Coffee With Scott Adams — Knowledge Archive May 24, 2026
Scott Adams Philosophy Archive
Search ideas
Episodes Episode #2965 Segments
MainContent Cognitive Reframing

Back to episode — Episode 2965 CWSA 09/21/25

Context —

f he's actually a skilled cartoonist who has actually been paid for his work, and apparently he has been, then I have to default to my, how do I treat other cartoonists? And I generally go easy on other cartoonists. So I'm often asked, "Hey, do you think the guy who does Ziggy has a good cartoon?" Which of course I don't because it was terrible. But you know, I would try not to, depending on the c…

← Previous segment →

simply wrong about it. So is this true? Is it true that Thomas Massie could write down the names of 20 people because he's seen the names? Does he know where that list is? I mean, was it in his SCIF? So he doesn't have a copy of it, but he remembers most of it. What is going on here that on one hand this would be just so terrible if this is true, on the other hand it's the only thing that would explain everything we've observed am I right? Everything we've observed would easily be explained if you said yeah there's 20 powerful people and it's really all about protecting the 20. Everything would be explained. We would have no more questions. I mean, I'd have questions who the 20 are, but beyond that, no. Everything would be answered. Oh, okay. Got it.

Now, that would still leave some blackmailing stuff and things like that, but it would certainly go a long way toward explaining things. Well, we'll see. I would like to see Kash Patel be asked that question under oath and have them ask, "Do you have a list of 20 names that Epstein trafficked young people to?" Let's see.

According to the Daily Caller News Foundation, there's some kind of an exclusive explosive report showing that George Soros or his organization doled out $80 million to leftist groups that are glorifying terrorism. Now, that means that somewhere in their communication, they said something about, well, you know, sometimes you have to go beyond nonviolence, you know, basically things like that. Not super direct as in pick up a gun and meet me on Tuesday, but suggesting very clearly that violence is on the table, that it's just one of the options and his money is going to a number of those groups.

And my question is, and I've been saying this for years now, the Soros organization, who exactly is even watching where the money's going? Because I feel as though the Soros organization is being robbed every day. Just like really robbed because George Soros is clearly beyond the point where he's making the detailed decisions. His son honestly doesn't look smart enough or interested enough to look into every organization the money goes to. I'll bet that's not happening at the top. And that would mean that there's somebody in a lower level who's a gatekeeper for this money and is, I'll just say it, there's almost no chance that there isn't massive fraud. A fraud against Soros.

So whatever you say about Soros being bad might be true, but I'll bet you he's also a victim of massive corruption within his organization. My guess is that Huma might have been put in there to help get th

Context —

at under control. I don't think she's necessarily the one stealing money, although her connection to Hillary Clinton would suggest it's a possibility. But I would give this question to Alexander Soros. Almost certainly you're being robbed in the biggest possible way because none of this looks organic. It looks like somebody figured out a way to take money from the old man and a lot of it. That's w…

Next segment → →