Back to episode — Episode 2749 CWSA 02/13/25
Context —
o say something like, no, no, no, we were supposed to guard against it. So we were working against large-scale social deception. It's just listed that way on the invoice. So now we're against large-scale deception. We're trying to end it. You think that's possible? You know, it wouldn't be too weird if something on an invoice was ambiguous, but it would really be weird to me if they put in direct…
← Previous segment →incredible. So Lee Zeldin did a video in which he's claiming that they've discovered a staggering 20 billion that the Biden regime, they call it, laundered to NGOs. So what it sounds like is there was a video, I think it was Project Veritas, had an undercover video in which the Democrats and the EPA were saying, oh yeah, we're throwing the gold bars off the Titanic. What they meant was we're trying to spend money as quickly as possible before Trump finds out what's going on. And so they parked 20 billion dollars in some kind of a financial institution so they could get it out the door. And then once it's out the door, it could be allocated to their evil ways, I guess. But they wanted to like pretend it was already gone. So they did some kind of intermediary little trick to make it look like it was already gone and couldn't be clawed back. But it might get clawed back. We'll find out.
Now if this is all true, this would be an example of a staggering amount of corruption. Is it illegal? I don't know. I don't know what law specifically it breaks, but it certainly is corrupt anyway.
Apparently the government is planning to, our government is planning to sell hundreds of federal government buildings, according to Wired. Now I don't think that's going to settle the budget or anything, but there are 500 or more buildings that don't seem to have a use. Five hundred federal buildings that are sort of empty or not being utilized in any great way. Five hundred. Over 500. That's just shocking. So yeah, let's go close those buildings.
All right, here's the most troubling story of the day according to me, according to the New York Post. The House GOP, they've got a budget plan they've put together for Trump, and they're looking for 4.5 trillion in tax cuts. Now that would be over some number of years. 4.5 trillion in tax cuts. But so far you're saying I like that. But the budget cuts would be more like two trillion. So again there may be some confusion about what time window you're looking at. You know, some
Context —
might be what's happening this year and some might be a 10-year kind of number. So you have to be careful if it's a one-year or a 10-year number. But is there a problem? How in the world is Trump going to get away with increasing our public debt by two trillion, which is what it would be? Now I get that I like tax cuts and I get that I like budget cuts, but if your tax cuts are tremendously bigge…
Next segment → →