the fact that the averages can be the average. So I know you know somebody who is not like that. I know you're not like that. Can we agree that you and your friends are not what we're talking about? So let's get out of the anecdotal mindset. I mean yes we all know individuals are all over the board on everything that people can be different about.

So it is certainly not true in a technical scientific way that women are any of these things: agreeable, quiet, passive, desexualized, soft, gentle or emotional. I think the point is that more that those are sort of traditional. You don't have to say that that's good or bad because I don't think AJ is saying these are good qualities or bad. He doesn't say that. He's just saying that there was some kind of gender difference. You can agree or disagree.

But here's where I'll take this. And it may be good to see if there was any kind of a testosterone difference in Republicans versus Democrats. So I googled that. What do you think? What do you think I found out? Do you think that Trump supporters have more testosterone than anti-Trump? Or what would you say in the comments that based on your non-scientific opinion, just observation, is it your observation that the class of people who are supporters of Trump have more testosterone than those who are opposed to? Look at the comments. The comments is it's unambiguous, right? It's very unambiguous. You could tell me that this doesn't pass the science and then