Back to episode — Episode 3047 ChatWSA 12/19/25
Context —
t know. You want to check out the news? Let's check out the news. So the Epstein files are going to be released today. Do you believe that that will turn up anything new or interesting? You did miss a sponge bath. I think that was at midnight. Success lessons. Oh, good. Your success lessons doing great. Good to hear. All right, I'm going to predict that the Epstein story might be probably underw…
← Previous segment →elming. What do you think? Probably underwhelming. So Thomas Massie has been fighting hard to turn that into a law. So I guess there's a law now to release all the Epstein files. The Epstein Files Transparency Act is now the law. So but something, I don't know. It just doesn't feel like we're going to learn anything. We might be the biggest story in the whole world, but we'll see.
So did anybody watch the video from the Turning Point USA speeches? I don't know what to think about all this. So there are now like what? One, two, three, four, five, six. So there are about six conservative stars who have some kind of Charlie Kirk, Turning Point USA, Candace Owens kind of dust-up. And some of it's about Israel and some of it's about Candace and some of it's about Charlie Kirk and some of it's about the Turning Point USA staff. Yeah.
So the players, I've been kind of ignoring this because I don't know, it's not really world news, but so Ben Shapiro, I guess he's going hard at the people who are not going hard at Candace and Tucker. So are there sides? Is Tucker on the side or is Tucker on his own? So let's see. Candace Owens has some conspiracy theories about who might have been involved in Charlie Kirk's death. And I think it involves everything from Israel to the staff to his wife to Egypt or at least Egyptian planes. None of it really lines up.
But I guess Ben Shapiro's point is that if you're not going to speak out against it, you're not doing enough. So I'm just watching this one. Are any of you taking sides with any of the Turning Point USA stuff, or are you just sort of watching it? I feel like nobody is covering themselves with glory, but I'll be interested if anything comes of it. So all right. Well, let's leave that story. That one's more about the individuals involved, if anything.
Uh oh, Tucker. Isn't that interesting? The story has two Tuckers in it. One is Tucker Carlson and the other is Brigitte Macron. Two Tuckers. No, I'm just kidding. Brigitte Macron is not a Tucker. Oh, and then Nick Fuentes gets thrown in there too. Yeah. Anyway, I feel like taking sides is a really bad strategy and I frankly don't have a side. You know, I think they all have a right to their opinions, no matter how wacky or wrong or inappropriate. I'm not sure I have an obligation to speak out against them. But you know I can say I don't strongly agree with any of them because I have my own opinions. They have their opinions. I have my opinions. So I don't feel a need to agree or disagree or decide who is in a conspiracy theory or not. Turning Point Hunger Games.
Anyway, so enough about that. So yesterday's news, I saw a bunch of conservative people get worked up because Trump signed an executive order to reschedule weed. But people took that, it looked like to me it looked like people misinterpreted it as making weed legal at the federal level, but that did not happen. It was just reschedu
Context —
led from a one to a three, which means they can use it for medical use. And I saw a bunch of people complaining about that. And I thought to myself, how can you complain about medical use? I totally understand why some people would be against weed being legalized for casual use. I mean, there's an argument on both sides of that. You know which side I'm on. But medical, really, it's one of the most…
Next segment → →