Episode 2749 CWSA 02/13/25
If you would like to enjoy this same content plus bonus content from Scott Adams, including micro-lessons on lots of useful topics to build your talent stack, please see scottadams.locals.com for full access to that secret treasure.
Technical difficulties today, so I'm just streaming on my phone until the battery runs out. I've got my laptop open, so I'm doing a higher-quality feed at the same time on Locals. If you go to ScottAdams.locals.com, you can watch it there if you like that concept. All right, what time is it? Oh, I…
View segment →you were expecting to be watching this on YouTube or Rumble, that won't be happening this morning, but we'll probably post the finished show after it's live. Might take a little while. Well, story number one. There's a study at the University of Zurich that shows that hypnosis does alter brain acti…
View segment →on your actual brain, it wouldn't be doing anything. There are a lot of people who think that hypnosis is just, uh, what is it that Penn Jillette says? I think he said some while ago that hypnosis was two people lying to each other. The hypnotist pretending to be a hypnotist and the subject pretend…
View segment →ything about the motives yet, but yeah, I'll tell you, the car-related attacks, they seem to kill as many or more people than bombs. So maybe this is the beginning of a very long, terrible trend. I don't know. Let's talk about hostage releases because that's a better story. So I was listening to th…
View segment →g hostages back is that, you're saying that, quote, "When you hold our citizens, we'll come after you at any cost." That's sort of the Trump message. If you hold our citizens, we'll come after you at any cost. Now that is exactly the right... it's not Witkoff, it's not, uh, it's not Witkoff or Gren…
View segment →them money to do it. Do you think Hamas wants to hear that? That Israel just has a free pass and the United States won't put any pressure on them to ease up? That would be the ultimate nightmare for Hamas. But I think that's where they're heading. They're heading to their ultimate nightmare. There…
View segment →ox in charge of counting the chickens. And then you're like, uh, do we still have 18 chickens? Uh, no, no, it's, uh, we have 14 chickens, says the fox. And then you say, what, did you eat those four chickens? And the fox says, I don't know what you're talking about. There's no data that says we ate…
View segment →. It's always the fox counting the chickens. And that's where we're at. That's why you need DOGE, because DOGE lets the rooster in. Lets the rooster count the chickens. I'm torturing that analogy. All right, well, you probably know that Trump was suing the Pulitzer committee for giving Pulitzer Pr…
View segment →'ve never seen that before. That's weird. Anyway, then also the DMV commissioner. I think that has something to do with issuing driver's licenses to non-citizens. I'm guessing. But it gets more interesting now. You say to yourself, huh, it's kind of a coincidence, isn't it? Oh, I think, isn't Alvin…
View segment →esterday? Trump is doing what we should have done. Quote, "Trump is moving so fast. They hit the ground running in a serious way. It's like genuinely impressive." Remember, this is the most Democrat, anti-Trump people you've ever heard. It's genuinely impressive. Impressive. And then they throw in t…
View segment →saving the Republic and ending wars, but really it's just a preparation for stealing your democracy and setting up a kleptocracy. Stealing your democracy, setting up a kleptocracy. The kleptocracy is exactly what they're dismantling. And then there's Dan Goldman. There's no accountability or oversi…
View segment →at least in the news business there aren't too many funny Scots. But Scott Jennings is just lapping me lately. I just had a belly laugh over this one. So Scott Jennings is commenting this morning over someone else's post. Well, it was a story actually on Fox News. So his comment, I'll just read it…
View segment →thing early in her career where she had some kind of USAID connection or in Russia. And he said possibly Taylor Swift. There's no evidence that Taylor Swift was connected to any of this, but there is a video of somebody in the intelligence community suggesting that she would be the type of person th…
View segment →o say something like, no, no, no, we were supposed to guard against it. So we were working against large-scale social deception. It's just listed that way on the invoice. So now we're against large-scale deception. We're trying to end it. You think that's possible? You know, it wouldn't be too weird…
View segment →incredible. So Lee Zeldin did a video in which he's claiming that they've discovered a staggering 20 billion that the Biden regime, they call it, laundered to NGOs. So what it sounds like is there was a video, I think it was Project Veritas, had an undercover video in which the Democrats and the EPA…
View segment →might be what's happening this year and some might be a 10-year kind of number. So you have to be careful if it's a one-year or a 10-year number. But is there a problem? How in the world is Trump going to get away with increasing our public debt by two trillion, which is what it would be? Now I get…
View segment →at's going to happen in 10 years, more like five years. But I don't see how this works. To me it's been looking for a while like the amount that Trump wants to add to the budget, because they want to add 300 billion a year for border security and national defense. No, I understand that, the border s…
View segment →this works. Because I'm getting a little mad about it. I mean, maybe the public doesn't follow these things closely enough to know that this can't work. They're basically presenting us a doom scenario in which we all die for sure. Can you give me any hope? Because this budget just tells me we're go…
View segment →r AI copyright case, according to Wired. So I guess they found that there was some specific AI company, what is it, not one of the big ones, doesn't matter, a smaller AI company you never heard of. Apparently there's evidence that they may have trained their model using some proprietary stuff from T…
View segment →ey stranger, what would you do to end the war in Ukraine? Almost everybody would say, well, you know, Zelensky is going to need to get flexible about losing some land. Russia is probably going to keep what they've already gotten. And probably the only way the war ends is if Ukraine makes some kind o…
View segment →rest in keeping Ukraine a sovereign country. If we don't have access to your minerals, you're just an expense and you're on your own. Well, that should loosen them up a little bit, don't you think? Because I think that's exactly the situation. We're either going to turn you into a profit center or y…
View segment →saying that his persuasion skills are way above average. And then I'd say Bukele from El Salvador. So I put him in the third spot. But all of them are world-class persuaders, just completely in a different, they're in a level of their own. If you look at Canada, Justin Trudeau, no skill at all. No…
View segment →n't do what we want. He says if we can work together, we can both get richer. That's really strong. And I don't believe anybody has said to Russia that someday we could work together and it'll be a great benefit to both countries. Now I don't know specifically what he has in mind, but don't you thin…
View segment →e and Rumble later. All right, I'm seeing something going by in the comments. Zuby said in a post we've collectively suffered through TDS for 10 years and now we must also suffer through EDS, which would be I guess Elon Derangement Syndrome instead of Trump Derangement Syndrome. And Elon Musk says…
View segment →Technical difficulties today, so I'm just streaming on my phone until the battery runs out. I've got my laptop open, so I'm doing a higher-quality feed at the same time on Locals. If you go to ScottAdams.locals.com, you can watch it there if you like that concept.
All right, what time is it? Oh, I guess it's time for a show. Hold on. I just assumed that nothing was going to go right this morning. That's how it was looking so far. I can't see the comments of anybody but Locals right now, but feel free to comment away. Got 1,500 people on X. Excellent. How many do we have on Locals? Six hundred sixty-eight. Good. All right.
Good morning, everybody, and welcome to the highlight of human civilization. It's called Coffee with Scott Adams, and you've never had a better time. But if you want to take this up to levels that nobody can even understand with their tiny, shiny human brains, all you need for that is a cup or a mug or a glass or a tankard or a chalice or a stein, a canteen, a jug, or a flask, a vessel of any kind. Fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee. And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure, the dopamine of the day, the thing that makes everything better. It's called the simultaneous sip.
And yes, it's going to happen right now. Right now.
If you were expecting to be watching this on YouTube or Rumble, that won't be happening this morning, but we'll probably post the finished show after it's live. Might take a little while.
Well, story number one. There's a study at the University of Zurich that shows that hypnosis does alter brain activity and neurochemistry. Do you know who they could have asked? Huh? I wonder if hypnosis will alter brain activity and neurochemistry. Do you know who could have answered that question? Every hypnotist for the last 100 years. Every one of them. It's the most basic thing you learn. If hypnosis didn't have any effect on your actual brain, it wouldn't be doing anything.
There are a lot of people who think that hypnosis is just, uh, what is it that Penn Jillette says? I think he said some while ago that hypnosis was two people lying to each other. The hypnotist pretending to be a hypnotist and the subject pretending to be hypnotized. But no, there is a change in the brain, and that's the longest known thing that every hypnotist has known. It's just obvious anyway.
There's another tragic terrorist attack, it looks like, over in Germany. An Afghan man drove a car into a big crowd. He's injured. I think at least 28 people, some of them really badly. We don't know anything about the motives yet, but yeah, I'll tell you, the car-related attacks, they seem to kill as many or more people than bombs. So maybe this is the beginning of a very long, terrible trend. I don't know.
Let's talk about hostage releases because that's a better story. So I was listening to the U.S. envoy for hostages, and his name is, his name is not written down on my notes, so just imagine I said the name of the person. Today's just a disaster. I feel like everything today is just not going to work, so that might be funny. That might be entertaining in its own way.
Yeah, the most important thing I was going to write down was the name of the person who is the United States envoy for hostages. Yeah, that guy. Okay, so he was saying that one of the reasons that Trump is successful getting hostages back is that, you're saying that, quote, "When you hold our citizens, we'll come after you at any cost." That's sort of the Trump message. If you hold our citizens, we'll come after you at any cost.
Now that is exactly the right... it's not Witkoff, it's not, uh, it's not Witkoff or Grenell. All right, never mind. Stop guessing. The Witkoff, Grenell. That will still be wrong no matter how many times you write it down. All right, I shouldn't have even brought it up.
But the right framing is that hostages are not really a negotiating tool, at least with the United States, because we're going to take everything you have. If you take our hostages, we'll take everything you have. And what happened when Trump put the extra threat on? Well, now Hamas is getting a little flexible, says they're going to release some more hostages by Saturday, maybe, which was Trump's deadline.
Now that's not all the hostages. Trump has said if you don't release them all, there's going to be hell to pay. So if there's some they're holding back, in theory they're still hell to pay. Now what would be hell to pay? Probably just unleashing Israel and saying all right, we're out, we're out. Whatever Israel wants to do is fine. We'll even give them money to do it.
Do you think Hamas wants to hear that? That Israel just has a free pass and the United States won't put any pressure on them to ease up? That would be the ultimate nightmare for Hamas. But I think that's where they're heading. They're heading to their ultimate nightmare.
There was a story in Politico by Eugene Ludwig titled "Voters Were Right About the Economy. The Data Was Wrong." Anybody who's watched this show, we always knew the data was wrong. It's not because you heard it from me. Didn't you all know the data was wrong? Because they kept saying, I don't know what you're talking about. This data said you should be happy and have lots of money. But people would say, I can't afford eggs and gas. And then the Biden administration would say, yes you can. Look at the data.
And people would say, I'm pretty sure I know what's in my pocket. You don't know what's in my pocket, and I don't have enough money for eggs and gas. Oh yes you do. Just look at these high-level statistics. So of course time goes by, and then finally we can learn that it was all fake.
Now here's something I've been telling you for a long time, but I finally figured out a better way to say it. I've been saying for a long time, wait until you find out that all data that is important is fake. All data that's important. You know, not something that, let's say, a scientist did for a little study that nobody cared about. Right? That's probably okay. Or it might be. But anything that's big and important like the economy, those are all fake numbers. And there's a reason for that. There's a systemic reason why all the important numbers, the important ones, just limiting it to the important ones, are fake.
Do you know what the reason is? Well, it's like this. You don't want the fox to be your only source of data of how many chickens are left. Does that make sense? Because we always put the fox in charge of counting the chickens. And then you're like, uh, do we still have 18 chickens? Uh, no, no, it's, uh, we have 14 chickens, says the fox. And then you say, what, did you eat those four chickens? And the fox says, I don't know what you're talking about. There's no data that says we ate any chickens. There's just 14 chickens.
All right, we'll check back tomorrow. There are eight chickens. What? What are you doing? Are you eating those chickens again? I don't even know what you're talking about. There's no document that shows any chickens were eaten. It's just eight chickens.
So you can take the fox and the chicken analogy to pretty much everything. Who told us that vaccinations were perfectly safe? The fox. We didn't get it from anywhere except the company that is making money from selling it. Right? Was there some independent analysis that I'm not aware of? No. No.
So in every case, the only people who are close enough to know what the real numbers are are the foxes. They're the ones in charge of the numbers, and the foxes are the ones that are stealing and lying and, you know, shaving things to make it biased in one direction or the other. So there's a systemic reason. It's not a coincidence that all data, all data that's important, is fake. It has to be, because it's coming from the fox.
As soon as you realize that all the data comes from the fox and not from the chickens, then everything makes sense. And if you find an exception where the chickens are in charge of counting themselves, let me know about that, because I've never heard of it. Never heard of it. It's always the fox counting the chickens. And that's where we're at.
That's why you need DOGE, because DOGE lets the rooster in. Lets the rooster count the chickens. I'm torturing that analogy.
All right, well, you probably know that Trump was suing the Pulitzer committee for giving Pulitzer Prizes to the Russia collusion liars in the press. But worse than that, I guess they said something else. Let's see. There was something they said after the war that Trump didn't like, and apparently this is going to go forward. So there were some challenges to it that have been overcome, but the appeals court, the Florida appeals court, says the burden of proof about that there was actual malice seems to be met. In other words, it wouldn't go forward if there was no evidence of malice, meaning that they did it intentionally. But apparently there's evidence they did it intentionally, and that it was just basically a defamation hit job.
Now this is interesting. This is really interesting, because I don't know what kind of evidence they have that would demonstrate malice. We know what they did, but how do you get in their heads? There might be some kind of document or maybe a witness or something who said, oh yeah, we did this just to get Trump. So I haven't heard that. I'm just speculating. But maybe that's what's happening. We'll see.
Meanwhile, Attorney General Pam Bondi, she's filing some charges against the bad people in New York. The bad people in New York. And now this is over the question of prioritizing illegal aliens over American citizens. So the idea would be that they're not cooperating with the federal government to protect American citizens, and that's their job and they need to do that.
Now I guess this is a criminal action. It's not a civil. If Pam Bondi is filing charges, it's not a civil suit. It's a criminal. So they're in real trouble. But the people who are in trouble are the governor, Kathy Hochul, the Attorney General Letitia James, who, as we know, has been targeting Trump and decided to make up some reasons that he allegedly broke some laws. So Letitia James is sort of one. She's like a Sith Lord come after Trump. Oh, and if I don't get him, the next Sith Lord will. Ayanna Pressley will get you. She's a supervillain if I don't.
So I don't know how many anti-Trump people can actually have a persona that looks exactly like a supervillain. It's weird that there's two of them. I mean, if only Ayanna Pressley dressed intentionally like a supervillain, which she does for reasons I don't understand, that would be unique enough. But you've got two Democrats who have total Sith Lord supervillain vibe. I've never seen that before. That's weird.
Anyway, then also the DMV commissioner. I think that has something to do with issuing driver's licenses to non-citizens. I'm guessing. But it gets more interesting now. You say to yourself, huh, it's kind of a coincidence, isn't it? Oh, I think, isn't Alvin Bragg part of this? Or is it just Letitia James? Yeah, Alvin Bragg is part of it too, I think. Although I didn't see that in the list, so I may be conflating two different stories.
So Bill O'Reilly had a hypothesis. He was on NewsNation with Chris Cuomo, and this is just some speculation from Bill O'Reilly, but he is very experienced and he's sniffing some stuff out. But he doesn't have proof. So what I'm going to say, I want you to understand that Bill O'Reilly wants you to know he doesn't have any proof of this. It's just something he's feeling. That the real target of all this might be Letitia James and Alvin Bragg, the two people who came after Trump. And it's also possible that the reason, and again this is just speculation, there's no evidence of this whatsoever, that Mayor Adams got his pardon from Trump, maybe because he knows where the bodies are buried with Alvin Bragg and Letitia James.
Now I don't know if he would, but if somebody did know where the bodies were buried, he'd be a top guess, I would think. So we'll keep an eye on that. So it does look like maybe the Trump administration is circling the bad elements. Now if we didn't know for sure that these are lawfare people, the people who tried the lawfare on Trump, I would not be in favor of kind of going after them. But what they did was so inappropriate in our constitutional situation that it's effectively criminal, without maybe breaking any laws, but in effect it's criminal. So yeah, should go after them as hard as possible.
Meanwhile, Democrats still trying to figure out what's wrong with Democrats. And on Pod Save America, this is one of the big Democrat podcasts, and the ex-Obama people on there, and they're very Democrat. So if I didn't mention it, they're very, very Democrat. Like super Democrat. And as you can imagine, have been big critics of Trump. Guess what they said yesterday? Trump is doing what we should have done. Quote, "Trump is moving so fast. They hit the ground running in a serious way. It's like genuinely impressive." Remember, this is the most Democrat, anti-Trump people you've ever heard. It's genuinely impressive. Impressive. And then they throw in this: impressive in a dark and sinister way. But nonetheless impressive.
So even when they're fully understanding that he's doing some good stuff, they have to throw in the little propaganda phrase. Oh, well, dark and sinister. Did I mention it's dark and sinister? Yeah, he's doing everything right, but maybe there's a dark and sinister undertone to it all. The Democrats have are vague statements that can't be supported by anything.
Yeah, so they go on, quote, "Do we all know that government is slow? We all know that government can be inefficient. We all know that the bureaucracy can be bloated. We all worked in the White House. We tried to reorganize the government. We tried to find efficiency. It's hard to do." And then one of them said, some of this is pretty annoying because it's some of the stuff we should have done.
Now I do appreciate the honesty of this, so I'm going to call out this is a very honest take, except for the dark and sinister part. Yeah, yeah, they should have done it. They couldn't do it. And then they're watching it being done right in front of them.
So I thought I'd start a list of all the empty attacks. The things that Democrats say about Trump, they don't have any meat to them whatsoever. It's just stuff to scare you. So now we've got dark and sinister. That whatever he's doing, oh, whatever he's doing on the surface, it looks perfect. Nothing wrong with it on the surface, but underneath, underneath we believe it's dark and sinister.
And then they've got, you know, sure he might be, Trump might be saving the Republic and ending wars, but really it's just a preparation for stealing your democracy and setting up a kleptocracy. Stealing your democracy, setting up a kleptocracy. The kleptocracy is exactly what they're dismantling.
And then there's Dan Goldman. There's no accountability or oversight with the DOGE project. There's no accountability or oversight. Well, here's the problem of having politicians talk about things that make sense. They can't do it. I'm pretty sure that in the history of audits of big companies, there's not one time that the CEO went along with the audit, you know, with the auditors. So when a big company does its own audit, they'll often audit themselves. Do you think the CEO follows them around and says, what do you got there, Bob? Did you find a document? What's it say? What's it say? Oh, it says that. All right, now what do you got? What's that? Can you read that to me?
There's no world in which the CEO is informed about the audit while it's going on, except for the big stuff. So the auditor might say we found this, we found that, we found that. But is the CEO saying give me the document to prove it? Or is the CEO saying all right, when you're done with the audit, write it up and then tell me everything you found? I think the most normal way that DOGE should be working is that Musk should answer questions every day, which he does. What do you find? What are you looking at? And he says so. But the onus is on him and DOGE to provide documents when he's done.
Now will everything that he says preliminarily turn out to be, will it check out? Not everything. No. This is a messy process and it has to be, because there's no way to do a clean process. So you either give up or you do it messy. There's only two possibilities. We don't want to give up. So there's that.
And then the other one is CNN's running with this one. There's no actual evidence of fraud. What do you mean there's no actual evidence? Do you need a court case? They're doing the same thing they did with the election. Well, there's no actual evidence. Just because everything looks sketchy, but there's no actual court who said that.
So let's see. We've got dark and sinister. We've got stealing your democracy, setting up a kleptocracy. No accountability or oversight. And no actual evidence of fraud. What do all of those things have in common? There's not a single American citizen who gives a about any of it. Give me my straw. Get rid of these pennies. Solve the war in Ukraine. Cut the budget. There's a pretty long list of things I do care about, but nowhere on that list is the dark and sinister, stealing your democracy. Oh, he's also stealing your privacy. They're stealing my privacy. There's no accountability or oversight. No actual evidence of fraud. It's pretty weak. Weak sauce.
Well, here's something I hate. I hate waking up and being the second funniest Scott. I'm kind of used to being the funniest Scott, you know, and at least in the news business there aren't too many funny Scots. But Scott Jennings is just lapping me lately. I just had a belly laugh over this one.
So Scott Jennings is commenting this morning over someone else's post. Well, it was a story actually on Fox News. So his comment, I'll just read it in the order that it's written. So Scott Jennings posts on X. He says Trump lets cut taxes, shrink the government, and unleash American energy. And then he says Democrats. And he points to the Fox News story that says the House Democrats are reintroducing reparations legislation.
So Representative Ayanna Pressley, supervillain, says reparations are a necessary step in achieving justice. Now would it be fair to say Democrats are not good at reading the room? Was this really the time to introduce reparations? Probably not the right timing. Probably just a little off in the timing.
But I would go further than that, and I would love to see somebody in the Trump administration calculate reparations, because I'm pretty sure it's going to show that the money's already been paid three times. Because you know what would be in that calculation, right? You'd first have to calculate how descendants of slavery would have done if they stayed in Africa versus how they would do over here. And then specifically the descendants, not the actual slaves. The slaves are unhappy, right? So everybody agrees there was nothing good about being a slave. But the descendants of slaves ended up in a better place than maybe they would have been.
Now that's no reason for slavery. We all agree slavery is bad. Slavery is bad. But if you were going to calculate, you'd have to calculate any social payments made. You have to calculate how much everybody added to the economy versus subtracted from the economy. You'd have to do differences in law enforcement costs for different demographic groups. You'd have to bring everything into it. And I don't know if it would be a positive number or negative by the time you were done with an actual honest analysis.
Now if somebody actually did calculate reparations honestly, would you believe it, whatever number they came up with? No. Because I just got done telling you that all data that matters is fake. So whoever does the calculating for reparations, it's going to come up with a fake number. So if it's somebody who's pro-reparations, they'll just ignore a whole bunch of things and come up with a number that says yo, it's a lot of money. If it's somebody who's biased against reparations, such as me, if I calculated it would show that it's already been paid three times. So there's no such thing as the true number, and there's no such data for anything important that's real. This is no exception.
But certainly I would have included 50 years of discrimination against white males. I mean, that's pretty expensive.
And along those lines, Fox News is reporting that there's an Illinois university being sued because the professor says he was fired for objecting to race-based hiring. University of Illinois in Chicago. So Professor Stephen Klein Schmidt, he said he wasn't buying into being a racist. He probably just thought he wanted to be a professor. And then they said but you're also, you know, can you be a racist? And then he said how about no? How about no, I won't be a racist with you. And that was a lawsuit. I think he might win.
Trump says reciprocal tariffs are coming out today. I guess that means that everybody who's tariffing us for anything is going to get the same back. I don't know how any of this is going to work out, but I do see it as a negotiating tactic. And so far Trump's shown that he can navigate these negotiating tactics. All right, so we'll see.
Tulsi Gabbard got confirmed. Is it true that McConnell voted no on Tulsi Gabbard? That's a little suspicious, isn't it? Just a little suspicious. It makes you think he might be hiding something. But the half-dead turtle said no.
RFK Jr., I guess the vote on him was a tie, and we're expecting JD Vance to go break the tie, and it should be confirmed today. I don't know if it's today.
All right, so looks like we get Tulsi and we'll get RFK Jr. And wow, I just have to say wow. Good job. Good job getting both of them.
Mike Benz was on the Joe Rogan show, probably three hours of goodness there. But one of the things that popped out was Mike Benz talking about how USA and the intelligence communities have historically trained some musical artists, both in our country and in other countries, to be part of their, I guess, political narrative that the intelligence community wants to push. Or to do it for statecraft reasons.
Now some of the names he named, including working with Dua Lipa. So I guess there was something early in her career where she had some kind of USAID connection or in Russia. And he said possibly Taylor Swift. There's no evidence that Taylor Swift was connected to any of this, but there is a video of somebody in the intelligence community suggesting that she would be the type of person that they would want to influence. There's no evidence that they have.
So you probably heard that the AP, Associated Press, they lost their White House press access because they refused to call the Gulf of America the Gulf of America. They're sticking with the old way, Gulf of Mexico. And I didn't really understand why. Like why would they be the one entity that does that? Well, their argument is that they're an international news entity, and if the other countries around the world don't know what the Gulf of America is, they can't refer to it that way because, you know, it would be against their style guide. So they have a style guide that they'll, I guess, they'll use whatever is most internationally recognized.
But that also means that they're not doing America First. America First would be use America's names for stuff and let the other countries work it out. I mean, you could always put it in parenthesis: used to be called the Gulf of Mexico. So it's not the worst defense in the world, but it does feel like they're not quite on Team America here. So Trump's letting them know, I guess.
Here's a story I hope there's more context to this one, because if it's exactly what it looks like, it's pretty bad. So apparently Reuters, which does a lot more than news stuff, according to the Musk account I was reading, that DOGE found a document that actually says that a part of Reuters was being paid a lot of money for doing what is actually listed on the invoice. This is actually on the invoice: large-scale social deception. What? Is that real? Did our government pay Reuters to implement a large-scale social deception?
Now before I say that that's true, it's being reported, but before I say it's true, I'd kind of want to hear what Reuters said about it, which I haven't seen yet. Do you think Reuters is going to say something like, no, no, no, we were supposed to guard against it. So we were working against large-scale social deception. It's just listed that way on the invoice. So now we're against large-scale deception. We're trying to end it. You think that's possible? You know, it wouldn't be too weird if something on an invoice was ambiguous, but it would really be weird to me if they put in direct words which are on the invoice: large-scale social deception.
I'm going to put a pin in that one and wait for the other side of the story. But it's what it looks like on the surface.
Well, Trump is calling out Politico and the New York Times for accepting some millions of dollars, I guess each, from USAID. And Trump asked what's that for? Like why is the government paying you? Are they paying you to do fake news? Are they paying you to get good stories about themselves? And he wants to claw it back.
So again, we don't know why these entities were receiving money, but it all looks sketchy. So I do like that Trump is going to treat it like it's sketchy and, you know, go after it. I feel like Trump can sniff out corruption and fraud faster than the average person because he's really good at knowing what looks sketchy, and he can just recognize it anywhere. So he's probably seeing some there.
Now according to this, it's incredible. So Lee Zeldin did a video in which he's claiming that they've discovered a staggering 20 billion that the Biden regime, they call it, laundered to NGOs. So what it sounds like is there was a video, I think it was Project Veritas, had an undercover video in which the Democrats and the EPA were saying, oh yeah, we're throwing the gold bars off the Titanic. What they meant was we're trying to spend money as quickly as possible before Trump finds out what's going on. And so they parked 20 billion dollars in some kind of a financial institution so they could get it out the door. And then once it's out the door, it could be allocated to their evil ways, I guess. But they wanted to like pretend it was already gone. So they did some kind of intermediary little trick to make it look like it was already gone and couldn't be clawed back. But it might get clawed back. We'll find out.
Now if this is all true, this would be an example of a staggering amount of corruption. Is it illegal? I don't know. I don't know what law specifically it breaks, but it certainly is corrupt anyway.
Apparently the government is planning to, our government is planning to sell hundreds of federal government buildings, according to Wired. Now I don't think that's going to settle the budget or anything, but there are 500 or more buildings that don't seem to have a use. Five hundred federal buildings that are sort of empty or not being utilized in any great way. Five hundred. Over 500. That's just shocking. So yeah, let's go close those buildings.
All right, here's the most troubling story of the day according to me, according to the New York Post. The House GOP, they've got a budget plan they've put together for Trump, and they're looking for 4.5 trillion in tax cuts. Now that would be over some number of years. 4.5 trillion in tax cuts. But so far you're saying I like that. But the budget cuts would be more like two trillion. So again there may be some confusion about what time window you're looking at. You know, some might be what's happening this year and some might be a 10-year kind of number. So you have to be careful if it's a one-year or a 10-year number.
But is there a problem? How in the world is Trump going to get away with increasing our public debt by two trillion, which is what it would be? Now I get that I like tax cuts and I get that I like budget cuts, but if your tax cuts are tremendously bigger than your budget cuts, you're making the deficit worse by trillions.
Now depending on the time span we're looking at, it could be that the two trillion that's going to be added to the budget, you know, maybe it's spread over several years. And if you keep cutting the budget during those years, you know, you might get to a much better situation than it looks like in a direct line calculation. So yeah, I don't know if the tariffs are going to, I don't think the tariffs are going to make up the difference, but maybe. I don't know.
But let me tell you, as a numbers person, somebody who's, you know, my early career before any of this was the finance guy in two big corporations, not the finance guy but a finance guy, and I was always working with big projections and numbers and what's going to happen in 10 years, more like five years. But I don't see how this works. To me it's been looking for a while like the amount that Trump wants to add to the budget, because they want to add 300 billion a year for border security and national defense. No, I understand that, the border security especially. But you're going to add that expense and then you're going to cut taxes, and the amount that DOGE can cut out won't be anywhere near the amount that we lost in tax revenue. So it's not like this is going to goose the economy enough.
So let me just say it directly. As far as I can tell, the House GOP is not on the same page with DOGE. I don't think they're on the same page. I think Elon Musk needs to tell us if this budget goes through and if DOGE does an amazing job and gets rid of one or two trillion dollars in expenses, do we fix our problem or do we just make it worse by voting in a bunch of expensive things?
I don't feel like we have a plan. It looks to me like there's two separate tracks, and one destroys the other one. So DOGE is a great track if nothing else changed. But if you add wildly cut taxes and add expenses at the same time as DOGE, and the things you're cutting and adding far exceed the amount of budget reductions, somebody needs to explain to us from the Trump administration how this works. Because I'm getting a little mad about it.
I mean, maybe the public doesn't follow these things closely enough to know that this can't work. They're basically presenting us a doom scenario in which we all die for sure. Can you give me any hope? Because this budget just tells me we're going to let you all die. That's the budget. The budget is you're all dead. Because the whole reason that DOGE exists is because our budget is out of control. Our debt is out of control. So if you're going to give us another plan that says oh, you're going to be dead in a few years, and that's for the Trump administration, you, because that's not what we signed up for. We signed up for less debt. Give us less debt however you have to do it. Whatever you need to do, give us less debt. Because this looks like you've planned to kill us. You've planned to kill us. That's what the news is telling me.
Now if I'm reading it wrong and I'm doing the numbers wrong, I would love to be corrected. But it doesn't look like it. It looks like they plan to kill us. And we didn't fight this hard to get a Republican administration so the Republican administration can kill us. Figure it out. Figure it out. Don't do this. Yeah, I am so out if they don't balance the budget or make a good try. It's got to be at least a good try. We're not seeing anything that looks like a good try. It looks like they're screwing DOGE. Looks like they're screwing Musk by giving him a no-win situation. Not cool. Not cool anyway.
I would love to know that my rant was completely embarrassing and shameful and that I'm just getting the numbers wrong. But I don't think I am. So we need some answers.
According to Brett Adcock, I can't believe there's a guy who owns the Figure robot company. These are humanoid-looking robots that don't have genitalia. But the founder of the company is named Adcock. I mean, come on. Humanoid robots with no genitalia made by somebody called Adcock. Somebody's going to add a few. Maybe it's aftermarket. But anyway.
So what Adcock says, he says, quote, "In our lifetime you will see more humanoid robots than humans when you're out and about." Trying to resist. Try to resist. I wake up every morning trying to resist making any reference to Skynet. No, only NPCs say Skynet. When you say the robots will outnumber the humans, don't do it, Scott. Don't do it. Try to resist. Don't say Skynet or else you're an NPC. Skynet. Skynet. Skynet. I couldn't resist. I'm sorry. I'm weak.
I don't have much else to say about that story except stop making me think of Skynet. Because as soon as I read this, that there will be more robots out and about than humans, my first question is, is that because we made more robots? That'd be the best-case scenario. Or are there just fewer humans? There are a couple different ways you can get there.
Well, how could there be fewer humans? Well, here's one way, even without Skynet. Turns out, according to The Conversation, and May Dwayne is writing that teenagers are using AI companions and they're saying it's easier than dating humans. AI companions. So teenagers are falling in love with chatbots.
Well, who was it who told you 20 years ago that when the AI got good enough that people would prefer the AI? I did. Yeah, I told you that people would prefer it. But I'll be more specific. Here's my calculation. I believe that the top 10 percent of attractive people will have options of being with the other attractive people. But the bottom 90 percent of attractive people, which I'm certainly in the bottom 90 percent, but the bottom 90 percent are going to just prefer AI because the AI will not disappoint them. It really is, we really do, no joke, have a situation that we're not quite ready for.
I don't even know if it's bad. I mean, if the bottom 90 percent are happier, well, okay, you know, maybe that is a good solution. But no, I think we're already at a point where only the top 10 percent are likely to reproduce, and everybody else is just going to be roboting up. That's what I think.
So speaking of AI, Thomson Reuters won their first major AI copyright case, according to Wired. So I guess they found that there was some specific AI company, what is it, not one of the big ones, doesn't matter, a smaller AI company you never heard of. Apparently there's evidence that they may have trained their model using some proprietary stuff from Thomson Reuters. And it looks like the judge ruled in Thomson Reuters' favor, said the AI company's copyright was indeed infringed. Oh, it's by Ross Intelligence. Ross Intelligence, that's the name of the AI company. So it's specifically for legal stuff, I guess. That's what the AI was.
Now remember, I warned you that if you're worried about AI suddenly taking over everything, AI is going to have a tough path through all the lawsuits, because everybody who's not getting rich from AI is going to be trying to sue it to stop it. Yeah, and although it looks like this case was kind of clean, that they could more easily prove that somebody trained on their materials without permission, I feel like all the general AIs are just going to get sued and sued and sued until it's tough to do business. So I think that's what's going to slow them down: lawsuits.
Well, meanwhile, Ukraine is going the obvious way. How many of you already knew how to end the war in Ukraine for years, right? If I had asked you, hey stranger, what would you do to end the war in Ukraine? Almost everybody would say, well, you know, Zelensky is going to need to get flexible about losing some land. Russia is probably going to keep what they've already gotten. And probably the only way the war ends is if Ukraine makes some kind of commitment not to join NATO. Right? Yeah, you and I could have done that. And it looks like that's exactly what's going to happen, is that there will be a land-for-peace deal. Probably. We don't know any details yet, so we're just speculating still.
And of course there's no way the NATO thing can stick. They're going to have to back off on that. But as you know, Scott Bessent was sent over there, Treasury headed the Treasury to work on a deal where America would benefit from the mineral resources of Ukraine and sort of pay it back. But my understanding is, just before I went live today, I believe that Ukraine backed out. So I think they got talked out of giving up their minerals. So I don't know who talked them out of it, but as of now they're negotiating and saying nope, no minerals.
What do you think Trump's going to say to Ukraine before he starts negotiating with Putin? Well, I don't know, but I think it's going to go something like this. If we do have access to your minerals, then you can guarantee that there'll be some American interest in keeping Ukraine a sovereign country. If we don't have access to your minerals, you're just an expense and you're on your own. Well, that should loosen them up a little bit, don't you think? Because I think that's exactly the situation. We're either going to turn you into a profit center or you're on your own, because we're not going to pay forever for something we don't need and don't want.
All right, I'm looking at, yeah, I think Zelensky is probably just negotiating, but he doesn't have a strong hand. So we'll see how that goes.
This is what Trump said himself about his conversations. I guess he had a big phone call with Putin. And I'll just read it because I want to tell you what both of them are doing right. I've decided that the three most persuasive leaders in terms of technique who actually understand persuasion are Trump, number one, best in the world. Putin, number two. You don't have to like Putin. This is not a pro-Putin statement. I'm just saying that his persuasion skills are way above average. And then I'd say Bukele from El Salvador. So I put him in the third spot. But all of them are world-class persuaders, just completely in a different, they're in a level of their own.
If you look at Canada, Justin Trudeau, no skill at all. No skill. Great Britain, no skill at all. Germany, no skill at all. Yeah, but America, Putin, and Bukele, lots of skill.
And so I'll read what Trump said in his Truth post, and we'll pick it apart for the persuasion lesson. Okay, so Trump said in a Truth post, I just had a lengthy and highly productive phone call with Vladimir Putin of Russia. Number one, he's now essentially considering Putin a peer that he can work with, and they're already making success. So this is a little bit of claiming success but also a little bit of allocating success to both of them equally. This is technique. He didn't say I got something, we're going to get something. He said that the two of us working together looks like something productive is going to come out of it. Perfect. Perfect persuasion.
Then he says we discussed Ukraine, the Middle East, energy, artificial intelligence, power of the dollar, and various other subjects. Perfect. Because the way that you make an agreement that other people can't figure out how to do is you bring in other elements. Now we don't know that he's done that, but that would be the perfect technique. Oh, well, if ending the war with Ukraine, you're not quite there yet. How about if we throw in something else, something else you care about? And or the other way, we can deny you something else you care about. So you bring in these other variables that are big just to make it easier for the other side to say yes. Good technique.
If you kept the conversation to the narrow topic of Ukraine versus Russia, it might not be enough because both sides are a little stuck in their positions or have been. We'll see if they're still stuck. So that's perfect. Bring in those other topics.
Then Trump says we both reflected on the great history of our nations, in all capital letters, and the fact that we fought so successfully together in World War II, remembering that Russia lost tens of millions of people and we likewise lost so many. Now we didn't lose tens of millions, but here he is acknowledging that Russia is a great nation. That is good. That's good technique. Because what is one of the things that Putin wants to get out of all of this business? Putin wants to get out of it that Russia is a great nation. That's not the only thing, of course. They have legitimate interests. But it does seem very important to both Putin and probably Russians that they're treated with full respect.
And if you consider that Russia was a big reason that Hitler was defeated, that is worth calling out. You know, it's not like Stalin was a good guy or anything, but showing some respect for tremendous sacrifice, tremendous sacrifice on your, I don't know, your partner, I'd say in this case. I don't want to say adversary. Good technique. Perfect technique. Now he's made it easier for Putin to make a deal because he's given him one thing that he wants, which is we're going to treat you like a real leader of a real important country, and you have our full respect. It's just that there's some things we need and we're not going to back down. That is really good.
Then he says we talked about the strengths of our respective nations and the great benefit that we will someday have in working together. There it is. That's classic Trump. When Trump talks to North Korea, he doesn't say only we will bomb you to the Stone Age if you do something bad. What just happened? Holy shit, Trump just fired all federal prosecutors appointed by Biden. Holy. All of them. I don't even know the implications of that. Wow. All right, we'll catch up with that after the show.
All right, but anyway, the thing that Trump does when he negotiates with another country, he doesn't just say we're going to kill you if you don't do what we want. He says if we can work together, we can both get richer. That's really strong. And I don't believe anybody has said to Russia that someday we could work together and it'll be a great benefit to both countries. Now I don't know specifically what he has in mind, but don't you think that if we were, let's say if we could find a way not to be at each other's throats, that we could make some money and be safer? I think so. I think so.
So that's classic Trump and good technique. And then Trump says but first, as we both agreed, we want to stop the millions of deaths taking place in the war with Russia, Ukraine. Again, just perfect. I mean, I might sound like just a fanboy at this point, but I'm showing you the actual technique. I'm not just saying he's awesome. I'm showing you the details. This again is the right frame. Trump has been right on frame. This from the start. We want fewer people to die, blah blah blah, NATO, blah blah blah. We want fewer people to die, blah blah blah. Russia's natural defenses, blah blah blah, minerals. We want fewer people to die. Stay in that frame. Because if you stay in the frame of we want fewer people to die, there's a solution. If you leave that frame into all NATO, 10 years, oh you blah blah blah, degrade Russia's military, oh Russia had a good reason or didn't they have a good reason? Nothing. You got nothing.
But if you can agree to enter the frame of saving lives, then you got something to work with. So that's pure Trump. Pure perfect.
And then he says this is what Trump says. He says President Putin even used my very strong campaign motto of common sense. So apparently Putin appealed to common sense, knowing that he was echoing Trump's great unifying campaign idea. So there's nothing more unifying than common sense, because nobody can disagree with it. It's common sense. So it's the ultimate high ground. It very much worked domestically.
But here's an example of Putin being that good persuader. So you notice that Putin seems to be on board with all the framing that Trump has mentioned. We don't know, but there was no sense of an objection. So if he is, then he knows what a good frame looks like and he's willing to enter it. A good frame would be can we include all these other interests? That's a good frame. Can we just figure out how to stop killing people? That's a good frame. So Putin knows that.
But he's also using a technique called mirroring. So he's mirroring back Trump's favorite thing: common sense. That is strong technique because it's also a sign of respect and it makes you feel like the two of you don't have much distance. It's almost like you're one person because you're both having the same thought. Yeah, common sense. Let's do that common sense thing. Very strong. That's why Putin's good at this.
So yeah, and then that great benefit of working together, it's a carrot, not just a stick. It's all perfect.
So will Trump get it done? Don't know. But if he does get it done and he gets also a mineral deal, you know, a rare earth mineral deal with Zelensky, Trump might be able to do the thing that is so Trumpy. Here's what I mean. Ending the war would be a real major accomplishment, especially if he did it in a month. It would be one of the great accomplishments of a president. But is that enough to just be amazingly end a war that couldn't be ended by other people? It's not enough. Trump wants to turn Ukraine into a profit center and get our money back. Now I don't know if he's going to do that. I don't know if that's going to work. But if he ends the war in a month and turns Ukraine into a profit center, that's standing ovation. That's just like make room on Mount Rushmore. Like nobody could do that. Like no president would even try to do that. Nobody would even think that it was worth doing. Nobody would even put like one minute of energy into trying it. But I think he could get it done. So that's why we voted for him.
All right, so those are all the comments I have, my prepared remarks. If you're joining late, a little bit of technical difficulty, probably on my end. So we're only streaming today on X and on Locals, and I believe we'll be able to put the recorded version on YouTube and Rumble later.
All right, I'm seeing something going by in the comments. Zuby said in a post we've collectively suffered through TDS for 10 years and now we must also suffer through EDS, which would be I guess Elon Derangement Syndrome instead of Trump Derangement Syndrome. And Elon Musk says what if I get EDS too? That's funny.
RFK vote is 52 to 48? You shoveled two driveways while listening. Good for you.
Hey, we're going to let the X people stay for a minute. So this is the after show. Normally I would just do this for the subscribers of mine on Locals. But since you were so nice on X to stay with us this long, we'll keep you live for another minute or so.
All right, usually I just look through the comments, see if there's anything to comment on that I missed. Yeah, you are correct. If it gets to a bigger audience, I'm happy with it. All right, I don't have much else to talk about, I guess. So I'm going to say goodbye to the folks on X. Thanks for joining. I hope your sound was good. The microphone's not actually connected to my phone, but it's connected for the Locals people.
All right, everybody, bye for now.
techncal difficulty today so I'm just streaming on my phone until the battery runs out I've got my laptop open so I'm doing a higher quality um feed at the same time on locals if you go to Scott adams.
locals.com you could watch it there if you like if you like that concept all right what time is it oh I guess I guess it's time for a show hold on I just assumed that nothing's going to go right this morning that's how was looking so far I can't see the comments of anybody but locals right now but feel free to comment away got 1,500 people on X excellent how many we have on locals 668 good all right good morning everybody and welcome to the highlight of human civilization it's called coffee with scat Adams and you've never had a better time but if you want to take this up to levels that nobody can even understand with their tiny shiny human brains all you need for that is a cuper marer glass of thanker chel suain a canteen jug or flask a vessel of any kind fill it with your favorite liquid I like coffee and join me now for the unparallel pleasure dopamine to the day thing that makes everything better it's called the simultaneous Sip and yes it's going to happen right now right now if you were expecting to be watching this on You.
Tube or Rumble that won't be happening this morning but we'll probably post the finished show after it's live might take a little while well Story number one there's a study in the University of Zurich that shows that hypnosis does alter brain activity and neurochemistry do you know who they could have asked huh I wonder if hypnosis will alter brain activity and neurochemistry do you know who could have answered that question every hypnotist for the last 100 years every one of them it's the most basic thing you learn if hypnosis didn't have any effect on your actual brain it wouldn't be doing anything there are a lot of people who think that hypnosis is just uh what is it that uh pen galette says I think he said some while ago the hypnosis was two people lying to each other the hypnotist pretending to be hypnotist and the subject pretending to be hypnotized but no there is a change in the brain and uh that's the longest known thing that every hypnotist is known it's just obvious anyway there's another tragic terrorist attack it looks like uh over in Germany an Afghan man drove a car into a big crowd um he's injured I think at least 28 people some of them really badly we don't know anything about the motives yet but yeah I'll tell you the the car related attacks they seem to kill as many or more people than bombs so maybe this is the beginning of a very long terrible Trend I don't know let's talk about hostage releases because that's a better story um so I was listening to the US Envoy for hostages um and his name is his name is not written down on my notes so just imagine I said the name of the person today's just a disaster I feel like everything today is just not going to work so that might be funny that might be entertaining in its own way yeah the most important thing I was going to write down was the name of the person who is the United States Envoy for hostages yeah that guy okay so you were saying that uh one of the reasons that Trump is successful getting hostages back is that uh you're saying that quote when you hold our citizens will come after you at any cost that's sort of the Trump message if you hold our citizens we'll come after you at any cost now that is exactly the right now it's not wickoff it's uh it's not wiof or grenell all right never mind stop guess stop guessing the wick caer grenell that will still be wrong no matter how many times you write it down all right I shouldn't have even brought it up um but the right the right framing is that uh hostages are not really a negotiating tool at least with the United States because we're going to take everything you have if you take our hostages we'll take everything you have and what happened when Trump put the extra threat on well now Hamas is getting a little flexible says they're going to release some more hostages by Saturday maybe which was Trump's deadline now that's not all the hostages um Trump is said if you don't release them all there's going to be held to pay so if there's some they're holding back in theory they're still held to pay now what would be held to pay probably just unleashing Israel and saying all right we're out we're out whatever Israel wants to do is fine we'll even give them money to do it do you think Hamas wants to hear that that Israel just has a free pass and that United States won't put any pressure on them to ease up that would be the ultimate nightmare for Hamas but I think that's where they're heading they're heading to their Ultimate Nightmare there was a story in Politico by Eugene Ludwig titled voters were right about the economy the data was wrong anybody who's watched this show we always knew the data was wrong it's not because you heard it from me didn't you all know the data was wrong because they kept saying I don't know what you're talking about this data said you should be happy and have lots of money but people would say I can't afford eggs and gas and then the Biden Administration would say yes you can look at the data and people would say I'm pretty here I know what's in my pocket you don't know what's in my pocket and I don't have enough money for eggs and gas oh yes you do just look at these highlight high level statistics so of course time goes by and then finally we can learn that it was all fake now here's something I've been telling you for a long time but I finally figured out a better way to say it I've been saying for a long time uh wait until you find out that all data that is important is fake all data that's important you know not not something that let's say a scientist did for a little study that nobody cared about right that's probably okay or it might be but anything that's big and important like the economy those are all fake numbers and there's a reason for that there's a systemic reason why all the important numbers the important ones just limitating it to the important ones are fake do you know what the reason is well it's like that you don't want the fox to be your only source of data of how many chickens are left does that make sense because we always we always put the fox in charge of counting the chickens and then you're like uh do we still have 18 chickens uh no no it's uh we we have 14 chickens says the fox and then you say what did you eat those four chickens and the fox says I don't know what you're talking about there's no data that says we ate any chickens there's just 14 chickens all right we'll check back tomorrow there are eight chickens what what what are you doing are you eating those chickens again I don't even know what you're talking about there's no document that shows any chickens were eaten it's just eight chickens so you can take the fox and the chicken analy to pretty much everything um who told us that vaccinations were perfectly safe the fox we we didn't get it from anywhere except the company that is making money from selling it right was there some independent analysis that I'm not aware of no no so in every case the only people who are close enough to know what the real numbers are are the foxes they're the ones in charge of the numbers and the foxes are the ones that are stealing and lying and you know shaving things to make it you know biased in One Direction or the other so there's a systemic reason it's not a coincidence that all data all data that's important is fake it has to be because it's coming from the Fox as soon as you realize that all the data comes from the fox and not from the chickens then everything makes sense and if you find an exception where the chickens are in charge of counting themselves let me know about that because I've never heard of it never heard of it it's always the fox counting the chickens and that's where we're at that's why you need Doge because Doge lets the uh lets the rooster in lets the rooster count the chickens I'm torturing that analogy all right well uh you probably know that Trump was suing the Pitzer committee for giving pulit Sur prises to the Russia collusion Liars in the Press but worse than that I guess they said something else uh let's see there was something they said after the war that Trump didn't like and apparently this is going to go forward so there were some challenges to it that have been overcome but uh the appeals court the Florida appeals court says the burden of proof about that there was actual malice uh seems to be made in other words it wouldn't go forward if there was no evidence of malice meaning that they did it intentionally but apparently there's evidence they did it intentionally and that it was just a basically defame jump now this is interesting this is really interesting because I don't know what kind of evidence they have that would demonstrate malice we know what they did but how do you get in their heads there might be some kind of document or maybe a witness or something who said oh yeah we did this just to get Trump so I haven't heard that I'm just speculating but maybe maybe that's what's happening we'll see meanwhile attorney general Pam Bondi she's uh filing some charges against the bad people in New York the bad people in New York and now this is over the question of prioritizing illegal aliens over American citizens so the idea would be that they're not cooperating with the federal government to protect American citizens and that's their job and they need to do that now I guess this is a criminal action it's not a civil right uh if you're F if Pam Bondi is filing charges it's not a it's not a civil suit it's a criminal so they're in real trouble but the people who are in trouble are the governor Kathy hokel the Attorney General Leticia James who as we know has been targeting Trump and decided to make up some reasons that he allegedly broke some laws so Leticia James is sort of one the um she's like like a Sith Lord come after Trump oh and if I don't get him the next Sith Lord will uh Ayana Presley will get you she's a super villain if I don't so I don't know how many anti-trump people can actually have a Persona that looks exactly like a super villain it's weird that there's two of them I mean if if only ayna Presley dressed intentionally like a super villain which he does for reasons I don't understand that would be unique enough but you got two Democrats who have total Sith Lord super villain Vibe I've never seen that before that's weird anyway uh then also the DMV commissioner I think that has something to do with issuing driver's license to to a non citizens I'm guessing but it gets more interesting now you say to yourself huh huh it's kind of a coincidence isn't it um oh I think isn't alen Bragg part of this or is it just Laticia James yeah Alvin Bragg is part of it too I think um although I didn't see that in the list so that I may be conflating two different stories so Bill O'Reilly had a hypothesis he was on news Nation with Chris guomo and this is just some speculation from Bill Riley but he is very experienced and he's sniffing some stuff out but he doesn't have proof so what I'm going to say I want you to understand that bill O'Reiley wants you to know he doesn't have any proof of this it's just something he's feeling um that the real Target of all this might be Leticia James and Al and brag the two two people who came after Trump and it's also possible that the reason and again this is just speculation there's no evidence of this whatsoever that mayor Adams got his pardon from Trump um maybe because he knows where the bodies are buried with Elvin Bragg and Luisa James now I don't know if he would but if somebody did know where the bodies were buried he'd be he'd be a top guess I would think so we we'll keep an eye on that so it does look like maybe the Trump Administration is circling the the bad elements now if we didn't know for sure that these are lawfare people the people who which tried the laware of trump I would not be in favor of kind of going after them but what they did was so inappropriate in our constitutional situation that it's effectively criminal without maybe breaking any laws but in effect it's criminal so yeah should go after them as hard as possible meanwhile Democrats still trying to figure out what's wrong with Democrats and on pod of America this is one of the big Democrat podcasts and the GU back Obama people on there and they're they're very Democrat so if I didn't mention it they're very very Democrat like super Democrat and and as you can imagine have been big critics of trump guess what they said yesterday Trump is doing what we should have done quote Trump is moving so fast they hit the ground running in a serious way it's like genuinely impressive remember this is this is the most Democrat anti-trump people you've ever heard it's genuinely impressive impressive and then they throw in this impressive in a dark and Sinister way but nonetheless impressive so even when they're even when they're fully understanding that he's doing some good stuff they they have to throw in the little propaganda phrase oh well dark and Sinister uh did I mention it's dark and Sinister yeah he's doing everything right but but maybe there's a dark and Sinister undertone to it all the Democrats have are vague statements that can't be supported by anything uh yeah so they they go on quote do we all know that government is slow we all know that government can be inefficient we all know that the bureaucracy can be bloed we all worked in the we all worked in the F and white house we tried to reorganize the government we tried to find efficiency it's hard to do and then one of them said some of this is pretty annoying because it's some of the stuff we should have done now I do appreciate the honesty of this so I'm going to call out this is a very honest take except for the dark and Sinister part uh yeah yeah they should have done it they couldn't do it and then they're watching it being done right in front of them um so I I thought I'd start a list of all the empty attacks the things that Democrats say about Trump they don't have any meat to them whatsoever it's just stuff to scare you so now we've got dark and Sinister that whatever he's doing oh whatever he's doing on the surface it looks perfect nothing wrong with it on the surface but underneath underneath we believe it's dark and Sinister and then they've got uh um you know sure he might be uh Trump might be saving the Republic and ending Wars uh but really it's just a preparation for stealing your democracy and setting up a kleptocracy stealing your democracy setting up a kleptocracy the ocracy is exactly what they're dismantling and then there's uh Dan Goldman um there's no accountability or oversight with the Doge project there's no accountability or oversight well here's the problem of having politicians talk about things that make sense they can't do it um I'm pretty sure that in the history of audits of big companies there's not one time that the ca CEO went along with the audit you know with the Auditors so when when a big company does its own audit they'll often audit themselves do you think the CEO follows them around and say what do you got there Bob did you find a document what's it say what's it say oh says that all right now what do you got what's that can you read that to me there's no world in which the CEO is informed about the audit while it's going on except for the big stuff so the auditor might say we found this we found that we found that but is the CEO saying give me the document to prove it or is the CEO saying all right when you're done with the audit write it up and then tell me everything you found I think the most normal way that Doge should be working is that musk should answer questions every day which he which he does uh what do you find what are you looking at and he said so but the onus is on him and Doge to provide documents when he's done now will everything that he says preliminarily turn out to be will it check out not everything no this is a messy process and it has to be because there's no way to do a clean process so you either give up or you do it messy there's only two possibilities we don't want to give up so there's that uh and then the other one is uh CNN's running with this one there's no actual evidence of fraud what do you mean there's no actual evidence do you need a court case they they're doing the same thing they did with the election well there's no actual evidence just because everything looks sketchy but there's no actual Court who said that so let's see we've got darken Sinister we've got stealing your democracy setting up a kleptocracy no accountability or oversight and no actual evidence of fraud what do all of those things have in common there's not a single American citizen who gives a about any of it give me my straw get rid of these pennies solve the war in Ukraine cut the budget there's a pretty long list of things I do care about but nowhere on that list is the darken Sinister stealing your democracy oh he's also stealing your privacy they're stealing my privacy uh there's no accountability or oversight no actual evidence of fraud it's uh pretty weak weak sauce well here's something I hate I hate waking up and being the second funniest Scott I'm kind of used to being the funniest Scott you know and at least in the news business there aren't too many funny Scots but Scott Jennings is just lapping me lately I I just had a belly laugh over this one so Scott Jennings is commenting this morning over someone else's posts so well it was a story actually on Fox News so his comment I'll just read it in the order that is written um so Scott Jennings posts on X he says Trump let's cut taxes shrink the government and unleash American Energy and then he says Democrats and he points to the Fox news story that says the house Democrats are reintroducing reparations reparations legislation so representative uh Ayan presle super villain uh says reparations are a necessary step in achieving Justice now would it be fair to say Democrats are not good at reading the room um was this really the time to introduce reparations probably not the right timing probably just a little off in the timing but uh I would go further than that and uh I would love to see somebody in the Trump Administration calculate reparations because I'm pretty sure it's going to show that the money's already been paid three times because you know what would be in that calculation right you'd first have to calculate how uh descendants of slavery would have done if they stayed in Africa versus how they would do over here and then spefic specifically The Descendants not not the actual slaves the slaves are unhappy right so everybody agrees there was nothing good about being a slave but the descendants of slaves ended up in a better place than maybe they would have been now that's no reason for slavery we all agree slavery is bad slavery is bad um but if you were going to calculate You' have to calculate uh any social payments made you have to calculate how much everybody added to the economy versus subtracted from the economy you'd have to do differences in law enforcement costs for different demographic groups you'd have to bring everything into it and I don't know if it would be a positive number or negative by the time you were done with an actual honest um analysis now if they if somebody actually did calculate reparations honestly would you believe it whatever number they came up with no because I just got done telling you that all data that matters is fake so whoever does the calculating for reparations it's going to come up with a fake number so if it's somebody who's Pro reparations they'll just ignore a whole bunch of things and come up with a number that says yo it's a lot of money if it's somebody who's biased against reparations such as me uh if I calculated it would show that it's already been paid three times so there's no such thing as the true number and there's no such this data for anything important that's real this is no exception but certainly I would have included 50 years of discrimination against white males I mean that's pretty expensive uh and along those lines Fox News is reporting that there's an Illinois University being sued because the professor says he was fired for objecting to race-based hiring University of Illinois in Chicago so Professor stepen Klein Schmid um he said he wasn't buying into the uh being a racist he probably just thought he wanted to be a professor and then they said but you're also you know can you be a racist and then he said how about no how about no I won't be a racist with you and that was lawsuit I think he might win Trump says reciprocal tariffs are coming out today I guess that means that everybody who's terrifing us for anything is going to get the same back I don't know how any of this is going to work out but I do see it as a negotiating tactic and so far Trump's shown that he can navigate these negotiating T tactics all right so we'll see tulsy gabard got confirmed uh is it true that Mc.
Connell voted no on telsy gabard that's a little suspicious isn't it just a little suspicious it makes you think he might be hiding something but the half dead Turtle said no RFK Jr.
I guess the vote on him as a tie and we're expecting JD Vance to go break the tie and it it should be should be confirmed today is I don't know if it's today all right so looks like we're we get Tulsa and we'll get RFK Jr and wow I I just have to say wow good job good job getting both of them Mike Ben was on uh Joe Rogan show probably three hours of goodness there but one of the things that popped out was Mike Ben talking about how USA and the intelligence communities um have historically trained some musical artists both in our country and in other countries to be part of their uh I guess political narrative that the the intelligence Community wants to push so or to do it for statecraft reasons now some of the names he named uh including working with du leipa so I guess there was something early in her career where she had some kind of USA connection Riot uh in Russia and he said possibly Taylor Swift there's no evidence that Taylor Swift was connected any of this but there was there is a video of somebody in the intelligence Community suggesting that she would be the type of person that they would want influence there's no evidence that they have so you probably heard that the AP Associated Press uh they lost their uh I think they lost their wouse press access because they refused to call the Gulf of America the Gulf of America they're sticking with the old way Gulf of Mexico and I didn't really understand why like why would they be the one entity that does that well their argument is that they're an international news entity and if the other countries around the world don't know what the Gulf of America is they can't refer to it that way because you know it would be against their style guide so they have a style guide that they'll I guess they'll use whatever is most internationally recognized but that also means that they're not doing America First America First would be use America's names for stuff and let the other countries work it out I mean you could always put it in parenthesis used to be called the Gulf of Mexico so um it's not the worst defense in the world but it does feel like they're not quite on Team America here so Trump's letting them know I guess um here's a story I hope there's more context to this one because if it's exactly what it looks like it's pretty bad so apparently Reuters which does a lot more than news stuff um according to the Muse account I was reading uh that uh Doge found a document that actually says that uh a part of Reuters was being paid a lot of money for doing what is actually listed on the invoice this is actually on the invoice large scale social deception what is that real did did our government pay Reuters to implement a large scale social deception now before I say that that's true it's being reported but before I say it's true I'd kind of want to hear what reuter said about it which I haven't seen yet do you think Reuters is going to say something like no no no we were supposed to guard against so we were working against large scale social deception it's just list of that way on invoice so now we're we're against large scale deception we're trying to end it you think that's possible you know it wouldn't be too weird if something on an invoice was ambiguous but it would really be weird to me if they put in direct words which are on the voice large scale social deception I'm going to put a pin in that one and wait for the other side of the story but it's what it looks like on the surface well Trump is calling out the Politico and the New York Times for accepting some millions of dollars I guess each from USA and Trump asked what's that for like why is the government paying you are they paying you to do fake news are they paying you to get good stories about themselves and he wants to claw back um so again we don't know why these entities were receiving money but it all looks sketchy so I do like that Trump is going to treat it like it's sketchy and you know go after it I I feel like Trump can sniff out corruption and fraud faster than the average person because he's really good at knowing what looks like and he can just recognize it anywhere so he's probably seeing some there um now according to this is incredible so Lee zeldon uh did a video in which he's claiming that uh that they've discovered a staggering 20 billion that the Biden regime they call it uh laundered to to NOS so what it sounds like is there was a video I think it was uh project Veritas uh at an undercover video in which the Democrats and the EPA were saying oh yeah we're throwing the gold bars off the T Titanic what they meant was we're trying to spend money as quickly as possible before Trump finds out what's going on and so they parked $20 billion dollar in some kind of a financial institution so they could get it out of the door and then once it's out the door it could be allocated to their evil ways I guess but they wanted to like pretend it was already gone so they did some kind of intermediary little trick to make it look like it was already gone and couldn't be clawed back but it might get clawed back we'll find out now if this is all true this would be an example of a staggering amount of corruption is it illegal I don't know I don't know I don't know what law specifically it breaks but it certainly corrupt anyway apparently the uh government is planning to our government is planning to sell hundreds of the federal government buildings according to wired um now I don't think that's going to settle the budget or anything but there are five 00 or more buildings that don't seem to have a use 500 Federal buildings that are sort of empty or not being utilized in any great way 500 over 500 that's just shocking so yeah let's go to close those buildings all right here's the most troubling story of the day according to me according to the New York Post um the House GOP they've got a budget plan they've put together for Trump and they're looking for 4.5 trillion in tax cuts now that would be over some number of years 4.5 trillion in tax cuts but so so far you're saying I like that but uh the budget cuts would be more like two trillion so again there may be some confusion about the what time window you're looking at you know some might be what's happening this year and some might be a 10y year kind of number so you have to be careful if it's a one- year or a 10year number but um is there a problem how in the world is Trump going to get away with increasing our public debt by $2 trillion which is what it would be now I get that I like tax cuts and I get that I like budget cuts but if your tax cuts are tremendously bigger than your budget cuts you're making the deficit worse by trillions now depending on the time span we're looking at it could be that the two trillion that's going to be added to the budget you know maybe it's spread over several years and if you keep cutting the budget during those years you know you might get to a much better situation that it looks like in a in a direct line calculation so yeah I don't know if the tariffs are going to I don't think the tariffs are going to make up the difference but uh maybe I don't know but let me tell you as a numbers person somebody who's you know my early career before any of this was the finance guy in two big corporations not the finance guy but a finance guy and I was always working with you know big projections and numbers and what's going to happen in 10 years more like five years but um I don't see how this works to me it's been looking for a while like the amount that Trump wants to add to the budget because they want to add 300 billion a year for border security and National Defense no I understand that the border security especially um but you're going to add that expense and then you're going to cut taxes and the amount that Doge can cut out won't be any won't be anywhere near the amount that we lost in tax revenue so it's not like this is going to Goose the economy enough so let me just say it directly as far as I can tell the House GOP is not on the same page with Doge I don't think they're on the same page I I think helon musk needs to tell us if this if this budget goes through and if Doge does an amazing job and gets rid of one or two trillion dollars in expenses do we fix our problem or do we just make it worse by voting in a bunch of expensive things I don't feel like we have a plan it looks to me like there's two separate tracks and one destroys the other one so doge is a great track if nothing else changed but if you add why don't wildly cut taxes and add expenses at the same time as Doge and the things you're cutting and adding far exceed the amount of budget reductions somebody needs to explain to us from the Trump Administration how the this works because I'm getting a little mad about it I mean maybe the public doesn't follow these things closely enough to know that this can't work they're basically presenting us a Doom scenario and which we all die for sure can you give me any hope because this budget just tells me we're going to let you all die that's the budget the budget is your all debt because the whole reason that Doge exists is because our budget is out of control our debt is out of control so if you're going to give us another plan that says you oh you're going to be dead in a few years you and that and that's for the Trump Administration you because that's not what we signed up for we signed up for Less debt give us less debt however you have to do it whatever you need to do give us less debt because this looks like you've planned to kill us you've planned to kill us that's what the news is telling me now if I'm reading it wrong and I'm doing the numbers wrong I I would love to be corrected but it doesn't look like it it looks like they plan to kill us and we didn't invite we didn't fight this hard to get a republican Administration so the Republican Administration can and kill us figure it out figure it out don't don't do this yeah I I'm am so out if they don't balance the budget or make a good try it's got to be at least a good try we're not seeing anything that looks like a good try we're looking like it looks like they're screwing Doge looks like they're screwing musk by giving him a no- win situation not cool not cool anyway I would love to know that my rant was completely embarrassing and shameful and that I'm just getting the numbers wrong but I don't think I am so we need some answers um according to Brett Adcock I can't believe there's a guy who's who owns the figure robot company these are humanoid looking robots um that don't have genitalia but the founder of the company is named Adcock I mean come on humanoid robots with no genitalia made by somebody called Adcock somebody's going to add a you maybe it's aftermarket but anyway so what Adcock says he says quote In Our Lifetime you will see more humanoid robots than humans when you're out and about trying to resist try to resist I wake up every morning trying to resist making any reference to Skynet no only NPC say skymet when you say the robots will outnumber the humans don't do it Scott don't do it try to resist don't say Skynet or else you're an NPC Skynet Skynet Skynet I could resist I'm sorry I'm weak I'm weak I don't have much else to say about that story except stop making me think of Skynet because what as soon as I read this that there will be more robots out and about than humans my first question is is that because we made more robots that'd be the best case scenario or are there just fewer humans there a couple different ways you can get there well how could there be fewer humans well here's one way even without Sky Net uh turns out according to the conversation an May Dwayne is writing that teenagers are using AI Companions and they're saying it's easier than seeing humans AI companions so teenagers are falling in love with chatbots well who was it who told you 20 years ago that when the the AI got good enough that people would prefer the AI I did yeah I told you that people would prefer it but I'll be more specific here's my calculation I believe that top 10% of Attractive people will have options of being with the other they're Attractive people but the the bottom 90% of Attractive people which I'm certainly in the bottom 90% but the bottom 90% are going to just prefer AI because the AI will not disappoint them it really is we really do no joke have a situation that we're not quite ready for um I don't even know if it's bad I mean if if the PE if the bottom 90% are happier well okay you maybe maybe that is a good solution but no I think we're already at a point where only the top 10% are likely to reproduce and everybody else is just going to be roboting up that's what I think so speaking of AI uh Thompson Reuters uh won their first major AI copyright case according to wired so guess they found that uh there was some specific AI company uh what is it uh not one of the big ones doesn't matter a smaller AI company you never heard of uh apparently there's evidence that they may have trained their model using some proprietary stuff from Thompson Reuters and it looks like uh the judge ruled in Thompson Roy's favor said the the compy the AI company's copyright or no their copyright was indeed infringed oh it's by Ross intelligence Ross intelligence that's the name of the AI company so it's specifically for legal legal stuff I guess that's what the AI was now remember I warned you that if you're worried about AI you know suddenly taking over everything AI is going to have a tough it's going to have a tough path through all the lawsuits because everybody who's not getting rich from AI is going to be trying to Su it to stop it yeah and although it looks like this case was kind of clean that they could more easily prove that somebody trained on their materials without permission um I feel like all the general AIS are just going to get sued and sued and sued until it's tough to do business so I think that's what's going to slow them down lawsuits well meanwhile Ukraine is is going the obvious way how many of you already knew how to end the war in Ukraine for years right if IID asked you hey stranger what would you do to end the war in Ukraine almost everybody would say well you know zalinski is going to need to get flexible about losing some land Russia is probably going to keep what they've already gotten um and probably the only way the war ends is if Ukraine makes some kind of commitment and not to join NATO right yeah you and I could have done that and it looks like that's exactly exactly what's going to happen is that uh there will be a land for peace deal probably we don't know any details yet so we're just speculating still um and of course the there's no way the NATO thing can stick they're going to have to back off on that but as you knows um Scott bassent was sent over there treasur headed the treasury to work on a deal where America would benefit from the mineral resources of Ukraine and sort of pay it back but my understanding is just before I went live today I believe um I believe that Ukraine backed out so I think they got talked down of giving up their minerals so I don't know who talked about of it but uh as of now they're negotiating and saying nope no minerals what do you think Trump's going to say to Ukraine before he starts negotiating with Putin well I don't know but I think it's going to go something like this uh if we do have access to your minerals then you can guarantee that there'll be some you know American interest in keeping Ukraine a sovereign country if we don't have access to your minerals you're just an expense and you're on your own well that's should loosen them up a little bit don't you think cuz I think that's exactly the situation we're either going to turn you into a profit Center or you're on your own because we're not going to pay forever for something we don't need and don't want all right I'm looking at yeah I think zinski is probably just negotiating but he doesn't have a strong doesn't have a strong hand so we'll see how that goes um this is what Trump said himself about his conversations I guess he had big phone call with Putin and I'll just read it because I want to I want to tell you what both of them are doing right uh I've decided that the three most persuasive leaders in terms of technique who actually understand persuasion are Trump number one best in the world Putin number two you don't have to like Putin this is not a pro Putin statement I'm just saying that his persuasion skills are way above average and then I'd say buelli from El Salvador so I put him in the third spot but all of them are world class persuaders just completely in different they're in a level of their own the if you look at Canada Justin Trudeau no skill at all no skill Great Britain no skill at all Germany No skill at all yeah the but America Putin and bu Kelly lots of skill and uh so I'll read what Trump said in his truth post and we'll pick it apart for the persuasion lesson okay so Trump said in a truth post I just had a lengthy and highly productive phone call with Vladimir Putin of Russia number one he's now essentially considering Putin a peer that he can work with and they're already making success so this is a little bit of claiming success but also a little bit of allocating success to both of them equally this is technique he didn't say I got something we're going to get something he said that the two of us working together looks like something productive is going to come out of it perfect perfect persuasion then he says we discussed Ukraine in the Middle East energy artificial intelligence power of the dollar and various other subjects perfect because the way that you make an agreement that other people can't figure out how to do is you bring in other elements now we don't know that he's done that but that would be the perfect technique oh well if ending the war with Ukraine you you're not quite there yet how about if we throw in something else something else you care about and or or the other way we can deny you something else you care about so you bring in these other variables that are big just to just make it easier for the other side to say yes good technique if you kept the the conversation to the narrow narrow topic of Ukraine versus Russia might not be enough because you know both sides are a little stuck in their positions or have been we'll see if they're still stuck so that's perfect bring in those other topics then Trump says we both reflected on the great history of our nations in all capital letters uh or capital capitalized uh and the fact that we fought so successfully together in World War II remembering that Russia lost tens of millions of people and we likewise lost so many now we didn't lose tens of millions but here he is uh acknowledging that Russia is a great nation that is good that's good technique because what is one of the things that Putin wants to get out of all of this business Putin wants to get out of it that Russia is a great nation that's not the only thing of course they have legitimate interests but it does seem very important to both Putin and probably Russians that they're treated with full respect and if you consider that you know Russia was big reason that uh well the biggest reason that uh Hitler was defeated um that is worth calling out you know it's not like Stalin was a good guy or anything but showing some respect for tremendous sacrifice tremendous sacrifice on your your I don't know your your partner I'd say in this case I don't want to say adversary good technique perfect technique now he's made it easier for Putin to make a deal because he's given him one thing that he wants which is we're going to treat you like like a real leader of a real important country and you have our full respect it's just that there's some things we need and we're not going to back down that is really good um then he says we talked about the strengths of our respective Nations and the great benefit that we will someday have in working together there it is that's classic Trump when Trump talks to North Korea he doesn't say only we will bomb you to the Stone Age if you do something bad what just happened uh holy sh Trump just fired all federal prosecutors appointed by Biden holy all of them I don't even know I don't even know the implications of that wow all right we'll catch up with that after the after the show all right but anyway the thing that Trump does when he negotiates with another country he doesn't just say um we're going to kill you if you don't do what we want he says if we can work together we can both get richer that's really strong and I don't believe anybody has said to Russia that uh that someday we could work together and it'll be a great benefit to both countries now I don't know specifically what he has in mind but don't you think that if we were let's say if we could find a way not to be at each other's throats that we could make some money and be safer I think so I think so so that's classic Trump and good technique um and then then Trump says but first as we both agreed we want to stop the millions of deaths taking place in the war with Russia Ukraine again just perfect I mean I might sound like just a fanboy at this point but I'm showing you the actual technique I'm not I'm not just saying he's awesome I'm showing you the details th this again is the right frame Trump has been right on frame CL this from the start we want fewer people to die blah blah blah NATO blah blah blah we want fewer people to die blah blah blah Russia's natural defenses blah blah blah minerals we want few people to die stay in that frame because if you stay in the frame of we want fewer people to die there's a solution if you leave that frame into all na oh 10 years oh oh you blah blah blah degrade degrade Russia's military oh Russia had a good reason or didn't they have a good reason nothing you got nothing but if you can if you can agree to enter the frame of saving lives then you got something to work with so that's pure Trump pure perfect um and then he says this is what Trump says he says president President Putin even used my very strong Camp campaign motto of common sense so apparently Putin appealed to Common Sense knowing that he was echoing you know Trump's great unifying um campaign idea so there's nothing more unifying than common sense because nobody can disagree with it it's common sense so it's the ultimate High Ground it very much worked domestically but here's a here's a example of Putin being that good Persuader so you notice that Putin seems to be on board with all the framing that Trump has mentioned we don't know but there was no sense of an objection so if he is then he knows what a good frame looks like and he's willing to enter it a good frame would be can we include all these other interests that's a good frame can we just figure out how to stop killing people that's a good frame so Putin knows that but he's also using a technique called mirroring so he's he's mirroring back Trump's favorite thing common sense that is strong technique because it's also a sign of respect and it makes you feel like the two of you don't have much distance it's almost like you're one person because you're both having the same thought yeah Common Sense let's do that Common Sense thing very strong that's why Putin's good at this so um yeah and then that great benefit of working together it's a carrot not just a stick it's all perfect so Will trump get it done don't know but if he does get it done and he gets also a mineral deal you know a rare Earth mineral deal with zinski he Trump might be able to do the thing that is so trumpy here's what I mean ending the war would be a real major accomplishment espe especially if he did it in a month it would be one of the Great accomplishments of a president but is that enough to just be amazingly end a war that couldn't be ended by other people it's not enough Trump wants to turn Ukraine into a profit Center and get our money back now I don't know if he's going to do that I don't know if that's going to work but if he ends the war in a month and turns Ukraine into a profit Center that's standing ovation that that's just like make room on Mount Rushmore like nobody could do that like no no president would even try to do that nobody would even think that it was worth doing nobody would even put like one minute of energy into trying it but I think he could get it done so that's why we voted for him all right so those are all the comments I have my prepared remarks um if you're joining late uh a little bit of technical difficulty probably on my end um so we're only streaming today on X and on locals and uh I believe we'll be able to put the recorded version on You.
Tube and Rumble later all right I'm seeing something going by in the comments uh uh zuie zuie said in a post we've collectively suffered uh through TDS for 10 years and now we must also suffer through EDS which would be I guess Elon Musk uh instead of trump derangement syndrome and Elon Musk says what if I get EDS to that's funny RFK vote is 32 y to 25 24 n you shoveled two driveways while listening good for you hey we're going to let the uh X people stay for a minute so this this is the after show normally I would just do this for the uh subscribers of mine on locals but since you were so nice on X to stay with us this long uh we we'll keep you live for another minute or so all right usually I just look through the comments see if there's anything to comment on that I missed um yeah you are correct if I gets to a bigger audience I'm happy with it all right I don't have much else to uh talk about I guess so I'm going to say goodbye to the folks on X thanks for joining I hope your sound was good the microphone's not actually connected to my phone it's but it's connected for the locals people all right everybody bye for now
techncal difficulty today so I'm just
streaming on my phone until the battery
runs out I've got my laptop open so I'm
doing a higher
quality um feed at the same time on
locals if you go to Scott adams.
locals.com
you could watch it there if you
like if you like that
concept all right what time is
it oh I guess I guess it's time for a
show hold
on I just assumed that nothing's going
to go right this morning that's how was
looking so
[Music]
far I can't see the comments of anybody
but locals right now but feel free to
comment
away got 1,500 people on X excellent
how many we have on locals
668 good all
right good morning everybody and welcome
to the highlight of human civilization
it's called coffee with scat Adams and
you've never had a better time but if
you want to take this up to levels that
nobody can even understand with their
tiny shiny human brains all you need for
that is a cuper marer glass of thanker
chel suain a canteen jug or flask a
vessel of any kind fill it with your
favorite liquid I like coffee and join
me now for the unparallel pleasure
dopamine to the day thing that makes
everything better it's called the
simultaneous Sip and yes it's going to
happen right now right
now if you were expecting to be watching
this on YouTube or Rumble that won't be
happening this morning but we'll
probably post the finished show after
it's live might take a little while
well Story number one there's a study in
the University of Zurich that shows that
hypnosis does alter brain activity and
neurochemistry do you know who they
could have asked huh I wonder if
hypnosis will alter brain activity and
neurochemistry do you know who could
have answered that
question every hypnotist for the last
100
years every one of them it's the most
basic thing you
learn if hypnosis didn't have any effect
on your actual brain it wouldn't be
doing
anything there are a lot of people who
think that hypnosis is just uh what is
it that uh pen galette says I think he
said some while ago the hypnosis was two
people lying to each other the hypnotist
pretending to be hypnotist and the
subject pretending to be hypnotized
but no there is a change in the brain
and uh that's the longest known thing
that every hypnotist is known it's just
obvious anyway there's another tragic
terrorist attack it looks like uh over
in Germany an Afghan man drove a car
into a big
crowd um he's injured I think at least
28 people some of them really badly we
don't know anything about the motives
yet but yeah I'll tell you the the car
related
attacks they seem to kill as many or
more people than
bombs so maybe this is the beginning of
a very long terrible Trend I don't know
let's talk about hostage releases
because that's a better
story um so I was listening to the US
Envoy for
hostages um and his name is
his name is not written down on my notes
so just imagine I said the name of the
person today's just a disaster I feel
like everything today is just not going
to work so that might be funny that
might be entertaining in its own way
yeah the most important thing I was
going to write down was the name of the
person who is the United States Envoy
for
hostages yeah that guy okay so you were
saying that uh one of the reasons that
Trump is successful getting hostages
back is that uh you're saying that quote
when you hold our citizens will come
after you at any cost that's sort of the
Trump message if you hold our citizens
we'll come after you at any cost now
that is exactly the right now it's not
wickoff it's
uh it's not wiof or
grenell all right never mind
stop guess stop guessing the wick caer
grenell that will still be wrong no
matter how many times you write it
down all right I shouldn't have even
brought it up um but the right the right
framing is that uh hostages are not
really a negotiating tool at least with
the United States because we're going to
take everything you have if you take our
hostages we'll take everything you have
and
what happened when Trump put the extra
threat on well now Hamas is getting a
little flexible says they're going to
release some more hostages by Saturday
maybe which was Trump's deadline now
that's not all the
hostages um Trump is said if you don't
release them all there's going to be
held to pay so if there's some they're
holding
back in theory they're still held to pay
now what would be held to pay probably
just unleashing Israel and saying all
right we're out we're out whatever
Israel wants to do is fine we'll even
give them money to do it do you think
Hamas wants to hear
that that Israel just has a free pass
and that United States won't put any
pressure on them to ease up that would
be the ultimate nightmare for
Hamas but I think that's where they're
heading they're heading to their
Ultimate
Nightmare there was a story in Politico
by Eugene
Ludwig titled voters were right about
the economy the data was
wrong anybody who's watched this show we
always knew the data was wrong it's not
because you heard it from me didn't you
all know the data was wrong because they
kept saying I don't know what you're
talking about this data said you should
be happy and have lots of money but
people would say I can't afford eggs and
gas and then the Biden Administration
would say yes you can look at the data
and people would say I'm pretty here I
know what's in my pocket you don't know
what's in my pocket and I don't have
enough money for eggs and gas oh yes you
do just look at these highlight high
level
statistics so of course time goes by and
then finally we can learn that it was
all
fake now here's something I've been
telling you for a long time but I
finally figured out a better way to say
it I've been saying for a long time uh
wait until you find out that all data
that is important is fake all data
that's important you know not not
something that let's say a scientist did
for a little study that nobody cared
about right that's probably okay or it
might be but anything that's big and
important like the economy those are all
fake numbers and there's a reason for
that there's a systemic reason why all
the important numbers the important ones
just limitating it to the important ones
are fake do you know what the reason
is well it's like that
you don't want the fox to be your only
source of data of how many chickens are
left does that make sense because we
always we always put the fox in charge
of counting the
chickens and then you're like uh do we
still have 18 chickens uh no no it's uh
we we have 14 chickens says the fox and
then you say what did you eat those four
chickens and the fox says I don't know
what you're talking about there's no
data that says we ate any chickens
there's just 14 chickens
all right we'll check back tomorrow
there are eight
chickens what what what are you doing
are you eating those chickens again I
don't even know what you're talking
about there's no document that shows any
chickens were eaten it's just eight
chickens so you can take the fox and the
chicken analy to pretty much everything
um who told us that vaccinations were
perfectly safe the
fox we we didn't get it from anywhere
except the company that is making money
from selling it right was there some
independent analysis that I'm not aware
of no no so in every case the only
people who are close enough to know what
the real numbers are are the foxes
they're the ones in charge of the
numbers and the foxes are the ones that
are stealing and lying and you know
shaving things to make it you know
biased in One Direction or the other so
there's a systemic reason it's not a
coincidence that all data all data
that's important is fake it has to be
because it's coming from the Fox as soon
as you realize that all the data comes
from the fox and not from the chickens
then everything makes sense and if you
find an exception where the chickens are
in charge of counting themselves let me
know about that because I've never heard
of it never heard of it it's always the
fox counting the chickens and that's
where we're at that's why you need Doge
because Doge lets the
uh lets the rooster in lets the rooster
count the chickens I'm torturing that
analogy all right well uh you probably
know that Trump was suing the Pitzer
committee for giving pulit Sur prises to
the Russia collusion Liars in the Press
but worse than that I guess they said
something else uh let's see there was
something they said after the war that
Trump didn't like and apparently this is
going to go forward so there were some
challenges to it that have been overcome
but uh the appeals court the Florida
appeals court says the burden of proof
about that there was actual
malice uh seems to be made in other
words it wouldn't go forward if there
was no evidence of malice meaning that
they did it intentionally but apparently
there's evidence they did it
intentionally
and that it was just a basically defame
jump now this is interesting this is
really interesting because I don't know
what kind of evidence they have that
would demonstrate malice we know what
they did but how do you get in their
heads there might be some kind of
document or maybe a witness or something
who said oh yeah we did this just to get
Trump so I haven't heard that I'm just
speculating but maybe maybe that's
what's happening
we'll see meanwhile attorney general Pam
Bondi she's uh filing some charges
against the bad people in New
York the bad people in New York and now
this is over the question of
prioritizing illegal aliens over
American citizens so the idea would be
that they're not cooperating with the
federal government to protect American
citizens and that's their job and they
need to do that now I guess this is a
criminal action it's not a civil
right uh if you're F if Pam Bondi is
filing charges it's not a it's not a
civil suit it's a criminal so they're in
real trouble but the people who are in
trouble are the governor Kathy hokel the
Attorney General Leticia James who as we
know has been targeting Trump and
decided to make up some reasons that he
allegedly broke some laws so Leticia
James is sort of one the um she's like
like a Sith
Lord come after
Trump oh and if I don't get him the next
Sith Lord
will uh Ayana Presley will get you she's
a super villain if I don't so I don't
know how many anti-trump people can
actually have a Persona that looks
exactly like a super
villain it's weird that there's two of
them I mean if if only ayna Presley
dressed intentionally like a super
villain which he does for reasons I
don't understand that would be unique
enough but you got two Democrats who
have total Sith Lord super villain Vibe
I've never seen that before that's weird
anyway uh then also the DMV commissioner
I think that has something to do with
issuing driver's license to to a non
citizens I'm guessing but it gets more
interesting now you say to yourself huh
huh it's kind of a coincidence isn't it
um oh I think isn't alen Bragg part of
this or is it just Laticia James yeah
Alvin Bragg is part of it too I think um
although I didn't see that in the list
so that I may be conflating two
different stories so Bill
O'Reilly had a hypothesis he was on news
Nation with Chris guomo and this is just
some speculation from Bill Riley but he
is very
experienced and he's sniffing some stuff
out but he doesn't have proof so what
I'm going to say I want you to
understand that bill O'Reiley wants you
to know he doesn't have any proof of
this it's just something he's
feeling um that the real Target of all
this might be Leticia James and Al and
brag the two two people who came after
Trump and
it's also possible that the reason and
again this is just speculation there's
no evidence of this whatsoever that
mayor Adams got his pardon from
Trump um maybe because he knows where
the bodies are buried with Elvin Bragg
and Luisa
James now I don't know if he would but
if somebody did know where the bodies
were buried he'd be he'd be a top guess
I would think
so we we'll keep an eye on that so it
does look like maybe the Trump
Administration is circling the the bad
elements now if we didn't know for sure
that these are
lawfare people the people who which
tried the laware of trump I would not be
in favor of kind of going after them but
what they did was so inappropriate in
our constitutional situation that it's
effectively criminal without maybe
breaking any laws but in effect it's
criminal so yeah should go after them as
hard as
possible meanwhile Democrats still
trying to figure out what's wrong with
Democrats and on pod of America this is
one of the big Democrat podcasts and the
GU back Obama people on there and
they're they're very Democrat so if I
didn't mention it they're very very
Democrat like super Democrat and and as
you can imagine have been big critics of
trump guess what they said
yesterday Trump is doing what we should
have done quote Trump is moving so fast
they hit the ground running in a serious
way it's like genuinely impressive
remember this is this is the most
Democrat anti-trump people you've ever
heard it's genuinely impressive
impressive and then they throw in this
impressive in a dark and Sinister way
but nonetheless impressive
so even when they're even when they're
fully understanding that he's doing some
good stuff they they have to throw in
the little propaganda phrase oh well
dark and Sinister uh did I mention it's
dark and Sinister yeah he's doing
everything right but but maybe there's a
dark and Sinister undertone to
it all the Democrats have are vague
statements that can't be supported by
anything uh yeah so they they go on
quote do we all know that government is
slow we all know that government can be
inefficient we all know that the
bureaucracy can be bloed we all worked
in the we all worked in the F and white
house we tried to reorganize the
government we tried to find efficiency
it's hard to
do and then one of them said some of
this is pretty annoying because it's
some of the stuff we should have
done now I do appreciate the honesty of
this so I'm going to call out this is a
very honest take except for the dark and
Sinister part uh yeah yeah they should
have done it they couldn't do it and
then they're watching it being done
right in front of
them um so I I thought I'd start a list
of all the empty attacks the things that
Democrats say about Trump they don't
have any meat to them whatsoever it's
just stuff to scare you so now we've got
dark and Sinister that whatever he's
doing oh whatever he's doing on the
surface it looks
perfect nothing wrong with it on the
surface but underneath underneath we
believe it's dark and
Sinister and then they've got
uh um you know sure he might be uh Trump
might be saving the Republic and ending
Wars uh but really it's just a
preparation for stealing your democracy
and setting up a
kleptocracy stealing your
democracy setting up a kleptocracy the
ocracy is exactly what they're
dismantling and then there's uh Dan
Goldman um there's no accountability or
oversight with the Doge project there's
no accountability or oversight well
here's the problem of
having politicians talk about things
that make sense they can't do it um I'm
pretty sure that in the history of
audits of big companies there's not one
time that the ca CEO went along with the
audit you know with the Auditors so when
when a big company does its own audit
they'll often audit themselves do you
think the CEO follows them around and
say what do you got there Bob did you
find a document what's it say what's it
say oh says that all right now what do
you got what's
that can you read that to me there's no
world in which the CEO is informed about
the audit while it's going on except for
the big stuff so the auditor might say
we found this we found that we found
that but is the CEO saying give me the
document to prove it or is the CEO
saying all right when you're done with
the audit write it up and then tell me
everything you
found I think the most normal way that
Doge should be working is that musk
should answer questions every day which
he which he does uh what do you find
what are you looking at and he said so
but the onus is on him and Doge to
provide documents when he's done now
will everything that he says
preliminarily turn out to be will it
check out not everything no this is a
messy process and it has to be because
there's no way to do a clean process so
you either give up or you do it messy
there's only two possibilities we don't
want to give up so there's that uh and
then the other one is uh CNN's running
with this one there's no actual evidence
of fraud what do you mean there's no
actual
evidence do you need a court case they
they're doing the same thing they did
with the election well there's no actual
evidence just because everything looks
sketchy but there's no actual Court who
said that so let's see we've got darken
Sinister we've got stealing your
democracy setting up a kleptocracy no
accountability or oversight and no
actual evidence of fraud what do all of
those things have in
common there's not a single American
citizen who gives a about any of it
give me my
straw get rid of these
pennies solve the war in
Ukraine cut the
budget there's a pretty long list of
things I do care about but nowhere on
that list is the darken Sinister
stealing your
democracy oh he's also stealing your
privacy they're stealing my privacy uh
there's no accountability or oversight
no actual evidence of
fraud it's uh pretty weak weak
sauce well here's something I hate I
hate waking up and being the second
funniest
Scott I'm kind of used to being the
funniest
Scott you know and at least in the news
business there aren't too many funny
Scots but Scott Jennings is just lapping
me lately I I just had a belly laugh
over this one so Scott Jennings is
commenting this morning over someone
else's posts so well it was a story
actually on Fox News so his comment I'll
just read it in the order that is
written um so Scott Jennings posts on X
he says Trump let's cut taxes shrink the
government and unleash American Energy
and then he says Democrats and he points
to the Fox news story that says the
house Democrats are reintroducing
reparations reparations
legislation so representative uh Ayan
presle super villain uh says reparations
are a necessary step in achieving
Justice
now would it be fair to
say Democrats are not good at reading
the
room um was this really the time to
introduce
reparations probably not the right
timing
probably just a little off in the timing
but uh I would go further than that and
uh I would love to see somebody in the
Trump Administration calculate
reparations because I'm pretty sure it's
going to show that the money's already
been paid three times because you know
what would be in that calculation right
you'd first have to calculate how uh
descendants of slavery would have done
if they stayed in Africa versus how they
would do over here and then spefic
specifically The Descendants not not the
actual slaves the slaves are unhappy
right so everybody agrees there was
nothing good about being a slave but the
descendants of slaves ended up in a
better place than maybe they would have
been now that's no reason for slavery we
all agree slavery is bad slavery is bad
um but if you were going to calculate
You' have to calculate uh any social
payments made you have to calculate how
much everybody added to the economy
versus subtracted from the economy you'd
have to do differences in law
enforcement costs for different
demographic groups you'd have to bring
everything into it and I don't know if
it would be a positive number or
negative by the time you were done with
an actual
honest um analysis
now if they if somebody actually did
calculate reparations
honestly would you believe it whatever
number they came up with no because I
just got done telling you that all data
that matters is fake so whoever does the
calculating for
reparations it's going to come up with a
fake number so if it's somebody who's
Pro reparations they'll just ignore a
whole bunch of things and come up with a
number that says yo it's a lot of money
if it's somebody who's biased against
reparations such as me uh if I
calculated it would show that it's
already been paid three times so there's
no such thing as the true number and
there's no such this data for anything
important that's real this is no
exception but certainly I would have
included 50 years of discrimination
against white males I mean that's pretty
expensive uh and along those lines Fox
News is reporting that there's an
Illinois University being sued because
the professor says he was fired for
objecting to race-based hiring
University of Illinois in Chicago
so Professor stepen Klein
Schmid um he said he wasn't buying into
the uh being a racist he probably just
thought he wanted to be a professor and
then they said but you're also you know
can you be a racist and then he said how
about no how about no I won't be a
racist with you and that was lawsuit I
think he might
win Trump says reciprocal tariffs
are coming out today I guess that means
that everybody who's terrifing us for
anything is going to get the same back I
don't know how any of this is going to
work out but I do see it as a
negotiating tactic and so far Trump's
shown that he can navigate these
negotiating T
tactics all right so we'll see tulsy
gabard got
confirmed uh is it true that McConnell
voted no on telsy gabard that's a little
suspicious isn't
it just a little suspicious it makes you
think he might be hiding something but
the half dead Turtle said no RFK Jr I
guess the vote on him as a tie and we're
expecting JD Vance to go break the tie
and it it should be should be confirmed
today is I don't know if it's
today all right so looks like we're we
get Tulsa and we'll get RFK Jr and
wow I I just have to say wow good
job good job getting both of them Mike
Ben was on uh Joe Rogan show probably
three hours of goodness there but one of
the things that popped out was Mike Ben
talking about how USA and the
intelligence communities um have
historically trained some musical
artists both in our country and in other
countries to be part of their uh I guess
political narrative that the the
intelligence Community wants to push so
or to do it for statecraft reasons now
some of the names he
named uh including working with du leipa
so I guess there was something early in
her career where she had some kind of
USA connection Riot uh in Russia
and he said possibly Taylor Swift
there's no evidence that Taylor Swift
was connected any of this but there was
there is a video of somebody in the
intelligence Community suggesting that
she would be the type of person that
they would want influence there's no
evidence that they
have so you probably heard that the AP
Associated Press uh they lost their uh I
think they lost their wouse press access
because they refused to call the Gulf of
America the Gulf of America they're
sticking with the old way Gulf of Mexico
and I didn't really understand why like
why would they be the one entity that
does that well their argument is that
they're an international news entity and
if the other countries around the world
don't know what the Gulf of America is
they can't refer to it that way because
you know it would be against their style
guide so they have a style guide that
they'll I guess they'll use whatever is
most internationally
recognized but that also means that
they're not doing America First America
First would be use America's names for
stuff and let the other countries work
it out I mean you could always put it in
parenthesis used to be called the Gulf
of Mexico
so um it's not the worst defense in the
world but it does feel like they're not
quite on Team America here so Trump's
letting them know I
guess um here's a story I hope there's
more context to this one
because if it's exactly what it looks
like it's pretty bad so apparently
Reuters which does a lot more than news
stuff um according to the Muse account I
was reading uh that uh Doge found a
document that actually says that uh a
part of Reuters was being paid a lot of
money for doing what is actually listed
on the invoice this is actually on the
invoice large scale social
deception
what is that
real did did our government pay
Reuters to implement a large scale
social
deception now before I say that that's
true it's being reported but before I
say it's true I'd kind of want to hear
what reuter said about it which I
haven't seen yet do you think Reuters is
going to say something like no no no we
were supposed to guard against so we
were working against large scale social
deception it's just list of that way on
invoice so now we're we're against large
scale deception we're trying to end it
you think that's
possible you know it wouldn't be too
weird if something on an invoice was
ambiguous but it would really be weird
to me if they put in direct words which
are on the voice large scale social
deception I'm going to put a pin in that
one and wait for the other side of the
story but it's what it looks like on the
surface well Trump is calling out the
Politico and the New York Times for
accepting some millions of dollars I
guess each from
USA and Trump asked what's that for like
why is the government paying you are
they paying you to
do fake news are they paying you to get
good stories about themselves and he
wants to claw
back
um so again we don't know why these
entities were receiving money but it all
looks sketchy so I do like that Trump is
going to treat it like it's sketchy and
you know go after it I I feel like Trump
can sniff out corruption and fraud
faster than the average person
[Music]
because he's really good at knowing what
looks like and he can just
recognize it
anywhere so he's probably seeing some
there
um now according to this is incredible
so Lee
zeldon uh did a video in which he's
claiming that uh that they've discovered
a staggering 20 billion that the
Biden regime they call it uh laundered
to to NOS so what it sounds like is
there was a video I think it was uh
project Veritas uh at an undercover
video in which the Democrats and the EPA
were saying oh yeah we're throwing the
gold bars off the T Titanic what they
meant was we're trying to spend money as
quickly as possible before Trump finds
out what's going
on and so they parked $20 billion dollar
in some kind of a financial
institution so they could get it out of
the door and then once it's out the door
it could be allocated to their evil ways
I guess but they wanted to like pretend
it was already gone so they did some
kind of intermediary little trick to
make it look like it was already gone
and couldn't be clawed back but it might
get clawed back we'll find out now if
this is all
true this would be an example of
a
staggering amount of corruption is it
illegal I don't know I don't know I
don't know what law specifically it
breaks but it certainly
corrupt anyway apparently the uh
government is planning to our government
is planning to sell hundreds of the
federal government buildings according
to
wired
um now I don't think that's going to
settle the budget or anything but there
are five 00 or more buildings that don't
seem to have a
use
500 Federal buildings that are sort of
empty or not being utilized in any great
way 500 over 500 that's just
shocking so yeah let's go to close those
buildings all right here's the most
troubling story of the day according to
me according to the New York Post um the
House GOP they've got a budget plan
they've put together for Trump
and they're looking for 4.5 trillion in
tax cuts now that would be over some
number of years 4.5 trillion in tax
cuts but so so far you're
saying I like that but uh the budget
cuts would be more like two
trillion so again there may be some
confusion about the
what time window you're looking at you
know some might be what's happening this
year and some might be a 10y year kind
of number so you have to be careful if
it's a one- year or a 10year number
but
um is there a
problem how in the
world is Trump going to get away with
increasing our public debt by $2
trillion which is what it would be now I
get that I like tax cuts and I get that
I like budget cuts but if your tax cuts
are tremendously bigger than your budget
cuts you're making the deficit worse by
trillions now depending on the time span
we're looking at it could be that the
two trillion that's going to be added to
the budget you know maybe it's spread
over several years and if you keep
cutting the budget during those years
you know you might get to a much better
situation that it looks like in a in a
direct line
calculation so yeah I don't know if the
tariffs are going to I don't think the
tariffs are going to make up the
difference but uh maybe I don't know but
let me tell you as a numbers person
somebody who's you know my early career
before any of this was the finance guy
in two big corporations not the finance
guy but a finance guy and I was always
working with you know big projections
and numbers and what's going to happen
in 10 years more like five years but um
I don't see how this
works to me it's been looking for a
while like the amount that Trump wants
to add to the budget because they want
to add 300 billion a year for border
security and National Defense no I
understand that the border security
especially um but you're going to add
that expense and then you're going to
cut taxes
and the amount that Doge can cut out
won't be any won't be anywhere near the
amount that we lost in tax revenue so
it's not like this is going to Goose the
economy enough so let me just say it
directly as far as I can tell the House
GOP is not on the same page with
Doge I don't think they're on the same
page I I think helon musk needs to tell
us if this if this budget goes through
and if Doge does an amazing job and gets
rid of one or two trillion dollars in
expenses do we fix our problem or do we
just make it worse by voting in a bunch
of expensive things I don't feel like we
have a
plan it looks to me like there's two
separate tracks and one destroys the
other one so doge is a great track if
nothing else changed but if you add why
don't wildly cut taxes and add expenses
at the same time as Doge and the things
you're cutting and adding far exceed the
amount of budget
reductions somebody needs to explain to
us from the Trump Administration how the
this works because I'm getting a
little mad about it I mean maybe the
public doesn't follow these things
closely enough to know that this can't
work they're basically presenting us a
Doom scenario and which we all
die for sure can you give me any hope
because this budget just tells me we're
going to let you all die that's the
budget the budget is your all
debt because the whole reason that Doge
exists is because our budget is out of
control our debt is out of control so if
you're going to give us another
plan that says you oh you're going to be
dead in a few years you and that
and that's for the Trump Administration
you because that's not what we
signed up for we signed up for Less debt
give us less
debt however you have to do it whatever
you need to do give us less debt
because this looks like you've planned
to kill us you've planned to
kill us that's what the news is telling
me now if I'm reading it wrong and I'm
doing the numbers
wrong I I would love to be corrected but
it doesn't look like it it looks like
they plan to kill us
and we didn't invite we didn't fight
this hard to get a republican
Administration so the Republican
Administration can and kill
us figure it out figure it
out don't don't do
this yeah I I'm am so out if they don't
balance the budget or make a good try
it's got to be at least a good try we're
not seeing anything that looks like a
good try we're looking like it looks
like they're screwing Doge looks like
they're screwing musk by giving him a
no- win
situation not cool not
cool anyway I would love to know that my
rant was completely embarrassing and
shameful and that I'm just getting the
numbers
wrong but I don't think I am so we need
some
answers
um according to Brett
Adcock I can't believe there's a guy
who's who owns the figure robot company
these are humanoid looking robots um
that don't have genitalia but the
founder of the company is named
Adcock I mean come
on humanoid robots with no
genitalia made by somebody called Adcock
somebody's going to add a you maybe
it's aftermarket but anyway so what
Adcock says he says quote In Our
Lifetime you will see more humanoid
robots than humans when you're out and
about trying to resist try to resist I
wake up every morning trying to resist
making any reference to Skynet no only
NPC say skymet when you say the robots
will outnumber the humans don't do it
Scott don't do it try to resist don't
say Skynet or else you're an NPC Skynet
Skynet
Skynet I could resist I'm sorry I'm weak
I'm weak I don't have much else to say
about that story except stop making me
think of
Skynet because what as soon as I read
this that there will be more robots out
and about than humans my first question
is is that because we made more robots
that'd be the best case scenario or are
there just fewer
humans there a couple different ways you
can get there well how could there be
fewer humans well here's one way even
without Sky
Net uh turns out according to the
conversation an May Dwayne is writing
that teenagers are using AI
Companions and they're saying it's
easier than seeing humans AI companions
so teenagers are falling in love with
chatbots well who was it who told you 20
years
ago that when the the AI got good enough
that people would prefer the
AI I did yeah I told you that people
would prefer it but I'll be more
specific here's my calculation I believe
that top 10% of Attractive
people will have options of being with
the other they're Attractive
people but the the bottom 90% of
Attractive
people
which I'm certainly in the bottom 90%
but the bottom 90% are going to just
prefer AI because the AI will not
disappoint
them it really is we really do no
joke have a situation that we're not
quite ready for um I don't even know if
it's bad I mean if if the PE if the
bottom 90% are
happier well okay you maybe maybe that
is a good solution but no I think we're
already at a point where only the top
10% are likely to reproduce and
everybody else is just going to be
roboting up that's what I
think so speaking of AI uh Thompson
Reuters uh won their first major AI
copyright case according to wired so
guess they found that uh there was some
specific AI company uh what is
it uh not one of the big ones doesn't
matter a smaller AI company you never
heard of uh apparently there's evidence
that they may have trained their model
using some proprietary stuff from
Thompson Reuters and it looks like uh
the judge ruled in Thompson Roy's favor
said the the compy the AI company's
copyright or no their copyright was
indeed infringed oh it's by Ross
intelligence Ross intelligence that's
the name of the AI company so it's
specifically for legal legal stuff I
guess that's what the AI was now
remember I warned you that if you're
worried about AI you know suddenly
taking over everything AI is going to
have a tough it's going to have a tough
path through all the lawsuits because
everybody who's not getting rich from AI
is going to be trying to Su it to stop
it yeah and although it looks like this
case was kind of clean that they could
more easily prove that somebody trained
on their materials without
permission um I feel like all the
general AIS are just going to get sued
and sued and sued until it's tough to do
business so I think that's what's going
to slow them down
lawsuits well meanwhile Ukraine is is
going the obvious
way how many of you already knew how to
end the war in Ukraine for
years right if IID asked you hey
stranger what would you do to end the
war in Ukraine almost everybody would
say well you know zalinski is going to
need to get flexible about losing some
land Russia is probably going to keep
what they've already gotten um and
probably the only way the war ends is if
Ukraine makes some kind of commitment
and not to join
NATO right yeah you and I could have
done that and it looks like that's
exactly exactly what's going to happen
is that uh there will be a land for
peace deal probably we don't know any
details yet so we're just speculating
still um and of course the there's no
way the NATO thing can stick they're
going to have to back off on that but as
you knows um Scott bassent was sent over
there treasur headed the treasury to
work on a deal where America would
benefit from the mineral resources of
Ukraine and sort of pay it back but my
understanding is just before I went live
today I
believe um I believe that Ukraine backed
out so I think they got talked down of
giving up their minerals so I don't know
who talked about of it but uh as of now
they're negotiating and saying nope no
minerals what do you think Trump's going
to say to
Ukraine before he starts negotiating
with
Putin well I don't know but I think it's
going to go something like
this uh if we do have access to your
minerals then you can guarantee that
there'll be some you know American
interest in keeping Ukraine a sovereign
country if we don't have access to your
minerals you're just an
expense and you're on your
own well that's should loosen them up a
little bit don't you think cuz I think
that's exactly the situation we're
either going to turn you into a profit
Center or you're on your own because
we're not going to pay forever for
something we don't need and don't
want all right I'm looking at yeah I
think zinski is probably just
negotiating but he doesn't have a strong
doesn't have a strong hand so we'll see
how that
goes um this is what Trump said himself
about his conversations I guess he had
big phone call with Putin and I'll just
read it because I want to I want to tell
you what both of them are doing
right uh I've decided that the three
most persuasive leaders in terms of
technique who actually understand
persuasion are Trump number one best in
the world Putin number two you don't
have to like Putin this is not a pro
Putin statement I'm just saying that his
persuasion skills are way above average
and then I'd say buelli from El Salvador
so I put him in the third spot but all
of them are world class persuaders just
completely in different they're in a
level of their own the if you look at
Canada Justin Trudeau no skill at all no
skill Great Britain no skill at all
Germany No skill at all yeah the but
America
Putin and bu Kelly lots of skill and uh
so I'll read what Trump said in his
truth post and we'll pick it apart for
the persuasion lesson okay so Trump said
in a truth post I just had a lengthy and
highly productive phone call with
Vladimir Putin of Russia number one he's
now
essentially considering Putin a peer
that he can work with and they're
already making success so this is a
little bit of claiming success but also
a little bit of allocating success to
both of them equally this is technique
he didn't say I got something we're
going to get something he said that the
two of us working together looks like
something productive is going to come
out of it perfect perfect persuasion
then he says we discussed Ukraine in the
Middle East energy artificial
intelligence power of the dollar and
various other
subjects perfect because the way that
you make an agreement that other people
can't figure out how to do is you bring
in other elements now we don't know that
he's done that but that would be the
perfect technique oh well if ending the
war with Ukraine you you're not quite
there yet how about if we throw in
something else something else you care
about and or or the other way we can
deny you something else you care about
so you bring in these other variables
that are big just to just make it easier
for the other side to say yes good
technique if you kept the the
conversation to the narrow narrow topic
of Ukraine versus Russia might not be
enough because you know both sides are a
little stuck in their positions or have
been we'll see if they're still stuck so
that's perfect bring in those other
topics then Trump says we both reflected
on the great history of our nations in
all capital letters uh or capital
capitalized uh and the fact that we
fought so successfully together in World
War II remembering that Russia lost tens
of millions of people and we likewise
lost so many now we didn't lose tens of
millions but here he is uh acknowledging
that Russia is a great
nation that is good that's good
technique because what is one of the
things that Putin wants to get out of
all of this business Putin wants to get
out of it
that Russia is a great nation that's not
the only thing of course they have
legitimate interests but it does seem
very important to both Putin and
probably Russians that they're treated
with full
respect and if you consider that you
know Russia was big reason that uh well
the biggest reason that uh Hitler was
defeated um that is worth calling out
you know it's not like Stalin was a good
guy or anything but showing some respect
for tremendous sacrifice tremendous
sacrifice on your your I don't know your
your partner I'd say in this case I
don't want to say
adversary good technique perfect
technique now he's made it easier for
Putin to make a deal because he's given
him one thing that he wants which is
we're going to treat you like like a
real leader of a real important country
and you have our full respect it's just
that there's some things we need and
we're not going to back down that is
really
good um then he says we talked about the
strengths of our respective Nations and
the great benefit that we will someday
have in working together there it is
that's classic Trump when Trump talks to
North Korea he doesn't say only we will
bomb you to the Stone Age if you do
something
bad what just
happened uh holy sh Trump just
fired all federal prosecutors appointed
by Biden holy
all of them I don't even know I
don't even know the implications of
that wow all right we'll catch up with
that after the after the
show all right but anyway the thing that
Trump does when he negotiates with
another country he doesn't just say um
we're going to kill you if you don't do
what we want he says if we can work
together we can both get richer that's
really strong and I don't believe
anybody has said to
Russia that
uh that someday we could work together
and it'll be a great benefit to both
countries now I don't know specifically
what he has in mind but don't you think
that if we were let's say if we could
find a way not to be at each other's
throats that we could make some money
and be
safer I think so I think so so that's
classic Trump and good
technique um and then then Trump says
but first as we both agreed we want to
stop the millions of deaths taking place
in the war with Russia Ukraine again
just perfect I mean I might sound like
just a fanboy at this point but I'm
showing you the actual technique I'm not
I'm not just saying he's awesome I'm
showing you the details th this again is
the right frame Trump has been right on
frame CL this from the start we want
fewer people to die blah blah blah NATO
blah blah blah we want fewer people to
die blah blah blah Russia's natural
defenses blah blah blah
minerals we want few people to
die stay in that frame because if you
stay in the frame of we want fewer
people to
die there's a solution if you leave that
frame into all na oh 10 years oh oh you
blah blah blah degrade degrade Russia's
military oh Russia had a good reason or
didn't they have a good
reason nothing you got nothing but if
you can if you can agree to enter the
frame of saving lives then you got
something to work with so that's pure
Trump pure
perfect
um and then he says this is what Trump
says he says president President Putin
even used my very strong Camp campaign
motto of common sense so apparently
Putin appealed to Common Sense knowing
that he was echoing you know Trump's
great
unifying um campaign idea so there's
nothing more unifying than common sense
because nobody can disagree with it it's
common sense so it's the ultimate High
Ground it very much worked domestically
but here's a here's a example of Putin
being that good Persuader so you notice
that Putin seems to be on board with all
the framing that Trump has mentioned we
don't know but there was no sense of an
objection so if he is then he knows what
a good frame looks like and he's willing
to enter it a good frame would be can we
include all these other interests that's
a good frame can we just figure out how
to stop killing people that's a good
frame so Putin knows that but he's also
using a technique called mirroring so
he's he's mirroring back Trump's
favorite thing common sense that is
strong technique because it's also a
sign of
respect and it makes you feel like the
two of you don't have much distance it's
almost like you're one person because
you're both having the same thought yeah
Common Sense let's do that Common Sense
thing very strong that's why Putin's
good at
this so
um yeah and then that great benefit of
working together it's a carrot not just
a stick it's all perfect so Will trump
get it done don't know but if he does
get it done and he gets also a mineral
deal you know a rare Earth mineral deal
with
zinski he Trump might be able to do the
thing that is so
trumpy here's what I mean ending the war
would be a real major accomplishment
espe especially if he did it in a month
it would be one of the Great
accomplishments of a
president but is that enough to just be
amazingly end a war that couldn't be
ended by other people it's not enough
Trump wants to turn Ukraine into a
profit Center and get our money back now
I don't know if he's going to do that I
don't know if that's going to work but
if he ends the war in a month and turns
Ukraine into a profit Center
that's standing
ovation that that's just like make room
on Mount Rushmore like nobody could do
that like no no president would even try
to do that nobody would even think that
it was worth doing nobody would even put
like one minute of energy into trying
it but I think he could get it
done so that's why we voted for him
all right so those are all the comments
I have my prepared remarks um if you're
joining late uh a little bit of
technical difficulty probably on my end
um so we're only streaming today on X
and on
locals and uh I believe we'll be able to
put the recorded version on YouTube and
Rumble
later all right I'm seeing something
going by in the comments
uh
uh zuie zuie said in a post we've
collectively suffered uh through TDS for
10 years and now we must also suffer
through EDS which would be I guess Elon
Musk uh instead of trump derangement
syndrome and Elon Musk says what if I
get EDS
to that's
funny RFK vote is 32 y to 25 24
n you shoveled two driveways while
listening good for
you hey we're going to let the uh X
people stay for a minute so this this is
the after show normally I would just do
this for the uh subscribers of mine on
locals but since you were so nice on X
to stay with us this
long uh we we'll keep you live for
another minute or so all right usually I
just look through the comments see if
there's anything to comment on that I
missed
um yeah you are correct if I gets to a
bigger audience I'm happy with
it all right I don't have much else to
uh talk about I guess so I'm going to
say goodbye to the folks on X thanks for
joining I hope your sound was good the
microphone's not actually connected to
my phone it's but it's connected for the
locals people all right everybody bye
for now