ox in charge of counting the chickens. And then you're like, uh, do we still have 18 chickens? Uh, no, no, it's, uh, we have 14 chickens, says the fox. And then you say, what, did you eat those four chickens? And the fox says, I don't know what you're talking about. There's no data that says we ate any chickens. There's just 14 chickens.

All right, we'll check back tomorrow. There are eight chickens. What? What are you doing? Are you eating those chickens again? I don't even know what you're talking about. There's no document that shows any chickens were eaten. It's just eight chickens.

So you can take the fox and the chicken analogy to pretty much everything. Who told us that vaccinations were perfectly safe? The fox. We didn't get it from anywhere except the company that is making money from selling it. Right? Was there some independent analysis that I'm not aware of? No. No.

So in every case, the only people who are close enough to know what the real numbers are are the foxes. They're the ones in charge of the numbers, and the foxes are the ones that are stealing and lying and, you know, shaving things to make it biased in one direction or the other. So there's a systemic reason. It's not a coincidence that all data, all data that's important, is fake. It has to be, because it's coming from the fox.

As soon as you realize that all the data comes from the fox and not from the chickens, then everything makes sense. And if you find an exception where the chickens are in charge of counting themselves, let me know about that, because I've never heard of it. Never heard of it