Coffee With Scott Adams — Knowledge Archive October 12, 2026
Scott Adams Philosophy Archive
Search ideas
Episodes › Episode #2743

Episode 2743 CWSA 02/07/25

Episode #2743 Feb 7, 2025 1:31:51 37,713 views

USAID and all the badness, plus more Trump and lots of fun ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ If you would like to enjoy this same content plus bonus content from Scott Adams, including micro-lessons on lots of useful topics to build your talent stack, please see scottadams.locals.com for full access to that secret treasure.

Opening General Commentary

Well, there you are. Checking in on the stock market here. We're a little bit up, not looking too bad. Looks like things are normalizing. Even Tesla is up a little bit today. It took quite a hit this week. Let's see the comments and then we start the show. Want to make sure I can see all your geniu…

View segment →
SimultaneousSip General Commentary

n, Skull Coffee with Scott Adams. And wow, do we have a lot to cover today. But if you'd like to take this experience up to levels that nobody can even understand with their tiny shiny human brains, all you need for that is a coffee mug or a glass or a tankard or a canteen or a jug or a flask or a v…

View segment →
Tangent Health & Biohacking

alleled pleasure, the dopamine hit of the day. The thing that makes everything better. It's called the simultaneous sip. It's the elixir of the gods. I wonder if there are any new stories about the benefits of drinking coffee. Checking notes: yes there is. According to a story, Ellen Jen writes th…

View segment →
NewsReaction Media & Fake News

n get it on the X platform. Just hit the subscription button. And here's what you would be finding. You would find that the new comic will tell you the problem with hiring the low bid hitman. So Dogbert is in the role of a hitman and you see what happens when you take the low bid for your hitman. I…

View segment →
MainContent Politics as Persuasion

Ron Paul thinks that basically all of the media is influenced by government spending that's channeled through this and that so it gets there. Well maybe. Brian Stelter called the claim that Politico is receiving government subsidies "quote rampant right-wing misinformation." Well technically he's c…

View segment →
MainContent Persuasion

ng what it might take to get rid of it you know such as bunker busting bombs on nuclear facilities in Iran. So you don't necessarily think that Israel would have the green light to do what needs to be done in Iran. But what if Trump says you do? When Trump says the one thing I'll guarantee is you're…

View segment →
Closing General Commentary

ative. I mean completely different frame. And that's what Trump does better than anybody. All right, according to Popular Science there's a company that's building underwater homes that you could live in for extended times. They're for research but maybe someday they'll be underwater homes. All ri…

View segment →

Well, there you are. Checking in on the stock market here. We're a little bit up, not looking too bad. Looks like things are normalizing. Even Tesla is up a little bit today. It took quite a hit this week.

Let's see the comments and then we start the show. Want to make sure I can see all your genius comments. All right, I think we're in good shape now.

Good morning everybody and welcome to the highlight of human civilization, Skull Coffee with Scott Adams. And wow, do we have a lot to cover today. But if you'd like to take this experience up to levels that nobody can even understand with their tiny shiny human brains, all you need for that is a coffee mug or a glass or a tankard or a canteen or a jug or a flask or a vessel of any kind. Fill it with your favorite liquid. I like the coffee. Join me now for the unparalleled pleasure, the dopamine hit of the day. The thing that makes everything better. It's called the simultaneous sip.

It's the elixir of the gods.

I wonder if there are any new stories about the benefits of drinking coffee. Checking notes: yes there is. According to a story, Ellen Jen writes that drinking one extra cup of sugar-free coffee a day is linked to weight loss. I believe that. I'm only a few cups away from disappearing totally. If there's less of you the more you drink coffee, I'm about ready to disappear. So that's how I'm going to go, just drink coffee until I don't exist.

If you're following the Dilbert comic that you can only watch if you're on the Locals platform, but there's a lot of political stuff on there. If you don't want that, that's not for you. But if you just want to see the comic that has continued since my cancellation two years ago, it's called Dilbert Reborn and you can get it on the X platform. Just hit the subscription button.

And here's what you would be finding. You would find that the new comic will tell you the problem with hiring the low bid hitman. So Dogbert is in the role of a hitman and you see what happens when you take the low bid for your hitman. It doesn't go well.

But here's the more interesting thing. I also publish whatever comic ran exactly 10 years ago from whatever date today is. So the comics that ran exactly 10 years ago are so on point for right now. It's about humanoid robots being introduced into Dilbert's house and you know what goes wrong. And oh my god, did I call it 10 years ago? You have to see it to see how on point it is for today anyway. So go take a look at that.

In other news, well we'll get to the hard news in a minute. I like to ease you into it with some lesser hard news.

So apparently Ye is making a buzz on social media. I think he's got a new album out and he's apparently off his meds. And I'm not going to tell you any of the things that he said in all caps shouting like crazy on X. But let me tell you, it looks like he's off his meds. It's just absolute mental illness. There's no other way to look at it. He says he's off his meds, by the way. He thinks he was misdiagnosed as bipolar so now he thinks he's autistic. He is not autistic. I'm pretty sure that's not right, but I don't know. We'll see.

In other news, simulation alert! Simulation alert! Simulation alert everybody! Simulation alert!

Here's how you know you live in a simulation. The confirmation vote for the new budget chief. Democrats try to delay it. They try to delay the vote for somebody named Russ Vought. That's right, his name sounds like "Rush the vote." And they delayed the vote for Russ Vought. That's all. That's the whole story. Simulation alert.

Meanwhile, there's a Michigan Democrat state legislator who decided to announce that she's going to sterilize herself, actually already has, to avoid giving birth in Donald Trump's America, according to the Gateway Pundit, Colleen Lineberger.

So I would regard this as a combination of mental illness and probably something she wanted to do anyway that had nothing to do with anything. She's 36, hasn't had a kid. I guess you know how much sex she was having, but she won't be having any extra Democrats.

The most important story of the entire year: one of the DOGE team members used to go by a secret name online, Big Balls. And Big Balls said some pretty inappropriate things. Yeah, pretty inappropriate. And once that all came out, you would be surprised to hear there's somebody who was once working for USAID but now works for the Wall Street Journal who outed that DOGE person. Huh. Feels like everything's coming together and now we understand. Every time you hear that somebody like Liz Cheney or AOC were birthed by the USAID funding, you have to say to yourself, is this really describing the entire structure we see? That all the people that we know to be turds came from the same place. That would be kind of a big coincidence.

Anyway, so the best part is that CNN did a part in this in which Aaron Burnett and Kara Swisher were talking about it. Because you just can't have somebody working on your team named Big Balls who once said offensive things online under a pseudonym. Anyway, what's the point of having a pseudonym if you can't be anonymous?

But here's the best part. I believe that the media thought that they would hurt Musk and his effort by giving a lot of attention to Big Balls. And I don't think they know much about Elon Musk because Big Balls is the funniest thing you could possibly do. And the more you talk about it on CNN, the happier I am. I think you should do the whole segment on Big Balls. There should be more of a special. I'd like to see them delve deeper into it.

But here's the thing. And I love the fact that they thought they were defeating the monster. You know, they would think that Elon Musk is the monster. And so the way they thought they would defeat him is talking about Big Balls. That's really feeding the monster. I mean, if you're really afraid of him, don't feed him stories about Big Balls. He's going to be dining on that all day, so to speak.

So there's one thing missing with this story and I think you can all tell what's missing. You know what's missing, right? It doesn't have a clever name yet. So we need to have some kind of a name to talk about this scandal about the Big Balls. I'm going to go first. I'm going to call it Scrotum Gate. Scrotum Gate, everybody. Do you like that? So whenever we talk about it, it'll just be Scrotum Gate.

Now Elon is running a poll on X to see if he should bring him back. By the way, Big Balls quit once the news got out and I can understand that. But Elon wants to bring him back. Now here's my take. If somebody who is a teenager or 19 years old said something that we all agree is absolutely inappropriate but did it anonymously, I don't have a problem with it. Because every 19-year-old boy is saying deeply inappropriate things all the time. And if he was doing it anonymously, he knew that it was not something that you could put in the public domain. Somebody else put it in the public domain. So my problem is not with anything he said, because I just can't blame a 19-year-old for having inappropriate thoughts, especially a man, a 19-year-old male. It's all we have is inappropriate thoughts. Do you understand what a 19-year-old male is? That is a person who is non-stop inappropriate thoughts. That's all we do at that age. Do we grow out of it? Sometimes. Sometimes not all the time.

Anyway, Big Balls might be back, but we'll keep an eye on Scrotum Gate.

Fox News says that a big consulting firm, PwC, they're going to have a big conference this summer trying to get high-performing college students an opportunity to work for their company. Oh that's good. Yeah, big consulting company wants to make sure that the high-performing students get to check out their job offerings. Oh wait, it specifically excludes white and Asian applicants. So it's a DEI policy or something like it. So apparently not everybody got the memo that if you openly discriminate against white and Asian applicants, it's not going to end well. It might not go your way in the long run. So maybe rethink breaking the law.

All right, I got to look at this comment because it looks interesting. Ron Paul says on X, look behind the curtain has revealed a horrific truth. Nearly the entire mainstream media worldwide has been funded by the US government under the USAID. From the BBC to the New York Times and Politico. At this point it might be easier to find out who USAID does not fund. Well that does seem approximately true.

And I saw a video online. I couldn't tell if it's a new one or an old one. I think it's an old one, so you tell me. It was Pam Bondi talking about how many times Bill Clinton had been on the Lolita Express with Jeffrey Epstein. Apparently he hadn't been on the plane just a couple of times. He'd been on there multiple times and traveled internationally with Epstein. And that plane had a bed in it. That's all you need to know. And apparently they stayed friends for years, whereas Trump removed him from his life fairly early on. So is that a new clip or an old one? What's all the 27s?

All right, so that's out there.

So Trump has tried to fire the Federal Election Commission commissioner Ellen Weintraub, but she says it's illegal and the president can't fire her. We'll see. But she was appointed by Bush and apparently they can only be replaced if they resign or their term expires. Wait, let me read that again. According to legal experts, an FEC commissioner can only be replaced if they resign or their term expires. Wait, what? Who the hell has a job that they can't be fired from? Who the hell has a job that they can't be fired from unless you're elected? And even if you're elected, you can be fired. You know, it's got to be an impeachment, but there's a process. Are you telling me that there's somebody in our government who's in charge of the elections who can't be fired? Are you serious? I hope I'm reading this wrong. Do I have this wrong? The most important person, the head of the spear for our entire democracy, can't be fired? Oh my God. You think that the well of corruption and badness is deep? I've never seen anything like that. Have you? Have you ever heard of somebody who can't be fired for any reason? That can't be right. There must be. Everybody can be fired for cause, right? But apparently not, according to legal experts. Wow.

The Daily Mail has a story that looks fake to me. They're saying that there's unconfirmed plans that Trump's trying to end the Ukraine war in 100 days and that he wants to get a ceasefire by April 20th. And that the deal would freeze Russia's place. They get to keep what they have. Ukraine would not join NATO. And that would be the deal. Now I guess this comes from a sketchy source and then the Daily Mail picked it up. So it's two sketchy sources. The Daily Mail is not full propaganda but it's not right 100% of the time either, you know, like most things. So I don't think this is anything but maybe a test balloon. My best guess is that it's a way for the government to float an idea to see what people think of it. So as an idea, floating a test balloon is a good one, but I don't think it's a real story. Feels like just testing out the water. We'll see.

So Senator Fetterman has weighed in on the RFK Jr. and Tulsi Gabbard nominations and he will not vote for them. So he will not vote for either Gabbard or Kennedy. Now we don't absolutely need his vote because Republicans can get it through if they're all together. But I was amused by Nicole Shanahan's reply to the X post about this. I'll just paraphrase. She said it better but you know, here's just my summary. Fetterman is a slob who wears gym clothes and doesn't go to the gym. He's a slob who wears gym clothes all day and doesn't go to the gym. In other words, health is not high on his list.

All right, so here's somebody who apparently doesn't have any appreciation for good human health or he would act like it. He'd go to the gym, he'd lose weight. He acts like he has no appreciation for the biggest issue in the whole country, which is our kids have chronic diseases and they'll have no good life. That's a pretty big problem and he's against it.

Separately, Fetterman also said that he thought the Democrats don't have much chance of winning men back because he said he's been warning about it and that the Democrats have become sort of the party of whiny women. And that not only were white males leaving the Democrat Party but black men, Hispanic men. And it's pretty broad and obvious change. But the interesting thing is he thinks they can't get it back, meaning that Fetterman believes he is in the party that's anti-men. That would be according to all the men who changed sides because they want to be on the side that's not anti-men. DEI is anti-men.

What do we got here? Okay, so Ellen Weintraub, the head of the FEC that Trump is trying to get rid of, she once was in private practice at Perkins Coie. So if you understand Perkins Coie, that's like the heart of the Democrat legal dirty tricks. Well, I won't call them that. I'll just say they're the legal arm of the Democrats where much has been done the Republicans don't like. So we can see why Trump's getting rid of her. It makes sense.

But let me close on the Fetterman. So Fetterman knows that he's on the anti-male team and he stays there. Now if he tried to become a Republican, I'm sorry, that door is very closed right now. You're not going to become a Republican if you're turning down Kennedy. You're dead. I mean not physically dead. You're done as a political entity that anybody on the Republican side's going to care about. So you're a piece of shit from my perspective and you should expect that. Scott Pressler is coming for your job. Not to take the job but to make sure that there are more Republicans registered in Pennsylvania. And he said so, by the way. I'm not speculating. Scott Pressler, Nicole Shanahan, they're going to take him out. And I don't know if that means he'll be primaried, but that's what Nicole Shanahan promised, that she'd be primarying people who go the wrong direction on the Kennedy vote. And Scott Pressler says it directly, you know, we're coming after you basically. So Fetterman, I think his political fortunes are now over because he just made an unrecoverable error.

Allegedly, according to Wired, Elon Musk's DOGE is working on a chatbot. So they're going to create a chatbot called GS allegedly. And it would be part of, you know, maybe some of it would be to analyze the complexities that DOGE is looking into. But some of it would be maybe a replacement for some of the functions of the government. You know, if you had a really good AI, it could do a lot of stuff.

Now I'm a skeptic because my own experience with trying to create an AI agent, even though it was last summer and a lot has changed, I don't believe AI can do that. I don't believe AI can create an agent that can do general stuff that a human could do. I don't think it's anywhere near it. So the AI is super smart but when you try to get it to do the job of a person, it's, you know, it hallucinates and it's hard to know when it's going to do it. They can't look up data reliably. So the only way it would work is if it's sort of an interface layer but all of the real important work is just regular programming. You know, just it initiates something that looks into a database. That's not AI. So if it's the interface for things that are not AI, it could be great.

So I don't want to judge. I obviously let me just say the obvious. The people who are working on this know a lot more than I do about AI. So if they think it can work, you would be kind of dumb for me to bet against it. But from my understanding it can't work unless it's just an interface to regular programming. We'll see. Someday it will work. I don't think it's there yet.

All right, you know we're going to talk about USAID. I got more to say about that. But Thomas Massie says, now if you're brand new I'll just give you the quick update. USAID is a 50 billion dollar whatever funded entity within the government that does things for the State Department, sometimes the CIA, sometimes the Pentagon. This is the Mike Benz explanation of the world. And it's been basically gutted by DOGE for all the alleged waste and, you know, fraud. The waste would be funding things that are not good for anybody. That would be the claim.

But Thomas Massie says I'm concerned that the House and Senate will fully fund USAID in March just like we did in December, although he voted against it. He said the argument from Republican leadership will be that they need Democrat votes to pass the omnibus to avoid a government shutdown. Oh my God, I hate how right he is. So Massie is pretty good at seeing around corners and telling you what's coming. How do we beat that? Because the whole omnibus thing is essentially a criminal process. It's a criminal process because it allows the people of Congress to not do their job and get tons of money for things that will help them get reelected. I don't know if it's illegal but certainly in intention and in a de facto way it's just criminal.

The omnibus is when they put all the spending in one big thing and you could just say yes or no. But they put all kinds of crap in there and then they say well if you say no to the crap you're the one who shut down the government and children will die, which is an exaggeration. So yeah, we have a system that guarantees that USAID will be fully funded. Think about that. We just nuked it and the corrupt government is so advanced at this point it's evolved almost to its own creature. The corruption is self-healing. We have a self-healing corruption designed machine. If you take out the heart of the machine, USAID, that might be the most important beating organ in the whole machine, completely removed. And in one month it could be reinstated because it's a self-healing corrupt system. And they'll just use the omnibus as the argument for why it must be refunded.

Now if it's not done with the omnibus, and I don't know what would stop it, they could do the same thing with onesies and twosies. Well but this one's important. Well you cut all the funding but this one's important. And just try to wear down Marco Rubio and the State Department which absorbed the USAID function.

So let me tell you, if you think USAID is defeated, not even close. We're not even close to defeating it. It's sort of like the Terminator. You know, okay good news we shot the Terminator. Uh oh, he's reforming. He's self-healing. So it's coming for you.

Did you know according to Leslie Kimovitz, I don't know if this is a good source or not but it's a good example of the kind of news I'm seeing on social media. I'll give you the following warning. There will be claims about USAID funding that are not true. Trump just reversed the Biden decision on plastic straws. We're getting our plastic straws back. Yes, USAID's coming back but so are plastic straws. So it's a tie.

All right, so according to Leslie Kimovitz, and remember the umbrella for this story and a lot of others is they might not be true. There are going to be a whole bunch of claims about USAID funding that if you looked into it, it might mean not exactly what the claim is but could be close. But the claim is that USAID in 2016 gave $310 million of taxpayer money to a Palestinian cement factory. Well now on the surface you'd say to yourself, well if you're going to have a modern country and you're going to develop, you're going to need some cement. So maybe we funded one of the main things they needed to rebuild, this good quality local cement. I wonder where the cement went. Well maybe some of it went for factories to build some factories, maybe some housing. But maybe it's how they built their Hamas tunnels.

So the real concern is that no matter what our intentions were, it may have been just siphoned off and taken to build, not siphoned off but they would have actually built the cement plant but the cement plant may have been allegedly some part of the tunnel building. $310 million. Do you think we got our money's worth there? I don't know. That one feels a little too on the nose, doesn't it? Remember I tell you the one way to spot fake news quickly is it's too perfect. What would be the most perfect story somebody could make up about USAID? The most perfect story would be it built the Hamas tunnels. Now it might have. I'm not saying it didn't happen. I'm saying oh boy is that one right on the nose. So if you have to bet on it, I don't know if it's a safe bet. It's a little too clean. So just beware that when you hear these stories that are a little too perfect, there may be a reason they're too perfect. But they also might be true. So it's hard to say.

Yesterday I posted on X that it seems to me that maybe we could close the entire budget gap, the deficit, the entire thing just by getting rid of fraud. And that's a big claim, right? Because we're talking about $2 trillion. So I honestly think that if we got rid of all fraud in all forms of the government from military to Medicare fraud to everything else, we might close the entire gap. And I thought, well you know it just is how it feels. It's not really, I haven't done the math. But Elon Musk saw that comment that I made and he modified it in the comments. He said that maybe getting rid of fraud would close one half to one third of the deficit. One half of the deficit is a trillion dollars. A trillion dollars per year, not a trillion dollars over many years, one year. Now that's the person who's looked into it the closest. He knows more than any of us now about what he's found and maybe even what he's likely to find. He thinks there'd be a trillion dollars of something that we might call waste or fraud. I think that's right. I think it's a trillion at least. You know I thought it was two but I'm going to go with his estimate because he's closer to it.

Here are some examples. Jesse Watters had a good rundown on some of the examples of things that USAID was doing. Now here's the problem and I'll get into this in more detail. The fake news, the corporate news is reporting that USAID is a charitable organization doing all kinds of good things all over the world. And that defunding it means that people will die by the millions. So people will die.

So when Jesse and other people give the list of the fake looking wastes of money, and I'm going to list them in a moment, you might say to yourself, oh if we get rid of the fake ones then all we'll have left is the real charity and maybe the real charity makes sense. Some people would say now the fake news is covering this like it's a charity being removed story. The real news, the MAGA Republican version of what's happening is that USAID has always been a fake organization that is designed to overthrow other countries and also control the United States. So those are completely different stories.

But here's what's interesting. The fake news is pretending like there's only one version of the narrative. They're not even telling you that the other narrative is wrong. They're just ignoring it. What's that tell you? If they told you that the narrative that it's a CIA front, if they told you that was not true and they said why and they showed their work, well then maybe you could compare their version with what other sources are saying and maybe make up your own mind. But they're acting like there's only one narrative. They're actually ignoring the main claim. And the main claim is the biggest scandal in American history. You know, maybe since I don't know, maybe since slavery. But it's the biggest story I've ever seen since I've been alive. Would you agree? I mean wars are big in their own way so you know you can't ignore wars. But in terms of a scandal this is the biggest one I've ever seen by a thousand. This is not even close to anything I've ever seen. This is enormous. That's one narrative. Why can they ignore what half of the country thinks is true and is digging into the details of it and completely coming up to speed? They're just ignoring it. Now that tells you that they're fake news. So if you're wondering are they fake news? Yes, turns out they are.

Here are some of the things Jesse Watters says they funded. $6 million for tourism in Egypt because Egypt certainly couldn't do any tourism without an extra $6 million. You know as Jesse points out they have pyramids. They have pyramids. You'd be lucky if you could stop people from going there. I mean you'd have to close the border to stop all the people who want to go in there to look at the pyramids. The one thing they don't need is some help with a tourist destination because again they've got pyramids. They have pyramids.

All right, $2 million to help the British Broadcasting Company value the diversity of Libyan society. I didn't make that up. We're paying the BBC, British entity, how to value the diversity of Libyan society. Now that can't be real. How is that real?

$1 million for a gay group in Armenia. What? $20 million for Iraqi Sesame Street. Okay. $2 million for trans surgeries in Guatemala. $235 million to the National Democratic Institute. Well that sounds fine, right? We like democracy and it sounds like that's what they're working on. It's right in the name. So $235 million. But a lot of that money went to executive compensation. So the real meaning of all this funding is everything about the government funding seems to be a way for Democrats to get a payday. And some anti-Trump Republicans, they all seem to have one foot in some form of either USAID or somebody that USAID funds or something.

Also an NGO. I saw an estimate from Alex Jones that there are 1.5 million NGOs but 1.1 million of them are left leaning. Is that possible? Somebody in the comments said 55,000 at the very least. There are thousands, thousands of these entities that get funded by our government, your taxpayers, your tax money. And it seems to be mostly for controlling America, controlling other countries, and for people to get paychecks so that they can get this easy funding from your money. Basically it's just a transfer of wealth to Democrats, the wealthy Democrats. It's not even the poor Democrats. That's what it looks like.

Well according to Grok, and I should warn you that all of the AIs are not up to date on this story. They're up to date on what people are saying but your AIs are going to tell you there's no evidence that the CIA has anything to do with USAID. That's what your AI will tell you. But Grok tells me that all the spending of USAID is transparent. It's transparent so everybody could have always seen it. And that the GAO, Government Accounting Office, can audit it. So don't worry about the spending being wrong because you can see it. It's transparent. You know the names of the places it's going to and you also know that there's an auditing function so it could get audited by the government to make sure they're not doing anything wrong. So you good with that?

I hope you're good with it because I'm starting an NGO. So the name of my NGO is going to be called America Doing Awesome Things for Gay Climate Scientists and Democracy. Now that sounds like a joke but it's not very far from the name of the other NGOs. So the first thing you do is put a name on your NGO and a primary purpose that looks like it's good and then you hide behind that goodness and do all your evil behind it. Because you can get your paycheck, you can do your influence peddling. But as long as people come after you. So if you come after me after I get funded from my America Doing Awesome Things for Gay Climate Scientists and Democracy, I'm going to say whoa, look who's coming after me. Apparently you don't like gay people. You're a bigot. And you're anti-science because why else would you be coming after me for trying to fund climate scientists? So you're anti-scientist. You're anti-gay. You're opposed to democracy. I mean all those things are right in the title of my NGO. So clearly I'm doing good work and you're some kind of a bigoted piece of crap science denier. Get out of here. Get out of here. And I'm going to tell all the other Democrats to stay away from you. God you're such a terrible person. You're awful. How could you even come after me when I'm so virtuous? Just look at the name of my NGO. It's right there in the name.

All right, so there's that.

Also according to the Washington Examiner, taxpayers also funded Chinese research. Representative Claudia Tenney, Republican, she's got a bill she's introduced to stop funding our adversaries. Now you would think that's something we weren't doing. Your common sense would say we're not funding any adversaries. What are you talking about? How could it possibly be true that we're funding adversaries? But between 2015 and 2021 the US provided $29 million directly to Chinese entities for research and development. I think that included Wuhan. These are real things I think. Now remember the umbrella caution. There are going to be claims that aren't true and I'm not sure I'll know which ones are not true. But the general thrust of it is still the same. Directionally these are largely fake things.

Now is it true that it also does good things such as helping countries battle AIDS? Yes, that's called a cover. The reason that they do good things is so you can't pull their funding. If they're doing good things, the government, let's say the foreign government that allows USAID funded things in, probably can't handle the problems themselves such as an AIDS epidemic or any other major problem that a smaller country can't handle. We come in and say we can handle that. And the government says well we can't do it ourselves and it is destroying our country so yeah come on in. And then you can't kill it because if you try to kill the funding you're going to say that you killed people with AIDS.

Elon Musk just posted "I love Donald Trump as much as a straight man can love another man." Oh God, he likes causing trouble.

All right, so let's see what else is. So CNN says the concern about these big government payouts to media organizations such as Politico are fake. So no, the media is telling you that if you think the media is taking money to change the reporting, that's fake, people. That's just fake. And the example they give is that Politico which has two I think two main businesses. One is Politico the publication but another one is a very expensive subscription thing that has extra data and things that are not in their public political thing. And the claim was that $8 million flowed into the pro part of the Politico, not the publication. And that it came from not just USAID but maybe a bunch of entities that are also NGOs and kind of operate the same.

So do you think that $8 million of subscriptions, do you think that was an appropriate expense for all kinds of different parts of the government? They all needed a subscription to this thing. Does that sound real to you? Now Politico is trying to make the distinction that buying a bunch of subscriptions to one part of their business has no influence on their coverage in the other part of the business. That's for the stupid people.

Let me tell you how you can bribe people. Oh how many lines of business do you have? Two? Well we'd like to influence one of those lines of business. Okay great, we'll give you millions of dollars if you'll do with that line of business what we want you to. Excellent, you got a deal. But can you do us a favor? Don't write the checks to something that looks like that line of business that you want us to influence. Instead could you write it to the other line of business so it looks like you're just buying a regular product like anybody would? So I'm not saying that's what happened. I'm just saying that's exactly what it looks like happened. There's no such thing as people are uninfluenced by money. Millions of dollars? Yeah, no influence at all. Millions of dollars. Nobody believes that.

And as I read, Ron Paul thinks that basically all of the media is influenced by government spending that's channeled through this and that so it gets there. Well maybe.

Brian Stelter called the claim that Politico is receiving government subsidies "quote rampant right-wing misinformation." Well technically he's correct. Here's what he didn't say but the parent company of Politico is making millions of dollars and it doesn't seem like that number could be supported by the fact that people like subscriptions to your pro service. That would be the better frame.

All right, if you're getting lost in all this stuff because the DOGE thing is getting complicated, I would recommend that you listen to the explainers. One difference from 2016 till now is that the right-leaning part of the world has developed these incredible explainers. People who simply know enough that they can tell you what's really happening that's different from what the news is telling you. So some of them of course Mike Benz is the tip of the spear on this particular topic. But I would listen to Mike Cernovich who digs into it deeper than most and explains it better. Glenn Greenwald, Bret Weinstein. And look at podcasts not the news. The podcasts are where you get closest to the truth in this case. And the good explainers are the ones that can help you. So the bad explainers aren't going to give you anything. You got to listen to the good explainers that I just listed.

So here's an example. Bret Weinstein on Joe Rogan. I'm going to read the whole thing. I just like the way he said it. He said quote "As I was watching the confirmation hearings my sense was that Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders were dinosaurs who do not understand that the Earth has just been hit from outer space and that they don't live in the world that they're used to. That their corruption was immediately apparent and they're not used to that. They're used to having a whole phony journalistic layer that covers for them and that layer is gone. And the American public is awake and they're angry and rightfully so." And now look at Bernie Sanders and you see the same guy going after Bobby Kennedy like dude I just went through COVID. I see Bernie Sanders and I see him reading from a script that is no longer relevant to the movie that we're watching.

That's a good description. Yes, if you look at the politicians that are prairie dogging, the ones who've decided that they're going to be really noisy about USAID being cut and about the DOGE, those are all the corrupt ones. By accident. This wasn't what anybody was trying to do but by accident by poking the right part of the government it revealed all of the turds. Everybody who is corrupt in my opinion, this is just an opinion, they're the ones that are the loudest. If you see Jamie Raskin and Schumer and Warren and Sanders and you know Adam Schiff, those are all the designated liars. They're the ones who specifically come out when they're selling. They don't bring them out when the truth can handle itself. If the problem is the truth then the news can handle it. The news will just say fact check, this is true. But when the news can't handle it because it's such a big lie that even the news can't go there, they bring out the same cast of characters. Yeah, and Letitia James is obviously part of the corruption. She's the lawfare queen. So that's the world we're living in.

So this is from Mike Cernovich who was on Jesse Kelly's show and he said that USAID funds diversity. The money hits a nonprofit so diversity. Everybody loves that right? So you fund the diversity so that you've got a cover. And then the money hits the nonprofit that's going to do something for diversity and some lib in DC pays herself or himself half a million dollars. Power couples are pulling in millions of dollars per year stealing from you. I believe that is a perfect explanation of some large part of what's happening. That Democrats have figured out wait a minute if 98% of the people in USAID are Democrats and I'm a Democrat and they've got all this money and they give it out to all kinds of sketchy people all the time for sketchy reasons, all I need is to say I'm going to do something that sounds important like fix diversity. Then what are they going to do? If you're USAID and somebody says I'm going to work on diversity, don't you say oh yeah good good let's do that.

So it basically turns out a lot of this is I think literally just a scam. It's hard to know because there might be some legitimate ones that got in the mix but it does look like mostly it's designed as a scam. At least that's the way it operates. It's a de facto criminal enterprise. De facto might not actually be illegal.

Marco Rubio now ahead of a State Department where USAID got rolled in. So after it got gutted what's left of it got rolled under the State Department. So Rubio is in charge of that and he's going to reduce the staff of USAID from about 10,000 to 294 which is probably about 200 people too many but you know I'll take what I can get.

So this is very Musk-like. It just feels like a lot of what he did with Twitter. You know your common sense which wouldn't work in this case told you okay Twitter might have 20% more people than they need. Nope they had 90% more people than they needed. Well probably maybe 80 or 75% and that was the right number because X has apparently turned cash positive. Can you believe that? I think that's true. I'll take a fact check on that but I saw this morning just in passing somebody said that X is now beyond break even, that they're cash positive. Is that still true? I hope so.

Anyway, so Mike Benz is now being attacked by the same media that may be benefiting from these corrupt payments from USAID and similar NGOs. So would you be surprised to know that the Washington Post not only went after that DOGE guy but he already did a hit piece on Mike Benz and he says that a whole bunch of the media has contacted him asking him to comment because they're also working on hit pieces apparently.

It took him a while. Were you all wondering why hasn't Mike Benz been taken out by the deep state yet? I hate to say it but I've been wondering that for a long time. And the only thing I could think of is that he had not penetrated the bubble yet. Meaning that as long as they had a good bubble so that nobody in their base ever heard any Mike Benz argument. And by the way I tested this with my smartest Democrat friend a while back. I said all right just do me a favor just listen to one person. Just listen to Mike Benz. Figure out what he's saying about things and then you'll finally maybe catch up to a big part of what the political right knows. And my friend looked at one of his videos, dismissed it as I don't know a troll or something and would never look at another one. So that's probably what happened with any other Democrat who tried looking at it. The Mike Benz view of reality is so disturbing that if you're not already leaning in that direction it'll just make your head explode and your brain won't be able to process how completely wrong your impression of the world you live in has been.

Here's the most provocative thing that Benz said just on a podcast I think yesterday. He said there's no such thing as domestic policy. Just listen to that. There's no such thing as domestic policy. Everything that you think is domestic policy is fake. Meaning that is designed to control other countries or to control our own country to keep a populist scent of office. Now when I heard that my first thought was well that's not true because you know what about our emphasis on the government has on DEI? You know before Trump. And now we know that DEI is what we introduced to a country we're trying to destabilize. Because if you can get them to really be mad about racial division which is what DEI gets you, you can weaponize them and put them on the streets and have them rebel against their government.

But what about climate change? I mean that's obviously domestic policy. We want to save our lives and make sure we're doing the right thing, right? Well except that one of the ways you destabilize another country is to inject climate change into that other country. Say it's the most important thing and if the leaders aren't working on it well they got to be replaced. And so it goes that everything you think was a domestic policy is really a way to make sure that populists like Trump don't get power because the populist will rip into all that stuff.

What about trans rights? Were you all confused about why trans rights suddenly became the only thing we were talking about for a long time? Like how is that even possible? Like even if you agree or disagree with any of the topics on the trans stuff, nobody thought it should have been the top national talking point. That can't be natural. Do you know what we do when we try to destabilize other countries? We fund pro-trans things in those countries because the trans people can get the LGBTQs on board and suddenly they all hate their leadership. Now doesn't this sound exactly like what's happening in this country? It does.

So let's talk more about that. So I spent some time this morning so that you didn't need to on Grok. So Grok is the AI I used and I said to myself I want to use the most unbiased one because I'm going to ask some questions that I know will be censored on the other ones. So this is what Grok said.

So the first thing I asked it was about this Smith-Mundt Act of 1948. I'll bet most of you have heard of that, right? It's something that Democrats have no idea about. So the Smith-Mundt Act allowed the CIA or whatever it was at the time to do propaganda broadcasts in other countries so we could literally try to brainwash other countries. But it was very carefully walled so they couldn't do that in America.

Now the conservative story or the MAGA story is that when Obama came in office he changed the part about being able to do it domestically. So the very purpose of it, and nobody argues that this is the purpose. So both sides would agree this is the purpose. The purpose of sending media to other countries is to control their minds. It's brainwashing. It's propaganda. And nobody argues that. So that part nobody argues because we're okay propagandizing other countries. You know they do it to us, we do it to them. But the MAGA people would say yes but that all stopped. That all stopped when Obama said you can also use that same material that was used to propagandize other countries. You can now use it internally.

So I asked Grok if that's true and he said no that's not true. Here's what Grok says. The only change that was made was that if you wanted to get some of that external propaganda for research, just for research, you could request it and it would not be denied you. That's what Grok says. Grok is I think the least censored AI. Grok says that nothing like that happened. There was no authorization for the CIA to brainwash Americans. That didn't happen. The only thing they did was this little technical change that allowed somebody to request something if they want to do some research. Do you believe that? I don't know. I'm going to say I don't know. I don't think that the Smith-Mundt Act is terribly important to what we're seeing today. In other words you could see everything we're seeing whether or not the Smith-Mundt Act did or did not do anything. So I think maybe it's just a distraction. Not an intentional distraction but rather a distraction to spend much time thinking about it. Because we could argue all day whether that act has any difference but we could also just look at the difference. We could just look at what people are doing and that's probably all you need.

So the CIA specifically would be not allowed to use that stuff. But what about an NGO? Do you think an NGO, a non-government organization that gets funded by the government, do you think it could look at some of the propaganda and then repurpose it for the United States? Because I don't think anything says that a non-CIA entity can't do it. Do you think the CIA could ask somebody else to do it for them? Do you think they could talk to the Washington Post? I'll just use them as an example. It's not an accusation, just an example. Could the CIA say hey you know I'm having lunch with a journalist and you know there's this interesting story happening over in Europe right now and might be some application in the United States. Maybe the US market would like this story too. And then it's not really the CIA that's using it to propagandize. They're just, it's just lunch. It's just a conversation. It's just lunch.

So if you have lunch with your favorite journalist and you happen to know about a story that's kind of big in another country, maybe they'd be interested in looking at that story and how it plays out in this country. So I think if we're looking at the technical language of the law and this Smith-Mundt Act and what it does do and what it doesn't do and how it was revised, probably we're just going down the rabbit hole for no reason. Because you don't even need to be in that hole. Everything that you care about, know about, everything that matters, it can all be deduced without any reference to the Smith-Mundt Act. Because the one thing we can all be sure of is that any entity in the United States could get around that without any effort. It basically has no teeth because there's nothing that would stop me from let's say looking at some media in another country and saying oh I think I'll say that on social media because that looked good to me. That's not illegal. I could do it. I'm just a citizen. I just saw some stuff and I thought it'd be a good story. So it couldn't possibly be true that Smith-Mundt either caused anything or prevented anything. It would be far more reasonable to say it doesn't do anything. It's like you can forget that whole story. You know from the MAGA perspective it kind of gave some meat to a belief but you don't need it. You got plenty.

All right, so that's the first thing I found.

Now also you might know that Operation Mockingbird was the CIA literally in the 50s and 60s. They had favored news entities and journalists that they influenced including the Washington Post and the New York Times. Well they were implicated. So Grok doesn't say they were guilty. Grok says they were implicated. All right, so and it remains to be seen according to Grok whether they were really guilty of that. But I think most of us believe that Operation Mockingbird was real. And so that means in my lifetime, in my lifetime in the 60s, the CIA was managing our news. And they don't have to manage every news entity because if you get the Washington Post and the New York Times everybody else just follows them. They're called the newsmakers. Meaning that until it's in one of those entities, at least in the 60s, it wasn't really news. So if a local newspaper had a big story nobody cared. Didn't go anywhere. It has to be in the New York Times or the Washington Post in those days. That was before you know internet.

So allegedly there was this Church Committee in the 70s that exposed this evil and then it was ended. Do you think it was ended because it became illegal? Let's go back to lunch shall we? Hey favorite journalist who works for the Washington Post, would you like to have lunch? I work for the CIA and I know lots of things that maybe off the record you'd like to know too. All right well it's just lunch so let's have lunch. All right here's a scoop. Let me tell you this scoop. And they give him a real scoop and the journalist says wow that was worth it. I'm glad I went to lunch with that guy. And then maybe later he needs some context on the story and he contacts that CIA guy and says hey you know I'm doing a story on this. Do you have any context? And CIA guy adds it, makes his story better. Journalist is now killing it. He's got two great stories thanks to the CIA contact. And then there's another lunch. The CIA contact says you know what, God this terrible Trump guy. Wow yeah I don't know what the world's going to do with this Trump Trump Trump guy trying to break all of our democracy and doing racist things. You know what's your newspaper doing about Trump? Well I don't know. I mean I haven't, I don't have any stories about that. You know you really should think about it because it really is the biggest story in my opinion. I mean I'm not telling you any CIA stuff and of course the CIA can't tell you to do it but wow it's the biggest story. How are you missing that? And the next thing you know the journalist does not believe that they have been influenced by the CIA. They just think they have a good idea for a story.

Now this is just an example of course but if you think that the law or any kind of law like the Church Committee or whatever they found and whatever law changed, if you think the law can prevent somebody from having lunch, what world do you live in? All they need is a conversation. You don't think that the CIA is trained in how to manipulate somebody into doing what they want? That's exactly what they're trained to do. Not just in America but to anybody. If you sit down with somebody who's trained to persuade you, you're going to leave that meeting a little bit persuaded. So you don't really need to do anything illegal. It's just lunch. Just lunch.

Okay that's bad.

All right, so I would ignore the fact that there were any legal changes about what the CIA can or cannot do. Sometimes it's the CIA, sometimes it's the State Department, sometimes it's the Pentagon. So when I say the CIA did this or that what I mean is any of those entities because they're sort of joined at the hip for a lot of stuff.

So let me tell you what the MAGA belief is and then we'll see how it connected to reality. So the MAGA belief is that the CIA developed a bunch of tools allegedly for influencing other countries but they ended up turning those tools on the populist movement of Trump. Because stopping populists in other countries was mainly what they did. And stopping a Trump populist movement was apparently some say allegedly what they did next.

Now we know that there was some effort to censor Americans by controlling foreign entities. So if a foreign fake fact checker kept saying that X or something was fake, well then the European countries could say well according to our fake fact checker that's paid by USAID just as an example, I don't know if they are, according to the fake fact checkers this one Elon Musk owned platform is just full of lies and Nazis so I guess we can just ban it which would put X out of business. So we do know that our own government intentionally, not by accident, got a whole bunch of fake entities in other countries that we funded to do things that we couldn't do legally in this country. So it might have been technically legal but certainly a violation of everything we care about constitutionally. So we know that's true.

So here are the things we know are true. The things we know are true are that our own government has done a bunch of color revolutions in other countries. Now if you don't know what a color revolution is it's because a lot of these coups that are usually instigated by America, they often have a color associated with them. Not always. Sometimes there'll be some other label. But let me just give you an example of some color revolutions.

Now let me tell you that the way they do the color revolution is they first do capacity building. This is also Mike Benz's narrative. The capacity building means we bribe or somehow get control of various things within the country we're targeting. So if we could bribe or control their media or any part of it that'd be a big part of it. If we can control union heads they could tell the unions what to do that'd be a big part of it. If we can control the universities so we're educating the young people to be against their own government and for us. And you would try to control minority groups because they're the ones most likely to say hey the government's not serving us we better overthrow it.

So if you saw USAID going into a country and even if they said oh we're going to help you with your terrible problems, it is verified that in a number of cases, some would say not 100%, Mike Benz might say 100%, but that the CIA rides on the charity to get into the country and then do its CIA thing. And that all of the charities are basically cover for that activity because we don't do anything for another country unless it has a domestic purpose. And the domestic purpose is controlling other countries. So that's the claim.

So this is the narrative on the right. So if somebody were running a color revolution in the United States we know what to look for and I'll tell you that in a minute. But here are some of the examples. In 2000 Serbia had a bulldozer revolution. So they didn't have a color yet. The colors came later. There was a rose revolution in Georgia 2003. There was an orange revolution in Ukraine in 2004. There was a tulip revolution in Kyrgyzstan 2005. Cedar revolution in Lebanon 2005. Jeans revolution Belarus 2006. Saffron revolution Myanmar 2007. Green movement Iran 2009. Velvet revolution Armenia 2018. Some say that Euromaidan which is also Ukraine that came later, the Arab Spring in Hong Kong protest and Belarus protest are sometimes also labeled as color revolutions. That's according to Grok.

So this comes from Grok. Now did you know how many there were? That's kind of a lot. And I think this is not a complete list. I think maybe it's just the bigger countries we're all we've all heard of.

So here are the things we know for sure. There have been decades in which the CIA controlled Americans by brainwashing us through the media. That's not questioned by anybody left right. We all agree on that. Some say has stopped happening but they are morons. They are morons. There's no way to stop that from happening domestically. There's no way. You know when I watch a movie like Top Gun it's all rah Americans are good at flying planes. I don't think that happens by itself. You know I think they maybe Tom Cruise makes amazing movies and he has the power to do any movie he wants and that was an obvious sequel but I know, do you think that's totally without any influence by our government? I don't know. I have no evidence that it is but it's exactly what they do so I don't know.

Well now let's go to 2016. Tie it all together. Trump wins unexpectedly. How did Trump win unexpectedly? Because the bad guys failed to believe it was true. There was such a thing as shy Trump supporters. That's right. The smartest people in our government, you know the spooks and the spies and the FBI and all the smart politicians, they all believed it wasn't real when people like me were saying you know what's coming, right? You know that you've made it impossible to say out loud who you support and you know it's so you can't even tell your spouse and you know it's so bad that if a pollster calls and you do support Trump you're not going to take the call. You know it's so bad you might be lying to your own spouse about who you support. Now that's what they missed. Now I didn't miss it. I was saying it almost every day. Almost every day I said you gotta watch out for shy Trump supporters. It's way bigger than you think. And there's a logical obvious reason for it because you've made it impossible to go public with your beliefs. And so sure enough Trump wins unexpectedly.

And then what do you think happened? So one of the tricks that the color revolutions use is to say that Russia or somebody else is behind who is in office now. So you can get a revolution going if you can say oh the current leader is a Russian puppet. See where this is going? What was the main attack on Trump? Literally that he was a Russian puppet. This is textbook. This is guaranteed every time. If America tries to overthrow a populist the first thing they say is that's not a populist that's a Russian puppet. And watch how hard they've pushed on the Russian puppet thing. And now as I was saying the prairie dogs, the people who have exposed themselves as being part of the corrupt machine, they were the ones pushing it. Hillary Clinton to this day is pushing the Russia puppet thing about Trump. It's not an accident. If all they wanted to do was say there's bad things about Trump you would just say a million different things. But the fact that they converged on a whole made up Russia puppet thing, that's textbook 100% indication that they turned their external tools internally. It's not proof but it would be the biggest coincidence in the world. Especially since it wasn't true. If it were true then you just say well it was just true but they made it up and we know that they made it up.

And then let's see what about the capacity building. If we were doing capacity building in other places we would fund things like universities. Huh look at our universities full of leftist anti-populist. Look at our media. Huh the media seems completely controlled just like we would do to another country if we wanted to take it over. How about racial groups? Oh Black Lives Matter. Well suddenly we can make a story out of this George Floyd thing that if it had been based on the facts would have been no story at all. But if you control the media you can turn the George Floyd story into a story about rampant racial problems in the country. That's exactly what we would do to another country. How about Antifa? And by the way BLM was funded by USAID. Did you know that? What about Antifa? Well I don't know where they came from but they disappeared as soon as Trump was out of office. And given that they're supposed to be anarchists they should be just as mad at Biden as they would have been at Trump. They're anarchists. Are you telling me the anarchists like Democrats? Oh that's Joe Biden yeah that's fine but you're an anarchist. Yeah yeah but only when Trump's in office, right? None of this ever made sense. It's obviously external.

What about the Charlottesville op? To me I think it's so obvious that the Charlottesville thing was a government op. It's exactly what you would do exactly what you do to overthrow another country. You would have some kind of event that showed the racial minorities that they better act because they're in trouble. You better act. You better get to the streets. You better vote. Well that looks suspiciously right on point, doesn't it?

Now what about district attorneys? Is there any history in which we tried to control the district attorneys in another country for the benefit of overthrowing the government? Have you heard of Joe Biden and his trip to Ukraine in which he said if you don't get rid of that prosecutor you can't have money from, was it from USAID? Somebody said it was but I don't know if that's true. So we watched the first thing Biden had to do is get rid of the prosecutor and get one in there that he liked. What did the Democrats and USAID and George Soros fund? They funded friendly DAs and attorney generals so that they can control prosecutions against who they wanted to prosecute. And then they engaged them and then they went after Trump. All the lawfare is the same thing we would do in another country to control their government. We would do the same thing. We would just find some fake reason that the DAs and the law has to go after them and they would be our people. The law would be basically bribed by us so that looks like exactly what's happening. Letitia James is still yelling she's going to be suing Trump and trying to put him in jail. She's still saying it.

The other thing you'd want to do is if you were taking over another country you'd want to weaponize their Department of Justice like I just said. But also if they had an FBI or something like that you'd want to control them too. These are all the things that happened to us.

Now is it a coincidence that the precise exact tools that are used in other countries and there's a long list of times we've used them and they're well established tools. Nobody's doubting that those are the tools. And also nobody would doubt what I just described. There was a Russia collusion hoax. There was our universities, media, Black Lives Matter, Antifa are clearly fake. I say the Charlottesville thing was fake because it never happened again. I mean that's your ultimate signal. If that had been real even after they all got in trouble there would have been some second wave, third wave even if it were smaller. But no it just disappeared. Okay it was never real. The racists were real but obviously was organized by some dark entity that was trying to mess with the United States.

So that's what we got going. And of course we know that in the United States DEI and climate change and trans rights became our big weapons to use against who? Oh it just turns out that all of those things can be used against the populist. Huh, coincidence right? That the things that you said to yourself why are these the top story they shouldn't be the top story even if you think they're important it's all fake.

So when Mike Benz says there's no such thing as domestic policy does that make sense now? Even getting rid of Trump is for the benefit of our international policy. And the things that they use to get rid of them that you think are domestic policy are only to get rid of them. Now there of course there are people who agree with all these policies but that's not why they're the big thing. The reason anything becomes a big thing is because somebody behind the curtain's pushing it. It doesn't become a big thing on its own.

All right, so did I already talk about Thomas Massie who says that USAID is gutted but I can't tell if I thought about talking about it or I did. So Thomas Massie was saying that the omnibus might just put USAID all back together. I think I told you that but yeah so that might happen. So we have a self-healing criminal system.

There's also something called DRL according to American Thinker. John Kski is writing about this. Here's what that is. Something that started under Carter. DRL and it's a has some human rights agenda and foreign policy and it's a practically independent element of American foreign policy. So the thinking is that that's just another one of these you know USAID things like USAID but different entity.

In other news Iran has unveiled its first drone carrier. So it's like an aircraft carrier except for drones only and it's already launched. So apparently Iran will now have the power to project drone swarms wherever they want. I'd like to make a prediction about the fate of their new craft. I'm going to give it 6 months before a catastrophic mechanical problem causes it to blow up in port. Just a guess. I think it might have a terrible mechanical problem that hey if they'd done a better job of building it it wouldn't have happened but sadly probably because they're bad at engineering they're going to make a carrier that just explodes on its own. Really? And we weren't even anywhere near it so don't look at us. It just exploded on its own. It's very bad. Very bad luck.

But Trump is calling for in terms of Iran he wants a verified nuclear peace agreement and he's sort of talking like a president in a good way. He said I would much prefer a verified nuclear peace agreement which will let Iran peacefully grow and prosper. I like how Trump always says don't you want to prosper? You know that's his go-to for every adversarial country. How about we just stop fighting each other and you just make a bunch of money? How about that? Because it's a pretty appealing concept to at least the public if not the leaders.

He said we don't want to be tough on Iran. We don't want to be tough on anybody. But they just can't have a nuclear bomb. Now I love the clarity of that. I love the clarity. You're not going to have a nuclear weapon. When Israel says it you know they mean it as well but you wonder if the United States might prevent them from doing what it might take to get rid of it you know such as bunker busting bombs on nuclear facilities in Iran. So you don't necessarily think that Israel would have the green light to do what needs to be done in Iran. But what if Trump says you do? When Trump says the one thing I'll guarantee is you're not going to get a nuclear weapon, what that tells me is what Trump always says which is everything's on the table. So if Israel, let's say that nothing good happens with Iran and there's no progress and there's no talks and there's not going to be, do you think that Trump is going to stop Israel from taking out their nuclear facilities? I don't. I think they have a green light but not yet. We're going to see if Iran will you know just want to join the peaceful world now that their proxies have been decimated. It's a whole different conversation. So it's the best time in the world to be negotiating with Iran. But I love the fact that we have the capability of bombing all of their nuclear facilities no matter how underground they are and that it's green light. So you can talk to us about stopping it yourself or we'll stop it. But the question of whether it will be stopped is asked and answered.

Yeah you don't see, this is important. If you act like it's a negotiation it will be one. So the mistake would be to say we need to have a negotiation about your nuclear program. Nope, fail. You failed before you started. As soon as you say it's a negotiation then they just drag it out and they fake it and nothing happens. If you say you're not going to have a nuclear weapon everybody knows what that means. It means that there's nothing we won't do to stop it. Meaning we would nuke you. I don't think that's going to happen but we'd nuke them before we'd let them have a nuclear weapon. There's no limit to what we'd be willing to do.

Now once you start your negotiations with all right this thing's not going to happen and now here's your decision. So he's again he's making them think past the sale. The sale is do you do nuclear or not. He's saying that's solved. Now that we've solved you're not going to have nuclear because we have the power. Notice how he does this. Trump always tells people that he has the power so you can stop thinking about it. I've decided.

Wow, what's this breaking news? Egypt says it will work with partners to reconstruct Gaza without Palestinians leaving the strip. That sounds like a non-starter but back to Trump. Look how good the technique is and you could take this with yourself and I've used this by the way. I've used this technique a number of times and when I do it always works. It works every time. You never let it be a discussion whether they can have the thing that you don't want them to have. The thing you only tell them how they can lose it all. Right we're not talking about whether you can have it. That's already settled. We're going to talk about how you don't have it. Do you not have it because you decided to play nice and then you make money we make money and everybody's happy? Or did you decide to do it by losing your control over your own country while we just decimate your nuclear program and good luck picking up the pieces.

So I don't think anybody's ever put it in those terms before where the question of whether you're going to have it is now taken off the table. That's asked and answered and settled. You are not going to have it because we do have the power. Trump has 100% of the ability to take it away from you. So he just said you don't have it. So now you only get to decide what path you take to not have it. With bombs or no bombs. That is good technique. You know sometimes the things that he says are so ordinary looking that you don't realize how deep the technique is. What he said I don't believe anybody said it quite the way he said it. But also this is important because he's Trump they think he would carry through with a threat. If Biden says, I'd love to see Biden's language. Maybe you can do a fact check on me. Find me some quotes from Biden and I'll bet you it says things like we're going to work really hard to make sure Iran doesn't have a nuclear weapon. Fail. Fail. Complete failure. We don't want Iran to have a nuclear weapon. Fail fail fail. You already killed yourself before you started. If you say you're not going to have a nuclear weapon now let's talk about how that happens. Whole different narrative. I mean completely different frame. And that's what Trump does better than anybody.

All right, according to Popular Science there's a company that's building underwater homes that you could live in for extended times. They're for research but maybe someday they'll be underwater homes.

All right, that's all I have. I ran way too long. I'm going to say hi to the Locals people privately. I hope you like this. It's really hard understanding all the various layers of things but I think we're getting closer. So Locals I'm coming at you privately. If you're on X or Rumble or YouTube thanks for joining. I'll be here tomorrow same time same place. Remember to sign up to subscribe to Dilbert Reborn.

well there you are checking in in the stock market here we're a little bit up not looking too bad looks like things are normalizing even Tesla is up a little bit today took quite a hit this week let's see the uh comments and then we start the show want to make sure I can see all your Genius comments all right I think we're in good shape now good morning everybody and welcome to the highlight of human civilization scull coffee with Scott Adams and wow do we have a lot to cover today but if you'd like to take this experience up to levels that nobody can even understand with their tiny shiny human brains all you need for that is a cover mugger a glass of tanker chal Ain a canteen jug a flask a vessel of any kind fill it with your favorite liquid I like the coffeee join me now for the unparallel pleasure the dopamine here of the day thing makes everything better it's called the simultaneous sip go uh it's the elixir of the Gods I wonder if there are any new stories about the benefits of drinking coffee checking notes yes there is according to get surri Ellen Jen writes that drinking one extra cup of sugar-free coffee a day is linked to weight loss uh I believe that I'm only a few cups away from disappearing totally if you get if you get uh if there's less of you the more you drink coffee I'm about ready to disappear so that's how I'm going to go just drink coffee until I don't exist if you're following the Dilbert kic that you can only watch if you're on the locals platform but there's a lot of political stuff on there if you don't want that that's not for you but if you just want to see the comic that has continued since my cancellation two years ago it's called dilbur reborn and you can get it on the xplatform just hit the subscription button and here's what you would be finding you would find that the new comic will tell you uh the problem with hiring the low bid Hitman yeah so dog B is in the role of a Hitman and you see what happens when you take the low bid for your Hitman doesn't go well but here's the more interesting thing I also publish that whatever comic ran exactly 10 years ago from whatever date today is so the comics that ran exactly 10 years ago are so on point for right now it's about humanoid robots being introduced into Dilbert's house and you know what goes wrong and oh my god did I call it 10 years ago you have to see it to see how On.

Point it is for today anyway so go take a look at that in other news yay well we'll get to the hard news in a minute I I like to ease you into it with some lesser hard news so apparently yay is making a buzz on social media I think he's got a new album out and he's apparently off his meds and I'm not going to tell you any of the things that he said in all caps shouting like crazy X but let me tell you um he looks like he's off his meds it it's uh it's just absolute mental illness there there's no other way to no other way to look at it he says he's off his meds by the way he thinks he was misdiagnosed as bipolar so now he thinks he's autistic he is not autistic I'm pretty sure that's not right but I don't know we'll see in other news is simulation alert simulation alert simulation alert everybody simulation alert here's how you know you live in a simulation the confirmation vote for the new budget Chief Democrats try to delay it they try to delay the vote for somebody named Russ vote that's right his name sounds like Rush the vote vote and they delayed the vote for Rush vote that's all that's the whole story simulation alert uh meanwhile there's a Michigan Democrat state legislator who decided to announce that she's going to sterilize herself actually already has to avoid giving birth in Donald Trump's America according to the Gateway pundit Colin linberger Lineberger Barger um so I would regard this as a combination of mental illness and probably something she wanted to do anyway that had nothing to do with anything she's 36 hasn't had a kid I guess you so I don't know how much sex she was having but uh she won't be having any extra Democrats in the most important story of the entire year uh one of the Doge team members used to go by the name a secret name online big balls and Big Balls said some pretty pretty inappropriate things yeah pretty inappropriate um and uh once that all came out um you would be surprised to hear there's somebody who was once working for usaid but now works for the Wall Street Journal uh outed that Doge person huh feels like everything's coming together and now we understand every time you hear that somebody like you know Liz Cheney came out of the you know was or AOC were birthed by the US Aid funding you have to say to yourself H is this really describing the entire structure we see that all the people that we know to be turds came from the same place that would be kind of of a big coincidence anyway um so the best part is that CNN uh did did a part in this in which Aaron Bernett and Cara swisser um were talking about it because uh you just can't have somebody working on your team named Big Balls who once said offensive things online under a suud name anyway what's the point of having a pseudonym if you can't if you can't be anonymous um but here's the best part I believe that the media thought that they would um hurt musk and his effort by making giving a lot of attention to big balls and I don't think they know much about Elon Musk because Big Balls is the funniest thing you could possibly do and the more you talk about it on CNN the happier I am I think you should do the the whole segment on Big Balls there should be more of a special i' like to see them delve deeper into it but here's the thing uh and I love the fact that they thought they were defeating the monster you know they would think that Elon Musk is the monster and so the way they thought they would defeat him is talking about Big Balls that's really feeding the monster I mean if you're really afraid of him don't feed him stories about Big Balls he's going to dining on that all day so to speak so there's one thing missing with this story and I think you can all tell what's missing you know what's missing right it doesn't have a clever name yet so we need to have some kind of a name to talk about this Scandal about the Big Balls uh I'm going to go first uh I'm going to call it a scrotum gate scrotum gate everybody in do you like that so whenever we talk about it it'll just be scrotum gate now uh Elon is running a poll on X to see if uh he should bring back the the equ quit by the way Big Balls quit once the news got out and I can understand that but uh Elon wants to bring him back now here's my take if somebody who is a teenager or 19 years old uh said something that we all agree is absolutely inappropriate but did it anonymously ly did it anonymously I don't have a problem with it because every 19-year-old boy is saying deeply inappropriate things all the time and if he was doing it anonymously he knew that it was not something that you could put in the public domain somebody else put it in the public domain so my problem is not with anything you said um because I just I just can't blame a 19-year-old for having inapo especially a man a 19-year-old male it's all we have is inappropriate thoughts do you understand what a 19-year-old male is that is a person who is non-stop inappropriate thoughts that's all we do at that age do we grow out of it sometimes sometimes not all the time anyway big balls might be back but we'll keep an eye on scrotum gate Fox News says that a big consulting firm PWC they going to have a big conference this summer uh trying to get uh high- performing college students an opportunity to work for their company oh that's good yeah big consulting company wants to make sure that the high performing students get to check out their job offerings oh wait is specifically excludes white and Asian applicants so it's a Dei policy or something like it so apparently not everybody got the memo that if you openly discriminate against white and Asian applicants it's not going to end well it might not go your way in the long run so maybe rethink breaking the law all right I got to look at this comment because it looks interesting uh Ron Paul says on X look behind the curtain has revealed a horrific truth nearly the entire mainstream media worldwide has been funded by the US government under the USA from the BBC to the New York Times and Politico at this point it might be easier to find out who USA does not funded well that does seem approximately true and I I saw a video online I couldn't tell if it's a new one or an old one I think it's an old one so you tell me it was Pam Bondi talking about how many times Bill Clinton had been on the Lolita Express with Jeffrey Epstein apparently he he'd uh he he hadn't been on the plane just a couple of times he'd been on there multiple times and traveled internationally with Epstein and uh that that plane had a bed in it that's all you need to know um and apparently they stayed friends for years whereas Trump you know removed him from his life fairly early on so is that a new clip a new one or an old one what's all the 27s um all right so that's out there so Trump has uh tried to fire the Federal Election Commission commissioner Ellen wi drob but she says it's illegal in the president campire we'll see but she was appointed by Bush and apparently the they can only be replaced if they resign or their term expires what let me read that again according to Legal experts an FEC commissioner can only be replaced if they resign or their term expires wait what who the has a job that they can't be fired from who the has a job that they can't be fired from unless you're elected and even if you're elected you can be fired you know it's got it's got to be an impeachment but there's a process are you telling me that there's somebody in our government who's in charge of the elections who can't be fired are you serious I hope I I hope I'm reading this wrong do I have this wrong the most important person the head of the spear for our entire democracy can't be fired oh my God you you think that the well of corruption and and Badness is deep I've never seen anything like that have you have you ever heard of somebody who can't be fired for any reason that can't be right there there must be everybody can be fired for call right but apparently not according to Legal experts wow the Daily Mail has a uh has a story that looks fake to me um they're saying that there's unconfirmed plans that Trump's trying to end the Ukraine war in 100 days and uh that he wants to get a ceasefire by April 20th and that the deal would freeze Russia's uh place they get to keep what they have Ukraine would not join NATO and uh and that would be the deal now I guess this comes from a sketchy source and then the daily mail picked it up so it's two sketchy sources uh the daily mail is not uh full propaganda but it's not right 100% of the time either you know like most things so I don't think this is anything but maybe a test balloon my best gu guess is that it's a way for the government to float an idea to see what people think of it so as an idea of floating test balloon is a good one but I don't think it's a real story feels like just testing out the water we'll see so uh Senator fedman uh has weighed in on the RFK Jr and Tulsi gabard um nominations and he will not vote for them so you will not vote for either gabri or Kennedy now we don't absolutely need his vote because Republicans can get it through if they're all together but I was uh I was amused by Nicole Shanahan's uh reply to the EXP poost about this uh I'll just paraphrase um she said it better but you know here's here's just my summary the Federman is a slob who wears gim clothes and doesn't go to the gym he's a slob who wears gym clothes all day and doesn't go to the gym in other words health is not high on his list all right so here's somebody who apparently doesn't have any appreciation for good human health or he would act like it he'd go to the gym he'd lose weight he need write he do he acts like he has no appreciation for the biggest issue in the whole country which which is our kids have chronic diseases and they'll have no good life that's a pretty big problem and he's against it separately fedman also said that he thought the Democrats don't have much chance of winning men back because he he said he's been warning about it and that the Democrats become sort of the uh party of whiny women and that not only were white males leaving the Democrat Party but black men Hispanic men and it's pretty Broad and obvious change but the interesting thing is he thinks they can't get it back meaning that Federman believes he is in the party that's anti-men that would be according to all the men who change sides because they want to be on the side that's not anti-men Dei is anti-men what do we got here um H okay so Ellen wob the head of the F that Trump is trying to get rid of um she once was in private practice at Perkins Koy so if you recommend if you understand Perkins koi that's like the the heart of the Democrat legal dirty tricks well I won't call them that I'll just say they're the the legal arm of the Democrats where much has been done the Republicans don't like so we can see why Trump's getting rid of her it makes sense but uh let me close on the Federman so fedman knows that he's on the anti-male team and he stays there now if he tried to become a republican I'm sorry you've that door is very closed right now you're not going to become a republican if you're turning down uh Kennedy you're dead I mean not physically dead you're done as a political entity that anybody on the Republican side's going to care about so you're you're a piece of from my perspective and you should expect that Scott pressler's coming for your job not to take the job but to make sure that there are more Republicans uh registered in Pennsylvania and he said so by the way I'm not speculating Scott presler Nicole Shanahan they're going to take him out and I I don't know if that means he'll be primaried but that's what Nicole Shanahan promised that she'd be primarying people who go the wrong direction on the Kennedy vote and Scott presler says it directly you know we're coming after you basically so fedman I think his political fortunes are now over cuz he just made an unrecoverable error um allegedly according to wired um Elon Musk doge is working on a on a chatbot so they're going to create a chatbot called GS allegedly and it would be part of you know maybe maybe some of it would be to analyze the complexities that doge is looking into but some of it would be maybe a replacement for some of the functions of the government you know if you had a really good AI it could do a lot of stuff now I'm a skeptic because my own experience with trying to create an AI agent even though it was last summer and a lot has changed I don't believe AI can do that I don't believe AI can create an agent that can do General stuff that a human could do I I don't think it's anywhere near it so the AI is super smart but when you try to get it to do of the job of a person it's uh you know it hallucinates and it's hard to know when it's going to do it they can't look up data reliably so the only way it would work is if it's sort of a interface layer but all of the real important work is just regular programming you know just it initiates something that looks into a database that's not AI so if it's the interface for things that are not AI it could be great so I don't want to Jud I obviously let me just say the obvious the people who are working on this know a lot more than I do about AI so if they think it can work you would be kind of dumb for me to bet against it but I don't it's not my understanding that it can work unless it's just an interface to regular programming we'll see someday it will work I don't think it's there yet all right you know we're going to talk about us Aid I got more to say about that but Thomas M uh says now if you're brand new I'll just give you the the quick update USA is a 50 billion dollar whatever funded entity within the government that um does things for the state department sometimes the CIA sometimes the Pentagon this is the Mike Ben's explanation of the world and uh it's been basically gutted by Doge for all the alleged waste and you know fraud um the waste would be funding things that are not good for anybody that would be the claim but Thomas Massie says I'm concerned that the House and Senate will fully fund us Aid in March just like we did in December although he voted against it he said the argument from Republican leadership will be that they need Democrat votes to pass the omnius to avoid a government shutdown oh my God I hate how right he is so Massie is pretty good at seeing around corners and telling you what's coming uh how do we beat that because the whole omnius thing is a it's essentially a criminal process it's a criminal process because it allows the people of congress to not do their job and get tons of money for things that will help them get reelected I don't know if it's illegal but certainly in intention and in you know in a de facto way it's just criminal the the let me say it again the Omnibus is when they put all the spending in one big thing and you could just say yes or no but they put all kinds of crap in there and then they say well if you say no to the crap you're the one who shut down the government and children will die which is an exaggeration so yeah we have a system that guarantees that usaid will be fully funded think about that we just nuked it and it the the corrupt government is so Advanced at this point it's evolved almost to its own creature the corruption is self-healing we have a selfhealing corruption designed machine if you take out the heart of the machine us Aid that might be the most important beating organ in the whole machine completely removed and in one month it could be reinstated because it's a self-healing corrupt system and they'll just use the Omnibus as the argument for why it must be refunded now if it's not done with the omnius and I don't know what would stop it uh they could do the same thing with onesies and twozies well but this one's important well you cut all the funding but but this one's important but this one's important and just try to wear down Marco Rubio and the state department which absorbed the usaid function so let me tell you if you if you think usaid is defeated not even close we're not even close to defeating it it it's sort of like the Terminator you know you okay good news we shot the Terminator uhoh he's reforming he's self-healing so it's coming for you did you know according to Leslie Kim movitz I don't know if this is uh I don't know if this is a good source or not but it's a good example of the kind of news I'm seeing on social media I'll give you the following warning there will be claims about USA funding that are not true Trump just reversed the Biden decision on plastic straws we're getting our plastic straws back yes USA's coming back but so are plastic straws so it's it's a tie all right so according to Leslie kajim and remember the the umbrella for this story and a lot of others is they might not be true there going to be a whole bunch of claims about us Aid funding that if you looked into it it might mean not exactly what the claim is but could be close but the claim is that usaid in 2016 gave $310 million of taxpayer money to a Palestinian cement factory well now on the surface you'd say to yourself well if you're going to you know have a modern country and you going to develop you're going to need some cement so maybe we funded the one of the main things they needed to to rebuild this good quality local cement I wonder where the cement went well maybe some of it went for factories to build some factories maybe some housing but maybe it's how they built their Hamas tunnels so the the real concern is is that no matter what our intentions were it may have been just you know siphoned off and taken to build not siphoned off but they would have they would have actually built the cement plant but the cement plant may have been allegedly some part of the tunnel building 310 million do you think we got our money's worth there um I don't know that one that one feels a little too on the nose doesn't it remember I tell you the one way to spot fake news quickly is it's too perfect what would be the most perfect story somebody could make up about us Aid the most perfect story would be it built the Hamas tunnels now it might have I'm not saying it didn't happen I'm saying oh boy is that one right on the nose so if you have to bet on it I don't know if it's a safe bet it's a little too clean so just be just beware that when you hear these stories that a little too perfect there may be a reason they're too perfect but they also might be true so it's hard to say um yesterday I posted an X that uh it seems to me that maybe we could close the entire budget Gap the deficit the entire thing just by getting rid of Fraud and that's a big claim right cuz we're talking about $2 trillion so I honestly think that if we got rid of all fraud in all forms of the government from military to Medicare fraud to everything else we might close the entire Gap and I thought well you know it just it's just how it feels it's not really haven't done the math but Elon Musk saw that comment that I made and he modified it in the comments he said uh that maybe get a fraud would close oneir to 1/ half of the deficit one half of the deficit is a trillion dollars a trillion dollars per year not a trillion dollars over many years one year now that's the person who's looked into it the closest he knows more than any of us now about what he's found and maybe even what he's likely to find he thinks there be a trillion dollars of something that we might call Waste or fraud I think that's right I think it's a trillion at least you know I thought it was two but I'm going to go with his estimate because he's closer to it um here are some examples Jesse Waters had a good rundown on some of the examples of things that us Aid was doing now here's the problem and I'll get get into this in more detail the the fake news the corporate news is reporting that the usaid is a charitable organization doing all kinds of good things all over the world and um and that defunding it means that people will die by the millions so people will die so when Jesse and other people give the list of the fake looking wastes of money and I'm I'm going to list them in moment you might say to yourself oh uh if we get rid of the fake ones then all we'll have left is the real charity and maybe the real charity makes sense some people would say now the fake news is covering this like it's a charity being removed story The Real News the magga Republican version of what's happening is that USA is always been a fake organization that is designed to overthrow other countries and and also control the United States so those are completely different stories but here's what's interesting the fake news is pretending like there's only one version of The Narrative they're not even telling you that the other narrative is wrong they're just ignoring it what's that tell you if they told you that the narrative that it's you know a c IIA front if they told you that was not true and they said why and they showed their work well then maybe you could compare their version with what other sources are saying and maybe make up your own mind but they're acting like there's only one narrative they're actually ignoring the main claim and the main claim is the biggest the biggest scandal in American history you know maybe since I don't know maybe since slavery but it's the biggest story I've ever seen since I've been alive would you agree I mean Wars are big in their own way so you know you can't ignore Wars but in terms of a scandal this is the biggest one I've ever seen by a thousand this is not even close to anything I've ever seen this is enormous that's one narrative why can they ignore what half of the country thinks is true and is digging into the details of it and completely coming up to speed they're just ignoring it now that tells you that they're fake news so if you're wondering are they fake news yes turns out they are um here are some the things Jesse Waters says they funded uh $6 million for tourism in Egypt because Egypt certainly couldn't do any tourism without an extra $6 million you know as Jesse points out they have pyramids they have pyramids you you'd be you'd be lucky if you could stop people from going there I mean you'd have to close the border to stop all the people who want to go in there to look at the pyramids the one thing they don't need is some help with a tourist destination because again they've got pyramids they have pyramids all right $2 million help the British Broadcasting Company value the diversity of Libyan Society I didn't make that up we're paying the BBC British entity um how to Value the diversity of Libyan Society now that can't be real how is Is that real uh $1 million for a gay group in Armenia what what 20 million for Iraqi Sesame Street okay 2 million for Trans surgeries in Guatemala um 235 million to the National Democratic Institute H well well that sounds sounds fine right we like democracy and sounds like that's what they're working on it's right in the name so 235 million uh but um a lot of that money went to executive compensation so the the real meaning of all this funding is everything about the government funding seems to be a way for Democrats to get a Payday and some anti-trump Republicans they all seem to have one foot in some form of either us Aid or somebody that usaid funds or something also an NGL uh I saw an estimate from Alex Jones that there are 1.5 million NOS but 1.1 million of them are left leaning is that possible somebody in the comments said 55,000 at the very least there are thousands thousands of these entities that get funded by our government your taxpayers your your tax money and it seems to be mostly for controlling America controlling other countries and for people to get paychecks so that they can get this easy funding from your money basically it's just a transfer of wealth to Democrats the wealthy Democrats is not even the poor Democrats that's what it looks like well according to grock and I should warn you that all of the AIS are not up to date on this story they're up to date on what people are saying but your AIS are going to tell you there's no evidence that the CIA has anything to do with the usaid that's what your AI will tell you um but uh grock tells me that all the spending of us Aid is transparent it's transparent so everybody could have always seen it and that the uh GAO uh government Accounting Office can audit it so they so don't worry about the spending being wrong because you can see it it's transparent you know the names of the places it's going to and you also know that there's an auditing function so it could get audited by the government to make sure they're not doing anything wrong so you good with that um I hope you're good with it because I'm starting an NGO so the name of my NGO um is going to be it's going to be called America doing awesome things for a gay climate scientists and democracy now that sounds like a joke but it's not very far from the name of the other NOS so the first thing you do is put a name on your NGO and a primary purpose that looks like it's good and then you hide behind that goodness and do all your evil behind it because you can get your paycheck you can do your your infl infuence pedling but as long as people come after you so if if you come after me after I get funded from my America doing awesome things for gay climate scientists and democracy I'm going to say whoa oh look who's coming after me uh apparently you don't like gay people you're a bigot uhhuh and you're anti-science because why else would you be coming after me for trying to fund climate scientists so you're anti- scientist you're anti-gay you're opposed to democracy I mean all those things are right in the title of my NGO so clearly I'm doing good work and you're some kind of a bigoted piece of crap science denier get out of here get out of here and I'm going to tell all the other Democrats to stay away from you God you're such a terrible person you're awful how could you even come after me when I'm so virtuous just look at the name of my NGO it's right there in the name all right so um so there's that also uh according to the Washington examiner um taxpayers also funded Chinese research representative uh Claudia Tenny Republican uh she's she's got a bill she's introduced into stop funding our adversaries now you would think that's something we weren't doing your common sense would say we're not funding any adversaries what are you talking about how could it possibly be true that we're funding adversaries what but between 2015 and 2021 the US provided $29 million directly to Chinese entities for research and development I think that included Wuhan these are real things I think now remember remember the umbrella caution there are going to be claims that aren't true and I'm not I'm not sure I'll know which ones are not true but the general thrust of it is still the same directionally these are largely fake things now is it true that it also does good things such as helping countries battle AIDS yes that's called a cover the reason that they do good things is so you can't pull their funding if they're doing good things the government uh let's say the foreign government that allows us Aid funded things in probably can't handle the problems themselves such as you know an AIDS epidemic or you know any other major problem that a smaller country can't handle we come in and say we can handle that and the government says well we can't do it ourselves and it is destroying our country so yeah come on in and then you can't kill it because if you try to kill the funding you're going to say that you killed people with AIDS Elon mus just posted I love Donald Trump as much as a straight man can love another man oh God he likes causing trouble all right so um let's see what else is uh so CNN says the uh concern about these big government payouts to uh to Media organizations such as Politico are fake so no the media is telling you that if you think the media is taking money to you know change the reporting that's fake people that's just fake and the example they give is that Politico which has two I think two main businesses one is Politico of the publication but another one is a Subs very expensive subscription uh thing that has extra data and things that are not in their public political thing and the claim was that $8 million flowed into the pro part of the Politico not the publication and that it came from not just USA but maybe a bunch of entities that are also Nos and kind of operate same so do you think that $8 million of subscriptions were do you think that was an appropriate expense for all kinds of different parts of the government they they all needed a subscription to this thing does that sound real to you now Politico is trying to make the distinction that funding not funding but let's say buying a bunch of subscriptions to one part of their business has no influence on their coverage in the other part of the business that's for the stupid people let let me tell you how you can bribe people oh how many lines of business do you have two Well we'd like to influence one of those lines of business okay great we'll give you millions of dollars if you'll do with that line of business what we want you to excellent you got a deal but can you do us a favor don't write the checks to something that looks like that line of business that you want us to influence instead could you write it to the other line of business so it looks like you're just buying a regular product like anybody would so I'm not saying that's what happened I'm just saying that's exactly what it looks like happened there's no such thing as people are uninfluenced by money millions of dollars yeah yeah no influence at all millions of dollars nobody believes that and as I read Ron Paul thinks that basically all of the media is influenced by government spending that's channeled through this and that so it gets there well maybe uh Brian stelter called the claim that Politico is receiving government sub subsidies quote rampant right-wing misinformation well technically he's correct here's what he didn't say but the parent company of Politico is making millions of dollars and it doesn't seem like that number could be supported by the fact that people like subscriptions to your pro service that would be the better frame all right if you're getting lost in all this stuff because the Doge thing is getting complicated I would recommend that you listen to the explainers uh one difference from 20 16 till now is that the right leaning part of the the world has developed these incredible explainers people who simply know enough that they can tell you what's really happening that's different from what the news is telling you so some of them of course Mike Benz is the uh tip of the spear on this particular topic but I would listen to Mike cernovich who can who digs into it deeper than most and explains it better uh Glenn Greenwald Brett Einstein um and look at podcasts not the news the podcasts are where you get closest to the truth in this case and the the good explainers are the ones that can help you so the bad explainers aren't going to give you anything you got to listen to the good explainers that I just explained so here's an example um Brett Weinstein on Joe Rogan I'm going to read the whole thing I just like the way he said it he said quote as a I was watching the confirmation hearings my sense was that Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders were dinosaurs who do not understand that the Earth has just been hit from outer space and that they don't live in the world that they're used to that their corruption was immediately apparent and they're not used to that they're used to having a whole phony journalistic layer that covers for them and that layer is gone and the American public is awake and they're angry and rightfully so and now it looks like and now look at Bernie Sanders and you see the same guy going after Bobby Kennedy like dude I just went through Co I see Bernie Sanders and I see him reading from a script that is no longer relevant to the movie that we're watching that's a good description that's a good description yes if you look at the the politicians that are prairie dogging the the ones whove decided that they're going to be really noisy about us Aid being cut and about the Doge those are all the corrupt ones by accident uh this wasn't what anybody was trying to do but by accident by poking the right part of the government it it revealed all of the turds everybody who is corrupt in my opinion this just an opinion they're the ones that are the loudest if you see Jamie Rasin and Schumer and Warren and uh Sanders and you know Adam Schiff those are all the designated Liars they're the ones who specifically come out when they're selling they don't bring them out when the truth can handle itself if if the problem is the truth then the news can handle it the news will just say y fact Jack this is true but when the news can't handle it because it's such a big lie that even the news can't go there they bring out the same cast the characters yeah and Leticia James is obviously part of the corruption she's the law fair Queen so that's the world we're living in um so this is from Mike cernovich who was on Jesse Kelly's show and he said that usaid funds diversity uh the money hits a nonprofit so diversity everybody loves that right so you fund the diversity so that you've got a cover and then the money hits the nonprofit that's going to do something for diversity and some lib in DC pays herself himself or herself half a million dollars power power couples are pulling pulling in millions of dollars per year stealing from you I believe that is a perfect explanation of some large part of what's Happening that Democrats have figured out wait a minute if 98% of the people in USA are Democrats and I'm a Democrat and they've got all this money and they give it out to all kinds of sketchy people all the time for sketchy reasons all I need is to say I'm going to do something that sounds important like fix diversity then what are they going to do if you're usaid and somebody says I'm going to work on diversity don't you say oh yeah good good let's do that so it basically turns out a lot of this is I think literally just scam it's hard to know because there might be some legitimate ones they got in the mix but it does look like mostly it's designed as a scam at least that's the way it operates it's a de facto criminal Enterprise de facto might not actually be illegal um Marco Rubio now ahead of a state department where usaid got rolled in so after it got gutted what's left of it got rolled under the state department so Rubio is in charge of that and he's going to reduce the staff of USA from about 10,000 to 294 which is probably about 200 people too many but you know I'll take what I can get uh so this is very musk likee it just feels like a lot lot of what he did with Twitter you know your common sense which wouldn't work in this case told you okay Twitter might have 20% more people than they need nope they had 90% more people than they needed well probably maybe 80 or 75% and that was the right number because uh X has apparently turned cash positive can you believe that I think that's true I'll take I'll take a fact check on that but I saw this morning just in passing somebody said that X is now Beyond break even that they're cash positive is that still true I hope so anyway um so Mike Ben is now being attacked by the same media that may be benefiting from these corrupt payments from us Aid and and similar NOS so would you be surprised to know that the Washington Post post uh not only went after that Doge guy but it's he already did a hit piece on Mike Ben and he says that a whole bunch of the media has contacted him asking him to comment because they're also working on H pieces apparently it took him a while wer were you all wondering why hasn't Mike Benz been taken out by the Deep state yet I hate to say it but I've been wondering that for a long time and the only thing I could think of is that he had not penetrated the bubble yet meaning that as long as they had a good bubble so that nobody in their base ever heard any Mike Ben's argument and by the way I tested this with my smartest Democrat friend uh while back I said all right just do me a favor just listen to one person just listen to Mike Ben figure out what he's saying about things and then you'll you'll finally maybe catch up to a big part of what the political right knows and uh my friend looked at one of his videos dismissed it as I don't know a troll or something and would never look at another one so that's probably what happened with any other Democrat who tried looking it the the Mike Ben's view of reality is so disturbing that if you're not already leaning in that direction it'll just make your head explode and your your brain won't be able to process C how completely wrong your impression of the world you live in has been here's the most uh provocative thing that Ben said just on a podcast I think yesterday he said there's no such thing as domestic policy just listen to that there's no such thing as domestic policy everything that you think is domestic policy is fake meaning that is designed to control other countries or to control our own country to keep a populist scent of office now when I heard that my first thought was well that's not true because you know what about our uh what about the emphasis on the government has on Dei you know before Trump and now we know that Dei is what we introduced to a country we're trying to destabilize because if you can get them to really be mad about racial division which is what Dei gets you you can weaponize them and put them on the streets and have them rebel against their government but what about climate change I mean that's obviously domestic policy we we want to save our lives and make sure we're doing the right thing right well except that one of the ways you destabilize another country is to inject climate change into that other country say it's the most important thing and if the leader aren't working on it well they got to be replaced and so it goes that everything you think was a domestic policy is really a way to make sure that uh populists like Trump don't get power because the populist will rip into all that stuff uh what about trans rights were you all confused about why trans rights suddenly became the only thing we were talking about for a long time like how is that even possible like even even if you agree or disagree with you know any of the topics onto the trans stuff nobody thought it was should have been the top National talking point that can't be natural do you know what uh we do when we try to destabilize other countries we fund protrans things in those countries because the trans people can get the lgbtqs on board and suddenly they all hate their their leadership now doesn't this sound exactly like what's happening in this country it does so let's talk more about that so I spent some time this morning so that you didn't need to uh on grock so grock is the AI I used and I said to myself I want to use the most unbiased one because I'm going to ask some questions that I know will be censored on the other ones so this is what grock said so the first thing I asked it was about this Smith mon Act of 1948 I'll bet most of you have heard of that right it's something that Democrats have no idea about so the Smith Mont act allowed uh or CIA or whatever it was at the time to do propaganda broadcasts in other countries so we could literally try to brainwash other countries but it was very carefully um you know walled so they couldn't do that in America now the the conser ative story or the Maga story is that when Obama came in office he he changed the part about uh being able to do it domestically so the very the purpose of it and nobody nobody argues that this is the purpose so both sides would agree this is the purpose the purpose of sending media to other countries is to control their minds it's brainwashing it's propaganda and nobody nobody argues that so that part nobody argues because we're okay propagandizing other countries you know they do it to us we do it to them but the magga people would say yes but that all stopped that all stopped when Obama said you can also use that same material that was used to propag propagandize other countries you can now use it internally so I asked grock if that's true and he said no that's not true here's what grock says the only change that was made was that if you wanted to get some of that external propaganda for research just for research you could request it and it would not be denied you that's what grock says grock is the most I think the most or the least censored AI GR says that's Gru says that nothing like that happened there was there was no authorization for the CIA to brainwash Americans that didn't happen the only thing they did was this little technical change that allowed somebody to request something if they want to do some research do you believe that I don't know I'm going to say I don't know I don't think that the Smith bunt Act is terribly important to what we're seeing today in other words you could see everything we're seeing whether or not the smithm ACT did or did not do anything so I think maybe it's just a distraction uh not an intentional distraction but rather a distraction to spend much time thinking about it because we could argue all day whether that act has any difference but we could also just look at the difference we could just look at what people doing and that's probably all you need so um the CIA specifically would be um not allowed to use that stuff but what about an NGO do you think an NGO a non-government organization that gets funded by the government do you think it could look at some of the propaganda and then repurpose it for the United States because I don't think anything says that a non CIA entity can't do it do you think the CIA could ask somebody else to do it for them do you think they could uh talk to the Washington Post I'll just use them as an example it's not an accusation just an example could the CIA say Hey you know I'm having lunch with a journalist and you know there's this interesting story happening over in uh Europe right now and uh might be some some application in the United States maybe the US market would like this story too and then it's not really the CIA that's using it to propagandize they're just lunch it's just a conversation it's just lunch so if you have lunch with your favorite journalist and you you happen to know about a story that's a you know kind of big in another country maybe they'd be interested in looking at that story and how it plays out in this country so I think if we're looking at the technical language of the law and this Smith Mont act and what it does do and what it doesn't do and how it was revised probably were just going down the rabbit hole for no reason because you don't even need to be in that hole everything that you care about know about everything that matters it can all be deduced without any reference to the Smith mon act because the one thing we can all be sure of is that any entity in the United States could get around that without any effort it basically has no teeth because there's nothing that would stop me from uh let's say looking at some media in another country and saying oh I think I'll say that on social media because that looked good to me that's not illegal I could do it I'm just a citizen I just saw some stuff and I thought it'd be a good story so it couldn't possibly be true that Smith M Mont either caused anything or prevented anything it would be far more reasonable to say it doesn't do anything it's like it's like you can forget that whole story you know from the magga perspective it it kind of gave some meat to a belief but you don't need it you got plenty all right so that's the first thing I found now also you might know that operation Mockingbird was the CIA literally in the 50s and 60s um they had favored uh news entities and journalists that they influenced including the Washington Post in the New York Times well well they were implicated so grock doesn't say they were guilty GL grock says they were implicated all right so and it it remains to be seen according to grock whether they were really guilty of that but I think most of us believe that uh the operation Mockingbird was real and so that means in my lifetime in my lifetime the' 60s the CIA was was managing our news and they don't have to manage every news entity because if you get the washingon post and the New York Times everybody else just follows them they're they're called the newsmakers meaning that until it's in one of those entities at least in the 60s it wasn't really news so if a local newspaper had a big story nobody cared didn't go anywhere it has to be in the New York Times or the New York or the Washington Post in those days that was before you know internet so allegedly there was this church Committee in the 70s that exposed this um this evil and then it was ended do you do you think it was ended because it became illegal let's go back to lunch shall we hey favorite journalist who works for the Washington Post would you like to have lunch uh I work for the CIA and I know lots of things that maybe off the Record you'd like to know too all right well it's just lunch so let's have lunch all right here's here's a scoop let me tell you this scoop and they give him a real scoop and the journalist says wow that was worth it I'm glad I went to lunch with that guy and then maybe later you know he needs some context on the story and he contacts that CIA guy and says hey you know I'm doing a story on this do you have any context and CIA guy adds it makes his story better journalist is now killing it he's got two great stories thanks to the CIA contact and then there's another lunch the CI cont CIA contact says you know what God this terrible Trump guy wow yeah I I don't know what the world's going to do with this Trump Trump trump guy trying to break all of our democracy and doing racist things you know what's your newspaper doing about Trump well I I don't know I mean I haven't I don't have any stories about that you know you really should think about it because it really is the biggest story in my opinion I mean I'm not telling you any CIA stuff and and of course the CIA can't tell you to do it but wow it's the biggest story uh how are you missing that and the next thing you know the journalist does not believe that they have been influenced by the CIA they just just think they have a good good idea for a story now this is just an example of course but if you think that the law or any kind of law like the uh Church committee or whatever they found and whatever whatever law changed if you think the law can prevent somebody from having lunch what world do you live in all they need is a conversation you don't think that the CIA is trained and how to manipulate some somebody into doing what they want that's exactly what they're trained to do not just in America but to anybody if you sit down with somebody who's trained to persuade you you're going to leave that meeting a little bit persuaded so you don't really need to do anything illegal it's just lunch just lunch what that uh okay that's bad all right so I would ignore the fact that there were any legal changes about what the CIA can or cannot do sometimes it's the CIA sometimes it's the state department sometimes it's the Pentagon so when I say the CIA did this or that what I mean is any of those entities because they're they're sort of joined at the hip for a lot of stuff um so let me tell you what the magga belief is and then we'll we see how it connected to reality is so the mega belief is that the CIA developed a bunch of tools allegedly for influencing other countries but they ended up turning those tools on uh the populist movement of trump because stopping populists in other countries was mainly what they did and stopping a uh Trump populist movement was apparently some say allegedly what they did next now we know that there was some effort to um censor Americans by controlling foreign entities so if a foreign fake fact Checker kept saying that X or something was fake well then the European countries could say well uh according to our fake fact Checker that's paid by usaid just as an example I don't know if they are um according to the fake fact Checkers this this one Elon Musk owned plow form is just full of lies and Nazis so I guess we can just ban it which would put X out of business so we're we do know that our own government intentionally not by accident got a whole bunch of fake entities in other countries that that we funded to do things that we couldn't do legally in this country so it might have been technically legal but certainly a violation of everything we care about constitutionally so we know that's true so here are the things we know are true um I'm not going to read that comment but it's very funny uh the things we know are true are that the our own government has done a bunch of color Revolutions in other countries now if you don't know what a color Revolution is it's because a lot of these coups that are usually instigated by America um they often have a color associated with them not always sometimes there'll be some other some other label but let me just give you an example of some some color revolutions now let I should tell you that the way they do the color Revolution is they first do capacity building this is also Mike Ben's narrative uh the capacity building means we we bribe or somehow get control of various things within the country we're targeting so if we could uh let's say briber control their Media or any part of it that'd be a big part of it if we can control Union heads they could tell the unions what to do that'd be a big part of it uh if we can control the universities so we're educating the young people to be against their own government and for us and you would try to control minority groups because they're the ones most likely to say hey the government's not serving us we better overthrow it so uh if you saw USA going into a country and even if they said oh we're going to help you with your terrible problems it it is it is verified that in a number of cases some would say not 100% Mike Ben might say 100% but that the CIA rides on the charity to get into the country and then do its CIA thing and that all of the Charities are basically cover for that activity because we don't do anything for another country unless it has a domestic purpose and the domestic purpose is controlling other countries so that's the that's the claim so this is the narrative on the right so if you if somebody were running a color revolution in the United States we know what to look for and I'll tell you that in a minute but here are some of the examples uh in 2000 Serbia had a bulldozzer revolution so they didn't have a color yet the colors came later there was a rose revolution in Georgia 2003 there was an orange revolution in Ukraine in 2004 there was a tulip revolution in kyrgistan 2005 Cedar revolution in Lebanon 2005 jees Revolution Belarus 2006 saffron Revolution Myanmar 2007 green movement Iran 2009 Velvet Revolution Armenia 2018 some say that eurom Maiden which is also Ukraine that came later the Arab Spring in Hong Kong protest and Belarus protest are sometimes also labeled as color revolutions that's according to grock so so this comes from grock now did you know how many there were that's kind of a lot and I think this is not a complete list I think maybe it's just you know the bigger countries we're all we've all heard of um so here are the things we know for sure there have been decades in which the CIA um controlled Americans by brainwashing us through the media that's not questioned by anybody left right we all agree on that some say has stopped happening but they are morons they are morons there's no way to stop that from happening domestically there's no way you know when I watch a movie like Top Gun it's all rah Americans are good at flying planes I don't think that happens by itself you know I think they maybe you know Tom Cruz makes amazing movies and he has the power to do any movie he wants and that and that was an obvious sequel but I know do you think that's totally without any influence by our government I don't know I have no evidence that it is but it's exactly what they do so I don't know well now let's go to 2016 tie it all together Trump wins unexpectedly how did Trump win unexpectedly because the bad guys failed to believe it was true there was such a thing as shy Trump supporters that's right the smartest people in our government you know the Spooks and the spies and the FBI and all the smart politicians they all believed it wasn't real when people like me were saying uh you know what's coming right you know that you've made it impossible to say out loud who you who you support and you know it's so you can't even tell your spouse and you know it's so bad that if a pollster calls and you do support Trump you're not going to take the call you know it's so bad you might be lying to your own spouse about who you support now that's what they missed now I didn't miss it I was saying it almost every day almost every day I said you gotta watch out shy Trump supporters it's way bigger than you think and there's a logical obvious reason for it because you've made it imp possible to go public with your beliefs and so sure enough Trump wins unexpectedly and then what do you think happened so one of the one of the tricks that the color revolutions use is to say that Russia or or somebody else is behind who is in office now so you can get a you can get a Revolution going if you can say oh the current leader is a Russian puppet see where this is going what was the main attack on Trump literally that he was a Russian puppet this is textbook this is guaranteed every time if you if the America tries to overthrow a populist the first thing they say is that's not a populist that's a Russian puppet and watch how hard they've pushed on the Russian puppet thing and now as I was saying the prairie dogs the people who have exposed themselves as you know being part of the corrupt machine they were the ones pushing it Hillary Clinton to this day is pushing the Russia the Russia puppet thing about Trump it's not an accident if if if all they wanted to do was say there's bad things about Trump you would just say a million different things but the fact that they converged on a whole madeup Russia puppet thing that's textbook 100% indication that they turned their external to TOS internally it's not proof but it would be the biggest coincidence in the world um especially since it wasn't true if it were true then you just say well it was just true but they made it up and we know that they made it up and then uh let's see what about the capacity building if we were doing capacity building in other places we would fund things like universities huh look at our univers full of leftist anti-populist uh look at our media huh the media seems completely controlled just like we would do to another country if we wanted to take it over how about uh racial groups oh black lives matter well suddenly we can make a story on of this George Floyd thing that if it had been based on the facts would have been no story at all but if you control the media you can turn the George Floyd story into a St about rampant uh racial problems in the country that's exactly what we would do to another country how about antifa and by the way BLM was funded by us Aid did you know that um what about antifa well I don't know where they came from but they disappeared as soon as Trump was out of office and given that they're supposed to be anarchists they should be just as mad as Biden at Biden as they would have been at Trump they're anarchists are you telling me the anarchists like Democrats oh that's Joe Biden yeah that's fine but you're an anarchist yeah yeah uh but only when Trump's in office right none of this ever made sense it's obviously external what about the charlotesville uh op to me I think it's so obvious that the Charlottesville thing was a government op it's exactly what you would do exactly what you do to overthrow another country you would have some kind of event that showed the the uh racial minorities that they better act because they're in trouble you better act you better get to the streets you better vote well that looks suspiciously right on point doesn't it now what about District Attorneys is there any history in which we tried to control the district attorneys in another country for the benefit of overthrowing the government have you heard of Joe Biden and his trip to Ukraine in which he said if you don't get rid of that um prosecutor you can't have money from was it from USA somebody said it was but I don't know if that's true so we watched the first thing Biden had to do is get rid of the prosecutor and get one in there that he liked what did the Democrats and usaid and George Soros fund they funded friendly Das and attorney generals so that they can control prosecutions against who they wanted to prosecute and then they engaged them and then they went after Trump all the law fair is the same thing we would do in another country to control their government we would the same thing we would just find some fake reason that the uh Das and the the law has to go after them and they would be our people the law would be basically bribed by us so that looks like exactly what's happening Leticia James is still yelling she's going to be suing Trump and trying to put him in jail she's still saying it um the other thing you'd want to do is if you're were taking over another country you'd want to you'd want to weaponize their Department of Justice like I just said but also if they had an FBI or something like that you'd want to control them too these are all the things that happened to us now is it a coincidence that the precise exact tools that are used in other countries and there's a long list of times we've used them and they're wellestablished tools nobody nobody's doubting that those are the tools and also nobody would doubt what I just described there was a Russia collusion hoax there was our University's media black lives matter antifa are clearly fake uh I say the charlottesv thing was fake because it never happened again I mean that's your that's your ultimate signal if that had been real even after they all got in trouble there would have been some second wave third wave even if it were smaller but no it just disappeared okay it was never real the racists were real but obviously was organized by some dark entity that was trying to mess with the United States um so that's what we got going and of course we know that in the United States uh EI and climate change and trans rights became our big uh weapons to use against who oh it just turns out that all of those things can be used against the populist huh coincidence right that the things that you said to yourself why are these the top story they shouldn't be the top story even if you think they're important it's all fake so when Mike Ben says there's no such thing as domestic policy does that make sense now even getting rid of trump is for the benefit of our International policy and the things that they use to get rid of them that you think are domestic policy are only to get rid of them now there of course there are people who agree with all these policies but that's not why they're the big thing the reason anything that become becomes a big thing is because somebody the curtains pushing it it doesn't become a big big thing on its own all right so um did I already talk about Thomas Massie who says that USA is gutted but I can't tell if I thought about talking about it or talking about so Thomas Massie was saying that the omnius might just put USA all back together I think I told you that but yeah so that might happen so we have a self-healing criminal system uh there's also something called DRL according to American Thinker John kski is writing about this um here's what that is something that uh started under Carter DRL and it's a has some human rights agenda and foreign policy and Central and practically independent element of American foreign Poli policy so the thinking is that that's just another one of these you know USA things like USA but different entity in other news Iran has unveiled its first drone carrier so it's like a um an aircraft carrier except for drones only and it's already launched so apparently Iran will now have the power to project drone swarms wherever they want uh I'd like to make a prediction about the fate of their new their new craft I'm going to give it uh 6 months before a catastrophic mechanical problem causes it to blow up and Port just a guess I think it might have a terrible terrible mechanical problem that hey if they if they' done a better job of building it it wouldn't have happened but sadly probably because they're bad engineering they're going to make a carrier that just explodes on its own really and we weren't even anywhere near it so don't look at us it just exploded on its own Israel I don't know what you're talking about no sometimes things just explode on their own it's very bad very bad luck uh but Trump is calling for in terms of Iran he wants a verified nuclear peace agreement and he's he's sort of talking like a president um in a good way he said uh I would much prefer a verified nuclear peace agreement which will let Iran peacefully grow and prosper I like how Trump always says don't you want to prosper you know that that's his go-to for every adversarial country how about we just stop fighting each other and you just make a bunch of money how about that because it's a pretty appealing concept to at least the public if not the leaders um he said uh we don't want to be tough on Iran we don't want to be tough on anybody uh but they just can't have a nuclear bomb now I love the clarity of that I love the clarity you're not going to have a nuclear weapon when when Israel says it you know they mean it as well but you wonder if the United States might prevent them to for doing what it might take to get rid of it you know such as you know bunker busting bombs on nuclear facilities in Iran so you don't necessarily think that Israel would have the the green light to do what needs to be done in Iran but what if Trump says you do when Trump says the one thing I'll guarantee is you're not going to get a nuclear weapon what that tells me is what Trump always says which is everything's on the table so if Israel come let's say that nothing good happens with Iran and there's no progress and there's no talks and there's not going to be do you think that Trump is going to stop Israel from taking out their nuclear facilities I don't I think they have a green light but not yet we're going to see if Iran will you know just want to join the the peaceful world um you know now that their proxy have been decimated it's a whole different conversation so it's the best time in the world to be negotiating with Iran but I love the fact that we have the capability of bombing to all of their nuclear facilities no matter how underground they are and that it's green light so you can talk to us about stopping it yourself or will'll stop it but the question of whether it will be stopped is asked and answered yeah you don't see see this is important if you act like it's a negotiation it will beat one so the mistake would be to say we need to have a negotiation about your n nuclear program nope fail you failed before you started as soon as you say it's a negotiation then they just drag it out and they fake it and nothing happens if you say you're not going to have a nuclear weapon everybody knows what that means it means that there's nothing we won't do to stop it meaning we would nuke you I don't think that's going to happen but we'd nuke them before we' let them have a nuclear weapon there's no limit to what we'd be willing to do now once you start your negotiations with all right this thing's not going to happen and now here's your decision so he's see again he's making him think P the sale the sale is do you do nuclear or not he's saying that's solved now that we've solved you're not going to have nuclear CU we have the power notice how he does this Trump always tells people that he has the power so you can stop thinking about it I've decided wow what's this breaking news Egypt says it will work with Partners to reconstruct Gaza without Palestinians leaving the strip that sounds like a non-starter but back to Trump look how good the technique is and you could take this with yourself and I've used this by the way I've used this technique a number of times and when I do it always works it works every time you never let it be a discussion whether they can have the thing that you don't want them to have the thing you only tell them how they can lose it all right we're not talking about whether you can have it that's already settled we're going to talk about how you don't have it do you not have it because you decided to play nice and then you make money we make money and everybody's happy or did you decide to do it by losing your control over your own country while we just decimate your nuclear program and good luck picking up the pieces so I don't think anybody's ever put it in those terms before where the question of whether you're going to have it is now taken off the table that's asked and answered and settled you are not going to have it because we do have the power Trump has 100% of the ability to take it away from so he just said you don't have it so now you only get to decide what path you take to not have it with bombs or no bombs that is good technique you know see sometimes the things that he says are so ordinary looking that you don't realize how deep the technique is what he said I don't believe anybody said it quite the way he said it but also this is important because he's Trump they think he would carry through with a threat if Biden says uh we I'd love to see Biden's language maybe you can do a fact check on me find me some quotes from Biden and I'll bet you it says things like uh we're going to work really hard to make sure Iran doesn't have a nuclear weapon fail fail complete failure uh we don't want Iran to have a nuclear weapon fail fail fail you you you already killed yourself before you started if you say you're not going to have a nuclear weapon now let's talk about how that happens whole different narrative I mean completely different frame and that's that's what Trump does better than anybody all right uh according to Popular Science there's a company that's building an underwater homes that you could live in for extended times they're for research but maybe someday they'll be underwater homes all right that's all I have I ran way too long I'm going to say hi to the locals people privately I hope you like this uh it's really hard understanding all the various layers of of things but I think we're getting closer so locals I'm coming at you privately if you're on xor rumble or You.

Tube thanks for joining I'll be here tomorrow same time same place remember to sign up to subscribe to Dilbert Reborn e e e e

well there you are checking in in the

stock market here we're a little bit up

not looking too bad looks like things

are normalizing even Tesla is up a

little bit today took quite a hit this

week let's see the uh comments and then

we start the

show want to make sure I can see all

your Genius

comments all

right I think we're in good shape

now good morning everybody and welcome

to the highlight of human civilization

scull coffee with Scott Adams and wow do

we have a lot to cover today but if

you'd like to take this experience up to

levels that nobody can even understand

with their tiny shiny human brains all

you need for that is a cover mugger a

glass of tanker chal Ain a canteen jug a

flask a vessel of any kind fill it with

your favorite liquid I like the coffeee

join me now for the unparallel pleasure

the dopamine here of the day thing makes

everything better it's called the

simultaneous sip

go uh it's the elixir of the Gods I

wonder if there are any new stories

about the benefits of drinking coffee

checking notes yes there is according to

get surri Ellen Jen writes that drinking

one extra cup of sugar-free coffee a day

is linked to weight

loss uh I believe that I'm only a few

cups away from disappearing totally if

you get if you get uh if there's less of

you the more you drink coffee I'm about

ready to disappear so that's how I'm

going to go just drink coffee until I

don't

exist if you're following the Dilbert

kic that you can only watch if you're on

the locals platform but there's a lot of

political stuff on there if you don't

want that that's not for you but if you

just want to see the comic that has

continued since my cancellation two

years ago it's called dilbur reborn and

you can get it on the xplatform just hit

the subscription button and here's what

you would be finding you would find that

the new comic will tell you uh the

problem with hiring the low bid

Hitman yeah so dog B is in the role of a

Hitman and you see what happens when you

take the low bid for your Hitman doesn't

go well but here's the more interesting

thing I also publish that whatever comic

ran exactly 10 years ago from whatever

date today is so the comics that ran

exactly 10 years ago are so on point for

right now it's about humanoid robots

being introduced into Dilbert's house

and you know what goes wrong and oh my

god did I call it 10 years ago you have

to see it to see how OnPoint it is for

today anyway so go take a look at that

in other news yay well we'll get to the

hard news in a minute I I like to ease

you into it with some lesser hard news

so apparently yay is making a buzz on

social media I think he's got a new

album out and he's apparently off his

meds and I'm not going to tell you any

of the things that he said in all caps

shouting like crazy X but let me tell

you um he looks like he's off his meds

it it's uh it's just absolute mental

illness there there's no other way to no

other way to look at it he says he's off

his meds by the way he thinks he was

misdiagnosed as

bipolar so now he thinks he's

autistic he is not

autistic I'm pretty sure that's not

right but I don't know we'll see

in other news is simulation alert

simulation alert simulation alert

everybody simulation

alert here's how you know you live in a

simulation the confirmation vote for the

new budget

Chief Democrats try to delay it they try

to delay the vote for somebody named

Russ

vote that's right his name sounds like

Rush the vote vote and they delayed the

vote for Rush

vote that's all that's the whole story

simulation

alert uh meanwhile there's a Michigan

Democrat state legislator who decided to

announce that she's going to sterilize

herself actually already has to avoid

giving birth in Donald Trump's

America according to the Gateway pundit

Colin linberger Lineberger

Barger

um so I would regard this as a

combination of mental

illness and probably something she

wanted to do anyway that had nothing to

do with anything she's 36 hasn't had a

kid I guess you so I don't know how much

sex she was having but uh she won't be

having any extra

Democrats in the most important story of

the entire year

uh one of the Doge team members used to

go by the name a secret name online big

balls and Big Balls said some

pretty pretty inappropriate

things yeah pretty inappropriate um and

uh once that all came out um you would

be surprised to hear there's somebody

who was once working for

usaid but now works for the Wall Street

Journal uh outed that Doge person huh

feels like everything's coming together

and now we understand every time you

hear that somebody like you know Liz

Cheney came out of the you know was or

AOC were birthed by the US Aid funding

you have to say to yourself

H is this really describing the entire

structure we see that all the people

that we know to be turds came from the

same place that would be kind of of a

big

coincidence anyway um so the best part

is that CNN uh did did a part in this in

which Aaron Bernett and Cara

swisser um were talking about it because

uh you just can't have somebody working

on your team named Big Balls who once

said offensive things online under a

suud name anyway what's the point of

having a pseudonym if you can't if you

can't be

anonymous um but here's the best

part I believe that the media thought

that they would um hurt musk and his

effort by making giving a lot of

attention to big

balls and I don't think they know much

about Elon Musk because Big Balls is the

funniest thing you could possibly do and

the more you talk about it on CNN the

happier I

am I think you should do the the whole

segment on Big Balls there should be

more of a special i' like to see them

delve deeper into it but here's the

thing uh and I love the fact that they

thought they were defeating the monster

you know they would think that Elon Musk

is the monster and so the way they

thought they would defeat him is talking

about Big

Balls that's really feeding the monster

I mean if you're really afraid of him

don't feed him stories about Big Balls

he's going to dining on that all day so

to speak so there's one thing missing

with this story and I think you can all

tell what's missing you know what's

missing right it doesn't have a clever

name yet so we need to have some kind of

a name to talk about this Scandal about

the Big

Balls uh I'm going to go first uh I'm

going to call it a scrotum gate scrotum

gate everybody in do you like that so

whenever we talk about it it'll just be

scrotum gate now uh Elon is running a

poll on X to see if uh he should bring

back the the equ quit by the way Big

Balls quit once the news got out and I

can understand that but

uh Elon wants to bring him back now

here's my take if somebody who is a

teenager or 19 years old uh said

something that we all agree is

absolutely inappropriate but did it

anonymously ly did it

anonymously I don't have a problem with

it because every 19-year-old boy is

saying deeply inappropriate things all

the time and if he was doing it

anonymously he knew that it was not

something that you could put in the

public domain somebody else put it in

the public

domain

so my problem is not with anything you

said um because I just I just can't

blame a 19-year-old for having inapo

especially a man a 19-year-old male it's

all we have is inappropriate thoughts do

you understand what a 19-year-old male

is that is a person who is non-stop

inappropriate thoughts that's all we do

at that age do we grow out of it

sometimes sometimes not all the

time anyway big balls might be back but

we'll keep an eye on scrotum gate Fox

News says that a big consulting firm PWC

they going to have a big conference this

summer uh trying to get uh high-

performing college students an

opportunity to work for their company oh

that's good yeah big consulting company

wants to make sure that the high

performing students get to check out

their job offerings oh wait is

specifically excludes white and Asian

applicants so it's a Dei policy or

something like it so apparently not

everybody got the

memo that if you openly discriminate

against white and Asian

applicants it's not going to end

well it might not go your way in the

long run so maybe rethink breaking the

law all right I got to look at this

comment because it looks

interesting uh Ron Paul says on X look

behind the curtain has revealed a

horrific truth nearly the entire

mainstream media worldwide has been

funded by the US government under the

USA from the BBC to the New York Times

and Politico at this point it might be

easier to find out who USA does not

funded well that does seem approximately

true and I I saw a video online I

couldn't tell if it's a new one or an

old one I think it's an old one so you

tell me it was Pam Bondi talking about

how many times Bill Clinton had been on

the Lolita Express with Jeffrey Epstein

apparently he he'd

uh he he hadn't been on the plane just a

couple of times he'd been on there

multiple times and traveled

internationally with

Epstein

and uh that that plane had a bed in it

that's all you need to

know um and apparently they stayed

friends for years whereas Trump you know

removed him from his life fairly early

on so is that a new

clip a new one or an old one what's all

the

[Music]

27s um all

right so that's out

there so Trump has uh tried to fire the

Federal Election Commission commissioner

Ellen wi drob but she says it's illegal

in the president campire we'll see but

she was appointed by Bush and apparently

the they can only be replaced if they

resign or their term

expires what let me read that

again according to Legal experts an FEC

commissioner can only be replaced if

they resign or their term

expires

wait what

who the has a job that they can't

be fired from who the has a job

that they can't be fired from unless

you're elected and even if you're

elected you can be fired you

know it's got it's got to be an

impeachment but there's a process are

you telling me that there's somebody in

our government who's in charge of the

elections who can't be fired are

you serious I hope I I hope I'm reading

this wrong do I have this wrong the most

important person the head of the spear

for our entire democracy can't be

fired oh my

God you you think that the well of

corruption and and Badness is

deep I've never seen anything like that

have you have you ever heard of somebody

who can't be fired for any

reason that can't be right there there

must be everybody can be fired for call

right but apparently not according to

Legal

experts

wow the Daily Mail has a uh has a story

that looks fake to me um they're saying

that there's unconfirmed

plans that Trump's trying to end the

Ukraine war in 100

days and uh that he wants to get a

ceasefire by April

20th and that the deal would freeze

Russia's uh place they get to keep what

they have Ukraine would not join

NATO and uh and that would be the deal

now I guess this comes from a sketchy

source and then the daily mail picked it

up so it's two sketchy

sources uh the daily mail is not uh full

propaganda but it's not right 100% of

the time either you know like most

things so I don't think this is anything

but maybe a test balloon my best gu

guess is that it's a way for the

government to float an idea to see what

people think of it so as an idea of

floating test balloon is a good one but

I don't think it's a real story feels

like just testing out the

water we'll

see so uh Senator fedman uh has weighed

in on the RFK Jr and Tulsi gabard um

nominations and he will not vote for

them so you will not vote for either

gabri or Kennedy now we don't absolutely

need his vote because Republicans can

get it through if they're all together

but I was uh I was amused by Nicole

Shanahan's uh reply to the EXP poost

about this uh I'll just paraphrase um

she said it better but you know here's

here's just my summary the Federman is a

slob who wears gim clothes and doesn't

go to the

gym he's a slob who wears gym clothes

all day and doesn't go to the gym in

other

words health is not high on his list all

right so here's somebody who apparently

doesn't have any appreciation for good

human health or he would act like it

he'd go to the gym he'd lose weight he

need write he do he acts like he has no

appreciation for the biggest issue in

the whole country which which is our

kids have chronic diseases and they'll

have no good life that's a pretty big

problem and he's against it separately

fedman also said that he thought the

Democrats don't have much chance of

winning men

back because he he said he's been

warning about it and that the Democrats

become sort of the uh party of whiny

women and that not only were white males

leaving the Democrat Party

but black men Hispanic men and it's

pretty Broad and obvious change but the

interesting thing is he thinks they

can't get it back meaning that Federman

believes he is in the party that's

anti-men that would be according to all

the men who change sides because they

want to be on the side that's not

anti-men Dei is anti-men

what do we got

here

um H okay so Ellen wob the head of the F

that Trump is trying to get rid of um

she once was in private practice at

Perkins

Koy so if you recommend if you

understand Perkins koi that's like the

the heart of the Democrat legal dirty

tricks well I won't call them that I'll

just say they're the the legal arm of

the Democrats where much has been

done the Republicans don't like so we

can see why Trump's getting rid of her

it makes sense but uh let me close on

the

Federman so fedman knows that he's on

the anti-male

team and he stays

there now if he tried to become a

republican I'm sorry you've that door is

very closed right now you're not going

to become a republican if you're turning

down uh Kennedy you're dead I mean not

physically dead you're done as a

political entity that anybody on the

Republican side's going to care about so

you're you're a piece of from my

perspective and you should expect that

Scott pressler's coming for your job not

to take the job but to make sure that

there are more Republicans uh registered

in Pennsylvania and he said so by the

way I'm not speculating Scott presler

Nicole Shanahan they're going to take

him

out and I I don't know if that means

he'll be primaried but that's what

Nicole Shanahan promised that she'd be

primarying people who go the wrong

direction on the Kennedy vote and Scott

presler says it directly you know we're

coming after you basically so fedman I

think his political fortunes are now

over cuz he just made an unrecoverable

error um allegedly according to

wired um Elon Musk doge is working on a

on a chatbot so they're going to create

a chatbot called GS allegedly and it

would be part of you know maybe maybe

some of it would be to

analyze the complexities that doge is

looking into but some of it would be

maybe a replacement for some of the

functions of the government you know if

you had a really good AI it could do a

lot of stuff now I'm a skeptic because

my own experience with trying to create

an AI agent even though it was last

summer and a lot has changed I don't

believe AI can do that I don't believe

AI can create an agent that can do

General stuff that a human could do I I

don't think it's anywhere near it so the

AI is super smart but when you try to

get it to do of the job of a

[Music]

person it's uh you know it hallucinates

and it's hard to know when it's going to

do it they can't look up data reliably

so the only way it would work is if it's

sort of a interface layer but all of the

real important work is just regular

programming you know just it initiates

something that looks into a database

that's not AI so if it's the interface

for things that are not AI it could be

great so I don't want to Jud I

obviously let me just say the obvious

the people who are working on this know

a lot more than I do about AI so if they

think it can work you would be kind of

dumb for me to bet against it but I

don't it's not my understanding that it

can work unless it's just an interface

to regular programming we'll see someday

it will work I don't think it's there

yet all right you know we're going to

talk about us Aid I got more to say

about that but Thomas M

uh says now if you're brand new I'll

just give you the the quick update USA

is a 50 billion dollar whatever funded

entity within the government that um

does things for the state department

sometimes the CIA sometimes the Pentagon

this is the Mike Ben's explanation of

the world and uh it's been basically

gutted by Doge for all the alleged waste

and you know fraud

um the waste would be funding things

that are not good for anybody that would

be the claim but Thomas Massie says I'm

concerned that the House and Senate will

fully fund us Aid in March just like we

did in December although he voted

against it he said the argument from

Republican leadership will be that they

need Democrat votes to pass the

omnius to avoid a government

shutdown oh my

God I hate how right he is so Massie is

pretty good at seeing around corners and

telling you what's

coming uh how do we beat

that because the whole omnius thing is a

it's essentially a criminal process it's

a criminal process because it allows the

people of congress to not do their job

and get tons of money for things that

will help them get

reelected I don't know if it's

illegal but certainly in

intention and in you know in a de facto

way it's just criminal the the let me

say it again the Omnibus is when they

put all the spending in one big thing

and you could just say yes or no but

they put all kinds of crap in there and

then they say well if you say no to the

crap you're the one who shut down the

government and children will die which

is an

exaggeration so yeah we have a system

that guarantees that usaid will be fully

funded think about

that we just nuked

it and it the the corrupt government is

so Advanced at this point it's evolved

almost to its own creature the

corruption is

self-healing we have a

selfhealing

corruption designed

machine if you take out the heart of the

machine us Aid that might be the most

important beating organ in the whole

machine completely

removed and in one month it could be

reinstated because it's a self-healing

corrupt system and they'll just use the

Omnibus as the argument for why it must

be refunded now if it's not done with

the omnius and I don't know what would

stop it uh they could do the same thing

with onesies and twozies well but this

one's important well you cut all the

funding but but this one's important but

this one's important and just try to

wear down Marco Rubio and the state

department which absorbed the usaid

function so let me tell you if you if

you think usaid is defeated not even

close we're not even close to defeating

it it it's sort of like the Terminator

you know you okay good news we shot the

Terminator uhoh he's reforming he's

self-healing so it's coming for

you did you know according to Leslie Kim

movitz I don't know if this is uh I

don't know if this is a good source or

not but it's a good example of the kind

of news I'm seeing on social media I'll

give you the following warning there

will be claims about USA funding that

are not

true Trump just reversed the Biden

decision on plastic

straws we're getting our plastic straws

back yes USA's coming back but so are

plastic straws so it's it's a tie all

right so according to Leslie kajim and

remember the the umbrella for this story

and a lot of others is they might not be

true there going to be a whole bunch of

claims about us Aid funding that if you

looked into it it might mean not exactly

what the claim is but could be close but

the claim is that usaid in 2016 gave

$310 million of taxpayer money to a

Palestinian cement

factory well now on the surface you'd

say to yourself well if you're going to

you know have a modern country and you

going to develop you're going to need

some cement so maybe we funded the one

of the main things they needed to to

rebuild this good quality local

cement I wonder where the cement went

well maybe some of it went for factories

to build some factories maybe some

housing but maybe it's how they built

their Hamas

tunnels so the the real concern is is

that no matter what our intentions were

it may have

been just you know siphoned off and

taken to build not siphoned off but they

would have they would have actually

built the cement plant but the cement

plant may have been allegedly some part

of the tunnel building 310 million do

you think we got our money's worth

there um I don't know that one that one

feels a little too on the nose doesn't

it

remember I tell you the one way to spot

fake news quickly is it's too perfect

what would be the most perfect story

somebody could make up about us Aid the

most perfect story would be it built the

Hamas

tunnels now it might

have I'm not saying it didn't happen I'm

saying oh boy is that one right on the

nose so if you have to bet on it

I don't know if it's a safe bet it's a

little too clean so just be just beware

that when you hear these stories that a

little too perfect there may be a reason

they're too perfect but they also might

be true so it's hard to say um yesterday

I posted an X that uh it seems to me

that maybe we could close the entire

budget Gap the deficit the entire thing

just by getting rid of

Fraud and that's a big claim right cuz

we're talking about $2

trillion so I honestly think that if we

got rid of all fraud in all forms of the

government from military to Medicare

fraud to everything else we might close

the entire

Gap and I thought well you know it just

it's just how it feels it's not really

haven't done the math but Elon Musk saw

that comment that I made and he modified

it in the comments he said uh that maybe

get a fraud would close oneir to 1/ half

of the

deficit one half of the deficit is a

trillion

dollars a trillion dollars per year not

a trillion dollars over many years one

year now that's the person who's looked

into it the closest he knows more than

any of us now about what he's found and

maybe even what he's likely to find he

thinks there be a trillion dollars of

something that we might call Waste or

fraud I think that's

right I think it's a

trillion at least you know I thought it

was

two but I'm going to go with his

estimate because he's closer to

it um here are some examples Jesse

Waters had a good rundown on some of the

examples of things that us Aid was doing

now here's the

problem and I'll get get into this in

more detail the the fake news the

corporate news is reporting that the

usaid is a charitable organization doing

all kinds of good things all over the

world and

um and that defunding it means that

people will die by the millions so

people will die so when Jesse and other

people give the list of the fake looking

wastes of money and I'm I'm going to

list them in moment you might say to

yourself

oh uh if we get rid of the fake ones

then all we'll have left is the real

charity and maybe the real charity makes

sense some people would say now the fake

news is covering this like it's a

charity being removed

story The Real News the magga Republican

version of what's happening is that USA

is always been a fake

organization that is designed to

overthrow other countries and and also

control the United

States so those are completely different

stories but here's what's

interesting the fake news is pretending

like there's only one version of The

Narrative they're not even telling you

that the other narrative is

wrong they're just ignoring

it what's that tell you if they told you

that the narrative that it's you know a

c IIA front if they told you that was

not true and they said why and they

showed their work well then maybe you

could compare their version with what

other sources are saying and maybe make

up your own mind but they're acting like

there's only one

narrative they're actually

ignoring the main claim and the main

claim is the

biggest the biggest scandal in American

history you know maybe since I don't

know maybe since slavery

but it's the biggest story I've ever

seen since I've been alive would you

agree I mean Wars are big in their own

way so you know you can't ignore Wars

but in terms of a scandal this is the

biggest one I've ever seen by a thousand

this is not even close to anything I've

ever seen this is enormous

that's one

narrative why can they ignore what half

of the country thinks is true and is

digging into the details of it and

completely coming up to

speed they're just ignoring it now that

tells you that they're fake news so if

you're wondering are they fake news yes

turns out they are um here are some the

things Jesse Waters says they funded uh

$6 million for tourism in Egypt

because Egypt certainly couldn't do any

tourism without an extra $6

million you know as Jesse points out

they have

pyramids they have pyramids you you'd be

you'd be lucky if you could stop people

from going there I mean you'd have to

close the border to stop all the people

who want to go in there to look at the

pyramids the one thing they don't

need is some help with a tourist

destination because again they've got

pyramids they have pyramids all

right $2 million help the British

Broadcasting Company value the diversity

of Libyan

Society I didn't make that up we're

paying the

BBC British

entity um how to Value the diversity of

Libyan Society now that can't be real

how is Is that real uh $1 million for a

gay group in

Armenia

what what 20 million for Iraqi Sesame

Street okay 2 million for Trans

surgeries in

Guatemala um 235 million to the National

Democratic Institute H well well that

sounds sounds fine right we like

democracy and sounds like that's what

they're working on it's right in the

name so 235 million uh but um a lot of

that money went to executive

compensation so the the real meaning of

all this funding is everything about the

government funding seems to be a way for

Democrats to get a Payday and some

anti-trump Republicans they all seem to

have one foot in some form of either us

Aid or somebody that usaid funds or

something also an

NGL uh I saw an estimate from Alex Jones

that there are 1.5 million

NOS but 1.1 million of them are left

leaning is that possible somebody in the

comments said

55,000 at the very least there are

thousands thousands of these entities

that get funded by our government your

taxpayers

your your tax money

and it seems to be

mostly for controlling America

controlling other countries and for

people to get

paychecks so that they can get this easy

funding from your money basically it's

just a transfer of wealth to

Democrats the wealthy Democrats is not

even the poor

Democrats that's what it looks like

well according to grock

and I should warn you that all of the

AIS are not up to date on this

story they're up to date on what people

are saying but your AIS are going to

tell you there's no evidence that the

CIA has anything to do with the

usaid that's what your AI will tell you

um but uh grock tells me that all the

spending of us Aid is

transparent it's transparent so

everybody could have always seen it and

that the uh

GAO uh government Accounting Office can

audit it so they so don't worry about

the spending being wrong because you can

see it it's transparent you know the

names of the places it's going to and

you also know that there's an auditing

function so it could get audited by the

government to make sure they're not

doing anything wrong so you good with

that um I hope you're good with it

because I'm starting an NGO so the name

of my NGO um is going to be it's going

to be called America doing awesome

things for a gay climate scientists and

democracy now that sounds like a joke

but it's not very far from the name of

the other NOS so the first thing you do

is put a name on your NGO and a primary

purpose that looks like it's good and

then you hide behind that goodness and

do all your evil behind it because you

can get your paycheck you can do your

your infl infuence pedling but as long

as people come after you so if if you

come after me after I get funded from my

America doing awesome things for gay

climate scientists and democracy I'm

going to say whoa oh look who's coming

after me uh apparently you don't like

gay people you're a bigot uhhuh and

you're anti-science because why else

would you be coming after me for trying

to fund climate scientists so you're

anti- scientist you're anti-gay you're

opposed to democracy I mean all those

things are right in the title of my NGO

so clearly I'm doing good work and

you're some kind of a bigoted piece of

crap science denier get out of here get

out of here and I'm going to tell all

the other Democrats to stay away from

you God you're such a terrible person

you're awful how could you even come

after me when I'm so virtuous just look

at the name of my NGO it's right there

in the

name all right

so

um so there's

that also uh according to the Washington

examiner um taxpayers also funded

Chinese

research representative uh Claudia Tenny

Republican uh she's she's got a bill

she's introduced into stop funding our

adversaries

now you would think that's something we

weren't

doing your common sense would say we're

not funding any adversaries what are you

talking about how could it possibly be

true that we're funding adversaries

what but between 2015 and 2021 the US

provided $29 million directly to Chinese

entities for research and

development I think that included Wuhan

these are real things I think now

remember remember the umbrella caution

there are going to be claims that aren't

true and I'm not I'm not sure I'll know

which ones are not true but the general

thrust of it is still the same

directionally these are

largely fake

things now is it true that it also does

good things such as helping countries

battle AIDS yes that's called a

cover the reason that they do good

things is so you can't pull their

funding if they're doing good things the

government uh let's say the foreign

government that allows us Aid funded

things in probably can't handle the

problems themselves such as you know an

AIDS epidemic or you know any other

major problem that a smaller country

can't handle we come in and say we can

handle that and the government says well

we can't do it ourselves and it is

destroying our country so yeah come on

in and then you can't kill it because if

you try to kill the

funding you're going to say that you

killed people with

AIDS Elon mus just posted I love Donald

Trump as much as a straight man can love

another

man oh God he likes causing

trouble all right so um

let's see what else is uh so CNN says

the uh concern about these big

government payouts to uh to Media

organizations such as Politico are fake

so no the media is telling you that if

you think the media is taking money to

you know change the reporting that's

fake people that's just fake and the

example they give is that Politico which

has two I think two main businesses one

is Politico of the publication but

another one is a Subs very expensive

subscription uh thing that has extra

data and things that are not in their

public political thing and the claim was

that $8 million flowed into the pro part

of the Politico not the publication and

that it came from not just USA but maybe

a bunch of entities that are also Nos

and kind of operate same so do you

think that $8 million of

subscriptions were do you think that was

an appropriate expense for all kinds of

different parts of the government they

they all needed a subscription to this

thing does that sound real to you now

Politico is trying to make the

distinction that funding not funding but

let's say buying a bunch of

subscriptions to one part of their

business has no influence on their

coverage in the other part of the

business that's for the stupid

people let let me tell you how you can

bribe people oh how many lines of

business do you have two Well we'd like

to influence one of those lines of

business okay great we'll give you

millions of dollars if you'll do with

that line of business what we want you

to excellent you got a deal

but can you do us a favor don't write

the checks to something that looks like

that line of business that you want us

to influence instead could you write it

to the other line of business so it

looks like you're just buying a regular

product like anybody

would so I'm not saying that's what

happened I'm just saying that's exactly

what it looks like happened there's no

such thing as people are uninfluenced by

money millions of dollars yeah yeah no

influence at all millions of dollars

nobody believes

that and as I read Ron Paul thinks that

basically all of the media is influenced

by government spending that's channeled

through this and that so it gets there

well maybe uh Brian stelter called the

claim that Politico is receiving

government sub subsidies quote rampant

right-wing

misinformation well technically he's

correct here's what he didn't say but

the parent company of Politico is making

millions of dollars and it doesn't seem

like that number could be supported by

the fact that people like subscriptions

to your pro

service that would be the better

frame all right if you're getting lost

in all this stuff because the Doge thing

is getting complicated I would recommend

that you listen to the

explainers uh one difference from 20 16

till now is that the right leaning part

of the the world has developed these

incredible

explainers people who simply know enough

that they can tell you what's really

happening that's different from what the

news is telling you so some of them of

course Mike Benz is the uh tip of the

spear on this particular topic but I

would listen to Mike cernovich who can

who digs into it deeper than most and

explains it better uh Glenn Greenwald

Brett

Einstein um and look at podcasts not the

news the podcasts are where you get

closest to the truth in this case and

the the good explainers are the ones

that can help you so the bad explainers

aren't going to give you anything you

got to listen to the good explainers

that I just explained so here's an

example um Brett Weinstein on Joe Rogan

I'm going to read the whole thing I just

like the way he said

it he said quote as a I was watching the

confirmation hearings my sense was that

Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders were

dinosaurs who do not understand that the

Earth has just been hit from outer space

and that they don't live in the world

that they're used to that their

corruption was immediately apparent and

they're not used to that they're used to

having a whole phony journalistic layer

that covers for them and that layer is

gone and the American public is awake

and they're angry and rightfully so and

now it looks like

and now look at Bernie Sanders and you

see the same guy going after Bobby

Kennedy like dude I just went through

Co I see Bernie Sanders and I see him

reading from a script that is no longer

relevant to the movie that we're

watching that's a good

description that's a good description

yes if you look at the the politicians

that are prairie dogging the the ones

whove decided that they're going to be

really noisy

about us Aid being cut and about the

Doge those are all the corrupt

ones by accident uh this wasn't what

anybody was trying to do but by accident

by poking the right part of the

government it it revealed all of the

turds everybody who is corrupt in my

opinion this just an opinion they're the

ones that are the loudest if you see

Jamie Rasin and Schumer and Warren and

uh Sanders and you know Adam

Schiff those are all the designated

Liars they're the ones who specifically

come out when they're selling

they don't bring them out when the truth

can handle

itself if if the problem is the truth

then the news can handle it the news

will just say y fact Jack this is true

but when the news can't handle it

because it's such a big lie that even

the news can't go there they bring out

the same cast the characters yeah and

Leticia James is obviously part of the

corruption she's the law fair

Queen so that's the world we're living

in

um so this is from Mike cernovich who

was on Jesse Kelly's show and he said

that usaid funds

diversity uh the money hits a nonprofit

so diversity everybody loves that right

so you fund the diversity so that you've

got a cover and then the money hits the

nonprofit that's going to do something

for diversity and some lib in DC

pays herself himself or herself half a

million dollars power power couples are

pulling pulling in millions of dollars

per year stealing from you I believe

that is a perfect explanation of some

large part of what's Happening that

Democrats have figured out wait a minute

if 98% of the people in USA are

Democrats and I'm a

Democrat and they've got all this money

and they give it out to all kinds of

sketchy people all the time for sketchy

reasons all I need is to say I'm going

to do something that sounds important

like fix diversity then what are they

going to do if you're usaid and somebody

says I'm going to work on diversity

don't you say oh yeah good good let's do

that so it basically turns out a lot of

this is I think literally just scam it's

hard to know because there might be some

legitimate ones they got in the mix but

it does look like mostly it's designed

as a scam at least that's the way it

operates it's a de facto criminal

Enterprise de facto might not actually

be

illegal um Marco Rubio now ahead of a

state department where usaid got rolled

in so after it got gutted what's left of

it got rolled under the state department

so Rubio is in charge of that and he's

going to reduce the staff of USA from

about

10,000 to

294 which is probably about 200 people

too many but you know I'll take what I

can

get uh so this is very musk likee it

just feels like a lot lot of what he did

with Twitter you know your common sense

which wouldn't work in this case told

you okay Twitter might have 20% more

people than they

need nope they had 90% more people than

they needed well probably maybe 80 or

75% and that was the right number

because uh X has apparently turned cash

positive can you believe that I think

that's true I'll take I'll take a fact

check on that but I saw this morning

just in passing

somebody said that X is now Beyond break

even that they're cash positive is that

still true I hope

so anyway

um so Mike Ben is now being attacked by

the same media that may be benefiting

from these corrupt payments from us Aid

and and similar

NOS so would you be surprised to know

that the Washington Post post uh not

only went after that Doge guy but it's

he already did a hit piece on Mike Ben

and he says that a whole bunch of the

media has contacted him asking him to

comment because they're also working on

H

pieces apparently it took him a while

wer were you all

wondering why hasn't Mike Benz been

taken out by the Deep state yet I hate

to say it but I've been wondering that

for a long time and the only thing I

could think of is that he had not

penetrated the bubble yet meaning that

as long as they had a good bubble so

that nobody in their base ever heard any

Mike Ben's argument and by the way I

tested this with my smartest Democrat

friend uh while back I said all right

just do me a favor just listen to one

person just listen to Mike Ben figure

out what he's saying about things and

then you'll you'll finally maybe catch

up to a big part of what the political

right knows

and uh my friend looked at one of his

videos dismissed it as I don't know a

troll or something and would never look

at another

one so that's probably what happened

with any other Democrat who tried

looking it the the Mike Ben's view of

reality is so

disturbing that if you're not already

leaning in that direction it'll just

make your head explode and your your

brain won't be able to process C how

completely wrong your impression of the

world you live in has been here's the

most uh provocative thing that Ben said

just on a podcast I think yesterday he

said there's no such thing as domestic

policy just listen to that there's no

such thing as domestic

policy everything that you think is

domestic policy is

fake meaning that is designed to control

other countries or to control our own

country to keep a populist scent of

office now when I heard that my first

thought was well that's not true because

you know what about our uh what about

the emphasis on the government has on

Dei you know before

Trump and now we know that Dei is what

we introduced to a country we're trying

to

destabilize because if you can get them

to really be mad about racial division

which is what Dei gets you you can

weaponize them and put them on the

streets and have them rebel against

their

government but what about climate change

I mean that's obviously domestic policy

we we want to save our lives and make

sure we're doing the right thing right

well except that one of the ways you

destabilize another country is to inject

climate change into that other country

say it's the most important thing and if

the leader aren't working on it well

they got to be

replaced and so it

goes that everything you think was a

domestic policy is really a way to make

sure that

uh populists like Trump don't get power

because the populist will rip into all

that stuff uh what about trans rights

were you all confused about why trans

rights suddenly became the only thing we

were talking about for a long time like

how is that even possible like even even

if you agree or disagree with you know

any of the topics onto the trans

stuff nobody thought it was should have

been the top National talking

point that can't be natural do you know

what uh we do when we try to destabilize

other

countries we fund protrans things in

those

countries because the trans people can

get the lgbtqs on board and suddenly

they all hate their their leadership now

doesn't this sound exactly like what's

happening in this

country it does so let's talk more about

that so I spent some time this morning

so that you didn't need to uh on grock

so grock is the AI I used and I said to

myself I want to use the most unbiased

one because I'm going to ask some

questions that I know will be censored

on the other

ones so this is what grock said so the

first thing I asked it was about this

Smith mon Act of

1948 I'll bet most of you have heard of

that right it's something that Democrats

have no idea about so the Smith Mont act

allowed uh or CIA or whatever it was at

the time to do propaganda broadcasts in

other countries so we could literally

try to brainwash other countries but it

was very carefully um you know walled so

they couldn't do that in

America now the the conser ative story

or the Maga story is that when Obama

came in office he he changed the part

about uh being able to do it

domestically so the very the purpose of

it and nobody nobody argues that this is

the purpose so both sides would agree

this is the purpose the purpose of

sending media to other countries is to

control their minds it's brainwashing

it's propaganda and nobody nobody argues

that so that part

nobody argues because we're okay

propagandizing other countries you know

they do it to us we do it to

them but the magga people would say yes

but that all stopped that all stopped

when Obama said you can also use that

same material that was used to propag

propagandize other countries you can now

use it internally so I asked grock if

that's true and he said no that's not

true

here's what grock says the only change

that was

made was that if you wanted to get some

of that external propaganda for

research just for research you could

request it and it would not be denied

you that's what grock says grock is the

most I think the most or the least

censored AI GR says that's

Gru says that nothing like that

happened there was there was no

authorization for the CIA to brainwash

Americans that didn't happen the only

thing they did was this little technical

change that allowed somebody to request

something if they want to do some

research do you believe

that I don't

know I'm going to say I don't know I

don't think that the Smith bunt Act is

terribly important to what we're seeing

today in other words you could see

everything we're seeing whether or not

the smithm ACT did or did not do

anything so I think maybe it's just a

distraction uh not an intentional

distraction but rather a distraction to

spend much time thinking about it

because we could argue all day whether

that act has any

difference but we could also just look

at the difference we could just look at

what people doing and that's probably

all you need so

um the CIA specifically would

be um not allowed to use that stuff but

what about an

NGO do you think an

NGO a non-government organization that

gets funded by the government do you

think it could look at some of the

propaganda and then repurpose it for the

United States because I don't think

anything says that a non CIA entity

can't do it do you think the CIA could

ask somebody else to do it for them do

you think they could uh talk to the

Washington Post I'll just use them as an

example it's not an accusation just an

example could the CIA say Hey you know

I'm having lunch with a journalist and

you know there's this interesting story

happening over in uh Europe right now

and uh might be some some application in

the United States maybe the US market

would like this story too and then it's

not really the CIA that's using it to

propagandize they're just lunch it's

just a conversation it's just lunch so

if you have lunch with your favorite

journalist and you you happen to know

about a story that's a you know kind of

big in another

country maybe they'd be interested in

looking at that story and how it plays

out in this

country

so I think if we're looking at the

technical language of the law and this

Smith Mont act and what it does do and

what it doesn't do and how it was

revised

probably were just going down the rabbit

hole for no reason because you don't

even need to be in that hole everything

that you care about know about

everything that matters it can all be

deduced without any reference to the

Smith mon act because the one thing we

can all be sure of is that any entity in

the United States could get around that

without any effort it basically has no

teeth because there's nothing that would

stop me from uh let's say looking at

some media in another country and saying

oh I think I'll say that on social media

because that looked good to me that's

not illegal I could do it I'm just a

citizen I just saw some stuff and I

thought it'd be a good story so it

couldn't possibly be true that Smith M

Mont either caused anything or prevented

anything it would be far more reasonable

to say it doesn't do anything it's like

it's like you can forget that whole

story you know from the magga

perspective it it kind of gave some meat

to a belief but you don't need it you

got plenty all right so that's the first

thing I found now also you might know

that operation

Mockingbird was the CIA literally in the

50s and 60s um they had favored uh news

entities and journalists that they

influenced including the Washington Post

in the New York Times well well they

were

implicated so grock doesn't say they

were guilty GL grock says they were

implicated all right so and it it

remains to be seen according to grock

whether they were really guilty of that

but I think most of us believe that uh

the operation Mockingbird was

real and so that means in my

lifetime in my

lifetime the'

60s the CIA was was managing our news

and they don't have to manage every news

entity because if you get the washingon

post and the New York Times everybody

else just follows them they're they're

called the newsmakers meaning that until

it's in one of those entities at least

in the 60s it wasn't really news so if a

local newspaper had a big story nobody

cared didn't go anywhere it has to be in

the New York Times or the New York or

the Washington Post in those days that

was before you know

internet so allegedly there was this

church Committee in the 70s that exposed

this um this evil and then it was

ended do you do you think it was ended

because it became

illegal let's go back to lunch shall we

hey favorite journalist who works for

the Washington Post would you like to

have lunch

uh I work for the CIA and I know lots of

things that maybe off the Record you'd

like to know too all right well it's

just

lunch so let's have lunch all right

here's here's a scoop let me tell you

this scoop and they give him a real

scoop and the journalist says wow that

was worth it I'm glad I went to lunch

with that

guy and then maybe later you know he

needs some context on the story and he

contacts that CIA guy and says hey you

know I'm doing a story on this do you

have any context and CIA guy adds it

makes his story better journalist is now

killing it he's got two great stories

thanks to the CIA

contact and then there's another lunch

the CI cont CIA contact says you know

what God this terrible Trump guy wow

yeah I I don't know what the world's

going to do with this Trump Trump trump

guy trying to break all of our democracy

and doing racist things you know what's

your newspaper doing about Trump well I

I don't know I mean I haven't I don't

have any stories about that you know you

really should think about it because it

really is the biggest story in my

opinion I mean I'm not telling you any

CIA stuff and and of course the CIA

can't tell you to do it but wow it's the

biggest story uh how are you missing

that and the next thing you know the

journalist does not believe that they

have been influenced by the CIA they

just just think they have a good good

idea for a

story now this is just an example of

course but if you think that the law or

any kind of law like the uh Church

committee or whatever they found and

whatever whatever law changed if you

think the law can prevent somebody from

having

lunch what world do you live

in all they need is a conversation you

don't think that the CIA is trained and

how to manipulate some somebody into

doing what they want that's exactly what

they're trained to do not just in

America but to anybody if you sit down

with somebody who's trained to persuade

you you're going to leave that meeting a

little bit persuaded so you don't really

need to do anything illegal it's just

lunch just

lunch what

that

[Music]

uh okay that's bad all right

so I would ignore the fact that there

were any legal changes about what the

CIA can or cannot do sometimes it's the

CIA sometimes it's the state department

sometimes it's the Pentagon so when I

say the CIA did this or that what I mean

is any of those entities because they're

they're sort of joined at the hip for a

lot of

stuff

um so let me tell you what the magga

belief is and then we'll we see how it

connected to reality is so the mega

belief is that the CIA developed a bunch

of tools allegedly for influencing other

countries but they ended up turning

those tools on uh the populist movement

of trump because stopping populists in

other countries was mainly what they did

and stopping a uh Trump populist

movement was apparently some say

allegedly what they did next now we know

that there was some effort to um censor

Americans by controlling foreign

entities so if a foreign fake fact

Checker kept saying that X or something

was fake well then the European

countries could say well uh according to

our fake fact Checker that's paid by

usaid just as an example I don't know if

they are um according to the fake fact

Checkers this this one Elon Musk owned

plow form is just full of lies and Nazis

so I guess we can just ban it which

would put X out of business so we're we

do know that our own

government intentionally not by accident

got a whole bunch of fake entities in

other countries that that we

funded to do things that we couldn't do

legally in this country so it might have

been technically legal but certainly a

violation of everything we care about

constitutionally

so we know that's true so here are the

things we know are

true

um I'm not going to read that comment

but it's very funny uh the things we

know are true are that the our own

government has done a bunch of color

Revolutions in other countries now if

you don't know what a color Revolution

is it's because a lot of these coups

that are usually instigated by America

um they often have a color associated

with them

not always sometimes there'll be some

other some other label but let me just

give you an example of some some color

revolutions now let I should tell you

that the way they do the color

Revolution is they first do capacity

building this is also Mike Ben's

narrative uh the capacity building means

we we bribe or somehow get control of

various things within the country we're

targeting so if we could uh

let's say briber control their Media or

any part of it that'd be a big part of

it if we can control Union heads they

could tell the unions what to do that'd

be a big part of it uh if we can control

the universities so we're educating the

young people to be against their own

government and for us and you would try

to control minority groups because

they're the ones most likely to say hey

the government's not serving us we

better overthrow it

so uh if you saw USA going into a

country and even if they said oh we're

going to help you with your terrible

problems it it is it is verified that in

a number of cases some would say not

100% Mike Ben might say 100% but that

the CIA rides on the charity to get into

the country and then do its CIA thing

and that all of the Charities are

basically cover for that activity

because we don't do anything for another

country unless it has a domestic purpose

and the domestic purpose is controlling

other

countries so that's the that's the claim

so this is the narrative on the right so

if you if somebody were running a color

revolution in the United States we know

what to look for and I'll tell you that

in a minute but here are some of the

examples uh in 2000 Serbia had a

bulldozzer revolution so they didn't

have a color yet the colors came later

there was a rose revolution in Georgia

2003 there was an orange revolution in

Ukraine in 2004 there was a tulip

revolution in kyrgistan 2005 Cedar

revolution in Lebanon 2005 jees

Revolution Belarus 2006 saffron

Revolution Myanmar 2007 green movement

Iran 2009 Velvet Revolution Armenia 2018

some say that eurom Maiden which is also

Ukraine that came later the Arab Spring

in Hong Kong protest and Belarus protest

are sometimes also labeled

as color revolutions that's according to

grock so so this comes from

grock now did you know how many there

were that's kind of a lot and I think

this is not a complete list I think

maybe it's just you know the bigger

countries we're all we've all heard of

um so here are the things we know for

sure there have been decades in which

the CIA um controlled Americans by

brainwashing us through the media that's

not questioned by anybody left right we

all agree on that some say has stopped

happening but they are morons they are

morons there's no way to stop that from

happening

domestically there's no

way you know when I watch a movie like

Top Gun it's all rah Americans are good

at flying planes I don't think that

happens by itself you know I think they

maybe you know Tom Cruz makes amazing

movies and he has the power to do any

movie he wants and that and that was an

obvious sequel but I know do you think

that's totally without any influence by

our

government I don't know I have no

evidence that it is but it's exactly

what they do so I don't

know well now let's go to 2016 tie it

all together Trump wins unexpectedly how

did Trump win

unexpectedly because the bad guys failed

to believe it was true there was such a

thing as shy Trump

supporters that's

right the smartest people in our

government you know the Spooks and the

spies and the FBI and all the smart

politicians they all believed it wasn't

real when people like me were saying uh

you know what's coming right you know

that you've made it impossible to say

out loud who you who you support and you

know it's so

you can't even tell your spouse and you

know it's so bad that if a pollster

calls and you do support Trump you're

not going to take the call you know it's

so bad you might be lying to your own

spouse about who you support now that's

what they missed now I didn't miss it I

was saying it almost every day almost

every day I said you gotta watch out shy

Trump supporters it's way bigger than

you think and there's a logical obvious

reason for it because you've made it imp

possible to go public with your

beliefs and so sure enough Trump wins

unexpectedly and then what do you think

happened so one of the one of the tricks

that the color revolutions use is to say

that

Russia or or somebody else is behind who

is in office

now so you can get a you can get a

Revolution going if you can say oh the

current leader is a Russian

puppet see where this is going

what was the main attack on

Trump literally that he was a Russian

puppet this is textbook this is

guaranteed every time if you if the

America tries to overthrow a populist

the first thing they say is that's not a

populist that's a Russian puppet and

watch how hard they've pushed on the

Russian puppet thing and now as I was

saying the prairie dogs the people who

have exposed themselves as you know

being part of the corrupt machine

they were the ones pushing it Hillary

Clinton to this day is pushing the

Russia the Russia puppet thing about

Trump it's not an accident if if if all

they wanted to do was say there's bad

things about Trump you would just say a

million different things but the fact

that they converged on a whole madeup

Russia puppet

thing that's

textbook 100% indication that they

turned their external to TOS

internally it's not proof but it would

be the biggest coincidence in

the

world um especially since it wasn't true

if it were true then you just say well

it was just true but they made it up and

we know that they made it

up and then uh let's see what about the

capacity building if we were doing

capacity building in other places we

would fund things like universities huh

look at our univers

full of leftist anti-populist uh look at

our media huh the media seems completely

controlled just like we would do to

another country if we wanted to take it

over how about uh racial groups oh black

lives matter well suddenly we can make a

story on of this George Floyd thing that

if it had been based on the facts would

have been no story at all but if you

control the media you can turn the

George Floyd story into a St about

rampant uh racial problems in the

country that's exactly what we would do

to another country how about antifa and

by the way BLM was funded by us Aid did

you know

that um what about antifa well I don't

know where they came from but they

disappeared as soon as Trump was out of

office and given that they're supposed

to be anarchists they should be just as

mad as Biden at Biden as they would have

been at Trump they're anarchists are you

telling me the anarchists like Democrats

oh that's Joe Biden yeah that's fine but

you're an

anarchist yeah yeah uh but only when

Trump's in office right none of this

ever made sense it's obviously external

what about the charlotesville uh op to

me I think it's so obvious that the

Charlottesville thing was a government

op it's

exactly what you would

do exactly what you do to overthrow

another country you would have some kind

of event that showed the the uh racial

minorities that they better act because

they're in trouble you better act you

better get to the streets you better

vote well that looks suspiciously right

on point doesn't it now what about

District

Attorneys is there any history in which

we tried to control the district

attorneys in another country for the

benefit of overthrowing the government

have you heard of Joe Biden and his trip

to Ukraine in which he said if you don't

get rid of that um prosecutor you can't

have money from was it from

USA somebody said it was but I don't

know if that's

true so we watched the first thing Biden

had to do is get rid of the prosecutor

and get one in there that he

liked what did the Democrats and usaid

and George Soros fund they funded

friendly Das

and attorney generals so that they can

control prosecutions against who they

wanted to prosecute and then they

engaged them and then they went after

Trump all the law fair is the same thing

we would do in another country to

control their government we would the

same thing we would just find some fake

reason that the uh Das and the the law

has to go after them and they would be

our people the law would be basically

bribed by us

so that looks like exactly what's

happening Leticia James is still yelling

she's going to be suing Trump and trying

to put him in jail she's still saying it

um the other thing you'd want to do is

if you're were taking over another

country you'd want to you'd want to

weaponize their Department of Justice

like I just said but also if they had an

FBI or something like that you'd want to

control them too these are all the

things that happened to

us now is it a coincidence that the

precise exact tools that are used in

other countries and there's a long list

of times we've used them and they're

wellestablished tools nobody nobody's

doubting that those are the tools and

also nobody would doubt what I just

described there was a Russia collusion

hoax there was our University's media

black lives matter antifa are clearly

fake uh I say the charlottesv thing was

fake because it never happened again I

mean that's your that's your ultimate

signal if that had been real even after

they all got in trouble there would have

been some second wave third wave even if

it were smaller but no it just

disappeared okay it was never real the

racists were real but obviously was

organized by some dark entity that was

trying to mess with the United

States

um

so that's what we got going and of

course we know that in the United States

uh EI and climate change and trans

rights became our big uh weapons to use

against

who oh it just turns out that all of

those things can be used against the

populist huh coincidence right that the

things that you said to yourself why are

these the top

story they shouldn't be the top story

even if you think they're

important it's all

fake so when Mike Ben says there's no

such thing as domestic policy does that

make sense

now even getting rid of

trump is for the benefit of our

International policy and the things that

they use to get rid of them that you

think are domestic

policy are only to get rid of

them now there of course there are

people who agree with all these policies

but that's not why they're the big thing

the reason anything that become becomes

a big thing is because somebody the

curtains pushing it it doesn't become a

big big thing on its

own all

right

so

um did I already talk about Thomas

Massie who says that USA is gutted but I

can't tell if I thought about talking

about it or talking about so Thomas

Massie was saying that the omnius might

just put USA all back together I think I

told you that but yeah so that might

happen so we have a self-healing

criminal

system uh there's also something called

DRL according to American Thinker John

kski is writing about this um here's

what that is something that uh started

under Carter DRL and it's a has some

human rights agenda and foreign

policy and Central and practically

independent element of American foreign

Poli

policy so the thinking is that that's

just another one of these you know

USA things like USA but

different

entity in other news Iran has unveiled

its first drone

carrier so it's like a um an aircraft

carrier except for drones

only and it's already

launched so apparently Iran will now

have the power to project drone swarms

wherever they

want uh I'd like to make a prediction

about the fate of their new their new

craft I'm going to give it uh 6

months before a catastrophic mechanical

problem causes it to blow up and Port

just a guess I think it might have a

terrible terrible mechanical problem

that hey if they if they' done a better

job of building it it wouldn't have

happened but sadly probably because

they're bad engineering they're going to

make a carrier that just explodes on its

own really and we weren't even anywhere

near it so don't look at us it just

exploded on its own Israel I don't know

what you're talking about no sometimes

things just explode on their own it's

very bad very bad

luck uh but Trump is calling for in

terms of Iran he wants a verified

nuclear peace agreement and he's he's

sort of talking like a president um in a

good way he said uh I would much prefer

a verified nuclear peace agreement which

will let Iran peacefully grow and

prosper I like how Trump always says

don't you want to

prosper you know that that's his go-to

for every adversarial country how about

we just stop fighting each other and you

just make a bunch of money how about

that because it's a pretty appealing

concept to at least the public if not

the

leaders um he said uh we don't want to

be tough on Iran we don't want to be

tough on anybody uh but they just can't

have a nuclear bomb

now I love the clarity of

that I love the clarity you're not going

to have a nuclear weapon when when

Israel says it you know they mean it as

well but you wonder if the United States

might prevent them to for doing what it

might take to get rid of it you know

such as you know bunker busting bombs on

nuclear facilities in Iran so you don't

necessarily think that Israel would have

the the green light to do what needs to

be done in

Iran but what if Trump says you

do when Trump

says the one thing I'll guarantee is

you're not going to get a nuclear

weapon what that tells me is what Trump

always says which is everything's on the

table so if Israel come let's say that

nothing good happens with Iran and

there's no progress and there's no talks

and there's not going to

be do you think that Trump is going to

stop Israel from taking out their

nuclear facilities I don't I think they

have a green light but not

yet we're going to see if Iran will you

know just want to join the the peaceful

world um you know now that their proxy

have been decimated it's a whole

different conversation so it's the best

time in the world to be negotiating with

Iran but I love the fact that we have

the capability of bombing to all of

their nuclear

facilities no matter how underground

they are and that it's green light so

you can talk to us about stopping it

yourself or will'll stop it but the

question of whether it will be stopped

is asked and answered yeah you don't see

see this is important if you act like

it's a negotiation it will beat one so

the mistake would be to say we need to

have a negotiation about your n nuclear

program nope fail you failed before you

started as soon as you say it's a

negotiation then they just drag it out

and they fake it and nothing happens if

you say you're not going to have a

nuclear weapon everybody knows what that

means it means that there's nothing we

won't do to stop it meaning we would

nuke you I don't think that's going to

happen but we'd nuke them before we' let

them have a nuclear weapon there's no

limit to what we'd be willing to do now

once you start your negotiations with

all right this thing's not going to

happen and now here's your decision so

he's see again he's making him think P

the sale the sale is do you do nuclear

or not he's saying that's solved now

that we've solved you're not going to

have nuclear CU we have the power notice

how he does this Trump always tells

people that he has the power so you can

stop thinking about it I've

decided wow what's this breaking news

Egypt says it will work with Partners to

reconstruct Gaza without Palestinians

leaving the

strip that sounds like a

non-starter but back to

Trump look how good the technique is and

you could take this with yourself and

I've used this by the way I've used this

technique a number of times and when I

do it always works it works every time

you never let it be a

discussion whether they can have the

thing that you don't want them to have

the thing you only tell them how they

can lose it all right we're not talking

about whether you can have it that's

already

settled we're going to talk about how

you don't have it do you not have it

because you decided to play nice and

then you make money we make money and

everybody's happy or did you decide to

do it by losing your control over your

own country while we just decimate your

nuclear program and good luck picking up

the

pieces so I don't think anybody's ever

put it in those terms before where the

question of whether you're going to have

it is now taken off the table that's

asked and answered and settled you are

not going to have it because we do have

the power Trump has 100% of the ability

to take it away from so he just said you

don't have it so now you only get to

decide what path you take to not have

it with bombs or no

bombs that is good technique you know

see sometimes the things that he says

are so ordinary looking that you don't

realize how deep the technique

is what he said I don't believe anybody

said it quite the way he said it but

also this is important because he's

Trump they think he would carry through

with a threat if Biden says uh we

I'd love to see Biden's language maybe

you can do a fact check on me find me

some quotes from Biden and I'll bet you

it says things like uh we're going to

work really hard to make sure Iran

doesn't have a nuclear weapon fail fail

complete failure uh we don't want Iran

to have a nuclear weapon fail fail fail

you you you already killed yourself

before you

started if you say

you're not going to have a nuclear

weapon now let's talk about how that

happens whole different narrative I mean

completely different frame and that's

that's what Trump does better than

anybody all

right uh according to Popular Science

there's a company that's building an

underwater

homes that you could live in for

extended times they're for research but

maybe someday they'll be underwater

homes all right that's all I have

I ran way too long I'm going to say hi

to the locals people privately I hope

you like this uh it's really hard

understanding all the various layers of

of things but I think we're getting

closer so locals I'm coming at you

privately if you're on xor rumble or

YouTube thanks for joining I'll be here

tomorrow same time same place remember

to sign up to subscribe to Dilbert

Reborn

e

e

e e