unless I've checked with Grok. Now, Grok could be hallucinating, right? Could be hallucinating. So grain of salt, but according to Grok, over a thousand tankers are part of this ghost fleet. Don't you think that should have been right at the top of the story? Now go check the stories. Is that propaganda? Because if you said to me, "Oh, they took out two of a thousand." I would say, "Oh, so they did basically nothing and they were empty, so it barely even polluted, right?" But if you thought the number of total ghost tankers was some lower number, maybe in the low hundreds, then suddenly two of them being taken out one day starts sounding like, whoa, maybe those Ukrainians are doing well.

So ask yourself this. Is it bad reporting that they don't give you the context of how many tankers there are total? Is it just bad reporting? Or is it intentionally trying to create a narrative that Ukraine has more of a chance of winning or at least pressing the war than they do? What do you think? Is that a coincidence? Do you think it's just a coincidence that the most important number isn't in the story? Or maybe they don't know. Even if they don't know how many ghost tankers there are, shouldn't they say that? As in, well, two of them went down or at least they were damaged. I don't think they went down. They were damaged and we don't know how many there are total. That feels like something that story should include, right? So the fact that it's not in the story tells me that we're seei