Episode 913 Scott Adams - Was LIVE
My new book LOSERTHINK, available now on Amazon https://tinyurl.com/rqmjc2a Content: Senator Kennedy says no bats in the wet market Forgiving each other for our honest mistakes during fog of war Obama's endorsement of Biden had 2 categories Reconfiguring sports to bring them back President Trump's WWE style verbal take down of loudmouth ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ If you would like my channel to have a wider audience and higher production quality, please donate via my startup (Whenhub.com) at this link: https://interface.my/ScottAdamsSays I use donations to pay for the daily conversions of the original Periscope videos into Youtube and podcast form, and to improve my production quality and search results over time. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Please subscribe to my channel…it REALLY helps. Like my video? Hate my video? Let me know, VOTE! Please leave a comment, let me know how I'm doing. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Bum-bum-bum-bum-bum. Hey Jack, come on in. Yes, this is the place to come at this time of night so that you can get all of the cares and tensions of the world drained out of your overstressed body. Today and for the next, oh let's say 45 minutes, it's nothing but good times. We're gonna put things i…
View segment →have a little observation for you, and I don't know what to make of it yet, and it goes like this. I was watching Obama do his recommendation for Biden, and you know that I've commented on how Dr. Birx has uptalk. Now uptalk is where you end the sentence with a little bit of an up, so it makes you s…
View segment →mean, "No, I don't uptalk." Oh look what I did. I automatically did a downtalk. I think I'm going to practice that. Speaking of people who have interesting ways of speaking, one of my favorite TV senators, and maybe one of yours as well, is Senator Kennedy. So you know Senator Kennedy. He's got, I…
View segment →past them. But let's take Senator Kennedy's case. He alleges that it's known that there were no bats, let's say, and there was a lab nearby. And there's the story in The Washington Post that says there was some kind of a report a few years ago that that lab had coronavirus. It had the virus and it…
View segment →not the real problem for China. You know it's bad to have a bad reputation but isn't this going to cause all of the major countries that were victims of this to decouple? You know the United States I'm sure is going to decouple. I don't know how quickly, you know who's gonna pay for it, what it look…
View segment →rgive each other for all of our honest mistakes during the fog of war. Because let's admit there's always somebody's gonna be right but only because there's always somebody on every side of every issue. So somebody's gonna be right by luck but nobody knows what's the right thing to do. Nobody really…
View segment →t work together. Whatever it is that we're doing, you know this democracy capitalism, you know as much transparency as you can, it just doesn't fit with the "we'll get away with anything we can and we're gonna hide as much as we can." Those two systems don't work. Now if they were both the same sys…
View segment →den that it made me think there was no organic enthusiasm. Did he pick up on that? It was like Obama sat down to write an essay and the topic he didn't care about. All right, please write an essay: the advantages of Joe Biden over the evil orange menace President Trump. And Obama sat down with a big…
View segment →llionaire from New York and he's not different enough. He's just not different enough. It's not good enough that even if he thought Mike Bloomberg had more skill and was nicer it's just not different enough. And the most different person was Joe Biden. So you could take almost any of the other cand…
View segment →your group too. So instead of having the cheering of the crowd that motivates the players it makes you feel like you're part of something and of course you get motivated by the cheer of the crowd. What if just saying the cheer of the crowd was in your headphones and it's the other people at home who…
View segment →a hilarious shortstop and then the others just sort of play to him it's the best show in the world. How much would you like watching a baseball game where most of the time you're just waiting for something to happen even if you love baseball? Let's admit it you're waiting for stuff to happen. But w…
View segment →old Trump did some more crazy stuff because he's so impulsive and he can't control himself, right? And then their ratings go up and everybody has a good time. So it's like everybody wins. You know the reason that wrestling and sports and all that work is that everybody gets a chance to win. Maybe yo…
View segment →to be written, it's not going to be a problem. And you've already seen them all work together well enough that I think you believe that. Let's see. So here's a real sign of something. So in the news AOC and Senator Schumer got together and they're calling on FEMA to supply funeral funding to famili…
View segment →s catch up, just tell me if that worked for you. On average before one on various 7,500 people die every day. We can if we can't afford it. Okay so I ask the question of people who think we're panicking on this thing to tell me what it would look like for them to be wrong. In other words how many p…
View segment →alk to you in the morning. Dennis Prager posted a letter written by five doctors who think a lockdown was not necessary. Does that mean anything? Pretty sure you can find five or five doctors to say anything. All right we'll talk about that tomorrow. Enough of that. Have a great night.
View segment →Bum-bum-bum-bum-bum. Hey Jack, come on in. Yes, this is the place to come at this time of night so that you can get all of the cares and tensions of the world drained out of your overstressed body. Today and for the next, oh let's say 45 minutes, it's nothing but good times. We're gonna put things in perspective. We're going to make you feel better, make you feel relaxed.
I have a little observation for you, and I don't know what to make of it yet, and it goes like this. I was watching Obama do his recommendation for Biden, and you know that I've commented on how Dr. Birx has uptalk. Now uptalk is where you end the sentence with a little bit of an up, so it makes you sound maybe like a Valley girl. And then when you do the uptalk you don't sound as confident because you're sort of asking. You make statements but you're making statements that sound like a question.
But have you ever noticed Obama does downtalk? So Obama's last word is always the deeper word. I'd never noticed that. I was watching him today. So I'll give you my Obama impression. We've got here the back scratcher and I have a remote control, but you could take your Apple earbuds and you could pair it with your mechanical pen thing. Listen to him and listen to how he finishes on a confident low note. And I thought to myself, I think that's really effective. And I also asked myself if I do it, and I don't know, because probably because I'm thinking about it I'll either do it or I'll conceal how much I do it or don't do it.
So maybe you could tell me. Do I — well this is a question so I'm going to uptalk the question — do I uptalk? Have you ever heard me uptalk when I'm making statements, not questions? And have you ever noticed me, because I really don't know, do I downtalk on the last word? Do I give you a sentence and then I'm talking like this because it makes me sound confident? Because I'm starting the sentence and you say, "What's it all about?" and I finish it fast. I finish it hard. I finish it strong because I'm coming in and I'm just laying it down there and just putting it down there, finishing down.
Somebody says, "No you don't." I think you mean, "No, I don't uptalk." Oh look what I did. I automatically did a downtalk. I think I'm going to practice that.
Speaking of people who have interesting ways of speaking, one of my favorite TV senators, and maybe one of yours as well, is Senator Kennedy. So you know Senator Kennedy. He's got, I don't know what state he's from, he's got an accent. It makes him sound, I assume it's southern. It's a little bit slower. It's interesting to listen to. And what he's talking about, between the fact that what he says tends to be very clever, often funny, and because he says it in a certain way and there's a variation in the way he talks, you can't look away when he's on television because something interesting is going to happen.
And I was watching him. He was on Martha MacCallum's show on Fox, and he was making the case for why he thinks essentially that the virus came from a Wuhan biological lab of some sort as opposed to a wet market. And one of the things that I do appreciate about our elected officials is that while I normally hate the fact there's so many of them, and they're all lawyers, I feel like we have too many lawyers. Some lawyers are very good. You know, a few lawyers, yeah you want some good advice. The lawyers are smart. They're solid thinkers. But certainly there's too much of a good thing sometimes, right? I mean you could have too many lawyers and that would argue, you know, maybe we've reached that level.
But that said though, the ones who are good enough lawyers that they become well known, run for office, and win tend to be pretty good lawyers. And so when you watch, you say, Lindsey Graham argue something on TV or you're watching Senator Kennedy, they just do a really good job of making a case in a way that other people just aren't as clever.
So here is some of the evidence and you can make up your own mind. So Senator Kennedy says, and I think this is a fact — he says as a fact. I know that there was a study and an article that alleges this is the fact but I'm gonna say I'm skeptical of this fact. I'm not skeptical of his overall conclusion but this fact has me with a little bit of skepticism. And the fact is somebody said that there were no bats at the Wuhan wet markets. And so the implication is the virus could not have spread from the bat to a human in the wet market because there were no bats there to do that.
Now I feel as if — I just feel as if that might not be true. Maybe there was a bat or two. Now that doesn't mean it came from the bat. I'm just saying that I don't know if we would try to make a cover story that couldn't possibly be possible because there were no bats. Maybe because whatever they did is pretty remarkable so you almost can't put anything past them.
But let's take Senator Kennedy's case. He alleges that it's known that there were no bats, let's say, and there was a lab nearby. And there's the story in The Washington Post that says there was some kind of a report a few years ago that that lab had coronavirus. It had the virus and it had insufficient safety guidelines and safety protocols and stuff. So apparently it was known that that lab had this stuff and that it could get out and it was a known problem that had been written up. And there weren't any bats there at the wet market.
We also know that, is it true that the doctors who originally reported this sort of either died or disappeared? Are there a bunch of people who died or disappeared? And didn't China say we can't look into it? You know there's no more looking into it. And didn't China say that it wasn't transferable from person to person, from human to human? It sort of adds up to I don't know how it could be anything else. And they also closed Wuhan at the same time they were saying it was no big deal. Like they totally closed their city. It's no big deal.
If you're wondering about the timing, I think it was January 23rd they closed Wuhan and the very next day, which was probably the next Periscope I did, I assume I called for closing travel. So the moment that China said we're going to close Wuhan I said, okay I'm done. I do not need to see any additional information. If somebody has some kind of a virus and they blockade their entire city, what other questions do you need to ask to know that it's time to close down the airports?
I mean that's what I said. You know you could say to yourself, "Scott, the experts at the CDC and the World Health Organization and China." To which I say, did you hear the part about China closed a major city? You couldn't even get in or out because of a virus that's killing people. If you tell me you need to study this a little bit longer I don't think you heard this part: China closed a major city. They didn't let people travel in and out. No extra study required. Close the airport.
So yeah, now that some time is going by, those of you who sort of remember the moment, you remember my rant and now you can see it in hindsight and you can see how accurate that was.
Anyway, so here's some questions for you. Will President Xi remain in power? Now obviously he has a pretty good grip on the country. He's a dictator in practical terms so there's certainly no political process for removing him. Well I suppose if the party wanted to remove him they could but I don't see that as being likely in their system.
But here's the thing. The coronavirus scandal just went from we're accusing you, you're denying it, to another level. Wouldn't you say? Wouldn't you say? Wouldn't you say? Well get rid of this critic. Wouldn't you say that China has a big scandal now and that we're past the point of questioning whether they're responsible in a very bad way?
But that's not the real problem for China. You know it's bad to have a bad reputation but isn't this going to cause all of the major countries that were victims of this to decouple? You know the United States I'm sure is going to decouple. I don't know how quickly, you know who's gonna pay for it, what it looks like, but it's the beginning of the end. There's not any question that the United States is going to have less business there, not more. I think the same probably with Japan and I would expect some of the European countries to follow.
So it seems to me that the only path that China has is economic catastrophe. I think the United States will climb on to this pretty readily. You know if you want to feel good about the United States here's a little fact that I heard from Peter Navarro who by the way was excellent on television today. I listened to Peter Navarro just talk on a news show. I don't know if he's always this good because I haven't really paid attention to him but he gave just one of the best TV interviews you'll ever see. You know it wasn't flashy so maybe nobody's gonna notice but the clarity of his thought and the precision in which he just presented things in a simple way for the public was really good. A plus, Peter Navarro.
Anyway so it seems — I don't know, I was even talking about Peter Navarro. There was some point there but oh yeah I was gonna make you feel good. Here's something Peter Navarro said. He was talking about the ventilators and how the American companies were gearing up to rapidly create ventilators. And I think which company it was but one of the car companies I believe built a ventilator factory that was using their own factory as a retrofit and they started producing ventilators in 11 days. In 11 days we spun up a ventilator factory and we're well on the way to producing, I think he said, 150,000 ventilators. A hundred and fifty thousand ventilators. It looks like we'll need about a third of them. We'll probably take two-thirds of them and distribute them to states for storehouses and stuff for storage and then we'll probably help other countries.
But how proud are you to live in the country that can make a ventilator factory in 11 days? You know remember when we were watching China put up their little instant hospitals and everybody was saying my god we can't do that, we'll never build a hospital in 11 days like China. Then we build a ventilator factory in 11 days. Now I assume it was probably more about assembling parts from other places so it was probably had a lot more to do with assembling than anything else but still, 11 days, pretty impressive.
Here's what I proposed. I just tweeted this before I got out here. I propose when the coronavirus is behind us, and someday will be, that we forgive each other. Be you Democrats or Republicans, be you professionals and experts and doctors, be you businesspeople, be you citizens. I propose that we just forgive each other for all of our honest mistakes during the fog of war. Because let's admit there's always somebody's gonna be right but only because there's always somebody on every side of every issue. So somebody's gonna be right by luck but nobody knows what's the right thing to do. Nobody really had quite the right information in the early days. Nobody's smart enough to know what's the exact right thing to do and the right time to do it.
So whether we got things right or whether some people got some things wrong, they're both luck. The things we did right, a little bit of luck. The things we did wrong, bad luck. Because you know you just can't be smart when you don't have data and you don't have a way to get it. But that's what I'm talking about: honest mistakes. If you make honest mistakes I think we should just forgive each other. But we should not forgive dishonest mistakes. And I don't have any evidence that anybody involved in this country has made a dishonest mistake. I know you're gonna think so-and-so lied blah blah blah and I don't think that's necessarily the case. I think some people had bad information and took bad information forward but I don't know that anybody had bad intentions in this country.
However China made a different kind of mistake as far as we can tell. Now apparently the president is gonna withhold funding from the World Health Organization until he gets an answer and maybe that'll tell us whether China did something let's say intentional versus unintentional. But it's certainly looking every bit as if China made a dishonest mistake. In other words they just lied to us and knew it. So under those conditions I don't think we have to yell at them and call them names. We don't have to disrespect them. But it wouldn't make any sense to have a future with them in which we're continuing to trade because they don't have a system that's compatible with our system.
So whatever it is about their system, I don't even need to judge it. I'm not going to say it's a good system. I'm not going to say it's bad. I'm not going to say that the Chinese government is good or bad. I don't, you know, I mean I have an opinion but it doesn't matter for what I'm gonna say next. And certainly I don't think the Chinese people are anything except awesome people. Everybody I know from China is pretty amazing. So you know but still we can say no hard feelings but our systems don't work together. Whatever it is that we're doing, you know this democracy capitalism, you know as much transparency as you can, it just doesn't fit with the "we'll get away with anything we can and we're gonna hide as much as we can." Those two systems don't work.
Now if they were both the same system I don't know, would that work? Who knows. Maybe you would both be okay with it because you're both doing the same thing. But it's not personal. You know we don't have to say China we're in a cold war now. We don't have to do that. We could just say you know we'd love to connect our telecommunications equipment stuff that's made in your country but we also like security and you haven't built anything that has that feature. So it's nothing personal. We just can't connect to your telecom equipment because you don't have a feature we need. The feature is security. Should you ever have that feature we'd love to talk to you again. But I think we should just completely depersonalize this thing because you know I don't know what they're thinking but I don't have a bad feeling about anybody in China except you know maybe some of the leaders. But let's just not make it personal. It's just business. If you've got a system and we've got a system and they just don't talk, why force it?
All right, most of you probably saw Obama's endorsement of Joe Biden and I cheekily tweeted this a little while ago. This is me imagining a conversation between Obama and some sample Democrats. And Obama says, "Going to endorse a candidate today." The Democrats in unison say, "Yay!" "Is the candidate pretty?" Obama says, "He has a great personality." It felt like that's what he was saying. Did you note that when Obama was describing the greatness of Joe Biden there were two categories? One, he attended meetings for important stuff.
Now the way Obama says it is Obama put Biden in charge and he got things done. But did he? I think he attended meetings of things that were going to happen one way or the other that Obama ordered and other people pretty much executed. But okay, you know he was at the meetings. But how much did Biden initiate? He did initiate some stuff. I don't remember Obama mentioning it. But it seems like Obama was really focusing on his personality. Am I wrong? You know he might have said character and you know you need a president who's got these qualities and the qualities are, you know. And I'm thinking to myself you're so three years too late.
Because if President Trump's personality quirks were going to ruin the country we have a sample of that already. Think about it. We've had three and a half years of President Trump and from the very beginning people were saying that personality, that character of his, yeah the way he thinks and operates, those times he's not going to pass the fact-checking, all that personality stuff that's going to cost you. It's gonna cost you. What would be an example of that? Three and a half years he's been exactly the same person for three and a half years. If it's Obama's biggest, three and a half years later he'd better come up with an example. If that's your biggest complaint is the guy's personality and how that personality will wreck stuff after three and a half years you need to give us an example of that.
The economy went down because the time Trump told a joke? Was that it? The unemployment level rose because that time Trump insulted a member of the press? Right, did that happen? I don't remember that happening. So give us an example. So that was such a 2015 way to approach Joe Biden that it made me think there was no organic enthusiasm. Did he pick up on that? It was like Obama sat down to write an essay and the topic he didn't care about. All right, please write an essay: the advantages of Joe Biden over the evil orange menace President Trump. And Obama sat down with a big old pencil and he's like, all right, oh he has character. It is not the type of fiber we need to be leadership in the country. Oh I'm not just talking about mayors. I can fill up this page. Not just talking about governors. Need to fill up the page. I'm not just talking about Congress. Okay that'll be odd to me if I do another sentence like that.
And I'm just listening to this thing and it looked like the most uninspired essay that was written by somebody who really didn't want to write the essay. And the best thing he could come up with is this guy's got a good personality. I swear to God. Yeah, damn my favorites. I swear to God the biggest advantage Joe Biden has as a Democratic candidate is that nobody dislikes him. Think about that.
Have you during this whole process — Joe Biden has been criticized and insulted and just every way, every accusation from corruption to senility, just everything. He's had every charge at him. But let me ask you this. To his credit have you heard even one person say that he's not a nice guy? Right? Even President Trump said in public the other day he's a really nice guy. And everybody who's on the other side can't even find anything that they don't like about him.
But I think the Democrats have mistaken Biden having no reason to dislike him with having the qualities to be president. Now one of the characteristics of human beings is we're always fighting the last war. You've heard that phrase, right? So and I think it was a Duval who was saying, I don't know if he quoted somebody or this was his own observation, that you are the result of your traumas. That who you are is mostly defined by the biggest problems you had and how you got past them.
And since the country, the Democrats specifically, have been undergoing this three and a half year trauma of being in a country in which their most hated nemesis President Trump is the president, you got to figure that they're gonna fight the war of the personality. It's the one that lost because they tried to beat him on personality and character and it didn't work. Yeah that's what the whole grab him by the whatever tape was about. Your character is bad. We can't have that character. So they're coming around again with the old character attack and it feels like Joe Biden was the antidote to the mental anguish of Trump.
I just hold this thought in your head for a moment and you'll see how profound it is or not. If you're thinking about Trump what is literally the opposite of him? It's Biden. Biden is almost the literal opposite of Trump. I believe that the Democrats wanted the most opposite person because they had such a high level of hatred for Trump and then whoever ran against him just had to be the most different. And when somebody like Mike Bloomberg gets on the stage, well it doesn't matter that Mike Bloomberg is considered highly capable and honest. I mean he was considered highly capable and honest. That should have been good enough, right?
And probably Mike Bloomberg said to himself, look if we're running against President Trump and I think I have all these billionaire credentials and I've been a mayor, I mean I've got the resume. Clearly I have the skills. I have the money. I'm a reasonable guy. I'm nice to people. I have all the right policies. Why wouldn't I win? And here's what I think he missed. I think he missed that he's a billionaire from New York and he's not different enough. He's just not different enough. It's not good enough that even if he thought Mike Bloomberg had more skill and was nicer it's just not different enough. And the most different person was Joe Biden.
So you could take almost any of the other candidates. Amy Klobuchar, very capable, one of the top politicians, could still be the vice presidential pick, has not been ruled out, and by all accounts a very capable politician. But you know that the story about her eating the salad with the comb or whatever, she was a little bit mean. So she wasn't opposite enough of the thing they hated the most about Trump. What about Kamala Harris? Well in many ways she was the opposite but not in personality. In personality people thought she could be a little harsh. Yeah maybe she'd been a little mean and she had prosecuted a little too hard. So you could see how people would be looking for the farthest from their trauma which was Trump. And so Biden I think was just the default.
All right, I told you that some restaurants might start selling goods directly to the public because they have different supply chains. So if you wanted to buy toilet paper and your grocery store didn't have any there's actually a pretty good chance that you could go to your local restaurant that's only doing takeout because they have to close because of the shutdown and say, "Hey can you order me a bunch of toilet paper?" And they'd say sure, will you take a 20% markup, 50%, whatever it is, and then they just buy it and walk it out to the car.
So I just found out there is one of our local, another one of our local businesses is doing this. The first retail house at Livermore in California. If it's something that they would ordinarily order anyway from a cut of meat, salmon, or actually toilet paper that's on their list, you can buy it over the phone and you just drive up and you show your receipt in the window and they carry it out and put it in your trunk. You know you don't have to have any human contact. You're behind the glass of your car. You just hold up the receipt, pop your trunk, boom you got yourself some groceries and you never went to the grocery store.
Now when I say this, you know it's really amazing how people are adapting, right? People, the best entrepreneurs just found new ways to make money and when the old ways come back they're gonna have new ways and old ways. So I think the best entrepreneurs are actually finding a way to come out of this.
And here's another idea. You know the big sports businesses are in a lot of trouble because they can't fill the stadium because for the obvious reasons of distance. So I was saying that maybe these big sports teams should look at this as an opportunity to build sports from the ground up. You know same athletes and same basic rules but instead of building it for in-person watching why not build it from the ground up for watching it digitally from a distance? In other words the reason that sports can survive just with television, as great as watching sports on television is, it's still not optimized for that.
Here's what you could do for example. You could mic all of the players and all the coaches and all of the refs. Let's say you're at home and you know maybe you've got an app so you can watch sports and you could choose your channel. So you could actually hear the ref. You could hear the announcers. You could hear the defensive line. You could hear everything except the quarterback giving them the calls I guess you'd have to turn that off. But it would have to be just football. It could be basketball, baseball, et cetera. And you make it a sort of a party in which let's say the other people watching are in your group too. So instead of having the cheering of the crowd that motivates the players it makes you feel like you're part of something and of course you get motivated by the cheer of the crowd. What if just saying the cheer of the crowd was in your headphones and it's the other people at home who are literally sharing at home?
So they you might be hearing, you know let's say just to complete this, let's say you're watching it on whatever device and you're watching one of the channels. You're listening to the defense, the offense and the players there. "Get it, rip this guy apart. He always leans left. Watch this. I'm gonna make him lean left and I'm gonna take his legs out anyway." And you're listening to it and then there's a play and then the app just lets all the cheering from all the living rooms through. And let's say that the players also have an earpiece so that the players can, because this is a microphone as well as an earpiece, so they've got an earpiece so they can actually hear the cheering. So what if they can hear you cheering at home? And why not? There's no technological reason that you couldn't hear everybody cheering from their living room. You just have to build the app that does it.
Then you can imagine that the players were talking to each other. You'd be able to pick up that. Now you might say to yourself well I don't want to listen to these boring athletes and their inane chatter but that's what you're thinking about it the old way. I'm not saying do business exactly the same way. I'm saying tell the players that part of their job is to be interesting. Mic them up. There's always going to be a few funny people on every team. You don't need all nine players on the field to be witty and entertaining. If you've got a hilarious shortstop and then the others just sort of play to him it's the best show in the world.
How much would you like watching a baseball game where most of the time you're just waiting for something to happen even if you love baseball? Let's admit it you're waiting for stuff to happen. But while you're waiting you're hearing the funniest shortstop in the world just ripping apart the other team and just saying honest that this guy's got two left legs and he hasn't had a hit since Tuesday. You know whatever. It would be very entertaining.
Anyway so the whole point of it is that if you rethought sports as a digital product it would still work. Every bit of it would still work in the live setting once they go back to crowds are okay. But in the meantime you'd have a better product. So they should go back with a better product. It should be improved sports when they go back. You shouldn't be just wait, take a few months off and then just back to it. How boring would that be?
Did you see the press conference in which Trump got all over that one idiot in the back who wouldn't shut up? I thought it was his best sort of world wrestling performance because I think by now even the people who were slow to catch on have figured out that Trump knows what the show is. He knows he's putting on a show and he plays that like a show. It took people, I think his critics, it's taken them years to figure that out and even some of them still talk about it like he just lost his temper. No that's not what happened. He might have been genuinely mad that whatever time you're talking about, yeah it doesn't matter which time you say that that time you're talking about, whatever it was he might have been genuinely mad but that's not why he acted the way he did. He didn't act that way because he was mad. He acted that way because it's a show and he knows how to put on the show and he used a genuine emotion at whatever time to put on the show.
So today's show was excellent. There was this, I don't know, there's some reporter that must have been from some unfriendly publication and he starts asking questions and Trump tries to shut him down and doesn't really let him get his question out. So the guy's insistent and he won't stop talking and Trump's already gone to the next person. The guy just keeps talking and Trump just stops, puts the full Trump laser cannon focus on this guy and just rips him apart. And I'm just watching this and I'm thinking I've never enjoyed politics this much.
You know we say this all the time to the point where it's trite. You're gonna miss this. I mean you're really gonna miss this because you don't realize how jacked up your body chemistry is. We're kind of addicted to it if I'm being honest. We're kind of addicted. And you might have taken your team, you know let's say your team is team Trump and you're like Trump really tore into that guy that was a good day. But of course the other team they think that they're winning too. So you'll see then it'll be like ah did you see that crazy old Trump did some more crazy stuff because he's so impulsive and he can't control himself, right? And then their ratings go up and everybody has a good time. So it's like everybody wins. You know the reason that wrestling and sports and all that work is that everybody gets a chance to win. Maybe your team loses today but you know you're gonna win later so you win too.
Anyway I thought Trump's show was maybe the finest ever just for like a one out of one moment. What's his best? I'm gonna say let's talk about the fake controversy of whether Trump is trying to be a dictator and overrule the governors despite the constitutional limitations. And the press tried to bait Trump back into that conversation and he wisely decided that he just didn't want to have that conversation. He doesn't need to. He doesn't have to answer it. Here's why. There's no real question about what would happen in the real world.
So talking to the governors and talking to, well what would you do in this situation and what if this and who is really in charge? Are you in charge? You say you're in charge but are you in charge? Maybe you should talk to him. Maybe you should fight it. Now maybe we got a little fight going. That's all artificial because neither the governors nor the president have any question in their mind how this will play out. There's no question. There's no ambiguity whatsoever among the governors and the president. When you say because here's how it's going to work out. Whatever is the smartest thing that's what they'll agree to do.
Because remember the visibility on this is extraordinary. Everything that every governor decides, everything the president does, the task force does, we've got 325 million eyes looking at it. So if there is such a thing as a good plan and let's say a governor brings it to the president, he doesn't have to bring it to the president but let's just say they publicize their plans and let's say the president says oh that one's a problem. What's going to happen? Well the president isn't going to send the FBI and kill them. The president's going to call them and say look this could be a big problem why are you doing this? They'll talk it out. The president might use some pressure by saying look you know the federal government's giving you a lot of help. You got to give us a little. So we'll give you a little. Might be a little pressure.
In the end how's it going to work out? Well in the end the state will give something that's pretty close to what they wanted. The president might influence a little bit and that's what you would want. It's exactly the way you would want it to go. So as long as we're all watching nobody's gonna do something crazy that the public and the observers would say why are you doing that? We're watching. We're watching you do that. Don't do that. There's just too many people watching. So I don't think there's any risk whatsoever that there's any problem between the governors and the federal government. And Trump when it comes right down to it, you know when the phone call is made, when the legislation has to be, when the check has to be written, it's not going to be a problem. And you've already seen them all work together well enough that I think you believe that.
Let's see. So here's a real sign of something. So in the news AOC and Senator Schumer got together and they're calling on FEMA to supply funeral funding to families who have lost loved ones to the virus. And they say quote "disaster funeral assistance would help individuals and households with the death of an immediate family member." Now you know I don't know much about the issue but sounds like a good one, right? So in terms of whether this is a good idea or a bad idea I would say anything we can do to help the public at this point is a good idea. So separate from the question of whether it's a good idea which I don't want to talk about it's just not interesting because it seems like a good enough idea. It's not really controversial.
But what's interesting about this is that AOC and Schumer, wouldn't you say are the sort of top tier of effective Trump critics? Is that a fair statement? Am I seeing Schumer? When they get together they're like the best strongest Trump critics. And what they spent their time on today was something that needed to be done. I'm guessing it seems like this is a reasonable thing to ask for and I'm happy that they're serving the public. I'm sure their constituents are asking for this so I'm totally on board with what they're asking for.
Here's my point. It's all they had left. It's all they had left. Because as soon as Dr. Fauci said President Trump did everything we recommended what do you got? As soon as President Trump said let's get a ton of money and give it to people directly and then the Democrats said how about even more money and the president said okay. And then when we spend all that money the president's literally in public today is saying you Democrats got to give us more money, more money to give to the poor people. What do AOC and Chuck Schumer have left? What issue are they gonna — because they can't really talk about the economy. Everybody understands why the economy is the way it is. They can't really talk about him handling things wrong because the experts told them what to do and he just did it. And they're the ones saying president you have to listen to the experts on climate change.
I think in a weird way the most positive endorsement I've ever seen of President Trump came today completely accidentally and in a different realm that had nothing to do with him. That two of his strongest nemeses got together to do something that was simply useful for the public. And by the way to their credit. So thank you. I'm sure the families will appreciate that. I hope it comes through. But that's all they had left. Think about that. Think about that. That was the issue that was left. Important and I'm glad they did it but it kind of shows that the president is sort of hitting the big levers and hitting the big buttons and what's left needs to be mopped up. It's not less important but certainly suggests that the president's on the right path.
All right, I promised you 45 minutes of stellar entertainment. Pretty sure I delivered. So tonight by the way did anybody try my technique for relaxation? The technique was to remember your last haircut or your hair salon visit and just imagine yourself going through the steps and how it felt and smelled and all that stuff. So in the comments, what the comments catch up, just tell me if that worked for you.
On average before one on various 7,500 people die every day. We can if we can't afford it. Okay so I ask the question of people who think we're panicking on this thing to tell me what it would look like for them to be wrong. In other words how many people would have to die when we go back to work for somebody who said you know you're overselling this thing it's not that big a deal compared to other problems we have. You know what level of death would it take for you to look back and say whoa I guess the experts were right this was way worse than the flu? Is there a number that you would say yeah I was wrong? I just wonder what that would be.
Thank you. I drink myself to sleep. So somebody now my husband wants me to cut his hair. If somebody doesn't like haircuts aw that's too bad. Awesome suggestion. It worked like a charm. Slept like a baby. Amazingly no panic. Oh it worked again. Okay wow I guess it worked pretty well. I'll try it again. The sort of thing that you could do more than once.
All right that's all for now. I will talk to you in the morning. Dennis Prager posted a letter written by five doctors who think a lockdown was not necessary. Does that mean anything? Pretty sure you can find five or five doctors to say anything. All right we'll talk about that tomorrow. Enough of that. Have a great night.
bum-bum-bum-bum-bum hey Jack come on in yes this is the place to come at this time of night so that you can get all of the cares and tensions of the world drained out of your overstressed body today and for the next oh let's say 45 minutes it's nothing but good times we're gonna put things in perspective we're going to make you feel better make you feel relaxed I feel a little observation for you and I don't know what to make of it yet and it goes like this I was watching Obama do his recommendation for Biden and you know that I've commented how dr.
Burks has up talk now up Talk is where you end the sentence with a little bit of it up so it makes you sound maybe like a violently girl and then when you do the up top you don't sound as confident because you're sort of asking you make you statements but you're making a statements that sounds like a question but have you ever noticed Obama Obama does down talk so Obama's last word is always the the deeper word I'd never noticed that I was watching him today so I'll give you my Obama impression we've got here the back scratcher and have a remote control but you could take your Apple earbuds and you could pair it with your mechanical pen thing listen to him and listen to how he finishes on a confident low note and I thought to myself I think that's really effective and I also asked myself if I do it and I don't know because probably because I'm thinking about it I'll lie there do it or I'll conceal how much I do it or don't do it so maybe you could tell me do I well this is a question so I'm going to up talk the question do I up talk have you ever heard me up talk in what I'm making statements not questions and if you ever noticed me because I really don't know do i down talk on the bat on the last on the last word do I give you a sentence and then I'm talking like this because it makes me sound confident because I'm starting the sentence and you say what's it all about and I finish it fast I finished hard I finish it strong because I'm coming in and I'm just laying it down there and just putting it down there finishing down somebody says no you don't I think you mean no I don't up talk oh look what I did I automatically did a down talk I think I'm going to practice that speaking of people who have interesting ways of speaking one of my favorite TV senators and maybe one of yours as well is senator Kennedy so you know you know I was sent her to Canda t he's got I don't know what state as from he's got an accent it makes him sound I assume it's southern it's a little bit slower it's interesting to listen to and what he's talking between the fact that what he says tends to be very clever often funny him because he says it in a certain way and there's a variation in the way he talks you can't look away when he's on television because something interesting is going to happen and I was watching him he was on martha maccallum show on fox and he was he was making the case for why he thinks essentially that the the virus came from a Wuhan biological lab of some sort as opposed to a web market and one of the things that I do appreciate about our elected officials is that while I I normally hate the fact there's so many of them our own lawyers I feel like we have too many lawyers some lawyers very good you know a few lawyers yeah you want some good advice the lawyers are smart they're solid thinkers but certainly there's too much of a good thing sometimes right I mean you could have too many lawyers and that would argue you know maybe we've reached that level but that said though the ones who are good enough lawyers that they become well known run for run for office and wind tend to be pretty good lawyers and so so it when you watch you to say Lindsey Graham you know argue something on TV or you're watching senator Kennedy they just do a really good job of making a case in a way that other people just aren't as clever so here here's some of the evidence and you can make up your own mind so senator Kennedy says and I think this this is a fact he says as a fact I know that there was a study and an article that alleges this is the fact but I'm gonna say I'm skeptical of this fact I'm not skeptical of his overall conclusion but this fact has me with a little bit of skepticism and the fact is somebody said that there were any bats at the Wuhan web markets and so the implication is the virus could not have spread from the back to a human in the wet market because of the web market because there were no bats there to do that now I feel as if I just feel as if that might not be true maybe there was a bat or two now that doesn't mean it came from the bat us like that I'm just saying that I don't know we would try to make up a cover story that couldn't be possible because there were no bats maybe because whatever they did is pretty remarkable so you almost can't put anything past them but but let's let's take Senator Kennedy's case he alleges that it's known that there were no bats let's say and there was a lab nearby and there's the story in The Washington Post that this says there was some kind of a report a few years ago that that lab had coronavirus it had the virus and it had insufficient safety guidelines and safety protocols and stuff so apparently apparently it was known that that lab had this stuff and that it could get out and it was a known problem that had been written up and there weren't any bats there at the web market we also know that is it true that the the doctors who originally reported this sort of either died or disappeared are there a bunch of people who died or disappeared and didn't Chyna say we can't look into it you know there's no more looking into it and didn't Chyna say that didn't try to say that it wasn't transferable from person to person from human to human it sort of adds up to I don't know how it could be any and they also closed they closed Wuhan at the same time they were saying it was no big deal like they they totally closed their city it's no big deal if you're wondering about the timing I think it was January 23rd they closed Wuhan and the very next day which was probably the next periscope I did I assume I called for closing travel so the moment that China said we're going to close Wuhan I said okay I'm done I do not need to see any additional information if if somebody has some kind of a virus and they blockade their entire city what other questions do you need to ask to know that it's time to close down the airports I mean that's what I said you know you could say to yourself Scott the the experts of the CDC and the World Health Organization and China to which I say did you hear the part about China closed a major city you couldn't even get in or out because of a virus that's killing people if you tell me you need to study this a little bit longer I don't think you heard this part China closed a major city they didn't let people travel in and out no extra study required close the airport so yeah now that some time is going by those of you who some of you sort of remember the moment you remember the you know my rant and now you can see it in hindsight and you can see how how accurate that was anyway so here's some questions for you will president Chi remain in power now obviously has a pretty good grip on the country he's a dictator in practical terms so there's certainly no political process for removing him well I suppose the you know if the if the party wanted to remove them they could but I don't see that as being likely in their system but here's the thing the coronavirus scandal just went from we're accusing you you're denying it to another level wouldn't you say wouldn't you say wouldn't you say we'll get rid of this critic wouldn't you say that China has a big scandal now and that we're past the point of questioning whether whether they're responsible in a very bad way but that's not the real problem for China you know it's bad to have a bad reputation but isn't this going to cause all of the major countries that were victims of this to decouple you know the United States I'm sure is going to decouple I don't know how quickly you know who's gonna pay for it what it looks like but it's the beginning of the end there's not any question that the United States is going to have less business there not more I think the same probably with Japan and I would expect some of the European countries to follow so it seems to me that the only path that China has is economic catastrophe I think the United States will will climb on to this pretty readily you know if you want to feel good about the United States here's a little fact that I heard from Peter Navarro who by the way was excellent on television today melisten to Peter Navarro just talked on a news show I don't know if he's always this good because I haven't really paid attention to him but he gave just one of the best TV interviews you'll ever say I you know it wasn't flashy so maybe nobody's gonna maybe it didn't take note you know maybe nobody noticed but the the clarity of his thought and they and the precision in which he just you know presented things in a simple way for the public was really good a plus Peter Navarro anyway so it seems I don't know I was even talking about Peter Navarro there was some point there but oh yeah I was gonna make you feel good yours here's something Peter Navarro said he was talking about the ventilators and how the American companies were gearing up to rapidly create ventilators and I think which company was but one of the car companies I believe built a ventilator factory that was using their own factory as a retrofit and they started producing ventilators in 11 days in 11 days we spun up a ventilator factory and we're well on the way to producing on I think he said 150,000 ventilators a hundred and fifty thousand ventilators it looks like we'll need about a third of them we'll probably you know take 2/3 of them and you know distribute them to States for store houses and stuff for storage and then we'll probably help other countries but how how proud are you to live in the country that can make a ventilator Factory in 11 days you know remember when we were watching China put up their little instant hospitals and everybody was saying my god we can't do that we'll never build a hospital 11 days like China then we build a ventilator factory in 11 days now bad now I assume I assume it was probably more about assembling parts from other places so it was probably yeah had a lot more to do with assembling than anything else but still 11 days pretty impressive here's what I proposed I just tweeted this before I get out here I prefer proposal when the coronavirus is behind us and sunday will be that we forgive each other be you democrats or republicans be you professionals and experts and doctors be you businesspeople be you citizens i I propose that we just forgive each other for all of our honest mistakes during the fog of war because let's admit there's always somebody's gonna be right but only because there's always somebody on every side of every issue so somebody's gonna be right back lock but nobody knows what's the right thing to do nobody really had quite the right information in the early days no but he's smart enough to know what's the exact right thing to do and the right time to do it so whether we got things right or whether some people got some things wrong there both luck the things we did right a little bit of luck the things we did wrong bad luck because you know you just can't be smart when you don't have data and you don't have a way to get it but that's what I'm talking about honest mistakes if you make honest mistakes I think we should just forgive each other but we should not forgive dishonest mistakes and I don't have any evidence that anybody involved in this country has a dishonest mistake I know you're gonna think so-and-so lied blow the blob and I don't think that's necessarily the case I think some people had bad information and you know took bad information forward but I don't know that anybody had bad intentions in this country however China made a different kind of mistake as far as we can tell now apparently the president is gonna withhold funding from the World Health Organization until he gets an answer and maybe that'll tell us whether China did something let's say intentional versus unintentional but it's certainly looking every bit as if China made a dishonest mistake in other words they they just lied to us and knew it so under those conditions I don't think we have to yell at them and call the beams we don't have to disrespect them but it wouldn't make any sense to have a future with them in which we're continuing to trade because they don't have it they don't have a system that's compatible with our system so whatever it is whatever it is about their system I don't even need to judge it I'm not going to say it's a good system I'm not going to say it's bad I'm not going to say that the Chinese government is good or bad I don't you know I mean I have an opinion but it doesn't matter for what I'm gonna say next and certainly I don't think the Chinese people are anything except awesome people everybody I know from China is pretty pretty amazing so you know but still we can say no hard feelings but our systems don't work together whatever it is that we're doing you know this democracy capitalism you know as much transparency as you can it just doesn't fit with the will get away with anything we can and we're gonna hide as much as we can those two systems don't work now if they were both the same system I don't know would that work who knows maybe maybe you would both be okay with it because you're both doing the same thing but it's not personal you know we don't have to say China we're in a cold war now we don't have to do that we could just say you know we'd love to connect our telecommunications equipment stuff that's made in your country but we also like security and you haven't built anything that has that feature so it's nothing personal we just can't connect to your telecom equipment because you don't have a feature we need the feature is security should you ever have that feature we'd love to talk to you again but I think we should just completely do personalize this thing because you know I don't know what they're thinking but I don't have a bad feeling about anybody in China except you know maybe some of the leaders but let's just not make your personal it's just business if you got a system and we got a system and they just don't talk why force it all right most of you probably saw Obama's endorsement of Joe Biden and I cheekily tweeted this a little while ago this is me imagining a conversation between Obama and some sample Democrats and Obama says going to endorse a candidate today the Democrats in unison say yay is the candidate pretty and Obama says he has a great personality it felt like that's what he was saying did you note that when Obama was describing the greatness of Joe Biden there were two categories one he attended meetings for important stuff now the way Obama says it is Obama put Biden in charge and he got things done but did he I think he attended meetings of things that were going to happen one way or the other that you know that Obama ordered and other people pretty much executed but okay you know he was at the meetings but how much did that did divided initiate he did initiate some stuff I don't remember Obama mentioning it but it seems like Obama was really focusing on his personality am I am I wrong you know he might have said character and you know you need a you need a president you need the president who's got these qualities and the colds are you know and and I'm thinking to myself you're so three years too late because if president Trump's personality quirks were going to ruin the country when we have a sample of that already think about it we've had three and a half years of President Trump and from the very beginning people were saying that personality that character of his yeah the way he thinks and operates those those times he's not going to pass the fact-checking all that personality stuff that's going to cost you it's gonna cost you what would be an example of that three and a half years he's been exactly the same person for three and a half years if it's if it's Obama's biggest three and a half years later he'd better come up with a lips he better come up with an example if that's your biggest complaint is the guy's personality and how that personality will wreck stuff after three and a half years you need to give us an example of that the economy went down because the time Trump told a joke was that it the the unemployment level rose because that time Trump insulted a member of the press right did that happen I don't remember that happening so give us an example you know that so that was such a 2015 way to approach Joe Biden that it made me think there was no no organic enthusiasm did he pick up on that there was that it was like Obama sat down to write an essay and the topic he didn't care about all right please write an essay the advantages of joe biden over the evil orange menace President Trump and you know and Obama sat down as a big old pencil and he's like all right oh he is character it is not the type of fiber we need to be leadership in the country oh I'm not just talking about mayors I can fill up this page not just talking about governors need to fill up the page I'm not just talking about Congress okay they'll be odd to me if I do another sentence like that and I'm just listening to this thing and it looked like the most uninspired essay that was written by somebody who really didn't want to write the essay and the best thing he could come up with is this guy's got a good personality I swear to God yeah damned by favorites I swear to God the the biggest advantage Joe Biden has as a Democratic candidate is that nobody dislikes him think about that have you during this whole process Joe Biden has been you know criticized and insulted and just every way you know every accusation from you know corruption to senility I'd be just everything he's had every charge at him but let me ask you this to his credit have you heard even one person say that he's not a nice guy right even President Trump said in public the other day he's a really nice guy and everybody who's on the other side can't even find anything that they don't like about him but I think the Democrats have mistaken Biden having no reason to dislike him with having the qualities to be President now one of the characteristics of human beings as we're always fighting the last war you've heard that phrase right so and I think it was a Duvall who were saying I don't know if he quoted somebody or this was his own observation that you are the you're the result of your traumas that you know that who you are is mostly defined by the the biggest problems you had and you know how you got got past them and since the country the Democrats specifically have been undergoing this three and a half a year trauma of being you know in a country in which their most heated nemesis President Trump is the president you got a figure that they're that they're gonna fight the war of the personality war it's the one that lost because they tried to beat him on personality and character and it didn't work yeah that's what the whole grab him by the whatever tape was about your your character is bad we can't have that character so they're coming around again with the old character attack and it feels like Joe Biden was the antidote out to the mental anguish of Trump I just just hold this thought in your head for a moment and you'll see how profound it is or not if you're thinking about Trump what is literally the opposite of him its Biden Biden is almost the literal opposite of Trump I believe that that the Democrats wanted the most opposite person because they had such a high level of hatred for Trump and then whoever ran against him just had to be the most different and when somebody like Mike Bloomberg gets on the stage well it doesn't matter that Mike Bloomberg is considered highly capable and and honest right I mean he was considered highly capable and honest that should have been good enough right and probably Mike Bloomberg said to himself look if we're running against President Trump and I think I have you know all these billionaire credentials and I've been a mayor I mean I've got the resume clearly I have the skills I have the money I'm a reasonable guy you know I'm nice to people I have all the right policies why wouldn't I win and here's what I think he missed I think he missed they he's a billionaire from New York and he's not different enough he's just not different enough it's not good enough that even if he thought Mike Bloomberg had more skill and was nicer it's just not different enough and the most different person was Joe Biden so you could take almost any of the other candidates Amy Klobuchar very capable you know one of the top politicians could still be the vice presidential pick has not been ruled out and by all accounts a very capable you know politician but you know that the story better being beamed to her staff and I know eating the salad with the comb or whatever she was a little bit mean so she wasn't opposite enough of the thing they hated the most about Trump what about Carla Harris well in many ways she was the opposite of but not in personality in personality people thought she could be a little harsh yeah maybe she'd been a little me and she had prosecuted a little too hard so you could see how people would be looking for the farthest from their trauma which was Trump and so Biden I think was just the default all right I told you that some some restaurants might start selling goods directly to the public because they have different supply chains so if you wanted to buy toilet paper and your grocery store didn't have any there's actually a pretty good chance that you could go to your local restaurant that's only doing takeout because they have to close because of the shutdown and say hey can you order be a bunch of toilet paper and they'd say sure will you take a 20% markup 50% whatever it is and then they just buy it and walk it out to the car so I just found out there is one of our local another one of our local businesses is doing this the the first retail house at Livermore in California if it's something that's something they would ordinarily order anyway from a cut of meat salmon or actually toilet paper that's on their list you can buy it over the phone and you just drive up and you show your receipt in the window and they carry it out and put it in your trunk you know you don't have to have any human contact you're behind the glass of your car you just hold up the receipt pop your trunk boom you got yourself some groceries and you never went to the grocery store now what I say this and you know it's really amazing how people are adapting right people the best entrepreneurs just just found new ways to make money and when the old ways come back they're gonna have new ways and old ways so I think I think the the best entrepreneurs are actually finding a way to come and come out of this and here's another idea you know the big guy sports businesses are in a lot of trouble because they can't fill the stay because for the obvious reasons of distance so I was saying that maybe these big sports teams should look at this as an opportunity to build sports from the ground up you know same athletes and same basic rules but instead of building a four in person watching why not build it from the ground up before watching it digitally from a distance in other words the reason that the sports can survive just with television as as great as watching sports on television is it's still not optimized for that here's what you could do for example you could Mike all of the players and all the coaches and all of the refs let's say you're a home and you know maybe you've got an app so you can watch sports and you could choose your channel so you could actually hear the ref you could hear the announcers you could hear the defensive line you could hear that you know everything except the quarterback giving them the calls I guess you'd have to turn that off but it would have to be just football it could be basketball baseball and cetera and and you make it a sort of a party in which let's say you know the other people watching are in your gear too so instead of having the the cheering of the crowd that motivates motivates the players it makes you feel like you're part of something and you know of course you get you get motivated by the cheer of the crowd what if what if just saying the cheer of the crowd was in your headphones and it's the other people at home who are literally sharing at home so they you might be hearing you know let's say just to complete this let's say you're watching it on whatever device and you you know you're watching one of the channels you're listening to the defense of the offense and the players there get it rip this guy apart he always leans left watch this I mean I'm gonna make him lean left and I'm gonna take his legs out anyway and you're listening to it and then there's a play and then you know the app just lets all the cheering from all the living rooms through and and let's say that the just to extend this just a brainstorm and let's say the pliers let's say the players also have an earpiece so that the players can because this is a microphone as well as an earpiece so they've got an earpiece so they can actually hear the cheering so what if they can hear you cheering at home and why not is there there's no technological reason that you couldn't hear everybody cheering from their living room you just have to build the app that does it then you you can imagine that the the players were talking to each other you'd be able to pick up that etc now you might say to yourself well I don't want to listen to these boring athletes and their inane chatter but that's what you're thinking about it develop the old way I'm not saying do business exactly the same way I'm saying tell the players that part of their job is to be interesting Mike them up there there's always going to be a few funny people on every team you don't need all nine players on the field to be witty and entertaining if you've got a hilarious shortstop and then the other is just sort of you know play to him it's the best show in the world how much would you like watching a baseball game where most of the time you're just waiting for something to happen even if you love baseball let's admit it you're waiting for stuff to happen what but while you're waiting you're hearing the the funniest shortstop in the world just ripping apart the other team and just saying honest that this guy's got you know he's got to do two legs and he hasn't had a hit since Tuesday you know whatever it would be very entertaining anyway so the whole point of it is that if you rethought sports as a digital product it would still work you know every bit of it would still work in the life setting once they go back to you know crowds are okay but in the meantime you'd have a better product so they should go back with a better product it should be improved sports when they go back you shouldn't be the you know just wait take a few months off and then just back to it how boring would that be you know did you see the press conference in which Trump got all over that one idiot in the back who would shut up I thought it was his best you know sort of world wrestling performance because you know I I think I think by now even the people who were slow to catch on have figured out that Trump knows what the show is he knows he's putting on a show and he plays that like a show that took people I think his critics it's taken them years to figure that out and even some of them still talk about it like he just lost his temper no that's not what happened he might have been genuinely bad that you know whatever time you're talking about yeah it doesn't matter which time you say that that time you're talking about whatever it was he might have been genuinely mad but that's not why he acted the way he did he didn't act that way because he was mad he acted that way because it's a show and he knows how to put on the show and he used a genuine emotion and whatever time to to put on the show so today's show was excellent there was this I don't know there's some reporter that must have been from some unfriendly publication and you starts asking questions and Trump tries to shut him down and doesn't really let him to get his question now so the guy's insistent and he won't stop talking and Trump's already gone to the next person the guy just keeps talking and Trump just stops puts the the full Trump you know laser cannon focus on this guy and it just rips them apart and I'm just watching this and I'm thinking I've never enjoyed politics this much you know we say this all the time it to the point where it's it's trite you're gonna miss this I mean you're really gonna miss this because you don't realize how jacked up your body chemistry is we're kind of addicted to it if I'm being honest we're kind of addicted and you might have taken your team you know let's say your team is team Trump and you're like Trump really tore into that guy that was a good day but of course the other team they think that are winning - so unsee you then it'll be like ah did you see that crazy old Trump did some more crazy stuff because he's so impulsive and he can't control himself right and then their ratings go up and everybody has a good time so it's like everybody wins you know the the reason that you know wrestling and sports and all that work is that everybody gets a chance to win you know maybe your team loses today buddy you know you're gonna win later so you win - anyway I thought Trump's show was maybe the finest ever just for like a one out of one moment what his best I'm gonna say let's talk about the the fake controversy of whether Trump is trying to be a dictator and overrule the governor's despite despite the constitutional limitations and the press tried to bait Trump back into that conversation and he he wisely decided that he just you didn't want to have that conversation he doesn't need to he doesn't have to answer it here's why there's no real question about what would happen in the real world so talking to the governor's and talking to Charl well what would you do in this situation and what if this and you know who is really in charge are you in charge you say you're in charge but are you in charge maybe you should talk to him maybe you should fight it now maybe we got a little fight going that's all artificial because neither the governor's nor the president have any question in their mind how this will play out there's no question there's no ambiguity whatsoever among the governor's in the president when you say because here's how it's going to work out whatever is the smartest thing that's what they'll agree to do because remember the visibility on this is extraordinary everything that every governor decides everything the president does the taskforce does we've got 325 million I is looking at it so if if there is such a thing as a good plan and let's say a governor brings it to the president he doesn't have to bring it to the president but let's just say they publicize their plans and let's say the president says oh that one's a problem what's going to happen well the president isn't going to send them the RV and kill them all right the president's going to call them and say look this could be a big problem why are you doing this they'll talk it out the president and well maybe use some pressure by saying look you know we're federal government's giving you a lot of help you got to give us a little you got to give us a little so we'll give you a little might be a little pressure in the end how's it going to work out well in the end the state will give something that's pretty close to what they wanted the president might influence a little bit and that's what you would want it's exactly the way you would want it to go so as long as we're all watching nobody's gonna do something crazy that that the public and the observers would say why are you doing that we're watching we're watching you do that don't do that there's just too many people watching so I don't think there's any risk whatsoever that there's any problem between the governors and the federal government and Trump when it comes right down to it you know when when the phone call is made you know when the legislation has to be you know when the check has to be written it's not going to be a problem and you see you've already seen them all work together well enough that I think you believe that let's see so here's here's a real sign of something so in the news AOC and Senator Schumer got together and they're calling on FEMA to supply funeral funding to families who have lost loved ones to the virus and they say quote disaster funeral assistance would help individuals and households with the death of an immediate family remember now you know I don't know much about the issue but sounds like a good one right so in terms of whether this is a good idea or a bad idea I would say anything anything we can do to help the public at this point is a good idea so separate from the question of whether it's a good idea which I don't want to talk about it's just not interesting yeah because it seems like a good enough idea it's not really controversial but what's interesting about this is that a OC and Schumer wouldn't you say are the sort of top five of effective Trump critics is that a fair statement am i seein Schumer when they get together they're like the best strongest Trump critics and what they spent their time on today was something that needed to be done I'm guessing you know it seems like this is a reasonable thing to ask for and I'm happy that they're serving the public I'm sure their constituents are asking for this so I'm totally on board with what they're asking for here's my here's my point here's my point it's all they had left it's all they had left because as soon as doctor foul she said president Trump did everything we recommended what do you got as soon as President Trump said let's get a ton of money and give it to people directly and then the Democrats said how about even more money and the president said okay and then when we spend all that money the president's literally in public today is saying you you Democrats got to give us more money more money to give to the poor people what do I even say a OSE and Chuck Schumer have left what issue are they gonna because they can't really talk about the economy everybody understands why the economy is the way it is they can't really talk about him handling things wrong because the experts told them what to do and he just did it and they're the ones saying president you have to listen to the experts on climate change I think in a weird way the most positive endorsement I've ever seen a president Trump came today completely accidentally and in a different realm that had nothing to do with him that two of his strongest you know nemec's got together to do something that was simply useful for the public and by the way to their credit so thank you you know I'm sure the families will appreciate that I hope I hope him what comes through but that's all they had left think about that think about think about that was the issue that was left important and I'm glad they did it but it kind of shows that the president is sort of hitting the you know he's pulling the big levers and hitting the big buttons and what's left needs to be mopped up it's not less important but certainly suggests that the president's on the right path all right I promised you 45 minutes of stellar entertainment pretty sure I delivered so tonight by the way did anybody try my technique for relaxation the technique was to remember your last haircut or you know hair salon visit and just imagine yourself go through the steps and how I felt and spelled and and all that stuff so in the comments what the comments catch up just tell me if that worked for you on average before one on various 7500 people die every day we can if we can't afford it okay so I ask the question of people who think we're panicking on this thing to tell me what it would look like for them to be wrong in other words how many people would have to die when we go back to work for somebody who said you know you're you're overselling this thing it's not that big a deal compared to other problems we have you know what level of death would it take for you to look back and say whoa I guess the experts were right this was way worse than the flu is there a number that you would say yeah I was wrong I just wonder what that would be thank you I drink myself to sleep so somebody now my husband wants me to cut his hair if somebody doesn't like haircuts aw that's too bad awesome suggestion it worked like a charm slept like a baby amazingly no panic oh it worked again okay Wow I guess it worked pretty well I'll try it again the sort of thing that you could do more than once all right that's all for now I will talk to you in the morning Dennis Prager posted a letter written by five doctors who think a lockdown was not necessary does that mean anything pretty sure you can find five or five doctors to say anything all right we'll talk about that tomorrow enough of that have a great night
bum-bum-bum-bum-bum hey Jack come on in
yes this is the place to come at this
time of night so that you can get all of
the cares and tensions of the world
drained out of your overstressed body
today and for the next oh let's say 45
minutes it's nothing but good times
we're gonna put things in perspective
we're going to make you feel better make
you feel relaxed I feel a little
observation for you and I don't know
what to make of it yet and it goes like
this I was watching Obama do his
recommendation for Biden and you know
that I've commented how dr. Burks
has up talk now up Talk is where you end
the sentence with a little bit of it up
so it makes you sound maybe like a
violently girl and then when you do the
up top you don't sound as confident
because you're sort of asking you make
you statements but you're making a
statements that sounds like a question
but have you ever noticed Obama Obama
does down talk so Obama's last word is
always the the deeper word I'd never
noticed that I was watching him today so
I'll give you my Obama impression we've
got here the back scratcher and have a
remote control but you could take your
Apple earbuds and you could pair it with
your mechanical pen thing listen to him
and listen to how he finishes on a
confident low note and I thought to
myself I think that's really effective
and I also asked myself if I do it and I
don't know
because probably because I'm thinking
about it I'll lie there do it or I'll
conceal how much I do it or don't do it
so maybe you could tell me do I well
this is a question so I'm going to up
talk the question do I up talk have you
ever heard me up talk in what I'm making
statements not questions and if you ever
noticed me because I really don't know
do i down talk on the bat on the last on
the last word do I give you a sentence
and then I'm talking like this because
it makes me sound confident because I'm
starting the sentence and you say what's
it all about and I finish it fast
I finished hard I finish it strong
because I'm coming in and I'm just
laying it down there and just putting it
down there finishing down somebody says
no you don't I think you mean no I don't
up talk oh look what I did I
automatically did a down talk I think
I'm going to practice that speaking of
people who have interesting ways of
speaking one of my favorite TV senators
and maybe one of yours as well
is senator Kennedy so you know you know
I was sent her to Canda t he's got I
don't know what state as from he's got
an accent it makes him sound
I assume it's southern it's a little bit
slower it's interesting to listen to and
what he's talking between the fact that
what he says tends to be very clever
often funny him because he says it in a
certain way and there's a variation in
the way he talks you can't look away
when he's on television because
something interesting is going to happen
and I was watching him he was on martha
maccallum show on fox and he was he was
making the case for why he thinks
essentially that the
the virus came from a Wuhan biological
lab of some sort as opposed to a web
market and one of the things that I do
appreciate about our elected officials
is that while I I normally hate the fact
there's so many of them our own lawyers
I feel like we have too many lawyers
some lawyers very good you know a few
lawyers yeah you want some good advice
the lawyers are smart they're solid
thinkers but certainly there's too much
of a good thing sometimes right I mean
you could have too many lawyers and that
would argue you know maybe we've reached
that level but that said though the ones
who are good enough lawyers that they
become well known run for run for office
and wind tend to be pretty good lawyers
and so so it when you watch you to say
Lindsey Graham you know argue something
on TV or you're watching senator Kennedy
they just do a really good job of making
a case in a way that other people just
aren't as clever so here here's some of
the evidence and you can make up your
own mind so senator Kennedy says and I
think this this is a fact he says as a
fact I know that there was a study and
an article that alleges this is the fact
but I'm gonna say I'm skeptical of this
fact I'm not skeptical of his overall
conclusion but this fact has me with a
little bit of skepticism and the fact is
somebody said that there were any bats
at the Wuhan web markets and so the
implication is the virus could not have
spread from the back to a human in the
wet market because of the web market
because there were no bats there to do
that
now I feel as if I just feel as if that
might not be true maybe there was a bat
or two now that doesn't mean it came
from the bat us like that I'm just
saying that I don't know we would try to
make up a cover story
that couldn't be possible because there
were no bats
maybe because whatever they did is
pretty remarkable so you almost can't
put anything past them but but let's
let's take Senator Kennedy's case he
alleges that it's known that there were
no bats let's say and there was a lab
nearby and there's the story in The
Washington Post that this says there was
some kind of a report a few years ago
that that lab had coronavirus it had the
virus and it had insufficient safety
guidelines and safety protocols and
stuff so apparently apparently it was
known that that lab had this stuff and
that it could get out and it was a known
problem that had been written up and
there weren't any bats there at the web
market we also know that is it true that
the the doctors who originally reported
this sort of either died or disappeared
are there a bunch of people who died or
disappeared and didn't Chyna say we
can't look into it you know there's no
more looking into it and didn't Chyna
say that didn't try to say that it
wasn't transferable from person to
person from human to human it sort of
adds up to I don't know how it could be
any and they also closed
they closed Wuhan at the same time they
were saying it was no big deal like they
they totally closed their city it's no
big deal if you're wondering about the
timing I think it was January 23rd they
closed Wuhan and the very next day which
was probably the next periscope I did I
assume I called for closing travel so
the moment that China said we're going
to close Wuhan I said okay I'm done I do
not need to see any additional
information if
if somebody has some kind of a virus and
they blockade their entire city what
other questions do you need to ask to
know that it's time to close down the
airports I mean that's what I said you
know you could say to yourself Scott the
the experts of the CDC and the World
Health Organization and China to which I
say did you hear the part about China
closed a major city you couldn't even
get in or out because of a virus that's
killing people if you tell me you need
to study this a little bit longer I
don't think you heard this part China
closed a major city they didn't let
people travel in and out no extra study
required close the airport so yeah now
that some time is going by those of you
who some of you sort of remember the
moment you remember the you know my rant
and now you can see it in hindsight and
you can see how how accurate that was
anyway so here's some questions for you
will president Chi remain in power
now obviously has a pretty good grip on
the country he's a dictator in practical
terms so there's certainly no political
process for removing him well I suppose
the you know if the if the party wanted
to remove them they could but I don't
see that as being likely in their system
but here's the thing the coronavirus
scandal just went from we're accusing
you you're denying it to another level
wouldn't you say wouldn't you say
wouldn't you say we'll get rid of this
critic wouldn't you say that China has a
big scandal now and that we're past the
point of questioning whether whether
they're responsible in a very bad way
but that's not the real problem for
China you know it's bad to have a bad
reputation but isn't this going to cause
all of the major countries that were
victims of this to decouple you know the
United States I'm sure is going to
decouple I don't know how quickly you
know who's gonna pay for it what it
looks like but it's the beginning of the
end there's not any question that the
United States is going to have less
business there not more I think the same
probably with Japan and I would expect
some of the European countries to follow
so it seems to me that the only path
that China has is economic catastrophe I
think the United States will will climb
on to this pretty readily you know if
you want to feel good about the United
States here's a little fact that I heard
from Peter Navarro who by the way was
excellent on television today melisten
to Peter Navarro just talked on a news
show
I don't know if he's always this good
because I haven't really paid attention
to him but he gave just one of the best
TV interviews you'll ever say I you know
it wasn't flashy so maybe nobody's gonna
maybe it didn't take note you know maybe
nobody noticed but the the clarity of
his thought and they and the precision
in which he just you know presented
things in a simple way for the public
was really good a plus
Peter Navarro anyway so it seems I don't
know I was even talking about Peter
Navarro there was some point there but
oh yeah I was gonna make you feel good
yours here's something Peter Navarro
said he was talking about the
ventilators and how the American
companies were gearing up to rapidly
create ventilators and I think
which company was but one of the car
companies I believe built a ventilator
factory that was using their own factory
as a retrofit and they started producing
ventilators in 11 days in 11 days we
spun up a ventilator factory and we're
well on the way to producing on I think
he said 150,000 ventilators a hundred
and fifty thousand ventilators it looks
like we'll need about a third of them
we'll probably you know take 2/3 of them
and you know distribute them to States
for store houses and stuff for storage
and then we'll probably help other
countries but how how proud are you to
live in the country that can make a
ventilator Factory in 11 days you know
remember when we were watching China put
up their little instant hospitals and
everybody was saying my god we can't do
that
we'll never build a hospital 11 days
like China then we build a ventilator
factory in 11 days now bad now I assume
I assume it was probably more about
assembling parts from other places so it
was probably yeah had a lot more to do
with assembling than anything else but
still 11 days pretty impressive
here's what I proposed I just tweeted
this before I get out here I prefer
proposal when the coronavirus is behind
us and sunday will be that we forgive
each other be you democrats or
republicans be you professionals and
experts and doctors be you
businesspeople be you citizens i I
propose that we just forgive each other
for all of our honest mistakes during
the fog of war because let's admit
there's always somebody's gonna be right
but only because there's always somebody
on every side of every issue so
somebody's gonna be right back lock but
nobody knows what's the right thing to
do nobody really had quite
the right information in the early days
no but he's smart enough to know what's
the exact right thing to do and the
right time to do it so whether we got
things right or whether some people got
some things wrong there both luck the
things we did right a little bit of luck
the things we did wrong bad luck because
you know you just can't be smart when
you don't have data and you don't have a
way to get it but that's what I'm
talking about honest mistakes if you
make honest mistakes I think we should
just forgive each other
but we should not forgive dishonest
mistakes and I don't have any evidence
that anybody involved in this country
has a dishonest mistake I know you're
gonna think so-and-so lied blow the blob
and I don't think that's necessarily the
case I think some people had bad
information and you know took bad
information forward but I don't know
that anybody had bad intentions in this
country however China made a different
kind of mistake as far as we can tell
now apparently the president is gonna
withhold funding from the World Health
Organization until he gets an answer and
maybe that'll tell us whether China did
something let's say intentional versus
unintentional but it's certainly looking
every bit as if China made a dishonest
mistake in other words they they just
lied to us and knew it so under those
conditions I don't think we have to yell
at them and call the beams we don't have
to disrespect them but it wouldn't make
any sense to have a future with them in
which we're continuing to trade because
they don't have it they don't have a
system that's compatible with our system
so whatever it is whatever it is about
their system I don't even need to judge
it I'm not going to say it's a good
system I'm not going to say it's bad I'm
not going to say that the Chinese
government is good or bad
I don't you know I mean I have an
opinion but it doesn't matter for what
I'm gonna say next and certainly I don't
think the Chinese people are anything
except awesome people everybody I know
from China is pretty pretty amazing so
you know but still we can say no hard
feelings but our systems don't work
together whatever it is that we're doing
you know this democracy capitalism you
know as much transparency as you can it
just doesn't fit with the will get away
with anything we can and we're gonna
hide as much as we can those two systems
don't work now if they were both the
same system I don't know would that work
who knows maybe maybe you would both be
okay with it because you're both doing
the same thing but it's not personal you
know we don't have to say China we're in
a cold war now we don't have to do that
we could just say you know we'd love to
connect our telecommunications equipment
stuff that's made in your country but we
also like security and you haven't built
anything that has that feature so it's
nothing personal
we just can't connect to your telecom
equipment because you don't have a
feature we need the feature is security
should you ever have that feature we'd
love to talk to you again but I think we
should just completely do personalize
this thing because you know I don't know
what they're thinking but I don't have a
bad feeling about anybody in China
except you know maybe some of the
leaders but let's just not make your
personal it's just business if you got a
system and we got a system and they just
don't talk why force it all right
most of you probably saw Obama's
endorsement of Joe Biden and I cheekily
tweeted this a little while ago this is
me imagining a conversation between
Obama and some sample Democrats and
Obama says
going to endorse a candidate today the
Democrats in unison say yay is the
candidate pretty and Obama says
he has a great personality it felt like
that's what he was saying did you note
that when Obama was describing the
greatness of Joe Biden there were two
categories one he attended meetings for
important stuff now the way Obama says
it is Obama put Biden in charge and he
got things done but did he I think he
attended meetings of things that were
going to happen one way or the other
that you know that Obama ordered and
other people pretty much executed but
okay you know he was at the meetings but
how much did that did divided initiate
he did initiate some stuff I don't
remember Obama mentioning it but it
seems like Obama was really focusing on
his personality am I am I wrong you know
he might have said character and you
know you need a you need a president you
need the president who's got these
qualities and the colds are you know and
and I'm thinking to myself you're so
three years too late because if
president Trump's personality quirks
were going to ruin the country when we
have a sample of that already think
about it we've had three and a half
years of President Trump and from the
very beginning people were saying that
personality that character of his yeah
the way he thinks and operates those
those times he's not going to pass the
fact-checking all that personality stuff
that's going to cost you it's gonna cost
you what would be an example of that
three and a half years he's been exactly
the same person for three and a half
years if it's if it's Obama's biggest
three and a half years later he'd
better come up with a lips
he better come up with an example if
that's your biggest complaint is the
guy's personality and how that
personality will wreck stuff after three
and a half years you need to give us an
example of that the economy went down
because the time Trump told a joke was
that it the the unemployment level rose
because that time Trump insulted a
member of the press right did that
happen I don't remember that happening
so give us an example you know that so
that was such a 2015 way to approach Joe
Biden that it made me think there was no
no organic enthusiasm did he pick up on
that there was that it was like Obama
sat down to write an essay and the topic
he didn't care about all right please
write an essay the advantages of joe
biden over the evil orange menace
President Trump and you know and Obama
sat down as a big old pencil and he's
like all right oh he is character it is
not the type of fiber we need to be
leadership in the country oh I'm not
just talking about mayors I can fill up
this page not just talking about
governors need to fill up the page I'm
not just talking about Congress okay
they'll be odd to me if I do another
sentence like that and I'm just
listening to this thing and it looked
like the most uninspired essay that was
written by somebody who really didn't
want to write the essay and the best
thing he could come up with is this
guy's got a good personality I swear to
God
yeah damned by favorites I swear to God
the the biggest advantage
Joe Biden has as a Democratic candidate
is that nobody dislikes him think about
that have you during this whole process
Joe Biden has been you know criticized
and insulted and just every way you know
every accusation from you know
corruption to senility I'd be just
everything he's had every charge at him
but let me ask you this to his credit
have you heard even one person say that
he's not a nice guy right even President
Trump said in public the other day he's
a really nice guy and everybody who's on
the other side can't even find anything
that they don't like about him but I
think the Democrats have mistaken Biden
having no reason to dislike him with
having the qualities to be President
now one of the characteristics of human
beings as we're always fighting the last
war you've heard that phrase right so
and I think it was a Duvall who were
saying I don't know if he quoted
somebody or this was his own observation
that you are the you're the result of
your traumas that you know that who you
are is mostly defined by the the biggest
problems you had and you know how you
got got past them and since the country
the Democrats specifically have been
undergoing this three and a half a year
trauma of being you know in a country in
which their most heated nemesis
President Trump is the president you got
a figure that they're that they're gonna
fight the war of the personality war
it's the one that lost because they
tried to beat him on personality and
character and it didn't work yeah that's
what the whole grab him by the whatever
tape was about your your character is
bad we can't have that character so
they're coming around again with the old
character attack and it feels like Joe
Biden was the antidote
out to the mental anguish of Trump
I just just hold this thought in your
head for a moment and you'll see how
profound it is or not if you're thinking
about Trump
what is literally the opposite of him
its Biden Biden is almost the literal
opposite of Trump I believe that that
the Democrats wanted the most opposite
person because they had such a high
level of hatred for Trump and then
whoever ran against him just had to be
the most different and when somebody
like Mike Bloomberg gets on the stage
well it doesn't matter that Mike
Bloomberg is considered highly capable
and and honest right I mean he was
considered highly capable and honest
that should have been good enough right
and probably Mike Bloomberg said to
himself look if we're running against
President Trump and I think I have you
know all these billionaire credentials
and I've been a mayor I mean I've got
the resume clearly I have the skills I
have the money I'm a reasonable guy you
know I'm nice to people I have all the
right policies
why wouldn't I win and here's what I
think he missed I think he missed
they he's a billionaire from New York
and he's not different enough he's just
not different enough it's not good
enough that even if he thought Mike
Bloomberg had more skill and was nicer
it's just not different enough and the
most different person was Joe Biden so
you could take almost any of the other
candidates Amy Klobuchar very capable
you know one of the top politicians
could still be the vice presidential
pick has not been ruled out and by all
accounts a very capable you know
politician but you know that the story
better being beamed to her staff and I
know eating the salad with the comb or
whatever she was a little bit mean so
she wasn't opposite enough of the thing
they hated the most about Trump what
about Carla Harris well in many ways she
was the opposite of
but not in personality in personality
people thought she could be a little
harsh
yeah maybe she'd been a little me and
she had prosecuted a little too hard so
you could see how people would be
looking for the farthest from their
trauma which was Trump and so Biden I
think was just the default all right I
told you that some some restaurants
might start selling goods directly to
the public because they have different
supply chains so if you wanted to buy
toilet paper and your grocery store
didn't have any there's actually a
pretty good chance that you could go to
your local restaurant that's only doing
takeout because they have to close
because of the shutdown and say hey can
you order be a bunch of toilet paper and
they'd say sure will you take a 20%
markup 50% whatever it is and then they
just buy it and walk it out to the car
so I just found out there is one of our
local another one of our local
businesses is doing this the the first
retail house at Livermore in California
if it's something that's something they
would ordinarily order anyway from a cut
of meat salmon or actually toilet paper
that's on their list you can buy it over
the phone and you just drive up and you
show your receipt in the window and they
carry it out and put it in your trunk
you know you don't have to have any
human contact you're behind the glass of
your car you just hold up the receipt
pop your trunk boom you got yourself
some groceries and you never went to the
grocery store now what I say this and
you know it's really amazing how people
are adapting right people the best
entrepreneurs just just found new ways
to make money and when the old ways come
back they're gonna have new ways and old
ways so I think I think the the best
entrepreneurs are actually finding a way
to come and come out of this and here's
another idea you know the big guy sports
businesses are in a lot of trouble
because they can't fill the stay
because for the obvious reasons of
distance so I was saying that maybe
these big sports teams should look at
this as an opportunity to build sports
from the ground up
you know same athletes and same basic
rules but instead of building a four in
person watching why not build it from
the ground up before watching it
digitally from a distance in other words
the reason that the sports can survive
just with television as as great as
watching sports on television is it's
still not optimized for that here's what
you could do for example you could Mike
all of the players and all the coaches
and all of the refs let's say you're a
home and you know maybe you've got an
app so you can watch sports and you
could choose your channel so you could
actually hear the ref you could hear the
announcers you could hear the defensive
line you could hear that you know
everything except the quarterback giving
them the calls I guess you'd have to
turn that off but it would have to be
just football it could be basketball
baseball and cetera and and you make it
a sort of a party in which let's say you
know the other people watching are in
your gear too so instead of having the
the cheering of the crowd that motivates
motivates the players it makes you feel
like you're part of something and you
know of course you get you get motivated
by the cheer of the crowd what if what
if just saying the cheer of the crowd
was in your headphones and it's the
other people at home who are literally
sharing at home so they you might be
hearing you know let's say just to
complete this let's say you're watching
it on whatever device and you you know
you're watching one of the channels
you're listening to the defense of the
offense and the players there get it rip
this guy apart he always leans left
watch this I mean I'm gonna make him
lean left and I'm gonna take his legs
out anyway and you're listening to it
and then there's a play and then you
know the app just lets all the cheering
from all the living rooms through
and and let's say that the just to
extend this just a brainstorm and let's
say the pliers let's say the players
also have an earpiece so that the
players can because this is a microphone
as well as an earpiece so they've got an
earpiece so they can actually hear the
cheering so what if they can hear you
cheering at home and why not is there
there's no technological reason that you
couldn't hear everybody cheering from
their living room you just have to build
the app that does it then you you can
imagine that the the players were
talking to each other you'd be able to
pick up that etc now you might say to
yourself well I don't want to listen to
these boring athletes and their inane
chatter but that's what you're thinking
about it develop the old way I'm not
saying do business exactly the same way
I'm saying tell the players that part of
their job is to be interesting Mike them
up there there's always going to be a
few funny people on every team you don't
need all nine players on the field to be
witty and entertaining if you've got a
hilarious shortstop and then the other
is just sort of you know play to him
it's the best show in the world how much
would you like watching a baseball game
where most of the time you're just
waiting for something to happen even if
you love baseball
let's admit it you're waiting for stuff
to happen what but while you're waiting
you're hearing the the funniest
shortstop in the world just ripping
apart the other team and just saying
honest that this guy's got you know he's
got to do two legs and he hasn't had a
hit since Tuesday you know whatever it
would be very entertaining anyway so the
whole point of it is that if you
rethought sports as a digital product it
would still work you know every bit of
it would still work in the life setting
once they go back to you know crowds are
okay but in the meantime you'd have a
better product so they should go back
with a better product it should be
improved sports when they go back you
shouldn't be the you know just wait take
a few months off and then just back to
it how boring would that be you know
did you see the
press conference in which Trump got all
over that one idiot in the back who
would shut up I thought it was his best
you know sort of world wrestling
performance because you know I I think I
think by now even the people who were
slow to catch on have figured out that
Trump knows what the show is
he knows he's putting on a show and he
plays that like a show that took people
I think his critics it's taken them
years to figure that out and even some
of them still talk about it like he just
lost his temper no that's not what
happened he might have been genuinely
bad that you know whatever time you're
talking about yeah it doesn't matter
which time you say that that time you're
talking about whatever it was he might
have been genuinely mad but that's not
why he acted the way he did he didn't
act that way because he was mad he acted
that way because it's a show and he
knows how to put on the show and he used
a genuine emotion and whatever time to
to put on the show so today's show was
excellent there was this I don't know
there's some reporter that must have
been from some unfriendly publication
and you starts asking questions and
Trump tries to shut him down and doesn't
really let him to get his question now
so the guy's insistent and he won't stop
talking and Trump's already gone to the
next person the guy just keeps talking
and Trump just stops puts the the full
Trump you know laser cannon focus on
this guy and it just rips them apart and
I'm just watching this and I'm thinking
I've never enjoyed politics this much
you know we say this all the time it to
the point where it's it's trite you're
gonna miss this I mean you're really
gonna miss this because you don't
realize how jacked up your body
chemistry is we're kind of addicted to
it if I'm being honest we're kind of
addicted and you might have taken your
team you know let's say your team is
team Trump and you're like
Trump really tore into that guy that was
a good day but of course the other team
they think that are winning - so unsee
you then it'll be like ah did you see
that crazy old Trump did some more crazy
stuff because he's so impulsive and he
can't control himself right and then
their ratings go up and everybody has a
good time so it's like everybody wins
you know the the reason that you know
wrestling and sports and all that work
is that everybody gets a chance to win
you know maybe your team loses today
buddy you know you're gonna win later so
you win - anyway I thought Trump's show
was maybe the finest ever just for like
a one out of one moment what his best
I'm gonna say let's talk about the the
fake controversy of whether Trump is
trying to be a dictator and overrule the
governor's despite despite the
constitutional limitations and the press
tried to bait Trump back into that
conversation and he he wisely decided
that he just you didn't want to have
that conversation he doesn't need to he
doesn't have to answer it
here's why there's no real question
about what would happen in the real
world so talking to the governor's and
talking to Charl
well what would you do in this situation
and what if this and you know who is
really in charge are you in charge you
say you're in charge but are you in
charge maybe you should talk to him
maybe you should fight it now maybe we
got a little fight going
that's all artificial because neither
the governor's nor the president have
any question in their mind how this will
play out there's no question there's no
ambiguity whatsoever
among the governor's in the president
when you say because here's how it's
going to work out whatever is the
smartest thing that's what they'll agree
to do because remember the visibility on
this is extraordinary
everything that every governor decides
everything the president does the
taskforce does we've got 325 million
I is looking at it so if if there is
such a thing as a good plan
and let's say a governor brings it to
the president he doesn't have to bring
it to the president but let's just say
they publicize their plans and let's say
the president says oh that one's a
problem what's going to happen well the
president isn't going to send them the
RV and kill them all right the
president's going to call them and say
look this could be a big problem why are
you doing this they'll talk it out the
president and well maybe use some
pressure by saying look you know we're
federal government's giving you a lot of
help you got to give us a little you got
to give us a little so we'll give you a
little might be a little pressure in the
end how's it going to work out well in
the end the state will give something
that's pretty close to what they wanted
the president might influence a little
bit and that's what you would want it's
exactly the way you would want it to go
so as long as we're all watching
nobody's gonna do something crazy that
that the public and the observers would
say why are you doing that we're
watching we're watching you do that
don't do that there's just too many
people watching so I don't think there's
any risk whatsoever that there's any
problem between the governors and the
federal government and Trump when it
comes right down to it you know when
when the phone call is made you know
when the legislation has to be you know
when the check has to be written it's
not going to be a problem and you see
you've already seen them all work
together well enough that I think you
believe that let's see so here's here's
a real sign of something so in the news
AOC and Senator Schumer got together and
they're calling on FEMA to supply
funeral funding to families who have
lost loved ones to the virus and they
say quote disaster funeral assistance
would help individuals and households
with the death of an immediate family
remember
now you know I don't know much about the
issue but sounds like a good one right
so in terms of whether this is a good
idea or a bad idea I would say anything
anything we can do to help the public at
this point is a good idea so separate
from the question of whether it's a good
idea which I don't want to talk about
it's just not interesting yeah because
it seems like a good enough idea it's
not really controversial but what's
interesting about this is that a OC and
Schumer wouldn't you say are the sort of
top five of effective Trump critics is
that a fair statement am i seein Schumer
when they get together they're like the
best strongest Trump critics and what
they spent their time on today was
something that needed to be done I'm
guessing you know it seems like this is
a reasonable thing to ask for and I'm
happy that they're serving the public
I'm sure their constituents are asking
for this so I'm totally on board with
what they're asking for here's my here's
my point here's my point it's all they
had left it's all they had left because
as soon as doctor foul she said
president Trump did everything we
recommended what do you got
as soon as President Trump said let's
get a ton of money and give it to people
directly and then the Democrats said how
about even more money and the president
said okay and then when we spend all
that money the president's literally in
public today is saying you you Democrats
got to give us more money more money to
give to the poor people what do I even
say a OSE and Chuck Schumer have left
what issue are they gonna because they
can't really talk about the economy
everybody understands why the economy is
the way it is they can't really talk
about him handling things wrong because
the experts told them what to do and he
just did it and they're the ones saying
president you have to listen to the
experts on climate change I think in a
weird way the most positive endorsement
I've ever seen a president Trump came
today completely accidentally and in a
different realm that had nothing to do
with him that two of his strongest you
know nemec's got together to do
something that was simply useful for the
public and by the way to their credit so
thank you you know I'm sure the families
will appreciate that I hope I hope him
what comes through but that's all they
had left think about that think about
think about that was the issue that was
left important and I'm glad they did it
but it kind of shows that the president
is sort of hitting the you know he's
pulling the big levers and hitting the
big buttons and what's left needs to be
mopped up it's not less important but
certainly suggests that the president's
on the right path all right I promised
you 45 minutes of stellar entertainment
pretty sure I delivered so tonight by
the way did anybody try my technique for
relaxation the technique was to remember
your last haircut or you know hair salon
visit and just imagine yourself go
through the steps and how I felt and
spelled and and all that stuff so in the
comments what the comments catch up just
tell me if that worked for you on
average before one on various 7500
people die every day we can if we can't
afford it okay so I ask the question of
people who think we're panicking on this
thing
to tell me what it would look like for
them to be wrong in other words how many
people would have to die when we go back
to work for somebody who said you know
you're you're overselling this thing
it's not that big a deal compared to
other problems we have
you know what level of death would it
take for you to look back and say whoa I
guess the experts were right this was
way worse than the flu is there a number
that you would say yeah I was wrong I
just wonder what that would be thank you
I drink myself to sleep so somebody now
my husband wants me to cut his hair if
somebody doesn't like haircuts aw that's
too bad
awesome suggestion it worked like a
charm slept like a baby
amazingly no panic oh it worked again
okay Wow
I guess it worked pretty well I'll try
it again the sort of thing that you
could do more than once all right that's
all for now I will talk to you in the
morning Dennis Prager posted a letter
written by five doctors who think a
lockdown was not necessary does that
mean anything pretty sure you can find
five or five doctors to say anything all
right we'll talk about that tomorrow
enough of that have a great night