Episode 1336 Scott Adams - How to Quit Coke and Other Junk Food, Virus News, and Updates
Find my "extra" content on Locals: https://ScottAdams.Locals.com Content: ----------- - Glenn Greenwald...a mandatory Twitter follow - The evolving Matt Gaetz story - China's fishing boat invasion of Philippines - How to kick your Coca Cola addiction - George Floyd trial, camera perspective bias - Is herd immunity really possible? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ If you would like to enjoy this same content plus bonus content from Scott Adams, including micro-lessons on lots of useful topics to build your talent stack, please see scottadams.locals.com for full access to that secret treasure.
Well, well, well. Yeah, I'm a little bit late. A little bit late. You know, have you ever wondered what it would be like to watch Coffee with Scott Adams if he had no time to prepare and had literally just awakened 15 minutes earlier? What would that be like? Well,
View segment →you're going to find out. And if you'd like to enjoy it, and I know you would — I mean, why not? Why not enjoy it, right? — all you need is a copper mug or glass, a tanker, challenger-style canteen, jugger, flask, a vessel of any kind. Fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee. Join me now f…
View segment →Those of you who have, get ready. It's happening now. Do you remember, some of you have been watching me for a while, I once told you that if you take the Dale Carnegie course, one of the things that it teaches you is really, really valuable for some situations. One of those situations is happening…
View segment →into these situations as I did. I just gave a speech because you just always have one. Now it's usually pieces of speeches, right? So you have these little components that if you get in one of these situations, you can just take them off the shelf. You say, okay, I'll take one of these, one of these…
View segment →ain of reality, it just pushes it back and then he's done. And then he brings it back, you know, after you're done reading them. And then you have to live in that other artificial world for a while. And then Glenn Greenwald says something and he pulls the curtain back again and you can see the real…
View segment →mazing. So he's a mandatory follow because he shows you what's on the other side of the curtain. And you don't get that from everybody. I'll give you other mandatories as we go along here. Here's a way to know if you are dumb. A lot of you have been wondering, am I dumb? Do you ever have that thou…
View segment →n't fail it so badly that you could say it's impossible. All right, it doesn't pass the sniff test but it's not completely ruled out. Okay, now I looked at the documents, the emails back and forth. And the way it's presented is that hey, there's an extra benefit if you help us out with this 25 mill…
View segment →s to think this was extortion? What would cause them to think that? I think one thing that would certainly cause you to think that is — wait for it — if you were Matt Gaetz and you knew for sure that you had not been involved in any sex crimes, right? If you thought you had been involved in sexual…
View segment →So they were Russian soldiers and they just took off their uniforms and they just invaded Ukraine and said oh no, we're not military. Are you kidding? No, look at me. I'm not even wearing a uniform. How could I be Russian military? Until there are so many of them there it becomes kind of a fact on t…
View segment →ungry and also not have a Diet Coke. Those are two really strong forces to be fighting at the same time. So I say take two months. Give yourself a break on the rest of your diet. You know, eat healthy food but don't obsess over it. And just do one thing. Just quit Diet Coke or Coke or soda. It does…
View segment →ther things and my allergies are killing me. So I'm not that old but I've got asthma, you know. Don't take a chance. And I will talk to you tomorrow.
View segment →Well, well, well. Yeah, I'm a little bit late. A little bit late. You know, have you ever wondered what it would be like to watch Coffee with Scott Adams if he had no time to prepare and had literally just awakened 15 minutes earlier? What would that be like? Well, you're going to find out.
And if you'd like to enjoy it, and I know you would — I mean, why not? Why not enjoy it, right? — all you need is a copper mug or glass, a tanker, challenger-style canteen, jugger, flask, a vessel of any kind. Fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee. Join me now for the unparalleled pleasure, the dopamine hit of the day, the thing that makes everything better. It's called the simultaneous sip.
If you haven't tried it, oh, I feel sorry for you. Those of you who have, get ready. It's happening now.
Do you remember, some of you have been watching me for a while, I once told you that if you take the Dale Carnegie course, one of the things that it teaches you is really, really valuable for some situations. One of those situations is happening right now. And let me tell you a little bit of a story before I get into that.
Yeah. Um, years ago I was doing a book tour, going around the country signing books for whatever book was out. And I got to a Denver bookstore, one of the biggest ones in, I don't know, the country or Denver. Just some massive bookstore that had a room with a stadium audience and everything. I mean, it was just a big bookstore.
And I get there and the owner of the bookstore greets me and says, all right, people have been waiting for two hours to see you. And I said, ah, that's great. And I thought they meant to sign books. And they said, yeah, they can't wait to hear your speech. And I said, what? Yeah, your speech that you're going to give in 10 minutes. They're really excited about it.
And I said, huh? I didn't know I was giving a speech in 10 minutes. No idea. I thought I was just there to sign books. But apparently the audience had already assembled. So there were, I don't know, several hundred people in the room waiting to hear my speech, which didn't exist.
So my point is, if you take the Dale Carnegie course, they actually teach you how to be prepared to always have a speech so you can walk into these situations as I did. I just gave a speech because you just always have one. Now it's usually pieces of speeches, right? So you have these little components that if you get in one of these situations, you can just take them off the shelf. You say, okay, I'll take one of these, one of these, one of these, and I'll just put them together on the fly, which is what I just did.
So that story about the bookstore, some of you have heard it before. And the point of it is it's one of my shelf points. Always keep a few on the shelf so anytime you get a little situation like this you go, oh, I'll introduce it by the Denver bookstore story and then I'll have a good momentum going and then I'll find other pieces as I go.
I'm going to give you today my first mandatory Twitter follow recommendation. You ready? Now when I say mandatory, I'm going to the next level. I'm taking it up. Because I've told you before there are some people you should follow. I'll probably mention them again. But there are a number of people who are just way better to follow than other people because they have some kind of insight or they're just good at tweeting or something.
And I'm going to give you my first ever mandatory follow, meaning that if you follow me, I'm telling you it's mandatory: Glenn Greenwald.
Now if you don't already follow Glenn Greenwald, here's the first thing you need to know. Has nothing to do with politics. He talks about politics, so his domain is politics, but that's not the recommendation. He's one of the few people who every time he writes or tweets, he can take the curtain of reality, it just pushes it back and then he's done. And then he brings it back, you know, after you're done reading them. And then you have to live in that other artificial world for a while. And then Glenn Greenwald says something and he pulls the curtain back again and you can see the real world for a little bit.
Now usually he's pulling back the curtain on the media itself so that you can see that you're living in an artificial world, literally, that you've created an artificial subjective world that you're living in. And he's one of the people, and there aren't many of them, who don't live in that world. I don't know why. I would love to know the history of what hallucinogenics he's ever tried in his life, if any. I would love to know how he became who he is because somehow he lives outside that world and he can just pull the curtain back and look and show you. It's kind of amazing.
So he's a mandatory follow because he shows you what's on the other side of the curtain. And you don't get that from everybody. I'll give you other mandatories as we go along here.
Here's a way to know if you are dumb. A lot of you have been wondering, am I dumb? Do you ever have that thought? Sometimes it might be the imposter effect. You're not really dumb but you worry that you are compared to other people. But one way to know you are dumb is if you hear an argument and the first thing you think is, oh, you love that person you're talking about. Why don't you just kiss them? Apparently you love them.
Okay, that if that's your response to an argument, you're kind of dumb. You're not really ready for talking in public. If you say, oh, Scott, you're defending the worst person. You're an apologist for the worst person. If that's your feeling, you're dumb. Because you can't, for some reason, you can't separate an argument which could be good or bad from the people who are making it. If you can't do that, you just probably shouldn't talk in public. Maybe that's not for you.
Have I set you up enough? All right, let's talk about Matt Gaetz. Because I refuse to be limited by dumb people not understanding that you can talk about people, you can talk about their situation, but you're not an apologist defending people. You're just not that person, right? Can we do that?
All right, I would like to know that the people who follow me are smart enough to separate an argument from people. If you can't do that, you're on the wrong livestream. So let's do that as these stories go.
And of course you all know the weird Matt Gaetz story. There's allegations of orgies with underage people with no evidence that we've seen to suggest any of that's true. But the longer you wait, don't you expect the evidence to come out? Big old story like this, you know more and more evidence is coming out. So it becomes a different story the longer you wait. It starts as one thing and now it's evolving and it has evolved to sort of a new thing. And that's what I'm going to describe right now.
Number one, Matt Gaetz has said from the beginning that any allegations that he was with a 17-year-old are just completely false. It just doesn't exist. But he's gone further to say that the accuser doesn't exist. That's pretty gutsy, isn't it? How many people accused of something like this would go so far as to say not only did I not do it but the accuser doesn't exist? Now that's a pretty big claim.
Later if you find out that the accuser does exist, you know, then there's a separate question of whether anything happened with that accuser similar to what was accused. But isn't that an unusual claim? Don't you think? Because if somebody knew that the accuser would exist, in other words if Matt Gaetz knew the person exists, wouldn't that be the worst defense to say that they don't even exist? Right? Unless it's true.
Put yourself in that position right now. We can't read his mind, okay, so we're not reading his mind. But put yourself in the position. You've been accused of something with an underage person, 17. Would you say, if you knew you'd been accused of that, would you say no, we did not do that thing. I know who you're talking about but certainly we didn't do that thing. That's very different from saying nobody exists, that they just don't exist. That's really different.
I don't know that you'd have to be pretty sure they don't exist, would you? Because for sure the simplest thing to prove is that a person exists. Am I wrong? Is there anything easier to prove than that a person exists? He's really — it's interesting, isn't it? Because what happens if they produce the person? He looks really, really bad. Would he put himself in a position? And it's obvious that he's thought about it and planned his defense, right? It's not like an off-the-cuff thing. He's saying this repeatedly and often: the person doesn't exist.
Now if that person ends up existing, that's going to completely change what I think about the situation and for you too, I would think. But at the moment, every day that goes by when we don't hear that the person exists — and by the way, I don't think the person would be still 17, right? A number of months have gone by since the accusations even began. So statistically speaking, it seems deeply unlikely that there's still a minor involved. At least today it would be somebody over 18.
So do you think that there is somebody deeply involved in some kind of a secret investigation who doesn't want to be known at this point? And the leaks don't produce that person. I don't know. There's something sketchy about the fact that the longer you wait, you don't find out. Now if tomorrow we hear the name of the person and the person exists, change everything, right? I'm just saying that every day that goes by you have to say, I'm starting to wonder if this person exists. That's the reasonable question.
Here's the other part that I haven't heard anybody say. There's this weird element of it where apparently the Gaetzes had involved the FBI before any of this broke. They had involved the FBI in what they believed was an extortion attempt. All right, so here's the key point: that the Gaetz father and son both believed that it was an extortion attempt, so much so that they got the law enforcement involved.
All right, now we've seen the documents. If you haven't seen them yet, they're in the news today. We see the documents and emails going back and forth between the two attorney types who were proposing to Gaetz senior that for 25 million dollars they could get this alleged captive back from Iran who may or may not exist, right? He may or may not be alive. We don't know. There's indication he's not alive. But these two people said they had indication he was alive. You and I don't know, so we don't know if that guy exists.
But imagine you're the Gaetzes and people approach you and say for 25 million dollars we can maybe get this hostage back that you think might not even be real. Okay, you're saying to yourself, I'm not even sure there's a real guy alive that could be saved. And if he is, why isn't the government doing it, right? So it's kind of sketchy, right? The government wouldn't do this. Are you saying that there's nobody in the government of the United States who would be interested in getting back this hostage? So right away it's sketchy, right?
Now you could argue, oh, the government tried or they don't care or they don't believe the story but it's true. So you could maybe come up with some stretch of a story that would say yeah, this is the way to do it. You wouldn't use the government. You would make some deal with a private citizen. I mean it doesn't pass the sniff test, right? But it doesn't fail it so badly that you could say it's impossible. All right, it doesn't pass the sniff test but it's not completely ruled out.
Okay, now I looked at the documents, the emails back and forth. And the way it's presented is that hey, there's an extra benefit if you help us out with this 25 million dollars that they call the loan. But I don't know if you would call it a loan because a loan is something you expect to get repaid. I don't know if anybody expected that to be repaid. So let's first say that characterizing it as a loan is maybe a subjective call. Even if there was some alleged plan to repay, it feels a little iffy to me.
Now when you looked at the documents, did you say to yourself there's an extortion thing? Because part of the offer was that they would try to lobby the government to get Matt Gaetz cleared or pardoned, presidentially pardoned, of some wrongdoings which were unspecified about whatever they heard about these sex crimes.
Now do you believe that these two lawyers had enough weight that they could have done anything at all to get a pardon for Matt Gaetz should he have done anything that so far we're not aware of, right? So let me say it again. There's no evidence of a specific anything. None. No evidence to the public. We don't know if anybody else has seen anything but you and I have seen no evidence of a crime.
Now imagine you're the Gaetzes and you've got this offer that will help you get out of this alleged crime if you help us with this alleged loan for a captive who is allegedly alive. What do you do with that? Well, what the Gaetzes did is they went to law enforcement. They said this feels like extortion.
All right, now let me ask you this. We're amateurs looking from the outside, right? And we take the clues. Carpe, good to see you. That wasn't worth twenty dollars. You should just text me. But thank you. What was I saying? I was just — good to see you, Carpe. Carpe Duncan joins, has just joined the show here.
So we're looking at this situation and here's my question that I haven't seen answered. What would cause the Gaetzes to think this was extortion? What would cause them to think that? I think one thing that would certainly cause you to think that is — wait for it — if you were Matt Gaetz and you knew for sure that you had not been involved in any sex crimes, right?
If you thought you had been involved in sexual crimes and these people said we have a way to maybe help you get out, wouldn't you be a little bit interested in talking to them if you've done the crime? Because if you've done the crime and allegedly there's an investigation, you know there's witnesses and you know there's real evidence. Now you know you're in real big trouble. You would at least listen to the offer, wouldn't you? Yeah, you would.
The only situation in which you would say my God, this looks like an obvious scam is if you knew there was no crime. Thank you, Kevin. Yeah, and I haven't seen anybody mention that. It seems to me that given that these documents and the offer from the two lawyer people were kind of sketchy, the way they handled it was as if they didn't believe there was any crime. That's the way they handled it. That means something.
They didn't handle it as if, well, maybe there is a crime here. They handled it like no crime existed. That's the way you'd handle it. This must be a scam because there's no crime. They're trying to extort me over no crime. You go right to law enforcement. But suppose you had done the crime and you knew it. Is the first thing you do get law enforcement involved? I don't think so. It doesn't quite fit, does it?
So I would say the documents are quite exculpatory. But we are far from knowing the final conclusion to any of this. I'm just going to say that the Gaetz situation is looking better for Gaetz every day and worse for his accusers. But we'll keep watching this.
Meanwhile, World War III has begun. I don't know if you've heard about this. World War III is underway. And I'm not even kidding. There's an actual world war that just hasn't started. Apparently the way it's begun is that China has started to capture Philippine fishing territory by just moving 220 fishing boats to fish. But they're not exactly there to fish. They're really there as part of the military to occupy until they have so much functional control of the sea that for all practical purposes China owns it. Which is what they're doing to the entire South China Sea.
It's hard to see that as not World War III because they are literally conquering territory. It just happens to be ocean territory and they're doing it directly with assets. It's obvious. There's no question about it. It is World War III. They are absorbing enormous swaths of the Earth and putting it under Chinese control. Parts of the world that people think China doesn't control.
Now the thing that makes it a little different than say a normal world war, a little different, is that China might need that ocean to feed its people in the future. So apparently it's very rich in fish. And I don't think that they want to control it just for export. I think that China has a massive problem feeding its people just because there are so many of them and they probably need that fish in the future. So it's not like a regular war of conquest. It might be a war of necessity.
And I don't know what historical precedent there is for a war of necessity or presumed advantage slash necessity. It's a little different but it's a similar strategy they're using that Russia used in Ukraine where you send in, I guess the Russians sent in what were called the little green men. So they were Russian soldiers and they just took off their uniforms and they just invaded Ukraine and said oh no, we're not military. Are you kidding? No, look at me. I'm not even wearing a uniform. How could I be Russian military? Until there are so many of them there it becomes kind of a fact on the ground that Russia controls some territory.
So China's doing the same thing with these fishing boats. They're just making it a fact that they own it over time.
Let's talk about Coca-Cola. Let me start by saying I oppose boycotts. I oppose boycotts. As soon as you go down that boycott road and you get re-boycotted, everybody's boycotting everybody. It's just better to let business be business and let politics be politics. It's just better, right? It's better for all of us. Let's just not be attacking companies.
But sometimes the company attacks you. That's not your fault, right? Sometimes the company attacks you. Well that's different. I would say don't boycott a company just because they have some opinion or something. But if that company attacks you, well you certainly have a right to defend yourself.
And so let's talk about Coke. So there are many conservatives who would consider that Coke, Coca-Cola, the company, has attacked them in a way by going after Georgia for their voting ID laws, which conservatives would say are just common sense. And it's the same laws or similar laws requiring an ID to vote, similar to most countries, most places. Nothing unusual about it.
So this is just an attack by a company on the system and on conservatives basically. So many conservatives have called for people to stop drinking Coca-Cola. Matt Walsh did a tweet which he summed it up well. I'll just read it. He said Coca-Cola went from indoctrinating its employees in critical race theory to fighting against Georgia's voter ID law. Is there any good reason for any conservative to ever buy another Coke product again? We could cut them off and out of our life with no effort. Why shouldn't we?
Now here's my take on this. Quitting Diet Coke or Coke is really hard. I know because I had a 12 Diet Coke a day habit for I don't know 30 years or something. And I did quit but it was hard. And I'm going to tell you how. So I'm going to teach you how to stop your Diet Coke habit or Coke habit, soda habit. And it's not hard if you do it right. If you do it wrong it's pretty hard. And I'll teach you how to do it right.
And it goes like this. Don't quit anything else at the same time. It is such a strong addiction. At least that's how I found it to be. Not addiction in the scientific term but you know functionally it's an addiction. That if you're trying to let's say improve your entire diet, anytime you're quitting Diet Coke that's a lot to ask of you, right? You want to be hungry and also not have a Diet Coke. Those are two really strong forces to be fighting at the same time.
So I say take two months. Give yourself a break on the rest of your diet. You know, eat healthy food but don't obsess over it. And just do one thing. Just quit Diet Coke or Coke or soda. It doesn't have to be Coca-Cola company. Just sugary drinks. Just quit that. In two months you will not only not crave it, it will look like a chemical experiment and not even look like a food beverage item. In two months the way you think of it will completely change just by not drinking it. You don't have to do anything else. Just don't drink it for two months and you will think it's crazy that anybody puts that in their body. It won't even look like a beverage.
I look at a soda now and I think, oh my God, I just feel sorry for anybody who drinks this stuff. After drinking 12 sodas a day for 30 years, right? So I'm the biggest hypocrite in the world and that's what I'm telling you. The moment you go two months without it, it doesn't look the same. When you're done it completely changes what it is subjectively.
So two months. Don't do anything else hard. Just do that. And here's the extra benefit. You know I like to find the benefit in chaos, right? Whenever there's chaos there's advantage. Whenever there's tragedy there's something, some little thing somebody created to make money.
And here's what the Coca-Cola company did for you and you should thank them for this. Coca-Cola just made it the easiest it's ever been to stop drinking soda because they pissed you off. Use it. Use it. If you're pissed off, don't waste that. Do not waste a good anger. Employ it. Use it. When that Diet Coke's looking at you saying drink me, drink me, use this anger and say I would love to drink you, you little freaking bastard, but I'm not because I hate you. I hate you.
Use it. The Coca-Cola company made I think a gigantic business mistake because they made it easier for a third of the country to quit their product. And it's good for your health if you do. Now I'm just going to quote people who know more than I do to make that claim that it's good for your health if you do.
So do it. Take the good from this which is they made it easy. Dr. Nicole Saphier tweeted on these sets of tweets and she said the pandemic showed an unhealthy diet contributes to approximately 678,000 deaths each year with diabetes, heart disease, and obesity making people vulnerable to COVID-19.
And this number is much larger than 2020 because of the pandemic. 670,000 people here dying from basically eating themselves to death. You know that's the comorbidity that puts them in a vulnerable position. So let's get healthy. I want everybody who watches this livestream to be healthier than the average. Just take the tips and put together a system that works for you.
All right, let's talk about the Floyd trial. So there was something interesting that came out of that. You know I've been telling you that the defense for Chauvin, they'd be missing the most obvious play if they don't challenge the quality of video evidence. You want to challenge the idea that just because you think you saw it with your own eyes on video that doesn't mean anything because video lies.
So the point that video lies and lies a lot and lies easily, it has to be communicated to the jury. Because if the jury sits there and thinks well it's on video, I saw it with my own eyes, it's over.
So the defense, I'm going to give them an A-plus for the following move. Apparently they had some camera angles in which it showed that Chauvin's knee at some point — we don't know how often during the nine minutes, we don't know how often this was — but at some point Chauvin's knee was actually on the shoulder blade above the neck. And it's very clear in the photos. But at other times I think he was on the neck.
So the way that I guess the lawyer introduced this was he asked one of the experts whoever was on stand if you'd heard of camera angle bias. Have you ever heard of camera angle bias? And I think the witness said no. And then he showed him two photos side by side. One the one you've probably seen that looks exactly like the knee is on his neck and then another camera angle of the same thing where it looks like it's on maybe further back on his shoulder blade. And apparently they time stamped it so you can tell it's the same time.
Now imagine you're in the jury. The entire time you've been watching these videos. So because you've seen them as part of the trial the entire time all you saw was a knee on the neck. And now the defense says okay, here's a different angle. It's not on the neck.
Now you might say to yourself but Scott that doesn't matter because he just took it off at one point, put it back on. It's not really relevant to anything. To which I would say it is relevant to intent. The entire argument is that he intentionally put Floyd in a dangerous situation, not intentionally killed him. Intentionally killed him I think is a higher charge. But intentionally put him in a dangerous situation. Where if he took his knee off every now and then that would suggest he was trying to mitigate the danger, right? That he was aware of a situation, was trying to not kill him. Because sometimes he took his knee off the neck. But I think there's other evidence to suggest that might have been after he'd already passed out. So he might have been dead by then. Don't know that part.
So the only thing I'll say is I don't know if the evidence makes the point the defense wanted to make because the timing, it might have been too late when the knee was off. But it's a really good play in terms of persuasion. Because the persuasion of it is that the jury just learned that they can't trust their own eyes. Regardless of the timing of when the knee was on the neck or the shoulder, the lesson is the same. You can't tell by looking at it. That's really good defense. That's really good. We'll see what happens.
Again, for the people who are watching this, I don't defend Chauvin. I don't defend Matt Gaetz. We just talk about the persuasion element of it and see if we can learn anything.
Carl Bergstrom, who often tweets about the virus and statistical truths about it, is warning us that we're misinterpreting — we being the public — that we're misinterpreting what it means to reach herd immunity. And specifically that herd immunity doesn't mean that we're past all the trouble and that the virus goes away.
So herd immunity you should understand is not the point when you don't have any more virus or more deaths. Herd immunity is when it doesn't go as fast. In other words it's not another pandemic peak coming. But the baseline infections could just go forever. I mean you could just have new babies being born and being infected forever.
So if you think that getting to herd immunity means oh we're done, throw away the masks, stop the social distancing, unfortunately it might not mean that. Now I'm not telling you that we're going to wear masks forever. I don't think we will. But we — the cough has to be a technique. Somebody says no, just woke up and I got a little allergies at the moment.
So here's what I would add to this. I'm less concerned because the weirdness of this virus is that we might be able to vaccinate basically 100 percent of the people who would die. So if it's not a dry cough, don't worry. I don't have COVID. So I'm going to disagree with Carl Bergstrom even though he's about a hundred times smarter than I am on the topic. I'm disagreeing.
And the only thing I'm going to add is that I think this virus is not like any other virus because you actually could vaccinate 100 percent of the people who might die from it. Nothing would stop you from doing that. All right, so what happens if 100 percent of the people who are vulnerable or something like it get vaccinated? Do you care if the rest of the people get it? I don't know. I don't know if you care. Now you've got the long-haul problem but isn't the long-haul problem probably even that people seem to get over it? It's just a really bad problem for several months.
Elon Musk said he will not take the vaccine. Interesting. I should tell you that I have scheduled myself to take the vaccine. I've been telling you that I wouldn't make a decision until I had to, until it was available, because I'd get all the information I could. And I've decided that given my age that I'm going to take it. If I were Elon Musk's age I don't know, I might think differently. But I'm not. So I'm going to call this early today because I'm going to go do some other things and my allergies are killing me. So I'm not that old but I've got asthma, you know. Don't take a chance.
And I will talk to you tomorrow.
well well well yeah i'm a little bit late a little bit late you know have you ever wondered what would it be like to watch coffee with scott adams if he had no time to prepare and had literally just awakened 15 minutes earlier what would that be like well you're going to find out and if you'd like to enjoy it and i know you would i mean why not why not enjoy it right all you need is a copper bug or glass a tanker challenger style canteen jugger flask a vessel of any kind fill it with your favorite liquid i like coffee join me now for the unparalleled pleasure the dopamine hit of the day the thing that makes everything better it's called the simultaneous sip if you haven't tried it oh i feel sorry for you those of you who have get ready it's happening now do you remember some of you have been watching me for a while i once told you that if you take the dale carnegie course one of the things that teaches you is really really valuable for some situations one of those situations is happening right now and let me tell you a little bit of a story before i get into that yeah um years ago i was doing a book tour going around the country signing books for whatever book was out and i got to a denver bookstore one of the biggest ones in i don't know the country or denver just some massive bookstore that had a room with a stadium audience and everything i mean it was just a big bookstore and i get there and the owner of the bookstore greets me and says all right people uh have been waiting for uh two hours to see you and i said ah that's great and and i thought they meant to sign books and they said yeah they can't wait to hear your speech and i said what yeah your speech that you're going to give in 10 minutes they're really excited about it and i said huh i didn't know i was giving a speech in 10 minutes no idea i thought i was just there to sign books but apparently the the audience had already assembled so there were i don't know several hundred people in the room waiting to hear my speech which didn't exist so uh my point is the if you take the dale carnegie course they actually teach you how to be prepared to always have a speech so you can walk into these situations as i did i just gave a speech because you just always have one now it's usually pieces of speeches right so you have these little components that if you get in one of these situations you can just take them off the shelf you say okay i'll take one of these one of these one of these and i'll just put them together on the fly which is what i just did so that story about the bookstore some of you have heard it before and the point of it is it's one of my shelf points always keep a few on the shelf so anytime you get you get a little situation like this you go oh i'll introduce it by the the denver bookstore story and then i'll have a good momentum going and then i'll find other pieces as i go i'm going to give you today my first mandatory twitter follow recommendation you ready now when i say mandatory i'm going to the next level i'm taking it up because i've told you before there are some people you should follow i'll probably mention them again but there are a number of people who are just way better to follow than other people because they have some kind of insight or they're just good at tweeting or something and i'm going to give you my first ever mandatory follow meaning that if you follow me i'm telling you it's mandatory glenn greenwald now if you don't already follow glenn greenwald here's the first thing you need to know has nothing to do with politics he talks about politics so his domain is politics but that's not the recommendation he's one of the few people who every time he writes or tweets he can take the the curtain of reality it just pushes it back and then he's done and then he then he brings it back you know after you're done reading them and then you have to live in that other artificial world for a while and then glenn greenwald says something and he pulls the curtain back again and you can see the real world for a little bit now usually he's pulling back the curtain on um the media itself so that you can see that you're living in an artificial world literally that you've created an artificial subjective world that you're living in and he's one of the people and there aren't many of them who don't live in that world i don't know why i would love to know the history of what you know hallucinogenics he's ever tried in his life if any i would love to know how he became who he is because somehow he lives outside that world and he can just pull the curtain back and look and show you it's kind of amazing so he's a mandatory follow because he shows you what's on the other side of the curtain and you don't get that from everybody i'll give you other mandatories as we go along here here's a way to know if you were dumb a lot of you have been wondering am i dumb do you ever have that thought sometimes it might be the imposter effect you're not really dumb but you worry that you are compared to other people um but one way to know you are dumb is if you hear an argument and the first thing you think is oh you love that person you're talking about why don't you just kiss them apparently you love them okay that that if that's your response to an argument you're kind of dumb you're not really ready for talking in public okay if you say oh oh scott you're defending you're defending the worst person you're an apologist for the worst person if you if that's your feeling you're dumb because you can't you for some reason you can't separate an argument which could be good or bad from the people who are making it if you can't do that you just probably shouldn't talk in public maybe that's not for you okay have i set you up enough all right let's talk about matt gates because i i refuse to be limited by dumb people not understanding that you can talk about people you can talk about their situation but you're not an apologist defending people you're just not that person right can we do that all right i would like to know that the people who follow me are smart enough to separate an argument from people if you can't do that you're you're on the wrong live stream so let's do that as these stories go and of course you all know the weird matt gates story there's allegations of orgies with underage people with no evidence that we've seen to suggest any of that's true but the longer you wait don't you expect the evidence to come out big old story like this you know more and more evidence is coming out so it becomes a different story the longer you wait it starts as one thing and now it's it's evolving and it's it has so evolved to sort of a new thing and that's that's what i'm going to describe right now number one matt gates has said from the beginning that any allegations that he was with a 70 year old excuse me i don't know and the allegations that he was with the 17 year old are just completely false it just doesn't exist but he's gone further to say that the accuser doesn't exist that's pretty gutsy isn't it how many people accused of something like this would go so far as to say not only did i not do it but the accuser doesn't exist now that's a pretty big claim later if you find out that the accuser does exist you know then there's a separate question of whether anything happened with that accuser similar to what was accused but isn't that is that an unusual claim don't you think because if somebody knew that the accuser would exist in other words if matt gates knew the person exists wouldn't that be the worst defense to say that they don't even exist right unless is true if put yourself in that position right now we can't read his mind okay so we're not reading his mind but put yourself in the position you've been accused of something with an underage person 17 would you say if you knew you'd been accused of that would you say no we did not do that thing i know who you're talking about but certainly we didn't do that thing that's very different from saying nobody exists that they just don't exist that's really different i don't know that like you'd have to be pretty sure they don't exist would you because for sure the most the simplest thing to prove is that a person exists am i wrong is there anything easier to prove than that a person exists he's really it's interesting isn't it because what happens if they produce the person he looks really really bad would he put himself in a position and it's not it's obvious that he's thought about it and planned his defense right it's not like an off-the-cuff thing he said he's saying this repeatedly and often the person doesn't exist now if that person ends up existing that's going to completely change what i think about the situation and for you too i would think but at the moment every day that goes by when we don't hear that the person exists and by the way i don't think the person would be still 17 right a number of months have gone by since the accusations even began so statistically speaking it seems deeply unlikely that there's still a minor involved at least today it would be somebody over 18.
so do you think that there is somebody deeply involved in some kind of a secret investigation who doesn't want to be known at this point and and the leaks don't produce that person i don't know there's something sketchy about the fact that the longer you wait you don't find out now if tomorrow we hear the name of the person and the person exists change everything right i'm just saying that every day that goes by you have to say i'm starting to wonder if this person exists that's the reasonable question here's the other part that i haven't heard anybody say there's this weird element of it where apparently the gases had involved the fbi before any of this broke they had involved the fbi and what they believed was an extortion attempt all right so here's the key point uh that the the gates father and son both believed that it was an extortion attempt so much so that they got the law enforcement involved all right now we've seen the documents if you haven't seen them yet they're they're in the news today we see the documents and emails going back and forth between the two attorney types who were proposing to gates a senior that for 25 million dollars they could get this alleged um what would you call him captive back from iran who may or may not exist right he may he may or may not be alive we don't know there's indication he's not alive but these two people said they had indication he was alive you and i don't know so we don't know if that guy exists but imagine you're the gates and the and people approach you and say for 25 million dollars we can maybe get this hostage back that you think might not even be real okay you're saying to yourself i'm not even sure there's a real guy alive that could be saved and if he is why isn't the government doing it right so it's kind of sketchy right the government wouldn't do this are you saying that there's nobody in the government of the united states who would be interested in getting back this hostage so right away it's sketchy right now you could argue oh the government tried or they don't care or they don't believe the story but it's true so you could maybe maybe come up with some stretch of a story that would say yeah this is the way to do it you wouldn't use the government you would you would make some deal with a private citizen i mean it doesn't yeah it doesn't pass to the stiffness right but but it doesn't fail it so badly that you could say it's impossible all right it doesn't pass the sniff test but it's not completely ruled out okay now i looked at the documents the emails back and forth and the way it's the way it's presented is that hey there's an extra benefit if you help us out with this 25 million dollars that they call the loan but i don't know if you would call it a loan because a loan is something you expect to get repaid i don't know if anybody expected that to be repaid so let's let's first say that characterizing it as a loan is maybe a subjective call even if there was some alleged plan to repay it feels a little iffy to me now when you looked at the documents did you say to yourself there's an extortion thing because part of the offer was that they would try to lobby the government to get matt gates cleared or pardoned presidentially pardoned of some wrongdoings which were unspecific about whatever they heard about these sex crimes now do you believe that these two lawyers had enough weight that they could have done anything at all to get a pardon for matt gates should he have done anything that so far we're not aware of right so let me say it again there's no evidence of a specific anything none no evidence right to the public we don't know if anybody else has seen anything but you and i have seen no evidence of a crime now imagine you're the gates's and you've got this offer that will help you will help you get out of this alleged crime if you help us with this alleged loan for a captive who is allegedly alive what do you do with that well what the gates did is they went to law enforcement they said this feels like extortion all right now let me ask you this we're amateurs looking from the outside right and we take the clues and carpe good to see you uh that wasn't worth twenty dollars you should just text me um but thank you uh what was i saying i was just good to see you carpe carpe duncan joins has just joined the uh the show here um so we're looking at this situation and here's my question that i haven't seen answered what would cause the gases to think this was extortion what would cause them to think that i think one thing that would certainly cause you to think that is wait for it if you were matt gates and you knew for sure that you had not been involved in any sex crimes right if you thought you had been involved in sexual crimes and these people said we have a way to maybe help you get out wouldn't you be a little bit interested in talking to him if you've done the crime because if you've done the crime and allegedly there's an investigation you know there's witnesses and you know there's real evidence now you know you're in real big trouble you would at least listen to the offer wouldn't you yeah you would the only situation in which you would say my god this looks like an obvious scam is if you knew there was no crime thank you kevin uh yeah and i haven't seen anybody mention that it seems to me that given that these documents and the offer from the the two lawyer people were um they were kind of sketchy the way they handled it was as if they didn't believe there was any crime that's the way they handled it that means something they didn't handle it as if well maybe there is a crime here they handled it like no crime existed that's the way you'd handle it this must be a scam because there's no crime they're trying to extort me over no crime you go right to law enforcement but suppose you had done the crime and you knew it is the first thing you do get to get law enforcement involved i don't think so like it doesn't it doesn't quite fit does it so i would say the the documents are quite exculpatory but we are far from knowing the you know the final conclusion to any of this i'm just going to say that the gates situation is looking better for gates every day and worse for his accusers but we'll keep watching this meanwhile world war iii has begun i don't know if you've heard about this world war three is underway and i'm not even kidding there's an actual world war that just hasn't started apparently the way it's begun is that china has started to capture philippine fishing territory by just moving 220 fishing boats to fish but they're not exactly there to fish they're really there as part of the military to occupy until they have so much functional control of the sea that for all practical purposes china owns it which is what they're doing to the entire south china sea it's hard to see that as not world war three because they are literally conquering territory it just happens to be ocean territory and they're doing it directly with assets it's obvious there's no question about it it is world war iii they are they they are absorbing enormous swaths of the earth and putting it under chinese control parts of the world that people think china doesn't control now the thing that makes it um a little different than say a normal world war a little different is that um china might need might need that ocean to feed its people in the future so apparently it's very rich in fish and i don't think that they want to control it just for export i think that china has a massive problem feeding his people just because there are so many of them and they probably need that fish in the future so it's not like a regular war of conquest it might be a war of necessity and i don't know what historical precedent there is for a war of necessity or presumed advantage slash necessity it's a little different but it's a similar strategy they're using that russia used in the ukraine where you send in i guess the the russians sent in what were called the little green men so they were russian soldiers and they just took off their their uniforms and uh they they just invaded ukraine and said oh no we're not military are you kidding no look at me i'm not even wearing a uniform how could i be russian military until there are so many of them there it's it becomes kind of a fact on the ground that that russia controls some territory so china's doing the same thing with these fishing boats they're just making it a fact that they own it over time let's talk about coca-cola let me start by saying i oppose boycotts i oppose boycotts as soon as you go down that boycott road and you get re-boycotted everybody's boycotting everybody it's just better to let business be business and let politics be politics it's just better right it's better for all of us let's just not be attacking companies but sometimes sometimes the company attacks you that's not your fault right sometimes the company attacks you well that's different i i would say don't boycott a company just because they have some opinion or something but if that company attacks you well you certainly have a right to defend yourself and so let's talk about coke so there are many conservatives who would consider that coke coca-cola the company has attacked them in a way by going after georgia for their voting id laws which conservatives would say are just common sense and it's the same laws or similar laws requiring an id to vote similar to most countries most places nothing unusual about it so this is just an attack by a company on the system and on conservatives basically so many conservatives have called for people to stop drinking coca-cola matt walsh did a tweet which he summed it up well i'll just read it he said coca-cola went from went from indoctrinating its employees and critical race theory to fighting against georgia's voter id law is there any good reason for any conservative to ever buy another coke product again we could cut them off and out of our life with no effort why shouldn't we now here's my take on this quitting diet coke or coke is really hard i know because i had a 12 diet coke a day habit for i don't know 30 years or something and i did quit but it was hard and i'm going to tell you how so i'm going to teach you how to stop your diet coke habit or coke habit soda habit and it's not hard if you do it right if you do it wrong it's pretty hard and i'll teach you how to do it right and it goes like this don't quit anything else at the same time it is such a strong addiction at least that's how i found it to be not addiction in the scientific term but you know functionally it's an addiction that if you if you're trying to let's say improve your entire diet anytime you're quitting diet coke that's a lot to ask of you right you want to be hungry and also not have a diet coke those are two really strong forces to be fighting at the same time so i say take two months give yourself a break on the rest of your diet you know eat healthy food but don't um don't obsess over it and just do one thing just quit diet coke or coke or soda it doesn't have to be coca-cola company just sugary drinks just quit that in two months you will not only not crave it it will look like a chemical experiment and not even look like a food beverage item in two months the way you think of it will completely change just by not drinking it you don't have to do anything else just don't drink it for two months and you will think it's crazy that anybody puts that in their body it won't even look like a beverage i look at i look at a soda now and i think oh my god i just feel sorry for anybody who drinks this stuff after drinking 12 sodas a day for 30 years right so i'm the biggest hypocrite in the world and that's what i'm telling you the moment you go two months without it it doesn't look the same when you're done completely changes what it is subjectively so two months don't do anything else hard just do that and here's the extra extra benefit um you know i like to find the benefit and of chaos right whenever there's chaos there's advantage whenever there's tragedy there's something some little thing somebody created to make money and here's what uh the coca-cola company did for you and you should thank them for this coca-cola just made it the easiest it's ever been to stop drinking soda because they pissed you off use it use it if you're pissed off don't waste that do not waste a good anger employ it use it when that diet coke's looking at you saying drink me drink me use this anger and say i would love to drink you you little freaking bastard but i'm not because i hate you i hate you use it the the diet the coca-cola company made i think a gigantic business mistake because they made it easier for a third of the country to quit their product and it's good for your health if you do now i'm just going to quote people who know more than i do to make that claim that is good for your your health if you do so do it take the good from this which is they made it easy uh dr nicole sapphire tweeted on on these sets of tweets and she said the pandemic side an unhealthy diet contributes to approximately 678 000 deaths each year with diabetes heart disease and obesity making people vulnerable to covenant 19.
and this number is much larger than 22 20 20 because of the the pandemic 670 000 people here dying from basically eating themselves to death you know that's the co-morbidity that puts them in a vulnerable position so let's get healthy i i want everybody who watches this live stream to be healthier than the average just just take the tips and put together a system that works for you all right let's talk about the uh floyd trial so there was something interesting that came out of that um you know i've been i've been telling you that the defense for a shaven they'd be missing they'd be missing the most obvious play if they don't challenge the quality of video evidence all right um you want to you want to challenge the idea that just because you think you saw it with your own eyes on video that doesn't mean anything because video lies so the ver the point that video lies and lies a lot and lies easily it has to be communicated to the to the jury because if the jury sits there and thinks well it's on video i saw it with my own eyes it's over so the defense i'm going to give them a they get an a-plus for the following move apparently they had some camera angles in which it showed that shaven's uh knee at some point we don't know how often during the nine minutes we don't know how often this was but at some point shaven's uh knee was actually on the shoulder blade above the neck and it's very clear in the photos but at other times i think he was on the neck so the way that i guess the way the lawyer introduced this was he asked one of the experts whoever was on stand if you'd heard of camera angle bias have you ever heard of camera angle bias and i think the witness said no and then he showed him two photos side by side one the one you've probably seen that looks exactly like the knee is on his neck and then another camera angle of the same thing where it looks like it's on maybe further back on his shoulder blade and you and apparently they time stamped it so you can tell it's the same time now imagine you're you're in the jury the entire time you've been watching these videos so because you've seen them as part of the trial the entire time all you saw all you saw was a knee on the neck and now the defense says okay here's a different angle it's not on the neck now you might say to yourself but scott that doesn't matter because he took his he just took it off at one point put it back on it's not really relevant to anything to which i would say it is relevant to intent the the entire the entire argument is that uh you know he intentionally put floyd in a dangerous situation not intentionally killed him intentionally killed him i think he's a higher charge but intentionally put him in a dangerous situation where if he took his knee off every now and then that would suggest he was trying to mitigate the danger right that he was aware of a situation who was trying to not kill him because sometimes he took his knee off the neck but i think there's other evidence to suggest that might have been after he'd already passed out so he might have been dead by then don't know that part so the only thing i'll say is i don't know if the evidence makes the point the defense wanted to make because the timing it might have been too late when the knee was off but it's a really good play in terms of persuasion because the persuasion of it is that the the jury just learned that they can't trust their own eyes regardless of the timing of when the knee the knee was on the neck or the shoulder the lesson is the same you can't tell by looking at it that's really good defense that's really good we'll see what happens again for the people who are watching this i don't i don't defend shaven i don't defend matt gates we just talk about the persuasion element of it and see if we can learn anything carl bergstrom who often tweets about the virus and statistical truths about it is warning us that uh we're misinterpreting we being the public excuse me that we're misinterpreting um what it means to reach herd immunity and specifically specifically that herd immunity doesn't mean that we're past all the trouble and that the virus goes away so herd immunity you should understand is not the point when you don't have any more virus or more deaths herd immunity is when it doesn't go as fast in other words it's not a another pandemic peak coming but the baseline the baseline infections could just go forever i mean you could just have new babies being born and being infected forever so if you think that getting to herd immunity means oh we're done throw away the masks stop the social distancing unfortunately it might not mean that now i'm not i'm not telling you that we're going to wear masks forever i don't think we will but we the cough has to be a technique somebody says no just woke up and i got a little allergies at the moment um so um here's what i would add to this i'm i'm less less concerned because the weirdness of this virus is that we might be able to vaccinate basically a hundred percent of the people who would die so if the uh it's not a dry cough don't worry uh i don't have code um so i'm gonna disagree with carl bergstrom even though he's about a hundred times smarter than i am on the topic i'm disagreeing and the only thing i'm gonna add is that i think this virus is not like any other virus because you actually could you could vaccinate 100 of the people who might die from it nothing would stop you from doing that all right so what happens if 100 of the people who are vulnerable or something like it get vaccinated do you care if the rest of the people get it i don't know i don't know if you care now you got the long-haul problem but isn't the long-haul problem probably uh you know even that people seem to get over it it's just a really bad problem for several months elon musk said he will not take the vaccine interesting i should tell you that i have scheduled myself to take the vaccine i've been telling you that i wouldn't make a decision until i had to until it was available because i'd get all the all the information i could and i've decided that given my age that i'm gonna i'm gonna take it if i were if i were elon musk's age i don't know i i might think differently but i'm not so i'm gonna call this uh i'm gonna call this early today because i'm going to go do some other things and my allergies are killing me so uh i'm not that old but i've got asthma you know don't take a chance and i will talk to you tomorrow
well well well
yeah i'm a little bit late a little bit
late
you know have you ever wondered what
would it be like
to watch coffee with scott adams if he
had
no time to prepare and had literally
just awakened 15 minutes earlier
what would that be like well you're
going to find out
and if you'd like to enjoy it and i know
you would
i mean why not why not enjoy it right
all you need is a copper bug or glass a
tanker challenger style canteen jugger
flask a vessel of any kind
fill it with your favorite liquid i like
coffee join me now
for the unparalleled pleasure the
dopamine hit of the day
the thing that makes everything better
it's called the simultaneous sip if you
haven't tried it oh i feel sorry for you
those of you who have get ready it's
happening now
do you remember some of you have been
watching me for a while
i once told you that if you take the
dale carnegie course
one of the things that teaches you is
really really
valuable for some situations one of
those situations
is happening right now and let me tell
you a little bit of a story
before i get into that
yeah um years ago i was doing a book
tour going around the country
signing books for whatever book was out
and i got to a denver bookstore one of
the biggest ones in
i don't know the country or denver just
some massive bookstore that had
a room with a stadium audience and
everything i mean it was just a big
bookstore
and i get there and the owner of the
bookstore greets me and says all right
people uh have been waiting for uh two
hours
to see you and i said ah that's great
and
and i thought they meant to sign books
and they said yeah they can't wait to
hear your speech
and i said what yeah your speech that
you're going to give in
10 minutes they're really excited about
it and i said
huh i didn't know i was giving a speech
in 10 minutes
no idea i thought i was just there to
sign books
but apparently the the audience had
already assembled
so there were i don't know several
hundred people in the room waiting to
hear my speech
which didn't exist
so uh my point is the if you take the
dale carnegie course
they actually teach you how to be
prepared to always have a speech
so you can walk into these situations as
i did
i just gave a speech because you just
always have one now it's usually
pieces of speeches right so you have
these little components
that if you get in one of these
situations you can just take them off
the shelf
you say okay i'll take one of these one
of these one of these and i'll just put
them together on the fly
which is what i just did so that story
about the
bookstore some of you have heard it
before and the point of it is
it's one of my shelf points
always keep a few on the shelf so
anytime you get
you get a little situation like this you
go oh
i'll introduce it by the the denver
bookstore story
and then i'll have a good momentum going
and then i'll find other pieces as i go
i'm going to give you today my first
mandatory
twitter follow recommendation
you ready now when i say mandatory
i'm going to the next level i'm taking
it up because i've told you before there
are some people you should follow i'll
probably mention them again
but there are a number of people who are
just way better to follow
than other people because they have some
kind of insight or
they're just good at tweeting or
something and i'm going to give you my
first ever
mandatory follow meaning that if you
follow me
i'm telling you it's mandatory glenn
greenwald
now if you don't already follow glenn
greenwald here's the first thing you
need to know
has nothing to do with politics he talks
about politics
so his domain is politics but that's not
the recommendation
he's one of the few people who every
time he writes or tweets
he can take the the curtain of reality
it just pushes it back
and then he's done and then he then he
brings it back you know after you're
done reading them
and then you have to live in that other
artificial world for a while
and then glenn greenwald says something
and he pulls the curtain back again and
you can see the real world for a little
bit
now usually he's pulling back the
curtain on um the media itself
so that you can see that you're living
in an artificial world
literally that you've created an
artificial
subjective world that you're living in
and he's one of the people
and there aren't many of them who don't
live in that world
i don't know why i would love to know
the history of what
you know hallucinogenics he's ever tried
in his life if any
i would love to know how he became who
he is because somehow he lives outside
that world
and he can just pull the curtain back
and look and show you
it's kind of amazing so he's a mandatory
follow
because he shows you what's on the other
side of the curtain
and you don't get that from everybody
i'll give you other mandatories as we
go along here here's a way to know if
you were dumb
a lot of you have been wondering am i
dumb
do you ever have that thought sometimes
it might be the imposter
effect you're not really dumb but you
worry that you are compared to other
people
um but one way to know you are dumb is
if you hear an
argument and the first thing you think
is
oh you love that person you're talking
about
why don't you just kiss them apparently
you love them
okay that that if that's your response
to an argument you're kind of dumb
you're not really ready for talking in
public
okay if you say oh oh scott you're
defending
you're defending the worst person you're
an apologist for
the worst person if you if that's your
feeling
you're dumb because you can't you for
some reason you can't separate
an argument which could be good or bad
from the people who are making it
if you can't do that you just probably
shouldn't talk in
public maybe that's not for you okay
have i set you up enough
all right let's talk about matt gates
because i i refuse to be limited
by dumb people not understanding that
you can talk about people
you can talk about their situation but
you're not an apologist
defending people you're just not that
person right can we do that
all right i would like to know that the
people who follow me are smart enough
to separate an argument from people if
you can't do that you're
you're on the wrong live stream so let's
do that
as these stories go and of course you
all know the weird
matt gates story there's allegations of
orgies with underage people with no
evidence that we've seen
to suggest any of that's true but the
longer you wait
don't you expect the evidence to come
out big old story like this you know
more and more evidence is coming out
so it becomes a different story the
longer you wait
it starts as one thing and now it's it's
evolving
and it's it has so evolved to sort of a
new thing
and that's that's what i'm going to
describe right now
number one matt gates has said from the
beginning
that any allegations that he was with a
70 year old
excuse me i don't know and the
allegations that he was with the 17 year
old are just completely false
it just doesn't exist but he's gone
further to say
that the accuser doesn't exist
that's pretty gutsy isn't it how many
people
accused of something like this
would go so far as to say not only did i
not do it
but the accuser doesn't exist
now that's a pretty big claim
later if you find out that the accuser
does exist
you know then there's a separate
question of whether anything happened
with that accuser
similar to what was accused
but isn't that is that an unusual claim
don't you think because if somebody knew
that the accuser would
exist in other words if matt gates knew
the person exists
wouldn't that be the worst defense to
say that they don't even exist
right unless is true if
put yourself in that position right now
we can't read his mind
okay so we're not reading his mind but
put yourself in the position
you've been accused of something with an
underage person 17
would you say if you knew you'd been
accused of that would you say
no we did not do that thing i know who
you're talking about
but certainly we didn't do that thing
that's very different from saying nobody
exists
that they just don't exist that's really
different
i don't know that like you'd have to be
pretty sure they don't exist
would you because for sure the most
the simplest thing to prove is that a
person exists
am i wrong is there anything easier to
prove
than that a person exists he's really
it's interesting isn't it because what
happens if they produce the person
he looks really really bad would he put
himself in a position and it's not
it's obvious that he's thought about it
and planned his defense right it's not
like an off-the-cuff thing he said he's
saying this repeatedly and often
the person doesn't exist
now if that person ends up existing
that's going to completely change what i
think about the situation
and for you too i would think but at the
moment
every day that goes by when we don't
hear that the person exists
and by the way i don't think the person
would be still 17
right a number of months have gone by
since the accusations even
began so statistically speaking it seems
deeply unlikely
that there's still a minor involved at
least today
it would be somebody over 18. so do you
think that there is somebody deeply
involved in some kind of a
secret investigation who doesn't want to
be
known at this point and and the leaks
don't produce that person
i don't know there's something sketchy
about the fact that the longer you wait
you don't find out now if tomorrow we
hear the name of the person and the
person exists
change everything right i'm just saying
that every day that goes by
you have to say i'm starting to wonder
if this person exists
that's the reasonable question here's
the other part that i haven't heard
anybody say
there's this weird element of it where
apparently the gases
had involved the fbi before any of this
broke
they had involved the fbi and what they
believed was an extortion attempt
all right so here's the key point uh
that the the gates father and son
both believed that it was an extortion
attempt so much so that they got the law
enforcement involved
all right now we've seen the documents
if you haven't seen them yet they're
they're in the news today we see the
documents and emails going back and
forth
between the two attorney types who
were proposing to gates a senior
that for 25 million dollars they could
get this
alleged um what would you call him
captive
back from iran who may or may not exist
right he may
he may or may not be alive we don't know
there's indication he's not alive but
these two people said they had
indication he was alive
you and i don't know so we don't know if
that guy exists
but imagine you're the gates and the and
people approach you and say for 25
million dollars
we can maybe get this hostage back that
you think
might not even be real okay
you're saying to yourself i'm not even
sure there's a real guy
alive that could be saved and
if he is why isn't the government doing
it right so it's kind of sketchy right
the government wouldn't do this are you
saying that there's nobody in the
government of the united states
who would be interested in getting back
this hostage
so right away it's sketchy right now you
could argue oh the government tried or
they don't care or
they don't believe the story but it's
true so you could
maybe maybe come up with some
stretch of a story that would say yeah
this is the way to do it you wouldn't
use the government
you would you would make some deal with
a private citizen
i mean it doesn't yeah it doesn't pass
to the stiffness right
but but it doesn't fail it so badly
that you could say it's impossible all
right it doesn't pass the sniff test
but it's not completely ruled out
okay now i looked at the documents
the emails back and forth and the way
it's the way it's presented
is that hey there's an extra benefit if
you help us out with this 25 million
dollars
that they call the loan but i don't know
if you would call it a loan
because a loan is something you expect
to get repaid
i don't know if anybody expected that to
be repaid so let's
let's first say that characterizing it
as a loan
is maybe a subjective call even if there
was some alleged plan to repay it
feels a little iffy to me now
when you looked at the documents did you
say to yourself there's an extortion
thing because part of the offer was that
they would
try to lobby the government to
get matt gates cleared or pardoned
presidentially pardoned
of some wrongdoings which were
unspecific
about whatever they heard about these
sex crimes now do you believe that these
two lawyers had enough weight
that they could have done anything at
all to get a pardon for matt gates
should he have done anything that so far
we're not aware of
right so let me say it again there's no
evidence of a specific anything
none no evidence right to the public we
don't know if anybody else has seen
anything
but you and i have seen no evidence of a
crime
now imagine you're the gates's and
you've got this offer that will help you
will help you get out of this alleged
crime
if you help us with this alleged loan
for a captive who is allegedly alive
what do you do with that well what the
gates did is they went to law
enforcement they said
this feels like extortion all right
now let me ask you this we're amateurs
looking from the outside right
and we take the clues and
carpe good to see you uh
that wasn't worth twenty dollars you
should just text me um
but thank you uh what was i saying
i was just good to see you carpe carpe
duncan joins has just joined the uh the
show here
um so we're looking at this situation
and here's my question that i haven't
seen answered
what would cause the gases to think this
was extortion
what would cause them to think that
i think one thing that would certainly
cause you to think that is
wait for it if you were matt gates
and you knew for sure that you had not
been involved
in any sex crimes
right if you thought you had been
involved in
sexual crimes and these people said we
have a way to maybe help you get out
wouldn't you be a little bit interested
in talking to him
if you've done the crime because if
you've done the crime
and allegedly there's an investigation
you know there's witnesses and you know
there's real evidence
now you know you're in real big trouble
you would at least listen to the offer
wouldn't you
yeah you would the only situation in
which you would say
my god this looks like an obvious scam
is if you knew there was no crime
thank you kevin uh
yeah and i haven't seen anybody mention
that
it seems to me that given that these
documents and the offer from the the two
lawyer people
were um they were kind of sketchy
the way they handled it was as if they
didn't believe there was any crime
that's the way they handled it that
means something
they didn't handle it as if well maybe
there is a crime here
they handled it like no crime existed
that's the way you'd handle it this must
be a scam
because there's no crime they're trying
to extort me over no crime
you go right to law enforcement but
suppose you had done the crime and you
knew it
is the first thing you do get to get law
enforcement involved
i don't think so like it doesn't it
doesn't quite fit does it
so i would say the the documents are
quite exculpatory
but we are far from knowing the you know
the final conclusion to any of this
i'm just going to say that the gates
situation is looking better for gates
every day
and worse for his accusers but we'll
keep watching this
meanwhile world war iii has begun i
don't know if you've heard about this
world war three is underway and i'm not
even kidding
there's an actual world war that just
hasn't started apparently the way it's
begun
is that china has
started to capture philippine fishing
territory
by just moving 220 fishing boats
to fish but they're not exactly there to
fish they're really there as part of the
military to
occupy until they have so much
functional control of the sea that for
all practical purposes
china owns it which is what they're
doing to the entire
south china sea it's hard to see that as
not world war three
because they are literally conquering
territory it just happens to be ocean
territory
and they're doing it directly with
assets
it's obvious there's no question about
it it is world war
iii they are they
they are absorbing enormous swaths of
the earth and putting it under chinese
control
parts of the world that people think
china doesn't control
now the thing that makes it um
a little different than say a normal
world war
a little different is that
um china might need might need that
ocean to feed its
people in the future so apparently it's
very rich in fish
and i don't think that they want to
control it just for export
i think that china has a massive problem
feeding his people just because there
are so many of them and they
probably need that fish in the future so
it's not like a regular war of conquest
it might be a war of necessity and i
don't know
what historical precedent there is for a
war of necessity
or presumed advantage slash necessity
it's a little different but it's a
similar strategy they're using that
russia
used in the ukraine where you send in i
guess the
the russians sent in what were called
the little green men
so they were russian soldiers and they
just took off their their uniforms
and uh they they just invaded ukraine
and said
oh no we're not military are you kidding
no look at me i'm not even wearing a
uniform
how could i be russian military until
there are so many of them there it's
it becomes kind of a fact on the ground
that that russia controls some territory
so china's doing the same thing with
these fishing boats
they're just making it a fact that they
own it over time
let's talk about coca-cola
let me start by saying i oppose boycotts
i oppose boycotts as soon as you go down
that boycott road
and you get re-boycotted everybody's
boycotting everybody
it's just better to let business be
business and let politics be politics
it's just better right it's better for
all of us
let's just not be attacking companies
but sometimes
sometimes the company attacks you that's
not your fault
right sometimes the company attacks you
well that's different i i would say
don't boycott a company just because
they have some opinion or something
but if that company attacks you
well you certainly have a right to
defend yourself and so let's talk about
coke so there are many conservatives who
would consider that coke
coca-cola the company has attacked them
in a way by going after georgia for
their voting
id laws which conservatives would say
are just
common sense and it's the same laws or
similar laws
requiring an id to vote similar to most
countries most places
nothing unusual about it so this is just
an attack
by a company on the system and on
conservatives basically
so many conservatives have called for
people to stop drinking coca-cola
matt walsh did a tweet which he summed
it up well i'll just read it he said
coca-cola went from
went from indoctrinating its employees
and critical race theory
to fighting against georgia's voter id
law is there any good reason
for any conservative to ever buy another
coke product again
we could cut them off and out of our
life with no effort
why shouldn't we now
here's my take on this
quitting diet coke or coke is really
hard
i know because i had a 12 diet coke a
day habit for
i don't know 30 years or something and i
did quit
but it was hard and i'm going to tell
you how
so i'm going to teach you how to stop
your diet coke
habit or coke habit soda habit and
it's not hard if you do it right if you
do it wrong it's pretty hard
and i'll teach you how to do it right
and it goes like this
don't quit anything else at the same
time
it is such a strong addiction at least
that's how i found it to be
not addiction in the scientific term but
you know functionally it's an addiction
that if you if you're trying to let's
say improve your entire diet
anytime you're quitting diet coke that's
a lot to ask of you
right you want to be hungry and also not
have a diet coke
those are two really strong forces to be
fighting at the same time
so i say take two months give yourself a
break on the rest of your diet you know
eat healthy food but don't
um don't obsess over it and just do one
thing
just quit diet coke or coke or soda it
doesn't have to be coca-cola company
just sugary drinks just quit that
in two months you will not only not
crave it
it will look like a chemical experiment
and not even look
like a food beverage item in two months
the way you think of it will completely
change just by not drinking it
you don't have to do anything else just
don't drink it for two months
and you will think it's crazy that
anybody puts that in their body
it won't even look like a beverage
i look at i look at a soda now and i
think oh my god i just feel
sorry for anybody who drinks this stuff
after drinking 12 sodas a day for 30
years right
so i'm the biggest hypocrite in the
world and that's what i'm telling you
the moment you go two months without it
it doesn't look the same when you're
done
completely changes what it is
subjectively
so two months don't do anything else
hard just do that
and here's the extra extra benefit um
you know i like to find the benefit and
of chaos right
whenever there's chaos there's advantage
whenever there's tragedy
there's something some little thing
somebody created to make money
and here's what uh the coca-cola company
did for you
and you should thank them for this
coca-cola just made it the easiest it's
ever been
to stop drinking soda because they
pissed you off
use it use it if you're pissed off
don't waste that do not waste
a good anger employ it
use it when that diet coke's looking at
you saying
drink me drink me
use this anger and say i would love to
drink you
you little freaking bastard but i'm not
because i hate you i hate you use it
the the diet the coca-cola company
made i think a gigantic business mistake
because they made it easier for a third
of the country to quit their product
and it's good for your health if you do
now i'm just
going to quote people who know more than
i do to make that claim that is good for
your
your health if you do so do it
take the good from this which is they
made it easy
uh dr nicole sapphire tweeted on
on these sets of tweets and she said the
pandemic side an unhealthy diet
contributes to approximately
678 000 deaths each year
with diabetes heart disease and obesity
making people vulnerable to covenant 19.
and this number is much larger than 22
20 20 because of the the pandemic
670 000 people here dying from
basically eating themselves to death you
know that's the co-morbidity that puts
them
in a vulnerable position so
let's get healthy i i want everybody who
watches
this live stream to be healthier
than the average just just take the tips
and
put together a system that works for you
all right let's talk about the uh
floyd trial so there was something
interesting that came out of that
um you know i've been i've been telling
you that the defense
for a shaven they'd be missing they'd be
missing the most obvious play
if they don't challenge the quality of
video evidence
all right um you want to
you want to challenge the idea that just
because you think you saw it with your
own eyes on video
that doesn't mean anything because video
lies
so the ver the point that video lies and
lies a lot
and lies easily it has to be
communicated to the
to the jury because if the jury sits
there and thinks well it's on video
i saw it with my own eyes it's over so
the defense i'm going to give them a
they get an a-plus for the following
move apparently they had some camera
angles
in which it showed that shaven's uh knee
at some point we don't know how often
during the nine minutes we don't know
how often this was
but at some point shaven's uh knee was
actually on the shoulder blade
above the neck and it's very clear in
the photos
but at other times i think he was on the
neck so
the way that i guess the way the lawyer
introduced this was he asked
one of the experts whoever was on stand
if you'd heard of
camera angle bias have you ever heard of
camera angle bias
and i think the witness said no and then
he showed him two photos
side by side one the one you've probably
seen
that looks exactly like the knee is on
his neck and then
another camera angle of the same thing
where it looks like it's on
maybe further back on his shoulder blade
and you and apparently they time stamped
it so you can tell it's the same time
now imagine you're you're in the jury
the entire time you've been watching
these videos so because you've seen them
as part of the trial
the entire time all you saw all you saw
was a knee on the neck and now the
defense says
okay here's a different angle it's not
on the neck
now you might say to yourself but scott
that doesn't matter
because he took his he just took it off
at one point put it back on
it's not really relevant to anything to
which i would say it is relevant to
intent
the the entire the entire argument
is that uh you know he intentionally
put floyd in a dangerous situation not
intentionally killed him
intentionally killed him i think he's a
higher charge but intentionally put him
in a dangerous situation
where if he took his knee off every now
and then that would suggest he was
trying to mitigate the danger
right that he was aware of a situation
who was trying to not kill him
because sometimes he took his knee off
the neck but i think there's other
evidence to suggest that might have been
after he'd already passed out
so he might have been dead by then don't
know that part so the only thing i'll
say is i don't know if the evidence
makes the point the defense wanted to
make because the timing
it might have been too late when the
knee was off but it's a really good play
in terms of persuasion because the
persuasion of it is
that the the jury just learned that they
can't trust their own
eyes regardless of the timing of when
the knee
the knee was on the neck or the shoulder
the lesson is the same
you can't tell by looking at it that's
really good defense
that's really good we'll see what
happens
again for the people who are watching
this i don't
i don't defend shaven i don't defend
matt gates we just talk about the
persuasion element of it and
see if we can learn anything carl
bergstrom who
often tweets about the
virus and statistical truths about it
is warning us that uh we're
misinterpreting
we being the public
excuse me that we're misinterpreting
um what it means to reach herd immunity
and specifically
specifically that herd immunity doesn't
mean that we're
past all the trouble and that the virus
goes away
so herd immunity you should understand
is not the point when you don't have any
more
virus or more deaths herd immunity
is when it doesn't go as fast in other
words it's not a
another pandemic peak coming but the
baseline
the baseline infections could just go
forever
i mean you could just have new babies
being born and being infected
forever so if you think that
getting to herd immunity means oh we're
done
throw away the masks stop the social
distancing
unfortunately it might not mean that now
i'm not
i'm not telling you that we're going to
wear masks forever i don't think we will
but we
the cough has to be a technique somebody
says no just woke up
and i got a little allergies at the
moment um
so um here's what i would add to this
i'm i'm less less concerned because the
weirdness of this virus
is that we might be able to vaccinate
basically a hundred percent of the
people who would die
so if the uh it's not a dry cough don't
worry
uh i don't have code
um so i'm gonna disagree with carl
bergstrom
even though he's about a hundred times
smarter than i am on
the topic i'm disagreeing and the only
thing i'm gonna
add is that i think this virus is not
like any other virus
because you actually could you could
vaccinate 100 of the people who might
die from it
nothing would stop you from doing that
all right so what happens if 100
of the people who are vulnerable or
something like it
get vaccinated do you care if the rest
of the people get it
i don't know i don't know if you care
now you got the long-haul problem but
isn't the long-haul problem probably
uh you know even that people seem to get
over it
it's just a really bad problem for
several months
elon musk said he will not take the
vaccine interesting
i should tell you that i have scheduled
myself to take the vaccine
i've been telling you that i wouldn't
make a decision until i had to
until it was available because i'd get
all the all the information i could
and i've decided that given my age
that i'm gonna i'm gonna take it if i
were
if i were elon musk's age i don't know
i i might think differently but i'm not
so
i'm gonna call this uh i'm gonna call
this
early today because i'm going to go do
some other things and
my allergies are killing me so uh i'm
not that old but i've got asthma
you know don't take a chance and i will
talk to you tomorrow