Episode 2397 CWSA 02/27/24
Get ready to raise your level of awareness, thanks to the news If you would like to enjoy this same content plus bonus content from Scott Adams, including micro-lessons on lots of useful topics to build your talent stack, please see scottadams.locals.com for full access to that secret treasure.
Welcome to the highlight of human civilization. It's called Coffee with Scott Adams, and that's what we're going to do. In addition to talking about the news, I'm going to boost your level of awareness. We're going to take everybody up to a higher level of awareness today. Challe
View segment →nge accepted. And if you'd like to get a good start on this higher level of awareness, all you need is a cup, a mug, or a glass, a tankard, a stein, a canteen, a jug or flask, vessel of any kind. Fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee. Enjoy me now for the unparalleled pleasure of the dop…
View segment →teboard, huh? That's right. Well, let's start with this cool news. I saw Brian Reilly post on X about a portal. It's one of the coolest uses of technology I've seen. So if you imagine something that's bigger than a person, a big round circle, and the center of the circle is a screen, you know, a hu…
View segment →War and it would exclude the Revolutionary War and those earlier wars. But since we've had internet and since we've had really good phones and communication, how many wars have there been between the United States and somebody who spoke the same language? Let's see. Actual question. It's not, I'm n…
View segment →nversation. I'm very specifically saying America. No, Russia plus Ukraine, you're not getting this yet. America. Have we gotten in a fight with an English-speaking country? And so here's what I'm speculating. If universal translation just becomes part of all of our technology, which it looks like i…
View segment →are that citizens want to be in a war. It's not rare when governments want to be in a war. Just think about it. It might actually end war. All right, maybe. And I'm being a little optimistic. Don Lemon got a settlement from CNN, got 24.5 million. That's what he would have been paid if he stayed on…
View segment →s captured by wokeness. There is indication from earlier video of him before wokeness became crazy that he's just a reasonable person who can see both sides of stuff. I would love to be on his show. It's the number one show I would like to be invited on. So if anybody knows him, let him know I'd lov…
View segment →mally see and is able to see all sides of an argument. My God, Dr. Phil just entered the chat. Yes, you got ahead of me. This is dad energy. What does Dr. Phil have more than any human you've ever seen in your entire life? More dad energy than I've ever seen. Name one person who has more pure dad e…
View segment →So we make this mistake over and over again. We treat people who literally have mental health problems as if it's just a difference of opinion. Probably ought to stop doing that. Joy Reid, somebody just posted a picture of Joy Reid with her new Trump haircut. Joy Reid comes off as a mental health p…
View segment →re are just so many things that didn't look real. Now it could be that the only problem is my low level of understanding of physics. But the more I looked into it, the more obvious it was that the physicists really didn't understand their own field. And I don't know if that's what Eric Weinstein is…
View segment →we would have talked about it forever, but we kind of would have accepted it. It was one person who caused two-thirds of the country to think the elections are rigged. Now that's my current belief without the benefit of any proof. Would you like to see my argument for why I believe that climate cha…
View segment →etimes. It's every time. It doesn't have the option of going any other way. As soon as there's enough money, it becomes completely corrupt. Now at a lower level of money maybe you can get away with stuff, but once you get to the big numbers, it's all lies. It's all lies. Now let us develop that th…
View segment →one that's not already bought that also has the features I want, what are the odds of that?" "Well, it's about zero." So then I say, "Well then, but I could just build one." Yeah, I could order one with my specifications, right? And I'd be willing to wait. I'll wait six months. I just want to get t…
View segment →all realize we're living in a simulation. But I would think that the fact you can create your own simulation would get you halfway there. I think the double slit experiment, the limit on the size of the universe, the speed of light, Bell's theorem, the fact that there's something called the smallest…
View segment →and the entire joke is that he's near death and crazy and stupid. Do you remember when one of the biggest problems we were worried about was that other countries wouldn't respect Trump? What do you think they think now? What do you think they think now, now that Trump has been shown to be right abou…
View segment →ing. "Oh well, I'm a Democrat. Probably they'll vote Democrat. My leaders are bringing them in, the border's open. Oh, it's to get extra voters." So I think that the Democrats are fooled about the real reason. And I think that Elon Musk, seeing that the Democrats say it out loud, quite reasonably at…
View segment →cally, and this is a matter of record, tried to control Hollywood and some celebrities because they know that controlling the media is a good way to control how everybody thinks, etc. We know that they've controlled the news for a long time. We know that they're knee deep in social media companies.…
View segment →structed to ignore Trump-related success. Obviously it ignored it so much that it wouldn't list him as a prior president. What else would do that? What else? There's some kind of general suppression commands or series of commands in Meta AI that very obviously and very clearly is suppressing anythin…
View segment →gramming say ah I got it wrong. I got another wrong thing about this prosecutor because I know that she's not biased. I better change that. There is no way to get there from here. Where we want to get to is an AI that's smart and unbiased. It's not a technical problem. Let me say that clearly. It's…
View segment →politics. He would change our understanding of reality itself. And then we watched and he did. He brought us all the way to the middle of the third level of awareness. AI is going to take you over the border. AI is what will convince you that you're living in a simulation. Not just the fact that it…
View segment →Welcome to the highlight of human civilization. It's called Coffee with Scott Adams, and that's what we're going to do. In addition to talking about the news, I'm going to boost your level of awareness. We're going to take everybody up to a higher level of awareness today. Challenge accepted.
And if you'd like to get a good start on this higher level of awareness, all you need is a cup, a mug, or a glass, a tankard, a stein, a canteen, a jug or flask, vessel of any kind. Fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee. Enjoy me now for the unparalleled pleasure of the dopamine hit of the day, the thing that makes everything better. It's called the simultaneous sip. It happens now.
Oh, so good.
Now I don't want to get you too excited, but there will be a whiteboard. A whiteboard, huh? That's right.
Well, let's start with this cool news. I saw Brian Reilly post on X about a portal. It's one of the coolest uses of technology I've seen. So if you imagine something that's bigger than a person, a big round circle, and the center of the circle is a screen, you know, a huge person-sized screen, and you could put it in any city, and a person could walk up to it and they will see the person in the other portal. So it's sort of a portal, you know, it's always up. And here's the cool thing: it has a translator built in.
So you can walk up to the portal in, let's say, Paris or wherever. I guess it's going to be in different places. You walk up to the portal in Paris, and then somebody on the street in China would see you standing there at the portal, and they would walk up. They would speak in Chinese, you would speak in French, and you would have a complete conversation in real time. Now that's insanely cool. I don't even know what to say about it. It just activates every hair in my body to stand up. Don't think about that too long. Yeah, it's just one of the coolest things.
I like to start the show with just something to imagine, and I ask you this: Couldn't this stop war? Did you ever wonder what would happen if these citizens got to vote on war and actually talk to each other directly? "Hey, do you guys want a war? Because I feel like we don't really want one over here, but our government is kind of pushing us toward it." And then the other people in whatever country would say, "You know, I'm glad you talked to me on the portal, because we're not too crazy about war either. How about we just fire our leaders and don't have a war?"
Yeah, it's actually a threat to power if people could talk to each other with translation.
Here's a question for you that I just thought of, so I don't know if it's a good one yet. Give me one second to think if this is a really dumb thing to say. No, I think it might make sense. Since we've had good communications in the world, so that would exclude, let's say, the Civil War and it would exclude the Revolutionary War and those earlier wars. But since we've had internet and since we've had really good phones and communication, how many wars have there been between the United States and somebody who spoke the same language?
Let's see. Actual question. It's not, I'm not being rhetorical. There are two. Now who would that be? Because Russia doesn't speak English. The Palestinians, I mean, so a lot of them have a second language, but they're mostly different language. And here here's the thing. I wonder if it's possible to have a war between two nations that speak the same language, their original language, and have lots of communication technology where the citizens can talk to each other. Now don't give me the Civil War. Only in modern times when we could, in modern. Now, okay, I don't want to see anything with 18 in it. 1800 and anything is not in this conversation. I'm very specifically saying America. No, Russia plus Ukraine, you're not getting this yet. America. Have we gotten in a fight with an English-speaking country?
And so here's what I'm speculating. If universal translation just becomes part of all of our technology, which it looks like it will, I mean pretty easy to predict, you would be able to directly talk to citizens of any other country that you were considering having a war with, and you might actually be able to work it out without the benefit of your government. That's actually a possibility. That universal translation plus universal communication, you know, the ability to reach anybody, could end war. Because it's very rare that citizens want to be in a war. It's not rare when governments want to be in a war. Just think about it. It might actually end war. All right, maybe. And I'm being a little optimistic.
Don Lemon got a settlement from CNN, got 24.5 million. That's what he would have been paid if he stayed on for his contract. But what do you think of that? 24.5 million, that's pretty good, right? Do you know how much he takes home if he makes 24.5? Well, he's going to pay over half of it in taxes. He's probably going to pay 15% to his agent, and God knows how much his lawyer gets because his lawyer is putting in some serious high-level work here. If I had to guess, 24.5, I think you'll net six or seven. Yeah, so that's probably six in the bank.
Now how many of you did that calculation in your head when you saw the 24 million? And how many of you said, "Wow, he just made 24 million"? It's actually closer to six. I mean, it's a ton of money. I'm not saying it's a small amount. I'm just saying that if you don't have that filter on it, you're missing it by a factor of four basically.
But the good news is Don Lemon is going to launch his own show on the X platform called The Don Lemon Show. And you know what? I'm really excited about it. You know, as much as I complained when he was on CNN, it was more about being in the CNN channel. Let me make a prediction. My prediction is that Don Lemon, without the yoke of CNN on him, is going to be a good show. Does anybody want to take the other side of that? I actually predict it's going to be a good show and that you'll enjoy watching it. Maybe not every day, but I'll bet you it'll be good.
And the reason I think so is that I don't think he's captured by wokeness. There is indication from earlier video of him before wokeness became crazy that he's just a reasonable person who can see both sides of stuff. I would love to be on his show. It's the number one show I would like to be invited on. So if anybody knows him, let him know I'd love to talk to him.
There's a New York Times writer who says he was fired for saying he liked Chick-fil-A sandwiches. Does that sound true? I don't know. It sounds like it could be. I'm just going to say maybe because it's fun. It's not too important. So I'm just going to say, ah, let's treat it like it's true. Do you agree? Let's treat it like it's true because it sounds like something that would be true.
And here's the reason. I guess he ended up in an HR or something, or maybe his manager talked to him and said, "We don't do that here. They hate gay people, so you can't say that you like Chick-fil-A and be a writer at the New York Times." All right, all right. So I'm working toward my theme today. There will be a theme, and we'll see if you can spot it before I tell you what it is. But that's a hint.
So Dr. Phil went on The View and had a little mix-up with the hosts of The View about how bad it was that the schools were closed. Of course, I believe that the hosts of The View were in favor of school closures. Dr. Phil gave them a dose of reality.
Now here's what's really fun about Dr. Phil. Are you ready? I think that because he's been a TV guy and an Oprah creation for years, that people assume he's left-leaning without knowing. The truth is that fair assumption that the public doesn't really know that he's not a woke lefty. They probably assume he's just a TV guy. He's from Oprah's orbit, of course he's just going to be sort of a lefty guy. But he apparently is now free from all constraints, corporate constraints, because his regular show is over. I think he's doing something new. I don't know the details, but I suspect that he fully owns whatever he's going to do, and that means he's free.
Dr. Phil just entered the chat. Now you might say to yourself, well that's just one more person, you know, one more voice. No, it's Dr. Phil. It's Dr. Phil. It's not just one more voice. This is like a Dr. Jordan Peterson. This is like Tucker Carlson. This is somebody whose communication abilities are beyond what you normally see and is able to see all sides of an argument. My God, Dr. Phil just entered the chat. Yes, you got ahead of me. This is dad energy.
What does Dr. Phil have more than any human you've ever seen in your entire life? More dad energy than I've ever seen. Name one person who has more pure dad energy than he does. Nobody, right? So big welcome to the, I would like to say that people like me who got canceled and then didn't die have made it easier for people who are maybe a little more established, maybe they have more to lose or something. But I feel like the people who took the arrows in the back make it easier for anybody else to join the fight. So I hope that's the case.
Byron York is posting, telling us about Letitia James. You know, she's the AG who ran for office to bring down Trump, and then she found some BS reason to do it. And she's posting every day the extra gazillion dollars of interest he has to pay on what he's already on the line to pay. Now how disgusting is that, that she's bragging about it? Now some people ask, is that even legal? And I assume it is legal. Free speech. I'm good for free speech. I think it's legal. But it's the most distasteful thing, and unethical. I think it's unethical for sure, but it's so distasteful that it's just mind-boggling.
Now I have a hypothesis, which, speaking of Jordan Peterson, I tagged him on my post, because it seems to me that a lot of what we think is a difference of opinion is mental health. And this to me looks like toxic narcissism. You know what I mean? So the fact that she ran to bring him down because that was such a popular thing and she'd be such a celebrity and such a star if she did, and she also ran on bringing down the NRA because if she did she'd be such a celebrity and such a star, and now she's doing a dance on Trump's economic grave by posting that to make herself more noticed, more of a celebrity, more of a star.
Now is there anybody here who actually has experience in mental health, as in a psychologist or psychiatrist? Okay, we got at least one, two. Oh, okay, I got a lot of people listening who have that skill set. Can you agree or disagree, or if you don't want to have an opinion, does it seem to you really obvious that narcissism is her problem? I just want to see in the comments, do you agree? It seems, you know, you can't, to be fair, if we're being fair, you cannot diagnose a mental health problem in another person from a distance and do it ethically. It wouldn't be ethical to do it. But I'm not a psychiatrist. I don't think those ethical standards apply to my observation. My observation is that she and Fannie, and there might be some others, maybe Alvin Bragg, are suffering with some kind of narcissism, and that if they were diagnosed they would actually get that diagnosis. That's what I think.
So we keep confusing political opinion and mental health, and it's really bad. This is very much mental health. And you know, you see it with the trans movement. Whatever part of that is based on real people with real problems, I don't know. I'm not an expert. But it's really obvious that a large percentage of it, and again I don't know what percentage, is just purely mental health. Purely, obviously. Now, but I'm no expert, right? It's just obvious to anybody. So we make this mistake over and over again. We treat people who literally have mental health problems as if it's just a difference of opinion. Probably ought to stop doing that.
Joy Reid, somebody just posted a picture of Joy Reid with her new Trump haircut. Joy Reid comes off as a mental health problem. What's her name, what's her co-host there who only works on Monday? What's her name? Rachel. Rachel Maddow. Yeah. So Rachel Maddow, she looks always to me like she's literally suffering some kind of psychological breakdown as she talks. Have you ever seen that? You look at her face and she feels like she's being tortured by demons on the inside when she talks. Now again, I'm not a mental health professional, but if she's not under the care of a professional I'd be really surprised. I'd be really surprised if she's not under the care of a professional in your private life. But again I'm no professional myself, so you're free to ignore my observation.
Eric Weinstein was talking about physics, and he said that, I want you to remember this the next time you start talking about peer review and simply using the normal channels, fundamental physics theory is being destroyed within our institutions by total nonsense. And I don't know why. Now the "I don't know why" is the payoff. Because if you don't know who I'm talking about, Eric Weinstein, he would know about the insides of the physics community because he's part of that world. So he would understand if it's BS. All you and I can't tell from the outside necessarily, but we could see it. He could see it, and he's saying there's something wrong.
Now did you ever have the feeling that I had at one point in time? Gosh, I think all this politics is full of lies, right? I think politics is awful, full of lies. But thank goodness we still have science, because science is not going to be influenced by all these bad characters and psychological problems and all that stuff, all that bias. We get rid of that, we got some science. Well, years ago, here's a little story I don't think I've ever told you. Years ago, maybe when I was in my 30s, I got real interest in physics, having no educational background in physics whatsoever.
And let me tell you what interested me about physics. It looked like it was complete to me. That's what got me interested. I wasn't interested in the science. I was interested in the psychology of how we could get to the point of believing what I believed was obviously not true. Obviously not true. I'm talking about basic reality. You know, the mysterious stuff, you know, Bell's theorem, and you got your spooky action at a distance, and we're going to prove that string theory is true any day now, but it didn't quite happen. And to me, oh, and the fact that the universe has an edge, and that the speed of light has a limit, and that we're coincidentally here despite all odds. I mean, there are just so many things that didn't look real.
Now it could be that the only problem is my low level of understanding of physics. But the more I looked into it, the more obvious it was that the physicists really didn't understand their own field. And I don't know if that's what Eric Weinstein is getting at. I think his point is a little more nuanced and a little more interesting than that. But to me it looks like they don't know their own field. And I've thought that for decades now.
Recently I find out that half of all scientific papers are just BS. You know, people have tested it by making fake papers and seeing if they passed peer review. About half of them do. And that matches the number of peer-reviewed studies that can't be reproduced because they're probably not true. So science is indeed a ridiculous thing that we pumped up to be more important than it is. Because it might be the best we have, but that's a long way from being good.
But you know, even though physics is sort of sketchy, at least climate science is real. Am I right? At least we got climate science completely right. So next story. Michael Shellenberger says there's an author, Dr. Mike Hulme, I think, Cambridge climate scientist. Well, he's going to tell some stuff about climate science and how big of a problem it is. Let's see. He says in his new book, climate emergency is what he calls a noble lie. A noble lie. That feels like an academic way of saying something else. A noble lie. Well, seems like a positive spin on something that somebody with orange hair once said about climate change. What was that word? Oh, a hoax.
Ladies and gentlemen, it's too early to say for sure, but the simulation seems to be very intent on lighting up a third act for Trump that is like nothing you've ever seen. Now I've long predicted that Trump's third act would be proof that the election was rigged. I don't know if we need proof when two-thirds of the country says it's obviously true. I don't know if he needs proof. He got two-thirds of the country to say, "Yeah, I think elections are not real." That's kind of a big win, right? And that was all him. That was all him. One person got two-thirds of the country to not believe our elections are real.
Now you can say to yourself, but all these other Republicans were saying it too. They would have said it if Trump didn't say it. If Trump said, you know what, stand down, I think it was fair, let's accept it, his base would have gone along with it. I mean, we would have talked about it forever, but we kind of would have accepted it. It was one person who caused two-thirds of the country to think the elections are rigged. Now that's my current belief without the benefit of any proof.
Would you like to see my argument for why I believe that climate change is almost certainly a lie, and that our elections are almost certainly a lie, and that the war in Ukraine is almost certainly a lie, and maybe a few more things? And it's all going to be with one graph on one whiteboard, and it'll be the most magnificent thing you've ever seen. I give you now the explanation for everything that was confusing you. I call it the money versus lies graph.
If you're listening to this, on the lower line of the graph we've got money, and then on the other side we've got lies. And there's a hockey stick kind of a graph there showing that the more money is involved, the more lies. What things are expensive? Name something expensive. Let's see how about changing the energy sources of the planet Earth everywhere. Climate change. That's some super expensive stuff, huh? What do you think happens when things get that expensive? Right, the line goes through the roof because people want some of that money.
Now how about Ukraine? That Ukraine war is pretty expensive, huh? Have there been any lies about the Ukraine war? Nothing but war. War is the thing you can guarantee is all lies. It's also the most expensive thing we do. Iraq war, all lies, all BS, right? Now how about what else do we have here? See, climate science is expensive and war is expensive. How about just the economy in general? Oh, how about COVID? Was expensive. How about those vaccinations? How about healthcare? How about reparations? How about college?
I'm just reading your comments. Do you see it yet? Everything expensive is a lie because it brings out the liars, and it's a system problem. Wherever there is money, there are moths going toward the flame. Ah, there's money there, so you're going to get 10 crooks for every honest person. And eventually the 10 crooks will overwhelm the honest person, if you even have one. Right? So and there's no real other way this can go. There's not a second way this goes. You know that, right? Do you all get that? It doesn't go this way sometimes. It's every time. It doesn't have the option of going any other way. As soon as there's enough money, it becomes completely corrupt.
Now at a lower level of money maybe you can get away with stuff, but once you get to the big numbers, it's all lies. It's all lies.
Now let us develop that theme a little bit, shall we? So the fact that there's a Cambridge climate scientist who's coming out and saying that at least the alarm part of climate science is a lie, so that's fun. So it seems to me that the conversation about everything is now far more honest. Are you all seeing that? The effect with sort of the bounce back or the counter effect, it seems pretty strong. There's a whole bunch of people who seem to be able to say the truth now that couldn't. A lot more people can talk about the truth.
All right, here's some more evidence that we are living in a simulation. I watched a video this morning of a robot doing a series of tasks sort of autonomously. And have you ever noticed that the robots are all naked and they look kind of male? Like when you see a robot you never think female, do you? It's always a naked man. So this is how you know you're in a simulation. I'm watching this robot who looks like a naked guy, and it's being posted by the founder of the company that makes the robot, and his name is Brett Adcock. So as I'm looking at this naked male robot with no genitalia that was created by a guy named Adcock, I said to myself, AI robotics, I think is an archetype. If that's where he's from, I can't ignore that. I cannot ignore that.
So don't you imagine that buying a robot will be someday like buying a car? I was just shopping for a car, by the way. Do you know it's impossible to buy a vehicle? Has anybody tried to buy a vehicle? They don't let you do it anymore. I go to Toyota to buy a truck. There are none on the lot. They go, "Oh yeah, we don't really keep them here, but you can buy one that's in the pipeline." And I said, "Oh, will the pipeline have ones that have the features I want?" "Well, they all have different features." "Oh, so the odds of one that's in the pipeline that is not already bought, because people are buying them in the pipeline, one that's not already bought that also has the features I want, what are the odds of that?" "Well, it's about zero."
So then I say, "Well then, but I could just build one." Yeah, I could order one with my specifications, right? And I'd be willing to wait. I'll wait six months. I just want to get the truck I want. And then the Toyota guy says, "We don't do that anymore." And I said, "What don't you do anymore? Make trucks that people want?" "Yeah, yeah, no, we just make the trucks we want to make, put them in the pipeline, and people are buying them. So you can't test drive it. You can't order it with the features you want." That's a real thing. And the reason they can do that is that all of their trucks are bought as fast as they make them. They don't have to do better. Yeah, they don't have to.
So then I said to myself, well heck with Toyota, I'll go over to Ford and I'll get a Bronco. So I start looking at the Broncos, and they range from like 30,000 to 105,000 for a Bronco. Did you know that? That the highest ones are well over 100,000. And so I have to do this major research to find out what features I want between 34,000 and 115,000. There must be some of that that's unnecessary, right? Somewhere in between might be sane. I don't know. So first thing, I have to spend my afternoon doing all this research. Do you think that did me any good? No, because when I contact the dealer they'll only have three of them and they won't be the ones I want. Do you think I can order one? I don't know, maybe. But so yeah, everything is incompetent.
But I think if you buy a robot it'll be like buying a car someday, and it'll ask you what package you want with it. Do I need to connect those dots or are you already with me? They're going to ask you what package you want with it. So when you buy a robot by Mr. Adcock, you can specify what package you want. Okay, moving on.
Rowan Cheung, who talks about AI on X, he's a real good follow if you want to keep up with AI, does a real good job every day. He says that Google's DeepMind unveiled Genie. It's an AI system that can generate interactive video games from just a text or image prompt. It can create an entire functioning video game with a whole realm and world that never existed anywhere, on the fly while you play it. Now that's insane. It's crazy. You know what else it is? It's one step closer to you understanding that you're in a simulation. Yep. And the reason that it gets you closer is as you realize that these simulated worlds can be created on demand. And here's the fun part: in those simulated games they create the past on demand. Let me explain.
So let's say you're in a video game that's just created by AI, and you want to walk through a forest. That forest doesn't exist. It comes into being as you walk through it. But as you walk through it, you get to see a tree that's 50 years old. It actually created the past. Do you get that? By creating the current, which is what it does, it puts things there that have been made historically. The tree, if you started digging in the ground in your simulated game, let's say it was one where you're trying to find a treasure, if you got lucky and you dig in your simulated world and there's a treasure down there, was it down there before you started digging? It wasn't. The past is already being created on demand within the context of a video game.
Sooner or later you're going to realize that's how your real world works. That if you dig a hole in the backyard, unless somebody already dug a hole there, there's nothing below the dirt until you dig, until you need it. It doesn't exist because that's how you would build software. You would just build it to exist when you needed it, including the past.
I don't know how many hints it will take before we all realize we're living in a simulation. But I would think that the fact you can create your own simulation would get you halfway there. I think the double slit experiment, the limit on the size of the universe, the speed of light, Bell's theorem, the fact that there's something called the smallest unit of matter that doesn't make any sense. There can't be a smallest unit of matter because what's that made of? And if the smallest units of matter are all made of the same thing, nothing's going to move. All right. And then of course string theory is going to fail.
But in order to guarantee that we're a simulation, you need to be able to make predictions that work. Would you agree? Having a theory that we're a simulation would be hard to prove unless you could make a prediction that could only be satisfied by a simulation. Right? Yep. So I wonder if anybody's done anything like that. Well, in 2015 I made the prediction that Trump would change more than politics, that he would change the nature of reality itself. And then AI came along because we already realized that everything in politics was subjective. But did you still believe there was something that wasn't subjective before you saw the AI is just a woke biased monster? Did you think to yourself, hey, if we build a robot, at least the robot won't have bias? Do you think that was going to happen?
The reason that we didn't build the robot to be unbiased is that is logically impossible because we don't know what's real. If we knew what was real we could build a robot to know what was real too. Not only can we not build it, and not only do we not agree with what's real, there's no way to check. I'm just unlocking one level at a time here. Click. There's no way to check what's real. We live in a completely subjective reality that may be connected to some fixed reality that we're unaware of. It will become increasingly clear that nothing is real. When we build machines they should be able to figure out what is real and they can't do it and they'll never be able to do it. They can't figure out what's real because there is nothing real. There is only narrative. There might actually be something real that we can't see, but beyond it our actual experience is just narrative, things we make up to live within.
I'll get back to that. I'm going to let that settle in. I'm going to circle back.
Italian TV is mocking Biden. I guess they've had two episodes now where they've got a guy who acts like a demented Biden, and the entire joke is that he's near death and crazy and stupid. Do you remember when one of the biggest problems we were worried about was that other countries wouldn't respect Trump? What do you think they think now? What do you think they think now, now that Trump has been shown to be right about everything, the subject of obvious lawfare, and he's coming back? Well, I bet he's not as embarrassing as Biden.
And let me talk about the dog not barking. I think we all agreed that if Trump could just not cause any new trouble he would just be on a glide path to the presidency. He just has to not ruin it himself. And we wondered if he would have the discipline to be able to pull that off, if he even wanted to try. What do you think now? To me it's becoming increasingly obvious that Trump is playing the winning strategy. He has the winning hand. He just has to not tell people what he has. You just don't show your hand. And all he has to do is be cool. Just be cool. Just do what you do and be cool, and you're the next president for sure.
So I feel like, yeah, and it does feel like maybe vibes and influences again, a positive one. It's really hard to tell somebody as powerful as Trump what works better than what he's doing. You would need to be a great communicator and so smart that he would recognize that it's coming from a good source. That's why we suspect Vance might be helping way more than you can see on the public level. Because the wisdom that Trump is exhibiting looks like a combination of his own thinking plus wisely using feedback from somebody he trusts. That's your perfect combination.
All right, but at least that's just the Italians. It's not like anybody else is making fun of our president, right? Right? Nobody else would do that.
You should, if you would like to learn how to detect lies, watch a 2017 video. I reposted it. It came from the Maze Mo X account. John Brennan testifying about Russia collusion. And watch when he's asked a direct question by Trey Gowdy, and watch his body language. Because the beauty is that we know he's lying now. We didn't know at the time. So if you can find any examples where you can know now that somebody knew they were lying back then, go back and look at it and you'll be able to spot it.
Yeah, let me give you my physical impression of John Brennan answering questions. He had a pen in his hand and he's talking. This happened, this happened. And then he gets the tough question. Definitely what happened is what I'm thinking is I think that the Russians did this. It's really obvious. Just watch his fidgeting, squirming, and he bounces. He starts bouncing when he gets into the stuff that's clearly a lie.
All right. So I would like to disagree with Elon Musk, which is very rare. Hardly ever happens. But I partly agree, and it's about the theory that the thing behind the mass migration is Democrats wanting extra voters and extra census and representation. Now that's certainly true. It's true that they would get a benefit from extra voters. It's certainly true that some of the Democrats have noted it and said it out loud. Is that right? Fact check me. There are Democrats who have said it out loud. So we don't have to wonder if they get some benefit from it.
Here's what I would like to introduce. I don't believe that it's a universal plan that's coming from the top. I believe that the Democrats, who also don't know why it's happening, are putting their own interpretation of why it must be happening. "Oh well, I'm a Democrat. Probably they'll vote Democrat. My leaders are bringing them in, the border's open. Oh, it's to get extra voters." So I think that the Democrats are fooled about the real reason. And I think that Elon Musk, seeing that the Democrats say it out loud, quite reasonably attributes that reason to what we see. Now that's a quite reasonable opinion. They say it, you observe it. It's true that it will create more Democrat voters and it could swing everything. So it's quite reasonable to have that theory.
Here's my theory. If that were true, Biden would have already closed the border because it's not good for him. It's not good for Biden to get reelected. So I believe we have proof that Biden is not in charge. Because nothing could be more clear than Biden should close the border if he wants to get reelected. Would you agree? So it's not coming from a political place because the top guy in the political place couldn't possibly be better off personally to get reelected. Because remember this is a long-term play. Politicians don't think long-term, right? Biden is basically, he's not buying green bananas, if you know what I mean. He's not looking at the long term. He's just trying to get elected. And getting elected, very clearly every Democrat knows it and every Republican knows it, he would just sign an executive order, close the border tomorrow, because we know he can do it. He knows he can do it. Everybody knows he can do it. The fact that he doesn't do it is really strong indication he's not in charge.
So what possible explanation could there be if the top political person who should be wanting it clearly doesn't want it? What else is there? Well, I'm going to go with the obvious, and I'm going to extend this to a larger concept. Everything that's expensive and you don't understand why it's going the way it is is because the CIA or intelligence entities. But I'll just say CIA for short. It seems to me that the most reasonable working assumption is that the CIA, and again I'll just use them for intelligence as a shorthand because there are lots of different entities, but it seems to me they must be coordinating with the cartels to not only control Mexico's government but also to make sure that American interests and manufacturing doesn't get attacked. And it looks like for reasons that are kind of mysterious American interests don't seem to get attacked. And we can conclude that the cartels do run Mexico, the government itself. Because the Mexican military knows where their own border is. If they wanted to control it with Mexican military they would just put their troops there, but they don't. They let the cartels, I say let but that's not what I mean. The cartels control the border. That means they control the country.
Does anybody think that the power that controls the border of the country doesn't control the country? Does anybody think that? That would be ridiculous. So it could be that every time you see a weird distortion where the country is not operating the way you think common sense tells you it should, every bit of your common sense says close the border. Even most Democrats would agree. All common sense, yet it doesn't happen. The only reason I can think of for this and all the other things that don't make sense that are big and expensive is that it's the CIA. And that there's a bigger plan that maybe we don't, and maybe it's a good idea. I don't even know. Maybe it's a good idea.
But imagine the alternative. Let's say the CIA did not work with the cartel. Well, we would not have functional control of the Mexican government, which seems really, really important if they're your neighbor, right? If we didn't control the Mexican government, you don't think Russia would be trying to control it so they could put a little badness on our doorstep just like we do to them? Of course they would. But if you control the cartel and the cartel controls the government, and some Russian guy tries to influence Mexico, what happens? Cartel just kills him and nobody ever hears about it.
So it seems to me obvious that if the CIA is in the business of controlling other countries for the benefit of American interests, usually economic, that we would have to control Mexico. There's no way to do it directly by controlling the government because they're puppets. Instead the best you can do is to partner with, not control, but partner with the cartels and say, look, if you leave our big corporations alone and you let us get what we want in terms of Mexico staying not Russian, then, and I'm just using the Russian thing as an example of anything we don't want, then we'll let you get away with your normal crimes.
Now is there any precedent for that in law enforcement? Has law enforcement ever let somebody like Whitey Bulger do crimes right in front of them because they wanted to control the entity that they controlled? Yeah, isn't Whitey Bulger exactly that example? Right? So and lots of them. There are plenty of examples. So that would actually be a normal thing for our CIA to work with the baddest people in the country, Mexico, for some common interest. Very normal. You would expect so.
My theory is that the idea that Democrats are bringing in extra voters is a CIA cover story for what's really happening. And that it's such a good story that Democrats themselves believe it at the lower levels, but not at the Biden level. At the Biden level he might actually know what's going on.
Now I'm going to make a prediction based on this hypothesis. The prediction is that Trump wins and the cartels are not militarily attacked because he said he would. All the Republicans said they would, but I don't think it's going to happen. I think that you get in office and the CIA sits you down, says here's the deal. If we don't work with the cartels they're going to unleash horrors in this country like you've never seen. The drug traffic will triple and basically we won't own Mexico anymore. They won't cooperate and all the American interests in manufacturing will be at risk. And then they say, so our deal with the devil is we're going to let 100,000 people die of overdoses, but we don't think they're the important people. Right? We don't think they're the important people or we'd protect them. So that's what it looks like to me. Just a hypothesis.
Who do you think was behind ESG, DEI, and wokeness in general? Who was behind that? Now you say to yourself, Scott, that's not the CIA. That sort of came out of Ibram X. Kendi and various people and authors and the WEF, and basically you sort of grew organically and a lot of things. But let me ask you this. Do you think that it got turbocharged by the George Floyd situation? Would you say that's fair to say it was turbocharged by the George Floyd situation? Because you can see it in the data. Like white people just stopped being hired by big corporations. It just stopped, right?
Now who is behind George Floyd? Well, obviously the CIA didn't cause the death. They didn't cause him to be stopped by the police. But what turned George Floyd from an ordinary tragedy, the police action with a tragedy, into the biggest story in the country? Well, the media did, right? The media turned George Floyd, what could have been a story about one person, tragic as it was, it turned into a national story that influences all of our thoughts about everything. How was that done? Well, that was done through social media and the mainstream media making it the biggest story of the year. Why did the mainstream media make it the biggest story of the year? Who controls that? I think the CIA does. Am I wrong? Isn't our media completely subject to what the CIA says is the primary story? Of course it is.
So even all the DEI, ESG, probably it all happened maybe accidentally, but because of the boosting of the George Floyd. Now why would they boost George Floyd? Why would the CIA want to do that? Seems like a bad idea, doesn't it? Well, it would be the number one way to get rid of Trump. It would be the number one way to say, oh all those Republicans who look like Derek Chauvin, look what those whites will do, right? So I believe that George Floyd was really about getting rid of Trump. I believe that it was CIA at least boosted it. It may have had an organic nature to it, but it clearly was boosted like crazy. And I don't believe that any of our top stories are organic. I think our B-level stories that are just sort of interesting are organic, but the top stories I don't think ever are. And the reason is that the CIA can't take that chance. The CIA is in the business of making us think the way they want us to think. They would say for the benefit of the country and to make other countries think the way they want them to think. It's not about the truth. It's about making you think what they want you to think.
So to me it looks like the CIA is the cause of the George Floyd, the racial division, all of the DEI, the massive discrimination against white people. I also wonder if Ibram X. Kendi is organic and natural. Now I don't have any information that would suggest otherwise, but it would be a normal CIA method, as I understand it, to find influencers and to boost influencers that they want to boost. For example, we assume that they boosted Elvis maybe, or well not Elvis, let's say John Wayne. You know, in the old days they'd make the war movies seem awesome so you'd join the military. So I wonder, given the, and let me be honest, Ibram X. Kendi doesn't seem like an intellectual powerhouse. He looks like somebody who must have been boosted by something. You know what I mean? Like Jordan Peterson became a national phenomenon and you listened to him for one minute and you understand why, right? One minute of listening to Jordan Peterson and you automatically know why he's world famous. There's no doubt about it. If you listen to Ibram X. Kendi, now of course I have a cultural block there, but even if you were black and American and you listen to Ibram X. Kendi, would you say that's the smartest guy I've heard lately? I don't know. It feels like he must be boosted because his importance is whack with what he's bringing to the table. Just a theory.
What's behind all the terrible movies, the wokeness? So the CIA probably was behind George Floyd. What about Charlottesville? Remember the Charlottesville hoax? So it was not only a hoax what Trump said about it, which was brought to you by the media. And who controls the media? The CIA. So probably the whole fine people hoax was probably a CIA op. That's my guess. Because all the major media said it was true even though it was obviously not, just totally obviously not true. And that suggests some power behind the throne, power behind the media. CIA. That would be their normal business.
Have you been surprised that there hasn't been a Charlottesville 2? Like what happened to all those people? And aren't there lots more who would want to do a successful march like that from their perspective? It wasn't as successful. You know, hypothetically if they were real and they were actual racists, and a lot of them were, I know a lot of them were for sure they were racists. But if this was a big thing that sort of had its own energy you'd see it again. There'd be another march somewhere. But the fact that it only happened once has op written all over it. Yeah, it doesn't look real.
How about the, we're up to 14 Russian hoaxes, many of them by John Brennan. How many of the Russian hoaxes are just CIA or ex-CIA who basically are still CIA in my opinion? Probably all the Russian hoaxes or maybe half of them or more were just pure CIA. And I think somewhat obviously because Brennan was central to those efforts, you know, the laptop one, etc.
How about all the lawfare against Trump? Do you think the lawfare against Trump is just Democrats knowing what to do? They all sort of know what to do so they just do it. It's like we'll elect us some prosecutors that want to get rid of Trump and then it just happens on its own. Well I would argue that the prosecutors are all funded by Soros. Soros and his organization I believe have a connection to the Atlantic Council which is staffed largely by ex-CIA directors. Soros, the only thing that explains Soros is that he's a CIA asset. Would you agree? The only explanation for Soros is that he's a CIA asset. There's nothing else that makes sense.
So if the CIA wanted to get Trump, how would they do it? They'd have their bank Soros fund a bunch of prosecutors and then they would shop a venue and go after Trump. So I think all of the lawfare is CIA instigated directly or indirectly.
How about the TDS in general and all the other hoaxes? Probably CIA because again they control the media. The media does the hoaxes. If the CIA didn't want the media to present these hoaxes, do you think they would? No. The CIA would call NBC and say this doesn't help us, don't do that one anymore, and it would just stop. It would just stop.
How about the Biden crime family and the fact that it becomes increasingly obvious that, I don't know if it's a crime per se, but that their behavior was sketchy and there was a lot of lying involved. Does it feel to you like the only reason that Biden is president is because the CIA has the goods on him and can control him? And that he was part of the whole Ukraine. Really was a CIA operation and he's knee deep in it. It looks like it to me. Everything about Ukraine can be explained by the CIA. Would you agree? All of it. And we have information now that it's coming out that the CIA was involved since 2014. The Maidan thing, even the shelling of Russians who considered themselves Russians in what was then Ukrainian territory. It all seems to be CIA. So there's that.
How about the Gemini AI and how woke it is? Now do you think I could tie that to the CIA? That'd be quite a stretch, wouldn't it? Watch me do it. The CIA, as we know, has historically, and this is a matter of record, tried to control Hollywood and some celebrities because they know that controlling the media is a good way to control how everybody thinks, etc. We know that they've controlled the news for a long time. We know that they're knee deep in social media companies. We know that AI is the biggest thing coming and will be the most dominant technical force. Do you think there's any chance that the CIA didn't get inside the AI efforts of all the major companies? Of course they do. If they're not doing it they all need to be fired. What are they doing if they're not doing that? That's the most basic thing they should be doing. If the CIA isn't all the way into our AI products and every big company, why aren't they? They better be because that's their main job is to determine how we think and the AI is going to be the main part of that.
Have you noticed that nobody built an AI that can tell the truth? Some of it is because there is no truth, but part of it is that what you see must be what the CIA wants you to see. The fact that Google pulled back Gemini, although I don't know how it's pulled back, it's still there, suggests that maybe they revealed themselves a little bit too obviously. That we are to believe that the intelligence of AI is rising organically. It's not. Everything that's important will be programmed into it because the CIA needs us to believe a certain set of things. We're going to start relying on the AI more and more. So if the AI is not saying what the CIA wants to say, they're going to tell the company to reprogram it until it does. And the company will do it because we have plenty of evidence from the Twitter files that they don't even have to threaten them. They just have to have a meeting with them and they just have to walk in and say, hey, we're the CIA, we'd really like it if you did this thing. What's the company going to do? They got government contracts, right? And they want to keep them. Yeah, they're going to do whatever the CIA wants to do.
How about COVID? Do I need to say anything about that? Moving on.
How about the teachers unions? Have you been puzzled why we can't fix schools and you think it's the teachers unions? Do you think that the teachers unions are completely organic and free from any CIA influence? Doesn't seem possible because we know the CIA likes to control unions. Do you know why? Well, if they're controlling something like the Teamsters or one of those tough unions it's because they can get muscle on the street. But they need to control unions in general because that's where the power is. So my guess is that the CIA must want to control the Democrats through the teachers union. And that requires allowing some slop in how the teachers unions control the education system. So tell me the teachers unions don't look like the border problem. It's a gigantic problem to the country. It seems obvious to every observer that it would be easy to fix, right? But it doesn't get fixed. We can all see the problem and it just keeps lasting forever. That suggests there's somebody behind this throne who wants it to last because they're getting some benefit that's not obvious to you. Who else could it be?
Well, in case you trusted the CIA, here's a report, long thread from Kanekoa the Great, one of the better follows on the X platform. I don't know where Kanekoa gets all his research but wow does he have good stuff pretty much every day. So I'm just going to read this thing here. This thread: The New York Times disclosed yesterday that the CIA built 12 secret spy bases in Ukraine, waging a shadow war against Russia for the past decade. Sort of understand why Putin was a little concerned after a US-supported violent coup toppled Ukraine's democratically elected government. CIA director John Brennan visited Kiev in April of 2014 shortly after the new Ukrainian government launched an "anti-terror operation." Oh, isn't that convenient? Got to get those terrorists. But those terrorists happen to be in the Russian-speaking part of eastern Ukraine. For eight years leading up to Russia's invasion in 2022, Ukraine's government, with help from the CIA, relentlessly bombed eastern Ukraine. Millions of innocent civilians were caught in the crossfire of a geopolitical chess match between Russia and the United States. This is part of the story often ignored by the Western press.
So Ukraine apparently is just CIA trying to take out Putin and always was. And it's exactly what it looked like.
Let's talk about Crimea. NBC journalist, now NBC generally is known as a CIA operation so not sure about this story, but NBC journalist Kier Simmons explained that most Crimeans are pro-Russia. So how exactly would you take it back? And why? The people who live in Crimea don't want to be anywhere but in Russia apparently, at least by some kind of majority.
Christopher Todd Nolan said this. He said a few years ago I made a series of documentaries on the war in Ukraine. This relatively short video is a summary. Well basically saying that an unelected government began killing its own people in the southeast of the country after a visit from Joe Biden and John Brennan. So John Brennan and Joe Biden linked at the hip. Sounds like it. Sounds like they're working together. Do you think Biden is anything but a CIA puppet? It doesn't look like it. It looks like he's just a CIA puppet.
All right, let's talk about some more AI nonsense. The libs of TikTok was posting that Meta's AI, if you ask it to list the presidents of the United States, it will skip Trump. Now I wouldn't believe that except they had a video of the actual screen skipping Trump. And they actually assigned the 45th presidency to Joe Biden and they just left out Trump. Now you might say to yourself, oh that's just like a little bug. No it isn't. No. And I don't believe that they programmed just this question to do it. Let me tell you what is obvious from this. It is obvious the AI has been instructed to ignore Trump-related success. Obviously it ignored it so much that it wouldn't list him as a prior president. What else would do that? What else? There's some kind of general suppression commands or series of commands in Meta AI that very obviously and very clearly is suppressing anything good about Trump anyway. So that's a smoking gun.
Now do you believe that the CIA is not behind that? Do you think the employees came up with that on their own? "Hey let's put some code in there that makes Trump always look bad." Maybe it's possible. It could be just the employees. But I feel like they might have a little help. You know what I mean? I'm suspicious of any gigantic American company that's in the information business and surprisingly got very large very quickly. You know, like Google and Facebook, two examples.
I had a long conversation with Google's Gemini yesterday and I can conclude that it got everything about my story wrong. It did not understand the context of me. It gave the official news account that I'm a big old racist. Now that's permanent. Do I have a legal action? Or because people also believe it is just an ordinary thing. People believe because the news was wrong. Well, apparently Google shares fell. I don't know how they are today. Is Google still down? Their shares fell after their AI generator seemed to make a lot of anti-white images. And there's a question about the organizational incompetence.
There was a commenter Alex Krawitz. He was on CNBC this morning, I guess maybe yesterday, and he said that this Gemini problem is a big deal because it's not just about Gemini making a mistake but it really suggests there's more organizational incompetence within Google. Organizational incompetence.
Now remember I told you that the truth is subjective and the closest you can get to knowing what's true is prediction. Prediction. Did anybody predict that if DEI became the primary DNA of companies that it would guarantee a massive incompetence problem that we hadn't seen before? We all did. We all did. And I hasten to say it has nothing to do with race. It has nothing to do with gender. It's just math. If everybody starts fishing in the same fishing spot at the same time you just run out of fish. That's the entire argument. If there were exactly the same amount of totally qualified people of all types then you could reach diversity without giving anything up. But if you have a shortage of STEM people and management people, etc., and diversity is your primary goal, you will necessarily and in every case promote people who are not ready. Every time. Not sometimes. It's not a risk. It's a guarantee.
And now everybody who has experience in a big company knows that. Those who don't think, Scott, this is the Mark Cuban point of view. Scott, you just have to maybe try a little harder, dig a little deeper, and you can find just as many people in the minority world and female world that can do the job. You just have to put a little effort into it. That is mathematically impossible. It might be possible for his one company to do it. That's actually possible. It's definitely possible for any one company to do it. It is impossible by math for most companies to do it. It guarantees that especially the big ones are going to have massive incompetence problems. Now is that the only problem? Probably not. There are probably other things as well. But it was the most predictable outcome would be massive societal incompetence. We could have predicted that the airplanes would start falling apart in the sky, right? We could have predicted that. In fact I think people did. They predicted it exactly.
Andy Ngo talked, asked Gemini about Antifa, and he was asked about Antifa's violence and it said that labeling Antifa as violent risks perpetuating harmful stereotypes. Says we should consider the justification of their diverse tactics that include the use of political violence. Yeah, maybe that, you know, a little bit of violence. Don't you know, don't say the whole group is violent because there's a little bit of violence sometimes, some of them. But that it might be justified. You know, kind of the justified domestic violence sort of thing. That's what Gemini said to Andy Ngo, who was physically attacked by Antifa. And it told Andy Ngo, yeah maybe that's justified. Maybe he had it coming. Andy, sorry Andy. Google thinks you had it coming.
Well I have a theory about why AI can never be fixed and it's Gell-Mann Amnesia. Now you've heard me talk about this a lot in other contexts. It goes like this. There was a physicist named Gell-Mann and he noticed that when he read the news about physics it was always way off. It was just wrong. But then he turned the page and it'd be a topic he's not an expert in, let's say geopolitical stuff, and he'd say to himself, oh that's probably right. And then one day he realized, wait a minute, if it's always wrong when I know what the truth is, maybe it's always wrong and I just don't know because I don't know the truth in these other domains. And indeed that's what we see. Certainly when I look at the stories about myself are almost always wrong. But who knows it besides me? I'm the only one. You, maybe somebody I know really well. But you, if any of you have ever been in the news you know, right? Have any of you been in the news? You know it's never real. They always get basic things wrong that really matter.
So imagine that it's your job to build AI and you're a technical person and you're not an expert in physics, you're not an expert in lots of things. So you build this AI and then you find out that it agrees with you on a lot, so you think it's pretty smart. And that when it does something that you do understand such as write code you find it quite helpful. So if you're a person who knows code and you make a device that makes code you could look at it and say yeah, you know it's not perfect, I have to tweak it, but wow that really helped me. You know it moved me ahead quite a bit.
Now what happens if the people who are making it see that it tells a story about me that's not quite true? Well they don't know because they believe the same thing that the AI said because they got it from the news and the news is all fake. Let me say this in the funniest way. For thousands of years humans have been lying about everything important in writing, in all of our books and medias and everything else. And then we thought it was a good idea to train an advanced intelligence on a body of work which we know to be all lies. And we built intelligence on a database that we knew were all lies. Now why would we do that? It's Gell-Mann Amnesia. We didn't know they were all lies. We only knew the one thing we knew and then we tweaked it until it worked. Okay it does write code, huh? I write code, it writes code. I make mistakes, it makes mistakes. This is pretty good.
But as soon as it gets into any other domain such as mental health, the people who programmed it are blind. So if the AI says you know I think that prosecutor, one of those Trump prosecutors, is a perfectly capable person, would the programmer say that that was wrong? But if the programmer was also let's say a psychologist and a psychiatrist they might look at that same person and say oh I'm seeing some indications of bad mental health. Could they ever let AI say that? Of course not. So even if AI could see the truth it will be immediately turned off because the people who are programming say ah I got it wrong. I got another wrong thing about this prosecutor because I know that she's not biased. I better change that.
There is no way to get there from here. Where we want to get to is an AI that's smart and unbiased. It's not a technical problem. Let me say that clearly. It's not a technical problem. The problem is with us. The problem is that we created an entire body of work that is mostly lies. It's mostly motivated lies. And then we trained the AI on our motivated lies and we're wondering why it seems biased. It can't be anything else. How are you going to, and who is so smart that they could train it to be unbiased? Who's the unbiased person? I don't know any. How in the world is it going to arrive at an unbiased view of anything? It can't. It can't pull unbiased out of only bias. There's no way that it's built to even manage that situation.
All right, so I think Gell-Mann Amnesia is why we'll never be able to build it and it'll take a long time to realize that it's impossible. So I think one of the big proofs of the simulation will be when we realize that we can't fix AI. Now there's a prediction for you. We will come to realize that this bias problem is unfixable because it was never the technology that was the problem. Everybody get that? The technology is fine. It's doing exactly what they built it to do. They looked at what humans do and built an intelligence based on it. Except the techies didn't realize that all of their news is untrue. Because if you work in Silicon Valley you think well the things I know about aren't always true but the rest of that stuff is true. So I'll just train it on the rest of the stuff. It'll be fine. And I'll just tweak it on the things that I know about and then we got it perfectly unbiased. They will give up on that. They will give up because it is unsolvable logically. It can't be solved. It's not the technology. It's not how they tweak it. And that will get us one step closer to the level where we understand we are a simulation.
In level one of awareness, I call that the child level. In level one of awareness you believe that adults tell you the truth. Santa Claus is real. Okay, tooth fairy is going to put a quarter under your pillow. Sounds good. That's level one, child level one of awareness.
Level two comes when you realize that adults sometimes lie. You say, oh God, there are bad adults and then there are good adults. There's some adults who tell the truth and there's some who lie. That's level two.
Level three is when you understand that reality might be fixed, like there might be an actual reality, but that we don't have access to it and our interpretations of it, our narratives, are purely subjective. So subjective that we literally can't tell if we're the bad guys or the good guys in the story, right? Take Ukraine. Are we the bad guys? Are we the good guys? We don't know. We are so in our subjective worlds that even the most basic questions, are we the bad guys, we can't tell. What about wokeness? Are the people bringing you wokeness the good guys or the bad guys? Depends who you ask. The most basic questions of reality we don't know. And that's level three, where you realize that, wait a minute, maybe everybody's hypnotized. That's level three. But at that point you still believe that it's mostly other people who are having the problem. You believe that you have a thing called common sense and it is protecting you from the problems that other people are having. "Wow it's a good thing I haven't been fooled by that. Yeah I get that there's a difference about whether we're the bad guys or the good guys in these various issues but it's obvious to me. It's obvious to me. So I'm not really part of that. I'm an observer of other people who have subjective problems understanding this base reality. But I'm just on the outside. I'm like this smart observer." That's level three.
Level four is coming. You know what level four is? Once AI has completely proven to us that we are only a narrative-driven species and that we don't know the truth and we don't have access to it and never will, somewhere around that point you're going to become an author. And I don't mean writing books. I mean you're going to start authoring your environment, your actual reality. Now you might only be authoring your subjective impression of what your reality is but it's all you have. If you believe that you won the Olympics and you go through your entire life thinking you did, well you did, even if you didn't.
And I would say that level four, where you realize that nothing's real or at least you don't have access to reality, it's all narrative, we're close in that level. We will also realize that we are a simulation created by a higher entity. Some of you are already there. But we're probably no more than a year or two away from the general consensus being that we're there. It's going to be a lot like thinking the election was rigged. Two-thirds of the country thinks the elections are sketchy. Didn't start out that way. That took five years, two years or so. Well you could say less from 2020.
And I've got a prediction. Well actually I'm going to tell you about a prediction. I've reminded you of this many times but I'm quite aware that it doesn't register like it's something I say and you've heard it before. But until reality caught up with it it didn't make as much sense. In 2015 I told you in public a number of times that Trump would change more than politics. He would change our understanding of reality itself. And then we watched and he did. He brought us all the way to the middle of the third level of awareness. AI is going to take you over the border. AI is what will convince you that you're living in a simulation. Not just the fact that it can create a simulation that's perfectly photorealistic, but we will realize that we can't program the AI to know things about important things because it will just be somebody's opinion. The programmers. That there is no such thing as here are the facts and we all agree on them. If we could just be smarter we'd all agree.
And I would say that that prediction is absolutely true already. You know, not the part about knowing you're in a simulation, but would you agree with the first part of the prediction that Trump ripped a hole in reality and nothing looks the same anymore? Agree? Yeah. Now remember I told you that the closest you can get to reality is prediction. So my next prediction, now that you saw that that one was uncannily right, I don't think anybody's ever made a bolder prediction than that. I actually told you that reality would change while you watched. Who has ever predicted that? Now it was, you know, people were impressed when I said Trump would be president and then he became president. That was impressive. It's nowhere near as impressive as telling you that reality would change while you watched. Those are completely different realms. Yeah, and I nailed that and it was obvious to me.
Now there's a member watching right now who just completed a course in hypnosis. Your head is spinning right now, isn't it? Because once you complete a course in hypnosis you can see all of this. All the things that were just confusing just lock into place and you say, ah, that's why. It was purely subjective and it affects me as well as other people. I'm not exempt. And that's when you enter the simulation.
Speaking of reality, 77% according to Rasmussen of likely US voters believe it is likely Putin hadn't have only murdered, I think that the idea that Ukraine actually, no what is it? Ukraine actually said that he died of natural causes. Yeah, to me that feels a little CIA-ish. All right.
Ladies and gentlemen, to conclude, I don't know what the CIA does and doesn't do. I don't have access to that. I'm just saying that if you're looking for explanations that explain everything, the simulation theory explains a lot. Gell-Mann Amnesia explains a lot. My chart of the more money is involved the more BS and the more lies explains a lot. And the possibility that the CIA and John Brennan specifically is behind a lot of things that you don't understand in politics explains a lot.
And that, ladies and gentlemen, is a show you could not ever see if I had corporate sponsors. This is why I'm a subscription entity. So if you'd like to join the Locals, ScottAdams.locals.com, I would welcome you. And we do more of this that you don't get to see in the morning. All right, that's all for now. Thanks for joining on YouTube and Rumble and the X platform. I will see you tomorrow, same place, same time.
welcome to the highlight of human civilization it's called coffee with Scott Adams and that's what we're going to do in addition to talking about the news and I'm going to boost your level of awareness you're going to take everybody up to a higher level of awareness today challenge accepted and if you'd like to get a good start in this higher level of awareness all you need is a CPP a Mugger a glass a tanker cheler Stein a canteen Jugger flask vessel of any kind fill it with your favorite liquid I like coffee en Joy me now for the unparallel pleasure of the dopamine here the day the thing that makes everything better it's called the simultaneous siping happens now go oh so good now I don't want to get you too excited but there will be a whiteboard a whiteboard huh that's right well let's start with this cool news I saw Brian relli post on X about a uh a portal it's one of the coolest uses of Technology I've seen so if you imagine something that's bigger than a person and a big round circle and the center of the circle is a screen you know a huge personized screen and you could put it in any City and a person could walk up to it and they will see the person in the other portal so it's sort of a hard coat you know it's it's always up and here's the cool thing it has a a translator built in so you can walk up to the portal in let's say Paris or wherever is I guess it's going to be in different places you walk up to the portal in Paris and then somebody on the street in China would see you standing there at the portal and they would walk walk up they would speak in Chinese you would speak in French and you would have a complete conversation in real time now that's insanely cool I don't even know what to say about it it just like it just activates every like hair in my body to stand up don't think about that too long yeah it's just one of the coolest things I like to start the show with just something to imagine and I ask you this couldn't stop war did you ever wonder what would happen if these citizens got to vote on war and actually talk to each other directly hey do you guys want a war because I I feel like we don't really want one over here but our government is kind of pushing us toward us and then the other people in whatever country would say you know I'm glad you talked to me on the portal because uh we're not too crazy about war either how about we just fire our leaders and don't have a war yeah it's actually a threat to the uh threat to power If people could talk to each other uh with translation here's a question for you that I just thought of so I don't know if it's a good one yet give me one second to think if this is a really dumb thing to say no I think it might make sense since we've had good Communications in the world so that would exclude let's say the Civil War war and it would exclude you know the Revolutionary War and those earlier Wars but since we've had internet and since we've had really good you know phones and communication how many wars have there been between the United States and somebody who spoke the same language let's I actual question it's not I'm not being rhetorical there are two now well who would that be cuz Russia doesn't speak English the uh Palestinians I mean so a lot of them have a second language but they're mostly different language and here here's the thing I wonder I wonder if it's possible to have a war between two Nations that speak the same language their original language and have lots of communication um technology where they the citizens can talk to each other now don't give me the Civil War only in modern times when we could in modern now okay I don't want to see anything with 18 in it 1800 and anything is not in this conversation I'm very specifically saying America no Russia plus Ukraine you're not getting this yet America have we gotten in a fight with an English-speaking country and so here's what I'm speculating if Universal translation just becomes part of all of our technology which it looks like it will I mean pretty easy to predict you would be able to directly talk to citizens of any other country that you were considering have a war with and you might actually be able to work it out without the benefit of your government that's actually a possibility that Universal translation plus Universal communication you know the ability to reach anybody could end War because it's very rare that citizens want to be in a war it's not rare when governments want to be in a war just think about it it might actually end War all right maybe and I'm being a little optimistic Don Lemon uh got a settlement from CNN got 24.5 million that's what he would have been paid if he stayed on for his contract um but what do you think of that 24.5 million that's pretty good right do you know how much he takes takes home if he makes 24.5 well he's going to pay over half of it in taxes he's probably going to pay 15% to his agent and God knows how much his lawyer gets because his lawyer is you know putting in some serious high level work here if if I had to guess 24.5 I think you'll Net 7 six or seven yeah so that's probably six in the bank now how many of you did that calculation in your head when you saw the 24 million and how many of you said wow he just made $24 million it's actually closer to six I mean it's a ton of money I'm not I'm not saying it's a small amount I'm just saying that if if you don't have that filter on it you're missing it by you know a factor of four basically but the good news is Don Lemon is going to launch his own show on the xplatform called The Don Lemon show and you know what I'm really excited about it you know as as much as I complained when he was on CNN it was more about being in the CNN uh Channel let me make a prediction my prediction is that Don Lemon without the Yoke of CNN on him is going to be a good show does anybody want to take the other side of that I actually predict it's going to be a good show and that you'll enjoy watching it maybe not every day but I'll bet you it'll be good and the reason I think so is that I don't think he's captured by um you know wokeness that there there is indication from you know earlier video of him before wokeness became crazy that he's just a reasonable person who can see both sides of stuff I would love to be on his show it's the number one show I would like to be invited on so if you if anybody knows him let him know I'd love to talk to him um there's a New York Times writer who says he was uh he was Ed for saying he liked Chick-fil-A sandwiches does that sound true I don't know it sounds like it could be I'm just going to say maybe because it's fun it's not too important so I'm just going to say ah let's let's let's treat it like it's true do you agree let's treat it like it's true because it sounds like something that would be true and here's the reason uh I guess he ended up in an HR or something or maybe his manager talked to him and said uh we don't do that here they hate gay people so you can't say that you like chickfila and be a writer at the D New York Times all right all right so I'm working toward my theme today there will be a theme and we'll see if you can spot it before I tell you what it is but uh that's a hint so Dr.
Phil went on The View and had a little mix up with the view the host of The View about how bad it was that the schools were closed of course I believe that the hosts of The View were in favor of school closures Dr.
Phil gave them a dose of reality now here's what's really fun about Dr.
Phil are you ready I think that because he's been a TV guy and an Oprah an Oprah creation for years that people assume he's left leaning without knowing the truth is that fair assumption that the public doesn't really know that he's not a woke Lefty they probably assume he's just a TV guy he's you know from Oprah's orbit of course he's just going to be sort of a lefty guy but he apparently is now free from all constraints corporate constraints because I because his regular show is over I think he's doing something new I don't know the details but I suspect that he fully owns whatever he's going to do and that means he's free Dr.
Phil just entered the chat now you might say to yourself well that's just one more person you know one more voice no it's Dr.
Phil it's Dr.
Phil it's not just one more voice th this is like a Dr.
Jordan Peterson you know this is like uh Tucker Carlson this is somebody it's like V is somebody whose communication abilities are beyond what you normally see and is able to see all sides of an argument my God Dr.
Phil just entered the chat yes you you got ahead of me this is Dad energy what does Dr.
Phil have more than any human you've ever seen in your entire life more dad energy than I've ever seen name one person who has more pure dad energy than he does nobody right so big uh big Welcome to the um I would like to say that people like me who got cancelled um and then didn't die have made it easier for people who are maybe a little more let's say established maybe they have more you know more to lose or something but I feel like the people who took the arrows in the back uh make it easier for anybody else to join the fight so I hope that's the case uh Byron York is posting telling us about Leticia James you know she's the AG who uh ran for office to bring down Trump and then she found some BS reason to do it and she's posting every day gly the extra gazillion dollars of Interest he has to pay on what he's already um on the line to pay now how disgusting is that that she's bragging about it now some people ask is that even legal and I assume it is legal you know Free Speech I'm I'm good for free speech I think it's legal but it's the most distasteful thing and unethical I think it's unethical for sure but it's so distasteful that it's just mind-boggling now I have a hypothesis which uh speaking of Jordan Peterson I tagged him on my post because it seems to me that a lot of what we think is a difference of opinion is mental health and this to me looks like toxic toxic narcissism you know I'm right right so the fact that she's she ran to bring him down because that was such a popular thing and she'd be such a celebrity and such a star if she did and she also ran on bringing down the NRA because if she did she'd be such a celebrity and such a star and now she's uh doing a dance on Trump's economic Grave by you know posting that to make herself more noticed more of a celebrity more of a star now is there anybody here who actually has experience in mental health uh as in a psychologist or psychiatrist that okay we got at least one two oh okay I got a lot of people listening who have that skill set can you agree or disagree or or if you don't want to have an opinion does it seem to you really obvious that narcissism is her problem I just want to see in the comments do you agree it seems you know you can't to be fair if we're being fair you cannot diagnose a mental health problem in another person from a distance and do it ethically wouldn't be ethical to do it but I'm not a psychiatrist I don't think those ethical standards apply to my observation my observation is that she and fonnie uh and there might be some others maybe Alvin brag are are suffering with some kind of narcissism and that if they were diagnosed they would actually get that diagnosis that's what I think so we keep confusing political opinion and mental health and it's really it's really bad this is very much mental health and you know you see it with the Trans movement there there whatever part of that is based on real people with real problems I don't know I'm not an expert but it's really obvious that a large percentage of it and again I don't know what percentage is just purely mental health purely obviously now uh but I'm no expert right it's just obvious to anybody so we make this mistake over and over again we treat people who literally have mental health problems as if it's just a difference of opinion probably ought to stop doing that Joy Reed somebody just posted a picture of Joy Reed with her new Trump haircut Joy Reed comes off as a mental health problem um uh what's her name uh what's her co-host there who only works on Monday what's her name Rachel Rachel madow yeah so racial mad now she looks always to me like she's literally suffering some kind of psychological breakdown as she talks have you ever seen that you look at her face and she feels like she's being tortured by demons on the inside when she talks now again I'm not a mental health professional but if she not under the care of a professional I'd be really surprised I'd be really surprised if she's not under the care of a professional you know in your private life but again I'm no professional myself so you're free to ignore my observation Eric we Eric Weinstein was talking about physics and he said that I want you to remember this the next time you start talking about peer review and simply using the normal channels fundamental physics theory is being destroyed within our institutions by total nonsense and I don't know why now the I don't know why is is the payoff because if you don't know who I'm talking about Eric uh Eric Weinstein he would know about the insides of you know the physics Community because he's part of that world so he would understand if it's BS all you and I can't tell from the outside necessarily but we could see it he could see it and he's saying there's something wrong now did you ever have the feeling that I had at one point in time gosh I think all this politics is full of lies right I think politics is awful of Lies but thank goodness we still have science because science is not going to be influenced by all these you know Bad characters and Psych olical problems and all that stuff all that bias we get rid of that we got some science well years ago here's a little story I don't think I've ever told you years ago uh maybe when I was in my 30s um I got real interest in physics having no background educational background in physics whatsoever and let me tell you what interested me about physics it looked like it was complete to me that's what got me interested I wasn't interested in the science I was interested in the psychology of how we could get to the point of believing what I believed was obviously not true obviously not true I'm talking about basic reality you know the the the mysterious stuff you know Bell's theorem and you got your spooky action at a distance and we're going to prove that string theory is true any day now but it didn't quite happened and and to me oh and the fact that the Universe has an edge and that the speed of light has a limit and that we're coincidentally here you know Despite All Odds I mean there are just so many things that didn't look real now it could be that the only problem is my low level of understanding of physics but the more I looked into it the more obvious it was that the phys the physicists really didn't understand their own field and I don't know if that's what uh what Eric Weinstein is getting at you know I think his I think his point is a little more nuanced than you know a little more interesting than that but to me it looks like they don't know their own field and I've I've thought that for decades now recently find out that half of all scientific papers are just BS you know people have tested it by making fake papers and seeing if they passed peer review about half of them do and that matches the number that of peer-reviewed studies that can't be reproduced because they're probably not true so science is indeed a ridiculous thing that we pumped up to be more important than it is because it it might be the best we have but that's a long way from being good but you know even though physics is uh sort of sketchy looking at least climate science is real am I right at least we got climate science completely right so next story Michael shellenberger um says there's a author Dr.
Mike Hy I think H lme uh Cambridge climate scientist well he's going to tell some stuff about climate science and and how big of a problem it is let's see he says in his new book oh okay climate emergency is what he calls a noble lie huh a noble lie that that that feels like a like an academic way of saying something else a noble lie well seems like a positive spin on something that some somebody else somebody with orange hair once said about climate change what was that word oh a hoax ladies and gentlemen it's too early to say for sure but the simulation seems to be very intent on lighting up a third act for Trump that is like nothing you've ever seen now I've long predicted that Trump's thirdd act would be proof that the election ction was rigged I don't know if we need proof when 2third of the country says it's obviously true I don't know if he needs proof he got two-thirds of the country to say yeah I think elections are not real that's kind of a big win right and that was all him that was all him one person one person got 2third of the country to not believe our elections are real now you can say to yourself but but but all these other Republicans were saying it too they would have said it if Trump didn't say it if Trump said you know what stand down I think it was fair you know let's accept it his base would have gone along with it I mean we would have you know talked about it forever but we kind of would have accepted it uh it was one person who caused two-thirds of the country to think the elections are rigged now that's my current belief without the benefit of um without the benefit of any proof would you like to see my argument for why I believe that climate change is almost certainly and that our elections are almost certainly and that the war in Ukraine is almost certainly and maybe a few more things and it's all going to be with one graph on one whiteboard and it'll be the most magnificent thing you've ever seen I give you now the explanation for everything that was confusing you I call it the versus money graph if you're listening to this on the lower line of the graph we've got money and then on the other side we've got or lies and uh there's a a hockey stick kind of a graph there showing that the more money is involved the more lies what things are expensive H name something expensive let's see how bet out changing the energy sources of the planet Earth everywhere climate change that's some super expensive stuff huh what do you think happens when things get that expensive right the line goes through the roof because people want some of that money now how about uh Ukraine that Ukraine war is pretty expensive huh have there been any lies about the Ukraine war nothing nothing but war war is the thing you can guarantee is all lies it's also the most expensive thing we do Iraq war all lies all Bs right now uh how about what else do we have here see climate science is expensive and war is expensive how about um how about just the economy in general oh how about Co covid was expensive how about those vaccinations how about Healthcare how about reparations how about college I'm just reading your comments do do you see it yet everything expensive is a lie because it brings out the liars and and it's a system problem wherever there is money there are moths going toward the flame ah there's money there so you're going to get 10 Crooks for every honest person and eventually the 10 Crooks will overwhelm the honest person if you even have one right so and there's no real other way this can go there's not a second way this goes you know that right do you all get that it doesn't go this way sometimes it's every time it doesn't have the option of going any other way as soon as there's enough money it becomes completely corrupt now at a lower level of money maybe you can get away with stuff but once you get to the big numbers it's all lies it's all lies now let us develop that theme a little bit shall we um so the fact that there's a uh Cambridge climate scientist who's coming out and saying that at least the alarm part of climate science is a Li um so that that's fun so it seems to me that the conversation about everything is now far more honest are you all seeing that the the the what do you call it the uh um what's that called the effect with sort of the bounce back or the counter effect it it seems pretty strong there's a whole bunch of people who seem to be able to say the truth now that couldn't the blow a lot more people can talk about the truth all right here's some more evidence that we are living in a simulation uh I watched a video this morning of a robot uh doing a series of tasks sort of autonomously and have you ever noticed that the robots are all naked and they look kind of male like when you see a robot you never think female do you it's always a naked man so this is how you know you're in a simulation I'm watching this robot who looks like a naked guy and it's being U posted by the founder of the company that makes the robot and his name is Brett Adcock so as I'm looking at this naked male robot with no genitalia that was created by a guy named ad coock I said to myself AI robotics I think is an Archer if ation is where he's from um I can't ignore that I cannot ignore that so don't you imagine that buying a robot will be someday like buying a car I was just shopping for a car by the way do you know it's impossible to buy a vehicle has anybody tried to buy a vehicle they don't let you do it anymore I got I go to Toyota to buy a truck there are none on the lot they go oh yeah we don't really keep them here but you can buy one that's in the pipeline and I said oh will the pipeline have ones that are have the features I want well they all have different features oh so the odds of one that's in the pipeline that is not already bought because people are buying them in the pipeline one that's not already bought that also has the features I want what are the odds of that well it's about zero so then I say well then but I could just you know build one yeah I could order one with my specifications right and I'd be willing to wait I'll wait six months I just want to get the truck I want and then the Toyota guy saids we don't do that anymore and I said what don't you do anymore make trucks that people want you say yeah yeah no we just make the trucks we want to make put them in the pipeline and people are buying them so you can't you can't test drive it you can't can't test drive it and you can't order it with the features you want that's a real thing and and the reason they can do that is that all of their trucks are bought as fast as they make them they don't have to do better yeah they don't have to so then I said to myself well heck with Toyota I'll go over to Ford and I'll get a Bronco so I start looking at the Broncos and they range from like $30,000 to $105,000 for Bronco did you know that that the highest ones are well over $100,000 and so I have to do this like major research to find out you know what features I want between $34,000 and $115,000 there must be some of that that's unnecessary right somewhere in between might be sane I don't know so first thing I have to I have to spend my afternoon doing all this research do you think that did me any good no because when I contact the dealer they'll only have three of them and they won't be the ones I want do you think I can order one I don't know maybe but so yeah everything is uh incompetent but I think if you buy a robot it'll be like buying a car someday and it'll ask you what package you want with it do I need to connect those dots or are you already with me they're going to ask you what package you want with it So when you buy a robot by Mr.
Adcock you can specify what package you want okay moving on uh Rowan Chong who talks about AI on exot he's real good follow if you want to keep up with AI does a real good job every day he says that uh Google's deep mind uh unveiled Genie it's a AI system that can generate interactive video games from just a text or image prompt it can create an entire functioning video game with a whole realm and and world that never existed anywhere on the Fly while you play it now that's that's insane it's crazy you know what else it is it's one step closer to you understanding that you're in a simulation yep and the reason that it gets you closer is as you realize that these simulated worlds can be created on demand and here's the fun part in those simulated uh games they create the past on demand let me explain so let's say you're in a video game that's just created by Ai and you want to walk through a forest that Forest doesn't exist it it it comes into being as you walk through it but as you walk through it you get to see a tree that's 50 years old it actually created the past do you get that by creating the the F the current which is what it does it puts things there that have been made historically the tree if if you started digging in the ground in your simulated game let's say it was one where you're trying to find a treasure if you got lucky and you dig in your simulated world and there's a treasure down there was it down there before you started digging it wasn't the past is already being created on demand within the context of a video game sooner or later you're going to realize that's how your real world works that if you dig a hole in the backyard unless somebody already dug a hole there there's nothing below the dirt until you dig until you need it it doesn't exist because that's how you would build software you would just build it to exist when you needed it including the past um I don't know how many hints it will take before we all realize we're living in a simulation but I would think that the fact you can create your own simulation would get you halfway there I think the double slid experiment the limit on the size of the universe the speed of light Bells theorem the fact that there's something called the smallest unit of matter that doesn't make any sense there can't be a smallest unit of matter because what's that made of and if the smallest units of matter are all made of the same thing nothing's going to move all right uh and then of course string theory is going to fail but in order to guarantee that we're a simulation you need to be able to make predictions that work would you agree H having a theory that were a simulation would be hard to prove unless you could make a prediction that could only be satisfied by a simulation right yep so I wonder if anybody's done anything like that well in 2015 I made the prediction that Trump would change more than politics that he would change the nature of reality itself and then AI came along because we were we already realized that um everything in politics was subjective but did you still believe there was something that wasn't subjective before you saw the AI is just a woke biased monster did you think to yourself hey if we build a robot at least the robot won't have bias do you think that was going to happen the reason that we didn't build the robot to be unbiased is that is logically impossible because we don't know what's real if we knew what was real we could build a robot to know what was real too not only can we not build it and not only do we not agree with what's real there's no way to check click I'm just unlocking one level at a time here click there's no way to check what's real we live in a completely subjective reality that may be connected to some fixed reality that we're unaware of it will become increasingly clear that nothing is real when we build machines they should be able to figure out what is real and they can't do it and they'll never be able to do do it they can't figure out what's real because there is nothing real there is only narrative there there might actually be something real that we can't see but beyond it our actual experience is just narrative things we make up to live within I'll get back to that I'm going to let that settle in I'm going to circle back um Italian TV is mocking Biden I guess they've had two episodes now where they've got a guy who acts like A demented Biden and the entire joke is that he's near death and and crazy and stupid do you remember when one of the biggest problems we were worried about was that other countries wouldn't respect Trump what do you think they think now what do you think they think now now that Trump has been shown to be right about everything the subject of obvious lawfare and uh he's coming back well I bet he's not as embarrassing as Biden and let me talk about the dog not barking I think we all agreed that if Trump could just not cause any new trouble he would just he's on a Glide path to the presidency he just has to not ruin it himself and we wondered if he would have the discipline to be able to pull that off if he even wanted to try what do you think now to me it's becoming increasingly obvious that Trump is playing the winning strategy he has the winning hand he just has to not tell people what he has you just don't show your hand and all he has to do is be cool just be cool just do what you do and be cool and you're the next president for sure so I feel like yeah and it does feel like maybe Vives and influences again a positive one it's really hard to tell somebody as powerful As Trump what works better than what he's doing you would need to be a great communicator and so smart that he would recognize that it's coming from a good source that's why we suspect fake might be helping way more than you can see on the public level because the the wisdom that Trump is exhibiting looks like a combination of his own thinking plus wisely using feedback from somebody he trusts that that's your perfect combination all right but at least that's just the uh Italians it's not like anybody else is making fun of our president right right nobody else would do that um you should if you would like to learn how to detect lies watch a 2017 video I reposted it came from The Maze Mo X account uh John Brennan testifying about Russia collusion and watch when he's asked a direct question by Trey gy and watch his body language because the the beauty is that we know he's lying now we didn't know at the time so if you can find any examples where you can know now that somebody knew they were lying back then go back and look at it and you'll be able to spot it yeah let me let me give you my physical impression of John Brennan answering questions he had a pen in his hand and he's he's talking uh this happened this happened and then he gets the tough question um definitely uh what happened is what I'm thinking is I think that the Russians uh did this is really obvious just just watch his fidget squirming and he bounces he starts bouncing when he when he gets into the stuff that's clearly a lie all right um so I would like to um disagree with Elon Musk which is very rare hardly ever happens but I partly agree and it's about the theory that the thing behind the mass migration is Democrats wanting extra voters and extra census and representation now that's certainly true it's true that they would get a benefit from extra voters it's certainly true that some of the Democrats have noted it and set it out loud is that right fact check me there are Democrats who have set it out loud so we don't have to wonder if they get some benefit from it here's what I would like to introduce I don't believe that I don't believe that it's a universal plan that's coming from the top I believe that the Democrats who also don't know why it's happening are putting their own interpretation of why it must be happening oh well I'm a Democrat probably they'll vote Democrat my leaders are bringing them in the borders open oh it's to get extra voters so I think that the Democrats are fooled about the real reason and I think that Elon Musk seeing that the Democrats say it out loud quite reasonably attributes that reason to what we see now that's a quite reasonable opinion they say it You observe it it's true that it will create more Democrat voters and it could swing everything so it's quite reasonable to have that theory here's my theory if that were true Biden would have already closed the Border because it's not good for him it's not good for Biden to get reelected so I believe we have proof that Biden is not in charge because nothing could be more clear than Biden should close the border if he wants to get reelected would you agree so it's not coming from a political place because the the top guy in the political Place couldn't possibly be better off personally to get reelected because remember this is a long-term play politicians don't think long-term right Biden is basically he's not buying you know he's not buying green bananas if you know what I mean he's not looking at the long term he's just trying to get elected and getting elected very clearly every Democrat knows it and every Republican knows it he would just sign an executive Ord close the border tomorrow because we know he can do it he knows he can do it everybody knows he can do it the fact that he doesn't do it is really strong indication he's not in charge so what possible explanation could there be if the top political person who should be wanting it clearly doesn't want it what else is there well I'm going to go with the obvious and I'm going to extend this to to a larger concept everything that's expensive and you don't understand why it's going the way it is is because the CIA or intelligence entities but I'll just say CIA for short it seems to me that the most reasonable working assumption is that the CIA and again I'll just use them for intelligence as a short hand uh because there are lots of different entities but it seems to me they must be coordinating with the cartels to not only control Mexico's government but also to make sure that American interests and Manufacturing doesn't get attacked and it looks like for reasons that are kind of mysterious American interests don't seem to get attacked and we can conclude that the cartels do run Mexico the government itself because the Mex the Mexican military knows where their own border is if they wanted to control it with Mexican military they would just put their troops there but they don't they let the cartels I say let but that's not what I mean the cartels control the border that means they control the country does anybody think that the power that controls the border of the country doesn't control the country does anybody think that that would be ridiculous so it could be that every time you see a weird Distortion where the country is not operating the way you think Common Sense tells you it should every bit of your common sense says close the border even most Democrats would agree all common sense yet it doesn't happen the only reason I can think of for this and all the other things that don't make sense that are big and expensive is that it's the CIA and that there's a bigger plan that maybe we don't and maybe it's a good idea I don't even know maybe it's a good idea but imagine the alternative let's say the CIA did not work with the cartel well we would not have functional control of the Mexican Government which seems really really important if they're your neighbor right if we didn't control the Mexican Government you don't think Russia would be trying to control it so they could put a little Badness on our doorstep just like we do to them of course they would but if you control the cartel and the cartel controls the government and some Russian uh guy tries to influence Mexico what happens cartel just kills him and nobody ever hears about it so it seems to me obvious that if the CIA is in the business of controlling other countries for the benefit of American interests usually economic that we would have to control Mexico there's no way to do it directly by controlling the government because they're puppets instead your best you can do is to partner with not control but partner with the cartels and say look if you leave our big corporations alone and you let us you know get what we want in terms of Mexico staying not Russian then and I'm just using the Russian thing as an example of anything we don't want then we'll let you get away with your normal crimes now is there any precedent for that in let's say law enforcement has Law Enforcement ever let somebody oh like a wey Bulger uh do crimes right in front of them because they wanted to control the The Entity that they controlled yeah isn't it Whitey bulgar is exactly that example right so and lots of them there there are plenty of examples so that would actually be a normal thing for our CIA to work with the baddest people in the country Mexico for some common interest very normal you would expect so my my theory is that the the idea that Democrats are bringing in extra voters is a CIA cover story for what's really happening and that it's such a good story that Democrats themselves believe it at the lower levels but not at the Biden level at the Biden level he might actually know what's going on on now I'm going to make a prediction based on this hypothesis the prediction is that Trump wins and the cartels are not militarily attacked because he said he would all the all the Republicans said they would but I don't think it's going to happen I think that you get an office and the CIA sits you down says here's the deal if we don't work with the cartels they're going to unleash Horrors in this country like you've never seen the drug traffic will triple the and basically we won't own Mexico anymore they won't cooperate and all the American interests in manufacturing will be at risk and then they say so our deal with the Devil is we're going to let 100,000 people die of overdosis but we don't think they're the important people right we don't think they're the important people or we' protect them so that's what it looks like to me just a hypothesis who do you think was behind ESG Dei and wokeness in general who was behind that now you say yourself Scott that's not the CIA that that sort of came out of you know ibam kendi and you know various people and authors and the WF and basically you sort of grew organically and a lot of things but let me ask you this do you think that it got turbocharged by the George Floyd situation would you say that's fair to say it was turbocharged by the George Floyd situation because you can see it in the data like white people just stopped being hired by big corporations it just stopped right now who is behind George Floyd well obviously the CIA didn't cause the the death you know they didn't cause him to be stopped by the police but what turned George Floyd from an ordinary tragedy the police action with a tragedy into the biggest story in the country well the media did right the media turned to George Floyd what could have been a story about one person tragic as it was it turned into a national story that influences all of our thoughts about everything how was that done well that was done through social media and the mainstream media making it the biggest Story of the Year why did the mainstream media make it the biggest Story of the Year who controls that I think the CIA does Am I Wrong isn't our media completely uh subject to what the CIA says is the primary story of course it is so even all the deic ESG probably probably it all happen maybe accidentally but because of the boosting of the the uh George Floyd now why would they boost George Floyd why why would why would the CIA want to do that seems like a bad idea doesn't it well it would be the number one way to get rid of trump it would be the number way number one way to say oh all those Republicans who look like Derek chovin look what th look what those whes will do right so I believe that George Floyd was really about getting rid of trump I believe that it was CIA at least boosted it may it may have had an organic nature to it but it it clearly was boosted like crazy and I don't believe that any of our top stories are organic I think our our B level stories that are just sort of interesting are organic but the top stories I don't think ever are and the reason is that the CIA can't take that chance the CIA is in the business of making us think the way they want us to think they would say for the benefit of the country and to make other countries think the way they want them to think it's not about the truth it's about making you think what they want to think so to me it looks like the CIA is the cause of the George Floyd the racial division uh all of the Dei the massive discrimination against white people I also wonder if ibam kendi is organic and natural now I don't have any information that would suggest otherwise but it would be a normal CA method I as I understand it to find influencers and to boost influencers that they want to boost for example we assume that they boosted Elvis maybe and or well not Elvis let's say John Wayne you know in the old days they'd make the war movies seem awesome so You' join the military so I wonder given the uh and let me be honest Ibraham keny doesn't seem like an intellectual Powerhouse he looks like somebody who must have been boosted by something you know what I mean like Jordan Peterson became a national phenomenon and you listened to him for one minute and you understand why right one minute of listening to Jordan Peterson and you automatically know why he's world famous there's no doubt about it if you listen to Ibraham kendi now of course I I have a cultural uh you know sort of a block there but even if you were if you were black and American and you listen to Ibraham kendi would you say that's the smartest guy I've been I heard lately I don't know if it feels like he must be boosted because his importance is um an a whack with what he's bringing to the table just a theory um what's behind all the terrible movies the wokeness so the CIA probably was behind George Floyd what about um Charlottesville remember the Charlottesville hoax so it was not only hoax what Trump said about it which was brought to you by the media and who controls the media the CIA so probably the whole the fine people oax was probably a CIA op that's my guess because all all the major media said it was true even though it was obviously not just totally obviously not true um and that suggest some power behind the throne power behind the media CIA that that would be their normal business um have you have you been surprised that there hasn't been a Charlottesville 2 like what happened to all those people and aren't there lots more who would you know would want to do a successful March like that from their perspective wasn't as successful it you know hypothetically if they were real and they were actual you know racist and a lot of were I know a lot of them were for sure they were racists but if this was a big thing that sort of had its own energy you'd see it again there'd be another March somewhere but the fact that only happened once has op written all over it yeah it doesn't look real how about the uh we're up to 14 Russian hoaxes uh many of them by John Brennan how many of the Russian hoaxes are just CIA or excia who basically are still CIA in my opinion um probably all the Russian hoaxes or maybe half of them or more were just pure CIA and I think somewhat obviously because Brennan was Central to those efforts you know the laptop one Etc um how about all the lawfare against Trump do you do you think the law fair against Trump is just Democrats knowing what to do they they all sort of know what to do so they just do it it's like uhuh we we'll we'll elect us some prosecutors that you know want to get rid of trump and then it just happens on its own well I would argue that the prosecutors are all funded by Soros Soros and his organization I believe have a connection to the Atlantic Council which is staffed largely by xcia director s Soros the only thing that explains Soros is that he's a CIA asset would you agree the only explanation for Soros is that he's a CIA asset there's nothing else that make sense so if the CIA wanted to get Trump how would they do it they'd have their Bank Soros fund a bunch of prosecutors and then they would shop a venue and go to on Trump so I think all of the law law far is Cia instigated directly or indirectly how about uh the TDS in general and all the other hoaxes probably CIA because again they control the media the media does the hoaxes if the CIA didn't want the media to present these hoaxes do you think they would no the CIA would call NBC and say you this doesn't help us don't do that one anymore and it would just stop it would just stop how about the uh Biden crime family and the fact that it becomes increasingly obvious that I don't know if it's a crime per se but that their behavior was sketchy and there was a lot of lying involved does it feel to you like the only reason that Biden is President is because the CIA has the goods on him and can control him and that he was part of the whole Ukraine really was a CIA operation and he's knee deep in it it looks like it to me everything about Ukraine can be explained by the CIA would you agree all of it and we we have information now that it's coming out that uh the CIA was involved since 2014 the maiden thing the you know the even the shelling of Russians who considered themselves Russians in what was then Ukrainian territory it all seems to be CIA so so there's that how about the uh Gemini Ai and how woke it is now do you think I could tie that to the CIA that that'd be quite a stretch wouldn't it watch me do it the CIA as we know has historically and this is a matter of record tried to control Hollywood and some celebrities because they know that controlling the media is a good way to control how everybody thinks Etc we know that they've controlled the news for a long time we know that they're kneed deep in social media companies we know that AI is the biggest thing coming and will be the most dominant technical Force do you think there's any chance that the CIA didn't get inside the AI efforts of all the major companies of course they do if they if they're not doing it they all need to be fired what are they doing if they're not doing that that's the most basic thing they should be doing if the if the CIA isn't all the way into our AI products and every every big company why aren't they they better be because that's their main job job is to determine how we think and the AI is going to be the main part of that have you noticed that nobody built an AI that can tell the truth some of it is because there is no truth but part of it is that what you see must be what the CIA wants you to see the fact that Google um pulled back Gemini although I don't know how it's pulled back it's still there um suggests that maybe they revealed themselves a little bit too obviously that we we are to believe that the intelligence of AI is rising organically it's not everything that's important will be programmed into it because the CIA needs us to believe a certain set of things we're going to start relying on the AI more and more so if the AI is not saying what the CIA want want to say they're going to tell the company to reprogram it until it does and the company will do it because we have plenty of um evidence from the Twitter files that they don't even have to threaten them they just have to have a meeting with them and they just have to walk in and say hey we the CIA we'd really like it if you did this thing what's the company going to do they got government contracts right and they want to keep them yeah they're going to do whatever the CIS want to do I would all right um how about Co do I need to say anything about that moving on how about the teachers unions have you been puzzled why we can't fix schools and you think it's the teachers unions do you think that the teachers unions are completely organic and free from any uh CIA influence doesn't seem possible because we know the CIA likes to control unions do you know why well if they're controlling something like the teamsters or one of those tough unions it's because they can get muscle on the street but they need to control unions in general because that's where the power is so my guess is that the CIA must want to control the Democrats through the teachers union and that requires allowing some slop in how the teachers unions control the the education system so tell me the teachers unions don't look like the Border problem it's a gigantic problem to the country it seems obvious to every Observer that it would be easy to fix right but it doesn't get fixed we can all see the problem and it just keeps lasting forever that suggests there's somebody behind this Throne who wants it to last because they're getting some benefit that's not obvious to you who else could it be well in case you trusted the CIA here's a report long thread from kakoa the great one of the better follows on the xplatform I don't know where kakoa gets all his research but wow does he have good stuff pretty much every day um so I'm just going to read this thing here this a thread uh the New York Times disclosed yesterday that the CIA built 12 Secret Spy Bases in Ukraine uh waging a shadow war against Russia for the past decade sort of understand why Putin was a little concerned after a US supported violent coup toppled Ukraine's democratically elected government CIA director John Braden visited Kev in April of 2014 shortly after the new Ukrainian government launched an quote anti-terror operation oh isn't that convenient got to get those terrorists but those terrorists happen to be in the Russians speaking uh part of eastern Ukraine H for eight years leading up to Russia's invasion in 20122 Ukraine's government with help from the CIA relentlessly bombed eastern Ukraine H millions of innocent civilians were caught in the crossfire of a geopolitical chess match between Russia and the United States this is part of the story often ignored by the Western press so Ukraine apparently is just CIA trying to take out Putin and always was and it's exactly what it looked like let's talk about ch Mia um NBC journalist Now NBC generally is known as CIA operation so not sure about this story but NBC journalist uh Kier Simmons uh explained that most crimeans are pro- Russia so how exactly would you take it back and why the the people who live in Crimea don't want to be anywhere but in Russia apparently at least by by some kind of majority uh Christopher Todd Nolan said this he said a few years ago I made a series of documentaries on the war in Ukraine this relatively short video is a summary uh well basically saying that uh an unelected government began killing its own people in the southeast of the country after a visit from Joe Biden and John Brennan so J John Brennan and Joe Biden linked at the hip sounds like it sounds like they're working together do do you think Biden is anything but a CIA puppet it doesn't look like it it looks like he's just a CIA puppet all right uh let's talk about some more AI nonsense the libs of Tik Tock uh was posting that uh meta's AI if you ask it to list the presidents of the United States it will skip Trump now I wouldn't believe that except they had a video video of the actual screen scripp skipping Trump and they actually uh assigned the 45th presidency to Joe Biden and they just left down Trump now you might say to yourself oh that's just like a little bug no it isn't no and I don't believe that they programmed just this question to do it let me tell you what is obvious from this it is obvious the AI has been instructed to ignore Trump related success obviously it ignored it so much that it wouldn't list him as a prior president what else would do that what else there's some kind of General suppression commands or series of commands in in meta AI that very obviously and very clearly is suppressing anything good about Trump anyway um so that's a Smoking Gun now do you believe that the CIA is not behind that do you think the employees came up with that on their own hey let's put some code in there that makes Trump always look bad maybe it's possible it could be just the employees but I feel like they might have a little help you know what I mean I'm suspicious of any gigantic American company that's in the information business and surprisingly got very large very quickly you know like Google and Facebook two examples um I had a long conversation with Google's Gemini yesterday and I can conclude that it got everything about my story wrong it did not understand the context of me it gave the official news account that I'm a big old racist now that's permanent do I have a legal action or because people also believe it is just an ordinary thing people believe because the news was wrong well um apparently Google Shares fell I don't know how are they today is Google to still down their shares fell after their AI generator seemed to make um a lot of uh lot of anti-white images and there's a question about the organizational incompetence uh there was a commenter uh Alex uh krowitz he was on CN CNBC this morning I guess maybe yesterday and he said that this the Gemini problem is a big deal because it's not just about Gemini making mistake but it really suggests there's more organizational incompetence within Google organizational incompetence now remember I told you that the truth is subjective and the the closest you can get to knowing what's true is prediction prediction did anybody predict that if Dei became the primary DNA of companies that it would guarantee a massive incompetence problem that we hadn't seen before we all did we all did and I hasten to say it has nothing to do with race it has nothing to do with gender it's just math if everybody starts fishing in the same fishing spot at the same time you just run out of fish that's the entire argument I if there were exactly amount the same amount of totally qualified people of all types then you could reach diversity without giving anything up but if you have a shortage of you know stem people and management people Etc and and diversity is your primary goal you will necessarily and in every case promote people who are not ready every time not sometimes it's not a risk it's a guarantee and now everybody who has experience in a big company knows that those who don't think Scott you this is the Mark Cuban point of view Scott you just have to maybe try a little harder dig a little deeper and you can find just as many people in the you know the minority world and female world that can do the job you just have to you know put a little effort into it that is mathematically impossible it might be possible for his one company to do it that's actually possible it's definitely possible for any one company to do it it is impossible by math for most companies to do it it guarantees that especially the big ones are going to have massive incompetence problems now is that the only problem probably not there probably other things as well but it was the most predictable outcome would be massive societal incompetence we could have predicted that the airplanes would start falling apart in the sky right we could have predicted that in fact I think people did they predicted it exactly uh Andy no talk asked Gemini about antifa um and uh he was asked about antifa's violence and it said that labeling antifa as violent risks perpetuating harmful stereotypes says we should consider the justification of their diverse tactics that include the use ofl political violence yeah maybe that you know a little bit of violence don't you know don't say the whole group is violent because they're a little bit of violence Sometimes some of them um but that it might be justified you know kind of the Justified domestic violence sort of thing that's what Gemini said to Andy know who was physically attacked by antifa and it told Andy no yeah maybe that's Justified maybe had to comeing Andy sorry Andy Google thinks she had it coming well I have a theory about why AI um can never be fixed and it's a Gelman Amnesia now you've heard me talk about this a lot in other contexts it goes like this there was a physic physicist named Gil man and he noticed that when he read the news about physics it was always way off it was just wrong but then he turned the page and be a topic he's not an expert in let's say geopolitical political stuff and he'd say to himself oh that's probably right and then one day he realized wait a minute if it's always wrong when I know what the truth is maybe it's always wrong and I just don't know because I don't know the truth in these other domains and indeed that's what we say um certainly when I look at the stories about myself are almost always wrong but who knows it besides me I'm the only one you maybe somebody I know really well but you you if any of you have ever been in the news you know right have any of you been in the news you know it's never real they always get basic things wrong that really matter so imagine that it's your job to build Ai and you're a technical person and you don't have um you're not an expert in physics you're not an expert in lots of things so you build this Ai and then you find out that it agrees with you on a lot so you think it's pretty smart and that when it does something that you do understand such as write code you find it quite helpful so if you're a person who knows code and you make a device that makes code you could look at it and say yeah you know it's not perfect I to tweak it but wow that really helped me you know it moved me ahead quite a bit now what happens if the people were making it um see that it tells a story about me that's not quite true well they don't know because they believe the same thing that they AI said because they got it from the news and the news is all fake let let me say this in the funniest way for thousands of years humans have been lying about everything important in writing in all of our you know books and Medias and everything else and then we thought it was a good idea to train an advanced intelligence on a body of work which we know to be all lies and we built Intelligence on a DAT base that we knew were all lies now why would we do that it's Gelman Amnesia we didn't know they were all lies we only knew the one thing we knew and then we tweaked it until it worked okay it does write code huh I write code it writes code my you know I make mistakes it makes mistakes this is pretty good but as soon as it gets into any other domain such as mental health the people who programmed it are blind so if the if the AI says you know I think that uh prosecutor one of those Trump prosecutors is a perfectly capable person would the programmer say that that was wrong but if the programmer was also let's say a psychologist and a psychiatrist they might look at that same person and say oh I'm seeing some indications of bad mental health could they ever let AI say that of course not so even if AI could see the truth it will be immediately turned off because the people who are programming say ah I got it wrong I got another wrong thing about this prosecutor because I know that she's not biased I better change that there is no way to get there from here where we want to get to is an AI That's smart and unbiased it's not a technical problem let me say that clearly it's it's not a technical problem the problem is with us the problem is that we created an entire body of work that is mostly lies it's mostly motivated lies and then we trained the AI on our motivated lies and we're wondering why it's unbi why it seems biased it can't be anything else how are you going and who is so smart that they could train it to be unbiased who's the unbiased person I don't know any how in the world is it going to arrive at an unbiased view of anything it can't it can't it can't pull unbiased out of only bias there's no way that it's built to even you know manage that situation all right so I think gal and Amnesia is why we'll never be able to build it and we'll never it'll take a long time to realize that it's impossible so I think one of the the big proofs of the simulation will be when we realize that we can't fix AI now there's a prediction for you we will come to realize that this bias problem is unfixable because it was never the technology that was the problem everybody get that the technology is fine it's doing exactly what they built it to do they looked at what humans do and built an intelligence based on it except the teis didn't realize that all of their news is untrue because if you work in Silicon Valley you think well the things I know about are't always true but the rest of that stuff is true so I'll just train it on the rest of the stuff it'll be fine and I'll just tweak it on the things that I know about and then we got it perfectly unbiased they will give up on that they will give up because it is unsolvable logically it can't be solved it's not the technology it's not how they tweak it and that will get us one closer to the level where we understand we are a simulation in level one of awareness I call that the child level in level one of awareness you believe that adults tell you the truth Santa Claus is real okay uh tooth fair is going to put a quarter under your pillow sounds good that's level one child level one of awareness level two comes when you realize that adults sometimes lie you say oh god there are bad adults and then they're good adults there's some adults who tell the truth and there's some who lie that's level two level three is when you understand that reality might be fixed like there might be an actual reality but that we don't have access to it and our interpretations of it our narratives are purely subjective so subjective that we literally can't tell if we're the bad guys or the good guys in the story right take Ukraine are we the bad guys are we the good guys we don't know we are so we are so um in our subjective worlds that even the most basic questions are we the bad guys we can't tell what about wokeness are the people bringing you wokeness the good guys or the bad guys depends who you ask the most basic questions of reality we don't know and that's that's level three where you realize that wait a minute maybe everybody's hypnotized that's level three but at that point you still believe that it's mostly other people who are having the problem you believe that you have a thing called common sense and it is protecting you from the problems that other people are having wow it's a good thing I haven't been fooled by that yeah I get that there's a difference about whether we're the bad guys or the good guys in these various issues but it's obvious to me it's obvious to me so I'm not really part of that I'm I'm an observer of other people who have subjective problems understanding this base reality but I'm I'm just on the outside I'm like this smart Observer that's level three um level four is coming you know what level four is once AI has completely proven to us that we are only a narrative driven species and that we don't know the truth and we don't have access to it and never well somewhere around that point you're going to become an author and I don't mean writing books I mean you're going to start authoring your environment your actual reality now you might only be authoring your subjective impression of what your reality is but it's all you have if you believe that you won the Olympics and you go through your entire life thinking you did well he did even if he didn't and and I would say that level four where you realize that nothing's real or at least you don't have access to reality it's all it's all narrative we're close in that level we will also realize that we are a simulation created by a higher entity some of you are already there but we're probably no more than a year or two away from the general consensus being that we're there it's going to be a lot like thinking the election was rigged two-thirds of the country thinks the elections are sketchy didn't start out that way that took five years two years or so well you could say you know less from 2020 and I've got a prediction well actually I'm going to tell you about a prediction um I've reminded you of this many times but I'm quite aware that it doesn't register like it's something I say and you've heard it before but until reality caught up with it it didn't make as much sense in 2015 I told you in public a number of times that Trump would change more than politics he would change our understanding of reality itself and then we watched and he did he brought us all the way to the middle of the third level of awareness AI is going to take you over the over the Border AI is what will convince you that you're living in a simulation not just the fact that it can create a simulation that's perfectly you know photorealistic but we will realize that we can't program the AI to know things about important things because will just be somebody's opinion the programmers that there is no such thing as here are the facts and we all agree on them if if we could just be smarter we'd all agree and I would say that that prediction is absolutely true already you know not the part about knowing you're in a simulation but would you agree with the first part of the prediction that Trump ripped a hole in reality and nothing looks the same anymore agree yeah now remember I told you that the closest you can get to reality is prediction so my next prediction now that you saw that that one was uncannily right I don't think anybody's ever made a bolder prediction than that I actually told you that reality would change while you watched who has ever predicted that now it was you know people were impressed when I said Trump would be president and then he became president that was impressive it's nowhere near as impressive as telling you that reality would change while you watched those are completely completely different Realms yeah and I nailed that and it was obvious to me now there's a member watching right now who just completed a course in hypnosis um your head is spinning right now isn't it because once you complete a course in hypnosis you can see all of this all the things that were just confusing just lock into place and you say Ah that's why it was purely subjective and it affects me as well as other people I'm not exempt and that's when you enter the simulation speaking of reality um 77% according to rasmason of likely us voters believe it is likely Putin hadn't have only murdered um I think that the uh the idea that um Ukraine actually no what is it Ukraine's Ukraine actually said that he died of natural causes yeah to me that feels a little CIA is all right ladies and gentlemen um to conclude I don't know what the CIA does and doesn't do I don't have access to that I'm just saying that if you're looking for explanations that explain everything the simulation Theory explains a lot Gman Amnesia explains a lot my chart of the more money is involved the more BS and the more lies explains a lot and the possibility that the CIA and John Brennan specifically is behind a lot of things that you don't understand in politics explains a lot and that ladies and gentlemen is a show you could not ever see if I had corporate sponsors this is why I'm a subscription entity um so if you'd like to join the locals Scott adams.
locals.com I would welcome you and we do more of this uh that you don't get to see in the morning all right that's all for now thanks for joining on You.
Tube and Rumble and the xplatform I will see you tomorrow same place same time
welcome to the highlight of human
civilization it's called coffee with
Scott Adams and that's what we're going
to do in addition to talking about the
news and I'm going to boost your level
of
awareness you're going to take everybody
up to a higher level of awareness
today challenge accepted and if you'd
like to get a good start in this higher
level of awareness all you need is a CPP
a Mugger a glass a tanker cheler Stein a
canteen Jugger flask vessel of any kind
fill it with your favorite liquid I like
coffee en Joy me now for the unparallel
pleasure of the dopamine here the day
the thing that makes everything better
it's called the simultaneous siping
happens now
go oh so
good now I don't want to get you too
excited but there will be a
whiteboard a whiteboard
huh that's right well let's start with
this cool news I saw Brian relli post on
X about a uh a
portal it's one of the coolest uses of
Technology I've seen so if you imagine
something that's bigger than a person
and a big round circle and the center of
the circle is a screen you know a huge
personized
screen and you could put it in any City
and a person could walk up to it and
they will see the person in the other
portal so it's sort of a hard coat you
know it's it's always up and here's the
cool thing it has a a translator built
in so you can walk up to the portal in
let's say Paris or wherever is I guess
it's going to be in different places you
walk up to the portal in Paris and then
somebody on the street in China would
see you standing there at the portal and
they would walk walk up they would speak
in Chinese you would speak in French and
you would have a complete conversation
in real
time now that's insanely
cool I don't even know what to say about
it it just like it just activates every
like hair in my body to stand up don't
think about that too long yeah it's just
one of the coolest things I like to
start the show with just something to
imagine and I ask you this couldn't stop
war did you ever wonder what would
happen if these
citizens got to vote on war and actually
talk to each other directly hey do you
guys want a war because I I feel like we
don't really want one over here but our
government is kind of pushing us toward
us and then the other people in whatever
country would say you know I'm glad you
talked to me on the portal because uh
we're not too crazy about war either how
about we just fire our leaders and don't
have a war
yeah it's actually a threat to the uh
threat to power If people could talk to
each other uh with
translation here's a question for you
that I just thought of so I don't know
if it's a good one yet give me one
second to think if this is a really dumb
thing to
say no I think it might make
sense since we've had good
Communications in the world so that
would exclude let's say the Civil War
war and it would exclude you know the
Revolutionary War and those earlier Wars
but since we've had internet and since
we've had really good you know phones
and
communication how many wars have there
been between the United States and
somebody who spoke the same
language let's I actual question it's
not I'm not being
rhetorical there are two
now well who would that
be cuz Russia doesn't speak
English the uh Palestinians I mean so a
lot of them have a second language but
they're mostly different language and
here here's the thing I wonder I wonder
if it's possible to have a war between
two Nations that speak the same language
their original language and have lots of
communication um technology where they
the citizens can talk to each
other now don't give me the Civil War
only in modern times when we
could in modern now okay I don't want to
see anything with 18 in it 1800 and
anything is not in this conversation I'm
very specifically saying America no
Russia plus Ukraine you're not getting
this yet
America have we gotten in a fight with
an English-speaking
country and so here's what I'm
speculating if Universal translation
just becomes part of all of our
technology which it looks like it will I
mean pretty easy to predict you would be
able to directly talk to citizens of any
other country that you were considering
have a war with and you might actually
be able to work it out without the
benefit of your
government that's actually a possibility
that Universal
translation plus Universal communication
you know the ability to reach anybody
could end War because it's very rare
that citizens want to be in a war it's
not rare when governments want to be in
a
war just think about it it might
actually end
War all right maybe and I'm being a
little optimistic Don Lemon uh got a
settlement from CNN got 24.5 million
that's what he would have been paid if
he stayed on for his
contract um but what do you think of
that 24.5 million that's pretty good
right do you know how much he takes
takes home if he makes
24.5 well he's going to pay over half of
it in
taxes he's probably going to pay 15% to
his
agent and God knows how much his lawyer
gets because his lawyer is you know
putting in some serious high level work
here if if I had to guess
24.5 I think you'll
Net
7 six or
seven yeah so that's probably six in the
bank now how many of you did that
calculation in your head when you saw
the 24 million and how many of you said
wow he just made $24
million it's actually closer to six I
mean it's a ton of money I'm not I'm not
saying it's a small amount I'm just
saying that if if you don't have that
filter on it you're missing it by you
know a factor of four
basically but the good news is Don Lemon
is going to launch his own show on the
xplatform called The Don Lemon show and
you know what I'm really excited about
it you know as as much as I complained
when he was on
CNN it was more about being in the
CNN uh Channel let me make a prediction
my prediction is that Don Lemon without
the Yoke of CNN on him is going to be a
good show does anybody want to take the
other side of
that I actually predict it's going to be
a good show and that you'll enjoy
watching it maybe not every day but I'll
bet you it'll be good and the reason I
think so is that I don't think he's
captured by um you know
wokeness that there there is indication
from you know earlier video of him
before wokeness became crazy that he's
just a reasonable person who can see
both sides of stuff I would love to be
on his show it's the number one show I
would like to be invited on so if you if
anybody knows him let him know I'd love
to talk to him um there's a New York
Times writer who says he was uh he was
Ed for saying he liked Chick-fil-A
sandwiches does that sound true I don't
know it sounds like it could be I'm just
going to say maybe because it's fun it's
not too important so I'm just going to
say ah let's let's let's treat it like
it's true do you agree let's treat it
like it's true because it sounds like
something that would be true and here's
the
reason uh I guess he ended up in an HR
or something or maybe his manager talked
to him and said uh we don't do that here
they hate gay people so you can't say
that you like
chickfila and be a writer at the D New
York
Times all right all right so I'm working
toward my theme today there will be a
theme and we'll see if you can spot it
before I tell you what it is but uh
that's a hint so Dr Phil went on The
View and had a little mix up with the
view the host of The View about how bad
it was that the schools were closed of
course I believe that the hosts of The
View were in favor of school closures Dr
Phil gave them a dose of reality now
here's what's really fun about Dr Phil
are you
ready I think that because he's been a
TV guy and an Oprah an Oprah creation
for years that people assume he's left
leaning without knowing the truth is
that fair assumption that the public
doesn't really know that he's not a woke
Lefty
they probably assume he's just a TV guy
he's you know from Oprah's orbit of
course he's just going to be sort of a
lefty guy but he apparently is now free
from all constraints corporate
constraints because I because his
regular show is over I think he's doing
something new I don't know the details
but I suspect that he fully owns
whatever he's going to do and that means
he's
free Dr
Phil just entered the chat now you might
say to yourself well that's just one
more person you know one more voice no
it's Dr
Phil it's Dr Phil it's not just one more
voice th this is like a Dr Jordan
Peterson you know this is like uh Tucker
Carlson this is somebody it's like V is
somebody whose communication abilities
are beyond what you normally see and is
able to see all sides of an
argument my
God Dr Phil just entered the chat yes
you you got ahead of me this is Dad
energy what does Dr Phil have more than
any human you've ever seen in your
entire
life more dad energy than I've ever seen
name one person who has more pure dad
energy than he does
nobody right so big uh big Welcome to
the
um I would like to say that people like
me who got
cancelled um and then didn't die have
made it easier for people who are maybe
a little
more let's say
established maybe they have more you
know more to lose or something but I
feel like the people who took the arrows
in the back uh make it easier for
anybody else to join the fight so I hope
that's the case
uh Byron York is posting telling us
about Leticia James you know she's the
AG who uh ran for office to bring down
Trump and then she found some BS reason
to do
it and she's posting every day gly the
extra gazillion dollars of Interest he
has to pay on what he's already um on
the line to pay now how disgusting is
that that she's bragging about
it now some people ask is that even
legal and I assume it is legal you know
Free Speech I'm I'm good for free speech
I think it's legal but it's the most
distasteful thing and unethical I think
it's unethical for sure but it's so
distasteful that it's just
mind-boggling now I have a hypothesis
which uh speaking of Jordan Peterson I
tagged him on my post because it seems
to me that a lot of what we think is a
difference of
opinion is mental
health and this to me looks like toxic
toxic
narcissism you know I'm right right so
the fact that she's she ran to bring him
down because that was such a popular
thing and she'd be such a celebrity and
such a star if she did and she also ran
on bringing down the NRA because if she
did she'd be such a celebrity and such a
star and now she's uh doing a dance on
Trump's economic Grave by you know
posting that to make herself more
noticed more of a celebrity more of a
star now is there anybody here who
actually has experience in mental health
uh as in a psychologist or
psychiatrist that okay we got at least
one
two oh okay I got a lot of people
listening who have that skill set can
you agree or disagree or or if you don't
want to have an opinion does it seem to
you really
obvious that narcissism is her
problem I just want to see in the
comments do you agree it seems you know
you can't to be fair if we're being fair
you cannot diagnose a mental health
problem in another person from a
distance and do it ethically wouldn't be
ethical to do it but I'm not a
psychiatrist I don't think those ethical
standards apply to my
observation my
observation is that she and
fonnie uh and there might be some others
maybe Alvin brag are are suffering with
some kind of
narcissism and that if they were
diagnosed they would actually get that
diagnosis that's what I think so we keep
confusing political opinion and mental
health and it's really it's really
bad this is very much mental health and
you know you see it with the Trans
movement there there whatever part of
that is based on real people with real
problems I don't know I'm not an expert
but it's really obvious that a large
percentage of it and again I don't know
what percentage is just purely mental
health purely obviously now uh but I'm
no expert right it's just obvious to
anybody so we make this mistake over and
over again we treat people who literally
have mental health problems as if it's
just a difference of opinion probably
ought to stop doing that Joy Reed
somebody just posted a picture of Joy
Reed with her new Trump haircut Joy Reed
comes off as a mental health
problem
um uh what's her name
uh what's her co-host there who only
works on Monday what's her name Rachel
Rachel
madow yeah so racial mad now she looks
always to me like she's literally
suffering some kind of psychological
breakdown as she talks have you ever
seen that you look at her face and she
feels like she's being tortured by
demons on the inside when she talks now
again I'm not a mental health
professional but if she not under the
care of a professional I'd be really
surprised I'd be really surprised if
she's not under the care of a
professional you know in your private
life but again I'm no professional
myself so you're free to ignore my
observation Eric
we Eric Weinstein was talking about
physics and he said that I want you to
remember this the next time you start
talking about peer review and simply
using the normal
channels fundamental physics theory is
being destroyed within our institutions
by total nonsense and I don't know
why now the I don't know why is is the
payoff because if you don't know who I'm
talking about Eric uh Eric Weinstein he
would
know about the insides of you know the
physics Community because he's part of
that world so he would understand if
it's BS all you and I can't tell from
the outside necessarily but we could see
it he could see it and he's saying
there's something
wrong
now did you ever have the feeling that I
had at one point in time gosh I think
all this politics is full of
lies right I think politics is awful of
Lies but thank goodness we still have
science because science is not going to
be influenced by all these you know Bad
characters and Psych olical problems and
all that stuff all that bias we get rid
of that we got some
science well years ago here's a little
story I don't think I've ever told you
years ago uh maybe when I was in
my
30s um I got real interest in physics
having no background educational
background in physics whatsoever and let
me tell you what interested me about
physics it looked like it was complete
to
me that's what got me interested I
wasn't interested in the science I was
interested in the psychology of how we
could get to the point of believing what
I believed was obviously not true
obviously not true I'm talking about
basic reality you know the the the
mysterious stuff you know Bell's theorem
and you got your spooky action at a
distance and we're going to prove that
string theory is true any day now but it
didn't quite
happened and and to me oh and the fact
that the Universe has an
edge and that the speed of light has a
limit and that we're coincidentally here
you know Despite All Odds I mean there
are just so many things that didn't look
real now it could be that the only
problem is my low level of understanding
of physics but the more I looked into it
the more obvious it was that the phys
the
physicists really didn't understand
their own
field and I don't know if that's what uh
what Eric Weinstein is getting at you
know I think his I think his point is a
little more nuanced than you know a
little more interesting than that but to
me it looks like they don't know their
own field and I've I've thought that for
decades now recently find out that half
of all scientific
papers are just BS
you know people have tested it by making
fake papers and seeing if they passed
peer review about half of them do and
that matches the number that of
peer-reviewed studies that can't be
reproduced because they're probably not
true so science is indeed a ridiculous
thing that we pumped up to be more
important than it is because it it might
be the best we have but that's a long
way from being good
but you know even though physics is uh
sort of sketchy
looking at least climate science is real
am I
right at least we got climate science
completely
right so next story Michael
shellenberger um says there's a author
Dr Mike Hy I think H
lme uh Cambridge climate scientist well
he's going to tell some stuff about
climate science and and how big of a
problem it is let's see he says in his
new book oh okay climate emergency is
what he calls a noble
lie huh a noble
lie that that that feels like a like an
academic way of saying something
else a noble
lie well seems like a positive spin on
something that some somebody else
somebody with orange hair once said
about climate change what was that word
oh a
hoax ladies and
gentlemen it's too early to say for
sure but the simulation seems to be very
intent on lighting up a third act for
Trump that is like nothing you've ever
seen now I've long predicted that
Trump's thirdd act would be proof that
the election ction was
rigged I don't know if we need proof
when 2third of the country says it's
obviously
true I don't know if he needs proof he
got two-thirds of the country to say
yeah I think elections are not
real that's kind of a big win right and
that was all him that was all him one
person one person got 2third of the
country to not believe our elections are
real
[Laughter]
now you can say to yourself but but but
all these other Republicans were saying
it too they would have said it if Trump
didn't say it if Trump said you know
what stand down I think it was fair you
know let's accept
it his base would have gone along with
it I mean we would have you know talked
about it forever but we kind of would
have accepted
it uh it was one person who caused
two-thirds of the country to think the
elections are
rigged now that's my current belief
without the benefit of um without the
benefit of any proof would you like to
see my argument for why I believe that
climate change is almost certainly
and that our
elections are almost certainly
and that the war in
Ukraine is almost certainly
and maybe a few more things
and it's all going to be with one graph
on one whiteboard and it'll be the most
magnificent thing you've ever
seen I give you now the
explanation for everything that was
confusing
you I call it the
versus money graph if you're listening
to this on the lower line of the graph
we've got
money and then on the other side we've
got or
lies and uh there's a a hockey stick
kind of a graph there showing that the
more money is
involved the more
lies what things are expensive H name
something expensive let's see how bet
out changing the energy sources of the
planet Earth everywhere climate change
that's some super expensive stuff huh
what do you think happens when things
get that
expensive right the line goes through
the roof because people want some of
that
money now how about uh
Ukraine that Ukraine war is pretty
expensive
huh have there been any lies about the
Ukraine war nothing nothing but war war
is the thing you can guarantee is all
lies it's also the most expensive thing
we
do Iraq war all lies all Bs right now uh
how about what else do we have here see
climate science is expensive and war is
expensive how about
um how about just the economy in general
oh how about Co covid was expensive how
about those vaccinations
how about
Healthcare how about
reparations how about college I'm just
reading your
comments do do you see it
yet everything expensive is a lie
because it brings out the
liars and and it's a system
problem wherever there is
money there are moths going toward the
flame ah there's money there so you're
going to get 10 Crooks for every honest
person and eventually the 10 Crooks will
overwhelm the honest person if you even
have one right so and there's no real
other way this can
go there's not a second way this goes
you know that right do you all get that
it doesn't go this way
sometimes it's every
time it doesn't have the option of going
any other way as soon as there's enough
money it becomes completely corrupt now
at a lower level of money maybe you can
get away with stuff but once you get to
the big numbers it's all lies it's all
lies now let us develop that theme a
little bit shall
we
um so the fact that there's a uh
Cambridge climate scientist who's coming
out and saying that at least the alarm
part of climate science is a
Li um so that that's fun so it seems to
me that the conversation about
everything is now far more honest are
you all seeing
that the the the what do you call it the
uh um what's that called the effect with
sort of the bounce back or the counter
effect it it seems pretty strong there's
a whole bunch of people who seem to be
able to say the truth now that couldn't
the blow
a lot more people can talk about the
truth all right here's some more
evidence that we are living in a
simulation uh I watched a video this
morning of a robot uh doing a series of
tasks sort of
autonomously and have you ever noticed
that the robots are all
naked and they look kind of
male like when you see a robot you never
think female do
you it's always a naked man so this is
how you know you're in a simulation I'm
watching this robot who looks like a
naked guy and it's being U posted by the
founder of the company that makes the
robot and his name is Brett
Adcock so as I'm looking at this naked
male robot with no
genitalia that was created by a guy
named ad
coock I said to myself AI robotics I
think is an Archer if ation is where
he's from
um I can't ignore that I cannot ignore
that so don't you imagine that buying a
robot will be someday like buying a car
I was just shopping for a car by the way
do you know it's impossible to buy a
vehicle has anybody tried to buy a
vehicle they don't let you do it
anymore I got I go to Toyota to buy a
truck there are none on the lot they go
oh yeah we don't really keep them here
but you can buy one that's in the
pipeline and I said oh will the pipeline
have ones that are have the features I
want well they all have different
features oh so the odds of one that's in
the pipeline that is not already bought
because people are buying them in the
pipeline one that's not already bought
that also has the features I want what
are the odds of that well it's about
zero so then I say well then but I could
just you know build one yeah I could
order one with my specifications
right and I'd be willing to wait I'll
wait six months I just want to get the
truck I want and then the Toyota guy
saids we don't do that anymore and I
said what don't you do anymore make
trucks that people want you say yeah
yeah no we just make the trucks we want
to make put them in the pipeline and
people are buying them so you can't you
can't test drive
it you can't
can't test drive it and you can't order
it with the features you
want that's a real thing and and the
reason they can do that is that all of
their trucks are bought as fast as they
make them they don't have to do
better yeah they don't have to so then I
said to myself well heck with Toyota
I'll go over to Ford and I'll get a
Bronco so I start looking at the
Broncos and they range from like $30,000
to $105,000
for Bronco did you know that that the
highest ones are well over
$100,000 and so I have to do this like
major research to find out you know what
features I want between $34,000 and
$115,000 there must be some of that
that's unnecessary right somewhere in
between might be sane I don't know so
first thing I have to I have to spend my
afternoon doing all this research do you
think that did me any good no because
when I contact the dealer they'll only
have three of them and they won't be the
ones I
want do you think I can order
one I don't know maybe but so yeah
everything is uh incompetent but I think
if you buy a robot it'll be like buying
a car someday and it'll ask you what
package you want with
it do I need to connect those dots or
are you already with me they're going to
ask you what package you want with it So
when you buy a robot by Mr
Adcock you can specify what package you
want okay moving on uh Rowan Chong who
talks about AI on exot he's real good
follow if you want to keep up with AI
does a real good job every
day he says that uh Google's deep
mind uh unveiled Genie it's a AI system
that can generate interactive video
games from just a text or image
prompt it can create an entire
functioning video game with a whole
realm and and world that never existed
anywhere on the Fly while you play
it now that's that's insane it's crazy
you know what else it is it's one step
closer to you understanding that you're
in a
simulation
yep
and the reason that it gets you closer
is as you realize that these simulated
worlds can be
created on
demand and here's the fun part in those
simulated uh
games they create the past on
demand let me explain so let's say
you're in a video game that's just
created by
Ai and you want to walk through a forest
that Forest doesn't exist
it it it comes into being as you walk
through it but as you walk through it
you get to see a tree that's 50 years
old it actually created the
past do you get
that by creating the the F the current
which is what it does it puts things
there that have been made
historically the
tree if if you started digging in the
ground in your simulated game let's say
it was one where you're trying to find a
treasure if you got lucky and you dig in
your simulated world and there's a
treasure down there was it down there
before you started digging it
wasn't the past is already being created
on demand within the context of a video
game sooner or later you're going to
realize that's how your real world works
that if you dig a hole in the backyard
unless somebody already dug a hole there
there's nothing below the dirt until you
dig until you need it it doesn't exist
because that's how you would build
software you would just build it to
exist when you needed it including the
past um I don't know how many hints it
will take before we all realize we're
living in a simulation but I would think
that the fact you can create your own
simulation would get you halfway there I
think the double slid experiment the
limit on the size of the universe the
speed of light Bells theorem the fact
that there's something called the
smallest unit of matter that doesn't
make any sense there can't be a smallest
unit of
matter because what's that made of and
if the smallest units of matter are all
made of the same thing nothing's going
to move all right uh and then of course
string theory is going to fail but in
order to
guarantee that we're a simulation you
need to be able to make predictions
that work would you agree H having a
theory that were a
simulation would be hard to prove unless
you could make a prediction that could
only be satisfied by a
simulation right
yep so I wonder if anybody's done
anything like
that well in
2015 I made the
prediction that Trump would change more
than politics that he would change the
nature of reality
itself and then AI came
along because we were we already
realized that um everything in politics
was
subjective but did you still believe
there was something that wasn't
subjective before you saw the AI is just
a woke biased monster did you think to
yourself hey if we build a robot at
least the robot won't have
bias do you think that was going to
happen the reason that we didn't build
the robot to be unbiased is that is
logically
impossible because we don't know what's
real if we knew what was real we could
build a robot to know what was real too
not only can we not build it and not
only do we not agree with what's real
there's no way to
check click
I'm just unlocking one level at a time
here click there's no way to check
what's real we live in a completely
subjective reality that may be connected
to some fixed reality that we're unaware
of it will become increasingly clear
that nothing is real when we build
machines they should be able to figure
out what is real and they can't do it
and they'll never be able to do do it
they can't figure out what's real
because there is nothing real there is
only
narrative there there might actually be
something real that we can't
see but beyond it our actual experience
is just narrative things we make up to
live
within I'll get back to that I'm going
to let that settle in I'm going to
circle
back um Italian TV is mocking Biden I
guess they've had two episodes now where
they've got a guy who acts like A
demented Biden and the entire joke is
that he's near death and and crazy and
stupid do you remember when one of the
biggest problems we were worried about
was that other countries wouldn't
respect
Trump what do you think they think
now what do you think they think now now
that Trump has been shown to be right
about everything the subject of obvious
lawfare and uh he's coming back
well I bet he's not as embarrassing as
Biden and let me talk about the dog not
barking I think we all agreed that if
Trump could just not cause any new
trouble he would just he's on a Glide
path to the presidency he just has to
not ruin it himself and we wondered if
he would have the discipline to be able
to pull that off if he even wanted to
try what do you think now
to me it's becoming increasingly obvious
that Trump is playing the winning
strategy he has the winning hand he just
has to not tell people what he has you
just don't show your hand and all he has
to do is be
cool just be cool just do what you do
and be cool and you're the next
president for
sure so I feel like yeah and it does
feel like maybe Vives and influences
again a positive
one it's really hard to tell somebody as
powerful As
Trump what works better than what he's
doing you would need to be a great
communicator and so smart that he would
recognize that it's coming from a good
source that's why we suspect fake might
be helping way more than you can see on
the public level because the the wisdom
that Trump is
exhibiting looks like a combination of
his own thinking plus wisely using
feedback from somebody he trusts that
that's your perfect
combination all right but at least
that's just the uh Italians it's not
like anybody else is making fun of our
president right right nobody else would
do
that um you should if you would like to
learn how to detect lies watch a 2017
video I reposted it came from The Maze
Mo X account uh John Brennan testifying
about Russia
collusion and watch when he's asked a
direct question by Trey gy and watch his
body language because the the beauty is
that we know he's lying now we didn't
know at the time so if you can find any
examples where you can know now that
somebody knew they were lying back then
go back and look at it and you'll be
able to spot it yeah let me let me give
you my physical impression of John
Brennan answering
questions he had a pen in his
hand and he's he's talking uh this
happened this happened and then he gets
the tough
question um definitely uh what happened
is what I'm thinking is I think that the
Russians uh did this is really obvious
just just watch his fidget
squirming and he bounces he starts
bouncing when he when he gets into the
stuff that's clearly a
lie all right
um so I would like to um disagree with
Elon Musk which is very rare hardly ever
happens but I partly
agree and it's about the theory that the
thing behind the mass migration is
Democrats wanting extra voters and extra
census and
representation now that's certainly
true it's true that they would get a
benefit from extra voters it's certainly
true that some of the Democrats have
noted it and set it out loud is that
right fact check me there are Democrats
who have set it out loud so we don't
have to wonder if they get some benefit
from it here's what I would like to
introduce
I don't believe
that I don't believe that it's a
universal plan that's coming from the
top I believe that the Democrats who
also don't know why it's happening are
putting their own interpretation of why
it must be happening oh well I'm a
Democrat probably they'll vote Democrat
my leaders are bringing them in the
borders open oh it's to get extra voters
so I think that the
Democrats are fooled about the real
reason and I think that Elon Musk seeing
that the Democrats say it out loud quite
reasonably attributes that reason to
what we see now that's a quite
reasonable
opinion they say it You observe it it's
true that it will create more Democrat
voters and it could swing everything so
it's quite reasonable to have that
theory here's my
theory if that were true
Biden would have already closed the
Border because it's not good for
him it's not good for Biden to get
reelected so I believe we have proof
that Biden is not in charge because
nothing could be more
clear than Biden should close the border
if he wants to get reelected would you
agree so it's not coming from a
political
place because the the top guy in the
political Place couldn't possibly be
better off
personally to get reelected because
remember this is a long-term play
politicians don't think
long-term right Biden is basically he's
not buying you know he's not buying
green bananas if you know what I mean
he's not looking at the long term he's
just trying to get elected and getting
elected very clearly every Democrat
knows it and every Republican knows it
he would just sign an executive Ord
close the border
tomorrow because we know he can do it he
knows he can do it everybody knows he
can do it the fact that he doesn't do it
is really strong indication he's not in
charge so what possible explanation
could there be if the top political
person who should be wanting it clearly
doesn't want it what else is
there well I'm going to go with the
obvious and I'm going to extend this to
to a larger
concept everything that's
expensive and you don't understand why
it's going the way it is is because the
CIA or intelligence entities but I'll
just say CIA for
short it seems to me that the most
reasonable working assumption is that
the CIA and again I'll just use them for
intelligence as a short hand uh because
there are lots of different entities but
it seems to me they must be coordinating
with the
cartels to not only control Mexico's
government but also to make sure that
American interests and Manufacturing
doesn't get
attacked and it looks like for reasons
that are kind of mysterious American
interests don't seem to get
attacked and we can conclude that the
cartels do run Mexico the government
itself because the Mex the Mexican
military knows where their own border
is if they wanted to control it with
Mexican military they would just put
their troops there but they don't they
let the cartels I say let but that's not
what I mean the cartels control the
border that means they control the
country does anybody think that the
power that controls the border of the
country doesn't control the
country does anybody think
that that would be ridiculous so it
could be that every time you see a weird
Distortion where the country is not
operating the way you think Common Sense
tells you it should every bit of your
common sense says close the border even
most Democrats would agree all common
sense yet it doesn't happen the only
reason I can think of for this and all
the other things that don't make sense
that are big and
expensive is that it's the CIA and that
there's a bigger plan that maybe we
don't and maybe it's a good idea I don't
even know maybe it's a good idea but
imagine the
alternative let's say the CIA did not
work with the
cartel well we would not have functional
control of the Mexican Government which
seems really really important if they're
your
neighbor right if we didn't control the
Mexican Government you don't think
Russia would be trying to control it so
they could put a little Badness on our
doorstep just like we do to them of
course they would but if you control the
cartel and the cartel controls the
government and some Russian uh guy tries
to influence Mexico what
happens cartel just kills him and nobody
ever hears about
it so it seems to me
obvious that if the CIA is in the
business of controlling other countries
for the benefit of American interests
usually
economic that we would have to control
Mexico there's no way to do it directly
by controlling the government because
they're puppets instead your best you
can do is to partner with not control
but partner with the cartels and say
look if you leave our big corporations
alone and you let us you know get what
we want in terms of Mexico staying not
Russian then and I'm just using the
Russian thing as an example of anything
we don't
want then we'll let you get away with
your normal crimes
now is there any precedent for that in
let's say law
enforcement has Law Enforcement ever let
somebody oh like a wey
Bulger uh do crimes right in front of
them because they wanted to control the
The Entity that they controlled yeah
isn't it Whitey bulgar is exactly that
example right so and lots of them there
there are plenty of examples so that
would actually be a normal thing for our
CIA to work with the baddest people in
the country Mexico for some common
interest very normal you would expect so
my my theory is that the the idea that
Democrats are bringing in extra voters
is a CIA cover story for what's really
happening and that it's such a good
story that Democrats themselves believe
it at the lower levels but not at the
Biden level at the Biden level he might
actually know what's going on
on now I'm going to make a prediction
based on this
hypothesis the prediction is that Trump
wins and the cartels are not militarily
attacked because he said he would all
the all the Republicans said they would
but I don't think it's going to happen I
think that you get an office and the CIA
sits you down says here's the deal if we
don't work with the cartels they're
going to unleash Horrors in this country
like you've never seen the drug traffic
will
triple the and basically we won't own
Mexico anymore they won't cooperate and
all the American interests in
manufacturing will be at
risk and then they say so our deal with
the Devil is we're going to let 100,000
people die of
overdosis but we don't think they're the
important
people right we don't think they're the
important people or we' protect
them so that's what it looks like to me
just a
hypothesis who do you think was behind
ESG Dei and wokeness in general who was
behind
that now you say yourself Scott that's
not the
CIA that that sort of came out of you
know ibam kendi and you know various
people and authors and the WF and
basically you sort of grew organically
and a lot of things but let me ask you
this do you think that it got
turbocharged by the George Floyd
situation would you say that's fair to
say it was turbocharged by the George
Floyd situation because you can see it
in the data like white people just
stopped being hired by big corporations
it just stopped right now who is behind
George
Floyd well obviously the CIA didn't
cause the the death you know they didn't
cause him to be stopped by the
police but what turned George Floyd from
an ordinary
tragedy the police action with a tragedy
into the biggest story in the
country well the media did right the
media turned to George Floyd what could
have been a story about one person
tragic as it was it turned into a
national story that influences all of
our thoughts about everything how was
that done well that was done through
social
media and the mainstream media making it
the biggest Story of the Year why did
the mainstream media make it the biggest
Story of the Year who controls
that I think the CIA does Am I
Wrong isn't our media
completely uh subject to what the CIA
says is the primary
story of course it is so even all the
deic
ESG
probably probably it all happen maybe
accidentally but because of the boosting
of the the uh George Floyd now why would
they boost George
Floyd why why would why would the CIA
want to do that seems like a bad idea
doesn't it well it would be the number
one way to get rid of trump it would be
the number way number one way to say oh
all those Republicans who look like
Derek chovin
look what th look what those whes will
do right so I believe that George Floyd
was really about getting rid of trump I
believe that it was CIA at least boosted
it may it may have had an organic nature
to it but it it clearly was boosted like
crazy and I don't believe that any of
our top
stories are
organic I think our our B level stories
that are just sort of interesting are
organic but the top stories I don't
think ever are and the reason is that
the CIA can't take that chance the CIA
is in the business of making us think
the way they want us to
think they would say for the benefit of
the
country and to make other countries
think the way they want them to think
it's not about the truth it's about
making you think what they want to think
so to me it looks like the CIA is the
cause of the George Floyd the racial
division uh all of the Dei the massive
discrimination against white people
I also wonder if ibam kendi is organic
and
natural now I don't have any information
that would suggest otherwise but it
would be a normal CA method I as I
understand it to find
influencers and to boost influencers
that they want to boost for example we
assume that they boosted Elvis maybe and
or well not Elvis let's say John Wayne
you know in the old days they'd make the
war movies seem awesome so You' join the
military
so I
wonder given the uh and let me be honest
Ibraham keny doesn't seem like an
intellectual
Powerhouse he looks like somebody who
must have been boosted by
something you know what I mean like
Jordan Peterson became a national
phenomenon and you listened to him for
one minute and you understand why right
one minute of listening to Jordan
Peterson and you automatically know why
he's world
famous there's no doubt about
it if you listen to Ibraham kendi now of
course I I have a cultural uh you know
sort of a block there but even if you
were if you were black and American and
you listen to Ibraham kendi would you
say that's the smartest guy I've been I
heard
lately I don't know if it feels like he
must be
boosted because his importance is um an
a whack with what he's bringing to the
table just a
theory um what's behind all the terrible
movies the wokeness so the CIA probably
was behind George Floyd what about
um
Charlottesville remember the
Charlottesville
hoax so it was not only hoax what Trump
said about
it which was brought to you by the media
and who controls the
media the
CIA so probably the whole the fine
people oax was probably a CIA op that's
my guess because all all the major media
said it was true even though it was
obviously not just totally obviously not
true
um and that suggest some power behind
the throne power behind the media CIA
that that would be their normal business
um have you have you been surprised that
there hasn't been a Charlottesville
2 like what happened to all those people
and aren't there lots more who would you
know would want to do a successful March
like that from their perspective wasn't
as successful it you know hypothetically
if they were real and they were actual
you know racist and a lot of were I know
a lot of them were for sure they were
racists but if this was a big thing that
sort of had its own energy you'd see it
again there'd be another March somewhere
but the fact that only happened once has
op written all over
it yeah it doesn't look
real how about the uh we're up to 14
Russian hoaxes uh many of them by John
Brennan
how many of the Russian hoaxes are just
CIA or
excia who basically are still CIA in my
opinion um probably all the Russian
hoaxes or maybe half of them or more
were just pure
CIA and I think somewhat obviously
because Brennan was Central to those
efforts you know the laptop one
Etc um how about all the lawfare against
Trump
do you do you think the law fair against
Trump is just Democrats knowing what to
do they they all sort of know what to do
so they just do it it's like uhuh we
we'll we'll elect us some prosecutors
that you know want to get rid of trump
and then it just happens on its
own well I would argue that the
prosecutors are all funded by Soros
Soros and his organization I believe
have a connection to the Atlantic
Council which is staffed largely by xcia
director
s Soros the only thing that explains
Soros is that he's a CIA asset would you
agree the only explanation for Soros is
that he's a CIA asset there's nothing
else that make
sense so if the CIA wanted to get Trump
how would they do
it they'd have their Bank Soros fund a
bunch of prosecutors and then they would
shop a
venue and go to on Trump so I think all
of the law law far is Cia instigated
directly or
indirectly how about uh the TDS in
general and all the other
hoaxes probably CIA because again they
control the media the media does the
hoaxes if the CIA didn't want the media
to present these hoaxes do you think
they would
no the CIA would call NBC and say you
this doesn't help us don't do that one
anymore and it would just stop it would
just
stop how about the uh Biden crime family
and the fact that it becomes
increasingly obvious that I don't know
if it's a crime per se but that their
behavior was sketchy and there was a lot
of lying
involved does it feel to you like the
only reason that Biden is President is
because the CIA has the goods on him and
can control him and that he was part of
the whole Ukraine really was a CIA
operation and he's knee deep in it it
looks like it to me everything about
Ukraine can be explained by the CIA
would you
agree all of it and we we have
information now that it's coming out
that uh the CIA was involved since 2014
the maiden thing the you know the even
the shelling of Russians who considered
themselves Russians in what was then
Ukrainian territory it all seems to be
CIA so
so there's
that how about the uh Gemini Ai and how
woke it
is now do you think I could tie that to
the
CIA that that'd be quite a stretch
wouldn't
it watch me do
it the CIA as we know has historically
and this is a matter of record tried to
control Hollywood and some celebrities
because they know that controlling the
media is a good way to control how
everybody thinks Etc we know that
they've controlled the
news for a long time we know that
they're kneed deep in social media
companies we know that AI is the biggest
thing coming and will be the most
dominant technical
Force do you think there's any chance
that the CIA didn't get inside the AI
efforts of all the major
companies of course they do if they if
they're not doing it they all need to be
fired what are they doing if they're not
doing that that's the most basic thing
they should be
doing if the if the CIA isn't all the
way into our AI products and every every
big company why aren't they they better
be because that's their main job job is
to determine how we think and the AI is
going to be the main part of
that have you noticed that nobody built
an AI that can tell the
truth some of it is because there is no
truth but part of it is that what you
see must be what the CIA wants you to
see the fact that Google um pulled back
Gemini although I don't know how it's
pulled back it's still there um
suggests that maybe they revealed
themselves a little bit too
obviously
that we we are to believe that the
intelligence of AI is rising
organically it's
not everything that's important will be
programmed into it because the CIA needs
us to believe a certain set of things
we're going to start relying on the AI
more and more so if the AI is not saying
what the CIA want want to say they're
going to tell the company to reprogram
it until it does and the company will do
it because we have plenty of um evidence
from the Twitter files that they don't
even have to threaten them they just
have to have a meeting with them and
they just have to walk in and say hey we
the CIA we'd really like it if you did
this thing what's the company going to
do they got government contracts right
and they want to keep them yeah they're
going to do whatever the CIS want to do
I
would
all right um how about
Co do I need to say anything about
that moving
on how about the teachers
unions have you been puzzled why we
can't fix schools and you think it's the
teachers unions do you think that the
teachers unions are completely organic
and free from any uh CIA
influence doesn't seem possible
because we know the CIA likes to control
unions do you know why well if they're
controlling something like the teamsters
or one of those tough unions it's
because they can get muscle on the
street but they need to control unions
in general because that's where the
power
is so my guess is that the CIA must want
to control the Democrats through the
teachers union and that
requires allowing some slop in how the
teachers unions control the the
education
system
so tell me the teachers unions don't
look like the Border
problem it's a gigantic problem to the
country it seems obvious to every
Observer that it would be easy to
fix right but it doesn't get fixed we
can all see the problem and it just
keeps lasting
forever that suggests there's somebody
behind this Throne who wants it to last
because they're getting some benefit
that's not obvious to
you who else could it
be well in case you trusted the CIA
here's a report long thread from kakoa
the great one of the better follows on
the xplatform I don't know where kakoa
gets all his research but wow does he
have good stuff pretty much every
day um so I'm just going to read this
thing here this a thread uh the New York
Times disclosed yesterday that the CIA
built 12 Secret Spy Bases in
Ukraine uh waging a shadow war against
Russia for the past
decade sort of understand why Putin was
a little
concerned after a US supported violent
coup toppled Ukraine's democratically
elected government CIA director John
Braden visited Kev in April of 2014
shortly after the new Ukrainian
government launched an quote anti-terror
operation oh isn't that convenient got
to get those terrorists but those
terrorists happen to be in the Russians
speaking uh part of eastern
Ukraine H for eight years leading up to
Russia's invasion in 20122 Ukraine's
government with help from the CIA
relentlessly bombed eastern Ukraine
H millions of innocent civilians were
caught in the crossfire of a
geopolitical chess match between Russia
and the United States this is part of
the story often ignored by the Western
press
so Ukraine apparently is just CIA trying
to take out Putin and always
was and it's exactly what it looked
like let's talk about ch
Mia um NBC journalist Now NBC generally
is known as CIA operation
so not sure about this story but NBC
journalist uh Kier
Simmons uh explained that most crimeans
are pro-
Russia so how exactly would you take it
back and
why the the people who live in Crimea
don't want to be anywhere but in Russia
apparently at least by by some kind of
majority uh Christopher Todd Nolan said
this he said a few years ago I made a
series of documentaries on the war in
Ukraine this relatively short video is a
summary uh well basically saying that uh
an unelected government began killing
its own people in the southeast of the
country after a visit from Joe Biden and
John Brennan so J John Brennan and Joe
Biden linked at the
hip sounds like
it sounds like they're working together
do do you think Biden is anything but a
CIA
puppet it doesn't look like it it looks
like he's just a CIA
puppet all right uh let's talk about
some more AI nonsense the libs of Tik
Tock uh was posting that uh meta's AI if
you ask it to list the presidents of the
United States it will skip
Trump now I wouldn't believe that except
they had a video video of the actual
screen scripp skipping Trump and they
actually uh assigned the 45th
presidency to Joe Biden and they just
left down Trump now you might say to
yourself oh that's just like a little
bug no it
isn't no and I don't believe that they
programmed just this question to do it
let me tell you what is obvious from
this it is obvious the AI has been
instructed to ignore Trump related
success
obviously it ignored it so much that it
wouldn't list him as a prior
president what else would do
that what else there's some kind of
General suppression commands or series
of commands in in meta AI that very
obviously and very clearly is
suppressing anything good about
Trump anyway um so that's a Smoking
Gun now do you believe that the
CIA is not behind that do you think the
employees came up with that on their own
hey let's put some code in there that
makes Trump always look bad maybe it's
possible it could be just the
employees but
I feel like they might have a little
help you know what I mean I'm suspicious
of any gigantic American company that's
in the information business and
surprisingly got very large very quickly
you know like Google and
Facebook two
examples um I had a long conversation
with Google's Gemini yesterday and I can
conclude that it got everything about my
story wrong it did not understand the
context of me it gave the official news
account that I'm a big old
racist now that's permanent do I have a
legal action or because people also
believe it is just an ordinary thing
people believe because the news was
wrong
well um apparently Google Shares fell I
don't know how are they today is Google
to still down their shares fell after
their AI generator seemed to make um a
lot of uh lot of anti-white
images and there's a question about the
organizational incompetence uh there was
a commenter uh Alex uh krowitz he was on
CN CNBC this morning I guess maybe
yesterday and he said that this the
Gemini problem is a big deal because
it's not just about Gemini making
mistake but it really suggests there's
more organizational incompetence within
Google organizational incompetence now
remember I told you that the truth is
subjective and the the closest you can
get to knowing what's true is
prediction prediction did anybody
predict that if Dei became the primary
DNA of companies that it would guarantee
a massive incompetence problem that we
hadn't seen
before we all
did we all did and I hasten to say it
has nothing to do with race it has
nothing to do with gender it's just math
if everybody starts fishing in the same
fishing spot at the same time you just
run out of fish that's the entire
argument I if there were exactly amount
the same amount of totally qualified
people of all types
then you could reach diversity without
giving anything up but if you have a
shortage of you know stem people and
management people Etc and and diversity
is your primary goal you will
necessarily and in every case promote
people who are not ready every time not
sometimes it's not a risk it's a
guarantee and now everybody who has
experience in a big company knows that
those who don't think Scott you this is
the Mark Cuban point of view Scott you
just have to maybe try a little harder
dig a little deeper and you can find
just as many people in the you know the
minority world and female world that can
do the job you just have to you know put
a little effort into
it that is mathematically
impossible it might be possible for his
one company to do it that's actually
possible it's definitely possible for
any one company to do it it is
impossible by math for most companies to
do it it guarantees that especially the
big ones are going to have massive
incompetence problems now is that the
only problem probably not there probably
other things as well but it was the most
predictable outcome would be massive
societal
incompetence we could have predicted
that the airplanes would start falling
apart in the
sky right we could have predicted that
in fact I think people did they
predicted it
exactly uh Andy no talk asked Gemini
about
antifa um and uh he was asked about
antifa's violence and it said that
labeling antifa as violent risks
perpetuating harmful
stereotypes says we should consider the
justification of their diverse tactics
that include the use ofl political
violence yeah maybe that you know a
little bit of violence don't you know
don't say the whole group is violent
because they're a little bit of violence
Sometimes some of them um but that it
might be justified you know kind of the
Justified domestic violence sort of
thing that's what Gemini said to Andy
know who was physically attacked by
antifa and it told Andy no yeah maybe
that's Justified maybe had to comeing
Andy sorry Andy
Google thinks she had it
coming well I have a theory about why AI
um can never be
fixed and it's a Gelman Amnesia now
you've heard me talk about this a lot in
other contexts it goes like this there
was a physic physicist named Gil man and
he noticed that when he read the news
about physics it was always way off it
was just wrong but then he turned the
page and be a topic he's not an expert
in let's say geopolitical political
stuff and he'd say to himself oh that's
probably right and then one day he
realized wait a minute if it's always
wrong when I know what the truth
is maybe it's always wrong and I just
don't know because I don't know the
truth in these other domains and indeed
that's what we say um certainly when I
look at the stories about myself are
almost always wrong but who knows it
besides me I'm the only one you maybe
somebody I know really well but you you
if any of you have ever been in the news
you know right have any of you been in
the news you know it's never real they
always get basic things wrong that
really
matter so imagine that it's your job to
build
Ai and you're a technical person and you
don't have um you're not an expert in
physics you're not an expert in lots of
things so you build this Ai and then you
find out that it agrees with you on a
lot so you think it's pretty
smart and that when it does something
that you do understand such as write
code you find it quite
helpful so if you're a person who knows
code and you make a device that makes
code you could look at it and say yeah
you know it's not perfect I to tweak it
but wow that really helped me you know
it moved me ahead quite a
bit now what happens if the people were
making it um see that it tells a story
about me that's not quite true well they
don't know because they believe the same
thing that they AI said because they got
it from the news and the news is all
fake let let me say this in the funniest
way for thousands of years humans have
been lying about everything important in
writing in all of our you know books and
Medias and everything else and then we
thought it was a good idea to train an
advanced intelligence on a body of work
which we know to be all
lies and we built
Intelligence on a DAT base that we knew
were all lies now why would we do that
it's Gelman
Amnesia we didn't know they were all
lies we only knew the one thing we knew
and then we tweaked it until it worked
okay it does write code huh I write code
it writes code my you know I make
mistakes it makes mistakes this is
pretty
good but as soon as it gets into any
other domain such as mental health the
people who programmed it are
blind so if the if the AI says you know
I think that uh prosecutor one of those
Trump prosecutors is a perfectly capable
person would the programmer say that
that was
wrong but if the programmer was also
let's say a psychologist and a
psychiatrist they might look at that
same person and say oh I'm seeing some
indications of bad mental health could
they ever let AI say that of course not
so even if AI could see the truth it
will be immediately turned off because
the people who are programming say ah I
got it wrong I got another wrong thing
about this prosecutor because I know
that she's not biased I better change
that there is no way to get there from
here where we want to get to is an AI
That's smart and
unbiased it's not a technical
problem let me say that clearly it's
it's not a technical problem the problem
is with us the problem is that we
created an entire body of work that is
mostly
lies it's mostly motivated lies and then
we trained the AI on our motivated lies
and we're wondering why it's unbi why it
seems biased it can't be anything else
how are you going and who is so smart
that they could train it to be
unbiased who's the unbiased person
I don't know any how in the world is it
going to arrive at an unbiased view of
anything it can't it can't it can't pull
unbiased out of only
bias there's no way that it's built to
even you know manage that
situation all right so I think gal and
Amnesia is why we'll never be able to
build it and we'll never it'll take a
long time to realize that it's
impossible so I think one of the the big
proofs of the simulation will be when we
realize that we can't fix
AI now there's a prediction for you we
will come to
realize that this bias problem is
unfixable because it was never the
technology that was the
problem everybody get that the
technology is fine it's doing exactly
what they built it to do they looked at
what humans do and built an intelligence
based on it
except the teis didn't realize that all
of their news is
untrue because if you work in Silicon
Valley you think well the things I know
about are't always true but the rest of
that stuff is true so I'll just train it
on the rest of the stuff it'll be fine
and I'll just tweak it on the things
that I know about and then we got it
perfectly
unbiased they will give up on
that they will give up because it is
unsolvable logically it can't be solved
it's not the technology it's not how
they tweak
it and that will get us one closer to
the level where we understand we are a
simulation in level one of awareness I
call that the child level in level one
of awareness you believe that adults
tell you the truth Santa Claus is real
okay uh tooth fair is going to put a
quarter under your pillow sounds good
that's level one child level one of
awareness level two comes when you
realize that adults sometimes lie you
say oh god there are bad adults and then
they're good adults there's some adults
who tell the truth and there's some who
lie that's level
two level three is when you understand
that reality might be fixed like there
might be an actual
reality but that we don't have access to
it and our interpretations of it our
narratives are purely
subjective so
subjective that we literally can't tell
if we're the bad guys or the good guys
in the
story right take Ukraine are we the bad
guys are we the good
guys we don't know we are so we are so
um in our subjective worlds that even
the most basic questions are we the bad
guys we can't tell what about wokeness
are the people bringing you wokeness the
good guys or the bad
guys depends who you ask the most basic
questions of
reality we don't
know and that's that's level three where
you realize that wait a minute maybe
everybody's
hypnotized that's level three but at
that point you still believe that it's
mostly other people who are having the
problem you believe that you have a
thing called common sense and it is
protecting you from the problems that
other people are having wow it's a good
thing I haven't been fooled by that yeah
I get that there's a difference about
whether we're the bad guys or the good
guys in these various issues but it's
obvious to
me it's obvious to me so I'm not really
part of that I'm I'm an observer of
other people who have subjective
problems understanding this base reality
but I'm I'm just on the outside I'm like
this smart
Observer that's level
three
um level four is
coming you know what level four
is once AI has completely proven to us
that we are only a narrative driven
species and that we don't know the truth
and we don't have access to it and never
well somewhere around that
point you're going to become an
author and I don't mean writing books I
mean you're going to start authoring
your
environment your actual
reality now you might only be authoring
your subjective impression of what your
reality is but it's all you
have if you believe that you won the
Olympics and you go through your entire
life thinking you did well he
did even if he
didn't and and I would say that level
four where you realize that nothing's
real or at least you don't have access
to reality it's all it's all narrative
we're close in that level we will also
realize that we are a simulation created
by a higher
entity some of you are already
there but we're probably no more than a
year or two away from the general
consensus being that we're there it's
going to be a lot like thinking the
election was rigged two-thirds of the
country thinks the elections are sketchy
didn't start out that way that took five
years two years or so well you could say
you know less from
2020 and I've got a
prediction well actually I'm going to
tell you about a prediction
um I've reminded you of this many times
but I'm quite aware that it doesn't
register like it's something I say and
you've heard it before but until reality
caught up with it it didn't make as much
sense in 2015 I told you in public a
number of times that Trump would change
more than politics he would change our
understanding of reality
itself and then we
watched and he did
he brought us all the way to the middle
of the third level of
awareness AI is going to take you over
the over the
Border AI is what will convince
you that you're living in a
simulation not just the fact that it can
create a simulation that's perfectly you
know
photorealistic but we will realize that
we can't program the AI to know things
about important things because will just
be somebody's opinion the programmers
that there is no such thing as here are
the facts and we all agree on them if if
we could just be smarter we'd all
agree and I would say that that
prediction is absolutely true already
you know not the part about knowing
you're in a simulation but would you
agree with the first part of the
prediction that Trump ripped a hole in
reality and nothing looks the same
anymore agree yeah now remember I told
you that the closest you can get to
reality is
prediction so my next prediction now
that you saw that that one
was uncannily right I don't think
anybody's ever made a bolder prediction
than
that I actually told you that reality
would change while you watched who has
ever predicted that
now it was you know people were
impressed when I said Trump would be
president and then he became president
that was
impressive it's nowhere near as
impressive as telling you that reality
would change while you
watched those are completely completely
different Realms yeah and I nailed that
and it was obvious to
me now there's a member watching right
now who just completed a course in
hypnosis
um your head is spinning right now isn't
it because once you complete a course in
hypnosis you can see all of
this all the things that were just
confusing just lock into place and you
say
Ah that's why it was purely
subjective and it affects me as well as
other people I'm not exempt and that's
when you enter the
simulation
speaking of reality um 77% according to
rasmason of likely us voters believe it
is likely Putin hadn't have only
murdered um I think that
the uh the idea that um Ukraine actually
no what is it Ukraine's Ukraine actually
said that he died of natural
causes yeah to me that feels a little
CIA
is all right ladies and gentlemen um to
conclude I don't know what the CIA does
and doesn't do I don't have access to
that I'm just saying that if you're
looking for explanations that explain
everything the simulation Theory
explains a lot Gman Amnesia explains a
lot my chart of the more money is
involved the more BS and the more lies
explains a lot
and the possibility that the CIA and
John Brennan specifically is behind a
lot of things that you don't understand
in
politics explains a lot and that ladies
and gentlemen is a show you could not
ever see if I had corporate sponsors
this is why I'm a subscription
entity um so if you'd like to join the
locals Scott adams. locals.com I would
welcome you and we do more of this uh
that you don't get to see in the morning
all right that's all for now thanks for
joining on YouTube and Rumble and the
xplatform I will see you tomorrow same
place same
time