Episode 2768 CWSA 03/04/25
Tariffs and Russia and the EU and censorship and so much more ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ If you would like to enjoy this same content plus bonus content from Scott Adams, including micro-lessons on lots of useful topics to build your talent stack, please see scottadams.locals.com for full access to that secret treasure.
Good morning, everybody, and welcome to the highlight of human civilization. It's called Coffee with Scott Adams, and you've never had a better time.
View segment →But if you'd like to take it up to levels that nobody can even understand with their tiny, shiny human brains, all you need for that is a covered mug or a glass or a tankard or a chalice or a stein, a canteen, a jug or a flask, a vessel of any kind. Fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee.…
View segment →e simultaneous sip. And damn, it happens right now. Mmm, so good. Special thanks to Jack Babic for your kind words on X. I appreciate that. I'm glad you're glad you watch every day. How about the news, huh? There's a lot of news today. Let's see if we can pound through it. We'll get to the seriou…
View segment →Los Angeles, 30 officers at a Southern California juvenile detention facility have been charged for holding what they call gladiator fights with the minors. So it's not even an adult facility. It's a juvenile detention center. I'm not supposed to laugh at this. It's a juvenile detention center. But…
View segment →robably just was cost cutting. And then she said that Trump has disbanded key U.S. counterintelligence units, eliminated the FBI's foreign influence task force which investigated secret foreign lobbying by adversaries such as Russia. Okay, so it's something that affects all of our other adversaries…
View segment →'re not going to stop our defensive stuff so it's not like we're unprotected. Scott Jennings continues to entertain on the panel with Abby Phillip on CNN. And he said to his table mates, he goes, you mentioned the Europeans. It's interesting to me they spent more money on Russian oil and gas last y…
View segment →'re women. Yeah, you know, but we're not arguing the definition of words. We're just saying that biological men, they're stronger and so there's a risk and sort of an unfairness to the women. But they're women. They're women. It's a definition. By definition. Say it, say it, say it. They're women.…
View segment →is happened and then the magic would catch it every time it tried to happen again? No. The Russia collusion hoax was just a made-up whole thing. What about the fine people hoax which by the way, and was it NPR actually pushed the fine people hoax again I think yesterday? Now the media has never been…
View segment →is probably as important as the dollar amounts at least in the early stages because you need a lot more but you want everybody to think everybody's doing it. Like you need people to just think oh this is the thing now. This is what we do. And I think he's actually achieved that. Eric Daugherty on X…
View segment →and everything looks like racism because you could sort of rationalize it to make anything sound like one of those two things. So it would be just a gross attack on free speech. But it looks like X hired some lawyers and it looks like it's going to be blocked at the moment. The court struck down the…
View segment →this is war. You can try to censor us but we're not giving up the First Amendment. So you tell us how expensive you want to make this because there's nothing we're not going to do to make sure that we're not censored. You can censor yourself, put yourself out of business as a real country, but you'r…
View segment →hat meeting and it sounded like oh looks like there's a little bit of unity there. So the UK and France were talking about maybe putting boots on the ground. And I thought well it starts with two of the more important countries and then they'll slowly be collecting their allies and maybe they've got…
View segment →s nukes and those are not a deterrent to being invaded. Like what are they actually buying weapons to do? Are they buying weapons so that they don't have to use their nukes if Russia tries to roll over Europe and take over the UK? Has Russia ever shown, give me a history lesson, has Russia ever show…
View segment →can do it. So JD Vance was explaining how the mineral deal would have been better than a security guarantee. And he said the president knows that look if you want real security guarantees, if you want to actually ensure that Putin does not invade Ukraine again, the very best security guarantee is t…
View segment →eir own economic interest. If you said oh we're going to go protect this country on the other side of the world that doesn't have a direct impact on us even if we meant it it's not terribly persuasive. But if you say we're not going to give up a trillion dollars in mining operations which are critic…
View segment →perating independently to feel like you know one of them wasn't totally biased. Meanwhile Governor Newsom of California according to Joel Pollak and Breitbart is ordering state employees back to the office. So Newsom's plan to act more like a Republican seems to be right on point. So he's copying D…
View segment →nd them. So nobody is completely natural but Republicans talk and act and think like Republicans. But Democrats have this weird thing where the most prominent part of their party are just theater kids and they try to sell their ideas with their faces. Have you noticed that? If you listen to a Republ…
View segment →for the next year or two in the worst possible way but when we're done we're going to be on solid ground and prices will drift down and we need to do this is the only way to survive. You can't really sell that because all the public would hear is what about the price of my eggs? Okay I just said the…
View segment →Good morning, everybody, and welcome to the highlight of human civilization. It's called Coffee with Scott Adams, and you've never had a better time. But if you'd like to take it up to levels that nobody can even understand with their tiny, shiny human brains, all you need for that is a covered mug or a glass or a tankard or a chalice or a stein, a canteen, a jug or a flask, a vessel of any kind. Fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee. And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure, the dopamine of the day, the thing that makes everything better. It's called the simultaneous sip. And damn, it happens right now.
Mmm, so good.
Special thanks to Jack Babic for your kind words on X. I appreciate that. I'm glad you're glad you watch every day.
How about the news, huh? There's a lot of news today. Let's see if we can pound through it. We'll get to the serious stuff in a minute, but people are streaming in.
According to the AP, in Los Angeles, 30 officers at a Southern California juvenile detention facility have been charged for holding what they call gladiator fights with the minors. So it's not even an adult facility. It's a juvenile detention center. I'm not supposed to laugh at this. It's a juvenile detention center. But apparently the officers were organizing the gladiator fights where they would all meet in a certain place at a certain time and fight it out.
Now, I know somebody who has had a more interesting life than I have and claims that this is completely normal for adult detention facilities, that the guards do in fact organize fights among the inmates for the adults. I didn't know it was happening in juvenile facilities. That just makes it extra bad. But if you think this just happened in one place and there were 30 officers who were all in on it, I got to wake you up. This is closer to standard procedure. The guards, if they hate the inmates, any particular ones, they organize a fight and they just put the ones they hate in the fight and they just stand back and watch it. That's a real thing.
According to Attorney General Pam Bondi, there's an alleged truckload of Epstein files that were released by, guess what, the Southern District of New York. I guess that's where they were all being stored. And not unrelated, the head of that office, the Southern District of New York, was asked to resign, partly because he told people to dig in and that was taken as resisting the Trump administration. But also he wasn't really too keen on releasing all the Epstein files. So he's gone and the Epstein files are in a truck and Pam Bondi says that they're going to be delivered, or they've already been delivered, and now they have to go through them and then they'll figure out just what they can and cannot show.
Do you believe that? I don't believe any of it. Do you think that they fought so hard to not show it that they wouldn't also destroy the good stuff? The truckload doesn't mean there's any good stuff. So I'm going to guess that when they get in there they're going to say, huh, according to the evidence records and the document page numbers, it feels like all the good stuff has been removed. Or the FBI itself will, again, even if it's Kash Patel or somebody else, will just block out the things that we're not supposed to see. And maybe that's all the stuff that we really wanted to see. So I'm going to say just for fun I don't believe it's real. I do believe there's a truck. I do believe it's got a lot of Epstein files in it. I do not believe this means we're going to find out the good stuff. I think it's just going to be more repeats of things we've seen but with a lot more detail. So I don't trust this at all. But it does look like Pam Bondi is dead serious and it looks like Kash Patel is dead serious about trying. So I'm going to give them an A+ for trying, but I feel like the deep state may have already removed any possibility of finding the good stuff. We'll see. That's just speculation.
Rachel Maddow trying to sell the idea that Trump is working with Putin, a Russian puppet. You know, the usual thing. It wouldn't matter what Trump did. Trump woke up today. Oh, he woke up like a Russian puppet. Trump took a walk on the golf course. Oh, that's exactly what Putin would want him to do. So she writes up this super academic list of all the ways that Trump is already helping Putin. And it's such an academic and boring and complicated list. But you know, this could be connected in some way. This stretching the idea of the connection. Let me give you some examples.
So here's one of the ways that Trump is allegedly helping Putin. He weakened, this is from Rachel Maddow, he weakened the nuclear security by firing personnel. Okay, we're reducing personnel in basically everything that DOGE touches. So basically everything that DOGE touches ends up in people being fired. And every time, no matter what department it is, somebody says, but those are the best people. Those are the best. You got rid of all the best people. What are we going to do now? The nuclear security is probably exactly the same. So no, that's probably had nothing to do with Putin. Probably just was cost cutting.
And then she said that Trump has disbanded key U.S. counterintelligence units, eliminated the FBI's foreign influence task force which investigated secret foreign lobbying by adversaries such as Russia. Okay, so it's something that affects all of our other adversaries and also our allies because they always try to influence us too. So it was a general rule. But Rachel's like, that looks like that's for Putin. So almost anything that Trump does you can make an argument, but indirectly, indirectly that looks like that's for Putin. So it's the most boring and academic and ridiculous list, but it's good enough for her audience who are, as you know, all idiots.
Here's one we don't know why yet, but Pete Hegseth has ordered a pause in U.S. cyber offensive against Russia according to the BBC. So the U.S. just stopped doing offensive cyber attacks on Russia, to which I say, now that doesn't mean they stopped doing defensive stuff of course, but why would you stop offensive cyber attacks? Well, if I were getting ready to negotiate peace I would show them that we were capable of doing that. I wouldn't wait forever. You know, we're not going to wait forever for Russia to sign a deal. But one of the things that Trump is good at is bringing new variables into a negotiation. So suddenly cyber attacks are on the table.
And then separately there's a report that Russia has been asked to help communicate with Iran to work out a nuclear, some kind of a nonproliferation or something about their nuclear program. But the idea is that Russia would be a productive partner in negotiating with Iran because they have a better relationship. To which I say that doesn't sound crazy.
So we don't know enough about the pause in the U.S. cyber offensive, but if it's just a pause and we're just showing that we can do it and we're trying to bring Russia into a more productive conversation about different parts of the world and how can you help us and maybe we can work together and maybe we can make some money, I don't know. I think you have to look at the entire universe of things that are happening to figure out whether there's any room for a deal. If all you're looking at is ceasefire yes or no ceasefire, well you're not going to know anything. You have to look at all the moving parts and say to yourself, all right, is that enough moving parts where there's stuff we can give without costing anything and there's stuff they can give us without costing anything? And probably there's going to be a whole bunch of variables that allow us to do that. So yeah, the more variables that Trump puts into the deal, the more success it will be I think anyway. And we're not going to stop our defensive stuff so it's not like we're unprotected.
Scott Jennings continues to entertain on the panel with Abby Phillip on CNN. And he said to his table mates, he goes, you mentioned the Europeans. It's interesting to me they spent more money on Russian oil and gas last year than they sent to Ukraine collectively. And then Scott Jennings said that the proposed mineral deal that got turned down by Zelensky or never got signed, he says the mineral deal is effectively a security guarantee. And what did Abby Phillip say? I have to do the Democrat idiot face because it doesn't make sense. Oh that's not a security guarantee. That's not a security guarantee. You know, you have to do a stupid face. And then Scott Jennings would say, well actually it's the best kind because it puts our own interests tied to the welfare of the country. So it's actually a really good security thing. But it's not a security guarantee. It's not a security guarantee.
You know, my book *Loserthink*, there's a chapter in there which I talk about people who argue by definition. You can't win an argument with a definition. That's like not even playing. And Abby Phillip is one of the definition people. Oh but but that's not called a, that would not be called a security guarantee.
So let me ask you this. Remember when Kamala Harris and the U.S. and Europe, they were all promising Ukraine that NATO would be helping them and they were meaning that they would let Ukraine into NATO if certain conditions were met? And those were kind of like security guarantees, weren't they? And what did that cause to happen? Russia invaded the country.
So how about the time when Clinton promised, was it Clinton who promised Putin that we wouldn't be adding NATO countries on the border of Russia? And then we did. So how about those security guarantees? Now I would agree that if you're a NATO country you're safer than if you're not. But to imagine that we wouldn't sell out somebody for our own best interest, or anybody really, any country would. Countries only operate in their best interest.
So Scott Jennings is completely correct that having a big financial interest in the country probably keeps them a lot safer than if we didn't. But if the only thing we did is said, hey I promise you if they attack we'll be there tomorrow, can you trust that? Is that enough of a guarantee? What does it take to be a guarantee? It's not like there's some court that could make us do it. What if we say, well that's a special case, we can't get involved in that.
So I think the definition, this is also a very Democratic thing to do, to insist that there's only one definition of a thing and just act like it. We don't think that biological men should compete with women in sports. They're called women. The definition of them are called women. They're women. Yeah, you know, but we're not arguing the definition of words. We're just saying that biological men, they're stronger and so there's a risk and sort of an unfairness to the women. But they're women. They're women. It's a definition. By definition. Say it, say it, say it. They're women.
And then they do the same thing with January 6th. They start with, first let's agree that this is an insurrection. Well actually almost nobody who was there or maybe some tiny percent would have thought of it that way. Almost everybody who protested on January 6 thought that they might be stopping an insurrection. So really it would be closer to the opposite of an insurrection, a protest perhaps. Oh it's an insurrection. It's an insurrection. They're called women. They're called women. Security guarantees.
So once you see the pattern that Republicans argue about what works, you know, what are the motivations, what are the incentives, what does the system look like, that's how Republicans argue. And then the Democrats argue definitions, which is not even an argument. It's literally what a child would do. But but but you said you you said you take me to ice cream. I know but it's raining and the car is broken. But you said. You said. I know it's just I can't because the car is broken but we'll go tomorrow. But you said. You said. It's just a child argument over and over again.
Reddit co-founder Alexis Ohanian is joining a group trying to see if they can put together a purchase deal for TikTok. I don't know how many groups there are looking at it now but they're pretty serious people. So if the most serious people can't make a deal to buy TikTok, who can?
A post by John Stossel. And if you didn't know this, I knew this, but it kind of fits into the stories today. So this is an old, old story but he mentions, John Stossel does, that the New York Times covered up Stalin's famine when he was starving people. Stalin was, while millions starved. Now why did the New York Times cover up one of the crimes of the century, starving millions of people? Why would they cover that? Well it turns out that their star reporter Walter Duranty, but also his colleagues, they liked communism's utopian promises, this is John Stossel writing, and the status he got when his exclusive interviews, he could do exclusive interviews with Stalin. So literally the New York Times was ignoring the biggest story happening, the most horrible, incredibly bad thing, and it was because the reporter sort of thought maybe communism is a good deal and you know if you get past this maybe it'll all work out.
Now isn't it great that the media used to be completely fake and that's all fixed now? You know I always think that if you don't know anything about history everything looks different. If you knew that for sure, no doubt about it, that our major media platforms historically had all been fake, they were either controlled by the CIA or in this case probably wasn't the CIA but just somebody wanted to lie because it was good for him or it worked into his philosophy, can you even imagine what changed enough that this wouldn't still be the case? Was there magic? Was there some magic after this happened and then the magic would catch it every time it tried to happen again? No. The Russia collusion hoax was just a made-up whole thing. What about the fine people hoax which by the way, and was it NPR actually pushed the fine people hoax again I think yesterday? Now the media has never been real. And if you don't know that it's never been real historically it's really hard to understand that like it suddenly turned bad. But most people think well it was pretty good in the old days you know maybe it got a little worse but it's basically okay. No it has always been completely fake and there are reasons for it. There are structural reasons that guarantee it will be fake because people have interests and those interests have money and sometimes the writers, but nobody's really interested in the truth. They're interested in what works out for them.
Meanwhile TSMC, the big gigantic chip company that operates mostly in Taiwan, says they're going to put 100 billion dollars into the U.S. to build and support semiconductor manufacturing here. Now that sounds familiar right because we've had a few rounds of this company's going to do that, this company. So I saw Daniel Baldwin who works for OAN and he put together a list. So it's 100 billion from TSMC the chip company, Apple promised 500 billion for domestic manufacturing, something called Zepbound 27 billion, 100 billion from SoftBank, 20 billion from DAC I don't know what that is, 500 billion from Stargate, 600 billion from Saudi Arabia. Now those numbers start adding up don't they?
The other thing that's important that Trump understands better than anybody's ever understood it is that sometimes you have to BS a little bit about how things are going and then everybody's like, really? Everything's going in that direction? Everybody, there's a big list of people putting a lot of money in there. I better get on board. It's how I get attention. It's how I make the government like me. It's how I get the public to like me. Looks like it's a trend. So these type of deals are being really well promoted and the promotion is probably as important as the dollar amounts at least in the early stages because you need a lot more but you want everybody to think everybody's doing it. Like you need people to just think oh this is the thing now. This is what we do. And I think he's actually achieved that.
Eric Daugherty on X says that HP is looking to move a lot of their operations from China to the U.S. in response to Trump's tariffs. So there's another story. The tariffs are working at least in that limited sense.
And meanwhile Trump's telling farmers to get ready to produce more food to sell inside the U.S. because he's putting tariffs on external food coming in starting April 2nd. Now the tariffs for Canada and Mexico kicked in today, 25% on most things but energy is a little cheaper, 10%. And I think Canada's already matched it with 25%. I haven't heard from Mexico yet but one assumes it'll match it. So the trade war is on. But at the same time, we'll talk more about that.
OPEC announced that it's going to increase oil production according to The Hill. Now if you increase oil production that should drive the price of oil down because it increases supply. And I don't know if that's net good or bad for the United States because if prices are high then we drill a lot more in the United States because everything you do would make money. It's like whoa oil is so high. If it goes down then even some of the wells we already drilled, somebody's going to say oh this was a good idea before but now the price went down so they might just cap it. So it certainly should help with the price of your eggs and it certainly should help with inflation eventually and I don't think there's anything bigger. So OPEC producing more is just about the best thing that could ever happen for Trump. You know it's the one thing that everybody agrees lowers inflation or at least prices today. So that's good news.
Meanwhile X, the X platform, is doing more great work for free speech. So California introduced this censorship law for social media and the essence of it is they require, they want to require the social media platforms to have their own censorship standards but it's all kind of squishy stuff like do you have a definition of hate speech, what is your definition of racism, and all these things have that uh-oh thing to them. It's like okay we don't want hate speech, we don't want any racism, but as soon as you say it's somebody's job to decide when it happened then everything looks like hate speech and everything looks like racism because you could sort of rationalize it to make anything sound like one of those two things. So it would be just a gross attack on free speech. But it looks like X hired some lawyers and it looks like it's going to be blocked at the moment. The court struck down the key censorship provision according to Reclaim the Net's D.D. Rankovic. So this is really huge. And if you only think of X in terms of the more obvious stuff it's doing you would miss one of its biggest values to the country is this: Musk will lawyer up whatever it costs and he will go after every attack on free speech that affects X. And this is huge that you could get a win like that.
Speaking of which, you know that the Europeans are trying to do the same thing that California was doing which is create these censorship standards so that they can control American companies by controlling what they can do in Europe which would trickle into the United States. So if they said for example you can't post a message like this whatever this is in Europe, well what are the platforms going to do? If you're Facebook you're going to say all right well I guess we're going to have to ban it everywhere because if it's banned in Europe and they're going to completely kick us out of that market if we don't do this, we're going to have to censor.
So the FCC chairman was over at the Mobile World Congress. This is Brendan Carr. Brendan Carr is one of the good guys. He is very active in chasing down the bad behavior and addressing it. So he's giving speeches basically and he's mentioning the EU's Digital Services Act which is the one that would be sort of a backdoor way of censoring Americans. And basically he's warning them that the United States is going to respond because Trump has already said he wants a directive to figure out how to tariff them or do something to make sure that they can't extort us that way. So I love the fact that Trump and his head of the FCC basically are saying this is war. You can try to censor us but we're not giving up the First Amendment. So you tell us how expensive you want to make this because there's nothing we're not going to do to make sure that we're not censored. You can censor yourself, put yourself out of business as a real country, but you're not going to do it to us. And I think that Trump, again one of the magic parts of Trump is that he doesn't bluff. So when Trump says we're coming for you if you don't change this they know he's coming. And Brendan Carr is like chief gladiator. So if he's coming for you he's fully supported by Trump. So we'll see where this goes but I love the fact that Trump is completely at war and isn't going to take this. It's just completely unacceptable. We're going to do whatever it takes.
Meanwhile update on the DEI dominoes. So DEI has been falling everywhere. Even BlackRock decided to get out of it. The big banks are getting out of it. Now today Arizona universities are quietly deleting their DEI language according to Cronkite News. Now I don't know if that means they're just hiding it but it means that they understand there's a risk and so they're operating based on risk which is what we want. Also the University of Southern California is going to scrub their DEI stuff out of their other documents and stuff. And again I don't know if that's just hiding it. It might be hiding it but still step in the right direction. If they have to hide it that feels like a little bit of a win. It's a half win.
And then apparently there were some CIA officers who were fired because they were part of the DEI programs for the CIA. And according to Natural News a judge just upheld Trump and DOGE's ability to fire them for just being part of the DEI. They didn't need a better reason. So that was a reason and so that's going to stick.
One of my big questions is how will history treat DEI? Because you know if you went back in history and let's say it was right in the middle of slavery, what do you think the news said about slavery in the South? The news in the South it was probably like yeah things are working real good. Of course we got a lot of slaves so production is up. We had a good ball. Don't you think that while it was happening it was treated like a positive because otherwise it wouldn't have been there? But then you know a few hundred years later we quite rightly call it like one of the worst things we've ever done. And we've done some bad things but we all understand okay that's just that's right near the top of the worst things we've ever done.
What do you think DEI will do in the future? I have a dream. I have a dream that it will be treated by historians as just evil. Now it's not going to be full slavery evil or Jim Crow evil but it's right up there with Jim Crow. So it's like 40 years, roughly 40 years I think, of absolute over-discrimination against one category of people and lives were ruined, careers were ruined, the economy was suffering I think. It's just one of the darkest, worst, messed up parts of American history and I just wonder if history will ever record it that way or if they'll say well all the good people tried for decades to make things better but the evil Republicans shut it down after 40 years of being terribly successful. Now it wasn't called DEI for 40 years but it was affirmative action, same thing. So I'm hoping history will get it right and say this is one of the worst things that the country's ever done. We've done worse but it's one of the bad ones.
All right this is funny and also predictable. Do you remember when the UK and France were meeting to figure out what they could do about Ukraine and then they came out of that meeting and it sounded like oh looks like there's a little bit of unity there. So the UK and France were talking about maybe putting boots on the ground. And I thought well it starts with two of the more important countries and then they'll slowly be collecting their allies and maybe they've got this, maybe they figured it out. But instead apparently what we just learned is that Germany walked out of the meeting according to the European Conservative. So Germany just said, I'm paraphrasing because I wasn't there, but it was something like wait what did you just say? Well our idea is we're going to put boots on the ground in Ukraine. Wait whose boots? You know European. So we're going to put some UK boots, going to put a little France boots, we can get some German boots over there filled with people of course not just the boots. And then Germany was like we're done. That's crazy. And they just walked out.
Now if Europe can't get Germany on board and it's not because it's expensive it's because Germany just said ah how about no, how about hard no. And then we're not even sure if France and the UK agree on what a ceasefire would look like. So the European Union or let's just call it the European countries decide that they're going to go it alone and the best they could come up with is two countries that almost agreed and the rest of them just said are you crazy we're out. So it looks like they got nothing.
But then on top of that the head of the EU says that they're going to unveil an 800 billion plan to rearm Europe. 800 billion. And I say to myself okay what would have been the most predictable outcome, not the most entertaining, the most predictable outcome. Let's see if you can figure this out. There's a possibility of conflict. People are trying to prevent conflict but there's a real possibility of the conflict. If you were going to predict what was going to happen the most obvious prediction it would have been oh so what will happen is that the military-industrial complex will get billions of dollars and we'll get screwed. It was completely predictable. The military-industrial complex they just keep winning. I've actually thought how could I get in on this military-industrial complex because you know I like to be on the winning team and I swear to God they win every round. What's your problem Russia? You're going to need to buy some weapons. What's your problem China? Well I got an idea you better spend a trillion dollars on weapons. It's like no matter what we do the answer is always give money to the military-industrial complex.
So that's why we like Trump because I don't think he automatically falls for that. It's also weird that Europe has nukes and those are not a deterrent to being invaded. Like what are they actually buying weapons to do? Are they buying weapons so that they don't have to use their nukes if Russia tries to roll over Europe and take over the UK? Has Russia ever shown, give me a history lesson, has Russia ever shown interest in conquering any country that wasn't really either Russian-speaking or had some obvious strategic value? They're not good guys so I'm not saying Russia is the good guys don't get me wrong. But do you think Russia has ever wanted to conquer France? If they ever wanted to conquer the UK or at least let's say in the last 100 years I don't think so.
So it seems like if you just said here's the deal we're going to get rid of all of our weapons but if you put one Russian boot on our territory we're going to nuke Moscow. Sorry don't aim the nuke at the exited ally. Why doesn't that work? You know if the more traditional weapons you have the more likely you're going to get into a traditional fight. But if you just said we're going to get rid of all of them because you'd be insane to attack us because we only have this one defense so we use it. We'll just take out Moscow with a nuclear weapon. Would you if you were Russia and somebody said our entire defense is written up in this document you're free to read it and the document says if Russia attacks even one inch of our territory we're going to nuke them would you attack if it was actually in writing we're going to put a nuke right up your ass? I don't think so. Now there like I said there's no such thing as a real security guarantee. There's no guarantees. But it would have to be at least as safe as spending 800 billion for the military-industrial complex some of it in our country I assume but a lot in Europe.
While Trump's giving a big speech to Congress tonight some people were speculating that he might float the idea of leaving NATO. I don't think so because I don't think he would announce that in his speech but hey he's full of surprises. Anything could happen. He might tease it. I could imagine him teasing it just to see what reaction he got but I don't think he's going to announce it.
Apparently according to Election Wizard on X the Congressional Democrats are planning to disrupt his speech and their plan allegedly involves using a variety of tactics including noise makers, hand clappers, signs, eggs and walkouts. Now how do the eggs fit into this and why are eggs suddenly such a big part of every story? Can we do any story that doesn't involve eggs? Why did eggs become the biggest thing to talk about anyway? I assume the eggs would be to throw. If somebody threw an egg at the president wouldn't they be arrested? Would that not be assault or attempted injury of some kind of a sitting president? Wouldn't it be a disruption of official business? I don't know if his speech is official business or not but we'll see. I'm kind of doubtful that eggs will be thrown. Maybe they'll just bring them to show off. It's like look I got an egg. Anybody else have an egg? Can't afford it can you? I got an egg because I did insider trading. I did enough insider trading to have an egg.
According to Laura Loomer and some others apparently the left is also going to organize or has organized some kind of a massive protest in the Black Lives Matter Plaza before Trump does his speech to Congress. Now do you remember when we were more innocent and if you heard that the left had an organized protest you'd think wow it must be a lot of people like regular people were just mad otherwise you couldn't pull together that many people. But then you learned that these are all fake. All these protests are just probably Soros funded or Hoffman or something and that some of the people might be sincere but this doesn't happen unless it's just a big fake thing driven by people at the top with money. So to me it's just funny because once you realize it's just theater and it's fake it doesn't even look the same anymore. Like I can't even get mad at it because like oh that's kind of funny. How's your fake protest going?
Well if you haven't seen economist Jeffrey Sachs talking about Russia and Ukraine you really should. Now he does have what I would consider a, I don't want to say it, it's hard to describe him. Other people would say he's pro-Russian. Other people would. So I'm not going to say that but it lets you know how he is received. So one of the things when I say pro-Russian I don't mean more than the United States. It's just that he doesn't want to be at war with Russia. Doesn't make any sense. So I guess other people think that's pro-Russian because he doesn't want to be at war with Russia. But he says the war is over because Trump doesn't want to back a loser and that's all you have to know. That Zelensky is a loser and backing him wouldn't make sense and it certainly wouldn't make sense for somebody like Trump who doesn't want to back a loser. And I thought to myself that is really cleverly summarized. You know if you could imagine that Trump thought Zelensky was actually Winston Churchill and an amazing figure maybe he would treat him that way but it's pretty clear that Trump thinks that Zelensky is a loser and he doesn't want to hitch his wagon to somebody who's unpredictable and not going along with the game. And once Zelensky predicted that the war would last a long time. Now isn't that kind of up to Zelensky? It's only going to last as long as he wants it to. So yeah I think I agree with Jeffrey Sachs on this. If the only thing you knew is that Trump isn't the kind of guy who wants to back a loser, an obvious loser, it's kind of all you need to know.
So meanwhile Russia has allegedly agreed, I think I mentioned this, to help with negotiating with Iran over their nuclear program, Iran's nuclear program, and also talked to them about Iran support of proxies in the region. Bloomberg AI was reporting this. Now what I like about this like I said is when Trump expands the negotiations which he's doing instead of saying hey which part of Ukraine do you keep and what day do you want to do the ceasefire, total losing approach, not enough variables. But if Trump goes and says, according to Unusual Whales, Ukraine's president Zelensky just said quote I am ready to work under Trump's strong leadership to bring peace. Interesting because that's exactly what Trump demanded. He said we can work with you but we need a strong statement that says you want peace because the last thing you said was I think the war is going to last a long time. We need security guarantees. We need weapons. That's the opposite of working toward peace. So it looks like Zelensky is reading the room a little bit better. Obviously he's getting a lot of advice. But you see the bigger picture right? It's a really big world. Russia has a lot of energy. They get a big military. They've got connections with countries we want to influence you know Syria and Iran. And we have things that they want such as maybe not doing cyber attacks. Maybe we're better at it than they are. So I think the conversation is going to go to, I'm just going to guess, I'll bet you we had 20 variables which would be genius because if you got 20 variables everybody's got something to get out of it. It's like okay well you're going to help us with Iran but also this will settle Ukraine but well maybe we can do a mineral deal with Russia separately from anything that we do with Ukraine. And so suddenly you've got 20 different things that just make sense. Just common sense. You help us we can help you. There's no reason that we should be enemies.
Now those of you who have been with me a long time, how long have I been saying that the arc of history is bending toward Russia and the United States being allies? We're natural allies. Now what I mean by that is that we have more interests in common if we think about it right. Yeah if we stop pecking at each other and trying to get an advantage and put the other one out of business which is what we've both been doing for decades. If we just stopped doing it and said how about instead of trying to destroy each other and putting all of our efforts into it what if we tried to make money? What if we tried to make the world safer? What if we said if you stay out of our part of the world there are parts of your world that we'll stay out of. And I just think we have the most natural possibility of being allies. Now part of it is we don't share a border. As soon as you share a border everything becomes complicated but we don't. We got that wonderful ocean between us and more we got Europe and an ocean. So I really think my optimism of getting sort of a giant 20 variable Russia deal, very high, very high. And the reason is both sides want it and it's doable. Both sides have really good negotiators. And Trump said in one of his announcements that Putin even used his own campaign phrase "common sense" which of course was very smart for Putin to do because he's good at sucking up you know when he's negotiating. So yeah I think something good could come out. I'm 100% positive on this at the moment. 100% positive. It won't be right away because 20 variables. I mean think about how long it would take to figure out 20 variables but we can do it.
So JD Vance was explaining how the mineral deal would have been better than a security guarantee. And he said the president knows that look if you want real security guarantees, if you want to actually ensure that Putin does not invade Ukraine again, the very best security guarantee is to give Americans economic upside in the future of Ukraine. That is a way better security guarantee than here comes his diss, I love how JD just slaps down other entities because this is way better security guarantee than 20,000 troops from some random country that hasn't fought a war in 30 or 40 years. Wow that's how he talks about our allies. Well okay I like it. And I agree. The only thing that protects you is that the country that has the big guns has a personal interest. So if we've got a lot of money on the line, I mean this could be a trillion dollars you know in these mining deals, yeah that would be a good way to guarantee that we're interested.
And by the way if you're Russia and we said to you don't attack Ukraine because you know we'll go in and protect them we gave them a security guarantee would that be stronger than saying you better not go into Ukraine because we've got a trillion dollars riding there and we're not going to let that just be taken over so if you go in we're going to protect our interests. Doesn't that sound the same? The one where you say we're going to protect our own economic interest that sounds like the more real one because everybody protects their own economic interest. If you said oh we're going to go protect this country on the other side of the world that doesn't have a direct impact on us even if we meant it it's not terribly persuasive. But if you say we're not going to give up a trillion dollars in mining operations which are critical to our most important industries like AI and self-driving cars and robots, we're not going to give that up. So if you move your armies in we have to stop you. And you wouldn't even have to put it in writing because Putin would know that these are critical mineral rights. They're not these are not ordinary things. It's not mining for fun. It's critical. Survival depends on it. We need to nail down some sources that we can mine preferably in other countries anyway.
Elon Musk was saying this about Zelensky. He says as distasteful as it is Zelensky should be offered some kind of amnesty in a neutral country in exchange for a peaceful transition back to democracy in Ukraine. Now how many years have I been talking about dictator retirement island? We always have the same problem that if there's a dictator we want to depose there's not really any path for the dictator. They kind of have to fight to the death including killing all of their own country people by sending them against your machine guns. So I don't think there's a practical way to solve this but if we had just one good island and we said here's the deal if you decide to retire to this island we'll give you an American passport and you can live there. You'll have a mansion. You can keep the billion dollars you stole. You can live in luxury and we'll guarantee then nobody comes over and tries to kill you from anything you did before. You'll just live with your neighbors who are also retired dictators. Be kind of cool. It's not my best idea but I agree with Musk there needs to be some way that the alleged dictator can make a clean escape in a way that would just be good for them because we don't need to punish them so much as we just need them gone sometimes.
All right here's my idea for what to do to negotiate who owns what land on the eastern part of what used to be Ukraine but now seems to be totally occupied by Russia, just the eastern part. I saw a map of where Russian was the main language. I didn't realize that something like, is it over half of Ukraine, Russian is the dominant language and people might even call themselves Russian. Not all of them but a lot of them would call themselves Russians even though they're technically Ukrainians. And so I thought well if let's say you did a vote and you said all right all these little regions that are disputed that Russia controls right now, Russia would you agree to do a vote? Well nobody's going to trust the vote. We would just assume that would be rigged so you can't really have a vote. But could you do a survey? I'm guessing that most of the people over there still have cell phones right? Could you do a scientific enough, and I would get at least three separate pollsters to do it and then compare them so that they would do their work blind then the three would compare to see if there's any major differences in what they got. And they would just call people they say all right if do you want to be owned by Russia or owned by Ukraine and then you just figure out what they want.
Now what if Ukraine said we don't agree with that then you have to wonder what is their motivation. If what the people who live there want isn't the main thing then what are you? Are you a dictatorship? Shouldn't the people who live there be the primary ones who decide? Now we also have the problem that some of that area is depopulated so I don't even know what's left so you might not even be able to get any kind of representative sample because it might be just people who haven't died yet you know old people and children and stuff. So maybe impossible but I would at least look at the idea of polling them and you'd have to have at least three polls operating independently to feel like you know one of them wasn't totally biased.
Meanwhile Governor Newsom of California according to Joel Pollak and Breitbart is ordering state employees back to the office. So Newsom's plan to act more like a Republican seems to be right on point. So he's copying DOGE and making the Californians come back to work. Now he says only four days a week which would be a lot but it does remind you that the Democrats just painted themselves into the corner of all corners by being opposed to common sense. So whenever they embrace a little bit of common sense it just looks like they're copying and then you say well why do we need them if they're just copying? You know just Republicans already do it and you don't have to wonder if they mean it because Republicans tend to only do things they mean.
So the Democrat strategy of saying let's do more common sense things and emphasize patriotism and get rid of the identity politics, how does that work from an election strategy perspective? So follow me on this. If somebody likes what Republicans do and they like what Trump does and they like especially that Trump is emphasizing common sense solutions is there any scenario in which they vote Democrat because oh it's all the same now now they're both doing common sense so I guess I'll abandon my love of MAGA and I'll vote for a Democrat? Not many people are going to do that because it looks like one side means it and the other side is just doing fast copying and you couldn't even be sure that if you looked away they would still do common sense stuff because it's not really in their genes. But meaning the party's genes not any individuals genes. And wouldn't it just make the extreme people in their own party, the Democrats, wouldn't it just make them not show up to vote? So if they copy Republicans and try to be the common sense ones wouldn't the only net effect be to reduce their own base because it's not going to make any difference to a Trump voter. No Trump voter is going to say oh look those Democrats look good today I'll go over there for a day. I don't think so. So it makes me wonder if they've thought anything out like even on paper it doesn't look like it can work even though obviously backing common sense makes sense but how can that work?
Now the other thing I notice is that when Republicans talk, have you noticed the Republicans have a vibe like you could probably tell who's a Republican if they're talking on TV. Takes you about 10 seconds to say ah probably a Republican because they have a let's say a buttoned up kind of Republican conservative way of talking about things. And I would say that that's authentic because it's the lifestyle that they've adopted. They are influenced by the people that they like and people around them. So nobody is completely natural but Republicans talk and act and think like Republicans. But Democrats have this weird thing where the most prominent part of their party are just theater kids and they try to sell their ideas with their faces. Have you noticed that? If you listen to a Republican trying to sell a policy they'll say well if we do this and that we'll get this impact so that's why we want to do it. Just policy. But if you get any one of these cats out, Schiff, Chris Murphy, Jamie Raskin, AOC, Swalwell, Elizabeth Warren or Schumer, they do face persuasion where they just crunch up their face to show how terrible something is that Trump is doing. It's so bad. Oh it's so bad. He's Hitler. He's Hitler. And none of it makes sense and they do definition thinking and analogy thinking literally analogy because they say oh he's acting like Hitler now. An analogy which is not anything. Or oh the definition of an insurrection. These are not even attempts to be part of the rational conversation because none of that's rational. So instead they send actors. Now it doesn't mean that every Democrat is an actor because they have normal ones but the normal ones are not on TV. The ones that get on TV are the ones who do the faces. Oh it's so bad. I've got so much empathy. Oh look look at the little things in my forehead. Look at those lines on my forehead. That's how serious I am about how bad it is. They're so beyond pathetic at this point that it just seems funny. And my new favorite is Chris Murphy because that guy doesn't look genuine even a little bit. He literally just looks like a theater kid who's just so happy he can do his act on TV anyway.
Tariffs tariffs tariffs. Trump is doubling his tariffs on China over the fentanyl crisis. I'm in favor of that. I'm in favor of pressing China in every way we can. I don't think that a tariff will end their fentanyl practice because I think their benefit is too big. It's a huge burden on the United States. They don't care about our deaths and so clearly strategically they're going to keep doing it. But there is one thing that they do care about which is being shamed on the public stage. And by putting gigantic tariffs on them because they're sending fentanyl to us and we know they can stop it that is a way to shame them without just getting in Xi's face. We just say this is going to stop. We're going to press every button and we're going to make a lot of noise forever and it's going to be one of the biggest things that anybody thinks about when they think about China. So China if you want your reputation to be that you're drug dealers you win because we're going to make sure that your reputation is drug dealers. So if you want that to be your brand Trump will be happy to make that come true for you. Now that might have some power not by itself. So again you'd have to add 20 variables to get any kind of a deal that really stopped fentanyl but I don't know if fentanyl can be stopped but I do like the level of effort that Trump's putting into it.
Meanwhile China is halting imports of U.S. logs and is suspending imports of our soybeans. Now what will happen to our logs and our soybeans? Now of course these are tragedies for the industries involved. I don't want to minimize it but the thing you should probably expect is that prices will go up in the short term and the short term could be a year but it might be more than a year. But everything he's doing collectively makes sense in the long term and it's a hard sell if you say to people hey I've got an idea we're going to raise your prices for the next year or two in the worst possible way but when we're done we're going to be on solid ground and prices will drift down and we need to do this is the only way to survive. You can't really sell that because all the public would hear is what about the price of my eggs? Okay I just said they'd go up. What about the price of my gas? Well it might go up but the only way we can get to a point where it's domestic manufacturing and all the things we need to reduce cost like creating more energy the only way we get there is through this hard road so we got to do it. Well you can't really sell that so I expect it to get a little worse before it gets better. So that would be the most natural outcome.
Trump said he's considering a free trade agreement with Argentina. I guess that means no tariffs and no duties and no VAT taxes. So that would be a big deal. I can't imagine that Milei of Argentina would say no to that because he's a free market guy so is Trump. So I like the fact that Trump is saying this part of the world no tariffs. I like that a lot. That's a really good way to run a continent.
Well here's a seriously disturbing note. So Representative Nancy Mace who's talked about this in public before so I don't know the details but my understanding is she was a victim of a horrific sex related crime with multiple people and maybe the suggestion that there was a videotape. So drugged, raped and videotaped. Now that's what people are saying. I don't know the details but she said this in a post on X. I understand video or videos may have been released via media outlet tonight. I hope this warrants the state to search for certain devices and certain tapes at a certain location. What is she suggesting? That the crime against her might be on video and that somebody may be releasing it today. Now I assume it'd be censored at least a little bit but I got to say I certainly admire her guts. The fact that she's taking ownership of what had to be the most horrific thing that ever happened to her I'm guessing. The fact that instead of just avoiding it or not talking about it she's going right at it. She wants you to know what happened and it looks like she wants you to know who it was. And I feel like she knows who it was but I don't know if she's for any reason decided not to talk about it yet. But if this video comes out there will be faces on the screen and they won't all be hers if it is her at all. We're speculating. That's what it looks like.
Well this is funny. According to Retro Coast when DOGE tried to remove the credit cards from government employees I guess it was the Department of Defense who was running up all kinds of entertainment and booze and travel on their government credit cards like a lot like just totally out of control because nothing's audited it seems like. So they tried to just remove the credit cards from government employees but some kind of federal judge blocked it. So instead of removing the credit cards they just reset the limit to one dollar. So they can keep their credit cards but it's only a one dollar limit per month. Well maybe just one dollar.
According to Rasmussen 61% believe that an audit of the Social Security system would reveal widespread fraud in the program. 61%. That means there are 39% who don't expect widespread fraud in our Social Security. They are very optimistic. In many ways that's the best DOGE endorsement you could get. The 61% thinking audit of the Social Security is going to find massive fraud. That is quite an endorsement of why don't you look at everything and find that fraud for us. So I like that.
Meanwhile a NASA scientist according to Brighter Side of News and Joseph Shavit is reporting on a propellantless propulsion for rockets, space rockets. And propellantless means it's not based on stuff exploding out the rocket's ass to drive it forward. Rather it generates thrust using electric fields rather than expelling mass. So the thinking is if they can perfect this it would be just this enormous leap forward in space travel because you wouldn't need to have fuel that you're burning. It probably would be easier to generate electricity which in turn would manipulate these electric fields. So I think they surprised themselves how well it worked.
All right ladies and gentlemen that is what I have for today. Thank you for joining another tight hour of fun. I'm going to say hi to the people on Locals privately but the rest of you thanks for joining on Rumble and YouTube and X. And Locals coming at you in 30 seconds. I'll definitely be watching the president tonight. I don't know if I'll stream it. Probably not.
it's time for a show everything's going to be amazing today let me get your comments on locals working there we go good morning everybody and welcome to the highlight of human civilization it's called coffee with Scott Adams and you've never had a better time but if you'd like to take it up to levels that nobody can even understand with their tiny shiny human brains all you need for that is a cover Mar a glass of tank of chel Stein a canteen juger flask a vessel of any kind fill it with your favorite liquid I like coffee and join me now for the unparallel pleasure the doping of the day the thing makes everything better it's called the simultaneous Sip and damn it it happens right now go so good well special thanks to jack babic for your kind words on X I appreciate that I'm glad you're glad you watch every day um how about the news huh there's a lot of news today let's see if we can pound through it we'll uh we'll get to the serious stuff in a minute but we people are streaming in um according to the AP in Los Angeles uh 30 offic officers at a Southern California Juvenile Detention Facility have been charged for holding uh what they call Gladiator fights with with the miners so it's a it's not even an adult facility it's a juvenile DET I'm not supposed to laugh at this it's a juvenile detention center but apparently there were organizing the the officers were not not the inmates but he uh the guards were were organizing Gladiator fights where they would just all meet in a certain place at a certain time and fight it out now I know somebody who uh has had a more interesting life than than I have and claims that this is completely normal for adult detention facilities that the guards do in fact organize fights among the uh the inmates for the adults I didn't know it was happening juvenile facilities that just you know makes it extra bad but if you think this just happened in one place and there were 30 officers who are all in on it I got to wake you up this is closer to standard procedure the guards if they hate the uh the inmates any particular ones they organize a fight and they just put the ones they hate in the fight and they just stand back and watch it that that's a real thing all right well according to attorney general Pam Bondi there's an alleged truckload of Epstein files that were released by guess what the uh southern district of New York I guess that's where they they were all being stored and uh not unrelated the uh the head of that FBI the southern district New York was asked to resign partly because he told people to dig in and that was taken as resisting you know Trump Administration but uh also he wasn't really too keen on releasing all the Epstein files so he's gone and the Epstein files are in a truck and uh Pam Bonnie says that um that they're going to be delivered or theyve already been delivered and now they have to go through them and uh and uh then they'll figure out just what they can cannot show do you believe that I don't believe any of it do you think that they fought so hard to to not show it that they wouldn't also destroy the good stuff the truckload doesn't mean there's any good stuff so I'm going to guess that when they get in there they're going to say huh according to the evidence records and the document page numbers it feels like all the good stuff has been removed or the FBI itself will again even even if it's cash Patel or somebody else will just block out the things that we're not supposed to see and maybe that's all the stuff that we really wanted to see so I'm going to say just for fun uh I don't believe it's real I do believe there's a truck I do believe it's got a lot of Epstein files in it I do not believe this means we're going to find out the good stuff I I think it's just going to be more repeats of things we've seen but with a lot more detail so I don't trust this at all but it does look like Pam Bondi is dead serious and it looks like cash Patel is dead serious about trying so I'm going to give them A+ for trying but I feel like the Deep state may have already removed any possibility of finding the good stuff we'll see that's just speculation well Rachel M trying to Sal the idea that Trump is working with Putin a Russian puppet you know the usual thing it wouldn't matter what Trump did Trump woke up today oh he woke up like a Russian puppet Trump took a walk on the golf course oh that's exactly what Putin would want him to do so she writes up this super academic list of all the ways that that Trump is already already helping Putin and it's such it's such an academic and boring and complicated well but you know this could be connected in some way you know this stretching the idea of of the connection let me give you some examples uh so here's one of the ways that Trump is allegedly helping Putin um he weakened this is from Rachel M uh he weakened the nuclear security by firing Personnel okay we're reducing Personnel in basically everything that Doge touches so basically everything that Doge touches you know ends up in people being uh fired and every time no matter what department it is somebody says but those are the best people those are the best you got rid of all the best people what are we going to do now the nuclear security is probably exactly the same so no that's probably had nothing to do with Putin probably just was cost cutting and then she said that uh that Trump has disbanded key us Counter Intelligence units um eliminated the FBI's foreign influence task force which investigated secret foreign lobbying by adversaries such as Russia okay so it's something that affects all of our other adversaries and but also our allies because they always try to influence us too so it was a general rule but Rachel's like that looks like that's for Putin so almost anything that Trump does you can make an argument but indirectly indirectly that looks like that's for Putin so it's the most boring and academic and ridiculous list but it's good enough for her audience who are as you know all idiots so here's here's one we don't know why yet but P Heth has ordered a pause in US cyber offensive against Russia according to the BBC so the US just stopped doing offensive cyber attacks on Russia to which I say now that doesn't mean they stopped doing defensive stuff of course but why would you stop offensive cyber attacks well if I were getting ready to negotiate piece I would show them that we were capable of doing that I wouldn't wait forever you know we're not going to wait forever for Russia to sign a deal but one of the things that Trump is good at is bringing new variables into a negotiation so suddenly cyber attacks are on the table and then separately there's a report that uh that Russia has been asked to help communicate with Iran to work out a nuclear um some kind of a nonproliferation or something uh something about their nuclear program but the idea is that Russia would be a productive partner in negotiating with Iran because they have a better relationship to which I say that doesn't that's not crazy so we don't know enough about the uh the pause in the US cyber offensive but if it's just a pause and we're just showing that we can do it and we're trying to bring Russia into a more productive conversation about different parts of the world and how can you help us and maybe we can work together and maybe we can make some money I don't know I I think you have to look at the entire universe of things that are happening to figure out whether there's any room for a deal if all you're looking at is seire ceasefire yes or no ceasefire well you're not going to know anything yeah have to look at all the moving parts and say to yourself all right is that enough moving Parts where there's stuff we can give without costing anything and there's stuff they can give us without costing anything and probably there's going to be a whole bunch of variables that allow us to do that so yeah the more variables that Trump puts into the deal the more success will it be I think uh anyway and and we're not going to stop our defensive stuff so it's not like we're unprotected so Scott Jennings continues to entertain on the the panel with Abby Phillip on the CNN and he said uh to his uh to his TBL mates he goes you mentioned the Europeans it's it's interesting to me they spent more money on Russian oil and gas last year than they sent to Ukraine collectively and then Scott Jennings said that the proposed mineral deal that got turned down by zalinsky or never got signed he says the mineral deal is a effectively a security guarantee and what did Abby Phillips say um I have to do the the Democrat idiot face because it doesn't make sense oh that's not a security guarantee that's not a security guarantee you know you have to do a stupid face and then Scott Jennings would say well actually it's the best kind because it puts our own interests you know tied to the welfare of the country so it's actually a really good security thing but it's not a security guarantee it's not a security guarantee you know my book loser think there's a chapter in there which I talk about people who argue by definition you can't win an argument with a definition that's like not even playing and that be Philip is one of the definition people oh but but that's not called a that would that that would not be called a security guarantee so let me ask you this remember when KL Harris and the US and Europe they were all promising uh Ukraine that you know NATO would would be helping them and they were meaning that they would let Ukraine into NATO if certain conditions were met and those were kind of like security guarantees weren't they and what did that cause to happen Russia invaded the country so how about the time when uh Clinton promised was it Clinton who promised Putin that we wouldn't be adding a NATO countries on the border of Russia and then we did so how about those security guarantees now I would agree that if you're a NATO country you're safer than if you're not but to imagine that we wouldn't sell out with somebody for our own best interest or anybody really any country would countries only operate in their best interest so Scott Jennings is completely correct that having a big financial interest in the country probably keeps them a lot safer than if we didn't but if the only thing we did is said hey I promise you if they attack we'll be there tomorrow can you trust that is that enough of a guarantee what does it take to be a guarantee it's not like there's some court that could make us do it what if we say well that's a special case we can't get involved in that so um I think the definition this is also a very Democratic thing to do to insist that there's only one definition of a thing and and just act like it um we uh we don't think that biological men should compete with women in sports they're called women the definition of them are called women they're women yeah you know but we're not arguing the definition of words we're just saying that biological men they're stronger and so there's a risk and sort of an unfairness to the women but they're women they're women it's a definition by definition say it say it say it they're women and then they do the same thing with January 6th they start with first let's agree that this is an Insurrection U well actually almost nobody who was there or maybe some tiny percent would have thought of it that way almost everybody who protested on January 6 thought that they might be stopping an Insurrection so really it would be closer to the opposite of an Insurrection a protest perhaps oh it's an Insurrection it's an Insurrection they're called women they're called women security gues so once you see the pattern that Republicans argue about what works you know what what are the motivations what are the incentives what does the system look like that's how Republicans argue and then the Democrats argue definitions which is not even an argument it's literally what a child would do but but but you said you you said you take me to Ice Cream I know but it's raining and the car is broken but you said you said I I know it's just I can't because the car is broken but we'll go tomorrow but you said you said it's just a it's just a child argument over and over again so Reddit co-founder Lexis Ohanian is joining a group trying to see if they can put together a purchase deal for Tik tock I don't know how many groups there are looking at it now but they're pretty serious people so if the most serious people can't make a deal to buy Tik Tok who can so a post by John stasel and if you didn't know this I knew this but it kind of fits into the the stories today so this is an old old story but he mentions John stel does that the New York Times covered up Stalin's famine when he was starving people Stalin was while Millions starved now why did the New York Times cover up you know the one of the crimes of the century starving millions of people why would they cover that well it turns out that their star reporter Walter duranti uh but also his colleagues they uh they liked communism's utopian promises this is John stasel writing and uh the status he got when his exclusive interviews he could do exclusive interviews with Stalin so literally the New York Times was ignoring the biggest story happening the most horrible incredible bad thing and it was because the reporter sort of thought maybe communism is a good deal and you know if you get past this maybe it'll all work out now isn't it great that the media used to be completely fake and that's all fixed now you know I always think that if you don't if you don't know anything about history everything looks different if if you knew that for for sure no doubt about it that our major media platforms historically had all been fake uh they were either controlled by the CIA or or in this case probably wasn't the CIA but just somebody wanted to Li because it was good for him or it worked into his philosophy can you even imagine what changed enough that this wouldn't still be the case was there magic was there some magic after this happened and then and then the magic would catch it every time it tried to happen again no the Russia collusion hoax was just a madeup whole thing what about the uh fine people hoax which by the way and was it yeah I think NPR actually pushed the fine people hoax again I think yesterday now the the media has never been real and if you don't know that it's never been real historically it's really hard to understand that like it suddenly turned bad but most people think well it was pretty good in the old days you know maybe it got a little worse but it's basically okay no it is always been completely fake and there are reasons for it there are structural reasons that guarantee it will be fake because people have interests and those interests have money and U sometimes the writers but nobody's really interested in the truth they're interested in what works out for them well meanwhile the uh tsmc the big uh gigantic chip company that operates mostly in Taiwan says they're going to put 100 bill billion dollars into the US to build uh and support uh semiconductor manufacturing here now that sounds familiar right because we've had a few rounds of this company's going to do that this company so I saw Daniel Baldwin who uh works for oann and he put together a list so it's 100 billion from from tsmc the chip company uh Apple promised 500 billion for domestic man facturing uh something called Zep bound 27 billion um 100 billion from soft Bank 20 billion from daac I don't know what that is 500 billion from Stargate 600 billion from Saudi Arabia now those those numbers start adding up don't they um the other thing that's important that Trump understands better than anybody's ever understood it is that sometimes you have to BS a little bit about how things are going and then everybody's like really everything's going in that direction everybody every there's a big list of people putting a lot of money in there I better get on board it's how I get attention it's how the I make the government like me it's how I get the public to like me looks like it's Trend so these type of deals are being really well promoted and the promotion is probably as important as the dollar amounts at least in the early stages because you need a lot more but you want everybody to think everybody's doing it like you you need people to just think oh this is the thing now this is what we do um and we're there I think I think he's actually achieved that uh Eric D dhy on X says that HP is looking to move a lot of their operations from China to the US in response to Trump's tariffs so there's another story um the tariffs are working at least in that limited sense and meanwhile Trump's telling Farmers to get ready to produce more uh food to sell inside the us because he's putting tariffs on uh external food coming in starting April 2nd now the tariffs for um Canada and Mexico kicked in today 25% on most things but energy is a little cheaper 10% and I think uh Canada's already matched it with 25% I haven't heard from Mexico yet but one assumes it'll match it so the trade war is on but um the same time we'll talk more about that uh OPEC announced that it's going to increase oil production according to the hill now if you increase oil production C that should drive the uh price of oil down because it increases Supply um and I don't know if that's net good or bad for the United States because if prices are high then we drill a lot more in the United States because everything you do would make money it's like whoa oil is so high if it goes down then even some of the wells we already drilled um somebody's going to say oh this was a good idea before but now the price went down so they might you know just cap it so it it certainly should help with the price of your eggs and it certainly should help with inflation eventually and I don't think there's anything bigger so OPEC producing more is just about the best thing that could ever happen for Trump you know it's the one thing that everybody agrees lowers inflation or at least prices today so that's good news uh meanwhile uh X the xplatform is doing more great work for free speech uh so California was intro introduced this uh censorship law for social media and the essence of it is they require they want to require the social media platforms to have their own censorship um standards but it's all kind of squishy stuff like do you have a definition of hate speech what is your definition of racism and and all these things have that uhoh thing to them it's like okay we don't want ha speech we don't want any racism but as soon as you say it's somebody's job to decide when it happened then everything looks like hate speech and everything looks like racism because you could sort of you know racial mat it to make anything sound like one of those two things so it would be just a gross attack on Free Speech uh but it looks like X hired some lawyers and uh uh looks like it's going to be blocked at the moment the court struck down the key censorship provision according to reclaim the net DD rankovic so this is this is really huge and if you only think of X in terms of you know the the more obvious stuff it's doing you would miss one of its biggest values to the country is this uh musk will lawyer up whatever it costs and he will go after every attack on free speech that affs X and this is huge that you know you could get a win like that um speaking of which you know that the Europeans are trying to do the same thing that California was doing which is create these censorship standards so that they can control American companies by controlling what they can do in Europe which would you know trickle into the United States so if they said for example you can't post a message like this whatever this is in Europe well what are the platforms going to do if you're Facebook you're going to say all right well I guess we're going have to ban it everywhere because if it's banned in Europe and they're going to completely kick us out that market if we don't do this we're going to have to sens so um the FCC chairman um was over at the uh uh Mobile World Congress this is a Brendan Carr Brendan Carr is one of the good guys he he is very active and chasing down the bad behavior and addressing it so he's a giving speeches basically uh and he's mentioning the eu's Digital Services act which is the the one that would be sort of a backdoor way of censoring Americans and uh basically he's he's warning them that the United States is going to respond you know because Trump has already said uh he wants a directive to figure out how to tariff them or do something to make sure that they can't extort us that way so I love the fact that Trump and his head of the FCC basically are saying This Is War you you can try to censor us but we're not giving up the First Amendment so you tell us how expensive you want to make this because you know there's nothing we're not going to do to make sure that we're not censored you can censor yourself put yourself out of business as a real country but you're not going to do it to us and I think that Trump again one of the Magic parts of trump is that he doesn't Bluff so when Trump says were coming for you if you don't change this they know he's coming and Brendan Carr is like you know Chief Gladiator so if he's coming for you he's you know fully supported by Trump so we'll see where this goes but I love the fact that Trump is completely at War and isn't going to take this it's just completely unacceptable we're we're going to we do whatever it takes meanwhile update on the Dei dominoes so Dei has been falling everywhere even Black Rock decided to get out of it the big banks are getting out of it now today Arizona universities are quietly deleting their Dei language according to kronite news now I don't know if that means they're just hiding it but it means that they understand there's a risk and so they're operating based on risk which is what we want uh also the University of Southern California is going to scrub their Dei stuff out of their um other documents and stuff and again I don't know if that's just hiding it it might be hiding it but still step in the right direction if they have to hide it that feels like a little bit of a win it's a half win uh and then apparently there were um there were some CIA officers who were fired because they were part of the Dei programs for for the CIA and according to Natural news but a judge just um upheld Trump and Doge's ability to fire them for just being part of the Dei they didn't need a better reason so that was a reason and uh so that's going to stick one of my big questions is how will history treat Dei because you know if you went back in history and let's say it was right in the middle of slavery what do you think the news said about slavery in the South the news in the South it was probably like yeah things are working real good uh we of course we got a lot of slaves so production is up uh we had a good ball um don't you think that while it was happening it was treated like a positive because otherwise it wouldn't have been there but then you know a few hundred years later we quite rightly call it like one of the worst things we've ever done and we've done some bad things things uh but we all understand okay that's just that's right near the top of the worst things we've ever done what do you think Dei will do in the future I I have a dream I have a dream that it will be treated by historians as just evil now it's not going to be full you know slavery evil or Jim Crow evil but it's it's right up there with Jim Crow so it's like 40 years roughly 40 years I think of absolute over discrimination against one category of people and lives were ruined careers were ruined the economy was suffering I think um it's just one of the darkest worst messed up parts of American history and I just wonder if history will ever record it that way or if they'll say well uh all the good people try for decades to make things better but the evil Republicans shut it down after 40 years of being terribly successful now it wasn't called Dei for 40 years but it was you know affirmative action same thing so I'm hoping history will get it right and say this is one of the worst things that the country's ever done we've done worse but it's it's one of the bad ones all right this is funny and also predictable do you remember when UK UK and France were meeting to figure out what they could do about Ukraine and then they came out to that meeting and it sounded like oh looks like there's a little bit of unity there so the UK and France were talking about maybe putting boots on the ground and I thought well it starts with you know two of the more important countries and then then they'll slowly you know collecting their allies and you know maybe maybe they've got this maybe they figured it out but instead apparently what we just learned is that Germany walked out of the meeting according to Javier Vore European conservative um so Germany just said you know I'm paraphrasing because I wasn't there but it was something like wait what did you just say well our idea is we're going to put boots on the ground in Ukraine wait whose boots you know European so we're going to put some UK boots going to put a little France boots we we we can get some German boots over there filled with people of course not just the boots and then Germany was like we're done that's crazy and they just walked out now if Europe can't get Germany on board and it's not because it's expensive it's because Germany just said ah how about no how about hard hard no so and then we're not even sure if France and the UK agree on uh on what a ceasefire would look like so so the European Union or let's just call it the European countries decide that they're going to go it alone and the best they could come up with is two countries that almost agreed and the rest of them just said are you crazy we're out so it looks like they got nothing but then on top of that the uh EU head of the EU uh says that they they're going to unveil a $800 billion plan to rearm Europe $800 billion and I say to myself okay what would have been the most predictable outcome not the most entertaining the most predictable outcome's let's see if you can figure this out there's a possibility of conflict uh people are trying to prevent conf lict but there's a real possibility of the conflict if you were going to predict what was going to happen the most obvious prediction it would have been oh so what will happen is that the military-industrial complex will get billions of dollars and uh and we'll get screwed it was completely predictable the military industrial complex they just keep winning I I've actually thought huh how could I get in on this military-industrial complex because you know I like to be on the winning team and I swear to God they win every they win every round what's your problem uh Russia you're going to need to buy some weapons what's your problem China well I got an idea you better spend a trillion dollars on weapons it's like no matter what we do the answer is always give money to the military-industrial complex so that's why we like Trump because I don't think he automatically Falls for that um it's also weird that Europe has nukes and those are not a deterrent to being invaded like what what are they actually buying weapons to do are they buying weapons so that they don't have to use their nukes if Russia tries to roll over Europe and take over the UK has Russia ever shown give me a history lesson has Russia ever shown interest in conquering any country that wasn't really either Russians speaking or had some you know obvious uh strategic value they're not good guys so I'm not saying Russia is the good guys don't get me wrong but do you think Russia has ever wanted to conquer France if they ever wanted to conquer the UK or at least let's say in the last 100 years I don't think so so it seems like if you just said here's the deal we're going to get rid of all of our weapons but if you put one Russian boot on our territory we're going to Nuke Poland not Poland we're going to Nuke Moscow sorry don't aim the don't a the new exited Ally why doesn't that work you know if the more traditional weapons you have the more likely you're going to get into a traditional fight but if you just said we're going to get rid of all of them because you'd be insane to attack us because we only have this one defense so we use it we'll just take out Moscow with a nuclear weapon would you if you were Russia and somebody said our entire defense is written up in this document you're free to read it and the document says if Russia attacks even one inch of our territory we're going to Nuke them would you attack if it was actually in writing we're going to put a nuke right up your ass I don't think so now there like I said there's no such thing as a real security guarantee there's no no guarantees but it would have to be at least as safe as spending $800 billion for the military-industrial complex some of it in our country I assume but a lot of in Europe while Trump's giving a big speech to Congress tonight somebody some people were speculating that he might float the idea of leaving NATO I don't think so because I don't think he would announce that in his speech but hey he's full of surprises Anything Could Happen he might tease it I could imagine him teasing it just to see what reaction he got but I don't think he's going to announce it um apparently according to election wizard on X the Congressional Democrats are planning to disrupt his speech and their plan allegedly uh involves using a variety of tactics including noise makers Hand Clappers signs eggs and walkouts now how do the eggs fit into this and and why are eggs suddenly such a big part of every story can we do can we do any story that doesn't involve eggs why did eggs become the biggest thing to talk about anyway I assume the eggs would be to what throw if somebody threw an egg at the president wouldn't they be arrested would that not be assault or attempted attempted injury of some kind of a sitting president Wouldn't It Be A disruption of uh of an official business I don't know if his speech is official business or not but uh we'll see uh I'm kind of kind of doubtful that eggs will be thrown maybe they'll just bring him to show off it's like look I got an egg anybody else have an egg can't afford it can you I got an egg because I did insider trading I did enough insider trading to have an egg well according to Laura lumer and some others uh apparently the left is also going to organize or has organized uh some kind of a massive protest in the black lives matter Plaza before Trump does his speech to Congress now do you remember when we were more innocent and if you heard that the left had an organized protest you'd think wow it must be a lot of people like Regular People were just mad otherwise you couldn't pull together that many people but then you learned that these are all fake all these protests are just probably Soros funded or you know Hoffman or something and that um some of the people might be sincere but this this doesn't happen unless it's just a big fake thing driven by people at the top with money so to me it's just funny because once you realize it's just theater and it's fake it doesn't even look the same anymore like I I can't even get mad at it because like oh that's kind of funny how's your fake protest going well if you haven't seen Economist Jeffrey saxs talking about Russia and Ukraine you really should now he does have what I would consider a I don't want to say it in a it's hard to describe him other people would say he's pro-russian other people would so I'm not going to say that but it it lets you know how he is received so one of the things when I say Pro Russian I don't mean more than the United States it's just that he doesn't want to be at war with Russia doesn't make any sense so I guess other people think think that's pro- Russian because he doesn't want to be at war with Russia um but he says the war is over because Trump doesn't want to back a loser and that's all you have to know that zinski is a loser and backing him would wouldn't make sense and it certainly wouldn't make sense for somebody like Trump who doesn't want to back a loser and I thought to myself that is really cleverly summarized you know if you could imagine that Trump thought zalinski was actually you know uh Winston Churchill and a amazing figure maybe he would treat him that way but it's pretty clear that Trump thinks that zinski is a loser and he doesn't want to Hitch his wagon to somebody who's unpredictable and not going along with the game and once and zalinsky predicted that the war would last a long time now isn't that kind of up to zilinski Ian it's only going to last as long as he wants it to so yeah I I think I agree with Jeffrey saaks on this if the only thing you knew is that Trump isn't the kind of guy who wants to back a loser an obvious loser um it's kind of all you need to know so meanwhile uh Russia has allegedly agreed I think I mentioned this to help with uh uh negotiating with Iran over their nuclear program Iran's nuclear program and also talked to them about uh Iran support of proxies in the region uh Bloomberg AI was reporting this now what I like about this like I said is when Trump expands the negotiations which he's doing instead of saying hey which part of Ukraine do you keep and what day do you want to do the ceasefire total losing approach not enough variables but if Trump goes and says um according to unusual whales uh Ukraine's president zalinski just said quote I am ready to work under Trump's strong leadership to bring peace interesting because that's exactly what Trump demanded he said we can work with you but we need a strong statement that says you want peace because the last thing you said was I think the war is going to last a long time we need security guarantees we need weapons s that's the opposite of working toward peace so it looks like zinski is reading the room a little bit better obviously he's getting a lot of advice but uh you see the bigger picture right it's a really big world uh Russia has a lot of energy they get a big military they've got connections with countries we want to influence you know Syria and um and Iran and we have things that they want such as maybe not doing cyber attacks maybe we're better at it than they are so I think the conversation is going to go to I'm just going to guess I'll bet you you we had 20 variables which would be genius because if you got 20 variables everybody's got something to get out of it it's like okay well you're going to help us with the rant but also this will settle you know Ukraine but well maybe we can do a mineral deal with Russia separately from anything that we do with Ukraine and so suddenly you've got 20 different things that just make sense just common sense you know you help us we can help you there's no reason that we should be enemies now those of you who have been with me a long time how long have I been saying that the The Arc of history is bending toward Russia and the United States being allies we're natural allies now what I mean by that is that we have more interests in common if we think about it right yeah if we stop packing at each other and and trying to get an advantage and put the other one out of business which is what we've both been doing for decades if we just stopped doing it and said how about instead of trying to destroy each other and putting all of our efforts into it what if we tried to make money what if we tried to make the world safer uh what if we said if you stay out of uh you know our part of the world uh there are parts of your world that will stay out of and I just think we have the most natural um possibility of being allies now part of it is we don't share a border as soon as you share a border everything everything becomes complicated but we don't we got that wonderful Ocean between us and more we got Europe and an ocean so I really think my optimism of getting sort of a giant 20 variable Russia deal very high very high and the reason is both sides want it and it's doable both sides have really good uh really good negotiators and and uh Trump trump said in one of his announcements that uh that Putin even used his own campaign phrase Common Sense which of course was very smart for Putin to do because he's good at sucking up you know when he's negotiating so yeah I think something good could come out I'm 100% positive on this at the moment 100% positive it won't be right away because 20 variables I mean think about how long it would take to figure out 20 variables but we can do it um so JD Vance was explaining how the uh the mineral deal would have been better than a security guarantee and he said uh he said uh the president knows that look if you want real security guarantees if you want to actually ensure that Putin does not invade Ukraine again the very best security guarantee is to give Americans economic upside in the future of Ukraine uh that is a way better security guarantee than here comes his disc I love how JD just slaps down other entities because this is way better security guarantee than 20,000 troops from some random country that hasn't fought a war in 30 or 40 years wow that's how he talks with about our allies well okay I like it um and I agree the the only thing that protects you is that the country that has the big guns has a personal interest so if we've got a lot of money on the line I mean this could be a trillion dollars you know in these mining deals uh yeah that would be a good way to guarantee that we we're interested and by the way if you're Russia and we said to you don't attack Ukraine because you know we'll go in and protect them we gave them a security guarantee would that be stronger than saying uh you better not go into Ukraine because we've got a trillion dollars riding there and we're not going to let that just be taken over so if you go in we're going to protect our interests doesn't that sound the same the the one where you say we're going to protect our own economic interest that sounds like the more real one because everybody protects their own economic interest if you said oh we're going to go protect this country in the other side of the world that doesn't have a direct impact on us even if we meant it it's not terribly persuasive but if you say we're not going to give up a trillion dollars in mining operations which are critical to our most important industries like Ai and self-driving cars and robots we're not going to give that up so if you move your armies in we have to stop you and you wouldn't even have to put it in writing because Putin would know that these are critical mineral rights they're not these are not ordinary things it's not it's not mining for fun it's critical survival depends on it we need to nail down some sources that we can mine preferably in other countries anyway uh Elon Musk was saying this about zinski uh he says as distaste distasteful as it is zinsky should be offered some kind of amnesty in a neutral country in exchange for a peaceful transition back to democracy in Ukraine now how many years have I been talking about dictator retirement Island we always have the same problem that if there's a dictator we want to depose there's not really any path for the dictator they kind of have to fight to the death including killing all of their own their own uh country people by sending them you know against your machine guns so I don't think there's a practical way to solve this but if we had just one good Island and we deci here's the deal if you decide to retire to this island we'll give you an American passport and you can you can live there you'll have a mansion you can keep the billion dollars you stole uh you can live in luxury and we'll guarantee then nobody comes over and tries to kill you from anything you did before you'll just live with your neighbors who are also retired dictators be kind of cool it's not my best idea but I agree with musk there needs to be some way that the alleged dictator can make a clean Escape in in a way that would just be good for them because we don't need to punish them so much as we just need them gone sometimes all right here's my idea for what to do to negotiate the who owns what land uh on the eastern part of what used to be Ukraine but now seems to be totally occupied by Russia just the eastern part um I saw a map of where Russia was the main language I didn't realize that something like is it over half of Ukraine uh Russia is the dominant uh language and people might even call themselves Russian not all of them but a lot of them would call themselves Russians even though they're technically ukrainians and so I thought well if let's say you did a vote and you said all right all these little regions that are disputed that Russia controls right now uh Russia would you agree to do a vote well nobody's going to trust the vote we would just assume that would be rigged so you can't really have a vote but could you do a survey I'm guessing that most of the people over there still have cell phones right could you do a scientific enough um and I would get at least three separate pollsters to do it and then compare them so that they would do their work blind then the three would compare to see if there's any major differences in what they got and they would just call people they say all right you if do you want to be uh owned by Russia or owned by Ukraine and then you just figure out what they want now what if you what if Ukraine said we don't agree with that then you have to wonder what is their motivation if what the if what the people who live there want isn't the main thing then what are you are you a dictatorship shouldn't the people who live there be the primary ones who decide now we also have the problem that some of that area is depopulated so I don't even know what's left so you might not even be able to get any kind of representative sample because it might be just people who haven't died yet you know old people and children and stuff so maybe impossible but I would at least look at the idea of polling them and you'd have to have at least three polls operating independently to to feel like you know one of them wasn't totally biased meanwhile Governor Nome of California um according to Joel Pollock and Breitbart is uh ordering state employees back to the office so nome's uh plan to act more like a republican seems to be right on point so he's copying Doge and and making The Californians come back to work now he says only four days a week which would be a lot but it does remind you that the Democrats just painted themselves into the corner of all Corners by being opposed to Common Sense so when whenever they Embrace a little bit of common sense it just looks like they're copying and then you say well why do we need them if they're just copying you know just Republicans already do it and you don't have to wonder if they mean it because Republicans tend to only do things they mean so the uh the Democrat strategy of saying let's let's do more common sense things and emphasize uh patriotism and get rid of the identity politics how does that work from an election strategy perspective so so follow me on this if somebody likes what Republicans do and they like what Trump does and they like especially that Trump is emphasizing Common Sense Solutions is there any is there any scenario in which they vote Democrat because oh it's all the same now now they're both doing common sense so I I guess I'll I'll abandon you know my love of magga and I'll vote for a Democrat not many people are going to do that because it looks like one side means it and the other side is just doing fast copying and you couldn't even be sure that you know if you looked away they would still do on a common sense stuff because it's not really in their genes but um meaning the party's genes not any individuals genes and wouldn't it just make the the the extreme people in their own party the Democrats wouldn't it just make them not show up to vote so if they copy Republicans and try to be the common sense ones wouldn't the only net effect be to reduce their own base because it's not going to make any difference to a trump voter not no Trump voter is going to say oh look those Democrats look good today I'll go over there for a day I don't think so so it makes me wonder if they've thought anything out like even on paper it doesn't look like it can work even though obviously backing Common Sense makes sense but how can that work now the other thing I notic is that when Republicans talk have you noticed the Republicans have a vibe like you could probably tell who's a republican if they're talking on TV takes you about 10 seconds to say ah probably a republican because they have a let's say a buttoned up kind of Republican conservative way of talking about things and I would say that that's authentic because it's the lifestyle that they've adopted they they are influenced by the people that they like and people are around so you know nobody is completely natural but Republicans talk and act and think like Republicans but Democrats have this weird thing where the most prominent part of their party are just theater kids and they try to sell their ideas with their faces have you noticed that if if you listen to a republican trying to sell a policy they'll say well if we do this and that we'll get this impact so that's why we want to do it just policy but if you get any one of these cats out shiff Chris Murphy Jamie Raskin AOC swell Elizabeth Warren or Schumer they do face persuasion where they they just crunch up their face to show how terrible something is that Trump is doing it's so bad oh it's so bad he's H there he's H there and none of it makes sense and they they do uh you know definition thinking and analogy thinking literally analogy because they say oh he's acting like Hitler now an analogy which is not anything or oh the definition of an Insurrection these are not even attempts to be part of the rational conversation because none of that's rational uh so instead they send actors now it doesn't mean that every Democrat is an actor because they have you know normal ones but the normal ones are not on TV the ones that get on TV are the are the ones who do the faces oh it's so bad I've got so much empathy oh look look at the little things in my forehead look at those lines on my forehead that's that's how serious I am about how bad it is it they're so beyond pathetic at this point that it just seems funny and my new favorite is Chris Murphy because that guy doesn't look genuine even a little bit he literally just looks like a theater kid who's just so happy he can do his you know he can do his act on TV anyway tariffs tariffs tariffs uh Trump is doubling his tariffs on China over the fenol crisis I'm in favor of that I'm in favor of uh pressing China in every way we can I don't think that a tariff will end um their fental practice because I think their benefit is to Big it's a huge burden on the United States they don't care about our deaths and so clearly strategically they're going to keep doing it but there is one thing that they do care about which is being shamed on the public stage and by putting gigantic tariffs on them because they're sending fenel to us and we know they can stop it that is a way to shame them without just getting in she's face we just say this is going to stop we're going to press every button and we're going to make a lot of noise forever and it's going to be one of the biggest things that anybody thinks about when they think about China so China if you want your reputation to be that your drug dealers you win because we're going to make sure that your reputation is drug dealers so if you want uh that to be your brand uh Trump will be happy to make that come true for you now that might have some power um not by itself so again you'd have to add 20 variables to get any kind of a deal that really stopped fenel but I don't know if fentanyl can be stopped but I do like the level of effort that Trump's putting into it meanwhile China is halting Imports of us logs and it's suspend suspending Imports of our soybeans no what what will happen to our logs and our soybeans now of course these are tragedies for the industries involved I don't want to minimize it but the thing you should probably um expect is that prices will go up in the short term and the short term could be a year but it might be more than a year but everything he's doing collectively makes sense in the long term and it's a hard sell if you say to people hey I've got an idea we're going to raise your prices for the next year or two uh in the worst possible way but when we're done we're going to be in a solid ground and prices will drift down and we need to do this is the only way to survive you can't really sell that because the all the public would hear is what about the price of my eggs okay I just said they'd go up what about the price of my gas well it might go up but the only way we can get to a point where it's domestic manufacturing and all the things we need to uh reduce cost like creating more energy the only way we get there is through this hard road so we got to do it well you can't really sell that so um I expect it to get a little worse before it gets better so that would be the most natural outcome Trump said he's considering a free trade agreement with Argentina I guess that means no tariffs and no duties and no vat taxes so that would be a big deal I can't imagine that M of Argentina would say no to that because he's a free market guy so is Trump so um I like the fact that Trump is saying this part of the world no tariffs I like that a lot that's a really good way to run a continent well here's a seriously disturbing uh note so representative Nancy mace who's talked about this in public before so I don't know the details but my understanding is she was a victim of a horrific sex related crime with multiple people and maybe the suggestion that there was a videotape so drugged raped and videotaped now that's what people are saying I don't know the details but she said this in a post on X I understand video or videos may have been released via media Outlet tonight I hope this warrants the state to search for certain devices and certain tapes at a certain location what is she suggesting that the crime against her might be on video and that somebody may be releasing it today now I assume it' be you know censored at least a little bit but I got to say I certainly admire her guts that the fact that she's taking ownership of what had to be the most horrific thing that ever happened to her I'm guessing um the fact that instead of just avoiding it or not talking about it she's going right at it she wants you to know what happened and it looks like she wants you to know who it was and I I feel like she knows who it was but I I don't know if she's for any reason decided not to talk about it yet but if this video comes out there will be faces on the screen and they won't all be hers if it's if it is her at all we're we're speculating that's what it looks like well this is funny uh according to Retro Coast um when Doge tried to remove the credit cards from government employees I guess it was the Department of Defense who was running up all kinds of entertainment and Babs and travel on their their government credit cards like a lot like just totally under control uh because nothing's audited seems like so they tried to just remove the credit cards from government employees but some kind of federal judge blocked it so instead of removing the credit cards they just reset the limit to $1 so they can keep their credit cards but it's only $1 limit per month well maybe just $1 according to rasmason 61% believe that an audit of the Social Security System would reveal widespread fraud in the program 61% that means there are 39% who don't expect widespread fraud in our social security they are very optimistic um in many ways that's the best Doge endorsement you could get the 61% thinking audit of the Social Security is going to find massive fraud that is quite an endorsement of the why don't you look at everything and and find that fraud for us so I like that meanwhile NASA scientist according to brighter side of news and Joseph shavit um the reporting on a propellantless propulsion for Rockets space rockets and propellantless means it's not based on stuff explos put in the Rocket's ass to drive it forward or rather it generates thrust using electric Fields rather than expelling Mass so the thinking is if they can perfect this it would be just this enormous Leap Forward in space travel because you wouldn't need to have fuel that you're burning it probably would be easier to generate electricity which in in turn would you know manipulate these electric Fields so I think they surprised themselves how well work all right ladies and gentlemen that is what I have for today thank you for joining another tight hour of fun I'm going to say hi to the uh people on locals privately but the rest of you thanks for joining on Rumble and You.
Tube and x and locals coming at you in 30 seconds I'll definitely be watching the President tonight uh I don't know if I'll stream it probably not e e e
it's time for a
show everything's going to be amazing
today let me get your comments on locals
working there we
[Music]
go good morning everybody and welcome to
the highlight of human civilization it's
called coffee with Scott Adams and
you've never had a better time but if
you'd like to take it up to levels that
nobody can even understand with their
tiny shiny human brains all you need for
that is a cover Mar a glass of tank of
chel Stein a canteen juger flask a
vessel of any kind fill it with your
favorite liquid I like coffee and join
me now for the unparallel pleasure the
doping of the day the thing makes
everything better it's called the
simultaneous Sip and damn it it happens
right now go
so good well special thanks to jack
babic for your kind words on X I
appreciate that I'm glad you're glad you
watch every day um how about the news
huh there's a lot of news today let's
see if we can pound through
it we'll uh we'll get to the serious
stuff in a minute but we people are
streaming in um according to the AP in
Los Angeles uh 30 offic officers at a
Southern California Juvenile Detention
Facility have been charged for holding
uh what they call Gladiator fights with
with the miners so it's a it's not even
an adult facility it's a juvenile
DET I'm not supposed to laugh at this
it's a juvenile detention center but
apparently there were organizing the the
officers were not not the inmates but he
uh the guards were were organizing
Gladiator fights where they would just
all meet in a certain place at a certain
time and fight it
out now I know somebody who uh has had a
more interesting life than than I have
and claims that this is completely
normal for adult detention facilities
that the guards do in fact organize
fights among the uh the inmates for the
adults I didn't know it was happening
juvenile facilities that just you know
makes it extra bad but if you think this
just happened in one place and there
were 30 officers who are all in on
it I got to wake you up this is closer
to standard
procedure the guards if they hate the uh
the inmates any particular ones they
organize a fight and they just put the
ones they hate in the fight and they
just stand back and watch it that that's
a real
thing all right well according to
attorney general Pam Bondi there's an
alleged truckload of Epstein files that
were released by guess what the uh
southern district of New York I guess
that's where they they were all being
stored and uh not unrelated the uh the
head of that FBI the southern district
New York was asked to resign partly
because he told people to dig in and
that was taken as resisting you know
Trump
Administration but uh also he wasn't
really too keen on releasing all the
Epstein files so he's gone and the
Epstein files are in a truck and uh Pam
Bonnie says that
um that they're going to be delivered or
theyve already been delivered and now
they have to go through them and uh and
uh then they'll figure out just what
they can cannot show do you believe
that I don't believe any of it do you
think that they fought so hard to to not
show it that they wouldn't also destroy
the good stuff the truckload doesn't
mean there's any good stuff so I'm going
to guess that when they get in there
they're going to say huh according to
the evidence records and the document
page numbers it feels like all the good
stuff has been removed
or the FBI itself will again even even
if it's cash Patel or somebody else
will just block out the things that
we're not supposed to see and maybe
that's all the stuff that we really
wanted to see so I'm going to say just
for
fun uh I don't believe it's real I do
believe there's a truck I do believe
it's got a lot of Epstein files in it I
do not believe this means we're going to
find out the good stuff
I I think it's just going to be more
repeats of things we've seen but with a
lot more detail so I don't trust this at
all but it does look like Pam Bondi is
dead serious and it looks like cash
Patel is dead serious about trying so
I'm going to give them A+ for trying but
I feel like the Deep state may have
already removed any possibility of
finding the good stuff we'll see that's
just speculation
well Rachel M trying to Sal the idea
that Trump is working with Putin a
Russian puppet you know the usual thing
it wouldn't matter what Trump did Trump
woke up today oh he woke up like a
Russian puppet Trump took a walk on the
golf course oh that's exactly what Putin
would want him to do so she writes up
this super academic list of all the ways
that that Trump is already
already helping Putin and it's such it's
such an academic and boring and
complicated well but you know this could
be connected in some way you know this
stretching the idea of of the connection
let me give you some
examples uh so here's one of the ways
that Trump is allegedly helping
Putin um he weakened this is from Rachel
M uh he weakened the nuclear security by
firing
Personnel okay we're reducing Personnel
in basically everything that Doge
touches so basically everything that
Doge touches you know ends up in people
being uh
fired and every time no matter what
department it is somebody says but those
are the best people those are the best
you got rid of all the best people what
are we going to do now the nuclear
security is probably exactly the same so
no that's probably had nothing to do
with Putin probably just was cost
cutting and then she said that uh that
Trump has disbanded key us Counter
Intelligence
units um eliminated the FBI's foreign
influence task force which investigated
secret foreign lobbying by adversaries
such as
Russia okay so it's something that
affects all of our other adversaries and
but also our allies because they always
try to influence us too so it was a
general
rule but Rachel's like that looks like
that's for Putin so almost anything that
Trump does you can make an argument but
indirectly indirectly that looks like
that's for Putin so it's the most boring
and academic and ridiculous list but
it's good enough for her audience who
are as you know all
idiots so here's here's one we don't
know why yet but P Heth has ordered a
pause in US cyber offensive against
Russia according to the BBC so the US
just stopped doing offensive cyber
attacks on
Russia to which I say now that doesn't
mean they stopped doing defensive stuff
of course but why would you stop
offensive cyber attacks
well if I were getting ready to
negotiate piece I would show them that
we were capable of doing that I wouldn't
wait forever you know we're not going to
wait forever for Russia to sign a deal
but one of the things that Trump is good
at is bringing new variables into a
negotiation so suddenly cyber attacks
are on the table and then separately
there's a report that uh that Russia has
been asked to help communicate with Iran
to work out a
nuclear um some kind of a
nonproliferation or something uh
something about their nuclear program
but the idea is that Russia would be a
productive partner in negotiating with
Iran because they have a better
relationship to which I
say that doesn't that's not
crazy so we don't know enough about the
uh the pause in the US cyber offensive
but if it's just a pause and we're just
showing that we can do it and we're
trying to bring Russia into a more
productive conversation about different
parts of the world and how can you help
us and maybe we can work together and
maybe we can make some
money I don't know I I think you have to
look at the entire universe of things
that are happening to figure out whether
there's any room for a deal if all
you're looking at is seire ceasefire yes
or no ceasefire well you're not going to
know anything yeah have to look at all
the moving parts and say to yourself all
right is that enough moving Parts where
there's stuff we can give without
costing anything and there's stuff they
can give us without costing anything and
probably there's going to be a whole
bunch of variables that allow us to do
that so yeah the more variables that
Trump puts into the deal the more
success will it be I
think uh anyway and and we're not going
to stop our defensive stuff so it's not
like we're
unprotected so Scott Jennings continues
to entertain on the the panel with Abby
Phillip on the CNN and he said uh to his
uh to his TBL mates he goes you
mentioned the Europeans it's it's
interesting to me they spent more money
on Russian oil and gas last year than
they sent to Ukraine
collectively and then Scott Jennings
said that the proposed mineral deal that
got turned down by zalinsky or never got
signed he says the mineral deal is a
effectively a security guarantee and
what did Abby Phillips say um I have to
do the the Democrat idiot face because
it doesn't make sense oh that's not a
security guarantee that's not a security
guarantee you know you have to do a
stupid face and then Scott Jennings
would say well actually it's the best
kind
because it puts our own interests you
know tied to the welfare of the country
so it's actually a really good security
thing but it's not a security guarantee
it's not a security
guarantee you know my book loser think
there's a chapter in there which I talk
about people who argue by
definition you can't win an argument
with a
definition that's like not even playing
and that be Philip is one of the
definition people oh but but that's not
called a that would that that would not
be called a security
guarantee so let me ask you
this remember when KL Harris and the US
and Europe they were all promising uh
Ukraine that you know NATO would would
be helping them and they were meaning
that they would let Ukraine into NATO if
certain conditions were met and those
were kind of like security guarantees
weren't they
and what did that cause to
happen Russia invaded the
country
so how about the time when uh Clinton
promised was it Clinton who promised
Putin that we wouldn't be adding a NATO
countries on the border of Russia and
then we
did so how about those security
guarantees now I would agree that if
you're a NATO country you're safer than
if you're not but to imagine that we
wouldn't sell out with somebody for our
own best interest or anybody really any
country would countries only operate in
their best
interest so Scott Jennings is completely
correct that having a big financial
interest in the country probably keeps
them a lot safer than if we didn't but
if the only thing we did is said hey I
promise you if they attack we'll be
there tomorrow can you trust that is
that enough of a
guarantee what does it take to be a
guarantee it's not like there's some
court that could make us do it what if
we say well that's a special case we
can't get involved in
that
so um I think the definition this is
also a very Democratic thing to do to
insist that there's only one definition
of a thing and and just act like it um
we uh we don't think that biological men
should compete with women in sports
they're called women the definition of
them are called women they're women yeah
you know but we're not arguing the
definition of words we're just saying
that biological men they're stronger and
so there's a risk and sort of an
unfairness to the women but they're
women they're women it's a definition by
definition say it say it say it they're
women and then they do the same thing
with January 6th they start with first
let's agree that this is an
Insurrection U well actually almost
nobody who was there or maybe some tiny
percent would have thought of it that
way almost everybody who protested on
January 6 thought that they might be
stopping an Insurrection so really it
would be closer to the opposite of an
Insurrection a protest perhaps oh it's
an Insurrection it's an Insurrection
they're called women they're called
women security
gues
so once you see the pattern that
Republicans argue about what
works you know what what are the
motivations what are the incentives what
does the system look like that's how
Republicans argue and then the Democrats
argue
definitions which is not even an
argument it's literally what a child
would do but but but you said you you
said you take me to Ice Cream I know but
it's raining and the car is broken but
you said you said I I know it's just I
can't because the car is broken but
we'll go tomorrow but you said you
said it's just a it's just a child
argument over and over
again so Reddit co-founder Lexis Ohanian
is joining a group trying to see if they
can put together a purchase deal for Tik
tock I don't know how many groups there
are looking at it now but they're pretty
serious people so if the most serious
people can't make a deal to buy Tik Tok
who
can so a post by John
stasel and if you didn't know this I
knew this but it kind of fits into the
the stories today so this is an old old
story but he mentions John stel does
that the New York Times
covered up Stalin's famine when he was
starving people Stalin was while
Millions starved now why did the New
York Times cover up you know the one of
the crimes of the century starving
millions of people why would they cover
that well it turns out that their star
reporter Walter duranti uh but also his
colleagues they uh they liked
communism's utopian promises this is
John stasel writing and uh the status he
got when his exclusive interviews he
could do exclusive interviews with
Stalin so literally the New York Times
was ignoring the biggest story happening
the most horrible incredible bad thing
and it was because the
reporter sort of thought maybe communism
is a good deal and you know if you get
past this maybe it'll all work
out now isn't it
great that the media used to be
completely fake and that's all fixed
now you know I always think that if you
don't if you don't know anything about
history everything looks different if if
you knew that for for sure no doubt
about it that our major media
platforms historically had all been
fake uh they were either controlled by
the CIA or or in this case probably
wasn't the CIA but just somebody wanted
to Li because it was good for him or it
worked into his
philosophy can you even imagine what
changed enough that this wouldn't still
be the case was there magic was there
some magic after this happened and then
and then the magic would catch it every
time it tried to happen again no the
Russia collusion hoax was just a madeup
whole thing what about the uh fine
people hoax which by the way and was it
yeah I think
NPR actually pushed the fine people hoax
again I think
yesterday
now the the media has never been real
and if you don't know that it's never
been real historically it's really hard
to understand that like it suddenly
turned
bad but most people think well it was
pretty good in the old days you know
maybe it got a little worse but it's
basically okay no it is always been
completely fake and there are reasons
for it there are structural reasons that
guarantee it will be fake because people
have interests and those interests have
money and U sometimes the writers but
nobody's really interested in the truth
they're interested in what works out for
them well meanwhile the uh tsmc the big
uh gigantic chip company that operates
mostly in Taiwan says they're going to
put 100 bill billion dollars into the US
to build uh and support uh semiconductor
manufacturing here
now that sounds familiar right because
we've had a few rounds of this company's
going to do that this company so I saw
Daniel Baldwin who uh works for
oann and he put together a list so it's
100 billion from from tsmc the chip
company uh Apple promised 500 billion
for domestic man facturing uh something
called Zep bound 27
billion
um 100 billion from soft Bank 20 billion
from daac I don't know what that is 500
billion from
Stargate 600 billion from Saudi
Arabia
now those those numbers start adding up
don't
they um the other thing that's important
that Trump understands better than
anybody's ever understood it is that
sometimes you have
to BS a little bit about how things are
going and then everybody's like really
everything's going in that direction
everybody every there's a big list of
people putting a lot of money in there I
better get on board it's how I get
attention it's how the I make the
government like me it's how I get the
public to like me looks like it's Trend
so these type of deals are being really
well
promoted and the promotion is probably
as important as the dollar amounts at
least in the early stages because you
need a lot more but you want everybody
to think everybody's doing it like you
you need people to just think oh this is
the thing now this is what we do um and
we're there I think I think he's
actually achieved that uh Eric D dhy on
X says that HP is looking to move a lot
of their operations from China to the US
in response to Trump's
tariffs so there's another story um the
tariffs are working at least in that
limited
sense and meanwhile Trump's telling
Farmers to get ready to produce more uh
food to sell inside the us because he's
putting tariffs on uh external food
coming in starting April 2nd now the
tariffs for um Canada and Mexico kicked
in today 25% on most things but energy
is a little cheaper 10% and I think uh
Canada's already matched it with 25% I
haven't heard from Mexico yet but one
assumes it'll match it so the trade war
is
[Music]
on but um the same time we'll talk more
about that uh OPEC announced that it's
going to increase oil production
according to the hill now if you
increase oil production C that should
drive the uh price of oil down because
it increases
Supply um and I don't know if that's net
good or bad for the United States
because if prices are high then we drill
a lot more in the United States because
everything you do would make money it's
like whoa oil is so high if it goes down
then even some of the wells we already
drilled um somebody's going to say oh
this was a good idea before but now the
price went down so they might you know
just cap it so it it certainly should
help with the price of your eggs and it
certainly should help with inflation
eventually and I don't think there's
anything
bigger so OPEC producing more is just
about the best thing that could ever
happen for Trump you know it's the one
thing that everybody agrees lowers
inflation or at least prices
today so that's good news uh
meanwhile uh X the xplatform is doing
more great work for free speech uh so
California was intro introduced this uh
censorship law for social media and the
essence of it is they require they want
to require the social media platforms to
have their own censorship um standards
but it's all kind of squishy stuff like
do you have a definition of hate speech
what is your definition of
racism and and all these things have
that
uhoh thing to them it's like okay we
don't want ha speech we don't want any
racism but as soon as you say it's
somebody's job to decide when it
happened then everything looks like hate
speech and everything looks like racism
because you could sort of you know
racial mat it to make anything sound
like one of those two things so it would
be just a gross attack on Free Speech uh
but it looks like X hired some lawyers
and
uh uh looks like it's going to be
blocked at the moment the court struck
down the key censorship provision
according to reclaim the net DD rankovic
so this is this is really huge and if
you only think of X in terms of you know
the the more obvious stuff it's doing
you would miss one of its biggest values
to the country is this uh musk will
lawyer up whatever it costs and he will
go after every attack on free speech
that affs X and this is
huge that you know you could get a win
like
that um speaking of which you know that
the Europeans are trying to do the same
thing that California was doing which is
create these censorship standards so
that they can control American companies
by controlling what they can do in
Europe which would you know trickle into
the United States so if they said for
example you can't post a message like
this whatever this is in Europe well
what are the platforms going to do if
you're Facebook you're going to say all
right well I guess we're going have to
ban it everywhere because if it's banned
in Europe and they're going to
completely kick us out that market if we
don't do this we're going to have to
sens
so um the FCC chairman
um was over at the uh uh Mobile World
Congress this is a Brendan Carr Brendan
Carr is one of the good guys he he is
very active and chasing down the bad
behavior and addressing it so he's a
giving speeches basically uh and he's
mentioning the eu's Digital Services act
which is the the one that would be sort
of a backdoor way of censoring
Americans and
uh basically he's he's warning them that
the United States is going to respond
you know because Trump has already said
uh he wants a directive to figure out
how to tariff them or do something to
make sure that they can't extort us that
way so I love the fact that Trump and
his head of the FCC basically are saying
This Is War
you you can try to censor us but we're
not giving up the First Amendment so you
tell us how expensive you want to make
this
because you know there's nothing we're
not going to do to make sure that we're
not censored you can censor yourself put
yourself out of business as a real
country but you're not going to do it to
us
and I think that Trump again one of the
Magic parts of trump is that he doesn't
Bluff so when Trump says were coming for
you if you don't change this they know
he's coming and Brendan Carr is like you
know Chief Gladiator so if he's coming
for you he's you know fully supported by
Trump
so we'll see where this goes but I love
the fact that Trump is completely at War
and isn't going to take this it's just
completely unacceptable we're we're
going to we do whatever it takes
meanwhile update on the Dei dominoes
so Dei has been falling everywhere even
Black Rock decided to get out of it the
big banks are getting out of it now
today Arizona universities are quietly
deleting their Dei language according to
kronite news now I don't know if that
means they're just hiding it but it
means that they understand there's a
risk and so they're operating based on
risk which is what we want uh also the
University of Southern California is
going to scrub their Dei stuff out of
their
um other documents and stuff and again I
don't know if that's just hiding it it
might be hiding it but still step in the
right direction if they have to hide it
that feels like a little bit of a win
it's a half win uh and then apparently
there were um there were some CIA
officers who were fired because they
were part of the Dei programs for for
the CIA and according to Natural news
but a judge just um
upheld Trump and Doge's ability to fire
them for just being part of the Dei they
didn't need a better reason so that was
a reason and uh so that's going to
stick one of my big questions is how
will history treat
Dei because you know if you went back in
history and let's say it was right in
the middle of
slavery what do you think the news said
about slavery in the South the news in
the South it was probably like yeah
things are working real good uh we of
course we got a lot of slaves so
production is up uh we had a good
ball um don't you think that while it
was happening it was treated like a
positive because otherwise it wouldn't
have been there but then you know a few
hundred years later we quite rightly
call it like one of the worst things
we've ever done and we've done some bad
things things uh but we all understand
okay that's just that's right near the
top of the worst things we've ever done
what do you think Dei will do in the
future I I have a dream I have a
dream that it will be treated by
historians as just
evil now it's not going to be full you
know slavery evil or Jim Crow evil but
it's it's right up there with Jim Crow
so it's like 40 years roughly 40 years I
think of absolute over discrimination
against one category of
people and lives were ruined careers
were ruined the economy was suffering I
think um it's just one of the darkest
worst messed up parts of American
history and I just wonder if history
will ever record it that way or if
they'll say well uh all the good people
try for decades to make things better
but the evil Republicans shut it down
after 40 years of being terribly
successful now it wasn't called Dei for
40 years but it was you know affirmative
action same thing so I'm hoping history
will get it right and say this is one of
the worst things that the country's ever
done we've done worse but it's it's one
of the bad ones all right this is funny
and
also predictable do you remember when UK
UK and France were meeting to figure out
what they could do about
Ukraine and then they came out to that
meeting and it sounded like oh looks
like there's a little bit of unity there
so the UK and France were talking about
maybe putting boots on the ground and I
thought well it starts with you know two
of the more important countries and then
then they'll slowly you know collecting
their allies and you know maybe maybe
they've got this maybe they figured it
out but instead apparently what we just
learned is that Germany walked out of
the meeting according to Javier Vore
European
conservative um so Germany just said you
know I'm paraphrasing because I wasn't
there but it was something like wait
what did you just say well our idea is
we're going to put boots on the ground
in
Ukraine wait whose boots you know
European so we're going to put some UK
boots going to put a little France boots
we we we can get some German boots over
there filled with people of course not
just the boots and then Germany was
like we're
done that's crazy and they just walked
out now if Europe can't get Germany on
board and it's not because it's
expensive it's because Germany just said
ah how about no how about hard hard
no so and then we're not even sure if
France and the UK agree on uh on what a
ceasefire would look like so so the
European Union or let's just call it the
European countries decide that they're
going to go it
alone and the best they could come up
with is two countries that almost agreed
and the rest of them just said are you
crazy we're out so it looks like they
got nothing but then on top of that the
uh EU head of the
EU uh says that they they're going to
unveil a $800 billion plan to rearm
Europe $800
billion and I say to
myself okay what would have been the
most predictable outcome not the most
entertaining the most predictable
outcome's let's see if you can figure
this out there's a possibility of
conflict uh people are trying to prevent
conf lict but there's a real possibility
of the
conflict if you were going to predict
what was going to happen the most
obvious prediction it would have been oh
so what will happen is that the
military-industrial complex will get
billions of dollars and uh and we'll get
screwed it was completely predictable
the military industrial complex they
just keep
winning I I've actually thought huh how
could I get in on this
military-industrial complex because you
know I like to be on the winning team
and I swear to God they win every they
win every round what's your problem uh
Russia you're going to need to buy some
weapons what's your problem China well I
got an idea you better spend a trillion
dollars on weapons it's like no matter
what we do the answer is always give
money to the military-industrial
complex so that's why we like Trump
because I don't think he automatically
Falls for that
um it's also weird that Europe has nukes
and those are not a deterrent to being
invaded like what what are they actually
buying weapons to do are they buying
weapons so that they don't have to use
their nukes if Russia tries to roll over
Europe and take over the
UK has Russia ever shown give me a
history lesson has Russia ever shown
interest
in conquering any country that wasn't
really either Russians speaking or had
some you know obvious uh strategic
value they're not good guys so I'm not
saying Russia is the good guys don't get
me wrong but do you think Russia has
ever wanted to conquer
France if they ever wanted to conquer
the UK or at least let's say in the last
100 years I don't think so so it seems
like if you just said here's the deal
we're going to get rid of all of our
weapons but if you put one Russian boot
on our territory we're going to Nuke
Poland not Poland we're going to Nuke
Moscow sorry don't aim the don't a the
new exited
Ally why doesn't that work you know if
the more traditional weapons you have
the more likely you're going to get into
a traditional fight but if you just said
we're going to get rid of all of them
because you'd be insane to attack us
because we only have this one defense so
we use it we'll just take out Moscow
with a nuclear weapon would you if you
were Russia and somebody said our entire
defense is written up in this document
you're free to read it and the document
says if Russia attacks even one inch of
our territory we're going to Nuke
them would you attack if it was actually
in writing we're going to put a nuke
right up your ass
I don't think so now there like I said
there's no such thing as a real security
guarantee there's no no
guarantees
but it would have to be at least as safe
as spending $800 billion for the
military-industrial complex some of it
in our country I assume but a lot of in
Europe while Trump's giving a big speech
to Congress tonight somebody some people
were speculating that he might float the
idea of leaving NATO I don't think so
because I don't think he would announce
that in his speech but hey he's full of
surprises Anything Could Happen he might
tease it I could imagine him teasing it
just to see what reaction he got but I
don't think he's going to announce it um
apparently according to election wizard
on
X the Congressional Democrats are
planning to disrupt his
speech and their plan
allegedly uh involves using a variety of
tactics including noise makers Hand
Clappers signs eggs and
walkouts now how do the eggs fit into
this and and why are eggs suddenly such
a big part of every story can we do can
we do any story that doesn't involve
eggs why did eggs become the biggest
thing to talk about anyway I
assume the eggs would be to what
throw if somebody threw an egg at the
president wouldn't they be
arrested would that not be
assault or
attempted attempted injury of some kind
of a sitting president Wouldn't It Be A
disruption of uh of an official business
I don't know if his speech is official
business or not but uh we'll see uh I'm
kind of kind of doubtful that eggs will
be thrown
maybe they'll just bring him to show off
it's like look I got an egg anybody else
have an egg can't afford it can you I
got an egg because I did insider trading
I did enough insider trading to have an
egg well according to Laura lumer and
some others uh apparently the left is
also going to organize or has organized
uh some kind of a massive protest in the
black lives matter Plaza before Trump
does his speech to Congress now do you
remember when we were more
innocent and if you heard that the left
had an organized protest you'd think wow
it must be a lot of people like Regular
People were just mad otherwise you
couldn't pull together that many people
but then you learned that these are all
fake all these protests are just
probably Soros funded or you know
Hoffman or something and that um some of
the people might be
sincere but this this doesn't happen
unless it's just a big fake thing driven
by people at the top with money so to me
it's just funny because once you realize
it's just theater and it's fake it
doesn't even look the same anymore like
I I can't even get mad at it because
like oh that's kind of funny how's your
fake protest
going well if you haven't seen Economist
Jeffrey saxs talking about Russia and
Ukraine you really should now he does
have what I would
consider a I don't want to say
it in a it's hard to describe him other
people would say he's
pro-russian other people would so I'm
not going to say that but it it lets you
know how he is received so one of the
things when I say Pro Russian I don't
mean more than the United States it's
just that he doesn't want to be at war
with Russia doesn't make any sense so I
guess other people think think that's
pro- Russian because he doesn't want to
be at war with Russia um but he says the
war is over because Trump doesn't want
to back a loser and that's all you have
to know that zinski is a loser and
backing him would wouldn't make sense
and it certainly wouldn't make sense for
somebody like Trump who doesn't want to
back a loser and I thought to myself
that is really cleverly
summarized you know if you could imagine
that Trump thought zalinski was actually
you know uh Winston Churchill and a
amazing figure maybe he would treat him
that way but it's pretty clear that
Trump thinks that zinski is a
loser and he doesn't want to Hitch his
wagon to somebody who's unpredictable
and not going along with the game and
once and zalinsky predicted that the war
would last a long time now isn't that
kind of up to
zilinski Ian it's only going to last as
long as he wants it to
so yeah I I think I agree with Jeffrey
saaks on this if the only thing you knew
is that Trump isn't the kind of guy who
wants to back a loser an obvious
loser um it's kind of all you need to
know
so
meanwhile uh Russia has allegedly agreed
I think I mentioned this to help with uh
uh negotiating with Iran over their
nuclear program Iran's nuclear program
and also talked to them about uh Iran
support of proxies in the region uh
Bloomberg AI was reporting this now what
I like about this like I said is when
Trump expands the
negotiations which he's doing instead of
saying hey which part of Ukraine do you
keep and what day do you want to do the
ceasefire total losing approach not
enough variables but if Trump goes and
says um
according to unusual
whales uh Ukraine's president zalinski
just
said quote I am ready to work under
Trump's strong leadership to bring peace
interesting because that's exactly what
Trump demanded he said we can work with
you but we need a strong statement that
says you want peace because the last
thing you said was I think the war is
going to last a long time we need
security guarantees we need weapons s
that's the opposite of working toward
peace so it looks like zinski
is reading the room a little bit better
obviously he's getting a lot of
advice but uh you see the bigger picture
right it's a really big world uh Russia
has a lot of energy they get a big
military they've got connections with
countries we want to influence you know
Syria and um
and Iran and we have things that they
want such as maybe not doing cyber
attacks maybe we're better at it than
they are so I think the conversation is
going to go to I'm just going to guess
I'll bet you you we had 20
variables which would be
genius because if you got 20 variables
everybody's got something to get out of
it it's like okay well you're going to
help us with the rant but also this will
settle you know Ukraine but well maybe
we can do a mineral deal with Russia
separately from anything that we do with
Ukraine and so suddenly you've got 20
different things that just make sense
just common sense you know you help us
we can help
you there's no reason that we should be
enemies now those of you who have been
with me a long time how long have I been
saying that the The Arc of history is
bending toward Russia and the United
States being
allies we're natural
allies now what I mean by that is that
we have more interests in common if we
think about it right yeah if we stop
packing at each other and and trying to
get an advantage and put the other one
out of business which is what we've both
been doing for decades if we just
stopped doing it and said how about
instead of trying to destroy each other
and putting all of our efforts into it
what if we tried to make money what if
we tried to make the world safer uh what
if we said if you stay out of uh you
know our part of the world uh there are
parts of your world that will stay out
of and I just think we have the most
natural um possibility of being allies
now part of it is we don't share a
border as soon as you share a border
everything everything becomes
complicated but we don't we got that
wonderful Ocean between us and more we
got Europe and an ocean
so I really
think my optimism of getting sort of a
giant 20 variable Russia
deal very high very high and the reason
is both sides want it and it's doable
both sides have really good uh really
good negotiators and and uh Trump trump
said in one of his announcements that uh
that Putin even used his own campaign
phrase Common Sense which of course was
very smart for Putin to do because he's
good at sucking up you know when he's
negotiating so yeah I think something
good could come out I'm 100% positive on
this at the moment 100% positive it
won't be right away because 20 variables
I mean think about how long it would
take to figure out 20 variables but we
can do
it
um so JD Vance was explaining how the uh
the mineral deal would have been better
than a security guarantee and he said
uh he said uh the president knows that
look if you want real security
guarantees if you want to actually
ensure that Putin does not invade
Ukraine again the very best security
guarantee is to give Americans economic
upside in the future of
Ukraine uh that is a way better security
guarantee than here comes his
disc I love how JD just slaps down other
entities because this is way better
security guarantee than 20,000 troops
from some random country that hasn't
fought a war in 30 or 40
years
wow that's how he talks with about our
allies well okay I like it
um and I agree the the only thing that
protects you is that the country that
has the big guns has a personal interest
so if we've got a lot of money on the
line I mean this could be a trillion
dollars you know in these mining deals
uh yeah that would be a good way to
guarantee that we we're interested and
by the way if you're
Russia and we said to you don't attack
Ukraine because you know we'll go in and
protect them we gave them a security
guarantee would that be
stronger than saying uh you better not
go into Ukraine because we've got a
trillion dollars riding there and we're
not going to let that just be taken over
so if you go in we're going to protect
our interests doesn't that sound the
same the the one where you say we're
going to protect our own economic
interest that sounds like the more real
one because everybody protects their own
economic interest if you said oh we're
going to go protect this country in the
other side of the world that doesn't
have a direct impact on
us even if we meant it it's not terribly
persuasive but if you say we're not
going to give up a trillion dollars in
mining operations which are critical to
our most important industries like Ai
and self-driving cars and robots we're
not going to give that up so if you move
your armies in we have to stop you and
you wouldn't even have to put it in
writing
because Putin would know that these are
critical mineral rights they're not
these are not ordinary things it's not
it's not mining for fun it's critical
survival depends on it we need to nail
down some sources that we can mine
preferably in other
countries anyway uh Elon Musk was saying
this about zinski uh he says as distaste
distasteful as it is zinsky should be
offered some kind of amnesty in a
neutral country in exchange for a
peaceful transition back to democracy in
Ukraine now how many years have I been
talking about dictator retirement
Island we always have the same problem
that if there's a dictator we want to
depose there's not really any path for
the dictator they kind of have to fight
to the death including killing all of
their own their own uh country people by
sending them you know against your
machine guns
so I don't think there's a practical way
to solve this but if we had just one
good Island and we deci here's the deal
if you decide to retire to this island
we'll give you an American passport and
you can you can live there you'll have a
mansion you can keep the billion dollars
you stole uh you can live in luxury and
we'll guarantee then nobody comes over
and tries to kill you from anything you
did before you'll just live with your
neighbors who are also retired dictators
be kind of
cool it's not my best idea but I agree
with musk there needs to be some way
that the alleged
dictator can make a clean Escape in in a
way that would just be good for them
because we don't need to punish them so
much as we just need them gone
sometimes all right here's my idea for
what to do to negotiate the who owns
what land uh on the eastern part of what
used to be Ukraine but now seems to be
totally occupied by Russia just the
eastern part um I saw a map of where
Russia was the main language I didn't
realize that something like is it over
half of Ukraine uh Russia is the
dominant uh language and people might
even call themselves Russian not all of
them but a lot of them would call
themselves Russians even though they're
technically ukrainians and so
I thought well if let's say you did a
vote and you said all right all these
little regions that are disputed that
Russia controls right now uh Russia
would you agree to do a vote well
nobody's going to trust the vote we
would just assume that would be rigged
so you can't really have a
vote but could you do a
survey I'm guessing that most of the
people over there still have cell phones
right
could you do a scientific
enough um and I would get at least three
separate pollsters to do it and then
compare them so that they would do their
work blind then the three would compare
to see if there's any major differences
in what they got and they would just
call people they say all right you if do
you want to be uh owned by Russia or
owned by
Ukraine and then you just figure out
what they
want now what if you what if Ukraine
said we don't agree with
that then you have to wonder what is
their
motivation if what the if what the
people who live there want isn't the
main thing then what are you are you a
dictatorship shouldn't the people who
live there be the primary ones who
decide now we also have the problem that
some of that area is depopulated so I
don't even know what's left so you might
not even be able to get any kind of
representative sample because it might
be just people who haven't died yet you
know old people and children and stuff
so maybe impossible but I would at least
look at the idea of polling them and
you'd have to have at least three polls
operating independently to to feel like
you know one of them wasn't totally
biased meanwhile Governor Nome of
California um according to Joel Pollock
and Breitbart is uh ordering state
employees back to the
office so nome's uh plan to act more
like a
republican seems to be right on point so
he's copying Doge and and making The
Californians come back to work now he
says only four days a
week which would be a
lot but it does remind you that the
Democrats just painted themselves into
the corner of all Corners by being
opposed to Common Sense
so when whenever they Embrace a little
bit of common sense it just looks like
they're copying and then you say well
why do we need them if they're just
copying you know just Republicans
already do it and you don't have to
wonder if they mean it because
Republicans tend to only do things they
mean so the
uh the Democrat strategy of saying let's
let's do more common sense things and
emphasize uh
patriotism and get rid of the identity
politics how does that
work from an election strategy
perspective so so follow me on this if
somebody likes what Republicans do and
they like what Trump does and they like
especially that Trump is emphasizing
Common Sense
Solutions is there any is there any
scenario in which they vote Democrat
because oh it's all the same now now
they're both doing common sense so I I
guess I'll I'll
abandon you know my love of magga and
I'll vote for a Democrat not many people
are going to do that because it looks
like one side means it and the other
side is just doing fast copying and you
couldn't even be sure that you know if
you looked away they would still do on a
common sense stuff because it's not
really in their
genes but um
meaning the party's genes not any
individuals
genes
and wouldn't it just make the the the
extreme people in their own party the
Democrats wouldn't it just make them not
show up to
vote so if they copy
Republicans and try to be the common
sense ones wouldn't the only net effect
be to reduce their own
base because it's not going to make any
difference to a trump voter not no Trump
voter is going to say oh look those
Democrats look good today I'll go over
there for a day I don't think
so so it makes me wonder if they've
thought anything out like even on paper
it doesn't look like it can work even
though obviously backing Common Sense
makes sense but how can that work now
the other thing I notic is that when
Republicans talk have you noticed the
Republicans have a vibe like you could
probably tell who's a republican if
they're talking on TV takes you about 10
seconds to say ah probably a republican
because they have a let's say a buttoned
up kind of Republican conservative way
of talking about things and I would say
that that's
authentic because it's the lifestyle
that they've adopted they they are
influenced by the people that they like
and people are around so you know nobody
is completely natural but Republicans
talk and act and think like
Republicans but Democrats have this
weird thing where the most prominent
part of their party are just theater
kids and they try to sell their ideas
with their faces have you noticed that
if if you listen to a republican trying
to sell a policy they'll say well if we
do this and that we'll get this impact
so that's why we want to do it just
policy but if you get any one of these
cats out shiff Chris Murphy Jamie Raskin
AOC swell Elizabeth Warren or Schumer
they do face
persuasion where they they just crunch
up their face to show how terrible
something is that Trump is
doing it's so bad oh it's so bad he's H
there he's H there and none of it makes
sense and they they do uh you know
definition thinking and analogy thinking
literally
analogy because they say oh he's acting
like Hitler now an analogy which is not
anything or oh the definition of an
Insurrection these are not even attempts
to be part of the rational
conversation because none of that's
rational uh so instead they send
actors now it doesn't mean that every
Democrat is an actor because they have
you know normal ones but the normal ones
are not on TV the ones that get on TV
are the are the ones who do the faces
oh it's so bad I've got so much empathy
oh look look at the little things in my
forehead look at those lines on my
forehead that's that's how serious I am
about how bad it is it they're so beyond
pathetic at this point that it just
seems funny and my new favorite is Chris
Murphy because that guy doesn't look
genuine even a little bit he literally
just looks like a theater kid who's just
so happy he can do his you know he can
do his act on
TV anyway tariffs tariffs
tariffs uh Trump is doubling his tariffs
on China over the fenol
crisis I'm in favor of that I'm in favor
of uh pressing China in every way we can
I don't think that a tariff will end um
their fental practice because I think
their benefit is to Big it's a huge
burden on the United States they don't
care about our deaths and so clearly
strategically they're going to keep
doing it but there is one thing that
they do care about which is being shamed
on the public stage and by putting
gigantic tariffs on them because they're
sending fenel to us and we know they can
stop it
that is a way to shame them without just
getting in she's face we just say this
is going to stop we're going to press
every button and we're going to make a
lot of noise forever and it's going to
be one of the biggest things that
anybody thinks about when they think
about China so China if you want your
reputation to be that your drug
dealers you win because we're going to
make sure that your reputation is drug
dealers so if you want uh that to be
your brand uh Trump will be happy to
make that come true for you now that
might have some
power um not by itself so again you'd
have to add 20 variables to get any kind
of a deal that really stopped
fenel but I don't know if fentanyl can
be stopped but I do like the level of
effort that Trump's putting into
it meanwhile China is halting Imports of
us
logs and it's suspend suspending Imports
of our soybeans
no what what will happen to our logs and
our soybeans now of course these are
tragedies for the industries involved I
don't want to minimize it but the thing
you should
probably um
expect is that prices will go up in the
short term and the short term could be a
year but it might be more than a year
but everything he's doing collectively
makes sense in the long term and it's a
hard sell if you say to people hey I've
got an idea we're going to raise your
prices for the next year or two uh in
the worst possible way but when we're
done we're going to be in a solid ground
and prices will drift down and we need
to do this is the only way to survive
you can't really sell that because the
all the public would hear is what about
the price of my eggs okay I just said
they'd go up what about the price of my
gas well it might go up but the only way
we can get to a point where it's
domestic manufacturing and all the
things we need to uh reduce cost like
creating more energy the only way we get
there is through this hard road so we
got to do it well you can't really sell
that so um I expect it to get a little
worse before it gets better so that
would be the most natural
outcome Trump said he's considering a
free trade agreement with Argentina I
guess that means no tariffs and no
duties and no vat taxes so that would be
a big deal I can't imagine that M of
Argentina would say no to that because
he's a free market guy so is Trump so um
I like the fact that Trump is saying
this part of the world no
tariffs I like that a lot that's a
really good way to run a continent
well here's a seriously disturbing uh
note so representative Nancy mace who's
talked about this in public before so I
don't know the details but my
understanding is she was a victim of a
horrific sex related crime with multiple
people and maybe the suggestion that
there was a videotape so drugged raped
and videotaped now that's what people
are saying I don't know the details but
she said this in a post on X I
understand video or videos may have been
released via media Outlet tonight I hope
this warrants the state to search for
certain devices and certain tapes at a
certain
location
what is she suggesting that the crime
against her might be on video and that
somebody may be releasing it today now I
assume it' be you know censored at least
a little bit
but I got to say I certainly admire her
guts that the fact that she's taking
ownership of what had to be the most
horrific thing that ever happened to her
I'm guessing um the fact that instead of
just avoiding it or not talking about it
she's going right at it she wants you to
know what
happened and it looks like she wants you
to know who it was and I I feel like she
knows who it was but I I don't know if
she's for any reason decided not to talk
about it yet but if this video comes
out there will be faces on the screen
and they won't all be hers if it's if it
is her at all we're we're speculating
that's what it looks like well this is
funny uh according to Retro
Coast um when Doge tried to remove the
credit cards from government employees I
guess it was the Department of Defense
who was running up all kinds of
entertainment and Babs and travel on
their their government credit cards like
a lot like just totally under control uh
because nothing's audited seems like so
they tried to just remove the credit
cards from government employees but some
kind of federal judge blocked it so
instead of removing the credit cards
they just reset the limit to
$1 so they can keep their credit cards
but it's only $1 limit per month well
maybe just
$1 according to rasmason 61% believe
that an audit of the Social Security
System would reveal widespread fraud in
the program
61% that means there are
39% who don't expect widespread fraud in
our social security they are very
optimistic um in many ways that's the
best Doge endorsement you could get the
61% thinking audit of the Social
Security is going to find massive fraud
that is quite an
endorsement of the why don't you look at
everything and and find that fraud for
us so I like that meanwhile NASA
scientist according to brighter side of
news and Joseph shavit um the reporting
on a propellantless propulsion for
Rockets space rockets and propellantless
means it's not based on stuff explos put
in the Rocket's ass to drive it forward
or rather it generates thrust using
electric
Fields rather than expelling
Mass so the thinking is if they can
perfect this it would be just this
enormous Leap Forward in space travel
because you wouldn't need to have fuel
that you're burning it probably would be
easier to generate electricity which in
in turn would you know manipulate these
electric Fields so I think they
surprised themselves how well work all
right ladies and gentlemen that is what
I have for
today thank you for joining another
tight hour of fun I'm going to say hi to
the uh people on
locals privately but the rest of you
thanks for joining on Rumble and YouTube
and x and
locals coming at you in 30
seconds I'll definitely be watching the
President tonight uh I don't know if
I'll stream it probably
not
e
e e