Back to episode — Episode 3001 CWSA 10/27/25
Context —
ve a listening device. I might be bugged. I'm not sure what's going on. Anyway, let's talk about Trump in the third term. That's heating up. I think I might be part of the reason that's heating up because I added to that noise a little bit. You know, 1%. Bannon's the one driving it, but the idea of Trump staying for a third term is not being dismissed by Trump too hard. So they asked him on the p…
← Previous segment →ase the chance of living. Wouldn't you? I mean, really, wouldn't you? To increase your own chance of living and not being paraded through town and spit on. Yeah, if those are my choices, I'll take the violation to the Constitution. And you know, and you'll have to live with another four years of Trump. I don't think that's going to happen, but I feel like it's the right tradeoff.
So what would be the argument for keeping him? I'm going to give you my best argument which I don't think is good, but it'll be an argument for keeping Trump for a third term. You ready? Do you think I could pull this off? Do you think I could give you a persuasive argument why he should get a third term? Well, I don't know if this is unique or if other people have said this, so it might not be original. Here's my argument. They stole his first and second term with a hoax. The government stole it. The government denied him a full regular term by making him fight to stay out of jail the entire first term and then using the lies that they created in the first term to prevent him from being elected in the second term. Now, I don't know if there was also any chicanery with the votes itself. I don't have any proof of that. But what we do know is that they had a well organized from the top Obama plan to deny him a normal presidential term. And I would argue if you look at what he's accomplished in his current term where he's now having to do all this impeachment hoax stuff, you can see the difference between what it would look like if he had been unfettered, where he is now, versus the way they treated him and essentially denied him a real presidential term. Now, you could say, "Well, they denied him his second term." Or you could say they denied him his first term. You could say they denied him his first term. He was president, but with such an anchor on him that they put on him, it was like he couldn't really serve his term. So is that a good enough argument to overcome the very clear wording in the Constitution that you only get two? No. No. The only way that would fly is if the Supreme Court just went totally rogue. Could the Supreme Court go rogue and vote just by conservative majority that yeah, that is true. They did steal his first term. We're going to give it back to him. I don't think so. I think that's too far. I can't see Roberts going for that at all. And not really the other ones either. I can't see Kavanaugh. I can't see any of them voting for it, frankly. I think it wou
Context —
ld be 9-0. But that's the best argument I have. It's not terrible. I just don't think it would pass any kind of scrutiny. All right. Here's more of this. Is the media changing to be more right leaning? So now that Bari Weiss is going to be taking over CBS News or already has, I'm not sure where that is. But somebody pointed out that Margaret Brennan in her interview with Hakeem Jeffries seemed a…
Next segment → →