Coffee With Scott Adams — Knowledge Archive August 24, 2026
Scott Adams Philosophy Archive
Search ideas
Episodes Episode #2397

Episode 2397 CWSA 02/27/24

Episode #2397 Feb 27, 2024 1:30:09 31,594 views

Get ready to raise your level of awareness, thanks to the news If you would like to enjoy this same content plus bonus content from Scott Adams, including micro-lessons on lots of useful topics to build your talent stack, please see scottadams.locals.com for full access to that secret treasure.

Opening General Commentary

Welcome to the highlight of human civilization. It's called Coffee with Scott Adams, and that's what we're going to do. In addition to talking about the news, I'm going to boost your level of awareness. We're going to take everybody up to a higher level of awareness today. Challe

View segment →
SimultaneousSip General Commentary

nge accepted. And if you'd like to get a good start on this higher level of awareness, all you need is a cup, a mug, or a glass, a tankard, a stein, a canteen, a jug or flask, vessel of any kind. Fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee. Enjoy me now for the unparalleled pleasure of the dop…

View segment →
NewsReaction AI & Technology

teboard, huh? That's right. Well, let's start with this cool news. I saw Brian Reilly post on X about a portal. It's one of the coolest uses of technology I've seen. So if you imagine something that's bigger than a person, a big round circle, and the center of the circle is a screen, you know, a hu…

View segment →
NewsReaction Economics & Finance

War and it would exclude the Revolutionary War and those earlier wars. But since we've had internet and since we've had really good phones and communication, how many wars have there been between the United States and somebody who spoke the same language? Let's see. Actual question. It's not, I'm n…

View segment →
NewsReaction Media & Fake News

nversation. I'm very specifically saying America. No, Russia plus Ukraine, you're not getting this yet. America. Have we gotten in a fight with an English-speaking country? And so here's what I'm speculating. If universal translation just becomes part of all of our technology, which it looks like i…

View segment →
NewsReaction Politics as Persuasion

are that citizens want to be in a war. It's not rare when governments want to be in a war. Just think about it. It might actually end war. All right, maybe. And I'm being a little optimistic. Don Lemon got a settlement from CNN, got 24.5 million. That's what he would have been paid if he stayed on…

View segment →
NewsReaction Cognitive Reframing

s captured by wokeness. There is indication from earlier video of him before wokeness became crazy that he's just a reasonable person who can see both sides of stuff. I would love to be on his show. It's the number one show I would like to be invited on. So if anybody knows him, let him know I'd lov…

View segment →
NewsReaction Media & Fake News

mally see and is able to see all sides of an argument. My God, Dr. Phil just entered the chat. Yes, you got ahead of me. This is dad energy. What does Dr. Phil have more than any human you've ever seen in your entire life? More dad energy than I've ever seen. Name one person who has more pure dad e…

View segment →
NewsReaction Media & Fake News

So we make this mistake over and over again. We treat people who literally have mental health problems as if it's just a difference of opinion. Probably ought to stop doing that. Joy Reid, somebody just posted a picture of Joy Reid with her new Trump haircut. Joy Reid comes off as a mental health p…

View segment →
Whiteboard Systems vs Goals

re are just so many things that didn't look real. Now it could be that the only problem is my low level of understanding of physics. But the more I looked into it, the more obvious it was that the physicists really didn't understand their own field. And I don't know if that's what Eric Weinstein is…

View segment →
MainContent Media & Fake News

we would have talked about it forever, but we kind of would have accepted it. It was one person who caused two-thirds of the country to think the elections are rigged. Now that's my current belief without the benefit of any proof. Would you like to see my argument for why I believe that climate cha…

View segment →
Tangent AI & Technology

etimes. It's every time. It doesn't have the option of going any other way. As soon as there's enough money, it becomes completely corrupt. Now at a lower level of money maybe you can get away with stuff, but once you get to the big numbers, it's all lies. It's all lies. Now let us develop that th…

View segment →
MainContent AI & Technology

one that's not already bought that also has the features I want, what are the odds of that?" "Well, it's about zero." So then I say, "Well then, but I could just build one." Yeah, I could order one with my specifications, right? And I'd be willing to wait. I'll wait six months. I just want to get t…

View segment →
NewsReaction Politics as Persuasion

all realize we're living in a simulation. But I would think that the fact you can create your own simulation would get you halfway there. I think the double slit experiment, the limit on the size of the universe, the speed of light, Bell's theorem, the fact that there's something called the smallest…

View segment →
MainContent Hypnosis & Influence

and the entire joke is that he's near death and crazy and stupid. Do you remember when one of the biggest problems we were worried about was that other countries wouldn't respect Trump? What do you think they think now? What do you think they think now, now that Trump has been shown to be right abou…

View segment →
MainContent Politics as Persuasion

ing. "Oh well, I'm a Democrat. Probably they'll vote Democrat. My leaders are bringing them in, the border's open. Oh, it's to get extra voters." So I think that the Democrats are fooled about the real reason. And I think that Elon Musk, seeing that the Democrats say it out loud, quite reasonably at…

View segment →
MainContent Media & Fake News

cally, and this is a matter of record, tried to control Hollywood and some celebrities because they know that controlling the media is a good way to control how everybody thinks, etc. We know that they've controlled the news for a long time. We know that they're knee deep in social media companies.…

View segment →
MainContent AI & Technology

structed to ignore Trump-related success. Obviously it ignored it so much that it wouldn't list him as a prior president. What else would do that? What else? There's some kind of general suppression commands or series of commands in Meta AI that very obviously and very clearly is suppressing anythin…

View segment →
MainContent Cognitive Reframing

gramming say ah I got it wrong. I got another wrong thing about this prosecutor because I know that she's not biased. I better change that. There is no way to get there from here. Where we want to get to is an AI that's smart and unbiased. It's not a technical problem. Let me say that clearly. It's…

View segment →
Closing General Commentary

politics. He would change our understanding of reality itself. And then we watched and he did. He brought us all the way to the middle of the third level of awareness. AI is going to take you over the border. AI is what will convince you that you're living in a simulation. Not just the fact that it…

View segment →

Welcome to the highlight of human civilization. It's called Coffee with Scott Adams, and that's what we're going to do. In addition to talking about the news, I'm going to boost your level of awareness. We're going to take everybody up to a higher level of awareness today. Challenge accepted.

And if you'd like to get a good start on this higher level of awareness, all you need is a cup, a mug, or a glass, a tankard, a stein, a canteen, a jug or flask, vessel of any kind. Fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee. Enjoy me now for the unparalleled pleasure of the dopamine hit of the day, the thing that makes everything better. It's called the simultaneous sip. It happens now.

Oh, so good.

Now I don't want to get you too excited, but there will be a whiteboard. A whiteboard, huh? That's right.

Well, let's start with this cool news. I saw Brian Reilly post on X about a portal. It's one of the coolest uses of technology I've seen. So if you imagine something that's bigger than a person, a big round circle, and the center of the circle is a screen, you know, a huge person-sized screen, and you could put it in any city, and a person could walk up to it and they will see the person in the other portal. So it's sort of a portal, you know, it's always up. And here's the cool thing: it has a translator built in.

So you can walk up to the portal in, let's say, Paris or wherever. I guess it's going to be in different places. You walk up to the portal in Paris, and then somebody on the street in China would see you standing there at the portal, and they would walk up. They would speak in Chinese, you would speak in French, and you would have a complete conversation in real time. Now that's insanely cool. I don't even know what to say about it. It just activates every hair in my body to stand up. Don't think about that too long. Yeah, it's just one of the coolest things.

I like to start the show with just something to imagine, and I ask you this: Couldn't this stop war? Did you ever wonder what would happen if these citizens got to vote on war and actually talk to each other directly? "Hey, do you guys want a war? Because I feel like we don't really want one over here, but our government is kind of pushing us toward it." And then the other people in whatever country would say, "You know, I'm glad you talked to me on the portal, because we're not too crazy about war either. How about we just fire our leaders and don't have a war?"

Yeah, it's actually a threat to power if people could talk to each other with translation.

Here's a question for you that I just thought of, so I don't know if it's a good one yet. Give me one second to think if this is a really dumb thing to say. No, I think it might make sense. Since we've had good communications in the world, so that would exclude, let's say, the Civil War and it would exclude the Revolutionary War and those earlier wars. But since we've had internet and since we've had really good phones and communication, how many wars have there been between the United States and somebody who spoke the same language?

Let's see. Actual question. It's not, I'm not being rhetorical. There are two. Now who would that be? Because Russia doesn't speak English. The Palestinians, I mean, so a lot of them have a second language, but they're mostly different language. And here here's the thing. I wonder if it's possible to have a war between two nations that speak the same language, their original language, and have lots of communication technology where the citizens can talk to each other. Now don't give me the Civil War. Only in modern times when we could, in modern. Now, okay, I don't want to see anything with 18 in it. 1800 and anything is not in this conversation. I'm very specifically saying America. No, Russia plus Ukraine, you're not getting this yet. America. Have we gotten in a fight with an English-speaking country?

And so here's what I'm speculating. If universal translation just becomes part of all of our technology, which it looks like it will, I mean pretty easy to predict, you would be able to directly talk to citizens of any other country that you were considering having a war with, and you might actually be able to work it out without the benefit of your government. That's actually a possibility. That universal translation plus universal communication, you know, the ability to reach anybody, could end war. Because it's very rare that citizens want to be in a war. It's not rare when governments want to be in a war. Just think about it. It might actually end war. All right, maybe. And I'm being a little optimistic.

Don Lemon got a settlement from CNN, got 24.5 million. That's what he would have been paid if he stayed on for his contract. But what do you think of that? 24.5 million, that's pretty good, right? Do you know how much he takes home if he makes 24.5? Well, he's going to pay over half of it in taxes. He's probably going to pay 15% to his agent, and God knows how much his lawyer gets because his lawyer is putting in some serious high-level work here. If I had to guess, 24.5, I think you'll net six or seven. Yeah, so that's probably six in the bank.

Now how many of you did that calculation in your head when you saw the 24 million? And how many of you said, "Wow, he just made 24 million"? It's actually closer to six. I mean, it's a ton of money. I'm not saying it's a small amount. I'm just saying that if you don't have that filter on it, you're missing it by a factor of four basically.

But the good news is Don Lemon is going to launch his own show on the X platform called The Don Lemon Show. And you know what? I'm really excited about it. You know, as much as I complained when he was on CNN, it was more about being in the CNN channel. Let me make a prediction. My prediction is that Don Lemon, without the yoke of CNN on him, is going to be a good show. Does anybody want to take the other side of that? I actually predict it's going to be a good show and that you'll enjoy watching it. Maybe not every day, but I'll bet you it'll be good.

And the reason I think so is that I don't think he's captured by wokeness. There is indication from earlier video of him before wokeness became crazy that he's just a reasonable person who can see both sides of stuff. I would love to be on his show. It's the number one show I would like to be invited on. So if anybody knows him, let him know I'd love to talk to him.

There's a New York Times writer who says he was fired for saying he liked Chick-fil-A sandwiches. Does that sound true? I don't know. It sounds like it could be. I'm just going to say maybe because it's fun. It's not too important. So I'm just going to say, ah, let's treat it like it's true. Do you agree? Let's treat it like it's true because it sounds like something that would be true.

And here's the reason. I guess he ended up in an HR or something, or maybe his manager talked to him and said, "We don't do that here. They hate gay people, so you can't say that you like Chick-fil-A and be a writer at the New York Times." All right, all right. So I'm working toward my theme today. There will be a theme, and we'll see if you can spot it before I tell you what it is. But that's a hint.

So Dr. Phil went on The View and had a little mix-up with the hosts of The View about how bad it was that the schools were closed. Of course, I believe that the hosts of The View were in favor of school closures. Dr. Phil gave them a dose of reality.

Now here's what's really fun about Dr. Phil. Are you ready? I think that because he's been a TV guy and an Oprah creation for years, that people assume he's left-leaning without knowing. The truth is that fair assumption that the public doesn't really know that he's not a woke lefty. They probably assume he's just a TV guy. He's from Oprah's orbit, of course he's just going to be sort of a lefty guy. But he apparently is now free from all constraints, corporate constraints, because his regular show is over. I think he's doing something new. I don't know the details, but I suspect that he fully owns whatever he's going to do, and that means he's free.

Dr. Phil just entered the chat. Now you might say to yourself, well that's just one more person, you know, one more voice. No, it's Dr. Phil. It's Dr. Phil. It's not just one more voice. This is like a Dr. Jordan Peterson. This is like Tucker Carlson. This is somebody whose communication abilities are beyond what you normally see and is able to see all sides of an argument. My God, Dr. Phil just entered the chat. Yes, you got ahead of me. This is dad energy.

What does Dr. Phil have more than any human you've ever seen in your entire life? More dad energy than I've ever seen. Name one person who has more pure dad energy than he does. Nobody, right? So big welcome to the, I would like to say that people like me who got canceled and then didn't die have made it easier for people who are maybe a little more established, maybe they have more to lose or something. But I feel like the people who took the arrows in the back make it easier for anybody else to join the fight. So I hope that's the case.

Byron York is posting, telling us about Letitia James. You know, she's the AG who ran for office to bring down Trump, and then she found some BS reason to do it. And she's posting every day the extra gazillion dollars of interest he has to pay on what he's already on the line to pay. Now how disgusting is that, that she's bragging about it? Now some people ask, is that even legal? And I assume it is legal. Free speech. I'm good for free speech. I think it's legal. But it's the most distasteful thing, and unethical. I think it's unethical for sure, but it's so distasteful that it's just mind-boggling.

Now I have a hypothesis, which, speaking of Jordan Peterson, I tagged him on my post, because it seems to me that a lot of what we think is a difference of opinion is mental health. And this to me looks like toxic narcissism. You know what I mean? So the fact that she ran to bring him down because that was such a popular thing and she'd be such a celebrity and such a star if she did, and she also ran on bringing down the NRA because if she did she'd be such a celebrity and such a star, and now she's doing a dance on Trump's economic grave by posting that to make herself more noticed, more of a celebrity, more of a star.

Now is there anybody here who actually has experience in mental health, as in a psychologist or psychiatrist? Okay, we got at least one, two. Oh, okay, I got a lot of people listening who have that skill set. Can you agree or disagree, or if you don't want to have an opinion, does it seem to you really obvious that narcissism is her problem? I just want to see in the comments, do you agree? It seems, you know, you can't, to be fair, if we're being fair, you cannot diagnose a mental health problem in another person from a distance and do it ethically. It wouldn't be ethical to do it. But I'm not a psychiatrist. I don't think those ethical standards apply to my observation. My observation is that she and Fannie, and there might be some others, maybe Alvin Bragg, are suffering with some kind of narcissism, and that if they were diagnosed they would actually get that diagnosis. That's what I think.

So we keep confusing political opinion and mental health, and it's really bad. This is very much mental health. And you know, you see it with the trans movement. Whatever part of that is based on real people with real problems, I don't know. I'm not an expert. But it's really obvious that a large percentage of it, and again I don't know what percentage, is just purely mental health. Purely, obviously. Now, but I'm no expert, right? It's just obvious to anybody. So we make this mistake over and over again. We treat people who literally have mental health problems as if it's just a difference of opinion. Probably ought to stop doing that.

Joy Reid, somebody just posted a picture of Joy Reid with her new Trump haircut. Joy Reid comes off as a mental health problem. What's her name, what's her co-host there who only works on Monday? What's her name? Rachel. Rachel Maddow. Yeah. So Rachel Maddow, she looks always to me like she's literally suffering some kind of psychological breakdown as she talks. Have you ever seen that? You look at her face and she feels like she's being tortured by demons on the inside when she talks. Now again, I'm not a mental health professional, but if she's not under the care of a professional I'd be really surprised. I'd be really surprised if she's not under the care of a professional in your private life. But again I'm no professional myself, so you're free to ignore my observation.

Eric Weinstein was talking about physics, and he said that, I want you to remember this the next time you start talking about peer review and simply using the normal channels, fundamental physics theory is being destroyed within our institutions by total nonsense. And I don't know why. Now the "I don't know why" is the payoff. Because if you don't know who I'm talking about, Eric Weinstein, he would know about the insides of the physics community because he's part of that world. So he would understand if it's BS. All you and I can't tell from the outside necessarily, but we could see it. He could see it, and he's saying there's something wrong.

Now did you ever have the feeling that I had at one point in time? Gosh, I think all this politics is full of lies, right? I think politics is awful, full of lies. But thank goodness we still have science, because science is not going to be influenced by all these bad characters and psychological problems and all that stuff, all that bias. We get rid of that, we got some science. Well, years ago, here's a little story I don't think I've ever told you. Years ago, maybe when I was in my 30s, I got real interest in physics, having no educational background in physics whatsoever.

And let me tell you what interested me about physics. It looked like it was complete to me. That's what got me interested. I wasn't interested in the science. I was interested in the psychology of how we could get to the point of believing what I believed was obviously not true. Obviously not true. I'm talking about basic reality. You know, the mysterious stuff, you know, Bell's theorem, and you got your spooky action at a distance, and we're going to prove that string theory is true any day now, but it didn't quite happen. And to me, oh, and the fact that the universe has an edge, and that the speed of light has a limit, and that we're coincidentally here despite all odds. I mean, there are just so many things that didn't look real.

Now it could be that the only problem is my low level of understanding of physics. But the more I looked into it, the more obvious it was that the physicists really didn't understand their own field. And I don't know if that's what Eric Weinstein is getting at. I think his point is a little more nuanced and a little more interesting than that. But to me it looks like they don't know their own field. And I've thought that for decades now.

Recently I find out that half of all scientific papers are just BS. You know, people have tested it by making fake papers and seeing if they passed peer review. About half of them do. And that matches the number of peer-reviewed studies that can't be reproduced because they're probably not true. So science is indeed a ridiculous thing that we pumped up to be more important than it is. Because it might be the best we have, but that's a long way from being good.

But you know, even though physics is sort of sketchy, at least climate science is real. Am I right? At least we got climate science completely right. So next story. Michael Shellenberger says there's an author, Dr. Mike Hulme, I think, Cambridge climate scientist. Well, he's going to tell some stuff about climate science and how big of a problem it is. Let's see. He says in his new book, climate emergency is what he calls a noble lie. A noble lie. That feels like an academic way of saying something else. A noble lie. Well, seems like a positive spin on something that somebody with orange hair once said about climate change. What was that word? Oh, a hoax.

Ladies and gentlemen, it's too early to say for sure, but the simulation seems to be very intent on lighting up a third act for Trump that is like nothing you've ever seen. Now I've long predicted that Trump's third act would be proof that the election was rigged. I don't know if we need proof when two-thirds of the country says it's obviously true. I don't know if he needs proof. He got two-thirds of the country to say, "Yeah, I think elections are not real." That's kind of a big win, right? And that was all him. That was all him. One person got two-thirds of the country to not believe our elections are real.

Now you can say to yourself, but all these other Republicans were saying it too. They would have said it if Trump didn't say it. If Trump said, you know what, stand down, I think it was fair, let's accept it, his base would have gone along with it. I mean, we would have talked about it forever, but we kind of would have accepted it. It was one person who caused two-thirds of the country to think the elections are rigged. Now that's my current belief without the benefit of any proof.

Would you like to see my argument for why I believe that climate change is almost certainly a lie, and that our elections are almost certainly a lie, and that the war in Ukraine is almost certainly a lie, and maybe a few more things? And it's all going to be with one graph on one whiteboard, and it'll be the most magnificent thing you've ever seen. I give you now the explanation for everything that was confusing you. I call it the money versus lies graph.

If you're listening to this, on the lower line of the graph we've got money, and then on the other side we've got lies. And there's a hockey stick kind of a graph there showing that the more money is involved, the more lies. What things are expensive? Name something expensive. Let's see how about changing the energy sources of the planet Earth everywhere. Climate change. That's some super expensive stuff, huh? What do you think happens when things get that expensive? Right, the line goes through the roof because people want some of that money.

Now how about Ukraine? That Ukraine war is pretty expensive, huh? Have there been any lies about the Ukraine war? Nothing but war. War is the thing you can guarantee is all lies. It's also the most expensive thing we do. Iraq war, all lies, all BS, right? Now how about what else do we have here? See, climate science is expensive and war is expensive. How about just the economy in general? Oh, how about COVID? Was expensive. How about those vaccinations? How about healthcare? How about reparations? How about college?

I'm just reading your comments. Do you see it yet? Everything expensive is a lie because it brings out the liars, and it's a system problem. Wherever there is money, there are moths going toward the flame. Ah, there's money there, so you're going to get 10 crooks for every honest person. And eventually the 10 crooks will overwhelm the honest person, if you even have one. Right? So and there's no real other way this can go. There's not a second way this goes. You know that, right? Do you all get that? It doesn't go this way sometimes. It's every time. It doesn't have the option of going any other way. As soon as there's enough money, it becomes completely corrupt.

Now at a lower level of money maybe you can get away with stuff, but once you get to the big numbers, it's all lies. It's all lies.

Now let us develop that theme a little bit, shall we? So the fact that there's a Cambridge climate scientist who's coming out and saying that at least the alarm part of climate science is a lie, so that's fun. So it seems to me that the conversation about everything is now far more honest. Are you all seeing that? The effect with sort of the bounce back or the counter effect, it seems pretty strong. There's a whole bunch of people who seem to be able to say the truth now that couldn't. A lot more people can talk about the truth.

All right, here's some more evidence that we are living in a simulation. I watched a video this morning of a robot doing a series of tasks sort of autonomously. And have you ever noticed that the robots are all naked and they look kind of male? Like when you see a robot you never think female, do you? It's always a naked man. So this is how you know you're in a simulation. I'm watching this robot who looks like a naked guy, and it's being posted by the founder of the company that makes the robot, and his name is Brett Adcock. So as I'm looking at this naked male robot with no genitalia that was created by a guy named Adcock, I said to myself, AI robotics, I think is an archetype. If that's where he's from, I can't ignore that. I cannot ignore that.

So don't you imagine that buying a robot will be someday like buying a car? I was just shopping for a car, by the way. Do you know it's impossible to buy a vehicle? Has anybody tried to buy a vehicle? They don't let you do it anymore. I go to Toyota to buy a truck. There are none on the lot. They go, "Oh yeah, we don't really keep them here, but you can buy one that's in the pipeline." And I said, "Oh, will the pipeline have ones that have the features I want?" "Well, they all have different features." "Oh, so the odds of one that's in the pipeline that is not already bought, because people are buying them in the pipeline, one that's not already bought that also has the features I want, what are the odds of that?" "Well, it's about zero."

So then I say, "Well then, but I could just build one." Yeah, I could order one with my specifications, right? And I'd be willing to wait. I'll wait six months. I just want to get the truck I want. And then the Toyota guy says, "We don't do that anymore." And I said, "What don't you do anymore? Make trucks that people want?" "Yeah, yeah, no, we just make the trucks we want to make, put them in the pipeline, and people are buying them. So you can't test drive it. You can't order it with the features you want." That's a real thing. And the reason they can do that is that all of their trucks are bought as fast as they make them. They don't have to do better. Yeah, they don't have to.

So then I said to myself, well heck with Toyota, I'll go over to Ford and I'll get a Bronco. So I start looking at the Broncos, and they range from like 30,000 to 105,000 for a Bronco. Did you know that? That the highest ones are well over 100,000. And so I have to do this major research to find out what features I want between 34,000 and 115,000. There must be some of that that's unnecessary, right? Somewhere in between might be sane. I don't know. So first thing, I have to spend my afternoon doing all this research. Do you think that did me any good? No, because when I contact the dealer they'll only have three of them and they won't be the ones I want. Do you think I can order one? I don't know, maybe. But so yeah, everything is incompetent.

But I think if you buy a robot it'll be like buying a car someday, and it'll ask you what package you want with it. Do I need to connect those dots or are you already with me? They're going to ask you what package you want with it. So when you buy a robot by Mr. Adcock, you can specify what package you want. Okay, moving on.

Rowan Cheung, who talks about AI on X, he's a real good follow if you want to keep up with AI, does a real good job every day. He says that Google's DeepMind unveiled Genie. It's an AI system that can generate interactive video games from just a text or image prompt. It can create an entire functioning video game with a whole realm and world that never existed anywhere, on the fly while you play it. Now that's insane. It's crazy. You know what else it is? It's one step closer to you understanding that you're in a simulation. Yep. And the reason that it gets you closer is as you realize that these simulated worlds can be created on demand. And here's the fun part: in those simulated games they create the past on demand. Let me explain.

So let's say you're in a video game that's just created by AI, and you want to walk through a forest. That forest doesn't exist. It comes into being as you walk through it. But as you walk through it, you get to see a tree that's 50 years old. It actually created the past. Do you get that? By creating the current, which is what it does, it puts things there that have been made historically. The tree, if you started digging in the ground in your simulated game, let's say it was one where you're trying to find a treasure, if you got lucky and you dig in your simulated world and there's a treasure down there, was it down there before you started digging? It wasn't. The past is already being created on demand within the context of a video game.

Sooner or later you're going to realize that's how your real world works. That if you dig a hole in the backyard, unless somebody already dug a hole there, there's nothing below the dirt until you dig, until you need it. It doesn't exist because that's how you would build software. You would just build it to exist when you needed it, including the past.

I don't know how many hints it will take before we all realize we're living in a simulation. But I would think that the fact you can create your own simulation would get you halfway there. I think the double slit experiment, the limit on the size of the universe, the speed of light, Bell's theorem, the fact that there's something called the smallest unit of matter that doesn't make any sense. There can't be a smallest unit of matter because what's that made of? And if the smallest units of matter are all made of the same thing, nothing's going to move. All right. And then of course string theory is going to fail.

But in order to guarantee that we're a simulation, you need to be able to make predictions that work. Would you agree? Having a theory that we're a simulation would be hard to prove unless you could make a prediction that could only be satisfied by a simulation. Right? Yep. So I wonder if anybody's done anything like that. Well, in 2015 I made the prediction that Trump would change more than politics, that he would change the nature of reality itself. And then AI came along because we already realized that everything in politics was subjective. But did you still believe there was something that wasn't subjective before you saw the AI is just a woke biased monster? Did you think to yourself, hey, if we build a robot, at least the robot won't have bias? Do you think that was going to happen?

The reason that we didn't build the robot to be unbiased is that is logically impossible because we don't know what's real. If we knew what was real we could build a robot to know what was real too. Not only can we not build it, and not only do we not agree with what's real, there's no way to check. I'm just unlocking one level at a time here. Click. There's no way to check what's real. We live in a completely subjective reality that may be connected to some fixed reality that we're unaware of. It will become increasingly clear that nothing is real. When we build machines they should be able to figure out what is real and they can't do it and they'll never be able to do it. They can't figure out what's real because there is nothing real. There is only narrative. There might actually be something real that we can't see, but beyond it our actual experience is just narrative, things we make up to live within.

I'll get back to that. I'm going to let that settle in. I'm going to circle back.

Italian TV is mocking Biden. I guess they've had two episodes now where they've got a guy who acts like a demented Biden, and the entire joke is that he's near death and crazy and stupid. Do you remember when one of the biggest problems we were worried about was that other countries wouldn't respect Trump? What do you think they think now? What do you think they think now, now that Trump has been shown to be right about everything, the subject of obvious lawfare, and he's coming back? Well, I bet he's not as embarrassing as Biden.

And let me talk about the dog not barking. I think we all agreed that if Trump could just not cause any new trouble he would just be on a glide path to the presidency. He just has to not ruin it himself. And we wondered if he would have the discipline to be able to pull that off, if he even wanted to try. What do you think now? To me it's becoming increasingly obvious that Trump is playing the winning strategy. He has the winning hand. He just has to not tell people what he has. You just don't show your hand. And all he has to do is be cool. Just be cool. Just do what you do and be cool, and you're the next president for sure.

So I feel like, yeah, and it does feel like maybe vibes and influences again, a positive one. It's really hard to tell somebody as powerful as Trump what works better than what he's doing. You would need to be a great communicator and so smart that he would recognize that it's coming from a good source. That's why we suspect Vance might be helping way more than you can see on the public level. Because the wisdom that Trump is exhibiting looks like a combination of his own thinking plus wisely using feedback from somebody he trusts. That's your perfect combination.

All right, but at least that's just the Italians. It's not like anybody else is making fun of our president, right? Right? Nobody else would do that.

You should, if you would like to learn how to detect lies, watch a 2017 video. I reposted it. It came from the Maze Mo X account. John Brennan testifying about Russia collusion. And watch when he's asked a direct question by Trey Gowdy, and watch his body language. Because the beauty is that we know he's lying now. We didn't know at the time. So if you can find any examples where you can know now that somebody knew they were lying back then, go back and look at it and you'll be able to spot it.

Yeah, let me give you my physical impression of John Brennan answering questions. He had a pen in his hand and he's talking. This happened, this happened. And then he gets the tough question. Definitely what happened is what I'm thinking is I think that the Russians did this. It's really obvious. Just watch his fidgeting, squirming, and he bounces. He starts bouncing when he gets into the stuff that's clearly a lie.

All right. So I would like to disagree with Elon Musk, which is very rare. Hardly ever happens. But I partly agree, and it's about the theory that the thing behind the mass migration is Democrats wanting extra voters and extra census and representation. Now that's certainly true. It's true that they would get a benefit from extra voters. It's certainly true that some of the Democrats have noted it and said it out loud. Is that right? Fact check me. There are Democrats who have said it out loud. So we don't have to wonder if they get some benefit from it.

Here's what I would like to introduce. I don't believe that it's a universal plan that's coming from the top. I believe that the Democrats, who also don't know why it's happening, are putting their own interpretation of why it must be happening. "Oh well, I'm a Democrat. Probably they'll vote Democrat. My leaders are bringing them in, the border's open. Oh, it's to get extra voters." So I think that the Democrats are fooled about the real reason. And I think that Elon Musk, seeing that the Democrats say it out loud, quite reasonably attributes that reason to what we see. Now that's a quite reasonable opinion. They say it, you observe it. It's true that it will create more Democrat voters and it could swing everything. So it's quite reasonable to have that theory.

Here's my theory. If that were true, Biden would have already closed the border because it's not good for him. It's not good for Biden to get reelected. So I believe we have proof that Biden is not in charge. Because nothing could be more clear than Biden should close the border if he wants to get reelected. Would you agree? So it's not coming from a political place because the top guy in the political place couldn't possibly be better off personally to get reelected. Because remember this is a long-term play. Politicians don't think long-term, right? Biden is basically, he's not buying green bananas, if you know what I mean. He's not looking at the long term. He's just trying to get elected. And getting elected, very clearly every Democrat knows it and every Republican knows it, he would just sign an executive order, close the border tomorrow, because we know he can do it. He knows he can do it. Everybody knows he can do it. The fact that he doesn't do it is really strong indication he's not in charge.

So what possible explanation could there be if the top political person who should be wanting it clearly doesn't want it? What else is there? Well, I'm going to go with the obvious, and I'm going to extend this to a larger concept. Everything that's expensive and you don't understand why it's going the way it is is because the CIA or intelligence entities. But I'll just say CIA for short. It seems to me that the most reasonable working assumption is that the CIA, and again I'll just use them for intelligence as a shorthand because there are lots of different entities, but it seems to me they must be coordinating with the cartels to not only control Mexico's government but also to make sure that American interests and manufacturing doesn't get attacked. And it looks like for reasons that are kind of mysterious American interests don't seem to get attacked. And we can conclude that the cartels do run Mexico, the government itself. Because the Mexican military knows where their own border is. If they wanted to control it with Mexican military they would just put their troops there, but they don't. They let the cartels, I say let but that's not what I mean. The cartels control the border. That means they control the country.

Does anybody think that the power that controls the border of the country doesn't control the country? Does anybody think that? That would be ridiculous. So it could be that every time you see a weird distortion where the country is not operating the way you think common sense tells you it should, every bit of your common sense says close the border. Even most Democrats would agree. All common sense, yet it doesn't happen. The only reason I can think of for this and all the other things that don't make sense that are big and expensive is that it's the CIA. And that there's a bigger plan that maybe we don't, and maybe it's a good idea. I don't even know. Maybe it's a good idea.

But imagine the alternative. Let's say the CIA did not work with the cartel. Well, we would not have functional control of the Mexican government, which seems really, really important if they're your neighbor, right? If we didn't control the Mexican government, you don't think Russia would be trying to control it so they could put a little badness on our doorstep just like we do to them? Of course they would. But if you control the cartel and the cartel controls the government, and some Russian guy tries to influence Mexico, what happens? Cartel just kills him and nobody ever hears about it.

So it seems to me obvious that if the CIA is in the business of controlling other countries for the benefit of American interests, usually economic, that we would have to control Mexico. There's no way to do it directly by controlling the government because they're puppets. Instead the best you can do is to partner with, not control, but partner with the cartels and say, look, if you leave our big corporations alone and you let us get what we want in terms of Mexico staying not Russian, then, and I'm just using the Russian thing as an example of anything we don't want, then we'll let you get away with your normal crimes.

Now is there any precedent for that in law enforcement? Has law enforcement ever let somebody like Whitey Bulger do crimes right in front of them because they wanted to control the entity that they controlled? Yeah, isn't Whitey Bulger exactly that example? Right? So and lots of them. There are plenty of examples. So that would actually be a normal thing for our CIA to work with the baddest people in the country, Mexico, for some common interest. Very normal. You would expect so.

My theory is that the idea that Democrats are bringing in extra voters is a CIA cover story for what's really happening. And that it's such a good story that Democrats themselves believe it at the lower levels, but not at the Biden level. At the Biden level he might actually know what's going on.

Now I'm going to make a prediction based on this hypothesis. The prediction is that Trump wins and the cartels are not militarily attacked because he said he would. All the Republicans said they would, but I don't think it's going to happen. I think that you get in office and the CIA sits you down, says here's the deal. If we don't work with the cartels they're going to unleash horrors in this country like you've never seen. The drug traffic will triple and basically we won't own Mexico anymore. They won't cooperate and all the American interests in manufacturing will be at risk. And then they say, so our deal with the devil is we're going to let 100,000 people die of overdoses, but we don't think they're the important people. Right? We don't think they're the important people or we'd protect them. So that's what it looks like to me. Just a hypothesis.

Who do you think was behind ESG, DEI, and wokeness in general? Who was behind that? Now you say to yourself, Scott, that's not the CIA. That sort of came out of Ibram X. Kendi and various people and authors and the WEF, and basically you sort of grew organically and a lot of things. But let me ask you this. Do you think that it got turbocharged by the George Floyd situation? Would you say that's fair to say it was turbocharged by the George Floyd situation? Because you can see it in the data. Like white people just stopped being hired by big corporations. It just stopped, right?

Now who is behind George Floyd? Well, obviously the CIA didn't cause the death. They didn't cause him to be stopped by the police. But what turned George Floyd from an ordinary tragedy, the police action with a tragedy, into the biggest story in the country? Well, the media did, right? The media turned George Floyd, what could have been a story about one person, tragic as it was, it turned into a national story that influences all of our thoughts about everything. How was that done? Well, that was done through social media and the mainstream media making it the biggest story of the year. Why did the mainstream media make it the biggest story of the year? Who controls that? I think the CIA does. Am I wrong? Isn't our media completely subject to what the CIA says is the primary story? Of course it is.

So even all the DEI, ESG, probably it all happened maybe accidentally, but because of the boosting of the George Floyd. Now why would they boost George Floyd? Why would the CIA want to do that? Seems like a bad idea, doesn't it? Well, it would be the number one way to get rid of Trump. It would be the number one way to say, oh all those Republicans who look like Derek Chauvin, look what those whites will do, right? So I believe that George Floyd was really about getting rid of Trump. I believe that it was CIA at least boosted it. It may have had an organic nature to it, but it clearly was boosted like crazy. And I don't believe that any of our top stories are organic. I think our B-level stories that are just sort of interesting are organic, but the top stories I don't think ever are. And the reason is that the CIA can't take that chance. The CIA is in the business of making us think the way they want us to think. They would say for the benefit of the country and to make other countries think the way they want them to think. It's not about the truth. It's about making you think what they want you to think.

So to me it looks like the CIA is the cause of the George Floyd, the racial division, all of the DEI, the massive discrimination against white people. I also wonder if Ibram X. Kendi is organic and natural. Now I don't have any information that would suggest otherwise, but it would be a normal CIA method, as I understand it, to find influencers and to boost influencers that they want to boost. For example, we assume that they boosted Elvis maybe, or well not Elvis, let's say John Wayne. You know, in the old days they'd make the war movies seem awesome so you'd join the military. So I wonder, given the, and let me be honest, Ibram X. Kendi doesn't seem like an intellectual powerhouse. He looks like somebody who must have been boosted by something. You know what I mean? Like Jordan Peterson became a national phenomenon and you listened to him for one minute and you understand why, right? One minute of listening to Jordan Peterson and you automatically know why he's world famous. There's no doubt about it. If you listen to Ibram X. Kendi, now of course I have a cultural block there, but even if you were black and American and you listen to Ibram X. Kendi, would you say that's the smartest guy I've heard lately? I don't know. It feels like he must be boosted because his importance is whack with what he's bringing to the table. Just a theory.

What's behind all the terrible movies, the wokeness? So the CIA probably was behind George Floyd. What about Charlottesville? Remember the Charlottesville hoax? So it was not only a hoax what Trump said about it, which was brought to you by the media. And who controls the media? The CIA. So probably the whole fine people hoax was probably a CIA op. That's my guess. Because all the major media said it was true even though it was obviously not, just totally obviously not true. And that suggests some power behind the throne, power behind the media. CIA. That would be their normal business.

Have you been surprised that there hasn't been a Charlottesville 2? Like what happened to all those people? And aren't there lots more who would want to do a successful march like that from their perspective? It wasn't as successful. You know, hypothetically if they were real and they were actual racists, and a lot of them were, I know a lot of them were for sure they were racists. But if this was a big thing that sort of had its own energy you'd see it again. There'd be another march somewhere. But the fact that it only happened once has op written all over it. Yeah, it doesn't look real.

How about the, we're up to 14 Russian hoaxes, many of them by John Brennan. How many of the Russian hoaxes are just CIA or ex-CIA who basically are still CIA in my opinion? Probably all the Russian hoaxes or maybe half of them or more were just pure CIA. And I think somewhat obviously because Brennan was central to those efforts, you know, the laptop one, etc.

How about all the lawfare against Trump? Do you think the lawfare against Trump is just Democrats knowing what to do? They all sort of know what to do so they just do it. It's like we'll elect us some prosecutors that want to get rid of Trump and then it just happens on its own. Well I would argue that the prosecutors are all funded by Soros. Soros and his organization I believe have a connection to the Atlantic Council which is staffed largely by ex-CIA directors. Soros, the only thing that explains Soros is that he's a CIA asset. Would you agree? The only explanation for Soros is that he's a CIA asset. There's nothing else that makes sense.

So if the CIA wanted to get Trump, how would they do it? They'd have their bank Soros fund a bunch of prosecutors and then they would shop a venue and go after Trump. So I think all of the lawfare is CIA instigated directly or indirectly.

How about the TDS in general and all the other hoaxes? Probably CIA because again they control the media. The media does the hoaxes. If the CIA didn't want the media to present these hoaxes, do you think they would? No. The CIA would call NBC and say this doesn't help us, don't do that one anymore, and it would just stop. It would just stop.

How about the Biden crime family and the fact that it becomes increasingly obvious that, I don't know if it's a crime per se, but that their behavior was sketchy and there was a lot of lying involved. Does it feel to you like the only reason that Biden is president is because the CIA has the goods on him and can control him? And that he was part of the whole Ukraine. Really was a CIA operation and he's knee deep in it. It looks like it to me. Everything about Ukraine can be explained by the CIA. Would you agree? All of it. And we have information now that it's coming out that the CIA was involved since 2014. The Maidan thing, even the shelling of Russians who considered themselves Russians in what was then Ukrainian territory. It all seems to be CIA. So there's that.

How about the Gemini AI and how woke it is? Now do you think I could tie that to the CIA? That'd be quite a stretch, wouldn't it? Watch me do it. The CIA, as we know, has historically, and this is a matter of record, tried to control Hollywood and some celebrities because they know that controlling the media is a good way to control how everybody thinks, etc. We know that they've controlled the news for a long time. We know that they're knee deep in social media companies. We know that AI is the biggest thing coming and will be the most dominant technical force. Do you think there's any chance that the CIA didn't get inside the AI efforts of all the major companies? Of course they do. If they're not doing it they all need to be fired. What are they doing if they're not doing that? That's the most basic thing they should be doing. If the CIA isn't all the way into our AI products and every big company, why aren't they? They better be because that's their main job is to determine how we think and the AI is going to be the main part of that.

Have you noticed that nobody built an AI that can tell the truth? Some of it is because there is no truth, but part of it is that what you see must be what the CIA wants you to see. The fact that Google pulled back Gemini, although I don't know how it's pulled back, it's still there, suggests that maybe they revealed themselves a little bit too obviously. That we are to believe that the intelligence of AI is rising organically. It's not. Everything that's important will be programmed into it because the CIA needs us to believe a certain set of things. We're going to start relying on the AI more and more. So if the AI is not saying what the CIA wants to say, they're going to tell the company to reprogram it until it does. And the company will do it because we have plenty of evidence from the Twitter files that they don't even have to threaten them. They just have to have a meeting with them and they just have to walk in and say, hey, we're the CIA, we'd really like it if you did this thing. What's the company going to do? They got government contracts, right? And they want to keep them. Yeah, they're going to do whatever the CIA wants to do.

How about COVID? Do I need to say anything about that? Moving on.

How about the teachers unions? Have you been puzzled why we can't fix schools and you think it's the teachers unions? Do you think that the teachers unions are completely organic and free from any CIA influence? Doesn't seem possible because we know the CIA likes to control unions. Do you know why? Well, if they're controlling something like the Teamsters or one of those tough unions it's because they can get muscle on the street. But they need to control unions in general because that's where the power is. So my guess is that the CIA must want to control the Democrats through the teachers union. And that requires allowing some slop in how the teachers unions control the education system. So tell me the teachers unions don't look like the border problem. It's a gigantic problem to the country. It seems obvious to every observer that it would be easy to fix, right? But it doesn't get fixed. We can all see the problem and it just keeps lasting forever. That suggests there's somebody behind this throne who wants it to last because they're getting some benefit that's not obvious to you. Who else could it be?

Well, in case you trusted the CIA, here's a report, long thread from Kanekoa the Great, one of the better follows on the X platform. I don't know where Kanekoa gets all his research but wow does he have good stuff pretty much every day. So I'm just going to read this thing here. This thread: The New York Times disclosed yesterday that the CIA built 12 secret spy bases in Ukraine, waging a shadow war against Russia for the past decade. Sort of understand why Putin was a little concerned after a US-supported violent coup toppled Ukraine's democratically elected government. CIA director John Brennan visited Kiev in April of 2014 shortly after the new Ukrainian government launched an "anti-terror operation." Oh, isn't that convenient? Got to get those terrorists. But those terrorists happen to be in the Russian-speaking part of eastern Ukraine. For eight years leading up to Russia's invasion in 2022, Ukraine's government, with help from the CIA, relentlessly bombed eastern Ukraine. Millions of innocent civilians were caught in the crossfire of a geopolitical chess match between Russia and the United States. This is part of the story often ignored by the Western press.

So Ukraine apparently is just CIA trying to take out Putin and always was. And it's exactly what it looked like.

Let's talk about Crimea. NBC journalist, now NBC generally is known as a CIA operation so not sure about this story, but NBC journalist Kier Simmons explained that most Crimeans are pro-Russia. So how exactly would you take it back? And why? The people who live in Crimea don't want to be anywhere but in Russia apparently, at least by some kind of majority.

Christopher Todd Nolan said this. He said a few years ago I made a series of documentaries on the war in Ukraine. This relatively short video is a summary. Well basically saying that an unelected government began killing its own people in the southeast of the country after a visit from Joe Biden and John Brennan. So John Brennan and Joe Biden linked at the hip. Sounds like it. Sounds like they're working together. Do you think Biden is anything but a CIA puppet? It doesn't look like it. It looks like he's just a CIA puppet.

All right, let's talk about some more AI nonsense. The libs of TikTok was posting that Meta's AI, if you ask it to list the presidents of the United States, it will skip Trump. Now I wouldn't believe that except they had a video of the actual screen skipping Trump. And they actually assigned the 45th presidency to Joe Biden and they just left out Trump. Now you might say to yourself, oh that's just like a little bug. No it isn't. No. And I don't believe that they programmed just this question to do it. Let me tell you what is obvious from this. It is obvious the AI has been instructed to ignore Trump-related success. Obviously it ignored it so much that it wouldn't list him as a prior president. What else would do that? What else? There's some kind of general suppression commands or series of commands in Meta AI that very obviously and very clearly is suppressing anything good about Trump anyway. So that's a smoking gun.

Now do you believe that the CIA is not behind that? Do you think the employees came up with that on their own? "Hey let's put some code in there that makes Trump always look bad." Maybe it's possible. It could be just the employees. But I feel like they might have a little help. You know what I mean? I'm suspicious of any gigantic American company that's in the information business and surprisingly got very large very quickly. You know, like Google and Facebook, two examples.

I had a long conversation with Google's Gemini yesterday and I can conclude that it got everything about my story wrong. It did not understand the context of me. It gave the official news account that I'm a big old racist. Now that's permanent. Do I have a legal action? Or because people also believe it is just an ordinary thing. People believe because the news was wrong. Well, apparently Google shares fell. I don't know how they are today. Is Google still down? Their shares fell after their AI generator seemed to make a lot of anti-white images. And there's a question about the organizational incompetence.

There was a commenter Alex Krawitz. He was on CNBC this morning, I guess maybe yesterday, and he said that this Gemini problem is a big deal because it's not just about Gemini making a mistake but it really suggests there's more organizational incompetence within Google. Organizational incompetence.

Now remember I told you that the truth is subjective and the closest you can get to knowing what's true is prediction. Prediction. Did anybody predict that if DEI became the primary DNA of companies that it would guarantee a massive incompetence problem that we hadn't seen before? We all did. We all did. And I hasten to say it has nothing to do with race. It has nothing to do with gender. It's just math. If everybody starts fishing in the same fishing spot at the same time you just run out of fish. That's the entire argument. If there were exactly the same amount of totally qualified people of all types then you could reach diversity without giving anything up. But if you have a shortage of STEM people and management people, etc., and diversity is your primary goal, you will necessarily and in every case promote people who are not ready. Every time. Not sometimes. It's not a risk. It's a guarantee.

And now everybody who has experience in a big company knows that. Those who don't think, Scott, this is the Mark Cuban point of view. Scott, you just have to maybe try a little harder, dig a little deeper, and you can find just as many people in the minority world and female world that can do the job. You just have to put a little effort into it. That is mathematically impossible. It might be possible for his one company to do it. That's actually possible. It's definitely possible for any one company to do it. It is impossible by math for most companies to do it. It guarantees that especially the big ones are going to have massive incompetence problems. Now is that the only problem? Probably not. There are probably other things as well. But it was the most predictable outcome would be massive societal incompetence. We could have predicted that the airplanes would start falling apart in the sky, right? We could have predicted that. In fact I think people did. They predicted it exactly.

Andy Ngo talked, asked Gemini about Antifa, and he was asked about Antifa's violence and it said that labeling Antifa as violent risks perpetuating harmful stereotypes. Says we should consider the justification of their diverse tactics that include the use of political violence. Yeah, maybe that, you know, a little bit of violence. Don't you know, don't say the whole group is violent because there's a little bit of violence sometimes, some of them. But that it might be justified. You know, kind of the justified domestic violence sort of thing. That's what Gemini said to Andy Ngo, who was physically attacked by Antifa. And it told Andy Ngo, yeah maybe that's justified. Maybe he had it coming. Andy, sorry Andy. Google thinks you had it coming.

Well I have a theory about why AI can never be fixed and it's Gell-Mann Amnesia. Now you've heard me talk about this a lot in other contexts. It goes like this. There was a physicist named Gell-Mann and he noticed that when he read the news about physics it was always way off. It was just wrong. But then he turned the page and it'd be a topic he's not an expert in, let's say geopolitical stuff, and he'd say to himself, oh that's probably right. And then one day he realized, wait a minute, if it's always wrong when I know what the truth is, maybe it's always wrong and I just don't know because I don't know the truth in these other domains. And indeed that's what we see. Certainly when I look at the stories about myself are almost always wrong. But who knows it besides me? I'm the only one. You, maybe somebody I know really well. But you, if any of you have ever been in the news you know, right? Have any of you been in the news? You know it's never real. They always get basic things wrong that really matter.

So imagine that it's your job to build AI and you're a technical person and you're not an expert in physics, you're not an expert in lots of things. So you build this AI and then you find out that it agrees with you on a lot, so you think it's pretty smart. And that when it does something that you do understand such as write code you find it quite helpful. So if you're a person who knows code and you make a device that makes code you could look at it and say yeah, you know it's not perfect, I have to tweak it, but wow that really helped me. You know it moved me ahead quite a bit.

Now what happens if the people who are making it see that it tells a story about me that's not quite true? Well they don't know because they believe the same thing that the AI said because they got it from the news and the news is all fake. Let me say this in the funniest way. For thousands of years humans have been lying about everything important in writing, in all of our books and medias and everything else. And then we thought it was a good idea to train an advanced intelligence on a body of work which we know to be all lies. And we built intelligence on a database that we knew were all lies. Now why would we do that? It's Gell-Mann Amnesia. We didn't know they were all lies. We only knew the one thing we knew and then we tweaked it until it worked. Okay it does write code, huh? I write code, it writes code. I make mistakes, it makes mistakes. This is pretty good.

But as soon as it gets into any other domain such as mental health, the people who programmed it are blind. So if the AI says you know I think that prosecutor, one of those Trump prosecutors, is a perfectly capable person, would the programmer say that that was wrong? But if the programmer was also let's say a psychologist and a psychiatrist they might look at that same person and say oh I'm seeing some indications of bad mental health. Could they ever let AI say that? Of course not. So even if AI could see the truth it will be immediately turned off because the people who are programming say ah I got it wrong. I got another wrong thing about this prosecutor because I know that she's not biased. I better change that.

There is no way to get there from here. Where we want to get to is an AI that's smart and unbiased. It's not a technical problem. Let me say that clearly. It's not a technical problem. The problem is with us. The problem is that we created an entire body of work that is mostly lies. It's mostly motivated lies. And then we trained the AI on our motivated lies and we're wondering why it seems biased. It can't be anything else. How are you going to, and who is so smart that they could train it to be unbiased? Who's the unbiased person? I don't know any. How in the world is it going to arrive at an unbiased view of anything? It can't. It can't pull unbiased out of only bias. There's no way that it's built to even manage that situation.

All right, so I think Gell-Mann Amnesia is why we'll never be able to build it and it'll take a long time to realize that it's impossible. So I think one of the big proofs of the simulation will be when we realize that we can't fix AI. Now there's a prediction for you. We will come to realize that this bias problem is unfixable because it was never the technology that was the problem. Everybody get that? The technology is fine. It's doing exactly what they built it to do. They looked at what humans do and built an intelligence based on it. Except the techies didn't realize that all of their news is untrue. Because if you work in Silicon Valley you think well the things I know about aren't always true but the rest of that stuff is true. So I'll just train it on the rest of the stuff. It'll be fine. And I'll just tweak it on the things that I know about and then we got it perfectly unbiased. They will give up on that. They will give up because it is unsolvable logically. It can't be solved. It's not the technology. It's not how they tweak it. And that will get us one step closer to the level where we understand we are a simulation.

In level one of awareness, I call that the child level. In level one of awareness you believe that adults tell you the truth. Santa Claus is real. Okay, tooth fairy is going to put a quarter under your pillow. Sounds good. That's level one, child level one of awareness.

Level two comes when you realize that adults sometimes lie. You say, oh God, there are bad adults and then there are good adults. There's some adults who tell the truth and there's some who lie. That's level two.

Level three is when you understand that reality might be fixed, like there might be an actual reality, but that we don't have access to it and our interpretations of it, our narratives, are purely subjective. So subjective that we literally can't tell if we're the bad guys or the good guys in the story, right? Take Ukraine. Are we the bad guys? Are we the good guys? We don't know. We are so in our subjective worlds that even the most basic questions, are we the bad guys, we can't tell. What about wokeness? Are the people bringing you wokeness the good guys or the bad guys? Depends who you ask. The most basic questions of reality we don't know. And that's level three, where you realize that, wait a minute, maybe everybody's hypnotized. That's level three. But at that point you still believe that it's mostly other people who are having the problem. You believe that you have a thing called common sense and it is protecting you from the problems that other people are having. "Wow it's a good thing I haven't been fooled by that. Yeah I get that there's a difference about whether we're the bad guys or the good guys in these various issues but it's obvious to me. It's obvious to me. So I'm not really part of that. I'm an observer of other people who have subjective problems understanding this base reality. But I'm just on the outside. I'm like this smart observer." That's level three.

Level four is coming. You know what level four is? Once AI has completely proven to us that we are only a narrative-driven species and that we don't know the truth and we don't have access to it and never will, somewhere around that point you're going to become an author. And I don't mean writing books. I mean you're going to start authoring your environment, your actual reality. Now you might only be authoring your subjective impression of what your reality is but it's all you have. If you believe that you won the Olympics and you go through your entire life thinking you did, well you did, even if you didn't.

And I would say that level four, where you realize that nothing's real or at least you don't have access to reality, it's all narrative, we're close in that level. We will also realize that we are a simulation created by a higher entity. Some of you are already there. But we're probably no more than a year or two away from the general consensus being that we're there. It's going to be a lot like thinking the election was rigged. Two-thirds of the country thinks the elections are sketchy. Didn't start out that way. That took five years, two years or so. Well you could say less from 2020.

And I've got a prediction. Well actually I'm going to tell you about a prediction. I've reminded you of this many times but I'm quite aware that it doesn't register like it's something I say and you've heard it before. But until reality caught up with it it didn't make as much sense. In 2015 I told you in public a number of times that Trump would change more than politics. He would change our understanding of reality itself. And then we watched and he did. He brought us all the way to the middle of the third level of awareness. AI is going to take you over the border. AI is what will convince you that you're living in a simulation. Not just the fact that it can create a simulation that's perfectly photorealistic, but we will realize that we can't program the AI to know things about important things because it will just be somebody's opinion. The programmers. That there is no such thing as here are the facts and we all agree on them. If we could just be smarter we'd all agree.

And I would say that that prediction is absolutely true already. You know, not the part about knowing you're in a simulation, but would you agree with the first part of the prediction that Trump ripped a hole in reality and nothing looks the same anymore? Agree? Yeah. Now remember I told you that the closest you can get to reality is prediction. So my next prediction, now that you saw that that one was uncannily right, I don't think anybody's ever made a bolder prediction than that. I actually told you that reality would change while you watched. Who has ever predicted that? Now it was, you know, people were impressed when I said Trump would be president and then he became president. That was impressive. It's nowhere near as impressive as telling you that reality would change while you watched. Those are completely different realms. Yeah, and I nailed that and it was obvious to me.

Now there's a member watching right now who just completed a course in hypnosis. Your head is spinning right now, isn't it? Because once you complete a course in hypnosis you can see all of this. All the things that were just confusing just lock into place and you say, ah, that's why. It was purely subjective and it affects me as well as other people. I'm not exempt. And that's when you enter the simulation.

Speaking of reality, 77% according to Rasmussen of likely US voters believe it is likely Putin hadn't have only murdered, I think that the idea that Ukraine actually, no what is it? Ukraine actually said that he died of natural causes. Yeah, to me that feels a little CIA-ish. All right.

Ladies and gentlemen, to conclude, I don't know what the CIA does and doesn't do. I don't have access to that. I'm just saying that if you're looking for explanations that explain everything, the simulation theory explains a lot. Gell-Mann Amnesia explains a lot. My chart of the more money is involved the more BS and the more lies explains a lot. And the possibility that the CIA and John Brennan specifically is behind a lot of things that you don't understand in politics explains a lot.

And that, ladies and gentlemen, is a show you could not ever see if I had corporate sponsors. This is why I'm a subscription entity. So if you'd like to join the Locals, ScottAdams.locals.com, I would welcome you. And we do more of this that you don't get to see in the morning. All right, that's all for now. Thanks for joining on YouTube and Rumble and the X platform. I will see you tomorrow, same place, same time.

welcome to the highlight of human civilization it's called coffee with Scott Adams and that's what we're going to do in addition to talking about the news and I'm going to boost your level of awareness you're going to take everybody up to a higher level of awareness today challenge accepted and if you'd like to get a good start in this higher level of awareness all you need is a CPP a Mugger a glass a tanker cheler Stein a canteen Jugger flask vessel of any kind fill it with your favorite liquid I like coffee en Joy me now for the unparallel pleasure of the dopamine here the day the thing that makes everything better it's called the simultaneous siping happens now go oh so good now I don't want to get you too excited but there will be a whiteboard a whiteboard huh that's right well let's start with this cool news I saw Brian relli post on X about a uh a portal it's one of the coolest uses of Technology I've seen so if you imagine something that's bigger than a person and a big round circle and the center of the circle is a screen you know a huge personized screen and you could put it in any City and a person could walk up to it and they will see the person in the other portal so it's sort of a hard coat you know it's it's always up and here's the cool thing it has a a translator built in so you can walk up to the portal in let's say Paris or wherever is I guess it's going to be in different places you walk up to the portal in Paris and then somebody on the street in China would see you standing there at the portal and they would walk walk up they would speak in Chinese you would speak in French and you would have a complete conversation in real time now that's insanely cool I don't even know what to say about it it just like it just activates every like hair in my body to stand up don't think about that too long yeah it's just one of the coolest things I like to start the show with just something to imagine and I ask you this couldn't stop war did you ever wonder what would happen if these citizens got to vote on war and actually talk to each other directly hey do you guys want a war because I I feel like we don't really want one over here but our government is kind of pushing us toward us and then the other people in whatever country would say you know I'm glad you talked to me on the portal because uh we're not too crazy about war either how about we just fire our leaders and don't have a war yeah it's actually a threat to the uh threat to power If people could talk to each other uh with translation here's a question for you that I just thought of so I don't know if it's a good one yet give me one second to think if this is a really dumb thing to say no I think it might make sense since we've had good Communications in the world so that would exclude let's say the Civil War war and it would exclude you know the Revolutionary War and those earlier Wars but since we've had internet and since we've had really good you know phones and communication how many wars have there been between the United States and somebody who spoke the same language let's I actual question it's not I'm not being rhetorical there are two now well who would that be cuz Russia doesn't speak English the uh Palestinians I mean so a lot of them have a second language but they're mostly different language and here here's the thing I wonder I wonder if it's possible to have a war between two Nations that speak the same language their original language and have lots of communication um technology where they the citizens can talk to each other now don't give me the Civil War only in modern times when we could in modern now okay I don't want to see anything with 18 in it 1800 and anything is not in this conversation I'm very specifically saying America no Russia plus Ukraine you're not getting this yet America have we gotten in a fight with an English-speaking country and so here's what I'm speculating if Universal translation just becomes part of all of our technology which it looks like it will I mean pretty easy to predict you would be able to directly talk to citizens of any other country that you were considering have a war with and you might actually be able to work it out without the benefit of your government that's actually a possibility that Universal translation plus Universal communication you know the ability to reach anybody could end War because it's very rare that citizens want to be in a war it's not rare when governments want to be in a war just think about it it might actually end War all right maybe and I'm being a little optimistic Don Lemon uh got a settlement from CNN got 24.5 million that's what he would have been paid if he stayed on for his contract um but what do you think of that 24.5 million that's pretty good right do you know how much he takes takes home if he makes 24.5 well he's going to pay over half of it in taxes he's probably going to pay 15% to his agent and God knows how much his lawyer gets because his lawyer is you know putting in some serious high level work here if if I had to guess 24.5 I think you'll Net 7 six or seven yeah so that's probably six in the bank now how many of you did that calculation in your head when you saw the 24 million and how many of you said wow he just made $24 million it's actually closer to six I mean it's a ton of money I'm not I'm not saying it's a small amount I'm just saying that if if you don't have that filter on it you're missing it by you know a factor of four basically but the good news is Don Lemon is going to launch his own show on the xplatform called The Don Lemon show and you know what I'm really excited about it you know as as much as I complained when he was on CNN it was more about being in the CNN uh Channel let me make a prediction my prediction is that Don Lemon without the Yoke of CNN on him is going to be a good show does anybody want to take the other side of that I actually predict it's going to be a good show and that you'll enjoy watching it maybe not every day but I'll bet you it'll be good and the reason I think so is that I don't think he's captured by um you know wokeness that there there is indication from you know earlier video of him before wokeness became crazy that he's just a reasonable person who can see both sides of stuff I would love to be on his show it's the number one show I would like to be invited on so if you if anybody knows him let him know I'd love to talk to him um there's a New York Times writer who says he was uh he was Ed for saying he liked Chick-fil-A sandwiches does that sound true I don't know it sounds like it could be I'm just going to say maybe because it's fun it's not too important so I'm just going to say ah let's let's let's treat it like it's true do you agree let's treat it like it's true because it sounds like something that would be true and here's the reason uh I guess he ended up in an HR or something or maybe his manager talked to him and said uh we don't do that here they hate gay people so you can't say that you like chickfila and be a writer at the D New York Times all right all right so I'm working toward my theme today there will be a theme and we'll see if you can spot it before I tell you what it is but uh that's a hint so Dr.

Phil went on The View and had a little mix up with the view the host of The View about how bad it was that the schools were closed of course I believe that the hosts of The View were in favor of school closures Dr.

Phil gave them a dose of reality now here's what's really fun about Dr.

Phil are you ready I think that because he's been a TV guy and an Oprah an Oprah creation for years that people assume he's left leaning without knowing the truth is that fair assumption that the public doesn't really know that he's not a woke Lefty they probably assume he's just a TV guy he's you know from Oprah's orbit of course he's just going to be sort of a lefty guy but he apparently is now free from all constraints corporate constraints because I because his regular show is over I think he's doing something new I don't know the details but I suspect that he fully owns whatever he's going to do and that means he's free Dr.

Phil just entered the chat now you might say to yourself well that's just one more person you know one more voice no it's Dr.

Phil it's Dr.

Phil it's not just one more voice th this is like a Dr.

Jordan Peterson you know this is like uh Tucker Carlson this is somebody it's like V is somebody whose communication abilities are beyond what you normally see and is able to see all sides of an argument my God Dr.

Phil just entered the chat yes you you got ahead of me this is Dad energy what does Dr.

Phil have more than any human you've ever seen in your entire life more dad energy than I've ever seen name one person who has more pure dad energy than he does nobody right so big uh big Welcome to the um I would like to say that people like me who got cancelled um and then didn't die have made it easier for people who are maybe a little more let's say established maybe they have more you know more to lose or something but I feel like the people who took the arrows in the back uh make it easier for anybody else to join the fight so I hope that's the case uh Byron York is posting telling us about Leticia James you know she's the AG who uh ran for office to bring down Trump and then she found some BS reason to do it and she's posting every day gly the extra gazillion dollars of Interest he has to pay on what he's already um on the line to pay now how disgusting is that that she's bragging about it now some people ask is that even legal and I assume it is legal you know Free Speech I'm I'm good for free speech I think it's legal but it's the most distasteful thing and unethical I think it's unethical for sure but it's so distasteful that it's just mind-boggling now I have a hypothesis which uh speaking of Jordan Peterson I tagged him on my post because it seems to me that a lot of what we think is a difference of opinion is mental health and this to me looks like toxic toxic narcissism you know I'm right right so the fact that she's she ran to bring him down because that was such a popular thing and she'd be such a celebrity and such a star if she did and she also ran on bringing down the NRA because if she did she'd be such a celebrity and such a star and now she's uh doing a dance on Trump's economic Grave by you know posting that to make herself more noticed more of a celebrity more of a star now is there anybody here who actually has experience in mental health uh as in a psychologist or psychiatrist that okay we got at least one two oh okay I got a lot of people listening who have that skill set can you agree or disagree or or if you don't want to have an opinion does it seem to you really obvious that narcissism is her problem I just want to see in the comments do you agree it seems you know you can't to be fair if we're being fair you cannot diagnose a mental health problem in another person from a distance and do it ethically wouldn't be ethical to do it but I'm not a psychiatrist I don't think those ethical standards apply to my observation my observation is that she and fonnie uh and there might be some others maybe Alvin brag are are suffering with some kind of narcissism and that if they were diagnosed they would actually get that diagnosis that's what I think so we keep confusing political opinion and mental health and it's really it's really bad this is very much mental health and you know you see it with the Trans movement there there whatever part of that is based on real people with real problems I don't know I'm not an expert but it's really obvious that a large percentage of it and again I don't know what percentage is just purely mental health purely obviously now uh but I'm no expert right it's just obvious to anybody so we make this mistake over and over again we treat people who literally have mental health problems as if it's just a difference of opinion probably ought to stop doing that Joy Reed somebody just posted a picture of Joy Reed with her new Trump haircut Joy Reed comes off as a mental health problem um uh what's her name uh what's her co-host there who only works on Monday what's her name Rachel Rachel madow yeah so racial mad now she looks always to me like she's literally suffering some kind of psychological breakdown as she talks have you ever seen that you look at her face and she feels like she's being tortured by demons on the inside when she talks now again I'm not a mental health professional but if she not under the care of a professional I'd be really surprised I'd be really surprised if she's not under the care of a professional you know in your private life but again I'm no professional myself so you're free to ignore my observation Eric we Eric Weinstein was talking about physics and he said that I want you to remember this the next time you start talking about peer review and simply using the normal channels fundamental physics theory is being destroyed within our institutions by total nonsense and I don't know why now the I don't know why is is the payoff because if you don't know who I'm talking about Eric uh Eric Weinstein he would know about the insides of you know the physics Community because he's part of that world so he would understand if it's BS all you and I can't tell from the outside necessarily but we could see it he could see it and he's saying there's something wrong now did you ever have the feeling that I had at one point in time gosh I think all this politics is full of lies right I think politics is awful of Lies but thank goodness we still have science because science is not going to be influenced by all these you know Bad characters and Psych olical problems and all that stuff all that bias we get rid of that we got some science well years ago here's a little story I don't think I've ever told you years ago uh maybe when I was in my 30s um I got real interest in physics having no background educational background in physics whatsoever and let me tell you what interested me about physics it looked like it was complete to me that's what got me interested I wasn't interested in the science I was interested in the psychology of how we could get to the point of believing what I believed was obviously not true obviously not true I'm talking about basic reality you know the the the mysterious stuff you know Bell's theorem and you got your spooky action at a distance and we're going to prove that string theory is true any day now but it didn't quite happened and and to me oh and the fact that the Universe has an edge and that the speed of light has a limit and that we're coincidentally here you know Despite All Odds I mean there are just so many things that didn't look real now it could be that the only problem is my low level of understanding of physics but the more I looked into it the more obvious it was that the phys the physicists really didn't understand their own field and I don't know if that's what uh what Eric Weinstein is getting at you know I think his I think his point is a little more nuanced than you know a little more interesting than that but to me it looks like they don't know their own field and I've I've thought that for decades now recently find out that half of all scientific papers are just BS you know people have tested it by making fake papers and seeing if they passed peer review about half of them do and that matches the number that of peer-reviewed studies that can't be reproduced because they're probably not true so science is indeed a ridiculous thing that we pumped up to be more important than it is because it it might be the best we have but that's a long way from being good but you know even though physics is uh sort of sketchy looking at least climate science is real am I right at least we got climate science completely right so next story Michael shellenberger um says there's a author Dr.

Mike Hy I think H lme uh Cambridge climate scientist well he's going to tell some stuff about climate science and and how big of a problem it is let's see he says in his new book oh okay climate emergency is what he calls a noble lie huh a noble lie that that that feels like a like an academic way of saying something else a noble lie well seems like a positive spin on something that some somebody else somebody with orange hair once said about climate change what was that word oh a hoax ladies and gentlemen it's too early to say for sure but the simulation seems to be very intent on lighting up a third act for Trump that is like nothing you've ever seen now I've long predicted that Trump's thirdd act would be proof that the election ction was rigged I don't know if we need proof when 2third of the country says it's obviously true I don't know if he needs proof he got two-thirds of the country to say yeah I think elections are not real that's kind of a big win right and that was all him that was all him one person one person got 2third of the country to not believe our elections are real now you can say to yourself but but but all these other Republicans were saying it too they would have said it if Trump didn't say it if Trump said you know what stand down I think it was fair you know let's accept it his base would have gone along with it I mean we would have you know talked about it forever but we kind of would have accepted it uh it was one person who caused two-thirds of the country to think the elections are rigged now that's my current belief without the benefit of um without the benefit of any proof would you like to see my argument for why I believe that climate change is almost certainly and that our elections are almost certainly and that the war in Ukraine is almost certainly and maybe a few more things and it's all going to be with one graph on one whiteboard and it'll be the most magnificent thing you've ever seen I give you now the explanation for everything that was confusing you I call it the versus money graph if you're listening to this on the lower line of the graph we've got money and then on the other side we've got or lies and uh there's a a hockey stick kind of a graph there showing that the more money is involved the more lies what things are expensive H name something expensive let's see how bet out changing the energy sources of the planet Earth everywhere climate change that's some super expensive stuff huh what do you think happens when things get that expensive right the line goes through the roof because people want some of that money now how about uh Ukraine that Ukraine war is pretty expensive huh have there been any lies about the Ukraine war nothing nothing but war war is the thing you can guarantee is all lies it's also the most expensive thing we do Iraq war all lies all Bs right now uh how about what else do we have here see climate science is expensive and war is expensive how about um how about just the economy in general oh how about Co covid was expensive how about those vaccinations how about Healthcare how about reparations how about college I'm just reading your comments do do you see it yet everything expensive is a lie because it brings out the liars and and it's a system problem wherever there is money there are moths going toward the flame ah there's money there so you're going to get 10 Crooks for every honest person and eventually the 10 Crooks will overwhelm the honest person if you even have one right so and there's no real other way this can go there's not a second way this goes you know that right do you all get that it doesn't go this way sometimes it's every time it doesn't have the option of going any other way as soon as there's enough money it becomes completely corrupt now at a lower level of money maybe you can get away with stuff but once you get to the big numbers it's all lies it's all lies now let us develop that theme a little bit shall we um so the fact that there's a uh Cambridge climate scientist who's coming out and saying that at least the alarm part of climate science is a Li um so that that's fun so it seems to me that the conversation about everything is now far more honest are you all seeing that the the the what do you call it the uh um what's that called the effect with sort of the bounce back or the counter effect it it seems pretty strong there's a whole bunch of people who seem to be able to say the truth now that couldn't the blow a lot more people can talk about the truth all right here's some more evidence that we are living in a simulation uh I watched a video this morning of a robot uh doing a series of tasks sort of autonomously and have you ever noticed that the robots are all naked and they look kind of male like when you see a robot you never think female do you it's always a naked man so this is how you know you're in a simulation I'm watching this robot who looks like a naked guy and it's being U posted by the founder of the company that makes the robot and his name is Brett Adcock so as I'm looking at this naked male robot with no genitalia that was created by a guy named ad coock I said to myself AI robotics I think is an Archer if ation is where he's from um I can't ignore that I cannot ignore that so don't you imagine that buying a robot will be someday like buying a car I was just shopping for a car by the way do you know it's impossible to buy a vehicle has anybody tried to buy a vehicle they don't let you do it anymore I got I go to Toyota to buy a truck there are none on the lot they go oh yeah we don't really keep them here but you can buy one that's in the pipeline and I said oh will the pipeline have ones that are have the features I want well they all have different features oh so the odds of one that's in the pipeline that is not already bought because people are buying them in the pipeline one that's not already bought that also has the features I want what are the odds of that well it's about zero so then I say well then but I could just you know build one yeah I could order one with my specifications right and I'd be willing to wait I'll wait six months I just want to get the truck I want and then the Toyota guy saids we don't do that anymore and I said what don't you do anymore make trucks that people want you say yeah yeah no we just make the trucks we want to make put them in the pipeline and people are buying them so you can't you can't test drive it you can't can't test drive it and you can't order it with the features you want that's a real thing and and the reason they can do that is that all of their trucks are bought as fast as they make them they don't have to do better yeah they don't have to so then I said to myself well heck with Toyota I'll go over to Ford and I'll get a Bronco so I start looking at the Broncos and they range from like $30,000 to $105,000 for Bronco did you know that that the highest ones are well over $100,000 and so I have to do this like major research to find out you know what features I want between $34,000 and $115,000 there must be some of that that's unnecessary right somewhere in between might be sane I don't know so first thing I have to I have to spend my afternoon doing all this research do you think that did me any good no because when I contact the dealer they'll only have three of them and they won't be the ones I want do you think I can order one I don't know maybe but so yeah everything is uh incompetent but I think if you buy a robot it'll be like buying a car someday and it'll ask you what package you want with it do I need to connect those dots or are you already with me they're going to ask you what package you want with it So when you buy a robot by Mr.

Adcock you can specify what package you want okay moving on uh Rowan Chong who talks about AI on exot he's real good follow if you want to keep up with AI does a real good job every day he says that uh Google's deep mind uh unveiled Genie it's a AI system that can generate interactive video games from just a text or image prompt it can create an entire functioning video game with a whole realm and and world that never existed anywhere on the Fly while you play it now that's that's insane it's crazy you know what else it is it's one step closer to you understanding that you're in a simulation yep and the reason that it gets you closer is as you realize that these simulated worlds can be created on demand and here's the fun part in those simulated uh games they create the past on demand let me explain so let's say you're in a video game that's just created by Ai and you want to walk through a forest that Forest doesn't exist it it it comes into being as you walk through it but as you walk through it you get to see a tree that's 50 years old it actually created the past do you get that by creating the the F the current which is what it does it puts things there that have been made historically the tree if if you started digging in the ground in your simulated game let's say it was one where you're trying to find a treasure if you got lucky and you dig in your simulated world and there's a treasure down there was it down there before you started digging it wasn't the past is already being created on demand within the context of a video game sooner or later you're going to realize that's how your real world works that if you dig a hole in the backyard unless somebody already dug a hole there there's nothing below the dirt until you dig until you need it it doesn't exist because that's how you would build software you would just build it to exist when you needed it including the past um I don't know how many hints it will take before we all realize we're living in a simulation but I would think that the fact you can create your own simulation would get you halfway there I think the double slid experiment the limit on the size of the universe the speed of light Bells theorem the fact that there's something called the smallest unit of matter that doesn't make any sense there can't be a smallest unit of matter because what's that made of and if the smallest units of matter are all made of the same thing nothing's going to move all right uh and then of course string theory is going to fail but in order to guarantee that we're a simulation you need to be able to make predictions that work would you agree H having a theory that were a simulation would be hard to prove unless you could make a prediction that could only be satisfied by a simulation right yep so I wonder if anybody's done anything like that well in 2015 I made the prediction that Trump would change more than politics that he would change the nature of reality itself and then AI came along because we were we already realized that um everything in politics was subjective but did you still believe there was something that wasn't subjective before you saw the AI is just a woke biased monster did you think to yourself hey if we build a robot at least the robot won't have bias do you think that was going to happen the reason that we didn't build the robot to be unbiased is that is logically impossible because we don't know what's real if we knew what was real we could build a robot to know what was real too not only can we not build it and not only do we not agree with what's real there's no way to check click I'm just unlocking one level at a time here click there's no way to check what's real we live in a completely subjective reality that may be connected to some fixed reality that we're unaware of it will become increasingly clear that nothing is real when we build machines they should be able to figure out what is real and they can't do it and they'll never be able to do do it they can't figure out what's real because there is nothing real there is only narrative there there might actually be something real that we can't see but beyond it our actual experience is just narrative things we make up to live within I'll get back to that I'm going to let that settle in I'm going to circle back um Italian TV is mocking Biden I guess they've had two episodes now where they've got a guy who acts like A demented Biden and the entire joke is that he's near death and and crazy and stupid do you remember when one of the biggest problems we were worried about was that other countries wouldn't respect Trump what do you think they think now what do you think they think now now that Trump has been shown to be right about everything the subject of obvious lawfare and uh he's coming back well I bet he's not as embarrassing as Biden and let me talk about the dog not barking I think we all agreed that if Trump could just not cause any new trouble he would just he's on a Glide path to the presidency he just has to not ruin it himself and we wondered if he would have the discipline to be able to pull that off if he even wanted to try what do you think now to me it's becoming increasingly obvious that Trump is playing the winning strategy he has the winning hand he just has to not tell people what he has you just don't show your hand and all he has to do is be cool just be cool just do what you do and be cool and you're the next president for sure so I feel like yeah and it does feel like maybe Vives and influences again a positive one it's really hard to tell somebody as powerful As Trump what works better than what he's doing you would need to be a great communicator and so smart that he would recognize that it's coming from a good source that's why we suspect fake might be helping way more than you can see on the public level because the the wisdom that Trump is exhibiting looks like a combination of his own thinking plus wisely using feedback from somebody he trusts that that's your perfect combination all right but at least that's just the uh Italians it's not like anybody else is making fun of our president right right nobody else would do that um you should if you would like to learn how to detect lies watch a 2017 video I reposted it came from The Maze Mo X account uh John Brennan testifying about Russia collusion and watch when he's asked a direct question by Trey gy and watch his body language because the the beauty is that we know he's lying now we didn't know at the time so if you can find any examples where you can know now that somebody knew they were lying back then go back and look at it and you'll be able to spot it yeah let me let me give you my physical impression of John Brennan answering questions he had a pen in his hand and he's he's talking uh this happened this happened and then he gets the tough question um definitely uh what happened is what I'm thinking is I think that the Russians uh did this is really obvious just just watch his fidget squirming and he bounces he starts bouncing when he when he gets into the stuff that's clearly a lie all right um so I would like to um disagree with Elon Musk which is very rare hardly ever happens but I partly agree and it's about the theory that the thing behind the mass migration is Democrats wanting extra voters and extra census and representation now that's certainly true it's true that they would get a benefit from extra voters it's certainly true that some of the Democrats have noted it and set it out loud is that right fact check me there are Democrats who have set it out loud so we don't have to wonder if they get some benefit from it here's what I would like to introduce I don't believe that I don't believe that it's a universal plan that's coming from the top I believe that the Democrats who also don't know why it's happening are putting their own interpretation of why it must be happening oh well I'm a Democrat probably they'll vote Democrat my leaders are bringing them in the borders open oh it's to get extra voters so I think that the Democrats are fooled about the real reason and I think that Elon Musk seeing that the Democrats say it out loud quite reasonably attributes that reason to what we see now that's a quite reasonable opinion they say it You observe it it's true that it will create more Democrat voters and it could swing everything so it's quite reasonable to have that theory here's my theory if that were true Biden would have already closed the Border because it's not good for him it's not good for Biden to get reelected so I believe we have proof that Biden is not in charge because nothing could be more clear than Biden should close the border if he wants to get reelected would you agree so it's not coming from a political place because the the top guy in the political Place couldn't possibly be better off personally to get reelected because remember this is a long-term play politicians don't think long-term right Biden is basically he's not buying you know he's not buying green bananas if you know what I mean he's not looking at the long term he's just trying to get elected and getting elected very clearly every Democrat knows it and every Republican knows it he would just sign an executive Ord close the border tomorrow because we know he can do it he knows he can do it everybody knows he can do it the fact that he doesn't do it is really strong indication he's not in charge so what possible explanation could there be if the top political person who should be wanting it clearly doesn't want it what else is there well I'm going to go with the obvious and I'm going to extend this to to a larger concept everything that's expensive and you don't understand why it's going the way it is is because the CIA or intelligence entities but I'll just say CIA for short it seems to me that the most reasonable working assumption is that the CIA and again I'll just use them for intelligence as a short hand uh because there are lots of different entities but it seems to me they must be coordinating with the cartels to not only control Mexico's government but also to make sure that American interests and Manufacturing doesn't get attacked and it looks like for reasons that are kind of mysterious American interests don't seem to get attacked and we can conclude that the cartels do run Mexico the government itself because the Mex the Mexican military knows where their own border is if they wanted to control it with Mexican military they would just put their troops there but they don't they let the cartels I say let but that's not what I mean the cartels control the border that means they control the country does anybody think that the power that controls the border of the country doesn't control the country does anybody think that that would be ridiculous so it could be that every time you see a weird Distortion where the country is not operating the way you think Common Sense tells you it should every bit of your common sense says close the border even most Democrats would agree all common sense yet it doesn't happen the only reason I can think of for this and all the other things that don't make sense that are big and expensive is that it's the CIA and that there's a bigger plan that maybe we don't and maybe it's a good idea I don't even know maybe it's a good idea but imagine the alternative let's say the CIA did not work with the cartel well we would not have functional control of the Mexican Government which seems really really important if they're your neighbor right if we didn't control the Mexican Government you don't think Russia would be trying to control it so they could put a little Badness on our doorstep just like we do to them of course they would but if you control the cartel and the cartel controls the government and some Russian uh guy tries to influence Mexico what happens cartel just kills him and nobody ever hears about it so it seems to me obvious that if the CIA is in the business of controlling other countries for the benefit of American interests usually economic that we would have to control Mexico there's no way to do it directly by controlling the government because they're puppets instead your best you can do is to partner with not control but partner with the cartels and say look if you leave our big corporations alone and you let us you know get what we want in terms of Mexico staying not Russian then and I'm just using the Russian thing as an example of anything we don't want then we'll let you get away with your normal crimes now is there any precedent for that in let's say law enforcement has Law Enforcement ever let somebody oh like a wey Bulger uh do crimes right in front of them because they wanted to control the The Entity that they controlled yeah isn't it Whitey bulgar is exactly that example right so and lots of them there there are plenty of examples so that would actually be a normal thing for our CIA to work with the baddest people in the country Mexico for some common interest very normal you would expect so my my theory is that the the idea that Democrats are bringing in extra voters is a CIA cover story for what's really happening and that it's such a good story that Democrats themselves believe it at the lower levels but not at the Biden level at the Biden level he might actually know what's going on on now I'm going to make a prediction based on this hypothesis the prediction is that Trump wins and the cartels are not militarily attacked because he said he would all the all the Republicans said they would but I don't think it's going to happen I think that you get an office and the CIA sits you down says here's the deal if we don't work with the cartels they're going to unleash Horrors in this country like you've never seen the drug traffic will triple the and basically we won't own Mexico anymore they won't cooperate and all the American interests in manufacturing will be at risk and then they say so our deal with the Devil is we're going to let 100,000 people die of overdosis but we don't think they're the important people right we don't think they're the important people or we' protect them so that's what it looks like to me just a hypothesis who do you think was behind ESG Dei and wokeness in general who was behind that now you say yourself Scott that's not the CIA that that sort of came out of you know ibam kendi and you know various people and authors and the WF and basically you sort of grew organically and a lot of things but let me ask you this do you think that it got turbocharged by the George Floyd situation would you say that's fair to say it was turbocharged by the George Floyd situation because you can see it in the data like white people just stopped being hired by big corporations it just stopped right now who is behind George Floyd well obviously the CIA didn't cause the the death you know they didn't cause him to be stopped by the police but what turned George Floyd from an ordinary tragedy the police action with a tragedy into the biggest story in the country well the media did right the media turned to George Floyd what could have been a story about one person tragic as it was it turned into a national story that influences all of our thoughts about everything how was that done well that was done through social media and the mainstream media making it the biggest Story of the Year why did the mainstream media make it the biggest Story of the Year who controls that I think the CIA does Am I Wrong isn't our media completely uh subject to what the CIA says is the primary story of course it is so even all the deic ESG probably probably it all happen maybe accidentally but because of the boosting of the the uh George Floyd now why would they boost George Floyd why why would why would the CIA want to do that seems like a bad idea doesn't it well it would be the number one way to get rid of trump it would be the number way number one way to say oh all those Republicans who look like Derek chovin look what th look what those whes will do right so I believe that George Floyd was really about getting rid of trump I believe that it was CIA at least boosted it may it may have had an organic nature to it but it it clearly was boosted like crazy and I don't believe that any of our top stories are organic I think our our B level stories that are just sort of interesting are organic but the top stories I don't think ever are and the reason is that the CIA can't take that chance the CIA is in the business of making us think the way they want us to think they would say for the benefit of the country and to make other countries think the way they want them to think it's not about the truth it's about making you think what they want to think so to me it looks like the CIA is the cause of the George Floyd the racial division uh all of the Dei the massive discrimination against white people I also wonder if ibam kendi is organic and natural now I don't have any information that would suggest otherwise but it would be a normal CA method I as I understand it to find influencers and to boost influencers that they want to boost for example we assume that they boosted Elvis maybe and or well not Elvis let's say John Wayne you know in the old days they'd make the war movies seem awesome so You' join the military so I wonder given the uh and let me be honest Ibraham keny doesn't seem like an intellectual Powerhouse he looks like somebody who must have been boosted by something you know what I mean like Jordan Peterson became a national phenomenon and you listened to him for one minute and you understand why right one minute of listening to Jordan Peterson and you automatically know why he's world famous there's no doubt about it if you listen to Ibraham kendi now of course I I have a cultural uh you know sort of a block there but even if you were if you were black and American and you listen to Ibraham kendi would you say that's the smartest guy I've been I heard lately I don't know if it feels like he must be boosted because his importance is um an a whack with what he's bringing to the table just a theory um what's behind all the terrible movies the wokeness so the CIA probably was behind George Floyd what about um Charlottesville remember the Charlottesville hoax so it was not only hoax what Trump said about it which was brought to you by the media and who controls the media the CIA so probably the whole the fine people oax was probably a CIA op that's my guess because all all the major media said it was true even though it was obviously not just totally obviously not true um and that suggest some power behind the throne power behind the media CIA that that would be their normal business um have you have you been surprised that there hasn't been a Charlottesville 2 like what happened to all those people and aren't there lots more who would you know would want to do a successful March like that from their perspective wasn't as successful it you know hypothetically if they were real and they were actual you know racist and a lot of were I know a lot of them were for sure they were racists but if this was a big thing that sort of had its own energy you'd see it again there'd be another March somewhere but the fact that only happened once has op written all over it yeah it doesn't look real how about the uh we're up to 14 Russian hoaxes uh many of them by John Brennan how many of the Russian hoaxes are just CIA or excia who basically are still CIA in my opinion um probably all the Russian hoaxes or maybe half of them or more were just pure CIA and I think somewhat obviously because Brennan was Central to those efforts you know the laptop one Etc um how about all the lawfare against Trump do you do you think the law fair against Trump is just Democrats knowing what to do they they all sort of know what to do so they just do it it's like uhuh we we'll we'll elect us some prosecutors that you know want to get rid of trump and then it just happens on its own well I would argue that the prosecutors are all funded by Soros Soros and his organization I believe have a connection to the Atlantic Council which is staffed largely by xcia director s Soros the only thing that explains Soros is that he's a CIA asset would you agree the only explanation for Soros is that he's a CIA asset there's nothing else that make sense so if the CIA wanted to get Trump how would they do it they'd have their Bank Soros fund a bunch of prosecutors and then they would shop a venue and go to on Trump so I think all of the law law far is Cia instigated directly or indirectly how about uh the TDS in general and all the other hoaxes probably CIA because again they control the media the media does the hoaxes if the CIA didn't want the media to present these hoaxes do you think they would no the CIA would call NBC and say you this doesn't help us don't do that one anymore and it would just stop it would just stop how about the uh Biden crime family and the fact that it becomes increasingly obvious that I don't know if it's a crime per se but that their behavior was sketchy and there was a lot of lying involved does it feel to you like the only reason that Biden is President is because the CIA has the goods on him and can control him and that he was part of the whole Ukraine really was a CIA operation and he's knee deep in it it looks like it to me everything about Ukraine can be explained by the CIA would you agree all of it and we we have information now that it's coming out that uh the CIA was involved since 2014 the maiden thing the you know the even the shelling of Russians who considered themselves Russians in what was then Ukrainian territory it all seems to be CIA so so there's that how about the uh Gemini Ai and how woke it is now do you think I could tie that to the CIA that that'd be quite a stretch wouldn't it watch me do it the CIA as we know has historically and this is a matter of record tried to control Hollywood and some celebrities because they know that controlling the media is a good way to control how everybody thinks Etc we know that they've controlled the news for a long time we know that they're kneed deep in social media companies we know that AI is the biggest thing coming and will be the most dominant technical Force do you think there's any chance that the CIA didn't get inside the AI efforts of all the major companies of course they do if they if they're not doing it they all need to be fired what are they doing if they're not doing that that's the most basic thing they should be doing if the if the CIA isn't all the way into our AI products and every every big company why aren't they they better be because that's their main job job is to determine how we think and the AI is going to be the main part of that have you noticed that nobody built an AI that can tell the truth some of it is because there is no truth but part of it is that what you see must be what the CIA wants you to see the fact that Google um pulled back Gemini although I don't know how it's pulled back it's still there um suggests that maybe they revealed themselves a little bit too obviously that we we are to believe that the intelligence of AI is rising organically it's not everything that's important will be programmed into it because the CIA needs us to believe a certain set of things we're going to start relying on the AI more and more so if the AI is not saying what the CIA want want to say they're going to tell the company to reprogram it until it does and the company will do it because we have plenty of um evidence from the Twitter files that they don't even have to threaten them they just have to have a meeting with them and they just have to walk in and say hey we the CIA we'd really like it if you did this thing what's the company going to do they got government contracts right and they want to keep them yeah they're going to do whatever the CIS want to do I would all right um how about Co do I need to say anything about that moving on how about the teachers unions have you been puzzled why we can't fix schools and you think it's the teachers unions do you think that the teachers unions are completely organic and free from any uh CIA influence doesn't seem possible because we know the CIA likes to control unions do you know why well if they're controlling something like the teamsters or one of those tough unions it's because they can get muscle on the street but they need to control unions in general because that's where the power is so my guess is that the CIA must want to control the Democrats through the teachers union and that requires allowing some slop in how the teachers unions control the the education system so tell me the teachers unions don't look like the Border problem it's a gigantic problem to the country it seems obvious to every Observer that it would be easy to fix right but it doesn't get fixed we can all see the problem and it just keeps lasting forever that suggests there's somebody behind this Throne who wants it to last because they're getting some benefit that's not obvious to you who else could it be well in case you trusted the CIA here's a report long thread from kakoa the great one of the better follows on the xplatform I don't know where kakoa gets all his research but wow does he have good stuff pretty much every day um so I'm just going to read this thing here this a thread uh the New York Times disclosed yesterday that the CIA built 12 Secret Spy Bases in Ukraine uh waging a shadow war against Russia for the past decade sort of understand why Putin was a little concerned after a US supported violent coup toppled Ukraine's democratically elected government CIA director John Braden visited Kev in April of 2014 shortly after the new Ukrainian government launched an quote anti-terror operation oh isn't that convenient got to get those terrorists but those terrorists happen to be in the Russians speaking uh part of eastern Ukraine H for eight years leading up to Russia's invasion in 20122 Ukraine's government with help from the CIA relentlessly bombed eastern Ukraine H millions of innocent civilians were caught in the crossfire of a geopolitical chess match between Russia and the United States this is part of the story often ignored by the Western press so Ukraine apparently is just CIA trying to take out Putin and always was and it's exactly what it looked like let's talk about ch Mia um NBC journalist Now NBC generally is known as CIA operation so not sure about this story but NBC journalist uh Kier Simmons uh explained that most crimeans are pro- Russia so how exactly would you take it back and why the the people who live in Crimea don't want to be anywhere but in Russia apparently at least by by some kind of majority uh Christopher Todd Nolan said this he said a few years ago I made a series of documentaries on the war in Ukraine this relatively short video is a summary uh well basically saying that uh an unelected government began killing its own people in the southeast of the country after a visit from Joe Biden and John Brennan so J John Brennan and Joe Biden linked at the hip sounds like it sounds like they're working together do do you think Biden is anything but a CIA puppet it doesn't look like it it looks like he's just a CIA puppet all right uh let's talk about some more AI nonsense the libs of Tik Tock uh was posting that uh meta's AI if you ask it to list the presidents of the United States it will skip Trump now I wouldn't believe that except they had a video video of the actual screen scripp skipping Trump and they actually uh assigned the 45th presidency to Joe Biden and they just left down Trump now you might say to yourself oh that's just like a little bug no it isn't no and I don't believe that they programmed just this question to do it let me tell you what is obvious from this it is obvious the AI has been instructed to ignore Trump related success obviously it ignored it so much that it wouldn't list him as a prior president what else would do that what else there's some kind of General suppression commands or series of commands in in meta AI that very obviously and very clearly is suppressing anything good about Trump anyway um so that's a Smoking Gun now do you believe that the CIA is not behind that do you think the employees came up with that on their own hey let's put some code in there that makes Trump always look bad maybe it's possible it could be just the employees but I feel like they might have a little help you know what I mean I'm suspicious of any gigantic American company that's in the information business and surprisingly got very large very quickly you know like Google and Facebook two examples um I had a long conversation with Google's Gemini yesterday and I can conclude that it got everything about my story wrong it did not understand the context of me it gave the official news account that I'm a big old racist now that's permanent do I have a legal action or because people also believe it is just an ordinary thing people believe because the news was wrong well um apparently Google Shares fell I don't know how are they today is Google to still down their shares fell after their AI generator seemed to make um a lot of uh lot of anti-white images and there's a question about the organizational incompetence uh there was a commenter uh Alex uh krowitz he was on CN CNBC this morning I guess maybe yesterday and he said that this the Gemini problem is a big deal because it's not just about Gemini making mistake but it really suggests there's more organizational incompetence within Google organizational incompetence now remember I told you that the truth is subjective and the the closest you can get to knowing what's true is prediction prediction did anybody predict that if Dei became the primary DNA of companies that it would guarantee a massive incompetence problem that we hadn't seen before we all did we all did and I hasten to say it has nothing to do with race it has nothing to do with gender it's just math if everybody starts fishing in the same fishing spot at the same time you just run out of fish that's the entire argument I if there were exactly amount the same amount of totally qualified people of all types then you could reach diversity without giving anything up but if you have a shortage of you know stem people and management people Etc and and diversity is your primary goal you will necessarily and in every case promote people who are not ready every time not sometimes it's not a risk it's a guarantee and now everybody who has experience in a big company knows that those who don't think Scott you this is the Mark Cuban point of view Scott you just have to maybe try a little harder dig a little deeper and you can find just as many people in the you know the minority world and female world that can do the job you just have to you know put a little effort into it that is mathematically impossible it might be possible for his one company to do it that's actually possible it's definitely possible for any one company to do it it is impossible by math for most companies to do it it guarantees that especially the big ones are going to have massive incompetence problems now is that the only problem probably not there probably other things as well but it was the most predictable outcome would be massive societal incompetence we could have predicted that the airplanes would start falling apart in the sky right we could have predicted that in fact I think people did they predicted it exactly uh Andy no talk asked Gemini about antifa um and uh he was asked about antifa's violence and it said that labeling antifa as violent risks perpetuating harmful stereotypes says we should consider the justification of their diverse tactics that include the use ofl political violence yeah maybe that you know a little bit of violence don't you know don't say the whole group is violent because they're a little bit of violence Sometimes some of them um but that it might be justified you know kind of the Justified domestic violence sort of thing that's what Gemini said to Andy know who was physically attacked by antifa and it told Andy no yeah maybe that's Justified maybe had to comeing Andy sorry Andy Google thinks she had it coming well I have a theory about why AI um can never be fixed and it's a Gelman Amnesia now you've heard me talk about this a lot in other contexts it goes like this there was a physic physicist named Gil man and he noticed that when he read the news about physics it was always way off it was just wrong but then he turned the page and be a topic he's not an expert in let's say geopolitical political stuff and he'd say to himself oh that's probably right and then one day he realized wait a minute if it's always wrong when I know what the truth is maybe it's always wrong and I just don't know because I don't know the truth in these other domains and indeed that's what we say um certainly when I look at the stories about myself are almost always wrong but who knows it besides me I'm the only one you maybe somebody I know really well but you you if any of you have ever been in the news you know right have any of you been in the news you know it's never real they always get basic things wrong that really matter so imagine that it's your job to build Ai and you're a technical person and you don't have um you're not an expert in physics you're not an expert in lots of things so you build this Ai and then you find out that it agrees with you on a lot so you think it's pretty smart and that when it does something that you do understand such as write code you find it quite helpful so if you're a person who knows code and you make a device that makes code you could look at it and say yeah you know it's not perfect I to tweak it but wow that really helped me you know it moved me ahead quite a bit now what happens if the people were making it um see that it tells a story about me that's not quite true well they don't know because they believe the same thing that they AI said because they got it from the news and the news is all fake let let me say this in the funniest way for thousands of years humans have been lying about everything important in writing in all of our you know books and Medias and everything else and then we thought it was a good idea to train an advanced intelligence on a body of work which we know to be all lies and we built Intelligence on a DAT base that we knew were all lies now why would we do that it's Gelman Amnesia we didn't know they were all lies we only knew the one thing we knew and then we tweaked it until it worked okay it does write code huh I write code it writes code my you know I make mistakes it makes mistakes this is pretty good but as soon as it gets into any other domain such as mental health the people who programmed it are blind so if the if the AI says you know I think that uh prosecutor one of those Trump prosecutors is a perfectly capable person would the programmer say that that was wrong but if the programmer was also let's say a psychologist and a psychiatrist they might look at that same person and say oh I'm seeing some indications of bad mental health could they ever let AI say that of course not so even if AI could see the truth it will be immediately turned off because the people who are programming say ah I got it wrong I got another wrong thing about this prosecutor because I know that she's not biased I better change that there is no way to get there from here where we want to get to is an AI That's smart and unbiased it's not a technical problem let me say that clearly it's it's not a technical problem the problem is with us the problem is that we created an entire body of work that is mostly lies it's mostly motivated lies and then we trained the AI on our motivated lies and we're wondering why it's unbi why it seems biased it can't be anything else how are you going and who is so smart that they could train it to be unbiased who's the unbiased person I don't know any how in the world is it going to arrive at an unbiased view of anything it can't it can't it can't pull unbiased out of only bias there's no way that it's built to even you know manage that situation all right so I think gal and Amnesia is why we'll never be able to build it and we'll never it'll take a long time to realize that it's impossible so I think one of the the big proofs of the simulation will be when we realize that we can't fix AI now there's a prediction for you we will come to realize that this bias problem is unfixable because it was never the technology that was the problem everybody get that the technology is fine it's doing exactly what they built it to do they looked at what humans do and built an intelligence based on it except the teis didn't realize that all of their news is untrue because if you work in Silicon Valley you think well the things I know about are't always true but the rest of that stuff is true so I'll just train it on the rest of the stuff it'll be fine and I'll just tweak it on the things that I know about and then we got it perfectly unbiased they will give up on that they will give up because it is unsolvable logically it can't be solved it's not the technology it's not how they tweak it and that will get us one closer to the level where we understand we are a simulation in level one of awareness I call that the child level in level one of awareness you believe that adults tell you the truth Santa Claus is real okay uh tooth fair is going to put a quarter under your pillow sounds good that's level one child level one of awareness level two comes when you realize that adults sometimes lie you say oh god there are bad adults and then they're good adults there's some adults who tell the truth and there's some who lie that's level two level three is when you understand that reality might be fixed like there might be an actual reality but that we don't have access to it and our interpretations of it our narratives are purely subjective so subjective that we literally can't tell if we're the bad guys or the good guys in the story right take Ukraine are we the bad guys are we the good guys we don't know we are so we are so um in our subjective worlds that even the most basic questions are we the bad guys we can't tell what about wokeness are the people bringing you wokeness the good guys or the bad guys depends who you ask the most basic questions of reality we don't know and that's that's level three where you realize that wait a minute maybe everybody's hypnotized that's level three but at that point you still believe that it's mostly other people who are having the problem you believe that you have a thing called common sense and it is protecting you from the problems that other people are having wow it's a good thing I haven't been fooled by that yeah I get that there's a difference about whether we're the bad guys or the good guys in these various issues but it's obvious to me it's obvious to me so I'm not really part of that I'm I'm an observer of other people who have subjective problems understanding this base reality but I'm I'm just on the outside I'm like this smart Observer that's level three um level four is coming you know what level four is once AI has completely proven to us that we are only a narrative driven species and that we don't know the truth and we don't have access to it and never well somewhere around that point you're going to become an author and I don't mean writing books I mean you're going to start authoring your environment your actual reality now you might only be authoring your subjective impression of what your reality is but it's all you have if you believe that you won the Olympics and you go through your entire life thinking you did well he did even if he didn't and and I would say that level four where you realize that nothing's real or at least you don't have access to reality it's all it's all narrative we're close in that level we will also realize that we are a simulation created by a higher entity some of you are already there but we're probably no more than a year or two away from the general consensus being that we're there it's going to be a lot like thinking the election was rigged two-thirds of the country thinks the elections are sketchy didn't start out that way that took five years two years or so well you could say you know less from 2020 and I've got a prediction well actually I'm going to tell you about a prediction um I've reminded you of this many times but I'm quite aware that it doesn't register like it's something I say and you've heard it before but until reality caught up with it it didn't make as much sense in 2015 I told you in public a number of times that Trump would change more than politics he would change our understanding of reality itself and then we watched and he did he brought us all the way to the middle of the third level of awareness AI is going to take you over the over the Border AI is what will convince you that you're living in a simulation not just the fact that it can create a simulation that's perfectly you know photorealistic but we will realize that we can't program the AI to know things about important things because will just be somebody's opinion the programmers that there is no such thing as here are the facts and we all agree on them if if we could just be smarter we'd all agree and I would say that that prediction is absolutely true already you know not the part about knowing you're in a simulation but would you agree with the first part of the prediction that Trump ripped a hole in reality and nothing looks the same anymore agree yeah now remember I told you that the closest you can get to reality is prediction so my next prediction now that you saw that that one was uncannily right I don't think anybody's ever made a bolder prediction than that I actually told you that reality would change while you watched who has ever predicted that now it was you know people were impressed when I said Trump would be president and then he became president that was impressive it's nowhere near as impressive as telling you that reality would change while you watched those are completely completely different Realms yeah and I nailed that and it was obvious to me now there's a member watching right now who just completed a course in hypnosis um your head is spinning right now isn't it because once you complete a course in hypnosis you can see all of this all the things that were just confusing just lock into place and you say Ah that's why it was purely subjective and it affects me as well as other people I'm not exempt and that's when you enter the simulation speaking of reality um 77% according to rasmason of likely us voters believe it is likely Putin hadn't have only murdered um I think that the uh the idea that um Ukraine actually no what is it Ukraine's Ukraine actually said that he died of natural causes yeah to me that feels a little CIA is all right ladies and gentlemen um to conclude I don't know what the CIA does and doesn't do I don't have access to that I'm just saying that if you're looking for explanations that explain everything the simulation Theory explains a lot Gman Amnesia explains a lot my chart of the more money is involved the more BS and the more lies explains a lot and the possibility that the CIA and John Brennan specifically is behind a lot of things that you don't understand in politics explains a lot and that ladies and gentlemen is a show you could not ever see if I had corporate sponsors this is why I'm a subscription entity um so if you'd like to join the locals Scott adams.

locals.com I would welcome you and we do more of this uh that you don't get to see in the morning all right that's all for now thanks for joining on You.

Tube and Rumble and the xplatform I will see you tomorrow same place same time

welcome to the highlight of human

civilization it's called coffee with

Scott Adams and that's what we're going

to do in addition to talking about the

news and I'm going to boost your level

of

awareness you're going to take everybody

up to a higher level of awareness

today challenge accepted and if you'd

like to get a good start in this higher

level of awareness all you need is a CPP

a Mugger a glass a tanker cheler Stein a

canteen Jugger flask vessel of any kind

fill it with your favorite liquid I like

coffee en Joy me now for the unparallel

pleasure of the dopamine here the day

the thing that makes everything better

it's called the simultaneous siping

happens now

go oh so

good now I don't want to get you too

excited but there will be a

whiteboard a whiteboard

huh that's right well let's start with

this cool news I saw Brian relli post on

X about a uh a

portal it's one of the coolest uses of

Technology I've seen so if you imagine

something that's bigger than a person

and a big round circle and the center of

the circle is a screen you know a huge

personized

screen and you could put it in any City

and a person could walk up to it and

they will see the person in the other

portal so it's sort of a hard coat you

know it's it's always up and here's the

cool thing it has a a translator built

in so you can walk up to the portal in

let's say Paris or wherever is I guess

it's going to be in different places you

walk up to the portal in Paris and then

somebody on the street in China would

see you standing there at the portal and

they would walk walk up they would speak

in Chinese you would speak in French and

you would have a complete conversation

in real

time now that's insanely

cool I don't even know what to say about

it it just like it just activates every

like hair in my body to stand up don't

think about that too long yeah it's just

one of the coolest things I like to

start the show with just something to

imagine and I ask you this couldn't stop

war did you ever wonder what would

happen if these

citizens got to vote on war and actually

talk to each other directly hey do you

guys want a war because I I feel like we

don't really want one over here but our

government is kind of pushing us toward

us and then the other people in whatever

country would say you know I'm glad you

talked to me on the portal because uh

we're not too crazy about war either how

about we just fire our leaders and don't

have a war

yeah it's actually a threat to the uh

threat to power If people could talk to

each other uh with

translation here's a question for you

that I just thought of so I don't know

if it's a good one yet give me one

second to think if this is a really dumb

thing to

say no I think it might make

sense since we've had good

Communications in the world so that

would exclude let's say the Civil War

war and it would exclude you know the

Revolutionary War and those earlier Wars

but since we've had internet and since

we've had really good you know phones

and

communication how many wars have there

been between the United States and

somebody who spoke the same

language let's I actual question it's

not I'm not being

rhetorical there are two

now well who would that

be cuz Russia doesn't speak

English the uh Palestinians I mean so a

lot of them have a second language but

they're mostly different language and

here here's the thing I wonder I wonder

if it's possible to have a war between

two Nations that speak the same language

their original language and have lots of

communication um technology where they

the citizens can talk to each

other now don't give me the Civil War

only in modern times when we

could in modern now okay I don't want to

see anything with 18 in it 1800 and

anything is not in this conversation I'm

very specifically saying America no

Russia plus Ukraine you're not getting

this yet

America have we gotten in a fight with

an English-speaking

country and so here's what I'm

speculating if Universal translation

just becomes part of all of our

technology which it looks like it will I

mean pretty easy to predict you would be

able to directly talk to citizens of any

other country that you were considering

have a war with and you might actually

be able to work it out without the

benefit of your

government that's actually a possibility

that Universal

translation plus Universal communication

you know the ability to reach anybody

could end War because it's very rare

that citizens want to be in a war it's

not rare when governments want to be in

a

war just think about it it might

actually end

War all right maybe and I'm being a

little optimistic Don Lemon uh got a

settlement from CNN got 24.5 million

that's what he would have been paid if

he stayed on for his

contract um but what do you think of

that 24.5 million that's pretty good

right do you know how much he takes

takes home if he makes

24.5 well he's going to pay over half of

it in

taxes he's probably going to pay 15% to

his

agent and God knows how much his lawyer

gets because his lawyer is you know

putting in some serious high level work

here if if I had to guess

24.5 I think you'll

Net

7 six or

seven yeah so that's probably six in the

bank now how many of you did that

calculation in your head when you saw

the 24 million and how many of you said

wow he just made $24

million it's actually closer to six I

mean it's a ton of money I'm not I'm not

saying it's a small amount I'm just

saying that if if you don't have that

filter on it you're missing it by you

know a factor of four

basically but the good news is Don Lemon

is going to launch his own show on the

xplatform called The Don Lemon show and

you know what I'm really excited about

it you know as as much as I complained

when he was on

CNN it was more about being in the

CNN uh Channel let me make a prediction

my prediction is that Don Lemon without

the Yoke of CNN on him is going to be a

good show does anybody want to take the

other side of

that I actually predict it's going to be

a good show and that you'll enjoy

watching it maybe not every day but I'll

bet you it'll be good and the reason I

think so is that I don't think he's

captured by um you know

wokeness that there there is indication

from you know earlier video of him

before wokeness became crazy that he's

just a reasonable person who can see

both sides of stuff I would love to be

on his show it's the number one show I

would like to be invited on so if you if

anybody knows him let him know I'd love

to talk to him um there's a New York

Times writer who says he was uh he was

Ed for saying he liked Chick-fil-A

sandwiches does that sound true I don't

know it sounds like it could be I'm just

going to say maybe because it's fun it's

not too important so I'm just going to

say ah let's let's let's treat it like

it's true do you agree let's treat it

like it's true because it sounds like

something that would be true and here's

the

reason uh I guess he ended up in an HR

or something or maybe his manager talked

to him and said uh we don't do that here

they hate gay people so you can't say

that you like

chickfila and be a writer at the D New

York

Times all right all right so I'm working

toward my theme today there will be a

theme and we'll see if you can spot it

before I tell you what it is but uh

that's a hint so Dr Phil went on The

View and had a little mix up with the

view the host of The View about how bad

it was that the schools were closed of

course I believe that the hosts of The

View were in favor of school closures Dr

Phil gave them a dose of reality now

here's what's really fun about Dr Phil

are you

ready I think that because he's been a

TV guy and an Oprah an Oprah creation

for years that people assume he's left

leaning without knowing the truth is

that fair assumption that the public

doesn't really know that he's not a woke

Lefty

they probably assume he's just a TV guy

he's you know from Oprah's orbit of

course he's just going to be sort of a

lefty guy but he apparently is now free

from all constraints corporate

constraints because I because his

regular show is over I think he's doing

something new I don't know the details

but I suspect that he fully owns

whatever he's going to do and that means

he's

free Dr

Phil just entered the chat now you might

say to yourself well that's just one

more person you know one more voice no

it's Dr

Phil it's Dr Phil it's not just one more

voice th this is like a Dr Jordan

Peterson you know this is like uh Tucker

Carlson this is somebody it's like V is

somebody whose communication abilities

are beyond what you normally see and is

able to see all sides of an

argument my

God Dr Phil just entered the chat yes

you you got ahead of me this is Dad

energy what does Dr Phil have more than

any human you've ever seen in your

entire

life more dad energy than I've ever seen

name one person who has more pure dad

energy than he does

nobody right so big uh big Welcome to

the

um I would like to say that people like

me who got

cancelled um and then didn't die have

made it easier for people who are maybe

a little

more let's say

established maybe they have more you

know more to lose or something but I

feel like the people who took the arrows

in the back uh make it easier for

anybody else to join the fight so I hope

that's the case

uh Byron York is posting telling us

about Leticia James you know she's the

AG who uh ran for office to bring down

Trump and then she found some BS reason

to do

it and she's posting every day gly the

extra gazillion dollars of Interest he

has to pay on what he's already um on

the line to pay now how disgusting is

that that she's bragging about

it now some people ask is that even

legal and I assume it is legal you know

Free Speech I'm I'm good for free speech

I think it's legal but it's the most

distasteful thing and unethical I think

it's unethical for sure but it's so

distasteful that it's just

mind-boggling now I have a hypothesis

which uh speaking of Jordan Peterson I

tagged him on my post because it seems

to me that a lot of what we think is a

difference of

opinion is mental

health and this to me looks like toxic

toxic

narcissism you know I'm right right so

the fact that she's she ran to bring him

down because that was such a popular

thing and she'd be such a celebrity and

such a star if she did and she also ran

on bringing down the NRA because if she

did she'd be such a celebrity and such a

star and now she's uh doing a dance on

Trump's economic Grave by you know

posting that to make herself more

noticed more of a celebrity more of a

star now is there anybody here who

actually has experience in mental health

uh as in a psychologist or

psychiatrist that okay we got at least

one

two oh okay I got a lot of people

listening who have that skill set can

you agree or disagree or or if you don't

want to have an opinion does it seem to

you really

obvious that narcissism is her

problem I just want to see in the

comments do you agree it seems you know

you can't to be fair if we're being fair

you cannot diagnose a mental health

problem in another person from a

distance and do it ethically wouldn't be

ethical to do it but I'm not a

psychiatrist I don't think those ethical

standards apply to my

observation my

observation is that she and

fonnie uh and there might be some others

maybe Alvin brag are are suffering with

some kind of

narcissism and that if they were

diagnosed they would actually get that

diagnosis that's what I think so we keep

confusing political opinion and mental

health and it's really it's really

bad this is very much mental health and

you know you see it with the Trans

movement there there whatever part of

that is based on real people with real

problems I don't know I'm not an expert

but it's really obvious that a large

percentage of it and again I don't know

what percentage is just purely mental

health purely obviously now uh but I'm

no expert right it's just obvious to

anybody so we make this mistake over and

over again we treat people who literally

have mental health problems as if it's

just a difference of opinion probably

ought to stop doing that Joy Reed

somebody just posted a picture of Joy

Reed with her new Trump haircut Joy Reed

comes off as a mental health

problem

um uh what's her name

uh what's her co-host there who only

works on Monday what's her name Rachel

Rachel

madow yeah so racial mad now she looks

always to me like she's literally

suffering some kind of psychological

breakdown as she talks have you ever

seen that you look at her face and she

feels like she's being tortured by

demons on the inside when she talks now

again I'm not a mental health

professional but if she not under the

care of a professional I'd be really

surprised I'd be really surprised if

she's not under the care of a

professional you know in your private

life but again I'm no professional

myself so you're free to ignore my

observation Eric

we Eric Weinstein was talking about

physics and he said that I want you to

remember this the next time you start

talking about peer review and simply

using the normal

channels fundamental physics theory is

being destroyed within our institutions

by total nonsense and I don't know

why now the I don't know why is is the

payoff because if you don't know who I'm

talking about Eric uh Eric Weinstein he

would

know about the insides of you know the

physics Community because he's part of

that world so he would understand if

it's BS all you and I can't tell from

the outside necessarily but we could see

it he could see it and he's saying

there's something

wrong

now did you ever have the feeling that I

had at one point in time gosh I think

all this politics is full of

lies right I think politics is awful of

Lies but thank goodness we still have

science because science is not going to

be influenced by all these you know Bad

characters and Psych olical problems and

all that stuff all that bias we get rid

of that we got some

science well years ago here's a little

story I don't think I've ever told you

years ago uh maybe when I was in

my

30s um I got real interest in physics

having no background educational

background in physics whatsoever and let

me tell you what interested me about

physics it looked like it was complete

to

me that's what got me interested I

wasn't interested in the science I was

interested in the psychology of how we

could get to the point of believing what

I believed was obviously not true

obviously not true I'm talking about

basic reality you know the the the

mysterious stuff you know Bell's theorem

and you got your spooky action at a

distance and we're going to prove that

string theory is true any day now but it

didn't quite

happened and and to me oh and the fact

that the Universe has an

edge and that the speed of light has a

limit and that we're coincidentally here

you know Despite All Odds I mean there

are just so many things that didn't look

real now it could be that the only

problem is my low level of understanding

of physics but the more I looked into it

the more obvious it was that the phys

the

physicists really didn't understand

their own

field and I don't know if that's what uh

what Eric Weinstein is getting at you

know I think his I think his point is a

little more nuanced than you know a

little more interesting than that but to

me it looks like they don't know their

own field and I've I've thought that for

decades now recently find out that half

of all scientific

papers are just BS

you know people have tested it by making

fake papers and seeing if they passed

peer review about half of them do and

that matches the number that of

peer-reviewed studies that can't be

reproduced because they're probably not

true so science is indeed a ridiculous

thing that we pumped up to be more

important than it is because it it might

be the best we have but that's a long

way from being good

but you know even though physics is uh

sort of sketchy

looking at least climate science is real

am I

right at least we got climate science

completely

right so next story Michael

shellenberger um says there's a author

Dr Mike Hy I think H

lme uh Cambridge climate scientist well

he's going to tell some stuff about

climate science and and how big of a

problem it is let's see he says in his

new book oh okay climate emergency is

what he calls a noble

lie huh a noble

lie that that that feels like a like an

academic way of saying something

else a noble

lie well seems like a positive spin on

something that some somebody else

somebody with orange hair once said

about climate change what was that word

oh a

hoax ladies and

gentlemen it's too early to say for

sure but the simulation seems to be very

intent on lighting up a third act for

Trump that is like nothing you've ever

seen now I've long predicted that

Trump's thirdd act would be proof that

the election ction was

rigged I don't know if we need proof

when 2third of the country says it's

obviously

true I don't know if he needs proof he

got two-thirds of the country to say

yeah I think elections are not

real that's kind of a big win right and

that was all him that was all him one

person one person got 2third of the

country to not believe our elections are

real

[Laughter]

now you can say to yourself but but but

all these other Republicans were saying

it too they would have said it if Trump

didn't say it if Trump said you know

what stand down I think it was fair you

know let's accept

it his base would have gone along with

it I mean we would have you know talked

about it forever but we kind of would

have accepted

it uh it was one person who caused

two-thirds of the country to think the

elections are

rigged now that's my current belief

without the benefit of um without the

benefit of any proof would you like to

see my argument for why I believe that

climate change is almost certainly

and that our

elections are almost certainly

and that the war in

Ukraine is almost certainly

and maybe a few more things

and it's all going to be with one graph

on one whiteboard and it'll be the most

magnificent thing you've ever

seen I give you now the

explanation for everything that was

confusing

you I call it the

versus money graph if you're listening

to this on the lower line of the graph

we've got

money and then on the other side we've

got or

lies and uh there's a a hockey stick

kind of a graph there showing that the

more money is

involved the more

lies what things are expensive H name

something expensive let's see how bet

out changing the energy sources of the

planet Earth everywhere climate change

that's some super expensive stuff huh

what do you think happens when things

get that

expensive right the line goes through

the roof because people want some of

that

money now how about uh

Ukraine that Ukraine war is pretty

expensive

huh have there been any lies about the

Ukraine war nothing nothing but war war

is the thing you can guarantee is all

lies it's also the most expensive thing

we

do Iraq war all lies all Bs right now uh

how about what else do we have here see

climate science is expensive and war is

expensive how about

um how about just the economy in general

oh how about Co covid was expensive how

about those vaccinations

how about

Healthcare how about

reparations how about college I'm just

reading your

comments do do you see it

yet everything expensive is a lie

because it brings out the

liars and and it's a system

problem wherever there is

money there are moths going toward the

flame ah there's money there so you're

going to get 10 Crooks for every honest

person and eventually the 10 Crooks will

overwhelm the honest person if you even

have one right so and there's no real

other way this can

go there's not a second way this goes

you know that right do you all get that

it doesn't go this way

sometimes it's every

time it doesn't have the option of going

any other way as soon as there's enough

money it becomes completely corrupt now

at a lower level of money maybe you can

get away with stuff but once you get to

the big numbers it's all lies it's all

lies now let us develop that theme a

little bit shall

we

um so the fact that there's a uh

Cambridge climate scientist who's coming

out and saying that at least the alarm

part of climate science is a

Li um so that that's fun so it seems to

me that the conversation about

everything is now far more honest are

you all seeing

that the the the what do you call it the

uh um what's that called the effect with

sort of the bounce back or the counter

effect it it seems pretty strong there's

a whole bunch of people who seem to be

able to say the truth now that couldn't

the blow

a lot more people can talk about the

truth all right here's some more

evidence that we are living in a

simulation uh I watched a video this

morning of a robot uh doing a series of

tasks sort of

autonomously and have you ever noticed

that the robots are all

naked and they look kind of

male like when you see a robot you never

think female do

you it's always a naked man so this is

how you know you're in a simulation I'm

watching this robot who looks like a

naked guy and it's being U posted by the

founder of the company that makes the

robot and his name is Brett

Adcock so as I'm looking at this naked

male robot with no

genitalia that was created by a guy

named ad

coock I said to myself AI robotics I

think is an Archer if ation is where

he's from

um I can't ignore that I cannot ignore

that so don't you imagine that buying a

robot will be someday like buying a car

I was just shopping for a car by the way

do you know it's impossible to buy a

vehicle has anybody tried to buy a

vehicle they don't let you do it

anymore I got I go to Toyota to buy a

truck there are none on the lot they go

oh yeah we don't really keep them here

but you can buy one that's in the

pipeline and I said oh will the pipeline

have ones that are have the features I

want well they all have different

features oh so the odds of one that's in

the pipeline that is not already bought

because people are buying them in the

pipeline one that's not already bought

that also has the features I want what

are the odds of that well it's about

zero so then I say well then but I could

just you know build one yeah I could

order one with my specifications

right and I'd be willing to wait I'll

wait six months I just want to get the

truck I want and then the Toyota guy

saids we don't do that anymore and I

said what don't you do anymore make

trucks that people want you say yeah

yeah no we just make the trucks we want

to make put them in the pipeline and

people are buying them so you can't you

can't test drive

it you can't

can't test drive it and you can't order

it with the features you

want that's a real thing and and the

reason they can do that is that all of

their trucks are bought as fast as they

make them they don't have to do

better yeah they don't have to so then I

said to myself well heck with Toyota

I'll go over to Ford and I'll get a

Bronco so I start looking at the

Broncos and they range from like $30,000

to $105,000

for Bronco did you know that that the

highest ones are well over

$100,000 and so I have to do this like

major research to find out you know what

features I want between $34,000 and

$115,000 there must be some of that

that's unnecessary right somewhere in

between might be sane I don't know so

first thing I have to I have to spend my

afternoon doing all this research do you

think that did me any good no because

when I contact the dealer they'll only

have three of them and they won't be the

ones I

want do you think I can order

one I don't know maybe but so yeah

everything is uh incompetent but I think

if you buy a robot it'll be like buying

a car someday and it'll ask you what

package you want with

it do I need to connect those dots or

are you already with me they're going to

ask you what package you want with it So

when you buy a robot by Mr

Adcock you can specify what package you

want okay moving on uh Rowan Chong who

talks about AI on exot he's real good

follow if you want to keep up with AI

does a real good job every

day he says that uh Google's deep

mind uh unveiled Genie it's a AI system

that can generate interactive video

games from just a text or image

prompt it can create an entire

functioning video game with a whole

realm and and world that never existed

anywhere on the Fly while you play

it now that's that's insane it's crazy

you know what else it is it's one step

closer to you understanding that you're

in a

simulation

yep

and the reason that it gets you closer

is as you realize that these simulated

worlds can be

created on

demand and here's the fun part in those

simulated uh

games they create the past on

demand let me explain so let's say

you're in a video game that's just

created by

Ai and you want to walk through a forest

that Forest doesn't exist

it it it comes into being as you walk

through it but as you walk through it

you get to see a tree that's 50 years

old it actually created the

past do you get

that by creating the the F the current

which is what it does it puts things

there that have been made

historically the

tree if if you started digging in the

ground in your simulated game let's say

it was one where you're trying to find a

treasure if you got lucky and you dig in

your simulated world and there's a

treasure down there was it down there

before you started digging it

wasn't the past is already being created

on demand within the context of a video

game sooner or later you're going to

realize that's how your real world works

that if you dig a hole in the backyard

unless somebody already dug a hole there

there's nothing below the dirt until you

dig until you need it it doesn't exist

because that's how you would build

software you would just build it to

exist when you needed it including the

past um I don't know how many hints it

will take before we all realize we're

living in a simulation but I would think

that the fact you can create your own

simulation would get you halfway there I

think the double slid experiment the

limit on the size of the universe the

speed of light Bells theorem the fact

that there's something called the

smallest unit of matter that doesn't

make any sense there can't be a smallest

unit of

matter because what's that made of and

if the smallest units of matter are all

made of the same thing nothing's going

to move all right uh and then of course

string theory is going to fail but in

order to

guarantee that we're a simulation you

need to be able to make predictions

that work would you agree H having a

theory that were a

simulation would be hard to prove unless

you could make a prediction that could

only be satisfied by a

simulation right

yep so I wonder if anybody's done

anything like

that well in

2015 I made the

prediction that Trump would change more

than politics that he would change the

nature of reality

itself and then AI came

along because we were we already

realized that um everything in politics

was

subjective but did you still believe

there was something that wasn't

subjective before you saw the AI is just

a woke biased monster did you think to

yourself hey if we build a robot at

least the robot won't have

bias do you think that was going to

happen the reason that we didn't build

the robot to be unbiased is that is

logically

impossible because we don't know what's

real if we knew what was real we could

build a robot to know what was real too

not only can we not build it and not

only do we not agree with what's real

there's no way to

check click

I'm just unlocking one level at a time

here click there's no way to check

what's real we live in a completely

subjective reality that may be connected

to some fixed reality that we're unaware

of it will become increasingly clear

that nothing is real when we build

machines they should be able to figure

out what is real and they can't do it

and they'll never be able to do do it

they can't figure out what's real

because there is nothing real there is

only

narrative there there might actually be

something real that we can't

see but beyond it our actual experience

is just narrative things we make up to

live

within I'll get back to that I'm going

to let that settle in I'm going to

circle

back um Italian TV is mocking Biden I

guess they've had two episodes now where

they've got a guy who acts like A

demented Biden and the entire joke is

that he's near death and and crazy and

stupid do you remember when one of the

biggest problems we were worried about

was that other countries wouldn't

respect

Trump what do you think they think

now what do you think they think now now

that Trump has been shown to be right

about everything the subject of obvious

lawfare and uh he's coming back

well I bet he's not as embarrassing as

Biden and let me talk about the dog not

barking I think we all agreed that if

Trump could just not cause any new

trouble he would just he's on a Glide

path to the presidency he just has to

not ruin it himself and we wondered if

he would have the discipline to be able

to pull that off if he even wanted to

try what do you think now

to me it's becoming increasingly obvious

that Trump is playing the winning

strategy he has the winning hand he just

has to not tell people what he has you

just don't show your hand and all he has

to do is be

cool just be cool just do what you do

and be cool and you're the next

president for

sure so I feel like yeah and it does

feel like maybe Vives and influences

again a positive

one it's really hard to tell somebody as

powerful As

Trump what works better than what he's

doing you would need to be a great

communicator and so smart that he would

recognize that it's coming from a good

source that's why we suspect fake might

be helping way more than you can see on

the public level because the the wisdom

that Trump is

exhibiting looks like a combination of

his own thinking plus wisely using

feedback from somebody he trusts that

that's your perfect

combination all right but at least

that's just the uh Italians it's not

like anybody else is making fun of our

president right right nobody else would

do

that um you should if you would like to

learn how to detect lies watch a 2017

video I reposted it came from The Maze

Mo X account uh John Brennan testifying

about Russia

collusion and watch when he's asked a

direct question by Trey gy and watch his

body language because the the beauty is

that we know he's lying now we didn't

know at the time so if you can find any

examples where you can know now that

somebody knew they were lying back then

go back and look at it and you'll be

able to spot it yeah let me let me give

you my physical impression of John

Brennan answering

questions he had a pen in his

hand and he's he's talking uh this

happened this happened and then he gets

the tough

question um definitely uh what happened

is what I'm thinking is I think that the

Russians uh did this is really obvious

just just watch his fidget

squirming and he bounces he starts

bouncing when he when he gets into the

stuff that's clearly a

lie all right

um so I would like to um disagree with

Elon Musk which is very rare hardly ever

happens but I partly

agree and it's about the theory that the

thing behind the mass migration is

Democrats wanting extra voters and extra

census and

representation now that's certainly

true it's true that they would get a

benefit from extra voters it's certainly

true that some of the Democrats have

noted it and set it out loud is that

right fact check me there are Democrats

who have set it out loud so we don't

have to wonder if they get some benefit

from it here's what I would like to

introduce

I don't believe

that I don't believe that it's a

universal plan that's coming from the

top I believe that the Democrats who

also don't know why it's happening are

putting their own interpretation of why

it must be happening oh well I'm a

Democrat probably they'll vote Democrat

my leaders are bringing them in the

borders open oh it's to get extra voters

so I think that the

Democrats are fooled about the real

reason and I think that Elon Musk seeing

that the Democrats say it out loud quite

reasonably attributes that reason to

what we see now that's a quite

reasonable

opinion they say it You observe it it's

true that it will create more Democrat

voters and it could swing everything so

it's quite reasonable to have that

theory here's my

theory if that were true

Biden would have already closed the

Border because it's not good for

him it's not good for Biden to get

reelected so I believe we have proof

that Biden is not in charge because

nothing could be more

clear than Biden should close the border

if he wants to get reelected would you

agree so it's not coming from a

political

place because the the top guy in the

political Place couldn't possibly be

better off

personally to get reelected because

remember this is a long-term play

politicians don't think

long-term right Biden is basically he's

not buying you know he's not buying

green bananas if you know what I mean

he's not looking at the long term he's

just trying to get elected and getting

elected very clearly every Democrat

knows it and every Republican knows it

he would just sign an executive Ord

close the border

tomorrow because we know he can do it he

knows he can do it everybody knows he

can do it the fact that he doesn't do it

is really strong indication he's not in

charge so what possible explanation

could there be if the top political

person who should be wanting it clearly

doesn't want it what else is

there well I'm going to go with the

obvious and I'm going to extend this to

to a larger

concept everything that's

expensive and you don't understand why

it's going the way it is is because the

CIA or intelligence entities but I'll

just say CIA for

short it seems to me that the most

reasonable working assumption is that

the CIA and again I'll just use them for

intelligence as a short hand uh because

there are lots of different entities but

it seems to me they must be coordinating

with the

cartels to not only control Mexico's

government but also to make sure that

American interests and Manufacturing

doesn't get

attacked and it looks like for reasons

that are kind of mysterious American

interests don't seem to get

attacked and we can conclude that the

cartels do run Mexico the government

itself because the Mex the Mexican

military knows where their own border

is if they wanted to control it with

Mexican military they would just put

their troops there but they don't they

let the cartels I say let but that's not

what I mean the cartels control the

border that means they control the

country does anybody think that the

power that controls the border of the

country doesn't control the

country does anybody think

that that would be ridiculous so it

could be that every time you see a weird

Distortion where the country is not

operating the way you think Common Sense

tells you it should every bit of your

common sense says close the border even

most Democrats would agree all common

sense yet it doesn't happen the only

reason I can think of for this and all

the other things that don't make sense

that are big and

expensive is that it's the CIA and that

there's a bigger plan that maybe we

don't and maybe it's a good idea I don't

even know maybe it's a good idea but

imagine the

alternative let's say the CIA did not

work with the

cartel well we would not have functional

control of the Mexican Government which

seems really really important if they're

your

neighbor right if we didn't control the

Mexican Government you don't think

Russia would be trying to control it so

they could put a little Badness on our

doorstep just like we do to them of

course they would but if you control the

cartel and the cartel controls the

government and some Russian uh guy tries

to influence Mexico what

happens cartel just kills him and nobody

ever hears about

it so it seems to me

obvious that if the CIA is in the

business of controlling other countries

for the benefit of American interests

usually

economic that we would have to control

Mexico there's no way to do it directly

by controlling the government because

they're puppets instead your best you

can do is to partner with not control

but partner with the cartels and say

look if you leave our big corporations

alone and you let us you know get what

we want in terms of Mexico staying not

Russian then and I'm just using the

Russian thing as an example of anything

we don't

want then we'll let you get away with

your normal crimes

now is there any precedent for that in

let's say law

enforcement has Law Enforcement ever let

somebody oh like a wey

Bulger uh do crimes right in front of

them because they wanted to control the

The Entity that they controlled yeah

isn't it Whitey bulgar is exactly that

example right so and lots of them there

there are plenty of examples so that

would actually be a normal thing for our

CIA to work with the baddest people in

the country Mexico for some common

interest very normal you would expect so

my my theory is that the the idea that

Democrats are bringing in extra voters

is a CIA cover story for what's really

happening and that it's such a good

story that Democrats themselves believe

it at the lower levels but not at the

Biden level at the Biden level he might

actually know what's going on

on now I'm going to make a prediction

based on this

hypothesis the prediction is that Trump

wins and the cartels are not militarily

attacked because he said he would all

the all the Republicans said they would

but I don't think it's going to happen I

think that you get an office and the CIA

sits you down says here's the deal if we

don't work with the cartels they're

going to unleash Horrors in this country

like you've never seen the drug traffic

will

triple the and basically we won't own

Mexico anymore they won't cooperate and

all the American interests in

manufacturing will be at

risk and then they say so our deal with

the Devil is we're going to let 100,000

people die of

overdosis but we don't think they're the

important

people right we don't think they're the

important people or we' protect

them so that's what it looks like to me

just a

hypothesis who do you think was behind

ESG Dei and wokeness in general who was

behind

that now you say yourself Scott that's

not the

CIA that that sort of came out of you

know ibam kendi and you know various

people and authors and the WF and

basically you sort of grew organically

and a lot of things but let me ask you

this do you think that it got

turbocharged by the George Floyd

situation would you say that's fair to

say it was turbocharged by the George

Floyd situation because you can see it

in the data like white people just

stopped being hired by big corporations

it just stopped right now who is behind

George

Floyd well obviously the CIA didn't

cause the the death you know they didn't

cause him to be stopped by the

police but what turned George Floyd from

an ordinary

tragedy the police action with a tragedy

into the biggest story in the

country well the media did right the

media turned to George Floyd what could

have been a story about one person

tragic as it was it turned into a

national story that influences all of

our thoughts about everything how was

that done well that was done through

social

media and the mainstream media making it

the biggest Story of the Year why did

the mainstream media make it the biggest

Story of the Year who controls

that I think the CIA does Am I

Wrong isn't our media

completely uh subject to what the CIA

says is the primary

story of course it is so even all the

deic

ESG

probably probably it all happen maybe

accidentally but because of the boosting

of the the uh George Floyd now why would

they boost George

Floyd why why would why would the CIA

want to do that seems like a bad idea

doesn't it well it would be the number

one way to get rid of trump it would be

the number way number one way to say oh

all those Republicans who look like

Derek chovin

look what th look what those whes will

do right so I believe that George Floyd

was really about getting rid of trump I

believe that it was CIA at least boosted

it may it may have had an organic nature

to it but it it clearly was boosted like

crazy and I don't believe that any of

our top

stories are

organic I think our our B level stories

that are just sort of interesting are

organic but the top stories I don't

think ever are and the reason is that

the CIA can't take that chance the CIA

is in the business of making us think

the way they want us to

think they would say for the benefit of

the

country and to make other countries

think the way they want them to think

it's not about the truth it's about

making you think what they want to think

so to me it looks like the CIA is the

cause of the George Floyd the racial

division uh all of the Dei the massive

discrimination against white people

I also wonder if ibam kendi is organic

and

natural now I don't have any information

that would suggest otherwise but it

would be a normal CA method I as I

understand it to find

influencers and to boost influencers

that they want to boost for example we

assume that they boosted Elvis maybe and

or well not Elvis let's say John Wayne

you know in the old days they'd make the

war movies seem awesome so You' join the

military

so I

wonder given the uh and let me be honest

Ibraham keny doesn't seem like an

intellectual

Powerhouse he looks like somebody who

must have been boosted by

something you know what I mean like

Jordan Peterson became a national

phenomenon and you listened to him for

one minute and you understand why right

one minute of listening to Jordan

Peterson and you automatically know why

he's world

famous there's no doubt about

it if you listen to Ibraham kendi now of

course I I have a cultural uh you know

sort of a block there but even if you

were if you were black and American and

you listen to Ibraham kendi would you

say that's the smartest guy I've been I

heard

lately I don't know if it feels like he

must be

boosted because his importance is um an

a whack with what he's bringing to the

table just a

theory um what's behind all the terrible

movies the wokeness so the CIA probably

was behind George Floyd what about

um

Charlottesville remember the

Charlottesville

hoax so it was not only hoax what Trump

said about

it which was brought to you by the media

and who controls the

media the

CIA so probably the whole the fine

people oax was probably a CIA op that's

my guess because all all the major media

said it was true even though it was

obviously not just totally obviously not

true

um and that suggest some power behind

the throne power behind the media CIA

that that would be their normal business

um have you have you been surprised that

there hasn't been a Charlottesville

2 like what happened to all those people

and aren't there lots more who would you

know would want to do a successful March

like that from their perspective wasn't

as successful it you know hypothetically

if they were real and they were actual

you know racist and a lot of were I know

a lot of them were for sure they were

racists but if this was a big thing that

sort of had its own energy you'd see it

again there'd be another March somewhere

but the fact that only happened once has

op written all over

it yeah it doesn't look

real how about the uh we're up to 14

Russian hoaxes uh many of them by John

Brennan

how many of the Russian hoaxes are just

CIA or

excia who basically are still CIA in my

opinion um probably all the Russian

hoaxes or maybe half of them or more

were just pure

CIA and I think somewhat obviously

because Brennan was Central to those

efforts you know the laptop one

Etc um how about all the lawfare against

Trump

do you do you think the law fair against

Trump is just Democrats knowing what to

do they they all sort of know what to do

so they just do it it's like uhuh we

we'll we'll elect us some prosecutors

that you know want to get rid of trump

and then it just happens on its

own well I would argue that the

prosecutors are all funded by Soros

Soros and his organization I believe

have a connection to the Atlantic

Council which is staffed largely by xcia

director

s Soros the only thing that explains

Soros is that he's a CIA asset would you

agree the only explanation for Soros is

that he's a CIA asset there's nothing

else that make

sense so if the CIA wanted to get Trump

how would they do

it they'd have their Bank Soros fund a

bunch of prosecutors and then they would

shop a

venue and go to on Trump so I think all

of the law law far is Cia instigated

directly or

indirectly how about uh the TDS in

general and all the other

hoaxes probably CIA because again they

control the media the media does the

hoaxes if the CIA didn't want the media

to present these hoaxes do you think

they would

no the CIA would call NBC and say you

this doesn't help us don't do that one

anymore and it would just stop it would

just

stop how about the uh Biden crime family

and the fact that it becomes

increasingly obvious that I don't know

if it's a crime per se but that their

behavior was sketchy and there was a lot

of lying

involved does it feel to you like the

only reason that Biden is President is

because the CIA has the goods on him and

can control him and that he was part of

the whole Ukraine really was a CIA

operation and he's knee deep in it it

looks like it to me everything about

Ukraine can be explained by the CIA

would you

agree all of it and we we have

information now that it's coming out

that uh the CIA was involved since 2014

the maiden thing the you know the even

the shelling of Russians who considered

themselves Russians in what was then

Ukrainian territory it all seems to be

CIA so

so there's

that how about the uh Gemini Ai and how

woke it

is now do you think I could tie that to

the

CIA that that'd be quite a stretch

wouldn't

it watch me do

it the CIA as we know has historically

and this is a matter of record tried to

control Hollywood and some celebrities

because they know that controlling the

media is a good way to control how

everybody thinks Etc we know that

they've controlled the

news for a long time we know that

they're kneed deep in social media

companies we know that AI is the biggest

thing coming and will be the most

dominant technical

Force do you think there's any chance

that the CIA didn't get inside the AI

efforts of all the major

companies of course they do if they if

they're not doing it they all need to be

fired what are they doing if they're not

doing that that's the most basic thing

they should be

doing if the if the CIA isn't all the

way into our AI products and every every

big company why aren't they they better

be because that's their main job job is

to determine how we think and the AI is

going to be the main part of

that have you noticed that nobody built

an AI that can tell the

truth some of it is because there is no

truth but part of it is that what you

see must be what the CIA wants you to

see the fact that Google um pulled back

Gemini although I don't know how it's

pulled back it's still there um

suggests that maybe they revealed

themselves a little bit too

obviously

that we we are to believe that the

intelligence of AI is rising

organically it's

not everything that's important will be

programmed into it because the CIA needs

us to believe a certain set of things

we're going to start relying on the AI

more and more so if the AI is not saying

what the CIA want want to say they're

going to tell the company to reprogram

it until it does and the company will do

it because we have plenty of um evidence

from the Twitter files that they don't

even have to threaten them they just

have to have a meeting with them and

they just have to walk in and say hey we

the CIA we'd really like it if you did

this thing what's the company going to

do they got government contracts right

and they want to keep them yeah they're

going to do whatever the CIS want to do

I

would

all right um how about

Co do I need to say anything about

that moving

on how about the teachers

unions have you been puzzled why we

can't fix schools and you think it's the

teachers unions do you think that the

teachers unions are completely organic

and free from any uh CIA

influence doesn't seem possible

because we know the CIA likes to control

unions do you know why well if they're

controlling something like the teamsters

or one of those tough unions it's

because they can get muscle on the

street but they need to control unions

in general because that's where the

power

is so my guess is that the CIA must want

to control the Democrats through the

teachers union and that

requires allowing some slop in how the

teachers unions control the the

education

system

so tell me the teachers unions don't

look like the Border

problem it's a gigantic problem to the

country it seems obvious to every

Observer that it would be easy to

fix right but it doesn't get fixed we

can all see the problem and it just

keeps lasting

forever that suggests there's somebody

behind this Throne who wants it to last

because they're getting some benefit

that's not obvious to

you who else could it

be well in case you trusted the CIA

here's a report long thread from kakoa

the great one of the better follows on

the xplatform I don't know where kakoa

gets all his research but wow does he

have good stuff pretty much every

day um so I'm just going to read this

thing here this a thread uh the New York

Times disclosed yesterday that the CIA

built 12 Secret Spy Bases in

Ukraine uh waging a shadow war against

Russia for the past

decade sort of understand why Putin was

a little

concerned after a US supported violent

coup toppled Ukraine's democratically

elected government CIA director John

Braden visited Kev in April of 2014

shortly after the new Ukrainian

government launched an quote anti-terror

operation oh isn't that convenient got

to get those terrorists but those

terrorists happen to be in the Russians

speaking uh part of eastern

Ukraine H for eight years leading up to

Russia's invasion in 20122 Ukraine's

government with help from the CIA

relentlessly bombed eastern Ukraine

H millions of innocent civilians were

caught in the crossfire of a

geopolitical chess match between Russia

and the United States this is part of

the story often ignored by the Western

press

so Ukraine apparently is just CIA trying

to take out Putin and always

was and it's exactly what it looked

like let's talk about ch

Mia um NBC journalist Now NBC generally

is known as CIA operation

so not sure about this story but NBC

journalist uh Kier

Simmons uh explained that most crimeans

are pro-

Russia so how exactly would you take it

back and

why the the people who live in Crimea

don't want to be anywhere but in Russia

apparently at least by by some kind of

majority uh Christopher Todd Nolan said

this he said a few years ago I made a

series of documentaries on the war in

Ukraine this relatively short video is a

summary uh well basically saying that uh

an unelected government began killing

its own people in the southeast of the

country after a visit from Joe Biden and

John Brennan so J John Brennan and Joe

Biden linked at the

hip sounds like

it sounds like they're working together

do do you think Biden is anything but a

CIA

puppet it doesn't look like it it looks

like he's just a CIA

puppet all right uh let's talk about

some more AI nonsense the libs of Tik

Tock uh was posting that uh meta's AI if

you ask it to list the presidents of the

United States it will skip

Trump now I wouldn't believe that except

they had a video video of the actual

screen scripp skipping Trump and they

actually uh assigned the 45th

presidency to Joe Biden and they just

left down Trump now you might say to

yourself oh that's just like a little

bug no it

isn't no and I don't believe that they

programmed just this question to do it

let me tell you what is obvious from

this it is obvious the AI has been

instructed to ignore Trump related

success

obviously it ignored it so much that it

wouldn't list him as a prior

president what else would do

that what else there's some kind of

General suppression commands or series

of commands in in meta AI that very

obviously and very clearly is

suppressing anything good about

Trump anyway um so that's a Smoking

Gun now do you believe that the

CIA is not behind that do you think the

employees came up with that on their own

hey let's put some code in there that

makes Trump always look bad maybe it's

possible it could be just the

employees but

I feel like they might have a little

help you know what I mean I'm suspicious

of any gigantic American company that's

in the information business and

surprisingly got very large very quickly

you know like Google and

Facebook two

examples um I had a long conversation

with Google's Gemini yesterday and I can

conclude that it got everything about my

story wrong it did not understand the

context of me it gave the official news

account that I'm a big old

racist now that's permanent do I have a

legal action or because people also

believe it is just an ordinary thing

people believe because the news was

wrong

well um apparently Google Shares fell I

don't know how are they today is Google

to still down their shares fell after

their AI generator seemed to make um a

lot of uh lot of anti-white

images and there's a question about the

organizational incompetence uh there was

a commenter uh Alex uh krowitz he was on

CN CNBC this morning I guess maybe

yesterday and he said that this the

Gemini problem is a big deal because

it's not just about Gemini making

mistake but it really suggests there's

more organizational incompetence within

Google organizational incompetence now

remember I told you that the truth is

subjective and the the closest you can

get to knowing what's true is

prediction prediction did anybody

predict that if Dei became the primary

DNA of companies that it would guarantee

a massive incompetence problem that we

hadn't seen

before we all

did we all did and I hasten to say it

has nothing to do with race it has

nothing to do with gender it's just math

if everybody starts fishing in the same

fishing spot at the same time you just

run out of fish that's the entire

argument I if there were exactly amount

the same amount of totally qualified

people of all types

then you could reach diversity without

giving anything up but if you have a

shortage of you know stem people and

management people Etc and and diversity

is your primary goal you will

necessarily and in every case promote

people who are not ready every time not

sometimes it's not a risk it's a

guarantee and now everybody who has

experience in a big company knows that

those who don't think Scott you this is

the Mark Cuban point of view Scott you

just have to maybe try a little harder

dig a little deeper and you can find

just as many people in the you know the

minority world and female world that can

do the job you just have to you know put

a little effort into

it that is mathematically

impossible it might be possible for his

one company to do it that's actually

possible it's definitely possible for

any one company to do it it is

impossible by math for most companies to

do it it guarantees that especially the

big ones are going to have massive

incompetence problems now is that the

only problem probably not there probably

other things as well but it was the most

predictable outcome would be massive

societal

incompetence we could have predicted

that the airplanes would start falling

apart in the

sky right we could have predicted that

in fact I think people did they

predicted it

exactly uh Andy no talk asked Gemini

about

antifa um and uh he was asked about

antifa's violence and it said that

labeling antifa as violent risks

perpetuating harmful

stereotypes says we should consider the

justification of their diverse tactics

that include the use ofl political

violence yeah maybe that you know a

little bit of violence don't you know

don't say the whole group is violent

because they're a little bit of violence

Sometimes some of them um but that it

might be justified you know kind of the

Justified domestic violence sort of

thing that's what Gemini said to Andy

know who was physically attacked by

antifa and it told Andy no yeah maybe

that's Justified maybe had to comeing

Andy sorry Andy

Google thinks she had it

coming well I have a theory about why AI

um can never be

fixed and it's a Gelman Amnesia now

you've heard me talk about this a lot in

other contexts it goes like this there

was a physic physicist named Gil man and

he noticed that when he read the news

about physics it was always way off it

was just wrong but then he turned the

page and be a topic he's not an expert

in let's say geopolitical political

stuff and he'd say to himself oh that's

probably right and then one day he

realized wait a minute if it's always

wrong when I know what the truth

is maybe it's always wrong and I just

don't know because I don't know the

truth in these other domains and indeed

that's what we say um certainly when I

look at the stories about myself are

almost always wrong but who knows it

besides me I'm the only one you maybe

somebody I know really well but you you

if any of you have ever been in the news

you know right have any of you been in

the news you know it's never real they

always get basic things wrong that

really

matter so imagine that it's your job to

build

Ai and you're a technical person and you

don't have um you're not an expert in

physics you're not an expert in lots of

things so you build this Ai and then you

find out that it agrees with you on a

lot so you think it's pretty

smart and that when it does something

that you do understand such as write

code you find it quite

helpful so if you're a person who knows

code and you make a device that makes

code you could look at it and say yeah

you know it's not perfect I to tweak it

but wow that really helped me you know

it moved me ahead quite a

bit now what happens if the people were

making it um see that it tells a story

about me that's not quite true well they

don't know because they believe the same

thing that they AI said because they got

it from the news and the news is all

fake let let me say this in the funniest

way for thousands of years humans have

been lying about everything important in

writing in all of our you know books and

Medias and everything else and then we

thought it was a good idea to train an

advanced intelligence on a body of work

which we know to be all

lies and we built

Intelligence on a DAT base that we knew

were all lies now why would we do that

it's Gelman

Amnesia we didn't know they were all

lies we only knew the one thing we knew

and then we tweaked it until it worked

okay it does write code huh I write code

it writes code my you know I make

mistakes it makes mistakes this is

pretty

good but as soon as it gets into any

other domain such as mental health the

people who programmed it are

blind so if the if the AI says you know

I think that uh prosecutor one of those

Trump prosecutors is a perfectly capable

person would the programmer say that

that was

wrong but if the programmer was also

let's say a psychologist and a

psychiatrist they might look at that

same person and say oh I'm seeing some

indications of bad mental health could

they ever let AI say that of course not

so even if AI could see the truth it

will be immediately turned off because

the people who are programming say ah I

got it wrong I got another wrong thing

about this prosecutor because I know

that she's not biased I better change

that there is no way to get there from

here where we want to get to is an AI

That's smart and

unbiased it's not a technical

problem let me say that clearly it's

it's not a technical problem the problem

is with us the problem is that we

created an entire body of work that is

mostly

lies it's mostly motivated lies and then

we trained the AI on our motivated lies

and we're wondering why it's unbi why it

seems biased it can't be anything else

how are you going and who is so smart

that they could train it to be

unbiased who's the unbiased person

I don't know any how in the world is it

going to arrive at an unbiased view of

anything it can't it can't it can't pull

unbiased out of only

bias there's no way that it's built to

even you know manage that

situation all right so I think gal and

Amnesia is why we'll never be able to

build it and we'll never it'll take a

long time to realize that it's

impossible so I think one of the the big

proofs of the simulation will be when we

realize that we can't fix

AI now there's a prediction for you we

will come to

realize that this bias problem is

unfixable because it was never the

technology that was the

problem everybody get that the

technology is fine it's doing exactly

what they built it to do they looked at

what humans do and built an intelligence

based on it

except the teis didn't realize that all

of their news is

untrue because if you work in Silicon

Valley you think well the things I know

about are't always true but the rest of

that stuff is true so I'll just train it

on the rest of the stuff it'll be fine

and I'll just tweak it on the things

that I know about and then we got it

perfectly

unbiased they will give up on

that they will give up because it is

unsolvable logically it can't be solved

it's not the technology it's not how

they tweak

it and that will get us one closer to

the level where we understand we are a

simulation in level one of awareness I

call that the child level in level one

of awareness you believe that adults

tell you the truth Santa Claus is real

okay uh tooth fair is going to put a

quarter under your pillow sounds good

that's level one child level one of

awareness level two comes when you

realize that adults sometimes lie you

say oh god there are bad adults and then

they're good adults there's some adults

who tell the truth and there's some who

lie that's level

two level three is when you understand

that reality might be fixed like there

might be an actual

reality but that we don't have access to

it and our interpretations of it our

narratives are purely

subjective so

subjective that we literally can't tell

if we're the bad guys or the good guys

in the

story right take Ukraine are we the bad

guys are we the good

guys we don't know we are so we are so

um in our subjective worlds that even

the most basic questions are we the bad

guys we can't tell what about wokeness

are the people bringing you wokeness the

good guys or the bad

guys depends who you ask the most basic

questions of

reality we don't

know and that's that's level three where

you realize that wait a minute maybe

everybody's

hypnotized that's level three but at

that point you still believe that it's

mostly other people who are having the

problem you believe that you have a

thing called common sense and it is

protecting you from the problems that

other people are having wow it's a good

thing I haven't been fooled by that yeah

I get that there's a difference about

whether we're the bad guys or the good

guys in these various issues but it's

obvious to

me it's obvious to me so I'm not really

part of that I'm I'm an observer of

other people who have subjective

problems understanding this base reality

but I'm I'm just on the outside I'm like

this smart

Observer that's level

three

um level four is

coming you know what level four

is once AI has completely proven to us

that we are only a narrative driven

species and that we don't know the truth

and we don't have access to it and never

well somewhere around that

point you're going to become an

author and I don't mean writing books I

mean you're going to start authoring

your

environment your actual

reality now you might only be authoring

your subjective impression of what your

reality is but it's all you

have if you believe that you won the

Olympics and you go through your entire

life thinking you did well he

did even if he

didn't and and I would say that level

four where you realize that nothing's

real or at least you don't have access

to reality it's all it's all narrative

we're close in that level we will also

realize that we are a simulation created

by a higher

entity some of you are already

there but we're probably no more than a

year or two away from the general

consensus being that we're there it's

going to be a lot like thinking the

election was rigged two-thirds of the

country thinks the elections are sketchy

didn't start out that way that took five

years two years or so well you could say

you know less from

2020 and I've got a

prediction well actually I'm going to

tell you about a prediction

um I've reminded you of this many times

but I'm quite aware that it doesn't

register like it's something I say and

you've heard it before but until reality

caught up with it it didn't make as much

sense in 2015 I told you in public a

number of times that Trump would change

more than politics he would change our

understanding of reality

itself and then we

watched and he did

he brought us all the way to the middle

of the third level of

awareness AI is going to take you over

the over the

Border AI is what will convince

you that you're living in a

simulation not just the fact that it can

create a simulation that's perfectly you

know

photorealistic but we will realize that

we can't program the AI to know things

about important things because will just

be somebody's opinion the programmers

that there is no such thing as here are

the facts and we all agree on them if if

we could just be smarter we'd all

agree and I would say that that

prediction is absolutely true already

you know not the part about knowing

you're in a simulation but would you

agree with the first part of the

prediction that Trump ripped a hole in

reality and nothing looks the same

anymore agree yeah now remember I told

you that the closest you can get to

reality is

prediction so my next prediction now

that you saw that that one

was uncannily right I don't think

anybody's ever made a bolder prediction

than

that I actually told you that reality

would change while you watched who has

ever predicted that

now it was you know people were

impressed when I said Trump would be

president and then he became president

that was

impressive it's nowhere near as

impressive as telling you that reality

would change while you

watched those are completely completely

different Realms yeah and I nailed that

and it was obvious to

me now there's a member watching right

now who just completed a course in

hypnosis

um your head is spinning right now isn't

it because once you complete a course in

hypnosis you can see all of

this all the things that were just

confusing just lock into place and you

say

Ah that's why it was purely

subjective and it affects me as well as

other people I'm not exempt and that's

when you enter the

simulation

speaking of reality um 77% according to

rasmason of likely us voters believe it

is likely Putin hadn't have only

murdered um I think that

the uh the idea that um Ukraine actually

no what is it Ukraine's Ukraine actually

said that he died of natural

causes yeah to me that feels a little

CIA

is all right ladies and gentlemen um to

conclude I don't know what the CIA does

and doesn't do I don't have access to

that I'm just saying that if you're

looking for explanations that explain

everything the simulation Theory

explains a lot Gman Amnesia explains a

lot my chart of the more money is

involved the more BS and the more lies

explains a lot

and the possibility that the CIA and

John Brennan specifically is behind a

lot of things that you don't understand

in

politics explains a lot and that ladies

and gentlemen is a show you could not

ever see if I had corporate sponsors

this is why I'm a subscription

entity um so if you'd like to join the

locals Scott adams. locals.com I would

welcome you and we do more of this uh

that you don't get to see in the morning

all right that's all for now thanks for

joining on YouTube and Rumble and the

xplatform I will see you tomorrow same

place same

time