Back to episode — Episode 2780 CWSA 03/16/25
Context —
ig deal. But here's my take on this. Do you remember the time when Trump couldn't get good lawyers to defend him against massive waves of lawfare? And it was because the lawyers were afraid that if they got political, meaning just defending Trump, that it would cost them later. The law firm would suffer, and they wouldn't be able to get regular clients. And that was a big problem. And I thought t…
← Previous segment →o was stall and minimize the damage and play for him to get reelected basically so that the rest of it could go away. So I feel like they did a great job.
Now, I don't know if this will hurt them in the future if they can't get regular jobs again. But the fact that there was ever that much pressure on lawyers who were going to help Trump, I can't feel any sympathy for him getting revenge now. I'm sure they don't call it revenge. They call it something like getting rid of bias in the legal process or something like that. But I don't think it would happen if they hadn't gone after Trump. So there is a price. Yeah, the lawyers that help Trump are probably redlisted. That's probably true.
So as long as that's true, mutually assured destruction has been activated. And I can't say that I'm opposed to it. I hate that we're in this situation. So I hate that lawyers had pressure not to help Trump, and I also hate that there's pressure against anybody for what they did politically. So I can hate both of it. But it does look like mutually assured destruction has kicked in, and I don't hate that. I don't hate that because sometimes it's just the only thing you can do. So I don't know that that can get us to a good place where people can just be lawyers and there's no lawfare. But as long as there's lawfare and there's redlisting of people who help Republicans, then I think Republicans have a free pass to destroy every law firm that they can that had some hand in it. I hate it. I hate the whole thing. I hate it from top to bottom. But sometimes you got to pull a tooth.
Anyway, according to NeoScape and writer Nell's, that over in Great Britain they've come up with an mRNA technology. Stop it. Listen. That has proven effective. Well, no, take that part away. They've created a vaccine for cancer using the mRNA platform. Now, apparently they're getting some kind of good indications that it works. I don't have any information that says it cured anything, but it must be curing som
Context —
ething because they're pretty happy with it, and they're taking it wider now. Apparently what it does is you have to take a biopsy, and you have to adjust the what they call a vaccination. Why do they call it a vaccination? It doesn't vaccinate because you've already got the cancer by the time you take it. I don't know. So I guess that word vaccination is getting kind of overused. But they'll tak…
Next segment → →