Episode 3048 CWSA 12/20/25

Good morning.

Well, let's see what happens this morning.

I'm using my phone to stream because all of my charging devices died at the same time.

So, I've got a little bit of power on my phone and I'm using the Rumble Studio on the phone, which looks to me like it has stretched my image.

Is that what's happening?

And also, I can't see your comments for some reason.

Why would I not be able to see your comments?

How about this?

How about this?

Oh, there we go.

Comments are working.

I can't see myself, but uh is my image stretched?

No sound, huh?

Does anybody else have a sound?

I only see one person saying no sound.

Hello.

I need an answer on do I have sound?

Sound is good.

All right.

There are a couple of noisy devices running that I can't get turned off because my current nurse doesn't understand anything I say.

So, I'm having this misery kind of situation where for another half hour, the nurse on duty is a man who hears the opposite of everything I say.

I don't know why, but if I say, "Could you bring me an apple?" he will say, "Well, I would never ask for an apple." But if I did, he would say, "Uh, okay, I won't bring you an apple." And then I would say, "No, no, please bring me an apple." And then he would say, "Oh, oh, okay.

No apple.

No, no, listen to me.

Anyway, so that's how my last eight hours has been.

I can't quite get him to understand what I'm saying.

No, he speaks perfect English.

It's not a language problem.

His English is perfect.

He just hears the opposite of whatever I say.

I don't know why.

So, all three of my devices stopped charging at the same time.

So, my laptop will not charge.

Uh, and I've got two two bricks, two batteries, and both of them, for whatever reason, just don't charge.

So, I've got a little bit of juice left in my phone.

So, I thought I'd do a short one this morning.

He's a man.

Well, if somebody else comes in, I'll ask him to turn off my devices, but that is apparently not an option in my current situation.

So, I don't know if Owen Gregorian is going to do a spaces after uh afterwards or at some point today, but I think so.

So, after the show, go to Owen Gregorian's um Oops.

You go to his uh feed on X and by then he will either have the uh the indicator up or not.

But I think he will do a spaces and then you can have some more fun this morning.

In theory, I'll be going home today, but I don't know.

All right, you got a little company.

>> Hello.

>> Good morning.

>> Good morning.

>> I'm live streaming.

>> I just want to MTV.

>> Yeah.

Yeah.

Go ahead.

I'll just be talking.

>> Okay.

>> Okay.

My uh my catheter is being emptied, but you don't have to see that cuz that's in the other direction.

You know, I had I had some coughing last night.

I think I had an allergy, but it's all good this morning.

So, I'm good to go.

I believe I'm good to go.

All right.

Want to check in on some stories?

Well, it turns out that uh yesterday I met the first person at the hospital who has ever heard of Dil.

Strangely enough, trip the button.

Well, I try I tried all the outlets.

Well, somebody tried them for me.

All the outlets and all of the charge devices and all the charging cables.

And they all appear to be they all appear to be dead at the same time.

So, my laptop brick is door now.

Don't know why.

Hey, we had a couple of of earthquakes last night.

>> >> Robin, where's your rider or died?

All receptacles are dedicated.

Well, they weren't for the last 5 days.

So, all the devices worked perfectly.

They all charged until yesterday.

And today, none of none of the receptacles.

They all work because they're all uh they're all powering one thing or another.

Are you really asking me my opinion of my work versus Garfield?

All you need is a catheter cup or another ste.

Yeah, might have been a power surge that fried everything possibly.

Wow.

2004 delivery.

All right.

Anybody want to do the simultaneous step?

No, no.

All the power's on.

The the outlets actually have lights on them.

The earthquake happened after the problem with the power.

I don't know.

So, by coincidence, I have a good friend who is in the same hospital waiting for his wife to give birth.

So, he might bring me bring me a charging brick after the show.

um because it's a long day if you don't have a phone and you're sitting in a hospital bed.

But if you do, perfectly entertained.

All right.

Uh let's see if I can find the simultaneous because I certainly do not remember it.

Oh, here we go.

Everybody, you ready?

Waste your cup.

All you need is a cup or a mug or a glass to take your cherine, a canteen, sugar flask, a vessel of any kind, and fill it with your favorite liquid.

I like coffee, but I only have water.

Uh, and join me now for the unparalleled pleasure, the dopamine of the day, the thing that makes thing that makes everything better.

It's called the simultaneous step.

Gross.

I have to admit I love ice water.

I didn't always, but at the moment I do.

All right, let's check in on the stories of the day.

There's a story about a company that makes an exoskeleton for people like me.

might have to check that out.

So, apparently we made a the United States made some major attack on Syria.

Oh, that feels good.

We're striking very strongly against ISIS struggles in Syria.

Okay.

Well, so I guess we're at war with something ISIS.

50 strikes on ISIS targets in Syria.

This in the postm millennial.

Uh let's see.

So I was going to do a show today.

Oh my goodness me.

I I was thinking today of all the I guess conspiracy theories that are now considered just a fact.

And I thought I'd catch you up on which ones I think are just a fact.

I would say as of this week, good morning, Owen.

Uh, I would say that as of this week, there's no question that the 2020 election was rigged.

Would you agree?

Is there any question in your mind that the election was rigged?

Probably not right for this this crowd.

Now what's interesting is that forever more uh half of the country will believe that that's not the case.

Would you?

So half of the country is going to think there's no evidence that the election was rigged or that there was just some technical problem that doesn't matter.

and the other half which I am now solidly in would call that a fact.

I I would say all doubt has been removed because of the uh the Georgia discovery that there were so many uh so many votes that should not have been counted.

Likewise, I would say it's a fact that the Obama people and uh Rob Reiner and the heads of the CIA did in fact run a plot to overthrow the country.

I would say that's no longer any doubt.

There's no way to spin it.

There is 100% chance that we live through an actual coup.

How many of you would agree?

So I I move those things into the absolutely definitely fact.

No doubt about it.

Uh how about the I don't I don't want to talk about this, but I just has to.

Would you agree that the COVID shot was probably the biggest crime against citizens that we've ever seen?

and that the people who were behind it had to know long before we knew that it wasn't just risky it was a bad idea.

So, I'm moving that from well, you know, maybe they didn't know or you maybe maybe they got caught up in it or I would say they definitely knew.

Not everyone, not I'm not talking about regular doctors, but um the the only thing that I thought was still in dispute was whether it uh reduced the illness for people over 65 or had some bad bad problem.

But even they um it at least should have been informed.

So there was definitely no uh no accurate information.

So I'm moving the pandemic thing from maybe it was a bunch of people who up to yeah it was a crime and people should be executed for it because it's hard to imagine a bigger crime.

>> >> So, let's move that to the fact.

No doubt about it.

I'm not going to I'm not going to have a complaint if somebody says that was fact.

Well, we do know for sure that it did not stop transmission.

Um, I think there are still some open questions because if you didn't believe the data that it worked, why would you believe the data that it didn't work?

Because they're both noncredible data sets in my opinion.

I heard a Joe Rogan I heard somebody say, oh, I guess it was Brett Weinstein.

Weinstein or Stein.

God, I never get that right.

But he was talking about how there was a natural experiment with Ivormectin.

So some people took it and some people didn't and they were in separate places.

And you can see that the people who took it had a high survival rate and the people who didn't take it had a low survival rate even if they did the other stuff.

Um, now the way that was explained is that the odds of that of those two different outcomes being so stark is like a a gazillion trillion to one.

Um, yeah, how cheap Ardan was for a reason.

Uh so it had to be true that the arrogant worked because that natural experiment was you know so definitive.

However, I'm going to add this little bit of skepticism.

It goes like this.

It's not just that that was a non-controlled experiment because it's because there was a natural experiment.

another controlled, you know, um, placebo type of experiment.

If it were true that that the events happened as reported, then I would agree that the odds are a trillion trillion to one that it was an accident and that that would be quite definitive that Ivormectin was a good solution.

However, when it's not a controlled experiment, uh even if it is, because a lot of controlled experiments turn out to be fraudulent, uh it's possible that it was simply reported wrong.

Meaning that the people who said, "Uhoh, in my hospital, we got this result could be lying." They they could have made up the whole thing.

uh or if it were only known because the press looked into it, somebody could be lying.

So, you can't rule out the fact that if it were a natural experiment and you got all the data correct, that would be very definitive.

But if it was a natural experiment and that's the very reason that you can't know for sure if somebody made up the data or lied to you or just came up with a story, you can never really know.

And that actually is the reason that a lot of the scientific studies are debunked eventually is because if the data were true, it would tell you something, but you can't be sure it's true.

So, I would say the Ivormectin story highly likely that it made a difference in a positive way.

Um, but not not 100%.

Can't really get to 100% on that one in my opinion because I don't trust whoever told whoever says it happened.

Yeah.

But if I were Joe Rogan, I'd sure be mad at the way they treated me.

Are the fine Yep.

Never saw a horse with CO.

All right.

How about um UAPs and UFOs?

I do not believe that there are any aliens.

I wouldn't rule it out.

I mean maybe but I would say at this point we cannot convincingly say there are aliens.

Yeah, I have a good track record but not obviously didn't did not have a pandemic track record until recently.

Anyway, so that's what I think at the moment.

Let's see what other stories, but it's so weird that it's now just a fact that the election was stolen and that there was a coup attempt and the coup plotters um are free and they will never be punished.

So, did you see my predictions yesterday about the the Epstein files?

So, even as we had hours to go for the release of the files, I was posting on X uh skeptically, skeptically saying, "You're not going to see the files." And what happened?

Sure enough, we got some files.

And if you get some files and not all the files, it makes it worse, not better.

Would you agree with that take?

Would you agree that getting some of the some of the Epstein files but heavily redacted um that it made it worse?

it it almost confirms that there's something that that we should know that we don't know.

So I would say uh I don't know who is the guilty party but obviously the uh the Thomas Massie and Roana bill uh had a big loophole in it which allowed somebody we don't trust to block out stuff to redact stuff.

Yeah.

But would you agree that the bill ultimately made things worse because if it allowed any redactions, you will never trust the redactions.

True.

You will never trust the redactions because you don't know who made them.

And even if they told you why, you wouldn't believe them, would you?

So, so Massie and Kana trying to do the right thing, genuinely trying to do the right thing.

And also both of them, I would say, very capable and very bipartisan, but they made it worse.

They they did not mean to do that, but they made it worse.

Now, here's the most surprising thing, and don't get mad at me, all right?

If you're gonna if you're gonna get mad at somebody, get mad at Allan Dersitz.

So, I saw his reaction to the partial uh partial release and as usual, Dowitz had the most interesting argument that I'd never heard.

So, he argued that there should be no redactions, including the victims.

And his argument was that if you showed the people who were accused, but you didn't give the names of the people who were accusing them, um, that was not a fair situation.

And I thought to myself, wait a minute, he's right.

The argument is right.

It doesn't mean I agree with him.

doesn't mean I agree with him, but his argument is solid that it would be a crime to show the people accused but keep hidden the people who accused them.

Would you agree?

Imagine if Trump had been accused by Eugene Carol of some sex crime and she was allowed to be anonymous forever, but he was not allowed to be anonymous.

Would that be fair?

No.

In our system, you get to know who is accusing you.

And ultimately, if it goes to a trial or something, uh, you would know who the accuser is.

Then somebody got mad at me online because they said, "You you animal, are you saying that you should um throw the the victims under the bus a second time?" To which I say, "What is the alternative?" Keep in mind that everyone who is a underage victim is now in their probably 30s.

So none of none of them would be children.

There'd be no children involved even if they were children when the crime happened.

So forget about children.

This would be adults being outed or not.

Now some of them might not care, some of them might.

But apparently Massie knows the names of 20 or so uh accused famous people.

I think as soon as he said we'll we'll we'll uh out everybody accused but we won't out the people who accuse them we can redact that.

There was no chance any of this would work out.

So I believe unfortunately as smart as Thomas Massie is uh he created a system with Roana that guarantees that we will never see the uh the stuff that you think is important.

So unfortunately yesterday I predicted that the the bad people would resist even at the risk of going to jail even at the risk of jail that we would not see the full um stuff because it's just too easy to redact it.

But uh I saw somebody ask online, why doesn't Thomas Massie be released?

If he knows the names, why doesn't he tell us?

Apparently, there are a number of people who know the names.

However, you also don't know if there's some other reason they're not telling you stuff.

Cuz imagine if what would happen if the CIA uh came in and said, "All right, this is not protecting the guilty, but there's a whole bunch of stuff that you cannot know because it would be a a national a national security problem." Let's say, and I don't believe this is true, but let's say uh Epstein was at least partially a CIA asset and he had done some things that we don't want our adversaries to know or even the domestic uh audience to know.

Yeah.

So, Bonino knows the names, correct?

Do you think that the Bonino quitting has anything to do with the nonrelease of the Epstein files?

What do you think?

Uh, it could be a coincidence um because it's the end of the year so people make big changes at the end of years.

So, I know that Bino wanted to quit, but we don't know why.

So, at the moment, I would say that's a maybe.

Maybe had something to do with Epstein.

And maybe, but it could be that he just hated the job, couldn't couldn't hack it anymore.

Seems likely.

Too on the nose.

Yeah, it was too on the nose to to say that that's why he quit.

I think family and end of the year probably.

Bunch you quit in the summer.

Well, I don't think he made it official in the summer, but I think he decided in the summer.

That would be pretty tough on your marriage if you're just never home.

All right.

Uh, yes, Stefanic.

Elise Stefanic is dropping out of politics and not running for governor.

You saw what Elon saw.

All right.

What other stories are there?

Let's see.

There's new interceptor aircraft that can kill drones.

Cool.

While you do that, what's going to happen?

The world's first humanoid robotled EV battery production begins in China.

So, the Exobi, if I'm saying right, it's a humanoid robot.

Delivers over 99% connection success, matches skilled worker cycle times, and detects wiring faults in real time.

So, I guess I guess China is actually implementing some robots.

We also know, I'll add this into the uh definite fact.

Um, some of you remember that I was speculating the only way our deficits could be so bad is if somebody was stealing trillions of dollars and somehow we were not stopping it.

I now believe that's a fact that the reason for our deficit, not 100% of the reason, but a large part of our total deficit is absolutely just crime.

Would you agree that that's essentially a fact now?

Like look, you don't have to speculate if our tax money is being stolen.

It is being stolen at probably something in the half a trillion to a trillion dollar a year range.

Would you buy that?

Would you buy that estimate that every year probably for several years at least when the deficits exploded that probably half a trillion to a trillion is just pure fraud.

And that is probably in most of the states.

Um I'm pretty sure California has even more fraud than Minnesota, but there's no way it's just happening in Minnesota.

You know, there might be a few states like Florida where it's not that bad.

Um we can also say with confidence um that the NOS's which are being dismantled at least a little bit um are primarily for the purpose of democrat fraud primarily.

So those are essentially just criminal organizations disguised as legitimate charities.

So, I would say we can move that to the fact pile.

Hey, happy birthday.

Happy birthday to you.

Happy birthday to you.

Yeah, anything run by family members is some form of fraud, even if it's not technically illegal.

All right, everybody say happy birthday to Owen.

Yeah, the California bullet train.

My god.

Wow.

Japan is triing a This is This is also an Owens X.

Japan trials 100 kilowatt laser weapon that can cut through metal and drones midflight.

Oh, that's so cool.

Do you remember the the shadow ships from Babylon 5?

And they had these cool laser weapons that was a sci-fi show many years ago.

And the laser weapons would make this cool sound like and slice through the other spaceships.

Well, we're almost there with our laser defensive weapons.

All right.

So, so what do you think about the way Trump apparently used the threat of tariffs to get all the big pharma companies to drastically lower their prices so we had most favorable nation prices?

Did you see that?

Do you think any other president could have threatened?

The others didn't even have the tool.

Trump created the tool, the tariffs, and then threatened a big pharma unless they brought $150 billion dollars of manufacturing back to this country and lowered their prices as much as, you know, 80 or 90% that otherwise they would get tariffed.

So, they didn't have any choice.

And now he's going to call in the insurance companies and tell them they need to make less money.

How would you do that except by threatening them?

Maybe with also I don't Can you tariff an insurance company?

I don't know what it is you tariff.

You probably can't, but there's some way you can threaten them.

So, it looks like Trump is literally just going to bully and threaten the big farm at the lower the prices.

So, you can't tell me any other president could have pulled that off.

Now, we'll see.

We'll see if it's real or, you know, the pharma companies just find some other way to steal our money, but uh we'll see.

Yeah, you replace their whole industry if they don't play ball.

I I think Trump is serious about lowering those costs, and I would guess he's going to pull it off.

So, if he pulls it off, he would be successful in eggs, gasoline prices, except for California, but that's our fault.

um and pharma.

That would be pretty big.

But he still would not be successful in groceries.

Oh, he would also be successful in rent because by doing mass deportations, he has decreased the uh the uh demand for uh rental places.

So, I don't think people are feeling it yet.

Um, by the way, if you haven't seen the All-In Pod, the most recent All-In Pod, you have to watch it because it's just a brilliant uh explanation of what's happening with AI and uh a good point counterpoint about what's happening with costs.

So Jason from the All- In Pod was arguing that the average uh the average consumer, average voter is now seeing lower prices, and that would be true.

um they see low lower prices maybe in gas, but as long as their other their other costs are up, mostly groceries, I think groceries being the biggest problem, it's going to feel to them like nothing's happened.

And it will feel to them that Trump did not do enough because groceries are up.

Um, and I would agree with that that they would feel like they had not gotten enough from Trump and what they feel will determine how they act in the midterms.

Now the other fascinating thing David Saxs was explaining that there are a lot of beliefs about AI that the public has completely wrong and that they're basically hoaxes.

So some of the some of the AI hoaxes and it might be premature to know that these are that these are not true but one of them is that AI will definitely lower employment and Sax was pointing out that the current evidence is that it doesn't there's no evidence that AI has lowered uh employment but he also to his you know to his credit he also points out that it might be too early to know for sure that that's a permanent situation.

I would argue that the reason AI has not taken jobs yet is that AI doesn't work.

So, it's not about whether AI will take jobs, it's about whether it works and it just doesn't work.

And so a few companies are getting massively wealthy, mostly Nvidia really, primarily one one company.

And uh they're just moving capital around.

You know, the big companies are just finding reasons to pay each other big amounts of money.

uh but that eventually if AI actually starts working it might have some impact on uh the number of workers but here's the argument that it would never do that the argument that it would not do that is that AI makes workers more productive and if if you could make workers more productive then the employers would want more workers because every worker they got would be paired with AI and would be able to add more to the bottom line than a worker by himself or the AI by itself, which is a very solid argument, I think, but we don't know if that's the way it'll turn out.

Um the the other thing is that people can't connect the potential benefits of AI to how their life will be better, but they can tell that it looks like AI might uh use up their water with data centers, which is a hoax.

So apparently the data centers do not use up the local water supply.

That's just something people believe.

Also, what is this in all caps?

I can't read it.

Um, also if Trump demands that the big data centers and the AI um the AI centers, if he demands that they build their own power plants, you might end up with a lot of clean energy that you didn't have before and it wouldn't affect the uh locals because uh the the data center would have its own power plant.

I think that's what we've already heard some announcements about that, right?

Was it Google who is building combination com?

Maybe it was Amazon, but they'll they'll all have to do it.

So, if you're in the AI business, you will have to be in the nuclear power business, and that's the only way that uh that any of it will work.

Really?

You generated content that would have taken you a week manually?

Huh?

Well, there you go.

If uh if hiring you once made sense, but you were 10 times more productive with AI, why wouldn't why wouldn't they want two of you?

because the AI didn't do the work on its own, right?

I I'm trying to think in the real world, you know, if I put myself back in the cubicle, even if AI could do all the things that humans can't do fast enough or good enough, you still need a human to tell it to do it.

You still need a human to say whether it's been done and you still need a human to report to their boss and say I could or could not do this and you know so I feel like there's no legitimate way where an AI can just do what the boss wants.

the boss will have to explain it to a human, threaten them with firing and and tell them to use AI as a tool, but that ultimately the human will be responsible.

So I um and so I commented about the all-in pod first.

It was a great episode.

One of the best one of the best uh podcasts I've ever seen actually.

It was just so so interesting.

Those guys are so good at explaining complicated things.

Um, my voice is stronger maybe.

Yeah.

So, I wouldn't trust a AI to do almost anything.

Um I I saw a lawyer some lawyer said that he spent a week preparing a you know legal argument or something and then he tried to duplicate it with AI and AI did as good or better but did it in like a minute.

But you still need the lawyer because the AI isn't a lawyer, right?

You know, you're not going to have a court case where the lawyer says, "I will send a robot to uh do the closing closing argument." Yeah.

No cough this morning.

I had a I had a pretty bad allergic reaction.

I think it was last night.

Give me a give me about 6 hours of coffee, but when it stopped, it just stopped.

Yep.

AI information delusion.

I don't know what that is.

You have to know how to prompt the AI.

Exactly.

If if the skill of using AI still resides in the person who's giving it the prompts, how are you going to replace the human?

Anyway, we'll see what else is happening.

Come in.

>> Come in.

>> Hi.

I'm on a live stream right now, but that's okay.

Yeah, >> I'm gonna put my name on the board.

>> Okay.

>> Is going home, so I'll be your nurse today.

>> Okay, great.

Just pay no attention to me.

I'll just be >> anything for you.

>> Well, breakfast is coming pretty soon.

>> I put the right there.

>> Eric Yeah.

>> Ju just so you know, I'm live streaming, but don't you don't have to be careful.

Yeah.

You don't No, you don't have to be quiet.

They they know I'm in a hospital.

>> So, just do what you need to do.

They will they will patiently wait.

>> It's a shift change.

All right.

>> In spirit, you're a teenager.

I am.

>> Would you like coffee?

Would you write?

>> Yes, please.

Good.

All right.

Thank you.

You know, I think my I think my problem is that there's something I'm eating in the hospital that I'm allergic to.

All right, what else we got here?

China builds the most advanced chipmaking machine and cracks the EUV barrier.

Only one company in the world currently has functioning EUV machines, which I assume is Taiwan, and I assume it's the only way to make these advanced chips.

Let me see.

So this would be a very big deal if China could make the AI chips.

But I think I think the uh equally likely possibility is that all the big uh the big nations will figure out how to make AI chips.

They just haven't done it yet.

A new laser could beam power midair to US aircrafts at 5,000 ft for infinite range.

Oh, wow.

Did Did you see um Elon Musk's estimate that uh SpaceX could become the first hundred trillion dollar value company?

Hundred trillion dollar company.

SpaceX.

I feel like that is very possible.

Oh, so you probably saw the news that Elon's $56 billion pay package got approved.

So the force reversed they reversed the reversal of it.

So, if you didn't know that story, um I guess Tesla had a uh a pay package deal with with uh Elon from years ago.

They said if he reached certain targets, um he would get as much as 56 billion is what it was worth by the time they executed.

But time has passed.

So that $56 billion stock rant would now be worth closer to $140 billion.

So So while you were working yesterday, Elon made $140 billion in one day.

Well, actually it was the it was the sum total of all his work, but uh I do own some Tesla stock.

I'm pretty happy about it at the moment.

Uh I also bought a Tesla yesterday, but for a family member who was very happy about.

So let's I guess we should talk about this.

Um, how many of you are interested in the story of the quote civil war on the conservative side between Candace Owens and Tucker Carlson and Benpiro and Erica Kirk and Tim P's waiting into it a little bit.

Uh, Megan Kelly, she's into it a little bit.

How many of you find that interesting?

Because it's weirdly not interesting to me.

I think I have the only the only useful opinion on Israel and all that stuff, which I'll reiterate in case you haven't heard it.

If you say you're for or against Israel, you're you're in trouble.

Would you agree?

Doesn't matter if you're conservative or pro Trump or non-Trump.

If you were to come out publicly as a podcaster or a pundit and say that you were against Israel, even even against some things they're doing or even against Apac, if you're against anything, you're going to come up to this brick wall that will be bad for you and your career.

But likewise, if you say you're pro- Israel, you will be accused of not being America first.

So you can't be for Israel and you can't be against them without, you know, dividing everything and ruining your career, making enemies.

So, a while back, um, I I landed on the only defensible position in my opinion, and it goes like this.

I'm American, so I care about America first.

I have complete respect for Israel being Israel first.

Why wouldn't I?

I think every country gets to try to maximize their national benefit.

So if there are people who care more about Israel and they want to maximize Israel's benefit, that's just their it's their privilege.

Most of it is kind of public and transparent.

So if you wanted to dislike, you know, the people in Apac Americans, you can find out who they are and you could dislike them.

If you wanted to not vote for uh somebody who took Apac money, you could not vote for them.

So, I don't need to invest my reputation or my anything, my money or anything in Israel because Israel is its own country and they are pursuing what's best for Israel.

Of course.

Of course they are.

Now, do I need to dislike Ben Shapiro if I think he's too pro-Israel?

I don't need to.

I can simply observe that he has a set of preferences.

He's very public about it.

And if you know, if somebody wants to agree with him, that would just be a different opinion.

So personally, I would look at what's good for America in every situation.

And if Israel is if I thought that Israel was, let's say, guiding us in the wrong direction, I would have a dual opinion.

One, are they doing a good job of it?

Because it's their job to do a good job of it.

the Israeli lobby and the pro-Israel people um should be doing whatever they can to maximize their you know their preferred outcomes.

And if you're American, you you would quite reasonably prefer to maximize your American outcomes even if Netanyahu doesn't want want that to be the case or even if Ben Shapiro doesn't want to be the case.

So I find myself able to like everybody in the conversation.

Now, am am I required to have a negative opinion of Candace Owens if she's promoting some ideas that I don't think would prove out?

Not really, because I see her as an entertainer and I can enjoy the entertainment and I could be, you know, amused by the, you know, I'm just asking questions because I keep it in context.

If you know that she's a podcaster, but you don't know what's in her mind, you can just look at the content.

You can compare it to other people who might say, "Oh, that's BS.

Some people are getting mad at it.

Some people believe it, but they're entitled to their opinions.

They're not hurting me.

So I find that I can just sort of observe this weird allegedly uh you know people calling each other anti-semitic.

The the thing I'm least interested in is who gets labeled anti-semitic because I think that's like racism.

Well, it's exactly like racism in the sense that it's it's a way to diminish people who don't agree with your preferred priorities.

Uh I don't think it usually means well at least not with the if we're talking about the famous podcaster types from uh I I won't even name names, but you know what I'm talking about.

If you're talking about the famous uh podcasters, I just see them for what they are.

Some of them are, you know, virulent virulently uh anti-Israel.

Um I've tried to avoid any conversation about what's his name?

Uh Fuentes.

Nick Fuentes.

His biggest problem is that he's good at what he does, meaning that he's interesting on camera, but I don't have to agree with anything he says.

And I think it's useful to, you know, see all sides of this.

So when he gives his opinion, I go, "Oh, you've got some opinions that are way too far for me, but those are his opinions.

I don't believe he's harmful, but if I were if I were uh less pro-America and more pro Israel, I would want him to be quieter.

So, I understand why people have a problem with him and I understand why he wouldn't be platformed everywhere.

But it's not really my problem, is it?

It feels like that's just between him and Israel.

By the way, I heard uh I heard Nick Fuentes explain why he's a virgin and can't find a girlfriend and that there's no there's no practical way he could ever have a girlfriend.

It was actually really uh hit home a little bit.

He was saying, "What if he what if he got a girlfriend and things worked out?" But then eventually she realized that if she left him and uh turned on him, she could get a lot of money from his enemies.

So there's no real way he could just go on a dating app and meet a girl and have a normal relationship and hope it works out.

it basically, you know, nearly 100% of the time it would likely turn into a disaster.

It would be financially disastrous and relationship disastrous and that even if it seemed like a good idea at the time, it would guaranteed to be to turn bad.

And I thought to myself, man, he's so right that in his particular situation, because he's he's he's so prominent and apparently he's rich, he says, um, that there's no way a relation a standard relationship would work out in his life.

And it was kind of sad, but I have to tell you, um, I can relate to the fact that if you're rich, you have to worry about relationships that don't last forever.

And in our current world, relationships don't last forever.

So that he would uh his odds of finding somebody he could trust forever are just not really good.

It's just it's just a bad costbenefit uh situation.

Now, there might be things he's not telling us that would have an impact on that, but I do agree with the general general concept that it would be completely impractical for him to get married or even have a serious girlfriend.

Yeah.

If you're not rich and you're not if you're not um also a provocative kind of character, then I can see how marriage would work.

But if you're if you're what's the word, not provocative.

Um yeah, went straight to prostitutes.

Yeah, I don't don't think he did.

Yeah.

But anyway, so I don't have to have an opinion about all of those people.

Inflammatory.

That's close to what I'm looking for.

No, not provocative.

Not inflammatory.

There's another word controversial.

Let's say controversial.

That's good.

Yeah.

If you're controversial, uh especially the things he says he's controversial times 10, the odds that he would eventually get sold out by a an angry divorce a pretty high disgrace.

We all need a relationship manager.

He calls himself a revolutionary.

Anyway, so my take on the wow 40,000 people live.

My take on the whole conservative uh social what do you call it the civil war is that it just seems unnecessary.

No prenup doesn't help you at all.

So the prenup would not help him.

Well, I can give you more details on that, of course, but if you think a prenup protects you, it does not.

Now, I've I've not personally had any trouble in that regard.

But if you start looking into what a prenup can and cannot do, it would not protect them in the way that you think it would because somebody could still throw them under a bus.

And the courts would not the courts do not accept a prenup that is too one-sided.

So if for example somebody signed a prenup and then was in a relationship for several years and then you said, "Aha, I'm going to divorce you and give you nothing cuz that's what you signed in the prenup." the judge would just throw that out and say, "No, it has to be fair." And is it fair that you could be together for five years um and that the that the spouse would get nothing or even a low amount?

And the answer is the course would not allow you to give a low amount even if he had a prenup.

the non-disclosure forms.

Yeah, but you couldn't trust that.

Anybody can talk to a reporter and you wouldn't be able to.

You wouldn't be able to claw back even if they talked about you too many assets to get married.

Yeah.

So, the system kind of guarantees that uh marriage is a bad idea.

for some people.

I I think if you came into it with essentially identical, you know, financial uh power that it would work.

So there definitely situations where it would work, but not for famous people.

Never worked for you.

Oh, is Jason on here now?

I see somebody.

Come in.

>> Come in.

>> Yes.

Come on in.

>> Hello.

>> Hi.

I'm live streaming right now, but that's okay.

>> Okay.

Are you ready for breakfast?

>> Yes, please.

>> Okay.

And your last name?

>> Adams.

Saturday and birthday >> um June 8th 57.

>> All right, I'm back.

>> Thank you.

So, my food will be here somewhat um somewhat soon.

So, when my uh food gets here, I'll I'll have to say bye, and that's going to happen soon.

But the diversity lottery is going to be suspended.

Ukraine's Baba Yaga drones are Russia's latest nightmare.

There's a Turkish tank killing drone.

Okay.

The deadly LA paliciz palisades inferno took hold in area fighter fighters were restricted by woke laws protecting endangered plant species.

Of course, there had to be some kind of woke problem in California that made the fires worse.

Ukraine is making a thousand interceptor drones a day.

to fight Russia's shahid waves.

Damn, thousand drones a day.

Oh, the Biden FBI and DOJ wave campaign finance probe of Senator Kirsten Cinema after she left the Democratic party.

I guess that didn't happen.

Wow, there's an an invisibility cloak for no ridge.

I want an invisibility cloak.

Oh, wow.

The new cloaking concept shield sensor technic shields.

Wait a minute.

a magnetic cloak.

I don't know if I believe that.

Could a common spice help cure chronic back pain?

All right, we have to find out what those spices.

Uh, all right.

What are those spices?

Two drugs.

Turmeric.

Turmeric might cure your back pain.

And old van.

Never heard of them.

All right.

I'll be shutting down the uh feed as soon as my breakfast shows up, which will be any minute now.

Testosterone alters how men respond to unfairness against women.

Well, you could just ask me that one.

All right.

US firm gets funds for the first mass producible nuclear reactors.

Well um so Radiant remains on track for next year's startup of its first nuclear reactor, the Colidus Demonstration Unit.

So, it's a company named Radiant has raised over 300 million for new funding and they can apparently build a micronuclear reactor.

Isn't it weird that when AI became a big thing and suddenly we needed all this power, but that's exactly the time that the nuclear >> the nuclear industry suddenly learned how to make portable little micro.

Well, maybe they always did.

It's kind of weird that the power plants became practical and economical at the same time as AI.

It might be because there's just so much more money to be made with AI that suddenly, you know, you have the best of everything working in your favor.

Let's see what else.

US firm produces enriched uranium or uranium for nuclear reactors.

So there's all these breakthroughs in nuclear power that are happening at the same time.

Uh what there's a vapor breakthrough.

Okay.

I don't know why we need a vapor breakthrough.

Oh, look.

It's me.

Uh, so did you hear about the North Korean hacker who had a job in some big American company and the only way they caught him is that there was this tiny tiny uh lag in the time from the keystroke to something happening.

So they can finally figure out they they knew that he was in North Korea and not just remote worker.

It turns out that some Korean North Korean a North Korean had figured out how to fool an American company and get a job and work it for some time.

All right, here's the food.

All right, everybody.

You can you can put it right here.

>> Okay.

And your nurse is bringing your black coffee for you.

>> Thank you.

>> All right.

Thanks.

All right, everybody.

Got to eat.

Yeah, the unsynchronized sip is coming up now.

All right.

I've got a little bit of juice in my phone.

I think I'll keep it there.

All right.

Bye.

>> Coffee.

Thank you.

You put it right there.

>> Thank you.

>> Let me just I'm just ending the live stream here.

Good morning.

Well, let's see what happens this

morning.

I'm using my phone to stream because all

of my charging devices died at the same

time. So, I've got a little bit of power

on my phone

and I'm using the Rumble Studio on the

phone,

which looks to me like it has stretched

my image.

Is that what's happening?

And also,

I can't see your comments for some

reason. Why would I not be able to see

your comments? How about this?

How about this? Oh, there we go.

Comments are working.

I can't see myself, but uh is my image

stretched?

No sound, huh?

Does anybody else have a sound?

I only see one person saying no sound.

Hello.

I need an answer on do I have sound?

Sound is good. All right. There are a

couple of noisy devices running that I

can't get turned off because

my current nurse doesn't understand

anything I say.

So, I'm having this misery kind of

situation

where for another half hour,

the nurse on duty is a man who hears the

opposite of everything I say. I don't

know why,

but if I say, "Could you bring me an

apple?" he will say,

"Well, I would never ask for an apple."

But if I did, he would say,

"Uh,

okay, I won't bring you an apple." And

then I would say, "No, no, please bring

me an apple."

And then he would say, "Oh, oh, okay. No

apple. No, no, listen to me.

Anyway, so that's how my last eight

hours has been.

I can't quite get him to understand what

I'm saying.

No, he speaks perfect English.

It's not a language problem. His English

is perfect. He just hears the opposite

of whatever I say. I don't know why.

So, all three of my devices

stopped charging at the same time.

So, my laptop will not charge.

Uh, and I've got two two bricks, two

batteries, and both of them, for

whatever reason,

just don't charge.

So, I've got a little bit of juice left

in my phone. So, I thought I'd do a

short one this morning.

He's a man.

Well, if somebody else comes in, I'll

ask him to turn off my devices, but that

is apparently

not an option in my current situation.

So, I don't know if Owen Gregorian is

going to do a spaces after

uh afterwards or at some point today,

but I think so.

So, after the show, go to Owen

Gregorian's

um Oops. You go to his uh feed on X

and by then he will either have the uh

the indicator up or not.

But I think he will do a spaces and then

you can have some more fun this morning.

In theory, I'll be going home today,

but I don't know. All right, you got a

little company.

>> Hello.

>> Good morning.

>> Good morning.

>> I'm live streaming.

>> I just want to MTV.

>> Yeah. Yeah. Go ahead.

I'll just be talking.

>> Okay.

>> Okay. My uh my catheter is being

emptied,

but you don't have to see that cuz

that's in the other direction.

You know, I had I had some coughing last

night. I think I had an allergy, but

it's all good this morning. So, I'm good

to go. I believe I'm good to go.

All right. Want to check in on some

stories?

Well, it turns out that uh yesterday I

met the first person at the hospital who

has ever heard of Dil.

Strangely enough,

trip the button. Well, I try I tried all

the outlets.

Well, somebody tried them for me. All

the outlets and all of the charge

devices and all the charging cables. And

they all appear to be

they all appear to be dead at the same

time. So, my laptop brick

is door now.

Don't know why.

Hey, we had a couple of of earthquakes

last night.

>> [laughter]

>> Robin,

where's your rider or died?

All receptacles are dedicated.

Well, they weren't for the last 5 days.

So, all the devices worked

perfectly. They all charged until

yesterday.

And today, none of none of the

receptacles. They all work because

they're all uh they're all powering one

thing or another.

Are you really asking me my opinion of

my work versus Garfield?

All you need is a catheter cup or

another ste.

Yeah, might have been a power surge that

fried everything

possibly.

Wow. 2004 delivery.

All right. Anybody want to do the

simultaneous step?

No, no. All the power's on. The the

outlets actually have lights on them.

The earthquake happened after the

problem with the power. I don't know.

So, by coincidence,

I have a good friend who is in the same

hospital waiting for his wife to give

birth.

So, he might bring me bring me a

charging brick after the show.

um because it's a long day if you don't

have a phone and you're sitting in a

hospital bed. But if you do,

perfectly entertained.

All right. Uh let's see if I can find

the simultaneous

because I certainly do not remember it.

Oh, here we go.

Everybody, you ready?

Waste your cup. All you need is a cup or

a mug or a glass to take your cherine, a

canteen, sugar flask, a vessel of any

kind, and fill it with your favorite

liquid. I like coffee, but I only have

water.

Uh, and join me now for the unparalleled

pleasure, the dopamine of the day, the

thing that makes thing that makes

everything better. It's called the

simultaneous step.

Gross.

I have to admit I love ice water.

I didn't always, but at the moment I do.

All right, let's check in on the stories

of the day.

There's a story about a company that

makes an exoskeleton for people like me.

might have to check that out.

So, apparently we made a the United

States made some major attack

on Syria.

Oh, that feels good.

We're striking very strongly against

ISIS struggles in Syria.

Okay.

Well, so I guess we're at war with

something ISIS.

50 strikes on ISIS targets in Syria.

This in the postm millennial.

Uh let's see.

So

I was going to do a show today.

Oh my goodness me.

I I was thinking today of all the

I guess conspiracy theories that are now

considered just a fact.

And I thought I'd catch you up on which

ones I think are just a fact. I would

say as of this week, good morning, Owen.

Uh, I would say that as of this week,

there's no question that the 2020

election was rigged.

Would you agree?

Is there any question in your mind that

the election was rigged?

Probably not right for this this crowd.

Now what's interesting

is that forever more

uh half of the country will believe

that that's not the case. Would you?

So half of the country is going to think

there's no evidence that the election

was rigged or that there was just some

technical problem that doesn't matter.

and the other half which I am now

solidly in would call that a fact. I I

would say all doubt has been removed

because of the uh the Georgia discovery

that there were so many uh so many votes

that should not have been counted.

Likewise,

I would say it's a fact that the Obama

people and uh Rob Reiner and the heads

of the CIA

did in fact run a plot to overthrow the

country. I would say that's no longer

any doubt. There's no way to spin it.

There is 100% chance that we live

through an actual coup.

How many of you would agree?

So I I move those things into the

absolutely definitely fact.

No doubt about it.

Uh how about the I don't I don't want to

talk about this, but I just has to.

Would you agree that the COVID shot

was probably the biggest crime against

citizens that we've ever seen? and that

the people who were behind it had to

know

long before we knew that it wasn't just

risky

it was a bad idea.

So, I'm moving that from well, you know,

maybe they didn't know or you maybe

maybe they got caught up in it or I

would say they definitely knew. Not

everyone, not I'm not talking about

regular doctors, but um the the only

thing that I thought was still in

dispute

was whether it uh reduced the illness

for people over 65 or had some bad

bad problem. But even they

um

it at least should have been informed.

So there was definitely no uh no

accurate information. So I'm moving the

pandemic thing from maybe it was a bunch

of people who up to yeah it was a

crime and people should be executed for

it

because it's hard to imagine a bigger

crime.

>> [snorts]

>> So, let's move that to the fact. No

doubt about it. I'm not going to I'm not

going to have a complaint if somebody

says that was fact.

Well, we do know for sure

that it did not stop transmission.

Um, I think there are still some open

questions

because if you didn't believe the data

that it worked,

why would you believe the data that it

didn't work? Because they're both

noncredible data sets in my opinion.

I heard a Joe Rogan I heard somebody

say, oh, I guess it was Brett Weinstein.

Weinstein or Stein. God, I never get

that right. But he was talking about how

there was a natural experiment

with Ivormectin.

So some people took it and some people

didn't and they were in separate places.

And you can see that the people who took

it had a high survival rate and the

people who didn't take it had a low

survival rate even if they did the other

stuff.

Um, now the way that was explained is

that the odds of that of those two

different outcomes being so stark is

like a a gazillion trillion to one.

Um, yeah, how cheap Ardan was for a

reason. Uh so it had to be true that the

arrogant worked because that natural

experiment

was you know so definitive.

However,

I'm going to add this little bit of

skepticism.

It goes like this.

It's not just that that was a

non-controlled experiment

because it's because there was a natural

experiment. another controlled,

you know, um, placebo type of

experiment.

If it were true

that that the events happened as

reported,

then I would agree that the odds are a

trillion trillion to one that it was an

accident and that that would be quite

definitive that Ivormectin was a good

solution. However,

when it's not a controlled experiment,

uh even if it is, because a lot of

controlled experiments turn out to be

fraudulent, uh it's possible that it was

simply reported wrong. Meaning that the

people who said, "Uhoh, in my hospital,

we got this result

could be lying." They they could have

made up the whole thing. uh or if it

were only known because the press looked

into it,

somebody could be lying. So, you can't

rule out the fact

that if it were a natural experiment and

you got all the data correct,

that would be very definitive.

But if it was a natural experiment and

that's the very reason that you can't

know for sure if somebody made up the

data or lied to you or just came up with

a story, you can never really know. And

that actually is the reason that a lot

of the scientific studies are debunked

eventually is because if the data were

true, it would tell you something, but

you can't be sure it's true.

So, I would say the Ivormectin story

highly likely

that it made a difference in a positive

way. Um, but not not 100%.

Can't really get to 100% on that one in

my opinion because I don't trust

whoever told whoever says it happened.

Yeah. But if I were Joe Rogan, I'd sure

be mad at the way they treated me.

Are the fine

Yep.

Never saw a horse with CO.

All right. How about um UAPs and UFOs?

I do not believe that there are any

aliens.

I wouldn't rule it out. I mean maybe but

I would say at this point we cannot

convincingly say there are aliens.

Yeah, I have a good track record but not

obviously didn't did not have a pandemic

track record until recently.

Anyway, so that's what I think at the

moment.

Let's see what other stories,

but it's so weird that

it's now just a fact that the election

was stolen and that there was a coup

attempt and the coup plotters

um

are free [laughter] and they will never

be punished. So, did you see my

predictions yesterday about the the

Epstein files?

So, even as we had hours to go for the

release of the files, I was posting on X

uh skeptically,

skeptically saying, "You're not going to

see the files." And what happened? Sure

enough,

we got some files.

And if you get some files and not all

the files, it makes it worse, not

better. Would you agree with that take?

Would you agree that getting some of the

some of the Epstein files but heavily

redacted

um that it made it worse? it it almost

confirms that there's something that

that we should know that we don't know.

So I would say

uh I don't know who is the

guilty party

but obviously the uh the Thomas Massie

and Roana

bill uh had a big loophole in it which

allowed somebody we don't trust

to block out stuff to redact stuff.

Yeah. But would you agree that the bill

ultimately made things worse

because if it allowed any redactions,

you will never trust the redactions.

True. You will never trust the

redactions

because you don't know who made them.

And even if they told you why, you

wouldn't believe them, would you?

So, so Massie and Kana trying to do the

right thing, genuinely trying to do the

right thing. And also both of them, I

would say, very capable and very

bipartisan,

but they made it worse. They they did

not mean to do that, but they made it

worse. Now, here's the most surprising

thing, and don't get mad at me, all

right? If you're gonna if you're gonna

get mad at somebody, get mad at Allan

Dersitz.

So, I saw his reaction to the partial uh

partial release and as usual, Dowitz had

the most interesting argument that I'd

never heard. So, he argued that there

should be no redactions, including the

victims.

And his argument was that if you showed

the people who were accused,

but you didn't give the names of the

people who were accusing them, um, that

was not a fair situation. And I thought

to myself, wait a minute,

he's right. The argument is right. It

doesn't mean I agree with him. doesn't

mean I agree with him, but his argument

is solid that it would be a crime to

show the people accused

but keep hidden the people who accused

them. Would you agree?

Imagine if Trump had been accused by

Eugene Carol of some sex crime and she

was allowed to be anonymous forever,

but he was not allowed to be anonymous.

Would that be fair? No. In our system,

you get to know who is accusing you.

And ultimately, if it goes to a trial or

something, uh, you would know who the

accuser is.

Then somebody got mad at me online

because they said, "You you animal, are

you saying that you should um throw the

the victims under the bus a second

time?" To which I say, "What is the

alternative?"

Keep in mind that everyone who is a

underage victim is now in their probably

30s. So none of none of them would be

children.

There'd be no children involved even if

they were children when the crime

happened. So forget about children. This

would be adults

being outed or not.

Now some of them might not care, some of

them might. But apparently Massie

knows the names of 20 or so uh accused

famous people.

I think as soon as he said we'll we'll

we'll uh out everybody accused but we

won't out the people who accuse them we

can redact that. There was no chance any

of this would work out. So I believe

unfortunately as smart as Thomas Massie

is

uh he created a system with Roana

that guarantees that we will never see

the uh the stuff that you think is

important.

So unfortunately yesterday I predicted

that the the bad people would resist

even at the risk of going to jail

even at the risk of jail that we would

not see the full

um stuff because it's just too easy to

redact it.

But uh I saw somebody ask online, why

doesn't Thomas Massie be released? If he

knows the names, why doesn't he tell us?

Apparently, there are a number of people

who know the names.

However,

you also don't know if there's some

other reason they're not telling you

stuff. Cuz imagine if what would happen

if the CIA

uh came in and said, "All right, this is

not protecting the guilty,

but there's a whole bunch of stuff that

you cannot know because it would be a a

national

a national security problem." Let's say,

and I don't believe this is true, but

let's say

uh Epstein was at least partially a CIA

asset and he had done some

things that we don't want our

adversaries to know or even the domestic

uh audience to know.

Yeah.

So, Bonino knows the names, correct? Do

you think that the Bonino quitting

has anything to do with the nonrelease

of the Epstein files?

What do you think?

Uh, it could be a coincidence um because

it's the end of the year so people make

big changes at the end of years.

So, I know that Bino wanted to quit, but

we don't know why. So, at the moment, I

would say that's a maybe. Maybe had

something to do with Epstein.

And maybe,

but it could be that he just hated the

job, couldn't couldn't hack it anymore.

Seems likely. Too on the nose. Yeah, it

was too on the nose to to say that

that's why he quit. I think family and

end of the year

probably.

Bunch you quit in the summer. Well,

I don't think he made it official in the

summer, but I think he decided in the

summer.

That would be pretty tough on your

marriage if you're just never home.

All right. Uh, yes, Stefanic. Elise

Stefanic is dropping out of politics and

not running for governor.

You saw what Elon saw.

All right. What other stories are there?

Let's see. There's new interceptor

aircraft

that can kill drones.

Cool. While you do that, what's going to

happen?

The world's first humanoid robotled EV

battery production begins in China.

So, the Exobi,

if I'm saying right, it's a humanoid

robot. Delivers over 99% connection

success, matches skilled worker cycle

times, and detects wiring faults in real

time. So, I guess I guess China is

actually implementing some robots.

We also know, I'll add this into the uh

definite fact. Um, some of you remember

that I was speculating the only way our

deficits could be so bad is if somebody

was stealing trillions of dollars

and somehow we were not stopping it. I

now believe that's a fact

that the reason for our deficit, not

100% of the reason, but a large part of

our total deficit is absolutely just

crime.

Would you agree that that's essentially

a fact now?

Like look, you don't have to speculate

if our tax money is being stolen. It is

being stolen at probably

something in the half a trillion to a

trillion dollar a year range. Would you

buy that? Would you buy that estimate

that every year probably for several

years at least when the deficits

exploded that probably half a trillion

to a trillion is just pure fraud.

And that is probably in most of the

states.

Um I'm pretty sure California has even

more fraud than Minnesota,

but there's no way it's just happening

in Minnesota.

You know, there might be a few states

like Florida where it's not that bad.

Um we can also say

with confidence

um that the NOS's which are being

dismantled at least a little bit

um are primarily for the purpose of

democrat fraud

primarily.

So those are essentially just criminal

organizations

disguised as legitimate charities.

So, I would say we can move that to the

fact

pile.

Hey, happy birthday.

Happy birthday to you. Happy birthday to

you.

Yeah, anything run by family members is

some form of fraud, even if it's not

technically illegal. All

right, everybody say happy birthday to

Owen.

Yeah, the California bullet train. My

god.

Wow. Japan is triing a This is This is

also an Owens X.

Japan trials 100 kilowatt laser weapon

that can cut through metal and drones

midflight.

Oh, that's so cool.

Do you remember the the shadow ships

from Babylon 5?

And they had these cool laser weapons

that was a sci-fi show

many years ago. And the laser weapons

would make this cool sound like

and slice through the other spaceships.

Well, we're almost there with our laser

defensive weapons.

All right.

So,

so what do you think about the way Trump

apparently used the threat of tariffs

to get all the big pharma companies to

drastically lower their prices so we had

most favorable nation prices? Did you

see that?

Do you think any other president

could have threatened?

The others didn't even have the tool.

Trump created the tool, the tariffs, and

then threatened a big pharma unless they

brought $150 billion dollars of

manufacturing back to this country and

lowered their prices as much as, you

know, 80 or 90%

that otherwise they would get tariffed.

So, they didn't have any choice.

And now he's going to call in the

insurance companies and tell them they

need to make less money.

How would you do that

except by threatening them? Maybe with

also I don't Can you tariff an insurance

company? I don't know what it is you

tariff. You probably can't, but there's

some way you can threaten them. So, it

looks like Trump is literally just going

to bully and threaten the big farm at

the lower the prices.

So, you can't tell me any other

president could have pulled that off.

Now, we'll see. We'll see if it's real

or, you know, the pharma companies just

find some other way to steal our money,

but uh

we'll see.

Yeah, you replace their whole industry

if they don't play ball. I I think Trump

is serious about lowering those costs,

and I would guess he's going to pull it

off. So, if he pulls it off, he would be

successful in eggs,

gasoline prices, except for California,

but that's our fault. um and pharma.

That would be pretty big. But he still

would not be successful in groceries.

Oh, he would also be successful in rent

because by doing mass deportations,

he has decreased the uh the uh demand

for

uh rental places.

So, I don't think people are feeling it

yet.

Um, by the way, if you haven't seen the

All-In Pod, the most recent All-In Pod,

you have to watch it because it's just a

brilliant

uh explanation of what's happening with

AI and uh a good point counterpoint

about what's happening with costs. So

Jason

from the All- In Pod was arguing that

the average uh the average consumer,

average voter is now seeing lower

prices,

and that would be true.

um they see low lower prices maybe in

gas, but as long as their other their

other costs are up, mostly groceries, I

think groceries being the biggest

problem, it's going to feel to them like

nothing's happened. And it will feel to

them that Trump did not do enough

because groceries are up.

Um, and I would agree with that that

they would feel like they had not gotten

enough from Trump and what they feel

will determine how they act in the

midterms.

Now the other fascinating thing David

Saxs was explaining that there are a lot

of beliefs about AI that the public has

completely wrong and that they're

basically hoaxes.

So some of the some of the AI hoaxes and

it might be premature to know that these

are that these are not true but one of

them is that AI will definitely lower

employment

and Sax was pointing out that the

current evidence is that it doesn't

there's no evidence that AI has lowered

uh employment but he also to his you

know to his credit he also points out

that it might be too early to know for

sure that that's a permanent situation.

I would argue that the reason AI has not

taken jobs yet is that AI doesn't work.

So, it's not about whether AI will take

jobs, it's about whether it works and it

just doesn't work. And so a few

companies are getting massively wealthy,

mostly Nvidia really, primarily one one

company. And uh they're just moving

capital around. You know, the big

companies are just finding reasons to

pay each other big amounts of money.

uh

but that eventually if AI actually

starts working

it might have some impact on uh the

number of workers but here's the

argument that it would never do that the

argument that it would not do that is

that AI makes workers more productive

and if if you could make workers more

productive

then the employers would want more

workers because every worker they got

would be paired with AI and would be

able to add more to the bottom line than

a worker by himself or the AI by itself,

which is a very solid argument, I think,

but we don't know if that's the way

it'll turn out.

Um the the other thing is that people

can't connect

the potential benefits of AI to how

their life will be better, but they can

tell that it looks like AI might uh use

up their water with data centers, which

is a hoax. So apparently the data

centers do not use up the local water

supply. That's just something people

believe.

Also,

what is this in all caps?

I can't read it. Um, also if Trump

demands that the big data centers and

the AI

um the AI centers, if he demands that

they build their own power plants,

you might end up with a lot of clean

energy that you didn't have before and

it wouldn't affect the uh locals because

uh the the data center would have its

own power plant. I think that's what

we've already heard some announcements

about that, right? Was it Google

who is building combination

com? Maybe it was Amazon, but they'll

they'll all have to do it. So, if you're

in the AI business, you will have to be

in the nuclear power business,

and that's the only way that uh that any

of it will work.

Really? You generated content that would

have taken you a week manually?

Huh? Well, there you go.

If uh if hiring you once made sense,

but you were 10 times more productive

with AI,

why wouldn't

why wouldn't they want two of you?

because the AI didn't do the work on its

own, right?

I I'm trying to think in the real world,

you know, if I put myself back in the

cubicle,

even if AI

could do

all the things that humans can't do fast

enough or good enough, you still need a

human to tell it to do it. You still

need a human to say whether it's been

done

and you still need a human to report to

their boss and say I could or could not

do this and you know so I feel like

there's no legitimate way where an AI

can just do what the boss wants. the

boss will have to explain it to a human,

threaten them with firing and and tell

them to use AI as a tool, but that

ultimately the human will be

responsible.

So I um and so I commented about the

all-in pod first. It was a great

episode. One of the best one of the best

uh podcasts I've ever seen actually. It

was just so

so interesting.

Those guys are so good at explaining

complicated things.

Um, my voice is stronger maybe.

Yeah. So, I wouldn't trust a AI

to do almost anything.

Um I I saw a lawyer

some lawyer said that he spent a week

preparing a you know legal argument or

something and then he tried to duplicate

it with AI and AI did as good or better

but did it in like a minute.

But you still need the lawyer

because the AI isn't a lawyer, right?

You know, you're not going to have a

court case where the lawyer says, "I

will send a robot to uh do the closing

closing argument."

Yeah. No cough this morning.

I had a I had a pretty bad allergic

reaction. I think it was last night.

Give me a give me about 6 hours of

coffee, but when it stopped, it just

stopped.

Yep.

AI information delusion. I don't know

what that is.

You have to know how to prompt the AI.

Exactly. If if the skill of using AI

still resides in the person who's giving

it the prompts,

how are you going to replace the human?

Anyway, we'll see what else is

happening. Come in.

>> Come in.

>> Hi.

I'm on a live stream right now, but

that's okay. Yeah,

>> I'm gonna put my name on the board.

>> Okay.

>> Is going home, so I'll be your nurse

today.

>> Okay, great.

Just pay no attention to me. I'll just

be

>> anything for you.

>> Well, breakfast is coming pretty soon.

>> I put the

right there.

>> Eric Yeah.

>> Ju just so you know, I'm live streaming,

but don't you don't have to be careful.

Yeah. You don't No, you don't have to be

quiet. They they know I'm in a hospital.

>> So, just do what you need to do. They

will they will patiently wait.

>> It's a shift change.

All right.

>> In spirit, you're a teenager. I am.

>> Would you like coffee? Would you write?

>> Yes, please. Good. All right. Thank you.

You know, I think my I think my problem

is

that there's something I'm eating in the

hospital that I'm allergic to.

All

right, what else we got here? China

builds the most advanced chipmaking

machine and cracks the EUV barrier.

Only one company in the world currently

has functioning EUV machines, which I

assume

is Taiwan,

and I assume it's the only way to make

these advanced chips. Let me see.

So

this would be a very big deal

if China could make the AI chips. But I

think I think the uh equally likely

possibility

is that all the big uh the big nations

will figure out how to make AI chips.

They just haven't done it yet.

A new laser could beam power midair to

US aircrafts at 5,000 ft for infinite

range. Oh, wow.

Did Did you see um Elon Musk's estimate

that uh SpaceX could become the first

hundred trillion dollar value company?

Hundred trillion dollar company.

SpaceX.

I feel like that is very possible. Oh,

so you probably saw the news that Elon's

$56 billion pay package got approved. So

the force reversed

they reversed the reversal of it.

So, if you didn't know that story, um I

guess Tesla

had a uh a pay package deal with with uh

Elon from years ago. They said if he

reached certain targets,

um he would get as much as 56 billion is

what it was worth by the time they

executed.

But time has passed. So that $56 billion

stock rant would now be worth closer to

$140 billion.

So So while you were working yesterday,

Elon made $140 billion

in one day.

Well, actually it was the it was the sum

total of all his work, but

uh I do own some Tesla stock. I'm pretty

happy about it at the moment.

Uh I also bought a Tesla yesterday,

but for a family member

who was very happy about.

So let's I guess we should talk about

this.

Um, how many of you are interested

in the story of the quote civil war on

the conservative side between Candace

Owens and Tucker Carlson and Benpiro

and Erica Kirk and Tim P's waiting into

it a little bit.

Uh, Megan Kelly, she's into it a little

bit.

How many of you

find that interesting?

Because it's weirdly not interesting to

me.

I think I have the only the only useful

opinion on Israel and all that stuff,

which I'll reiterate in case you haven't

heard it.

If you say you're for or against Israel,

you're you're in trouble. Would you

agree?

Doesn't matter if you're conservative or

pro Trump or non-Trump. If you were to

come out publicly

as a podcaster or a pundit and say that

you were against Israel,

even even against

some things they're doing or even

against Apac,

if you're against anything, you're going

to come up to this brick wall that will

be bad for you and your career. But

likewise, if you say you're pro- Israel,

you will be accused of not being America

first. So you can't be for Israel and

you can't be against them without, you

know, dividing everything and ruining

your career, making enemies. So, a while

back,

um, I I landed on the only defensible

position in my opinion, and it goes like

this. I'm American,

so I care about America first.

I have complete respect for Israel

being Israel first.

Why wouldn't I? I think every country

gets to try to maximize their national

benefit. So if there are people who care

more about Israel and they want to

maximize Israel's benefit,

that's just their it's their privilege.

Most of it is kind of public and

transparent.

So if you wanted to dislike, you know,

the people in Apac Americans,

you can find out who they are and you

could dislike them. If you wanted to not

vote for uh somebody who took Apac

money, you could not vote for them.

So, I don't need to invest

my reputation or my anything, my money

or anything in Israel because Israel is

its own country and they are pursuing

what's best for Israel. Of course.

Of course they are. Now, do I need to

dislike Ben Shapiro if I think he's too

pro-Israel? I don't need to. I can

simply observe that he has a set of

preferences. He's very public about it.

And if

you know, if somebody wants to agree

with him,

that would just be a different opinion.

So personally,

I would look at what's good for America

in every situation. And if Israel is if

I thought that Israel was, let's say,

guiding us in the wrong direction, I

would have a dual opinion. One, are they

doing a good job of it? Because it's

their job to do a good job of it. the

Israeli lobby and the pro-Israel people

um should be doing whatever they can to

maximize their you know their preferred

outcomes. And if you're American,

you you would quite reasonably

prefer to maximize your American

outcomes even if Netanyahu doesn't want

want that to be the case or even if Ben

Shapiro doesn't want to be the case. So

I find myself

able to like everybody in the

conversation.

Now, am am I required

to have a negative opinion of Candace

Owens

if she's promoting some ideas that I

don't think would prove out? Not really,

because I see her as an entertainer

and I can enjoy the entertainment and I

could be, you know, amused by the, you

know, I'm just asking questions

because I keep it in context.

If you know that she's a podcaster, but

you don't know what's in her mind, you

can just look at the content. You can

compare it to other people who might

say, "Oh, that's BS. Some people are

getting mad at it. Some people believe

it,

but they're entitled to their opinions.

They're not hurting me.

So I find that I can just sort of

observe this weird

allegedly uh you know people calling

each other anti-semitic.

The the thing I'm least interested in

is who gets labeled anti-semitic

because I think that's like racism.

Well, it's exactly like racism in the

sense that it's it's a way to diminish

people who don't agree with your

preferred priorities.

Uh I don't think it usually means well

at least not with the if we're talking

about the famous podcaster types from uh

I I won't even name names, but you know

what I'm talking about. If you're

talking about the famous

uh podcasters, I just see them for what

they are. Some of them are, you know,

virulent

virulently

uh anti-Israel.

Um I've tried to avoid any conversation

about

what's his name? Uh Fuentes.

Nick Fuentes.

His biggest problem is that he's good at

what he does, meaning that he's

interesting on camera,

but I don't have to agree with anything

he says. And I think it's useful

to, you know, see all sides of this. So

when he gives his opinion, I go, "Oh,

you've got some opinions that are way

too far for me, but

those are his opinions. I don't believe

he's harmful,

but if I were

if I were uh less pro-America and more

pro Israel,

I would want him to be quieter.

So, I understand why people have a

problem with him and I understand why he

wouldn't be platformed everywhere. But

it's not really my problem, is it?

It feels like that's just between him

and Israel.

By the way, I heard uh I heard Nick

Fuentes explain why he's a virgin and

can't find a girlfriend and that there's

no there's no practical way he could

ever have a girlfriend.

It was actually really

uh hit home a little bit. He was saying,

"What if he what if he got a girlfriend

and things worked out?" But then

eventually she realized that if she left

him and uh turned on him, she could get

a lot of money from his enemies.

So there's no real way he could just go

on a dating app and meet a girl and have

a normal relationship and hope it works

out. it basically, you know, nearly 100%

of the time it would likely turn into a

disaster. It would be financially

disastrous and relationship disastrous

and that even if it seemed like a good

idea at the time, it would guaranteed to

be to turn bad. And I thought to myself,

man,

he's so right that in his particular

situation,

because he's he's he's so prominent and

apparently he's rich, he says,

um, that there's no way a relation a

standard relationship

would work out in his life.

And it was kind of sad, but I have to

tell you, um,

I can relate to the fact that if you're

rich,

you have to worry about relationships

that don't last forever. And in our

current world, relationships don't last

forever.

So that he would uh his odds of finding

somebody he could trust forever

are just not really good. It's just it's

just a bad costbenefit uh situation.

Now, there might be things he's not

telling us that would have an impact on

that, but I do agree with the general

general concept

that it would be completely impractical

for him to get married or even have a

serious girlfriend.

Yeah. If you're not rich and you're not

if you're not

um

also a provocative kind of character,

then I can see how marriage would work.

But if you're if you're what's the word,

not provocative. Um

yeah,

went straight to prostitutes.

Yeah, I don't don't think he did.

Yeah.

But anyway, so I don't have to have an

opinion about all of those people.

Inflammatory.

That's close to what I'm looking for.

No, not provocative. Not inflammatory.

There's another word controversial.

Let's say controversial. That's good.

Yeah. If you're controversial,

uh especially the things he says he's

controversial times 10,

the odds that he would eventually get

sold out by a an angry divorce a

pretty high

disgrace.

We all need a relationship manager.

He calls himself a revolutionary.

Anyway, so my take on the wow 40,000

people live. My take on the whole

conservative

uh

social what do you call it the civil war

is that

it just seems unnecessary.

No prenup doesn't help you at all. So

the prenup would not help him. Well, I

can give you more details on that, of

course, but if you think a prenup

protects you, it does not.

Now, I've I've not personally

had any trouble in that regard. But if

you start looking into what a prenup can

and cannot do, it would not protect them

in the way that you think it would

because somebody could still throw them

under a bus.

And the courts would not the courts do

not accept a prenup

that is too one-sided.

So if for example

somebody signed a prenup and then was in

a relationship for several years and

then you said, "Aha, I'm going to

divorce you and give you nothing cuz

that's what you signed in the prenup."

the judge would just throw that out and

say, "No, it has to be fair." And is it

fair

that you could be together for five

years

um and that the that the spouse would

get nothing or even a low amount? And

the answer is the course would not allow

you to give a low amount even if he had

a prenup.

the non-disclosure forms. Yeah, but you

couldn't trust that.

Anybody can talk to a reporter

and you wouldn't be able to.

You wouldn't be able to claw back even

if they talked about you

too many assets to get married. Yeah.

So, the system

kind of guarantees that uh marriage is a

bad idea.

for some people.

I I think if you came into it with

essentially identical,

you know, financial uh power

that it would work.

So there definitely situations where it

would work, but not for famous people.

Never worked for you.

Oh, is Jason on here now?

I see somebody.

Come in.

>> Come in.

>> Yes. Come on in.

>> Hello.

>> Hi. I'm live streaming right now, but

that's okay.

>> Okay. Are you ready for breakfast?

>> Yes, please.

>> Okay. And your last name?

>> Adams. Saturday

and birthday

>> um June 8th 57.

>> All right, I'm back.

>> Thank you. So, my food will be here

somewhat

um

somewhat soon. So, when my uh food gets

here, I'll

I'll have to say bye, and that's going

to happen soon.

But the diversity lottery is going to be

suspended.

Ukraine's Baba Yaga drones are Russia's

latest nightmare.

There's a Turkish tank killing drone.

Okay.

The deadly LA paliciz palisades inferno

took hold in area fighter fighters were

restricted by woke laws protecting

endangered plant species.

Of course, there had to be some kind of

woke problem in California that made the

fires worse.

Ukraine is making a thousand interceptor

drones a day.

to fight Russia's

shahid waves.

Damn,

thousand drones a day.

Oh, the Biden FBI and DOJ wave campaign

finance probe of Senator Kirsten Cinema

after she left the Democratic party.

I guess that didn't happen.

Wow, there's an an invisibility cloak

for no ridge.

I want an invisibility cloak.

Oh, wow.

The new cloaking concept shield sensor

technic

shields.

Wait a minute. a magnetic cloak.

I don't know if I believe that.

Could a common spice help cure chronic

back pain? All right, we have to find

out what those spices.

Uh,

all right. What are those spices?

Two drugs.

Turmeric.

Turmeric might cure your back pain.

And old van.

Never heard of them.

All right. I'll be shutting down the uh

feed as soon as my breakfast shows up,

which will be any minute now.

Testosterone alters how men respond to

unfairness against women. Well, you

could just ask me that one.

All right. US firm gets funds for the

first mass producible nuclear reactors.

Well

um

so Radiant remains on track for next

year's startup of its first nuclear

reactor, the Colidus Demonstration Unit.

So, it's a company named Radiant

has raised over 300 million for new

funding

and they can apparently build a

micronuclear reactor.

Isn't it weird that when AI became a big

thing and suddenly we needed all this

power, but that's exactly the time that

the nuclear

>> the nuclear industry

suddenly learned how to make portable

little micro. Well, maybe they always

did.

It's kind of weird

that the power plants became practical

and economical at the same time as AI.

It might be because there's just so much

more money to be made with AI

that suddenly, you know, you have the

best of everything working in your

favor.

[clears throat]

Let's see what else.

US firm produces enriched uranium or

uranium for nuclear reactors. So there's

all these breakthroughs

in nuclear power that are happening at

the same time.

Uh

what there's a vapor breakthrough.

Okay.

I don't know why we need a vapor

breakthrough.

Oh, look. It's me.

Uh,

so did you hear about the

North Korean hacker who had a job in

some big American company and the only

way they caught him is that there was

this tiny tiny

uh lag in the time from the keystroke to

something happening. So they can finally

figure out

they they knew that he was in North

Korea and not just remote worker. It

turns out that some Korean North Korean

a North Korean had figured out how to

fool an American company and get a job

and work it for some time.

All right, here's the food. All right,

everybody.

You can you can put it right here.

>> Okay.

And your nurse is bringing your black

coffee for you.

>> Thank you.

>> All right. Thanks.

All right, everybody.

Got to eat.

Yeah, the unsynchronized sip is coming

up now. All right. I've got a little bit

of juice in my phone. I think I'll keep

it there. All right. Bye.

>> Coffee. Thank you. You put it right

there.

>> Thank you.

>> Let me just I'm just ending the live

stream here. [clears throat]