t's check in on the stories of the day. There's a story about a company that makes an exoskeleton for people like me. Might have to check that out.

So apparently we made a major attack on Syria. Oh, that feels good. We're striking very strongly against ISIS targets in Syria. Okay. Well, so I guess we're at war with something ISIS. Fifty strikes on ISIS targets in Syria. This is in the Post Millennial.

Let's see. So I was going to do a show today. Oh my goodness me. I was thinking today of all the conspiracy theories that are now considered just facts. And I thought I'd catch you up on which ones I think are just facts. I would say as of this week, good morning, Owen, I would say that as of this week, there's no question that the 2020 election was rigged. Would you agree? Is there any question in your mind that the election was rigged? Probably not for this crowd.

Now what's interesting is that forevermore half of the country will believe that that's not the case. So half of the country is going to think there's no evidence that the election was rigged or that there was just some technical problem that doesn't matter. And the other half, which I am now solidly in, would call that a fact. I would say all doubt has been removed because of the Georgia discovery that there were so many votes that should not have been counted.

Likewise, I would say it's a fact that the Obama people and Rob Reiner and the heads of the CIA did in fact run a plot to overthrow the country. I would say that's no longer in any doubt. There's no way to spin it. There is a 100 percent chance that we lived through an actual coup. How many of you would agree? So I move those things into the absolutely definitely fact. No doubt about it.

How about the I don't want to talk about this, but it just has to be said. Would you agree that the COVID shot was probably the biggest crime against citizens that we've ever seen? And that the people who were behind it had to know long before we knew that it wasn't just risky, it was a bad idea. So I'm moving that from well, you know, maybe they didn't know or maybe they got caught up in it. I would say they definitely knew. Not everyone. I'm not talking about regular doctors. But the only thing that I thought was still in dispute was whether it reduced the illness for people over 65 or had some bad problem. But even then it at least should have been informed. So there was definitely no accurate information. So I'm moving the pandemic thing from maybe it was a bunch of people who, yeah, it was a crime and people should be executed for it because it's hard to imagine a bigger crime.

So let's move that to the fact. No doubt about it. I'm not going to have a complaint if somebody says that was a fact. Well, we do know for sure that it did not stop transmission.

I think there are still some open questions because if you didn't believe the data that it worked, why would you believe the data that it didn't work? Because they're both non-credible data sets in my opinion.

I heard a Joe Rogan, I heard somebody say, oh, I guess it was Brett Weinstein. Weinstein or Stein. God, I never get that right. But he was talking about how there was a natural experiment with Ivermectin. So some people took it and some people didn't and they were in separate places. And you can see that the people who took it had a high survival rate and the people who didn't take it had a low survival rate even if they did the other stuff. Now the way that was explained is that the odds of those two different outcomes being so stark is like a gazillion trillion to one. Yeah, how cheap Ivermectin was for a reason. So it had to be true that Ivermectin worked because that natural experiment was so defin