be the same under all scenarios. There's nothing that would change the fact that they'll still get treated at emergency rooms. So what exactly is the Republican argument to that?

I believe the Republican argument is the correct one that there is money that's being used for those purposes. But why can't they explain it in a way that sounds like a counterpoint to it's illegal so we don't do it? It's kind of confusing. Bad messaging by Republicans. Do better. I'd help, but I don't understand. I don't even understand what they're trying to say. Like I can't fix their messaging because I don't even know what it is. I don't know what they're trying to say, much less what they're saying.

So there's a Bill Gates, I've mentioned this before now, but they're really close to approval. TerraPower is a Gen 4 nuclear power plant that uses that molten salt and it's safe and cheaper and they'll make it modular and it'll be the greatest thing. Apparently they got through their environmental approvals, which is one of the hardest things to do if you're a new nuclear power company. And now they have to get a safety, so the environment will be fine but they need a general safety check so they have to go for that approval.

But the thing that was interesting about this, because you've heard about this before, is I wondered when did Bill Gates get first involved in funding this because I wondered how long it took and the answer was 2006 according to Grok. So Bill Gates started funding this highly speculative generation 4 nuclear power with who knows what the odds of this succeeding were. But in 2006, or was it nine? 2006. Yeah, that's when the company was founded and Gates got into it. So I mentioned that only so that you can know how long it takes to develop a new nuclear technology, but also to remind you of the value of our billionaires.

Don't you think that if Bill Gates had not invested a ton of money in 2006 on something that was very much not proven that we would not be here today? And this might be one of the biggest things that ever happened in the world. If we get the Gen 4 nuclear power plants commoditized so we can just pound them out and they're safe. That changes everything. Just so I wonder how much credit you would be willing to give him. I know you think he's the devil for other reasons, vaccinations and stuff. I'm not going to change your mind about him in general. I'm just saying, would you acknowledge that the United States has this billionaire asset where our billionaires will take a risk on something for 20 freaking years and still take a flyer on it?

Do you know how long ago Elon Musk got into robots and AI? It was about the same time, and it's only just now starting to pay off. Some of our billionaires are serious long-term thinkers with serious risk-reward nuts to do things that nobody else would do and nobody else could do really. So you can be mad at Bill Gates for all of your other reasons, but he's the guy developing the clean water for Africa and toilets for Africa and nuclear power that's safe and not everything he's doing is the devil. Not everything.

Anyway, the army is also going to bring nuclear micro reactors to their bases by 2028. I don't know if those nuclear mini reactors will be molten salt or not, but there's a greater chance that they will be.

Now Steven Miller is suggesting that Illinois Governor Pritzker could be arrested on seditious conspiracy charges if they block ICE deportations. Cassandra MacDonald is writing about this in the Gateway Pundit. What do you think of that? As a threat, it's probably pre