of character flaw because you've got some idea about reality that I don't fix yourself just fix yourself think think about how to not be that person anymore anyway back to this so you've heard the stories of people who met uh Magus supporters and we're surprised to find out that they're awesome and you've heard this anecdote a whole bunch of times right so how many times have you heard uh oh I I had Maga um neighbors but then they kept uh shoveling my driveway for me for free and I realized I was wrong about them you've heard that a million times have you ever heard it the other way have you ever have you ever heard somebody who said you know I thought these antifa people were all were all robing but then I met some they were pretty nice I never hear that it doesn't work both ways there's there's one side that was demonized by mental illness TDS and propaganda and the other side just wants to be left alone they just want to be left alone that it if if you put me in a room with a normal Democrat do you think I have any problem with them do you think that I have a negative opinion about just an ordinary Democrat never it's never even occurred to me it doesn't even seem like a thing that you should think about now there are certainly you know the extremists who are causing the ordinary Democrats to you know not be exactly the way you'd want them to be but I don't even hate the the extremists I just would you know want to stay away from them because they'd hate me the only thing that would keep me out of the room with the leftest Lefty Progressive of all time is what they think of me it wouldn't keep me out of the room because of what I think of them because what I think is people are all individuals no two are alike I'm not going to judge him because everybody's individual you know if I said hey you're not like the other person well what kind of a standard is that every person's different you can't be like other people so no I don't judge him um so let's see Thomas Massie says seed oil lobbyist will be chief of staff at USDA somebody as the oil seed processor Association really so that whole seed oil thing um I've never I've never followed it closely so as you know some number of people say the seed oils are among the worst things we're putting in our bodies and other people say no it isn't um I don't actually know which is true but I guess we'll find out looks like it's it's going to come to a head uh you don't deserve me right anyway I I just don't know enough about seed oil I I know there's I've heard the criticisms but I don't know how to know what's true um from wokeness to faith in God okay all right uh these are the end of my prepared remarks and I went too long because it took took a while to get going so I think uh this will be a reasonable time to end I'll talk to the locals people privately um later and we got 1,200 people to watch and we'll upload the show to the other platforms later it just take a while all right thanks for joining everybody bye for now
that's a terrible
tattoo
mama did you just
disappear when I tap my when I tap my
papers did the picture just disappear
cuz it it threw me out of the app
how could everything go wrong how's that
even possible that all I did was
this I I won't do it
again and it turned off the
app this is so beyond this is so beyond
possible I mean we're into some
statistical impossible situation here it
can't be that all the apps died at the
same time they couldn't all be broken at
once could they I know there's a massive
incompetence problem
but that's pretty impressive
anyway if you'd like to take your
experience
today up to levels that nobody can even
understand with their tiny shiny human
brain none of it makes sense today does
it like the the Preamble doesn't make
any sense be because the uh the starting
assumption is that things went right so
the Preamble doesn't make sense let's
just do the let's just do this
side Let's Just Surrender shall we
surrender to the fact that everything's
just going to go wrong today just
absolutely everything's going to go
wrong sip to that sometimes it goes that
way ah
and then he is slap happy it's up
172% since I told you about
it anyway all right let's talk about
some of the news you ready for
this and let's try for the fourth time
in a row to push one freaking
button okay I'm going to use my finger
which I know is a human finger I'm
positive I'm still alive and I'm going
to push the button which I've pushed now
five times once it worked all
right careful careful push the
icon
yes yes I pushed the button and it did
what it was supposed to first time
today all
right did you know there's a
breakthrough in
Fusion nobody
cares uh General
atomics they they figured out how to get
20% higher than the green wall limit the
Greenwald limit which you all know about
of course it's uh some kind of limit
that the fusion people needed to get
past and they got past it it was
considered difficult or impossible but
they did and they've also figured out to
stabilize the plasma now the thing with
the
fusion is it's it might be another 20
years of there's another breakthrough
without actually anything breaking
through but uh once it gets serious it's
all going to happen at once now isn't it
weird that that Fusion is coming which
would lower the cost of energy to zero
over time um at exactly the time we need
cheap energy and relief from
inflation have you noticed that we have
a number of timing things happening that
are weird meaning that all right we're
heading toward Doom with our debt and
our expenses and nobody can live but at
the same time if Fusion were a little
bit faster it would save us but it might
it might just be late by 20 years I mean
over the if you look at the history of
humankind missing it by 20
years that would be the slightest
slightest Miss but we have other timing
too too um so you know the AI people at
open AI think that we're on the verge of
being able to solve all of our cancers
and diseases because AI will figure out
some pattern recognition and figure out
how to do it what about the people who
have terminal cancer this
year they might miss the cure for all
cancers by a
month now it's bad enough if you you
have to die from cancer at all but think
how dumb you would feel if you died a
month before all cancer is cured that's
going to happen it's like somebody's
family member is going to die a month
before all cancer is
cured I don't know if that's a year from
now but that's what the AI people say
could be a year from now meanwhile NASA
is testing a nuclear
propulsion to go to Mars in 45 days so
currently it's 6 months I think that
would lower from 6 months to 45 days
that would be a pretty big deal and
they've um what else they
got oh I saw a quote from nval Rob he
was on Tim Ferris podcast and he said
that people who don't homeschool their
lives
suck and then they described why totally
right if anybody has had kids in the
last say last 20 years you know that the
life of the parents is essentially
destroyed by school because the school
you know loads them up with homework so
you can't have any quality time at night
but you got to get up and you've got
this stress of getting them there the
traffic and the you know everything's
tense tense getting the kids to school
if you drive them especially it's tense
and it's just
brutal but if you
homeschool you kind of make your own
schedule and everything's fine and they
perform better and they don't get
damaged by the school yeah I if you just
if you're just a regular parent with
children in
school you've got a tough life and
there's no reason for it there's no
reason for it at all because you can
homeschool and you can solve all those
problems well Mr Beast Mr Beast the uh
gigantic YouTube Star says he want he
wants to get some billionaires together
and by Tik Tock he's already talked to
his billionaires and he's pretty serious
about it he says we mean business you
know having Mr Beast and his advisors or
or his investors having them own Tik Tok
that would be pretty good as long as we
can solve the you know the privacy and
the the influence part of it so that's
interesting um president Trump has his
diet coke button back in the Oval Office
have you seen it it's like this you know
nice block of wood with one button on it
to order a Diet
Coke except I feel like he needs more
buttons don't you like I'd like to see a
trap door button where he could inviting
the top Dei director for every
government
organization so what's your job I'm the
DI
director
next what's your job well I'm the
director of
De and the Diet Coke please beep and
then you get it mixed up and you want to
Diet Coke and you know next thing you
know next thing you
know next thing you know rubo going
through the trapo oh sorry I I meant to
hit the The Diet Coke
but my
bad all
right well according to Christopher rufo
who you know was working very hard on
getting rid of Dei Ridiculousness in the
corporate world and elsewhere and uh he
says that the tech executives are
telling him that in the Silicon Valley
companies uh they respect Trump's ban on
Dei they respect
it and uh many feel relieved that they
don't they don't have to enforce it
anymore they don't have to protect and
so rufo says
resistance um to
Dei is basically
dead now does that surprise you are you
surprised that Dei could die that
easily I'm
not because I was well aware that the
main promoters of Dei tended to be rich
white guys who were just protecting
themselves so as soon as somebody said I
will hurt you more if you do it
then you don't do it then all the people
who were only doing it to avoid getting
hurt would say wait well hold on what
did you say oh oh it's going to hurt me
more to keep doing it oh then I won't do
it there there was never any
intellectual agreement it was purely
just a bunch of rich white guys covering
their ass pretending like they cared
they didn't
care they were just waiting for some
good reason not to do it Trump gave it
to them
meanwhile uh this is funny The Daily
Mail is
reporting and and I don't know if you
could trust this story if this story
were about Trump I would tell you
there's no way this is true but since
this it's about uh Jim aasta uh I'm
going to recreationally pretend it's
true now I think I've explained before
that a recreational belief is one that
doesn't really have a lot of credibility
but it would be fun if it were true
certainly would be fun yeah this is one
of those so as you know Jim aasta his
time slot is going to get moved from
10:00 a.m. to midnight which is widely
interpreted as you know he's being
minimized and CNN wants to you know
maybe encourage him to leave on his own
you know what I
mean uh but the story from Daily Mail is
that uh uh Jim aosta is reportedly
considering leaving the network you know
because of the shift of the bad time
slot and but the move comes as CNN is
slashing 200
jobs um now let me give some advice to
Jim Masta if he's telling people that
he's considering leaving the
network that would be sort of a
negotiating wouldn't you say he's sort
of negotiating with management oh if you
move my time slot I might I might quit
well let me give you some negotiating
advice Jim aosta and this is free this
is free there's there's no charged for
this
um if your company is trying desperately
to cut costs and they've already decided
that you need to move to midnight that's
not really the time to start threatening
them that you might
quit because that's exactly what they
want
obviously they want him to quit he must
be one of the more High highly paid
people he's not helping the network at
all and you know they showed it by
moving him to midnight no I wouldn't
negotiate under those
circumstances uh the good news is is
sucking at your job finally matters
again so there's that um but don't worry
about Jim AA he can always follow the
path of uh Tucker Carlson who left Fox
News and just got bigger got
bigger or he could follow the model of
Don Lemon who left his prime time show
and uh now he's
uh
doing nothing I don't know I don't think
Don Lemon worked it
out well the Oscar nominations are out
um and the only thing the Oscar
nominations for the the best movie The
only thing it tells me is movies don't
seem like a thing anymore do
they doesn't it seem
like just watching a movie doesn't feel
like a thing I do anymore there isn't a
single movie on the list I have even a
little bit of interest in i i Tred to
watch uh you know you know my story I
turn off any
movie as soon as somebody's tied to a
chair if your plot of your movie just
absolutely requires somebody to be tied
to a chair
you're just signaling you don't know how
to write it can't be true that everybody
always has to be tied to a chair no
matter what the movie is about it just
can't be true that your plot requires it
there there's no way you can't tie them
to a bed once you can't tie them to a
well sometimes they'll tie them to a
pole I guess so if they want to get
creative but now as soon as somebody's
tied to a chair I'm out so I tried to
watch a a
minseries on Prime Prime video called
the agency about the CIA now it's
fiction and characters were good and you
I kind of like the tone of it and the
writing seemed good and I got through
the first episode yesterday while I was
working second episode comes on and man
tied to a chair and that's the last I'll
ever watch of it uh I'm serious about
this if you tie somebody to a chair I'm
not going to watch that's the that's the
end of my viewing for that you have to
you got to come up with something better
than tying somebody to a chair all right
it's
2025 you can do
better meanwhile Oprah discovered that
Free Will is not a thing she didn't say
it that way what she said was that when
she got an
OIC um she understood thin people now
I'm not saying she's thin and she's not
saying she's thin
but it gave her an Insight because once
she got an O epic um apparently it it
changed her her thoughts about food
because when your body is less craving I
guess your mind is relaxed as well so
she
realized that thin people don't obsess
about food all the time like she
did you realize that's realizing that
there's no free will right so she
realized that her brain was just
different and her chemistry was
different and whatever her brain and
chemistry were designed to do well what
they were doing was obsessing about food
and that made it difficult for not to
eat too much now uh and then when she
took abmic she stopped obsessing about
it and then suddenly it was easy not to
eat too much well this is what I've been
telling people
forever um I discovered this with the
kids having sleepovers in the house and
having all their friends over and if I
got pizza
I put the pizza down and the kids no
matter how many of them there were would
appear to actually get a piece of pizza
because you know they they were always
busy doing something but they would
arrive at the food in the exact order of
their current
weight and the first time I saw it I
thought that looks like a
coincidence that that these skinniest
people don't even walk toward the pizza
they just keep doing what they're doing
like they're not even hungry and then
the people people who are a little
heavier right at the pizza now there's
no way that the way they're thinking
about food is the same because it can't
be a coincidence that the person who's
got a few extra pounds is always the
first one to the pizza but you can see
it really obviously with with
kids so I can tell with certainty that
some brains are different and it's not
about anybody choosing to be overweight
that that's not what
happens um so there is no free will
uh if you're an NPC and you'd like to
argue this let me tell you how the way
you could argue in favor of Free Will
existing is you just replace
words with your own personal definition
so if you want to argue here's what
you'd say um to to maintain your
illusion of Free Will you'd say
something like but I choose what I do
that's free
will no that's just putting a different
word for another word that's not
anything or somebody said to me in the
comments we have discipline when it is
hard no again that's just a word you
have discipline you mean you just
replaced Free Will with
discipline no that's not anything that's
just changing a word or somebody else
said um that Scott can believe what he
wishes because he has free
will so I can do what I wish
which means I have free will because you
just changed the definition of free will
to believing what I
wish yeah we we're not going to get into
this well today apparently Trump will be
addressing the world economic Forum by
Zoom or something and
uh the thing about the Trump era the
golden age is that I would literally buy
a ticket for that if you told me uh
Scott you have to pay $10 to watch a
10-minute video of trump addressing the
world economic Forum uh we don't even
know what he's going to say no idea what
he's going to say would you pay $10 to
watch 10 minutes of trump talking to the
world economic
Forum yes yes I would would you pay $10
to watch one of the movies um that
recently was nominated for an Academy
Award no
what uh I'll pay for the part before
somebody's tied to a chair oh you know
what would be
fun if there's somebody who by some
weird by some weird chance if some of if
if you've watched all of the movies that
are nominated for Academy Award can you
tell me what percentage of them have
somebody tied to a
chair it could be it could be the answer
is none I bet it's not but if the answer
is none maybe that's how you win an eomm
award it's like okay I'm writing it and
and then he's tied to a chair wait a
minute what if he's not tied to a chair
and next next you know you're nominated
for the Academy Award hey what he wasn't
even tied to a chair Academy
a anyway CNN is devolving into a
podcast so uh reportedly their CEO mark
thas
he uh he plans to do Mass layoffs as you
know um but apparently reportedly I
wasn't at the meeting so again I'll use
the same
standard if this story were about Trump
I would warn you it's probably not true
because there's no Source right it's
just somebody was at a meeting were they
were they at that meeting we don't know
so recreationally
just for fun I'm going to treat it like
it's true and the story is that uh there
was a meeting in which the CEO CNN told
Jake Tapper and Anderson Cooper that
they ought to avoid prejudging Trump and
uh stop talking about the past and all
the laware stuff and you know calling
him a felon and all that stuff and just
talk about what the future looks like
and what he's doing at the
moment um what do you think about
that well it does look like there is
some change it does look like the hosts
of CNN
are intentionally and uh I give them
credit for this most of them seem to be
finding some kind of Middle Ground
however they're still doing the thing
where they invite idiots on the show if
they're inviting idiots on the show and
they give them lots of
time it's the same CNN so you know at
the same time I'm reading this about
they're not going to be you know full of
TVs uh I see a clip of Scott Jennings
have to shut down a salute truther so
they have one of these guests on who
starts with saying that well you know
Elon did that igu was raising his hand
you see I oh my God I almost that was
close I don't know if you noticed but
inadvertently uh I had allowed one of my
hands to be higher than my waist and you
can't do that when Trump's in office
yeah you know as soon as it gets up up
here they're like is that a Hiller no oh
I was just reaching for something I was
over
Hill no oh I was just reaching for
something I just wanted to turn on my
lap the lap is a little no
no so you get get a little
jumpy but they had some guests I hadn't
seen before I don't know her name who
talked about uh musk was overshadowing
Trump and he was doing that that arm
salute now what do you think the CEO of
CNN was thinking when the guest came on
and started talking about the fake news
of the arm salute and the fake news that
musk is going to overshadow Trump and
trying to drive a wedge that feels like
exactly what the CEO said stop
doing so if the host stopped doing it
but then they introduce somebody who
does it and they do that every day which
is exactly what's
happening nothing really helped seems
like it's all the
same so anyway Scott Jennings calls it
the salute
truthers which is pretty
good um Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel
came to Elan musk defense about that
fake salute thing and he said musu is
being falsely smeared and Elon is a
great friend of Israel and um all true
all true and I'm trying to figure out
how can I get Netanyahu to do this for
me can Netanyahu do this for me it would
be great I'd like him to say that the uh
ADL uh is not right when they smeared
me that'd be great so uh BB um and
that's the reason that I don't support
Israel because they don't support me but
they do support Elon so I can see why he
would support
them um otherwise I just observe I'll
just be an observer but I can't be a
supporter because they don't support me
got to have rest got to have
reciprocity without reciprocity nothing
works right so a little reciprocity and
then we're in good
shape um there's the Sam mman story is
just getting more and more interesting
so I was unaware until Mike cernovich
found alman's old posts and started
putting them on acts I didn't realize
that Sam was not
just
anti-trump but he was really involved in
being anti-trump in 2016 and 2020
apparently so some of his posts which I
never seen then you know he was less
prominent then so there's no reason I
would have noticed um
so he this is actually a Sam Alman post
on it on back when it was Twitter on um
December 21st or I'm sorry December in
2021 so in
2021 uh so this is after Trump lost the
reelection uh Sam Alman said uh anx very
few people realized just how much Reed
Hoffman did and spent to stop Trump from
getting reelected it seems likely to me
that Trump would still be in office
without his efforts thank you
read and then Paul Graham had said in
2016 so this was just a month or so
before the 2016 election in October he
said few have done more than Sam Alman
to defeat
Trump so according to the people who
know the most and are the Insiders
Sam mman was one of the primary people
for defeating Trump in
2020 and one of the primary ones with
Reed hofen tried to keep him out of
office in
2016 did you know
that that's uh that's kind of
interesting and Alman himself
said on one of these uh I think
responding to Paul Graham he said I've
spent all of my free time and done less
work than I should have on various
projects and a lot of money the various
projects in the context of stopping
Trump how many various projects was he
involved in and how many of them were
totally
legitimate I don't know but
uh but now more recently especially
because he's sort of uh trying to work
with Trump which is necessary for all
the tech leaders are going to have to
work with him
um now he said I don't have his exact
words but Alman Alman basically said
that uh now he's had a chance to see
Trump more objectively and he doesn't
have his old
views and he he explained why he was so
wrong before by calling himself an
NPC so a non-player character somebody
who doesn't think before they act just
goes along with the crowd do you think
that explains it
do you think that one of the smartest
most capable people in the entire
country was an NPC and spent all of his
time and all of his money without
realizing that he' been hypnotized by
the
television now your your first instinct
is there's no way right Common Sense
common sense says you can't be that
smart and have acted that seemingly NPC
like for 8 years or whatever it
was and then suddenly you wake up and
now you see the error of your
ways that doesn't seem real does
it right so all of your common sense
says that doesn't seem like a real
change you you must be pretending now
because it's it's less likely you were
pretending then because you put years of
work years of work and massive amounts
of money before so that looked real and
then suddenly you do you know one post
where you're like oh sorry I was an NPC
didn't mean it and then we're supposed
to believe
it here's the hard
part that's
normal that's completely
normal if if you think there's no way
that could be true because you could be
that smart and that dumb at the same
time yeah you can totally normal if you
were to if you were to look at the
IQs of all the people suffering from TDS
and you compared to the IQs the people
not suffering from it the sufferers are
probably higher because they're more
likely to have gone to college where
they got hynotized
so IQ is actually not
opposite of being fooled high IQ and
high likelihood of being fooled try to
travel together and we have seen genuine
cases where people who had that much TDS
or at least were in the TDS world were
in fact
deprogrammed I know because I
deprogrammed some of them the you know
at least I I was part of the process um
and the fine people hoax did in fact did
in fact no doubt about it reprogram
people who were brilliant and they
didn't know they were acting like NP
sees so the first the first filter I'm
going to put on this is that this is
entirely
possible now I can almost hear Mike
covich yelling at me you
idiot he's just pretending for money I
agree with that I agree with that my my
current best take is that um he might
see he might see that he wasn't entirely
right before but he's seemingly
transactional he's got a fiduciary
responsibility to the company if he
didn't at least pretend to have pretend
to have become Pro Trump if he hadn't at
least
pretended well he wouldn't be doing his
job he he has billions of dollars
personally a stake in keeping open AI
you know a functioning successful
company so now if somebody has billions
of dollars at stake for having the right
opinion they're going to be on that
opinion so there's nothing about his
current opinion that tells us anything
about what he's thinking can't tell what
he's thinking but if you want to say to
yourself I think the old Sam was the
real one I think that's
reasonable but don't rule out that no
matter how brilliant you are and how
committed you are you could realize
later that you were
hypnotized because a lot of people did
you know if we didn't have a whole bunch
of people who said honestly you know and
they don't say this about themselves but
they could they could say but don't I'm
really really smart and I was totally
fooled by
that but lots of people are essentially
saying that so if lots of people who are
as smart as Sam Alman are saying I got
totally fooled and we believe them I
believe u bill aan for example I believe
he was genuinely fooled
but he's also genuinely brilliant how do
you explain that because it's normal
it's completely
normal be being able to be free from
persuasion is a specific skill it's not
a general intelligence thing at all in
fact general intelligence works against
you you're easier to fool dumb people
are harder to fool sometimes because
they'll say Hey you smarty pants looks
like you're trying to pull something on
me well why do you say that I don't know
I just don't trust you but what do you
see that's tipping you off don't need to
see anything I just don't trust you and
you're going to be
right so so the low IQ person who says I
just I just don't trust you ends up
being right and the smart person says H
let's look at all the facts and the
details by reading the New York Times
but I'll cross check it with a CNN to
make sure that one and the they both got
it right oh it looks like they agree I
guess that's true
so now I'll act like Trump is Hitler
because the CNN and you know being smart
isn't helping you it just is a different
skill than understanding persuasion so
you can you see the mechanism you have
to you have to be able to see the
machine if you can't see the mechanisms
of the machine the machine owns you but
once you learn enough about how it's
done such as learning how a rupar is
done learning how incentives work etc
once you realize how the Machine Works
then it just sort of materializes in
front of you and when a new hoax comes
out you go oh that just came out of that
hoax machine and and then you're immune
but you got to see it
all common sense doesn't get you
anywhere on that
topic so um and I didn't know that Reed
Hoffman and Sam were so close and worked
together on this but I don't know what's
going on with read
Hoffman someday we'll find out I think
um New York Times had a opinion piece
today I think it was an opinion piece
hard to tell these days the title was
how labeling cartels terrorists could
hurt the US
economy all right how many of you knew
that the biggest shareholder in the New
York Times is also the richest man in
Mexico and what they're talking about
here is is that the cartels are embedded
in all of the industries of Mexico it's
not just the drug industry but they're
embedded with the you know Agriculture
and everything else so it it could take
down the whole economy of Mexico not
just the drug selling part of the
economy
um now to be fair being the largest
shareholder is only
177% and he doesn't have a controlling
interest that still belongs with the
family so the family is making the all
the decisions but I simply point out
that wouldn't it have been nice to know
that the biggest shareholder for the
people who wrote this article is the
richest guy in Mexico who I'm
guessing has business interests that are
sort of have some cartel embedded with
them
so so you never know you just have to be
aware of the aware of Who's
Who uh um apparently the
Ice uh ice is going to call the uh
nonresidents aliens from now on remember
how that became like a dirty word don't
call them aliens they're just
undocumented I I've never been too
worked up about what name we use for him
and I don't you know I have to
agree that alien sounds more like
something you want to get rid of than
undocumented does and and the names
matter so um I don't love the aliens has
been
reintroduced but I wouldn't mind if all
the words are reintroduced meaning that
it just doesn't matter what you use that
seems healthy uh you shouldn't get mad
if somebody's calls says
aliens you shouldn't be happy if they
call them nondocumented well if we're
talking about the same thing it's just
words well my prediction on the JFK
files which as you know Mike Pompeo had
talked Trump out of revealing all of
them last time according to Mike Pompeo
there's nothing in there interesting
anyway but there are some secrets so
nothing that we would learn that's you
know big and shocking but still a few
Secrets even 60 years old because he
points out that if somebody was in their
20s then they could still be alive in
their 80s but he was just using that as
an example he didn't say that's the
reason some of is secret he thinks 99%
of it already available and that what
little there is left in the JFK file
isn't really going to change anybody's
mind about
anything
um here's what I
think given that we widely assume the
government itself was involved in
killing JFK the question I would ask is
do you think the government that killed
JFK and then you know if it was let's
say CIA related or dullas related um do
you think they would have left the memo
on that do you think there would have
been a memo that you could find in the
files as in uh here's a memo go kill JFK
and make sure you you keep this keep
this memo secret no there's not going to
be something in the file if our own
government killed
them if our own government killed JFK
which which is exactly what it looks
like happened they're not going to
they're not going to keep the memo I
mean even in the wildest imagination
that somebody ever wrote a memo and put
that in writing if they ever put it in
writing which is ridiculously unlikely
they certainly would have lost it by now
if you know what I mean lost it lost in
a fire
misplaced so no there isn't really any
chance there's something in the in the
JFK
file unless the JFK file says that that
the space aliens did
it what are you going to learn there
couldn't possibly be any secrets in
there at least secrets about who did it
there can't possibly
be anyway so I won't hold my breath for
that stuff um as you know TR the Trump
Administration is doing a lot of firing
and the funniest part is the uh Dei
uh professionals are trying to avoid
being fired because all the Dei people
are going to get fired uh by changing
the name of their
job so we're seeing some examples of the
director of Dei quickly changing their
names on the website to Executive you
know just generic
executive uh but I I I watched uh one
young black man who worked for the
government I forget which agency uh he
was he was sort of proudly crowing that
he was moving from his job as a you know
professional in charge of Dei to
something that sounded exactly like Dei
but used different words and he
announced it in
public at about the same time that the
Trump Administration was putting in a
clarifying order that says uh if all you
do is change your name we're going to
fire
you and so they asked people to turn
people in who were just changing the
names and still doing Dei and and like
10 minutes later he updated his post on
X from hey everybody I got this new job
to uh I've been laid off that's right he
bragged about his new job which was just
different letters for his old job at the
same time that the word went out fire
anybody who who changes jobs and keeps
doing Dei but changes the name of the
job so
got
him anyway so there's lots lots of
happening I guess the ice raid are
happening now um we're not seeing
gigantic video and stuff so one of the
things the ice people are apparently
doing
right and obviously they would do this
is they're not announcing where they're
going to attack so they don't have
cameras so we're not we're not seeing a
lot of video of their you know picking
up the people that were on the list of
the bad
people um and that's
good um oh all new hires in the
government got their offers rescinded
interesting all right um apparently
Trump has already sent 1500 uh military
troops down to the Border I don't know
if all 1500 are there yet they started
with 500 but it's targeting
1,500 and they're reinforcing the wall
and building Outpost to help them
monitor any illegal entries uh I thought
I saw in a separate
report
that
um they had orders to shoot basically
orders that they could use deadly
force whenever it made
sense now those are my words but is that
confirmed that that they have the uh
permission to fire at the border you
know if they need to you know we're
talking
defensively yeah well that's very
trumpian and uh probably a good
idea and meanwhile according to just the
news uh Trump is announcing emergency
price relief for cost of living crisis
now that doesn't mean if this were a
Democrat thing it would mean that they
put price gs on things
but that's not what Republicans do
because it's dumb and it doesn't work
haven't done that since uh Nixon that
didn't work out so they learned a
lesson um but here's what he is doing so
you decide if these actions will cause
prices to come down all right um he's
ordering all federal agencies to
untangle the American economy from Biden
constraints now what are those
constraints well he's going to eliminate
climate policies
that generally are going to increase the
cost of everything uh that make food and
fuel costs go up so in the short run if
companies get rid of their climate
expenses I think they would just Bank it
and just keep it as profit I don't think
they would immediately lower the
prices but they might so long-term ISS
should lower prices short term uh the
companies will just take an extra profit
uh he wants to eliminate rent seeking
practices now that's not a phrase that
most people know what it means rent
seeking that's sort of a political
insult that I even I forget what it
means I I always see it and I go can you
use like real regular ordinary words
like there there's something to rent
seeking that has you know its own
meaning so that that's useless
communication so my advice to the people
communicating on the Trump team don't
use Ren
seeking 99% of the public has no idea
what you're talking about they think it
means rent it has nothing to do with the
rent um and he wants to uh let's say uh
get rid of administration administrative
expenses and driving up healthc care
costs
um lower housing costs and increase the
housing Supply create employment
opportunities for American workers well
that rent seeking that phrase rent
seeking is doing a lot of work I think
it means just people getting a job and
some grifty kind of thing that didn't
need to happen in the first
place so rent seeking meaning trying to
get paid as opposed to trying to make
anything better is that a good
definition rent rent seeking would be
just somebody says well if I become the
head of Dei I'll get a big paycheck as
opposed to somebody saying do we need a
head of Dei like why why are we even
doing that I think it's close to
that anyway um so Trump is halting gain
of function research the kind that got
us in trouble gain of function on the
viruses he wants to Halt that but I
wonder about why we why do we call it
gain of
function isn't it weaponization
or are we pretending that we're only
seeking to understand how someone else
could weaponize it so we can treat
it uh oh here's the definition of rent
seeking uh rent seeking when an entity
seeks to gain added wealth without any
reciprocal contribution of productivity
okay
so uh my definition was not exactly
right not really
so I've got something on the screen that
I can't make a go
away which means I can't see you I don't
know if you can see me really come
on there should be somewhere on this
screen a little X or something to tell
me how to turn this
off
really can you even see me I I can't see
your comments I've got a black screen
with one image that I clicked on and no
indication of any kind of a way to turn
it off so I can see
you no it wasn't that wasn't that
clicking anywhere doesn't do it oh my
God I'm going to have to get out of this
to get back in just because I clicked on
an image holy hell can't make it go oh
okay it turns out that dragging it
worked another interface fail
well I'm glad you could see me
anyway so gain of function sounds like
weaponization to me uh Marco Rubio is
off to
Panama uh getting started fast but not
just Panama he's going to El Salvador
Guatemala Costa Rica Dominican
Republican Republic Etc um so he's going
to talk to Panama I'm sure that won't go
well in the first conversation but there
there is a story about how the Panama
Canal got started that I told in the man
cave but I I'll tell now
the the story is and this is wild um
there's a YouTube video on it you could
just go to YouTube and look for Panama
Canal uh and French
engineer so before before the United
States got involved in the Panama Canal
I'll try to tell the story quickly um
the French were trying to build
in the same place but the French uh
found out that every time they dug
something it rained and then the mud
just fell back in the in the trench so
they just gave up so the French left but
there was one
engineer who was a French engineer who
decided to stay to see if he could get
something going so one engineer just
one decides to
um he he decides to convince Panama
which at the time was not its own
country it was an extension of Colombia
so Colombia kind of extended you know
along the little peninsula there uh or
along whatever that is and so he talks
to the Panama panamanians who are more
like an area than a company than a
country he said hey the Colombians that
own you are like ignoring you and you're
not getting your value for being part of
the country you should be in you should
be independent and the panamanians are
like yeah yeah we should be independent
how about that and then he says if you
make me your Ambassador now keep in mind
he's not Panamanian he's a French
Citizen and he convinced the panamanians
if you make me your Ambassador I'll get
you
Independence and they probably didn't
think it was serious anyway so like sure
yeah you're you're our ambassador go get
us some Independence so he goes to
Columbia and says hey
Panama wants Independence how about that
and Columbia said get out of
here because of course that's ridiculous
so he goes back and then he goes to the
United States and this is during a Teddy
Roosevelt's time now Teddy liked to take
over some stuff so he was he was kind of
expanding the Empire so he was already
you know mentally on the same page if if
we can grab something we'll grab
it as he had already done and somehow
the French engineer convinces them that
he's speaking for Panama and that
they're going to go independent and it'
be really helpful if the American Navy
was parked outside you know nearby and
acted like they were in favor of this
Independence now Teddy thinking maybe we
could get some kind of very lowcost
conquer some territory here so the
American Navy sits sits out there
waiting Colombia knows about it and then
the Ambassador the ambassador of Panama
declares
independence and the Colombians are like
hey you can't
oh maybe you can well we don't care
about you that much okay you're
independent so they gain their
independence with no fighting because a
french guy wanted to build a
canal and he wanted America to be the
you know the Builder of it with his help
so so then then he says all right we got
a deal so then the Ambassador who is the
French engineer he comes up with a uh I
guess it would be a treaty or a deal
with the United States that the United
States could have control of the Panama
Canal uh in return for building it you
know they'd have to build it but they'd
have control of it so the Americans say
hey that's great they come they sign
sign the deal and then they pull up to
you know take control of the the canal
and the panamanians say what are you
doing here and the Americans say well
you know because of the deal we signed a
deal so Panama gave us this and the
Panamanian said what deal the the only
person who even knew about it was the
Ambassador the Ambassador who was not
even
Panamanian so so not only did the French
engineer create a new country out of
nothing but then he made a then he made
a deal with the United States the
biggest thing that ever happened in
Panama on his own without telling Panama
so the United States comes realizes they
don't really have any
standing but they have this big
military so they just took the
canal because they knew that Panama
couldn't stand up to the American
Military they knew that they had some
cover story of this ridiculous deal with
the panan
guy so they just it was just Teddy
Roosevelt situation he's like oh I guess
it's ours now and sure enough it was so
and and then the Panamanian
engineer uh had some ideas how to build
it that the French didn't like so his
ideas how to build it were adopted by
the Americans because it looked like a
good idea and it worked and they built
the Panama
Canal now have you ever heard that story
I think it's true I mean I it was an
extensive documentary on YouTube but I
think it's
true so it's a wonderful story again if
you don't think one person can change
the world well there's a big example now
uh the other context is that Teddy
Roosevelt knew that for America to be
the dominant um Maritime power that we
needed to connect our two oceans because
if you can't get assets from one side of
the country to the other without going
around you know uh South America you're
not really the naval power that you need
to be so the panal canal had a lot to do
with projecting American power and
that's why Teddy Roosevelt was okay to
play little fast and loose with
that anyway I'm going to make an
observation I've made before but I'm
give you going to give you some more
details have you noticed that Democrats
have what I call a rape
problem a rate problem let me
explain the the general statement is
that if something is good at a small
scale Democrats will say it must be good
at a big scale and that never makes
sense I mean it might make sense for
making money or something but that's
about it so they say for example if a
low amount of immigration is good for
the
country why wouldn't a high rate of be
good for the
country and then the Republic
Republicans say uh that's badshit crazy
those are completely different
situations a low rate of immigration is
sort of no problem and maybe it's more
plus than minus but a high rate you're
literally giving away your country and
dying those are not just doing more of a
good thing so it's a rate problem the
Democrats for whatever reason refuse to
acknowledge that doing a good thing too
much has any kind of negative here's
another one you don't want your police
to be over policing do you yeah yeah you
don't want the police to harm somebody
you know maybe be a little too tough on
the citizens nobody wants that so it's
good if the police are maybe a little
softer and more gentle in some
situations but if that's good why not
get rid of police entirely
wouldn't that be even better it's a rate
problem you you you don't just take some
little good thing and then take it to
the extreme and say it must be good um
it's nobody really cares if an adult
wants to
transition well if it's good for adults
why wouldn't it be good for toddlers say
the Democrats
again good for an adult to have enough
freedom to make that kind of a choice in
today's world I like it I I could argue
maybe they shouldn't or maybe they won't
be happy but it's not up to me I'm happy
that they have the choice as adult
citizens in a free country yes
absolutely you do what you need to do
I'll do what I need to do it's the best
we can
do but the rate can we keep it with just
the adults we're pretty sure does it
have to extend to children and
dogs um how about
uh it's good to help the
unfortunate most people would agree it's
nice if you get to help somebody needs a
little hand up yeah that's good so why
don't we give all of our money to
everybody else oh wait a minute that's a
rate problem it's only good if you keep
it within bounds if you open your doors
and let everybody come in and take what
they want nothing works it's a rate
problem
about uh if diversity is
good and I would agree that having
having a company who worked Force kind
of looks like the public that seems like
a plus everybody be a little happier
they'd feel a little safer uh they'd
have a little more visibility about what
the customers in general are looking for
because you got people who touch every
Community yeah you can see how that
would be a plus
but if a little bit of diversity is good
why not just get rid of white men
entirely which is what it turned into it
turned into let's just get rid of white
man because if you do it a little bit
it's good wouldn't it be good if he got
rid of all of
them it's a rate problem a little bit's
fine a lot of it is the end of the
country um how about
uh if criticizing a politician such as
Trump one one that you might not agree
with if criticizing him pretty
severely is good because we got a
competitive set we have a competitive
system so both sides will get you know
criticized and we like it because that
that's how we settle things we argue a
little bit so if a little bit of
criticism of trump is
good why not organize a coup against
him again it's a rate problem it's a
rate problem a little bit of criticism
of trump is good I would even argue that
he's such a change agent that I would
even agree with you that a lot of
criticism is good but can we keep it
there does it have to be if if if
criticism is good a coup is good it's a
rate
problem um yeah so here here's another
one uh if a store allows a little bit of
shoplifting
and the alternative is somebody in in
desperate need can't get the food or the
diaper or something we kind of think oh
we don't like we definitely don't like
shoplifting right nobody likes it but a
little bit of
it you could argue the person who stole
it you know got to stay alive got to put
a diaper on a
baby but if it's good if a little bit of
it happens why don't we just open the
door and make it legal to steal
everything it's a rate problem again
it's a rate
problem it it's the thing that they get
wrong every time
anyway so John Bolton as you know lost
his uh Secret Service protection under
Trump but he was awakened at 12:00 a.m.
to be told about
it that that part just seems like they
were messing with him like I I suppose
they needed to tell him as soon as they
knew
so I mean there's justification for it
to give him the most amount of time to
adjust to it but it it just feels like
they're messing with
them um but during the press conference
uh Trump uh said some bad things vam he
said he tried to blow up the Middle East
um and then here's what Trump said I
thought he was a very dumb person but
but I used him well because every time
people saw me coming into a meeting with
Bolton standing behind me they thought
that he'd attack them because he was a
warmonger now how many of you remember
that when Bolton was uh first added to
Trump's team in the first first term do
you remember what I
said because of course I didn't want a
war bonger on his team but if you
remember what I said oh this is perfect
because when Trump walks into a room
with the
warmonger and then he's not as bad as
the warmonger he's going to look like
the good cop so for NE negotiating
purposes is Kind of Perfect to have one
warmonger in the room you just so you're
not that warmonger yourself so that's
exactly what Trump said and I I think
everybody who understands negotiations I
think everybody understood it but now he
says it directly and I do I do believe
that this is not just an excuse If This
Were a normal politician if Trump were
normal I would have said oh you made a
big mistake with him and now you're
trying now you're trying to explain your
big mistake I don't think so I I think
he I think he knew that Bolton was a
negotiating asset and he was going to
use him like that right from the start
uh and only Trump would do that there's
nobody else who have even had that
idea but uh here's my take um I love the
fact that Trump is rebranding Bolton as
the uh the dumbest guy in America
at least on foreign policy because if
you're a ran just think about this if
you're a ran and you were mad at him
because you thought he was going to push
America to bomb your country and now
he's been branded by the actual
commander-in Chief as the dumbest guy of
the
country would your adversary want to
kill the dumbest guy on your
side no no that would be the last thing
you want to kill the Smart Ones I mean
if you're going to kill anybody if
you're going to kill anybody at all you
pick out their smartest guy remember
when Trump uh put the hit on
Solomon it's because Solomon was their
best guy killing their best guy makes
complete sense if you're an adversary
killing their dumbest guy doesn't buy
you a
thing you'd rather they keep their
dumbest guy no matter how dumb it is so
it's kind of funny that Trump B both
removed his security secret service at
the same time he made it completely
unnecessary to kill him It's Kind of
Perfect only Trump all right here's I'm
going to take another Victory lap on
this next
story as one does so apparently Alex
Soros uh gave an interview to the
financial times now the first thing that
should be noted is wait a minute Alex
Soros gave a
interview I've never seen him do that
because if he got interviewed how would
he explain what he's
doing like it's not really possible to
explain what he's doing in any way that
sounds non-evil so I always thought he
just avoided interviews because he
couldn't possibly explain what they were
doing but he does one and then I
immediately looked up who owns who owns
the financial times and turns out the
financial times is owned by a Japanese
holding company Japanese holding
company
so who would be the least
confrontational
media if if you're going to pick of all
the world who would be the least con uh
the least the least dangerous
media I got to think something owned by
a Japanese holding company is not going
to ask you the hard questions
I feel like you're going to get the easy
questions am I wrong I mean maybe I'm
making some kind of a stereotype that's
unfair but are the Japanese news people
uh are they are they world famous for
being extra
aggressive because I know the British
are
aggressive French Press pretty
aggressive American Press very
aggressive and none of them seem to be
able to talk to Soros but the one owned
by
a Japanese holding
company well so I don't think they asked
him any tough questions but still it
made news uh so the first question is is
Alex Soros intentionally avoiding any
serious News interviews I think the
answer is yes obviously remember when
Elon Musk said he wanted to talk to him
and and Soros said yes but I'll bet I'll
bet they can't schedule
it Elon can probably make it any any
time but I bet how bet Alex just he's
busy maybe we could do that later it's
never going to happen I don't think ever
Elon Musk and Alex Soros will sit in the
same room alone I don't think it'll ever
happen because he wouldn't put himself
in that position but anyway here's the
interesting part uh this is being
reported by the Washington Free
Beacon so according to Alex his father
George uh is is angry that the money is
going to well that his own organization
has too many
employees rent Seekers you might
say and so apparently George Soros said
quote I didn't want to create an
employment agency now that's what his
son says the dad said meaning that he
didn't want the nonprofit open Society
to just be hiring people like crazy but
apparently they
did um he said that George was very
upset by the massive number of employees
and quote amount of bureaucracy at his
liberal nonprofit the open Society
foundations
and um
furthermore he says his uh only regret
this is what Alex the the younger one
says he says his only regret since
taking over is that he didn't slash the
nonprofits Workforce
sooner now it gets more
interesting um part of the interview uh
Alex s considers himself a Zionist
meaning uh that he's very pro-israel and
Israel's existence as you know a Jewish
State now at the same time his Society
the open the open Society uh has been
funding millions of dollars to
self-declared anti-zionist
organizations how do you square that
he's massively funding
anti-israel organizations who are and
it's not just an
interpretation these are organizations
who say it
directly but that's the opposite of his
View and this is not a random view
because he's
Jewish right so if you're actually
Jewish and you say in an interview you
know I'm a Zionist or words that effect
but you're funding the exact
opposite the exact
opposite how do you explain it
do you remember who had the only
explanation for this me here's my
explanation I said George senior didn't
know what was
happening that he didn't know what was
happening he didn't know where his money
was
going do I win am I the winner I said
that George senior didn't know where the
money was going what we know is he has
too many people and too much
bureaucracy which does
what it
obscures to the owner what's happening
because even the owner can't penetrate
the
bureaucracy and even the younger Soros
has apparently been funding things that
are very much the opposite of one of his
core
beliefs how do you think he funds things
that are the opposite of his core
beliefs I say neither of them were
active
managers so my high hypothesis was that
neither of them knew what it was doing
that that somehow it it had taken on its
own bureaucratic life and that the
bureaucracy was making the decisions
based on you know Dei and Equity things
and that if you had put uh either of the
soros's in
charge it would have looked
different
so uh he just bought 200 more radio
stations
yeah so I'm going to I'm going to double
down in my hypothesis that the sorosis
are not aware what the organization is
doing uh and I think that's just true
because it never really made
sense anything we saw unless it was
accidental or was somebody else was in
Charge Scott why repeat
lies um well why don't you tell me what
the LIE is could you give me any hint
what what do you think was the
lie I told you what other people said is
that what you're calling repeating the
lies I call it the news and the context
that's
important so you tell me what lie what
lie did I just
repeat right now that was a dumbass
comment if you want to tell me what the
content is that you think I'm wrong
about something tell
me oh that Soros is so dumb not to not
know his business he just proved
it that's literally the story he just
reported on his own that he didn't know
what his business was
doing because the
bureaucracy yeah do better do better in
your
comments anyway
um there's a study u in something called
the conversation Michael pek who says
that learning your polit political
opponents don't actually hate you can
reduce toxic
polarization and anti-democratic
attitudes
um here's my
problem here's what I have no patience
for I have no patience for a personal
accus
in the context of factual
statements I have every every uh you
know every interest in being fact jacked
that part I like so if I say something
wrong then it's wrong but to immediately
assume that there's some kind of
character flaw because you've got some
idea about reality that I
don't fix yourself just fix yourself
think think about how to not be that
person anymore
anyway back to this so you've heard the
stories of people who met uh Magus
supporters and we're surprised to find
out that they're awesome and you've
heard this
anecdote a whole bunch of times right so
how many times have you heard uh oh I I
had Maga um neighbors but then they kept
uh shoveling my driveway for me for free
and I realized I was wrong about
them you've heard that a million times
have you ever heard it the other
way have you ever have you ever heard
somebody who said you know I thought
these antifa people were all were all
robing but then I met some they were
pretty nice I never hear that it doesn't
work both ways there's there's one side
that was demonized by mental illness TDS
and propaganda and the other side just
wants to be left
alone they just want to be left alone
that it if if you put me in a room with
a normal
Democrat do you think I have any problem
with them do you think that I have a
negative opinion about just an ordinary
Democrat never it's never even occurred
to me it doesn't even seem like a thing
that you should think about now there
are certainly you know the extremists
who are causing the ordinary Democrats
to you know not be exactly the way you'd
want them to be but I don't even hate
the the extremists I just would you know
want to stay away from them because
they'd hate me the only thing that would
keep me out of the room with the leftest
Lefty Progressive of all time is what
they think of me it wouldn't keep me out
of the room because of what I think of
them because what I think is people are
all individuals no two are
alike I'm not going to judge him because
everybody's individual you know if I
said hey you're not like the other
person well what kind of a standard is
that every person's different you can't
be like other
people so no I don't judge
him
um so let's see Thomas Massie says seed
oil lobbyist will be chief of staff at
USDA somebody as the oil seed processor
Association
really so that whole seed oil
thing um I've never I've never followed
it closely so as you know some number of
people say the seed oils are among the
worst things we're putting in our bodies
and other people say no it
isn't um I don't actually know which is
true but I guess we'll find out looks
like it's it's going to come to a head
uh you don't deserve me
right anyway I I just don't know enough
about seed oil I I know there's I've
heard the criticisms but I don't know
how to know what's
true um from wokeness to faith in God
okay all right uh these are the end of
my prepared remarks and I went too long
because it took took a while to get
going
so I think uh this will be a reasonable
time to end I'll talk to the locals
people privately um
later and we got 1,200 people to watch
and we'll upload the show to the other
platforms later it just take a while all
right thanks for joining
everybody bye for now