Back to episode — Episode 3023 CWSA 11/19/25
Context —
ss what? It turns out that Congress can pass anything it wants as fast as it wants. Does that make you happy? What have we been doing up to this point? Are you serious? You're telling me that the Congress can do things really fast and very efficiently sometimes but not all the time. So this is the thing that we got right in terms of speed. But the only reason it went fast is because it took us yea…
← Previous segment →it unless it was just obviously the CIA. So it looks like sort of a color revolution thing that you'd get these people who are in the government, people who are credible, to do a video that says, and here's what they said, that they're asking the military to not obey any illegal orders from Trump, but they don't mention what these so-called illegal orders would be.
Why are they even doing this? Was there some illegal order I'm not aware of? Lindsey Graham is asking the same question and he's smarter. I mean, he was a JAG guy forever. And he's saying, well, over 30 years, right? He was a military lawyer for 30 years or so. And he says, honestly, what are you talking about? Where's this crime that Trump allegedly asks anybody to do? I also wonder, has Trump ever disobeyed the Supreme Court in any meaningful way? I don't think so.
So this is a really good psyop because if you, again, if you're a low-information voter, you would think there's no reason in the world they would make this video unless what would be the only one reason Democrats would make this video that makes sense, that there's something happening that's illegal and they're trying to stop it. And that would be, what illegal thing are you trying to stop? We don't know. Do not know.
All right. And the other question is who gets to decide what's legal and what isn't. Now obviously the courts ultimately get to decide, but there's always a lot of stuff that happens before that where the government says, oh, gone too far or you haven't.
All right. So it seems to me there's kind of a psyop by the Democrats to create this frame where Republicans are, wait for it, insurrectionists. And the way that they're insurrectionists, according to this completely made-up narrative, is that Trump will give them illegal orders, the military, and then the military, despite all evidence to the contrary, would just start executing illegal orders. Do you think there's any real chance that's going to happen? I mean, I suppose anything's possible, but it doesn't seem like that's imminent or anything.
Anyway, as Lindsey Graham points out, the hatred for Trump is they're really going too far. And Stephen Miller is pointing out that the video itself seems to qualify as an insurrection. Meaning that it looks like, and I would agree with Stephen Miller's take on this, it looks like these six people are part of a larger group that's trying to create a narrative to literally overthrow the current government. Well, what else would it be? What's the other explanation for why they would go through all this trouble and expense to create this product? What's the other reason?
Again, if there were some specific crimes that they thought were being violated by the military on orders of Trump, shouldn't we be talking about those? Wouldn't that be already getting wrapped up into a court case? Don't we have a system that handles that fairly efficiently actually because we've had hundreds of court cases that got solved. So it seems to me that this is nothing but a psyop and I would say that the origin of this is almost certainly intelligence entity. Now I'm guessing it's ours. So I'm not making any accusation there's some foreign country behind it, but this is not Democrat stuff, is it?
You know, I want to hear what Mike Benz says about this. But if Mike Benz tells you, oh, this is totally grassroots. Yeah, I think they just maybe they were having dinner, somebody had this idea and then they put it together, right? If Mike Benz tells me that's probably what happened, maybe I'd change my opinion, but I don't think he's going to say that. You know, he hasn't weighed in yet that I've seen, but I'll probably see it by this afternoon. So go check out whatever Mike Benz says about the Democratic lawmaker video. Yeah, every bit of that looks like something suspicious is happening in the wings.
And the language that they use in the video, quote, "We want to speak directly to members of the military and the intelligence community." There it is. They're trying to get the intelligence community and the military to join them in an insurrection against the current government. What else is this? You can't even tell me that there's some other reason for this. And Steve Miller says, "Democrat lawmakers now openly calling for insurrection." That's what it looks like. I mean, it legitimately looks like that to me. Not making some political point or you can always twist things into your narrative. It doesn't feel like that at all. It feels like it's exactly what it looks like, which is shocking. It's shocking.
And then there's this weird story. We'll talk about this and then it might be about time for my guest. So this is funny, but Trump was asked on Air Force One a question, and it's hard to tell from the audio, but it sounded like he called one of the female reporters "Peggy," as in piggy. Now some people said, "No, no, no. Her name is Peggy." But the early reporting is that there's nobody named Peggy on the plane. I don't know if there's anybody named Piggy on the plane, but if you're trying to figure out did he really say that? And if he did, what was he thinking and why did he say it? I have no idea. I don't have the slightest idea. I don't think that he just decided to call her a pig, but I'm going to have to see a picture of the reporter. You know what I mean?
Is there any chance at all? I don't know which reporter it was. I haven't seen a name. Is there any chance at all that if I were to look at a picture of that reporter, an image of a particular animal would jump in my head? Is it possible that he wasn't doing it intentionally, but he looked at her and she just reminded him of some animal more than others, which would be terrible. It would be terrible. It would be funny. And if it seems like I'm laughing, well, that's on you because I wouldn't laugh at such a terrible thing. But everything about this story is weird and funny. I'm not sure I care. Do you? Because we know he's not the kind of guy who just sort of randomly attacks somebody. That doesn't seem like what he would do. So there's either some backstory or it sounded like something else or there's some othe
Context —
r word that sounds like that. I don't know. It could be anything. We'll find out later, but we'll keep an eye on that. All right. It looks like my guest has entered the green room. And let me make sure I'm going to accept him. Boom. You will be accepted. And then can I make you appear? Nope. Oh, there you are. Hey, Chris. "Hey, can you hear me? Okay, Scott." I can. Let's make sure the audience…
Next segment → →