Episode 2484 CWSA 05/24/24
Biden says revenge is not how to run a country. Okay. And more. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ If you would like to enjoy this same content plus bonus content from Scott Adams, including micro-lessons on lots of useful topics to build your talent stack, please see scottadams.locals.com for full access to that secret treasure.
Well, I see Rumbles in the house and Locals in the house. Let's hear from you. YouTubers in the house? I'd like to see at least one YouTuber before I start. Make sure you guys are good. There we go. YouTube's in the
View segment →house. Good morning, everybody, and welcome to Coffee with Scott Adams, the finest experience you've ever had in your life, I'll bet you. And if you'd like to take it up to levels that nobody can even see without some kind of Elon Musk rocket ship, well, all you need for that is a coffee mug or a g…
View segment →And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure, the dopamine of the day, the thing that makes everything better. It's called the simultaneous sip, and it happens now. You want to see the weirdest thing? I'm going to show you a picture from my college days. This is a true story. There was an undercla…
View segment →ors down in the dormitory. But anyway, for Halloween that year, we went as clones. See if you can tell which one I am. I'd like to think he was the poor man's version of me, but I'm not entirely sure. He's probably worth a billion dollars now. He was pretty smart, probably did a startup or somethin…
View segment →ing about starting a dog park that would have some shady place where you could plug in your laptop and sit at a table. And if you make it so it's sort of like picnic tables, you're going to have people who don't know each other sharing the same picnic table. And if they have a place to plug in their…
View segment →overdoses actually went down a little bit from 2023, down 4% from 2022. I don't know if this is real. It could be that they went down because the pandemic's over. The pandemic might have been a high point for drugs. Could be that all of our data is bad all the time, so it's not even real. Very possi…
View segment →tituting weed for stronger drugs? Maybe. I don't know. Maybe it works the other way, but I don't have data on it. Maybe the government is giving out fewer Subutex prescriptions, so fewer people are getting hooked. Maybe. I don't know. But certainly there was action in that direction. But I'm going…
View segment →know what? Why are you pretending that you have to lower the quality of people to get enough diversity? Now she said that in public, which suggests that she doesn't understand human motivation or how anything works, and somehow doesn't understand that systemic racism has made it impossible to not c…
View segment →ongress, do you know what I would say about her if there had never been DEI? I would have said, wow, she might be more capable than everybody in Congress. Because if she had to overcome things like being Black and being a woman in a world where that was not a free pass, I would have said, huh, you k…
View segment →your credentials? Now she also has some kind of legal degree. Do we assume that she got that the real way by being qualified? No, I don't assume that. I assume the opposite. I assume the opposite because we're in the context of DEI. And on top of that, seems to not understand the most basic element…
View segment →t to use it. So all right. Thomas Massie being awesome as usual has introduced a bill to eliminate taxpayer funding for online censorship. Yes please. And I'm thinking, wait a minute, why is it always the same guy who comes up with all the good ideas? Are you noticing the pattern? Who the hell did…
View segment →but it's such a head-shaker, and Turley is making a point that the fact that the regular media, you know, the corporate media, is not treating this as like the big story ever, just sort of ignoring it, tells you a lot. So this is a dog-not-barking situation. So the situation I'm talking about is th…
View segment →re deleting emails ahead of time before they got FOIA'd. And the nature of the conversations that we have seen suggests that they knew they were guilty and that they were trying to hide it. At least that's how it's being interpreted. I'll just say that's how it's being interpreted. Can't know their…
View segment →I that didn't look exactly like her but was a highly attractive blonde of the same age and then you gave it a voice that was based on not her but somebody who sounds a lot like her according to other people? Is that going to be legal? There's going to be massive lawsuits about all this stuff so we'l…
View segment →here's some people who were saying well it was just standard procedure. They just say that all the time. And there are other people, Mike Cernovich, Dan Bongino for example, who say no you idiots that is not standard procedure. Now how could it be standard procedure but also not a standard procedur…
View segment →other people too. So plenty of Asians, plenty of Blacks, plenty of Hispanics. Hey AOC seemed to be flipping out because remember I told you the Andre Agassi strategy where you don't go after your opponent's weakest shot you go after their strongest shot. Because if you get lucky and you can make th…
View segment →ay he is clearly not capable of handling a question that's not written in front of him with the answer. That's completely different in one year. What's he going to be by November? By November I don't even think there'll be a choice. It could be a really one person and one person who's just not even…
View segment →s saying very clearly and consistently we're all Americans we can pull together and one who says we're better off divided because that's kind of what he's saying. Biden anyway. Here's something Biden said in a post. He says Donald Trump and his MAGA Republican allies don't care about securing the b…
View segment →uch support is that you put 2,000 people in jail for political reasons. You're trying to jail the president for political reasons and Peter Navarro is still in jail. So revenge is going to be at the top of the menu. Revenge is at the top of the menu and it belongs there because that's what justice l…
View segment →Well, I see Rumbles in the house and Locals in the house. Let's hear from you. YouTubers in the house? I'd like to see at least one YouTuber before I start. Make sure you guys are good. There we go. YouTube's in the house.
Good morning, everybody, and welcome to Coffee with Scott Adams, the finest experience you've ever had in your life, I'll bet you. And if you'd like to take it up to levels that nobody can even see without some kind of Elon Musk rocket ship, well, all you need for that is a coffee mug or a glass, a tanker, a chalice, a canteen, a jug or a flask, a vessel of any kind. Fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee. And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure, the dopamine of the day, the thing that makes everything better. It's called the simultaneous sip, and it happens now.
You want to see the weirdest thing? I'm going to show you a picture from my college days. This is a true story. There was an underclassman who decided that he looked enough like me, and he decided that I was his role model because I was a year or two older. And he started dressing like me, and people noticed and started calling him the Clone. So rather than rejecting that and saying I'm not trying to copy him, he embraced it. He said, yeah, I'm totally trying to copy him. And it would get more and more extreme the entire time, and it just got funnier and funnier. He was a friend of mine. He lived just a few doors down in the dormitory.
But anyway, for Halloween that year, we went as clones. See if you can tell which one I am. I'd like to think he was the poor man's version of me, but I'm not entirely sure. He's probably worth a billion dollars now. He was pretty smart, probably did a startup or something.
Anyway, I saw a concept today in one of Owen's posts about what's called the third place. Have you ever heard that term? A third place. So your house is your first place, your place of work is your second place, and the third place would be like, I guess if you were in England it would be the tavern. If you were somewhere else it would be something else. Now my third place used to be my gym. You know, it's a place you could go to feel less lonely and maybe run into people.
But here's why I wanted to talk about it. I really think we need to design new cities around accidentally meeting your neighbors. Leaving it to chance just doesn't work. We need some way that in the normal course of business you run into people that you don't mind running into. You know, all voluntarily. Nobody's going to be forced to talk to their neighbors. But I've been looking into a number of businesses that I could start in my local area that would have a physical location, and I didn't realize that I was always thinking about them as the third place.
For example, I was thinking about starting a dog park that would have some shady place where you could plug in your laptop and sit at a table. And if you make it so it's sort of like picnic tables, you're going to have people who don't know each other sharing the same picnic table. And if they have a place to plug in their laptop and talk about your dog, hey, which one is your dog, it's kind of a perfect place to meet people. I've actually met good friends in the dog park. I had a few other ideas for that, but I think I might even call it the third place. I like the name so much. I'd call it a third place dog park. Yeah, and just build it around the human attraction, but also you can take your dog there. Wouldn't that be a good idea?
Anyway, couldn't make money from it, as my neighbor reminded me yesterday when I was talking about it. So where I live, our local real estate king and queen of the neighborhood, they're very, and I say that not as an insult, they're just very good at organizing things in the neighborhood. So I know I've met all of my neighbors just through the fact that they're fairly organized. We're all in a WhatsApp thing. It's actually a great situation.
Anyway, can you believe that overdoses are down? And obviously we're going to talk about Trump and the Bronx and all that later, but overdoses actually went down a little bit from 2023, down 4% from 2022. I don't know if this is real. It could be that they went down because the pandemic's over. The pandemic might have been a high point for drugs. Could be that all of our data is bad all the time, so it's not even real. Very possible. Maybe they just started reporting it differently. How about the fact that more people are substituting weed for stronger drugs? Maybe. I don't know. Maybe it works the other way, but I don't have data on it. Maybe the government is giving out fewer Subutex prescriptions, so fewer people are getting hooked. Maybe. I don't know. But certainly there was action in that direction.
But I'm going to offer the most provocative idea for why maybe ODs went down a little bit for that one year. I think the most likely explanation is we're off the pandemic. Don't you? 4% sounds sort of like just coming off the pandemic high. I don't know if it's real, but I would offer this possibility: all the junkies are dead. You can't kill somebody twice. There might be a logical end to how much the overdose problem can get. In other words, there might be a natural cap to it, and we might have hit it now.
Let me make a bad analogy. If you try to kill a head terrorist like a Bin Laden, it's not really going to stop things because there'll be a second in command. If you kill the second in command, it probably won't stop things because there'll be a third in command. But in theory, the quality of the terrorist goes down every time you kill one, you know, from the top down. Bin Laden, perhaps he was really good at it. Zawahiri, maybe he was really good at it. But when you get to maybe the fifth or sixth terrorist down in the organization chart, I think it probably starts falling apart. Like that fifth best terrorist isn't quite good enough.
But it could be that with the, that's a terrible analogy, maybe the worst I've ever done, but I think the overdoses are limited to people who would have a propensity to it. Once you run out of people who have a propensity, you don't make new ones, right? The people who are never going to become an addict are not going to wake up this morning and something changed. They were born people who were never going to be addicts because there is such a genetic component to this.
And if you take, let's take alcoholism. Alcohol is around 10% of the public. If alcohol killed you at a high rate like fentanyl does, it does kill you but at a higher rate like fentanyl, wouldn't you start running out of drunks? I think you'd actually start running out, you know, if the population has become stable. So it could be that.
Here's my favorite story of the day. Explorers say they found what they believe is the remains of a World War II ace pilot who was down in a jungle ravine. Now he was fairly famous for his exploits as a pilot, but here's the best part. His name is Richard Bong, B-O-N-G. I think his friends probably called him Dick. And if I were going to be a World War II flying ace and my name was Dick Bong, I would feel like I was the coolest person in the world. Well, you know, until I got shot down and died in a ravine in a jungle. But until then, cool name.
So I will be celebrating tonight in the man cave with the rest of the local subscribers, and we will do something, I don't know what, but something that would be appropriate to honor Dick Bong. Maybe some tubing kind of a thing. I don't know. You maybe could come up with an idea.
Well, do you remember when Marjorie Taylor Greene got into a little shouting match in Congress with eyelashes Mickey? Her real name is Representative Crockett. I think it's Jasmine Crockett. And she was talking today and there was some open hearing, and she was touting her credentials. She said, I currently hold an honorary doctorate. I also hold a juris doctorate, a bachelor's degree. She technically holds the rank of lieutenant colonel in the Civil Air Patrol, and I actually practiced law for almost two decades, in addition to serving on various boards, in addition to being a prior state lawmaker.
So this was in the context of telling somebody that she doesn't understand why you have to choose between qualified and diverse, because she's saying very clearly that she has lots of qualifications and she's diverse. She's Black and she's female. And so why can't they just do more of that? You know what? Why are you pretending that you have to lower the quality of people to get enough diversity?
Now she said that in public, which suggests that she doesn't understand human motivation or how anything works, and somehow doesn't understand that systemic racism has made it impossible to not choose between diversity and quality because the pipeline is too small. It has nothing to do with anybody's genes, has nothing to do with culture. The school system does not create a pipeline of people that corporations need in terms of the talents.
So here's the problem, and again it's what Democrats don't understand. If there had never been DEI, if there had never been DEI, and I saw Representative Crockett and I found out that she had done all of these things and also had gotten elected to Congress, do you know what I would say about her if there had never been DEI? I would have said, wow, she might be more capable than everybody in Congress. Because if she had to overcome things like being Black and being a woman in a world where that was not a free pass, I would have said, huh, you know, all things being equal, probably better than average because potentially maybe she overcame more barriers to get there.
But in the context of DEI, I assume that she does not belong in her job. She owns an honorary doctorate, which is complete, do you know who also has an honorary doctorate? Jerry Seinfeld. You get an honorary doctorate for giving a speech at a college. Does she think we're stupid enough to think that an honorary doctorate is something she can mention as a part of her qualifications? How stupid would you have to be to say you have an honorary doctorate and that's part of your credentials?
Now she also has some kind of legal degree. Do we assume that she got that the real way by being qualified? No, I don't assume that. I assume the opposite. I assume the opposite because we're in the context of DEI. And on top of that, seems to not understand the most basic element of the topic that she was having an open hearing on. How did she not understand the most basic thing, that the pipeline is insufficient to get us all what we all want?
I think everybody would be happy if the pipeline was just full of diverse candidates that were great, and then the companies would say that's great, and then you'd go to work with all these great people and you would not see their color because you'd say my coworker is just great. I mean, my coworker is nailing it. If your coworker is doing a good job, that's the part you see. Realistically, you know, you might be prejudiced. I like to say this a lot: discrimination only lasts until you open your mouth, and then you get judged by what you say and that's it. That in the real world you can't discriminate against somebody who's talking to you because you're going to decide what you think about them based on what comes out of their mouth, period. It doesn't matter what happened the moment until they open their mouth. The moment they open their mouth, you're judging them on what comes out. Yeah, that's it.
And I don't think not everybody understands that. I think the people who are worried about what other people are thinking about them are sort of missing the biggest part of that, that if you act like a good person it's pretty much automatic that people are going to like you and want to work with you. There aren't that many good people. If you're Black, let me give you an insider tip about white people. There are not so many white people that are awesome that I have an unlimited amount. If you walk into my life and you're just like a good person, you're in the top 10% without trying. It's not that hard. It's not that hard to get into my top 10% in favor of people. The bar is just not that high. It really isn't.
All right. So I would say that the thing that Representative Crockett misses is that she and anybody who is pro-DEI creates a situation where the assumption is flipped from "wow, you must be extra qualified if you made it through some extra challenges to get here" to "you're probably not qualified" because we've built a system to promote unqualified people. The system guarantees it because of systemic racism limiting the pipeline of applicants that you would like to hire.
All right. Elon Musk being, it must be nice to be the richest person in the world because there's just that little extra bit of freedom you get. So here's something that really happened. I could not have loved it more. So Elon Musk was on some kind of online thing where he was taking press calls, VivaTech 2024 in Paris, and somebody from Business Insider got up, a reporter to ask a question. And here's the question. She starts to ask, she says, quote, "Tesla has had a bumpy few months looking at flagging sales at home, stock market decline, layoffs." When you look back, and Musk interrupts her. He interrupts her in mid-sentence. He says, "Yeah, we can stop the question right now because I don't think Business Insider is a real publication." The reporter replied and sat down. Then Musk said, "So let's move on to the next question."
Can we take a moment to slow clap that out? Can you just slow clap at home? I don't know how much to express how much I love that. Why in the world would he give respect to something that's clearly not a real publication? All right. Business Insider is just now, I think it was sort of a little bit real at one point but not now. So more of that please. More of that.
I would like to suggest as my theme today it does feel like things are changing. Let me give you some hints. Do you think I could have gone after Representative Crockett as hard as I just did even two years ago? No. Somebody would have grabbed it out of context and tweeted it all over the place and tried to get me cancelled. But now I can just tell you what is useful and true. I wouldn't say it if it weren't useful. I don't know if everybody gets that. You know, even when I got cancelled for saying get the F away, does everybody know that was trying to be helpful for everybody? Of course the news made it look like I'm targeting one group. Nope. It specifically was to help that one group that it says I'm targeting because if you don't know what's true you cannot make plans. I'm telling you what's true.
What's true is if you're going to do DEI, I'm going to try to get away from it. If you're creating a situation where you say I've got your money and you better give it back, I'm going to run away. So you can't have it both ways. You can't have it both ways. And now I can say that out loud because I paid for it. I bought the ticket. I paid full price for the free speech ticket. Now I get to use it.
So all right. Thomas Massie being awesome as usual has introduced a bill to eliminate taxpayer funding for online censorship. Yes please. And I'm thinking, wait a minute, why is it always the same guy who comes up with all the good ideas? Are you noticing the pattern? Who the hell did we hire for Congress if there's like one guy who comes up with all the useful ideas? It's always the same one. Like I'm glad we elected accidentally one smart person. Now Rand Paul is pretty great too, but I like Thomas Massie.
So yes, the Twitter files, as Massie says, the Twitter files showed the government colludes with private companies and universities to violate the First Amendment. Yes, proven. And Congress must use the power of the purse to make that illegal. Yes please. That's a yes yes yes yes yes. And better yet, here's the best part. Let's get people on record to be against it. Let's see who's against having the government reduce your free speech. Let's find out who's bold enough to say yeah, I would like to use the government power to restrict your free speech because we wouldn't want you to get any bad information about the pandemic, right? Because that's the good argument. Yeah, we wouldn't want you to get any dangerous information about like Russia collusion or the real nature of the Hunter laptop. Yeah, we certainly wouldn't want any misinformation.
All right. Jonathan Turley is all over this story about the so-called Hunter Biden sugar bro. Now I mentioned this but it's such a head-shaker, and Turley is making a point that the fact that the regular media, you know, the corporate media, is not treating this as like the big story ever, just sort of ignoring it, tells you a lot. So this is a dog-not-barking situation.
So the situation I'm talking about is there's this fellow named, it's a friend of Hunter Biden's who has given him millions of dollars, Kevin Morris. And he just says he's a friend, he wants to help, no ulterior motive, he just likes to give his friend millions of dollars. And apparently he gave his friend all of his money because he doesn't have any left. That's what you do for your friends. Yeah. When your friend needs money, you don't give some money. Yeah, you give them all your money. What? What?
So Congress of course wanted to talk to the sugar bro to find out what the deal is, and the CIA said they had some relationship with the sugar bro and said no, you can't talk to him. What? What? We can't talk to the person giving millions of dollars to the president's son because the CIA says you can't know what that guy knows. Maybe it's exactly what it looks like. I've been saying that a lot lately. Maybe this story is exactly what it looks like. Yeah, like everything bad.
And if you tie this together with the Mike Benz view of the world that Ukraine is basically a play to get the energy resources from Russia, has nothing to do with Ukraine or liberty or democracy. In fact we're not interested even a little bit in Ukraine being democratic. Apparently that would just work against our interest. So there'll be more on that a little bit in a moment. It's a whole week of complicated stories.
Do you notice that the news is really complicated now? For example, there's a story about the EcoHealth Alliance boss Peter Daszak, and apparently he's in big trouble for some documents that have been found that suggest there was some kind of coordinated effort to hide the involvement of the Wuhan lab, if I have that right. And they apparently used personal email to avoid getting caught. There are some people involved who were deleting emails ahead of time before they got FOIA'd. And the nature of the conversations that we have seen suggests that they knew they were guilty and that they were trying to hide it. At least that's how it's being interpreted. I'll just say that's how it's being interpreted. Can't know their inner thoughts.
So it looks like everything you thought was true about the pandemic was true. It came out of the Wuhan lab. It was gain of function. We were behind it, right? America was behind it. Everything. And they covered it up. So every bad assumption you had about that apparently was all true. Apparently. Now that's a complicated story so I don't know if I have all that nuance there but that's a basic idea.
There's a Democratic consultant who's been indicted for creating a deepfake of Joe Biden's voice that did a bunch of robocalls and told people not to vote. Stephen Kramer. So he's being charged with voter suppression and faces up to $6 million fines. So that's the future. The future is people faking voices on robocalls but got caught.
Speaking of AI voices, you know the story about Scarlett Johansson saying that ChatGPT illegally stole her voice and they hired somebody to sound like her because she had declined the offer to do it herself. Well it turns out that this story is way more complicated than you thought because it's not so simple as we stole your voice. Because the voice they used is a real person who was not doing an impression. And the real person says this is new. Nobody in my real life has ever told me I sound like Scarlett Johansson. Now do you believe that? Do you believe that everybody who listens to it says oh it sounds like Scarlett Johansson but then in real life nobody's saying that? It was altered voice. It's a real voice. Nobody told her she sounds like, nobody. Never once I've been told I look like John Denver and about 50 other people. I hear it all the time and nobody's ever said that. I don't know. I don't know.
So OpenAI's story is that it never intended to copy Scarlett and wanted her for it but they found somebody who was not her that was just a voice they liked and there you go. That's their version. But this is going to have huge implications for Hollywood because what happens if you can create people who sort of are in the vibe of Scarlett Johansson? Is that going to be okay? What if you found, what if you created an AI that didn't look exactly like her but was a highly attractive blonde of the same age and then you gave it a voice that was based on not her but somebody who sounds a lot like her according to other people? Is that going to be legal? There's going to be massive lawsuits about all this stuff so we'll see.
I would just like to note because the important part is my connection to all stories that Scarlett Johansson's husband once mocked me on SNL. She's married to Colin Jost. So he mocked me about a year ago on SNL. So good luck with that guys.
There is a study of brains. They found there's a part of the brain that might be evolved with causing somebody to be a narcissist. Let me tell you something that I realized maybe 40 years ago. I remember the first time I heard that they found that the brains of addicts and alcoholics in particular were different and they were saying hey we think that alcoholism might have a genetic propensity. To which I said what? I thought that was free will. I thought you either decided to drink or you didn't. Are you telling me that your brain might be different and that some people cannot just decide not to drink? And that was the case.
Then later people said we found in the brain a part of the brain that makes you more likely to be gay. And I said what? I thought that was just a choice. You tell me that your brain could be the decider or your genes could be the decider of whether you're born gay? And then I said to myself what's going to happen to free will once we find and map all the parts of the brain? Once you know that there's a physical part of the brain that causes all of our behaviors and you can identify it and you go oh there it is, we just scanned you, you got that big narcissist thing in your brain. Oh that's why you're acting that way. Or oh found out you've got that tendency to be an alcoholic. There it is. It's right in your brain.
What are you going to think of free will when we identify all the parts of the brain that cause all of our actions? Well I realized that day that the idea of free will would get smaller and smaller as we got smarter and smarter about what the brain does as a machine. And so here's the newest one. Now if narcissism can be identified and everything from intelligence to you can even apparently even your propensity to be conservative or liberal can be identified in your brain. So if your brain has an influence on these things are you still clinging to the idea that you have free will? Because that idea is going to get harder and harder to hold on to. Harder and harder.
All right. The debate over whether the government was trying to kill Trump and have him assassinated by including in their Mar-a-Lago raid authorization they are authorized to use deadly force if necessary. And so there's some people who were saying well it was just standard procedure. They just say that all the time. And there are other people, Mike Cernovich, Dan Bongino for example, who say no you idiots that is not standard procedure.
Now how could it be standard procedure but also not a standard procedure? Well it turns out it can be. And Bongino gets to the heart of it by asking this question. If you think it's standard paperwork, would the DEA be allowed to serve a search warrant on the White House with armed agents in the cocaine case? Why not? Do you think that armed people with authorization to shoot to kill would have gone into the White House to look into the cocaine situation? And by the way in both cases there was full cooperation on the physical part. So at Mar-a-Lago there was never any indication anybody was going to resist anything and Secret Service were always in the communication. They were always talking to them. Never once said if you come in here we're going to prevent you. In fact they negotiated so that there would be no problems at all.
So the question is if you knew there were going to be no problems because you'd already negotiated it why do you have to put that in there? So I'm going to take a middle view of this. I don't think somebody sat down and said all right I got a plan to kill the president. Here's what we're going to do. We're going to create this situation and then we'll put this authorization in there and then as soon as something goes wrong we'll just start blazing away and gun down the president. I don't believe that even for the slightest second because nobody's that dumb.
But did they create a situation where the possibility would go from zero to nonzero? Yes it does look like they did that. It looks like they very much created a situation where there was a nonzero chance of killing him. That did happen. So I'm with Bongino on that. But I wouldn't take it so much as they planned to kill him because if they had planned to kill him it would have gone down differently. It would have been more of a surprise, you know, less of a negotiated situation.
And by the way I like, I say this often but one of the things I always value in Dan Bongino is his talent stack. He's done one of the greatest jobs of assembling talents everything and this is another one. So he's got this background in law enforcement type stuff but on top of that he knows politics and on top of that he knows all the players and on top of that he's great at the media stuff. So he's got the full package and that's why he's doing so well.
All right. So Trump went to the Bronx and gave his big speech. It was a giant hit. There were no real problems of any scale. It was all positivity. We're all Americans. Doesn't matter what color your skin is. People were wild for him. If anybody thought he would get a bad reception in the Bronx you were wrong. The crowd was the most diverse for a Trump crowd. There were plenty of white people but there were plenty of other people too. So plenty of Asians, plenty of Blacks, plenty of Hispanics.
Hey AOC seemed to be flipping out because remember I told you the Andre Agassi strategy where you don't go after your opponent's weakest shot you go after their strongest shot. Because if you get lucky and you can make them lose their confidence in their strongest shot they're dead. So you basically can decapitate somebody in the first set just by making sure they lose their confidence in their best play.
So the best play that the Democrats have is that the deepest bluest states absolutely cannot stand any Trump anything. So he went into the deepest bluest place and blew their doors off. He Andre Agassi'd them. You could see the panic in AOC's complaints about him going there. Why would you even complain about it? Like why would that even be a conversation that somebody running for president would visit a highly populated area in America and make his case? But they had to complain about it because he was going right into the belly of the beast. They could tell he was going for their forehand. He wasn't going for their weak backhand. He went right into the middle of the dragon and it, you know, and I agree with some people who say he's not going to win this state. He might by the way. I'm not on the page that he's not going to win the state.
You do, the part we can't predict is how far Biden will fall between now and Election Day. You see the rate of decline right? Have you seen a video of Biden talking one year ago? Completely different. One year, completely different. We'll talk about this.
So Biden gave a press conference, very rare apparently. He had all the people he was going to call on on a card. He gave them only one question apiece because that's the one he was prepared for. And then he read his response as it appears from a card. In other words it wasn't a press conference at all. It was a Q&A with written questions and written answers. He just stood in public and did it. Do you think he would have had to do that a year ago? A year ago he might have been able to bluff his way through although they were hiding him a year ago but I think he could have gotten through it. Today he is clearly not capable of handling a question that's not written in front of him with the answer. That's completely different in one year. What's he going to be by November? By November I don't even think there'll be a choice. It could be a really one person and one person who's just not even going to be alive in a few months.
So could Trump win New York? I'm going to say yes. I'm going to say yes but not because of steady state. It's because there's going to be a big drop in Biden before November. I think his health will just fall off a ledge. I think it already has and they're just hiding it from us but it's going to be hard to hide it for a few more months. I suspect that the Democratic National Convention where Biden has to give a speech could be really really touch and go for the Democrats because I don't think they trust him to be able to even read the teleprompter at this point. Imagine him going up there if it happens and giving his acceptance speech and he does the mumbly thing. Oh my God it's bad enough if he does it just on a stump speech but if he does it standing in front of the whole country at the DNC and I think he will it's not a good look.
Apparently, I don't know is this true? I need a fact check on this. Did Trump actually say at the Bronx rally and I quote "I don't eat bacon anymore it's too expensive"? He didn't really say those words did he? Because I've been laughing about it all morning. It sounds like something he would say in his normal hyperbole. We do assume that he can still afford bacon but if he said that it's hilarious because I think the difference between Trump today and prior Trump is that now we understand him like we get him. No you didn't mean literally you can't afford bacon of course but is it funny? It's totally funny. Yeah it's totally funny. So that's all we care about.
So meanwhile Trump goes and does by everybody's account everything right. Now may I remind you again that Trump's performance as a candidate this time around is unlike anything I've ever seen. I mean it's just all good all the way. I mean he's just doing one home run after another. I mean he's hitting frozen ropes into the outfield. Every at bat is crazy. And this Bronx thing really highlights that because he's not just playing it safe. If I told you he's made no mistakes but he's also playing it safe you'd say that's not the Trump we want. We're not looking for the play-it-safe guy. So here he goes into the belly of the beast in the Bronx, kills it. That's who we want. We want the one who can do the thing you think can't be done. We want the one who says why would I be afraid of that? Why would I be afraid of that? That's the one we want.
Meanwhile the governor of New York, Hochul, said that she referred to Trump supporters as clowns during the rally. Clowns. Have we noticed a correlation that the Democrats think that Republicans are pieces of shit? It's a pretty clear pattern. Yeah just remember that you have one leader who is saying very clearly and consistently we're all Americans we can pull together and one who says we're better off divided because that's kind of what he's saying. Biden anyway.
Here's something Biden said in a post. He says Donald Trump and his MAGA Republican allies don't care about securing the border or fixing America's broken immigration system. If they did they would have supported the toughest border enforcement in history. So it was a bill that just got turned down by mostly Republicans. Instead they put partisan politics ahead of our national security.
So here's my question. First of all you can see that he's dividing the country by referring to MAGA Republican allies. Now he's specifically talking about the elected politicians but how do you hear it? I don't hear it that way. I hear that he is just saying if you're a MAGA Republican he wants to piss on your head. That's what I hear. Do you hear it differently? I think he's insulting the citizens at the same time he's insulting the people they voted for, the so-called MAGA allies. So that's his usual piece of divisive, terrible president framing that they are bad people and there are good people and he's the good people I guess.
Do you think that the Democrats are catching on? This obviously was a fake border bill that had poison pills in it. Do you think that the Democrats haven't figured out that it's all theater and do they really think that the Republicans looked at a perfectly good border bill and said we're going to turn this down for the good of getting elected? I'm not saying they wouldn't but it's not what happened. They didn't really have a chance to look at a good border bill.
I think it's strange that the president's name is Biden at the same time we're all wondering the same question on Election Day: will he still be alive by then? What are the odds that his name would be Biden when all we're waiting for is if he's still going to be alive by then? That's a weird coincidence.
All right. Biden also posted or somebody did for him: Trump is not running to lead America. He's running for revenge. But you can't build a future on revenge. I'm running to lead America into the future. What future is that? The one where you live for another four months and then we bury you? Well what exact future are you talking about old man who can't even do a press conference? You're not part of our future. You're just not in any way our future. But okay.
But here's my bigger complaint. He says Trump is not running to lead America. He's running for revenge. Revenge is what I want. Revenge is called the justice system. Do you think the justice system was set up for fairness? No. Do you think the justice system was set up to rehabilitate people? No. It's revenge. That's what it does. And the risk of revenge is the only thing that keeps society together. Why do you not do bad things if you're a good person? Why do you not do bad things? Because we're going to get revenge on you. We're going to put you in jail. If you don't want to call that revenge fine. You can call it a flower. You can put a different word on it but the justice system is very much about revenge and that's what makes it work.
And you know what? Revenge is the animating part of it. The part of the reason that Trump has so much support is that you put 2,000 people in jail for political reasons. You're trying to jail the president for political reasons and Peter Navarro is still in jail. So revenge is going to be at the top of the menu. Revenge is at the top of the menu and it belongs there because that's what justice looks like. Justice looks like honest revenge.
Who else needs to talk about let's not have revenge? Did anybody else have to talk about that? Do you remember Jimmy Carter saying oh don't do revenge on me? Do you know why we didn't have to do revenge on Jimmy Carter? Because there was no reason. Do you know why we didn't need revenge on Bill Clinton? There was no reason. There was no reason. Do you know why nobody's ever talked about revenge before ever? There was no reason. If he's talking about don't do revenge it's because he created the whole situation. Nobody's going to be talking about revenge unless something really really big and terrible happened and something big and terrible is happening right now. Peter Navarro is still in prison. No you let Peter Navarro out of prison and the other 2,000 people. You drop this stupid lawfare charges and we'll stop talking about revenge. But right now I want to see hundreds of Democrats in jail. I want to see hundreds of Democrats in jail minimum and we do have the goods. I mean completely within the legal system. I recommend no actions outside the legal system. Yeah no no vigilante anything. Don't do that. But yes the justice system has plenty of evidence of crimes at the highest level. So yes revenge revenge revenge revenge. And every time you say don't do it you remind us why we need to because nobody else needs to even talk that way. If you're talking somebody out of getting revenge, revenge is called for because it isn't even in the conversation. It's just not part of the conversation until you fuck up really badly and you have Peter Navarro is still in prison. Peter Navarro is still in prison.
Remember the Elmo and yes you can build a future on revenge. It's called the justice system.
Speaking of justice, apparently the amuse account on X tells us that there's something called the 65 Project and it's apparently mostly to cancel anybody who was a lawyer who's trying to help Trump and it's run by David Brock and it's funded by George Soros and it's as Amuse says an all-out war on the Sixth Amendment to the Constitution. Revenge revenge.
All right. America First Legal that's the Republican-oriented group that's trying to create a counterbalance in the legal system and is trying to use legal means to get justice in a variety of ways that Democrats have tried to take it away from you. But there's this new story that frankly I do not understand. There's something about a new document that's been uncovered, some Obama order from his days that's been kind of secret that says that there should be something about keeping copies of all the classified stuff on a server. And the argument doesn't make sense to me but maybe it does to you. So I've asked for a clarification but here's what it sounds like. It sounds like America First Legal is saying that Trump's legal problems with the Mar-a-Lago documents are not a problem because there are also copies of them that the government never lost. They've always had the copies.
Now I don't understand that. Do you? Why would that make any difference if they have copies? I assume they had copies. Didn't you always assume they had copies? Would the government in 2024 not have a digital copy of everything important that came across the government's desks? I mean I just assume so. So I don't understand the importance of this but America First Legal is playing it as very important. So I've asked them to explain it. Give me the dummy's version of it. I don't get it. Like why is this important? How's it have anything to do with anything? So if they come up with that I'll talk about it again but at the moment all I can say is that people who know more than I do about the law think there's an important thing that happened and I have no idea what it is.
Block the FBI from arresting dangerous Iranians. Yeah that's a boring story but I see what you're saying. So there's some story about John Kerry blocking the arrest of some known Iranian bad guys because he was trying to get a deal done with Iran. Is that the biggest crime in the world? Here's the thing that might be just realpolitik meaning that if you're this close to getting a deal that's a really big deal maybe you don't arrest those people on Tuesday. You maybe get the deal, arrest him a few weeks later. So I don't know how real that story is. It's not that far from something I would think is normal business but I guess I'd wait for Dan Bongino to set me straight on that. So I guess I don't have enough of a hook into that story to care about it.
There's a report that the US and the European Union are moving toward an agreement for a massive loan for Ukraine but their clever technique is they're going to use Russian assets frozen in the West as collateral. Here's the thing I've been saying that our form of government is not a democracy. Of course it was designed to be a republic you know federal republic with democratic principles but it's really not that either. It probably hasn't been since the 50s. We are essentially a criminal organization and colonizers. We're basically the board trying to take everybody's assets and apparently we've always been that way. That's what America is now.
If that sounds like a criticism here's the twist. I don't think there's a better form of government because if you don't coordinate your government with your big capitalist entities somebody else will and they'll be your daddy. So unfortunately if you're not the baddest criminal in the criminal world you're going to get dead. So being the baddest of the criminals might be the best form of government maybe because you know I think democracy has its issues too if you let dumb people make big decisions. So I don't know. But when I see a story like this it just reminds you that we're a criminal organization trying to steal Putin's stuff.
You know the Mike Benz take is that Ukraine is really just an energy play and that Hunter Biden is part of that with Burisma. That's why Hunter was part of Burisma. All part of the big energy play to steal the energy from Russia. And since we couldn't get all of their energy we're going to settle for keeping their assets that we could freeze. I mean I get that there's a war going on but we're prosecuting the war like we're just criminals. We're just looking to steal it. It's hard to not see it as just a criminal act against another criminal. And again if it sounds like a criticism believe it or not it's not. We seem to be a very effective criminal organization because we've overthrown lots of governments. We've got access to lots of resources in other places and maybe it's not working out so well in Ukraine but you know it seems to be proving the point.
But to me, so Putin has said that he's willing to negotiate a ceasefire along current lines of who owns what now. I say there's no chance of negotiating until Trump gets there because the Biden play it was never about stopping a war. They're not really concerned with ending war. They're only concerned in stealing Russia's energy game and if they haven't done that and they think they still have a chance they're not going to negotiate. So this basically they're going to save the negotiations for Trump who as far as I know does not have a massive interest in a big energy deal or stealing things in Ukraine. So he could just say yeah let's just end this.
When Trump says he could end it in a day I would bet against it but I wouldn't bet against ending it in a month because I think he can get it done in a month. And that ladies and gentlemen brings us to the conclusion of my prepared remarks.
It all comes down to race and religion somebody says. Does it? Trump didn't let Zelensky rip up the Minsk peace accords. Biden did and that was the start of the war. You think that's what you think?
So all right I had another topic but I think too controversial. I think we overestimated Russia's willingness to negotiate. Creating a, well here's what I think we should do. I would love to see Trump do a grand deal where we just work out our differences with the three superpowers and just agree to rule the world in peace and they can have their part we'll have our part. You know I realize that Taiwan's a problem but at this point we are moving our chip facilities out of there and I think Taiwan knows that in the long run there's really no way that they could become, they can't be independent in the long run. It's too dangerous. Could you imagine China having a major ally in Cuba and being right at our doorstep? And I don't know it just seems to me that we're fighting history if we're trying to keep Taiwan out of Chinese control.
Here's what I think we should do instead. They had a good plan. I think what we should do instead is create a hundred-year plan. Do the Hong Kong plan. Say you know what why fight history? In a hundred years sometime within that hundred years Taiwan will be China but if you wait a hundred years you don't have to worry about microchips because something will be very different by then and it won't be depending on Taiwan. So I think if we said how about we just agree now that there's a hundred-year plan and in the hundred years Taiwan will figure out what its role will be. So there'll be future negotiations of does it operate a little bit independently compared to the mainland? Nobody knows what the mainland would even look like in a hundred years. You could have a democracy in China in a hundred years. Anything could happen.
So I think you do a hundred-year plan and just take the violence off the table because if you're President Xi and you know you got it back you just won't be alive when it happens. That's a big win. And if we can take that off the table then we can deal with China at a much much better level.
Hong Kong Island was ceded to the UK in perpetuity. I don't believe that. I thought it was a 99-year lease. Hong Kong had a 50-year plan that the CCP removed. Yeah well it's a risk but here's the thing. Hong Kong didn't really have a chance of staying independent forever. Taiwan doesn't have a chance of staying independent forever. If it were our hemisphere we would insist that we had that much control and I don't know I just wouldn't fight history.
Many think it was a deal. So I'm seeing people say that the narrative of Hong Kong is all fake and that they did not have a deal to give it back. I'm doubting your framing of that. I think it was a 99-year lease and when it ended the UK gave it back. So but I will note that there are people who are saying that's not true.
Yeah a managed democracy with an authoritarian streak. The one thing I don't see is China looking like they want to control other countries except economically of course but Taiwan's special. So I think something will happen there one sooner or later it's going to happen. So I think it's a deal that Trump could make. I think he could say look how about Russia you making your money China you making your money we'll make our money and let's play. I think you could pull that off.
I suspect that the biggest reason we can't get along with Russia and China is that we can't stop doing covert things to each other continuously because we're sure that the other is doing it too. So I know I'll tell you that the theory that China is doing everything it can to stop reproduction in America is looking better and better. I don't think that they're that clever but maybe.
All right that's all I got for you. And on YouTube and Rumble and X I'm going to take a few minutes with just the subscribers on Locals and I'll see the rest of you tomorrow. Locals stay with me. The rest of you bye for now. Thanks for joining.
well I see rumbles in the house and locals in the house let's hear from You.
Tube any You.
Tubers in the house yet I'd like to see at least one You.
Tuber before I start make sure you guys are good there we go You.
Tube's in the house good morning everybody and welcome to coffee with Scott Adams the finest experience you've ever had in your life I'll bet you and if you'd like to take it up to levels that nobody can even see you without some kind of Elon Musk rocket ship well all you need for that is a coverer muger glass a tanker Chell sste a canteen Jugger flask a vessel of any kind fill it with your favorite liquid I like coffee and join me now for the unparallel pleasure the dopamine of the day thing that makes everything better is called the simultaneous Sip and it happens now go you want to see the weirdest thing I'm going to show you a picture from my college days this is a true story there was an underclassman who decided that um he looked enough like me and he decided that I was his role model because I was a year or two older and he he started dressing like me and people noticed and started calling him the Clone so so and rather than rejecting that and saying I'm not trying to copy him he he embraced it he said yeah I'm totally trying to copy him and uh it it would get more and more extreme the entire time and it just got funnier and funnier he was a friend of mine he live he lived you know just a few doors down in the dormatory but anyway for Halloween that year uh let's see where is it we went as clones see if you can tell which one I am I'd like to think he was the poor man's version of me but I'm not entirely sure he's probably worth a billion dollars now he was pretty smart probably did a startup or something anyway I saw a concept today in one of uh Owen's posts um about the What's called the third place have you ever heard that term a third place so your house is your first place your place of work is your second place and the third place would be like I guess if you were in England it would be the tavern if you were somewhere else it would be some else now my third place used to be be my gym you know it's a place you could go to feel less lonely and maybe run into people but um here's why I wanted to talk about it I really think we need to design new cities around accidentally meeting your neighbors leaving it to chance just doesn't work we need some way that in the normal course of business you run into people that you don't mind running into you know by you know all voluntarily nobody's going to be forced to talk to their neighbors but I've been looking into a number of businesses that I could start in my local area that would have a physical location and I didn't realize that I was always thinking about them as the third place for example I was thinking it was starting a dog park that would have some uh Shady place where you could plug in your laptop and sit at a table and if you make it so it's sort of like picnic tables you're going to have people who don't know each other sharing the same picnic table and if they have a place to plug in their laptop and talk about your dog hey which one is your dog it's kind of a perfect place to meet people I I've actually met good friends in the dog park um I had a few other few other ideas for that but I think I think I might even call it the third place I like the name so much uh i' call it a third place dog park yeah and just build it around the human attraction but also you can take your dog there wouldn't that be a good idea anyway couldn't make money from it as my neighbor my neighbor reminded me yesterday when I was talking about it so where I live uh our local real estate um let's say real estate um let's say king and queen of the neighborhood they're they're very uh and I say that not as an insult they're just very good at organizing things in the neighborhood so I know I've met all of my neighbors just through the fact that they're they're fairly organized we're all in a Whats.
App thing it's actually a great situation anyway uh can you believe that overdoses are down and obviously we're going to talk about Trump and Bronx and all that later but overdoses actually went down a little bit from 2023 down 4% from 20 22 I don't know if this is real it could be that they went down because the pandemic's over the pandemic might have been a high point for drugs could be that uh all of our data is bad all the time so it's not even real very possible maybe they just start reported it differently how about the fact that more people are substituting weed for stronger drugs maybe I don't know maybe it works the other way but I don't have data on it um maybe the government is giving out fewer sub U prescriptions so fewer people are getting H um getting hooked maybe I don't know but certainly there was action in that direction but I'm going to I'm going to offer the most uh provocative idea for why maybe um OD is went down a little bit for that one year I think the most likely explanation is it's we're we're off the pandemic don't you 4% sounds sort of like just coming off the pandemic High I don't know if it's real but I would offer this possibility uh all the junkies are dead you can't kill somebody twice there might be a logical end to how much the um how much the overdose problem can get in other words there might be a natural cap to it and we might have had now let let me make a bad analogy if you try to kill a a head terrorist like a Bin Laden it's not really going to stop things because there'll be a second in command if you kill the second in command probably won't stop things because it'll be a third in command but in theory the quality of the terrorist goes down every time you kill one you know from the top down you bin l perhaps he was really good at it you elahi maybe he was really good at it but when you get to maybe the fifth or sixth terrorist down in the organization chart I think it probably starts falling apart like that fifth best terrorist isn't quite good enough but it could be that with the that's a terrible analogy maybe the worst I've ever done but um I think the overdoses are limited to people who would be would have a propensity to it once you run out of people who have a propensity you don't make new ones right there the people who are never going to become an addict are not going to wake up this morning and something changed they were born people were never going to be addicts because there's there is such a um a genetic component to this and if you take let's take alcoholism alcohol is around 10% of the public if alcohol killed you at a high rate like fentol it does kill you but at a higher rate like fentanyl wouldn't you start running out of drunks I think you'd actually start running out you know if the population is become stable so it could be that here's my favorite story of the day uh explorers say they found what they believe is the remains of World War to Ace pilot uh who was down in a jungle Ravine now he was fairly famous for his exploits as a pilot but here's the best part his name is Richard bong b o n or I think his his friends probably called him dick and if I were going to be a World War II flying ace and my name was Dick bong I would feel like I was the coolest person in the world well you know until I got shot down and died in a ravine in a jungle but until then cool name so I will be celebrating tonight in the man cave with the rest of the local subscribers and uh we will uh do something I don't know what but something that would be appropriate to honor dick bong maybe some tubin kind of a thing I don't know you maybe you could come up with an idea well do you remember when uh Marjorie Taylor green got into a little shouting match in congress with uh uh eyelashes Mickey uh her real name is representative Crockett I think it's Jasmine Crockett and uh she was talking today and there was some open hearing and she was touting her uh credentials she said I currently hold an honorary doctorate I also hold jur doctorate uh a bachelor's degree uh she technically holds the rank of lieutenant colonel in the Civil Air Patrol and I actually practiced law for almost two decades in addition to serving on various boards in addition to being a prior State lawmaker so uh this was in the context of telling somebody that she doesn't understand why you have to choose between uh qualified and diverse because she's saying very clearly that she has lots of qualifications and she's diverse she's black and she's female and so why can't they just do more of that you know what why why are you pretending that you have to lower the quality of people to get enough diversity now she said that in public which suggests that she doesn't understand human motivation or how anything works and and somehow doesn't understand that systemic racism has made it impossible to not choose between diversity and quality because the pipeline is too small has nothing to do with anybody's genes has nothing to do with culture the school system does not create uh a pipeline of people that corporations need in terms of the the talents so here's the problem and again it's what Democrats don't understand if there had never been Dei if there had never been Dei and I saw representative Crockett and I found out that she had done all of these things and also had gotten elected to congress do you know what I would say about her if there had never been Dei I would have said wow she might be more more capable than everybody in Congress because if she had to overcome things like being black and being a woman in a in a world where that was you know not a free pass I would have said huh you know all things being equal probably better than average because you know potentially maybe overcame more barriers to get there but in the context of Dei I assume that she does not belong in her job she owns an honorary doctorate which is complete do you know who own who also has an honorary doctorate Jerry Seinfeld you get an honorary doctorate for giving a speech as a college does she think we're stupid enough to think that an honorary doctorate is something she can mention in as a part of her qualifications how stupid would you have to be to say you have an honorary doctorate and that's part of your credentials uh now she also has some kind of legal degree do we assume that she got got that the real way by being qualified no I don't assume that I assume the opposite I assume the opposite because we're in the context of Dei and on top of that seems to not understand the most basic element of the topic that she was having an open hearing on how dides she not understand the most basic thing that the pipeline is insufficient to get us all what we all want I think everybody would be happy if the pipeline was just full of diverse candidates that were great and then the companies would say that's great and then you'd got to work with all these gray people and you would not see their color because you'd say uh my coworker is just great I mean my co-worker is nailing it if your co-worker is doing a good job that's the part you see realistically you know you might be you might be Prejudice I I like to say this a lot discrimination only lasts until you open your mouth and then you get judged by what the you say and that's it that in the real world you can't discriminate against somebody who's talking to you because you're going to decide what you think about them based on what comes out of their mouth period period it doesn't matter what happened the moment until they open their mouth the moment they open their mouth you're judging them on what comes out yeah that's it and and I don't think I don't think not everybody understands that I think the the people who are worried about what other people are thinking about them are sort of missing the biggest part of that that if you act like a good person it's pretty much automatic that people are going to like you and want to work with you there aren't that many good people if you're black let me give you a an Insider tip about white people there are not so many white people that are awesome that uh I have an unlimited amount if you walk into my life and you're just like a good person you're in the top 10% without trying it's not that hard it's not that hard to get into my top 10% in favor of people the bar is just not that high it really isn't all right um so I would say that thing that representative Crockett misses is that she is she and anybody who is pro Dei creates a situation where the assumption is flipped from wow you must be extra qualified if you made it through some extra challenges to get here to you're probably not qualified because we've built a system to promote unqualified people the system guarantees it because of systemic racism limiting the pipeline of applicants that you would like to hire all right Elon Musk being uh it must be nice to be the richest person in the world BEC because there's just that little extra bit of Freedom you get so here's something that really happened I could not have loved it more so Elon Musk was on some kind of uh online thing where he was taking uh press calls vivatech 2024 in Paris and uh somebody from Business Insider got up a reporter to ask a question and here's the here's the question she starts to ask she says quote Tesla has had a bumpy few months looking at of flagging sales at home stock market decline layoffs when you look back and musk interrupts her he interrupts her in mids sentence he says yeah we can stop the question right now because I don't think Business Insider is a real publication okay the reporter replied and sat down then mus said so let's move on to the next question can can we take a moment to slow clap that out can can you just slow clap at home I I don't know how much to express how much I love that what why in the world would he give respect to something that's clearly not a real publication all right Business Insider is just now I think it was sort of a little bit real at one point but not now so more of that please more of that I would like to suggest as my theme today it does feel like things are changing let me give you some hints do you think I could have gone after representative Crockett as hard as I just did even two years ago no somebody would have grabbed it an a context and tweeted it all over the place and tried to get me cancelled but now I can just tell you what is useful and true I wouldn't say it if it weren't useful I don't know if everybody gets that you know even when I got cancelled for saying get the F away does everybody know that was trying to be helpful for everybody the of course the news looked like it made it look like I'm targeting one group nope is specifically was to help that one group that it says I'm targeting because if you don't know what's true you cannot make plans I'm telling you what's true what's true is if you're going to do Dei I'm going to try to get away from it if you're creating a situation where you say I've got your money and you better give it back I'm going to run away so you can't have it both ways you can't have it both ways and now I can say that out loud cuz I paid for it I bought the ticket I paid full price for the Free Speech ticket now I get to use it so all right um Thomas Massie being awesome as usual is introduced a bill to eliminate taxpayer funding for online censorship yes please and I'm thinking wait a minute why why is it always the same guy who comes up with all the good ideas are you noticing the pattern who who the hell did we hire for congress if there's like one guy who comes up with all the useful ideas it's always the same one like I'm glad we elected accidentally one smart person now Rand Paul is pretty great too but I like Thomas Massie so yes the Twitter as Massie says the Twitter files showed the government colludes with private companies and universities to violate the First Amendment yes proven and Congress must use the power of the purse to make that illegal yes please that that's a yes yes yes yes yes and better yet here's the best part let's get people on record to be against it let's see who's against having the government reduce your free speech let's find out who's bold enough to say yeah I would like to use the government power to restrict your free speech because we wouldn't want you to get any bad information about the pandemic right because that's the good argument yeah we wouldn't want you to get any dangerous information about like Russia collusion or or who or the real nature of the Hunter laptop yeah we certainly wouldn't want any misinformation all right Jonathan turle is all over this story about the so-called Hunter Biden sugar bro now I mentioned this but it's such a head Shaker and and totle is making a point that the fact that the regular media media you know the corporate media is not treating this as like the big story ever just sort of ignoring it tells you a lot so this is dog not barking situation so the situation I'm talking about is there's this fellow named it's a friend of Hunter Biden's who has given him millions of dollars Kevin Morris and he just says he's a friend he wants to help no ulterior motive he's just likes to give his friend millions of dollars and apparently he gave his friend all of his money because he doesn't have any left that's what you do for your friends yeah when you your friend needs money you don't give some money yeah you give them all your money what what so Congress of course wanted to talk to the sugar bro to find out what the deal is and the CIA said they had some relationship with the sugar bro and said no you can't talk to him what wait what we can't talk to the person giving millions of dollars to the president's son cuz see eia says you you you can't know what that guy knows maybe it's exactly what it looks like I've been saying that a lot lately maybe this story is exactly what it looks like yeah like uh like everything bad yeah it and if you tie this together with the uh the Mike Ben's view of the world that Ukraine is basically a play to get the uh energy resources from Russia has nothing to do with Ukraine or Liberty or democracy in fact we're not interested even a little bit in Ukraine being Democratic apparently that would just work against our interest so uh there'll be more on that a little bit in a moment um it's a whole week of complicated stories do you notice that the news is really complicated now for example there's a story about the Ecco Health Alliance boss Peter daik and apparently he's in big trouble for some documents that have been found that suggest there was some kind of cordinated effort to hide the involvement of the uhan lab if I have that right uh and they use apparently they used the personally email to avoid getting caught they there there's some people involved who were deleting emails ahead of time before they got foed and the nature of the conversations that we have seen suggests that they know they were guilty and that they were trying to hide hide it at least that's how it's being interpreted I'll just say that's how it's being interpreted can't know their inner thoughts so it looks like everything you thought was true about the pandemic was true it came out of the Wuhan lab it was gain a function we were behind it right America was behind it everything and they covered it up so every bad assumption you had about that apparently was all true apparently now that's a complicated story so I don't know if I have all that Nuance there but that's a basic idea uh there's a democratic consultant who's been indicted for creating a deep fake of Joe Biden's voice that did a bunch of Robo calls and told people not to vote Stephen Kramer so he's being charged with voter suppression and faces up to $6 million fines so that's the future the future is uh people faking voices on rooc calls but got caught speaking of of AI voices you know the story about Scarlet Johansson saying that uh chat GPT illegally stole her voice and had they they hired somebody to sound like her because she had declined the offer to do it herself well it turns out that this story is way more complicated than you thought because it's not so simple as we stole your voice because the The Voice they used is a real person who was not doing an impression and the real person says this is new nobody's ever nobody in my real life has ever told me I sound like Scarlet Johansson now do you believe that do you believe that everybody who listens to it says oh sounds like Scarlet Johansson but then in a real life and nobody's saying that it was altered voice it's a real voice nobody told her she sounds like nobody never once I've been told I look like John Denver and uh about 50 other people I hear it all the time and no nobody's ever said that I don't know I don't know so a open ai's uh story is that it never intended to copy scarlet and wanted her for it but they found somebody who was not her that was just a voice they liked and there you go that's their version but uh this is going to have huge implications for uh Hollywood because what happens if you can create people who sort of are in the in the vibe of Scarlet Johansson is that going to be okay what if you found what if you created an AI that didn't look exactly like her but was a highly attractive blonde of the same age and then you gave it a voice that was based on not her but somebody who sounds a lot like her according to other people is that going to be legal there's going to be massive lawsuits about all this stuff so we'll see I would just like to note because the important part is my connection to all stories that uh Scarlet Johansson's husband once mocked me on SNL she's she's married to Colin Jou Jo so he mocked me about a year ago on SNL so good luck with that guys there is a study of uh brains they found there's a part of the brain that might be evolved with causing somebody to be a narcissist let me tell you something that I realized um uh maybe 40 years ago I remember the first time I heard that uh they found that the brains of addicts and alcoholics in particular were different and they were saying hey we think that alcoholism might have a genetic propensity to which I said what I thought that was free will I thought you either decided to drink or you didn't are you telling me that your brain might be different and that some people cannot just decide not to drink and that was the case then later people said we found in the brain a part of the brain that makes you more likely to be gay and I said what I thought that was just a choice you tell me that your brain could be the you know decider of in your genes could be the decider of whether you're a born guay and then I said to myself what's going to happen to free will once we find and map all the parts of the brain once you know that there's a physical part of the brain that causes all of our behaviors and you can identify it and you go oh there it is we just scanned you you got that big narcissist thing in your brain oh that's why you're acting that way or oh found out you've got that tendency to be an alcoholic there it is it's right in your brain what are you going to think of free will when we identify all the parts of the brain that cause all of our actions well I I realized that that day that the idea of Free Will would get smaller and smaller as we got smarter and smarter about what the brain does as a machine and here's and so here's the newest one now now if narcissism can be identified and everything from intelligence to you can even apparently even your propensity to be conservative or liberal can be identified in your brain so if your brain has an influence on these things are you still clinging to the idea that you have free will because that idea is going to get harder and harder to hold on to harder and harder all right um the debate over whether the government was trying to kill to kill Trump uh and have him assassinated by including in their maralago raid uh authorization they are authorized to use deadly force if necessary and um so there's some people who were saying well it was just standard procedure they just say that all the time and there are other people uh Mike cernovich Dan banino for example and uh who say no you idiots that is not a standard procedure now how could it be standard procedure but also not a standard procedure well it turns out it can be and Bonino gets to the heart of it by asking this question if you think it's standard paperwork um would the DEA be allowed to serve a search warrant on the White House with armed agents in the cocaine case why not do you think that armed people with authorization to shoot to kill would have gone into the White House to look into the cocaine situation and and by the way in both cases there was full cooperation on the physical part so at moral Lago there was never any indication anybody was going to resist anything and Secret Service were always in the communication they were always talking to them never once said if you come in here we're going to prevent you in fact they negotiated so that there would be no problems at all so the question is if you knew there were going to be no problems because you'd already negotiated it why do you have to put that in there so I'm going to take a a middle a middle view of this I don't think somebody sat down and said all right I got to plan to kill the president here's what we're going to do we're going to create this situation and then we'll put this authorization in there and then as soon as something goes wrong will just start blazing away and gun down the president I don't believe that even for the slightest second because nobody's nobody's that dumb but did they create a situation where the possibility would go from zero to nonzero yes it does look like they did that it looks like very much created a situation where there was a nonzero chance of killing him that did happen I so I'm with Bonino on that um but I but I wouldn't take it so much as they planed to kill him because if they had planned to kill him it would have gone down differently it would have been more like more of a surprise you know less of a negotiated situation so um and by the way I I like I say this often but one of the things I always value in Dan banino is his talent stack he he's done one of the greatest jobs of assembling uh talents everything and this is another one so he's got this background in you know uh law enforcement type stuff but on top of that he knows politics and on top of that he knows all the players and on top of that he's great at the media stuff so he's got the full package and that's why he's doing so well all right um so Trump went to the Bronx and gave his big speech it was a giant hit there were no real problems of any scale it was all positivity um we're all Americans doesn't matter what color your skin is people were wild for him if anybody thought he would get a bad reception in the Bronx you were wrong the crowd was the most diverse for a trump crowd there were plenty of white people but uh there were plenty of other people too so plenty of Asians plenty of blacks plenty of Hispanics hey AOC seem to be flipping out because remember I told you the Andre Agy strategy where you don't go after your opponent's weakest shot you go after their strongest shot because if you get lucky and you could you can make them lose their confidence in their strongest shot they're dead so you basically can decapitate somebody in the first set just by making sure you lose they lose their confidence in their best play so the best play that the uh Democrats have is that the deepest bluest States absolutely cannot stand any Trump anything so he went into the deepest bluest place and blew their doors off he Andre IAC see them you could see the panic in aoc's um you know complaints about him going there why would you even complain about it like why would that even be a conversation that somebody running for president would visit a highly populated area in America and make his case but they had to complain about it because he was going right into the belly of the Beast they could tell he was going for their fore hand he wasn't going for their weak backand he went right into the middle of the dragon and it up they now and I agree with some people who say he's not going to win this state he might by the way I'm not I'm not on the the page that he's not going to win the state you do the part we can't predict is how far Biden will fall between now on Election Day you see the rate of decline right have you seen a video of Biden talking one year ago completely different one year completely different um we we'll talk about this so Biden gave a a press conference very rare apparently he had all the people he was going to call out call on on a card he gave them only one question a piece because that's the one he was prepared for and then he read his response as it appears from a card in other words it wasn't a press conference at all it was a Q&A with written questions and written answers he just stood in public and did it do you think he would have had to do that a year ago a year ago he might have been able to Bluff his way through although they were they were hiding him a year ago but I think he could have gotten through it today he is clearly not capable of handling a question that he's not that's not written in front of him with the answer that's completely different in one year what's he going to be by November by November I don't even think there'll be a choice it it could be a really one person and one person who's just not even going to be alive in a few months so could Trump win New York I'm going to say yes I'm going to say yes but not because of steady state it's because there's there could be a big there's going to be a big drop in Biden before November I think his health will just fall off ledge I think it already has and they're just hiding it from us but it's going to be hard to hide it for a few more months I suspect that the Democratic National Convention where Biden has to give a speech could be really really touch and go for the Democrats because I don't think they trust them to be able to even read the teleprompter at this point imagine him going up there if it happens uh and giving in his acceptance speech and he does the mumbly thing oh my God it's bad enough if he does it just you know on a stump speech but if he does it standing in front of the whole country at the DNC and I think he will it's not a good look uh apparently I don't know is this true I need a fact check on this did did Trump actually say at the Bronx rally and I quote I don't eat bacon anymore it's too expensive he didn't really say those words did he because I've been laughing about it all morning it sounds like something he would say in his normal hyperbole we do assume that he can still afford bacon but but if he said that it's hilarious because I think the the difference between Trump today and prior Trump is that now we understand him like we get him no you didn't mean literally you can't afford bacon of course but is it funny it's totally funny yeah it's totally funny so that's all we care about so meanwhile Trump goes and does by everybody's account everything right now may I remind you again that Trump's performance as a candidate this time around is unlike anything I've ever seen I mean it's just all good all the way I mean he's just doing one home run after another I mean he's hitting Frozen Ropes into the Outfield every every at bat is crazy and this Bronx thing really highlights that because he's not just playing as safe if I told you he's made no mistakes but he's also playing as safe you'd say that's not the Trump we want we're not looking for the play as safe guy so here he goes into the belly of the Beast and the Bronx kills it that's who we want we want the one who can do the thing you think can't be done we want the one who says why would I be afraid of that why would I be afraid of that that's the one we want meanwhile the governor of New York hok um said that uh she referred to Trump supporters as clowns during the rally clowns have we noticed a correlation that the Democrats think that Republican an are pieces of it's a pretty clear pattern yeah just remember that you have one leader who is saying very clearly and consistently we're all Americans we can pull together and one who says we're better off divided because that's kind of what he's saying Biden anyway um here's something uh Biden said in a post he says Donald Trump and his Mega Republican allies don't care about securing the Border or fixing Americans broken immigration system if they did they would have supported the toughest border enforcement in history so it was a bill that just got turned down by mostly Republicans instead they put partisan politics ahead of our national security so here's my question first of all you can see that he's dividing the country by referring to magga Republican allies now he's specifically talking met the elected politicians but how do you hear it I don't hear it that way I hear that he is just saying if you're a magga republican he wants to piss on your head that's what I hear Do you hear it differently I think he's in insulting the citizens at the same time he's insulting the people they voted for the so-called Mega allies so that's his usual piece of divisive uh terrible president president um framing that they are bad people and there are good people and he's the good people I guess do you do you think that the Democrats are catching on this obviously was a fake border bill that had poison pills in it do you think that the Democrats haven't figured out that it's all theater and do they really think that the Republicans looked at a perfectly good border Bill and said we're going to turn this down for the good of getting elected I'm not saying they wouldn't but it's not what happened they didn't really have a chance to look at a good border bill I think it's strange that the president's name is Biden at the same time um we're all wondering the same question on Election Day will he still be alive byen what are the odds that his name would be byen when all we're waiting for is if he's still going to be alive by then that's a weird coincidence all right uh Biden also posted or somebody did for him Trump is not running to lead America he's running for Revenge but you can't build a future on Revenge I'm running to lead America into the future what future is that the one where you live for another four months months and then we bury you well what exact future are you talking about old man who can't even do a press conference you're not part of our future you're just not in any way our future but okay but here's my bigger complaint he says uh Trump is not leading running to lead America he's running for Revenge Revenge is what I want revenge is called the justice system do you think the justice system was set up for fairness no do you think the justice system was set up to rehabilitate people no it's Revenge that's what it does and the and the the risk of Revenge is the only thing that keeps Society together why do you not do bad things if you're a good person why do you not do bad things cuz we're going to get revenge on you we're going to put you in jail if you don't want to call that Revenge fine you can call it a flower you can put a different word on it but the justice system is very much about revenge and that's what makes it work and you know what revenge is the animated the animating part of it the part of the reason that uh Trump has so much support is that you put 2,000 people in jail for a political reasons you're trying to Jail the president for political reasons and Peter Navaro is still in jail so revenge is going to be at the top of the menu revenge is at the top of the menu and it belongs there because that's what Justice looks like justice looks like honest Revenge who else needs to talk about let's not have Revenge did anybody else have to talk about that do you remember Jimmy Carter saying oh don't do revenge on me do you know why we didn't have to do revenge on Jimmy Carter because there was no reason do you know why we didn't need revenge on Bill Clinton there was no reason there was no reason do you know why nobody's ever talked about revenge before ever there was no reason if he's talking about don't do Revenge it's because he created the whole situation nobody's going to be talking about revenge unless something really really big and terrible it happened and something big and terrible is happening right now Peter Navaro is still in prison no you let Peter Navaro ENT prison and the other 2,000 people you dropped this stupid lawfare charges and we'll stop talking about revenge but right now I want to see hundreds of Democrats in jail I want to see hundreds of Democrats in jail minimum and we do have the goods I mean completely within the legal system I recommend no actions outside the legal system yeah no no vigilante anything don't do that but yes the justice system has plenty of evidence of crimes at the highest level so yes Revenge Revenge Revenge Revenge and every time you say don't do it you remind us why we need to because nobody else needs to even talk that way if you're talking somebody out of getting revenge revenge is called for cuz it isn't even in the conversation it's just not part of the conversation until you up really badly and you have Peter Navaro is still in prison Peter Navaro is still in prison remember the Elmo and yes you can build a future on Revenge it's called The Justice System speaking of Justice apparent the amuse account on X tells us that there's something called the 65 project uh and it's apparently mostly to cancel anybody anybody was a lawyer who's trying to help Trump and it's run by David Brock and it's funded by George Soros and it's uh as Muse says it's an allout war on the sixth amendment to the Constitution Revenge Revenge all right uh American American first legal that's the uh Republican oriented uh group that's trying to create a counterbalance for the in the legal system and is trying to use legal means to get Justice in a variety of ways that Democrats have tried to take it away from you but there's this new story that frankly I do not understand there's something about a new document that's been undercovered some Obama order from his days that's been kind of secret that says that there should be something about keeping copies of all the classified stuff on a server and the argument doesn't make sense to me but maybe it does to you so I've asked for a clarification but here's what it sounds like it sounds like America First legal is saying that Trump's um legal problems with the moral Lago documents are not a problem because there are also copies of them that the government never lost they've always had the copies now I don't understand that do you why would that make any difference if they have copies I assume they had copies didn't you always assume they had copies would would the government in 2024 I have a digital copy of everything important that came across the the government's desks I mean I just assume so so I don't I don't understand the importance of this but American first legal is playing it as very important so I've asked them to explain it give me the dummies version of I don't get it like why is this important how's it how's it have anything to do with anything so if they come up with that I'll talk about it again but at the moment all I can say is that people who know more than I do about the law think there's an important thing that happened and I have no idea what it is uh block the FBI from arresting dangerous Iranians yeah that that's a boring story but I I see what you're saying so there's some story about John KY blocking the arrest of some known Iranian uh bad guys uh because he was trying to get a deal done with Iran is that the biggest crime in the world here's the thing that might be just real politic meaning that if you're this close if you're this close to getting a deal that's a really big deal maybe you don't arrest those people on Tuesday you maybe you get the deal arrest him a few weeks later so I don't know how real that story is uh it it's not that far from something I would think is normal business but I guess I'd wait for Dan banino to set me straight on that so I guess I don't have enough a hook into that story to care about it um there's a report that the US and the European Union are moving toward an agreement for a massive loan for Ukraine but their clever technique is they're going to use Russian assets Frozen in the west as collateral here's the thing I've been saying that our form of government is not a democracy of course it was designed to be a republic you know federal republic with Democratic principles but it's really not that either it probably hasn't been since the 50s we are essentially a criminal organization and colonizers we're basically the board trying to you know take everybody's assets and apparently we've always been that way that's what America is now if that sounds like a criticism here's the twist I don't think there's a better form a government because if you don't coordinate your government with your big capitalist entities somebody else will and they'll be your daddy so unfortunately if you're not the baddest criminal in the criminal world you're going to get dead so being the baddest of the criminals might be the best form a government maybe because you know I think democracy has its issues too if you let dumb people make big decisions so I don't know but when I see a story like this it just reminds you that we're a criminal organization trying to steal Putin's stuff you know the the Mike Ben's take is that Ukraine is really just an energy play and that Hunter Biden is part of that with barisma that's that's why Hunter was part of barisma all part of the you know the big Energy play to steal the energy from Russia and since we couldn't get all of their energy we're going to settle for keeping their assets that we could freeze I mean I get that there's a war going on but we're we're persecuting we're Prosecuting the war like we're just criminals we're just looking to steal it it's hard to not see it as just a criminal act against another criminal and again if it sounds like if it sounds like a criticism believe it or not it's not we seem to be a very effective criminal organization because we've overthrown lots of governments we've got access to lots of resources and other places and uh maybe it's not working out so well in Ukraine but you know it seems to be proving the the point but to me um so Putin has said that he's willing to negotiate a ceasefire along current lines of uh who owns what now I say there's no chance of negotiating until Trump gets there because the Biden play it was never about stopping a war they're not really concerned with ending War they're only concerned in stealing Russia's energy game and if they haven't done that and they think they still have a chance they're not going to negotiate so this basically they're going to save the negotiations for Trump who as far as I know does not have a massive interest in a big energy deal or stealing things in Ukraine so he could just say yeah let's just end this what when Trump says he could end it in the day I would bet against it but I wouldn't bet against ending it in a month because I think he can get it done in a month and that ladies and gentlemen brings us to the conclusion of my prepared remarks it all comes down to race and religion somebody says does it uh Trump didn't let zalinsky rip up the M Peace Accords Biden did and that was the start of the war you think that's what you think so um all right I had another topic but I think too controver IAL um I think we overestimated Russia's willingness to negotiate creating a well here's what I think we should do I would love to see Trump do a grand deal where we just work out our differences with the three superpowers and just agree to rule the world in peace and they can have their part we'll have our part you know I realize that taiwan's a problem but at this point we are moving our chip facilities out of there and I think Taiwan knows that in the long run there's really no way that they could become they can't be independent in the long run it's too dangerous could you imagine China having a major Ally in Cuba and you know being right at our doorstep and I don't know it it just seems to me that we're fighting history if we're trying to keep keep Taiwan out of Chinese control here's what I think we should do instead the had a good plan I think what we should do instead is create a hundred-year plan do do the Hong Kong plan say you know what why fight history in a 100 years sometime within that 100 years Taiwan will be China but if you wait 100 years you don't have to worry about microchips because something will be very different by then uh and it won't be you know depending on Taiwan so I think if we said how about we just agree now that there's it's 100-year plan and in the 100 years Taiwan will figure out what its role will be so there'll be future negotiations of does it operate a little bit independently compared to the mainland nobody knows what the mainland would even look like in 100 years you you could have a you know a de democracy in China in the 100 years Anything Could Happen so I think you do a 100-year plan and just take the violence off the table because if you're president she and you know you got it back you just won't be alive when it happens that's a big win and if we can take that off the table then we can deal with China at a much much better level Hong Kong Island was eded to the UK in perpetuity I don't believe that I thought it was a 99e elease Hong Kong had a 50-year plan that the CCP removed yeah well it's a risk but here's the thing Hong Kong didn't really have a chance of staying independent forever Taiwan doesn't have a chance of staying independent forever if it were our hemisphere we would insist that we had that much control and I don't know I just wouldn't fight history um many think it was a deal so I'm seeing people say that the the The Narrative of Hong Kong is all fake and that they did not have a deal to give it back I'm I'm doubting your framing of that uh I think it was 99 year lease and when it ended the UK gave it back so but I but I will note that there are people who are saying that's not true yeah a managed democracy with an authoritarian streak the the one thing I don't see is China looking like they're they want to control other countries except economically of course but taiwan's special so I think something will happen there one sooner or later it's going to happen so I I think it's a deal that Trump could make I think he could say look how about Russia you making your money China you making your money we'll make our money and let's play I think you could pull that off I I I suspect that the biggest reason we can't get along with Russia and China is that we can't stop doing covert things to each other continuously cuz we're sure that the other is doing it too so I know I'll tell you that the theory that China is doing everything it can to stop reproduction in America is looking better and better I don't think that that they're that clever but maybe all right that's all I got for you and on You.
Tube and Rumble and X I'm going to take a few minutes with just the subscribers on locals and uh I'll see the rest of you tomorrow locals stay with me the rest of you bye for now thanks for joining e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e for
well I see rumbles in the house and
locals in the house let's hear from
YouTube any YouTubers in the house
yet I'd like to see at least one
YouTuber before I start make sure you
guys are
good there we go YouTube's in the house
[Music]
good morning everybody and welcome to
coffee with Scott Adams the finest
experience you've ever had in your life
I'll bet you and if you'd like to take
it up to levels that nobody can even see
you without some kind of Elon Musk
rocket ship well all you need for that
is a coverer muger glass a tanker Chell
sste a canteen Jugger flask a vessel of
any kind fill it with your favorite
liquid I like coffee and join me now for
the unparallel pleasure the dopamine of
the day thing that makes everything
better is called the simultaneous Sip
and it happens now
go you want to see the weirdest
thing I'm going to show you a picture
from my college
days this is a true story there was an
underclassman who decided that um he
looked enough like me and he decided
that I was his role model because I was
a year or two
older and he he started dressing like
me and people noticed and started
calling him the
Clone so so and rather than rejecting
that and saying I'm not trying to copy
him he he embraced it he said yeah I'm
totally trying to copy him and uh it it
would get more and more extreme the
entire time and it just got funnier and
funnier he was a friend of mine he live
he lived you know just a few doors down
in the
dormatory but anyway for Halloween that
year uh let's see where is it we went as
clones see if you can tell which one I
am I'd like to think he was the poor
man's version of me but I'm not entirely
sure he's probably worth a billion
dollars now he was pretty smart probably
did a startup or something
anyway I saw a concept today in one of
uh Owen's posts um about the What's
called the third
place have you ever heard that term a
third place so your house is your first
place your place of work is your second
place and the third place would be like
I guess if you were in England it would
be the tavern if you were somewhere else
it would be some else now my third place
used to be be my
gym you know it's a place you could go
to feel less lonely and maybe run into
people but um here's why I wanted to
talk about it I really think we need to
design new cities around accidentally
meeting your
neighbors leaving it to chance just
doesn't work we need some way that in
the normal course of business you run
into people that you don't mind running
into you know by you know all
voluntarily nobody's going to be forced
to talk to their neighbors but I've been
looking into a number of
businesses that I could start in my
local area that would have a physical
location and I didn't realize that I was
always thinking about them as the third
place for example I was thinking it was
starting a dog park that would have some
uh Shady place where you could plug in
your laptop and sit at a table and if
you make it so it's sort of like picnic
tables you're going to have people who
don't know each other sharing the same
picnic table and if they have a place to
plug in their laptop and talk about your
dog hey which one is your dog it's kind
of a perfect place to meet people I I've
actually met good friends in the dog
park um I had a few other few other
ideas for that but I think I think I
might even call it the third
place I like the name so much uh i' call
it a third place dog
park yeah and just build it around the
human attraction but also you can take
your dog there wouldn't that be a good
idea anyway couldn't make money from it
as my neighbor my neighbor reminded me
yesterday when I was talking about
it
so where I live uh our local real estate
um let's say real estate um let's say
king and queen of the neighborhood
they're they're very uh and I say that
not as an insult they're just very good
at organizing things in the neighborhood
so I know I've met all of my
neighbors just through the fact that
they're they're fairly organized we're
all in a WhatsApp thing it's actually a
great
situation anyway uh can you believe that
overdoses are down and obviously we're
going to talk about Trump and Bronx and
all that later but overdoses actually
went down a little bit from 2023 down 4%
from 20 22 I don't know if this is real
it could be that they went down because
the pandemic's over the pandemic might
have been a high point for drugs could
be that uh all of our data is bad all
the time so it's not even real very
possible maybe they just start reported
it differently how about the fact that
more people are substituting weed for
stronger
drugs maybe I don't know maybe it works
the other way but I don't have data on
it
um maybe the government is giving out
fewer sub U
prescriptions so fewer people are
getting H um getting hooked maybe I
don't know but certainly there was
action in that direction but I'm going
to I'm going to offer the most uh
provocative idea for why maybe um OD is
went down a little bit for that one year
I think the most likely explanation is
it's we're we're off the
pandemic don't you 4% sounds sort of
like just coming off the pandemic High I
don't know if it's real but I would
offer this
possibility uh all the junkies are
dead you can't kill somebody twice there
might be a logical end to how much the
um how much the overdose problem can get
in other words there might be a natural
cap to it and we might have had
now let let me make a bad
analogy if you try to kill a a head
terrorist like a Bin Laden it's not
really going to stop things because
there'll be a second in
command if you kill the second in
command probably won't stop things
because it'll be a third in command but
in theory the quality of the terrorist
goes down every time you kill one you
know from the top down you bin l
perhaps he was really good at it you
elahi maybe he was really good at it but
when you get to maybe the fifth or sixth
terrorist down in the organization chart
I think it probably starts falling apart
like that fifth best terrorist isn't
quite good
enough but it could be that with the
that's a terrible analogy maybe the
worst I've ever done but um I think the
overdoses are limited to people who
would be
would have a propensity to it once you
run out of people who have a
propensity you don't make new
ones right there the people who are
never going to become an addict are not
going to wake up this morning and
something
changed they were born people were never
going to be addicts because there's
there is such
a um a genetic component to
this and if you take let's take
alcoholism alcohol is around 10% of the
public if alcohol killed
you at a high rate like fentol it does
kill you but at a higher rate like
fentanyl wouldn't you start running out
of
drunks I think you'd actually start
running out you know if the population
is become stable so it could be that
here's my favorite story of the day uh
explorers say they found what they
believe is the remains of World War to
Ace pilot uh who was down in a jungle
Ravine now he was fairly famous for his
exploits as a pilot but here's the best
part his name is Richard bong b o n or I
think his his friends probably called
him
dick and if I were going to be a World
War II flying ace and my name was Dick
bong I would feel like I was the coolest
person in the world well you know until
I got shot down and died in a ravine in
a jungle but until
then cool name so I will be celebrating
tonight in the man cave with the rest of
the local
subscribers and uh we will uh do
something I don't know what but
something that would be
appropriate to honor dick
bong maybe some tubin kind of a thing I
don't know you maybe you could come up
with an idea
well do you remember when uh Marjorie
Taylor green got into a little shouting
match in congress with uh uh eyelashes
Mickey uh her real name is
representative
Crockett I think it's Jasmine
Crockett and uh she was talking today
and there was some open
hearing and she was touting her uh
credentials she said I currently hold an
honorary
doctorate I also hold jur doctorate uh a
bachelor's degree uh she technically
holds the rank of lieutenant colonel in
the Civil Air Patrol and I actually
practiced law for almost two decades in
addition to serving on various boards in
addition to being a prior State
lawmaker so uh this was in the
context of telling somebody that she
doesn't understand why you have to
choose between uh qualified and diverse
because she's saying very clearly that
she has lots of
qualifications and she's diverse she's
black and she's female and so why can't
they just do more of that you know what
why why are you pretending that you have
to lower the quality of
people to get enough
diversity now she said that in public
which suggests that she doesn't
understand human motivation or how
anything works and and somehow doesn't
understand that systemic racism has made
it impossible to not choose between
diversity and quality because the
pipeline is too small has nothing to do
with anybody's genes has nothing to do
with
culture the school system does not
create uh a pipeline of people that
corporations need in terms of the the
talents so here's the problem
and again it's what Democrats don't
understand if there had never been
Dei if there had never been Dei and I
saw representative Crockett and I found
out that she had done all of these
things and also had gotten elected to
congress do you know what I would say
about her if there had never been
Dei I would have
said wow she might be more more capable
than everybody in Congress because if
she had to overcome things like being
black and being a woman in a in a world
where that was you know not a free pass
I would have said huh you know all
things being equal probably better than
average because you know potentially
maybe overcame more barriers to get
there but in the context of Dei I assume
that she does not belong in her job she
owns an honorary doctorate which is
complete do you know who own
who also has an honorary
doctorate Jerry Seinfeld you get an
honorary doctorate for giving a speech
as a college does she think we're stupid
enough to think that an honorary
doctorate is something she can mention
in as a part of her
qualifications how stupid would
you have to be to say you have an
honorary doctorate and that's part of
your
credentials uh now she also has some
kind of legal degree do we assume that
she got got that the real way by being
qualified no I don't assume that I
assume the opposite I assume the
opposite because we're in the context of
Dei and on top of that seems to not
understand the most basic element of the
topic that she was having an open
hearing on how dides she not understand
the most basic thing that the pipeline
is insufficient to get us all what we
all want I think everybody would be
happy if the pipeline was just full of
diverse candidates that were great and
then the companies would say that's
great and then you'd got to work with
all these gray people and you would not
see their color because you'd say uh my
coworker is just great I mean my
co-worker is nailing it if your
co-worker is doing a good job that's the
part you see realistically you know you
might be you might be Prejudice I I like
to say this a
lot discrimination only lasts until you
open your
mouth and then you get judged by what
the you say and that's it that in
the real world you can't discriminate
against somebody who's talking to you
because you're going to decide what you
think about them based on what comes out
of their mouth period period it doesn't
matter what happened the moment until
they open their mouth the moment they
open their mouth you're judging them on
what comes out yeah that's it and and I
don't think I don't think not everybody
understands
that I think the the people who are
worried about what other people are
thinking about them are sort of missing
the biggest part of
that that if you act like a good person
it's pretty much automatic that people
are going to like you and want to work
with you there aren't that many good
people if you're black let me give you a
an Insider tip about white
people there are not so many white
people that are
awesome that uh I have an unlimited
amount if you walk into my life and
you're just like a good person you're in
the top 10% without
trying it's not that hard it's not that
hard to get into my top 10% in favor of
people the bar is just not that high it
really
isn't all
right um so I would say that thing that
representative Crockett misses is that
she is she and anybody who is pro Dei
creates a situation where the assumption
is flipped from wow you must be extra
qualified if you made it through some
extra challenges to get here to you're
probably not qualified because we've
built a system to promote unqualified
people the system guarantees it because
of systemic racism limiting the pipeline
of applicants that you would like to
hire
all right Elon Musk being
uh it must be nice to be the richest
person in the
world BEC because there's just that
little extra bit of Freedom you
get so here's something that really
happened I could not have loved it more
so Elon Musk was on some kind of uh
online thing where he was taking uh
press calls vivatech 2024 in Paris and
uh somebody from Business Insider got up
a reporter to ask a question and here's
the here's the question she starts to
ask she says quote Tesla has had a bumpy
few months looking at of flagging sales
at home stock market decline layoffs
when you look back and musk interrupts
her he interrupts her in mids sentence
he says yeah we can stop the question
right now because I don't think Business
Insider is a real
publication okay the reporter replied
and sat
down then mus said so let's move on to
the next
question can can we take a moment to
slow clap that
out can can you just slow clap at
home I I don't know how much to express
how much I love
that what why in the world would he give
respect to something that's clearly not
a real publication all right Business
Insider is just now I think it
was sort of a little bit real at one
point but not
[Laughter]
now so more of that please more of
that I would like to suggest as my theme
today it does feel like things are
changing let me give you some hints do
you think I could have gone after
representative Crockett as hard as I
just
did even two years ago no somebody would
have grabbed it an a context and tweeted
it all over the place and tried to get
me
cancelled but now I can just tell you
what is useful and true I wouldn't say
it if it weren't useful I don't know if
everybody gets that you know even when I
got cancelled for saying get the F away
does everybody know that was trying to
be helpful for
everybody the of course the news looked
like it made it look like I'm targeting
one group nope is specifically was to
help that one group that it says I'm
targeting because if you don't know
what's true you cannot make
plans I'm telling you what's true what's
true is if you're going to do Dei I'm
going to try to get away from it if
you're creating a situation where you
say I've got your money and you better
give it back I'm going to run
away so you can't have it both ways you
can't have it both ways and now I can
say that out loud cuz I paid for it I
bought the ticket I paid full price for
the Free Speech ticket now I get to use
it
so all right um Thomas Massie being
awesome as usual is introduced a bill to
eliminate taxpayer funding for online
censorship yes
please and I'm thinking wait a
minute why why is it always the same guy
who comes up with all the good ideas are
you noticing the
pattern who who the hell did we hire for
congress if there's like one guy who
comes up with all the useful ideas it's
always the same
one like I'm glad we elected
accidentally one smart person now Rand
Paul is pretty great too but I like
Thomas
Massie so yes the Twitter as Massie says
the Twitter files showed the government
colludes with private companies and
universities to violate the First
Amendment yes proven and Congress must
use the power of the purse to make that
illegal yes
please that that's a yes yes yes yes yes
and better yet here's the best
part let's get people on record to be
against
it let's see who's against having the
government reduce your free
speech let's find out who's bold enough
to say yeah I would like to use the
government power to restrict your free
speech because we wouldn't want you to
get any bad information about the
pandemic right because that's the good
argument yeah we wouldn't want you to
get any dangerous information about like
Russia
collusion or or who or the real nature
of the Hunter
laptop yeah we certainly wouldn't want
any
misinformation all right Jonathan turle
is all over this story about the
so-called Hunter Biden sugar bro now I
mentioned this but it's such a head
Shaker and and totle is making a point
that the fact that the regular media
media you know the corporate media is
not treating this as like the big story
ever just sort of ignoring it tells you
a lot so this is dog not barking
situation so the situation I'm talking
about is there's this fellow named it's
a friend of Hunter Biden's who has given
him millions of dollars Kevin Morris and
he just says he's a friend he wants to
help no ulterior motive he's just likes
to give his friend millions of
dollars and apparently he gave his
friend all of his money because he
doesn't have any left that's what you do
for your friends yeah when you your
friend needs money you don't give some
money yeah you give them all your
money what what so Congress of course
wanted to talk to the sugar bro to find
out what the deal is and the CIA said
they had some relationship with the
sugar bro and said no you can't talk to
him
what wait
what we can't talk to the person giving
millions of dollars to the president's
son cuz see eia says you you you can't
know what that guy
knows maybe it's exactly what it looks
like I've been saying that a lot lately
maybe this story is exactly what it
looks like yeah like
uh like everything bad yeah it and if
you tie this together with the uh the
Mike Ben's view of the world that
Ukraine is basically a play to get the
uh energy resources from Russia has
nothing to do with Ukraine or Liberty or
democracy in fact we're not interested
even a little bit in Ukraine being
Democratic apparently that would just
work against our
interest so
uh there'll be more on that a little bit
in a
moment um it's a whole week of
complicated stories do you notice that
the news is really complicated now for
example there's a story about the Ecco
Health Alliance boss Peter
daik and apparently he's in big trouble
for some documents that have been found
that suggest there was some kind of
cordinated effort to hide the
involvement of the uhan lab if I have
that
right uh and they use apparently they
used the personally email to avoid
getting caught they there there's some
people involved who were deleting emails
ahead of time before they got foed and
the nature of the conversations that we
have seen suggests that they know they
were guilty and that they were trying to
hide hide it at least that's how it's
being interpreted I'll just say that's
how it's being
interpreted can't know their inner
thoughts so it looks like everything you
thought was true about the pandemic was
true it came out of the Wuhan lab it was
gain a function we were behind it
right America was behind
it everything and they covered it up so
every bad assumption you had about that
apparently was all
true
apparently now that's a complicated
story so I don't know if I have all that
Nuance there but that's a basic
idea uh there's a democratic consultant
who's been indicted for creating a deep
fake of Joe Biden's voice that did a
bunch of Robo calls and told people not
to vote
Stephen
Kramer so he's being charged with voter
suppression and faces up to $6 million
fines so that's the future the future is
uh people faking voices on rooc calls
but got
caught speaking of of AI voices you know
the story about Scarlet Johansson saying
that uh chat GPT illegally stole her
voice and had
they they hired somebody to sound like
her because she had declined the offer
to do it herself well it turns out that
this story is way more complicated than
you
thought because it's not so simple as we
stole your voice because the The Voice
they used is a real person who was not
doing an
impression and the real person says this
is new nobody's ever nobody in my real
life has ever told me I sound like
Scarlet Johansson
now do you believe that do you believe
that everybody who listens to it says oh
sounds like Scarlet Johansson but then
in a real life and nobody's saying that
it was altered voice it's a real voice
nobody told her she sounds like nobody
never
once I've been told I look like John
Denver and
uh about 50 other people I hear it all
the time and no nobody's ever said that
I don't know I don't
know so a open ai's uh story is that it
never intended to copy scarlet and
wanted her for it but they found
somebody who was not her that was just a
voice they liked and there you go that's
their version but uh this is going to
have huge implications for uh
Hollywood because what happens if you
can create people who sort of are in the
in the vibe of Scarlet Johansson is that
going to be okay what if you found what
if you created an AI that didn't look
exactly like her but was a highly
attractive blonde of the same age and
then you gave it a voice that was based
on not her but somebody who sounds a lot
like her according to other
people is that going to be
legal there's going to be massive
lawsuits about all this stuff so we'll
see I would just like to note because
the important part is my connection to
all stories that uh Scarlet Johansson's
husband once mocked me on
SNL she's she's married to Colin Jou
Jo so he mocked me about a year ago on
SNL so good luck with that guys there is
a study of uh brains they found there's
a part of the brain that might be
evolved with causing somebody to be a
narcissist let me tell you something
that I
realized
um uh maybe 40 years
ago I remember the first time I heard
that uh they found that the brains of
addicts and alcoholics in particular
were
different and they were saying hey we
think that alcoholism might have a
genetic
propensity to which I said what
I thought that was free will I thought
you either decided to drink or you
didn't are you telling me that your
brain might be different and that some
people cannot just decide not to drink
and that was the case then later people
said we found in the brain a part of the
brain that makes you more likely to be
gay and I said what I thought that was
just a choice you tell me that your
brain could be the you know decider of
in your genes could be the decider of
whether you're a born guay and then I
said to myself what's going to happen to
free will once we find and map all the
parts of the brain once you know that
there's a physical part of the brain
that causes all of our behaviors and you
can identify it and you go oh there it
is we just scanned you you got that big
narcissist thing in your brain oh that's
why you're acting that way or oh found
out you've got that tendency to be an
alcoholic there it is it's right in your
brain what are you going to think of
free
will when we identify all the parts of
the brain that cause all of our
actions well I I realized that that day
that the idea of Free Will would get
smaller and smaller as we got smarter
and smarter about what the brain does as
a
machine and here's and so here's the
newest one now now if narcissism can be
identified
and everything from intelligence to you
can even apparently even your propensity
to be conservative or liberal can be
identified in your
brain so if your brain has an influence
on these
things are you still clinging to the
idea that you have free
will because that idea is going to get
harder and harder to hold on
to harder and harder
all right um the debate over whether the
government was trying to kill to kill
Trump uh and have him assassinated by
including in their maralago raid uh
authorization they are authorized to use
deadly force if
necessary
and
um so there's some people who were
saying well it was just standard
procedure they just say that all the
time and there are other people uh Mike
cernovich Dan banino for example and uh
who say no you idiots that is not a
standard
procedure now how could it be standard
procedure but also not a standard
procedure well it turns out it can be
and Bonino gets to the heart of it by
asking this
question if you think it's standard
paperwork um would the DEA be allowed to
serve a search warrant on the White
House with armed agents in the cocaine
case why
not do you think that armed people with
authorization to shoot to kill would
have gone into the White House to look
into the cocaine situation and and by
the way in both cases there was full
cooperation on the physical part so at
moral Lago there was never any
indication anybody was going to resist
anything and Secret Service were always
in the communication they were always
talking to them never once said if you
come in here we're going to prevent you
in fact they negotiated so that there
would be no problems at all so the
question is if you knew there were going
to be no problems because you'd already
negotiated it why do you have to put
that in
there so I'm going to take a a middle a
middle view of
this I don't think somebody sat down and
said all right I got to plan to kill the
president here's what we're going to do
we're going to create this situation and
then we'll put this authorization in
there and then as soon as something goes
wrong will just start blazing away and
gun down the president I don't believe
that even for the slightest second
because nobody's nobody's that dumb but
did they create a situation where the
possibility would go from zero to
nonzero yes it does look like they did
that it looks like very much created a
situation where there was a nonzero
chance of killing him that did happen I
so I'm with Bonino on
that
um but I but I wouldn't take it so much
as they planed to kill him because if
they had planned to kill him it would
have gone down differently it would have
been more like more of a surprise you
know less of a negotiated
situation so
um and by the way I I like I say this
often but one of the things I always
value in Dan banino is his talent
stack he he's done one of the greatest
jobs of
assembling uh talents everything and
this is another one so he's got this
background in you know uh law
enforcement type stuff but on top of
that he knows politics and on top of
that he knows all the players and on top
of that he's great at the media
stuff so he's got the full
package and that's why he's doing so
well all right um so Trump went to the
Bronx and gave his big speech it was a
giant hit there were no real problems of
any scale it was all positivity um we're
all Americans doesn't matter what color
your skin is people were wild for him if
anybody thought he would get a bad
reception in the Bronx you were wrong
the crowd was the most diverse for a
trump crowd there were plenty of white
people but uh there were plenty of other
people too so plenty of Asians plenty of
blacks plenty of
Hispanics hey AOC seem to be flipping
out because remember I told you the
Andre Agy strategy where you don't go
after your opponent's weakest shot you
go after their strongest shot because if
you get lucky and you could you can make
them lose their confidence in their
strongest shot they're dead so you
basically can decapitate somebody in the
first set just by making sure you lose
they lose their confidence in their best
play so the best play that the uh
Democrats have is that the deepest
bluest
States absolutely cannot stand any Trump
anything so he went into the deepest
bluest place and blew their doors off he
Andre IAC see them you could see the
panic in aoc's um you know complaints
about him going there why would you even
complain about it like why would that
even be a conversation that somebody
running for president would visit a
highly populated area in America and
make his case but they had to complain
about it because he was going right into
the belly of the Beast they could tell
he was going for their fore hand he
wasn't going for their weak backand he
went right into the middle of the dragon
and it
up they now and I agree with some people
who say he's not going to win this
state he
might by the way I'm not I'm not on the
the page that he's not going to win the
state you do the part we can't predict
is how far Biden will fall between now
on Election Day you see the rate of
decline right have you seen a video of
Biden talking one year ago completely
different one year completely
different um we we'll talk about this so
Biden gave a a press conference very
rare apparently he had all the people he
was going to call out call on on a card
he gave them only one question a piece
because that's the one he was prepared
for and then he read his response as it
appears from a card in other words it
wasn't a press conference at all it was
a Q&A with written questions and written
answers he just stood in public and did
it do you think he would have had to do
that a year ago a year ago he might have
been able to Bluff his way through
although they were they were hiding him
a year ago but I think he could have
gotten through it today he is clearly
not capable of handling a question that
he's not that's not written in front of
him with the
answer that's completely different in
one
year what's he going to be by
November by November I don't even think
there'll be a choice it it could be a
really one person and one person who's
just not even going to be alive in a few
months so could Trump win New York I'm
going to say yes
I'm going to say yes but not because of
steady state it's because there's there
could be a big there's going to be a big
drop in Biden before November I think
his health will just fall off ledge I
think it already has and they're just
hiding it from us but it's going to be
hard to hide it for a few more months I
suspect that the Democratic National
Convention where Biden has to give a
speech could be really really touch and
go for the Democrats because I don't
think they trust them to be able to even
read the teleprompter at this
point imagine him going up there if it
happens uh and giving in his acceptance
speech and he does the mumbly
thing oh my God it's bad enough if he
does it just you know on a stump speech
but if he does it standing in front of
the whole country at the DNC and I think
he
will it's not a good
look uh apparently I don't know is this
true I need a fact check on this did did
Trump actually say at the Bronx rally
and I quote I don't eat bacon anymore
it's too
expensive he didn't really say those
words did he because I've been laughing
about it all
morning it sounds like something he
would
say in his normal hyperbole
we do assume that he can still afford
bacon but but if he said that it's
hilarious because I think the the
difference between Trump today and prior
Trump is that now we understand him like
we get him no you didn't mean literally
you can't afford bacon of course but is
it funny it's totally
funny yeah it's totally funny so that's
all we care
about so meanwhile Trump goes and does
by everybody's account everything
right now may I remind you
again that Trump's performance as a
candidate this time
around is unlike anything I've ever seen
I mean it's just all good all the way I
mean he's just doing one home run after
another I mean he's hitting Frozen Ropes
into the Outfield every every at bat is
crazy and this Bronx thing really
highlights that because he's not just
playing as safe if I told you he's made
no mistakes but he's also playing as
safe you'd say that's not the Trump we
want we're not looking for the play as
safe
guy so here he goes into the belly of
the Beast and the Bronx kills
it that's who we want we want the one
who can do the thing you think can't be
done we want the one who says why would
I be afraid of
that why would I be afraid of that
that's the one we
want meanwhile the governor of New York
hok um said that uh she referred to
Trump supporters as clowns during the
rally clowns have we noticed a
correlation that the Democrats think
that Republican an are pieces of
it's a pretty clear pattern
yeah just remember that you have one
leader who is saying very clearly and
consistently we're all Americans we can
pull together and one who says we're
better off divided because that's kind
of what he's
saying Biden
anyway um here's something uh Biden said
in a post he says Donald Trump and his
Mega Republican allies don't care about
securing the Border or fixing Americans
broken immigration system if they did
they would have supported the toughest
border enforcement in history so it was
a bill that just got turned down by
mostly Republicans instead they put
partisan politics ahead of our national
security so here's my question first of
all you can see that he's dividing the
country by referring to magga Republican
allies now he's specifically talking met
the elected politicians but how do you
hear it I don't hear it that way I hear
that he is just saying if you're a magga
republican he wants to piss on your head
that's what I hear Do you hear it
differently I think he's in
insulting the citizens at the same time
he's insulting the people they voted for
the so-called Mega
allies so that's his usual piece of
divisive uh terrible president president
um framing that they are bad people and
there are good people and he's the good
people I guess do you do you think that
the Democrats are catching on this
obviously was a fake border bill that
had poison pills in it do you think that
the Democrats haven't figured
out that it's all theater and
do they really think that the
Republicans looked at a perfectly good
border Bill and said we're going to turn
this down for the good of getting
elected I'm not saying they wouldn't but
it's not what
happened they didn't really have a
chance to look at a good border
bill I think it's strange that the
president's name is Biden at the same
time um we're all wondering the same
question on Election
Day will he still be
alive byen
what are the odds that his name would be
byen when all we're waiting for is if
he's still going to be alive by then
that's a weird
coincidence all right uh Biden also
posted or somebody did for him Trump is
not running to lead America he's running
for Revenge but you can't build a future
on Revenge I'm running to lead America
into the future what future is that the
one where you live for another four
months months and then we bury you well
what exact future are you talking about
old man who can't even do a press
conference you're not part of our future
you're just not in any way our future
but okay but here's my bigger complaint
he says uh Trump is not leading running
to lead America he's running for
Revenge Revenge is what I want revenge
is called the justice
system do you think the justice system
was set up for fairness no do you think
the justice system was set up to
rehabilitate people no it's Revenge
that's what it does and the and the the
risk of Revenge is the only thing that
keeps Society together why do you not do
bad things if you're a good person why
do you not do bad things cuz we're going
to get revenge on you we're going to put
you in jail if you don't want to call
that Revenge fine
you can call it a flower you can put a
different word on it but the justice
system is very much about revenge and
that's what makes it work and you know
what revenge is the animated the
animating part of it the part of the
reason that uh Trump has so much support
is that you put 2,000 people in
jail for a political reasons you're
trying to Jail the president for
political reasons and Peter Navaro is
still in jail so revenge is
going to be at the top of the menu
revenge is at the top of the menu and it
belongs there because that's
what Justice looks like justice looks
like honest Revenge who else needs to
talk about let's not have Revenge did
anybody else have to talk about that do
you remember Jimmy Carter saying oh
don't do revenge on me do you know why
we didn't have to do revenge on Jimmy
Carter because there was no reason
do you know why we didn't need revenge
on Bill
Clinton there was no
reason there was no reason do you know
why nobody's ever talked about
revenge before
ever there was no
reason if he's talking about don't do
Revenge it's because he created the
whole
situation nobody's going to be talking
about revenge unless something really
really big and terrible it
happened and something big and
terrible is happening right now Peter
Navaro is still in
prison no you let Peter Navaro ENT
prison and the other 2,000
people you dropped this stupid lawfare
charges and we'll stop talking about
revenge but right now I want to see
hundreds of Democrats in jail I want to
see hundreds of Democrats in jail
minimum and we do have the goods I mean
completely within the legal system I
recommend no actions outside the legal
system yeah no no vigilante anything
don't do that but yes the justice system
has plenty of evidence of crimes at the
highest level so yes Revenge Revenge
Revenge
Revenge and every time you say don't do
it you remind us why we need to because
nobody else needs to even talk
that
way if you're talking somebody out of
getting
revenge revenge is called for cuz it
isn't even in the
conversation it's just not part of the
conversation until you up really
badly and you have Peter Navaro is still
in
prison Peter Navaro is still in
prison remember the
Elmo and yes you can build a future on
Revenge it's called The Justice System
speaking of Justice apparent the amuse
account on X tells us that there's
something called the 65
project uh and it's apparently mostly to
cancel anybody anybody was a lawyer
who's trying to help Trump and it's run
by David Brock and it's funded by George
Soros and it's uh as Muse says it's an
allout war on the sixth amendment to the
Constitution
Revenge
Revenge all right uh American American
first legal that's the
uh Republican oriented uh group that's
trying to create a counterbalance for
the in the legal system and is trying to
use legal means to get Justice in a
variety of ways that Democrats have
tried to take it away from you
but there's this new story that frankly
I do not
understand there's something about a new
document that's been undercovered some
Obama order from his days that's been
kind of secret that says that there
should be something about keeping copies
of all the classified stuff on a server
and the argument doesn't make sense to
me but maybe it does to you so I've
asked for a clarification but here's
what it sounds like
it sounds like America First legal is
saying that Trump's um legal
problems with the moral Lago
documents are not a problem because
there are also copies of them that the
government never lost they've always had
the copies now I don't understand that
do you why would that make any
difference if they have copies I assume
they had copies didn't you always assume
they had copies
would would the government in 2024 I
have a digital copy of everything
important that came across the the
government's desks I mean I just assume
so so I don't I don't understand the
importance of this but American first
legal is playing it as very
important so I've asked them to explain
it give me the dummies version of I
don't get it like why is this important
how's it how's it have anything to do
with anything so if they come up with
that I'll talk about it again but at the
moment all I can say is that people who
know more than I do about the law think
there's an important thing that happened
and I have no idea what it
is uh block the FBI from arresting
dangerous
Iranians
yeah that that's a boring story but I I
see what you're saying so there's some
story about John KY blocking the arrest
of some known Iranian
uh bad guys uh because he was trying to
get a deal done with
Iran is that the biggest crime in the
world here's the thing that might be
just real
politic meaning that if you're this
close if you're this close to getting a
deal that's a really big deal maybe you
don't arrest those people on Tuesday you
maybe you get the
deal arrest him a few weeks later so I
don't know how real that story is uh it
it's not that far from something I would
think is normal business but I guess I'd
wait for Dan banino to set me straight
on that so I guess I don't have enough a
hook into that story to care about
it um there's a report that the US and
the European Union are moving toward an
agreement for a massive loan for Ukraine
but their clever technique is they're
going to use Russian assets Frozen in
the west as
collateral here's the
thing I've been saying that our form of
government is not a
democracy of course it was designed to
be a republic you know federal republic
with Democratic principles but it's
really not that either it probably
hasn't been since the 50s we are
essentially a criminal
organization and
colonizers we're basically the board
trying to you know take everybody's
assets and apparently we've always been
that way that's what America is now if
that sounds like a
criticism here's the twist I don't think
there's a better form a
government because if you don't
coordinate your government with your big
capitalist
entities somebody else will and they'll
be your
daddy so unfortunately if you're not the
baddest criminal in the criminal world
you're going to get dead so being the
baddest of the criminals might be the
best form a
government maybe because you know I
think democracy has its issues too if
you let dumb people make big
decisions so I don't know but when I see
a story like this it just reminds you
that we're a criminal organization
trying to steal Putin's stuff you know
the the Mike Ben's take is that Ukraine
is really just an energy play and that
Hunter Biden is part of that with
barisma that's that's why Hunter was
part of barisma all part of the you know
the big Energy play to steal the energy
from Russia and since we couldn't get
all of their energy we're going to
settle for keeping their assets that we
could
freeze I mean I get that there's a war
going on but we're we're persecuting
we're Prosecuting the war like we're
just criminals we're just looking to
steal
it it's hard to not see it as just
a criminal act against another criminal
and again if it sounds like if it sounds
like a
criticism believe it or not it's
not we seem to be a very effective
criminal
organization because we've overthrown
lots of governments we've got access to
lots of resources and other places and
uh maybe it's not working out so well in
Ukraine but you know it seems to be
proving the the
point but to me um so Putin has said
that he's willing to negotiate a
ceasefire along current lines of uh who
owns what now I say there's no chance of
negotiating until Trump gets there
because the Biden play it was never
about stopping a war
they're not really concerned with ending
War they're only concerned in stealing
Russia's energy game and if they haven't
done that and they think they still have
a chance they're not going to negotiate
so this basically they're going to save
the negotiations for Trump who as far as
I know does not have a massive interest
in a big energy deal or stealing things
in Ukraine so he could just say yeah
let's just end this
what when Trump says he could end it in
the
day I would bet against
it but I wouldn't bet against ending it
in a
month because I think he can get it done
in a
month and that ladies and
gentlemen brings us to the conclusion of
my prepared
remarks it all comes down to race and
religion somebody says does it
uh Trump didn't let zalinsky rip up the
M Peace Accords Biden did and that was
the start of the war you
think that's what you
think so
um all
right I had another topic but I think
too controver
IAL um I think we overestimated Russia's
willingness to
negotiate creating a
well here's what I think we should do I
would love to see Trump do a grand
deal where we just work out our
differences with the three
superpowers and just agree to rule the
world in peace and they can have their
part we'll have our part you know I
realize that taiwan's a problem
but at this point we are moving our chip
facilities out of
there and I think Taiwan knows that in
the long run there's really no way that
they could become they can't be
independent in the long run it's too
dangerous could you imagine China having
a major Ally in Cuba and you know being
right at our doorstep and I don't
know it it just seems to me that we're
fighting history if we're trying to keep
keep Taiwan out of Chinese
control here's what I think we should do
instead the had a good plan I think what
we should do instead is create a
hundred-year
plan do do the Hong Kong plan say you
know what why fight history in a 100
years sometime within that 100 years
Taiwan will be China but if you wait 100
years you don't have to worry about
microchips because something will be
very different by then
uh and it won't be you know depending on
Taiwan so I think if we said how about
we just agree now that there's it's
100-year plan and in the 100 years
Taiwan will figure out what its role
will be so there'll be future
negotiations of does it operate a little
bit independently compared to the
mainland nobody knows what the mainland
would even look like in 100 years you
you could have a you know a de democracy
in China in the 100 years Anything Could
Happen
so I think you do a 100-year plan and
just take the violence off the table
because if you're president
she and you know you got it back you
just won't be alive when it happens
that's a big
win and if we can take that off the
table then we can deal with China at a
much much better
level Hong Kong Island was eded to the
UK in perpetuity I don't believe that I
thought it was a 99e
elease Hong Kong had a 50-year plan that
the CCP removed yeah well it's a risk
but here's the thing Hong Kong didn't
really have a chance of staying
independent
forever Taiwan doesn't have a chance of
staying independent forever if it were
our hemisphere we would insist that we
had that much control and I don't know I
just wouldn't fight
history um many think it was a deal so
I'm seeing people say that the the The
Narrative of Hong Kong is all fake and
that they did not have a deal to give it
back I'm I'm doubting your framing of
that
uh I think it was 99 year lease and when
it ended the UK gave it
back so but I but I will note that there
are people who are saying that's not
true yeah a managed democracy with an
authoritarian streak the the one thing I
don't see is China looking like they're
they want to control other countries
except economically of
course but taiwan's
special so
I think something will happen there one
sooner or later it's going to happen so
I I think it's a deal that Trump could
make I think he could say look how about
Russia you making your money China you
making your money we'll make our money
and let's
play I think you could pull that off I I
I suspect that the biggest reason we
can't get along with Russia and China is
that we can't stop doing covert things
to each other continuously cuz we're
sure that the other is doing it too so I
know I'll tell you that the theory that
China is doing everything it can to stop
reproduction in America is looking
better and
better I don't think that that they're
that clever but
maybe all right that's all I got for you
and on YouTube and Rumble and X I'm
going to take a few minutes with just
the subscribers on
locals and uh I'll see the rest of you
tomorrow locals stay with me the rest of
you bye for now thanks for
joining
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e for