Episode 490 Scott Adams - Sanctuary City Persuasion, Climate Change Solutions

hey everybody stadley come on in here I'm a little bit late this morning I wasn't watching the clock I promise I was awake but I wasn't watching the clock and here I am a little later than usual but does it matter it does not because the deliciousness of the simultaneous sip cannot be diminished by simple chronological misgivings I'm not even sure that was a real sentence doesn't matter because you're here I'm here you've got your container your cup your mug you might have a flask or a tanker or a Stein maybe a thermos but whatever it is I hope it's filled with your favorite liquid I like coffee and join me now for the simultaneous app yes yes I'm sorry I'm late but what a fun so I need to start this uh presentation if you can call it that by uh acknowledging my critics who are going to say Scott are you sick of licking the president's shoes you say that everything he does is genius what you are so not credible now of course those of you who watch me know that I don't say that I criticize him on health care and statues and all kinds of stuff but when he does something good persuasion wise sometimes is better than anything anybody's ever done and I can't not say that because it's true and it's of course my main domain of content so when the news came out that it leaked that the White House was considering merely considering shipping the uh illegal immigrants from the Caravans into the sanctuary cities we all laughed when we saw it but we thought well and I said this well that's never going to happen that's never going to happen and it didn't take long for the president to tweet oh yeah we're totally thinking about that we're totally going to we're totally considering that and you know maybe we'll shift them to the sanctuary cities now of course the news and social media went crazy when he said that uh as Dana Bash said as CNN he quote owned the criticism and I thought yeah that's exactly what he did he took a bad news story because of the leak and all it was going to be is ah these people are bad they're even considering doing this they're so evil and as soon as he changed it from a a rumor that we found down through a leak into a tweet completely puts it out there with no shame whatsoever and says absolutely we we're planning on you we're not planning it but we're we're strongly considering it now what does that do what that does is that remember it's sort of a slow news period there's not much else going on and he he didn't want the weekend to go by with people talking about this rumor so he owns it creates more news but specifically he makes you focus on what he wants you to focus on so all weekend if we're talking about this and there's not much else to talk about we're going to be talking about hey why can't the sanctuary cities agree to take all of the immigrants why wouldn't they but it gets better because it turns out that that was just phase one of his persuasion phase two he dropped I guess it was last night so it's a followup to his first tweet and he says uh if the radical left Democrats all of a sudden don't want the illegal migrants in their Sanctuary cities no more Open Arms Why should others be expected to take them into their communities uh go home and come into our country legally and through a system of marriage now the key part of this tweet is why should others be expect them to expected to take them into their community so he's moved the conversation from wherever it was where nothing good was happening nothing was getting done he's moved it to the public so uh and of course the persuasion is always partly to Congress and partly to the public but this is squarely at the public this persuasion is just at the public it's not at it's not at the other politicians and he's forcing the question and he's forcing the question that the other side is determined to ignore and we may see him I'm not going to predict this but it would be an interesting Play We may see him ask the specific question how many are you willing to take if he takes it to the third phase and he might he could extend this one more day by tweeting something along the the lines of we're looking for volunteers volunteers Sanctuary cities to volunteer now people are going to call him on this Bluff and I think a few a few Mayors already have and I think they've said yeah we love immigrants absolutely bring them our away but they know they're bluffing they're calling his bluff but they're also bluffing so phase four is to say thank you for volunteering how many can you take and that's the kill shot how many can you take is the end of the conversation now I don't know if he's going to take his two-phase persuasion into the third phase of asking for volunteers volunteer Sanctuary cities volunteer communities because those politicians are going to be on this on the burner with their own residents if they volunteer if they don't volunteer then they're they're outed as Liars wait a minute you've been saying that this will help you why don't you volunteer and then once they volunteer you take it to phase four which is give us your number cuz we don't want to ship more than you want we only want to give you what you volunteer for so tell us the number and that's the end of the conversation because the only way that we've we have this um this impass the political impass is because the people on the left refuse to say how many is the right number and this is forcing that question now he's not there yet the president hasn't gotten to how many that's where you need to get though because that's where everything fall falls apart there the the entire resistance is built on um a transparent lie and the LIE is that more is better to Infinity more is not better to Infinity I'll agree that more is better so let me say you know in case anything gets taken out of context let me say as clearly as possible I think most people in the United States would agree with the general state M that immigration is positive for the country most people 90% of the country probably believes that immigration and the 10% who don't believe it are are not really serious players I'm not sure you could listen to anything that 10% says but 90% of us would say we absolutely want immigration it's not about immigration but give us the number everybody who likes immigration knows that there're some amount that's too much you know you you could die drinking water if you drink too much so water is great but how much do you have to drink because there is a there is a point where you die from it so here's a question I haven't seen anybody ask so I'll ask it we've been told for a long time that immigration brings down the crime rate if you bring in more immigrants you have lower crime now when people say that they usually don't distinguish between people coming in on airplanes and people coming in Legally and people coming across the border illegally they sort of get lumped into this big group of low crime population now I believe that's probably true it's very believable to me that the entire population of immigrants legal illegal airplane Visa type border type if you put them all together I do believe that they would have a low crime rate so here's my question how many Guatemalans could you put in Chicago to get the crime rate down to normal I know you're laughing right now aren't you it's a funny question theoretically how many migrant Caravans could you put in Chicago to get that crime rate down to something normal cuz right now the crime rate in Chicago is through the roof in theory if you add enough Guatemalans you get that crime rate down to something like I don't know my town now I'm I'm not suggesting that's a practical idea it's just a funny idea but we're seeing that the uh we're seeing that the people's uh let's say hardened positions are a little bit ridiculous in some cases now now I would argue that the question about uh immigration and border security are really persuasion problems at this point that it's not about resources it's not about knowing what to do we actually know what to do we have enough resources it's expensive but we can figure it out everything is doable except that our government is totally broken they can't agree on things they agree on let me say that again our government is so broken that they can't agree on things they agree on because everybody agrees well we need some good you know border control it's a crisis we'd like to be good to the people who who are just trying to make a better life everybody agrees on all the big stuff and they still can't get it done so it's a persuasion problem it's not a physical resource kind of a problem it's not a problem where we can't figure out how to get it done people just don't want to it's a political problem and the president's persuasion about hey how about we take them to your neighborhood is really highlighting the fact that the Democratic um um politicians are using the immigrants as pawns for their political Ambitions so if you're going to talk about the president potentially using the immigrants as PA to quote as CNN is using they're using the word dump to make you sound like the president is more evil if you're going to dump him in our backyard so everybody got the memo to say dump instead of relocate so all of the Democrats are referring to the uh immigrants as garbage I'm not making this up the president actually caused every analyst on CNN to refer to the to refer to immigrants who have a desperate situation and are just trying to live and survive and make a better life people who are by and large vast majority of them are excellent people that you would you would like in your life they're good people overwhelmingly and CNN has actually put out a memo to refer to them as garbage I'm not making this up I'm not making this because they're all using the word dump let me do a let me do a quick check here I just watched Dana Bash say dump CNN if you if you look at any article about this let's see um it looks like CNN has decided that reporting the story is not a winning position they've already backed off the entire story it's not even the president did the two most provocative tweets that we've seen in months and months and and it doesn't look like it's on their front page of their news I'm looking I'm still looking uh there's one link to Dana Bash saying that he's dumping them so that's it one link to a video that's it that's the whole the whole thing uh yeah I think by the way yes let me give credit to Tucker Carlson because he's the one who pointed out that they're all using this word dumped and I don't know how you can how can you use the word dumped without conting garbage I think the Democrats have to explain they have to explain why they're calling good people who just want to have a better life why are they saying dump they need to explain that and I don't know who's asking now here's the other funny thing imagine if you're a Democrat and you're the kind of democrat who likes to go on the news and and give interviews and let's say you've already been scheduled for today maybe you were scheduled a few days ago to go on today and talk about whatever topic you do not want to go on TV today there's no Democrat who wants to go in front of a camera today where there are questions because if somebody asks the question what do you think of this Trump tweet where they say they'll take them to your neighborhood how many can you take um now they're all going to have to avoid the question so they're going to have to avoid the question they're going to have to say uh they're going to have to say the president is using these good people as poems in his political games they're going to have to talk about the fact that the White House denied they were going to do it before the president tweeted which is not the story right that's the the B story The a story is you have to explain why you don't want them in your neighborhood and if there's some reason you don't want them in your neighborhood as the president said explain to us why somebody else should put them in their neighborhood why would your reasoning not apply to everybody why do you want to be treated special why do you want to put it on the necks of the the people who are going to be competing for jobs and you know may have to deal with the extra expense and everything else while the Democratic leaders who are the ones who said yes to this get all the benefits because they're nobody's moving into their neighborhoods they're just getting promoted to president if they do a good job right so the politicians only have an upside to bring in immigrants because they can say we're awesome we get more votes the public doesn't have the same upside as a candidate because it's not their job to to do this Stu stuff so they don't get any credit they just have the expense so the president has done what he always does he he takes the box and he shakes it how many times have I told you that right if you have a an aifi you know situation that's just stuck and nobody can make it move it's just stuck the president always does the same thing he walks up to it and says what you got there some kind of stuck situation watch this okay how's that and then everybody looks at it and they go ah my hair's on fire and all the variables are running around and I don't know what happened that was provocative you can't say that are you kidding I'm not sure if he means that was that a leak or is that true are you serious and suddenly all the variables are different now shaking the Box usually would not be a good idea if you already had a way to solve a problem you wouldn't want to ruin the solution you had by shaking the box so you see him do it when there is no solution and when nobody else has a solution he just shakes the Box somebody says does AOC shake the Box absolutely yes she does yes she does yes it's the same technique um um so for the next few days the entertainment here is to watch Democrats try to avoid questions you're going to see more Democrats avoiding questions than you've ever seen in your life I also believe that all of the conservative Outlets the the people who can send a report around you know the The Fox newses and the the breit Barts they will not get any Democrat to talk to them except for the the ones that are paid to be on their payroll and don't do a good job of it um no Democrat wants to be on camera basically the president just shut the Democrats off of Television because the last thing any of them want to do is get three follow-up questions of but why wouldn't you let them in your city well suppose he doesn't force you to take them here here's what the reporter should ask let let's just assum he doesn't force you to take him why wouldn't you volunteer and if you do volunteer how many how many is the kill shot until you hear a reporter ask a Democrat on cam on camera how many you haven't had a good time all right you got to see that question because they're not going to be able to answer it and if they can't answer it the next question is how can we take you seriously because this is a number a question this is not a this is not a yes no immigrant question and they want to treat it that way they want to treat it like it's a binary like immigrants yes or immigrants no because they can win that they can win the Immigrant yes over immigrant no because immigrants in general are positive but they cannot survive the question how many and then when they can't answer it how can we take you seriously if you don't have a number this is not a yes no question this is a number question if you don't have a number you should quit let me let me say this let me say this as clearly as I can if you're if you're a Democrat arguing for U being let's say arguing for being lenient on IM ation and you can't produce a number for your let's say maybe it's just for your area your state or your your domain if you can't come up with a number that you think is okay per year quit you should quit because that's what you're paid to do you you Democrats and you Republicans you are paid to give us a number you're not paid paid to say we like immigration I don't pay anybody to do that right do you pay anybody to say immigration is good because we all say immigration is good if it's done right that's saying nothing we don't pay you to do nothing give us your freaking number right tell me the number or quit those should be your that's the binary the binary is not immigration or no immigration the binary is your you're in charge you're a political leader give us the number or quit quit like right now just hand in hand in your keys here's a box for your go clear out your desk if you can't give us a number quit and I'm I'm serious about that if because this is a big big problem and if you're not even going to pretend to do your job and the and the president is sort of calling it you know with his tweets here if you're not even going to pretend to do your job clean out your desk just clean out your desk don't don't take our time don't expect to get interviewed don't expect ever to be on camera again just clean out your desk you're not even a politician give us a number all right I tweeted around an idea that the UN is kicking around for floating cities floating cities so apparently there's an architect and there's some serious people who have figuring out how how to make these hexagonal floating little islands that you can connect together in lots of combinations to create a floating city and apparently they know how to harden them so that they're safe from hurricanes and and everything else now I'm not sure it's seing because I believe that these are intended to be uh permanent locations so they're not I don't think they're intended to float around I think they're intended to be anchored with some technology they have and this is yet again one of those situations where you see the the Adams uh law of slow moving disasters when we have a lot of time to figure out how to get out of the way of disasters we're really good at it really really good at it we have not yet solved this floating city um challenge but doesn't it feel to you like really solveable wouldn't you say that as problems go this probably is in the category of you know hard but very solvable if you had enough um resources and attention and climate change might be that that attention it could be that climate change is what makes floating cities work I understand that 50% of the population of the world is near the coast they live near the coast so there's a thought that they might need to relocate now whether or not they do I think floating cities make sense for a lot of different reasons now here's the question I asked myself how would you power a floating city you know where this is going you know how would you power a floating city would you power it with solar and batteries no we haven't figured out how to do that would you run a long electrical cable under the ocean possibly I don't know I'm no expert on that stuff but maybe maybe you could depends where it is yeah Generation 4 nuclear is the answer so these small floating cities would be essentially nuclear submarines so we already know how to put a nuclear um Power Plant on a floating small floating thing it's called an aircraft carrier it's called a a submarine so in all likelihood these floating cities also depend also depend on Generation 4 nuclear now I tweeted around uh late last night so it's in my Twitter feed uh um uh why am I having a brain uh Tim who who is at timcast why am I having a I know his name and I'm just blanking out here tim tim tim tim tim sorry I'm forgetting your name I I actually remember his Twitter Tim Timol at timcast so his Twitter uh Twitter name is Tim cast c and uh he did a long segment on the New York Times article about Generation 4 and it was fun to watch him um move from apparently some older annadate thoughts about nuclear yeah thank you Tim pool um some outof dat thoughts about nuclear that he admits he had to the newer stuff uh the newer information about generation four and I didn't realize this but apparently Tim had been in Green Piece at one point and he's an independent journalist so he doesn't identify I believe he doesn't identify either right or left but he's now up to speed on this and he's got a lot of credibility uh I know he has a lot of credibility among the people watching here uh in part because he's not a member of a a party he's not a partisan but he also was a member of Greenpeace who just said in in the strongest possible terms that nuclear looks like the only solution for saving the world if climate change is what what the experts say so um yeah and he mentioned that he talked to Patrick more I think so you're seeing now um a correct me if I'm wrong correct me if I'm wrong but aren't you seeing Generation 4 nuclear just sort of become a the thing now it's entering it has entered the Zeitgeist and it looks like it's penetrated both sides but for some reason the major news organizations um except for the New York Times who did that article they're not really focusing on it and I don't know why for example I don't know why Fox News isn't talking about generation for nuclear every day I don't know how to explain that um I don't know why CNN I guess I do understand why CNN isn't talking about it it's because it would give credit to the administration so apparently the Congress um as Tim P was pointing out in his um his You.

Tube presentation there he pointed out that Congress is actually both sides like the new nuclear stuff so both Democrats and Republicans by a solid majority are pro-nuclear did you know that did you know that Congress is pro-nuclear both sides now when I say pronuclear nuclear I'm talking about generation four the new stuff not the old stuff that's a little riskier so why are we hearing about this or let me put it in in more Stark terms the biggest problem in the world according to the press that leans left is climate change and it's been solved that's not a story that the biggest problem in the world is solved nothing not a headline nothing as far as I can tell the left leaning press wants the issue more than they want the solution of course they want the solution because they don't want the the world to end but they certainly would rather go into 2020 saying that the Trump Administration isn't doing anything for climate change when in fact they solved it now when I say they solved it I mean they've put in motion um the so the government has passed some legislation recently Department of energy is doing some things where they're they're promoting the rapid development of this technology so the government is actually doing stuff they're they're making test beds for testing and they're they're taking fairly aggressive steps in that direction and it is the solution to what half the country believes is the biggest problem we've ever had climate change completely solved or at least it's on the path to completely solved uh and and it's just not a story yeah let's talk about 5G I'm not up to date on everything about 5G um but here's what I know it's inevitable we'll have more 5gs it's inevitable that people will say it causes cancer I don't know if that's true but we're definitely getting 5G and it will definitely be critics but and then the president of course wants us to be the the 5G lead leader of the world I don't think that's going to happen I think South Korea will be the leader in 5G but that's just me um but here's the thing 5G is not just faster internet if you're thinking well 4G is great it's better than 3G I'm sure glad we went from 3G to 4G it really makes a difference I'm happy I can't wait to give to 5G even faster it's not that 5G is civilization changing 4G just made 3G a lot better and you know you could do a few extra things watch the movies and stuff but 5G uh suddenly that that amount of speed makes all kinds of things possible that weren't possible before so um it's hard to you're going to want examples and it's almost impossible to give you an example because it's it's literally the future right it's something that somebody will come up with that we haven't thought of yet it could be um you know once you get your let's say your screen resolution up to let's say 4K or or some high level it could be that suddenly um doctor visits are completely unnecessary because the doctor can then see the screen just as clearly as he would see it in person you even better because I can just you know expand the screen and really see that that bruise or whatever it is so you're going to you're probably going to see changes in health care because of that you're going to see uh yeah I mean you could probably give me better suggestions of what's going to happen but I think you're going to see the 5G is civilization transforming oh um education education and um VR all right here so here's a I'll give you a specific a specific civilization changing thing if you were to try to take an online class today it would be just somebody standing in front of a screen talking and they just videotape them and then you watch them and you get bored but with 5G you could probably transmit VR content in other words that you could take your phone and you know whether whether you put it on the device that holds it in front of your head or there's some other glasses or something 5G probably gives you enough speed to create VR or even um you know adding things to your to your environment 5G might be the Tipping Point yeah augmented reality we we need all that stuff the point at which we mix the digital and the real world so right now the Dig digal world and the real world are sort of separate you know the digital world I have to look at it's on my phone I hold it in my hand it's just compartmentalized in this this little container so there's a very clear distinction between the real world you know what the things I touch and feel and the little things that are in this little box when you get 5G which will allow them people to transmit completely um uh and engulfing experiences that's the wrong word um experiences that are immersive that that's the best word 5G will allow transmission of immersive experiences so that you if you've got your little glasses on that can see um can see the world with things added there will be digital things added to your real world environment and you might even be able to manipulate them you might be able to walk up to a virtual button that's literally just floating in the air and you might be able to touch it and activate something imagine that an entire interface for things will just appear floating in the air and you could actually manipulate them Boop imagine that you take a a class and instead of learning about Napoleon trying to conquer Russia it drops you into the battle and you're actually in the battle you're like holy cow I'm in the battle for lenrad here or whatever and uh that may that may be the wrong War but you get the idea so imagine learning where they can drop you in the situation imagine trying to become let's say an auto mechanic if you're learning to be an auto mechanic you you really have to go where there's an engine and there's like lots of different engines and you're not going to work on everyone and and you've got to wait your turn because they've only got a few cars and it's a big class all of that is hard now imagine you had you had the you know the glasses on and you're in the virtual world and you're trying to learn to be an engineer the engine will float right in front of you and you could take pieces off put pieces on screw them in you'll be able to manipulate you know what looks like the real world and you could learn every engine and you might even be able to do it in an afternoon you might be able to learn in an afternoon what people have to take classes for for weeks because you get to do it all and and and you just say okay I'm done with this Toyota engine give me a BMW okay label it boop boop boop labels come show me how to change the oil boop boop boop boop oh okay show me how to uh change the spark plugs boop boop boop instructions come up point to the spark plug all right there it is rotate it turn it around take the spark plug out what tool do I use Boop tool appears you could you could learn maybe at 10 times the speed so 5G may allow us to learn as something like 10 times the rate we can learn right now and it could be Universal and we could all be learning at that rate anything we want any new skill I I told you that I um um I'm taking drum lessons online I'm using my own uh startups app whenhub so it's actually the name of the app is interface by whenhub and I'm taking lessons now at the moment the the quality of the sound and the picture are limited by the bandwidth and also the size of the picture and also the number of cameras so we're bandwidth limited imagine if my uh drum teacher Michael uh who by the way is available on the app if if you want to take drum lessons he's he's great uh just search for drums and look for Michael antberg and um you can just sign up and schedule schedule an online lesson if you don't like it you don't have to take another one so that's the beauty of it but imagine if he didn't have any bandwidth limitation he puts a few cameras or devices maybe an i.

Pad or two one is looking down at the drums maybe there's one on his foot because the the foot pedal timing is one of the things you have to learn so it'd be nice to have a camera there one on his face it would be a completely different experience just because of 5G so everything's going to be changing you know 5G probably is the Tipping Point that will make in in-person education seem archaic and stupid so that's my prediction when 5G is mature uh online Lear learning especially the immersive kind where you're actually part of the situation the online learning will become far superior to in-person learning and it will change everything there will no longer be imagine if you will what does it do do for the poor if they can afford a phone and maybe they need some glasses or something but if they could get just those assets a phone and some kind of a plan and some some glasses if that's the way it works so that you can see your your environment suppose that's all it took for the poorest person in the country who could at least afford those things to get any education changes everything suppose you could drop your classmates into the scene so that you're all in the same scene you're not only experiencing an historic battle or you're not just attending the the you know the the the signing of the Declaration of Independence you're actually in the room when it happens and you look around you see your other classmates that're also there and you say hey Bob good to see you welcome to Philadelphia all right um so I guess I'm just full of good news at the moment because Generation 4 nuclear will solve climate change and it will be an enormous uh an enormous stimul stimulus to the economy in a way that we've never seen before especially helping the poor because when you get the energy cost down just everything works better then you add 5G on top of that and you have Universal Health Care or something close to it you've got Universal education or something close to it and I'll tell you one of the ways that you know that your candidates for president are too damn old you know the the Beres and the bidens and even president Trump the fact that nobody is saying we want free college and or free training in college and the way we're going to get there is through technology the fact that nobody has said that sentence just tells you they're too old you know you need honestly I'm I'm calling on AOC or somebody somebody under a 100 to say let's get to free education but let's do it this smart way let's not just keep building these brick and mortar things where kids can go to get bullied which is about all you get out of school these days they can go to school to get bullied and to get drugs basically sex and drugs and bullying that's what going to school gets you but we can do better all right I'm exaggerating a little bit um yeah you need somebody like Andrew Yang a Candace Owens you need somebody somebody who represents you know the digital age yeah maybe Buddha Gigi he could do it somebody young all right um somebody says I'm retired I direct students to Con Academy so I've heard that that it's fairly popular that that uh students will go to an actual class take the physical class in an actual classroom and then when they go to go home to do their homework before they even do the homework they watch the Con Academy class for the same topic because it's just better however good your teacher is the con economy might be a little better and you could fast forward and you can you know do stuff like that by the way if you only did one thing for classroom experience which is that you could change the rate of of your teachers talking the way you can on a podcast you know in some podcasts you can speed it up to 1.5 or or two times the original speed people listen to me that way you're probably some of you are listening to me that that way right now on or you will when it's on playback so at 1.5 at 1.5 I talk like this it would be a lot easier and if I had a lot of content you could really hear it because even though I'm talking very fast you could hear everything I say and it really doesn't matter how how quickly I talk you can actually follow me very easily so if you had a classroom situation in which you could speed it up to 1.5 or 2.

know you could very quickly get to the point where the doc where the teacher is stopping is no longer uh babbling and gets to the actual content and then when you get to the actual content then you can slow it down and watch the part you need to know go back watch it again and then when you get to the filler okay now you're in the filler and the teacher is just wasting some time until he gets on the next stop it and then you slow it down that alone just that feature would make learning three times better three times better would you say yeah it's you could call it Ben Shapiro mode he does talk faster than anybody I've ever seen who could talk in public uh but that's I think that's a function of him being being smarter than the rest of us you can talk fast if you're smart all right uh so you pronounce a it Buddha judge not Buddha Gigi is it Buddha judge is that is that true or are you pranking me I can't tell well um I just know that they're going to be some bad nicknames for that guy must have been tough in high school I'll tell you um all right that's all for now I'll talk to you later

[Music]

hey everybody stadley come on in here

I'm a little bit late this morning I

wasn't watching the clock I promise I

was awake but I wasn't watching the

clock and here I am a little later than

usual but does it matter it does not

because the deliciousness of the

simultaneous sip cannot be diminished by

simple

chronological

misgivings I'm not even sure that was a

real sentence doesn't matter because

you're here I'm here you've got your

container your cup your mug you might

have a flask or a tanker or a

Stein maybe a thermos but whatever it is

I hope it's filled with your favorite

liquid I like coffee and join me now for

the simultaneous

app yes yes I'm sorry I'm

late but what a fun

so I need to start this uh presentation

if you can call it that by uh

acknowledging my critics who are going

to say Scott are you sick of licking the

president's

shoes you say that everything he does is

genius what you are so not credible now

of course those of you who watch me know

that I don't say that I criticize him on

health care and statues and all kinds of

stuff

but when he does something good

persuasion wise sometimes is better than

anything anybody's ever done and I can't

not say that because it's true and it's

of course my main domain of

content so when the news came out that

it leaked that the White House was

considering merely considering shipping

the uh illegal immigrants from the

Caravans into the sanctuary cities we

all laughed when we saw it but we

thought well and I said this well that's

never going to

happen that's never going to happen and

it didn't take long for the president to

tweet oh yeah we're totally thinking

about

that we're totally going to we're

totally considering that and you know

maybe we'll shift them to the sanctuary

cities now of course the news and social

media went crazy when he said that uh as

Dana Bash said as CNN he quote owned the

criticism and I thought yeah that's

exactly what he did he took a bad news

story because of the leak and all it was

going to be is ah these people are bad

they're even considering doing this

they're so

evil and as soon as he changed it from a

a rumor that we found down through a

leak into a tweet completely puts it out

there with no shame whatsoever and says

absolutely we we're planning on you

we're not planning it but we're we're

strongly considering

it now what does that

do what that does is that remember it's

sort of a slow news period there's not

much else going

on and he he didn't want the weekend to

go by with people talking about this

rumor so he owns it creates more news

but specifically he makes you focus on

what he wants you to focus on so all

weekend if we're talking about this and

there's not much else to talk about

we're going to be talking about hey why

can't the sanctuary cities agree to take

all of the immigrants why wouldn't they

but it gets better because it turns out

that that was just phase one of his

persuasion phase two he dropped I guess

it was last

night so it's a followup to his first

tweet and he says uh if the radical left

Democrats all of a sudden don't want the

illegal migrants in their Sanctuary

cities no more Open Arms Why should

others be expected to take them into

their communities uh go home and come

into our country legally and through a

system of marriage now the key part of

this tweet is why should others be

expect them to expected to take them

into their community so he's moved the

conversation from wherever it was where

nothing good was happening nothing was

getting done he's moved it to the public

so uh and of course the persuasion is

always partly to Congress and partly to

the public but this is squarely at the

public this persuasion is just at the

public it's not at it's not at the other

politicians and

he's forcing the question and he's

forcing the question that the other

side is determined to

ignore and we may see him I'm not going

to predict this but it would be an

interesting Play We may see him ask the

specific question how many are you

willing to

take if he takes it to the third phase

and he might he could extend this one

more day by tweeting something along the

the lines of we're looking for

volunteers

volunteers Sanctuary cities to

volunteer

now people are going to call him on this

Bluff and I think a few a few Mayors

already have and I think they've said

yeah we love immigrants absolutely bring

them our

away but they know they're bluffing

they're calling his bluff but they're

also bluffing so phase

four is to say thank you for

volunteering how many can you

take and that's the kill shot how many

can you

take is the end of the

conversation now I don't know if he's

going to take his two-phase persuasion

into the third phase of asking for

volunteers volunteer Sanctuary cities

volunteer communities because those

politicians are going to be on this on

the burner with their own residents if

they volunteer if they don't

volunteer then they're they're outed as

Liars wait a minute you've been saying

that this will help

you why don't you

volunteer and then once they volunteer

you take it to phase four which is give

us your number cuz we don't want to ship

more than you want we only want to give

you what you volunteer

for so tell us the number and that's the

end of the conversation because the only

way that we've we have this um this

impass the political impass is because

the people on the left refuse to say how

many is the right

number and this is forcing that question

now he's not there yet the president

hasn't gotten to how many that's where

you need to get though because that's

where everything fall falls apart there

the the entire resistance is built on um

a transparent lie and the LIE is that

more is better to

Infinity more is not better to

Infinity I'll agree that more is better

so let me say you know in case anything

gets taken out of context let me say as

clearly as possible I think most people

in the United States would agree with

the general state M that immigration is

positive for the country most people 90%

of the country probably believes that

immigration and the 10% who don't

believe it are are not really serious

players I'm not sure you could listen to

anything that 10% says but 90% of us

would say we absolutely want immigration

it's not about

immigration but give us the

number everybody who likes

immigration knows that there're some

amount that's too much you know you you

could die drinking water if you drink

too much so water is great but how much

do you have to drink because there is a

there is a point where you die from

it so here's a question I haven't seen

anybody ask so I'll ask

it we've been told for a long time that

immigration brings down the crime rate

if you bring in more

immigrants you have lower crime now when

people say that they usually don't

distinguish between people coming in on

airplanes and people coming in Legally

and people coming across the border

illegally they sort of get lumped into

this big group of low crime population

now I believe that's probably true it's

very believable to me that the entire

population of immigrants legal illegal

airplane Visa type border type if you

put them all together I do believe that

they would have a low crime rate so

here's my

question how many

Guatemalans could you put in Chicago to

get the crime rate down to

normal I know you're laughing right now

aren't you it's a funny

question theoretically how many migrant

Caravans could you put in Chicago to get

that crime rate down to something normal

cuz right now the crime rate in Chicago

is through the roof in theory if you add

enough

Guatemalans you get that crime rate down

to something like I don't know my

town now I'm I'm not suggesting that's a

practical idea it's just a funny idea

but we're seeing that the uh we're

seeing that the people's uh let's say

hardened positions are a little bit

ridiculous in some cases now now I would

argue that the question about uh

immigration and border security are

really persuasion problems at this point

that it's not about resources it's not

about knowing what to do we actually

know what to do we have enough resources

it's expensive but we can figure it out

everything is

doable except that our government is

totally broken they can't agree on

things they agree on let me say that

again our government is so broken that

they can't agree on things they agree

on because everybody agrees well we need

some good you know border control it's a

crisis we'd like to be good to the

people who who are just trying to make a

better life everybody agrees on all the

big stuff and they still can't get it

done so it's a persuasion problem it's

not a physical resource kind of a

problem it's not a problem where we

can't figure out how to get it done

people just don't want to it's a

political problem and the president's

persuasion about hey how about we take

them to your

neighborhood is really

highlighting the fact that the

Democratic um um politicians are using

the immigrants as pawns for their

political

Ambitions so if you're going to talk

about the president potentially using

the immigrants as PA to quote as CNN is

using they're using the word dump to

make you sound like the president is

more evil if you're going to dump him in

our backyard so everybody got the memo

to say dump instead of

relocate so all of the Democrats are

referring to the uh immigrants as

garbage I'm not making this up the

president actually caused every analyst

on CNN to refer to the to refer to

immigrants who have a desperate

situation and are just trying to live

and survive and make a better life

people who are by and large vast

majority of them are excellent people

that you would you would like in your

life they're good people

overwhelmingly and CNN has actually put

out a memo to refer to them as garbage

I'm not making this up I'm not making

this because they're all using the word

dump let me do a let me do a quick check

here I just watched Dana Bash say dump

CNN if you if you look at any article

about this let's

see

um it looks like

CNN has decided that reporting the story

is not a winning

position they've already backed off the

entire story it's not even the president

did the two most provocative tweets that

we've seen in months and months and

and it doesn't look like it's on their

front page of their

news I'm looking I'm still

looking uh there's one link to Dana Bash

saying that he's dumping them so that's

it one link to a video that's it that's

the whole the whole thing uh yeah I

think by the way yes let me give credit

to Tucker Carlson because he's the one

who pointed out that they're all using

this word dumped

and I don't know how you

can how can you use the word

dumped without conting

garbage I think the Democrats have to

explain they have to explain why they're

calling good people who just want to

have a better life why are they saying

dump they need to explain that and I

don't know who's asking now here's the

other funny

thing imagine if you're a Democrat and

you're the kind of democrat who likes to

go on the news and and give interviews

and let's say you've already been

scheduled for today maybe you were

scheduled a few days ago to go on today

and talk about whatever topic you do not

want to go on TV

today there's no Democrat who wants to

go in front of a camera today where

there are

questions because if somebody asks the

question what do you think of this Trump

tweet where they say they'll take them

to your neighborhood how many can you

take

um now they're all going to have to

avoid the

question so they're going to have to

avoid the question they're going to have

to say uh they're going to have to say

the president is using these good people

as poems in his political

games they're going to have to talk

about the fact that the White House

denied they were going to do it before

the president tweeted which is not the

story right that's the the B story The a

story is you have to explain why you

don't want them in your

neighborhood and if there's some reason

you don't want them in your neighborhood

as the president said explain to us why

somebody else should put them in their

neighborhood why would your reasoning

not apply to everybody why do you want

to be treated special why do you want to

put it on the necks of the the people

who are going to be competing for jobs

and you know may have to deal with the

extra expense and everything else

while the Democratic leaders who are the

ones who said yes to this get all the

benefits because they're nobody's moving

into their neighborhoods they're just

getting promoted to president if they do

a good job right so the politicians only

have an upside to bring in immigrants

because they can say we're awesome we

get more

votes the

public doesn't have the same upside as a

candidate because it's not their job to

to do this Stu stuff so they don't get

any credit they just have the

expense so the president has done what

he always

does he he takes the box and he shakes

it how many times have I told you that

right if you have a an

aifi you know situation that's just

stuck and nobody can make it move it's

just

stuck the president always does the same

thing he walks up to it and says what

you got there some kind of stuck

situation watch

this okay how's that and then everybody

looks at it and they go ah my hair's on

fire and all the variables are running

around and I don't know what happened

that was provocative you can't say that

are you kidding I'm not sure if he means

that was that a leak or is that true are

you serious and suddenly all the

variables are different now shaking the

Box usually would not be a good idea if

you already had a way to solve a problem

you wouldn't want to ruin the solution

you had by shaking the box so you see

him do it when there is no solution and

when nobody else has a solution he just

shakes the Box somebody says does AOC

shake the Box

absolutely yes she

does yes she does yes it's the same

technique um um

so for the next few days the

entertainment here is to watch Democrats

try to avoid questions you're going to

see more Democrats avoiding questions

than you've ever seen in your life I

also believe that all of the

conservative Outlets the the people who

can send a report around you know the

The Fox newses and the the breit Barts

they will not get any Democrat to talk

to them except for the the ones that are

paid to be on their payroll and don't do

a good job of it um no Democrat wants to

be on camera basically the president

just shut the Democrats off of

Television because the last thing any of

them want to do is get three follow-up

questions of but why wouldn't you let

them in your city well suppose he

doesn't force you to take them here

here's what the reporter should ask let

let's just assum he doesn't force you to

take him why wouldn't you

volunteer and if you do volunteer how

many how many is the kill

shot until you hear a reporter ask a

Democrat on cam on camera how many you

haven't had a good time all right you

got to see that question because they're

not going to be able to answer it and if

they can't answer it the next question

is how can we take you seriously because

this is a number a question this is not

a this is not a yes no immigrant

question and they want to treat it that

way they want to treat it like it's a

binary like immigrants yes or immigrants

no because they can win that they can

win the Immigrant yes over immigrant no

because immigrants in general are

positive but they cannot

survive the question how many and then

when they can't answer it how can we

take you seriously if you don't have a

number this is not a yes no question

this is a number question if you don't

have a

number you should quit let me let me say

this let me say this as clearly as I can

if you're if you're a Democrat arguing

for U being let's

say arguing for being lenient on IM

ation and you can't produce a number for

your let's say maybe it's just for your

area your state or your your domain if

you can't come up with a number that you

think is okay per year

quit you should

quit because that's what you're paid to

do you you

Democrats and you Republicans you are

paid to give us a number you're not paid

paid to say we like

immigration I don't pay anybody to do

that right do you pay anybody to say

immigration is good because we all say

immigration is good if it's done right

that's saying nothing we don't pay you

to do nothing give us your freaking

number right tell me the number or quit

those should be your that's the binary

the binary is not immigration or no

immigration the binary is your you're in

charge you're a political leader give us

the number or

quit quit like right now just hand in

hand in your keys here's a box for your

go clear out your desk if you can't

give us a number

quit and I'm I'm serious about that if

because this is a big big problem and if

you're not even going to pretend to do

your job and the and the president is

sort of calling it you know with his

tweets here if you're not even going to

pretend to do your job clean out your

desk just clean out your desk don't

don't take our time don't expect to get

interviewed don't expect ever to be on

camera again just clean out your desk

you're not even a politician give us a

number all right I tweeted around an

idea that the UN is kicking around for

floating

cities floating cities so apparently

there's an architect and there's some

serious people who have figuring out how

how to make these

hexagonal floating little islands that

you can connect together in lots of

combinations to create a floating city

and apparently they know how to harden

them so that they're safe from

hurricanes and and everything else now

I'm not sure it's seing because I

believe that these are intended to be uh

permanent locations so they're not I

don't think they're intended to float

around I think they're intended to be

anchored with some technology they have

and this is yet again one of those

situations where you see the the

Adams uh law of slow moving

disasters when we have a lot of time to

figure out how to get out of the way of

disasters we're really good at it really

really good at it we have not yet solved

this floating city

um challenge but doesn't it feel to you

like really

solveable wouldn't you say that as

problems go this probably is in the

category of you know hard but very

solvable if you had enough um resources

and attention and climate change might

be that that attention it could be that

climate change is what makes floating

cities work I understand that 50% of the

population of the world is near the

coast they live near the coast so

there's a thought that they might need

to relocate now whether or not they do I

think floating cities make sense for a

lot of different reasons now here's the

question I asked

myself how would you power a floating

city you know where this is going you

know how would you power a floating

city would you power it with solar and

batteries no we haven't figured out how

to do that would you run a long

electrical cable under the ocean

possibly I don't know I'm no expert on

that stuff but maybe maybe you could

depends where it is yeah Generation 4

nuclear is the answer so these small

floating cities would be essentially

nuclear

submarines so we already know how to put

a nuclear um Power Plant on a floating

small floating thing it's called an

aircraft carrier it's called a a

submarine

so in all likelihood these floating

cities also

depend also depend on Generation 4

nuclear now I tweeted around uh late

last night so it's in my Twitter feed uh

um uh why am I having a

brain uh Tim who who is at timcast why

am I having a I know his name and I'm

just blanking out here tim

tim tim tim tim sorry I'm forgetting

your name I I actually remember his

Twitter

Tim Timol at timcast so his Twitter uh

Twitter name is Tim cast

c and uh he did a long segment on the

New York Times article about Generation

4 and it was fun to watch him um move

from apparently some older

annadate thoughts about

nuclear yeah thank you Tim pool um some

outof dat thoughts about nuclear that he

admits he had to the newer stuff uh the

newer information about generation four

and I didn't realize this but

apparently Tim had been in Green Piece

at one point and he's an independent

journalist so he doesn't identify I

believe he doesn't identify either right

or left but he's now up to speed on this

and he's got a lot of

credibility uh I know he has a lot of

credibility among the people watching

here uh in part because he's not a

member of a a party he's not a

partisan but he also was a member of

Greenpeace who just said in in the

strongest possible terms that nuclear

looks like the only solution for saving

the world if climate change is what what

the experts say

so

um yeah and he mentioned that he talked

to Patrick more I think so you're seeing

now um a correct me if I'm wrong

correct me if I'm wrong but aren't you

seeing Generation 4 nuclear just sort of

become a the thing now it's entering it

has entered the Zeitgeist and it looks

like it's penetrated both sides but for

some reason the major news

organizations um except for the New York

Times who did that article they're not

really focusing on it and I don't know

why for example I don't know why Fox

News isn't talking about generation for

nuclear every

day I don't know how to explain that um

I don't know why CNN I guess I do

understand why CNN isn't talking about

it it's because it would give credit to

the

administration so apparently the

Congress um as Tim P was pointing out in

his um his YouTube presentation there he

pointed out that Congress is actually

both sides like the new nuclear stuff so

both Democrats and Republicans by a

solid

majority are pro-nuclear did you know

that did you know that Congress is

pro-nuclear both sides now when I say

pronuclear nuclear I'm talking about

generation four the new stuff not the

old stuff that's a little

riskier so why are we hearing about this

or let me put it in in more Stark terms

the biggest problem in the world

according to the press that leans left

is climate

change and it's been

solved that's not a

story that the biggest problem in the

world is

solved nothing not a

headline nothing as far as I can

tell the left leaning press wants the

issue more than they want the solution

of course they want the solution because

they don't want the the world to end but

they certainly would rather go into 2020

saying that the Trump Administration

isn't doing

anything for climate change when in

fact they solved

it now when I say they solved it I mean

they've put in motion um the so the

government has passed some legislation

recently Department of energy is doing

some things where they're they're

promoting the rapid development of this

technology so the government is actually

doing stuff they're they're making test

beds for testing and they're they're

taking fairly aggressive steps in that

direction and it is the solution to what

half the country believes is the biggest

problem we've ever had climate change

completely solved or at least it's on

the path to completely solved

uh and and it's just not a story yeah

let's talk about

5G I'm not up to date on everything

about 5G um but here's what I know it's

inevitable we'll have more 5gs it's

inevitable that people will say it

causes cancer I don't know if that's

true but we're definitely getting 5G and

it will definitely be critics but and

then the president of course wants us to

be the the 5G lead leader of the world I

don't think that's going to happen I

think South Korea will be the leader in

5G but that's just me

um but here's the

thing

5G is not just faster internet if you're

thinking well 4G is great it's better

than 3G I'm sure glad we went from 3G to

4G it really makes a difference I'm

happy I can't wait to give to 5G even

faster it's not that

5G is civilization

changing

4G just made 3G a lot better and you

know you could do a few extra things

watch the movies and stuff but

5G uh suddenly that that amount of speed

makes all kinds of things possible that

weren't possible before so um it's hard

to you're going to want examples and

it's almost impossible to give you an

example because it's it's literally the

future right it's something that

somebody will come up with that we

haven't thought of yet it could be um

you know once you get your let's say

your screen resolution up to let's say

4K or or some high level it could be

that suddenly um doctor visits are

completely unnecessary because the

doctor can then see the screen just as

clearly as he would see it in person you

even better because I can just you know

expand the screen and really see that

that bruise or whatever it

is so you're going to you're probably

going to see changes in health care

because of that you're going to

see

uh yeah I mean you could probably give

me better suggestions of what's going to

happen but I think you're going to see

the 5G is civilization transforming oh

um education

education and um

VR all right here so here's a I'll give

you a specific a specific civilization

changing thing if you were to try to

take an online class today it would be

just somebody standing in front of a

screen talking and they just videotape

them and then you watch them and you get

bored but with 5G you could probably

transmit

VR content in other words that you could

take your phone and you know whether

whether you put it on the device that

holds it in front of your head or

there's some other glasses or

something 5G probably gives you enough

speed to create VR or even um you know

adding things to your to your

environment 5G might be the Tipping

Point yeah augmented reality we we need

all that stuff the point at which we mix

the digital and the real

world so right now the Dig digal world

and the real world are sort of separate

you know the digital world I have to

look at it's on my phone I hold it in my

hand it's just compartmentalized in this

this little container so there's a very

clear distinction between the real world

you know what the things I touch and

feel and the little things that are in

this little

box when you get

5G which will allow them people to

transmit completely um uh and

engulfing experiences that's the wrong

word um experiences

that are immersive that that's the best

word 5G will allow transmission of

immersive experiences so that you if

you've got your little glasses on that

can see um can see the world with things

added there will be digital things added

to your real world environment and you

might even be able to manipulate them

you might be able to walk up to a

virtual button that's literally just

floating in the air and you might be

able to touch it and activate something

imagine that an entire

interface for things will just appear

floating in the air and you could

actually manipulate them

Boop imagine that you take a a class and

instead of learning about Napoleon

trying to conquer Russia it drops you

into the battle and you're actually in

the battle you're like holy cow I'm in

the battle for lenrad here or whatever

and uh that may that may be the wrong

War but you get the idea so imagine

learning where they can drop you in the

situation imagine trying to become let's

say an auto

mechanic if you're learning to be an

auto mechanic you you really have to go

where there's an engine and there's like

lots of different engines and you're not

going to work on everyone and and you've

got to wait your turn because they've

only got a few cars and it's a big class

all of that is hard now imagine you had

you had the you know the glasses on and

you're in the virtual world and you're

trying to learn to be an engineer the

engine will float right in front of you

and you could take pieces off put pieces

on screw them in you'll be able to

manipulate you know what looks like the

real world and you could learn every

engine and you might even be able to do

it in an afternoon you might be able to

learn in an

afternoon what people have to take

classes for for weeks because you get to

do it all and and and you just say okay

I'm done with this Toyota engine give me

a BMW okay label it boop boop boop

labels come show me how to change the

oil boop boop boop boop oh

okay show me how to uh change the spark

plugs boop boop boop instructions come

up point to the spark plug all right

there it is rotate it turn it around

take the spark plug out what tool do I

use Boop tool appears you could you

could

learn maybe at 10 times the speed so 5G

may allow us to learn as something like

10 times the rate we can learn right now

and it could be Universal and we could

all be learning at that rate anything we

want any new

skill I I told you that I um um I'm

taking drum lessons online I'm using my

own uh startups app whenhub so it's

actually the name of the app is

interface by whenhub and I'm taking

lessons now at the moment the the

quality of the sound and the picture are

limited by the bandwidth and also the

size of the picture and also the number

of cameras so we're bandwidth limited

imagine if my uh drum teacher Michael uh

who by the way is available on the app

if if you want to take drum lessons he's

he's great uh just search for drums and

look for Michael antberg

and um you can just sign up and schedule

schedule an online lesson if you don't

like it you don't have to take another

one so that's the beauty of it but

imagine if he didn't have any bandwidth

limitation he puts a few cameras or

devices maybe an iPad or two one is

looking down at the drums maybe there's

one on his foot because the the foot

pedal

timing is one of the things you have to

learn so it'd be nice to have a camera

there one on his

face it would be a completely different

experience just because of 5G so

everything's going to be changing you

know 5G probably is the Tipping Point

that will make in in-person

education seem archaic and

stupid so that's my prediction when 5G

is

mature uh online Lear learning

especially the immersive kind where

you're actually part of the situation

the online learning will become far

superior to in-person learning and it

will change everything there will no

longer be imagine if you will what does

it do do for the poor if they can afford

a phone and maybe they need some glasses

or something but if they could get just

those assets a phone and some kind of a

plan and some some glasses if that's the

way it works so that you can see your

your environment suppose that's all it

took for the poorest person in the

country who could at least afford those

things to get any education changes

everything suppose you could drop your

classmates into the scene so that you're

all in the same scene you're not only

experiencing an historic battle or

you're not just attending the the you

know the the the signing of the

Declaration of Independence you're

actually in the room when it happens and

you look around you see your other

classmates that're also there and you

say hey Bob good to see you welcome to

Philadelphia all right

um so I guess I'm just full of good news

at the moment because Generation 4

nuclear will solve climate change and it

will be an

enormous uh an enormous stimul stimulus

to the economy in a way that we've never

seen before especially helping the poor

because when you get the energy cost

down just everything works better then

you add 5G on top of

that and you have Universal Health Care

or something close to it you've got

Universal education or something close

to it and I'll tell you one of the ways

that you know that your candidates for

president are too damn old you know the

the Beres and the bidens and even

president

Trump the fact that nobody is saying we

want free college and or free training

in college and the way we're going to

get there is through

technology the fact that nobody has said

that

sentence just tells you they're too old

you know you need honestly I'm I'm

calling on AOC or somebody somebody

under a 100 to say let's get to free

education but let's do it this smart way

let's not just keep building these brick

and mortar things where kids can go to

get bullied which is about all you get

out of school these days they can go to

school to get bullied and to get drugs

basically sex and drugs and bullying

that's what going to school gets you but

we can do better all right I'm

exaggerating a little bit

um yeah you need somebody like Andrew

Yang a Candace Owens you need somebody

somebody who represents you know the

digital age

yeah maybe Buddha Gigi he could do it

somebody young all

right

um somebody says I'm retired I direct

students to Con Academy so I've heard

that that it's fairly popular that that

uh students will go to an actual class

take the physical class in an actual

classroom and then when they go to go

home to do their homework before they

even do the homework they watch the Con

Academy class for the same topic

because it's just

better however good your teacher is the

con economy might be a little better and

you could fast forward and you can you

know do stuff like that by the way if

you only did one thing for classroom

experience which is that you could

change the rate of of your teachers

talking the way you can on a podcast you

know in some podcasts you can speed it

up to 1.5 or or two times the original

speed people listen to me that way

you're probably some of you are

listening to me that that way right now

on or you will when it's on

playback so at 1.5 at 1.5 I talk like

this it would be a lot easier and if I

had a lot of content you could really

hear it because even though I'm talking

very fast you could hear everything I

say and it really doesn't matter how how

quickly I talk you can actually follow

me very easily so if you had a classroom

situation in which you could speed it up

to 1.5 or 2. know you could very quickly

get to the point where the doc where the

teacher is stopping is no longer uh

babbling and gets to the actual content

and then when you get to the actual

content then you can slow it down and

watch the part you need to

know go back watch it again and then

when you get to the filler okay now

you're in the filler and the teacher is

just wasting some time until he gets on

the next stop it and then you slow it

down that alone just that feature would

make

learning three times

better three times better would you say

yeah it's you could call it Ben Shapiro

[Laughter]

mode he does talk faster than anybody

I've ever seen who could talk in public

uh but that's I think that's a function

of him being being smarter than the rest

of us you can talk fast if you're smart

all

right

uh so you pronounce a it Buddha judge

not Buddha Gigi is it Buddha

judge is that is that true or are you

pranking me I can't

tell

well um I just know that they're going

to be some bad nicknames for that guy

must have been tough in high school I'll

tell you

um all

right that's all for now I'll talk to

you later