Coffee With Scott Adams — Knowledge Archive July 10, 2026
Scott Adams Philosophy Archive
Search ideas
Episodes Episode #1701

Episode 1701 Scott Adams - My Conversation With A Woke Person Did Not Go Well. And Fake News.

Episode #1701 Apr 2, 2022 50:35 25,918 views

Find my "extra" content on Locals: https://ScottAdams.Locals.com Content: ----------- - Conversation with a young, woke person - Disney goes Woke - Full human genome + AI - Jenn Psaki going to MSNBC - NATO trained terrorists, Operation Gladio - Bill Maher tells the left what nobody else can ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ If you would like to enjoy this same content plus bonus content from Scott Adams, including micro-lessons on lots of useful topics to build your talent stack, please see scottadams.locals.com for full access to that secret treasure.

Opening General Commentary

That, ladies and gentlemen, is the beautiful, beautiful sound of multiple documents being tapped on my desk. And that means my printer is online and everything's working smoothly today. And this might be the highlight of not only your personal experience but civilization itself. And it's called Coff…

View segment →
SimultaneousSip General Commentary

r happened. All you need is a proper regular glass or tankard, a flask, a vessel of any kind, filled with your favorite liquid. Audio is looking good. Join me now for the unparalleled pleasure of the dopamine of the day. The thing that makes everything better is called the simultaneo

View segment →
MainContent Energy & Mood Management

us sip, and it's going to happen right now. Ah. It's better every time. Now, if I haven't told you yet today, you're gonna have a wonderful day. Oh sure, you'll have your ups and downs, you always do. But t

View segment →
MainContent Cognitive Reframing

oday is going to be great because you're better looking and smarter than you were yesterday, and that's all going to work for you. Well, I had a conversation yesterday with a young woke person. How do you think that went? Do you think that if you put a young woke person and me in the same conversat…

View segment →
MainContent Politics as Persuasion

ds of witnesses to back up my story because they were there at the same time and they were also discriminated against for the same reasons, also directly. So yeah, I could produce presumably thousands. Actually I could probably produce a thousand witnesses with one tweet to back up my version of ev…

View segment →
NewsReaction Media & Fake News

atisfy their shareholders, presumably they should do what's good for the share price, within reason of course, not doing anything illegal. But what is the argument that they will make more money by doing this? You could easily make an argument that they'll make less money because you're going to ge…

View segment →
MainContent General Commentary

lity, I don't know, 10 or something. That's about it. So if you think I'm saying that Ivermectin definitely doesn't work in any scenario whatsoever because there's a study that says that, I guess I just can't do that anymore. I just can't tell you because there's a high-quality study that it's true.…

View segment →
MainContent AI & Technology

but evil? I don't know. Can you get a handful of evil? Can you measure it? This one's 200 evil. This other one, I don't know. Evil is real, but it's real in the sense of how we process our environment. So for some of you it's real. For me I've never sensed it, felt it, framed it that way, considere…

View segment →
NewsReaction Media & Fake News

ast eight percent, I guess, is all we didn't have already. But now imagine putting together artificial intelligence with the human genome, with medical records, with DNA. I don't think we fully understand what's about to happen. You see what I'm saying? The full human genome, DNA about individuals,…

View segment →
MainContent General Commentary

just be so much better at figuring out what's going on that they just don't need it. Well, Jen Psaki, spokesperson for Biden, is reportedly going to leave for MSNBC. She hasn't finalized a deal there. But the important thing to know is that according to people who know more than I do, NBC is maybe…

View segment →
Tangent Politics as Persuasion

we don't know how many of these Switchblade drones there are. But I would say that those two numbers are the only numbers that will tell you what's going to happen. So I'm boiling it down. The only thing that will tell you what's happening is how many drones do the Ukrainians have? We don't know. An…

View segment →
NewsReaction AI & Technology

d I take that as, first of all, something that was obvious in my opinion. But secondly, okay, I will accept that. A little history lesson. I'm not sure it adds or subtracts anything because war is dirty business. So I'm not surprised that CIA-related people are doing awful things. That's not new new…

View segment →
MainContent Persuasion

t tell the difference. You won't know if it's your president saying something or somebody else. So keep an eye on that. I think this whole deepfake thing is just going to be gigantic. So I continue to be entertained by Bill Maher's conversion to, what would I call it? So he's not becoming right-wi…

View segment →
QandA General Commentary

k is just like, well let me play the whole video, not the clip that reverses its meaning. Thank you. Well, ladies and gentlemen, those are my prepared remarks for today. No doubt this peak experience is something that will stay with you forever or for several minutes. Is there a topic which I have…

View segment →
Closing General Commentary

's do it. And by the way I'm a huge fan of Snoop Dogg. I love the fact that he never changed who he was. I guess that's what I like best. I like his music. I like his whole vibe. But I like the fact that he changed the world like the world didn't change him. You know that, right? Like Snoop just sai…

View segment →

That, ladies and gentlemen, is the beautiful, beautiful sound of multiple documents being tapped on my desk. And that means my printer is online and everything's working smoothly today. And this might be the highlight of not only your personal experience but civilization itself. And it's called Coffee with Scott Adams, and it's the best thing that's ever happened.

All you need is a proper regular glass or tankard, a flask, a vessel of any kind, filled with your favorite liquid. Audio is looking good. Join me now for the unparalleled pleasure of the dopamine of the day. The thing that makes everything better is called the simultaneous sip, and it's going to happen right now.

Ah. It's better every time.

Now, if I haven't told you yet today, you're gonna have a wonderful day. Oh sure, you'll have your ups and downs, you always do. But today is going to be great because you're better looking and smarter than you were yesterday, and that's all going to work for you.

Well, I had a conversation yesterday with a young woke person. How do you think that went? Do you think that if you put a young woke person and me in the same conversation that it'll be fun? Well, it was. It started out with a conversation about sexism and all the sexism and misogyny and discrimination against girls and boys. And I said, were you aware that girls do better than boys in a lot of different ways? And she was not aware of that.

And today, by coincidence, I saw a list of some of the things that are going better for girls than boys. Now here we're talking about younger folks, mostly younger folks, so it includes women and girls. And so somebody did a little chart I saw online. I tweeted it earlier this morning. For every hundred girls or women, how many boys or men are doing the same thing?

So for example, for every 100 women who take AP or honors courses in high school in art or music, how many men do the same thing? Honors courses in art and music: only 54. So there are almost twice as many women who attain this high level in school. And then you go right down the line. Who earns an associate's degree? Who takes these AP courses? Who graduates? Who's got a master's degree? Who's in the top 10 percent? Every one of these is women or girls. Every one of them.

So on educational attainment, it's not even close. Women are just smoking men. Not even close. Did you know that? How many woke young people are aware that women are just destroying men at least at the entry level, which predicts the future?

How about health-related stuff and mental health? Again, an entire list of things that women are way better off than men. I'll just give you examples. Basically it's about dying from suicide and everything from autism to learning disorders. People who are homeless: twice as many men and boys are homeless. Die of homicide: seven times more. Die in prison: 13 times more. It's not even close.

If you take most of the measures of well-being, women and girls are all at the top. It's not even close. Now what do you think happened when I mentioned that to a young woke person? Did the young woke person say, you know, that's not exactly what I've been hearing, but I'm going to take it under advisement, maybe do a little research myself and possibly even change my worldview? Do you think that happened?

No. The conversation very quickly turned to my racism. And so I said, well, if you think you live in a world in which it's hard to be a woman and it's hard to be Black, can you explain to me why Black women are getting into college and achieving more scholastically at the moment than white men? Can you explain to me how Black women, who have two strikes against them according to you, the woke person — they have two strikes against them and they're big ones according to you, Black and female — so can you explain why they're doing so well? Why is it that they're getting into college at higher rates than white men, which also suggests that they'll have higher incomes?

Now of course we're not talking about 50 years ago. That's a whole different situation. But how many woke young people were aware that if you're both Black and a woman, it's one of the best things you could be? Do you know what's the only thing that's better than being Black and female in terms of educational attainment, or even the ultimate step of getting your degree? The only thing better than being a Black woman is being a white woman. But being a woman is a pretty good deal in 2022, educationally, which should also translate into career, which should translate into income, etc.

All right. Now when the question of racism came up, I did the Chappelle reframe. And the Chappelle reframe goes like this: Let me ask you, who do you think is suffering more, Tiger Woods or a poor white person in Appalachia? And of course Tiger Woods is doing a little bit better. He's got his issues too, but he's doing better than the poorest of white people. Yeah.

How many do you think that Michael Jordan gets discriminated against more than, say, an average white person? And the answer is no, he doesn't. He's discriminated less, you probably guessed. More things than the average person. And so I was explaining to her that it always has been about rich versus poor. That's what Chappelle explains very well. And that she has been hypnotized into believing it's a racial problem so that the rich people can cover up the fact that they're in power and that they're suppressing other people to keep their power.

Now what happens when you hear that for the first time? Something this person had never heard. Never heard that if you're rich and Black you're in pretty good shape, and if you're poor and white you're in pretty bad shape. Am I right? There's not much to argue with there.

Now yeah, it all explodes, right? And it reminded me how little information gets from one bubble to the next. And I was also thinking, how many times am I discriminated against for race or gender every day? What do you think? Do you think that I ever go a day without overt, very direct discrimination against me for being either male or white? I don't think I've ever gone a day. Not once. Not in my public life.

If you look at my Twitter you can see almost every day somebody accusing me of something that you can tell is based on my gender and my race. And they're usually incorrect. That is racism, right? People making direct assumptions about my beliefs based on my gender and my race, and they're usually wrong. I get that every day, you know.

And most of you know my famous story of being denied promotions in two different corporate worlds because I was white and because I was male. And they told me that directly. That's not my interpretation. They said directly, you're white, you're male, we can't promote you.

Now how many Black people have ever had that happen to them? Probably some. I'm sure there are Black people who have exactly the same experience. We're not going to hire you because you're Black. Maybe they didn't say it out loud, but you know it's happening somewhere, right? So definitely it's happening.

But to imagine that it's Black people getting all the discrimination and white people getting none of it, and that it's about race, is missing the big story. It's also about race. I'm not denying racism exists, of course. I'm just saying it's everywhere all the time, and that rich people do better and poor people do worse. And that's the whole story.

And once I explained it to her, there's not much you can say about it. Am I right? Unless you just change the topic, there's not any real response to that, because the data is pretty clear, right? And the facts that I presented are not really in question. You know, there's not really a question. Did you or did you not get discriminated in employment? I could give you thousands of witnesses to back up my story because they were there at the same time and they were also discriminated against for the same reasons, also directly.

So yeah, I could produce presumably thousands. Actually I could probably produce a thousand witnesses with one tweet to back up my version of events.

So I wondered what would happen if somebody that woke heard something so counter to their worldview. And the result was the change of the topic. The change of the topic. Because I don't think you can convince anybody of anything anymore, but you can change the topic. So that's what happened.

So I know you want me to talk about Disney. Like I don't know why. I can't care less about this story. Maybe because I don't care about Disney or something. I don't know. No, I get the importance of it and how it is related to trends and all that. But you know, as Disney's going woke and they're removing their gender greetings — so they won't say welcome boys and girls, it'll be welcome carbon-based units or something. I don't know exactly what they're replacing it with, but it doesn't sound quite as friendly.

And of course they're opposing the, I guess the manipulatively named "Don't Say Gay" bill, which really isn't about that at all. And so they're going woke. So here's my only comment from a business perspective. Since Disney has to satisfy their shareholders, presumably they should do what's good for the share price, within reason of course, not doing anything illegal. But what is the argument that they will make more money by doing this?

You could easily make an argument that they'll make less money because you're going to get fewer guests of the conservative types going to Disney. So why would Disney, a corporate entity who has an obligation to the shareholders, why would they do something that feels like it can only reduce their business but it can never increase it? Why would they do that?

I guess individuals are afraid for their jobs and their reputations, so it's not for the shareholders. And you could argue whether it's for the good of society, I guess. I don't know. I just don't care that much about this story. I guess I should. I don't know why, but I don't. I guess I don't care because it's too easy to talk about. You just say I don't like that and you're done. That's about it.

All right. You remember that big Ivermectin study I talked about a few days ago? And it was the big gold standard, you know, randomized controlled, lots of people in it, to find out if Ivermectin worked or not. And of course that totally settled the question once and for all. No, it didn't.

And then I was asked today to tweet or comment on the fact that there is criticism of the study. And the criticism is actually kind of hilarious by itself. That the categories don't even add up. You know, when they say we're testing X number of people of this type, and then you look at the subcategories and you add them up and it doesn't equal the number of people they're testing. So it's not even internally consistent. Meaning you can't even look at their own numbers and say, well why does this column not match what they said they were doing? You know, that sort of thing.

Now is the person doing the debunk the correct one, or could somebody come along and debunk the debunker and get you right back to, hey, well maybe this study's good? Probably so. I just want you to know that there's no such thing as a reliable study whenever there's any political or pharma profit thing involved. There's no such thing as a study you could trust.

So there is an Ivermectin study that says it doesn't work. I would give its credibility, I don't know, 10 or something. That's about it. So if you think I'm saying that Ivermectin definitely doesn't work in any scenario whatsoever because there's a study that says that, I guess I just can't do that anymore. I just can't tell you because there's a high-quality study that it's true. It just doesn't work in 2022.

But let me say this, and this is not based on analysis. It's based on more like sometimes you just have to guess. Which is right? If you put a gun to my head and said you have to pick, does Ivermectin work or does it not, and we're actually just going to kill you if you get the wrong answer, I would bet it doesn't work. Don't know if I'm right because I don't think that the data can ever answer that question because we don't live in a world where data is reliable. But that would be my guess. And if you guess differently, I'm not even going to argue with you because since my guess is not based on reason...

I have a question for you. Does evil exist? Does evil exist? Lots of yeses on the Locals platform. Mostly yeses. Now can somebody define evil outside of mental illness? Because my frame on life is that some people have mental illness and some people don't. Or actually we all do, but it's a different kind, I guess. You could say everybody's got some kind of mental illness, just some less than others.

I don't really buy into the evil explanation because I don't know what it adds. What does it add? Because thinking in terms of demons and angels and god-like demonic stuff, I don't know what it adds to your understanding or what does it add to your process. Do you do something differently because of that? Pray or something like that? I don't know.

I say evil is just your subjective opinion of stuff you're seeing. I don't believe that evil exists as any kind of a quantity or a force in the world. I just think some people are broken. That's all. And you get exactly the same result. So I don't think you need to go to the complicated explanation that we've got souls and some of them are corrupted or controlled by Satan or anything. I think you just go for the easiest explanation: that some people have mental problems and that's it. That's it. Because it does explain everything.

If there were something it didn't explain, then I would revise it. But if it explains everything and it doesn't require you to believe anything that's not obvious and right in front of you — right, mental illness is obvious and true and right in front of you — but evil? I don't know. Can you get a handful of evil? Can you measure it? This one's 200 evil. This other one, I don't know.

Evil is real, but it's real in the sense of how we process our environment. So for some of you it's real. For me I've never sensed it, felt it, framed it that way, considered it as even anything important. Yeah, the Nazi death camps. Okay, there, let's take the extreme example. The Nazi death camps. That could all be explained in terms of normal human processes because we know that we can get underlings to do literally anything. Are they evil or are they just underlings who will do anything because they're afraid of whatever happens to them? I don't know.

And then some of the underlings are sadists, form of mental illness you could argue, or is it a personality disorder? I never know. But I don't know. I guess I would say that I don't have a use for that frame, which is different than saying it doesn't exist.

So the question of does evil exist is unanswerable because whatever it is, it's not like you can — there's no measuring device for it. There's no such thing as a detector for it. So we'll never agree on whether it exists or not. But could we agree it doesn't have a use? Like framing the world that way, does it help? I feel like it would just be scary to live in a world that you framed as full of evil and demons, whereas I just see broken stuff. Oh, there's somebody with a broken brain and they might act a certain way. Yeah. So yeah, maybe it's useful within the context of a religion.

Scientists have finally completed the human genome. So we have actually for the first time a hundred percent of the human genome has been mapped. So we're going to learn a lot more about genetic diseases and stuff. It was only eight percent of it or so the last eight percent, I guess, is all we didn't have already. But now imagine putting together artificial intelligence with the human genome, with medical records, with DNA. I don't think we fully understand what's about to happen.

You see what I'm saying? The full human genome, DNA about individuals, access to all kinds of medical records that are, I think at this point we don't have access to them, but I think we will. Maybe not everybody's, but enough medical records that you could make decisions about what works and what doesn't. I don't know. I think there's something coming that will redefine health care substantially.

There's a small company that already can do a test on you to find out which kinds of prescription medicines will work the best. Isn't that wild? You can now do a test — I think it's a blood test, you send it away. Blood, tears, spit, I forget, or urine. I don't know. There's some kind of a test you do that will come back and tell you what drugs will be effective and which ones don't work for you. How wild is that? Does it work? I don't know. I don't know.

But think about all these things coming together. If you had AI to the amount of data we're going to get about everything from DNA to human genome to health records, we're going to know almost everything pretty soon. We're probably 10 years away from just not even needing a doctor, meaning that the AI will just be so much better at figuring out what's going on that they just don't need it.

Well, Jen Psaki, spokesperson for Biden, is reportedly going to leave for MSNBC. She hasn't finalized a deal there. But the important thing to know is that according to people who know more than I do, NBC is maybe the closest network to the CIA's control, meaning that the most reliably CIA messaging entity. Now I don't know what the relationship is with the CIA, but people who know more than I do basically say they're in the bag for the CIA. And she's going to go work for them directly from the spokesperson job.

Does that bother you? Does that bother you at all that you worry that the deep state and whatever John Brennan is doing lately and all the former and current intel people are secretly running the government? And then you see somebody at that level of government go directly to MSNBC, which feels like it's in the bag. The CIA controls it, or at least for the stories they care about. Not the whole thing. And everything about this is icky. Everything about this is icky.

Now it's fully disclosed, but I almost have to ask the question: is she really changing jobs or is she just being transparent that she's always worked for MSNBC and the CIA? Because I don't even know if they change your direct deposit, do they? I'm just kidding, of course they do. But it feels like it's the same job. They just changed the title. Am I right? It feels like it's the same job. It's not a different job. It's the same job. That's the story. The story is she didn't change jobs. She changed job titles. Yeah, I'm exaggerating, but you get the point.

All right. Here's something that General Omar Bradley once said. He was an American general during World War II. And he's quoted as saying amateurs talk strategy, professionals talk logistics. Meaning that wars are won or lost based on whether you can resupply your military.

And CNN is still hammering on this idea that the Russian army is running out of fuel and food and everything. And there are other voices saying, ah, that's just complete propaganda. That's just Ukrainian propaganda. But let me ask you this: how many big fuel depots does the Russian military have within striking distance of the Ukrainian border?

Because the Ukrainians have apparently taken out one large fuel depot that fueled some percentage of the army on the eastern border, the Russian army. So here's the question for you. If it's true the Ukraine took out one large fuel depot, how many are there? How many are there? Because you know if there are three, Russia is totally, am I right? If there are only three, if they took out a third of their fuel, they're in real trouble.

Because remember, you don't have to take out all the fuel or all the food. If you take out 20, 30 percent of either the fuel or the food, there's chaos, right? They've got to do all kinds of stuff to adjust to that shortage and it's not going to be pretty. So you don't have to take it all the way. You just have to degrade it to the point where they're so ineffective that there's a cascade effect to collapse.

So I've asked you a very specific military question. Do you think anybody knows? First of all, can anybody make that kind of an estimate? And could anybody ask our military, do we have any idea how many large fuel depots are there? And can they quickly spin up a new one? In other words, has Russia already just sort of spun up a new fuel depot and it didn't even make a dent because they have plenty of fuel, they just have to get it to the right place?

So yeah. Define large. So here's the question. If there are 50 fuel depots of that size, the size that the Ukrainians allegedly destroyed, if there are 50 of them, well then Russia wins for sure because they're not going to run into fuel. Well what if there were three, right? Isn't that the right question? If there were only three, the Russian army's already in pretty bad shape because they just lost a third of their energy.

You're watching the wrong Ukraine movie, somebody says. What does not spin up a fuel depot? You need pipe welders, pipe fitters. Yeah, it can be easy, but I don't know. Maybe they just have giant tanks of fuel and they can move them wherever they want. I don't know if you need a gigantic tank to put the smaller tanks into or temporarily. Maybe you don't.

All right. So I'm going to say that I am unconvinced that logistics alone will be the decider in Ukraine. But I think it's at least a 50 percent chance that the big story will be logistics.

By the way, here's a little history lesson that I also learned by the CNN article. That the mistake that Hitler made attacking Russia was that he thought it would be fast and he did not develop his supply lines correctly. He only developed supply lines. And actually clothing, warm weather or cold weather clothing, was not even sufficient for the war. So huge numbers of German troops just froze to death or got frostbite because they couldn't even supply them with warm jackets. They never planned for that.

Somebody says and Napoleon too. Well so is the winter plus the supply line? Although the winter seemed like a bigger factor for Napoleon. So well I suppose it's always supply because you could survive any winter if you had enough supply. So yeah, I guess it's supply.

I don't know. I've been saying since the beginning that the Ukrainians can take out the supply lines. And we're learning more about their kamikaze drones. But then I heard they only had a hundred of them. What the hell good are 100 kamikaze drones? You're not going to win a war with a hundred. I feel like you need, I don't know, 5,000. So how fast could we make these things? Is somebody cranking out some more?

Yeah, 100 to start maybe. Yeah, these are the Switchblades. So it's the little drones you can launch from your backpack or carry the backpack. It's a little drone and it just goes up and hovers for 15 minutes until it finds something and then it dives in and destroys it. That's a pretty devastating psychological weapon. Like knowing that there's one hovering around you and it's just picking out which person to kill. I think I'll kill the people in that truck. Very psychologically devastating.

So we don't know how many fuel depots there are and we don't know how many of these Switchblade drones there are. But I would say that those two numbers are the only numbers that will tell you what's going to happen. So I'm boiling it down. The only thing that will tell you what's happening is how many drones do the Ukrainians have? We don't know. And how much fuel do the Russians have? We don't know. The only two things that matter and we don't know anything about either, with the public. The military probably does.

So for the last several days somebody has been screaming at me on YouTube in the comments that if I don't understand what Operation Gladio is then I don't understand anything. And so I said to myself, well I'll look into it because I had no reason to dismiss the comment. And whoever was saying it was pretty adamant.

So here's what Operation Gladio reportedly is. NATO has terrorist forces. That's the whole story. NATO has officially trained terrorists and they use them as leave-behind forces in case your country gets overrun. So if a NATO country gets overrun they already have spun up the terrorist forces that remain as part of the resistance. And they're actually terrorists, like actually literally terrorists.

And apparently there have been a number of discoveries of these various groups in different countries. And apparently it's fairly confirmed. I mean Wikipedia treats it like it's a fact, if you want to take that as your source. But does that change anything for you? Because the Gladio operation, Gladio would be terrorists working for your team. Are you comfortable having terrorists on your team? Because apparently we do. If you're on team NATO, apparently you're pro-terrorist. Sorry.

Now you could call them saboteurs, sure. So depending on the context of has your country been invaded? Well then they're not terrorists then, they're freedom fighters. But they're basically terrorists. Now part of what they would do is false flags. Now it's getting a little creepy, isn't it?

So allegedly what these Gladio people would do, among other things, is kill civilians of their own to make it look like the other side did it. So how do you like your team now? How do you like being on team NATO knowing that your team are literally terrorists? I'm okay with it. Are you? Is there anybody who has a problem with it? I'm okay with it.

I mean it's part of what makes it a bad idea to try to conquer your neighbor. If anything that NATO does is making it really, really hard to conquer your neighbor, I'm okay with that. Now nobody's in favor of killing civilians. I mean not that. But as soon as you say we're in a war, then the strategy changes to how do you do well? All right, we'd rather have no war, but if you're in one, well you're going to fight to win, right?

So one of the ways to fight to win are these false flag things. The reason people do it is because it works. If it didn't work people wouldn't do it. So if you want to win you do what works, as ugly as that is. So you could be morally outraged and should be, I guess, but it's going to happen anyway. Your moral outrage won't change anything.

So I don't know if the person asking me to look into that is on here, but are you satisfied? Or have I missed something about this Operation Gladio? Is there anything that ties it close? Because I believe that the point of it was for me to understand that NATO is not all unicorns and roses. And I take that as, first of all, something that was obvious in my opinion. But secondly, okay, I will accept that. A little history lesson. I'm not sure it adds or subtracts anything because war is dirty business. So I'm not surprised that CIA-related people are doing awful things. That's not new news.

All right. Did you see the deepfake video of Zelensky? So somebody did an AI-generated deepfake in which he was telling his soldiers to surrender to the Russian invasion. And the deepfake wasn't that good. But wow, how far away are we from not knowing who's giving you the commands at all? Pretty close, right? We're pretty close to not knowing who's giving the orders. As soon as the deepfakes get, I don't know, 20 percent better, you just won't tell the difference. You won't know if it's your president saying something or somebody else.

So keep an eye on that. I think this whole deepfake thing is just going to be gigantic.

So I continue to be entertained by Bill Maher's conversion to, what would I call it? So he's not becoming right-wing. I don't think that's going to happen. But he seems to be able to see the whole field. And so every Friday he's saying stuff that makes news, at least in Fox News, because he's saying stuff that his team doesn't hear. And I've decided he might be the most dangerous person in America. Well-meaning. I mean his intentions are positive, I'm sure. But he's the only person I know who consistently penetrates the left bubble and tells them what they don't know and haven't heard.

Think about how dangerous that is. Because I don't know anybody else who can do it. I can't do it, right? Can you? Yeah, I can't talk to anybody in the Democrat bubble and have them hear me. I don't have any channel to them. But he does because he started with them and you know audiences tend to stick with you.

So on Friday's show apparently Bill Maher said, quote, so the New York Post got a hold of what was in the computer. Talk about Hunter's laptop. And you know because the New York Post is a Republican paper — that's his description — and the New York Times and the Washington Post are the Democrat papers — again his description. And the Republican paper. And then he goes, Twitter canceled their account, talked about the New York Post. They can't even report the story.

So you see he's being amazed that a true story got canceled from the internet. And he noticed. Now he hasn't noticed all the stuff that's happened, but this one was just too shockingly big and so he's calling it out. And so he's just like, the right-leaning media is pointing out the mainstream media suppressed one of the most important stories of the election cycle.

Now Bill Maher did not go as far as he could have in saying that it probably influenced the election result and therefore one could say the election was rigged and therefore one could say that Trump was right. Although I think he was talking more about vote rigging, which would be different, and nobody's proven that in any scale.

Somebody says Bill Maher needs an ego death. Now I'm pretty sure — I don't know this, I'm speculating — but if Bill Maher has not done mushrooms, mushrooms don't exist. If he hasn't done them I'd be pretty amazed. Pretty amazed. And that's based on not only the lifestyle he promotes but also the fact that he is relatively aware. And that's one of the ways you get there.

So in my opinion Bill Maher has figured out maybe 25 percent of what's happening, maybe 50 percent. But I tweeted at him and I included him in the tweet and I said the most dangerous person in America is Bill Maher because he is capable of penetrating the Democrat bubble and telling them their news sources are fake. And then I said he's figured out about 25 percent of what's happening. He still believes the fine people hoax and the drinking bleach hoax.

Do you see what I did there? All right. Now here's some context. I've been on Bill Maher once and it was before the 2016 election. And I predicted on his show that Trump would win and I explained why based on his persuasive powers. Bill Maher listened to everything I said and did not push back at all, which I thought was unusual because I was saying things clearly supportive of Trump. He's clearly the opposite. And not once did he push back on anything.

Now maybe he thought the persuasion angle wasn't that important or a little off his sweet spot or something. But I will say that if he remembers who I am — I'm guessing he does — if he remembers who I am he would probably remember that on his show I was reasonable and that I sounded like not a crazy right-wing person. And I feel I established at least a little bit of credibility by saying things on his show that didn't get any pushback and were new. They were new for his audience and didn't get pushback. And it was important. It explained what was happening and accurately predicted.

Now if anything I just said is true, which is that I gained at least a little bit of credibility in my small interaction with him on his show, then if he were to see this tweet — and by no means certain, but usually when the blue checks tweet each other I feel like we usually see it. What do you think? You know some people are more active on their social media. I don't think Bill Maher is super active on Twitter. He's a super user but I don't know how many minutes he spends there. And I think he'd probably see it just because I at-ed him. So he'd probably see it.

Now if you were him and you knew that I'd said incredible the same things on the show that nobody even argued with, and you heard me say something that would blow your mind — that the fine people hoax and the drinking bleach hoax are hoaxes — and I'm sure that's the first time he would have heard it in a way that doesn't sound crazy. You may have heard Fox News say it, which doesn't sound credible. You may have heard, I don't know, somebody will say it if he did. But I feel as though there's some chance that I got that message through. I may have slipped the puck past the keeper.

And the reason is because, first of all, because it's Bill Maher and he's open to a competing idea. So if it were not him this wouldn't work at all. Secondly, because the blue checks probably check each other's comments. And thirdly, because the context: I waited until he was already primed to believe that the news is hugely manipulated on his side. Do you see what I did here? I waited until he was primed. While he's talking about his own news sources being illegitimate, he's talking about it. Now while he's talking about his news sources being illegitimate, I give him two things that, coming from me, should just blow the top of his head off if he notices.

Right? I mean I'm not going to assume I'm important enough in the scheme of things that he necessarily is going to even notice. But in theory. So this is sort of an impromptu persuasion lesson. If you can throw a mind thought into somebody who's already in the mode, it's a whole different idea than coming as somebody you're both loaded and ready for an argument. If you're both loaded and ready for an argument, nobody changes their mind. But if you can catch somebody in a vulnerable moment when they've already talked themselves into the point of view that you're promoting, and you're just giving them a little extra of where they already are — because do you know what? People do like confirmation bias of their own opinion. They'll accept that in a moment. That's not changing their mind. That's hard. Changing anybody's mind is really hard work, which is why persuasion is an important topic. It's so hard. If you don't do everything right you don't have a chance.

So I think there's some chance that I planted a seed that would be productive. Here's what I love. In my perfect world Bill Maher will see the full videos of the fine people hoax and the full video of the drinking bleach hoax. And he will realize that the two biggest really messages about Trump were entirely made up. The two biggest ones. And I don't know if that's expecting too much of anybody because it is kind of, you know. So I have a high opinion of Bill Maher's mental, let's say, openness and flexibility. Very different than most people. Very different. But this is a stretch to get somebody to believe this much of a mind is something really basic to the reality just didn't happen. Just never happened. And it's easy to prove. That's the weird part. If it were hard to prove then people could hold on to their assumption. But you just have to play the video. That's it. The entire debunk is just like, well let me play the whole video, not the clip that reverses its meaning. Thank you.

Well, ladies and gentlemen, those are my prepared remarks for today. No doubt this peak experience is something that will stay with you forever or for several minutes. Is there a topic which I have not covered which you'd like to hear me cover?

All right. How do you debunk the "Don't Say Gay"? Well unfortunately the "Don't Say Gay" thing is really a masterpiece of persuasion. Whoever frames something first has a big advantage. And the "Don't Say Gay" people framed it best. They framed it with a rhyme, which is really good. Say and gay rhymes. That's a good technique. It's short. It's easy to remember. It's repeatable. And that becomes true. So it doesn't even matter.

Dogs in blankets. I like that. I'm seeing a picture of a dog in a blanket on the Locals platform. They can put pictures in the comments.

By the way, last night I did a live stream from the man cave. These are only available for the people who subscribe on Locals. So what you missed was my story about meeting a psychic and hypnotizing her and some of the predictions she made which were just insane. A visit with my own spirit guide. Or not. I can only tell you what seems to have happened. I'm not sure what really happened. And tying that in with the simulation and all the evidence for the simulation that we live in a simulation.

Now if you think that sounds good, and not only were there simultaneous sips but let's just say that the man cave is simultaneous whatever. So you are allowed to do is simultaneously whatever you wanted. Well I did the same.

When am I going on Gutfeld again? So yes. I don't know. It's not up to me.

So it looks like I have answered all of your questions. Are you saying that Bill Maher has a podcast where he and Quentin Tarantino got stoned on the podcast? Well I would like to put out my challenge right now to Snoop Dogg. Snoop Dogg, number one I'm a cartoonist and I'm guessing you have no idea who I am. But I do this cartoon called Dilbert. Some people have heard of it. And I challenge you, Snoop Dogg, to join me in my man cave in Northern California and to see who can — let's say you can be more of the Snoop Dogg if you know what I mean. This is YouTube so I'm gonna keep it generic. If there are any young kids watching, kids don't do drugs. And I mean that sounds like a joke but no, kids don't do drugs.

That said, how much would you like to see me interview Snoop Dogg while we're seeing who can last the longest if you know what I mean? Come on, you'd watch that. You'd watch it. Now I don't think that Snoop would know enough about me or that it would ever make sense to him. But it would be awesome and I think it would be viral as hell. I don't think I could talk him into it because he just wouldn't be familiar with me. I'm guessing. I mean if Kanye somehow knew who I was it's not impossible but unlikely.

So that's the ask. Snoop Dogg, in my man cave. Let's do it. And by the way I'm a huge fan of Snoop Dogg. I love the fact that he never changed who he was. I guess that's what I like best. I like his music. I like his whole vibe. But I like the fact that he changed the world like the world didn't change him. You know that, right? Like Snoop just said I'm just going to be me and the world is going to have to catch up. And then it did. Who does that? Who does that? But he did.

All right. That is all for now and I'm going to go do some work. I got a lot of it. Oh I'm hearing from Sunny San Rafael. Somebody's watching. So if somebody knows Snoop get to him and make the offer and we'll go from there. And for the rest of you, can you have a great day? Pretty sure you can. Go forth.

that ladies and gentlemen is the beautiful beautiful sound of multiple documents being tapped on my desk and that means my printer is online and everything's working smoothly today and this might be the highlight of not only your personal experience but civilization itself and it's called the coffee with Scott Adams and it's the best thing that's ever happened and all you need to use a copper regular glass of tank which I'll start the canteen sugar flaska Festival of any kind fill with your favorite liquid audio is looking good and join me now for the unparalleled pleasure of the dopam media the day thing makes everything better it's called the simultaneous Sip and it's going to happen right now go ah it's better every time now if I haven't told you yet today you're gonna have a wonderful day oh sure you'll have your ups and downs always do but today is going to be great because you're better looking and smarter than you were yesterday and that's all going to work for you well I had a conversation uh yesterday with a young woke person how do you think that went do you think that if you put a young woke person and me in the same conversation that it'll be fun well it was it started out with a conversation about sexism and all the sexism and misogyny and discrimination against uh girls and boys and I said were you aware that girls do better than boys in a lot of different ways and she was not aware of that and today by coincidence I saw a list of some of the things that are going better for girls than boys now here we're talking about younger mostly younger folks so it includes women uh and girls and so somebody did a little chart I saw online I tweeted it earlier this morning of for every hundred girls or women how many boys or men are doing the same thing so for example how many women uh for for every 100 women who take AP or honors courses in high school in art or music how many men do the same thing honors courses and art and music only 54.

so they're almost twice as many women who attain this high level in school and then you go right down the line who is who earns an associate's degree who takes these AP courses who graduates who's got a master's degree who's in the top 10 percent and every one of these is women or girls every one of them so on educational attainment it's not even close women are just smoking then not even close did you know that how many woke young people are aware that women are just destroying men at the at least the entry level which predicts the future um how about health related stuff and mental health again an entire list of things that women are way better off than men I'll just give you examples basically it's about dying from suicide and everything from autism to learning disorders people are homeless you know twice as many men and boys are homeless die of homicide you know seven times more die in prison you know 13 times more it's not even close if you take most of the measures of well-being women and girls are all of the top it's not even close now what do you think happened when I mentioned that to a young woke person did the Young woke person say you know that's not exactly what I've been hearing but I'm going to take it under advisement maybe maybe do a little research myself and possibly even change my worldview do you think that happened no the conversation very quickly turned to my uh by racism and so I said well if you think you live in a world in which it's hard to be a woman and it's hard to be black can you explain to me why black women are getting into college and and achieving more um scholastically at the moment than white men can you explain to me how black women who have two strikes against them according to you you the woke person they have two strikes against them and they're big ones according to you black and female so can you explain why they're doing so well why is it that they're getting into college at higher rates than white men which also suggests that they'll have higher incomes now of course we're not talking about 50 years ago that's a whole different situation but how many woke young people were aware that if you're both black and a woman it's it's one of the best things you'd be do you know what's the only thing that's better than being black and female in terms of educational you know um let's say the educational first step or even the ultimate step of getting your degree the only thing better than being a black woman is being a white woman but being a woman is a pretty good deal in 2022 educationally which should also translate into career which should translate into income Etc all right now when uh when the question of racism came up I did the uh the Chappelle reframe and the Chappelle reframed goes like this let me ask you who do you think is suffering more uh Tiger Woods or a poor white person in Appalachia and of course Tiger Woods is doing a little bit better he's got his issues too but he's doing better than the poorest of white people yeah how many do you think that Michael Jordan gets discriminated against more than say an average white person and the answer is no no he doesn't he's discriminated less you probably guessed more things than the average person and so I was explaining to her that it always has been about rich versus poor that's what Chappelle explains very well and that she has been hypnotized into believing it's a racial problem so that the rich people can cover up the fact that they're in power and that they're suppressing other people to keep their power now what happens when you hear that for the first time something something this person had never heard never heard that if you're rich and black you're in pretty good shape and if you're poor and white you're in pretty bad shape am I right there's not much to argue with there now yeah I had explodes right and and it reminded me how little information gets from one bubble to the next and I was also thinking how many times um am I discriminated against for race or gender every day what do you think do you think that I ever go a day without over overt very direct discrimination against me for being either male or white I don't think I've ever gone today not once not in my public life if you if you look at my Twitter you can see almost every day I think somebody accusing me of something that's you can tell is based on my my gender and my race and they're usually incorrect that is racism right people making direct assumptions about my beliefs based on my my gender and my race and they're usually wrong that's I get that every day you know and most of you know my famous story of being denied promotions in two different corporate worlds because I was white and because I was male and they told me that directly that's not my interpretation they said directly your white your male we can't promote you now how many black people have ever had that happen to him probably some you know I'm sure there are black people who have exactly the same experience we're not going to hire you for your because you're black maybe they didn't say it out loud but you know what's happening somewhere right so definitely it's happening but to imagine that it's black people getting all the discrimination and white people getting none of it and that uh it's about race is missing the big story it's also about race I'm not denying racism exists of course I'm just saying it's everywhere all the time and that rich people do better and poor people do worse and that's the whole story and once I explained it to her there's not much you can say about it am I right unless you change unless you just change the topic there's not any real response to that because the data is pretty clear right and the facts that I presented are not really in question you know there's not not really a question did you or did you not you know get discriminated in employment I I could give you thousands of witnesses to back up my story because they were there at the same time and they were also discriminated for the same reasons also directly so yeah I could produce presumably thousands of actually I could probably produce a thousand Witnesses with one tweet to back up you know my version of events so I wondered what would happen if somebody that woke heard something so counter to their worldview um and uh the result was the change of the topic the change of the topic because I don't think you can convince anybody of anything anymore but you can change the topic so that's what happened uh so I know you want me to talk about Disney like I don't know why I can't care less about this story maybe because I don't care about Disney or something I don't know no I get the importance of it and how it you know is related to Trends and all that uh but you know as a Disney's going woke and they're removing their their gender greetings so they won't say welcome boys and girls it'll be welcome carbon-based units or something I don't know exactly what they're replacing it with but it doesn't sound quite as friendly and of course they're opposing the uh I guess the manipulatively named Bill dosage which really isn't about that at all um and so they're going whoa so here's my only comment from a business perspective since Disney has to satisfy their shareholders presumably they should do what's good for the the share price within reason of course not not doing anything illegal but what is the argument that they will make more money by doing this you could easily make an argument that they'll make less money because I think you would you're going to get less or fewer I just gave you that lesson don't say less say fewer you're going to get fewer guests of the conservative types going to Disney so why would Disney a corporate entity who has an obligation to the shareholders why would they do something that feels like it can only reduce their business but it can never increase it why would they do that I guess you know individuals are afraid for their jobs and their reputations so it's not for the shareholders and you could argue whether it's for the good of society I guess um I I don't know I just don't care that much about this story I guess I should I don't know why but I don't I guess I don't care because it's too easy to talk about you just say I don't like that and you're done that's about it all right you remember that big Ivermectin study I talked about a few days ago and uh it was the big gold standard you know randomized controlled lots of lots of people in it to find out if I ever met him worked or not and of course that totally settled the question once and for all no it didn't and then I was asked today to uh to tweet or comment on the fact that uh there there is criticism of the study and the criticism is actually kind of hilarious by itself that the uh I guess the categories don't even add up you know when they say we're we're testing X number of people of this type and then you look at the subcategories and you add them up and it doesn't equal the number of people they're testing so so it's not even internally consistent meaning you can't even look at their own numbers and say well why does this column not not match what they said they were doing you know that sort of thing now is is the person doing the debunk the correct one or could somebody come along and debunk the debunker and get you right back to hey well maybe this study's good probably so I just want you to know that there's no such thing uh there's no such thing as a reliable study whenever there's any political or Pharma profit thing involved there's no such thing as a study you could trust so there is an eye from active study that says it doesn't work I would give its credibility I don't know 10 or something that's about it so if you think I'm saying that Ivermectin definitely doesn't work in any scenario whatsoever because there's a study that says that um I guess I just can't do that anymore I just can't tell you because there's a high quality study that it's true it just that just doesn't work in 2022.

if I had to um but let me say this and this is not based on I guess analysis it's based on more like sometimes you just have to guess which is right if you put a gun to my head and said you have to pick does Ivermectin work or does it not and we're actually just going to kill you if you get the wrong answer I would bet it doesn't work don't know if I'm right because I don't think that the I don't think that the data can ever answer that question because we don't live in a world where data is reliable but that would be my guess and if you guess differently uh I'm not even going to argue with you because since my guess is not based on reason I have a question for you does evil exist does evil exist lots of yeses on the locals platform mostly yeses now can somebody Define evil outside of uh mental illness because my frame on life is that some people have mental illness and some people don't or actually we all do but it's a different kind I guess you could say everybody's got some kind of mental illness just some some less than others up I don't really buy into the evil explanation because I don't know what it adds what does it add because thinking in terms of you know demons and angels and and god-like you know demonic stuff I don't know what it adds to your understanding or what does it add to your process do you do something differently because of that prey something like that I don't know um I say evil is just your subjective opinion of stuff you're seeing I don't believe that evil exists as any kind of a quantity or a force in the world I just think some people are broken that's all and you get exactly the same result so I don't think you need to go to the complicated explanation that you know we've got souls and some of them are corrupted or you know controlled by Satan or anything um I think you just go for the easiest explanation that some people have mental problems and that's it that's it because it does explain everything if there were something it didn't explain then I would revise it but if it explains everything and it doesn't require you to believe anything that's not obvious and right in front of you right mental illness is obvious and true and right in front of you but evil I don't know can you get a handful of evil can you measure it this one's you know 200 the evil of this other one I don't know the evil is real but it's real in the sense of how we I guess process our environment so for some of you it's real for me I've never sensed it felt it framed it that way considered it as even anything important yeah the the Nazi death camps okay there let's let's take the extreme example the Nazi death camps that could all be explained in terms of normal human processes because we know that we can get underlings to do literally anything are they evil or are they just underlings who will do anything because they're afraid of whatever happens to them I don't know and then some of the underlings are sadists form of mental illness You could argue or is it a personality disorder I never know but I don't know I guess I would say that I don't have a use for that frame which is different than say it doesn't exist so the question of does evil exist is unanswerable because whatever it is you know it's not like you can there's no measuring device for it you know there's no such thing as a detector for it so we'll never we'll never agree on whether it exists or not but could we agree it doesn't have a use like framing the world that way does it help I feel like it would just be scary to live in a world that you framed Us full of evil and demons whereas I just see broken stuff oh there's a somebody with a broken brain and they might act a certainly yeah so yeah maybe it's useful within the context of a religion scientists have finally completed the human genome so we have actually for the first time a hundred percent of the human genome has been mapped so we're going to learn a lot more about genetic diseases and stuff it was only eight percent of it or so the last eight percent I guess is all we didn't have already but now imagine putting together artificial intelligence with the human genome with medical records with DNA I don't think we fully understand what's about to happen you see what I'm see what I'm saying the full Human Genome DNA about individuals uh access to all kinds of medical records that are I think at this point we don't have you know access to them but I think we will maybe not everybody's but enough medical records that you could make decisions about what works and what doesn't I don't know I think there's something coming that will redefine Health Care substantially there's a I think it's a small company that already does a can do a test on you to find out which kinds of which kinds of prescription medicines will work the best isn't that wild you can now do a test I think it's a blood test you send it away blood testers spit I forget or urine I don't know there's some kind of a test you do that will come back and tell you what what drugs will be effective and which ones don't work for you how Wild is that does it work I don't know I don't know but think about all these things coming together how our if you had AI to the amount of data we're going to get about everything from DNA to Human Genome to uh to you know health records we're going to know almost everything pretty soon we're probably 10 years away from just not even needing a doctor meaning that the AI will just be so much better at figuring out what's going on that uh they just don't need it well gem sake spokesperson for Biden is reportedly going to leave for MSNBC she hasn't finalized a deal there but the important thing to know is that according to people who know more than I do NBC is maybe the closest Network to the cia's control meaning that the most reliably CIA messaging entity now I don't know what the relationship is with the CIA but people who know more than I do basically say they're in the bag for the CIA and um and she's going to go work for them directly from the spokesperson job does that bother you does that bother you at all that you worry that the Deep State and you know whatever John Brennan is doing lately and all the former and current Intel people are secretly running the government and then you see somebody at that level of government go directly to MSNBC which feels like it's in the bag you know the CIA controls it or at least for the stories they care about not the whole thing and everything about this is Icky everything about this is Icky now it's fully disclosed but I almost have to ask the question is she really changing jobs or is she just being transparent that she's always worked for MSNBC in the CIA because I don't even know if they change your direct deposit do they I'm just kidding of course they do but it feels like it's the same job they just changed the title am I right it feels like it's the same job is not a different job it's the same job that's the story the story is she didn't change jobs she changed job titles yeah I'm exaggerating but you get the point all right um here's something that General Omar Bradley once said he said an American General he was an American General during World War II and he and he's quoted as saying amateurs talk strategy professionals talk Logistics meaning that Wars are won or Lost based on whether you can resupply your your military and CNN is still hammering on this idea that the Russian army is running out of fuel and food and everything and there are other there are other voices saying Ah that's just complete propaganda that's just Ukrainian propaganda but let me ask you this how many big fuel Depots does the Russian military have within Striking Distance of the Ukrainian border because the ukrainians have apparently taken out one large Fuel Depot that fueled some some percentage of the Army on the eastern border the Russian army so here's the question for you if if it's true the Ukraine took out one large Fuel Depot how many are there how many are there because you know if there are three Russia is totally am I right if there are only three if they took out a third of their fuel they're in real trouble because remember you don't have to take out all the fuel or all the food if you take out 20 30 percent of either the fuel or the food there's chaos right they've got to do all kinds of stuff to adjust to that shortage and it's not going to be pretty so you don't have to take it all the way you just have to degrade it to the point where they're so ineffective that there's a Cascade effect to collapse so so I've asked you a very specific military question do you think anybody knows first of all can anybody make that kind of an estimate and could anybody ask our military do we have any idea how many large fuel Depots are there and can they quickly spin up a new one in other words uh has Russia already just sort of you know spun up a new fuel Depot and it didn't even make a dent because they have plenty of fuel they just have to get it to the right place so uh yeah Define define large so here's the question if there are 50 fuel Depots of that size the size that the ukrainians allegedly destroyed if there are 50 of them well then Russia wins for sure because they can't you know they're not going to run into fuel well what if there were three right isn't that the right question if there were only three the Russian armies already in pretty bad shape because they just lost their energy uh you're watching the wrong Ukraine movie somebody says uh what does not spin up as a fuel Depot you need pipe welders Pipe Fitters yeah yeah it can be easy but I don't know maybe maybe they just have giant tanks of fuel and they can move them wherever they want I don't know if you need a gigantic tank to put the smaller tanks into or or temporarily maybe you don't all right uh so I'm going to say that I am unconvinced that Logistics alone will be the decider in Ukraine but I think it's at least a 50 chance that the big story will be Logistics by the way here's a little history lesson that I also learned by the CNN article that uh the mistake that Hitler made attacking Russia was that he thought it would be fast and he did not develop his supply lines correctly he only developed supply lines and actually clothing warm weather or cold weather clothing was not even sufficient for the war so huge numbers of German troops just froze to death or got frostbite because they couldn't even Supply them with warm jackets they they never planned for that somebody says and Napoleon too well so is is the winter plus the supply line although the winter seemed like a bigger factor for Napoleon so well I suppose it's always Supply because you could Supply you can survive any winter if you had enough Supply so yeah I guess it's Supply um I don't know I've been saying since the beginning uh that the ukrainians can take out the supply lines and we're learning more about their uh Kamikaze drones but then I heard they only had a hundred of them what the hell good are 100 100 Kamikaze drones you're not going to win a war with a hundred I feel like you need I don't know five thousand so how fast could we make these things is somebody cranking out some more yeah 100 to start maybe yeah these are the the switchblades so it's the little drones you can launch from your backpack or carry the backpack it's a little drone and it just goes up into hovers for 15 minutes until it finds something and then it Dives in and destroys it that's a pretty devastating psychological weapon like knowing that there's one hovering around you and it's just picking out which which person to kill I think I'll kill the people in that truck very psychologically devastating so we don't know how many fuel Depots that there are and we don't know how many of these switchblade drones there are but I would say that those two numbers are the only numbers that will tell you what's going to happen so I'm boiling it down the only thing that will tell you what's happening is how many drones do the ukrainians have we don't know and how much fuel do the Russians have we don't know the the only two things that matter and we don't know either anything about either with the public the military probably does so on uh for the last several days somebody has been screaming at me on You.

Tube in the comments that if I don't understand what operation gladio is then I don't understand anything and so I said to myself well I'll look into it because I don't know I I had no reason to dismiss the comment and whoever was saying it was was pretty adamant so here's what operation gladio reportedly is NATO has terrorist forces that's the whole story NATO has officially trained terrorists and they use them as leave behind forces in case your country gets overrun so if a NATO country gets overrun they already have spun up the terrorist forces that remain as part of the resistance and they're actually terrorists like actually literally terrorists and apparently there have been a number of discoveries of these various groups in different countries and apparently it's fairly confirmed I mean Wikipedia treats it like it's a fact you know if you want to if you want to take that as your Source but does that change anything for you because the the gladio operation gladios would be terrorists working for your team are you comfortable having terrorists on your team because apparently we do if you're on team NATO apparently you're pro-terrorist sorry now you could call them saboteurs sure so depending on the context of you know has your country been invaded well then they're not terrorists then they're Freedom Fighters but they're basically terrorists now part of what they would do is false Flags now it's getting a little creepy isn't it so allegedly what these gladio people would do among other things is kill civilians of Their Own to make it look like the other side did it so how do you like your team now how do you like being on team NATO knowing that your team are literally terrorists I'm okay with it are you is there anybody who has a problem with it I'm okay with it I mean it's part of what makes it um a bad idea to try to conquer your neighbor if anything that NATO does is making it really really hard to conquer your your neighbor I'm okay with that now nobody's in favor of killing civilians I mean not not that but as soon as you say we're in a war then then the strategy changes to how do you do well all right we'd rather have no war but if you're in one well you're going to fight the wind right so one of the ways to fight to win are these false flag things the reason people do it is because it works if it didn't work people wouldn't do it so if you want to win you do what works as ugly as that is so you could be morally outraged and should be I guess but it's going to happen anyway your your moral outrage won't change anything um so uh I don't know if the person asking me to look into that is on here but are you satisfied or or have I missed something about this operation gladio is there any was there anything that ties it close because I believe I believe that the point of it was for me to understand that NATO is not all uh unicorns and roses and I I take that as first of all something that was obvious in my opinion but secondly uh okay I will accept that a little history lesson I'm not sure ads or subtracts anything because war is dirty business so I'm not I'm not surprised that CIA related people are doing awful things that's not new news all right um did you see the Deep fake video of zelenski so somebody did a AI generated deep fake in which he was telling his soldiers to surrender to the Russian invasion and uh the Deep fake wasn't that good but wow how far away are we from not knowing who's giving you the commands at all pretty close right we're pretty close to not knowing who's giving the orders as soon as the Deep fakes get I don't know 20 better you just won't tell the difference you won't know if it's your president saying something or somebody else um so keep an eye on that I think this whole deep fake thing is just going to be gigantic so I continue to be entertained by Bill Maher's conversion to uh what would I call it uh so he's not becoming right wing I don't think that's going to happen but he seems to be able to see the whole field and so every Friday he's saying stuff that makes news at least in Fox News because he's saying stuff that his team doesn't hear and I've decided he might be the most dangerous person in America well-meaning I mean his intentions are positive I'm sure but he's the only person I know who consistently penetrates the the left bubble and tells them what they don't know and haven't heard think about how dangerous that is because I don't know anybody else who can do I can't do it right can you yeah I can't talk to anybody in the Democrat bubble and have them hear me I don't have any channel to them but he does because he started with them and you know audiences tend to stick with you so he so on Friday's show apparently uh Bill Maher said quote so the new New York Post got a hold of what was in the computer talk about hunter's laptop uh and you know because the New York Post is a republican paper that's his description and the New York Times And The Washington Post are the Democrat papers again his description and and the Republican paper uh and then he goes Twitter canceled their account talked about the New York Post they can't even report the story so you see he's being amazed that a true story got canceled from the internet and he noticed now he hasn't noticed all the stuff that's happened but this one was just too shockingly big and so he's calling it out and uh so he's just like the right-leaning media is pointing out the mainstream media suppressed one of the most important stories of the election cycle now Bill Maher did not go as far as he could have in saying that it probably influenced the election result and therefore one could say the election was rigged and therefore one could say that Trump was right although I think he was talking more about vote rigging which would be different and nobody's proven that in any scale so um somebody says billboard needs an ego death now I'm pretty sure I don't know this I'm speculating but if Bill Maher has not done mushrooms mushrooms don't exist if he hasn't done them uh I'd be pretty amazed pretty amazed and that's based on not only the lifestyle he promotes but also the fact that he is relatively aware and that's one of the ways you get there um so in my opinion Bill Maher has figured out maybe 25 of what's Happening maybe 50 percent but I tweeted Adam and I included him in the tweet and I said the most dangerous person in America is Bill Maher because he is capable of penetrating the Democrat bubble and telling them their new sources are fake and then I said he's figured out about 25 of what's Happening he still believes the fine people hoax and the drinking bleaks hoax do you see what I did there all right now here's some context I've been on Bill Marshall once and it was before the 2016 election and I predicted on his show that Trump would win and I explained why based on his persuasive powers Bill Maher listened to everything I said and did not push back at all which I thought was unusual because I was saying things clearly supportive of trump he's clearly the opposite and not once he didn't push back on anything now maybe he thought the persuasion angle wasn't that important or a little office you know his uh sweet spot or something but um I will say that if he remembers who I am I'm guessing he does if he remembers who I am he would probably remember that on his show I was reasonable and that I sounded like a not a crazy right-wing you know person and I feel I established at least a little bit of credibility by saying things on his show that didn't get any pushback and were new you know they were they were new for his audience and didn't get pushback and it was important it explained what was happening and accurately predicted now if anything I just said is true which is that I gained at least a little bit of credibility in my small interaction with him on his show then if he were to see this tweet and by you know that's by no means certain but usually when the blue checks tweeted each other I feel like we usually see it what do you think you know some people are more active on their social media I don't I don't think Bill Maher is Super Active on Twitter you know but he's a he's a super user but I don't know how many minutes he spends there and I think he'd probably see it just because I added it so you'd probably see it now if you were him and you knew that I'd said incredible the same things on the show that nobody even argued with and you heard me say something that would blow your mind that the fine people hoax and the drinking bleach hoax or hoaxes and I'm sure that's the first time he would have heard it in a way that doesn't sound crazy you may have heard Fox News said which doesn't sound credible you may have heard I don't know somebody will say it if he did but I feel as though I feel as though there's some chance that I got that message through I'm I may have slipped the puck past the the keeper and the reason is because first of all because it's Bill Maher and he's open to a competing idea so if it were not him this wouldn't work at all secondly because the blue checks probably check each other's comments and thirdly because the context I waited until he was already primed to believe that the news is hugely manipulated on his side do you see what I did here I waited until he was primed while he's talking about the his own news sources being illegitimate he's talking about it now while he's talking about his new sources being illegitimate I give him two things that coming from me should just blow the top of his head off if he notices right I mean I I'm not going to assume I'm important enough in the scheme of things that you necessarily is going to even notice but in theory so this is sort of a impromptu persuasion lesson if you can if you can throw a mind thought into somebody who's already in the mode it's a whole different idea than coming as somebody you're both loaded and ready for an argument if you're both loaded and ready for an argument nobody's nobody changes their mind but if you can catch somebody in a vulnerable moment when they've already talked themselves into the point of view that you're promoting and you're just giving them a little extra of where they already are because do you know what people do like they love confirmation by us of their own opinion they'll accept that in a moment that's not changing their mind that's hard changing anybody's mind is really hard work which is why persuasion is an important topic it's so hard if you don't do everything right you don't have a chance so I think there's some chance that I planted a seed that would be productive here's what I love in my perfect world Bill Maher will see the full videos of the fine people hoax and the full video of the drinking bleach oats and he will realize that the two biggest really messages about Trump were entirely made up the two biggest ones and I don't know if that's expecting too much of anybody because it is kind of you know so I have a high opinion of Bill Maher's mental let's say openness and flexibility you know different than most people very different but this is a stretch to get somebody to believe this much of a mind is something really basic to the reality just didn't happen just never happened and it's easy to prove that's the weird part if it were hard to prove then people could hold on to their their assumption but you just have to play the video that's it the entire debunk is just like well let me play the whole video not the clip that reverses its meaning thank you well ladies and gentlemen is my prepared marks for today uh no doubt this peak experience is something that will stay with you forever or for several minutes one um is there a topic which I have not covered which you'd like to hear me cover um all right uh the how do you debunk the don't say gay well unfortunately the don't say gay thing is really a masterpiece of persuasion whoever whoever frames something first as a big advantage and the don't say gay people framed it best they framed it with a rhyme which is really good say and gay Rhymes that's a good technique is short it's easy to remember it's it's repeatable and that becomes true so it doesn't even matter dogs and blankets I like that I'm seeing a picture of a dog in a blanket on the locals platform they can they can put pictures in the comments um by the way uh last night I did a live stream from the man caves these are only available for the people who subscribe on locals so while you missed was my story about meeting a psychic and hypnotizing her and some of the predictions she made which were just insane a visit with my own spirit guide or not I can only tell you what seems to have happened I'm not sure what really happened uh and they uh tying that in with the uh the simulation and all the evidence for the simulation that we live in a simulation now if you think that sounds good and not only were there simultaneous sips but uh let's just say that the man cave is simultaneous whatever so you are allowed to do is simultaneously whatever you wanted well I did the same and when am I going on guffeld again so yes um I don't know it's not up to me so um looks like I have uh answered all of your questions are you saying that Bill Maher has a podcast where he and Quentin Tarantino got Stoned on the podcast well I would like to uh put out my challenge right now to Snoop Dogg Snoop Dogg number one I'm a cartoonist and I'm guessing you have no no idea who I am um but I do this cartoon called Dilbert some people have heard of it and I challenge you Snoop Dogg to join me in my man cave in California Northern California and to see who can let's say you can be more of the Snoop Dogg if you know what I mean this is this is You.

Tube so I'm gonna keep it generic generic if there are any young kids watching kids don't do drugs and I mean that sounds like a joke but no kids don't do drugs that said uh how much would you like to see me interview Snoop Dogg while we're seeing who can last the longest if you know what I mean come on you'd watch that you'd watch it now I don't think that Snoop would know enough about me or that would ever make sense to him but it would be awesome and I think it would be viral as hell I don't I don't think I could talk him into it because he just wouldn't be familiar with me I'm guessing I mean if if Kanye somehow knew who I was it's not impossible but unlikely so that's the that's the uh the ask Snoop Dogg in my man cave let's do it and by the way I'm a huge fan of Snoop Dogg uh I I love the fact that he never changed who he was I guess that's what I like best you know I like his music I like his whole vibe but I like the fact that uh he changed the world like the world didn't change him you know that right like Snoop just said I'm just going to be me and the world is going to have to catch up and then it did who does that who does that but he didn't all right um that is all for now and uh I'm going to go do some work I got a lot of it oh I'm hearing from Sonny San Rafel somebody's watching so if somebody knows Snoop get to him and make the offer and we'll go from there and for the rest of you can you have a great day pretty sure you can go forth

that ladies and gentlemen is the

beautiful beautiful sound of multiple

documents being tapped on my desk and

that means my printer is online and

everything's working smoothly today and

this might be the highlight of not only

your personal experience but

civilization itself and it's called the

coffee with Scott Adams and it's the

best thing that's ever happened and all

you need to use a copper regular glass

of tank which I'll start the canteen

sugar flaska Festival of any kind fill

with your favorite liquid

audio is looking good

and join me now for the unparalleled

pleasure of the dopam media the day

thing makes everything better it's

called the simultaneous Sip and it's

going to happen right now go

ah it's better every time

now if I haven't told you yet today

you're gonna have a wonderful day

oh sure you'll have your ups and downs

always do but today is going to be great

because you're better looking and

smarter than you were yesterday and

that's all going to work for you

well I had a conversation uh yesterday

with a young woke person

how do you think that went

do you think that if you put a young

woke person and me

in the same conversation

that

it'll be fun

well it was it started out with a

conversation about sexism and all the

sexism and misogyny and discrimination

against uh girls and boys

and I said were you aware

that girls do better than boys

in a lot of different ways

and she was not aware of that and today

by coincidence I saw a list of some of

the things that are going better for

girls than boys now here we're talking

about younger mostly younger folks so it

includes women

uh and girls

and so somebody did a little chart I saw

online I tweeted it earlier this morning

of for every hundred girls or women

how many boys or men are doing the same

thing so for example

how many women uh for for every 100

women who take AP or honors courses in

high school

in art or music how many men do the same

thing honors courses and art and music

only 54.

so they're almost twice as many women

who attain this high level in school

and then you go right down the line who

is who earns an associate's degree who

takes these AP courses who graduates

who's got a master's degree who's in the

top 10 percent and every one of these is

women or girls

every one of them

so on educational attainment it's not

even close

women are just smoking then not even

close

did you know that

how many woke young people are aware

that women are just destroying men

at the at least the entry level which

predicts the future

um

how about health related stuff and

mental health again an entire list of

things that women are way better off

than men I'll just give you examples

basically it's about dying from suicide

and everything from autism to learning

disorders people are homeless you know

twice as many men and boys are homeless

die of homicide you know seven times

more die in prison you know 13 times

more it's not even close

if you take most of the measures of

well-being

women and girls are all of the top it's

not even close

now what do you think happened when I

mentioned that to a young woke person

did the Young woke person say you know

that's not exactly what I've been

hearing but I'm going to take it under

advisement maybe maybe do a little

research myself and possibly even change

my worldview

do you think that happened

no the conversation very quickly turned

to my uh by racism

and so I said well if you think you live

in a world in which it's hard to be a

woman

and it's hard to be black

can you explain to me why black women

are getting into college and and

achieving more

um scholastically at the moment

than white men

can you explain to me how black women

who have two strikes against them

according to you you the woke person

they have two strikes against them and

they're big ones according to you black

and female

so can you explain why they're doing so

well

why is it that they're getting into

college at higher rates than white men

which also suggests that they'll have

higher incomes now of course we're not

talking about 50 years ago that's a

whole different situation but how many

woke young people were aware

that if you're both black and a woman

it's it's one of the best things you'd

be do you know what's the only thing

that's better than being black and

female in terms of educational

you know

um let's say the educational first step

or even the ultimate step of getting

your degree the only thing better than

being a black woman is being a white

woman

but being a woman is a pretty good deal

in 2022 educationally

which should also translate into career

which should translate into income

Etc

all right now

when uh when the question of racism came

up I did the uh the Chappelle reframe

and the Chappelle reframed goes like

this

let me ask you who do you think is

suffering more

uh Tiger Woods or a poor white person in

Appalachia

and of course Tiger Woods is doing a

little bit better he's got his issues

too but he's doing better than the

poorest of white people

yeah how many do you think that Michael

Jordan

gets discriminated against more

than say an average white person

and the answer is no no he doesn't he's

discriminated less you probably guessed

more things than the average person

and so I was explaining to her that it

always has been about rich versus poor

that's what Chappelle explains very well

and that she has been hypnotized into

believing it's a racial problem so that

the rich people can cover up the fact

that they're in power and that they're

suppressing other people to keep their

power

now what happens when you hear that for

the first time

something something this person had

never heard

never heard that if you're rich and

black you're in pretty good shape

and if you're poor and white you're in

pretty bad shape

am I right there's not much to argue

with there

now

yeah I had explodes right and and it

reminded me how little information gets

from one bubble to the next

and I was also thinking how many times

um am I

discriminated against for race or gender

every day

what do you think do you think that I

ever go a day without over overt very

direct

discrimination against me for being

either male or white

I don't think I've ever gone today

not once not in my public life if you if

you look at my Twitter

you can see almost every day I think

somebody accusing me of something that's

you can tell is based on my my gender

and my race

and they're usually incorrect that is

racism right

people making direct assumptions about

my beliefs

based on my my gender and my race and

they're usually wrong that's I get that

every day

you know and most of you know my famous

story of being denied promotions in two

different corporate worlds because I was

white and because I was male and they

told me that directly that's not my

interpretation they said directly your

white your male we can't promote you

now how many black people have ever had

that happen to him

probably some

you know I'm sure there are black people

who have exactly the same experience

we're not going to hire you for your

because you're black maybe they didn't

say it out loud

but you know what's happening somewhere

right so definitely it's happening

but to imagine that it's black people

getting all the discrimination and white

people getting none of it and that uh

it's about race is missing the big story

it's also about race I'm not denying

racism exists of course I'm just saying

it's everywhere all the time and that

rich people do better and poor people do

worse and that's the whole story

and once I explained it to her

there's not much you can say about it am

I right

unless you change unless you just change

the topic

there's not any real response to that

because the data is pretty clear right

and the facts that I presented

are not really in question

you know there's not not really a

question did you or did you not you know

get discriminated in employment I I

could give you thousands of witnesses to

back up my story because they were there

at the same time and they were also

discriminated for the same reasons also

directly so yeah I could produce

presumably thousands of actually I could

probably produce a thousand Witnesses

with one tweet to back up you know my

version of events

so I wondered what would happen if

somebody that woke heard something so

counter to their worldview

um and uh the result was the change of

the topic the change of the topic

because I don't think you can convince

anybody of anything anymore but you can

change the topic

so that's what happened

uh so I know you want me to talk about

Disney

like I don't know why I can't care less

about this story

maybe because I don't care about Disney

or something I don't know no I get the

importance of it and how it you know is

related to Trends and all that uh but

you know as a Disney's going woke and

they're removing their their gender

greetings so they won't say welcome boys

and girls it'll be welcome

carbon-based units or something I don't

know exactly what they're replacing it

with but it doesn't sound quite as

friendly

and of course they're opposing the uh

I guess the manipulatively named Bill

dosage which really isn't about that at

all

um

and so they're going whoa so here's my

only comment

from a business perspective since Disney

has to satisfy their shareholders

presumably they should do what's good

for the the share price

within reason of course not not doing

anything illegal but what is the

argument that they will make more money

by doing this

you could easily make an argument that

they'll make less money

because I think you would you're going

to get less or fewer I just gave you

that lesson don't say less say fewer

you're going to get fewer guests of the

conservative types going to Disney

so why would Disney a corporate entity

who has an obligation to the

shareholders why would they do something

that feels like it can only reduce their

business but it can never increase it

why would they do that

I guess you know individuals are afraid

for their jobs and their reputations so

it's not for the shareholders and you

could argue whether it's for the good of

society I guess

um I I don't know I just don't care that

much about this story I guess I should

I don't know why but I don't

I guess I don't care because it's too

easy to talk about

you just say I don't like that and

you're done that's about it

all right you remember that big

Ivermectin study I talked about a few

days ago and uh it was the big gold

standard you know randomized controlled

lots of lots of people in it to find out

if I ever met him worked or not and of

course that totally settled the question

once and for all

no it didn't

and then I was asked today to uh

to tweet or comment on the fact that uh

there there is criticism of the study

and the criticism is actually kind of

hilarious by itself that the uh I guess

the categories don't even add up

you know when they say we're we're

testing X number of people of this type

and then you look at the subcategories

and you add them up and it doesn't equal

the number of people they're testing

so so it's not even internally

consistent meaning you can't even look

at their own numbers and say well why

does this column not

not match what they said they were doing

you know that sort of thing now

is is the person doing the debunk

the correct one

or could somebody come along and debunk

the debunker

and get you right back to hey well maybe

this study's good probably

so I just want you to know that there's

no such thing

uh

there's no such thing as a reliable

study whenever there's any political or

Pharma profit thing involved there's no

such thing as a study you could trust so

there is an eye from active study that

says it doesn't work I would give its

credibility I don't know

10 or something that's about it so if

you think I'm saying that Ivermectin

definitely doesn't work in any scenario

whatsoever because there's a study that

says that

um I guess I just can't do that anymore

I just can't tell you because there's a

high quality study that it's true

it just that just doesn't work in 2022.

if I had to um

but let me say this and this is not

based on I guess analysis it's based on

more like

sometimes you just have to guess which

is right

if you put a gun to my head and said you

have to pick does Ivermectin work or

does it not and we're actually just

going to kill you if you get the wrong

answer

I would bet it doesn't work

don't know if I'm right because I don't

think that the I don't think that the

data can ever answer that question

because we don't live in a world where

data is reliable

but that would be my guess

and if you guess differently uh I'm not

even going to argue with you because

since my guess is not based on reason

I have a question for you

does evil exist

does evil exist

lots of yeses on the locals platform

mostly yeses now

can somebody Define evil outside of uh

mental illness

because my frame on life is that some

people have mental illness and some

people don't or actually we all do but

it's a different kind I guess you could

say everybody's got some kind of mental

illness just some some less than others

up I don't really buy into the evil

explanation because I don't know what it

adds

what does it add

because thinking in terms of you know

demons and angels and and god-like you

know demonic stuff I don't know what it

adds to your understanding or what does

it add to your process do you do

something differently because of that

prey

something like that

I don't know

um I say evil is just your subjective

opinion of stuff you're seeing I don't

believe that evil exists as any kind of

a

quantity or a force in the world I just

think some people are broken

that's all and you get exactly the same

result

so I don't think you need to go to the

complicated explanation that you know

we've got souls and some of them are

corrupted or you know controlled by

Satan or anything

um I think you just go for the easiest

explanation that some people have mental

problems

and that's it that's it

because it does explain everything

if there were something it didn't

explain

then I would revise it but if it

explains everything and it doesn't

require you to believe anything that's

not obvious and right in front of you

right mental illness is obvious and true

and right in front of you

but evil

I don't know can you get a handful of

evil

can you measure it this one's you know

200 the evil of this other one I don't

know the evil is real

but it's real in the sense of how we I

guess process our environment so for

some of you it's real for me I've never

sensed it felt it

framed it that way

considered it as even anything important

yeah the the Nazi death camps okay there

let's let's take the extreme example the

Nazi death camps

that could all be explained in terms of

normal human processes

because we know that we can get

underlings to do literally anything

are they evil or are they just

underlings who will do anything because

they're afraid of whatever happens to

them I don't know and then some of the

underlings are sadists

form of mental illness You could argue

or is it a personality disorder I never

know but

I don't know I guess I would say that I

don't have a use for that frame

which is different than say it doesn't

exist

so the question of does evil exist is

unanswerable because whatever it is you

know it's not like you can

there's no measuring device for it you

know there's no such thing as a detector

for it so we'll never we'll never agree

on whether it exists or not but could we

agree it doesn't have a use like framing

the world that way does it help I feel

like it would just be scary to live in a

world that you framed Us full of evil

and demons whereas I just see broken

stuff oh there's a somebody with a

broken brain

and they might act a certainly

yeah so yeah maybe it's useful within

the context of a religion

scientists have finally completed the

human genome so we have actually for the

first time a hundred percent of the

human genome has been mapped

so we're going to learn a lot more about

genetic diseases and stuff it was only

eight percent of it or so the last eight

percent I guess is all we didn't have

already but now imagine putting together

artificial intelligence

with the human genome

with medical records

with DNA

I don't think we fully understand what's

about to happen

you see what I'm see what I'm saying

the full Human Genome DNA about

individuals uh access to all kinds of

medical records that are I think at this

point we don't have you know access to

them but I think we will

maybe not everybody's but enough medical

records that you could make decisions

about what works and what doesn't

I don't know I think there's something

coming

that will redefine

Health Care substantially

there's a I think it's a small company

that already does a can do a test on you

to find out which kinds of which kinds

of prescription medicines will work the

best

isn't that wild you can now do a test I

think it's a blood test you send it away

blood testers spit I forget

or urine I don't know there's some kind

of a test you do that will come back and

tell you what what drugs will be

effective and which ones don't work for

you

how Wild is that does it work I don't

know I don't know

but think about all these things coming

together how our if you had AI to the

amount of data we're going to get about

everything from DNA to Human Genome to

uh

to you know health records we're going

to know almost everything pretty soon

we're probably 10 years away

from

just not even needing a doctor

meaning that the AI will just be so much

better at figuring out what's going on

that uh they just don't need it

well gem sake spokesperson for Biden is

reportedly going to leave for MSNBC she

hasn't finalized a deal there but the

important thing to know is that

according to people who know more than I

do NBC

is maybe the closest Network to the

cia's control meaning that the most

reliably CIA

messaging entity now I don't know what

the relationship is with the CIA but

people who know more than I do basically

say they're in the bag for the CIA

and

um

and she's going to go work for them

directly from

the spokesperson job

does that bother you

does that bother you at all

that

you worry that the Deep State and you

know whatever John Brennan is doing

lately and all the former and current

Intel people are secretly running the

government

and then you see somebody at that level

of government go directly to MSNBC which

feels like it's in the bag you know the

CIA controls it

or at least for the stories they care

about not the whole thing

and

everything about this is Icky

everything about this is Icky now it's

fully disclosed

but I almost have to ask the question

is she really changing jobs or is she

just being transparent that she's always

worked for MSNBC in the CIA

because I don't even know if they change

your direct deposit do they I'm just

kidding of course they do

but it feels like it's the same job they

just changed the title

am I right it feels like it's the same

job

is not a different job it's the same job

that's the story the story is she didn't

change jobs she changed job titles yeah

I'm exaggerating but you get the point

all right um

here's something that General Omar

Bradley once said

he said an American General he was an

American General during World War II and

he and he's

quoted as saying amateurs talk strategy

professionals talk Logistics meaning

that Wars are won or Lost based on

whether you can resupply your your

military

and CNN is still hammering on this idea

that the Russian army is running out of

fuel and food and everything

and

there are other there are other voices

saying Ah that's just complete

propaganda that's just Ukrainian

propaganda

but let me ask you this

how many big fuel Depots does the

Russian military have within Striking

Distance of the Ukrainian border

because the ukrainians have apparently

taken out one large Fuel Depot

that fueled some some percentage of the

Army on the eastern border the Russian

army

so here's the question for you

if if it's true the Ukraine took out one

large Fuel Depot

how many are there

how many are there

because you know if there are three

Russia is totally am I right

if there are only three

if they took out a third of their fuel

they're in real trouble because remember

you don't have to take out all the fuel

or all the food if you take out 20 30

percent of either the fuel or the food

there's chaos

right they've got to do all kinds of

stuff to adjust to that shortage and

it's not going to be pretty so you don't

have to take it all the way you just

have to degrade it to the point where

they're so ineffective that there's a

Cascade effect to collapse

so so I've asked you a very specific

military question

do you think anybody knows first of all

can anybody make that kind of an

estimate

and could anybody ask our military do we

have any idea

how many large

fuel Depots are there and can they

quickly spin up a new one

in other words uh has Russia already

just sort of you know spun up a new fuel

Depot and it didn't even make a dent

because they have plenty of fuel they

just have to get it to the right place

so

uh yeah Define define large so here's

the question if there are 50 fuel Depots

of that size the size that the

ukrainians allegedly destroyed if there

are 50 of them well then Russia wins for

sure

because they can't you know they're not

going to run into fuel

well what if there were three

right isn't that the right question if

there were only three

the Russian armies already in pretty bad

shape

because they just lost their energy

uh you're watching the wrong Ukraine

movie somebody says

uh what does not spin up as a fuel Depot

you need pipe welders Pipe Fitters yeah

yeah it can be easy

but I don't know maybe maybe they just

have giant tanks of fuel and they can

move them wherever they want

I don't know if you need a gigantic tank

to put the smaller tanks into or or

temporarily maybe you don't

all right

uh so I'm going to say that I am

unconvinced

that Logistics alone will be the decider

in Ukraine but I think it's at least a

50 chance

that the big story will be Logistics by

the way here's a little history lesson

that I also learned by the CNN article

that uh the mistake that Hitler made

attacking Russia

was that he thought it would be fast and

he did not develop his supply lines

correctly he only developed supply lines

and actually clothing warm weather or

cold weather clothing

was not even sufficient for the war

so huge numbers of German troops just

froze to death or got frostbite because

they couldn't even Supply them with warm

jackets

they they never planned for that

somebody says and Napoleon too well so

is is the winter plus the supply line

although the winter seemed like a bigger

factor for Napoleon

so well I suppose it's always Supply

because you could Supply you can survive

any winter if you had enough Supply so

yeah I guess it's Supply

um

I don't know I've been saying since the

beginning uh that the ukrainians can

take out the supply lines and we're

learning more about their uh Kamikaze

drones but then I heard they only had a

hundred of them what the hell good are

100 100 Kamikaze drones you're not going

to win a war with a hundred

I feel like you need

I don't know five thousand

so how fast could we make these things

is somebody cranking out some more yeah

100 to start maybe yeah these are the

the switchblades so it's the little

drones you can launch from your backpack

or carry the backpack it's a little

drone and it just goes up into hovers

for 15 minutes until it finds something

and then it Dives in and destroys it

that's a pretty devastating

psychological weapon

like knowing that there's one hovering

around you and it's just picking out

which which person to kill

I think I'll kill the people in that

truck

very psychologically devastating

so we don't know how many fuel Depots

that there are and we don't know how

many of these switchblade drones there

are but I would say that those two

numbers are the only numbers that will

tell you what's going to happen

so I'm boiling it down the only thing

that will tell you what's happening

is how many drones do the ukrainians

have we don't know

and how much fuel do the Russians have

we don't know

the the only two things that matter and

we don't know either anything about

either with the public the military

probably does

so on uh for the last several days

somebody has been screaming at me on

YouTube in the comments that if I don't

understand what operation gladio is then

I don't understand anything

and so I said to myself well I'll look

into it

because I don't know I I had no reason

to dismiss the comment and whoever was

saying it was was pretty adamant

so here's what operation gladio

reportedly is

NATO has terrorist forces

that's the whole story NATO has

officially trained

terrorists and they use them as leave

behind forces in case your country gets

overrun so if a NATO country gets

overrun

they already have spun up the terrorist

forces that remain as part of the

resistance

and they're actually terrorists

like actually literally terrorists

and apparently there have been a number

of discoveries of these various groups

in different countries and apparently

it's fairly confirmed I mean Wikipedia

treats it like it's a fact

you know if you want to if you want to

take that as your Source but does that

change anything for you

because the the gladio operation gladios

would be terrorists working for your

team are you comfortable having

terrorists on your team

because apparently we do

if you're on team NATO apparently you're

pro-terrorist

sorry

now you could call them saboteurs sure

so depending on the context of you know

has your country been invaded well then

they're not terrorists

then they're Freedom Fighters

but they're basically terrorists now

part of what they would do is false

Flags

now it's getting a little creepy isn't

it so allegedly what these gladio people

would do among other things

is kill civilians of Their Own

to make it look like the other side did

it

so how do you like your team now

how do you like being on team NATO

knowing that your team are literally

terrorists

I'm okay with it

are you is there anybody who has a

problem with it I'm okay with it I mean

it's part of what makes it

um

a bad idea to try to conquer your

neighbor

if anything that NATO does is making it

really really hard to conquer your your

neighbor I'm okay with that

now nobody's in favor of killing

civilians I mean not

not that but as soon as you say we're in

a war

then then the strategy changes to how do

you do well

all right we'd rather have no war but if

you're in one

well you're going to fight the wind

right

so one of the ways to fight to win are

these false flag things the reason

people do it is because it works if it

didn't work people wouldn't do it

so if you want to win you do what works

as ugly as that is so you could be

morally outraged and should be I guess

but it's going to happen anyway your

your moral outrage won't change anything

um

so uh I don't know if the person asking

me to look into that is on here but are

you satisfied or or have I missed

something about this operation gladio

is there any was there anything that

ties it close because I believe

I believe that

the point of it was for me to understand

that NATO is not all uh unicorns and

roses

and I I take that as first of all

something that was obvious in my opinion

but secondly uh okay

I will accept that a little history

lesson I'm not sure ads or subtracts

anything

because war is dirty business so I'm not

I'm not surprised that CIA related

people are doing awful things that's not

new news

all right

um

did you see the Deep fake video of

zelenski so somebody did a AI generated

deep fake in which he was telling his

soldiers to surrender to the Russian

invasion and uh the Deep fake wasn't

that good

but wow how far away are we from not

knowing who's giving you the commands at

all

pretty close right

we're pretty close to not knowing who's

giving the orders as soon as the Deep

fakes get I don't know 20 better

you just won't tell the difference you

won't know if it's your president saying

something or somebody else

um

so keep an eye on that I think this

whole deep fake thing

is just going to be gigantic

so I continue to be entertained by Bill

Maher's conversion to uh

what would I call it uh so he's not

becoming right wing I don't think that's

going to happen but he seems to be able

to see the whole field and so every

Friday he's saying stuff that makes news

at least in Fox News because he's saying

stuff that his team doesn't hear

and I've decided he might be the most

dangerous person in America

well-meaning I mean his intentions are

positive I'm sure but

he's the only person I know who

consistently penetrates the the left

bubble and tells them what they don't

know and haven't heard

think about how dangerous that is

because I don't know anybody else who

can do I can't do it right can you

yeah I can't talk to anybody in the

Democrat bubble and have them hear me I

don't have any channel to them but he

does because he started with them and

you know audiences tend to stick with

you so he so on Friday's show apparently

uh Bill Maher said quote so the new New

York Post got a hold of what was in the

computer talk about hunter's laptop uh

and you know because the New York Post

is a republican paper

that's his description and the New York

Times And The Washington Post are the

Democrat papers again his description

and and the Republican paper

uh and then he goes Twitter canceled

their account talked about the New York

Post they can't even report the story

so you see he's being amazed

that a true story got canceled from the

internet and he noticed

now he hasn't noticed all the stuff

that's happened but this one was just

too shockingly big and so he's calling

it out and

uh

so he's just like the right-leaning

media is pointing out the mainstream

media

suppressed one of the most important

stories of the election cycle now Bill

Maher did not go as far as he could have

in saying that it probably influenced

the election result

and therefore one could say

the election was rigged and therefore

one could say that Trump was right

although I think he was talking more

about vote rigging which would be

different and nobody's proven that in

any scale

so

um somebody says billboard needs an ego

death now I'm pretty sure I don't know

this I'm speculating

but if Bill Maher has not done mushrooms

mushrooms don't exist

if he hasn't done them uh I'd be pretty

amazed pretty amazed and that's based on

not only the lifestyle he promotes

but also the fact that he is relatively

aware

and that's one of the ways you get there

um

so in my opinion Bill Maher has figured

out maybe 25 of what's Happening

maybe 50 percent

but I tweeted Adam and I included him in

the tweet

and I said the most dangerous person in

America is Bill Maher because he is

capable of penetrating the Democrat

bubble and telling them their new

sources are fake

and then I said he's figured out about

25 of what's Happening he still believes

the fine people hoax and the drinking

bleaks hoax

do you see what I did there

all right now here's some context I've

been on Bill Marshall once

and it was before the 2016 election and

I predicted on his show that Trump would

win and I explained why based on his

persuasive powers

Bill Maher listened to everything I said

and did not push back at all

which I thought was unusual

because I was saying things clearly

supportive of trump he's clearly the

opposite and not once

he didn't push back on anything

now maybe he thought the persuasion

angle wasn't that important or a little

office you know his uh sweet spot or

something but

um I will say that if he remembers who I

am I'm guessing he does

if he remembers who I am he would

probably remember that on his show I was

reasonable

and that I sounded like a not a crazy

right-wing you know person

and I feel I established at least a

little bit of credibility

by saying things on his show that didn't

get any pushback and were new you know

they were they were new for his audience

and didn't get pushback and it was

important it explained what was

happening and accurately predicted now

if anything I just said is true

which is that I gained at least a little

bit of credibility in my small

interaction with him on his show

then if he were to see this tweet and by

you know that's by no means certain but

usually when the blue checks tweeted

each other

I feel like we usually see it what do

you think you know some people are more

active on their social media I don't I

don't think Bill Maher is Super Active

on Twitter you know but he's a he's a

super user but I don't know how many

minutes he spends there and

I think he'd probably see it just

because I added it

so you'd probably see it

now if you were him

and you knew that I'd said incredible

the same things on the show that nobody

even argued with

and you heard me say something that

would blow your mind that the fine

people hoax and the drinking bleach hoax

or hoaxes

and I'm sure that's the first time he

would have heard it in a way that

doesn't sound crazy

you may have heard Fox News said which

doesn't sound credible you may have

heard I don't know somebody will say it

if he did

but I feel as though

I feel as though

there's some chance that I got that

message through

I'm I may have slipped the puck past the

the keeper and the reason is because

first of all because it's Bill Maher

and he's open to

a competing idea

so if it were not him this wouldn't work

at all secondly because the blue checks

probably check each other's comments

and thirdly because the context I waited

until he was already primed

to believe that the news is hugely

manipulated on his side

do you see what I did here

I waited until he was primed while he's

talking about the his own news sources

being illegitimate

he's talking about it now while he's

talking about his new sources being

illegitimate I give him two things that

coming from me

should just blow the top of his head off

if he notices right I mean I I'm not

going to assume I'm important enough in

the scheme of things that you

necessarily is going to even notice

but in theory so this is sort of a

impromptu persuasion lesson if you can

if you can throw a mind thought

into somebody who's already in the mode

it's a whole different idea than coming

as somebody you're both loaded and ready

for an argument

if you're both loaded and ready for an

argument nobody's nobody changes their

mind

but if you can catch somebody in a

vulnerable moment

when they've already talked themselves

into the point of view that you're

promoting

and you're just giving them a little

extra of where they already are because

do you know what people do like

they love confirmation by us of their

own opinion they'll accept that in a

moment that's not changing their mind

that's hard

changing anybody's mind is really hard

work which is why persuasion is an

important topic it's so hard if you

don't do everything right you don't have

a chance

so

I think there's some chance

that I planted a seed that would be

productive here's what I love

in my perfect world

Bill Maher will see the full videos of

the fine people hoax and the full video

of the drinking bleach oats and he will

realize that the two biggest really

messages about Trump were entirely made

up

the two biggest ones

and I don't know

if that's expecting too much of anybody

because it is kind of you know so I have

a high opinion of Bill Maher's mental

let's say openness and flexibility you

know different than most people very

different

but this is a stretch to get somebody to

believe this much of a mind is

something really basic to the reality

just didn't happen just never happened

and it's easy to prove that's the weird

part if it were hard to prove

then people could hold on to their their

assumption but you just have to play the

video that's it the entire debunk is

just like well let me play the whole

video not the clip that reverses its

meaning

thank you well ladies and gentlemen is

my prepared marks for today

uh no doubt this peak experience is

something that will stay with you

forever

or for several minutes one

um is there a topic which I have not

covered

which you'd like to hear me cover

um

all right

uh the how do you debunk the don't say

gay

well unfortunately the don't say gay

thing is really a masterpiece of

persuasion

whoever whoever frames something first

as a big advantage and the don't say gay

people framed it best they framed it

with a rhyme which is really good

say and gay Rhymes that's a good

technique is short it's easy to remember

it's it's repeatable

and that becomes true

so it doesn't even matter

dogs and blankets I like that I'm seeing

a picture of a dog in a blanket on the

locals platform they can they can put

pictures in the comments

um

by the way

uh last night I did a

live stream from the man caves these are

only available for the people who

subscribe on locals so while you missed

was my story about meeting a psychic and

hypnotizing her and some of the

predictions she made which were just

insane a visit with my own spirit guide

or not I can only tell you what seems to

have happened

I'm not sure what really happened uh and

they uh tying that in with the uh the

simulation and all the evidence for the

simulation that we live in a simulation

now if you think that sounds good and

not only were there simultaneous sips

but uh let's just say that the man cave

is simultaneous whatever

so you are allowed to do is

simultaneously whatever you wanted

well I did the same

and

when am I going on guffeld again so yes

um I don't know it's not up to me

so

um

looks like I have uh answered all of

your questions

are you saying that Bill Maher has a

podcast where he and Quentin Tarantino

got Stoned on the podcast

well I would like to uh put out my

challenge right now

to Snoop Dogg

Snoop Dogg

number one I'm a cartoonist

and I'm guessing you have no no idea who

I am

um but I do this cartoon called Dilbert

some people have heard of it and I

challenge you Snoop Dogg

to join me in my man cave in California

Northern California

and to see who can

let's say you can be more of the Snoop

Dogg if you know what I mean this is

this is YouTube so I'm gonna keep it

generic generic if there are any young

kids watching kids don't do drugs

and I mean that

sounds like a joke but no kids don't do

drugs

that said

uh how much would you like to see me

interview Snoop Dogg while we're seeing

who can last the longest if you know

what I mean

come on you'd watch that

you'd watch it now I don't think that

Snoop would know enough about me or that

would ever make sense to him but it

would be awesome

and I think it would be viral as hell I

don't I don't think I could talk him

into it because he just wouldn't be

familiar with me I'm guessing I mean if

if Kanye

somehow knew who I was it's not

impossible

but unlikely

so that's the that's the uh the ask

Snoop Dogg in my man cave

let's do it and by the way I'm a huge

fan of Snoop Dogg uh

I I love the fact that he never changed

who he was I guess that's what I like

best you know I like his music I like

his whole vibe but I like the fact that

uh he changed the world like the world

didn't change him

you know that right

like Snoop just said I'm just going to

be me and the world is going to have to

catch up and then it did

who does that who does that but he

didn't

all right

um that is all for now and uh

I'm going to go do some work I got a lot

of it

oh I'm hearing from Sonny San Rafel

somebody's watching

so if somebody knows Snoop get to him

and make the offer

and we'll go from there and

for the rest of you

can you have a great day pretty sure you

can

go forth