a different opinion. So personally, I would look at what's good for America in every situation. And if Israel is, if I thought that Israel was, let's say, guiding us in the wrong direction, I would have a dual opinion. One, are they doing a good job of it? Because it's their job to do a good job of it. The Israeli lobby and the pro-Israel people should be doing whatever they can to maximize their preferred outcomes. And if you're American, you would quite reasonably prefer to maximize your American outcomes even if Netanyahu doesn't want that to be the case or even if Ben Shapiro doesn't want that to be the case.

So I find myself able to like everybody in the conversation. Now, am I required to have a negative opinion of Candace Owens if she's promoting some ideas that I don't think would prove out? Not really, because I see her as an entertainer and I can enjoy the entertainment and I could be amused by the, you know, I'm just asking questions because I keep it in context. If you know that she's a podcaster, but you don't know what's in her mind, you can just look at the content. You can compare it to other people who might say, "Oh, that's BS." Some people are getting mad at it. Some people believe it, but they're entitled to their opinions. They're not hurting me.

So I find that I can just sort of observe this weird allegedly people calling each other anti-Semitic. The thing I'm least interested in is who gets labeled anti-Semitic because I think that's like racism. Well, it's exactly like racism in the sense that it's a way to diminish people who don't agree with your preferred priorities. I don't think it usually means well at least not with the if we're talking about the famous podcaster types from I won't even name names, but you know what I'm talking about. If you're talking about the famous podcasters, I just see them for what they are. Some of them are virulently anti-Israel.

I've tried to avoid any conversation about what's his name? Fuentes. Nick Fuentes. His biggest problem is that he's good at what he does, meaning that he's interesting on camera, but I don't have to agree with anything he says. And I think it's useful to see all sides of this. So when he gives his opinion, I go, "Oh, you've got some opinions that are way too far for me, but those are his opinions." I don't believe he's harmful, but if I were less pro-America and more pro-Israel, I would want him to be quieter. So I understand why people have a problem with him and I understand why he wouldn't be platformed everywhere. But it's not really my problem, is it? It feels like that's just between him and Israel.

By the way, I heard Nick Fuentes explain why he's a virgin and can't find a girlfriend and that there's no practical way he could ever have a girlfriend. It was actually really hit home a little bit. He was saying, "What if he got a girlfriend and things worked out?" But then eventually she realized that if she left him and turned on him, she could get a lot of money from his enemies. So there's no real way he could just go on a dating app and meet a girl and have a normal relationship and hope it works out. It basically, you know, nearly 100 percent of the time it would likely turn into a disaster. It would be financially disastrous and relationship disastrous and that even if it seemed like a good idea at the time, it would be guaranteed to turn bad. And I thought to myself, man, he's so right that in his particular situation, because he's so prominent and apparently he's rich, he says, that there's no way a standard relationship would work out in his life. And it was kind of sad, but I have to tell you, I can relate to the fact that if you're rich, you have to worry about relationships that don't last forever. And in our current world, relationships don't last forever. So that he would his odds of finding somebody he could trust forever are just not really good. It's just a bad cost-benefit situation.

Now, there might be things he's not telling us that would have an impact on that, but I do agree with the general concept that it would be completely impractical for him to get married or even have a serious girlfriend. Yeah. If you're not rich and you're not also a provocative kind of character, then I can see how marriage would work. But if you're controversial, especially the things he says he's controversial times 10, the odds that he would eventually get sold out by an angry divorce are pretty high. We all need a relationship manager. He calls himself a revolutionary.

Anyway, so my take on the whole conservative social civil war is that it just seems unnecessary. No prenup doesn't help you at all. So the prenup would not help him. Well, I can give you more details on that, of course, but if you think a prenup protects you, it does not. Now, I've not personally had any trouble in that regard. But if you start looking into what a prenup can and cannot do, it would not protect them in the way that you think it would because somebody could still throw them under a bus. And the courts would not accept a prenup that is too one-sided. So if for example somebody signed a prenup and then was in a relationship for several years and then you said, "Aha, I'm going to divorce you and give you nothing because that's what you signed in the prenup," the judge would just throw that out and say, "No, it has to be fair." And is it fair that you could be together for five years and that the spouse would get nothing or even a low amount? And the answer is the courts would not allow you to give a low amount even if he had a prenup. The non-disclosure forms. Yeah, but you couldn't trust that. Anybody can talk to a reporter and you wouldn't be able to claw back even if they talked about you. Too many assets to get married. Yeah. So the system kind of guarantees that marriage is a bad idea for some people. I think if you came into it with essentially identical financial power that it would work. So there definitely are situations where it would work, but not for famous people.

Never worked for you. Oh, is Jason on here now? I see somebody. Come in. Come in. Yes. Come on in. Hello. Hi. I'm live streaming right now, but that's okay. Okay. Are you ready for breakfast? Yes, please. Okay. And your last name? Adams. Saturday and birthday June 8th '57. All right, I'm back.

Thank you. So my food will be here somewhat soon. So when my food gets here, I'll have to say bye, and that's going to happen soon.

But the diversity lottery is going to be suspended. Ukraine's Baba Yaga drones are Russia's latest nightmare. There's a Turkish tank-killing drone. Okay. The deadly LA Palisades inferno took hold in area fighters were restricted by woke laws protecting endangered plant species. Of