Episode 2616 CWSA 10/03/24
All the news that is fit to talk about ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ If you would like to enjoy this same content plus bonus content from Scott Adams, including micro-lessons on lots of useful topics to build your talent stack, please see scottadams.locals.com for full access to that secret treasure.
The stock market. What would you be doing today? It's not looking that good. Well, I'm sure it'll pick up. It'll pick up. We're going to do a show that will delight you in ways that you didn't even know you could be delighted. Yeah, wait for that. Let's get our comments up from the locals, people…
View segment →ke to take your experience up to levels that nobody can understand with their tiny shiny human brains, all you need for that is a coffee mug or a glass, a tumbler, a chalice, a stein, a canteen, a jug or flask, a vessel of any kind. Fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee. And join me now f…
View segment →akes everything better. It's called the simultaneous sip. Happens now. Oh my goodness, I'm quivering, quivering with excitement. Did you know that you could buy only the hard copy version of Win Bigly? Because Amazon is in charge of the Kindle and the soft cover. This one comes from a third party,…
View segment →though the book is about persuasion, it's not about politics per se, do you think it's a coincidence that that's not allowed to be published and that there's no explanation? Remember the hardcover is published on the same platform, so it's not the content. And if it were something technical, it woul…
View segment →y is different. So if you haven't heard the other side, you just don't know. Yeah, so it seems unlikely that they just gave their money all to illegal immigrants or legal immigrants. So keep an open mind about that. But it doesn't look good. If you're asking me does it look good, I'd say no. It loo…
View segment →obs can be replaced by AI, does it become more jobs as soon as you add the robot body to it? Because then the body can lift things and move things in the real world. Or does it stay 5%? Because here's my thing. I spend a lot of time with ChatGPT AI and it's improving. You know, it's improving at an…
View segment →pparently just in three states on our northern border, so this is not the entire northern border, just three states, Vermont, New York and New Hampshire. And keep in mind that yeah, just three states. And currently according to the border patrol they got 19,000 illegal immigrants in 2024 so far. Tha…
View segment →ve laws that will handle robots with guns? And if the robot becomes sentient is it your fault if the robot uses the gun to shoot somebody because it would be the robot's decision? I don't know. So that's what I got for you today. I'm going to take a little time to talk to the locals people on their…
View segment →The stock market. What would you be doing today? It's not looking that good. Well, I'm sure it'll pick up. It'll pick up.
We're going to do a show that will delight you in ways that you didn't even know you could be delighted. Yeah, wait for that.
Let's get our comments up from the locals, people who are special in every way. Good morning everybody, and welcome to the highlight of human civilization. It's called Coffee with Scott Adams, for lots of good reasons.
And if you'd like to take your experience up to levels that nobody can understand with their tiny shiny human brains, all you need for that is a coffee mug or a glass, a tumbler, a chalice, a stein, a canteen, a jug or flask, a vessel of any kind. Fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee. And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure, the dopamine hit of the day, the thing that makes everything better. It's called the simultaneous sip. Happens now.
Oh my goodness, I'm quivering, quivering with excitement.
Did you know that you could buy only the hard copy version of Win Bigly? Because Amazon is in charge of the Kindle and the soft cover. This one comes from a third party, but you can only buy the hardcover of the new second edition. It's the second edition of Win Bigly. It's got some minor updates, similar to the first version with a few updates that you might like.
But do you know what you do when Amazon says we're not going to publish your book and we're not going to give you a reason? Nothing. So apparently Amazon can just decide that this book won't be published in two of its forms, even though one of them they're publishing now.
See if you can understand this. They've accepted the hardcover, and you can buy it right now. The soft cover and the Kindle are rejected, although they're identical. Same title, same content, everything. But one of them is accepted and the others are rejected. And there is no way to find out why or to fix it. There's no mechanism. There's no way to reach anybody. And you just get automated responses that say we rejected it if you try to follow up digitally.
Now here's the question. Is that political? Do you think it's a coincidence that one of the books that would give you the best impression of Trump, even though the book is about persuasion, it's not about politics per se, do you think it's a coincidence that that's not allowed to be published and that there's no explanation? Remember the hardcover is published on the same platform, so it's not the content. And if it were something technical, it would be great if they told us, but I don't know what it would be. So we have big question marks on that.
All right. I was going to have a guest this morning, but there's a technical level of complexity involved that I couldn't solve in time for the show. So I think I'll do that separately. We'll do a separate feed at some point real soon anyway.
Flood update. Some people are saying that FEMA is failing. You know, I don't think you can ever tell if FEMA is doing a good job or a bad job during the event, because it would be quite normal that if you were one of the people in the actual flood disaster zone, whatever FEMA did wouldn't feel like enough. So I'm not going to defend FEMA. That's not my job. But I would say that we're not going to really know if they performed until the end.
We do know there's a bunch of stuff that's not getting done. We know that there's lots of services that are not completed and people are stranded and there's all kinds of problems. But that doesn't mean that FEMA is failing necessarily or in some comprehensive way.
The things we worry about are allegedly some of the equipment that we could have used to get the electricity working in those places has already been donated to Ukraine to get their electrical grid working. So if that's true, and I can't confirm that's true, that would be a big deal.
We also hear that maybe FEMA is out of money because they gave a lot of money to the migrant processes, which are not really supposed to be their primary duty. If that's true, and I can't confirm it's true, that would be a big deal. But I can't really see the US government running out of money just for one thing when in fact we have no money for anything. How do you run out of money when there's no money in existence in the first place? You can't run out of something you don't have. So what we have is credit. I don't know why we have it. I mean we shouldn't, but we do.
So Brian Kemp said he was outraged. So governor of Georgia, he had to call the White House after only 11 of the 90 counties hit were included in the FEMA disaster declaration. Now if that's true, and of course all these stories you haven't heard the other side. You know, maybe FEMA says something like, well we didn't declare them but we still do all the work so nothing really is different. So if you haven't heard the other side, you just don't know.
Yeah, so it seems unlikely that they just gave their money all to illegal immigrants or legal immigrants. So keep an open mind about that. But it doesn't look good. If you're asking me does it look good, I'd say no. It looks like there's some FEMA problems. But I would give them a little bit of slack until we know what's what. It's still the fog of war in that situation. But it does seem pretty bad.
US job claims have risen a little bit more than estimated, and hiring fell to 3.3% in August, matching the lowest level since 2013 unless you include COVID. So employment looks sort of just tepid. Not great, not terrible. No real story there. It's just not good.
But I wonder if we're already seeing the effects of people assuming that robots are going to be doing more than the employees do. Do you think anybody is saying I better stop hiring because I know I'm going to have to do a lot of firing because I'm going to replace people with AI and robots?
There I just saw an estimate. There's somebody who knows a lot about AI who thinks that only 5% of jobs could ever be replaced by AI.
Paperback and Kindle are there. Oh, so somebody saying that maybe Amazon has approved it since this morning. Well that would be explained by me going public and torching them on it. I was just beginning to torch them. So I'll check on that and we'll see. But I'm getting a report in the comments that the Kindle version and the soft cover might be approved. I just don't know why. All right, so we'll keep an eye on that.
So anyway, the expert thinks that only 5% of jobs might ever be replaced with AI based on the current kinds of AI. If we get some better kind of AI in the future, then more jobs can be replaced. But I've got a real question. I'm not so sure robots are going to work. Are you?
You know, if only 5% of jobs can be replaced by AI, does it become more jobs as soon as you add the robot body to it? Because then the body can lift things and move things in the real world. Or does it stay 5%? Because here's my thing. I spend a lot of time with ChatGPT AI and it's improving. You know, it's improving at an impressive rate. But it's nowhere near something I would trust in a robot body.
And is there something I don't know about what's going on? Is there a whole different AI that's for robots? Because if I had to depend on the reliability of ChatGPT to put in a robot that could lift me up and throw me across the room, I don't know if I'd want my robot to have that brain in there. If it's bigger than me, I think the biggest robot I would allow in my home would be maybe five feet tall. I don't want any robot that could beat me in a fair fight. Like I want to think, oh it's only five feet tall. I can push it over and then outrun it. Because they still walk like Joe Biden for some reason. Nobody can fix that. Thirty years of freaking robots in movies and they still can't walk fast. Nobody can make a robot that can walk fast. I don't get that. Seems like that would be the easiest thing to fix.
Well here's my take on politics in case you're wondering. Would you like to hear my take on politics?
Have you noticed that the things that Democrats are afraid of and the things that Republicans are afraid of are very different? Now you're going to say to yourself, duh, yes, that's the whole point of politics. One group is afraid of certain issues. The other is afraid of the other issues. And you tend to work on things you're most afraid of. Sometimes we work on things that are like investments in the future. But mostly politics is about what's bothering you the most, what scares you the most. Then you put all your resources in that direction so you won't be scared. So you build up militaries and stuff like that.
But have you noticed there's a qualitative difference between what Democrats and Republicans are afraid of that goes beyond policy? You would expect them to be afraid of different things just because they have different political views. But here are some things that Democrats are afraid of. They're afraid of Trump. They're afraid of Trump's chaos and his personality and all the things he'll do. And he'll be stealing your democracy, they say. It could be the end of democracy. So the number one thing the Democrats are afraid of is Trump stealing their democracy.
They're worried about white supremacy and the militias up in the mountains and all the white supremacy that's in everything. Oh, so Amazon separated the hardcover from the other two entities so that if you look at one you won't necessarily find the other two. Perfect. It's always something.
All right. So Democrats afraid of Trump. They're afraid of all the white supremacy that they can't find any of it in the military. They're afraid of climate change and they're afraid of Russia.
What do all those things have in common? Trump stealing your democracy, white supremacy and the militias up in the hills, climate change and Russia. What do they all have in common? Can you see the common element? None of them are real. They're literally things that if you had not been told you should be afraid of them, you would never be afraid of them.
There is really zero chance that Trump is going to steal your democracy in the context of the Democrats already stealing your democracy. Clearly the elections have become just a cheaters contest. Let's be honest. Our election system is a cheaters contest. I don't know where all the cheating is, but you see election interference in everything that happens everywhere from both sides in different ways. So it's a cheating contest.
And to imagine that Trump is the one that steals your democracy that was probably been gone since 1963, literally like literally no joke, it's not likely we have a democracy. We have something like the impression of a democracy that's enough of an illusion to keep the country together. But I'm pretty sure we don't have a lot to do with who gets power and what happens in the biggest decisions.
So somehow the Democrats have managed to convince, or the press and the propagandists have managed to convince something like half the country that the biggest things they should be afraid of are all things that are good for the people in power. Let's see, getting rid of Trump, well that'd be good for the people in power because they want to be in charge. Saying the white supremacy is the problem, well that would be good for the people in power because it keeps Trump out of office. What about climate change? Well that would be good for the people in power because it means that a trillion dollars will be heading their direction and for all the services and the technologies and the companies that are pro-Democrat. So that would be good for them. What about Russia is the biggest fear? Oh, the military-industrial complex can make lots more money if Russia is our enemy than if we found a way to get along with them.
So Democrats are living in a completely fake fear world.
Now here are some things that I would consider real things to be afraid of. Now I'm not trying to make you afraid, but I want you to contrast the reality of these versus the complete fictional fear of what the Democrats are living under.
So these would be things that Republicans would be concerned with. Government censorship of what they call disinformation, which is really the end of the First Amendment and the end of any kind of freedom. That's what Republicans are worried about. Is that real? It's completely real. I mean it's documented in so many ways you can't, you know, I can't even mention them all. But from the Twitter files on, we've seen that the government has colluded with the media and platforms to censor the truth, not just misinformation, censor the truth. And probably know they're doing it. So should you be afraid of the loss of free speech? Well depends if you think you ever had it.
What about the fact that our food supply is poison? That bothers me a lot. That's like, I don't know, it'd be hard to come up with a bigger problem than that, poisoning you with your food supply. But that's a big issue, especially with RFK Jr. part of the pirate ship.
I'm worried about DEI. I think DEI is destroying the country. It's just destroying the fabric of the country which was merit-based and now it isn't. A non-merit based system is guaranteed to fail and I'm really worried about that. And that's very real. And we're seeing the mass incompetence problem everywhere from the Secret Service to you name it. It's everywhere.
I'm worried about the debt. I have no idea how to solve that. No idea how to solve it. And it's terminal by the way. If we don't solve it we're all dead. And I don't know how to solve it and nobody has an idea. So that's a problem.
How about nuclear war? Well I don't think it's an imminent problem but it's one that I worry about.
How about the supply chain breaking down? That's a really big problem, especially if Iran gets into a fighting war more directly with Israel or the United States. They've already threatened to turn off the oil and maybe block the Strait of Hormuz. Or we think they would. I don't know if they've threatened that. So I worry about the supply chain.
I worry about the next pandemic that may be coming along. I worry about the population decline, the birth rate problem in the United States. I worry about that.
I worry about energy shortage that's driven by having too many robots and too much AI and self-driving cars. And then we don't have enough energy to keep the lights on. I worry about that a lot.
How about foreign countries hacking our infrastructure and being able to turn off our lights and our water anytime they want? I worry about that. I'm pretty sure that's real. According to the FBI it looks like China has already hacked into everything and they can just turn us off when they want. That's a problem.
And of course I worry about the Deep State controlling the world, the country.
So I feel like those are pretty well documented, easily defended, obvious real fears.
Here's what I put zero fear into: Trump stealing my democracy, white supremacy, militias that nobody can find, climate change, and Russia wanting to attack us unless we attack them. I mean if we keep going after Russia enough then it becomes a problem. But I don't think it's a problem if we're just waiting around.
All right. I'm getting a confirmation that's still just the hardcover that's available on Amazon. So just think of that. So a bunch of you went to Amazon to check my claim and you came back with different stories about what is available and what's not. You can't even tell if you can buy my book. Just think about that. A number of you went to check just to see if my book is available for sale and you can't tell. You can't tell. Some of you say it is and some of you say it definitely isn't. The hardcover definitely is available. Wow.
Well Doug Emhoff is in trouble, but I don't think any Democrats will care or hear about it. Allegedly in 2020, in 2012 he slapped his girlfriend for flirting at some party where they were all drunk. She allegedly hit him back. No file, no charges were filed. Some say allegedly he paid $80,000 to make the story go away. I don't know if that's confirmed. So the Daily Mail says they have three sources I guess now.
If you look at the way the media is handling it so far, the biggest part of the media is only kind of ignoring it. So I don't think Democrats will even hear it. Or if they do they'll think it must be a nothing from the past.
But Chris Cuomo, NewsNation, he did do a little video piece in which he said that if this had been Trump who had done these things or anyone close to him it would just be the only news. To which I say that sounds about right. Yeah, yeah. So we're going to get the completely different treatment because it's him.
Now I love the fact that MSNBC in particular was trying to turn Walz and Doug Emhoff into the new model of masculinity. And then you find that the new model of masculinity slapped around a girlfriend, got the, I think it was the nanny, the same girlfriend I think it's the same person, right? Got her pregnant. Yeah. So there's your new model of masculinity. That didn't work out the way anybody hoped.
Bill Melugin is talking about the northern border. So apparently just in three states on our northern border, so this is not the entire northern border, just three states, Vermont, New York and New Hampshire. And keep in mind that yeah, just three states. And currently according to the border patrol they got 19,000 illegal immigrants in 2024 so far. That's higher than the previous 17 years combined. And they came from 97 different countries.
Now how many got through if 19,000 got caught but only in three states that border? So we got a whole bunch of states that border Canada. That's a lot. How many terrorists do you think are inside the country?
If I were Iran, let me tell you how I would build a defense against the United States. And I don't think I'm giving them ideas because this is sort of obvious. If our borders are open you would sneak as many operatives as you could. And any one motivated operative with a little bit of weaponry that doesn't seem too hard to get could do horrible damage, horrible damage. And again I'm not going to give many ideas.
Oh you, I think my Win Bigly, the first edition you're still seeing in various forms. It's the second edition that's not available in all its forms anyway.
So I would expect that if we have war with Iran, suddenly the lights are going to go out in the United States. So yeah. And I suppose it depends how bad things get. But if we took out, or Israel let's say Israel took out the oil refineries in Iran which basically eliminated their way to essentially eliminate their economy, they wouldn't be able to survive. I think they would turn the lights off in the United States. I think you literally wouldn't have electricity. And I think that they have the ability to do that either through physical sabotage or hacking.
And here's the thing. I wonder if something that big did happen to us in the United States, there's no restraint that we would use to make sure it didn't happen again. So that would end Iran as an independent nation in my opinion. If they turned off the lights in the United States and it you know we couldn't get them back on and it caused a hundred thousand people to die just from the lack of electricity, which is possible by the way, you could have a hundred thousand people die if that happened. Even we judged, well we were a little bit responsible for you maybe poking the bear some people would say and others would say no we're just responding to them poking us all the time. We'll never get to the bottom of that.
But if something that radical happened on the homeland I think the US military and Israel would essentially just colonize Iran and just take over the government there at whatever cost. I think at any cost we would do it at that point. So that's probably the only thing that's keeping Iran or China or anybody else from turning off our lights. Because it does seem we're super vulnerable. The only thing that we have is not that we're protecting our facilities or even our borders. The only thing we have is that if somebody does it we're going to find out who you are and we're going to make sure that everybody who's ever close to you is dead. So that's the only thing protecting us right now.
Yeah there's a bunch of counterfeit versions of all my books. So for all of my books as soon as I get published there'll be all these counterfeits. So hold this in your mind. Just hold this truth. So on Amazon I can only get my hardcover published because they give me technical problems that they can't solve and there's no mechanism to solve it for the soft cover and the Kindle. But how many counterfeit versions of my book did they approve? And you can buy them today. A lot. People just massively print counterfeit versions of my book and they won't take them down. But the real one they won't put up. And I'm worried that the reason I can't publish the real one is because the counterfeits have already taken the space. Meaning that the system probably says oh that book already exists but it would be the counterfeits. So I worry that that's the problem. Or it's just political. It'd be a big coincidence if it isn't.
Well do you know how California had that new law that said that disinformation was going to be illegal, especially political disinformation, and you could go to jail for a political parody? And it turns out that a federal court has tossed that out. It's unconstitutional. So the California ban on election-related quote misinformation looks like that's just going away. So thank goodness there are still some courts that operate. We don't have much going on for us but fortunately.
Well here's some good news. October is so lit when it comes to all the election stuff. The things that it looks like maybe people waited to tell you. But here's one. Did you know, well you did know that the Republican, the RNC where Lara Trump and who is she working with? She's got a co-chairman person, Michael Watley. So Lara Trump and Michael Watley. In case you're wondering if they've been busy, you're wondering hey is that orange getting anything done? Listen to this.
So apparently the RNC has recruited and trained hundreds of thousands of volunteers, thousands of attorneys, and have already held thousands of trainings ahead of the election. So that the total number of volunteers is 220,000 and they've had over 2,000 trainings and they've got 5,000 attorneys recruited. 5,000 attorneys, 220,000 volunteers, and they've had 2,000 training sessions. Does that sound like they're working hard? Sure does. Sure does.
Now it's impossible to know from a distance you know how much of this is needed and whether you got enough. But these are big numbers. So remember I told you months ago I said that the wild card in all of this, the election, might be Lara Trump's level of aggressiveness. In terms of how aggressively are you going to make sure that cheating doesn't happen this time? This is aggressive. Now Michael Watley gets of course credit as well. They're a team. But I have nothing to complain about here. Do you feel the same? Does this feel like this is a serious no joke we're really going to try to fix this problem? Don't know if it's enough. Don't know if they'll be observing in a way that can make a difference. But wow this is the best news I think I've heard in a long time.
My perfect scenario goes like this. Democrats massively cheat. Republicans catch the cheat in time and it's enough to redo how we do elections. In other words we'll learn that our elections have too many holes because we'll catch too many problems. I don't think it's practical that we're going to have an actual election result unless Trump wins by landslide and the Democrats decide uncharacteristically they decide it was a clean election.
So I think what you're going to see is that Democrats will be questioning the election if they lose even by a landslide and they'll say Russia interfered. They'll do all the normal things and they'll try to put Trump in jail. So we're just getting going and we're only the third of October.
Oh look it's another coincidence. Oh look at all the coincidences happening in October right before the election. Here's a coincidence. According to Scott Presler who's signing people up to vote in Pennsylvania, doing an amazing job, this Saturday Trump is going to come back to Pennsylvania to that Butler farm show place, the same place he almost was assassinated. So imagine how much press he's going to get and how much Pennsylvanians will be paying attention when Trump goes right back to the very place where somebody took a shot at him. Right, that naturally will be just complete press saturation. There's no way they can ignore it. And it'll make you think if you're a Republican. It's really going to make you think to vote. It's really going to make you think to register if you haven't. Because Pennsylvania is the key thing.
So not only is Pennsylvania the key state but by coincidence it's a place where he got shot at and almost killed, shot actually. And here's a coincidence you'll never guess. Turns out that the Pennsylvania voter registration website is going to be unavailable for maintenance that evening from 6:00 p.m., which is one hour after the rally, to midnight. So the exact period of time where people would be thinking about Pennsylvania, thinking about voting, thinking about registering, that's when the system won't be available. The one time that Trump goes back to Pennsylvania to that same place, the one time he's going to get the most press and the most attention, they're going to do a little maintenance on the system so you can't register then. Coincidence? It could be. It could be that the maintenance was scheduled long before the Butler thing. But don't you think it looks like election interference? If you wanted to make it not election interference, you know, let's say they scheduled it a year ago so there's nothing weird about it. Once you knew that Trump was going to be in Butler shouldn't you change it? Shouldn't you, couldn't you reschedule it? Couldn't you do it maybe after midnight? I don't know. I got questions. I'm not willing to say this was done specifically to depress Trump voters from registering. I'm going to say that if you knew it was going to be a problem you should reschedule. So if they don't, well then that looks a little slippery.
Meanwhile according to the Gateway Pundit you know we've got this big question mark about overseas votes. These would be Americans who are allowed to vote, they just happen to be overseas. So there's a big program by the Democrats to make sure that those overseas voters are definitely voting as many as possible. It's called the Uniformed Overseas Citizens Absentee Voting Act. And so the Democrats are going to really, they put money into it and they're going to go look and make sure that all those people voted.
Do you see any possible problems with that? No, what's wrong with making sure people vote? How could that possibly be a problem? You are so suspicious. No they're just they just want to make sure everybody has a right to vote and that's available and nothing stops people from expressing their democratic preferences. So stop thinking there's some like plot or it's obvious that there's something sketchy going on. There's no evidence of that whatsoever. No evidence at all.
Let's see. They're trying to win approximately, they say there are 9 million Americans that are overseas and could vote, some percentage of them. So they're working on that 9 million. The only problem is there are only 2.8 million of them that are of voting age and can vote and live overseas. So they're going to, they're working to get 9 million votes out of the 2.8 million. Wait a minute. Okay which is a bigger number? Nine is bigger than 2.8 right? So there are only 2.8 that are of the right age and also are overseas but they're trying to get 9 million votes out of the 2.8 million. Okay I take back everything I said. You should really really worry about that.
Now this is coming from the Gateway Pundit and various sources. And do I know that there's something sketchy here? Well this is one of those cases where you'd want to hear the counterargument. So the accusation is that they're very clearly signaling that they're going to get way more votes from overseas than there are human beings who are eligible to vote overseas. So it does feel like the setup is being broadcast to us. You can see it coming from a mile away unless they have an explanation. And maybe they have different data about who's overseas and what they expect to do. Maybe. But do you trust that? Does this look innocent to you? It doesn't look innocent to me.
Now one would hope, one would hope that the Lara Trump, Michael Watley RNC people have some way to get extra visibility into that process. I don't know what that would look like but there's got to be some way to see the votes opened up or something. We'll see. Maybe if that's completely unauditable we got a problem.
Meanwhile Judge Chuck Kan has unsealed Jack Smith's new indictment. And this is the one that got on all the lawfare stuff. I'm the worst person to listen to so I'll tell you what I think I know. The only thing you can get out of my analysis of the lawfare stuff is that somebody who watches the news doesn't even understand it. Like I do this literally every day. I check all the news stories and my brain just turns off when I look at the legal stuff. Partly because it's always just so boring and partly because you know if you're not a lawyer you can't really understand which parts are important and which parts are just formalities and which parts will be overturned so you don't have to worry about them. You know it's hard for me to dig in. So look for the actual lawyers, you know the Jonathan Turleys and the Dershes. You know look for the people who've done this to give you a better look.
But here's what I think is true from a non-lawyer stupid perspective. It looks to me like it's another, oh it's a coincidence. What a coincidence that this dropped just before the election and we won't have time to know that. Let's say the accusations turn out to be false and let's say there's a court process and let's say that Trump is completely exonerated. Well you're not going to know that by election day because by coincidence this drops just in time to poison the well and make people think, whoa there's with all of this action, 165 pages, there must be something there.
Now my understanding is that this was rewritten because of the presidential immunity decision at the Supreme Court which said that if Trump did something under the official banner of his office he had some immunity. So apparently it's being rewritten to emphasize the things he did which they're defining as outside the scope of his official office. For example they talk about his tweeting in his personal account as opposed to his presidential account because using the personal one would be a sign that he's doing it knowing he's doing it outside of the presidential umbrella. Does any of that matter? I don't know. You'd have to talk to a lawyer, not me.
But you've got this totally biased prosecutor. You've got this totally left-leaning judge. And they just dropped this thing that cannot be defended. There's just no defense against it because it's complicated and people just say well there's something there. With all that smoke there must be fire. But of course the play is create lots of smoke so that people think there's a fire. So during the election season it is not true that with all that smoke there must be fire. That's just not true during an election season. It's just true that it could be. But in the non-election context a whole bunch of smoke probably tells you there's a fire. And the election season doesn't mean anything. It just means somebody's making an accusation.
So I tried to figure out just exactly what was in that thing. And as far as I can tell it's mostly somebody called it hearsay. Meaning that it's a bunch of people who were acting in ways that maybe they thought were compatible with what Trump wanted. But there doesn't seem to be anything that Trump said or did directly that would be illegal as far as I know. Now this is too preliminary to know that that was a true statement. So I'm waiting for the news to surface. You know what's the thing we need to know? Can you give me the quote that says Trump did something? Haven't seen it. I've seen a bunch of quotes that other people thought they were doing other things.
But here's my big question about the whole situation. Everything that Trump did on January 6, and this is all about the January 6 business, everything he did in order for it to look like it was against the law would require you to know that he knew the election was clean. That's the trick they're playing on the country and Democrats are falling for it. Democrats actually believe you can measure the temperature of the earth accurately and they believe that you can know if an American election was clean or not. I don't know how dumb you'd have to be to believe either of those two things but super dumb.
There is no way to know if an American election was clean. You can know if somebody had a specific complaint and there was time and standing to pursue it. You could know how the court ruled. But there's no way to know that there is or is not something hidden in the system that was changing the result. How do you know what you don't know? You don't. Hey look there's a giant pile of hay. Somebody said there might be a needle in it. How do you judge there's no needle in it? Well I don't see a needle. No court has decided there's a needle. You can't prove there's a needle. But then I say but you also can't prove there's not a needle because you're not even looking for it. Well why would I look for something that is unspecific? Well that's my point. How would you know if there was something in the system that was corrupting it if you didn't look? Well nobody's complained. There's no court case. I know this had nothing to do with my point. How would you know that some state actor maybe with some insiders hadn't done something? How would you know there weren't some mail carriers who got together and said let's just throw away all the mail from the red neighborhoods? How would you know? There is no way to know those things unless somebody came forward as a whistleblower or just somebody got lucky. There is no way to know. And our systems are designed to make sure you can't know.
Now if there's only one thing you ever learn you should learn that the system, the way a system is designed, will tell you the intentions of the designers. But not on day one. On day one it could just be poorly designed and then you go oh okay they didn't mean for the machine to not work. That was just a mistake. If it's 10 years later and the machine is still doing the wrong thing you can no longer say that's an accident. At some point, and we're well beyond that point, at some point it's the design intention because you would fix it if it were not the design intention, right?
So that's why you can't tell in the first place. But is obvious. It is now obvious, very obvious, completely obvious. And by the way you will never see anybody debunk this point. There's your dog not barking. You'll see people say there was no proof of fraud. True. There's no proof of fraud that a court accepted. Oh let me put it that way. There's no court-accepted proof of a 2020 fraud. Doesn't mean anything. It doesn't mean you didn't have any fraud. Yeah our systems are designed to make sure you can't tell and that's really obvious.
So what else is going on? So my main point there is that I've got this question about the latest Jack Smith indictment stuff. How much of that depends on Trump's inner thoughts? As in if Trump knew, because they like to say he knew the election, that he lost the election. Don't let anybody say that in front of you. If somebody says he knew he lost the election just get all over him and say how could you know the unknowable? How do you know? You couldn't even describe how the election is put together. And then you go into why do we have voting machines at all.
So I think the entire January 6 hoax, and I'm going to call it a hoax, the hoax is that we know what Trump knows or that he could know whether the election was clean or not. To me it seems obvious that he really believed it was rigged which would make 100% of his actions make sense. Because if he thought it was rigged and he was trying to fix that problem that would be doing what the president should do. But on top of that even if he did it as a private citizen it's what a private citizen should do. A private citizen should try to fix a problem with the system if you had the power as a citizen. You weren't elected to anything and you saw that there was some big thing that you could fix. What's your responsibility as a citizen? Fix it. Fix it. It's not your job but it's definitely your responsibility as it would be for all of us.
Like the flood, the flood is you know sort of the government's job and FEMA the one supposed to be doing it. But you've seen a bunch of people say what the hell this isn't getting done. So they're taking their own helicopters and raising their own money, you know trying to get their own internet connections in there and stuff. So citizens do have a responsibility to fix things that are broken.
So whether Trump was operating under the banner of his job or independent of his job that didn't change the fact that it was his job as a citizen. Not a paid job, not an elected job, but as a citizen absolutely he's supposed to go fix that if he's the one in a position where it makes most sense for him to do it. If I were in the position where I could fix that I would feel that was my job. An unpaid job but it would certainly be my patriotic duty to try to fix it.
So yes don't let anybody make you think past the sale. The sale they have to make is how do you know that Trump could somehow know the unknowable that it was a clean election when it looked like it wasn't. That's not knowable. Don't let anybody make you think past that.
Well there's more Diddy updates. I keep seeing videos of Jaguar Wright who is a musician herself and she claims to have all kinds of inside information about Diddy's parties etc. She said she used to be a sex worker and so she sees the world from the darkest corners. And she was also part of Diddy's world so she's seen the entire field she claims.
And here are the things that she's saying. That there were in fact Satanic rituals. Again this is just a claim. I would put her credibility as a coin flip. I'm not sure that I lean toward her being accurate on everything but it does sound accurate. I have to admit it has a ring of truth to it. I just don't know if all of it's true so I'd take it with a big grain of salt, this particular source. But it's worth listening to.
So she says that young girls were stuffed into suitcases and later discarded in alleyways. You'd think there somebody would ask a follow-up question on that. Oh hold on, hold on. Young girls put in what suitcases? And then you take the suitcase to the alley. Are they alive in the suitcase? And why'd you put them in the suitcase? And if they were dead why'd you put them in an alley? So that's the sort of accusation where I say hm. Satanic rituals probably not. Girls stuffed into suitcases, if I had heard it happen once I might have said well that's terrible but it could happen once. But if you're saying it's sort of a routine thing to stuff girls in suitcases and drop them in alleys that's a little less credible sounding.
She implicated Jay-Z saying he has hundreds of victims. There's not yet any solid evidence of that. And then she goes this far. She says there's some sinister web that ties together Diddy, Harvey Weinstein and Jeffrey Epstein. Okay I'm out. I'm out. Too on the nose. Is that a little bit convenient? Just a little bit too perfect. Oh it cleverly ties together all these loose ends. Now it could. I'm not ruling it out. I mean stranger things have happened. But it's a little bit too exactly like what people are expecting you know in their conspiracy theories.
And she says that Diddy was a product of music mogul Clive Davis and Lucian Grainge, never heard of him, and taught him everything he knows. Well interestingly last night I was watching a Whitney Houston documentary that involves Clive Davis discovering her. And according to the documentary Clive Davis is just the nicest guy and man can he help your career because he's a nice guy. Just a nice nice guy. So do I believe that version of him? No. Because honestly almost nobody is that nice. If he's as nice as he was in the movie he's really nice. That would be one seriously nice guy. And maybe he is. Maybe he is. So I'm not willing to go so far as to throw any of these characters under the bus. I think we can throw Diddy under the bus with some confidence. But all the other names I'm really uncomfortable assuming that there's actual evidence of crimes. There might be. There might be. I mean there's 120 alleged victims according to one attorney. So how big this could get we don't know. But don't assume that some big celebrity name you heard is necessarily going to be guilty.
Well Israel is supposedly going to target in the next day or so maybe Iranian nuclear facilities, maybe oil facilities. And Israel did just today I guess strike a Russian air base in Syria. Now the reason is that some weapons for Hezbollah were allegedly in an airplane that landed there. So they were really going, they weren't going after Russians they were going after the Hezbollah supply line. But they haven't done that before. So it attacked the warehouses. It was trying not to kill too many people apparently. And Russian air defenses tried to intercept the Israeli missiles. So it was a missile attack and they failed.
So does that tell you anything? Does that tell you that Israeli missiles are better than Russian air defenses? Or does it maybe tell you that Russia has to use all their good stuff in Ukraine? Is it possible that the Syrian military assets are just all the crap stuff left over that didn't go to Ukraine? Maybe. Don't know. But certainly Israel has demonstrated that they can reach anything. And they have demonstrated by basically not having any damage from 200 rockets or 200 was it intercontinental missiles that got sent at them from Iran with no damage really to speak of. I mean nothing major.
So we're in that weird area where everybody's posturing and they've got to make sure that they look strong and they made a defense but they didn't go too far because you don't want a bigger war. So everybody's trying to balance on the head of a needle here.
So what would you think? Are they going to attack? Is Israel going to attack the nuclear facilities which would slow down Iran's ability to have a breakout nuclear thing with nuclear weapons? Or would they go after something that's more directly related to their economic well-being? So if they go after the oil terminals Iran has said they'll go after all the oil terminals in the area so the entire world will be out of oil. Would they do that? Don't know. There's a real good chance they wouldn't because if they took out all the oil facilities in the Middle East that would make every country in the Middle East say does anybody want a little help destroying Iran? We'll send some people. I mean I can't imagine that the other neighboring countries would put up with that. You know is Saudi Arabia going to put up with that? I mean I think that's World War I now. I think World War III would still be limited to the Middle East mostly except for terrorist acts in other countries. But I feel like Israel probably won't go after the oil refineries because that would be too much of a shock to the whole world.
But if they go after the nuclear facilities and that's all they go after and let's say they succeed in slowing it down then they get a definite benefit and it might not spread. It might be the least likely to spread to a larger field. And they could say that they responded. So I guess I would bet on that as the first most likely thing they would do is take out the nuclear thing. Because if they take out the nuclear threat, the threat that Iran can make a nuclear weapon in two weeks, which by the way is the estimate that they're about that, if they wanted to they could have a nuclear weapon in two weeks. Do you know what I say about that? If Iran could have a nuclear weapon in two weeks, which by the way I'm not sure that that's true, but if they could have it in two weeks they already have one. How the hell would we know if they had a nuclear weapon already if the experts were saying they could make one in two weeks if they wanted to? Are you telling me they could make one in two weeks if they wanted to and they didn't make one? They've had two weeks. In what world does a country not secretly make an actual nuclear weapon? That would be insane. They should make it as fast as possible and tell everybody they got one or at least suggest it so that you don't know if they can attack with a nuke or not.
Now I suppose Israel's intelligence would probably be good enough that they would know if they had a breakout nuclear weapon. But if I were Iran I hate to say it but I would have made the nuclear weapon already. So there's that.
Then there's the thought that if Iran got into a general war like a big wider war where really the mainland of Iran was under attack that they don't have enough manufacturing ability to replace their weapons after a fairly intense fight. So if they use most of their weapons fighting they don't have a way to rebuild them fast enough to stay in the fight. And the only place they could get them would be Russia and Russia is not likely to send them a lot of weapons at the same time they're trying to use them in Ukraine. So Iran is probably not capable of a sustained war that it could win.
So these are all the variables. Now I haven't heard the news talking about a decapitation attack. And given that Israel has shown that they'll take out the leaders of Hezbollah and Hamas if they can, do you think that would really stop them from taking out the leadership of Iran? I feel like it's on the table. It seems a lot safer than taking out the oil facilities. If you take out the oil facilities it's war for sure. If you take out the leadership I don't know, maybe it's worse. I don't know how to judge that one.
But most importantly there's the BBC reports there's some science that scientists have made a huge breakthrough in analyzing the brain of a fly. Now even a fly has a super complicated brain but it's a tiny little brain and way less complicated than bigger mammals. But they think they've made this big breakthrough in sort of mapping it almost like physically building a map of how all the neurons connect to the other ones. And it's the most detailed analysis of the brain of an adult creature ever produced.
Now what they don't say is that it's the first step in understanding why Democrats vote the way they do. You got to start with the fly but then you work your way up. So it's like fly, salamander, Democrat. No I'm just joking. I'm just joking. I kid the Democrats. Now they're like everybody else except they're afraid of things that don't exist.
Well Meta has these new smart glasses that you can wear with some VR capabilities. And some people combined that with an app called PimEyes that can do facial recognition. And it'll allow you to walk through a crowd and the personal information of everybody you look at will pop up on your glasses. So you'll know the name and address and social media history and they say phone numbers but I don't know where they get that. So you can actually see the phone number of somebody as you walk past them in a crowd, total strangers.
Now is that going to stay illegal? Probably. Probably. But imagine going to a party wearing your nerd glasses and you could tell who's single. Suppose that's the only thing you knew. You could tell who's single just by looking at them. Suppose you could tell their job just by looking at them. Suppose you could tell how much money they have just by looking at them with your glasses. That's all happening. That's all happening.
So my little life where most of the time I'm anonymous is about to end really quickly. You know if I leave my small town here and I don't run into somebody who watches the show every day I'm kind of anonymous. Like if I go to an airport I'm not usually recognized. Sometimes not usually. Now all it would take is a few people with those glasses on and they're going to ID me right away. So does that change my life? I don't know. It might change my life radically. Yours too.
Apparently the doctor who prescribed the drugs for Matthew Perry that he died of an overdose of has pled guilty according to the BBC. So there were two doctors involved. One had some facility that had ketamine and the other was his doctor. So I guess his doctor was working with the source doctor. So none of it was illegal in terms of the doctoring but I think the amount that they got and the way it was distributed, the way it was ingested, there are questions there I guess.
But here's the part that was just really scary. So according to the indictment the two doctors involved they were exchanging texts trying to figure out how to get this drug to Matthew Perry. And they're trying to figure out how much to charge him. And one of the doctors said and I quote, "I wonder how much this moron will pay." Those are the doctors. The doctors, the people who were responsible for keeping Matthew Perry alive were wondering how to rob him and calling him a moron.
If I can make any advice to the medical professionals who are watching now, I wouldn't ever call any of your customers morons because you never know when that's going to get discovered. I feel like all of our messages are discoverable and at some point they'll all be available publicly everywhere. That seems inevitable. But maybe don't do that. Yeah don't be like that.
Meanwhile according to the Independent the US Army is rolling in a robot dog with a gun on it. And we've talked about this before. We got robot dogs with flamethrowers. We've got every kind of drone. And now we have robot dogs with guns fitted at the top. Well you know I want one of those. If anybody's thinking about a good Christmas present to send me at the top of the list is a robot dog to defend my house.
Now here's where we're going with this. These are actually being deployed in war zones now. So Ukraine, the Ukrainian military is going to be seeing robot dogs with guns and flamethrowers coming over the hedge. That is not going to be a fun battle I'll tell you. So we've now entered the age in which humans are going to fight robots. That's here. Because already the Ukrainians are using their robots to breach the front lines and shoot the Russians. So we now have humans fighting robots. It's real. It's now the question is this. How long will it be before both sides are just all robots?
Now if a major power fights a smaller power it's going to be the major power's robots against the humans of the smaller power and the humans won't have a chance. You know assuming that the superpower has lots of money to make lots of robots humans won't have a chance. But what happens if two superpowers that can make unlimited robots get in a war with each other? Would it ever make sense for the US and China to be in a war in which we put humans on the front line if we could send unlimited drones and unlimited robot dogs? Wouldn't you just have the robots fight the robots? It's just going to be BattleBots right?
And then what happens when one of the robot sides wins? Does the other side say whoa whoa whoa we're not going to put our humans against your robots and you've already beat the robots. We surrender. It's going to be like that Star Trek where they would do a simulation of the war so they didn't have to have the actual war. And then whoever lost the simulation of the war had to volunteer to be basically suicided you know in some humane way. I think we're actually heading to that place like actually literally. Where after the robot war is over the losers have to accept the penalty whatever that penalty is. Could be slavery anyway.
So you might all want your own robot dog to guard your house. And also the Second Amendment is going to get a little dicey. If the Second Amendment says you can own a gun what's it going to say about your robot dog with a machine gun mounted on it? Or let's say it's a single-shot sort of a home defense weapon but it's mounted on a robot. Do we have laws that will handle robots with guns? And if the robot becomes sentient is it your fault if the robot uses the gun to shoot somebody because it would be the robot's decision? I don't know.
So that's what I got for you today. I'm going to take a little time to talk to the locals people on their own. And once we get that going anyway so we're going to talk to locals. If you're on X or YouTube or Rumble thanks for joining. It'll take about 20 seconds to be private with the locals people. So that's when we do our interstitial.
the stock market what would you be doing today it's not looking that good well I'm sure it'll pick up it'll pick up we're going to do a show that will Delight you in ways that you didn't even know you could be delighted yeah wait for that let's get our comments up from the locals people who are special in every way good morning everybody and welcome to the highlight of human civilization it's called coffee with Scott Adams for lots of good reasons and if you'd like to take your experience up to levels that nobody can understand with their tiny shiny human brains all you need for that is a cuper Mugger glass Tacker cheler Stein a canteen Jugger flask a vessel of any kind fill it with your favorite liquid I like coffee and join me now for the unparallel pleasure the dopamine h of the day the thing that makes everything better it's called the simultaneous sipping happens now go oh my goodness I'm quivering quivering with excitement did you know that you could buy only the hard copy version of wind bigley because Amazon is in charge of the Kindle and the soft cover this one comes from a third party but uh you can only buy the hard cover of the new second edition it's the second edition of wh bigley it's uh got some minor updates similar to the first version with a few updates that you might like but do you know what you do when Amazon says we're not going to publish your book and we're not going to give you a reason nothing so apparently Amazon can just decide that this book won't be published in in two of its forms even though one of them they're publishing now see if you can understand this they've AC they've accepted the hard cover and you can buy it right now the soft cover and the Kindle are rejected although they're identical to this same title same content everything but one of them is accepted and the others are rejected and there is no way to find out why or to fix it there's no mechanism there's no way to reach anybody and you just get automated responses and say we rejected it if you try to follow up digitally now here's the question is that political do you think it's a coincidence that one of the books that would give you the best impression of trump uh even though the book is about persuasion it's not about politics per se do you think it's a coincidence that that's not allowed to be published and that there's no explanation remember the hard cover is published on the same platform so it's not the content and if it were something technical it would be great if they told us but I don't know what it would be so we have big question marks on that all right um I was going to have a guest this morning but uh there's a technical level of complexity involved that I couldn't solve in time for the show so I think I'll do that separately we'll do a separate feed at some point real soon anyway uh flood update some people are saying that FEMA is failing you know I don't think you can ever tell if FEMA is doing a good job or a bad job during the event because it would be quite normal that if you were one of the people in you know the actual flood disaster Zone whatever FEMA did wouldn't feel like enough so I'm not going to defend FEMA that's not my job but I would say that we're not going to really know if they performed until the end um we do know there's a bunch of stuff that's not getting done we know that there's lots of services that are not completed and people are stranded and there's all kinds of problems but that doesn't mean the FEMA is failing necessarily or in some comprehensive way the the things we worry about are allegedly some of the equipment that we could have use to get the electricity working in those places has already been donated to Ukraine to get their electrical grid working so if that's true and I can't confirm that's true that would be a big deal uh we also hear that maybe females had of money because they gave a lot of money to the migrant um processes which are not really supposed to be their primary duty if that's true and I can't confirm it's true that would be a big deal but I can't really see the US government running out of money just for one thing when in fact we have no money for anything how do you run out of money when there's no money in existence in the first place you can't run out of something you don't have so what we have is credit I don't know why we have it I mean we shouldn't but we do so um Brian Kemp said he was outraged so governor of Georgia he he had to call the white house uh after only 11 of the 90 counties hit were included in the the FEMA disaster declaration now if that's true and and of course all these stories you haven't heard the other side you know maybe FEMA says something like well we didn't declare them but we still do all the work so nothing really is different so if if you haven't heard the other side you just don't know yeah so it seems unlikely that they just gave their money all to you know illegal immigrants or legal immigrants so keep an open mind about that uh but it doesn't look good if if you're asking me does it look good I'd say no it it looks like there's some female problems but I would give them a little bit of little bit of a slack until we know what's what it's still the fog of war in that situation but it does seem pretty pretty bad um us job claims have risen a little bit more than estimated and hiring fell to 3.3% in August matching the lowest level since uh 2013 unless you include Co so employment looks sort of just tepid not great not terrible uh no no real story there it's just not good but I wonder if we're already seeing the effects of people assuming that robots are going to be doing more than more than the employees do you think anybody is saying I better stop hiring because I know I'm going to have to do a lot of firing because I'm going to replace people with AI and robots there I just saw an estimate there's somebody who knows a lot about AI who thinks that only 5% of jobs could ever be replaced by AI paperback and Kindle are there oh so somebody saying that maybe Amazon has approved it since this morning well that would be explained by me going public and torching them on a I was just beginning to torch them so I'll check on that and we'll we'll see but I'm getting a report in the comments that the uh the Kindle version and the soft govern might be approved I just don't know why all right so we'll keep an eye on that um so anyway the expert thinks that only 5% of jobs might be ever replaced with AI based on the current kinds of AI if we get some better kind of AI in the future then more jobs can be replaced but I've got a real question I'm not so sure robots are going to work are you you know if if only 5% of jobs can be re replaced by AI does it become more jobs as soon as you add the robot body to it because then the body can lift things and move things in the real world or does it stay 5% because here's my thing I I spend a lot of time with h chat GPT Ai and it's improving you know it's improving at you an impressive rate but it's nowhere near something I would trust in a robot body and is there something I don't know about what's going on is there a whole different AI That's for robots because if I had to depend on the reliability of chat GPT to put in a robot that could lift me up and throw me across the room I don't know if I'd want my robot to have that brain in there you if if it's bigger than me I think the biggest robot I would allow in my home would be maybe 5et tall I don't want any robot that could beat me in a fair fight like I I want to think oh it's only 5 feet tall I can like push it over and then outrun it because they still they still walk like Joe Biden for some reason nobody can fix that 30 years of freaking robots in movies and they still can't walk fast nobody can make a robot that can walk fast I don't get that seems like that would be the easiest thing to fix well here's my take on politics in case you're wondering would you like to hear my take on politics have you noticed that the things that Democrats are afraid of and the things that Republicans are afraid of are very different now you're going to say to yourself du yes that's the whole point of politics one group is afraid of certain issues the others afraid of the other issues and you you tend to work on things you're most afraid of sometimes we work on things that are like investments in the future but mostly politics is about what's bothering you the most what scares you the most then you put all your resources in that direction so you won't be scared so you build up militaries and stuff like that but have you noticed there's a qualitative difference between what uh Democrats and Republicans are afraid of that goes beyond policy you would expect them to be afraid of different things just because they have different political views but here are some things that Democrats are afraid of they're afraid of trump they're afraid of Trump's chaos and his personality and all the things you'll do and you'll you'll be stealing your democ you'll be stealing your democracy they say it could be the end of democracy so the number one thing the Democrats are afraid of is Trump um stealing their democracy they're worried about white supremacy and the the militias up in the mountains and all the all the white supremacy that's in everything oh so Amazon separated the hard cover from the other two entities so that if you look at one you won't necessarily find the other two perfect it's always something all right so uh Democrats afraid of trump they're afraid of all the white supremacy that's uh they can't find any any of it in the military they're afraid of climate change and they're afraid of Russia what do all those things have in common Trump stealing your democracy white supremacy and the militias up in the hill uh climate change and Russia what do they all have in common can you see the the common element none of them are real they're literally things that if you if you had not been told you should be afraid of them you would never be afraid of them there is really zero chance that Trump is going to steal your democracy in the context of the Democrats already stealing your democracy clearly the elections have become just a cheaters contest let's be honest our election system is a cheaters contest I don't know where all the cheating is but you see election interference in every thing that happens everywhere from you know both sides in different ways so it's a cheating contest and to imagine that Trump is the one that steals your democracy that was probably been gone since 1963 literally like literally no joke it's not likely we have a democracy we have something like the impression of a democracy that's enough of an illusion to keep the country together but I'm pretty sure we don't have a lot to do with who gets power and what happens and in the biggest decisions so somehow the Democrats have managed to convince uh or the the press and the propagandists have managed to convince something like half the country that the biggest things they should be afraid of are all things that are good for the people in power let's see getting rid of trump well that' be good for the people in power because they want to be in charge uh saying the white supremacy is the problem well that would be good for the people in power because it keeps Trump out of office uh what about climate change well that would be good for the people in power because it means that a trillion dollar will be heading their Direction and for the all the the services and the Technologies and the companies that are pro- Democrat so that would be good for them what about Russia's the biggest fear oh the military-industrial complex can make lots more money if Russia is our enemy than if we found a way to get along with them so Democrats are living in a completely fake fear world now here are some things that I would consider real things to be afraid of now I'm not trying to make you afraid but I wanted you to want you to contrast the reality of these versus the complete fictional fear of what the Democrats are living under so these would be things that Republicans would be concerned with government censorship of what they call disinformation which is really the end of the first amendment and the end of any kind of Freedom that's what Republicans are worried about is that real it's completely real I mean it's documented in so many ways you can't you know I can't even mention them all but from the Twitter files on we've seen that the government has colluded with um the media and platforms to censor and censor the truth not just misin information censor the truth and probably know they're doing it so should you be afraid of the loss of free speech well depends if you think you ever had it what about the fact that our food supply is poison that bothers me a lot that's like I don't know it'd be hard to come up with a bigger problem than that poisoning you with your food supply um but that's a big issue especially with RFK Jr part of the pirate ship uh I'm worried about Dei I think Dei is destroying the country it's just destroying the fabric of the country which was merit-based and now it isn't a non-merit based system is guaranteed to fail and I'm really worried about that and that's very real and we're seeing the mass incompetence problem everywhere from the Secret Service to you name it it's everywhere I'm worried about the debt I have no idea how to solve that no idea how to solve it and it's terminal by the way if we don't solve it we're all dead um and I don't know how to solve it and nobody has an idea so that's a problem how about uh nuclear war well I don't think it's an imminent problem but it's one that I worry about um how about the supply chain breaking down that's a really big problem especially if a ran gets into a fighting War more directly with Israel or the United States they've already threatened to turn off the oil and and maybe block the straight of Horus or we think they would I don't know if they've threatened that so I worry about the supply chain I worry about the next pandemic that um may be coming along I worry about the population decline the birth rate problem in the United States I worry about that I worry about energy shortage that's driven by having too many robots and too much Ai and self-driving cars and then we don't have enough energy to keep the lights on I worry about that a lot how about uh how about foreign countries hacking our infrastructure and being able to turn off our lights in our water anytime they want I worry about that I'm pretty sure that's real according to uh the FBI it looks like China is already hacked into everything and they can just turn us off when they want that's a problem um and of course I worry about the Deep State controlling the world uh the country so I feel like those are pretty well documented easily defended obvious real fears here's what I put zero fear into Trump stealing my democracy white supremacy milias that nobody can find climate change and Russia wanting to attack US unless we attack them I mean if if we keep going after Russia enough then it becomes a problem but I don't think it's a problem if we're just waiting around all right I'm getting a confirmation that's still just hard cover that's available on Amazon so just think of that so A bunch of you went to Amazon to check my claim and you came back with different stories about what is available and what's not you can't even tell if you can buy my book just think about that the a number of you went to check just to see if my book is available for sale and you can't tell you can't tell some of you say it is and some of you say it definitely isn't the hard cover is definitely is is available wow well dog mhof is in trouble but I don't think any Democrats will care or hear about it allegedly uh in 2020 in 2012 he slapped his girlfriend for flirting at some party where they were all drunk she allegedly hit him back uh no file no charges were filed some say allegedly he paid $80,000 to make the story go away I don't know if that's confirmed um so the Daily Mail says they have three sources I guess now if you look at the way the media is handling it so far the the biggest part of the media the biggest part the media is only uh kind of ignoring it so I don't think Democrats will even hear it or if they do they'll think it must be a nothing from the past um but Chris Cuomo news Nation he did do a little video piece in which he said that if this had been Trump who had done these things or anyone close to him it would just be the only news to which I say that sounds about right yeah yeah so we're going to get the completely different treatment because it's him now um I love the fact that uh that MSNBC in particular was trying to turn wals and Doug mhof into the new model of masculinity and then you find that the new model of mascul the new model of masculinity slapped around a girlfriend uh got the I think it's was The Nanny the same girlfriend I think it's the same person right got her pregnant yeah so there's your new model of masculinity that didn't work out the way anybody hoped bill maluan is talking about the northern border so apparently just in three states on our northern border so this is this is not the entire northern border just three states uh Vermont New York and New Hampshire and keep in mind that yeah just three states and uh currently according to the border patrol they got 19,000 illegal immigrants in 2024 so far that's higher than the previous 17 years combined and they came from 97 different countries now how many got through if 19,000 got caught but only in three states that border so we got a whole bunch of states that border Canada that's a lot how many terrorists do you think are inside the country if I were Iran let me tell you how I would build a defense against the United States and I don't think I'm giving them ideas because this is sort of obvious if our borders are open you would sneak as many operatives as you could and any one motivated operative with a little bit of Weaponry that doesn't seem too hard to get could do horrible damage horrible damage and again I'm not going to give many ideas um oh you I think my wind bigley the first edition you're still seeing in various forms it's the second edition that's not available in all its forms anyway so I would expect that if we have war with Iran suddenly the lights are going to go out in the United States so yeah and I suppose it depends how bad things get but if we took out or Israel let's say Israel took out the oil refineries in Iran which basically eliminated their way to essentially eliminate their economy they wouldn't be able to survive I think they would turn the lights off in the United States I think you literally wouldn't have electricity and I think that they have the ability to do that either through physical sabotage or hacking and here's the thing I wonder if something that big did happen to us in the United States there's there's no restraint that we would use to make sure it didn't happen again so that would end Iran as an independent nation in my opinion if they turned off the lights in the United States and it you know we couldn't get them back on and it caused a 100,000 people to die just from the lack of electricity which is possible by the way you could have 100,000 people die if that happened even we judged well we were a little bit responsible for you maybe poking the bear some people would say and other would others would say no we're just responding to them poking us all the time we' never get to the bottom of that but if something that radical happened on the Homeland I think the US Military and Israel would essentially just colonize Iran and just take over the government there what at whatever cost I think at any cost we would do it at that point point so that's probably the only thing that's keeping Iran or China or anybody else from turning off our lights because it does seem we're super vulnerable the only thing that we have is not that we're protecting our facilities or even our borders the only thing we have is that if somebody does it we're going to find out who you are and we're going to make sure that everybody who's ever close to you is dead so that's the only protecting us right now yeah there's a bunch of counterfeit um versions of all my books so for all of my books as soon as I get published there'll be all these counterfeits so hold this in your mind Ju Just Just hold this truth so on Amazon I can only get my hard cover published because they give me technical problems that they can't solve and there's no mechanism to solve it for the soft cover and the Kindle but how many counterfeit versions of my book did they approve and you can buy them today a lot people just massively print counterfeit versions of my book and they won't take them down but the real one they won't put up and I'm worried that the reason I can't publish the real one is because the counterfeits have already taken the space meaning that they the the system probably says oh that book already exists but it would be the counterfeits so I worry that that's the problem or it's just political it'd be a big coincidence if it isn't well do you know how California had that new law that said that disinformation was going to be illegal especially political disinformation and you could go to jail for a political parody and it turns out that a uh federal court has uh tossed that out it's unconstitutional so the California ban on Election related quote misinformation looks like that's just going away so thank goodness there are still some courts that operate we don't have much going on going for us but fortunately well here's some good news um uh October is so lit when it comes to all the election stuff the the things that it looks like maybe people waited to tell you but here's one did you know well you did know that the Republican the RNC where uh uh Lara Trump and uh who is she working with she's got a she has a co-chairman person Michael Watley so Laura Trump and Michael Watley um in case you're wondering if they've been busy you're wondering hey is that orang getting anything done listen to this so apparently the RNC has recruited and trained hundreds of thousands of volunteers thousands of attorneys and I have already held thousands of trainings ahead of the election so that the total number of volunteers is 220,000 and they've had over over 2,000 trainings and they've got 5,000 attorneys recruited 5,000 attorneys 220,000 volunteers and they've had 2,000 training sessions does that sound like they're working hard sure does sure does now it's impossible to know from a distance you know how much of this is needed and whether you got enough but these are big numbers so remember I told you months ago I said that the the wild card and all of this the election might be Lara Trump's level of aggressiveness in terms of how aggressively are you going to make sure that cheating doesn't happen this time this is aggressive now Michael Watley gets of course credit as well that's a they they're their team but I have nothing to complain about here do you feel the same does this feel like this is a serious no joke we're really going to try to fix this problem don't know if it's enough don't know if they'll be observing in a way that can make a difference but wow this is the best news I think I've heard in a long time my perfect scenario goes like this Democrats massively cheat Republicans catch the cheat in time and it's enough to redo How We Do elections in other words we'll learn that our elections have too many holes cuz we we'll catch too many problems I don't think it's practical that we're going to have an actual election result unless unless Trump wins by Landslide and the Democrats decide uncharacteristically they decide it was a clean election so I think what you're going to see is that Dem rats will be questioning the election if they lose even by a landslide and they'll say Russia interfered they'll do all the normal things and they'll try to put Trump in jail so we're just getting going and we're only the third of October um oh look it's another coincidence oh look at all the coincidences happening in October right before the election here's a coincidence according to uh Scott presler who's a signing people up to vote in in uh Pennsylvania doing an amazing job um this Saturday Trump is going to come back to Pennsylvania to that Butler Farm Show Place the same place he uh almost was assassinated so imagine how much press he's going to get and how much pennsylvanians will be paying attention when Trump goes right back to the very place where somebody took a shot at him right that that naturally will be just complete press saturation there's no way they can ignore it and it'll make you think if you're a republican it's really going to make you think to vote it's really going to make you think to register if you haven't because Pennsylvania is the key thing so not only is Pennsylvania the key state but by coincidence it's a it's a place where he got shot at and almost killed shot actually and here's a coincidence you you'll never guess turns out that the Pennsylvania voter registration website is going to be unavailable for maintenance that evening from 6:00 pm.
which is 1 hour after the rally to midnight so the exact period of time where people would be thinking about Pennsylvania thinking about voting thinking about registering that's when the system won't be available the one time that Trump goes back to Pennsylvania to that same place the one time he's going to get the most press and the most attention they're going to do a little maintenance on the system so you can't register then coincidence it could be it could be that the maintenance was scheduled long before the the baller thing but don't you think it looks like election interference if you wanted to make it not election interference you know in the let's let's say they scheduled it a year ago so there's nothing there's nothing weird about it once you knew that Trump was going to be in berler shouldn't you change it shouldn't you re couldn't you reschedule it couldn't you do it maybe after midnight I don't know I got questions I'm not I'm not willing to say this was done specifically to depress Trump voters from registering I'm going to say that if you knew it's going to be a problem you should reschedule so if they don't well then that looks a little slippery meanwhile according to the Gateway pundit you know we've got this big uh question mark about uh overseas votes these would be Americans who are allowed to vote they just happen to be overseas so there's a big program by the uh Democrats to make sure that those overseas voters are definitely voting as many as possible uh it's called the uni the uh uniformed overseas citizens absentee Voting Act and so the Democrats are going to really really uh they put money into it and they're going to go look and make sure that all those people voted do you see any possible problems with that no what what's wrong with making sure people vote how could that possibly be a problem I you are so suspicious no they're they just want to make sure everybody has a right to vote and that's available and Nothing Stops people from expressing their Democratic preferences so stop thinking there's some like plot or or it's obvious that there's something sketchy going on there's no evidence of that whatsoever no evidence at all let's see uh they're trying to win approximately they say there are 9 million Americans that are overseas and could vote some percentage of them so they're working on that 9 million the only problem is uh there are only 2.8 million of them that are of voting age and can vote and live overseas so they're going to they're working to get 9 million votes out of the 2.8 million wait a minute okay which is a bigger number nine is bigger than 2.8 right so they're only 2.8 are of the right age and also are overseas but they're trying to get 9 million votes out of the 2.8 million okay I take back everything I said uh you should really really worry about that now this is coming from the Gateway pundit and various sources and do I know that there's something sketchy here well this is one of those cases where you'd want to hear the counterargument so the the accus ation is that they're very clearly signaling that they're going to get way more votes from overseas than there are human beings who are eligible to vote overseas so it does feel like the setup is being broadcast to us you can see it coming from a mile away unless they have an explanation and maybe they have different data about who's overseas and what they expect to do maybe but do you trust that does this look innocent to you it doesn't look innocent to me now one would hope one would hope that the Lara Trump Michael wle RNC people have some way to get extra visibility into that process I don't know what that would look like but there's got to be some way to see the votes opened up or something we'll see maybe if that's completely una auditable we got a problem meanwhile uh judge Chuck Ken has unsealed Jack Smith's new uh indictment uh and this is the one that it got on all the the lawfare stuff I'm the worst person to listen to so I'll tell you what I think I know the only the only thing you can get out of my analysis of the law pair of stuff is that somebody who watches the news doesn't even understand it like I I do this literally every day I check all the news stories and my brain just turns off when I look at the legal stuff partly because it's always just so boring and partly because you you know if you're not a lawyer you can't really understand which parts are important and which parts are just formalities and which parts will be overturned so you don't have to worry about them you know it's hard for me to dig in so look for the actual lawyers you know the Jonathan tures and the dtz you know look look for the people uh who've done this uh to give you a better look but here's what I think is true from a non- lawyer stupid perspective it looks to me like it's another oh it's a coincidence what a coincidence that this dropped just before the election and we won't have time to know that let's say the uh accusations turn out to be false and let's say there's a court process and let's say that Trump is completely exonerated well you're not going to know that by election day because by coincidence this drops just in time to to Poison the Well and make people think who there's with all of this action 165 pages there must be something there now my understanding is that um this was Rewritten because of the presidential immunity decision at the Supreme Court which said that if Trump did something under the official Banner of his office he had some immunity uh so apparently it's being Rewritten to emphasize the things he did which they're defining as outside the scope of His official office for example they talk about his tweeting in his personal account as opposed to his presidential account because is using the personal one would be a sign that he's doing it knowing he's doing it and will side of the presidential you know umbrella does any of that matter I don't know you'd have to talk to a lawyer not me but um you've got this totally biased prosecutor you've got this totally left leading judge and they just dropped this thing that cannot be defended there's just no defense against it because it's complicated and people just say well there's something there with all that smoke there must be fire but of course the play is cre lots of smoke so that people think there's a fire so during the election season it is not true that with all that smoke there must be fire that's just not true during an election season it's just true that it could be but in the non-election context a whole bunch of smoke probably tells you there's a fire and the election season doesn't mean anything it just means somebody's making an accusation um so I tried to figure out just exactly what was in that thing and as far as I can tell it's mostly somebody called it hearsay meaning that it's bunch of people who were acting in ways that maybe they thought were compatible with what Trump wanted but there doesn't seem to be anything that Trump said or did directly that would be illegal as far as I know now this is too preliminary to know that that was a true statement so I'm waiting for the news to surface you know what's the thing we need to know can you give me the quote that says Trump did something haven't seen it I've seen a bunch of quotes that other people thought they were doing other things but here's my big question about the whole situation everything that Trump did on January 6 and this is this is all about the January 6 business um everything you did in order for it to look like it was against the law would require you to know that he knew the election was clean that's the trick they're playing on the country and Democrats are falling for it Democrats actually believe you can me you can measure the temperature of the earth accurately and they believe that you can know if an American election was clean or not I don't know how dumb you'd have to be to believe either of those two things but super dumb there is no way to know if an American election was clean you can know if somebody had a specific complaint and there was time and standing to pursue it you could know how the coure ruled but there's no way to know that there's is or is not something hidden in the system that was changing the result how do you know what you don't know you don't hey look there's a giant pile of hay somebody said there might be a needle in it how do you judge there's no needle in it well I don't see a needle no court has decided there's a needle you can't prove there's a needle but then I say but you also can't prove there's not a needle because you're not even looking for it well why would I look for something that is unspecific well that's my point how would you know if there was something in the system that was corrupting it if you didn't look well nobody's complained there's no court case I know this had nothing to do with my point how would you know that some State actor maybe with some insiders hadn't done something how would you know there weren't some male carriers who got together and said let's just throw away all the mail from the the red neighborhoods how would you know there is no way to know those things unless somebody came forward as a whistleblower or just somebody got lucky there is no way to know and our systems are designed to make sure you can't know now if there's only one thing you ever learn you should learn that the system the way a system is designed will tell you the intentions of the designers but not on day one on day one it could just be poorly designed and then you go oh okay they didn't mean for the machine to not work that was just a mistake if it's 10 years later and and the Machine is still doing the wrong thing you can no longer say that's an accident at some point and we're well beyond that point at some point it's the design intention because you would fix it if it were not the design intention right so that's why you can't tell in the first place but is obvious it is now obvious very obvious completely obvious and by the way you will never see anybody debunk this point there's your dog not barking you'll see people say there was no proof of fraud true there's no proof of fraud that a court accepted oh let me put it that way there's no court accepted proof of a 2020 fraud doesn't mean anything it doesn't mean you didn't have any fraud yeah your our systems are designed to make sure you can't tell and that's really obvious so um what else is going on so my main point there is that uh I've got this question about the latest um Jack Smith indictment stuff how much of that depends on Trump's inner thoughts as in if Trump knew because they like to say he knew the election that he lost the election don't let anybody say that in front of you if somebody says he knew he lost the election just get all over him and say how the could you know the unknowable how do you know you you couldn't even describe how the election is put together and then you go into why do we have voting machines at all so I think the entire January 6 hoax and I'm going to call it a hoax The hoax is that we know what Trump knows or that he could know whether the election was clean or not to me it seems obvious that he really believed it was rigged which would make 100% of his actions make sense because if he thought it was rigged and he was trying to fix that problem that would be doing what the President should do but on top of that even if he did it as a private citizen it's what a private citizen should do a private citizen should try to fix a problem with the with the system if you had the power as a citizen you weren't elected to anything and you saw that there was some big thing that you could fix what's your responsibility as a citizen fix it fix it it's not your job but it's definitely your responsibility as as it would be for all of us like the flood the the flood is you know sort of the government's job and FEMA the one supposed to be doing it but you've seen a bunch of people said what the hell this isn't getting done so they're taking their own helicopters and raising their own money you know trying to get their own uh you know internet connections in there and stuff so citizens do have a responsibility to fix things that are broken so whether Trump was operating under the banner of hisob job or independent of his job that didn't change the fact that it was his job as a citizen not a paid job not an elected job but as a citizen absolutely he he's supposed to go fix that if he's the one in a position where it makes most sense for him to do it if I were in the position where I could fix that I would feel that was my job an unpaid job but it would certainly be my patriotic duty to try to fix it so yes don't let anybody make you think past the sale the sale they have to make is how do you know that Trump could somehow know the unknowable that it was a clean election when it looked like it wasn't that's not knowable don't let anybody make you think past that well there's more Diddy updates I keep seeing videos of Jaguar Wright who is a musician herself and she claims have all kinds of inside information about diddies parties Etc she said she used to be a sex worker and so she sees the world from you know the the darkest corners and she was also part of Diddy's world so she's seen you know the entire field she claims and here are the things that she's saying um that there were in fact Satanic rituals again this is just a claim uh I would put her credibility as a coin flip I I'm not sure that I lean toward her being accurate on everything but it does sound accurate I have to admit it has that there is a ring of truth to it I just don't know if all of it's true so i' take with a big big grain of salt this particular Source uh but it's worth listening to so she says that young girls were stuffed into suitcases and later discarded in Alleyways you'd think there somebody would ask a follow-up question on that oh hold on hold on young girls put in what suitcases and then you take the suitcase to the alley wa are they alive in the suitcase and why'd you put them in the suitcase and if they were dead why'd you put them in an alley so so that's the sort of accusation where I say hm Satanic rituals probably not girls stuffed into suitcases if I had heard it happen once I might have said well that's terrible but it could happen once but if you're saying it's sort of a routine thing to stuff girls and suitcases and drop them in alleys that's a little less credible sounding um she implicated Jay-Z saying he has hundreds of victims there's not yet any uh solid evidence of that and then she goes this far she says there's some Sinister web that ties together Diddy Harvey Weinstein and Jeffrey Epstein okay I'm out I'm out two on the nose is that a little bit convenient just a little bit too perfect oh it CL cleverly ties together all these loose ends now it could I'm not ruling it out I mean stranger things have happened but it's a little bit too exactly like what people are expecting you know in their conspiracy theories and uh she says that Diddy was a product of Music Mogul Clive Davis and Lucian gra never heard of him and taught him everything he knows well interestingly last night I was watching a Whitney Houston documentary that involves Clive Davis discovering her and uh according to the documentary Clive Davis is just the nicest guy and man can he help your career because he's a nice guy just a nice nice guy so do I believe that version of him no because honestly almost nobody is that nice if he's as nice as he was in the movie he's really nice that that would be one seriously nice guy and maybe he is maybe he is so I'm not willing to go so far as to throw any of these characters under the bus I think we can throw didy under the bus with some confidence but all the other names I'm really uncomfortable assuming that there's actual evidence of crimes there might be there might be I mean there's 120 alleged victims according to one attorney so how big this could get we don't know but don't assume that some big celebity name you heard is necessarily going to be guilty well Israel is uh supposedly going to Target in the next day or so uh maybe Iranian nuclear facilities maybe um oil facilities and uh Israel did just today I guess strike a Russian Air Base in Syria now the reason is that some weapons for Hezbollah were allegedly in an airplane that landed there so they were really going they weren't going after Russians they were going after the Hezbollah supply line but uh they haven't done that before so it attacked the warehouses it was trying not to kill too many people apparently and Russian air defenses tried to intercept the isra missiles so it was a missile attack and they failed so does that tell you anything does that tell you that Israeli missiles are better than Russian air defenses or does it maybe tell you that Russia has to use all their good stuff in Ukraine is it possible that the Syrian U military assets are just all the the crap stuff left over that didn't go to Ukraine maybe don't know but certainly Israel has demonstrated that they can reach anything and they have demonstrated by basically not having any damage from 200 rocket or 200 was it Inter.
Continental missiles that got sent at them from Iran with no damage really to speak of I mean nothing major so so we're in that uh that weird area where everybody's posturing and they've got to make sure that they look strong and they they made a defense but they didn't go too far because you don't want a bigger War so everybody's trying to balance on the the head of the needle here so what would you think is are they going to attack is Israel going to attack the nuclear facilities which would slow down Iran's ability to have a breakout nuclear thing uh with nuclear weapons or would they go after something that's more directly related to their economic weal being so if they go after the oil terminals Iran has said they'll go after all the oil terminals in the area so the entire world will be out of oil would they do that don't know there there's a real good chance they wouldn't because if they took out all the oil facilities in the Middle East that would make every country in the Middle East say does uh anybody want a little help destroying Iran uh we'll we'll send some people I mean I can't imagine that the other the neighboring countries would put up with that you know is Saudi Arabia going to put up with that I mean I think that's that's World War I now I think World War II would still be limited to the Middle East mostly except for terrorist acts in other countries but I feel like I feel like Israel probably won't go after the oil refineries because that would be too much for shock to the whole world but if they go after the nuclear facilities and that's all they go after and let's say they succeed in slowing it down then they get a definite benefit uh and they get a might not spread it might be the least likely to spread to a larger field and um and they could say that they responded so I guess I would bet on that as the first most likely thing they would do is take out the nuclear thing because if they take out the nuclear threat the threat that Iran can make a nuclear weapon in two weeks which by the way is the estimate that they're about that if they wanted to they could have a nuclear weapon in two weeks do you know what I say about that if Iran could have a nuclear weapon in two weeks which by the way I'm not sure that that's true but if they could have it in two weeks they already have one how how the hell would we know if they had a nuclear weapon already if the experts were saying they could make one in two weeks if they wanted to are you telling me they could make one in two weeks if they wanted to and they didn't make one they've had two weeks in what world does a country not secretly make an actual nuclear weapon that would be insane they should make it as fast as possible and tell everybody they got one or at least suggest it so that you don't know if they can attack with a nuke or not now I suppose Israel's intelligence would probably be good enough that they would know if they had a breakout nuclear weapon but uh if I were Iran I hate to say it but I would have made the nuclear weapon already so there's that uh then there's the thought that if Iran got into a general War like a big wider War where really the you know the mainland of Iran was under attack that they don't have enough uh manufacturing ability to replace their weapons after a fairly you know intense fight so if they use most of their weapons fighting they don't have a way to rebuild them fast enough to stay in the fight and the only place they could get them would be Russia and Russia is not likely to send them a lot of weapons at the same time they're trying to use them in Ukraine so Iran is probably not capable of a sustained war that it could win um so these are all the variables now I haven't heard the news talking about a decapitation attack and given that Israel has shown that they'll take out the leaders of Hezbollah and Hamas if they can um do you think that would really stop from taking up the leadership of Iran I feel like it's on the table it seems a lot safer than taking out the the oil facilities if you take out the oil facilities it's War for sure if you take out the leadership I don't know maybe it's worse I don't know how to judge that one but most importantly there's uh the BBC reports there's some science that scientists have made a a huge breakthrough in analyzing the brain of a fly now even a fly has a super complicated brain but it's a tiny little brain and way way less complicated than you know bigger mammals but they think they've made this big breakthrough and sort of mapping it almost like physically building a map of how all the neurons connect to the other ones and uh it's the most detailed analysis of the brain of an adult creature ever produced now what they don't say is that it's the first step in understanding why Democrats vote the way they do you got to start with the fly but then you work your your way up so it's like fly salamander Democrat no I'm just joking I'm just joking I kid the Democrats now they're like everybody else except they're afraid of things that don't exist well meta has these new smart glasses um that you can wear with some VR capabilities and uh some people combined that with an app called uh Pim eyes that can do facial recognition and it'll allow you to walk through a crowd and the personal information of everybody you look at will pop up on your glasses so you'll know the name and address and social media history and they say phone numbers but I don't know where they get that so you can actually see the phone number of somebody as you walk past them in a crowd total strangers now is that going to stay illegal probably probably but imagine going to a party wearing your nerd glasses and you could tell who's single suppose that's the only thing you knew you could tell who's single just by looking at him suppose you could tell their job just by looking at them suppose you could tell how much money they have just by looking at them with your glasses that's all happening that's all happening so my little life where uh most of the time I'm Anonymous it's about to end really quickly you know if I leave my my small town here and I don't run into somebody who watches the show every day I'm kind of anonymous like if I go to an airport I'm not usually recognized sometimes not usually now all it would take is a few people with those glasses on and they're going to ID me right away so does that change my life I don't know it might might change my life radically yours too um apparently the Doctor Who prescribed the drugs for Matthew Perry that he died of an overdose of has plad guilty according to the BBC so there were two doctors involved one had some facility that had ketamine uh and the other was his doctor so I guess his doctor was working with the source doctor so none of it was illegal in terms of the doctoring but I think the the amount that they got and the way it was distributed the way it was the way it was ingested there are the questions there I guess but uh here's the part that was just really scary so according to the indictment uh the the two doctors involved they were exchanging text trying to figure out how to get this drug to to Matthew Perry and uh they're trying to figure out how much to charge him and one of the doctors said and I quote I wonder how much this will pay those are the doctors the doctors the people who were responsible for keeping Matthew Perry alive were wondering how to rob him and calling him a wow if I can make any advice to the medical professionals uh who are watching now I wouldn't ever call any of your customers morons because you never know when that's going to get discovered I feel like all of our messages are discoverable and at some point they'll all be available publicly everywhere that seems inevitable but maybe don't do that yeah don't don't be like that meanwhile according to the independent the US Army is rolling in a robot dog with a gun on it and uh we've talked about this before we got robot dogs with flamethrowers we've got uh every kind of drone and now we have uh robot dogs with guns fitted at the top well you know I want one of those uh if anybody's thinking about a good Christmas pres to send me at the top of the list is a robot dog to defend my house now here's where we're going with us these These are actually being deployed in war zones now so Ukraine the Ukrainian military is going to be seeing robot dogs with guns and flamethrowers coming over the hedge r that is not going to be a fun battle I'll tell you so we've now entered the we've now entered the age in which humans are going to fight robots that's here because already the ukrainians are using their robots to you know breach the front lines and shoot the Russians so we now have humans fighting robots it's real it's now the question is this how long will it be before both sides are just all robots now if if major power fights a smaller power it's going to be the major Powers robots against the humans of the smaller power and the humans won't have a chance you know assuming that the superpower has lots of money to make lots of robots humans won't have a chance but what happens if two superpowers that can make unlimited robots get in a war with each other would it ever make sense for the US and China to be in a war in which we put humans on the front line if we could if we could send unlimited drones and unlimited robot dogs wouldn't you just have the robots fight the robots it's just going to be battlebot right and then what happens when one of the robot sides wins does the other side say whoa whoa whoa we're not going to put our humans against your robots and you've already beat the robots we surrender it's going to be like that Star Trek where they would do a simulation of the war so they didn't have to have the actual war and then whoever lost the simulation of the war had to volunteer to be basically suicided you know in some humane way I think we're actually heading to that place like actually literally where after the robot war is over the losers have to accept the penalty whatever that penalty is could be slavery anyway so you might all want your own robot dog to guard your house and uh also the Second Amendment is going to get a little dicey if the Second Amendment says you can own a gun what's it going to say about your robot dog with a machine gun mounted on it or or let's say it's a singleshot sort of a home defense weapon but it's mounted on a robot do we have laws that will handle robots with guns and uh if the robot becomes sensient is it your fault if the robot uses the gun to Sho somebody because it would be the robot's decision I don't know so that's what I got for you today I'm going to take a little time to talk to the uh locals people on their own and uh once we get that going um anyway so we going to talk to locals if you're on X or You.
Tube or Rumble thanks for joining it'll take about 20 seconds to be private with the locals people so that's when we do our interstitial e e e e e e e e e e e
the stock market what would you be doing
today it's not looking that
good well I'm sure it'll pick up it'll
pick
up we're going to do a show that will
Delight you in ways that you didn't even
know you could be
delighted yeah wait for
that let's get our comments up from the
locals people who are special in every
way
[Music]
good morning everybody and welcome to
the highlight of human civilization it's
called coffee with Scott Adams for lots
of good reasons and if you'd like to
take your experience up to levels that
nobody can understand with their tiny
shiny human brains all you need for that
is a cuper Mugger glass Tacker cheler
Stein a canteen Jugger flask a vessel of
any kind fill it with your favorite
liquid I like coffee and join me now for
the unparallel pleasure the dopamine h
of the day the thing that makes
everything better it's called the
simultaneous sipping happens now
go oh my goodness I'm
quivering quivering with excitement
did you know that you could buy only the
hard copy version of wind bigley because
Amazon is in charge of the Kindle and
the soft cover this one comes from a
third party but uh you can only buy the
hard cover of the new second edition
it's the second edition of wh bigley
it's uh got some minor updates similar
to the first version with a few updates
that you might like but
do you know what you do when Amazon says
we're not going to publish your book and
we're not going to give you a
reason
nothing so apparently Amazon can just
decide that this book won't be published
in in two of its forms even though one
of them they're
publishing now see if you can understand
this they've AC they've accepted the
hard cover and you can buy it right
now the soft cover and the Kindle are
rejected although they're identical to
this same title same
content everything but one of them is
accepted and the others are rejected and
there is no way to find out why or to
fix it there's no mechanism there's no
way to reach anybody and you just get
automated responses and say we rejected
it if you try to follow up
digitally now here's the question is
that political do you think it's a
coincidence that one of the books that
would give you the best impression of
trump uh even though the book is about
persuasion it's not about politics per
se do you think it's a coincidence that
that's not allowed to be published and
that there's no explanation remember the
hard cover is published on the same
platform so it's not the
content and if it were something
technical it would be great if they told
us but I don't know what it would
be so we have big question marks on that
all right um I was going to have a guest
this morning but uh there's a technical
level of complexity involved that I
couldn't solve in time for the show so I
think I'll do that separately we'll do a
separate feed at some point real soon
anyway uh flood
update some people are saying that FEMA
is failing you know I don't think you
can ever tell if FEMA is doing a good
job or a bad job during the
event because it would be quite normal
that if you were one of the people in
you know the actual flood disaster
Zone whatever FEMA did wouldn't feel
like
enough so I'm not going to defend FEMA
that's not my job but I would say that
we're not going to really know if they
performed until the end
um we do know there's a bunch of stuff
that's not getting done we know that
there's lots of services that are not
completed and people are stranded and
there's all kinds of problems but that
doesn't mean the FEMA is failing
necessarily or in some comprehensive way
the the things we worry about are
allegedly some of the equipment that we
could have use to get the electricity
working in those places has already been
donated to Ukraine to get their
electrical grid working so if that's
true and I can't confirm that's true
that would be a big deal uh we also hear
that maybe females had of money because
they gave a lot of money to the migrant
um processes which are not really
supposed to be their primary duty if
that's true and I can't confirm it's
true that would be a big deal but I
can't really see the US government
running out of money just for one thing
when in fact we have no money for
anything how do you run out of money
when there's no money in existence in
the first place you can't run out of
something you don't have so what we have
is credit I don't know why we have it I
mean we shouldn't but we
do
so um Brian Kemp said he was
outraged so governor of Georgia he he
had to call the white house uh after
only 11 of the 90 counties hit were
included in the the FEMA disaster
declaration now if that's
true and and of course all these stories
you haven't heard the other side you
know maybe FEMA says something like well
we didn't declare them but we still do
all the work so nothing really is
different so if if you haven't heard the
other side you just don't
know yeah so it seems unlikely that they
just gave their money all to you know
illegal immigrants or legal
immigrants so keep an open mind about
that uh but it doesn't look good if if
you're asking me does it look good I'd
say no it it looks like there's some
female problems but I would give them a
little bit of little bit of a slack
until we know what's what it's still the
fog of war in that situation but it does
seem pretty pretty
bad um us job claims have risen a little
bit more than estimated and hiring fell
to 3.3% in August matching the lowest
level since uh 2013 unless you include
Co so employment
looks sort of just tepid not great not
terrible uh no no real story there it's
just not
good but I wonder if we're already
seeing the effects of people assuming
that robots are going to be doing more
than more than the employees do you
think anybody is saying I better stop
hiring because I know I'm going to have
to do a lot of firing because I'm going
to replace people with AI and
robots there I just saw an estimate
there's somebody who knows a lot about
AI who thinks that only 5% of jobs could
ever be replaced by
AI paperback and Kindle are
there oh so somebody saying that maybe
Amazon has approved it since this
morning well that would be explained by
me going public and torching them on
a I was just beginning to torch
them so I'll check on that and we'll
we'll see but I'm getting a report in
the comments that the uh the Kindle
version and the soft govern might be
approved I just don't know
why all
right so we'll keep an eye on that um so
anyway the expert thinks that only 5% of
jobs might be ever replaced with AI
based on the current kinds of AI if we
get some better kind of AI in the future
then more jobs can be replaced but I've
got a real
question I'm not so sure robots are
going to
work are
you you know if if only 5% of jobs can
be re replaced by
AI does it become more jobs as soon as
you add the robot body to it because
then the body can lift things and move
things in the real world or does it stay
5% because here's my thing I I spend a
lot of time with h chat GPT Ai and it's
improving you know it's improving at you
an impressive rate but it's nowhere near
something I would trust in a robot
body and is there something I don't know
about what's going on is there a whole
different AI That's for
robots because if I had to depend on the
reliability of chat GPT to put in a
robot that could lift me up and throw me
across the room I don't know if I'd want
my robot to have that brain in there you
if if it's bigger than me I think the
biggest robot I would allow in my home
would be maybe 5et
tall I don't want any robot that could
beat me in a fair fight like I I want to
think oh it's only 5 feet tall I can
like push it over and then outrun it
because they still they still walk like
Joe
Biden for some reason nobody can fix
that 30 years of freaking robots in
movies and they still can't walk fast
nobody can make a robot that can walk
fast I don't get that seems like that
would be the easiest thing to
fix well here's my take on
politics in case you're wondering would
you like to hear my take on politics
have you noticed that the things that
Democrats are afraid of and the things
that Republicans are afraid of are very
different now you're going to say to
yourself du yes that's the whole point
of politics one group is afraid of
certain issues the others afraid of the
other issues and you you tend to work on
things you're most afraid
of sometimes we work on things that are
like investments in the future but
mostly politics is about what's
bothering you the most what scares you
the most then you put all your resources
in that direction so you won't be scared
so you build up militaries and stuff
like that but have you noticed there's a
qualitative difference between what uh
Democrats and Republicans are afraid of
that goes beyond
policy you would expect them to be
afraid of different things just because
they have different political
views but here are some things that
Democrats are afraid of they're afraid
of
trump they're afraid of Trump's chaos
and his personality and all the things
you'll do and you'll you'll be stealing
your democ you'll be stealing your
democracy they say it could be the end
of democracy so the number one thing the
Democrats are afraid of is
Trump um stealing their democracy
they're worried about white supremacy
and the the militias up in the mountains
and all the all the white supremacy
that's in
[Music]
everything oh so Amazon separated the
hard
cover from the other two entities so
that if you look at one you won't
necessarily find the other two
perfect it's always something all right
so uh Democrats afraid of trump they're
afraid of all the white supremacy that's
uh they can't find any any of it in the
military they're afraid of climate
change and they're afraid of
Russia what do all those things have in
common Trump stealing your democracy
white supremacy and the militias up in
the hill uh climate change and
Russia what do they all have in common
can you see the the common
element none of them are
real they're literally things that if
you if you had not been told you should
be afraid of them you would never be
afraid of
them there is really zero chance that
Trump is going to steal your democracy
in the context of the Democrats already
stealing your democracy clearly the
elections have become just a cheaters
contest let's be honest our election
system is a cheaters contest I don't
know where all the cheating is but you
see election interference in every
thing that happens everywhere
from you know both sides in different
ways so it's a cheating contest and to
imagine that Trump is the one that
steals your democracy that was probably
been gone since
1963 literally like literally no joke
it's not likely we have a democracy we
have something like the impression of a
democracy that's enough of an illusion
to keep the country together but I'm
pretty sure we don't have a lot to do
with who gets power and what happens and
in the biggest decisions
so somehow the Democrats have managed to
convince uh or the the press and the
propagandists have managed to convince
something like half the country that the
biggest things they should be afraid of
are all things that are good for the
people in
power let's see getting rid of trump
well that' be good for the people in
power because they want to be in charge
uh saying the white supremacy is the
problem well that would be good for the
people in power because it keeps Trump
out of office uh what about climate
change well that would be good for the
people in power because it means that a
trillion dollar will be heading their
Direction and for the all the the
services and the Technologies and the
companies that are pro- Democrat so that
would be good for them what about
Russia's the biggest fear oh the
military-industrial complex can make
lots more money if Russia is our enemy
than if we found a way to get along with
them so Democrats are living in a
completely fake fear world now here are
some things that I would consider real
things to be afraid of now I'm not
trying to make you afraid but I wanted
you to want you to contrast the reality
of these versus the complete fictional
fear of what the Democrats are living
under so these would be things that
Republicans would be concerned with
government censorship of what they call
disinformation which is really the end
of the first amendment and the end of
any kind of
Freedom that's what Republicans are
worried about is that real it's
completely real I mean it's documented
in so many ways you can't you know I
can't even mention them all but from the
Twitter files on we've seen that the
government has colluded with um the
media and platforms to censor and censor
the truth not just misin information
censor the truth and probably know
they're doing it so should you be afraid
of the loss of free speech well depends
if you think you ever had it what about
the fact that our food supply is
poison that bothers me a lot that's like
I don't know it'd be hard to come up
with a bigger problem than that
poisoning you with your food
supply um but that's a big issue
especially with RFK Jr part of the
pirate ship uh I'm worried about Dei I
think Dei is destroying the country it's
just destroying the fabric of the
country which was merit-based and now it
isn't a non-merit based system is
guaranteed to fail and I'm really
worried about that and that's very real
and we're seeing the mass incompetence
problem everywhere from the Secret
Service to you name it it's everywhere
I'm worried about the debt I have no
idea how to solve that no idea how to
solve it and it's terminal by the way if
we don't solve it we're all
dead um and I don't know how to solve it
and nobody has an idea
so that's a problem how about uh nuclear
war well I don't think it's an imminent
problem but it's one that I worry about
um how about the supply chain breaking
down that's a really big problem
especially if a ran gets into a fighting
War more directly with Israel or the
United States they've already threatened
to turn off the oil and and maybe block
the straight of Horus or we think they
would I don't know if they've threatened
that so I worry about the supply chain I
worry about the next pandemic that
um may be coming along I worry about the
population decline the birth rate
problem in the United States I worry
about that I worry about energy shortage
that's driven by having too many robots
and too much Ai and self-driving cars
and then we don't have enough energy to
keep the lights on I worry about that a
lot how about uh how about foreign
countries hacking our infrastructure and
being able to turn off our lights in our
water anytime they want I worry about
that I'm pretty sure that's real
according to uh the FBI it looks like
China is already hacked into everything
and they can just turn us off when they
want that's a problem
um and of course I worry about the Deep
State controlling the world uh the
country so I feel like those are pretty
well documented easily defended obvious
real
fears here's what I put zero fear into
Trump stealing my democracy white
supremacy
milias that nobody can find climate
change and Russia wanting to attack US
unless we attack them I mean if if we
keep going after Russia enough then it
becomes a problem but I don't think it's
a problem if we're just waiting
around all right I'm getting a
confirmation that's still just hard
cover that's available on
Amazon so just think of that so A bunch
of you went to Amazon to check my claim
and you came back with different stories
about what is available and what's not
you can't even tell if you can buy my
book just think about that the a number
of you went to check just to see if my
book is available for sale and you can't
tell you can't tell some of you say it
is and some of you say it definitely
isn't the hard cover is definitely is is
available wow well dog mhof is in
trouble but I don't think any Democrats
will care or hear about it
allegedly uh in 2020 in 2012 he slapped
his girlfriend for flirting at some
party where they were all drunk she
allegedly hit him back uh no file no
charges were filed some say allegedly he
paid $80,000 to make the story go away I
don't know if that's
confirmed um so the Daily Mail says they
have three sources I
guess now if you look at the way the
media is handling it so far the the
biggest part of the
media the biggest part the media is only
uh kind of ignoring
it so I don't think Democrats will even
hear it or if they do they'll think it
must be a nothing from the
past um but Chris Cuomo news Nation he
did do a little video piece in which he
said that if this had been Trump who had
done these things or anyone close to him
it would just be the only
news to which I say that sounds about
right yeah
yeah so we're going to get the
completely different treatment because
it's him now um I love the fact that
uh that MSNBC in particular was trying
to turn wals and Doug mhof into the new
model of
masculinity and then you find that the
new model of mascul the new model of
masculinity slapped around a girlfriend
uh got the I think it's was The Nanny
the same girlfriend I think it's the
same person right got her
pregnant yeah so there's your new model
of masculinity that didn't work out the
way anybody
hoped bill maluan is talking about the
northern border so apparently just in
three states on our northern border so
this is this is not the entire northern
border just three states uh Vermont New
York and New Hampshire and keep in mind
that yeah just three states and uh
currently according to the border patrol
they got 19,000 illegal immigrants in
2024 so far that's higher than the
previous 17 years combined and they came
from 97 different countries now how many
got through if 19,000 got
caught but only in three states that
border so we got a whole bunch of states
that border
Canada that's a
lot how many terrorists do you think are
inside the
country if I were
Iran let me tell you how I would build a
defense against the United States and I
don't think I'm giving them ideas
because this is sort of obvious if our
borders are open you would sneak as many
operatives as you
could and any one motivated operative
with a little bit of Weaponry that
doesn't seem too hard to
get could do horrible damage horrible
damage
and again I'm not going to give many
ideas um oh you I think my wind bigley
the first edition you're still seeing in
various forms it's the second edition
that's not available in all its
forms anyway so I would expect that if
we have war with Iran suddenly the
lights are going to go out in the United
States so yeah and I suppose it depends
how bad things get but if we took out or
Israel let's say Israel took out the oil
refineries in Iran which basically
eliminated their way to essentially
eliminate their economy they wouldn't be
able to survive I think they would turn
the lights off in the United States I
think you literally wouldn't have
electricity and I think that they have
the ability to do that either through
physical sabotage or
hacking and here's the thing I wonder
if something that big did happen to us
in the United States there's there's no
restraint that we would use to make sure
it didn't happen again so that would end
Iran as an independent nation in my
opinion if they turned off the lights in
the United States and it you know we
couldn't get them back on and it caused
a 100,000 people to die just from the
lack of electricity which is possible by
the way you could have 100,000 people
die if that happened even we judged well
we were a little bit responsible for you
maybe poking the bear some people would
say and other would others would say no
we're just responding to them poking us
all the time we' never get to the bottom
of that but if something that radical
happened on the
Homeland I think the US Military and
Israel would essentially just colonize
Iran and just take over the government
there what at whatever cost I think at
any cost we would do it at that point
point so that's probably the only thing
that's keeping Iran or China or anybody
else from turning off our lights because
it does seem we're super vulnerable the
only thing that we have is not that
we're protecting our facilities or even
our borders the only thing we have is
that if somebody does it we're going to
find out who you
are and we're going to make sure that
everybody who's ever close to you is
dead so that's the only protecting us
right
now yeah there's a bunch of counterfeit
um versions of all my books so for all
of my books as soon as I get published
there'll be all these counterfeits so
hold this in your mind Ju Just Just hold
this truth so on
Amazon I can only get my hard cover
published because they give me technical
problems that they can't solve and
there's no mechanism to solve it for the
soft cover and the Kindle but how many
counterfeit versions of my book did they
approve and you can buy them
today a
lot people just massively print
counterfeit versions of my book and they
won't take them down but the real one
they won't put up and I'm worried that
the reason I can't publish the real one
is because the counterfeits have already
taken the space meaning that they the
the system probably says oh that book
already exists but it would be the
counterfeits so I worry that that's the
problem or it's just political it'd be a
big coincidence if it
isn't well do you know how California
had that new law that said that
disinformation was going to be illegal
especially political disinformation and
you could go to jail for a political
parody and it turns out that a uh
federal court has uh tossed that out
it's unconstitutional so the California
ban on Election related quote
misinformation looks like that's just
going away so thank goodness there are
still some courts that
operate we don't have much going on
going for us
but
fortunately well here's some good news
um uh October is so lit when it comes to
all the election stuff the the things
that it looks like maybe people waited
to tell you
but here's one did you know well you did
know that the Republican the
RNC where uh uh Lara Trump and uh who is
she working with she's got
a she has a co-chairman person Michael
Watley so Laura Trump and Michael Watley
um in case you're wondering if they've
been
busy you're wondering hey is that orang
getting anything done listen to
this so apparently the
RNC has recruited and trained hundreds
of thousands of volunteers thousands of
attorneys and I have already held
thousands of
trainings ahead of the
election so that the total number of
volunteers is
220,000 and they've had over over 2,000
trainings and they've got 5,000
attorneys
recruited 5,000 attorneys
220,000 volunteers and they've had 2,000
training sessions does that sound like
they're working
hard sure
does sure does now it's impossible to
know from a distance you know how much
of this is needed and whether you got
enough but these are big numbers
so remember I told you months ago I said
that the the wild card and all of this
the election might be Lara Trump's level
of
aggressiveness in terms of how
aggressively are you going to make sure
that cheating doesn't happen this time
this is aggressive now Michael Watley
gets of course credit as well that's a
they they're their
team but I have nothing to complain
about here
do you feel the same does this feel like
this is a serious no joke we're really
going to try to fix this problem don't
know if it's enough don't know if
they'll be observing in a way that can
make a difference but
wow this is the best news I think I've
heard in a long time my perfect scenario
goes like
this Democrats massively
cheat Republicans catch the cheat in
time
and it's enough to redo How We Do
elections in other words we'll learn
that our elections have too many holes
cuz we we'll catch too many problems I
don't
think it's practical that we're going to
have an actual election result unless
unless Trump wins by Landslide and the
Democrats decide
uncharacteristically they decide it was
a clean election so I think what you're
going to
see is that Dem rats will be questioning
the election if they lose even by a
landslide and they'll say Russia
interfered they'll do all the normal
things and they'll try to put Trump in
jail so we're just getting going and
we're only the third of
October um oh look it's another
coincidence oh look at all the
coincidences happening in October right
before the election here's a coincidence
according to uh Scott presler who's a
signing people up to vote in in uh
Pennsylvania doing an amazing job um
this Saturday Trump is going to come
back to Pennsylvania to that Butler Farm
Show Place the same place he uh almost
was
assassinated so imagine how much press
he's going to get and how much
pennsylvanians will be paying attention
when Trump goes right back to the very
place where somebody took a shot at him
right that that naturally will be
just complete press saturation there's
no way they can ignore it and it'll make
you think if you're a republican it's
really going to make you think to vote
it's really going to make you think to
register if you haven't because
Pennsylvania is the key thing so not
only is Pennsylvania the key state but
by coincidence it's a it's a place where
he got shot at and almost killed shot
actually
and here's a coincidence you
you'll never guess turns out that the
Pennsylvania voter registration website
is going to be unavailable for
maintenance that evening from 6:00 pm.
which is 1 hour after the
rally to midnight so the exact period of
time where people would be thinking
about Pennsylvania thinking about voting
thinking about
registering that's when the system won't
be
available the one time that Trump goes
back to Pennsylvania to that same place
the one time he's going to get the most
press and the most
attention they're going to do a little
maintenance on the system so you can't
register
then coincidence it could be it could be
that the maintenance was scheduled long
before the the baller
thing
but don't you think it looks like
election interference
if you wanted to make it not election
interference you know in the let's let's
say they scheduled it a year ago so
there's nothing there's nothing weird
about it once you knew that Trump was
going to be in
berler shouldn't you change
it shouldn't you re couldn't you
reschedule it couldn't you do it maybe
after
midnight I don't know I got questions
I'm not I'm not willing to say this was
done specifically to depress Trump
voters from registering I'm going to say
that if you knew it's going to be a
problem you should reschedule so if they
don't well then that looks a little
slippery meanwhile according to the
Gateway pundit you know we've got this
big uh question mark about uh overseas
votes these would be Americans who are
allowed to vote they just happen to be
overseas so there's a big program by the
uh Democrats to make sure that those
overseas voters are definitely voting as
many as
possible uh it's called the uni the uh
uniformed overseas citizens absentee
Voting
Act and so the Democrats are going to
really really uh they put money into
it and they're going to go look and make
sure that all those people voted do you
see any possible problems with
that no what what's wrong with making
sure people vote how could that possibly
be a problem I you are so suspicious no
they're they just want to make sure
everybody has a right to vote and that's
available and Nothing Stops people from
expressing their Democratic preferences
so stop thinking there's some like plot
or or it's obvious that there's
something sketchy going on there's no
evidence of that whatsoever no evidence
at all let's see uh they're trying to
win approximately they say there are 9
million Americans
that are overseas and could vote some
percentage of them so they're working on
that 9 million the only problem is uh
there are only 2.8 million of them that
are of voting age and can vote and live
overseas so they're going to they're
working to get 9 million votes out of
the 2.8 million wait a minute okay which
is a bigger
number nine is bigger than 2.8 right so
they're only 2.8
are of the right age and also are
overseas but they're trying to get 9
million votes out of the 2.8 million
okay I take back everything I said uh
you should really really worry about
that now this is coming from the Gateway
pundit and various sources and do I know
that there's something sketchy here well
this is one of those cases where you'd
want to hear the
counterargument so the the accus ation
is that they're very clearly signaling
that they're going to get way more votes
from overseas than there are human
beings who are eligible to vote
overseas so it does feel
like the setup is being broadcast to us
you can see it coming from a mile away
unless they have an explanation and
maybe they have different data about
who's overseas and what they expect to
do maybe
but do you trust that does this look
innocent to you it doesn't look innocent
to
me now one would
hope one would hope that the Lara Trump
Michael wle RNC people have some way to
get extra visibility into that process I
don't know what that would look like but
there's got to be some way to see the
votes opened up or something
we'll see maybe if that's completely una
auditable we got a
problem meanwhile uh judge Chuck Ken has
unsealed Jack Smith's new uh
indictment uh and this is the one that
it got on all the the lawfare stuff I'm
the worst person to listen to so I'll
tell you what I think I know the only
the only thing you can get out of my
analysis of the law pair of stuff is
that somebody who watches the news
doesn't even understand it like I I do
this literally every day I check all the
news stories and my brain just turns off
when I look at the legal stuff partly
because it's always just so boring and
partly because you you know if you're
not a lawyer you can't really understand
which parts are important and which
parts are just formalities and which
parts will be overturned so you don't
have to worry about them you know it's
hard for me to dig in so look for the
actual lawyers you know the Jonathan
tures and the dtz you know look look for
the people uh who've done
this uh to give you a better look but
here's what I think is true from a non-
lawyer stupid
perspective it looks to me like it's
another oh it's a coincidence what a
coincidence that this dropped just
before the election and we won't have
time to know that let's say the uh
accusations turn out to be false and
let's say there's a court process and
let's say that Trump is completely
exonerated well you're not going to know
that by election day because by
coincidence this drops just in time to
to Poison the Well and make people think
who there's with all of this action 165
pages there must be something there now
my understanding is that
um this was Rewritten because of the
presidential immunity decision at the
Supreme Court which said that if Trump
did something under the official Banner
of his office he had some
immunity uh so apparently it's being
Rewritten to emphasize the things he did
which they're defining as outside the
scope of His official office for example
they talk about his tweeting in his
personal account as opposed to his
presidential account because is using
the personal one would be a sign that
he's doing it knowing he's doing it and
will side of the presidential you know
umbrella does any of that matter I don't
know you'd have to talk to a lawyer not
me but um you've got this totally biased
prosecutor you've got this totally left
leading judge and they just dropped this
thing that cannot be defended there's
just no defense against it because it's
complicated and people just say well
there's something there with all that
smoke there must be fire but of course
the play is cre lots of smoke so that
people think there's a
fire so during the election season it is
not true that with all that smoke there
must be fire that's just not true during
an election season it's just true that
it could be but in the non-election
context a whole bunch of smoke probably
tells you there's a fire and the
election season doesn't mean anything it
just means somebody's making an
accusation
um so I tried to figure out just exactly
what was in that thing and as far as I
can tell it's mostly somebody called it
hearsay meaning that it's bunch of
people who were acting in ways that
maybe they thought were compatible with
what Trump wanted but there doesn't seem
to be anything that Trump said or did
directly that would be illegal as far as
I know now this is too preliminary to
know that that was a true statement so
I'm waiting for the news to surface you
know what's the thing we need to know
can you give me the quote that says
Trump did something haven't seen it I've
seen a bunch of quotes that other people
thought they were doing other things but
here's my big question about the whole
situation everything that Trump did on
January 6 and this is this is all about
the January 6 business um everything you
did in order for it to look like it was
against the
law would require you to know that he
knew the election was
clean that's the trick they're playing
on the country and Democrats are falling
for it Democrats actually believe you
can me you can measure the temperature
of the
earth
accurately and they believe that you can
know if an American election was clean
or not
I don't know how dumb you'd have to be
to believe either of those two
things but super dumb there is no way to
know if an American election was clean
you can know if somebody had a specific
complaint and there was time and
standing to pursue it you could know how
the coure
ruled but there's no way to know that
there's is or is not something hidden in
the system that was changing the result
how do you know what you don't know
you don't hey look there's a giant pile
of
hay somebody said there might be a
needle in it how do you judge there's no
needle in
it well I don't see a needle no court
has decided there's a needle you can't
prove there's a needle but then I say
but you also can't prove there's not a
needle because you're not even looking
for it well why would I look for
something that is unspecific well that's
my point how would you know if there was
something in the system that was
corrupting it if you didn't look well
nobody's complained there's no court
case I know this had nothing to do with
my point how would you know that some
State actor maybe with some insiders
hadn't done something how would you know
there weren't some male carriers who got
together and said let's just throw away
all the mail from the the red
neighborhoods how would you know there
is no way to know those things unless
somebody came forward as a
whistleblower or just somebody got
lucky there is no way to know and our
systems are designed to make sure you
can't know now if there's only one thing
you ever learn you should learn that the
system the way a system is designed will
tell you the intentions of the designers
but not on day one on day one it could
just be poorly designed
and then you go oh okay they didn't mean
for the machine to not
work that was just a
mistake if it's 10 years later and and
the Machine is still doing the wrong
thing you can no longer say that's an
accident at some point and we're well
beyond that point at some point it's the
design
intention because you would fix it if it
were not the design intention right so
that's why you can't tell in the first
place but is obvious it is now obvious
very obvious completely obvious and by
the way you will never see anybody
debunk this
point there's your dog not barking
you'll see people say there was no proof
of fraud
true there's no proof of fraud that a
court accepted oh let me put it that way
there's no court accepted proof of a
2020 fraud doesn't mean
anything it doesn't mean you didn't have
any fraud
yeah your our systems are designed to
make sure you can't tell and that's
really
obvious so
um what else is going on so my main
point there is that uh I've got this
question about the latest um Jack Smith
indictment stuff how much of that
depends on Trump's inner thoughts
as in if Trump knew because they like to
say he knew the election that he lost
the election don't let anybody say that
in front of you if somebody says he knew
he lost the election just get all over
him and say how the could you know
the unknowable how do you know you you
couldn't even describe how the election
is put
together and then you go into why do we
have voting machines at
all so
I think the entire January 6 hoax and
I'm going to call it a hoax The
hoax is that we know what Trump
knows or that he could know whether the
election was clean or not to me it seems
obvious that he really believed it was
rigged which would make 100% of his
actions make
sense because if he thought it was
rigged and he was trying to fix that
problem that would be doing what the
President should do but on top of that
even if he did it as a private citizen
it's what a private citizen should do a
private citizen should try to fix a
problem with the with the
system if you had the power as a citizen
you weren't elected to anything and you
saw that there was some big thing that
you could fix what's your responsibility
as a citizen fix it fix it it's not your
job but it's definitely your
responsibility as as it would be for all
of us like the
flood the the flood is you know sort of
the government's job and FEMA the one
supposed to be doing it but you've seen
a bunch of people said what the hell
this isn't getting done so they're
taking their own helicopters and raising
their own money you know trying to get
their own uh you know internet
connections in there and stuff so
citizens do have a responsibility to fix
things that are
broken so whether Trump was operating
under the banner of hisob job or
independent of his job that didn't
change the fact that it was his job as a
citizen not a paid job not an elected
job but as a citizen absolutely he he's
supposed to go fix that if he's the one
in a position where it makes most sense
for him to do it if I were in the
position where I could fix that I would
feel that was my job an unpaid job but
it would certainly be my patriotic duty
to try to fix it
so yes don't let anybody make you think
past the sale the sale they have to make
is how do you know that
Trump could somehow know the unknowable
that it was a clean election when it
looked like it wasn't that's not
knowable don't let anybody make you
think past that well there's more Diddy
updates I keep seeing videos of Jaguar
Wright who is a musician
herself and she claims have all kinds of
inside information about diddies parties
Etc she said she used to be a sex worker
and so she sees the world from you know
the the darkest corners and she was also
part of Diddy's world so she's seen you
know the entire field she
claims and here are the things that
she's
saying um that there were in fact
Satanic rituals again this is just a
claim uh I would put her credibility
as a coin
flip I I'm not sure that I lean toward
her being accurate on
everything but it does sound accurate I
have to admit it has that there is a
ring of truth to it I just don't know if
all of it's
true so i' take with a big big grain of
salt this particular
Source uh but it's worth listening
to so she says that young girls were
stuffed into suitcases and later
discarded in
Alleyways you'd think there somebody
would ask a follow-up question on that
oh hold on hold on young girls put in
what
suitcases and then you take the suitcase
to the
alley wa are they alive in the
suitcase and why'd you put them in the
suitcase and if they were
dead why'd you put them in an alley so
so that's the sort of accusation where I
say hm
Satanic rituals probably
not girls stuffed into
suitcases if I had heard it happen
once I might have said well that's
terrible but it could happen once but if
you're saying it's sort of a routine
thing to stuff girls and suitcases and
drop them in alleys that's a little less
credible
sounding um she implicated Jay-Z saying
he has hundreds of victims there's not
yet any uh solid evidence of that and
then she goes this far she says there's
some Sinister web that ties together
Diddy Harvey Weinstein and Jeffrey
Epstein okay I'm out I'm
out two on the
nose is that a little bit
convenient just a little bit too
perfect oh it CL cleverly ties together
all these loose ends now it could I'm
not ruling it
out I mean stranger things have happened
but it's a little bit too exactly like
what people are expecting you know in
their conspiracy
theories and uh she says that Diddy was
a product of Music Mogul Clive Davis and
Lucian gra never heard of him and taught
him everything he
knows well interestingly last night I
was watching a Whitney Houston
documentary that involves Clive Davis
discovering her and uh according to the
documentary Clive Davis is just the
nicest guy and man can he help your
career because he's a nice guy just a
nice nice guy
so do I believe that version of
him no because
honestly almost nobody is that nice
if he's as nice as he was in the movie
he's really nice that that would be one
seriously nice guy and maybe he is maybe
he is so I'm not willing to go so far as
to throw any of these characters under
the bus I think we can throw didy under
the bus with some confidence but all the
other names I'm really
uncomfortable assuming that there's
actual evidence of crimes there might
be there might be I mean there's 120
alleged victims
according to one attorney so how big
this could get we don't know but don't
assume that some big celebity name you
heard is necessarily going to be
guilty well Israel is uh supposedly
going to Target in the next day or so uh
maybe Iranian nuclear
facilities
maybe um oil
facilities and uh Israel did just today
I guess strike a Russian Air Base in
Syria now the reason is that some
weapons for Hezbollah were allegedly in
an airplane that landed there so they
were really going they weren't going
after Russians they were going after the
Hezbollah supply line but uh they
haven't done that
before so it attacked the warehouses it
was trying not to kill too many people
apparently and Russian air defenses
tried to intercept the isra missiles so
it was a missile attack and they
failed so does that tell you anything
does that tell you that Israeli missiles
are better than Russian air defenses or
does it maybe tell you that Russia has
to use all their good stuff in
Ukraine is it possible that the Syrian U
military assets are just all the the
crap stuff left over that didn't go to
Ukraine maybe don't know
but certainly Israel has demonstrated
that they can reach anything and they
have demonstrated
by
basically not having any damage from 200
rocket or 200 was it InterContinental
missiles that got sent at them from Iran
with no damage really to speak of I mean
nothing major so so we're in that uh
that weird area where everybody's
posturing and they've got to make sure
that they look strong and they they made
a defense but they didn't go too far
because you don't want a bigger War so
everybody's trying to balance on the the
head of the needle
here so what would you think is are they
going to attack is Israel going to
attack the nuclear facilities which
would slow down Iran's ability to have a
breakout nuclear thing uh with nuclear
weapons or would they go after something
that's more directly related to their
economic weal
being so if they go after the oil
terminals Iran has said they'll go after
all the oil terminals in the area so the
entire world will be out of oil would
they do
that don't
know there there's a real good chance
they
wouldn't because if they took out all
the oil facilities in the Middle East
that would make every country in the
Middle East say does uh anybody want a
little help destroying Iran uh we'll
we'll send some
people I mean I can't imagine that the
other the neighboring countries would
put up with that you know is Saudi
Arabia going to put up with that I mean
I think that's that's World War I now I
think World War II would still be
limited to the Middle East mostly except
for terrorist acts in other countries
but I feel like I feel like Israel
probably won't go after the oil
refineries because that would be too
much for shock to the whole world but if
they go after the nuclear facilities and
that's all they go after and let's say
they succeed in slowing it down then
they get a definite
benefit uh and they get a might not
spread it might be the least likely to
spread to a larger field and um and they
could say that they
responded so I guess I would bet on that
as the first most likely thing they
would do is take out the nuclear thing
because if they take out the nuclear
threat the threat that Iran can make a
nuclear weapon in two weeks which by the
way is the estimate that they're about
that if they wanted to they could have a
nuclear weapon in two weeks do you know
what I say about
that if Iran could have a nuclear weapon
in two weeks which by the way I'm not
sure that that's true but if they could
have it in two weeks they already have
one how how the hell would we
know if they had a nuclear weapon
already if the experts were saying they
could make one in two weeks if they
wanted to are you telling me they could
make one in two weeks if they wanted to
and they didn't make one they've had two
weeks in what world does a country not
secretly make an actual nuclear
weapon that would be insane they should
make it as fast as possible and tell
everybody they got one or at least
suggest it so that you don't know if
they can attack with a nuke or not now I
suppose Israel's intelligence would
probably be good enough that they would
know if they had a breakout nuclear
weapon but uh if I were Iran I hate to
say it but I would have made the nuclear
weapon
already so there's that uh then there's
the thought that if Iran got into a
general War like a big wider War where
really the you know the mainland of Iran
was under
attack that they don't have enough uh
manufacturing ability to replace their
weapons after a fairly you know intense
fight so if they use most of their
weapons fighting they don't have a way
to rebuild them fast enough to stay in
the fight and the only place they could
get them would be Russia and Russia is
not likely to send them a lot of weapons
at the same time they're trying to use
them in
Ukraine so Iran is probably not capable
of a sustained war that it could
win um so these are all the
variables now I haven't heard the news
talking about a decapitation attack and
given that Israel has shown that they'll
take out the leaders of Hezbollah and
Hamas if they
can um do you think that would really
stop from taking up the leadership of
Iran I feel like it's on the table it
seems a lot safer than taking out the
the oil facilities if you take out the
oil facilities it's War for sure if you
take out the
leadership I don't know maybe it's worse
I don't know how to judge that
one but most importantly there's uh the
BBC reports there's some science that
scientists have made a a huge
breakthrough in analyzing the brain of a
fly now even a fly has a super
complicated brain but it's a tiny little
brain and way way less complicated than
you know bigger mammals but they think
they've made this big breakthrough and
sort of mapping it almost like
physically building a map of how all the
neurons connect to the other ones and uh
it's the most detailed analysis of the
brain of an adult creature ever produced
now what they don't say is that it's the
first step in understanding why
Democrats vote the way they do you got
to start with the fly but then you work
your your way up so it's like fly
salamander Democrat no I'm just joking
I'm just joking I kid the Democrats now
they're like everybody else except
they're afraid of things that don't
exist well meta has these new smart
glasses um that you can wear with some
VR
capabilities and uh some people combined
that with an app called uh Pim eyes
that can do facial
recognition and it'll allow you to walk
through a crowd and the personal
information of everybody you look at
will pop up on your
glasses so you'll know the name and
address and social media history and
they say phone numbers but I don't know
where they get that so you can actually
see the phone number of somebody as you
walk past them in a crowd total
strangers now is that going to stay
illegal
probably probably but imagine going to a
party wearing your nerd glasses and you
could tell who's
single suppose that's the only thing you
knew you could tell who's single just by
looking at him suppose you could tell
their job just by looking at them
suppose you could tell how much money
they have just by looking at them with
your glasses that's all
happening that's all happening
so my little life where uh most of the
time I'm
Anonymous it's about to end really
quickly you know if I leave my my small
town here and I don't run into somebody
who watches the show every day I'm kind
of anonymous like if I go to an airport
I'm not usually recognized sometimes not
usually now all it would take is a few
people with those glasses on and they're
going to ID me right away so does that
change my life I don't know it might
might change my life
radically yours
too um apparently the Doctor Who
prescribed the drugs for Matthew Perry
that he died of an overdose of has plad
guilty according to the
BBC so there were two doctors involved
one had some facility that had
ketamine uh and the other was his doctor
so I guess his doctor was working with
the source doctor so none of it was
illegal in terms of the doctoring but I
think the the amount that they got and
the way it was distributed the way it
was the way it was ingested there are
the questions there I guess but
uh here's the part that was just really
scary so according to the
indictment uh the the two doctors
involved they were exchanging text
trying to figure out how to get this
drug to to Matthew Perry and uh they're
trying to figure out how much to charge
him and one of the doctors said and I
quote I wonder how much this will
pay those are the
doctors the doctors the people who were
responsible for
keeping Matthew Perry
alive were wondering how to rob him and
calling him a
wow if I can make any advice to the
medical professionals uh who are
watching now I wouldn't ever call any of
your customers
morons because you never know when
that's going to get discovered I feel
like all of our messages are
discoverable and at some point they'll
all be available publicly everywhere
that seems inevitable
but maybe don't do that yeah don't don't
be like
that meanwhile according to the
independent the US Army is rolling in a
robot dog with a gun on
it and uh we've talked about this before
we got robot dogs with
flamethrowers we've got uh every kind of
drone and now we have uh robot dogs with
guns fitted at the top well you know I
want one of
those uh if anybody's thinking about a
good Christmas pres to send
me at the top of the list is a robot dog
to defend my house now here's where
we're going with us these These are
actually being deployed in war zones now
so
Ukraine the Ukrainian military is going
to be seeing robot dogs with guns and
flamethrowers coming over the hedge
r that is not going to be a fun battle
I'll tell you so we've now entered the
we've now entered the age in which
humans are going to fight
robots that's here because already the
ukrainians are using their robots to you
know breach the front lines and shoot
the Russians so we now have humans
fighting
robots it's real it's
now the question is this how long will
it be before both sides are just all
robots now if if major power fights a
smaller power it's going to be the major
Powers robots against the humans of the
smaller power and the humans won't have
a chance you know assuming that the
superpower has lots of money to make
lots of robots humans won't have a
chance but what happens if two
superpowers that can make unlimited
robots get in a war with each other
would it ever make sense for the US and
China to be in a war in which we put
humans on the front
line if we could if we could send
unlimited drones and unlimited robot
dogs wouldn't you just have the robots
fight the
robots it's just going to be battlebot
right and then what happens when one of
the robot sides
wins does the other side say whoa whoa
whoa we're not going to put our humans
against your robots and you've already
beat the robots we
surrender it's going to be like that
Star Trek where they would do a
simulation of the war so they didn't
have to have the actual war and then
whoever lost the simulation of the war
had to volunteer to be basically
suicided you know in some humane
way I think we're actually heading to
that place like actually
literally where after the robot war is
over the losers have to accept the
penalty whatever that penalty is could
be slavery
anyway so you might all want your own
robot dog to guard your house and uh
also the Second Amendment is going to
get a little
dicey if the Second Amendment says you
can own a
gun what's it going to say about your
robot dog with a machine gun mounted on
it or or let's say it's a
singleshot sort of a home defense weapon
but it's mounted on a robot do we have
laws that will handle robots with guns
and uh if the robot becomes
sensient is it your fault if the robot
uses the gun to Sho somebody because it
would be the robot's
decision I don't
know so that's what I got for you today
I'm going to take a little time to talk
to the uh locals people on their
own and
uh once we get that going um
anyway so we going to talk to locals if
you're on X or YouTube or Rumble thanks
for joining it'll take about 20 seconds
to be private with the locals
people so that's when we do our
interstitial
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e e