ative today on X. He posted this. I'm gonna read just what Tucker said because it's a big story if his allegations are true. And it goes like this. So this is brand new. This just before I came on. Tucker said that for months the Wall Street Journal has held a story detailing the personal corruption of somebody named Andriy Yermak, the second most powerful man in Ukraine. Yermak has skimmed hundreds of millions in American tax dollars meant for Ukraine aid. Now remember this is allegations made by Tucker. The journal's editors can prove that really but they're not. Instead they're protecting Yermak. Why? And then Tucker answers his own question. He says because Yermak is leading Ukraine's effort to scuttle the Trump peace plan for Eastern Europe. What the owners of the Wall Street Journal don't want peace with Russia.

Now remember that's a little mind reading going on there because unless they've said it I know you'd be assuming that that's what they're thinking and it might be right. I'm not saying it's wrong. I'm just saying just distinguish between things you can prove and things which are allegations. So the owners of the Wall Street Journal, says Tucker, don't want peace with Russia. They want war. At the same time, the journal's editorial page has attacked the Trump administration for pushing a peace agreement. And then, says Tucker, this is true corruption without informing its readers. The Murdoch family, no, without informing its readers, the Murdoch family, says Tucker, is using both sides of his newspaper to continue the war with Russia. That's not the behavior of a news organization. Wait for it. It's the hallmark of an intel agency.

Oh, damn. Damn. I don't know how many of you have been watching Tucker's content since he got cancelled and cancelled again. But he does do a lot of content about well, you probably didn't know this, but some intel agency is behind it because I think it usually is. What do you think of this? Do you think that Tucker's narrative of this is accurate? I don't have any inside information. I've never heard of this. Andriy Yermak, I will say that the Ukraine war has the feeling of something that rich people want to continue because it feels like if all the rich people wanted it to end, that would have already ended. What's the point of being all these billionaires if you can't control civilization too? So there must have been somebody who wanted the war to continue. And maybe it's this guy. I wouldn't know. But that's a heck of an allegation. A heck of an allegation.

So let's keep an eye on that one. I think it's too early for me to have an opinion on that one because I'd have to see if there's any second side to it. But the allegation that the Wall Street Journal is sort of intentionally promoting war for the benefit of some billionaires and maybe for the benefit of their own company. That's a big allegation. That's a big one.

All right. Glenn Beck recently asked RFK Jr. his thoughts on the World Economic Forum, the WEF, and RFK Jr. said, quote, "We shouldn't be paying attention to it." Meaning the WEF. It's a billionaire's boys club that's arranging for the world to shift wealth upward and to clamp down on totalitarian controls on everybody else. Now, who does that sound like? There's one other public figure who has talked about the World Economic Forum in almost exactly the same terms. The Billionaires Boys Club. That was Elon. When Elon Musk was asked about the World Economic Forum, he also just sort of brushed it aside in terms of importance and acted like it was just a social club for rich people and that if you thought it was more than that, you were kind of giving it too much power. Yeah. So I agree with RFK Jr.'s take. I have not seen the World Economic Forum be anything but a billionaire boys club. It looks exactly like that. And yes, we should ignore them unless they become more powerful and start affecting things.

All right. In other news, the Israeli Defense Forces apparently are dismissing the first wave, what they call the first wave of people that they say were responsible for allowing the October 7th attack to happen. Meaning people who allegedly did not do their jobs well enough to prevent it and should have. Now, apparently quite a few people are involved in this and they're calling it just the first major wave. Newsmax is reporting on this, by the way. It's the first major wave, but that would suggest that there are going to be other major waves. How many people were actually literally physically involved and should have done more? I don't know how there could be that many people. I could see if it were one or two or a dozen people, but once it gets up to larger numbers, how many people were making mistakes all in the same time in the same way? I don't know what that means. But apparently they're not done. So they're going to keep looking and keep firing people who are responsible.

Now, Prime Minister Netanyahu is apparently reportedly opposed to a state inquiry of the government to find out if members of the government as opposed to the military were also responsible and should take some kind of action or responsibility, I guess. So you've got the IDF saying, "Yes, we take responsibility and these specific people are being dismissed." But you've got the government saying, "No, let's not get into this any deeper. Maybe we should just leave this with the military."

Now, if you follow all your conspiracy theories, you know that there's been one that's been bugging me from almost day one. It bugging me because I just don't see it as possible in the world that I live in. Anything's possible and I could be totally surprised. But the conspiracy theory goes, and you've all heard it, that Netanyahu intentionally allowed security to be lapsed or lax so that the attack would happen because that would help him politically stay in power, but also, you know, to do what he wanted to do anyway in Gaza. How many of you believe that that's what really happened?

Now, I understand why you would believe it because it's really hard to look at the size of that security lapse and imagine that was an accident, right? If you're just looking at it from the outside, you say to yourself, how in the world could all of that be accidental, right? And that's a good place to start. It's a good starting place because I'm curious too. But now that the military has taken this much responsibility, does it change your opinion? Because if the military is taking responsibility and they're naming names and a lot of them and they're firing them, they must be finding things that these military people did wrong.

Now, do you believe that these military people would all take what must be one of the worst consequences you could get in the military other than being wounded, I suppose. One of the worst things would be to have your own military accuse you of being responsible for October 7th. Do you think that there are this many people, I don't know how many there are, but let's say dozens. Do you think there are dozens of people in the military who would be willing to take responsibility for October 7th trying, you know, living among the population that would know that they had taken responsibility? And you would do that what? To cover up for Netanyahu, would you?

Do you believe that that's like a possible thing that would happen that dozens of people at the officer level, we're not talking about grunts, talking people in leadership, would they all take the fall for October 7th, the most maybe the most shameful thing that's ever happened to any Israeli in decades? I just don't see it happening. So while I do think that Netanyahu is opportunistically using the situation to his advantage, that's not a big surprise. But it's hard for me to imagine that he planned it, he executed it, dozens and dozens of people in the military had to sort of stand down from their responsibilities. And then after it was all over, none of them became whistleblowers. They all just they all individually took the rap for October 7th. I mean, there are a lot of things you could take the rap for, but not that. That would be like the worst thing you could ever take the rap for if you didn't do it, especially right. So this doesn't really add up to me. And I'm gonna say that the new revelation that the military is dismissing people and naming names. They're naming names does kind of make it look like a military failure more so than it seems likely to me it would be a government failure.

Now, in case you're wondering, Israel is not paying me to do anything. They don't pay me for anything. And it's not my job to support Netanyahu. I'm not a supporter and I'm not