r money. So that's the good news. What's the bad news? Well, the bad news is that the picture on the front of the bill is the guy who's going to kill you. So there's that. That's such a good troll. I don't care if it happens or not, but if it did happen, I would never stop laughing. And I would immediately run to the bank and get me one. I would put it on my wall. It would be the best art worth $250 ever until somebody steals it.

Well, you've heard me talk about how the climate models are all bad, but here's a followup on that. So apparently there's a 42-page report from the president's energy department that was released in July, and we've talked about it before, but I'm going to add something to it. And they showed 36 climate models and then they showed how they're all wildly off of the actual temperatures that we've observed. 36 models. Now if you've lived in the real world or you've been in like a real corporation or if you're just a certain age, what do you know? If the only thing you know is that there are 36 different models for measuring the weather, what do you know for sure? Well, what I know for sure is if science was sure that they could model things with models, there would be one. There would be one because it would be the one where the scientists say, "Oh, yeah, that's the one." If you have 36, what's that telling you? You know, you lived in the real world. You're not a scientist, but you've lived in the real world and there are 36 different models. Well, I'll tell you what it tells me. It tells me there used to be a hundred and that the ones that didn't come close enough to reality, they just quietly threw away. So what you're seeing is the surviving models and they still needed 36 of them. So all you're seeing is a survivor bias. They started with lots of models. They looked at what was really happening. Some of the models by coincidence were close to reality. So they said, "Well, these must be the good ones." No, they're not the good ones. There were a hundred and they were all over the place. Some of them were going to be close. There was no science there at all. It's just, oh, let's keep the ones that were close as if they're scientific. But do you think in 10 years that those will be kept? I don't. I don't.

So here's the thing I'm going to add. If you knew that climate change was an existential risk and the biggest problem in the world and then your darn new president, darn him, he puts his name on a report that says the climate models are all bunk and haven't come anywhere near reality. What would you do if you knew that the climate models were real and that they represented an existential threat? It was the most important thing