Back to episode — Episode 3036 CWSA 12/04/25
Context —
I wrong about that? Like why does this feel like just Groundhog Day? Are we really just finding this out or is the news that the FDA is agreeing with it for the first time? Is that the only thing that's new? I mean, it just feels like we've been on this road for years and we all knew it for years. Anyway, now we'll find out more about that, I guess. In related news, RFK Jr. was saying that Pfizer…
← Previous segment →here were some secret documents about a new tank that the United States was producing and some of those documents allegedly disappeared, the plans for the tank, and that soon after China, where Walz had a history of visiting quite often, that soon after China produced a tank that looked just like the one that had the stolen plans and nobody knows where the plans went.
Now, is that enough to say that Tim Walz did it? We only know that Tim Walz had a strong connection to China. We know that he had access to those plans. We know that his co-soldiers believe that he might have been the one who stole them. And we know that the timing is such that China created the tank coincidentally. Coincidentally, just like the one that had the stolen documents. Well, that's not proof of anything, but sort of suspicious.
All right. What else happened? Also in Minnesota, I tell you, Minnesota is just this bed of crime. So the Minnesota director of elections, this guy named Paul Lene, he admitted recently, and this is also a Wall Street Apes post. He admitted recently that all you need to vote in Minnesota is a driver's license, and all you need to do to get a driver's license is ask for one. I mean, you probably have to take a test like everybody else, but you don't need to be a citizen to get a driver's license. If you get a driver's license, apparently it doesn't have to match your social security number, which could be fake. And if you try to register to vote, they will identify a fake social security number. But if you have a fake social security number, which they identify, so they know it's fake, but you have a real driver's license, which would be totally legal in Minnesota, they still let you vote. Even though they know your social security doesn't match a real social security number, they still let you vote. And they admit that.
Now, in the story, I didn't see how many people voted. I don't know if it's a big problem or a small one. But what the hell is wrong with Minnesota? They can't control. It's where I think wherever Tim Walz is, there's crime. It's like he's some sort of attractor for major crime. That's what it feels like. Anyway, so they don't have control of their elections. They don't have control of their budget. They don't have control of their governor. What is wrong with you, Minnesota?
Well, according to Patrick Byrne, you know Patrick Byrne, he was the CEO of Overstock.com and he's been in the news a lot talking about Venezuela and our election systems and allegations of problems that involve Venezuela and our elections. But he was doing an interview on Lindell TV and his claim is that the people there are people on the Venezuelan payroll who still are inside the US government and that some of these names and he knows who they are. He just can't tell us for various reasons. He's under oath not to name them for some reason. But that there are people who have a lot of seniority in some cases. So there might even be names that you've heard of that allegedly are literally just on the payroll of Venezuela, but they're part of our government.
Now, that's a hell of a claim, but we'll see. So I don't really have a way to form an independent opinion of whether the Patrick Byrne Venezuelan election stuff is true or not. Because how would I? I mean if you asked me does Patrick Byrne seem credible I would say yes. Yes. You know I've communicated with him a number of times and it seems credible but I don't know that I'm smart enough or wise enough that I could tell the difference between something that seems credible and something that's true. It's very different.
So remember, I always make a big deal about credible. Doesn't mean it's real. It just means you can't tell any reason that it looks fake, except that it's a let's say in this case, the only thing that would be a flag would be it would be a big story. And you expect big stories to spread, but they don't have to. They could stay as small, you know, skeptical stories for a long time until they're not. So I really don't have an opinion about whether this is true, but the claim is that there are people of such seniority secretly on the payroll it will shake this nation. So I guess he thinks we'll find out someday about that. He says, quote, "We have diaries. We have the witnesses. It's all documented." Well, that would be a hell of a thing if we have diaries and documents and people and all that. So we'll see.
Well, in other news, I can barely read my notes. My printer just totally hashed them up. But in other news, back in April of 2024, just nearly a year and a half ago, the prestigious journal Nature did a big study on climate change and how much damage it would cause by the end of the century. And wow, was it bad. Wow. So according to Nature or a study that was in Nature, that climate change is going to get you. It's going to really mess up the whole country, the world. Update. They have retracted their big study and find that it had flaws and they do not stand behind the idea that climate change is a huge existential threat. They're not saying it's not. They're just saying that that study that they had a lot of people had relied on was BS. So they retracted it.
Do you remember, as others have pointed out, that Kamala Harris didn't really make a big deal about climate change, did she? Imagine, imagine you were Kamala Harris. You're running against Trump. Trump has said that climate change, or at least the way people want it funded, etc., was a hoax. If you believed it was not a hoax and you believe the science, wouldn't you hammer on that all the time? Like, wouldn't that be the number one thing you'd say every time you open your mouth? You know, we're all going to die if you elect a Republican, especially Trump, who thinks it's a hoax because it's the most important thing. It's going to kill us all. The water's going to be up to your nose by Tuesday. If she believed that, you don't think that would come out of her mouth every time she talked? It would be by far the most important thing by far. But no.
And have you noticed that the mainstream news don't really talk about it much compared to how much they did? I mean, keep in mind that the current president says it's a hoax. And for years, decades, I guess decades, it's been treated as the biggest problem in the world. And now, is it a problem? I don't know. Is it real? Well, it might be real-ish, but it doesn't mean that the downside is going to be bad.
Now, you remember that Bill Gates recently changed his emphasis and he said, you know, climate change is real, but you know, we'll find ways to remediate it, ways to work around it. Probably will, you know, nobody's going to die. Too many extra people anyway. So little by little, you're going to see the climate change people just walking it back.
Now, is that because the climate models have not predicted? Well, yeah. Yeah. If you looked at all the predictions since I was born, they're pretty bad at predicting. And I guess there's finally some acknowledgment that the news is not really accurate and maybe the science is a little bit hyperbolic and maybe it's not really backed up by that much science.
So if you were on the side of this doesn't look real to me, which is the side I've been on for a long time. Have you noticed that reality is starting to conform around me? Has anybody noticed that? Because for years I've been saying this is obviously not true. And I would give my arguments and now the news is sort of saying, well, yeah, these studies are not that true.
Do you remember when I was sort of alone? Not really alone, but there weren't many of us saying that we just have to do nuclear power. There's really no other way around it. We're going to have to go gung-ho with nuclear power, not only because it's a green technology, but because if we want to conquer space, you're going to need nuclear and other reasons. And now nuclear is just the biggest thing. And everybody agrees that these new generation of nuclear, we're going to have to have lots of them. I'll talk more about that, etc.
So that's conforming around my view of that. Remember I told you that the war in Ukraine would very quickly be a robot war, robots including drones. Well, there it is. We got a robot war. We've got nuclear power
Context —
and we've got climate change that maybe it's not so scary. But is that a coincidence? Is it a coincidence that some of the biggest factors in the world are all starting to conform around my opinion of what they are? I don't know why. Am I good at predicting or am I living in some kind of simulation where my opinion is becoming reality? I don't know. But it's getting hard to ignore, isn't it? How o…
Next segment → →