Episode 1701 Scott Adams - My Conversation With A Woke Person Did Not Go Well. And Fake News.
Find my "extra" content on Locals: https://ScottAdams.Locals.com Content: ----------- - Conversation with a young, woke person - Disney goes Woke - Full human genome + AI - Jenn Psaki going to MSNBC - NATO trained terrorists, Operation Gladio - Bill Maher tells the left what nobody else can ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ If you would like to enjoy this same content plus bonus content from Scott Adams, including micro-lessons on lots of useful topics to build your talent stack, please see scottadams.locals.com for full access to that secret treasure.
That, ladies and gentlemen, is the beautiful, beautiful sound of multiple documents being tapped on my desk. And that means my printer is online and everything's working smoothly today. And this might be the highlight of not only your personal experience but civilization itself. And it's called Coff…
View segment →r happened. All you need is a proper regular glass or tankard, a flask, a vessel of any kind, filled with your favorite liquid. Audio is looking good. Join me now for the unparalleled pleasure of the dopamine of the day. The thing that makes everything better is called the simultaneo
View segment →us sip, and it's going to happen right now. Ah. It's better every time. Now, if I haven't told you yet today, you're gonna have a wonderful day. Oh sure, you'll have your ups and downs, you always do. But t
View segment →oday is going to be great because you're better looking and smarter than you were yesterday, and that's all going to work for you. Well, I had a conversation yesterday with a young woke person. How do you think that went? Do you think that if you put a young woke person and me in the same conversat…
View segment →ds of witnesses to back up my story because they were there at the same time and they were also discriminated against for the same reasons, also directly. So yeah, I could produce presumably thousands. Actually I could probably produce a thousand witnesses with one tweet to back up my version of ev…
View segment →atisfy their shareholders, presumably they should do what's good for the share price, within reason of course, not doing anything illegal. But what is the argument that they will make more money by doing this? You could easily make an argument that they'll make less money because you're going to ge…
View segment →lity, I don't know, 10 or something. That's about it. So if you think I'm saying that Ivermectin definitely doesn't work in any scenario whatsoever because there's a study that says that, I guess I just can't do that anymore. I just can't tell you because there's a high-quality study that it's true.…
View segment →but evil? I don't know. Can you get a handful of evil? Can you measure it? This one's 200 evil. This other one, I don't know. Evil is real, but it's real in the sense of how we process our environment. So for some of you it's real. For me I've never sensed it, felt it, framed it that way, considere…
View segment →ast eight percent, I guess, is all we didn't have already. But now imagine putting together artificial intelligence with the human genome, with medical records, with DNA. I don't think we fully understand what's about to happen. You see what I'm saying? The full human genome, DNA about individuals,…
View segment →just be so much better at figuring out what's going on that they just don't need it. Well, Jen Psaki, spokesperson for Biden, is reportedly going to leave for MSNBC. She hasn't finalized a deal there. But the important thing to know is that according to people who know more than I do, NBC is maybe…
View segment →we don't know how many of these Switchblade drones there are. But I would say that those two numbers are the only numbers that will tell you what's going to happen. So I'm boiling it down. The only thing that will tell you what's happening is how many drones do the Ukrainians have? We don't know. An…
View segment →d I take that as, first of all, something that was obvious in my opinion. But secondly, okay, I will accept that. A little history lesson. I'm not sure it adds or subtracts anything because war is dirty business. So I'm not surprised that CIA-related people are doing awful things. That's not new new…
View segment →t tell the difference. You won't know if it's your president saying something or somebody else. So keep an eye on that. I think this whole deepfake thing is just going to be gigantic. So I continue to be entertained by Bill Maher's conversion to, what would I call it? So he's not becoming right-wi…
View segment →k is just like, well let me play the whole video, not the clip that reverses its meaning. Thank you. Well, ladies and gentlemen, those are my prepared remarks for today. No doubt this peak experience is something that will stay with you forever or for several minutes. Is there a topic which I have…
View segment →'s do it. And by the way I'm a huge fan of Snoop Dogg. I love the fact that he never changed who he was. I guess that's what I like best. I like his music. I like his whole vibe. But I like the fact that he changed the world like the world didn't change him. You know that, right? Like Snoop just sai…
View segment →That, ladies and gentlemen, is the beautiful, beautiful sound of multiple documents being tapped on my desk. And that means my printer is online and everything's working smoothly today. And this might be the highlight of not only your personal experience but civilization itself. And it's called Coffee with Scott Adams, and it's the best thing that's ever happened.
All you need is a proper regular glass or tankard, a flask, a vessel of any kind, filled with your favorite liquid. Audio is looking good. Join me now for the unparalleled pleasure of the dopamine of the day. The thing that makes everything better is called the simultaneous sip, and it's going to happen right now.
Ah. It's better every time.
Now, if I haven't told you yet today, you're gonna have a wonderful day. Oh sure, you'll have your ups and downs, you always do. But today is going to be great because you're better looking and smarter than you were yesterday, and that's all going to work for you.
Well, I had a conversation yesterday with a young woke person. How do you think that went? Do you think that if you put a young woke person and me in the same conversation that it'll be fun? Well, it was. It started out with a conversation about sexism and all the sexism and misogyny and discrimination against girls and boys. And I said, were you aware that girls do better than boys in a lot of different ways? And she was not aware of that.
And today, by coincidence, I saw a list of some of the things that are going better for girls than boys. Now here we're talking about younger folks, mostly younger folks, so it includes women and girls. And so somebody did a little chart I saw online. I tweeted it earlier this morning. For every hundred girls or women, how many boys or men are doing the same thing?
So for example, for every 100 women who take AP or honors courses in high school in art or music, how many men do the same thing? Honors courses in art and music: only 54. So there are almost twice as many women who attain this high level in school. And then you go right down the line. Who earns an associate's degree? Who takes these AP courses? Who graduates? Who's got a master's degree? Who's in the top 10 percent? Every one of these is women or girls. Every one of them.
So on educational attainment, it's not even close. Women are just smoking men. Not even close. Did you know that? How many woke young people are aware that women are just destroying men at least at the entry level, which predicts the future?
How about health-related stuff and mental health? Again, an entire list of things that women are way better off than men. I'll just give you examples. Basically it's about dying from suicide and everything from autism to learning disorders. People who are homeless: twice as many men and boys are homeless. Die of homicide: seven times more. Die in prison: 13 times more. It's not even close.
If you take most of the measures of well-being, women and girls are all at the top. It's not even close. Now what do you think happened when I mentioned that to a young woke person? Did the young woke person say, you know, that's not exactly what I've been hearing, but I'm going to take it under advisement, maybe do a little research myself and possibly even change my worldview? Do you think that happened?
No. The conversation very quickly turned to my racism. And so I said, well, if you think you live in a world in which it's hard to be a woman and it's hard to be Black, can you explain to me why Black women are getting into college and achieving more scholastically at the moment than white men? Can you explain to me how Black women, who have two strikes against them according to you, the woke person — they have two strikes against them and they're big ones according to you, Black and female — so can you explain why they're doing so well? Why is it that they're getting into college at higher rates than white men, which also suggests that they'll have higher incomes?
Now of course we're not talking about 50 years ago. That's a whole different situation. But how many woke young people were aware that if you're both Black and a woman, it's one of the best things you could be? Do you know what's the only thing that's better than being Black and female in terms of educational attainment, or even the ultimate step of getting your degree? The only thing better than being a Black woman is being a white woman. But being a woman is a pretty good deal in 2022, educationally, which should also translate into career, which should translate into income, etc.
All right. Now when the question of racism came up, I did the Chappelle reframe. And the Chappelle reframe goes like this: Let me ask you, who do you think is suffering more, Tiger Woods or a poor white person in Appalachia? And of course Tiger Woods is doing a little bit better. He's got his issues too, but he's doing better than the poorest of white people. Yeah.
How many do you think that Michael Jordan gets discriminated against more than, say, an average white person? And the answer is no, he doesn't. He's discriminated less, you probably guessed. More things than the average person. And so I was explaining to her that it always has been about rich versus poor. That's what Chappelle explains very well. And that she has been hypnotized into believing it's a racial problem so that the rich people can cover up the fact that they're in power and that they're suppressing other people to keep their power.
Now what happens when you hear that for the first time? Something this person had never heard. Never heard that if you're rich and Black you're in pretty good shape, and if you're poor and white you're in pretty bad shape. Am I right? There's not much to argue with there.
Now yeah, it all explodes, right? And it reminded me how little information gets from one bubble to the next. And I was also thinking, how many times am I discriminated against for race or gender every day? What do you think? Do you think that I ever go a day without overt, very direct discrimination against me for being either male or white? I don't think I've ever gone a day. Not once. Not in my public life.
If you look at my Twitter you can see almost every day somebody accusing me of something that you can tell is based on my gender and my race. And they're usually incorrect. That is racism, right? People making direct assumptions about my beliefs based on my gender and my race, and they're usually wrong. I get that every day, you know.
And most of you know my famous story of being denied promotions in two different corporate worlds because I was white and because I was male. And they told me that directly. That's not my interpretation. They said directly, you're white, you're male, we can't promote you.
Now how many Black people have ever had that happen to them? Probably some. I'm sure there are Black people who have exactly the same experience. We're not going to hire you because you're Black. Maybe they didn't say it out loud, but you know it's happening somewhere, right? So definitely it's happening.
But to imagine that it's Black people getting all the discrimination and white people getting none of it, and that it's about race, is missing the big story. It's also about race. I'm not denying racism exists, of course. I'm just saying it's everywhere all the time, and that rich people do better and poor people do worse. And that's the whole story.
And once I explained it to her, there's not much you can say about it. Am I right? Unless you just change the topic, there's not any real response to that, because the data is pretty clear, right? And the facts that I presented are not really in question. You know, there's not really a question. Did you or did you not get discriminated in employment? I could give you thousands of witnesses to back up my story because they were there at the same time and they were also discriminated against for the same reasons, also directly.
So yeah, I could produce presumably thousands. Actually I could probably produce a thousand witnesses with one tweet to back up my version of events.
So I wondered what would happen if somebody that woke heard something so counter to their worldview. And the result was the change of the topic. The change of the topic. Because I don't think you can convince anybody of anything anymore, but you can change the topic. So that's what happened.
So I know you want me to talk about Disney. Like I don't know why. I can't care less about this story. Maybe because I don't care about Disney or something. I don't know. No, I get the importance of it and how it is related to trends and all that. But you know, as Disney's going woke and they're removing their gender greetings — so they won't say welcome boys and girls, it'll be welcome carbon-based units or something. I don't know exactly what they're replacing it with, but it doesn't sound quite as friendly.
And of course they're opposing the, I guess the manipulatively named "Don't Say Gay" bill, which really isn't about that at all. And so they're going woke. So here's my only comment from a business perspective. Since Disney has to satisfy their shareholders, presumably they should do what's good for the share price, within reason of course, not doing anything illegal. But what is the argument that they will make more money by doing this?
You could easily make an argument that they'll make less money because you're going to get fewer guests of the conservative types going to Disney. So why would Disney, a corporate entity who has an obligation to the shareholders, why would they do something that feels like it can only reduce their business but it can never increase it? Why would they do that?
I guess individuals are afraid for their jobs and their reputations, so it's not for the shareholders. And you could argue whether it's for the good of society, I guess. I don't know. I just don't care that much about this story. I guess I should. I don't know why, but I don't. I guess I don't care because it's too easy to talk about. You just say I don't like that and you're done. That's about it.
All right. You remember that big Ivermectin study I talked about a few days ago? And it was the big gold standard, you know, randomized controlled, lots of people in it, to find out if Ivermectin worked or not. And of course that totally settled the question once and for all. No, it didn't.
And then I was asked today to tweet or comment on the fact that there is criticism of the study. And the criticism is actually kind of hilarious by itself. That the categories don't even add up. You know, when they say we're testing X number of people of this type, and then you look at the subcategories and you add them up and it doesn't equal the number of people they're testing. So it's not even internally consistent. Meaning you can't even look at their own numbers and say, well why does this column not match what they said they were doing? You know, that sort of thing.
Now is the person doing the debunk the correct one, or could somebody come along and debunk the debunker and get you right back to, hey, well maybe this study's good? Probably so. I just want you to know that there's no such thing as a reliable study whenever there's any political or pharma profit thing involved. There's no such thing as a study you could trust.
So there is an Ivermectin study that says it doesn't work. I would give its credibility, I don't know, 10 or something. That's about it. So if you think I'm saying that Ivermectin definitely doesn't work in any scenario whatsoever because there's a study that says that, I guess I just can't do that anymore. I just can't tell you because there's a high-quality study that it's true. It just doesn't work in 2022.
But let me say this, and this is not based on analysis. It's based on more like sometimes you just have to guess. Which is right? If you put a gun to my head and said you have to pick, does Ivermectin work or does it not, and we're actually just going to kill you if you get the wrong answer, I would bet it doesn't work. Don't know if I'm right because I don't think that the data can ever answer that question because we don't live in a world where data is reliable. But that would be my guess. And if you guess differently, I'm not even going to argue with you because since my guess is not based on reason...
I have a question for you. Does evil exist? Does evil exist? Lots of yeses on the Locals platform. Mostly yeses. Now can somebody define evil outside of mental illness? Because my frame on life is that some people have mental illness and some people don't. Or actually we all do, but it's a different kind, I guess. You could say everybody's got some kind of mental illness, just some less than others.
I don't really buy into the evil explanation because I don't know what it adds. What does it add? Because thinking in terms of demons and angels and god-like demonic stuff, I don't know what it adds to your understanding or what does it add to your process. Do you do something differently because of that? Pray or something like that? I don't know.
I say evil is just your subjective opinion of stuff you're seeing. I don't believe that evil exists as any kind of a quantity or a force in the world. I just think some people are broken. That's all. And you get exactly the same result. So I don't think you need to go to the complicated explanation that we've got souls and some of them are corrupted or controlled by Satan or anything. I think you just go for the easiest explanation: that some people have mental problems and that's it. That's it. Because it does explain everything.
If there were something it didn't explain, then I would revise it. But if it explains everything and it doesn't require you to believe anything that's not obvious and right in front of you — right, mental illness is obvious and true and right in front of you — but evil? I don't know. Can you get a handful of evil? Can you measure it? This one's 200 evil. This other one, I don't know.
Evil is real, but it's real in the sense of how we process our environment. So for some of you it's real. For me I've never sensed it, felt it, framed it that way, considered it as even anything important. Yeah, the Nazi death camps. Okay, there, let's take the extreme example. The Nazi death camps. That could all be explained in terms of normal human processes because we know that we can get underlings to do literally anything. Are they evil or are they just underlings who will do anything because they're afraid of whatever happens to them? I don't know.
And then some of the underlings are sadists, form of mental illness you could argue, or is it a personality disorder? I never know. But I don't know. I guess I would say that I don't have a use for that frame, which is different than saying it doesn't exist.
So the question of does evil exist is unanswerable because whatever it is, it's not like you can — there's no measuring device for it. There's no such thing as a detector for it. So we'll never agree on whether it exists or not. But could we agree it doesn't have a use? Like framing the world that way, does it help? I feel like it would just be scary to live in a world that you framed as full of evil and demons, whereas I just see broken stuff. Oh, there's somebody with a broken brain and they might act a certain way. Yeah. So yeah, maybe it's useful within the context of a religion.
Scientists have finally completed the human genome. So we have actually for the first time a hundred percent of the human genome has been mapped. So we're going to learn a lot more about genetic diseases and stuff. It was only eight percent of it or so the last eight percent, I guess, is all we didn't have already. But now imagine putting together artificial intelligence with the human genome, with medical records, with DNA. I don't think we fully understand what's about to happen.
You see what I'm saying? The full human genome, DNA about individuals, access to all kinds of medical records that are, I think at this point we don't have access to them, but I think we will. Maybe not everybody's, but enough medical records that you could make decisions about what works and what doesn't. I don't know. I think there's something coming that will redefine health care substantially.
There's a small company that already can do a test on you to find out which kinds of prescription medicines will work the best. Isn't that wild? You can now do a test — I think it's a blood test, you send it away. Blood, tears, spit, I forget, or urine. I don't know. There's some kind of a test you do that will come back and tell you what drugs will be effective and which ones don't work for you. How wild is that? Does it work? I don't know. I don't know.
But think about all these things coming together. If you had AI to the amount of data we're going to get about everything from DNA to human genome to health records, we're going to know almost everything pretty soon. We're probably 10 years away from just not even needing a doctor, meaning that the AI will just be so much better at figuring out what's going on that they just don't need it.
Well, Jen Psaki, spokesperson for Biden, is reportedly going to leave for MSNBC. She hasn't finalized a deal there. But the important thing to know is that according to people who know more than I do, NBC is maybe the closest network to the CIA's control, meaning that the most reliably CIA messaging entity. Now I don't know what the relationship is with the CIA, but people who know more than I do basically say they're in the bag for the CIA. And she's going to go work for them directly from the spokesperson job.
Does that bother you? Does that bother you at all that you worry that the deep state and whatever John Brennan is doing lately and all the former and current intel people are secretly running the government? And then you see somebody at that level of government go directly to MSNBC, which feels like it's in the bag. The CIA controls it, or at least for the stories they care about. Not the whole thing. And everything about this is icky. Everything about this is icky.
Now it's fully disclosed, but I almost have to ask the question: is she really changing jobs or is she just being transparent that she's always worked for MSNBC and the CIA? Because I don't even know if they change your direct deposit, do they? I'm just kidding, of course they do. But it feels like it's the same job. They just changed the title. Am I right? It feels like it's the same job. It's not a different job. It's the same job. That's the story. The story is she didn't change jobs. She changed job titles. Yeah, I'm exaggerating, but you get the point.
All right. Here's something that General Omar Bradley once said. He was an American general during World War II. And he's quoted as saying amateurs talk strategy, professionals talk logistics. Meaning that wars are won or lost based on whether you can resupply your military.
And CNN is still hammering on this idea that the Russian army is running out of fuel and food and everything. And there are other voices saying, ah, that's just complete propaganda. That's just Ukrainian propaganda. But let me ask you this: how many big fuel depots does the Russian military have within striking distance of the Ukrainian border?
Because the Ukrainians have apparently taken out one large fuel depot that fueled some percentage of the army on the eastern border, the Russian army. So here's the question for you. If it's true the Ukraine took out one large fuel depot, how many are there? How many are there? Because you know if there are three, Russia is totally, am I right? If there are only three, if they took out a third of their fuel, they're in real trouble.
Because remember, you don't have to take out all the fuel or all the food. If you take out 20, 30 percent of either the fuel or the food, there's chaos, right? They've got to do all kinds of stuff to adjust to that shortage and it's not going to be pretty. So you don't have to take it all the way. You just have to degrade it to the point where they're so ineffective that there's a cascade effect to collapse.
So I've asked you a very specific military question. Do you think anybody knows? First of all, can anybody make that kind of an estimate? And could anybody ask our military, do we have any idea how many large fuel depots are there? And can they quickly spin up a new one? In other words, has Russia already just sort of spun up a new fuel depot and it didn't even make a dent because they have plenty of fuel, they just have to get it to the right place?
So yeah. Define large. So here's the question. If there are 50 fuel depots of that size, the size that the Ukrainians allegedly destroyed, if there are 50 of them, well then Russia wins for sure because they're not going to run into fuel. Well what if there were three, right? Isn't that the right question? If there were only three, the Russian army's already in pretty bad shape because they just lost a third of their energy.
You're watching the wrong Ukraine movie, somebody says. What does not spin up a fuel depot? You need pipe welders, pipe fitters. Yeah, it can be easy, but I don't know. Maybe they just have giant tanks of fuel and they can move them wherever they want. I don't know if you need a gigantic tank to put the smaller tanks into or temporarily. Maybe you don't.
All right. So I'm going to say that I am unconvinced that logistics alone will be the decider in Ukraine. But I think it's at least a 50 percent chance that the big story will be logistics.
By the way, here's a little history lesson that I also learned by the CNN article. That the mistake that Hitler made attacking Russia was that he thought it would be fast and he did not develop his supply lines correctly. He only developed supply lines. And actually clothing, warm weather or cold weather clothing, was not even sufficient for the war. So huge numbers of German troops just froze to death or got frostbite because they couldn't even supply them with warm jackets. They never planned for that.
Somebody says and Napoleon too. Well so is the winter plus the supply line? Although the winter seemed like a bigger factor for Napoleon. So well I suppose it's always supply because you could survive any winter if you had enough supply. So yeah, I guess it's supply.
I don't know. I've been saying since the beginning that the Ukrainians can take out the supply lines. And we're learning more about their kamikaze drones. But then I heard they only had a hundred of them. What the hell good are 100 kamikaze drones? You're not going to win a war with a hundred. I feel like you need, I don't know, 5,000. So how fast could we make these things? Is somebody cranking out some more?
Yeah, 100 to start maybe. Yeah, these are the Switchblades. So it's the little drones you can launch from your backpack or carry the backpack. It's a little drone and it just goes up and hovers for 15 minutes until it finds something and then it dives in and destroys it. That's a pretty devastating psychological weapon. Like knowing that there's one hovering around you and it's just picking out which person to kill. I think I'll kill the people in that truck. Very psychologically devastating.
So we don't know how many fuel depots there are and we don't know how many of these Switchblade drones there are. But I would say that those two numbers are the only numbers that will tell you what's going to happen. So I'm boiling it down. The only thing that will tell you what's happening is how many drones do the Ukrainians have? We don't know. And how much fuel do the Russians have? We don't know. The only two things that matter and we don't know anything about either, with the public. The military probably does.
So for the last several days somebody has been screaming at me on YouTube in the comments that if I don't understand what Operation Gladio is then I don't understand anything. And so I said to myself, well I'll look into it because I had no reason to dismiss the comment. And whoever was saying it was pretty adamant.
So here's what Operation Gladio reportedly is. NATO has terrorist forces. That's the whole story. NATO has officially trained terrorists and they use them as leave-behind forces in case your country gets overrun. So if a NATO country gets overrun they already have spun up the terrorist forces that remain as part of the resistance. And they're actually terrorists, like actually literally terrorists.
And apparently there have been a number of discoveries of these various groups in different countries. And apparently it's fairly confirmed. I mean Wikipedia treats it like it's a fact, if you want to take that as your source. But does that change anything for you? Because the Gladio operation, Gladio would be terrorists working for your team. Are you comfortable having terrorists on your team? Because apparently we do. If you're on team NATO, apparently you're pro-terrorist. Sorry.
Now you could call them saboteurs, sure. So depending on the context of has your country been invaded? Well then they're not terrorists then, they're freedom fighters. But they're basically terrorists. Now part of what they would do is false flags. Now it's getting a little creepy, isn't it?
So allegedly what these Gladio people would do, among other things, is kill civilians of their own to make it look like the other side did it. So how do you like your team now? How do you like being on team NATO knowing that your team are literally terrorists? I'm okay with it. Are you? Is there anybody who has a problem with it? I'm okay with it.
I mean it's part of what makes it a bad idea to try to conquer your neighbor. If anything that NATO does is making it really, really hard to conquer your neighbor, I'm okay with that. Now nobody's in favor of killing civilians. I mean not that. But as soon as you say we're in a war, then the strategy changes to how do you do well? All right, we'd rather have no war, but if you're in one, well you're going to fight to win, right?
So one of the ways to fight to win are these false flag things. The reason people do it is because it works. If it didn't work people wouldn't do it. So if you want to win you do what works, as ugly as that is. So you could be morally outraged and should be, I guess, but it's going to happen anyway. Your moral outrage won't change anything.
So I don't know if the person asking me to look into that is on here, but are you satisfied? Or have I missed something about this Operation Gladio? Is there anything that ties it close? Because I believe that the point of it was for me to understand that NATO is not all unicorns and roses. And I take that as, first of all, something that was obvious in my opinion. But secondly, okay, I will accept that. A little history lesson. I'm not sure it adds or subtracts anything because war is dirty business. So I'm not surprised that CIA-related people are doing awful things. That's not new news.
All right. Did you see the deepfake video of Zelensky? So somebody did an AI-generated deepfake in which he was telling his soldiers to surrender to the Russian invasion. And the deepfake wasn't that good. But wow, how far away are we from not knowing who's giving you the commands at all? Pretty close, right? We're pretty close to not knowing who's giving the orders. As soon as the deepfakes get, I don't know, 20 percent better, you just won't tell the difference. You won't know if it's your president saying something or somebody else.
So keep an eye on that. I think this whole deepfake thing is just going to be gigantic.
So I continue to be entertained by Bill Maher's conversion to, what would I call it? So he's not becoming right-wing. I don't think that's going to happen. But he seems to be able to see the whole field. And so every Friday he's saying stuff that makes news, at least in Fox News, because he's saying stuff that his team doesn't hear. And I've decided he might be the most dangerous person in America. Well-meaning. I mean his intentions are positive, I'm sure. But he's the only person I know who consistently penetrates the left bubble and tells them what they don't know and haven't heard.
Think about how dangerous that is. Because I don't know anybody else who can do it. I can't do it, right? Can you? Yeah, I can't talk to anybody in the Democrat bubble and have them hear me. I don't have any channel to them. But he does because he started with them and you know audiences tend to stick with you.
So on Friday's show apparently Bill Maher said, quote, so the New York Post got a hold of what was in the computer. Talk about Hunter's laptop. And you know because the New York Post is a Republican paper — that's his description — and the New York Times and the Washington Post are the Democrat papers — again his description. And the Republican paper. And then he goes, Twitter canceled their account, talked about the New York Post. They can't even report the story.
So you see he's being amazed that a true story got canceled from the internet. And he noticed. Now he hasn't noticed all the stuff that's happened, but this one was just too shockingly big and so he's calling it out. And so he's just like, the right-leaning media is pointing out the mainstream media suppressed one of the most important stories of the election cycle.
Now Bill Maher did not go as far as he could have in saying that it probably influenced the election result and therefore one could say the election was rigged and therefore one could say that Trump was right. Although I think he was talking more about vote rigging, which would be different, and nobody's proven that in any scale.
Somebody says Bill Maher needs an ego death. Now I'm pretty sure — I don't know this, I'm speculating — but if Bill Maher has not done mushrooms, mushrooms don't exist. If he hasn't done them I'd be pretty amazed. Pretty amazed. And that's based on not only the lifestyle he promotes but also the fact that he is relatively aware. And that's one of the ways you get there.
So in my opinion Bill Maher has figured out maybe 25 percent of what's happening, maybe 50 percent. But I tweeted at him and I included him in the tweet and I said the most dangerous person in America is Bill Maher because he is capable of penetrating the Democrat bubble and telling them their news sources are fake. And then I said he's figured out about 25 percent of what's happening. He still believes the fine people hoax and the drinking bleach hoax.
Do you see what I did there? All right. Now here's some context. I've been on Bill Maher once and it was before the 2016 election. And I predicted on his show that Trump would win and I explained why based on his persuasive powers. Bill Maher listened to everything I said and did not push back at all, which I thought was unusual because I was saying things clearly supportive of Trump. He's clearly the opposite. And not once did he push back on anything.
Now maybe he thought the persuasion angle wasn't that important or a little off his sweet spot or something. But I will say that if he remembers who I am — I'm guessing he does — if he remembers who I am he would probably remember that on his show I was reasonable and that I sounded like not a crazy right-wing person. And I feel I established at least a little bit of credibility by saying things on his show that didn't get any pushback and were new. They were new for his audience and didn't get pushback. And it was important. It explained what was happening and accurately predicted.
Now if anything I just said is true, which is that I gained at least a little bit of credibility in my small interaction with him on his show, then if he were to see this tweet — and by no means certain, but usually when the blue checks tweet each other I feel like we usually see it. What do you think? You know some people are more active on their social media. I don't think Bill Maher is super active on Twitter. He's a super user but I don't know how many minutes he spends there. And I think he'd probably see it just because I at-ed him. So he'd probably see it.
Now if you were him and you knew that I'd said incredible the same things on the show that nobody even argued with, and you heard me say something that would blow your mind — that the fine people hoax and the drinking bleach hoax are hoaxes — and I'm sure that's the first time he would have heard it in a way that doesn't sound crazy. You may have heard Fox News say it, which doesn't sound credible. You may have heard, I don't know, somebody will say it if he did. But I feel as though there's some chance that I got that message through. I may have slipped the puck past the keeper.
And the reason is because, first of all, because it's Bill Maher and he's open to a competing idea. So if it were not him this wouldn't work at all. Secondly, because the blue checks probably check each other's comments. And thirdly, because the context: I waited until he was already primed to believe that the news is hugely manipulated on his side. Do you see what I did here? I waited until he was primed. While he's talking about his own news sources being illegitimate, he's talking about it. Now while he's talking about his news sources being illegitimate, I give him two things that, coming from me, should just blow the top of his head off if he notices.
Right? I mean I'm not going to assume I'm important enough in the scheme of things that he necessarily is going to even notice. But in theory. So this is sort of an impromptu persuasion lesson. If you can throw a mind thought into somebody who's already in the mode, it's a whole different idea than coming as somebody you're both loaded and ready for an argument. If you're both loaded and ready for an argument, nobody changes their mind. But if you can catch somebody in a vulnerable moment when they've already talked themselves into the point of view that you're promoting, and you're just giving them a little extra of where they already are — because do you know what? People do like confirmation bias of their own opinion. They'll accept that in a moment. That's not changing their mind. That's hard. Changing anybody's mind is really hard work, which is why persuasion is an important topic. It's so hard. If you don't do everything right you don't have a chance.
So I think there's some chance that I planted a seed that would be productive. Here's what I love. In my perfect world Bill Maher will see the full videos of the fine people hoax and the full video of the drinking bleach hoax. And he will realize that the two biggest really messages about Trump were entirely made up. The two biggest ones. And I don't know if that's expecting too much of anybody because it is kind of, you know. So I have a high opinion of Bill Maher's mental, let's say, openness and flexibility. Very different than most people. Very different. But this is a stretch to get somebody to believe this much of a mind is something really basic to the reality just didn't happen. Just never happened. And it's easy to prove. That's the weird part. If it were hard to prove then people could hold on to their assumption. But you just have to play the video. That's it. The entire debunk is just like, well let me play the whole video, not the clip that reverses its meaning. Thank you.
Well, ladies and gentlemen, those are my prepared remarks for today. No doubt this peak experience is something that will stay with you forever or for several minutes. Is there a topic which I have not covered which you'd like to hear me cover?
All right. How do you debunk the "Don't Say Gay"? Well unfortunately the "Don't Say Gay" thing is really a masterpiece of persuasion. Whoever frames something first has a big advantage. And the "Don't Say Gay" people framed it best. They framed it with a rhyme, which is really good. Say and gay rhymes. That's a good technique. It's short. It's easy to remember. It's repeatable. And that becomes true. So it doesn't even matter.
Dogs in blankets. I like that. I'm seeing a picture of a dog in a blanket on the Locals platform. They can put pictures in the comments.
By the way, last night I did a live stream from the man cave. These are only available for the people who subscribe on Locals. So what you missed was my story about meeting a psychic and hypnotizing her and some of the predictions she made which were just insane. A visit with my own spirit guide. Or not. I can only tell you what seems to have happened. I'm not sure what really happened. And tying that in with the simulation and all the evidence for the simulation that we live in a simulation.
Now if you think that sounds good, and not only were there simultaneous sips but let's just say that the man cave is simultaneous whatever. So you are allowed to do is simultaneously whatever you wanted. Well I did the same.
When am I going on Gutfeld again? So yes. I don't know. It's not up to me.
So it looks like I have answered all of your questions. Are you saying that Bill Maher has a podcast where he and Quentin Tarantino got stoned on the podcast? Well I would like to put out my challenge right now to Snoop Dogg. Snoop Dogg, number one I'm a cartoonist and I'm guessing you have no idea who I am. But I do this cartoon called Dilbert. Some people have heard of it. And I challenge you, Snoop Dogg, to join me in my man cave in Northern California and to see who can — let's say you can be more of the Snoop Dogg if you know what I mean. This is YouTube so I'm gonna keep it generic. If there are any young kids watching, kids don't do drugs. And I mean that sounds like a joke but no, kids don't do drugs.
That said, how much would you like to see me interview Snoop Dogg while we're seeing who can last the longest if you know what I mean? Come on, you'd watch that. You'd watch it. Now I don't think that Snoop would know enough about me or that it would ever make sense to him. But it would be awesome and I think it would be viral as hell. I don't think I could talk him into it because he just wouldn't be familiar with me. I'm guessing. I mean if Kanye somehow knew who I was it's not impossible but unlikely.
So that's the ask. Snoop Dogg, in my man cave. Let's do it. And by the way I'm a huge fan of Snoop Dogg. I love the fact that he never changed who he was. I guess that's what I like best. I like his music. I like his whole vibe. But I like the fact that he changed the world like the world didn't change him. You know that, right? Like Snoop just said I'm just going to be me and the world is going to have to catch up. And then it did. Who does that? Who does that? But he did.
All right. That is all for now and I'm going to go do some work. I got a lot of it. Oh I'm hearing from Sunny San Rafael. Somebody's watching. So if somebody knows Snoop get to him and make the offer and we'll go from there. And for the rest of you, can you have a great day? Pretty sure you can. Go forth.
that ladies and gentlemen is the beautiful beautiful sound of multiple documents being tapped on my desk and that means my printer is online and everything's working smoothly today and this might be the highlight of not only your personal experience but civilization itself and it's called the coffee with Scott Adams and it's the best thing that's ever happened and all you need to use a copper regular glass of tank which I'll start the canteen sugar flaska Festival of any kind fill with your favorite liquid audio is looking good and join me now for the unparalleled pleasure of the dopam media the day thing makes everything better it's called the simultaneous Sip and it's going to happen right now go ah it's better every time now if I haven't told you yet today you're gonna have a wonderful day oh sure you'll have your ups and downs always do but today is going to be great because you're better looking and smarter than you were yesterday and that's all going to work for you well I had a conversation uh yesterday with a young woke person how do you think that went do you think that if you put a young woke person and me in the same conversation that it'll be fun well it was it started out with a conversation about sexism and all the sexism and misogyny and discrimination against uh girls and boys and I said were you aware that girls do better than boys in a lot of different ways and she was not aware of that and today by coincidence I saw a list of some of the things that are going better for girls than boys now here we're talking about younger mostly younger folks so it includes women uh and girls and so somebody did a little chart I saw online I tweeted it earlier this morning of for every hundred girls or women how many boys or men are doing the same thing so for example how many women uh for for every 100 women who take AP or honors courses in high school in art or music how many men do the same thing honors courses and art and music only 54.
so they're almost twice as many women who attain this high level in school and then you go right down the line who is who earns an associate's degree who takes these AP courses who graduates who's got a master's degree who's in the top 10 percent and every one of these is women or girls every one of them so on educational attainment it's not even close women are just smoking then not even close did you know that how many woke young people are aware that women are just destroying men at the at least the entry level which predicts the future um how about health related stuff and mental health again an entire list of things that women are way better off than men I'll just give you examples basically it's about dying from suicide and everything from autism to learning disorders people are homeless you know twice as many men and boys are homeless die of homicide you know seven times more die in prison you know 13 times more it's not even close if you take most of the measures of well-being women and girls are all of the top it's not even close now what do you think happened when I mentioned that to a young woke person did the Young woke person say you know that's not exactly what I've been hearing but I'm going to take it under advisement maybe maybe do a little research myself and possibly even change my worldview do you think that happened no the conversation very quickly turned to my uh by racism and so I said well if you think you live in a world in which it's hard to be a woman and it's hard to be black can you explain to me why black women are getting into college and and achieving more um scholastically at the moment than white men can you explain to me how black women who have two strikes against them according to you you the woke person they have two strikes against them and they're big ones according to you black and female so can you explain why they're doing so well why is it that they're getting into college at higher rates than white men which also suggests that they'll have higher incomes now of course we're not talking about 50 years ago that's a whole different situation but how many woke young people were aware that if you're both black and a woman it's it's one of the best things you'd be do you know what's the only thing that's better than being black and female in terms of educational you know um let's say the educational first step or even the ultimate step of getting your degree the only thing better than being a black woman is being a white woman but being a woman is a pretty good deal in 2022 educationally which should also translate into career which should translate into income Etc all right now when uh when the question of racism came up I did the uh the Chappelle reframe and the Chappelle reframed goes like this let me ask you who do you think is suffering more uh Tiger Woods or a poor white person in Appalachia and of course Tiger Woods is doing a little bit better he's got his issues too but he's doing better than the poorest of white people yeah how many do you think that Michael Jordan gets discriminated against more than say an average white person and the answer is no no he doesn't he's discriminated less you probably guessed more things than the average person and so I was explaining to her that it always has been about rich versus poor that's what Chappelle explains very well and that she has been hypnotized into believing it's a racial problem so that the rich people can cover up the fact that they're in power and that they're suppressing other people to keep their power now what happens when you hear that for the first time something something this person had never heard never heard that if you're rich and black you're in pretty good shape and if you're poor and white you're in pretty bad shape am I right there's not much to argue with there now yeah I had explodes right and and it reminded me how little information gets from one bubble to the next and I was also thinking how many times um am I discriminated against for race or gender every day what do you think do you think that I ever go a day without over overt very direct discrimination against me for being either male or white I don't think I've ever gone today not once not in my public life if you if you look at my Twitter you can see almost every day I think somebody accusing me of something that's you can tell is based on my my gender and my race and they're usually incorrect that is racism right people making direct assumptions about my beliefs based on my my gender and my race and they're usually wrong that's I get that every day you know and most of you know my famous story of being denied promotions in two different corporate worlds because I was white and because I was male and they told me that directly that's not my interpretation they said directly your white your male we can't promote you now how many black people have ever had that happen to him probably some you know I'm sure there are black people who have exactly the same experience we're not going to hire you for your because you're black maybe they didn't say it out loud but you know what's happening somewhere right so definitely it's happening but to imagine that it's black people getting all the discrimination and white people getting none of it and that uh it's about race is missing the big story it's also about race I'm not denying racism exists of course I'm just saying it's everywhere all the time and that rich people do better and poor people do worse and that's the whole story and once I explained it to her there's not much you can say about it am I right unless you change unless you just change the topic there's not any real response to that because the data is pretty clear right and the facts that I presented are not really in question you know there's not not really a question did you or did you not you know get discriminated in employment I I could give you thousands of witnesses to back up my story because they were there at the same time and they were also discriminated for the same reasons also directly so yeah I could produce presumably thousands of actually I could probably produce a thousand Witnesses with one tweet to back up you know my version of events so I wondered what would happen if somebody that woke heard something so counter to their worldview um and uh the result was the change of the topic the change of the topic because I don't think you can convince anybody of anything anymore but you can change the topic so that's what happened uh so I know you want me to talk about Disney like I don't know why I can't care less about this story maybe because I don't care about Disney or something I don't know no I get the importance of it and how it you know is related to Trends and all that uh but you know as a Disney's going woke and they're removing their their gender greetings so they won't say welcome boys and girls it'll be welcome carbon-based units or something I don't know exactly what they're replacing it with but it doesn't sound quite as friendly and of course they're opposing the uh I guess the manipulatively named Bill dosage which really isn't about that at all um and so they're going whoa so here's my only comment from a business perspective since Disney has to satisfy their shareholders presumably they should do what's good for the the share price within reason of course not not doing anything illegal but what is the argument that they will make more money by doing this you could easily make an argument that they'll make less money because I think you would you're going to get less or fewer I just gave you that lesson don't say less say fewer you're going to get fewer guests of the conservative types going to Disney so why would Disney a corporate entity who has an obligation to the shareholders why would they do something that feels like it can only reduce their business but it can never increase it why would they do that I guess you know individuals are afraid for their jobs and their reputations so it's not for the shareholders and you could argue whether it's for the good of society I guess um I I don't know I just don't care that much about this story I guess I should I don't know why but I don't I guess I don't care because it's too easy to talk about you just say I don't like that and you're done that's about it all right you remember that big Ivermectin study I talked about a few days ago and uh it was the big gold standard you know randomized controlled lots of lots of people in it to find out if I ever met him worked or not and of course that totally settled the question once and for all no it didn't and then I was asked today to uh to tweet or comment on the fact that uh there there is criticism of the study and the criticism is actually kind of hilarious by itself that the uh I guess the categories don't even add up you know when they say we're we're testing X number of people of this type and then you look at the subcategories and you add them up and it doesn't equal the number of people they're testing so so it's not even internally consistent meaning you can't even look at their own numbers and say well why does this column not not match what they said they were doing you know that sort of thing now is is the person doing the debunk the correct one or could somebody come along and debunk the debunker and get you right back to hey well maybe this study's good probably so I just want you to know that there's no such thing uh there's no such thing as a reliable study whenever there's any political or Pharma profit thing involved there's no such thing as a study you could trust so there is an eye from active study that says it doesn't work I would give its credibility I don't know 10 or something that's about it so if you think I'm saying that Ivermectin definitely doesn't work in any scenario whatsoever because there's a study that says that um I guess I just can't do that anymore I just can't tell you because there's a high quality study that it's true it just that just doesn't work in 2022.
if I had to um but let me say this and this is not based on I guess analysis it's based on more like sometimes you just have to guess which is right if you put a gun to my head and said you have to pick does Ivermectin work or does it not and we're actually just going to kill you if you get the wrong answer I would bet it doesn't work don't know if I'm right because I don't think that the I don't think that the data can ever answer that question because we don't live in a world where data is reliable but that would be my guess and if you guess differently uh I'm not even going to argue with you because since my guess is not based on reason I have a question for you does evil exist does evil exist lots of yeses on the locals platform mostly yeses now can somebody Define evil outside of uh mental illness because my frame on life is that some people have mental illness and some people don't or actually we all do but it's a different kind I guess you could say everybody's got some kind of mental illness just some some less than others up I don't really buy into the evil explanation because I don't know what it adds what does it add because thinking in terms of you know demons and angels and and god-like you know demonic stuff I don't know what it adds to your understanding or what does it add to your process do you do something differently because of that prey something like that I don't know um I say evil is just your subjective opinion of stuff you're seeing I don't believe that evil exists as any kind of a quantity or a force in the world I just think some people are broken that's all and you get exactly the same result so I don't think you need to go to the complicated explanation that you know we've got souls and some of them are corrupted or you know controlled by Satan or anything um I think you just go for the easiest explanation that some people have mental problems and that's it that's it because it does explain everything if there were something it didn't explain then I would revise it but if it explains everything and it doesn't require you to believe anything that's not obvious and right in front of you right mental illness is obvious and true and right in front of you but evil I don't know can you get a handful of evil can you measure it this one's you know 200 the evil of this other one I don't know the evil is real but it's real in the sense of how we I guess process our environment so for some of you it's real for me I've never sensed it felt it framed it that way considered it as even anything important yeah the the Nazi death camps okay there let's let's take the extreme example the Nazi death camps that could all be explained in terms of normal human processes because we know that we can get underlings to do literally anything are they evil or are they just underlings who will do anything because they're afraid of whatever happens to them I don't know and then some of the underlings are sadists form of mental illness You could argue or is it a personality disorder I never know but I don't know I guess I would say that I don't have a use for that frame which is different than say it doesn't exist so the question of does evil exist is unanswerable because whatever it is you know it's not like you can there's no measuring device for it you know there's no such thing as a detector for it so we'll never we'll never agree on whether it exists or not but could we agree it doesn't have a use like framing the world that way does it help I feel like it would just be scary to live in a world that you framed Us full of evil and demons whereas I just see broken stuff oh there's a somebody with a broken brain and they might act a certainly yeah so yeah maybe it's useful within the context of a religion scientists have finally completed the human genome so we have actually for the first time a hundred percent of the human genome has been mapped so we're going to learn a lot more about genetic diseases and stuff it was only eight percent of it or so the last eight percent I guess is all we didn't have already but now imagine putting together artificial intelligence with the human genome with medical records with DNA I don't think we fully understand what's about to happen you see what I'm see what I'm saying the full Human Genome DNA about individuals uh access to all kinds of medical records that are I think at this point we don't have you know access to them but I think we will maybe not everybody's but enough medical records that you could make decisions about what works and what doesn't I don't know I think there's something coming that will redefine Health Care substantially there's a I think it's a small company that already does a can do a test on you to find out which kinds of which kinds of prescription medicines will work the best isn't that wild you can now do a test I think it's a blood test you send it away blood testers spit I forget or urine I don't know there's some kind of a test you do that will come back and tell you what what drugs will be effective and which ones don't work for you how Wild is that does it work I don't know I don't know but think about all these things coming together how our if you had AI to the amount of data we're going to get about everything from DNA to Human Genome to uh to you know health records we're going to know almost everything pretty soon we're probably 10 years away from just not even needing a doctor meaning that the AI will just be so much better at figuring out what's going on that uh they just don't need it well gem sake spokesperson for Biden is reportedly going to leave for MSNBC she hasn't finalized a deal there but the important thing to know is that according to people who know more than I do NBC is maybe the closest Network to the cia's control meaning that the most reliably CIA messaging entity now I don't know what the relationship is with the CIA but people who know more than I do basically say they're in the bag for the CIA and um and she's going to go work for them directly from the spokesperson job does that bother you does that bother you at all that you worry that the Deep State and you know whatever John Brennan is doing lately and all the former and current Intel people are secretly running the government and then you see somebody at that level of government go directly to MSNBC which feels like it's in the bag you know the CIA controls it or at least for the stories they care about not the whole thing and everything about this is Icky everything about this is Icky now it's fully disclosed but I almost have to ask the question is she really changing jobs or is she just being transparent that she's always worked for MSNBC in the CIA because I don't even know if they change your direct deposit do they I'm just kidding of course they do but it feels like it's the same job they just changed the title am I right it feels like it's the same job is not a different job it's the same job that's the story the story is she didn't change jobs she changed job titles yeah I'm exaggerating but you get the point all right um here's something that General Omar Bradley once said he said an American General he was an American General during World War II and he and he's quoted as saying amateurs talk strategy professionals talk Logistics meaning that Wars are won or Lost based on whether you can resupply your your military and CNN is still hammering on this idea that the Russian army is running out of fuel and food and everything and there are other there are other voices saying Ah that's just complete propaganda that's just Ukrainian propaganda but let me ask you this how many big fuel Depots does the Russian military have within Striking Distance of the Ukrainian border because the ukrainians have apparently taken out one large Fuel Depot that fueled some some percentage of the Army on the eastern border the Russian army so here's the question for you if if it's true the Ukraine took out one large Fuel Depot how many are there how many are there because you know if there are three Russia is totally am I right if there are only three if they took out a third of their fuel they're in real trouble because remember you don't have to take out all the fuel or all the food if you take out 20 30 percent of either the fuel or the food there's chaos right they've got to do all kinds of stuff to adjust to that shortage and it's not going to be pretty so you don't have to take it all the way you just have to degrade it to the point where they're so ineffective that there's a Cascade effect to collapse so so I've asked you a very specific military question do you think anybody knows first of all can anybody make that kind of an estimate and could anybody ask our military do we have any idea how many large fuel Depots are there and can they quickly spin up a new one in other words uh has Russia already just sort of you know spun up a new fuel Depot and it didn't even make a dent because they have plenty of fuel they just have to get it to the right place so uh yeah Define define large so here's the question if there are 50 fuel Depots of that size the size that the ukrainians allegedly destroyed if there are 50 of them well then Russia wins for sure because they can't you know they're not going to run into fuel well what if there were three right isn't that the right question if there were only three the Russian armies already in pretty bad shape because they just lost their energy uh you're watching the wrong Ukraine movie somebody says uh what does not spin up as a fuel Depot you need pipe welders Pipe Fitters yeah yeah it can be easy but I don't know maybe maybe they just have giant tanks of fuel and they can move them wherever they want I don't know if you need a gigantic tank to put the smaller tanks into or or temporarily maybe you don't all right uh so I'm going to say that I am unconvinced that Logistics alone will be the decider in Ukraine but I think it's at least a 50 chance that the big story will be Logistics by the way here's a little history lesson that I also learned by the CNN article that uh the mistake that Hitler made attacking Russia was that he thought it would be fast and he did not develop his supply lines correctly he only developed supply lines and actually clothing warm weather or cold weather clothing was not even sufficient for the war so huge numbers of German troops just froze to death or got frostbite because they couldn't even Supply them with warm jackets they they never planned for that somebody says and Napoleon too well so is is the winter plus the supply line although the winter seemed like a bigger factor for Napoleon so well I suppose it's always Supply because you could Supply you can survive any winter if you had enough Supply so yeah I guess it's Supply um I don't know I've been saying since the beginning uh that the ukrainians can take out the supply lines and we're learning more about their uh Kamikaze drones but then I heard they only had a hundred of them what the hell good are 100 100 Kamikaze drones you're not going to win a war with a hundred I feel like you need I don't know five thousand so how fast could we make these things is somebody cranking out some more yeah 100 to start maybe yeah these are the the switchblades so it's the little drones you can launch from your backpack or carry the backpack it's a little drone and it just goes up into hovers for 15 minutes until it finds something and then it Dives in and destroys it that's a pretty devastating psychological weapon like knowing that there's one hovering around you and it's just picking out which which person to kill I think I'll kill the people in that truck very psychologically devastating so we don't know how many fuel Depots that there are and we don't know how many of these switchblade drones there are but I would say that those two numbers are the only numbers that will tell you what's going to happen so I'm boiling it down the only thing that will tell you what's happening is how many drones do the ukrainians have we don't know and how much fuel do the Russians have we don't know the the only two things that matter and we don't know either anything about either with the public the military probably does so on uh for the last several days somebody has been screaming at me on You.
Tube in the comments that if I don't understand what operation gladio is then I don't understand anything and so I said to myself well I'll look into it because I don't know I I had no reason to dismiss the comment and whoever was saying it was was pretty adamant so here's what operation gladio reportedly is NATO has terrorist forces that's the whole story NATO has officially trained terrorists and they use them as leave behind forces in case your country gets overrun so if a NATO country gets overrun they already have spun up the terrorist forces that remain as part of the resistance and they're actually terrorists like actually literally terrorists and apparently there have been a number of discoveries of these various groups in different countries and apparently it's fairly confirmed I mean Wikipedia treats it like it's a fact you know if you want to if you want to take that as your Source but does that change anything for you because the the gladio operation gladios would be terrorists working for your team are you comfortable having terrorists on your team because apparently we do if you're on team NATO apparently you're pro-terrorist sorry now you could call them saboteurs sure so depending on the context of you know has your country been invaded well then they're not terrorists then they're Freedom Fighters but they're basically terrorists now part of what they would do is false Flags now it's getting a little creepy isn't it so allegedly what these gladio people would do among other things is kill civilians of Their Own to make it look like the other side did it so how do you like your team now how do you like being on team NATO knowing that your team are literally terrorists I'm okay with it are you is there anybody who has a problem with it I'm okay with it I mean it's part of what makes it um a bad idea to try to conquer your neighbor if anything that NATO does is making it really really hard to conquer your your neighbor I'm okay with that now nobody's in favor of killing civilians I mean not not that but as soon as you say we're in a war then then the strategy changes to how do you do well all right we'd rather have no war but if you're in one well you're going to fight the wind right so one of the ways to fight to win are these false flag things the reason people do it is because it works if it didn't work people wouldn't do it so if you want to win you do what works as ugly as that is so you could be morally outraged and should be I guess but it's going to happen anyway your your moral outrage won't change anything um so uh I don't know if the person asking me to look into that is on here but are you satisfied or or have I missed something about this operation gladio is there any was there anything that ties it close because I believe I believe that the point of it was for me to understand that NATO is not all uh unicorns and roses and I I take that as first of all something that was obvious in my opinion but secondly uh okay I will accept that a little history lesson I'm not sure ads or subtracts anything because war is dirty business so I'm not I'm not surprised that CIA related people are doing awful things that's not new news all right um did you see the Deep fake video of zelenski so somebody did a AI generated deep fake in which he was telling his soldiers to surrender to the Russian invasion and uh the Deep fake wasn't that good but wow how far away are we from not knowing who's giving you the commands at all pretty close right we're pretty close to not knowing who's giving the orders as soon as the Deep fakes get I don't know 20 better you just won't tell the difference you won't know if it's your president saying something or somebody else um so keep an eye on that I think this whole deep fake thing is just going to be gigantic so I continue to be entertained by Bill Maher's conversion to uh what would I call it uh so he's not becoming right wing I don't think that's going to happen but he seems to be able to see the whole field and so every Friday he's saying stuff that makes news at least in Fox News because he's saying stuff that his team doesn't hear and I've decided he might be the most dangerous person in America well-meaning I mean his intentions are positive I'm sure but he's the only person I know who consistently penetrates the the left bubble and tells them what they don't know and haven't heard think about how dangerous that is because I don't know anybody else who can do I can't do it right can you yeah I can't talk to anybody in the Democrat bubble and have them hear me I don't have any channel to them but he does because he started with them and you know audiences tend to stick with you so he so on Friday's show apparently uh Bill Maher said quote so the new New York Post got a hold of what was in the computer talk about hunter's laptop uh and you know because the New York Post is a republican paper that's his description and the New York Times And The Washington Post are the Democrat papers again his description and and the Republican paper uh and then he goes Twitter canceled their account talked about the New York Post they can't even report the story so you see he's being amazed that a true story got canceled from the internet and he noticed now he hasn't noticed all the stuff that's happened but this one was just too shockingly big and so he's calling it out and uh so he's just like the right-leaning media is pointing out the mainstream media suppressed one of the most important stories of the election cycle now Bill Maher did not go as far as he could have in saying that it probably influenced the election result and therefore one could say the election was rigged and therefore one could say that Trump was right although I think he was talking more about vote rigging which would be different and nobody's proven that in any scale so um somebody says billboard needs an ego death now I'm pretty sure I don't know this I'm speculating but if Bill Maher has not done mushrooms mushrooms don't exist if he hasn't done them uh I'd be pretty amazed pretty amazed and that's based on not only the lifestyle he promotes but also the fact that he is relatively aware and that's one of the ways you get there um so in my opinion Bill Maher has figured out maybe 25 of what's Happening maybe 50 percent but I tweeted Adam and I included him in the tweet and I said the most dangerous person in America is Bill Maher because he is capable of penetrating the Democrat bubble and telling them their new sources are fake and then I said he's figured out about 25 of what's Happening he still believes the fine people hoax and the drinking bleaks hoax do you see what I did there all right now here's some context I've been on Bill Marshall once and it was before the 2016 election and I predicted on his show that Trump would win and I explained why based on his persuasive powers Bill Maher listened to everything I said and did not push back at all which I thought was unusual because I was saying things clearly supportive of trump he's clearly the opposite and not once he didn't push back on anything now maybe he thought the persuasion angle wasn't that important or a little office you know his uh sweet spot or something but um I will say that if he remembers who I am I'm guessing he does if he remembers who I am he would probably remember that on his show I was reasonable and that I sounded like a not a crazy right-wing you know person and I feel I established at least a little bit of credibility by saying things on his show that didn't get any pushback and were new you know they were they were new for his audience and didn't get pushback and it was important it explained what was happening and accurately predicted now if anything I just said is true which is that I gained at least a little bit of credibility in my small interaction with him on his show then if he were to see this tweet and by you know that's by no means certain but usually when the blue checks tweeted each other I feel like we usually see it what do you think you know some people are more active on their social media I don't I don't think Bill Maher is Super Active on Twitter you know but he's a he's a super user but I don't know how many minutes he spends there and I think he'd probably see it just because I added it so you'd probably see it now if you were him and you knew that I'd said incredible the same things on the show that nobody even argued with and you heard me say something that would blow your mind that the fine people hoax and the drinking bleach hoax or hoaxes and I'm sure that's the first time he would have heard it in a way that doesn't sound crazy you may have heard Fox News said which doesn't sound credible you may have heard I don't know somebody will say it if he did but I feel as though I feel as though there's some chance that I got that message through I'm I may have slipped the puck past the the keeper and the reason is because first of all because it's Bill Maher and he's open to a competing idea so if it were not him this wouldn't work at all secondly because the blue checks probably check each other's comments and thirdly because the context I waited until he was already primed to believe that the news is hugely manipulated on his side do you see what I did here I waited until he was primed while he's talking about the his own news sources being illegitimate he's talking about it now while he's talking about his new sources being illegitimate I give him two things that coming from me should just blow the top of his head off if he notices right I mean I I'm not going to assume I'm important enough in the scheme of things that you necessarily is going to even notice but in theory so this is sort of a impromptu persuasion lesson if you can if you can throw a mind thought into somebody who's already in the mode it's a whole different idea than coming as somebody you're both loaded and ready for an argument if you're both loaded and ready for an argument nobody's nobody changes their mind but if you can catch somebody in a vulnerable moment when they've already talked themselves into the point of view that you're promoting and you're just giving them a little extra of where they already are because do you know what people do like they love confirmation by us of their own opinion they'll accept that in a moment that's not changing their mind that's hard changing anybody's mind is really hard work which is why persuasion is an important topic it's so hard if you don't do everything right you don't have a chance so I think there's some chance that I planted a seed that would be productive here's what I love in my perfect world Bill Maher will see the full videos of the fine people hoax and the full video of the drinking bleach oats and he will realize that the two biggest really messages about Trump were entirely made up the two biggest ones and I don't know if that's expecting too much of anybody because it is kind of you know so I have a high opinion of Bill Maher's mental let's say openness and flexibility you know different than most people very different but this is a stretch to get somebody to believe this much of a mind is something really basic to the reality just didn't happen just never happened and it's easy to prove that's the weird part if it were hard to prove then people could hold on to their their assumption but you just have to play the video that's it the entire debunk is just like well let me play the whole video not the clip that reverses its meaning thank you well ladies and gentlemen is my prepared marks for today uh no doubt this peak experience is something that will stay with you forever or for several minutes one um is there a topic which I have not covered which you'd like to hear me cover um all right uh the how do you debunk the don't say gay well unfortunately the don't say gay thing is really a masterpiece of persuasion whoever whoever frames something first as a big advantage and the don't say gay people framed it best they framed it with a rhyme which is really good say and gay Rhymes that's a good technique is short it's easy to remember it's it's repeatable and that becomes true so it doesn't even matter dogs and blankets I like that I'm seeing a picture of a dog in a blanket on the locals platform they can they can put pictures in the comments um by the way uh last night I did a live stream from the man caves these are only available for the people who subscribe on locals so while you missed was my story about meeting a psychic and hypnotizing her and some of the predictions she made which were just insane a visit with my own spirit guide or not I can only tell you what seems to have happened I'm not sure what really happened uh and they uh tying that in with the uh the simulation and all the evidence for the simulation that we live in a simulation now if you think that sounds good and not only were there simultaneous sips but uh let's just say that the man cave is simultaneous whatever so you are allowed to do is simultaneously whatever you wanted well I did the same and when am I going on guffeld again so yes um I don't know it's not up to me so um looks like I have uh answered all of your questions are you saying that Bill Maher has a podcast where he and Quentin Tarantino got Stoned on the podcast well I would like to uh put out my challenge right now to Snoop Dogg Snoop Dogg number one I'm a cartoonist and I'm guessing you have no no idea who I am um but I do this cartoon called Dilbert some people have heard of it and I challenge you Snoop Dogg to join me in my man cave in California Northern California and to see who can let's say you can be more of the Snoop Dogg if you know what I mean this is this is You.
Tube so I'm gonna keep it generic generic if there are any young kids watching kids don't do drugs and I mean that sounds like a joke but no kids don't do drugs that said uh how much would you like to see me interview Snoop Dogg while we're seeing who can last the longest if you know what I mean come on you'd watch that you'd watch it now I don't think that Snoop would know enough about me or that would ever make sense to him but it would be awesome and I think it would be viral as hell I don't I don't think I could talk him into it because he just wouldn't be familiar with me I'm guessing I mean if if Kanye somehow knew who I was it's not impossible but unlikely so that's the that's the uh the ask Snoop Dogg in my man cave let's do it and by the way I'm a huge fan of Snoop Dogg uh I I love the fact that he never changed who he was I guess that's what I like best you know I like his music I like his whole vibe but I like the fact that uh he changed the world like the world didn't change him you know that right like Snoop just said I'm just going to be me and the world is going to have to catch up and then it did who does that who does that but he didn't all right um that is all for now and uh I'm going to go do some work I got a lot of it oh I'm hearing from Sonny San Rafel somebody's watching so if somebody knows Snoop get to him and make the offer and we'll go from there and for the rest of you can you have a great day pretty sure you can go forth
that ladies and gentlemen is the
beautiful beautiful sound of multiple
documents being tapped on my desk and
that means my printer is online and
everything's working smoothly today and
this might be the highlight of not only
your personal experience but
civilization itself and it's called the
coffee with Scott Adams and it's the
best thing that's ever happened and all
you need to use a copper regular glass
of tank which I'll start the canteen
sugar flaska Festival of any kind fill
with your favorite liquid
audio is looking good
and join me now for the unparalleled
pleasure of the dopam media the day
thing makes everything better it's
called the simultaneous Sip and it's
going to happen right now go
ah it's better every time
now if I haven't told you yet today
you're gonna have a wonderful day
oh sure you'll have your ups and downs
always do but today is going to be great
because you're better looking and
smarter than you were yesterday and
that's all going to work for you
well I had a conversation uh yesterday
with a young woke person
how do you think that went
do you think that if you put a young
woke person and me
in the same conversation
that
it'll be fun
well it was it started out with a
conversation about sexism and all the
sexism and misogyny and discrimination
against uh girls and boys
and I said were you aware
that girls do better than boys
in a lot of different ways
and she was not aware of that and today
by coincidence I saw a list of some of
the things that are going better for
girls than boys now here we're talking
about younger mostly younger folks so it
includes women
uh and girls
and so somebody did a little chart I saw
online I tweeted it earlier this morning
of for every hundred girls or women
how many boys or men are doing the same
thing so for example
how many women uh for for every 100
women who take AP or honors courses in
high school
in art or music how many men do the same
thing honors courses and art and music
only 54.
so they're almost twice as many women
who attain this high level in school
and then you go right down the line who
is who earns an associate's degree who
takes these AP courses who graduates
who's got a master's degree who's in the
top 10 percent and every one of these is
women or girls
every one of them
so on educational attainment it's not
even close
women are just smoking then not even
close
did you know that
how many woke young people are aware
that women are just destroying men
at the at least the entry level which
predicts the future
um
how about health related stuff and
mental health again an entire list of
things that women are way better off
than men I'll just give you examples
basically it's about dying from suicide
and everything from autism to learning
disorders people are homeless you know
twice as many men and boys are homeless
die of homicide you know seven times
more die in prison you know 13 times
more it's not even close
if you take most of the measures of
well-being
women and girls are all of the top it's
not even close
now what do you think happened when I
mentioned that to a young woke person
did the Young woke person say you know
that's not exactly what I've been
hearing but I'm going to take it under
advisement maybe maybe do a little
research myself and possibly even change
my worldview
do you think that happened
no the conversation very quickly turned
to my uh by racism
and so I said well if you think you live
in a world in which it's hard to be a
woman
and it's hard to be black
can you explain to me why black women
are getting into college and and
achieving more
um scholastically at the moment
than white men
can you explain to me how black women
who have two strikes against them
according to you you the woke person
they have two strikes against them and
they're big ones according to you black
and female
so can you explain why they're doing so
well
why is it that they're getting into
college at higher rates than white men
which also suggests that they'll have
higher incomes now of course we're not
talking about 50 years ago that's a
whole different situation but how many
woke young people were aware
that if you're both black and a woman
it's it's one of the best things you'd
be do you know what's the only thing
that's better than being black and
female in terms of educational
you know
um let's say the educational first step
or even the ultimate step of getting
your degree the only thing better than
being a black woman is being a white
woman
but being a woman is a pretty good deal
in 2022 educationally
which should also translate into career
which should translate into income
Etc
all right now
when uh when the question of racism came
up I did the uh the Chappelle reframe
and the Chappelle reframed goes like
this
let me ask you who do you think is
suffering more
uh Tiger Woods or a poor white person in
Appalachia
and of course Tiger Woods is doing a
little bit better he's got his issues
too but he's doing better than the
poorest of white people
yeah how many do you think that Michael
Jordan
gets discriminated against more
than say an average white person
and the answer is no no he doesn't he's
discriminated less you probably guessed
more things than the average person
and so I was explaining to her that it
always has been about rich versus poor
that's what Chappelle explains very well
and that she has been hypnotized into
believing it's a racial problem so that
the rich people can cover up the fact
that they're in power and that they're
suppressing other people to keep their
power
now what happens when you hear that for
the first time
something something this person had
never heard
never heard that if you're rich and
black you're in pretty good shape
and if you're poor and white you're in
pretty bad shape
am I right there's not much to argue
with there
now
yeah I had explodes right and and it
reminded me how little information gets
from one bubble to the next
and I was also thinking how many times
um am I
discriminated against for race or gender
every day
what do you think do you think that I
ever go a day without over overt very
direct
discrimination against me for being
either male or white
I don't think I've ever gone today
not once not in my public life if you if
you look at my Twitter
you can see almost every day I think
somebody accusing me of something that's
you can tell is based on my my gender
and my race
and they're usually incorrect that is
racism right
people making direct assumptions about
my beliefs
based on my my gender and my race and
they're usually wrong that's I get that
every day
you know and most of you know my famous
story of being denied promotions in two
different corporate worlds because I was
white and because I was male and they
told me that directly that's not my
interpretation they said directly your
white your male we can't promote you
now how many black people have ever had
that happen to him
probably some
you know I'm sure there are black people
who have exactly the same experience
we're not going to hire you for your
because you're black maybe they didn't
say it out loud
but you know what's happening somewhere
right so definitely it's happening
but to imagine that it's black people
getting all the discrimination and white
people getting none of it and that uh
it's about race is missing the big story
it's also about race I'm not denying
racism exists of course I'm just saying
it's everywhere all the time and that
rich people do better and poor people do
worse and that's the whole story
and once I explained it to her
there's not much you can say about it am
I right
unless you change unless you just change
the topic
there's not any real response to that
because the data is pretty clear right
and the facts that I presented
are not really in question
you know there's not not really a
question did you or did you not you know
get discriminated in employment I I
could give you thousands of witnesses to
back up my story because they were there
at the same time and they were also
discriminated for the same reasons also
directly so yeah I could produce
presumably thousands of actually I could
probably produce a thousand Witnesses
with one tweet to back up you know my
version of events
so I wondered what would happen if
somebody that woke heard something so
counter to their worldview
um and uh the result was the change of
the topic the change of the topic
because I don't think you can convince
anybody of anything anymore but you can
change the topic
so that's what happened
uh so I know you want me to talk about
Disney
like I don't know why I can't care less
about this story
maybe because I don't care about Disney
or something I don't know no I get the
importance of it and how it you know is
related to Trends and all that uh but
you know as a Disney's going woke and
they're removing their their gender
greetings so they won't say welcome boys
and girls it'll be welcome
carbon-based units or something I don't
know exactly what they're replacing it
with but it doesn't sound quite as
friendly
and of course they're opposing the uh
I guess the manipulatively named Bill
dosage which really isn't about that at
all
um
and so they're going whoa so here's my
only comment
from a business perspective since Disney
has to satisfy their shareholders
presumably they should do what's good
for the the share price
within reason of course not not doing
anything illegal but what is the
argument that they will make more money
by doing this
you could easily make an argument that
they'll make less money
because I think you would you're going
to get less or fewer I just gave you
that lesson don't say less say fewer
you're going to get fewer guests of the
conservative types going to Disney
so why would Disney a corporate entity
who has an obligation to the
shareholders why would they do something
that feels like it can only reduce their
business but it can never increase it
why would they do that
I guess you know individuals are afraid
for their jobs and their reputations so
it's not for the shareholders and you
could argue whether it's for the good of
society I guess
um I I don't know I just don't care that
much about this story I guess I should
I don't know why but I don't
I guess I don't care because it's too
easy to talk about
you just say I don't like that and
you're done that's about it
all right you remember that big
Ivermectin study I talked about a few
days ago and uh it was the big gold
standard you know randomized controlled
lots of lots of people in it to find out
if I ever met him worked or not and of
course that totally settled the question
once and for all
no it didn't
and then I was asked today to uh
to tweet or comment on the fact that uh
there there is criticism of the study
and the criticism is actually kind of
hilarious by itself that the uh I guess
the categories don't even add up
you know when they say we're we're
testing X number of people of this type
and then you look at the subcategories
and you add them up and it doesn't equal
the number of people they're testing
so so it's not even internally
consistent meaning you can't even look
at their own numbers and say well why
does this column not
not match what they said they were doing
you know that sort of thing now
is is the person doing the debunk
the correct one
or could somebody come along and debunk
the debunker
and get you right back to hey well maybe
this study's good probably
so I just want you to know that there's
no such thing
uh
there's no such thing as a reliable
study whenever there's any political or
Pharma profit thing involved there's no
such thing as a study you could trust so
there is an eye from active study that
says it doesn't work I would give its
credibility I don't know
10 or something that's about it so if
you think I'm saying that Ivermectin
definitely doesn't work in any scenario
whatsoever because there's a study that
says that
um I guess I just can't do that anymore
I just can't tell you because there's a
high quality study that it's true
it just that just doesn't work in 2022.
if I had to um
but let me say this and this is not
based on I guess analysis it's based on
more like
sometimes you just have to guess which
is right
if you put a gun to my head and said you
have to pick does Ivermectin work or
does it not and we're actually just
going to kill you if you get the wrong
answer
I would bet it doesn't work
don't know if I'm right because I don't
think that the I don't think that the
data can ever answer that question
because we don't live in a world where
data is reliable
but that would be my guess
and if you guess differently uh I'm not
even going to argue with you because
since my guess is not based on reason
I have a question for you
does evil exist
does evil exist
lots of yeses on the locals platform
mostly yeses now
can somebody Define evil outside of uh
mental illness
because my frame on life is that some
people have mental illness and some
people don't or actually we all do but
it's a different kind I guess you could
say everybody's got some kind of mental
illness just some some less than others
up I don't really buy into the evil
explanation because I don't know what it
adds
what does it add
because thinking in terms of you know
demons and angels and and god-like you
know demonic stuff I don't know what it
adds to your understanding or what does
it add to your process do you do
something differently because of that
prey
something like that
I don't know
um I say evil is just your subjective
opinion of stuff you're seeing I don't
believe that evil exists as any kind of
a
quantity or a force in the world I just
think some people are broken
that's all and you get exactly the same
result
so I don't think you need to go to the
complicated explanation that you know
we've got souls and some of them are
corrupted or you know controlled by
Satan or anything
um I think you just go for the easiest
explanation that some people have mental
problems
and that's it that's it
because it does explain everything
if there were something it didn't
explain
then I would revise it but if it
explains everything and it doesn't
require you to believe anything that's
not obvious and right in front of you
right mental illness is obvious and true
and right in front of you
but evil
I don't know can you get a handful of
evil
can you measure it this one's you know
200 the evil of this other one I don't
know the evil is real
but it's real in the sense of how we I
guess process our environment so for
some of you it's real for me I've never
sensed it felt it
framed it that way
considered it as even anything important
yeah the the Nazi death camps okay there
let's let's take the extreme example the
Nazi death camps
that could all be explained in terms of
normal human processes
because we know that we can get
underlings to do literally anything
are they evil or are they just
underlings who will do anything because
they're afraid of whatever happens to
them I don't know and then some of the
underlings are sadists
form of mental illness You could argue
or is it a personality disorder I never
know but
I don't know I guess I would say that I
don't have a use for that frame
which is different than say it doesn't
exist
so the question of does evil exist is
unanswerable because whatever it is you
know it's not like you can
there's no measuring device for it you
know there's no such thing as a detector
for it so we'll never we'll never agree
on whether it exists or not but could we
agree it doesn't have a use like framing
the world that way does it help I feel
like it would just be scary to live in a
world that you framed Us full of evil
and demons whereas I just see broken
stuff oh there's a somebody with a
broken brain
and they might act a certainly
yeah so yeah maybe it's useful within
the context of a religion
scientists have finally completed the
human genome so we have actually for the
first time a hundred percent of the
human genome has been mapped
so we're going to learn a lot more about
genetic diseases and stuff it was only
eight percent of it or so the last eight
percent I guess is all we didn't have
already but now imagine putting together
artificial intelligence
with the human genome
with medical records
with DNA
I don't think we fully understand what's
about to happen
you see what I'm see what I'm saying
the full Human Genome DNA about
individuals uh access to all kinds of
medical records that are I think at this
point we don't have you know access to
them but I think we will
maybe not everybody's but enough medical
records that you could make decisions
about what works and what doesn't
I don't know I think there's something
coming
that will redefine
Health Care substantially
there's a I think it's a small company
that already does a can do a test on you
to find out which kinds of which kinds
of prescription medicines will work the
best
isn't that wild you can now do a test I
think it's a blood test you send it away
blood testers spit I forget
or urine I don't know there's some kind
of a test you do that will come back and
tell you what what drugs will be
effective and which ones don't work for
you
how Wild is that does it work I don't
know I don't know
but think about all these things coming
together how our if you had AI to the
amount of data we're going to get about
everything from DNA to Human Genome to
uh
to you know health records we're going
to know almost everything pretty soon
we're probably 10 years away
from
just not even needing a doctor
meaning that the AI will just be so much
better at figuring out what's going on
that uh they just don't need it
well gem sake spokesperson for Biden is
reportedly going to leave for MSNBC she
hasn't finalized a deal there but the
important thing to know is that
according to people who know more than I
do NBC
is maybe the closest Network to the
cia's control meaning that the most
reliably CIA
messaging entity now I don't know what
the relationship is with the CIA but
people who know more than I do basically
say they're in the bag for the CIA
and
um
and she's going to go work for them
directly from
the spokesperson job
does that bother you
does that bother you at all
that
you worry that the Deep State and you
know whatever John Brennan is doing
lately and all the former and current
Intel people are secretly running the
government
and then you see somebody at that level
of government go directly to MSNBC which
feels like it's in the bag you know the
CIA controls it
or at least for the stories they care
about not the whole thing
and
everything about this is Icky
everything about this is Icky now it's
fully disclosed
but I almost have to ask the question
is she really changing jobs or is she
just being transparent that she's always
worked for MSNBC in the CIA
because I don't even know if they change
your direct deposit do they I'm just
kidding of course they do
but it feels like it's the same job they
just changed the title
am I right it feels like it's the same
job
is not a different job it's the same job
that's the story the story is she didn't
change jobs she changed job titles yeah
I'm exaggerating but you get the point
all right um
here's something that General Omar
Bradley once said
he said an American General he was an
American General during World War II and
he and he's
quoted as saying amateurs talk strategy
professionals talk Logistics meaning
that Wars are won or Lost based on
whether you can resupply your your
military
and CNN is still hammering on this idea
that the Russian army is running out of
fuel and food and everything
and
there are other there are other voices
saying Ah that's just complete
propaganda that's just Ukrainian
propaganda
but let me ask you this
how many big fuel Depots does the
Russian military have within Striking
Distance of the Ukrainian border
because the ukrainians have apparently
taken out one large Fuel Depot
that fueled some some percentage of the
Army on the eastern border the Russian
army
so here's the question for you
if if it's true the Ukraine took out one
large Fuel Depot
how many are there
how many are there
because you know if there are three
Russia is totally am I right
if there are only three
if they took out a third of their fuel
they're in real trouble because remember
you don't have to take out all the fuel
or all the food if you take out 20 30
percent of either the fuel or the food
there's chaos
right they've got to do all kinds of
stuff to adjust to that shortage and
it's not going to be pretty so you don't
have to take it all the way you just
have to degrade it to the point where
they're so ineffective that there's a
Cascade effect to collapse
so so I've asked you a very specific
military question
do you think anybody knows first of all
can anybody make that kind of an
estimate
and could anybody ask our military do we
have any idea
how many large
fuel Depots are there and can they
quickly spin up a new one
in other words uh has Russia already
just sort of you know spun up a new fuel
Depot and it didn't even make a dent
because they have plenty of fuel they
just have to get it to the right place
so
uh yeah Define define large so here's
the question if there are 50 fuel Depots
of that size the size that the
ukrainians allegedly destroyed if there
are 50 of them well then Russia wins for
sure
because they can't you know they're not
going to run into fuel
well what if there were three
right isn't that the right question if
there were only three
the Russian armies already in pretty bad
shape
because they just lost their energy
uh you're watching the wrong Ukraine
movie somebody says
uh what does not spin up as a fuel Depot
you need pipe welders Pipe Fitters yeah
yeah it can be easy
but I don't know maybe maybe they just
have giant tanks of fuel and they can
move them wherever they want
I don't know if you need a gigantic tank
to put the smaller tanks into or or
temporarily maybe you don't
all right
uh so I'm going to say that I am
unconvinced
that Logistics alone will be the decider
in Ukraine but I think it's at least a
50 chance
that the big story will be Logistics by
the way here's a little history lesson
that I also learned by the CNN article
that uh the mistake that Hitler made
attacking Russia
was that he thought it would be fast and
he did not develop his supply lines
correctly he only developed supply lines
and actually clothing warm weather or
cold weather clothing
was not even sufficient for the war
so huge numbers of German troops just
froze to death or got frostbite because
they couldn't even Supply them with warm
jackets
they they never planned for that
somebody says and Napoleon too well so
is is the winter plus the supply line
although the winter seemed like a bigger
factor for Napoleon
so well I suppose it's always Supply
because you could Supply you can survive
any winter if you had enough Supply so
yeah I guess it's Supply
um
I don't know I've been saying since the
beginning uh that the ukrainians can
take out the supply lines and we're
learning more about their uh Kamikaze
drones but then I heard they only had a
hundred of them what the hell good are
100 100 Kamikaze drones you're not going
to win a war with a hundred
I feel like you need
I don't know five thousand
so how fast could we make these things
is somebody cranking out some more yeah
100 to start maybe yeah these are the
the switchblades so it's the little
drones you can launch from your backpack
or carry the backpack it's a little
drone and it just goes up into hovers
for 15 minutes until it finds something
and then it Dives in and destroys it
that's a pretty devastating
psychological weapon
like knowing that there's one hovering
around you and it's just picking out
which which person to kill
I think I'll kill the people in that
truck
very psychologically devastating
so we don't know how many fuel Depots
that there are and we don't know how
many of these switchblade drones there
are but I would say that those two
numbers are the only numbers that will
tell you what's going to happen
so I'm boiling it down the only thing
that will tell you what's happening
is how many drones do the ukrainians
have we don't know
and how much fuel do the Russians have
we don't know
the the only two things that matter and
we don't know either anything about
either with the public the military
probably does
so on uh for the last several days
somebody has been screaming at me on
YouTube in the comments that if I don't
understand what operation gladio is then
I don't understand anything
and so I said to myself well I'll look
into it
because I don't know I I had no reason
to dismiss the comment and whoever was
saying it was was pretty adamant
so here's what operation gladio
reportedly is
NATO has terrorist forces
that's the whole story NATO has
officially trained
terrorists and they use them as leave
behind forces in case your country gets
overrun so if a NATO country gets
overrun
they already have spun up the terrorist
forces that remain as part of the
resistance
and they're actually terrorists
like actually literally terrorists
and apparently there have been a number
of discoveries of these various groups
in different countries and apparently
it's fairly confirmed I mean Wikipedia
treats it like it's a fact
you know if you want to if you want to
take that as your Source but does that
change anything for you
because the the gladio operation gladios
would be terrorists working for your
team are you comfortable having
terrorists on your team
because apparently we do
if you're on team NATO apparently you're
pro-terrorist
sorry
now you could call them saboteurs sure
so depending on the context of you know
has your country been invaded well then
they're not terrorists
then they're Freedom Fighters
but they're basically terrorists now
part of what they would do is false
Flags
now it's getting a little creepy isn't
it so allegedly what these gladio people
would do among other things
is kill civilians of Their Own
to make it look like the other side did
it
so how do you like your team now
how do you like being on team NATO
knowing that your team are literally
terrorists
I'm okay with it
are you is there anybody who has a
problem with it I'm okay with it I mean
it's part of what makes it
um
a bad idea to try to conquer your
neighbor
if anything that NATO does is making it
really really hard to conquer your your
neighbor I'm okay with that
now nobody's in favor of killing
civilians I mean not
not that but as soon as you say we're in
a war
then then the strategy changes to how do
you do well
all right we'd rather have no war but if
you're in one
well you're going to fight the wind
right
so one of the ways to fight to win are
these false flag things the reason
people do it is because it works if it
didn't work people wouldn't do it
so if you want to win you do what works
as ugly as that is so you could be
morally outraged and should be I guess
but it's going to happen anyway your
your moral outrage won't change anything
um
so uh I don't know if the person asking
me to look into that is on here but are
you satisfied or or have I missed
something about this operation gladio
is there any was there anything that
ties it close because I believe
I believe that
the point of it was for me to understand
that NATO is not all uh unicorns and
roses
and I I take that as first of all
something that was obvious in my opinion
but secondly uh okay
I will accept that a little history
lesson I'm not sure ads or subtracts
anything
because war is dirty business so I'm not
I'm not surprised that CIA related
people are doing awful things that's not
new news
all right
um
did you see the Deep fake video of
zelenski so somebody did a AI generated
deep fake in which he was telling his
soldiers to surrender to the Russian
invasion and uh the Deep fake wasn't
that good
but wow how far away are we from not
knowing who's giving you the commands at
all
pretty close right
we're pretty close to not knowing who's
giving the orders as soon as the Deep
fakes get I don't know 20 better
you just won't tell the difference you
won't know if it's your president saying
something or somebody else
um
so keep an eye on that I think this
whole deep fake thing
is just going to be gigantic
so I continue to be entertained by Bill
Maher's conversion to uh
what would I call it uh so he's not
becoming right wing I don't think that's
going to happen but he seems to be able
to see the whole field and so every
Friday he's saying stuff that makes news
at least in Fox News because he's saying
stuff that his team doesn't hear
and I've decided he might be the most
dangerous person in America
well-meaning I mean his intentions are
positive I'm sure but
he's the only person I know who
consistently penetrates the the left
bubble and tells them what they don't
know and haven't heard
think about how dangerous that is
because I don't know anybody else who
can do I can't do it right can you
yeah I can't talk to anybody in the
Democrat bubble and have them hear me I
don't have any channel to them but he
does because he started with them and
you know audiences tend to stick with
you so he so on Friday's show apparently
uh Bill Maher said quote so the new New
York Post got a hold of what was in the
computer talk about hunter's laptop uh
and you know because the New York Post
is a republican paper
that's his description and the New York
Times And The Washington Post are the
Democrat papers again his description
and and the Republican paper
uh and then he goes Twitter canceled
their account talked about the New York
Post they can't even report the story
so you see he's being amazed
that a true story got canceled from the
internet and he noticed
now he hasn't noticed all the stuff
that's happened but this one was just
too shockingly big and so he's calling
it out and
uh
so he's just like the right-leaning
media is pointing out the mainstream
media
suppressed one of the most important
stories of the election cycle now Bill
Maher did not go as far as he could have
in saying that it probably influenced
the election result
and therefore one could say
the election was rigged and therefore
one could say that Trump was right
although I think he was talking more
about vote rigging which would be
different and nobody's proven that in
any scale
so
um somebody says billboard needs an ego
death now I'm pretty sure I don't know
this I'm speculating
but if Bill Maher has not done mushrooms
mushrooms don't exist
if he hasn't done them uh I'd be pretty
amazed pretty amazed and that's based on
not only the lifestyle he promotes
but also the fact that he is relatively
aware
and that's one of the ways you get there
um
so in my opinion Bill Maher has figured
out maybe 25 of what's Happening
maybe 50 percent
but I tweeted Adam and I included him in
the tweet
and I said the most dangerous person in
America is Bill Maher because he is
capable of penetrating the Democrat
bubble and telling them their new
sources are fake
and then I said he's figured out about
25 of what's Happening he still believes
the fine people hoax and the drinking
bleaks hoax
do you see what I did there
all right now here's some context I've
been on Bill Marshall once
and it was before the 2016 election and
I predicted on his show that Trump would
win and I explained why based on his
persuasive powers
Bill Maher listened to everything I said
and did not push back at all
which I thought was unusual
because I was saying things clearly
supportive of trump he's clearly the
opposite and not once
he didn't push back on anything
now maybe he thought the persuasion
angle wasn't that important or a little
office you know his uh sweet spot or
something but
um I will say that if he remembers who I
am I'm guessing he does
if he remembers who I am he would
probably remember that on his show I was
reasonable
and that I sounded like a not a crazy
right-wing you know person
and I feel I established at least a
little bit of credibility
by saying things on his show that didn't
get any pushback and were new you know
they were they were new for his audience
and didn't get pushback and it was
important it explained what was
happening and accurately predicted now
if anything I just said is true
which is that I gained at least a little
bit of credibility in my small
interaction with him on his show
then if he were to see this tweet and by
you know that's by no means certain but
usually when the blue checks tweeted
each other
I feel like we usually see it what do
you think you know some people are more
active on their social media I don't I
don't think Bill Maher is Super Active
on Twitter you know but he's a he's a
super user but I don't know how many
minutes he spends there and
I think he'd probably see it just
because I added it
so you'd probably see it
now if you were him
and you knew that I'd said incredible
the same things on the show that nobody
even argued with
and you heard me say something that
would blow your mind that the fine
people hoax and the drinking bleach hoax
or hoaxes
and I'm sure that's the first time he
would have heard it in a way that
doesn't sound crazy
you may have heard Fox News said which
doesn't sound credible you may have
heard I don't know somebody will say it
if he did
but I feel as though
I feel as though
there's some chance that I got that
message through
I'm I may have slipped the puck past the
the keeper and the reason is because
first of all because it's Bill Maher
and he's open to
a competing idea
so if it were not him this wouldn't work
at all secondly because the blue checks
probably check each other's comments
and thirdly because the context I waited
until he was already primed
to believe that the news is hugely
manipulated on his side
do you see what I did here
I waited until he was primed while he's
talking about the his own news sources
being illegitimate
he's talking about it now while he's
talking about his new sources being
illegitimate I give him two things that
coming from me
should just blow the top of his head off
if he notices right I mean I I'm not
going to assume I'm important enough in
the scheme of things that you
necessarily is going to even notice
but in theory so this is sort of a
impromptu persuasion lesson if you can
if you can throw a mind thought
into somebody who's already in the mode
it's a whole different idea than coming
as somebody you're both loaded and ready
for an argument
if you're both loaded and ready for an
argument nobody's nobody changes their
mind
but if you can catch somebody in a
vulnerable moment
when they've already talked themselves
into the point of view that you're
promoting
and you're just giving them a little
extra of where they already are because
do you know what people do like
they love confirmation by us of their
own opinion they'll accept that in a
moment that's not changing their mind
that's hard
changing anybody's mind is really hard
work which is why persuasion is an
important topic it's so hard if you
don't do everything right you don't have
a chance
so
I think there's some chance
that I planted a seed that would be
productive here's what I love
in my perfect world
Bill Maher will see the full videos of
the fine people hoax and the full video
of the drinking bleach oats and he will
realize that the two biggest really
messages about Trump were entirely made
up
the two biggest ones
and I don't know
if that's expecting too much of anybody
because it is kind of you know so I have
a high opinion of Bill Maher's mental
let's say openness and flexibility you
know different than most people very
different
but this is a stretch to get somebody to
believe this much of a mind is
something really basic to the reality
just didn't happen just never happened
and it's easy to prove that's the weird
part if it were hard to prove
then people could hold on to their their
assumption but you just have to play the
video that's it the entire debunk is
just like well let me play the whole
video not the clip that reverses its
meaning
thank you well ladies and gentlemen is
my prepared marks for today
uh no doubt this peak experience is
something that will stay with you
forever
or for several minutes one
um is there a topic which I have not
covered
which you'd like to hear me cover
um
all right
uh the how do you debunk the don't say
gay
well unfortunately the don't say gay
thing is really a masterpiece of
persuasion
whoever whoever frames something first
as a big advantage and the don't say gay
people framed it best they framed it
with a rhyme which is really good
say and gay Rhymes that's a good
technique is short it's easy to remember
it's it's repeatable
and that becomes true
so it doesn't even matter
dogs and blankets I like that I'm seeing
a picture of a dog in a blanket on the
locals platform they can they can put
pictures in the comments
um
by the way
uh last night I did a
live stream from the man caves these are
only available for the people who
subscribe on locals so while you missed
was my story about meeting a psychic and
hypnotizing her and some of the
predictions she made which were just
insane a visit with my own spirit guide
or not I can only tell you what seems to
have happened
I'm not sure what really happened uh and
they uh tying that in with the uh the
simulation and all the evidence for the
simulation that we live in a simulation
now if you think that sounds good and
not only were there simultaneous sips
but uh let's just say that the man cave
is simultaneous whatever
so you are allowed to do is
simultaneously whatever you wanted
well I did the same
and
when am I going on guffeld again so yes
um I don't know it's not up to me
so
um
looks like I have uh answered all of
your questions
are you saying that Bill Maher has a
podcast where he and Quentin Tarantino
got Stoned on the podcast
well I would like to uh put out my
challenge right now
to Snoop Dogg
Snoop Dogg
number one I'm a cartoonist
and I'm guessing you have no no idea who
I am
um but I do this cartoon called Dilbert
some people have heard of it and I
challenge you Snoop Dogg
to join me in my man cave in California
Northern California
and to see who can
let's say you can be more of the Snoop
Dogg if you know what I mean this is
this is YouTube so I'm gonna keep it
generic generic if there are any young
kids watching kids don't do drugs
and I mean that
sounds like a joke but no kids don't do
drugs
that said
uh how much would you like to see me
interview Snoop Dogg while we're seeing
who can last the longest if you know
what I mean
come on you'd watch that
you'd watch it now I don't think that
Snoop would know enough about me or that
would ever make sense to him but it
would be awesome
and I think it would be viral as hell I
don't I don't think I could talk him
into it because he just wouldn't be
familiar with me I'm guessing I mean if
if Kanye
somehow knew who I was it's not
impossible
but unlikely
so that's the that's the uh the ask
Snoop Dogg in my man cave
let's do it and by the way I'm a huge
fan of Snoop Dogg uh
I I love the fact that he never changed
who he was I guess that's what I like
best you know I like his music I like
his whole vibe but I like the fact that
uh he changed the world like the world
didn't change him
you know that right
like Snoop just said I'm just going to
be me and the world is going to have to
catch up and then it did
who does that who does that but he
didn't
all right
um that is all for now and uh
I'm going to go do some work I got a lot
of it
oh I'm hearing from Sonny San Rafel
somebody's watching
so if somebody knows Snoop get to him
and make the offer
and we'll go from there and
for the rest of you
can you have a great day pretty sure you
can
go forth