Episode 2994 CWSA 10/20/25
Trump's No King reframe and lots more fun with headlines. I might take questions. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ If you would like to enjoy this same content plus bonus content from Scott Adams, including micro-lessons on lots of useful topics to build your talent stack, please see scottadams.locals.com for full access to that secret treasure.
Good morning, everybody. Let me solve my technical problem. For some reason my iPad died. Why? Stocks are looking good. Bitcoin's up. It's a slow news da
View segment →y. Good morning, everybody, and welcome to the highlight of human civilization. It's called Coffee with Scott Adams, and you've never had a better time. But if you'd like to take a chance at elevating your experience up to levels that nobody can even understand with their tiny, shiny human brains,…
View segment →t, the thing that makes everything better. It's called the simultaneous sip, and it happens right now. Go. Well, like I said when you were first joining, there's no news today. Do you ever wake up and there's no news? There's just no news. I'll talk about the news, and some of it's about science an…
View segment →t and then it'll take a few years for the big ones to be built. But I feel like we're at Gen 4. I think we got there, people, if you were waiting for it. Well, I guess last night while I was sleeping, the internet broke, except for X. So I guess the problem was with Amazon's AWS cloud service that…
View segment →reframe. Because the normal way that you would respond to an accusation that you were trying to become a dictator would be what? You would say, "I'm not trying to become a dictator." Would that move anybody? No. You might say, "I love the Constitution." And then people would say, "Yeah, everybody sa…
View segment →lling other people to do stuff. But we observe that Trump is in the trenches all the time, day and night, sleeps less than anybody you ever know, works harder, takes fewer vacations, golfs a lot, but the golf is often work too. And so he creates this frame where you can't really hold in your head th…
View segment →nt to stay in my life and I want to stay in their life. So we have a separate, very good relationship, but they don't live with me but they're also a certain age. And the second thing is that I always saw it as a package deal. So even though the relationships are separate it's still a package deal.…
View segment →What do you think of the theory that letting Mamdani win and essentially sacrificing our crown jewel city for however many years might be useful for Republicans and maybe useful for the city because it would prove that he's not the right solution and we maybe we get another 20-year reprieve from tha…
View segment →want to overpay taxes and doesn't want to be in a crime area. So in theory, it would be the easiest prediction in the world that the real estate situation in New York would continue getting worse, at least during the election when there's a chance of the communists getting in power. But it's the opp…
View segment →ot getting worse. That might be true. And crime rates have dropped in general and allegedly the number of homeless encampments in San Francisco has fallen, but I don't have a percentage on that. And then here's another one. Rents are up in San Francisco 12% over last year. All right, let's do this a…
View segment →it would just put you at parity with your biggest competitor who has access to it now but wouldn't if it got knocked down. But now we can make those chips in the US. So now you're China and you think, "Aha, I can totally overthrow Taiwan now because the US won't have to fight." If they don't want to…
View segment →with the food because it won't be regulated, but it's coming right from the farm and we'll give you all the information you want about the farm, but it's up to the farm. And we're going to hold the farm possibly blameless even if somebody gets sick from the food." So you'd have to handle sort of the…
View segment →terday, I'm not worried about the ceasefire as long as both sides have dramatically drawn down their military presence. There's definitely going to be violations of the ceasefire. You know, every single person who's been alive more than 10 minutes knows the ceasefire is going to get violated. So you…
View segment →good price, a really good price, and you had no source of other money and you also thought that the war was over, I think maybe half of them would sell their guns because money is better than a bunch of bullets you're not going to use. Right. So I do like the buyback idea, but I think it's only a de…
View segment →ause if you live there, you've got all these corrupt influences. You know, that gangster you grew up with and the people you went to school with and your wife's family who wants that contract. You can't let the people who live there control the money. They will always be corrupt. They would just giv…
View segment →rence coming, which is an all-AI paper conference. So the conference will have humans at it, but they're there to see what would happen if AI wrote the scientific papers, submitted the scientific papers, and then here's the fun part, did their own peer review. So they're doing a conference of AI-gen…
View segment →your question. That moved you, Tom. It should have. How does gravity manifest at the quantum level? Well, I don't know if I'm ready for that one yet. When you imagine how you're perceived. Now, that's interesting. So when you think about how other people think of you, I have a reframe for that. We…
View segment →Good morning, everybody. Let me solve my technical problem. For some reason my iPad died. Why? Stocks are looking good. Bitcoin's up. It's a slow news day.
Good morning, everybody, and welcome to the highlight of human civilization. It's called Coffee with Scott Adams, and you've never had a better time. But if you'd like to take a chance at elevating your experience up to levels that nobody can even understand with their tiny, shiny human brains, all you need for that is a coffee mug or a glass, a tankard, a stein, a canteen, a jug or flask, a vessel of any kind. Fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee. And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure, the dopamine hit, the thing that makes everything better. It's called the simultaneous sip, and it happens right now. Go.
Well, like I said when you were first joining, there's no news today. Do you ever wake up and there's no news? There's just no news. I'll talk about the news, and some of it's about science and stuff, but boy, they closed the government and all the fun stuff. So first I'll tell you about my comic that you can only see if you're a subscriber on X or on Locals. I'll just tell you that the boss is looking to hire an employee who's got a neurochip in his head. So he'll be an advanced employee. But not only does he have a neurochip in his head, he's got an entire micro data center in his head. So pretty soon you're going to be hiring employees who have micro data centers in their head. That's my prediction.
I saw a couple of posts by Dr. Nicholas Fabiano who found a few studies that were interesting on X. One of them is that apparently there's a high correlation between people who are nearsighted like me, people with glasses who are nearsighted, and higher IQ. Do you know how they could have known that without doing a study? They could have asked me. I'll tell you when I discovered this. Many years ago when Dilbert first became a phenomenon, I was invited to speak at MIT. And I go into this auditorium, and this was before LASIK. I don't know if it was before LASIK was invented, but it was before it was popular. And I stood up there in front of that crowd with my glasses on and I looked into the crowd and I'm not positive, but I think every single person in the room was wearing glasses. And they're probably all nearsighted. And I said to myself, I've never seen this before. I've never seen an entire auditorium of people wearing glasses at the same time. MIT, our smartest college. Dilbert actually graduated from MIT. That's part of his backstory.
Dr. Fabiano also found a study. They said that depression can be contagious via the mirror neuron system. So in other words, if you spend time around a depressed person, it can make you depressed. How many people didn't already know that? Happy wife, happy life. Is there anybody who didn't know that hanging around depressed people will make you feel bad if you do it enough? Okay, I think they could have saved some money on that one.
Here's some good news. How many of you remember, if you've been with me since the beginning politically back in 2016 or so, I was just talking all the time about generation 4 nuclear power and how it was coming. It's here finally, eight to ten years later. There's a first, I think it's the first Gen 4 reactor. It'll be a small one that's going to open up, and it's just what you think it is. It's molten salt used as both a coolant and a fuel. It's just going to be a little one-megawatt reactor, and it'll be a test to see if they can build the 100-megawatt, which they probably will. So it looks like this technology is now well understood, and the plan is that if they can build this in a factory. So they're trying to make a small, easy-to-build, won't-melt-down. Won't melt down is the important part. Won't melt down. It can't. It's actually designed so it could melt down if you wanted it to. So it won't melt down and will be built in mass production in factories. So they would build the components and then ship them out to the site, which would be way less expensive. So we might be, you know, it'll take a few years for this to get built and then it'll take a few years for the big ones to be built. But I feel like we're at Gen 4. I think we got there, people, if you were waiting for it.
Well, I guess last night while I was sleeping, the internet broke, except for X. So I guess the problem was with Amazon's AWS cloud service that affects a lot of the big services. So a whole bunch of apps, they use Amazon's backroom processing, and it all broke. So they had one failure point at Amazon and it broke the entire internet except for X because I guess Musk has his own secured internet. So everything went down except X, which is scary but at the same time isn't it nice to know that X didn't go down because you can do almost everything there. You can message. Pretty soon you'll be able to send money. Can't send money yet on X, but you will. I mean, he's already applied for it. That's going to happen. So yet again, another service that Elon Musk provides to the world. The list of things that one man is doing for the world to make it safer is just out of control now. I mean, it's crazy. It's crazy how much he's done for the world and how much he probably will do because he's still young.
Anyway, here's a study that was designed to do nothing but make you mad. You ready for this? On one level, it's a study about a thing, but the thing won't even matter to you. As soon as you hear it, you're just going to get mad. You ready? The study that has no purpose other than to make you mad. University of Florida says they've got a study now that said that people who got the COVID vaccine lived much longer if they also had cancer. In other words, the study says that the COVID vaccine was one of the greatest cancer treatments of all time. How do you feel now? Do you believe it? Do you believe that this would be reproducible, that they could do another study and find out that the people who got the shot, because this is opposite of everything you've heard, right? This is the direct opposite of everything you've ever heard because the only thing you ever heard is that maybe people were more vulnerable, and maybe they were. So do you think I know the answer? Of course not. I don't know the answer. I don't know if these shots made you more vulnerable or saved your life. No idea. But I'll tell you what I know for sure. Science doesn't know. That's what I know for sure. That the scientists don't know. So do I believe this? No. Do I rule it out as completely impossible? No. But I don't think I'm going to believe this one. I'm going to put a pin in that one. I'd love to know who funded it, don't you?
I'm going to give you some reframes this morning, but I thought I'd start with Trump's because Trump had a reframe that was very impressive. Very impressive. So the no-kings thing happened and Trump was responding to it and he said this quote: "I'm not a king. I work my ass off to make our country great. That's all it is. I'm not a king at all." Now that, ladies and gentlemen, is a reframe. Because the normal way that you would respond to an accusation that you were trying to become a dictator would be what? You would say, "I'm not trying to become a dictator." Would that move anybody? No. You might say, "I love the Constitution." And then people would say, "Yeah, everybody says that." It wouldn't mean anything. I love our democratic republic. That's what I'm committed to. Conceptual. But when he says, "I'm not a king. I work my ass off," he's reframed it into a category where it's hard to judge him, isn't it? Because even his biggest critics will admit he's working his ass off, right? So he retreats to something that even his biggest critics will grudgingly say, "All right, well, he does work his ass off." That's true. So he's already won half the battle because he moved them to a place where they agree with him. He works his ass off. And compared to Biden, it's really striking, right? So when he says, "I worked my ass off," it's not exactly specifically a defense against trying to become a king, but it is hard for you to hold in your head both of those thoughts at the same time. That's what makes it so good. You don't think of the king as working his ass off. You think of the king wearing the hat and telling other people to do stuff. But we observe that Trump is in the trenches all the time, day and night, sleeps less than anybody you ever know, works harder, takes fewer vacations, golfs a lot, but the golf is often work too. And so he creates this frame where you can't really hold in your head the hard worker part, which we observe and all know to be true, with the king part. That is brilliant. I don't know if I can quite express how smart that is. It's again the sort of thing that only a Trump can do, this specific Trump. Other people can't do this. They would just have some weak "I love my democracy." No, they're the ones who have the, they're the ones who want to be the king. But this is perfect. I work my ass off. It's hard to argue. I work my ass off.
I told you I was going to give you some more reframes, and so I will from my book *Reframe Your Brain*, my highest-rated book, five stars. So it's full of reframes if you didn't know that. Let me give you one. Suppose you want to do something big. Doesn't matter what it is. You want to shop for a house or save up for a house. You want to maybe decide to go back to school. You want to change your job. You want to do something big. So here's a reframe for that. Quite often we don't do it because the effort is so big and daunting that you can't even start. Do you ever have that situation? There's a thing you want to do, but it's just so big, you know, in order to start. Like maybe you want to relocate to another state. That's like a really big job, right? So you don't want to start because it's just so big. Here's the reframe. What's the smallest thing I can do that moves me in the right direction? Think of the smallest thing, not the biggest thing. Just reverse it. What's the smallest thing? Usually the smallest thing is to look for some information. So I'll just use my example of you wanted to move to another state. First thing you do is you look up their tax code. And maybe that's it. Maybe that's all you do that day. You just look at their tax and go, "Okay, they have lower state taxes, so so far I'm good." Maybe the next day you ask again, what is the smallest thing I can do? Well, I could maybe do a little research to find out what town would be the best town to live in that's near wherever I think I want to work, for example, or my family or whatever. So the way you approach it is what's the smallest thing you can do because what you'll find is that there's sort of a compound interest to it. When I wanted to become a cartoonist, I had to assemble all of these tiny little facts like this is the kind of paper you want to use. This is the book that tells you where to send your samples. This is the kind of pen you want to use because other pens have problems for various reasons. This is, you know, it's got to be three panels. You want all capital letters. So you assemble all these tiny, tiny little things that individually get you closer to this big thing. And you realize that life is actually kind of long. Sometimes time flies, but other times life is long.
So how many of you remember when I decided I was going to teach myself to play drums? Was that like seven years ago? Probably seven years ago. And some of you watched me. And you watched, you know, eventually I got a, I watched some YouTube, but I eventually got an instructor who would come once a week and I started assembling very, very slowly the skills to play the drums. Now, I didn't want to play in a band. I just wanted to be able to knock around in my garage, maybe play to my stereo or something. So those of you who are with me on the Locals app, you know that I've accomplished that. It took seven years, but after seven years I finally did a drum solo, you know, playing over with some other music in the background for my audience. Now, was it good? No. But I didn't care. I wasn't trying to be great. I was just trying to do it. Now, the doing it was extraordinarily fun. Extraordinarily fun because I could feel the entire seven-year arc. And it actually started with my stepson. I tried to get him into the drums when he was maybe 14 or something because I thought it'd be good for him. But he wasn't as interested as I was. So to me it's sort of a legacy that connects us across life and death. So that's my point. So the point is that you can in many times do the smallest little thing. I can't tell you how many times I would walk by the drums and say I'm going to try this one thing and I'd put 60 seconds of practice into it. And then the next day maybe two minutes. All right. That's your reframe for the day.
The no-kings event happened and I'm happy to report there are no extra kings. There are no reports of any extra kings. So I think the no-kings march did suppress any extra kings popping up. So far so good. But the Democrats are apparently afraid of the blowback now that the no-kings thing is over. They don't have a reason to keep the government closed. So, Scott, what do you think about becoming a stepfather? Many right-wing men don't like it. I'm going to answer that question even though it's distracting from my topic because we don't have much news today. So I'm going to just jump around. What do I think about stepkids? Here's the one and only way to think about stepkids. You have a separate relationship with them. That's it. You have a relationship with the parent, but your relationship with the kids, that's just separate. So you could like them. You could stay in their life if they want to stay in yours. You know, if you get divorced, if they want to stay in yours. Now, mine do. Mine do want to stay in my life and I want to stay in their life. So we have a separate, very good relationship, but they don't live with me but they're also a certain age. And the second thing is that I always saw it as a package deal. So even though the relationships are separate it's still a package deal. So when you agree to be part of the parent's life, you're agreeing to be part of the children's life too. As much as they want, it's up to them, right? It's always up to them. But as much as they want, I'm all in because both because they're just excellent people and I like having excellent people in my life. So the answer is it's really individual. If I were scraping by and didn't have enough money for myself, I would probably be regretting any kind of contact with any exes of any kind. But since I'm in a favorable situation financially, I can make their life a little easier and mine at the same time. So everybody wins.
Anyway, so what are the Democrats going to do now that their no-kings thing happened? It didn't make any difference to anybody. It just showed that they don't have anything. I think they proved that they don't have much Black support because the protesters were almost no diversity at all. And they were mostly older people and very few young men, the groups that they want to get. So if the Democrats wanted to win back the Black vote and win back the Hispanic vote and win back the young male vote, they did everything the opposite of that by showing all the people who are not that being their base visually. So visually I think it was a disaster for the Democrats because visually it was just grandparents. It was just old white grandparents, which could not be further from what they're trying to make their brand, which is all diverse everything. So I would say visually it was a complete disaster. But not in a way that they will recognize. There'll just be this continued drift toward fewer Democrats and nobody will be able to quite put their finger on what was the one thing that made that happen. Well, it wasn't one thing. It was everything. And this is just part of the everything that continues to push that ball down the road. It's like, no white guys. Nope. We don't like men. Nope. Nope. Just a little bit.
Mom Dami versus Cuomo and what's the other guy? Sliwa. There's a new poll. Gotham polling. I don't know how reliable Gotham polling is, but they do say that if Sliwa dropped out that it would be close between Cuomo and Mamdani and it would put Cuomo within striking distance and some New Yorkers, even Republicans, would say, "Ah, give us the Democrat. At least he's a normal Democrat." Cuomo being a normal Democrat. But Sliwa is not looking to drop out. So if he doesn't then it looks like Mamdani would win quite easily. So there's that.
What do you think of the theory that letting Mamdani win and essentially sacrificing our crown jewel city for however many years might be useful for Republicans and maybe useful for the city because it would prove that he's not the right solution and we maybe we get another 20-year reprieve from that kind of thinking. What do you think? Do you think we'd be better off, New York specifically? Do you think they'd be better off just eating this sandwich and then learning from it? I don't know. You know, I was surprised to learn that New York real estate is coming back. That's the last thing I would have expected. If there's one thing I can tell you about economics, nobody can predict it. So the entire argument against Mamdani is that we can all predict economics here. Here I'm going to make you a little bit uncertain. Are you ready? When you came in here you were completely certain that Mamdani's approach was a bad one. Communist, socialist, and that the normies had the right one, you know, social capitalism, free markets. You were completely right about that, right? Well, here's the thing. How many of you predicted that in the middle of the race to elect a socialist, maybe communist, in the middle of the race that New York City real estate prices would go up and people would be coming back in and buying office space and is recovering? How many of you would have predicted that? To me, it was the most easy thing to predict wouldn't happen, right? Because the situation in theory is getting worse and worse for a traditional business that doesn't want to overpay taxes and doesn't want to be in a crime area. So in theory, it would be the easiest prediction in the world that the real estate situation in New York would continue getting worse, at least during the election when there's a chance of the communists getting in power. But it's the opposite. So this is where I'm making you feel uncertain. And one of the reasons that I have no respect for my own college degree, which is in economics, it doesn't predict. Yeah, I've told you in different contexts that the best you can do in understanding reality because we're not good at understanding reality is whether it predicts. Well, the reality I was living in didn't predict. Did yours? Didn't predict that New York City real estate would already be recovering. Which reality predicted that? Not mine. Not mine at all. You know whose might have? Mamdani's. It's entirely possible that Mamdani was expecting and predicting real estate to come back and the argument would be there's only one New York City. That's the whole argument. There's only one New York City. So if you want to play with the big boys, you're going to have to go back. And he even thought, Mamdani even wanted to raise taxes on corporations to match New Jersey, which is also clever because he's matching. That's this very clever way to do it but obviously he thought it wouldn't destroy the economy or even he wouldn't be predicting it right. So now let's see if I succeeded. So you walked in here completely sure that he was the one who's always wrong and you're the one who's right because you like the capitalism and the free market. Except his point of view is the only one that predicted correctly, right? I'm just messing with you because obviously I don't think his plans are the ones that are the good ones. But have a little bit of humility. Just back up to a little bit of humility. Looks to me like he predicted correctly and you didn't. Looks to me like he predicted correctly and I didn't. And in theory, I have more credentials than he has for this kind of prediction. I don't know. Just that's just something to think about because it's a slow news day.
Apparently Denmark just decided that people in Denmark can copyright their own face. So if AI tries to use your face, there'll be a copyright violation. I don't know if that'll last. That doesn't seem like something that could last.
Here's another surprise. Did you know that San Francisco, I think this was in the Wall Street Journal, that even San Francisco is rebounding. Did you know that? So they've got a good mayor. I forget the mayor's name, but I heard people say they were happy about our current mayor. Burglaries are allegedly down 28% this year in San Francisco. Do you believe that or is that just another one of those they change the way they report it or people just stop reporting it? I feel like it's both, but it might be true that it's not getting worse. That might be true. And crime rates have dropped in general and allegedly the number of homeless encampments in San Francisco has fallen, but I don't have a percentage on that. And then here's another one. Rents are up in San Francisco 12% over last year. All right, let's do this again. How many of you predicted that San Francisco of all places would be able to raise rents in the middle of what looked like the city falling apart? How many of you would have said, "Oh yeah, those rentals will be up 12%." Not me. I would have guessed that rents would have collapsed by now. So that's two cities in which my ability to predict with all of my economics training, zero. Zero ability to predict. If you think you can do better, knock yourself out.
In other fun stories, let me say this about Candace Owens. I love Candace Owens. I like her personally. I only met her once, very briefly, but she was very warm. And I love this show that she puts on, not just the actual podcast, but the whole show. I like the way she's inserted herself into the public mind. I just sort of like everything about what she does. Now, that's different from agreeing with all of her takes. Everybody gets that, right? Do we ever get to the point where I don't have to say that? Can we ever as a civilization get to the point where I can say, "I like that public figure" without having to say, "but I don't agree with 100% of what they say." We're not there yet, right? I still have to do that. I don't agree with 100% of everything she's ever said.
She's making some noise today. She says Charlie Kirk was betrayed and don't worry about the gag order in the Charlie Kirk case. Is that a gag order directed at her? I think so. She says, "I plan to violate it on the world's behalf." So she plans to violate the court's gag order on the world's behalf. She says, "The things I've discovered this past week are enough to burn the house down." And yes, Charlie was betrayed by everyone. Now, do you see what I mean? How do you not love that? She's so good. Just so good at getting attention, which is her job, right? If that's what I do, she and I are in the same job in a way, which is to get attention. But you're only going to get attention if you're creating value, right? You could get attention for one day, but you can't be Candace unless you can get attention just regularly, anytime you want. And wow, can she get attention? So good at this. So if you simply, and you know, I like to do this. I like to separate the person's character from their skill level. I like in this case I like her character and her skill level, but the skill level is just crazy. Candace's skill level, her talent stack is crazy. Anyway, so this is fun. We'll keep an eye on that.
According to Jensen Huang, CEO of Nvidia, here's more good news. It only took one year and apparently the US is already manufacturing the most advanced chip for AI and Nvidia is working with TSMC. The Taiwan company apparently moved some of its technology to the US and working with Nvidia. So now the US can make not at the same quantity. TSMC. Thank you. TSMC is the name of the chip company from Taiwan. Anyway, so they're working together and now they can make the most advanced chip in the US. I assume that volume is probably still a big issue, but I feel it's TSMC. But that's a pretty big deal to me because it means that even if Taiwan sunk into the ocean, we could get going. We would have enough on our shores that we could reconstitute slowly. That's a big deal. But it probably also makes it far more likely that Taiwan will be destroyed by China because China will know that it's not an existential risk to the United States anymore. I just realized this could be a double-edged sword. If you're China and you're not benefiting directly from the advanced chips on Taiwan, but your biggest competitor is the United States, would you worry too much if in the process of conquering Taiwan, you destroyed the semiconductor business? You might not care as much as you should because then it would just put you at parity with your biggest competitor who has access to it now but wouldn't if it got knocked down. But now we can make those chips in the US. So now you're China and you think, "Aha, I can totally overthrow Taiwan now because the US won't have to fight." If they don't want to and they don't want to be in a war, a world war, they don't have to. But before we kind of would have had to because we couldn't let China take control of the chips that would be better than the ones that we could make. That'd be too big a risk. So it's entirely possible that growing our own homegrown best-of chips will sacrifice Taiwan. It's not impossible, you know, it's not impossible.
Apparently Trump is using the shutdown of the government to kill some projects. I didn't know that was an option. I guess the Democrats didn't know it either, but they're finding out. Allegedly, there's some kind of $20 billion New York City tunnel project that Schumer had spent years trying to get passed and finally did. And now because the government's closed, Trump's just going to cancel the whole project. I don't even know if Trump even looked into whether it was a good idea to do the project or not. I think it's just a Schumer project and he worked 20 years to get it, so he's just going to cancel it on his ass. All right, that might be a little bit authoritarian, but I'd have to know if we really need this tunnel. I imagine that we could live without the tunnel and the $20 billion.
There's a story today that somebody built a hunting stand in a tree, which is where the hunters hide from the prey, and then they can take a shot from their hiding place in the tree. They built one that had a complete view of Air Force One when it lands in Palm Beach. So he had the hunting blind had a wide open shot at the president of the United States coming down the gate from his own airplane in a place where he's known to land. Now, the good news is that it was discovered and it looks like it's been there for a while. But we don't know why it was there. We don't know if it was there for that purpose, but it would be a strange place for a hunting blind. Wouldn't you think that Palm Beach would be a strange place to have a hunting blind in a tree? I don't know how many other hunting blinds in trees there are in Palm Beach, but that certainly looks exactly like what it looks like, doesn't it? Bannon's all over that one.
Apparently Boston is looking into having a city-run grocery store. Mamdani has talked about that. They haven't done it yet, but did you know that Atlanta already has one? They have a city-run grocery. And I do not have an update on whether it's working in Atlanta. I imagine they've got some challenges, but it makes me wonder, is there a way to make a government grocery store work without getting rid of the regular grocery stores so the rest of us can have more choice? And I was thinking about that. What would you do if you were the government and you wanted to, I don't want to say compete, but you were going to have an alternative grocery store in the same place where there were regular grocery stores. So the first thing you have to do is make sure that people who had money still preferred the regular grocery stores. And you could do that easily by having more junk food and more selection, right? Selection alone would get the people with money to go there. So the first thing you do is have less selection if it's a government grocery store. I think if you reduce the selection to just basics like vegetables and protein, you could probably find ways to cut costs like crazy because you just keep it simple. It's like, okay, we got five proteins just always the same. But then could you also do something that was direct from farm if you got rid of some regulations because you are the government. So if you got rid of government regulations and said, "All right, you can take your chances with the food because it won't be regulated, but it's coming right from the farm and we'll give you all the information you want about the farm, but it's up to the farm. And we're going to hold the farm possibly blameless even if somebody gets sick from the food." So you'd have to handle sort of the insurance risk of providing food to people and a government could just say, "Yeah, you can't sue. Some people are going to die from the farm food. You can't sue." So if you did all of those things, you reduced the choice, you figured out how to get the footprint really low, maybe you even got some free rent, maybe you figured out how to use robots instead of employees. Maybe you squeeze the big food producers for a little taste of something to help pay for it. Maybe you had your own vertical so you owned the farm but you also owned the grocery store. So my point is if you started from scratch and said how would we build an alternative place to get food, could you do it? Is it even doable? I've always thought that the ideal would be that there would be like a cafeteria that you could go to that would be close enough everybody could get to it. You know, maybe there would be multiple, but the cafeteria model would have less waste than individuals. You know, if you shop for yourself and cook for yourself, it's just so wasteful the amount of time you spend and that you have to drive somewhere and pick something up. You got to store it. Some of it goes bad. You got to negotiate who gets what. Compare that to just everybody walks over to the buffet and you just get what you want. So I do not rule out that there could be a government grocery store. I think if you rule it out because it's never worked, that's a good starting point. But that's just the starting point for the analysis. You have to go past it never worked. You have to go to what has never been tried. If you get to what's never been tried, well now it's interesting.
You were not surprised to know that the Gaza ceasefire is not holding as well as people would like, but it's unclear whether the leadership of Hamas has anything to do with it or is it rogue elements within Hamas. But there is some firing, there are some deaths. Israel is responding to the encroachments by cutting food, I guess, and aid. We hope that's temporary. So humanitarian aid is stopped or paused, I guess. Mostly paused. And I feel like that'll get worked out. So as I said yesterday, I'm not worried about the ceasefire as long as both sides have dramatically drawn down their military presence. There's definitely going to be violations of the ceasefire. You know, every single person who's been alive more than 10 minutes knows the ceasefire is going to get violated. So you can't say we're going to change everything if the ceasefire gets violated because we know it's going to get violated. There wouldn't be any point even doing the deal if we thought a violation was going to overturn the whole thing. So of course we're going to work through all the little violations, but probably we will. It does make sense that there'll be plenty of people there who don't want a ceasefire and will be acting upon it. But as long as they get the big weapons out of there.
I guess Jared was talking about maybe a gun buyback program. And what was your first impression when you heard that they would do a gun buyback program with Hamas? Your first impression is no, right? That's not going to work. They're not going to sell their guns. My second impression was we don't really know the depth of their poverty right now. So if you were Hamas and you owned a gun and the government offered you what was a really good price, a really good price, and you had no source of other money and you also thought that the war was over, I think maybe half of them would sell their guns because money is better than a bunch of bullets you're not going to use. Right. So I do like the buyback idea, but I think it's only a dent. You can't get all the guns with that. But if you got half of them, that'd be pretty impressive.
Kushner and Witkoff are the two guys trying to figure out how to govern Gaza after that, which to me brings up this question. Is there a way to create a non-corrupt government, even for just a city? Let's call Gaza a city, even though it's bigger than a city. Has anybody ever done it? I don't think it's even doable. I don't believe there's any form of government that you could just plop in the middle of a highly corrupt culture and then suddenly have it not be corrupt. Now, when I say it's a highly corrupt culture, I am not banging on one type of people. It's everywhere. You could just take a pin and drop it on the globe and it would hit some corrupt place somewhere. Basically all cities are corrupt. So the question is, if you build the cities the way they've always been built in the past, what are you going to get? Well, corrupt Gaza for sure. But is there a way, similar to the conversation about the government grocery stores, if you were to throw away all assumptions, and this is what Jared I think is especially good at, throw away all assumptions, could you do it then? And who would do it? I've often thought that the number one thing you need to get right is that the people who are making the money decisions don't live there. Because if you live there, you've got all these corrupt influences. You know, that gangster you grew up with and the people you went to school with and your wife's family who wants that contract. You can't let the people who live there control the money. They will always be corrupt. They would just give it to their family members etc. So you need some kind of independent, physically not there entity to not only decide where the money is spent but then to watch it like a hawk and report on it so that everybody knows where it went. If you can't get that part right, nothing else works. So somehow Jared has to solve the problem of what happens when money is introduced into the zone and then who gets to decide where it goes, who watches it, and who reports it to the people to make sure it went to the right place. If you don't get that part right, nothing else matters. And that's the hardest part to get right. Nobody's done it. As far as I know, nobody's ever done it. I believe every city is corrupt. But if Jared could pull that off with some clever set of systems, it would be one of the greatest things that ever happened in the world. Think about that. The odds of pulling that off are pretty low. It's maximum challenge. But what if he did it? What if they pulled that off? Witkoff and Jared Kushner, what if they actually built a city that by its design, the systems they put in place avoided corruption? Can you even imagine that? That would be one of the greatest things that ever happened in the history of humankind. So I don't know what you're working on today, but those two guys have a chance to change everything. Do they have a plan? Probably not yet. But do they have the skills that the two of them could conceivably come up with a way to build a non-corrupt zone? And I think yes. I think yes. I believe that they have the skill to do that. Doesn't mean it will get done because there will be a lot of pushback in every possible way. But yeah, they might be the only two dudes that could pull that off right now.
Trump has announced an end to the Colombian foreign aid. I didn't even know we were giving Colombia foreign aid, but apparently now they're a bunch of illegal drug dealers too. Trump's not happy with the president of Colombia who is not happy with us. So Trump's going to discontinue whatever our subsidies were for Colombia. I feel like the subsidies were for the purpose of fighting drugs, weren't they? So is he saying that we've been paying Colombia to fight drugs, but Colombia is actually the drug cartel and we've been paying the cartel? Is that what happened? I don't know if that's what happened. I'm seeing some yeses. So yes, if that's even close to what's happening, and I don't know that it is, but if the government is embedded with the cartel and we were paying the government to deal with the cartel, well, maybe it's time to stop doing that, huh?
You would not be surprised to hear because it's Groundhog Day all over again. Ukrainian drone struck a major Russian gas plant. How many times have I said that? Like every day, right? Every day there's another Russian major energy structure that got attacked. So that's happening.
Other positive news. Interesting Engineering has a story about a wind turbine. So it's basically the fans of a windmill would be the turbine part, but apparently somebody has developed a new shape for the turbine. Now I don't know what turbine means. If you say turbine enough, you don't know what it means. Turbine, turbine, turbine. God, now I don't even know what it means. But it would be the little things that the air is bouncing off of. And they've figured out how to make one that boosts energy output by 83% with 35% less weight. Fiber composite rotors make a small turbine stronger, more durable. 83%. Do you believe that they figured out how to make a windmill 83% more efficient all of a sudden with just a shape change? It's just a shape, you know, something easy to reproduce, a shape. Well, if that's true, finally your dream can come true, which is you'll be able to watch television even when the wind is just barely blowing. Of course, I'm joking. Trump always says that the windmills are no good because when the wind stops blowing you can't watch TV, which of course is not true, but it's hilarious every time he says it. And now I'm thinking, finally, we can watch TV when the wind is barely blowing. You know, maybe it's so efficient, those little turbines, that you could have one in your house without making your neighbors crazy from the sound and the dead birds.
According to Elizabeth Gibney, who's writing for Nature, AI bots have now reviewed, oh, there's a conference coming, which is an all-AI paper conference. So the conference will have humans at it, but they're there to see what would happen if AI wrote the scientific papers, submitted the scientific papers, and then here's the fun part, did their own peer review. So they're doing a conference of AI-generated scientific papers that will be matched with the peer reviewers so that the humans who attend can see if the peer reviewers can add value to the AI papers. Does that make sense? Did I explain that well enough? So it's not that the papers are going to be trusted more. It's more about seeing how the human-AI scientific model works. I love this. I think this is exactly what they should be looking at to see what that looks like when you throw the AI in there.
Ladies and gentlemen, I told you I'd be finishing a little early. There's not much news happening today, which I suppose is good. But I did tell the people on Locals, my beloved subscribers, that I'd be taking some questions at the end about anything you want. So I won't be able to see all of your questions because they zip by pretty quickly. But if you do have any questions on any topic at all, I'd be happy to answer them.
Trump's government added the White House and departments to Blue Sky social network. So I subscribed. Wow, TDS is strong. What are your thoughts including how those supporting should engage? So how should Trump supporters engage with Blue Sky? So Blue Sky is the competitor to X that only Democrats went to basically. But the White House wanted a presence there, which is smart. I just would ignore it. Just ignore it. There's nothing there for you. If it becomes more of a thing then maybe someday you don't have to ignore it but at the moment I just ignore it.
I helped you with your team. Good. Can you reframe marriage for more success? Now the individual relationship ones you'd have to know so much about the individual situation. I can't just reframe marriage because some people ought to be married and some people ought to probably cut it out.
If my rodents returned what I noticed, I feel having two cats will probably eliminate my rodent stuff.
Dogn Barking says, "I missed what you learned from your medical testing Friday." I'll give you that fast. So I've got terminal cancer, metastatic prostate cancer. There's a drug that's newly approved just this spring called Pluvicto, but you don't get that unless you go through a scanning process in which they give you some radioactive juice to see if it lights up the tumors. Because if they can't light up the tumors with the practice juice, then the real thing won't do it either. So it's a way to find out if this limited and expensive process would be applicable to me or not. Now, the test was the most painful thing I've ever done in my life by far because I can't lay on my back without extraordinary pain and you have to lay on your back for 20 minutes. Extraordinary pain. Just extraordinary. But it's over and I got through it and it did light up at least my reading of the tests. I don't, the doctor hasn't read them yet so it might be maybe I'm misinterpreting but the reading of the test is that they lit up well, that they had a high sensitivity which is what we're looking for. So in theory my doctor will look at that today. He'll recommend it to a committee who decides whether or not that's good enough for me to get that drug. If the committee says yes in a week when they meet, then it will be scheduled. But I don't know how long it takes to schedule it. And there would be several applications. So it'd be once a week for I don't know four or six weeks or something like that. And then it doesn't work for everybody, right? Even if you've tested to see if it lights up your tumors, it's not going to work for everybody and it's not going to work as well for everybody. So there's some chance that I will get substantial relief fairly quickly, you know, within a matter of just a few weeks because some people have. But it's far more likely, maybe two out of three chance, that maybe I get a little bit of delay in the whole dying thing but it doesn't change the arc of my life too much. That'd be the most likely. However we're at this weird point in history where there are all kinds of new things coming online every day. Literally every day there's a new prostate cancer thing that looks like it might work if they test it a little bit further. So if I can extend my survival, and I don't know how much I need to, but we're at that period where if you can get that little extra, you might be able to get to the new thing. So that's my game plan. My game plan is to try to get to the new thing without knowing what the new thing is or even that it will exist. But and then there's a nonzero chance. I'm not counting on this, but there's a nonzero chance that the Pluvicto will just knock it out and that it will still be there because it's not marketed as a cure, by the way, but it could knock it back so much that if I don't do chemo and weaken my immune system, I might be able to just sort of keep it at bay without too much future trouble. Possible. Not likely. Most likely is I slow it down and it rages back in a few months. Most likely, but that might be enough.
I feel like I'm not adding value now because I'm just talking about my own situation. How did I prepare myself for the painful medical scan? Excellent question. How did I prepare myself? Well, I knew it would be bad and I had the maximum pain relievers, but I had not practiced being in that position for that long because obviously it's the most painful thing you could ever do in your life. So I didn't know how bad it would be. So that's number one. If you don't know how bad it will be, that helps get you in the room. Once you're in the room, this is where the reframe wanting versus deciding comes in. Do you see how powerful this is? If I had simply wanted it, I could not have held out. No way. But I had decided. I decided, meaning that you could put a hot poker through my forehead and I was going to hold on. There's a thing you hold on to to keep yourself from wiggling. And I told myself, you could do anything to me there. There's no level of pain that's going to make me move. This is my one shot because I don't have a plan B. There's no plan B. This is the only plan I had to survive. So that's a decision. That's not a preference, right? So once you move it from preference to decision, it doesn't make it easier, but it largely guarantees it'll get done. So you're not always trying to make it easier. You're trying to make sure it gets done because once it's done, it's done. That's a full solution. Done is done. And then I also do a thing where I try not to imagine it too much. When I have a dental appointment, I do that as well. If I know it's going to be painful, I tell myself simply, get out. That's another reframe. If it's in my head, I just get out. Get out. Get out. Think of something else. Get out. Get out. And the less you think about it before you go, the happier you're going to be because the thinking about it doesn't help. So you just say, "Get out. Get out every time you need to." So that's two reframes: the wanting versus deciding and then the get out so you're not obsessing about it before it happens. I think that was a good answer to your question. That moved you, Tom. It should have.
How does gravity manifest at the quantum level? Well, I don't know if I'm ready for that one yet.
When you imagine how you're perceived. Now, that's interesting. So when you think about how other people think of you, I have a reframe for that. We'll probably get to it later, but I'll share it with you now. What's the best reframe for worrying about what people think about you? You've heard me say this one. Provenge. Yeah, I'll look into Provenge. I know about that one. What was I talking about? You, I just forgot what I was talking about because I got on the Provenge track. How to reframe if you think people are thinking bad things about you. The basket case theory is one. That's not the one I was going for, but that is also correct. If you remember that everyone's a basket case, then you're not going to feel bad about you being one. That's a very powerful reframe. It's one of my favorites. You just, once you realize that once you get to know somebody, they've got all kinds of problems that you didn't know about until you knew them really well. And once you realize there's no such thing as the people who seem to have no problems, they don't exist. There's nobody like that. Once you realize that you're just like everybody else, but your problems might be different, but you all got your things, right? So that's the first one here. But here's one that's even better. Nobody cares about you. They're not even thinking about you. You imagine that people are having all these negative thoughts about you. If they do, it lasts all of one second in their head. It doesn't matter. People don't care about you. You know, your family does, but that's not what you're talking about, right? You're not talking about your loved ones. You're talking about sort of co-workers and people you run into in the street, stuff like that. So here's where I learned that. I've told you this story, but this will make it concrete again. Many years ago, I did laser surgery on my face to correct a bunch of spider veins that were sort of in the mask of my face. Now, I was told by the laser professional that my face would look all purple and it would look like I had gone through a windshield and it would last for about three weeks. And I probably didn't want to go out in public looking that way. So sure enough, I get the treatment. My face is all purple and it looked like I'd just gone through a windshield. So obviously, I don't want to leave the house. So day goes by and I'm bored and I'm thinking, three weeks? Wow, that's a long time not to leave the house. And the second day comes and I'm bored and I just want to go shopping just to get out of the freaking house. And I say to myself, what would happen if I just didn't care what anybody thought? What would happen if I just go to the mall with my face that looks like I just went through a windshield? What would happen? So I went to the mall. Nobody gave one what I look like. Nobody stared. Nobody asked me about it. Nobody showed the least bit of interest in whatever it was I was going through. Not a glance, not a stare, not a child going, "Oh, what's wrong?" Nothing. And once you get a big dose of nobody cares, oh my god, the freedom. The freedom that that gave me, it was actually one of my more memorable days of my life because that's when I realized for sure that I didn't have to worry about what other people were thinking about me because they weren't thinking about me. They just weren't. They just were not thinking about me. They think about themselves. So if you want to be liked, help people think about themselves. That's what the Dale Carnegie course does. If you want to be liked, your job was not to make them think better about what your face looked like. That wasn't the job. The job was to make them think about themselves if you want them to like you. So there's another reframe for you.
Ladies and gentlemen, I would say we've done what we need to do here. I hope I've changed your lives a little bit, just a little bit, and we'll come back and do this tomorrow. There will be real news sometime this week and we'll get back to what we usually do. But in the meantime, I'm hoping all these reframes are making you more powerful and happier. All right, everybody. Good. All right, everybody. I won't be talking to the Locals people privately because basically what I just did is what I would have been doing. But I will see you tomorrow everybody. Maybe tonight I will do another drawing class for the Locals people but I don't know yet.
Good morning everybody.
Let me solve my technical problem.
For some reason my i.
Pad died.
Why?
Why stocks are looking good?
Bitcoin's up.
It's a slow news day.
Good morning everybody and welcome to the highlight of human civilization.
It's called Coffee with Scott Adams and you've never had a better time.
But if you'd like to take a chance of elevating your experience up to levels that nobody can even understand with their tiny shiny human brains.
All you need for that is a cuper mug or a glass of tanker shelves, a canteen jugger flask, a vessel of any kind.
Fill it with your favorite liquid.
I like coffee.
And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure.
The dopamine hit the thing day, the thing that makes everything better.
It's called the simultaneous sip and happens right now.
Go.
Well, like I said when you were first joining, there's no news today.
Do you ever wake up and there's no news?
There's just there's just no news.
I'll talk about the news and I'll you know, some of it's about science and stuff, but boy, they closed the government and all the fun stuffs.
So, first I'll tell you about my comic that you can only see if you're a subscriber on X or on locals.
I'll just tell you that uh the boss is looking to hire an employee who's got a neurochip in his head.
So, he'll be an advanced employee, but not only does he have a neurochip in his head, he's got an entire micro data center in his head.
So pretty soon you're going to be hiring employees who have micro data centers in their head.
That's my prediction.
All right.
Uh I saw a couple of posts by Dr.
Nicholas Fabiano who found a few studies that were interesting on X.
One of them is that apparently there's a high correlation between people who are nearsighted like me, people have glasses that are nearsighted and higher IQ.
Do you know how they could have known that without doing a study?
They could have asked me.
I'll tell you when I discovered this.
Many years ago when Dilbert first became a phenomenon, I was invited to speak at MIT.
And I go into this auditorium and this was before LAS.
I don't know if it was before LASIK was invented, but it was before it was popular.
And I stood up there in front of that crowd with my glasses on and I looked into the CL crowd and I'm not positive, but I think every single person in the room was wearing glasses.
and they're probably all nearsighted.
And I said to myself, I've never seen this before.
I've never seen an entire auditorium of people wearing glasses at the same time.
MIT, our smartest college.
Uh Dilbert actually graduated from MIT.
That that's part of his backstory.
Dr.
Fabiano also found a study.
They said that depression can be contagious via the mirror neuron system.
So in other words, if you spend time around a depressed person, it can make you depressed.
How many people didn't already know that happy wife, happy life?
Is there anybody who didn't know that hanging around depressed people will make you feel bad if you do it enough?
Okay, I think they could have saved some money on that one.
Here's some good news.
How many of you remember you, if you've been with me since the beginning politically, uh, back in 2016 or so, I was just talking all the time about generation 4 nuclear power and how it was coming.
It's here finally 8 10 years later.
Uh, there's a first, I think it's the first Gen 4 reactor.
It'll be a small one.
uh that's going to open up and it's uh just what you think it is.
It's molten salt used as both a coolant and a fuel.
It's just going to be a little one megawatt reactor and it'll be a it'll be a test to see if they can build the 100 megawatt, which they probably will.
So it looks like this technology is now well understood and the plan is that if they can build this in a factory.
So they're trying to make a small easy to build won't melt down.
Won't melt down is the important part.
Won't melt down.
It can't.
It's actually designed so it could melt down if you wanted it to.
Um, so it won't melt down and will be built in mass production in factories.
So they would build the components and then ship them out to the site, which would be way less expensive.
So we might be uh, you know, it'll take a few years for this to get built and then it'll take a few years for the big ones to be built.
But I feel like we're at Gen 4.
I think we got there, people, if you were waiting for it.
Well, I guess last night while I was sleeping, the internet broke.
Uh, except for X.
So, I guess the problem was with Amazon's AWS cloud service that affects a lot of the big services.
So, a whole bunch of apps, they use Amazon's back, what would you call it?
Uh, backroom processing.
And, uh, it all broke.
So they had one failure point at Amazon and it broke the entire internet except for X because I guess Musk has his own his own secured internet.
So everything went down except X which is scary but at the same time isn't it nice to know that X didn't go down because you can do almost everything there.
You can message pretty soon you'll be able to send money.
can't send money yet on X, but you will.
I mean, he's already applied for it.
That's going to happen.
So, yet again, another service that Elon Musk provides to the world.
The the list the list of things that one man is doing for the world to make it safer is just out of control now.
I mean, just it's crazy.
It's crazy how much he's done for the world and how much he probably will do because he's still young.
Anyway, here's here's a study that was designed to do nothing but make you mad.
You ready for this?
On one level, it's a study about a thing, but the thing won't even matter to you.
As soon as you hear it, you're just going to get mad.
You ready?
the study that has no purpose other than to make you mad.
Uh, University of Florida says they they've got a study now that said that people who got the COVID vaccine lived much longer if they also had cancer.
In other words, the study says that the COVID vaccine was one of the greatest cancer treatments of all time.
How do you feel now?
Do you believe it?
Do you believe that this would be reproducible that that they could do another study and find out that the people who got the shot because this is opposite of everything you've heard, right?
This is direct opposite of everything you've ever heard because the only thing you ever heard is that maybe people were more vulnerable and and maybe they were.
So, do you think I know the answer?
Of course not.
I don't know the answer.
I don't know if these shots made you more vulnerable or saved your life.
No idea.
But I'll tell you what I know for sure.
Science doesn't know.
That's what I know for sure.
That the scientists don't know.
So, do I believe this?
No.
Do I rule it out as completely impossible?
No.
But I don't think I'm going to believe this one.
I'm gonna I'm gonna put a pin in that one.
I'd love to know who funded it, don't you know?
All right.
Uh, I'm going to give you some reframes this morning, but I thought I'd start with Trump's because Trump had a reframe that uh was very impressive.
Very impressive.
So, the the no kings thing happened and uh Trump was responding to it and he said this quote, "I'm not a king.
I work my ass off to make our country great.
That's all it is.
I'm not a king at all.
Now, that, ladies and gentlemen, is a reframe.
Because the normal way that you would respond to an accusation that you were trying to become a dictator would be what?
You would say, "I'm not trying to become a dictator." Would that move anybody?
No.
You might say, "I love the Constitution." And then people would say, "Yeah, everybody says that.
wouldn't mean anything.
Uh I I love our democratic republic.
That's what I'm committed to.
Conceptual.
Conceptual.
But when he says, "I'm not a king.
I work my ass off." He's reframed it into a category where it's hard to judge him, isn't it?
Because even his biggest critics will admit he's working his ass off, right?
So he retreats to something that even his biggest critics will will grudgingly say, "All right, well, he does work his ass off." That's true.
Now that So he's already won half the battle because he moved them to a place where they agree with him.
He works his ass off.
And compared to Biden, it's really striking, right?
So when he says, "I worked my ass off," it's not exactly specifically a defense against trying to become a king, but it is hard for you to hold in your head both of those thoughts at the same time.
That's what makes it so good.
You don't think of the king as working his ass off.
You think of the king wearing the hat and telling other people to do stuff.
But we observe that Trump is in the trench all the time.
day and night, sleeps less than anybody you ever know, works harder, takes fewer vacations, golfs a lot, but the golf is often worked too.
And so he creates this frame where you can't really hold in your head the hard worker part, which we observe and all know to be true with the cane part.
That is brilliant.
I don't I don't know if I can quite express how smart that is.
It's it's again it's the sort of thing that only a Trump can do this this specific Trump.
Other people can't do this.
They they would just have some, you know, weak I love my democracy.
No, no, they're the ones who have the they're the ones who want to be the king.
But this is perfect.
I work my ass off.
It's hard to argue.
I I work my ass off.
All right.
So, I told you I was going to give you some more reframes.
And so I will from my book Reframe Your Brain, my highest rated book, five stars.
So it's full of reframes if you didn't know that.
Let me give you one.
Um, how about the the Here's one.
Suppose you want to do something big.
Doesn't matter what it is.
You want to shop for a house or save up for a house.
You want to uh maybe decide to go back to school.
You want to change your job.
You want to do something something big.
So, here's a reframe for that.
Quite often, we don't do it because the effort is so big and daunting that you can't even start.
Do you ever have that situation?
There's a thing you want to do, but it's it's just so big, you know, in order to start.
Like maybe you want to relocate to another state.
That's like a really big job, right?
So, you don't want to start because it's just so big.
Here's the reframe.
What's the smallest thing I can do that moves me in the right direction?
Think of the smallest thing, not the biggest thing.
Just reverse it.
What's the smallest thing?
Usually, the smallest thing is to look for some information.
So, I'll just use my example of you wanted to move to another state.
First thing you do is you look up their tax code.
And maybe that's it.
Maybe that's all you do that day.
You just look at their tax and go, "Okay, they they have lower state taxes, so so far I'm good." Maybe the next day you ask again, what is the smallest thing I can do?
Well, I could maybe uh do a little research to find out what town would be the best town to live in that's near wherever I think I want to work, for example, or my family or whatever.
So the way you approach it is what's the smallest thing you can do because what you'll find is that there's sort of a compound interest to it.
When I wanted to become a cartoonist, I had to assemble all of these tiny little facts like this is the kind of paper you want to use.
This is the book that tells you where to send your samples.
This is the kind of pen you want to use cuz other pens have problems for various reasons.
This is, you know, it's got to be three panels.
You want to all capital letters.
So, you assemble all these tiny tiny little things that individually get you closer to this big thing.
And you realize that life is actually kind of long.
Sometimes, sometimes time flies, but other times life is long.
So, how many of you remember when I decided I was going to teach myself to play drums?
Was that like um seven years ago?
Probably seven years ago.
And some of you watched me.
And you watched, you know, eventually I got a I watched some You.
Tubetubes, but I eventually got a an instructor would come once a week and I started assembling very very slowly the skills to play the drum.
Now, I didn't want to play in a band.
I just wanted to be able to knock around in my garage, maybe play to my stereo or something.
So, those of you who are with me and uh on the locals app, you know that I've accomplished that.
It took seven years, but but after seven years, I finally did a a drum solo, you know, playing over with with some other music in the background for my audience.
Now, was it good?
No.
But I didn't care.
I I wasn't trying to be great.
I was just trying to do it.
Now, the doing it was extraordinarily fun.
Extraordinarily fun because I could feel the entire 7-year arc.
And it actually started with my stepson.
I tried to get him into the drums when he was maybe 14 or something because I thought it'd be good for him.
Uh but he wasn't as interested I as I was.
So to me it's sort of a legacy that connects us uh across across life and death.
So that's my point.
So the point is that you can in many times do the smallest little thing.
I can't tell you how many times I would walk by the drums and say I'm going to try this one thing and I'd put 60 seconds of practice into it.
And then the next day maybe two minutes.
All right.
That's your reframe.
for the day.
All right.
So, the no kings event happened and uh I'm happy to report there are no extra kings.
Uh there are no reports of any extra kings.
So, I think it the no kings um march did suppress any extra kings popping up.
So, so far so good.
Uh but the Democrats are apparently a afraid of the blowback now that the no kings thing is over.
They don't have a reason to keep the government closed.
So, uh, Scott, what do you think about becoming a stepfather?
Many rightwing men don't like it.
I'm going to answer that question even though it's distracting from my my topic because we don't have much news today.
So, I'm going to just jump around.
Uh, how do what do I think about stepids?
Here's the the one and only way to think about step kids.
You have a separate relationship with them.
That's it.
It's you you have a relationship with the the parent, but your relationship with the kids, that's just separate.
So, you could like them.
You could stay in their life if they want to stay in yours.
You know, if you get divorced, if they want to stay in yours.
Now, mine do.
Mine do want to stay in my life and I want to stay in their life.
So we have a separate very good relationship but they don't you know they don't live with me but they're also you know certain age.
Uh and the second thing is that I always saw it as a package deal.
So even though the the relationships are separate it's still a package deal.
So when you agree to be part of the parents life, you're agreeing to be part of the children's life, too.
As much as they want, it's up to them, right?
It's always up to them.
But as much as they want, I'm all in because both because they're they're just excellent people and I I like having excellent people in my life.
So the answer is it's really individual.
Um, if if I were scraping by and didn't have enough money for myself, I would probably be regretting, you know, any kind of contact with any exes of any kind.
But since I'm in a favorable situation financially, um, I can make their life a little easier and mine at the same time.
So, everybody wins.
Anyway, so what are the Democrats going to do now that their no kings thing happened?
It didn't make any difference to anybody.
It just showed that they don't have anything.
Uh I think they proved that they don't have much black support because the protesters were almost no diversity at all.
Uh and uh they were mostly older people and very few young men, the groups that they want to get.
So if the Democrats wanted to win back the black vote and win back the Hispanic vote and win back the young male vote, they did everything the opposite of that by showing all the people who are not that being their base visually.
So visually I think it was a disaster for the Democrats because visually it was just grandparents.
It was just old white grandparents, which could not be further from what they're trying to make their brand, which is the, you know, all diverse everything.
So, I would say visually it was a complete disaster.
Um, but not in a way that they will recognize the there'll just be this continued drift toward fewer Democrats and nobody will be able to quite put their finger on what was the one thing that made that happen.
Well, it wasn't one thing.
It was everything.
And this this is just part of the everything that continues to to push that ball down the road.
It's like, no white guys.
Nope.
We don't like men.
Nope.
Nope.
Just a little bit.
Anyway, uh Mom Dami versus Quomo and uh what's the other guy?
Siwa.
There's a new poll.
Gotham polling.
I don't know how reliable Gotham polling is, but they do say that if Sleewa dropped out that it would be close between Cuomo and Mdami and it would put Cuomo within striking distance and some New Yorkers, even Republicans would say, "Ah, give us the Democrat.
At least he's a normal Democrat." Cuomo being a normal Democrat.
Uh, but Siwa is not looking to drop out.
So if he doesn't uh then it looks like Mabi would win quite easily.
So there's that.
What do you think of the theory that letting M dami win and essentially sacrificing our crown jewel city for however many years uh might be useful for Republicans and maybe useful for the city because it would prove that he's not the right solution and we you maybe we get another 20 year reprieve from that kind of thinking.
What do you think?
Do you do you think we'd be better off New York specifically?
Do you think they'd be better off just eating this sandwich and then and then learning from it?
I don't know.
You know, I was surprised to learn that New York real estate is coming back.
That's the last thing I would have expected.
If there's one thing I can tell you about economics, nobody can predict it.
So the the entire um I would say the the argument against mom dummy is that we can all predict economics here.
Here I'm going to I'm going to make you a little bit uncertain.
Are you ready?
When you came in here you were completely certain that Mami's approach was a bad one.
Communist socialist and that uh the normies had the right one.
you know, social, capitalism, free markets.
You were completely right about that, right?
Well, here's the thing.
How many of you predicted that in the middle of the race to elect a socialist/ maybe communist in the middle of the race that New York City real estate prices would go up and people would be coming back in and buying office space and is recovering?
How many of you would have predicted that?
To me, it was the most easy thing to predict wouldn't happen, right?
Because the the situation in theory is getting worse and worse for a traditional business that doesn't want to overpay doesn't want to overpay taxes and doesn't want to be in a crime area.
So in theory, it would be the easiest prediction in the world that the real estate situation in New York would continue getting worse, at least during the election when there's a chance of the communists getting in power.
But it's the opposite.
So this is where I'm making you feel uncertain.
And one of the reasons that I have no respect for my own uh college degree, which is in economics, it doesn't predict.
Yeah, I I've told you in different contexts that the best you can do in understanding reality because we're not good at understanding reality is whether it predicts.
Well, the reality I was living in didn't predict.
Did yours?
Didn't predict that New York City real estate would already be recovering.
Which reality predicted that?
Not mine.
Not mine at all.
You know whose might have?
M Donny's it's entirely possible that M Donnie was expecting and predicting real estate to come back and the argument would be there's only one New York City.
That's that's the whole argument.
There's only one New York City.
So if you want if you want to play with the big boys, you're going to have to go back.
and and he even thought mom Davia even wanted to raise taxes on corporations to match uh New Jersey which is also clever because he's matching that's this very clever way to do it but obviously he thought it wouldn't destroy the economy or even he wouldn't be predicting it right so now let's see if I succeeded so you walked in here completely sure that he was the one who's always wrong and you're the one who's fight because you like the capitalism and the free market.
Except his point of view is the only one that predicted correctly, right?
I'm just messing with you because obviously I don't I don't think his his uh plans are the ones that are the good ones.
But have a little bit of humility.
Just just back up to a little bit of humility.
Looks to me like he predicted correctly and you didn't.
Looks to me like he predicted correctly and I didn't.
And in theory, I have more credentials than he has for this kind of prediction.
I don't know.
Just that's just something to think about because it's a slow news day.
Apparently Denmark uh just decided that uh people in Denmark can copyright their own face.
So if AI tries to use your face, there'll be a copyright violation.
I don't know if that'll last.
That doesn't seem like something that could last.
Anyway, all right.
Here's another surprise.
Did you know that San Francisco, I think this was in Wall Street Journal, that even San Francisco is rebounding.
Did you know that?
So, they've got a good mayor.
I forget the mayor's name, but I heard people say they were happy about our current mayor.
Uh, burglaries are allegedly down 28% this year in San Francisco.
Do you believe that or is that just another one of those they they change the way they report it or people just stop reporting it?
I feel like it's both, but it might be true that it's not getting worse.
That might be true.
And uh let's see.
Crime rates have dropped in general and uh allegedly the number of homeless encampments in San Francisco has fallen, but I don't have a percentage on that.
And then here's another one.
Rents are up in San Francisco 12% over last year.
All right, let's do this again.
How many of you predicted that San Francisco of all places would be able to raise rates in the middle of what looked like the city falling apart?
How many of you would have said, "Oh yeah, those rentals will be up 12%." Not me.
I I would have guessed that rents would have collapsed by now.
So that's two cities in which my ability to predict with all of my economics training zero.
Zero ability to predict.
If you think you can do better, knock yourself out.
Well, in other fun stories, uh let let me say this about Candace Owens.
Uh, I love Candace Owens.
Um, I like her personally.
I only met her once, very briefly, but she was very warm.
And, uh, I love this show that she puts on, not just the actual podcast, but the whole show.
I I I like the way she's, you know, inserted herself into the the public mind.
I I just sort of like everything about what she does.
Now, that's different from agreeing with all of her takes.
Everybody gets that, right?
Do do we ever get to the point where I don't have to say that?
Can we ever as a civilization get to the point where I can say, "I like that public figure without having to say, but I don't agree with 100% of what they say." We're not there yet, right?
I still have to do that.
I don't agree with 100% of everything she's ever said.
All right.
Well, she's she's making some uh noise today.
She says Charlie Kirk was betrayed and don't worry about the gag order in the Charlie Kirk case.
Is that a gag order directed at her?
I think so.
Um she says, "I plan to violate it on the world's behalf." So, she to violate the course gag order on the world's behalf.
She says, "The things I've discovered this past week are enough to burn the house down." And yes, Charlie was betrayed by everyone.
All right.
Now, do you see what I mean?
How do you not love that?
She She's so good.
Just so good at getting attention, which is her job, right?
If that's what I do, she and I are in the same job in a way, which is to get attention.
But you're only going to get attention if you're creating value, right?
You could get attention for one day, but you can't be Candace unless you can get attention just regularly, anytime you want.
And wow, can she get attention?
So good at this.
So if you if you simply and you know, I like to do this.
I like to separate the person's, you know, character from their skill level.
I like in this case I like your character and her skill level, but uh the skill level is just crazy.
Kandis's skill level, her talent stack is crazy.
Anyway, so this is fun.
We'll keep an eye on that.
Um according to Jensen Wang, CEO of Nvidia, here's more good news.
Um, it only took one year and apparently the US is already manufacturing the the most advanced chip for AI and Vinnie is working with uh what is the name of that uh TSMP or something.
The Taiwan company uh apparently used moved it some of its technology to the US and working with Nvidia.
So now the US can make not at the same not at the same quantity TSM.
Thank you.
TS TSM is the name of the chip company from Taiwan.
Anyway, so they're working together and now they can make the most advanced chip in the US.
I assume that uh volume is probably still a big issue, but I feel it's TSMC TMS TSMC.
Okay.
Um, but that's a pretty big deal to me because it means that even if Taiwan sunk into the ocean, um, we could get going.
You know, we we could we would have enough on our shores that we could reconstitute slowly.
That's a big deal.
But it probably also makes it far more likely that Taiwan will be destroyed by China because China will know that it's not an existential risk to the United States anymore.
H I just realized this could be a double-edged sword.
If you're China and you're not benefiting directly from the advanced chips on Taiwan, but your biggest competitor is the United States, would you worry too much if in the process of conquering Taiwan, you destroyed the semiconductor business?
You might not care as much as you should because then it would just put you at parody with your biggest competitor who who has access to it now but wouldn't if it got knocked down.
But now but now we can make those chips in the US.
So now you're China and you think, "Aha, I can totally overthrow Taiwan now because the US won't have to fight." If they don't want to and they don't want to be in a war, a world war, they don't have to.
But before we kind of would have had to because we couldn't let China take control of the chips that would be better than the ones that we could make.
That'd be too big a risk.
So, it's entirely possible that growing our own homegrown best of chips will sacrifice Taiwan.
It's not impossible, you know, it's not impossible.
All right.
Uh, apparently Trump is using the uh shutdown of the government to kill some projects.
I didn't know that was an option.
I guess the Democrats didn't know it either, but they're finding out.
Allegedly, there's some kind of $20 billion New York City tunnel project that Schumer had spent.
Uh, Representative Schumer, Senator Schumer has spent years trying to get passed and finally did.
And now because the government's closed, Trump's just going to cancel the whole project.
I don't even know if I don't even know if uh Trump even looked into whether it was a good idea to do the project or not.
I think it's just a Schumer's project and he worked 20 years to get it, so he's just going to cancel it on his ass.
All right, that might be a little bit that might be a little bit authoritarian, but I'd have I'd have to know if we really need this tunnel.
I imagine that we could live without the tunnel and the $20 billion.
Anyway, um, so there's a story today that somebody built a a hunting stand in a tree, which is where the hunters hide from the prey, and then they can take a shot from their hiding place in the tree.
They built one that had a uh that had a complete view of Air Force One when it lands in Palm Beach.
So, so he had the the the hunting blind had an open wide openen shot at the president of the United States coming down the gate from his own airplane in a place where he's known to land.
Now, the good news is that it was discovered and it looks like it's been there for a while.
Uh, but uh we don't know why it was there.
We don't know if it was there for that purpose, but it would be a strange place for a Wouldn't you think that Palm Beach would be a strange place to have a hunting blind in a tree?
I I don't know how many other hunting blinds and trees there are in Palm Beach, but that certainly looks exactly like what it looks like, doesn't it?
Bonino's all over that one.
Well, apparently Boston is looking into having a cityrun grocery store.
Mom Dami has um talked about that.
They haven't done it yet, but did you know that Atlanta already has one?
They have a cityrun um grocery.
And I do not have an update on whether it's working in Atlanta.
I imagine they've got some some challenges, but it makes me wonder, is there a way to make a government grocery store work without getting rid of the regular grocery stores so the rest of us can have more choice?
And I was thinking about that.
What What would you do if you were the government and you wanted to I don't want to say compete, but you were going to have an alternative grocery store in the same place where there were regular grocery stores.
So the first thing you have to do is make sure that people who had money still preferred the regular grocery stores.
And you could do that easily by having more junk food and more selection, right?
Selection alone would would get the people with money to go there.
So the first thing you do is have less selection if it's a government grocery store.
I think if you reduce the selection to just, you know, basics like vegetables and um and protein, you could probably find ways to cut costs like crazy cuz you just keep it simple.
It's like, okay, we got five proteins just always the same.
Um, but then could you also do something that was direct from farm if you got rid of some regulations because you are the government.
So, if you got rid of government regulations and said, "All right, you can take your chances with the food because it won't be regulated, but it's coming right from the farm and we'll give you all the information you want about the farm, but it's up to the farm.
And we're going to we're going to hold the farm possibly uh possibly hold the farm um blameless even if somebody gets sick from the food.
So you'd have to handle sort of the insurance risk of providing food to people and a government could just say, "Yeah, you can't sue.
You you can't, you know, some people are going to die from the farm food.
You can't sue." Uh so if you did all of those things, you reduced the choice, you figured out how to get the footprint really low, may maybe you even got some free rent, uh maybe you figured out how to use robots instead of employees.
Maybe you squeeze the big food producers, you know, for a little little taste of something to help pay for it.
Um maybe you had your own uh maybe you had your own vertical so you you owned the farm but you also owned the grocery store.
So my point is if you if you started from scratch and said how would we build a alternative place to get food?
Um could you do it?
Is it even doable?
I've always thought that the ideal would be that there would be like a cafeteria that you could go to that would be close enough everybody could get to it.
You know, maybe there would be multiple, but the cafeteria model would have less waste than individuals.
You know, if if you shop for yourself and cook for yourself, it's just so wasteful the amount of time you spend and that you have to drive somewhere and pick something up.
You got to store it.
Some of it goes bad.
You got to negotiate who gets what.
Compare that to just everybody walks over to the buffet and you just get what you want.
So I do not rule out that there could be a government grocery store.
I I think if you rule it out because it's never worked, that's a good starting point.
But that's just the starting point for the analysis.
You have to go past it never worked.
You have to go to what what has never been tried.
If you get to what's never been tried, well, now you've now it's interesting.
Well, you were not surprised to know that the Gaza ceasefire is not holding as well as people would like, but it's unclear whether the leadership of Hamas has anything to do with it or is it rogue elements within Hamas.
But there is some firing, there are some deaths.
Israel uh is responding to the to the encroachments by uh cutting food, I guess, and aid.
We hope that's temporary.
Uh so humanitarian aid is stopped or paused, I guess.
Mostly paused.
And uh I feel like that'll get worked out.
So, as I said yesterday, uh I'm not worried about the ceasefire as long as both sides have dramatically drawn down their military presence.
There's definitely going to be violations of the ceasefire.
You know, every single person who's been alive more than 10 minutes knows the ceasefire is going to get violated.
So, you can't say we're going to change everything if the ceasefire gets violated because we know it's going to get violated.
there there wouldn't be any point even doing the deal if we thought a violation was going to overturn the whole thing.
So, of course, we're going to work through all the little violations, but probably we will probably will.
It it does make sense that there'll be plenty of people there who don't want a ceasefire and we'll be acting upon it.
But as long as they get the big weapons out of there.
I guess uh Jared was talking about maybe a gun buyback program.
And my what what was your first impression when you heard that that they would do a gun buyback program with Hamas?
Your first impression is no, right?
That's not going to work.
They're not going to sell their guns.
My second impression was we don't really know how the the depth of their poverty right now.
So if you were a uh if you owned a gun, you were Hamas and you owned a gun and the government offered you what was a really good price, a really good price, and you had no source of other money and you also thought that the the war was over.
I think maybe half of them would sell their guns because money is better than a bunch of bullets you're not going to use.
Right.
So, I do like the buyback idea, but I think it's, you know, that's only a dent.
You can't get all the guns with that.
But if you got half of them, that'd be that'd be pretty impressive.
All right.
So, uh, yeah, Kushner and Wickoff are the two guys trying to figure out how to govern, uh, Gaza after that, which which to me, um, brings up this question.
Is there a way to create a non-corrupt government, even for just a city?
Let's let's call Gaza a city, even though it's a it's bigger than a city.
Has anybody ever done it?
I don't think it's even doable.
I don't believe there's any form of government um that you could just plop in the middle of a highly corrupt culture and then suddenly have it not be corrupt.
Now, when I say it's a highly corrupt culture, I am not uh I'm not banging on one type of people.
It's everywhere.
You know, you you you could, you know, just take a a pin and drop it on the globe and it would hit some some corrupt place somewhere.
All right.
Basically, all cities are corrupt.
So, the question is, if you build the cities the way they've always been built in the past, what are you going to get?
Well, corrupt Gaza for sure.
But is there a way, similar to the conversation about the government grocery stores, if you were to throw away all assumptions, uh, and this is what Jared I think is especially good at, throw away all assumptions, could you do it then?
And who would do it?
I've often thought that the number one thing you need to get right is that the people who are making the money decisions don't live there.
Because if you live there, you've got all these corrupt influences.
You know, that gangster you grew up with and uh the people you went to school with and you know, your your wife's family who wants that contract.
You can't let the people who live there control the money.
They will always be corrupt.
they would just give it to their family members etc.
So you need some kind of independent physically not there entity to not only decide where it goes where the money is spent but then to watch it like a hawk and report on it so that everybody knows where it went.
If you can't get that part right, nothing else works.
So somehow Jared has to solve the problem of what happens when money is introduced into the the zone and then who gets to decide where it goes, who watches it, and who reports it to the people to make sure it went to the right place.
If you don't get that part right, nothing else matters.
And that's the hardest part to get right.
Nobody's done it.
As far as I know, nobody's ever done it.
I believe every city is corrupt.
But if Jared could pull that off with some clever set of systems, it would be one of the greatest things that ever happened in the world.
Think about that.
The the odds of pulling that off are pretty low.
It's, you know, it's maximum challenge.
But what if he did it?
What if they pulled that off?
Wickoff and uh and Jared Kushner, what if they actually built a city that by its design, you know, the the systems they put in place avoided corruption?
Can you even imagine that?
That that would be one of the greatest things that ever happened in the history of humankind.
So, I don't know what you're working on today, but uh but those two guys have a chance to change everything.
Do they have a plan?
Probably not yet.
But do they have the skills that the two of them could conceivably come up with a way to build a non-corrupt zone?
And I think yes.
I think yes.
I believe that they have the skill to do that.
Doesn't mean it will get done because you know there there will be a lot of push back in every possible way.
But yeah, they might be the the only two dudes that could pull that off right now.
Trump has announced an end to the Colombian foreign aid.
I didn't even know we were giving Colombia foreign aid, but apparently now they're a bunch of illegal drug dealers, too.
Um Trump's not happy with the uh president of Colombia who is not happy with us.
So Trump's going to discontinue whatever our subsidies were for Colombia.
I feel like the subsidies were for the purpose of fighting drugs, weren't they?
So, is he saying that we've been paying Colombia to fight drugs, but Colombia is actually the drug cartel and we've been paying the cartel?
Is that what is that what happened?
I don't know if that's what happened.
I'm seeing some yeses.
So yes, if if that's even close to what's happening, and I don't know that it is, but if the government is embedded with the cartel and we were paying the government to deal with the cartel, well, maybe it's time to stop doing that, huh?
You would not be surprised to hear because it's it's a groundhog day all over again.
Ukrainian drone struck a major Russian gas plant.
How many times have I said that?
Like every day, right?
Every day there's another Russian major energy structure that got attacked.
So that's happening.
Um and other positive news, interesting engineering has a story about a wind turbine.
So it's basically, you know, the the fans of a windmill would be, you know, the the turbine part, but apparently they've somebody has developed a new shape for the uh I guess what the turbine, now I don't know what turbine means.
If you say turbine enough, you don't know what it means.
Turbine, turbine, turbine.
God, now I don't even know what it means.
But, uh, it would be the little things that the air is bouncing off of.
And they've figured out how to make one that boosts energy output by 83% with 35% less weight.
Fiber composite rotors make a small turbine stronger, more durable.
83%.
Do you believe that?
that they figured out how to make a windmill 83% more efficient all of a sudden with just a shape change.
It's just a shape, you know, something easy to reproduce, a shape.
Uh well, if that's true, finally your dream can come true, which is you'll be able to watch television even when the wind is just barely blowing.
Of course, I'm joking.
Trump always says that the windmills are no good because when the wind stops blowing you can't watch TV, which of course is not true, but it's hilarious every time he says it.
And now, now I'm thinking, finally, we can watch TV when the wind is barely blowing.
You know, maybe it's so efficient, those little turbines, that you could have one in your house without making your neighbors crazy from the sound and the dead birds.
Um, all right.
According to uh Elizabeth Gimney, who's writing for nature, AI boss have now reviewed uh oh, there's a conference coming, which is an all AI paper conference.
So the conference will have humans at it, but they're there to see what would happen if AI wrote the scientific papers, submitted the scientific papers, and then here's the fun part, did their own peer review.
So they're doing a conference of AI generated scientific papers uh that will be matched with the peer reviewers so that the humans who attend can see if the peer reviewers can add value to the AI papers.
Does that make sense?
Did I did I explain that well enough?
Um so I it's not that the papers are going to be um trusted more.
is it's more about seeing how the human AI scientific model works.
I love this.
I think this is exa exactly exactly what they should be looking at to see see what that looks like when you throw the AI in there.
All right, ladies and gentlemen, I told you I'd be uh finishing a little early.
There's not much news happening today, which I suppose is good.
But I did tell the people on locals, my beloved subscribers, that I'd be taking some questions at the end about anything you want.
So, I won't be able to see all of your questions because they zip by pretty quickly.
But, if you do have any questions uh on any topic at all, I'd be happy to uh happy to answer them.
All right.
I'm just looking to see there's a little lag here.
What if the peer reviewers have AI write their peer review?
They are.
That's what they're doing.
The peer reviewers are the AI.
It's exactly what they're doing.
All right.
Uh All right.
Uh question.
Trump's government added the White House.
Oh, man.
Trump's government added the White House and departments to Blue Sky Social Network.
So I subscribed.
Wow, TDS is strong.
What are your thoughts including how those supporting should engage?
So how how should Trump supporters engage with Blue Sky?
So Blue Sky is the competitor to X that only only Democrats went to basically.
Uh but the White House wanted a presence there, which is smart.
Um I just would ignore it.
Just ignore it.
There there's nothing there for you.
Uh if it becomes more of a thing then maybe someday you don't have to ignore it but at the moment I just ignore it.
I helped you with your teen.
Good.
Can you reframe marriage for more success?
Now the the individual relationship ones you'd have to know so much about the individual situation.
I I can't just reframe marriage because some people ought to be married and some people ought to probably cut it out.
If my rodents returned what I noticed, um I feel having two cats will probably eliminate my rodent stuff.
All right.
So, uh, dogn Barking says, "I missed what you learned from your medical testing Friday." I'll give you that fast.
So, I've got terminal cancer, um, metastatic prostate cancer.
There's a drug that's newly approved just this spring called Pliku, but you don't get that unless you go through a scanning process in which they give you some radioactive juice to see if it lights up the tumors.
because if they can't light up the tumors with the practice juice, then the real thing won't do it either.
So, it's a way to find out if this limited and expensive process would be applicable to me or not.
Now, the test was the most painful thing I've ever done in my life by far because I can't lay in my back without extraordinary pain and you have to lay in your back for 20 minutes.
Extraordinary pain.
Just extraordinary.
But it's over and I got through it and it did light up um at least my reading of the tests.
I don't the doctor hasn't read them yet so it might be maybe I'm misinterpreting but the reading of the test is that they let they lit up well that they had a high sensitivity which is what we're looking for.
So in theory my doctor will look at that today.
he'll recommend it to a committee who decides whether or not that's good enough for me to get that drug.
If the committee says yes in a week when they meet, then it will be scheduled.
But I don't know how long it takes to schedule it.
And there would be several applications.
So it' be once a week for I don't know four or six weeks or something like that.
And then it doesn't work for everybody, right?
Even if you've tested, even if you've tested to see if it lights up your tumors, it's not going to work for everybody and it's not going to work as well for everybody.
So, there's some chance that I will get substantial relief fairly quickly, you know, within a matter of just a few weeks.
uh because some people have but it's far more likely maybe two out of three chance that maybe I get a little bit of you know delay in the whole dying thing but doesn't change the arc of my life too much that'd be the most likely however we're at this weird point in history where there are all kinds of new things coming online every day literally every day there's a new prostate cancer thing that looks like it might work if they test it a little bit further So, if I can if I can extend my survival, and I don't know how much I need to, but we're at that period where if you can get that little extra, you might be able to get to the new thing.
So, that's my game plan.
My game plan is to try to get to the new thing without knowing what the new thing is or or even that it will exist.
But and then there's a nonzero chance.
I'm not counting on this, but there's a nonzero chance that the uh the blue vict will just just knock it out and that it will still be there because it's it's not it's not a cure, by the way.
not marketed as a cure, but it could knock it back so much that if I don't do chemo and weaken my immune system, I might be able to just sort of keep it at bay without too much future trouble.
Possible.
Not likely.
Most likely is I slow it down and it and it rages back in a few months.
Most likely, but that might be enough.
All right.
I feel like I'm not adding value now because I'm just talking about my own situation.
How did I prepare myself for the painful mental scan?
Excellent question.
How did I prepare myself?
Well, I knew it would be bad and I had the maximum pain relievers, but I had not practiced being in that position for that long because obviously it's the most painful thing you could ever do in your life.
Uh so I didn't know how bad it would be.
So that's number one.
If you don't know how bad it will be, that helps that helps you that helps get you in the room.
Once you're in the room, this is where the the reframe wanting versus deciding comes in.
Do you see how powerful this is?
If I had simply wanted it, I could not have held out.
No way.
But I had decided.
I decided, meaning that you could put a hot poker through my forehead and I was going to hold on.
There's a thing you hold on to to keep yourself from wiggling.
And I told myself, you could do anything to me there.
There's no level of pain that's going to make me move.
This is my one shot because I don't have a plan B.
There's no plan B.
This is the only plan I had to survive.
So that's a decision.
That's not a preference, right?
So once you move it from preference to decision, it doesn't make it easier, but it largely guarantees it'll get done.
So you're not always trying to make it easier.
You're trying to make sure it gets done because once it's done, it's done.
That's a that's a full solution.
Done is done.
And then I also do a thing where I don't I try not to imagine it too much.
Um, when I have a dental appointment, I do that as well.
If I know it's going to be painful, I tell myself simply, get out.
That's another reframe.
If it's in my head, I just get out.
Get out.
Get out.
Think of something else.
Get out.
Get out.
And the less you think about it before you go, the happier you're going to be because the thinking about it doesn't help.
So you just say, "Get out.
Get out every time you need to." So that's two reframes.
the wanting versus deciding and then the get out so you're not obsessing about it before it happens.
I think that was a good answer to your question.
Uh that moved you Tom.
It should have.
How does gravity manifest at the quantum level?
Well, I don't know if I'm ready for that one yet.
When you imagine how you're perceived.
Now, that's interesting.
So, um, when you think about how other people think of you, I have a reframe for that.
We'll probably get to it later, but I'll I'll share it with you now.
What's the best reframe for worrying about what people think about you?
You've heard me say this one.
Provenge.
Yeah, I'll look into Provenge.
I I know about that one.
Wait, what was I talking about?
You You uh I just forgot what I was talking about cuz I got on the revenge track.
Oh.
Uh how to reframe if you think people are thinking bad things about you.
The basket case theory is one.
That's not the one I was going for, but that's that is also correct.
If you remember that everyone's a basket case, then you're not going to feel bad about you being one.
That's that's a very powerful reframe.
It's one of my favorites.
You just once you realize that once you get to know somebody, they've got all kinds of problems that you didn't know about until you knew them really well.
And once you realize there's no such thing as the people who seem to have no problems, they don't exist.
There's nobody like that.
Once you realize that you're just like everybody else, but your problems might be different, but you all got you all have your things, right?
So that's the first one here.
But here's one that's even better.
Nobody cares about you.
They're not even thinking about you.
You you imagine that people are having all these negative thoughts about you.
If they do, it lasts all of one second in their head.
It doesn't matter.
People don't care about you.
You know, your family does, but that's not what you're talking about, right?
You're not talking about your loved ones.
You're talking about sort of co-workers and people you run into in the street, stuff like that.
So, here's where I learned that.
Uh, I've told you this story, but this will make it concrete again.
Uh, many years ago, I did laser surgery on my face to correct a bunch of spider veins that were sort of in the the mask of my face.
Now, I was told by the laser professional that my face would look all purple and it would look like I had gone through a a windshield and it would last for about 3 weeks.
and I probably didn't want to go out in public looking that way.
So, sure enough, I get the treatment.
My face is all purple and it looked like I'd just gone through a windshield.
So, obviously, I don't want to leave the house.
So, day goes by and I'm bored and I'm thinking, three weeks?
Wow, that's that's a long time not to leave the house.
And the second day comes and I'm bored and I just want to go shopping just to get out of the freaking house.
And I say to myself, what would happen if I just didn't care what anybody thought?
What would happen if I just do go to the mall with my face that looks like I just went through a windshield?
What would happen?
So I went to the mall.
Nobody gave one what I look like.
Nobody stared.
Nobody asked me about it.
Nobody showed Nobody showed the least bit of interest in whatever it was I was going through.
Not any.
Not a glance, not a stare, not not a child.
You know, there was no child going, "Oh, what's wrong?" Nothing.
And and once you get a big dose of nobody cares, oh my god, the freedom.
the freedom that that gave me it it was actually one of my more memorable days of my life because that's when I realized for sure that I didn't have to worry about what other people were thinking about me because they weren't thinking about me.
They just weren't.
They just were not thinking about me.
They think about themselves.
So if you want to be liked, help people think about themselves.
That's what the Dale Carnegie course does.
If you want to be liked, your job was not to make them think better about what your face looked like.
That wasn't the job.
The job was to make them think about themselves if you want them to like you.
So, there's another reframe for you.
All right, ladies and gentlemen.
I would say we've done what we need to do here.
I hope I've changed your lives a little bit.
just a little bit and we'll come back and do this tomorrow.
There will be real news sometime this week and we'll get back to what we usually do.
But in the meantime, I'm hoping all these reframes are making you more powerful and happier.
All right, everybody.
Good.
All right, everybody.
Um, I won't be talking to the locals people privately because basically what I just did is what I would have been doing.
But uh I will see you tomorrow everybody.
Maybe tonight I will do another drawing class for the locals people but I don't know yet.
[Music]
Good morning everybody. Let me solve my
technical problem.
For some reason my iPad died.
Why? Why
stocks are looking good?
Bitcoin's up.
It's a slow news day.
[Music]
Good morning everybody and welcome to
the highlight of human civilization.
It's called Coffee with Scott Adams and
you've never had a better time. But if
you'd like to take a chance of elevating
your experience up to levels that nobody
can even understand with their tiny
shiny human brains. All you need for
that is a cuper mug or a glass of tanker
shelves, a canteen jugger flask, a
vessel of any kind. Fill it with your
favorite liquid. I like coffee. And join
me now for the unparalleled pleasure.
The dopamine hit the thing day, the
thing that makes everything better. It's
called the simultaneous sip and happens
right now. Go.
Well, like I said when you were first
joining, there's no news today.
Do you ever wake up and there's no news?
There's just there's just no news. I'll
talk about the news and I'll you know,
some of it's about science and stuff,
but boy, they closed the government and
all the fun stuffs.
So, first I'll tell you about my comic
that you can only see if you're a
subscriber on X or on locals. I'll just
tell you that uh the boss is looking to
hire an employee who's got a neurochip
in his head. So, he'll be an advanced
employee, but not only does he have a
neurochip in his head, he's got an
entire micro data center in his head.
So pretty soon you're going to be hiring
employees who have micro data centers in
their head. That's my prediction.
All right. Uh I saw a couple of posts by
Dr. Nicholas Fabiano who found a few
studies that were interesting on X. One
of them is that apparently there's a
high correlation between people who are
nearsighted
like me, people have glasses that are
nearsighted and higher IQ.
Do you know how they could have known
that without doing a study? They could
have asked me. I'll tell you when I
discovered this. Many years ago when
Dilbert first became a phenomenon, I was
invited to speak at MIT.
And I go into this auditorium and this
was before LAS. I don't know if it was
before LASIK was invented, but it was
before it was popular. And I stood up
there in front of that crowd with my
glasses on and I looked into the CL
crowd and I'm not positive, but I think
every single person in the room was
wearing glasses. and they're probably
all nearsighted.
And I said to myself, I've never seen
this before. I've never seen an entire
auditorium of people wearing glasses at
the same time. MIT, our smartest
college. Uh Dilbert actually graduated
from MIT.
That that's part of his backstory.
Dr. Fabiano also found a study.
They said that depression can be
contagious via the mirror neuron system.
So in other words, if you spend time
around a depressed person, it can make
you depressed.
How many people didn't already know that
happy wife, happy life?
Is there anybody who didn't know that
hanging around depressed people will
make you feel bad if you do it enough?
Okay, I think they could have saved some
money on that one. Here's some good
news. How many of you remember you, if
you've been with me since the beginning
politically, uh, back in 2016 or so, I
was just talking all the time about
generation 4 nuclear power and how it
was coming. It's here finally 8 10 years
later. Uh, there's a first, I think it's
the first Gen 4 reactor. It'll be a
small one. uh that's going to open up
and it's uh just what you think it is.
It's molten salt
used as both a coolant and a fuel. It's
just going to be a little one megawatt
reactor and it'll be a it'll be a test
to see if they can build the 100
megawatt, which they probably will. So
it looks like this technology is now
well understood and the plan is that if
they can build this in a factory. So
they're trying to make a small easy to
build won't melt down. Won't melt down
is the important part. Won't melt down.
It can't. It's actually designed so it
could melt down if you wanted it to. Um,
so it won't melt down and will be built
in mass production in factories. So they
would build the components and then ship
them out to the site, which would be way
less expensive.
So we might be uh, you know, it'll take
a few years for this to get built and
then it'll take a few years for the big
ones to be built. But I feel like we're
at Gen 4. I think we got there, people,
if you were waiting for it. Well, I
guess last night while I was sleeping,
the internet broke. Uh, except for X.
So, I guess the problem was with
Amazon's AWS cloud service that affects
a lot of the big services. So, a whole
bunch of apps, they use Amazon's back,
what would you call it? Uh, backroom
processing. And, uh, it all broke. So
they had one failure point at Amazon and
it broke the entire internet except
for X because I guess Musk has his own
his own secured internet. So everything
went down except X which is
scary but at the same time isn't it nice
to know that X didn't go down because
you can do almost everything there. You
can message pretty soon you'll be able
to send money. can't send money yet on
X, but you will. I mean, he's already
applied for it. That's going to happen.
So,
yet again, another service that Elon
Musk provides to the world.
The the list the list of things that one
man is doing for the world to make it
safer
is just out of control now. I mean, just
it's crazy. It's crazy how much he's
done for the world and how much he
probably will do because he's still
young.
Anyway, here's
here's a study that was designed to do
nothing but make you mad. You ready for
this?
[Music]
On one level, it's a study about a
thing,
but the thing won't even matter to you.
As soon as you hear it, you're just
going to get mad. You ready? the study
that has no purpose other than to make
you mad. Uh, University of Florida says
they they've got a study now that said
that people who got the COVID vaccine
lived much longer if they also had
cancer. In other words, the study says
that the COVID vaccine was one of the
greatest cancer treatments of all time.
How do you feel now?
Do you believe it?
Do you believe that this would be
reproducible
that that they could do another study
and find out that the people who got the
shot because this is opposite of
everything you've heard, right? This is
direct opposite of everything you've
ever heard because the only thing you
ever heard is that maybe people were
more vulnerable
and and maybe they were. So, do you
think I know the answer? Of course not.
I don't know the answer. I don't know if
these shots made you more vulnerable or
saved your life. No idea. But I'll tell
you what I know for sure. Science
doesn't know.
That's what I know for sure. That the
scientists don't know. So, do I believe
this? No. Do I rule it out as completely
impossible?
No. But I don't think I'm going to
believe this one. I'm gonna I'm gonna
put a pin in that one.
I'd love to know who funded it,
don't you know?
All right. Uh,
I'm going to give you some reframes this
morning, but I thought I'd start with
Trump's because Trump had a reframe that
uh was very impressive. Very impressive.
So, the the no kings thing happened and
uh Trump was responding to it and he
said this quote, "I'm not a king. I work
my ass off to make our country great.
That's all it is. I'm not a king at all.
Now, that, ladies and gentlemen, is a
reframe.
Because the normal way that you would
respond to an accusation that you were
trying to become a dictator would be
what? You would say, "I'm not trying to
become a dictator."
Would that move anybody? No. You might
say, "I love the Constitution." And then
people would say, "Yeah, everybody says
that.
wouldn't mean anything. Uh I I love our
democratic republic. That's what I'm
committed to.
Conceptual. Conceptual.
But when he says, "I'm not a king. I
work my ass off." He's reframed it into
a category where it's hard to judge him,
isn't it? Because even his biggest
critics will admit he's working his ass
off, right? So he retreats to something
that even his biggest critics will will
grudgingly say, "All right, well, he
does work his ass off." That's true. Now
that So he's already won half the battle
because he moved them to a place where
they agree with him. He works his ass
off. And compared to Biden, it's really
striking, right? So when he says, "I
worked my ass off," it's not exactly
specifically
a defense against trying to become a
king,
but it is hard for you to hold in your
head both of those thoughts at the same
time. That's what makes it so good. You
don't think of the king as working his
ass off. You think of the king wearing
the hat and telling other people to do
stuff. But we observe that Trump is in
the trench all the time.
day and night, sleeps less than anybody
you ever know, works harder, takes fewer
vacations, golfs a lot, but the golf is
often worked too.
And so he creates this frame where you
can't really hold in your head the hard
worker part, which we observe and all
know to be true with the cane part. That
is brilliant.
I don't I don't know if I can quite
express how smart that is. It's it's
again it's the sort of thing that only a
Trump can do this this specific Trump.
Other people can't do this. They they
would just have some, you know, weak I
love my democracy. No, no, they're the
ones who have the they're the ones who
want to be the king. But this is
perfect. I work my ass off. It's hard to
argue. I I work my ass off.
All right. So, I told you I was going to
give you some more reframes.
And so I will
from my book Reframe Your Brain, my
highest rated book, five stars.
So it's full of reframes if you didn't
know that. Let me give you one.
Um, how about
the the Here's one. Suppose you want to
do something big. Doesn't matter what it
is.
You want to shop for a house or save up
for a house. You want to uh maybe decide
to go back to school. You want to change
your job. You want to do something
something big. So, here's a reframe for
that. Quite often, we don't do it
because the effort is so big and
daunting that you can't even start. Do
you ever have that situation? There's a
thing you want to do, but it's it's just
so big,
you know, in order to start. Like maybe
you want to relocate to another state.
That's like a really big job, right? So,
you don't want to start because it's
just so big. Here's the reframe. What's
the smallest thing I can do that moves
me in the right direction?
Think of the smallest thing, not the
biggest thing. Just reverse it. What's
the smallest thing? Usually, the
smallest thing is to look for some
information.
So, I'll just use my example of you
wanted to move to another state.
First thing you do is you look up their
tax code. And maybe that's it. Maybe
that's all you do that day. You just
look at their tax and go, "Okay, they
they have lower state taxes, so so far
I'm good." Maybe the next day you ask
again, what is the smallest thing I can
do? Well, I could maybe uh do a little
research to find out what town would be
the best town to live in that's near
wherever I think I want to work, for
example, or my family or whatever. So
the way you approach it is what's the
smallest thing you can do because what
you'll find is that there's sort of a
compound interest to it. When I wanted
to become a cartoonist,
I had to assemble all of these tiny
little facts like this is the kind of
paper you want to use. This is the book
that tells you where to send your
samples. This is the kind of pen you
want to use cuz other pens have problems
for various reasons. This is, you know,
it's got to be three panels. You want to
all capital letters. So, you assemble
all these tiny tiny little things that
individually get you closer to this big
thing. And you realize that life is
actually kind of long. Sometimes,
sometimes time flies, but other times
life is long.
So, how many of you remember when I
decided I was going to teach myself to
play drums?
Was that like um seven years ago?
Probably seven years ago. And some of
you watched me.
And you watched, you know, eventually I
got a I watched some YouTubetubes, but I
eventually got a an instructor would
come once a week and I started
assembling
very very slowly the skills to play the
drum. Now, I didn't want to play in a
band. I just wanted to be able to knock
around in my garage, maybe play to my
stereo or something. So, those of you
who are with me and uh on the locals
app, you know that I've accomplished
that. It took seven years, but but after
seven years, I finally did a a drum
solo, you know, playing over with with
some other music in the background for
my audience. Now, was it good? No. But I
didn't care. I I wasn't trying to be
great. I was just trying to do it. Now,
the doing it was extraordinarily fun.
Extraordinarily fun because I could feel
the entire 7-year arc. And it actually
started with my stepson. I tried to get
him into the drums when he was maybe 14
or something because I thought it'd be
good for him. Uh but he wasn't as
interested I as I was. So to me it's
sort of a legacy that connects us uh
across across life and death.
So that's my point. So the point is that
you can in many times do the smallest
little thing. I can't tell you how many
times I would walk by the drums and say
I'm going to try this one thing and I'd
put 60 seconds of practice into it. And
then the next day maybe two minutes. All
right. That's your reframe.
for the day. All right. So, the no kings
event happened and uh I'm happy to
report there are no extra kings. Uh
there are no reports of any extra kings.
So, I think it the no kings um march did
suppress
any extra kings popping up. So, so far
so good. Uh but the Democrats are
apparently a afraid of the blowback
now that the no kings thing is over.
They don't have a reason to keep the
government closed.
So,
uh, Scott, what do you think about
becoming a stepfather?
Many rightwing men don't like it.
I'm going to answer that question even
though it's distracting from my my topic
because we don't have much news today.
So, I'm going to just jump around. Uh,
how do what do I think about stepids?
Here's the the one and only way to think
about step kids. You have a separate
relationship with them.
That's it.
It's you you have a relationship with
the the parent,
but your relationship with the kids,
that's just separate. So, you could like
them. You could stay in their life if
they want to stay in yours. You know, if
you get divorced, if they want to stay
in yours. Now, mine do. Mine do want to
stay in my life and I want to stay in
their life. So we have a separate very
good relationship
but they don't you know they don't live
with me but they're also you know
certain age. Uh and the second thing is
that I always saw it as a package deal.
So even though the the relationships are
separate it's still a package deal. So
when you agree to
be part of the parents life, you're
agreeing to be part of the children's
life, too. As much as they want, it's up
to them, right? It's always up to them.
But as much as they want, I'm all in
because both because they're they're
just excellent people and I I like
having excellent people in my life. So
the answer is it's really individual.
Um, if if I were scraping by and didn't
have enough money for myself,
I would probably be regretting, you
know, any kind of contact with any exes
of any kind. But since I'm in a
favorable situation financially,
um, I can make their life a little
easier and mine at the same time. So,
everybody wins.
Anyway, so what are the Democrats going
to do now that their no kings thing
happened? It didn't make any difference
to anybody. It just showed that they
don't have anything. Uh I think they
proved that they don't have much black
support because the protesters were
almost no diversity at all. Uh and uh
they were mostly older people and very
few young men, the groups that they want
to get. So if the Democrats wanted to
win back the black vote and win back the
Hispanic vote and win back the young
male vote, they did everything the
opposite of that
by showing all the people who are not
that being their base visually. So
visually I think it was a disaster
for the Democrats because visually it
was just grandparents. It was just old
white grandparents, which could not be
further from what they're trying to make
their brand, which is the, you know, all
diverse everything. So, I would say
visually it was a complete disaster. Um,
but not in a way that they will
recognize the there'll just be this
continued drift toward fewer Democrats
and nobody will be able to quite put
their finger on what was the one thing
that made that happen. Well, it wasn't
one thing. It was everything. And this
this is just part of the everything
that continues to to push that ball down
the road. It's like, no white guys.
Nope. We don't like men. Nope. Nope.
Just a little bit.
Anyway, uh Mom Dami versus Quomo and uh
what's the other guy? Siwa.
There's a new poll. Gotham polling. I
don't know how reliable Gotham polling
is, but they do say that if Sleewa
dropped out that it would be close
between Cuomo and Mdami and it would put
Cuomo within striking distance and some
New Yorkers, even Republicans would say,
"Ah, give us the Democrat. At least he's
a normal Democrat." Cuomo being a normal
Democrat.
Uh, but Siwa is not looking to drop out.
So if he doesn't
uh then it looks like Mabi would win
quite easily.
So there's that. What do you think of
the theory that letting M dami win and
essentially sacrificing our crown jewel
city for however many years uh might be
useful for Republicans and maybe useful
for the city because it would prove that
he's not the right solution and we you
maybe we get another 20 year reprieve
from that kind of thinking. What do you
think? Do you do you think we'd be
better off New York specifically? Do you
think they'd be better off just eating
this sandwich and then and then
learning from it?
I don't know. You know, I was surprised
to learn that New York real estate is
coming back. That's the last thing I
would have expected.
If there's one thing I can tell you
about economics, nobody can predict it.
So the the entire um I would say the the
argument against mom dummy is that we
can all predict economics
here. Here I'm going to I'm going to
make you a little bit uncertain. Are you
ready? When you came in here you were
completely certain that Mami's approach
was a bad one. Communist socialist and
that uh the normies had the right one.
you know, social, capitalism, free
markets. You were completely right about
that, right? Well, here's the thing.
How many of you predicted that in the
middle of the race to elect a socialist/
maybe communist in the middle of the
race
that New York City real estate prices
would go up and people would be coming
back in and buying office space and is
recovering? How many of you would have
predicted that?
To me, it was the most easy thing to
predict wouldn't happen, right? Because
the the situation in theory is getting
worse and worse for a traditional
business that doesn't want to overpay
doesn't want to overpay taxes and
doesn't want to be in a crime area.
So in theory, it would be the easiest
prediction in the world that the real
estate situation in New York would
continue getting worse, at least during
the election when there's a chance of
the communists getting in power. But
it's the opposite.
So this is where I'm making you feel
uncertain. And one of the reasons that I
have no respect for my own uh college
degree, which is in economics, it
doesn't predict.
Yeah, I I've told you in different
contexts that the best you can do in
understanding reality because we're not
good at understanding reality is whether
it predicts.
Well, the reality I was living in didn't
predict. Did yours? Didn't predict that
New York City real estate would already
be recovering. Which reality predicted
that? Not mine. Not mine at all. You
know whose might have?
M Donny's
it's entirely possible that M Donnie was
expecting and predicting real estate to
come back and the argument would be
there's only one New York City. That's
that's the whole argument. There's only
one New York City. So if you want if you
want to play with the big boys, you're
going to have to go back. and and he
even thought mom Davia even wanted to
raise taxes on corporations to match uh
New Jersey which is also clever because
he's matching that's this very clever
way to do it but obviously he thought it
wouldn't destroy the economy or even he
wouldn't be predicting it right so now
let's see if I succeeded
so you walked in here completely sure
that he was the one who's always wrong
and you're the one who's fight because
you like the capitalism and the free
market. Except his point of view is the
only one that predicted correctly,
right?
I'm just messing with you because
obviously I don't I don't think his his
uh plans are the ones that are the good
ones. But have a little bit of humility.
Just just back up to a little bit of
humility.
Looks to me like he predicted correctly
and you didn't. Looks to me like he
predicted correctly and I didn't.
And in theory, I have more credentials
than he has for this kind of prediction.
I don't know. Just that's just something
to think about because it's a slow news
day.
Apparently Denmark
uh just decided that uh people in
Denmark can copyright their own face. So
if AI tries to use your face, there'll
be a copyright violation.
I don't know if that'll last. That
doesn't seem like something that could
last.
Anyway, all right. Here's another
surprise. Did you know that San
Francisco,
I think this was in Wall Street Journal,
that even San Francisco is rebounding.
Did you know that? So, they've got a
good mayor. I forget the mayor's name,
but I heard people say they were happy
about our current mayor. Uh, burglaries
are allegedly down 28%
this year in San Francisco. Do you
believe that or is that just another one
of those they they change the way they
report it or people just stop reporting
it? I feel like it's both, but it might
be true that it's not getting worse.
That might be true. And uh let's see.
Crime rates have dropped in general and
uh allegedly the number of homeless
encampments
in San Francisco has fallen, but I don't
have a percentage on that. And then
here's another one. Rents are up
in San Francisco
12% over last year. All right, let's do
this again. How many of you predicted
that San Francisco of all places would
be able to raise rates in the middle of
what looked like the city falling apart?
How many of you would have said, "Oh
yeah, those rentals will be up 12%."
Not me. I I would have guessed that
rents would have collapsed by now. So
that's two cities
in which my ability to predict with all
of my economics training zero.
Zero ability to predict. If you think
you can do better,
knock yourself out.
Well, in other fun stories, uh let let
me say this about Candace Owens. Uh, I
love Candace Owens. Um, I like her
personally. I only met her once, very
briefly, but she was very warm. And, uh,
I love this show that she puts on, not
just the actual podcast, but the whole
show.
I I I like the way she's, you know,
inserted herself into the the public
mind. I I just sort of like everything
about what she does. Now, that's
different from agreeing with all of her
takes. Everybody gets that, right? Do do
we ever get to the point where I don't
have to say that? Can we ever as a
civilization get to the point where I
can say, "I like that public figure
without having to say, but I don't agree
with 100% of what they say."
We're not there yet, right? I still have
to do that. I don't agree with 100% of
everything she's ever said. All right.
Well, she's she's making some uh noise
today. She says Charlie Kirk was
betrayed and don't worry about the gag
order in the Charlie Kirk case. Is that
a gag order directed at her? I think so.
Um she says, "I plan to violate it on
the world's behalf." So, she to violate
the course gag order on the world's
behalf. She says, "The things I've
discovered this past week are enough to
burn the house down." And yes, Charlie
was betrayed by everyone.
All right. Now, do you see what I mean?
How do you not love that?
She She's so good. Just so good at
getting attention, which is her job,
right? If that's what I do, she and I
are in the same job in a way, which is
to get attention. But you're only going
to get attention if you're creating
value, right? You could get attention
for one day, but you can't be Candace
unless you can get attention just
regularly, anytime you want. And wow,
can she get attention? So good at this.
So if you if you simply and you know, I
like to do this. I like to separate the
person's, you know, character from their
skill level.
I like in this case I like your
character and her skill level, but uh
the skill level is just crazy. Kandis's
skill level, her talent stack is crazy.
Anyway, so this is fun. We'll keep an
eye on that.
Um according to Jensen Wang, CEO of
Nvidia, here's more good news. Um, it
only took one year and apparently the US
is already manufacturing the the most
advanced chip for AI and Vinnie is
working with uh
what is the name of that uh TSMP or
something. The Taiwan company uh
apparently used moved it some of its
technology to the US and working with
Nvidia. So now the US can make not at
the same not at the same quantity TSM.
Thank you. TS TSM is the name of the
chip company from Taiwan. Anyway, so
they're working together and now they
can make the most advanced chip in the
US. I assume that uh volume is probably
still a big issue, but I feel it's TSMC
TMS TSMC. Okay. Um,
but that's a pretty big deal to me
because it means that even if Taiwan
sunk into the ocean, um, we could get
going. You know, we we could we would
have enough on our shores that we could
reconstitute slowly. That's a big deal.
But it probably also makes it far more
likely that Taiwan will be destroyed by
China because China will know that it's
not an existential risk to the United
States anymore. H I just realized this
could be a double-edged sword. If you're
China
and you're not benefiting directly from
the advanced chips on Taiwan, but your
biggest competitor is the United States,
would you worry too much if in the
process of conquering Taiwan, you
destroyed the semiconductor business?
You might not care as much as you should
because then it would just put you at
parody with your biggest competitor who
who has access to it now but wouldn't if
it got knocked down. But now but now we
can make those chips in the US.
So now you're China and you think, "Aha,
I can totally overthrow Taiwan now
because the US won't have to fight." If
they don't want to and they don't want
to be in a war, a world war, they don't
have to.
But before we kind of would have had to
because we couldn't let China take
control of the chips that would be
better than the ones that we could make.
That'd be too big a risk. So, it's
entirely possible that growing our own
homegrown best of chips
will sacrifice Taiwan.
It's not impossible, you know, it's not
impossible.
All right. Uh, apparently Trump is using
the uh shutdown of the government to
kill some projects. I didn't know that
was an option. I guess the Democrats
didn't know it either, but they're
finding out.
Allegedly, there's some kind of $20
billion New York City tunnel project
that Schumer had spent. Uh,
Representative Schumer, Senator Schumer
has spent years trying to get passed and
finally did. And now because the
government's closed, Trump's just going
to cancel the whole project.
I don't even know if I don't even know
if uh Trump even looked into whether it
was a good idea to do the project or
not. I think it's just a Schumer's
project and he worked 20 years to get
it, so he's just going to cancel it on
his ass. All right, that might be a
little bit that might be a little bit
authoritarian,
but I'd have I'd have to know if we
really need this tunnel.
I imagine that we could live without the
tunnel and the $20 billion.
Anyway, um, so there's a story today
that somebody built a a hunting stand in
a tree, which is where the hunters hide
from the prey, and then they can take a
shot from their hiding place in the
tree. They built one that had a uh that
had a complete view of Air Force One
when it lands in Palm Beach. So, so he
had the the the hunting blind had an
open wide openen shot at the president
of the United States coming down the
gate from his own airplane in a place
where he's known to land.
Now, the good news is that it was
discovered and it looks like it's been
there for a while. Uh, but uh we don't
know why it was there.
We don't know if it was there for that
purpose, but it would be a strange place
for a Wouldn't you think that Palm Beach
would be a strange place to have a
hunting blind in a tree?
I I don't know how many other hunting
blinds and trees there are in Palm
Beach, but that certainly looks exactly
like what it looks like, doesn't it?
Bonino's all over that one.
Well, apparently Boston is looking into
having a cityrun grocery store. Mom Dami
has um talked about that. They haven't
done it yet, but did you know that
Atlanta already has one? They have a
cityrun um grocery.
And I do not have an update on whether
it's working in Atlanta. I imagine
they've got some some challenges, but it
makes me wonder, is there a way to make
a government grocery store work without
getting rid of the regular grocery
stores so the rest of us can have more
choice? And I was thinking about that.
What What would you do if you were the
government and you wanted to I don't
want to say compete, but you were going
to have an alternative grocery store in
the same place where there were regular
grocery stores. So the first thing you
have to do is make sure that people who
had money still preferred the regular
grocery stores. And you could do that
easily by having more junk food and more
selection, right? Selection alone would
would get the people with money to go
there. So the first thing you do is have
less selection if it's a government
grocery store. I think if you reduce the
selection to just, you know, basics like
vegetables and um and protein,
you could probably find ways to cut
costs like crazy cuz you just keep it
simple. It's like, okay, we got five
proteins just always the same. Um, but
then could you also do something that
was direct from farm if you got rid of
some regulations because you are the
government. So, if you got rid of
government regulations and said, "All
right, you can take your chances with
the food because it won't be regulated,
but it's coming right from the farm and
we'll give you all the information you
want about the farm, but it's up to the
farm. And we're going to we're going to
hold the farm possibly
uh possibly hold the farm um blameless
even if somebody gets sick from the
food.
So you'd have to handle sort of the
insurance risk of providing food to
people and a government could just say,
"Yeah, you can't sue.
You you can't, you know, some people are
going to die from the farm food. You
can't sue." Uh so if you did all of
those things, you reduced the choice,
you figured out how to get the footprint
really low, may maybe you even got some
free rent,
uh
maybe you figured out how to use robots
instead of employees.
Maybe you squeeze the big food
producers, you know, for a little little
taste of something to help pay for it.
Um maybe you had your own uh maybe you
had your own vertical so you you owned
the farm but you also owned the grocery
store. So my point is if you if you
started from scratch and said how would
we build a alternative place to get
food? Um could you do it? Is it even
doable? I've always thought that the
ideal would be that there would be like
a cafeteria
that you could go to that would be close
enough everybody could get to it. You
know, maybe there would be multiple,
but the cafeteria model would have less
waste
than individuals. You know, if if you
shop for yourself and cook for yourself,
it's just so wasteful the amount of time
you spend and that you have to drive
somewhere and pick something up. You got
to store it. Some of it goes bad. You
got to negotiate who gets what. Compare
that to just everybody walks over to the
buffet and you just get what you want.
So I do not rule out
that there could be a government grocery
store. I I think if you rule it out
because it's never worked,
that's a good starting point.
But that's just the starting point for
the analysis. You have to go past it
never worked. You have to go to what
what has never been tried.
If you get to what's never been tried,
well, now you've now it's interesting.
Well, you were not surprised to know
that the Gaza ceasefire is not holding
as well as people would like, but it's
unclear whether the leadership of Hamas
has anything to do with it or is it
rogue elements within Hamas. But there
is some firing, there are some deaths.
Israel uh is responding to the
to the encroachments by uh cutting food,
I guess, and aid.
We hope that's temporary.
Uh so humanitarian aid is stopped or
paused, I guess. Mostly paused. And uh I
feel like that'll get worked out.
So, as I said yesterday, uh I'm not
worried about the ceasefire as long as
both sides have dramatically drawn down
their military presence.
There's definitely going to be
violations of the ceasefire. You know,
every single person who's been alive
more than 10 minutes knows the ceasefire
is going to get violated. So, you can't
say we're going to change everything if
the ceasefire gets violated because we
know it's going to get violated. there
there wouldn't be any point even doing
the deal if we thought a violation was
going to overturn the whole thing. So,
of course, we're going to work through
all the little violations,
but probably we will probably will. It
it does make sense that there'll be
plenty of people there who don't want a
ceasefire and we'll be acting upon it.
But as long as they get the big weapons
out of there. I guess uh Jared was
talking about maybe a gun buyback
program.
And my what what was your first
impression when you heard that that they
would do a gun buyback program with
Hamas?
Your first impression is no, right?
That's not going to work. They're not
going to sell their guns.
My second impression was we don't really
know how the the depth of their poverty
right now. So if you were a uh if you
owned a gun, you were Hamas and you
owned a gun and the government offered
you what was a really good price, a
really good price, and you had no source
of other money
and you also thought that the the war
was over.
I think maybe half of them would sell
their guns
because money is better than a bunch of
bullets you're not going to use. Right.
So, I do like the buyback idea, but I
think it's, you know, that's only a
dent. You can't get all the guns with
that. But if you got half of them,
that'd be that'd be pretty impressive.
All right. So, uh, yeah, Kushner and
Wickoff are the two guys trying to
figure out how to govern, uh, Gaza after
that, which which to me,
um, brings up this question.
Is there a way to create a non-corrupt
government,
even for just a city? Let's let's call
Gaza a city, even though it's a it's
bigger than a city. Has anybody ever
done it?
I don't think it's even doable. I don't
believe there's any form of government
um that you could just plop in the
middle of a highly corrupt culture and
then suddenly have it not be corrupt.
Now, when I say it's a highly corrupt
culture, I am not uh I'm not banging on
one type of people. It's everywhere.
You know, you you you could, you know,
just take a a pin and drop it on the
globe and it would hit some
some corrupt place somewhere. All right.
Basically, all cities are corrupt.
So, the question is, if you build the
cities the way they've always been built
in the past, what are you going to get?
Well, corrupt Gaza for sure. But is
there a way, similar to the conversation
about the government grocery stores, if
you were to throw away all assumptions,
uh, and this is what Jared I think is
especially good at, throw away all
assumptions,
could you do it then?
And who would do it? I've often thought
that the number one thing you need to
get right is that the people who are
making the money decisions don't live
there.
Because if you live there, you've got
all these corrupt influences. You know,
that gangster you grew up with and uh
the people you went to school with and
you know, your your wife's family who
wants that contract.
You can't let the people who live there
control the money. They will always be
corrupt. they would just give it to
their family members etc. So you need
some kind of independent
physically not there entity to not only
decide where it goes where the money is
spent but then to watch it like a hawk
and report on it so that everybody knows
where it went. If you can't get that
part right, nothing else works. So
somehow Jared has to solve the problem
of what happens when money is introduced
into the the zone
and then who gets to decide where it
goes, who watches it, and who reports it
to the people to make sure it went to
the right place. If you don't get that
part right, nothing else matters. And
that's the hardest part to get right.
Nobody's done it. As far as I know,
nobody's ever done it. I believe every
city is corrupt.
But if Jared could pull that off with
some clever set of systems, it would be
one of the greatest things that ever
happened in the world.
Think about that. The the odds of
pulling that off are pretty low. It's,
you know, it's maximum challenge. But
what if he did it?
What if they pulled that off? Wickoff
and uh and Jared Kushner, what if they
actually built a city that by its
design, you know, the the systems they
put in place avoided corruption?
Can you even imagine that?
That that would be one of the greatest
things that ever happened in the history
of humankind.
So, I don't know what you're working on
today, but uh but those two guys have a
chance to change everything.
Do they have a plan? Probably not yet.
But do they have the skills that the two
of them could conceivably
come up with a way to build a
non-corrupt zone?
And I think yes. I think yes. I believe
that they have the skill to do that.
Doesn't mean it will get done because
you know there there will be a lot of
push back in every possible way. But
yeah, they might be the the only two
dudes that could pull that off right
now.
Trump has announced an end to the
Colombian foreign aid. I didn't even
know we were giving Colombia foreign
aid, but apparently now they're a bunch
of illegal drug dealers, too.
Um Trump's not happy with the uh
president of Colombia who is not happy
with us. So Trump's going to discontinue
whatever our subsidies were for
Colombia. I feel like the subsidies were
for the purpose of fighting drugs,
weren't they? So, is he saying that
we've been paying Colombia to fight
drugs, but Colombia is actually the drug
cartel and we've been paying the cartel?
Is that what is that what happened? I
don't know if that's what happened. I'm
seeing some yeses. So yes, if if that's
even close to what's happening, and I
don't know that it is, but if the
government is embedded with the cartel
and we were paying the government to
deal with the cartel,
well, maybe it's time to stop doing
that, huh?
You would not be surprised to hear
because it's it's a groundhog day all
over again. Ukrainian drone struck a
major Russian gas plant. How many times
have I said that? Like every day, right?
Every day there's another Russian major
energy structure that got attacked.
So that's happening.
Um and other positive news, interesting
engineering has a story about
a wind turbine. So it's basically, you
know, the the fans of a windmill would
be, you know, the the turbine part, but
apparently they've somebody has
developed a new shape for the uh I guess
what the turbine, now I don't know what
turbine means. If you say turbine
enough, you don't know what it means.
Turbine, turbine, turbine. God, now I
don't even know what it means. But, uh,
it would be the little things that the
air is bouncing off of. And they've
figured out how to make one that boosts
energy output by 83%
with 35% less weight. Fiber composite
rotors make a small turbine stronger,
more durable. 83%.
Do you believe that? that they figured
out how to make a windmill 83% more
efficient all of a sudden with just a
shape change. It's just a shape, you
know, something easy to reproduce, a
shape. Uh well, if that's true,
finally your dream can come true, which
is you'll be able to watch television
even when the wind is just barely
blowing.
[Laughter]
Of course, I'm joking.
Trump always says that the windmills are
no good because when the wind stops
blowing you can't watch TV,
which of course is not true, but it's
hilarious every time he says it. And
now, now I'm thinking, finally, we can
watch TV when the wind is barely
blowing.
You know, maybe it's so efficient, those
little turbines, that you could have one
in your house without making your
neighbors crazy from the sound and the
dead birds.
Um, all right. According to uh Elizabeth
Gimney, who's writing for nature,
AI boss have now reviewed
uh oh, there's a conference coming,
which is an all AI paper conference. So
the conference will have humans at it,
but they're there to see what would
happen if AI wrote the scientific
papers, submitted the scientific papers,
and then here's the fun part, did their
own peer review.
So they're doing a conference of AI
generated scientific papers
uh that will be matched with the peer
reviewers so that the humans who attend
can see if the peer reviewers can add
value to the AI papers.
Does that make sense? Did I did I
explain that well enough? Um so I it's
not that the papers are going to be um
trusted more. is it's more about seeing
how the human
AI scientific model works. I love this.
I think this is exa exactly
exactly what they should be looking at
to see see what that looks like when you
throw the AI in there.
All right, ladies and gentlemen,
I told you I'd be uh finishing a little
early. There's not much news happening
today, which I suppose is good.
But I did tell the people on locals, my
beloved subscribers, that I'd be taking
some questions at the end about anything
you want. So, I won't be able to see all
of your questions because they zip by
pretty quickly. But, if you do have any
questions uh on any topic at all, I'd be
happy to uh
happy to answer them. All right. I'm
just looking to see there's a little lag
here.
What if the peer reviewers have AI write
their peer review? They are. That's what
they're doing. The peer reviewers are
the AI.
It's exactly what they're doing.
All right. Uh
All right. Uh question. Trump's
government added the White House.
Oh, man.
Trump's government added the White House
and departments to Blue Sky Social
Network. So I subscribed. Wow, TDS is
strong. What are your thoughts including
how those supporting should engage? So
how how should Trump supporters engage
with Blue Sky? So Blue Sky is the
competitor to X that only only Democrats
went to basically. Uh but the White
House wanted a presence there, which is
smart. Um I just would ignore it. Just
ignore it. There there's nothing there
for you.
Uh if it becomes more of a thing then
maybe someday you don't have to ignore
it but at the moment I just ignore it.
I helped you with your teen. Good.
Can you reframe marriage for more
success? Now the the individual
relationship ones you'd have to know so
much about the individual situation. I I
can't just reframe marriage because some
people ought to be married and some
people ought to probably cut it out.
If my rodents returned what I noticed,
um
I feel having two cats will probably
eliminate my rodent stuff. All right.
So, uh, dogn Barking says, "I missed
what you learned from your medical
testing Friday." I'll give you that
fast. So, I've got terminal cancer, um,
metastatic prostate cancer. There's a
drug that's newly approved just this
spring called Pliku, but you don't get
that unless you go through a scanning
process in which they give you some
radioactive juice to see if it lights up
the tumors. because if they can't light
up the tumors with the practice juice,
then the real thing won't do it either.
So, it's a way to find out if this
limited and expensive process would be
applicable to me or not. Now, the test
was the most painful thing I've ever
done in my life by far
because I can't lay in my back without
extraordinary pain and you have to lay
in your back for 20 minutes.
Extraordinary pain. Just extraordinary.
But it's over and I got through it and
it did light up um at least my reading
of the tests. I don't the doctor hasn't
read them yet so it might be maybe I'm
misinterpreting but the reading of the
test is that they let they lit up well
that they had a high sensitivity which
is what we're looking for. So in theory
my doctor will look at that today. he'll
recommend it to a committee who decides
whether or not that's good enough for me
to get that drug. If the committee says
yes in a week when they meet, then it
will be scheduled. But I don't know how
long it takes to schedule it. And there
would be several applications. So it' be
once a week for I don't know four or six
weeks or something like that. And then
it doesn't work for everybody, right?
Even if you've tested,
even if you've tested to see if it
lights up your tumors, it's not going to
work for everybody and it's not going to
work as well for everybody. So, there's
some chance that I will get substantial
relief fairly quickly, you know, within
a matter of just a few weeks. uh because
some people have but it's far more
likely maybe two out of three chance
that maybe I get a little bit of you
know delay in the whole dying thing but
doesn't change the arc of my life too
much that'd be the most likely however
we're at this weird point in history
where there are all kinds of new things
coming online every day literally every
day there's a new prostate cancer thing
that looks like it might work if they
test it a little bit further
So, if I can if I can extend my
survival,
and I don't know how much I need to, but
we're at that period where if you can
get that little extra, you might be able
to get to the new thing. So, that's my
game plan. My game plan is to try to get
to the new thing without knowing what
the new thing is
or or even that it will exist.
But
and then there's a nonzero chance.
I'm not counting on this, but there's a
nonzero chance that the uh the blue vict
will just just knock it out and that it
will still be there because it's it's
not it's not a cure, by the way. not
marketed as a cure, but it could knock
it back so much that if I don't do chemo
and weaken my immune system, I might be
able to just sort of keep it at bay
without too much future trouble.
Possible.
Not likely. Most likely is I slow it
down and it and it rages back in a few
months. Most likely,
but that might be enough. All right. I
feel like I'm not adding value now
because I'm just talking about my own
situation.
How did I prepare myself for the painful
mental scan? Excellent question. How did
I prepare myself? Well, I knew it would
be bad and I had the maximum
pain relievers, but I had not practiced
being in that position for that long
because obviously it's the most painful
thing you could ever do in your life. Uh
so I didn't know how bad it would be. So
that's number one. If you don't know how
bad it will be, that helps that helps
you that helps get you in the room. Once
you're in the room, this is where the
the reframe wanting versus deciding
comes in. Do you see how powerful this
is? If I had simply wanted it, I could
not have held out.
No way. But I had decided.
I decided, meaning that you could put a
hot poker through my forehead and I was
going to hold on. There's a thing you
hold on to to keep yourself from
wiggling. And I told myself, you could
do anything to me there. There's no
level of pain that's going to make me
move. This is my one shot because I
don't have a plan B. There's no plan B.
This is the only plan I had to survive.
So that's a decision. That's not a
preference, right? So once you move it
from preference to decision,
it doesn't make it easier,
but it largely guarantees it'll get
done.
So you're not always trying to make it
easier. You're trying to make sure it
gets done because once it's done, it's
done. That's a that's a full solution.
Done is done.
And then I also do a thing where I don't
I try not to imagine it too much. Um,
when I have a dental appointment, I do
that as well. If I know it's going to be
painful, I tell myself simply, get out.
That's another reframe. If it's in my
head, I just get out. Get out. Get out.
Think of something else. Get out. Get
out. And the less you think about it
before you go, the happier you're going
to be because the thinking about it
doesn't help. So you just say, "Get out.
Get out every time you need to." So
that's two reframes.
the wanting versus deciding and then the
get out so you're not obsessing about it
before it happens.
I think that was a good answer to your
question.
Uh
that moved you Tom. It should have.
How does gravity manifest at the quantum
level? Well, I don't know if I'm ready
for that one yet.
When you imagine how you're perceived.
Now, that's interesting.
So, um, when you think about how other
people think of you, I have a reframe
for that. We'll probably get to it
later, but I'll I'll share it with you
now. What's the best reframe for
worrying about what people think about
you? You've heard me say this one.
Provenge. Yeah, I'll look into Provenge.
I I know about that one.
Wait, what was I talking about?
You You uh I just forgot what I was
talking about cuz I got on the revenge
track.
Oh. Uh how to reframe if you think
people are thinking bad things about
you. The basket case theory is one.
That's not the one I was going for, but
that's that is also correct. If you
remember that everyone's a basket case,
then you're not going to feel bad about
you being one. That's that's a very
powerful reframe. It's one of my
favorites. You just once you realize
that once you get to know somebody,
they've got all kinds of problems that
you didn't know about until you knew
them really well. And once you realize
there's no such thing as the people who
seem to have no problems,
they don't exist. There's nobody like
that. Once you realize that you're just
like everybody else, but your problems
might be different, but you all got you
all have your things, right? So that's
the first one here. But here's one
that's even better.
Nobody cares about you.
They're not even thinking about you. You
you imagine that people are having all
these negative thoughts about you. If
they do, it lasts all of one second in
their head. It doesn't matter. People
don't care about you. You know, your
family does, but that's not what you're
talking about, right? You're not talking
about your loved ones. You're talking
about sort of co-workers and people you
run into in the street, stuff like that.
So, here's where I learned that. Uh,
I've told you this story, but this will
make it concrete again. Uh, many years
ago, I did laser surgery on my face to
correct a bunch of spider veins that
were sort of in the the mask of my face.
Now, I was told by the laser
professional that my face would look all
purple and it would look like I had gone
through a a windshield and it would last
for about 3 weeks. and I probably didn't
want to go out in public looking that
way. So, sure enough, I get the
treatment. My face is all purple and it
looked like I'd just gone through a
windshield.
So, obviously, I don't want to leave the
house. So, day goes by and I'm bored and
I'm thinking, three weeks? Wow, that's
that's a long time not to leave the
house. And the second day comes and I'm
bored and I just want to go shopping
just to get out of the freaking house.
And I say to myself, what would happen
if I just didn't care what anybody
thought? What would happen if I just do
go to the mall with my face that looks
like I just went through a windshield?
What would happen? So I went to the
mall.
Nobody gave one what I look like.
Nobody stared. Nobody asked me about it.
Nobody showed Nobody showed the least
bit of interest in whatever it was I was
going through. Not any. Not a glance,
not a stare, not not a child. You know,
there was no child going, "Oh, what's
wrong?" Nothing.
And and once you get a big dose of
nobody cares, oh my god, the freedom.
the freedom that that gave me it it was
actually one of my more memorable days
of my life because that's when I
realized for sure that I didn't have to
worry about what other people were
thinking about me because they weren't
thinking about me. They just weren't.
They just were not thinking about me.
They think about themselves.
So if you want to be liked,
help people think about themselves.
That's what the Dale Carnegie course
does.
If you want to be liked, your job was
not to make them think better about what
your face looked like. That wasn't the
job. The job was to make them think
about themselves
if you want them to like you.
So, there's another reframe for you.
All right, ladies and gentlemen. I would
say we've done what we need to do here.
I hope I've changed your lives a little
bit. just a little bit and we'll come
back and do this tomorrow. There will be
real news sometime this week and we'll
get back to what we usually do. But in
the meantime, I'm hoping all these
reframes are making you more powerful
and happier.
All right, everybody. Good. All right,
everybody. Um, I won't be talking to the
locals people privately because
basically what I just did is what I
would have been doing. But uh I will see
you tomorrow everybody.
Maybe tonight I will do another drawing
class for the locals people but I don't
know yet.