Coffee With Scott Adams — Knowledge Archive May 24, 2026
Scott Adams Philosophy Archive
Search ideas
Episodes Episode #3003 Segments
NewsReaction AI & Technology

Back to episode — Episode 3003 CWSA 10/29/25

Context —

ually kind of impressed. Now, do they still lean a little bit left? Yeah. Yeah. But Abby Phillip, who I've criticized before, she was a proponent of the fine people hoax before she had her current assignment as CNN. So I started off with a negative opinion of her and as her show got a lot of traction and a lot of clips, I maintained my negative opinion because I didn't think she was up to the job,…

← Previous segment →

lly good shape and that helps. I mean, if you have to look at something for an hour, when I was healthier, I made sure that at least my arms were well worked out. Not at the moment, but if you had to look at me, I would make sure that you were looking at my arms that had at least been to the gym. You know, Benny does that. And the same with Megyn Kelly. Same with the Candace Owens show. Well produced talent on every level that you could have talent from looks to able to speak on camera to be able to put together the content just amazing. When I watch the left-leaning podcasts they're doing the best they can but they all seem a little bit artificial like they started with good-looking young people but I don't know that those people say anything that every other lefty wouldn't say. So I don't know that they're really adding much. Whereas if you look at the Joe Rogans of the world and there are just so many podcasters I could be mentioning so if I leave somebody out doesn't mean anything. But the conservative ones all did it by bootstrapping like they just said you know here's how I started holding this phone up when it had Periscope on it. The old app. This is literally what you're watching right now. Me holding a phone up to my face. That's how I started podcasting and I just put it on the app and oh, somebody's watching me. I guess I should say something. And then little by little because it was interesting and fun, I developed this, you know, kind of bootstrapped it as well. So anyway, that was just an aside.

I was talking about Rand Paul and Fauci. What fascinates me about this is that if you assume that Rand Paul's claims are true and that Fauci was directly responsible for allowing a virus t

Context —

o be experimented with in an unsafe environment and he funded it, that he was in charge of the business of managing the weaponized virus research as Rand Paul would say, that he was at least responsible if not the direct cause of 18 million deaths from the virus. And we're not talking about the shots yet, but wouldn't that be the biggest story in the world? How many individuals like one person who…

Next segment → →