not open the government. It's not a hard point, but before I don't think you would have seen it. But then he goes on with this is just a kill shot. So then Jake says, "So is this a tradeoff you're willing to make, letting some Americans go hungry until these Obamacare subsidies get extended?" Let me read that again. This is an absolute kill shot. That there should be nothing left of the Democrat party by now. If anybody saw this question, so is this a trade-off you're willing to make? See, even putting it in the terms of willing to make strengthens it and continue to make strengthens it again. You've done it and you continue to do it. He was letting some Americans go hungry until these Obamacare subsidies get extended. Because I don't know about you, but you know, if you say healthcare, I obviously care a lot because that's important. But if you say hunger, I go to a whole different level of caring, right? Hunger comes before kind of everything except immediate physical safety. So this is really strong. So I'm going to give Jake a standing ovation for that journalism move because that was exactly the right question, exactly the right time, and exactly the right person to ask it. What do you think he did with that question? What do you think Murphy did? Did he say, "Yeah, we're intentionally going to starve 43 million people," which by the way, the Republicans don't want to do. They want to open the government and give them their money, their food. So they're going to starve Republicans so that they can get a political win on healthcare. Now, even if you were to say, "But Scott, you know, we need both of those things. So ranking them doesn't even make sense. Those are two essential things. You have to have them both." So putting them up against each other isn't fair. It's just two things you need. Okay. Doesn't feel like that though. Doesn't feel like that. Feels like you need to eat before you go to the doctor.

Well, that was to me that was really interesting as a