. It's always the fox counting the chickens. And that's where we're at.

That's why you need DOGE, because DOGE lets the rooster in. Lets the rooster count the chickens. I'm torturing that analogy.

All right, well, you probably know that Trump was suing the Pulitzer committee for giving Pulitzer Prizes to the Russia collusion liars in the press. But worse than that, I guess they said something else. Let's see. There was something they said after the war that Trump didn't like, and apparently this is going to go forward. So there were some challenges to it that have been overcome, but the appeals court, the Florida appeals court, says the burden of proof about that there was actual malice seems to be met. In other words, it wouldn't go forward if there was no evidence of malice, meaning that they did it intentionally. But apparently there's evidence they did it intentionally, and that it was just basically a defamation hit job.

Now this is interesting. This is really interesting, because I don't know what kind of evidence they have that would demonstrate malice. We know what they did, but how do you get in their heads? There might be some kind of document or maybe a witness or something who said, oh yeah, we did this just to get Trump. So I haven't heard that. I'm just speculating. But maybe that's what's happening. We'll see.

Meanwhile, Attorney General Pam Bondi, she's filing some charges against the bad people in New York. The bad people in New York. And now this is over the question of prioritizing illegal aliens over American citizens. So the idea would be that they're not cooperating with the federal government to protect American citizens, and that's their job and they need to do that.

Now I guess this is a criminal action. It's not a civil. If Pam Bondi is filing charges, it's not a civil suit. It's a criminal. So they're in real trouble. But the people who are in trouble are the governor, Kathy Hochul, the Attorney General Letitia James, who, as we know, has been targeting Trump and decided to make up some reasons that he allegedly broke some laws. So Letitia James is sort of one. She's like a Sith Lord come after Trump. Oh, and if I don't get him, the next Sith Lord will. Ayanna Pressley will get you. She's a supervillain if I don't.

So I don't know how many anti-Trump people can actually have a persona that looks exactly like a supervillain. It's weird that there's two of them. I mean, if only Ayanna Pressley dressed intentionally like a supervillain, which she does for reasons I don't understand, that would be unique enough. But you've got two Democrats who have total Sith Lord supervillain vibe. I