led from a one to a three, which means they can use it for medical use. And I saw a bunch of people complaining about that. And I thought to myself, how can you complain about medical use? I totally understand why some people would be against weed being legalized for casual use. I mean, there's an argument on both sides of that. You know which side I'm on. But medical, really, it's one of the most medically useful substances in the world I think. So I am in favor of rescheduling it for medical use at the federal level. That still keeps it illegal federally. So if parents want to use that as their argument for keeping their kids off it, that would be up to them.

So is it true that the Brown University shooter is connected, is the same guy who shot the MIT professor? It appears that they have now proven there's some connection between the two. So that doesn't, that's surprising. I bet against that. I think my instincts have been blunted, but I did not believe when it was first suggested that the MIT professor killing and the Brown University professor killing were related. But we still don't know why, right? I don't think we know why. And I usually don't cover the individual crime stuff. But this one might get more interesting. I don't think it's an Iranian plot. That's what we thought it might be.

All right. Here's the best story of the day. How many of you have for the last several years had to defend Trump when he called the Georgia, was it the secretary of state or the governor? I forget. And he told him he wanted to see if he could find votes. Do you remember that story? So that was the 2020 election in which Trump narrowly lost. So he called Georgia and said, "Hey, you know, you only need to find so many votes and it would reverse the thing." And was he not, my brain isn't working too well, was Trump impeached for that or nearly impeached for asking to find the votes?

Well, guess what? According to the Federalist and others, apparently they could have found the votes because there were 315,000 early votes in the 2020 election that were not certified. They didn't have the proper signatures and they had not certified that the tabulators were zeroed down before they started. So if you haven't certified that they were zeroed down, there's actually no way to know what the actual vote was. So Georgia, Kemp, yes it was Kemp. So according to actual court case the state attorney admits that they can't tell who voted. Is that incredible? So Trump was right. There's no record of the tabulators being set to zero and they don't have the proper signatures in almost all of the sites.

Now if you don't think that's more than a technical problem, apparently, and the Federalist talks about this, I guess in Montana they had the same problem and they did in fact determine that the final vote count was wrong. So this problem of not having the tabulators cleared before you start with a new thing, if you don't clear them, you don't know what the vote was. So I cheekily say I posted on X this morning that they found the votes. They found them. They found the votes. So I don't know if that would have been enough to change the election, but it does tell me that all of these accusations might have been a little bit closer than anybody thought. Lost by 7 million. Well, but not if we're talking about the state. Yeah. So it was Raffensperger, not Kemp. Okay. So Raffensperger was the secretary of state for Georgia.

But of all things. So the January 6ers have been vindicated. Trump always emphasizes signatures. Yep. Trump was right. So you know, do you remember how many times I said that everything in the country is broken except the elections, that the elections are pristine? And I always said it sarcastically that we as citizens had been asked to believe that absolutely everything in our environment was corrupt except this one thing. Well, it turns out now of course the reason I said that is because I knew that everything was corrupt and now we know. Now corrupt might imply also just incompetent. But what we don't know is who won the election. So we do not have a system that can reliably tell us who won. Incredible.

So and there's an update on the SNAP fraud in Minnesota. So apparently the person in charge of making sure that the SNAP money, that's the food stamp money, got to the right people, worked at home and had never had a job like this. So of course it's being called a DEI situation. I don't know if it's a DEI situation, but you have to assume that if things go wrong and it's a DEI environment, somebody's going to say it's DEI. So apparently there was a 174% surge in benefits between 2020 and 2021 and the person in charge falsely claimed that fraud was nearly non-existent by using other fake data. So they tried to justify the fraudulent payments by using fraudulent data and a state audit caught them all. I read this on the Amuse account on X.

So have you seen the pattern yet? That 100% of the time that a Democrat-run government-funded thing is audited, it turns out to be fraudulent or so corrupt that you can't tell what happened. 100% of the time. So what kind of state audit kicks in at this point? Do they only audit when somebody asks them to in a court case or something?

So how many of you remember? This will really test your memory. How many of you remember that I've said that I can't understand how the government deficits could possibly be so big unless there was massive fraud. Well, it turns out that the fraud is in the trillions. There probably is literally a trillion dollars of fraud every year. A trillion. A trillion dollars of fraud every year because that's the only way the numbers made sense to me.

All right. So I'm going to check some DMs that