I wrong about that? Like why does this feel like just Groundhog Day? Are we really just finding this out or is the news that the FDA is agreeing with it for the first time? Is that the only thing that's new? I mean, it just feels like we've been on this road for years and we all knew it for years. Anyway, now we'll find out more about that, I guess.

In related news, RFK Jr. was saying that Pfizer had data about their vaccine that it was not really a vaccine meaning it didn't stop transmission and they knew it seven months before the injections went on the market. Do you believe that? So apparently there was some monkey study where the macaque, no I'm not, I know that sounded naughty, but if you have any minors listening to this, could you cover their ears because I'm going to say the name of a type of monkey, but it's going to sound like I'm talking dirty. I won't be talking dirty at all. I'll just be naming a kind of monkey. You ready? Cover your children's ears. If you have a pet, cover their ears. The type of monkey is macaque. That's right. That's what those monkeys are. Macaque.

So if you put the virus in a macaque, apparently if your monkey has a nose like a macaque does, they found out that it had the same amount of virus in there as if they didn't get the vaccination. And so in theory, at least for macaques, it showed that it didn't stop the spread at all. And allegedly RFK Jr. says Pfizer knew that seven months before it went on the market. Well, that would be pretty damning if that were true.

But do I have it right that the big pharma companies have no liability risk? They don't, do they? Like even if they knew, does that change their liability risk? Because this would seem to me like insanely criminal, you know, not just some kind of a civil thing you could do a lawsuit about, but it feels like it's just flat out criminal because they had a lot of money on the line and they would have been knowingly killing people in large numbers allegedly, right? I don't know if it's true, but allegedly that would be like the crime of the century. So I don't know. We'll find out more about that.

Kristi Noem said they've just discovered that 50% of the visas in Minnesota are fraudulent. 50%. Boy, Tim Walz is having a bad, bad month. The governor of Minnesota. Is Minnesota just the biggest criminal enterprise you've ever seen in your life? Remember when you thought all the sketchy stuff happened in Las Vegas or maybe New York? No. Turns out that Minnesota was quietly racking up the biggest criminal record of any state. Unbelievable. They don't have a really good news day ever lately.

So 50% of the visas, the visas in this case would be the instrument for allowing you in the country. I'm not talking about Mastercard and Visa. That's a different visa. So that's happening. But luckily, there's nothing else illegal that's ever happened in Minnesota except that visa stuff. Oh, wait a minute. Mario Nawfal is reporting that apparently although you and I know that there's been massive fraud uncovered in Minnesota, how many times do you think ABC, CBS or NBC mentioned it or mentioned Tim Walz? The answer is nothing. Yeah.

So the big three networks are sort of acting like this story doesn't exist. This is like one of the biggest stories of all time. Decided, no, we'll talk about something else instead. All right. Wow. None of those networks, this is what Mario is saying on X, none of those networks have mentioned Walz by name in the past week. So I think what they did mention is that there were problems. So they may have mentioned the crime, but they didn't mention the governor's name even once. Okay.

And then according to Wall Street Apes, a real good account you should follow on X, Wall Street Apes is reporting that investigations found that Somalis in Minnesota were caught early on stealing millions of dollars. But do you know why it didn't become a story? And do you know why they kept on stealing even though they had been discovered? And apparently multiple people had discovered it and reported it. So it wasn't like there was one whistleblower. Apparently a lot of people were aware of it and some number of people were reporting it and saying, "Hey, hey, there's a whole bunch of money getting stolen here. Maybe we should do something about it." Why do you think nothing happened until recently?

Do you think it had to do with DEI? Yes, it did. So apparently the Somalis were smart enough to say if you cause trouble, we're going to brand you as a big old racist and we're going to say that you're only reporting this as trouble because we're black and you're a racist and by the way George Floyd did not have it coming. So I guess it was around the George Floyd-ish time that people wanted to report this, but it was just sort of impossible. It was just politically impossible to make this damning accusation against a large population of black residents of the country. There just wasn't anybody to do it. So people weren't willing to take the chance. So people did see it, they knew about it, and they did report it. But nothing happened until recently.

Now, that would be one of the many advantages of having Trump as your president because people have somewhat gotten past that. Not 100%. But I feel like we're in a more realistic world, a more common sense world where you can actually say, "Oh, yeah. It looks like we have a problem here." and you're not automatically the worst person in the world because you brought it up.

All right, here's another accusation against Tim Walz. I'll tell you, he's just having the worst month. Now, I don't know if this is true. I'll just say it's an allegation, but I also saw this in the Wall Street Apes account on X that apparently the men who work with Tim Walz in the National Guard in Nebraska went to the FBI when Tim Walz was in the National Guard because they believed that Tim Walz had given classified military secrets to the Chinese government.

Now, how certain would you have to be before you went to the FBI and turned in your fellow National Guardsmen for giving secrets to China? You would have to be really, really sure, wouldn't you? I mean, you don't have to be 100% sure, but you wouldn't do it if you just had a mild suspicion, would you? I mean, I feel like you'd have to have a pretty solid reason for even going there because remember, if you go to the FBI, you're putting your own life in a trajectory that's going to be a lot of trouble, right? Whether you're correct or whether you're incorrect, you're kind of donating your own freedom because you think it's important.

So the one thing we can know with some degree of certainty is that the people who reported it, they must have thought it was serious. I don't think you would report that. I mean, it's just such an allegation. Would you report that unless you really thought you had the goods? Well, they did report it and nothing happened. But the allegation is that t