Back to episode — Episode 2962 CWSA 09/18/25
Context —
. All right. By far my favorite story of the day is that French President Emmanuel Macron and his wife, you know that Candace Owens accused Brigitte Macron of being born a man and believes that he's still a man because I guess that's the way it works. And so the news is that Macron and his wife are going to present photographic and scientific evidence to a US court to prove that the French first…
← Previous segment →she was a man. I was amused by the whole thing and I was amazed at how much evidence that Candace could come up with that definitely looked like it was possible. I don't know if you've gone down that rabbit hole at all, but if you listen to Candace for 30 minutes talking about this, you will go away thinking it's real. But that's the documentary effect. You know, if you're exposed to one point of view for half an hour, you're probably going to be convinced. You know, that's all it takes is one point of view with no counterpoint for half an hour. And almost always you'll think it's true.
So I will say that it's a persuasive argument Candace makes that my own, let's say, gut feeling and common sense says probably not, probably not. But I think it's possible, you know. So the fact that she's going to give photographic evidence, what exactly would the photograph be of? Is Brigitte Macron going to, I just have this image of Brigitte Macron. She's at home and she's like, "All right." Oh, I'll do my best French accent. I'll try to. No, that's not French. I won't do a French accent.
All right. I need some pictures for the court. Click. Click. Click. Almost. Click. Click. Click. Yeah, there it is. Oh, that's beautiful.
So can we, um, maybe it's just me, but I like to look at these things from the entertainment perspective. If you do it from the entertainment perspective and you realize that Candace Owens is making the wife of the president of France take pictures of her genitalia, standing ovation. Candace, I don't know if any of it's true. I'm guessing it's not. But there's not much that's funnier than making her take a picture of her junk. All right, good job, Candace.
And other news, you know that Meta has these new glasses that have all kinds of functions and I guess they can project a screen on the glasses themselves that people will barely know you're looking at. And I saw a review from somebody who had tried a number of these different enhanced reality glasses. He said that it's the best one he's seen and it's actually kind of awesome. Costs about $800. Um, what do regular glasses cost? If you bought regular glasses, if it's like a designer pair, it's several hundred, isn't it? A designer pair.
So I don't know, maybe people will buy them for $800 if they can make those glasses prescription. I didn't see in the story that they could do that, but I assume they can, right? Do you think that they would make them prescription? It would be very disappointing if the only thing the glasses couldn't do is correct your vision. I feel like it ought to be able to do that.
However, if it really works, the odds of me trying it out at some point are pretty good. But apparently you can slightly detect when somebody's not paying attention to you. So let me ask you this. How happy would you be to spend time with a friend who has
Context —
those glasses on and you don't really know if they're watching a TV show while you're talking to them because apparently you can have all kinds of content in the glasses? I wouldn't like it at all. I don't think I would want to spend time having a conversation with somebody who was wearing those glasses because I would just assume that they're distracted, you know, even if I couldn't tell. So I th…
Next segment → →