good price, a really good price, and you had no source of other money and you also thought that the war was over, I think maybe half of them would sell their guns because money is better than a bunch of bullets you're not going to use. Right. So I do like the buyback idea, but I think it's only a dent. You can't get all the guns with that. But if you got half of them, that'd be pretty impressive.

Kushner and Witkoff are the two guys trying to figure out how to govern Gaza after that, which to me brings up this question. Is there a way to create a non-corrupt government, even for just a city? Let's call Gaza a city, even though it's bigger than a city. Has anybody ever done it? I don't think it's even doable. I don't believe there's any form of government that you could just plop in the middle of a highly corrupt culture and then suddenly have it not be corrupt. Now, when I say it's a highly corrupt culture, I am not banging on one type of people. It's everywhere. You could just take a pin and drop it on the globe and it would hit some corrupt place somewhere. Basically all cities are corrupt. So the question is, if you build the cities the way they've always been built in the past, what are you going to get? Well, corrupt Gaza for sure. But is there a way, similar to the conversation about the government grocery stores, if you were to throw away all assumptions, and this is what Jared I think is especially good at, throw away all assumptions, could you do it then? And who would do it? I've often thought that the number one thing you need to get right is that the people who are making the money decisions don't live there. Bec